User talk:AnonMoos/Archive5

Current discussions at User talk:AnonMoos

Talkback

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages at 111Alleskönner's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Greetings — Allrounder (talk) 14:43, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of the United Kingdom (3-2 aspect ratio).svg

First: the SVG file is bigger, but is not a problem since the RSVG lib that Wikipedia uses make a PNG of each SVG image at all the dimensions (for example: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/30/Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom_%283-2_aspect_ratio%29.svg/800px-Flag_of_the_United_Kingdom_%283-2_aspect_ratio%29.svg.png that is 13317 byte - yes more than 19 times bigger, oh!).
Second: the sapes of the two images are copletely different as you can see.
Third: first ask, then revert.

Hope it's clear now. --F l a n k e r (talk) 17:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PS: the specs I've used are at File:United Kingdom Flag Specifications.svg. --F l a n k e r (talk) 17:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your file have not aligned cross (horizontal bar are not aligned). A SVG file should be graphically corrected before else... If you need a more elegant code, you are welcome to correct mine. And last but not list, ask before modify a simple page like this one, is not in the wiki philosophy. --F l a n k e r (talk) 17:46, 28 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, I don't rely on anyone, is You that seems to be unconfortable witha a 4kb SVG... Please, can I rely on you to make the George cross horizontal? Also the St. Patrick's Cross seems to be too close to the St Andrew's borders. --F l a n k e r (talk) 20:23, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the cross of St. George seemed to me to have the horizontal arms not perfectly horizontal, I've checked it and they are correct instead.

About the St. Patrick's Cross: it seems to me to be too large (according to United Kingdom Flag Specifications.svg it must be 2/6 of the St Andrew's) and too close to the St Andrew's borders. What's the measure have you adopted (and why) for all the crosses? (I do not want to sound stickler, but since it's not me that have started the discussion and since we're talking about a flag...) --F l a n k e r (talk) 10:55, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brasão Eugene George.svg

File:Brasão Eugene George.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

User talk:DrTrigonBot

Dear AnonMoos

Just to remind you in case you forget to answer. Thanks and greetings --DrTrigon (talk) 19:32, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the best is we get some neutral third-party input, thus I created the following (--DrTrigon (talk) 20:59, 9 January 2013 (UTC)):[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Help requested on User talk:DrTrigonBot. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Relpy

Hey, I left a response on the help page. I'm really hoping you can answer!--Dom497 (talk) 20:00, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I left another message. :) --Dom497 (talk) 20:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lybian Air force fin flash.svg

File:Lybian Air force fin flash.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fry1989 ^eh? 03:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages at Inks.LWC's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Inks.LWC (talk) 09:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages at Waldir's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

02:59, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Abstraction flag.png

File:Abstraction flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ricordisamoa (talk) 09:24, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: File:POL COA Andrychewicz.svg

File:POL COA Andrychewicz.svg
On Polish Wikipedia is: „W polu zielonym róża czerwona o środku złotym i listkach zielonych” = „In the green rose red with gold center and green leafs”. S.: w:pl:Andrychewicz.
File:POL COA Żaliński III.svg‎
On Polish Wikipedia is: „róża czerwona na zielonej ulistnionej łodydze” = „red rose on a green leafy stem”. S.: w:pl:Żaliński III.
Probably some others also.

爪丹了 (talk) 21:20, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Four Spaces House

Hi AnonMoos, I saw that the proposal is from 4 month ago and nothing happened, that was the reason to my edit. Hanay (talk) 09:29, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:User page image

Thank you very much! I felt kind of rude and awkward uploading these to Wiki Commons, and I was hoping nobody would find them. I didn't realize that this existed. -- 07:03, 25 January 2013‎ Bulba2036

SchlurcherBot

Hi, thank you for the note. I corrected the mistake. --SchlurcherBot (talk) 21:06, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Penguins meet and talk small fish, big fish.svg

File:Penguins meet and talk small fish, big fish.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

125.25.145.58 17:30, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Illustration workshop talkback

You have a message at Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop#File:Political System of the United States.svg and File:Politisches System der Vereinigten Staaten.svg – Philosopher ^{Let us reason together.} 03:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ALGO QUE VALGA LA PENA!

Le agradecería que deje la resolución de la bandera de que subí. Y se ocupe de sus propios asuntos, en vez de aparentar logros con trabajos ajenos. Ocúpese de otros archivo, no me está haciendo ningún favor al bajarle la resolución al mio ni persistir tercamente en algo tan inoficioso como ocupar el historial de versiones de un mismo tema. Y pasar a una indefinida GUERRA DE EDICIONES. Dedíquese a algo que merezca más valía. ALGO QUE VALGA LA PENA!--Ninrouter (talk) 22:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green Smile.png

Hi, I think threr is need for the change - because it can not be seen without the PNG.

Like the dif here : http://he.wikibooks.org/w/index.php?title=%D7%AA%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%AA:%D7%97%D7%99%D7%95%D7%9A_%D7%99%D7%A8%D7%95%D7%A7&curid=21668&diff=103694&oldid=103692

יעל י (talk) 14:44, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK now, TNX! יעל י (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

I have asked a photographer to release some pictures to Commons. What is the current procedure? Aditya (talk) 03:28, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:RSAF Roundel 1973-1990.svg

File:RSAF Roundel 1973-1990.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 09:54, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I know things should have been put together into one request, yet every time I was involved in a multi-item requests, I am always yelled at (or seen people get yelled at) for doing such thing. I am not faulting you sir, but the mixed messages is confusing. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return fire)} 18:20, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Heterosexual flag

I'm deeply sorry if the picture offended anyone. I would like them to have a different flag from the "prison stripes", yes, but this page seems to say that it is popular and proposed. So, again, I'm sorry about it, and the "contrast with the rainbow flag"-well, the webpage seems to say that this is what it was for. But, now that I see it, it looks more like it was made to be for heteronormativity, not heterosexuality, and the design was most likely for the purpose of taking the colour out of the rainbow flag. Personally, your flag makes much more sense, except, I think all the sexuality flags should have stripes because I just have this perfectionist thing. You can delete mine if you want, because I certainly won't be using it on the Internet anymore, and it may be a little offensive. Again, sorry. Please do not be offended. Shikku27316 (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I understand. The thing is, I'm not trying to give it "worldwide acceptance", I just thought that it was a little popular or something, so I figured it must be on here. Maybe it should be renamed to "Heterosexism_flag" or "Heteronormativity_flag" because, you're right, it does take the colour out of the rainbow flag. I honestly hate heterosexism (the belief that heterosexuality is the best thing and anyone else is an abhorrence or something), so that is not what I was going for. On the page I linked, they said it could also represent the yin-yang, and anyone who is heterosexual and knows about the yin-yang would most likely see that first. I saw a picture once with 4 of the sexual orientation flags, the trans* flag, and the flag I uploaded and it showed cartoon people thinking all the flags were pretty, except this "heterosexual" flag, so I guess it could have negative connotations. Of course, I am asexual so I might be too biased to see any offense with any of them (given that I am also strongly antisexual), so I'm sorry to anyone who was offended (not saying you were, but anyone else who was). And, I believe it was you who, on Sexual identity symbols, captioned the romantic asexual heart with "demisexual" and the AVEN triangle as "asexual triangle". Well, the problem with these symbols was that the heart represented romantic asexuals alone, and the AVEN triangle was only for AVEN, so we had to create a flag (which I personally think is not very inclusive, but I use it nonetheless). Please, don't caption them as "demisexual" or "asexual triangle" because that is simply not accurate. Sorry if my tone was not very nice, I didn't want to be not nice here. Also, do I still have the rights to upload pictures, like flags, and put them on that page? Shikku27316 (talk) 17:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Well, as for romantic asexuality and demisexuality, romantic asexuality is when one is not attracted to people sexually, but does desire romantic relationships with them. Demisexuality is when somebody cannot experience sexual attraction to someone until they have formed a romantic relationship with that person. For more information, please go to www.asexuality.org , as I'm sure I did a terrible explanation. Well, there are some flags that are not yet on here (even some proposed ones), so I'll work on them. --Shikku27316 (talk) 03:41, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Transparency in File:Californie submergee simulation.svg

Hello,

in fact, I need this transparency for editing (I superimpose satellite picture from a famous web site to add landmarks), but you're right its not useful for the final rendering. I'll upload a new version soon (addition of Calistoga and Saint Helena city), I'll try to remember to fix it.

Regards.

Cdang (talk) 15:53, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

Cdang (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I added a few text on en:Always Coming Home, but as I'm not a native English speaker, maybe you could see for a clean up?

Best regards.

Cdang (talk) 10:49, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Cdang (talk) 13:43, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hey !

