User talk:Bob Collowân

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bob Collowân!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], which produces: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|correct name}} For more information read the full deletion guidelines.
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Categories

Hi Bob, Categories like Category:Category:Tranebjerg Kirke don't work. Remove one "Category:" to solve the problem. Greetings, -- Ies (talk) 18:11, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. I became aware of the problem myself just after I had uploaded six new pictures of which only two had gone into the proper category :-) --Bob Collowân (talk) 18:16, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Now it is fixed. --Bob Collowân (talk) 18:24, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Perspective correction

Hi, as for perspective correction of pictures, it depends on the software youre already using. Theres a standalone software for Windows: http://shiftn.de/. Theres a plugin for Photoshop: "Perspective Transformations", and one for GIMP: "EZ Perspective" (a bit tricky since there is no preview, you have to apply the filter and undo until it fits). I develop all my photographs from the RAW files using RawTherapee, which does a very good job in perspective correction itself. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 18:37, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for the advice. I have to admit that I haven't used editing software before, but perhaps I should learn how it works :-) --Bob Collowân (talk) 09:47, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter i Tranebjerg Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Steindy 23:34, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swan pair with offspring.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK, would be better with the location --Christian Ferrer 17:00, 6 June 2013 (UTC)  Done I have added coordinates and location description, thank you. --Bob Collowân 17:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Danish_wind_turbine

Hi Bob ! I applied some modifications on your file, because it was simpler to do them than to explain them. I agree with Kreuzschnabel : Rawtherapee is a very useful tool, but not only for raw files ; it does very well with jpeg too. -- I corrected the tilt on your picture with Gimp, using two plugins : "Perspective correction" and "Interactive deformation". They both need some learning but they're not too difficult to use (imo)... even though I'm sometimes absent minded ! -- I'm sure your picture will be assessed by someone else : as I've corrected it, I'm not allowed to promote it (the rules are so severe on Commons !). Nevertheless, I'll have an eye on it...-- Sorry for my English. -- Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 12:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi JLPC, thank you for balancing the horizon in the picture. I removed the blue artifacts you had left in the corners and uploaded a new version. --Bob Collowân (talk) 14:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Issehoved (Samsø, Danmark).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danish wind turbine.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Horizon tilted imo. Easy to fix. --JLPC 16:56, 7 June 2013 (UTC)  Question You're right, but I'm not very good at editing programs. Can you please help me balancing it? --Bob Collowân 20:08, 7 June 2013 (UTC)  New version uploaded --Bob Collowân 13:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC) QI now. --JLPC 09:13, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moat of Kastellet in Copenhagen.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alter og døbefont i Besser Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 17:51, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tranebjerg Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 21:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onsbjerg Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo. --ArildV 19:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Orgel i Tranebjerg Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Nicolai Kirke (Køge Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky could be bluer. Mattbuck 17:42, 9 June 2013 (UTC)  Done --Bob Collowân 21:42, 11 June 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 22:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klokketårn i Nordby (Samsø, Danmark).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me, left and top crop can be improved but QI level --Poco a poco 08:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Langør Kirke (Samsø Kommune) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, but I would crop a bit wider on all sides. Possible? --Tuxyso 12:09, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Sorry, the original is tight too, and this one is the result of a perspective correction. --Bob Collowân 17:26, 16 June 2013 (UTC) For me it is QI anyway. --Tuxyso 17:41, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rigets Flag (Marinestation København).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 12:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skib i Besser Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordby Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Need perspective correction, please see the left side.--ArildV 19:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Are you sure? The left side seems quite well-balanced to me. --Bob Collowân 10:33, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Undskyld! The right side, not the left.--ArildV 21:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Helt i orden. It was tilted, but I've corrected it now. --Bob Collowân 10:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC) Ok now.--ArildV 11:12, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Knippelsbro (København).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It need perspective corrections --Christian Ferrer 20:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)  Done I think this will do. --Bob Collowân 21:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)  Comment It's tilted on right, look at the bulding at right --Christian Ferrer 04:48, 15 June 2013 (UTC) I'm not sure whether Commons had finished loading the new version when you wrote your comment. Please look at it again. --Bob Collowân 10:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC))  Comment I have look again, it's tilted on right, look at the bulding at right, it need more corrections --Christian Ferrer 18:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC)  OK, I've applied some corrections. I hope it's better now. --Bob Collowân 21:17, 16 June 2013 (UTC)  Support OK now --Christian Ferrer 17:34, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bust and statue of Princess Marie of Orléans.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Asnæs Power Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Frederiksberg Palace.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope, I guess a snowy picture is representative for the scope ?--Jebulon (talk) 11:33, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magleby Kirke (Stevns Kommune) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tight crop, otherwise good quality.--ArildV 21:16, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magleby Kirke (Stevns Kommune).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 14:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skib i Tranebjerg Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 14:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Besser Kirke (Samsø Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Could do with some perspective correction, and seems tilted CCW to me (see window in horizontal center) --Kreuzschnabel 19:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Tilt and perspective corrected. --Bob Collowân 21:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC) Very close framing now (next time leave some space for correction) but QI for me --Kreuzschnabel 11:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC) OK, thanks for your advice. --Bob Collowân 11:08, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dannebrog ved Rødvig Strand.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Amager Power Station (Amagerværket) in Copenhagen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:23, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 20:10, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Object location vs camera location

