User talk:Remitamine/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
File:الفهرست.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 25 September 2018 (UTC)
File:James Eagan Homes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Wvdp (talk) 14:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:علی دیزایی و همسرش شهامه دیزایی.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:علی دیزایی و همسرش شهامه دیزایی.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:علی دیزایی و همسرش شهامه دیزایی.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 18:21, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
File:David Duke em 1978.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
FunnyMath (talk) 00:11, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
File:David Duke em 1978.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:28, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
Higher res image
Hello, Remitamine. Thank you for uploading higher resolution files of some images I uploaded. I wonder how you get a higher resolution from for example File:W.J. Dewez.jpg? Be glad to hear, greeting, Eissink (talk) 15:27, 18 September 2020 (UTC).
- just remove the width(w) query parameter from the download URL to get the higher resolution image, for your example, change the URL:
- https://www.delpher.nl/nl/api/downloadimage?id=MMKB26:001042002:00052:image&w=1024
- to:
- https://www.delpher.nl/nl/api/downloadimage?id=MMKB26:001042002:00052:image Remitamine (talk) 21:21, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- Brilliant, I never thought about that. Thank you! Eissink (talk) 22:02, 20 September 2020 (UTC).
I also want to express thanks for finding higher resolution copies of all these images, but I have to ask that you please document on the description page where they were obtained. Even for free-licensed works, it's important to show their source in case a question ever arose. Thank you. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- in most cases i'm extracting the higher resolution image from the same source, if the source is different than i try to update the file information with the new source URL(ex: [2] [3] ...).Remitamine (talk) 12:36, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks! What caught my attention was File:EcoDemonstrator on tarmac.jpg on my watchlist and (briefly checking) File:Coche nagoya con aire en la linea c.jpg, where neither replacement source was at all apparent. — Huntster (t @ c) 14:07, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Dushanbe Post Office, 1937.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Zoozaz1 (talk) 16:57, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
You uploaded a higher resolution version of this file but you did not provide any source. Where did you get it? Ww2censor (talk) 21:45, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- from the same source(British Film Institute website). Remitamine (talk) 21:51, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- I can't find or see any higher resolution versions. What is the full url of the image you uploaded? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I prefer to keep the method to extract the Full Resolution private, i did check other images uploaded from the same website and applied the method as needed(ex: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DoctorJekyllandMis1920.jpg , https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ingrid_Bergman_with_her_father_1921.jpg , ...).
- I can't find or see any higher resolution versions. What is the full url of the image you uploaded? Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:41, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
File:Download-1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Túrelio (talk) 21:10, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Alexandrina-petrescu-mama-elena-ceausescu.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Alexandrina-petrescu-mama-elena-ceausescu.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alexandrina-petrescu-mama-elena-ceausescu.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Steve Marino render.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Crep171166 (talk) 21:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Hi. I just wanted to thank you for your work in sourcing and uploading higher resolution images (e.g the above image). Storye book (talk) 13:15, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
File:Epa kim jong un kb 140422 16x9 992.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Headlock0225 (talk) 11:55, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
File:KDB Seteria (P-04).jpg was recently deleted
File:KDB Seteria (P-04).jpg was recently deleted by Fitindia for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.