I want to make sure that you don't get the wrong idea about the picture i post in the mouse / mice discussion. I want to use my new picture for ages, and that many big words in one comment and I'm like... what the ? if you don't see the humour (you'd be amazed by how many people have no sense of humour) then I'll remove it. Actually, feel free to remove it if you like also I don't mind. I figure you are cool with it tho. Penyulap ☏ 13:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

cool ! I knew you had a sense of humour ! I hope others enjoy it as much too ! that is one cool bird. Penyulap ☏ 14:00, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Sydney Ferries House.svg

You know, I hate to ask this after everything, but could you change the canton to 3:5? It looks too long compared to the photo as is. The cross is still Scandinavian-style shifted leftwards so that the fly is longer then the hoist. If you want, I can do half the work and re-construct the flag using File:Flag of Scotland.svg which is 3:5, I just can't do the red saltire and letters. Fry1989 ^eh? 22:21, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm really really realllllllllly sorry but the canton wasn't 3:5, and the fly got way too long. I fixed it how I want it now, but you'll have to do the saltire and letters one last time. I swear this is the last time and you've been so generous. Fry1989 ^eh? 05:07, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes but then the tail got too long and a star was off. I fixed it, but I'm afraid I jumped your code by 5kb. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:47, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've re-cleaned up the image --Ricordi samoa 22:02, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wavy stripes

You made them from scratch on File:Flag of the West Indies Federation.svg, could you teach me how to make a similar one, or by any chance make one for me (I'll attribute you in what I need it for)? I want a vertical wavy stripe that is inkscape compatible. The dimensions are 300 high, and 10 thick, with two bends leftwards and one bend rightwards, so that the position of the front of the stripe meets the back of the stripe half way down like in this drawing. Can you help? Fry1989 ^eh? 21:57, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, my math was wrong. The width needs to be 20, not 10. Everything else you did was perfect, if you could just increase the width and re-align the curve so the front still meets the back half-way down, I'd be so thankful. I don't think I know how to do it in a text editor. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:36, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Math was never my friend. Thanks so much. Fry1989 ^eh? 00:53, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, I have attributed you on the file. Fry1989 ^eh? 02:31, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandate of Syria.svg

File:Mandate of Syria.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 20:28, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zeraia Coat of Arms.svg

What I can do to delete the link of the coast ? --— Mouh2jijel ^[Talk] 20:51, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Message

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages at Jayarathina's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

fictional flag of Ontario deletion request update

Oh my, AnonMoos, I the author of the file added an aggravating factor by updating my file to show that I hate all Icelanders as well as Flamingos and that I want all Icelanders should be kicked out of Iceland because I believe they are inferior to make way for the growth of superior Liechensteiners of a new World-ruling Liechenstein Empire There, I'm an anti-Icelander bigot promoting hate speech on Icelanders because I want superior people from Liechenstein to rule Iceland and the entire world, I guess it should be removed for that aggravating factor of anti-Icelandic hate speech?--R-41 (talk) 00:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, fine, keep the file. But please at least delete my practical joke attempt to have the file removed by adding fake hate speech to create an aggravating factor, and also delete your revert with explanation along with the practical joke WP:POINT attempt, because I don't want any crazy person looking at it and thinking that I really hate Icelandic people.--R-41 (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does create more work, sorry. Now would you please inform an administrator to remove that edit and your reversal to restore it to the original. I don't want a crazy person believing and saying I am an evil anti-Icelander.--R-41 (talk) 13:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But you made your edit as well, I do not represent you. Do I have your permission to remove that edit as well. Also I am unfamiliar as to where to go to find administrators on Wikimedia. I haven't requested an administrator on Wikimedia before.--R-41 (talk) 14:09, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:Velde

geb. am 3. Aug. 1868 in Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland, gest. am 5. Jan. 1943 im Ghetto Theresienstadt, Tschechoslowakei/heute: Tschechien, Pädagogin, Klavierlehrerin. -- 18:54, 7 March 2013‎ User talk:Velde

File:Deja Vu Timeline.png

File:Deja Vu Timeline.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

TenPoundHammer (talk) 00:19, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great coincidence.

It has long had in mind to make the coat of arms of each cardinal alive, but postponed it due to time. But finally I decided to make them in November, I started from scratch, I made my own tassels, galero, and different types of processional crosses. I also made different types of croziers. Interestingly, I had much desire to finish before the new year. I have yet to do 44 coats of cardinals. Not everyone is happy with the new versions, the authors of previous versions and other users do not like to replace them, at first, did not want to make the shields that were already made in SVG format, but I saw that they had serious errors heraldic, and aesthetic shortcomings, I decided to make them too.

Do you speak Spanish?. for the message I used a translator online, sorry for the errors.--SajoR (talk) 23:04, 12 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag-map of Syria (1932-1958, 1961-1963).svg

File:Flag-map of Syria (1932-1958, 1961-1963).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GhiathArodaki (talk) 15:15, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Syria (2011 combined).svg

File:Flag of Syria (2011 combined).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GhiathArodaki (talk) 15:17, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re:IsraeliSyriarevolution.png

Regarding the origins of File:IsraeliSyriarevolution.png; Where is the source that the image is a "crude insult image based on an Iranian government propaganda line conspiracy theory?" Knowing Iran's propaganda history, and their support for the Assad regime, I believe you. But it's always good to have evidence, because I've looked for some and so far I can't find it. ----DanTD (talk) 17:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Love heart glowing bubble.svg

Thank you for fixing File:Love heart glowing bubble.svg. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 19:05, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Customs Flag of the Territory of Papua and New Guinea 1949-1952.svg

Would you be so kind as to assist in doing the letters for me, like in the source? Fry1989 ^eh? 00:36, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much, could you also do File:Flag of the Union Démocratique Bretonne.svg? Fry1989 ^eh? 17:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. Fry1989 ^eh? 23:18, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: SVG headers

I created a JavaScript program that can detect and log such files: I've filed a RFBOT here. --Ricordi samoa 05:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I fixed that in the script. --Ricordi samoa 07:42, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

If I had any idea of how to do what you suggest I would try it. I am using SVG because that is what Wikipedia insists on. I don't have the money to go out and buy a professional SVG passage, so the next best thing would probably be to just delete files that don't turn out right. Patrick Edwin Moran (talk) 05:50, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to Ingsoc logo message.

I think the red lines are supposed to be highlights/reflections on a black plastic/leather glove. I don't know for sure, but they are part of the proper Ingsoc logo, so removing them is incorrect. Nirwrath (talk) 11:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not really only criterion to the faithfulness of the movie, but I think they fit it, and they give it some asymmetry. Not to mention that neither of us designed the logo, so it's not our job to change how it looks. Nirwrath (talk) 13:01, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AfricaItaliana.PNG

File:AfricaItaliana.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arms of the House of Savoy.svg

Hallo - thanks for your help with this file. Now it has a reasonable size. The same oversize problem stays with 2 more file which are: File:Arms of the House of Savoy-Aosta.svg and File:Arms of the House of Savoy-Genova.svg. As i might run into trouble again i'd like to ask you to do the repair on these files, to. Thanks. --maxxl2 - talk 15:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again - i missed out File:Arms of the Prince of Piedmont.svg. Pls help here, too. maxxl2 - talk 17:40, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Flag map of the land of Palestine

How can this image been hatred of Jews?? Almost all Palestinians aspires to return to their homeland Palestine from the sea to the river. They use this map to indicate historic Palestine with the Palestinian flag. This will not cause any problem for the Jews because it is not their land.--Uishaki (talk) 17:34, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image may change your mind who shows that the Palestinian flag was used long before it was adopted officially.--Uishaki (talk) 20:24, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you defend the map of "Israel" so clearly and working on historical revisionism on everything regard Palestine? Every person with a conscience knows that the "Israeli" entity was established on vanity with a major conspiration by colonial states, at the expense of the innocent Palestinian people.--Uishaki (talk) 15:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attributed arms

While I was browsing through Special or Fictional arms for this deletion request, I stumbled on the quarrel we had back in 2010 with Ssire on attributed arms. The "solution" thought up back then was very confusing, and really messy. Could we perhaps fix it by renaming Category:Attributed arms to Category:Arms attributed to historical or mythical figures? Oh, and involve others this time. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 09:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we could discuss him, but his behaviour did indeed seem quite POINTy, and he's probably still angry at me. I did some really stupid things when was a new member, ignorant of the policies, trespassing on the territory of his heraldry project. Perhaps Dunkerqueenflandre knows the current situation. He was harassed back in 2012 for adding coats of arms in my style to the French Wikipedia. But in any case, a consensus is what's needed. We could approach other users, or an administrator, for advice. Oh, and Category:Arms attributed to historical, biblical and mythical figures perhaps?Lemmens, Tom (talk) 10:52, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Watermarks