Hi, you changed some of the camera locations to object location for some of my pictures. E.g. here. Take a look at where the location is placed, and you will see that it is outside the church. It is in fact within a couple of meters from where I took the picture. Haros (talk) 18:19, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

OK, sorry about that. --Bob Collowân (talk) 20:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Good. Haros (talk) 18:50, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holtug Kirke (Stevns Kommune, Danmark) 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Night photographs of Rødovre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Agree, meets criteria, VI to me Poco² 18:40, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Poco² 20:08, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duckling road sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Børsen (Copenhagen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 14:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viola tricolor in a tub.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO bad centring, if you want to take a tub of Viola tricolor you must take the entire pot --Christian Ferrer 18:15 29 June 2013 (UTC) Good point, I will change the nomination subject then. --Bob Collowân 11:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)  Comment Can you tilt it on the left to make the background horizontal please --Christian Ferrer 19:42, 01 July 2013 (UTC)  Tilted counterclockwise --Bob Collowân 20:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 19:42, 01 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Windmill of Kastellet (Copenhagen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saint Alban's English Church (Copenhagen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:42, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aerial photographs of Nordhavnen in Copenhagen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:17, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mount Rainier (Washington state, USA).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Diablo Lake (Washington State).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. --Jastrow 10:00, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Thanks :-) --Bob Collowân 15:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Diablo Lake (Washington state, USA)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of the Panum Institute in Copenhagen..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 17:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Windmill of Kastellet, Copenhagen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support best in scope Poco² 18:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:57, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! All Souls College, Oxford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 12:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of London viewed from the River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but it's leaning clockwise a bit, please correct --A.Savin 18:17, 23 July 2013 (UTC)  Done --Bob Collowân 21:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)  Support --A.Savin 22:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bridge (north side view).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christiansholm, Copenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower Bridge (aerial view).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective corrections, esp. at the left --A.Savin 12:35, 24 July 2013 (UTC)  New version uploaded, acceptable? --Bob Collowân 13:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC) Yes, imo QI now.  Support --A.Savin 16:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gemini Residence, Islands Brygge, Copenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 10:37, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Thanks :-) --Bob Collowân 16:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Metropolis, Sluseholmen, Copenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 10:17, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Metropolis, Copenhagen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Møns Klint 2 (Nylands Nakke).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 18:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Københavns Havn (Copenhagen Port).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Felix Koenig 13:57, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bridge of Sighs, Oxford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 13:57, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eryngium giganteum, Thames Barrier Park, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:27, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tower of University Church of St Mary the Virgin, Oxford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:02, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bridge of Sighs (Oxford).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --JLPC (talk) 17:25, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lion with a mooring ring.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 19:52, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tom Tower of Christ Church, Oxford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and sharp.--ArildV 19:50, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aller Media, Havneholmen, Copenhagen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok. --Sputniktilt 07:23, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! London Eye at sunset 2013-07-19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support wonderfull --Rolf H. 13:14, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! War Memorial Garden of Christ Church, Oxford.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment QI for me, but very big dust spot (See note)--Lmbuga 21:20, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Thank you, I wasn't aware of it. I have removed it now. --Bob Collowân 11:45, 1 August 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:20, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wheeler Hall, University of California, Berkeley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Onsbjerg Kirke (Samsø Kommune) 2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 14:35, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Thanks :-) --Bob Collowân 16:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rødovre by night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 19:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Telefonboks, andelslandsbyen Nyvang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.-ArildV 19:37, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Stefans Kirke, andelslandsbyen Nyvang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 09:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Prins Wilhelms Palæ (Københavns Kommune).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Stefans Kirke, andelslandsbyen Nyvang 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  QI --A.Savin 17:38, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panum-instituttet (Copenhagen).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sky a bi overexposed but ok --Poco a poco 19:19, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tower of London seen from the South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope--Jebulon (talk) 20:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Exterior of Svanemølleværket.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:12, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Møns Klint (the Cliffs of Møn).