- Reason for deletion: No permission since 6 October 2020
It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Hay-mar-nay-win.png
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Hay-mar-nay-win.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Hay-mar-nay-win.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 09:30, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
File:6055607 4b5a0920 1000x625.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Gbawden (talk) 18:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Big-data-social-media 0.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Big-data-social-media 0.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Big-data-social-media 0.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
LMLM (talk) 18:18, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Mao's portrait and surveillance cameras at Tiananmen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
shizhao (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Gusama Romero </talk> 07:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Pichi campana nets.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
File:PauloDybala.webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
4nn1l2 (talk) 21:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
File:AXGRTF7FWJBQXCFAXNA24KIX5M.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Gusama Romero </talk> 21:25, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
File:AliceOsman.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Smooth O (talk) 12:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Protest at Guatemalan National Congress building, 21 November 2020.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif answers questions after a meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono, May 16, 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Animalparty (talk) 19:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Dead fish in a breeding pond at the Maninjau Lake in Agam.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:05, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
File:The dead farmed fish floating in Lake Maninjau 2016.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 22:06, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
File:People in Baku celebrate on the streets after Azerbaijan's President Aliyev said the country's forces had liberated Shusha during the fighting over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 13:41, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Rescue teams work at a site hit by a rocket during fighting over the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh, in the city of Ganja, Azerbaijan, early Oct. 17, 2020.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 17:48, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
File:Julesrimet rauljude 1950.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Nanahuatl (talk) 08:31, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Jaber al-Ahmed Al-Sabah with George H.W. Bush.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jaber al-Ahmed Al-Sabah with George H.W. Bush.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 14:45, 4 December 2020 (UTC)
File tagging File:Nemonte Nenquimo.jpg
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Nemonte Nenquimo.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Nemonte Nenquimo.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Funcrunch (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
COM:AN/U
Funcrunch (talk) 19:28, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
File:FlorenceIreneLittleAbertilleryJuly1921a.jpg
The image you superseded in November was better for this image. The fact it displayed the subject in full as opposed to a cropped version, speaks great volumes. Can you please ensure the replacement template does not either skew the subject or leave a blank palette to the image. Hope you don't think I am being pedantic, it is just that the image you replaced this with was better, but left a white rectangle to the visual right of the image. I thought about superseding it, but thought I would contact you first. Best regards, and thanks. Kieron.--Kieronoldham (talk) 06:24, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- The image that i uploaded reflects the current image accessed from the source URL[4], generally i prefer to upload the original image without any modification especially when the image is not marked with retouched template and let the original uploader decide which one to keep or modify the one i uploaded, anyway, you can use the image that i did upload as a base or even better use the Sun version[5] if it's license is suitable for Commons or keep the current version.Remitamine (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Le Petit Chat (talk) 13:29, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Restes du véhicule attaqué le 9 aout 2020 à Kouré 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Le Petit Chat (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2020 (UTC)
File:Jonathan Holloway.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Innisfree987 (talk) 14:21, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1978-043-02, Focke-Wulf Fw 200 C Condor without text.jpg
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 22:46, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Isidro Romero Carbo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Yilku1 (talk) 00:50, 7 January 2021 (UTC)
Higher quality image
Hello Remitamine . Thank you for all the improvement you made about images I uploaded from VOA. I noticed that your are able to find higher quality images and with broader frame. But what is your secret please ? I don't unterstand. Guillaume70 (talk) 21:34, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
- i'm sorry, but i prefer to keep the method private, especially that it affect multiple websites.Remitamine (talk) 17:17, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Jeddah tv tower.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
File:Käthe Dorsch.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mutter Erde (talk) 07:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
File:K-Luxuriant 2020.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Minoraxtalk 09:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Hi. Please could you kindly have a look at the above too-small image file, and see whether you can find a larger version anywhere? It is a beautiful picture, and I would like to add a better version to the artist's article on en.wikipedia. Thank you for the good work you have already done on some of my uploads. Storye book (talk) 12:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Storye book: if you use http://www.nationaltrustcollections.org.uk/LargeImageHandler.ashx?id=8257164 you should be able to get a slighly better quality.Remitamine (talk) 19:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have clicked on the link but I just get a blank window. I shall leave it up for half an hour in case it's a slow-loader. I'll let you know if I get anything. Storye book (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Update. Wow - it eventually worked, though it took a while for the link to load up. Yes, it does give an image which is only slightly bigger, but I am grateful for that. Thank you so much. Storye book (talk) 11:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have clicked on the link but I just get a blank window. I shall leave it up for half an hour in case it's a slow-loader. I'll let you know if I get anything. Storye book (talk) 10:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Marjan SheikholeslamiAleagha(2).webp has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
Hanooz 19:51, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Joint media release Hastie Paterson November 15 2019.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Joint media release Hastie Paterson November 15 2019.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Peggy Cummins (1950).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Blocked
Taivo (talk) 08:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- After talking to you on IRC and reviewing some of your recent uploads, I'm not inclined to accept this unblock request. You need to take responsibility for your own actions, not blame your decisions on other people. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- @AntiCompositeNumber: i have no problem in taking responsibility for my errors, but not in taking responsibility for other people's errors, as an example: if someone gave me a stolen food and i ate from it not knowing that it's stolen, I'm not to be blamed for stealing the food in the first place.