I find with these that images without watermarks show up eventually. These are nice because they prove all versions of the same photo are PD. They usually don't last long on Ebay since she just passed a few days ago and everyone will be buying them.--Canoe1967 (talk) 23:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Monogram of King Peter II of Yugoslavia, Variant.svg

There is an errant... something on the lower right side of this image which I cannot identify and remove. Can you help me with this, and let me know what you found it to be? Thanks!--Glasshouse (talk) 12:34, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

These black boxes show a common problem: flowroot. I've deleted them already. --maxxl2 - talk 13:01, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I must have done something wrong when I edited File:Flag of Iraq 1959-1963.svg. The star was made of a whole bunch funky triangles that were all cloned, but apparently when edited manually the size increases. -- 00:06, 14 April 2013‎ Raymond1922A

Why I do things

What else have I done that you don't like? Hyacinth (talk) 21:59, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you make and edit and I make an edit, please show me the policy or guideline that indicates that I must explain myself, but you need not. Hyacinth (talk) 02:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What have I done that you consider makework? Hyacinth (talk) 02:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See: Commons:Categories#Category_names (also Commons:Naming_categories#Grammatical_number): "Category names...should generally be in plural form".
What categories have I created that you consider "quite similar in purpose to existing categories" and what do you mean by "quite similar"? Hyacinth (talk) 22:41, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Changhua County flag.png

File:Changhua County flag.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Akira123 (talk) 04:27, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Flag of China (R41 proposal).svg

File:New Flag of China (R41 proposal).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 11:18, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SVG defects

Thanks for the message -- I've been trying to figure out what was going wrong for at least an hour now. Someone on IRC suggested http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SVG_help#Missing_objects_or_black_boxes a couple of minutes earlier and that solved the artifacting. But I'm still running into issues with how the text looks -- compare this with this. Any ideas to that end of things? — C M B J 06:11, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see now by comparing them side by side that it's just a font rendering difference - it's defined as Sans, though. — C M B J 06:13, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

HTML

Hey there, I left a response on the uploads help page that I would like you to a look at if you could. :) --Dom497 (talk) 13:36, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AnonMoos

There is not much point in indenting to speak with me at ANU, as there was very damaging-to-the-project discussion here where, well, a cat can understand it really, too many trolls spoil the broth. So there are trigger happy tools with tools who itch to click the block button with their tool.

So I don't feel the overwhelming need to do what I am always good at, which is opening dialogue with difficult to talk to people and bringing them into the community. I guess we can all look forward to the replacement of wikipedia with something that actually works properly, the 'new editor' figures literally halved in about the last 5 years.

If you personally want my help with someone or something, feel free to use my talkpage, many people prefer that to the drama boards. (sorry for the adult/coarse concepts on your tp) Penyulap ☏ 15:28, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Knot theory. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

File:Gevlochten Iers kruis Irish cross.svg

Dear AnonMoos, I think you're right. I admire always your perfect (technical) drawings. I admit that I was not overly perfect. When the line-width is different, then the resulting slight 3D effect. If you mean this with "superficial appearance". I see now that the cross should not touch the escutcheon. I had seen that you yourself involve already more in Heraldry (with Sarang). It is really a kind of beautiful science. Unfortunately I have no experience with scripting drawing, but I could imagine it very interesting. I want to also use your French coat of arms shape templates.Perhelion (talk) ℗ 21:28, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that looks fine and yes I mean this shields. Inkscape has direct not such function. But standard extensions with /Render/Functionsplotter But I only changed the stroke-width of the clone wich has the same result!?-- Perhelion (talk) 15:50, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'see you on going improving to perfection. Let say I'm wondering that you use a not perfect round shield. Here I've added some of your stuff (but I mean you 've seen it). Best regards-- Perhelion (talk) 14:12, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the work, yes, it looks fine. Under "/Neuzeichnen" are few of information from real heraldists and references flowed in. (I build continiue the page, for half a year.) -- Perhelion (talk) 10:49, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lua-logo-nolabel.svg

File:Lua-logo-nolabel.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

–⁠moogsi (blah) 11:54, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Second Most Prevalent Languages in the United States.jpg

File:Second Most Prevalent Languages in the United States.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

F. F. Fjodor (talk) 17:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Proposed coat of arms of the Free Syrian Republic.png

File:Proposed coat of arms of the Free Syrian Republic.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

GhiathArodaki (talk) 15:25, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Where are you from ?GhiathArodaki (talk) 09:03, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Respond

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems

i responed to you

and stop saying i'm an assad swupporter , because i'm not, and there are no images here i opposed because it's anti-assad regime , i don't care if there is an insult to assad regime.GhiathArodaki (talk) 13:07, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yiddish flag

I vectorized your file as using vectormagic.com. Are you contented with its quality or should someone recreate it (mainly circles)? And what about its name? I want to avoid this template, but IMHO this flag is not fictious. Will it be adopted by some Yiddish organization? Hosmich (talk) 14:03, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

blason vide

Bonjour, excusez moi de vous déranger, j'ai remarqué que vous parlez un peu Français pourriez vous s'il vous plait réaliser deux blasons vides (empty shields).

File:Roi de suède.PNGwhat interests me is the the form of the two shields

voici deux blasons pourriez faire les deux blason vides juste le cadre la croix et l'ovale au milieu avec la couleur or pour la croix et les contours s'il vous plait.

Sincerely, good day to you -- 08:12, 14 June 2013‎ User:Dunkerqueenflandre

Hello, if this is not possible called me please

cordially good Sunday to you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 07:56, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is that what you wanted to see? --Maxxl2 - talk 14:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SVG

How can i make a SVG file ? GhiathArodaki (talk) 09:17, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks :)GhiathArodaki (talk) 10:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Denominations

I saw your reply on village pump. Do you think its a good idea to make a new map titled "Islamic denominations"? If so, could you help me in this task? Thank you. Pass a Method (talk) 16:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

request

I have no idea if this is the correct place to put this, but I was hoping to enlist your help for a personal project that involves the BDSM "triskelion" symbol (the one licensed for Free Use) and the "Love Outside The Box" symbol. I saw that you made edits to both images so I figure you would be familiar with them. If it wouldn't be too much hassle, would you help me combine the two? I'll check back on this page periodically for a response. I hope this is the correct place, I'm just not sure how else to contact you. -- 05:01, 21 June 2013‎ 88.3.74.17

I could probably do something, but would need a more specific and concrete explanation of what you have in mind... AnonMoos (talk) 08:38, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:ESCUDO SAN JUAN DE LA RAMBLA.svg

File:ESCUDO SAN JUAN DE LA RAMBLA.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 14:12, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image had been taken from the municipality's official website where there's no free license. But in the ,meantime I've prepared a free version that I'm goin to upload right now. De728631 (talk) 16:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, the original uploader was JonayID who also happens to be the author, but didn't license it here nor at his website. You had left him a message in 2012 about that [1]. The deletion tag above was sent to you because you uploaded a modified version of the file. Anyhow, I've left JonayID a note and pointed him at OTRS should he decide to reupload his file over here. De728631 (talk) 16:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Trouble with Inkscape

Hello, you helped me last time so I'm asking again :-) was working with File:Entitats sintàctiques.svg but the black rectangles appeared after adding the text with Inkscape. Last time you told me you edited the SVG text. Can you tell me exactly how to fix it? What should I remove? I'd like to know it for future cases. Thank you!--Arnaugir (talk) 11:16, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ling 001 jpg.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ling 001 jpg.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 20:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Somali navy.PNG

File:Flag of Somali navy.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fry1989 ^eh? 02:55, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Latuff

what was the thing about curls ? actually, as soon as I think to ask I think to google ;) silly me. Penyulap ☏ 03:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion of File:Venn diagram gr la ru.svg

Please do not revert changes just because they are changes. I made the change because it is an improvement to the file. Do not discourage editors from making improvements. — Timwi (talk) 15:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove edited version

Dear AnonMoos,

Can you please remove your edited version of http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Jacket_and_shawl_in_chintz,_skirt_in_glazed_printed_cotton,_1770-1800._MoMu_-_Fashion_Museum_Province_of_Antwerp,_www.momu.be._Photo_by_Hugo_Maertens,_Bruges..jpg

You may be assured that the photographer and the museum's curators have represented this costume in the most professional and accurate way in its best relation to its surroundings. --

Thank you. -- 16:12, 10 July 2013‎ User:MoMu - Fashion Museum

Give this to Acroterion

No explanations. Give this to a user called https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Acroterion&action=history and give him these words: long-term abuse, lengthening term after several 1-month blocks. (you are wrong, I am back!)

Also, give it to this guy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Shearonink -- 18:08, 12 July 2013‎ 92.15.141.139

I am not an admin, so I can't meaningfully threaten anybody, and I'm not sure how I'm involved in any of this... AnonMoos (talk) 06:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this guy has caused vandalism on the wiki, so report this to Acroterion.