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Møns Klint (the Cliffs of Møn).
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holtug Kirke (Stevns Kommune, Danmark).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holtug Kirke (Stevns Kommune, Danmark).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:34, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mossgrown tree roots.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 08:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traktørstedet, Stevns, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Blue Elf 14:12, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marianelund, Gurre, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:10, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Holtug Kirke (Stevns Kommune, Danmark).JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Holtug Kirke (Stevns Kommune, Danmark).JPG/2 has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/JKadavoor Jee 06:16, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ny Vor Frue Kirke.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:38, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Husmandsstedet, andelslandsbyen Nyvang.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:28, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Traktørstedet, Stevns, Denmark 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Fiskbæk_Kirke_(Viborg_Kommune)

Category:Fiskbæk_Kirke_(Viborg_Kommune) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Beethoven9 (talk) 09:34, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buddinge Kirke (Gladsaxe Kommune, Denmark).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 22:25, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

Request

Hello Bob,

I would like to request use of the photo you put out in Wikipedia of the Tower of London for my scrapbook (for personal use only). I will credit it to you when printing it (personal use single book). I think that is what you are requesting in the "license" part of the posting, and hope that is ok with you.

Thank you!

Jo Lee

Hi Jo, that is okay with me. --Bob Collowan (talk) 11:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Vissing Kirke og andre tre farvet kirker

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Vissing_Kirke denne kirke er vel trefarvet rød, hvi og grå! Der er flere af den slags hvad gør vi ved det? --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 21:07, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Det gælder også https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Skallerup_Kirke --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Jeg har lavet en trikolore-kategori til grå, hvide og røde kirker. Den hedder Category:Gray, white, and red churches in Denmark. --Bob Collowan (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Bob Collowân⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Ønsker at bruge et af dine foto i en bog

Hello Bob, I'm not member of Wikimedia Commons, therefor I can't e-mail you for permission. But I will be you most pleased, if you could give me permission to use your image from Møns Klint. I want to use it in a travel book in Danish. Will you please contact me at e-mail: cm@legind.dk.

Best regards Conny Mikkelsen

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Bob Collowân,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Usage of picture in genealogical site

Hi Bob

I am intending to use your picture of the church in Magleby Stevns at http://www.myerichsen.net/p70.html#i2079

Best rgds Michael Erichsen

Hi, feel free to do so, as long as you credit me. --Bob Collowan (talk) 20:36, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nødebo Kirke, Hillerød Kommune, Denmark, 2014-05-16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 18:15, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Metropolis, Sluseholmen, Copenhagen.jpg

Hi Bob My name is Marie Flensborg Im working at the University Copenhagen, may i use the photo "Metropolis, Sluseholmen, Copenhagen.jpg" for a poster ? Have a nice day

Metropolis, Sluseholmen, Copenhagen.jpg

Hi Bob My name is Marie Flensborg Im working at the University Copenhagen, may i use the photo "Metropolis, Sluseholmen, Copenhagen.jpg" for a poster ? Have a nice day