- as i said when i did upload the now disputed images, i didn't upload them knowing that they are copyrighted, and as a proof that i'm trying to check the images after the getting first warning, you can look at the examples from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_89#User:Remitamine, and if you can search in the deleted files that i have made edits in you would find multiple examples(i'm always label them as "CopyVio" in Edit summary).
@Nat: I was improving on a lot of images until i got my first warning[6], after that i did explain to the admin that I'm uploading from the same source [7], and after some suggestions in the IRC channel, i did collect the information about all my edits for VOA News and i did run through them and reported the images that are considered to be copyvio, shortly after that there was a second complain [8][9] even thought there wasn't any copyvio reported of images uploaded after the first warning, and from there going on until now i did slow down trying to reduce my errors and in the way i was reporting copyvio images if i detect them, but even though i did made an effort in the direction suggested by the admins, it's still considered not enough, a single error after getting the warning would trigger a block.
None of the images that I've uploaded are new, they where already uploaded by other people, i merely improved on them using the same source that the original uploader stated.
I'm here for single purpose, to do what i can do the best, improving on images(Removing Watermark, adding Original EXIF metadata, improving image resolution, etc...) uploaded by others using the same source, where there are lots of images that are uploaded in a low quality, but instead I'm asked here to do the work of a license reviewer which I'm not good at.Remitamine (talk) 17:05, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Yusif Baghirzadeh.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Isgandar Hamidov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Эльвин Мирзоев.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Mikhail Vistitskiy (Михаил Вистицкий) SvobodaNews.ru (RFERL).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
And also:
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Voa chinese Yang Jing 14May2017.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 16:40, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Elon-Musk Forbes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
B (talk) 13:24, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
File:UnalCevikoz.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
B (talk) 13:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
File:File 02.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)
|
B (talk) 13:28, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Prezident Ilhom Aliyev Xudaferin ko'prigida bayroqni ko'targan.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Prezident Ilhom Aliyev Xudaferin ko'prigida bayroqni ko'targan.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Village sénégalais. Les Plongeurs, Exposition internationale d’Amiens, carte postale, 1906.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
El Comandante (talk) 22:04, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Template:Idw/layout 188.123.231.41 11:44, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
File:3rd Prime Minister of Malaysia Tun Hussein Onn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Dr.Wiki54 ([[User talk:Dr.Wiki54|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate El Funcionario ([[User talk:El Funcionario|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:43, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Question
Hi there! Thanks for uploading pictures that have higher resolution than mines. How do you find them from VoA? --Dr.Wiki54 ([[User talk:Dr.Wiki54|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
- [10]Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:06, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Sherwood6 ([[User talk:Sherwood6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:17, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Sherwood6 ([[User talk:Sherwood6|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:21, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, GRuban ([[User talk:GRuban|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 88.131.3.207 13:04, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --ghouston ([[User talk:Ghouston|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Dr.Wiki54 ([[User talk:Dr.Wiki54|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate --Animalparty ([[User talk:Animalparty|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:17, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Talk page issues
Hello. There appears to be errors on your User talk page that prevent some templates from displaying correctly. This problem might be solved by archiving your talk page (which also avoids cluttering your active page with dozens of older threads). For more information see Category:User talk pages where template include size is exceeded (which includes your talk page). If you have additional issues or questions please ask at Commons:Help desk. Cheers! --Animalparty ([[User talk:Animalparty|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:25, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
Thank you
The Historical Media Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your recent efforts in uploading larger-sized image files for out-of-copyright historical images. Your hard work is much appreciated. Power to you! Storye book ([[User talk:Storye book|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:43, 11 July 2021 (UTC) |
File:Fossil-AvimaiaSchweitzerae-EggShell.png
The fix for phab:T286273 was backported early this morning, so I have reverted File:Fossil-AvimaiaSchweitzerae-EggShell.png to your version. The PNG metadata parser shouldn't be quite so fragile now, so you should be fine to continue overwriting PNGs. AntiCompositeNumber ([[User talk:AntiCompositeNumber|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:22, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Unwanted Exif Metadata overwrites
What is "Exif Metadata" ? This does not describe the changes made. It seems files that have more than one version, you have uploaded a worse quality version, such as File:Tongtianlong-5.jpg and File:Buddha 1910.jpg.--BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:37, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- the images that i did upload are in the same highest resolution presented from nature.com, so the last previous version cannot be intact non upscalled or artificially enhanced images from nature.com website.