92 user

Actually, that guy has caused vandalism on the wiki, so report this to Acroterion. -- 21:59, 13 August 2013‎ 92.15.132.75

I really don't understand how I'm involved in this, or what authority I have to do anything if I were... AnonMoos (talk)

Pan_flag.png description reuse

Hello, AnonMoos. I'm currently doing an SVG version of the Pansexual Flag, and I would like to know if I can take the description you have written for the PNG version, put it on the SVG version's page, and translate it into French. Have a good evening! KiwiNeko14 (talk) 17:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

librsvg error?

Hi, do you have any idea why some sizes, like the thumbnail, of Sq3 bluewhitegreen.svg are shown without the black strokes? I could not find any reason. sarang♥사랑 09:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sarang and AnonMoos (if I can answer), this bug is fixed!? Bugzilla:31122 So it must be a cache issue. Greetings -- Perhelion (talk) 19:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages at De728631's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

SVG Barnstar: 6 August 2013

	The SVG Barnstar
	Thanks for fixing the SVG DHS seal and creating an SVG DHS flag! Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 04:45, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hello, thanks for fix File:Asteroid Belt ca.svg!!--Manlleus (talk) 13:04, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the new USSR (2).svg

File:Flag of the new USSR (2).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Suvadive.jpg

File:Flag of Suvadive.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fry1989 ^eh? 20:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello,

Can you please also delete this file?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%E1%83%A4%E1%83%98%E1%83%A0%E1%83%AA%E1%83%AE%E1%83%90%E1%83%9A%E1%83%90%E1%83%98%E1%83%A8%E1%83%95%E1%83%98%E1%83%9A%E1%83%98.png

--GeorgianJorjadze (talk) 11:22, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Use of File:Flag-map of Syria (1932-1958, 1961-1963).svg

Hi there, I would like to use the above mentioned file for a headline box on my own website. Might I use this, and, if so, how should I attribute it to you? -- 18:33, 19 August 2013‎ User:Dlayman12

Copyright status: File:TelAvivEmblem.svg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:TelAvivEmblem.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Ju Ta 20:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marriage Equality Sign.JPG

File:Marriage Equality Sign.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

-- Tuválkin ✉ 20:34, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

My two SVG uploads got messed up, thank you for fixing them! In the end the original files were still deleted, so I re-uploaded a correct version. Everything back to normal now :) (phew) AlienSpoon (talk) 21:36, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Huyme

They have done it again with both File:Hoa Hao flag.svg and File:Flag of South Vietnam.svg. That coupled with the questionable and possibly copyrighted photos they've been uploading, I would fully support you in a request for sanctions. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:First Flag of Argentina.svg.png

File:First Flag of Argentina.svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fry1989 ^eh? 20:06, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roundel of Imperial Ethiopian Air Force (1946-74).svg

Hello, could you explain the change? Sincerely, --Kwasura (talk) 21:03, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't you see that you changed my image to totally different? I created the image to correct previously existed and supported it with the photo of the actual Ethiopian aircraft. What photo do you have to support your change? --Kwasura (talk) 16:56, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- My bad, bro. I was seeing the old version all the time... Thank you for pointing me to in. --Kwasura (talk) 18:19, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for uploading "Chaplin West Virginia 1938.jpg", and for answering my question on the help board. When I upload photos from Flickr, I use the [2] tool and it picks up all the info. As you said, there doesn't seem to be a similar tool for Library of Congress. But when I see many photos in the commons that are from the Library of Congress, they have their own unique template (which I also found). What I was looking for was a tool to fill in all the details. Thanks for you help. Cheers. Richard apple (talk) 03:05, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coats of arms of Slovak bishops

Please see Category talk:Coats of arms of bishops from Slovakia. Hosmich (talk) 14:19, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Weltbund Logo.jpg

File:Weltbund Logo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:47, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! If you could find some time, I'd really like your input on this DR! Thanks! :) --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 01:49, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

upload question

Hello -

Thanks for being a guardian angel when I made my first GLAM uploads last year. I'll be uploading a few images as part of today's Edit-a-thon, and it occurs to me that this GLAM institution has no source website for their historic images. Rather, the images were scanned onto the volunteer-curator's personal laptop.

How do I license these images (fewer than 10 today)? {{Own}}? Yes, they will be pre-1923 and published. We were hoping to create a Commons project in the near future - is that advisable without an institutional website? We could create a website fairly quickly =/ but for sure uploading to Commons will get the images more play sooner than any boring ol'archival website. Thanks, Bdcousineau (talk) 12:28, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infant Skull.jpg

File:Infant Skull.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tekksavvy (talk) 22:58, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human Flag of Vietnam.svg

File:Human Flag of Vietnam.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gaconnhanhnhen (talk) 05:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SWEDEN

Hello, sorry to bother you, I just saw that you change the margins of the Swedish coat of arms that I asked Leonid 2

Could you do me a favor please, because I think it n 'is not well understood (my english is basic) I asked him to put the vases on the crown of the same color as the coat of arms and the crown on the blue cap. Like that

It is a forgotten painter who make the table that often I can give two examples

File:Armoiries d'Eugène de Suède.jpgFile:Armoiries du Prince Guillaume de Suède.jpg

For the second shield (Estelle Sweden) is the same.

could you please make the change and make the second coat of arms, it is only to change Part 3

Thank you in advance for your help cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ok thanck you--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ausflag - Proposed flag for sport events.svg

And also:

Yours sincerely, LGA _talk^edits 03:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Celtic-knot-insquare.svg

File:Celtic-knot-insquare.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

67.10.65.78 22:51, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of mali empire.png

File:Flag of mali empire.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 12:41, 16 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SVG画像ありがとうございます

Mtiです。こんにちは。この度は日本のsvg画像にご協力していただいて有難うございます。--Mti (talk) 11:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of mali empire.png

File:Flag of mali empire.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 17:27, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blason-Famille-de-Méjanès.png

File:Blason-Famille-de-Méjanès.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

McZusatz (talk) 21:17, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:58, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages at Skiper's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Second answer. --Skiper (talk) 20:29, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serapis Flag.svg

Greetings and salutations, my good sire. I come to the court of the most exalted and gracious AnonMoos on this blessed day to bring you good tidings that hath require the utmost of urgencies. Through the course of the standard events of normalcy, it hath come to the attention of yours truly that when you hath simplify'd the scalable vector graphics file File:Serapis Flag.svg on the thirty-ninth minute of the eighth hour of the twentieth day of the month of March, in the year of our Lord twenty hundred and thirteen, you inadvertently removed one of the stripes, causing a transparency layer to be formed where there shant be one. I thought it was of my duty as a Wikimedian-Commoner of equal standing, to bring this to thy attention. Now, I must regret that I must bid you adieu. I trust and hope that our brief communiqué has been informative and one of sincerity. Yours truly, Illegitimate Barrister, signed this, the eighteenth day of the month of December, in the year of our Lord twenty hundred and thirteen. Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 23:28, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: Looks like the SVG is fixed now, thanks! Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 06:15, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jean Agélou , JA SERIE 52

Hi, I am researching for a publication and need a high resolution version of this image. I wondered if you could give any information about the source of the file, or where I could find an original. Thanks! -- 18:52, 19 December 2013‎ User:Coanika12

SVG code

Hi AnonMoos
You just edited Flag of Sikkim (1967-1975).svg and as I haven't been active here very long I would like to learn more about how to optimize the code for a svg-file which you seem to do very well.
Is there any source or other ways you could help me to get better in doing this, thanks? --Goran tek-en (talk) 10:20, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback 12-28-2013

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages on another wiki at Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Help_with_SVGs_that_won.27t_open_in_Inkscape_0.48.4. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 16:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zabajacek.svg

File:Zabajacek.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 13:28, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Münchner_abkommen5+.svg

There is a problem with the numbering on the map for the "Münchner Abkommen". I left a comment on the talk page File_talk:Münchner_abkommen5+.svg, as you wanted to know what the problem is. Tony Mach (talk) 13:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

SVG Help

Hi! I was wondering if you could help me. I'm trying to make the Iraqi flag appear in the shape of Iraq in this file. When opened in Inkscape the file looks like it should, but when uploaded to wikicommons the map of Iraq appears black, instead of looking like the flag. I know that you managed to get this effect to work on files such as this, and I was just wondering if you knew what I might be doing wrong? Many thanks! MrPenguin20 (talk) 02:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's fantastic. Thanks a lot! MrPenguin20 (talk) 12:47, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Illustrator svg

Hi There is this file India physical map.svg which I need for a request but I can't open it in Inkscape. When I look at it in a text editor I can see it's from Illustrator. Can you do your magic with the code so I can work on it, thanks. --Goran tek-en (talk) 19:58, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback 2014-01-14

	Hello, AnonMoos. You have new messages on another wiki at Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Help_with_SVGs_that_won.27t_open_in_Inkscape_0.48.4. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 16:23, 14 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Infant Skull.jpg

File:Infant Skull.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Tekksavvy (talk) 07:58, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Someone is wrong on the internet.