Hi Marie, could you please e-mail me at bob.collowan@gmail.com? Best regards, --Bob Collowan (talk) 11:24, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tranekær Kirke, Langeland Kommune, Danmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:17, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Keldsnor Fyr, Langeland, Danmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lindelse Kirke, Langeland Kommune, Danmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Overall good quality, but needs a perspective correction. --Cccefalon 15:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC) Thank you. Yes, there is a slight vertical distortion, but as the church is situated on a hill, I think that's what the eye naturally expects. Making the vertical edges perfectly vertical would create an undesirable effect. --Bob Collowân 20:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC) ok, as it is only a small incline, I won't be more catholic than the pope. --Cccefalon 13:25, 30 July 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rise Kirke, Ærø Kommune, Danmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs slight perspective correction. Also, there is a fine magenta CA at the left trees trunks. --Cccefalon 12:48, 27 July 2014 (UTC) Thank you. I don't think I can solve the perspective issues altogether (the stepped gable is quite delicate), but I've made a new version which I find acceptable, with the CA repaired too. --Bob Collowân 20:39, 27 July 2014 (UTC) Nice. Mattbuck 10:41, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tranderup Kirke, Ærø Kommune, Danmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective yet to be done. --Cccefalon 10:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)  Done Thank you. It should be better now. --Bob Collowân 09:03, 15 August 2014 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 07:46, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Valued image set: Naica Mine diagrams

Valued image set: Naica Mine diagrams has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

89.117.239.79 14:55, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality images ...

Hej Bob

Jeg har lagt lidt af dine billeder i forskellige kategorier for Quality images bla. i "Quality images of region Sjælland", håber på at du vil lægge resten i rette kategorier. Det er et arbejde som Slaunger startede og som jeg forsatte med mine egne billeder og så nogle få af dine. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:01, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Så skulle det vist være klaret. Venligst, --Bob Collowan (talk) 17:29, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Dejligt og tak! --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:30, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Kategorisering af museer i Danmark

Hej Bob, Måske vil du give en hånd med ved kategorisering af museer? Start måske her https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Museums_in_Denmark_by_Region .

Med venlig hilsen Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Eller start her https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kategori:Museer_i_Danmark_efter_region Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:28, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Using Your Image of the Tower of London

Hi Bob. We (my aunt Claudie an author and I, a small time publisher) love your photo of the Tower of London. We are going to use it in my Aunt's book that I helped illustrate, The ABC's book about William Pen. There will be an attribution page at the end of the book which I'm making up now to include a reference to you and the Wikimedia Commons phot page where your photo is: [[1]]. The book will be available on Amazon and all the usual channels. We do not expect high sales although the book is well written and the cover, is I think, attractive.

OK, thanks for letting me know. --Bob Collowan (talk) 14:41, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:London Eye at sunset 2013-07-19.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:London Eye at sunset 2013-07-19.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

--Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for nominating. -- Bob Collowan (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

tower of London Picture

Hi Bob i used you image to create a sketch of the tower of London for an experimental illustration project for college you can see it here: http://imgur.com/gallery/dtCjwyl and you are credited as the photographer. i will take it down if you ask. Just comment on the site linked

Very nice sketch! Thanks for the link, and good luck with your project. --Bob Collowan (talk) 10:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Use of Tower of London photo

Hi Bob,

I'm a secondary school teacher in UK and would really like to use your image of the Tower of London for a display I'm making about our GCSE course which includes a site study of the Tower. Would this be ok?

Many thanks, Tom — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.60.253.178 (talk) 14:07, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Yes, that is ok. Thanks for contacting me. -- Bob Collowan (talk) 16:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brøndbyvester Windmill, Denmark, 2017-02-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:51, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brøndby Middelalderlandsby, Denmark, 2017-02-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:19, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brøndby Strand Church, Denmark, 2017-02-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 19:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agger Kirke, Thisted Kommune, Denmark, 2015-07-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:59, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the picture - i used it for a lesser known public service channel in north west jutland, and credited as instructed. Thanks! mail: mygindkasper@gmail.com 128.76.195.228 15:05, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Vandtårnet på Randersvej - The water tower on Randersvej, Aarhus, Denmark..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Info This image was taken by User:CarinaT. --Bob Collowan (talk) 18:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment - I think I like File:Aarhus Nord Watertower.JPG better. It's smaller, but it's better focused, doesn't look like it's leaning back, and I'm unconvinced the bright light and shadow of the other picture is better than the more restrained light of this one. As for details, sure, you can see individual bricks better in this photo. But otherwise, is there really much that, though smaller, you can't see in the other picture? If the two pictures were otherwise identical, only this was a bigger, closer view, of course it would be more valuable, but the photos aren't identical. Please explain why I'm wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