- for your example File:Tongtianlong-5.jpg, the image that i did upload has the Exif metadata that contain the dates and the tools that has been used to create the image, and also has the correct colors.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:34, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Please, say where have you downloaded high resolution version of this file?— Redboston 17:05, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- From the same source.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:28, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Can you give me the direct link?— Redboston 23:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I prefer to keep the method to extract the Full Resolution private, i did check other images uploaded from the same website and applied the method as needed(ex: File:Gumrak_Airport_012.jpg , File:Board_of_the_Committee_of_Culture_of_the_Volgograd_Region_2016.jpg , ...).Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. But we have a problem which descripted here: ru:Википедия:Рецензирование/Площадь Павших Борцов. In short. Low resolution version have been downloaded from volgograd.ru, we can check it including via direct link. http://www.volgograd.ru is licensed CC-BY-4.0 International (excluding materials the copyright of which belongs to third parties). And low-res version don't have any attribution — both on the page with the photo and in the metadata of the file. But the metadata of the high-res file contains such information: author Oleg Dimitrov; copyright http://volfoto.ru. I think this clearly indicates that volgograd.ru haven't the copyright for this high resolution version.— Redboston 11:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- The low resolution version is derived on the server from the higher resolution version that i did upload, and it's metadata has been striped away, you can determine that by the checking the Exif comment tag that has the content "CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 95." which means that the low resolution version has been generated using the GD Graphics Library, so if the higher resolution version does not fit in Wikimedia Commons then the same applies the low resolution version.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not very good at technical details... Are you saying that the low-res version is generated from the high-res version automatically? If so, then we really need to delete both versions. The low-res file could have been manually uploaded to the site?— Redboston 13:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- yes, the low res image has been automatically generated, the website is managed by a Content Management System and there is an indication that the low quality version has been resized to fit in a 900x600 dimension.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:16, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm not very good at technical details... Are you saying that the low-res version is generated from the high-res version automatically? If so, then we really need to delete both versions. The low-res file could have been manually uploaded to the site?— Redboston 13:45, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- The low resolution version is derived on the server from the higher resolution version that i did upload, and it's metadata has been striped away, you can determine that by the checking the Exif comment tag that has the content "CREATOR: gd-jpeg v1.0 (using IJG JPEG v62), quality = 95." which means that the low resolution version has been generated using the GD Graphics Library, so if the higher resolution version does not fit in Wikimedia Commons then the same applies the low resolution version.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. But we have a problem which descripted here: ru:Википедия:Рецензирование/Площадь Павших Борцов. In short. Low resolution version have been downloaded from volgograd.ru, we can check it including via direct link. http://www.volgograd.ru is licensed CC-BY-4.0 International (excluding materials the copyright of which belongs to third parties). And low-res version don't have any attribution — both on the page with the photo and in the metadata of the file. But the metadata of the high-res file contains such information: author Oleg Dimitrov; copyright http://volfoto.ru. I think this clearly indicates that volgograd.ru haven't the copyright for this high resolution version.— Redboston 11:08, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but I prefer to keep the method to extract the Full Resolution private, i did check other images uploaded from the same website and applied the method as needed(ex: File:Gumrak_Airport_012.jpg , File:Board_of_the_Committee_of_Culture_of_the_Volgograd_Region_2016.jpg , ...).Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:02, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
- Can you give me the direct link?— Redboston 23:15, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Remitamine! Can you extract exifs from high resolution versions of the other photos published on this page? That could help us consider whether Oleg Dimitrov is an employee of the press service. --XVodolazx ([[User talk:XVodolazx|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:05, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- yes, i can, checking some of the images posted there, they have similar Exif Metadata values for the image ownership(all except the first image that show few persons, fountain and part of building), the "Creator" tag has the value "Oleg Dimitrov" and the "Copyright" tag has the value "http://volfoto.ru".Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:22, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- So what does the first photo's exif say? --XVodolazx ([[User talk:XVodolazx|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- for the first image, the "Creator" is "Lobakin_Dim +79377502021" and the "Copyright" is "Press Admin Volg obl".Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- Very interesting, thank you! --XVodolazx ([[User talk:XVodolazx|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:17, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- for the first image, the "Creator" is "Lobakin_Dim +79377502021" and the "Copyright" is "Press Admin Volg obl".Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:16, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