Yawn :(: mate2code 18:29, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adobe cruft removal

Greetings and salutations, Sir Lord AnonMoos! Could you please be of removings of Adobe Illustrator cruft from this SVG? It would be of very much appreciations. Thanks! --Illegitimate Barrister 02:46, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Arms of Bruno Contreras Valenzuela.svg

File:Arms of Bruno Contreras Valenzuela.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

195.220.213.10 12:38, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag-map of Kingdom of Libya svg.png

File:Flag-map of Kingdom of Libya svg.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Fry1989 ^eh? 21:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

... Why did you revert my edit?

In your Revision of File:JA52-French-postcard.jpg, you say "adding template in that way creates a problem". What way? What problem? —SamB (talk) 04:48, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Flag of Tanashi Tokyo.gif

Yours sincerely, Mahir256 (talk) 20:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Titi.mto (talk) 23:35, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Inkscape flowtext in episcopal coat of arms

I collect CoAs of Slovak bishops at my Slovak user page. Some files I uploaded, some I created or modified in Inkscape. I use no other SVG editor. I remember you removed "inkscape flowtext" nonsense in this file. Could you make it here too? I forgot how to do it. Eventually write instructions at my user talk or recommend me better editor. Thanks. Hosmich (talk) 11:50, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I used this to remove flowtext. But I'd appreciate some "preview" mode while uploading, similar as in Wikipedia. How to do it? Hosmich (talk) 11:56, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Flag-Edmonds.png

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ हिन्दी ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Flag-Edmonds.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Flag of China (R41 proposal).svg

File:New Flag of China (R41 proposal).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Mercurywoodrose (talk) 16:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

unDR

This unDR may interest you. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:36, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Haiti 1791.png

File:Flag of Haiti 1791.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Antemister (talk) 13:24, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gabriela arrependida II.jpg

File:Gabriela arrependida II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Gunnex (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Azerbaijan Democratic Republic 1918-1920 (variant).svg

Can you please assist me with this? This user is under the impression that Commons has the same "original research" and "reliable sources" policies as Wikipedia and nobody else is willing to tell them otherwise. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:49, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Expression

Hi, may I ask you to help with English? In Created with Inkscape-hand-addition-BOTrequ1 I am preparing some bot work, and I am not at all happy with the sentence there. Sure you will find a much better word. Thank you sarang♥사랑 07:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Anne Jeffreys

I think they're both from 1954, and Topper. Had to go with the 1958 "received" or "used" stamp on the one labeled 1958 as there's no year given on the release. I'm going to change the file's name as I see there's a typo in her name--will change it to Anne Jeffreys Topper. We hope (talk) 04:15, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhutan roundel.png

File:Bhutan roundel.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Alkari (?), 5 April 2014, 23:55 UTC 23:55, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

English

Hi, another question. You can see e.g. at Ecu-proportions.svg that I used for the invalid error number "due to" because it is short, and not the IMHO correct form "on behalf of" or "because of". Because I do not trust my feelings for English I ask you, whether we can live with it or need to change it against a better style. sarang♥사랑 09:57, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alberta-flagmap.svg

File:Alberta-flagmap.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Themightyquill (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Russia is false it needs to be restored to the original

i tried to talk about on the talkpage but evrytime i try to make them do the right thing nothing happens so can you please restore the original version of the file per Commons:Overwriting existing files, i have the also following sources: see official server of russia http://xn--h1alffa9f.xn--p1ai/main/symbols/gsrf3_2.html http://news.kremlin.ru/media/events/photos/medium/41d2904109f3781c14d6.jpg

from kremlin http://news.kremlin.ru/media/events/photos/medium/41d2904109f3781c14d6.jpg

from kremlin http://news.kremlin.ru/media/events/photos/medium/41d290410ca3621bd47e.jpg 95.199.0.181 22:26, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

- Any photo does not convey the original color correctly. See kremlin.ru source - http://flag.kremlin.ru/flag/
  - see http://flag.kremlin.ru/ looks like the original which should be so per file per Commons:Overwriting existing files -- 19:14, 18 April 2014 95.199.222.42

If you mean File talk:Flag of Russia.svg / File:Flag of Russia.svg, then I'm not involved with that in any way, and I don't have admin privileges... AnonMoos (talk) 21:07, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sweden road sign G1.svg

Do you know how this file is encoded? I can't open it in inkscape but wish to use the crown. Fry1989 ^eh? 01:11, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Fry1989 ^eh? 01:52, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Тризуб.png

File:Тризуб.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Perhelion (talk) 19:17, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

morphology (d:Q38311) and morphology (d:Q183252)

Thanks for Category:Morphology (anatomy)! Category:Morphology needs some explanations. It makes sense to me to have Category:Morphology (linguistics). See [3] for the "Wikimedia disambiguation page" Morphology (d:Q178224). Regards gangLeri ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 20:58, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

complaint

Hello how are you? I have a complaint relating to the user:Ich Pilot or user:B88 and his Sock puppetry (user:B88, user:Khny ,user:Zwanzig 20) he mad many of new uploads, which are not based on sources or in which the selection of sources, I asked him (user:Ich Pilot) to debate before doing any change, and I brought a variety of sources in order to debate, but he refuses to debate and even attack me.

Here is example for one of his personal attacks directed for me:by user:B88 attack my personal page and putting pictures calling me fascists and another picture as: If Jesus came kill him again! even he went to en and arwiki using low level of word, using low level of word in my Arabic page which called me a Christians Monkey!!! here you can also see some of his assaults on multiple articles as here, and here.

I open a discussion in these files: File:Christian Majority Countries-ar.png, File:Catholic Majority Countries.PNG and asking about the sources that he made, but user:B88 just keeping attacks and he never discuss. and he still create different accounts (user:B88, user:Khny ,user:Zwanzig 20) to uploads the same files without discussion the sources of his new file

user:Ich Pilot, user:Ich Pilot (create these accounts: (user:B88, user:Khny ,user:Zwanzig 20), which are his Sock puppetry because They have the same orientation, the same language in attacking, and more importantly, the same contributions ) had made many of new Contributions, which are not based on sources or selecting the sources that are compatible with his couches, I asked him (user:Ich Pilot) to discussed before making any changes to find a common solution (especially that there are many different Statistics which gives different data in the files you can see in the file Discussion page), and I brought a variety of sources in order to debate, and I asked him to debate before doing any modification until we get to the result of inappropriate but he refuses to debate and even attack me, I'll be grateful if you can stop that harassment, and I added here Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Ich Pilot but no respond and user:B88 or user:Ich Pilot still doing Personal attack.

A note when I was new here every time I uploaded a picture and I log out I forget the password so that why when I upload the next file I do it in anther account. after that when user:martin H. explain to me the rules and explain to me to make this this account user:jobas I never did anther account and you can check even if you want, and after user:Martin H. help how the project work here and I reared the rules an after he warned me in 20 December 2012 I had only one account and never did new account, and all these accounts have nothing to do with my last uploads, so the previous accounts have noting to do with this problem as User:B88 claims you can also chick these file and see I only upload with this account. so have a nice day :D--Jobas (talk) 16:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for responding, I appreciate it.--Jobas (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

William-Adolphe Bouguereau (1825-1905) - Nymphs and Satyr (1873).jpg

Sorry, my mistake. Now it should be OK.--Carnby (talk) 12:25, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tobramycin vector.svg

File:Tobramycin vector.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 09:27, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

flag of sweden colours (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Sweden.svg)

hi, an admin wanted me to ask someone who has exprience with flags approve the an change of the flag change please notify the admin at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Steinsplitter#flag_of_sweden_colours_.28https:.2F.2Fcommons.wikimedia.org.2Fwiki.2FFile:Flag_of_Sweden.svg.29, the change is to change the colours as per http://riksarkivet.se/sveriges-flagga and also per earlier consensus Enbionycaar (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of Arms of the Republic of Verendium.png

File:Coat of Arms of the Republic of Verendium.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Lemmens, Tom (talk) 11:07, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

85.73.154.150 14:56, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Erotic postcard J.Mandel.jpg