I think that because this image also shows the entrance to the water tower and the above relief showing the name "Aarhus Kommune" (Aarhus Municipality) and the year of construction (1907), it is more valuable. In the other image, the view of the entrance is blocked by a light pole. --Bob Collowan (talk) 15:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

•  Support - Convincing argument. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palads, Copenhagen, 2017-02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Brøndby Strandpark with hooded crow in tree.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House at Marina Boulevard, San Francisco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 17:47, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Farm and fields on Nekselø, Denmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Molbechs Hus, Sorø Akademi, Danmark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:23, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started

Hi, "Wiki Science Competition" 2017 has started This year is a world event. The upload phase in many European countries ends on November 30th. Here you can find more details in many languages. This is a manually inserted message for the uploaders of the 2015 edition. #WSC2017 #WikiScience #WikiScience2017 Wiki Science Competition

--Alexmar983 (talk) 06:31, 15 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:Arentsminde_Kirke

Category:Arentsminde_Kirke has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Beethoven9 (talk) 08:09, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2019

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2019 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), Ukraine and France (active during November), but it's still open in all the other countries.

If you want to take part where WSC2019 is still open, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, please consider that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, i.e. "nature and wildlife".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsuscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2019 #WikiScience #WikiScience2019

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--21:32, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alcatraz Island with sailboat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 19:23, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! The Embarcadero, San Francisco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 17:52, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tre små kinesere på Højbro Plads.jpg

And also:

• File:Tre små kinesere.png

I believe there is a copyright problem with files containing the lyrics to the song "tre små kinesere". Please see the deletion request, and you are very welcome to comment there. Yours sincerely, Peter Alberti (talk) 12:02, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Asnæsværket (Kalundborg, Denmark).JPG

Dear Bob,

I would like to use your photograph File:Asnæsværket (Kalundborg, Denmark).JPG in an open encyclopedia project (with license CC-BY-SA-4.0) https://bktt.vn, in an article about thermal power plan (https://bktt.vn/Nhà_máy_nhiệt_điện). When click on the image, user will see notice about the credit with: "Bob Collowan/Commons/CC-BY-SA-4.0" below the image (just like in Wikipedia). Let me know if you accept this. Thank you very much.

Tttrung (talk) 01:47, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

That is fine with me. Good luck with the project. Best, --Bob Collowan (talk) 12:22, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017 and Wiki Science Competition 2019, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now completed in Russia (active in May), but it's still open in almost all the other countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

Please keep in mind that there is a new category this year, that is "astronomy".

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase, please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2020.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--14:18, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Photo request.

Hi. I would like to request permission to use your aerial photo of Christiansborg Palace in Copenhagen for a LinkedIn post ( CC BY-SA 4.0, File: Christiansborg Palace (aerial view).jpg

I recently attended a meeting there so just using it as a reference image. Happy to credit. Amcnab2023 (talk) 08:32, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Sure, feel free to use with credit. Thanks for asking. --Bob Collowan (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Picture used in FamilySearch Wiki

I added the picture you took of Skellebjerg church to the Skellebjerg page on the FamilySearch wiki. It is a great picture and I gave you credit. https://www.familysearch.org/en/wiki/Skellebjerg_Parish,_Holb%C3%A6k,_Denmark_Genealogy 64.72.222.219 23:04, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2023

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019 and Wiki Science Competition 2021, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2023 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2023, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Russia), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2024.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2023 #WikiScience #WikiScience2023

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--17:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

Lion head mooring

Hello, wonderful image, I took one when visiting. Few years back but of course yours is perfect! I would like permission to use a cropped version of just the Lion as a reference image for an educational college level course on charcoal rendering. Crediting you of course. Thank you for considering. Lauralei7 (talk) 18:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Hello, sorry for replying late. If it's still relevant, feel free to use it. Best, Bob Collowan (talk) 21:28, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Request to use Embarcadero SF Photo

Hi, Bob - Students from UC Berkeley's Master of Real Estate Development + Design program will be presenting their original research on topics and issues within the built environment at one of the buildings visible in your photo. I would love to use your photo in our flyer for the event. Please let me know if this is ok with you--we will, of course, credit you as noted in the photo permissions section. Thank you! Slazarusberkeley (talk) 00:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello! Sorry about the late reply. Sure, feel free to use it. Best, Bob Collowan (talk) 21:26, 27 April 2024 (UTC)