- So what does the first photo's exif say? --XVodolazx ([[User talk:XVodolazx|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:34, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:09, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate — Racconish 💬 09:01, 10 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, Anatoliy (talk) 21:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Faktengebunden ([[User talk:Faktengebunden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate BevinKacon ([[User talk:BevinKacon|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:01, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Andrew Tahmooressi Mugshot.jpg
Template:Autotranslate Template:Autotranslate EugeneZelenko ([[User talk:EugeneZelenko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate JuTa 16:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
About Sogdiantextile
Hi there, about your flagging of File:Sogdiantextile.jpg. That is a 2-dimensional object's scan of a 5th-century textile, the copyright is of the 5th-century Sogdian artist. Or isn't it?--Haldir Marchwarden ([[User talk:Haldir Marchwarden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:54, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- you're claiming that the image has been released under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International but there is no indication that the image has been released under this license(base on the guardian article that you have cited as the source of the image).
Template:Autotranslate mattbr 10:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Mikehawk10 ([[User talk:Mikehawk10|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:56, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ruff tuff cream puff ([[User talk:Ruff tuff cream puff|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:59, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate And also:
- File:Police interupting the second wave of the pro-war demonstrators in July 2020, Baku.jpg
- File:Pro-war demonstrations in 2020, Baku, Azerbaijan.jpg
- File:Pro-war demonstrations in Baku, 2020.jpg
- File:TOMA interupting the second wave of the pro-war demonstrators in July 2020, Baku.jpg
Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 ([[User talk:廣九直通車|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:10, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Resizing of picture
Hello Remitamine!
I stumbled today upon this file I had previously uploaded from VOA : File:Christian Roger Okemba - 2019.jpg.
I see that you changed it to remove the watermark, which is fine by me. But I noticed that the picture itself has become far smaller that the original picture I uploaded (see original and new picture). So much that the cropping I did of this politician's face wouldn't be possible anymore (too small). Why is that?
I see that the new version you uploaded is also wider than the original. Isn't there a possibility to upload the HD version of this wider picture please? --Titlutin ([[User talk:Titlutin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- The Image that i did upload is in the original resolution present on VOA server, the image that you did upload has been upscaled by the VOA server.
- BTW, another higher res version of the same images is present on [11] but I'm not sure about it's license.Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello! Sorry for the late answer. And thank you for those links. Indeed, I see that this politician is speaking in a "VOX" microphone, so there's a high chance this is in fact a VOX pic, not owned by VOA. Plus, the VOX article was published in 2018, when the legend in the VOA article said the pic was taken in 2019. I think I'm going to start a "deletion request". --Titlutin ([[User talk:Titlutin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Titlutin ([[User talk:Titlutin|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 18:14, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Unclevinny ([[User talk:Unclevinny|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:48, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Victuallers ([[User talk:Victuallers|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Ytoyoda ([[User talk:Ytoyoda|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:14, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Mitte27 ([[User talk:Mitte27|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:06, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Please note that here you've replaced old version (before 2014 restoration, as is it in the filename) with new restored version of painting. The old version is without the whale on the shore, the new one - with the whale (full story here[12]). Please don't do such things again and read the descrition: we have here a lot of files "before restoration", "with frame", "old photo" etc. All of them are important. If you wants to upload bigger version, do it as the new file, don't replace. --Shakko ([[User talk:Shakko|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:11, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
- the error happened because the image present on source URL stated on the file description is different from the one uploaded in Commons, so i think the source URL should be updated because it's currently misleading. Remitamine ([[User talk:Remitamine#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)