Those numbers and letters ("J.Mandel 104" etc. etc.) were on the physical postcards as originally printed, and are essential to verifying the original author (and thus copyright status), and for grouping related images together, among other uses. There have been discussions before, and the basic consensus is to leave the series IDs in place on images of old French postcards... AnonMoos (talk) 03:28, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for these informations - I work now on Category:Images with borders - I think it is the same things for all old postcards ?, and I must to leave the mention (for exemple, File:280._Hardanger,_Parti_af_Folgefonnen_fra_Lofthus_-_NB_bldsa_AL0280.jpg) 280. Hardanger, Parti af Folgefonnen fra Lofthus and Axel Lindahl - Would you confirmed me this - Thanks ---Lomita (talk) 16:32, 28 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Flag of Zanzibar (January-April 1964)

dear AnonMoos, 26th March you adjusted the flag by removing a "mysterious" white stripe. Maybe your "mystery" can be cleared away by checking Flags of the World, Tanzania, Zanzibar, People's Republic of Zanzibar flag - variant. Or Wikipedia Flag of Zanzibar-site under Historical Flags: qte On 29 January, the flag was changed to a blue-black-green tricolour with a thin white stripe at the hoist.[1] This design, which was based on the flag of the Afro-Shirazi Party, was the longest-lived of the post-independence flags and eventually formed the basis for the current flag. unqte Please consider to undo your adjustment Regards / JanJC JanJC (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:La Syrie rayonnante.svg

File:La Syrie rayonnante.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

178.61.44.82 20:56, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Template:Idw/layout 46.198.115.12 23:48, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khatchkar in Tallinn nearby Jaani-Seegi kirik.Jpeg

Template:Idw/layout Pildirüüstaja (talk) 15:53, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of the Communist United States.svg

You're probably right, but I didn't want to alter the original design too much. Probably a red/yellow border around the white hammers, sickles and stars would add a more commie look. What do you think about?--Carnby (talk) 14:16, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conduct in File talk:Microsoft logo.svg

I put forth a question to you in File talk:Microsoft logo.svg. I advise you to answer it carefully and honestly, because so far, three people (myself) are against you, and your attitude won't help if any of the three report your conduct. Fleet Command (talk) 14:21, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If it wasn't then you should have used a level 1 indentation, depending whether it was a response to CL or an independent addition. HR is used to reset the discussion and is not warranted. But I don't insist much on trifles. There is more important things to discuss. Fleet Command (talk) 01:16, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Help with uploading

Hi, Im having trouble with my commons account. I wanted to upload this image of Carmine Galante here. Can you help me upload the image. The picture is a New York Daily News front cover (I don't known if it can be uploaded but found this as an example I found here.

Thank you for your help. --Vic49 (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Emblem manzhouguo2.svg

#invoke:Autotranslate 188.174.180.227 11:31, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal

You are invited to comment on my proposal, should you be interested. Fry1989 ^eh? 02:25, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category: ... in heraldry

Hi - as you have reverted File:Cross-Flory-Heraldry.svg I would like you to read the attention notice at Category:Crosses in heraldry which says: In this context, as for all the other subcategories of Category:Heraldic figures, … in heraldry means … in shield, not … in crest. This image doesn't show a shield or crest, it is just a heraldic element. -- Maxxl² - talk 11:34, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ÖBB Logo Pflatsch.svg

Template:Autotranslate FDMS 4 19:48, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Clipart

Hi, I'm trying to reach you to get the clipart you made on Wikimedia and then Openclipart attached to your Openclipart account. Can you email me at jon@rejon.org or love@openclipart.org? Thanks! Jon Phillips ([[User talk:Jon Phillips|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:28, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

To good use

TY m8. [4]. The images are excellent. Gregkaye ([[User talk:Gregkaye|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:40, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:My Coat of arms of Belarus.svg

Template:Autotranslate 37.192.250.101 10:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Middleton arms

It was brought up as a copyvio before, you stated heraldry is somehow exempt. The guy who vectorized the image, Sodacan, even stated that he "Unilaterally uploaded another version, with more obvious differences, no longer based on a copyrightable work." He stated this image was vectorized from a "copyrightable work", and that in response to the original request for deletion he created a separate and unique version for your website. It's a copyvio.

The nonheraldic border isn't in the blazon. It's seen in the original painting, and seen in this copy.
The pinhole is not in the blazon. It is also found as artistic license in the original painting and found in the copy.
The nonheraldic border around the pinhole. In the original, here in the copy.
The lozenge is an unusual shape, an oval like thing with eight points. From the original, found in the copy.
The bow is not in the blazon. It's in the original, and in the copy. Hell, the bow is traced even.

There is another version done for this website that isn't a copyvio. Use that one.

Oh, and there are no legalities that allow someone to violate a copyright just because it's heraldic in nature, copyright laws make no special provisions for a coat of arms. Even if there was, it doesn't matter, the servers of this website are hosted in Florida and thus subject to Florida and United States law. In America, this is a copyright violation. -- 16:42, 6 September 2014 50.82.40.97

Thanx+furthers

Hi Sir. Thank you for your help. Your explain in Village Pump was good. I tried fix the problem, but I cant because I'm not a professional. So, A am here to request you contribute with me to upload other svg maps.

I want upload 10 svg maps of Iran-Iraq War, but I need you to get the goal. You Uploaded first map. If you agree, I send you 9 maps in near future to fixing and uploading.

Do you accept my request?

best regards.SaMin SAmIN ([[User talk:SaMin SAmIN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I'm waiting for your answer. what's your decision about my offer? thanx.SaMin SAmIN ([[User talk:SaMin SAmIN|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:33, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Original artwork issue

Your uploads are fabulous examples of original art, by an otherwise "nonnotable" artist (i assume you are not a famous designer), that bring solid value to this project. so please understand, my passion on this one uploaders crude images is based on my desire to get rid of poorly done work by nonnotable artists, as we are not a webhosting service. I am not trying to annoy admins. if that were true, i would be haranguing admins for all of my CFD's i have listed that have gone nowhere:) I am ok with my deletion requests being kept, i just want to know the basis for that keep. none has been presented, aside from the "in use" argument, which i am sorry to say i missed the files usage, and which i apologize for.Mercurywoodrose ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:06, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but what about the merits of my arguments. none of them were ever addressed. I dont understand why process in this case should take priority over the arguments themselves. do YOU think this file should be kept? and if so, why? and i do see that a lot of your artwork is cleaning up historic images, which i recognize some of. again, then, why are you so interested in defending this file, which is the exact opposite of what you do so well? If being an admin was all about making sure all processes are followed precisely (which are all just conventions, not binding policy like at a corporation), then why would anyone want that "job"?Mercurywoodrose ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:20, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About the Teutonic Cross

Good day to you. I have recently uploaded a version of the Template:F, that I removed the white edge to improve the look of the image after its bordered. I cannot understand why you removed it. Pktlaurence ([[User talk:Pktlaurence|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see your second and third reason being strong and valid, and therefore I apologise for my image editing techniques. However I consider that the long history of the file does not make a valid reason for not to reupload a new image. My reupload is absolutely necessary as the margin would be very obvious while I am using the file as a bordered icon, and the necessity exists no matter how long the file exists. Still, thank you for your advice and I will do my best to ensure the pixels are at 540x540 and the file size as small as possible. Thank you for your notice. Pktlaurence ([[User talk:Pktlaurence|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:41, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, I am doing my comments right if my comments fits the format of talk page messages, and it is your very own responsibility to edit if you want to put my message at a different sequence in your user talk page. After that, you still have not explained why my second upload is problematic, and thus you are not qualified to remove my uploads. You are not a administrator, not even a rollbacker or page inspector, but just another ordinary Wikimedia user like me, so stop talking as if you are an administrator. Are you threatening me? I can't feel any needs to be scared. According to the official Wikipedia policies, editing wars are not vandalism as both sides have got decent reasons, so they can have the dispute to be settled down by an administrator and obeying to their final decisions. Pktlaurence ([[User talk:Pktlaurence|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:21, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcastically, while you are accusing me of editing your messages on my talk page, you are removing my last message at the same time. Apart from this line, you are also 'skirting unnecessarily close' to the line of violating others' personal privacy, as what I am telling Steve is completely none of your business, unless you knows Steve personally and he tells you about this. If you would like to know the reason anyway, the lines depends on the person, 'DUDE'. As I have recently noticed, you may be an autopatroller or something, but it still does not change your arrogant and threatening attitude. I found being humble as a decent virtue, but it is exactly the case like in the famous quote of Thomas Mann, 'Tolerance becomes a crime when it's applied to evil.' Besides, I have taken a look into the com:overwrite page you have given, that it says 'minor cropping' would be allowed to replace but 'radical cropping' would not. I would be very disappointed to your sense of judgement if you consider a blank margin of 60 pixels 'radical'. I admit the image size may be problematic, but is not focusing on the difference of one to two pixels too petty? Maybe you are an autopatroller, may be I am just an ignorant new user but I am willing to read and learn, but it seems that you are too arrogant to do so. Pktlaurence ([[User talk:Pktlaurence|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:59, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another thing

Thank you for your Template:Ut. How to code SVG drawings can be discussed over and over, from very different POVs. Of course it is interesting for me to see the contradictionary layers of opinions.
Yet another thing: It is always in question whether a new version should be uploaded or not. I tried to discuss it Template:Ut, as good as I am able to express my thoughts in English. How about starting a new community discussion about that topic? May be of general interest, again with many different POVs... Regards -- sarang♥사랑 07:56, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate--Jayarathina ([[User talk:Jayarathina|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of alternative israel.jpg

Did you read the article Bahá'í symbols? The Bahai religion also uses a five-pointed star. --Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod ([[User talk:Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:58, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cervix dilation sequence.svg

Template:Autotranslate Snowmanradio ([[User talk:Snowmanradio|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 08:31, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Radium cosmetics

I ran into the ad while looking for something else. It's interesting because at the time, there was no thought about radioactive substances being able to harm you. Marie Curie, who eventually died from the effects of radium, carried it in her pocket many times. Many women were employed at various watch and clock companies to paint radium on the hands and numbers of watches and clocks so they could be seen in the dark. en:Radium Girls Had read about and seen photos of some of the women, who were told to wet the paint brush between their lips to make a fine point. Later, they were either dying or severely handicapped as a result of this "work".

If you take a look through old copies of the mail-order catalogs like Sears, you'll see things like arsenic wafers being sold to women to whiten their complexions. And people always talk about the "good old days". We hope ([[User talk:We hope|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:11, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My family knew someone who served in the army in WWI. In those days, the army not only issued you things like uniforms, they also gave the servicemen watches. The person said the numbers on the watches glowed so much at night, it made the men easy to spot in trenches. The army made the soldiers scrape the radium off the faces. We hope ([[User talk:We hope|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 03:38, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Morocco hexagram.svg

Template:Autotranslate 41.137.57.101 14:13, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:3-Butin-1-ol.svg

Template:Autotranslate Leyo 19:39, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

god god hape

A.houmrani ([[User talk:A.houmrani|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:03, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

EXIF data in PNG?

Hi, Seeing your edit here, do you know how to include EXIF data in PNG? I use Gimp, and it removes the EXIF data when saved in PNG format. Thanks in advance, Yann ([[User talk:Yann|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:37, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Madhhab_Map3.png

Since it is apparently okay by Peaceworld111 to add Ahmadiyya to this map which is a small, obscure and what is widely viewed as a heretic sect to a map about Islam, why not add more established sects such as Muwahhidism/Salafism (who form a majority in the Nejd region of Saudi Arabia), and nondenominational Muslims (who form a majority in Kazakhstan)? Salafism and Muwahhidism are sometimes lumped in with Sunnism, but in reality there is no consensus by the ulema on whether they are Sunni or not. Secondly Nondenominational Muslims form 74% of Kazakhstan. These two are arguably more important and widespread than Ahmadis who are almost universally regarded as non-Muslim. Why should movements accepted as Muslim be shunned but movements disregarded as nonmuslim be sided alongside Ibadis, Shias and Sunnis on Muslim maps? Doesn't make sense does it? Therefpre I would appeciate it if you could add to that map, or teach me how to do so. I appreciate your help. Thanks 92.25.95.249 23:31, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag-map of Syria (1932-1958, 1961-1963).svg

Template:Autotranslate 162.121.244.36 06:36, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tl

Hi, sure you have an opinion to Template talk:Vector version available#Improvements and can oppose or support something. sarang♥사랑 07:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:53, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Germany Hyperinflation.svg

I noticed that you converted this from UTF-16 to UTF-8, and I have been creating quite a few images using Unicode (UTF16), and was wondering if it would be better to use UTF-8? I have been working on a number of images with User:Kopiersperre and they have had trouble with the Unicode ones. I suggested they just convert them to UTF-8, but what editor should they use to do that, and would it be better if I did all of them in UTF-8 (or ANSI if only in English)? Thanks. Delphi234 ([[User talk:Delphi234|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:41, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sudanese Naval Ensign 1956-1970.png

Template:Autotranslate Fry1989 ^eh? 19:52, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Assistance

If I gave you the dimensions, would you be able to create an exact equilateral triangle with rounded corners for me? Fry1989 ^eh? 18:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful, thank you. These are the dimensions. As you can see each side has a length of 600 with each corner having a radius of 32. The inner white triangle is 28 in on each side of the red triangle, with each corner having a radius of 4. I appreciate this very much. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:18, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't hate me for this, but is there any way you can do both layers as paths and with the exact dimensions? The problem for me is that I'm working on the Philippine road signs, but the PDF just has the drawings in a grid like this, so in order for me to draw the symbols all the dimensions have to be the same as in the PDF. I really wish I could do it myself but with these angles and stuff I'm just not confident I could make the triangle properly. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:07, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem creating the grid and the symbols, but when I open your file in inkscape the length of each side of the red triangle is not 600 so it's not in the same proportion as the PDF drawings. What I was hoping for was for the red triangle to be a path, with the white triangle as a path on top of it, matching the proportions in my first link. This is how I do my stop signs, but as an octagon that's easier for me to do by myself. With the triangle and these rounded edges, I could maybe do it if I focus hard enough but it would be messy. Fry1989 ^eh? 02:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I suck at geometry. Thank you for explaining it to me. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foldere.svg

Template:Autotranslate

 ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 18:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foldere.svg

Template:Autotranslate ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 21:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Message-new.svg

Template:Autotranslate ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 21:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alexamenos

This just doesn't stand up. Surely you know that? The graffito is always discussed as a representation of Christ. Johnbod ([[User talk:Johnbod|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

inkscape

Hi AnonMoos,

I have been checking help pages and FAQ's on inkscape but I cannot find an answer to what might be a simple problem to fix, could you help me (and perhaps include it in the FAQ for inkscape)? I made a very simple image

langs

to demonstrate the meaning of the preposition langs in the Dutch wikibook. I generated it in inkscape, unflowed the text and saved it as plain svg, then uploaded here and to my dismay the head of the arrow is now pointing the wrong way. I wanted it to point left and that is also how it appears in inkscape. Any idea how to fix that?

Thanks Jcwf ([[User talk:Jcwf|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:12, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Jcwf ([[User talk:Jcwf|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:54, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prince William outline Woodbridge.svg

Template:Autotranslate Rcsprinter123 ([[User talk:Rcsprinter123|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File compression

Hi. Could you compress File:IPA chart 2005.png like you did in 2012? And how do you do that? Thanks Kwamikagami ([[User talk:Kwamikagami|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 00:40, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grandes Armas de Berra.svg

Template:Autotranslate Tom-L ([[User talk:Tom-L|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:08, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Earth Ocean Flag.png

Template:Autotranslate Keφr (keep talk here) 16:02, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CoAs as logos

Concerning what you said here, well, CoAs are a specific type of emblems, while logos are a general type of emblems — it could be said that logos are emblems in general sense and therefore that CoAs, badges, monograms, (most) flags, etc., are all also logos. And, of course, an emblem is a symbol that expresses identity. So, by moving a CoA from among so-and-so logos back to among so-and-so symbols, you reduced the usefulness and accuracy of that categorization. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:09, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would say that logos are a particular sub-class of emblems or symbols. Logos in the specific sense (commercial printing "logotypes" or brand symbols) only have a small overlap with traditional heraldry. AnonMoos ([[User talk:AnonMoos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:20, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

“Commercial logotypes”, even in its narrowest sense, overlap with coats-of-arms in such way that separating them is unproductive — unless a really detailed analysis is made and many subcategories are created: I’m not against that, but splitting logos and CoAs in two blocks just doesn’t work.

However, you insist on clumping «emblems or symbols», as if these were interchangeable. They are not: As I said above, «an emblem is a symbol that expresses identity» (therefore, symbols includes emblems which in turn include «CoAs, badges, monograms, (most) flags, etc.», but not, say, traffic signs). We seem to be using the term "logo" in Commons’ categories as a sloppy surogate for "emblem" (instead of using it for the much stricter commercial/corporate identity item you refer to). Maybe clean up work should be started by fixing that. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:03, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You say "Commercial logotypes, even in its narrowest sense, overlap with coats-of-arms in such way that separating them is unproductive" but unfortunately that's simply not true. Heraldry is its own domain, with its own terminology and rules (governing which things are seen as "same" and "different", among many other matters). Traditional European heraldry dates from centuries before printing, and the textual "blazon" is authoritative (many different artistic depictions could all equally correspond to a single textual blazon). By contrast, commercial logotypes are a product of metal printing technology, and have a fixed artistic depiction which does not obey rigid rules of blazoning etc. A few companies have coats of arms as parts of logos, but usually in a rather ugly form (showing that the commercial logo artists have little real understanding or concern for heraldic traditions). AnonMoos ([[User talk:AnonMoos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:27, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for teaching me about Heraldry. Maybe you should look my name up online and find out that maybe you're preaching the choir. I suggest you try to adress the points I actually raised and not what you hastilty are assuming I did. Then, we can talk. (If you insist on breaking this thread and go on to reply in my talk page instead, I'll know you're not interested in a meaningful discussion.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:45, 12 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arms of John Hall

Hello, I noticed you made a very attractive rendition of the arms of William Shakespeare. Would you be able to do those of his son-in-law, John Hall? There is an illustration here, but it is in black and white and of very poor quality. I'm not 100% sure about the tinctures of the Hall half, but Burke in his General Armory names several families by the name Hall who bore argent, three talbots' heads erased sable, so I would go with that. Zacwill16 ([[User talk:Zacwill16|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:51, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion

Obviously I've irritated you and I apologize for that. I honestly do not understand how your comments reflect and edits I have made, and am hoping this is just a misunderstanding. I was not trying to clarify any situation, I was not trying to intervene in anything; if that was your impression I apologize. I created an image (which was in no way a personal message to any editors, and in no way reflects any personal belief) and uploaded it. If I am misinterpreting any part of your response I apologize. Obviously you are under no obligation to respond to any part of this, but it really bothers me that I would act in any way that someone could interpret as POINTed and disruptive; again that was not the intention. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja (talk / en) 00:48, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sefer raziel segulot.png

Why does the thumbnail of your version look significantly different (lighter) than the thumbnail of the original file version? AnonMoos ([[User talk:AnonMoos|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:54, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a good question. I don't know why, but it appears to be an issue specific to the thumbnailer. If you look at both full-size images, you can see that they appear identical in the browser. I was worried for a bit that the compressors I was using might be discarding unused PNG chunks, but when I ran both images through pngcheck, you can see that both of them have the same gAMA and cHRM chunks (saying what the gamma and chromaticity of the image is), however the new image was converted to greyscale because the pixel data for the R,G,B channels was always identical.

File: old.png (348422 bytes)
  chunk IHDR at offset 0x0000c, length 13
    525 x 727 image, 24-bit RGB, non-interlaced
  chunk pHYs at offset 0x00025, length 9: 2835x2835 pixels/meter (72 dpi)
  chunk gAMA at offset 0x0003a, length 4: 0.45454
  chunk cHRM at offset 0x0004a, length 32
    White x = 0.31269 y = 0.32899,  Red x = 0.63999 y = 0.33001
    Green x = 0.3 y = 0.6,  Blue x = 0.15 y = 0.05999
  chunk IDAT at offset 0x00076, length 348284
    zlib: deflated, 32K window, maximum compression
  chunk IEND at offset 0x550fe, length 0
No errors detected in old.png (6 chunks, 69.6% compression).

File: new.png (157116 bytes)
  chunk IHDR at offset 0x0000c, length 13
    525 x 727 image, 8-bit grayscale, non-interlaced
  chunk pHYs at offset 0x00025, length 9: 2835x2835 pixels/meter (72 dpi)
  chunk gAMA at offset 0x0003a, length 4: 0.45454
  chunk cHRM at offset 0x0004a, length 32
    White x = 0.31269 y = 0.32899,  Red x = 0.63999 y = 0.33001
    Green x = 0.3 y = 0.6,  Blue x = 0.15 y = 0.05999
  chunk IDAT at offset 0x00076, length 156978
    zlib: deflated, 32K window, superfast compression
  chunk IEND at offset 0x265b4, length 0
No errors detected in new.png (6 chunks, 58.8% compression).

Is the new thumbnail causing a problem for you you? Cmdrjameson ([[User talk:Cmdrjameson|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:53, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Friendly request

Might you be able to construct this arrow for me? The curves are beyond my abilities. Fry1989 ^eh? 00:58, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that. I'm redoing File:New South Wales R5-400.svg, and there is this PDF from NSW Roads & Maritime. The main sign is 450 units by 225 units. There are a few other arrows from Australian and Philippine signs I gotta do in the future, I really should learn how to be able to make them with the curved ends myself, but I appreciate your assistance very much. Fry1989 ^eh? 00:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to bug you, but is the new source helpful? Fry1989 ^eh? 22:13, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see know what you're wanting. That page just doesn't have it, I'll try searching some of the other signs to see if they do. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:34, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

None of the diagrams with the rounded arrows have the measurement, which is annoying, so what I did was download the PDF, take out the arrow and try my best to measure it. You can do that as well by going here and scrolling down to the design plan. The PDFs are very low-quality, the arrow is in pieces, but my best measurement guess would be a horizontal width being 25.6 units with the 32 unit height. Fry1989 ^eh? 21:17, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I guess you've taken a look at the Philippine signs manual then? And yes it is annoying. The construction sheet for this sign has the height and width of the arrow you desire, but it is missing the radius for the arrow on the forward point. The construction sheet for the turn symbol on File:Australia road sign R2-6-RTA (R).svg also doesn't quite make sense either, some things from NSW are just off. I just do the best I can in those cases. Thanks for helping me though. Fry1989 ^eh? 03:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is terribly annoying. I'm trying to find other manuals with similar arrows, maybe a different Australian state or something (I can access SA, WA, NT and Vic as well), but not really much luck. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:23, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we should scratch that arrow, eh? I'll try and borrow a similar arrow from somewhere else. I do have another one though with all the measurements you would need. Can also create the give way sign too? I can make the rest of the sign, but I need those two parts. If you can make them according to the W3-2A measurements please? You can just upload them over File:Test.svg and I can attribute you on File:Australia W3-2.svg when I put them all together. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:54, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a heads up, you can forget the arrow. I was able to figure that one out. The Give Way sign though is still beyond my abilities, when you have spare time. No rush. Fry1989 ^eh? 02:51, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I uploaded it over File:Australia road sign W3-2.svg since the file already existed. It's up to you if you want File:Triangle and arrow for Yield Ahead sign.svg to stay or not, I see no harm in it staying and it may even be useful in the future. Fry1989 ^eh? 17:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:National flag of the Whoovians.svg

Template:Autotranslate Keφr (keep talk here) 06:39, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of New Caledonia.svg

Template:Autotranslate Tharkun ([[User talk:Tharkun|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:20, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUslim Flag of Greece.png

Template:Autotranslate Keφr (keep talk here) 13:47, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:New Macova.jpg

Template:Autotranslate Keφr (keep talk here) 18:14, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

one of your SVG files

15	10	3	6
4	5	16	9
14	11	2	7
1	8	13	12

15	10	6	3
4	5	9	16
1	8	12	13
14	11	7	2

SVG file

most-perfect
magic square

reversible variant

Hi! I just found a SVG file modified by you. I see that you are skilled in SVG. The only SVG files I made are shown at [5]. Please take a look at hole page https://test.wikipedia.org/wiki/Most-perfect_magic_square and see what can be used at different languages / pages.
I hope to be able to specify some animations relevant for patterns and transformations of one square to another
I am a bureaucrat at test. If you need admin rights there please let me know. Regards lɛʁi ʁɑjnhɑʁt (Leri Reinhart)
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 16:50, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: commons:Help desk#today this is a draft · how to improve the SVG file

Regards ‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 20:13, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Soviet Canuckistan Flag.PNG

Template:Autotranslate Keφr (keep talk here) 09:21, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nordic Resistance Movement

there is a new party in sweden (before it was a militant organisation) can you please make a svg flag from http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/images/s/se%7Dsr.gif and https://flagspot.net/flags/se%7Dnaz.html, so that i can use in the party infobox thanks Dannis243 ([[User talk:Dannis243|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:15, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

@User:AnonMoos

I want to excuse myself for my behavoir. I think that I took too much care about Commons. That's why I go on holiday indefinitely.

Yours sincerely,

--Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod ([[User talk:Hen- Nes- Quick red novA trod|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:44, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Finland Air force.svg

Template:Autotranslate 85.76.116.179 16:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Womens-love-vs-mens-love-joke.svg -- are you sure it is a "sign"?

I agree about the humor part (albeit somewhat tasteless humor), but what I was uncertain about is whether it qualified as a sign, rather than an icon or some other type of graphic. I won't revert, but I'd be curious about your thoughts on the issue. JesseW ([[User talk:JesseW|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:58, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Morocco hexagram.svg

Template:Autotranslate 105.154.125.8 15:36, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MUTCD W14-1-TR.svg

Would you have any suggestions on what I should rename this file? I'm not too sure but the current name is inappropriate. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:20, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I'm just trying to think of a name that doesn't suggest a level of officiality, since it is not a real road sign and just created for use in article dead end templates. The current name suggests it is real, as would "Turkish Dead End sign" or something like that. I'll think of something. Fry1989 ^eh? 16:22, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

I removed Template:Tl, Template:Tl or similar templates from the files whose authors who died less then 70 years ago. Now the files have no license and unless it is fixed will be deleted in a week. If you know of other reason why those files are in public domain please feel free to add a new license template and alert me and I will remove Template:Tl tag. If you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:18, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Dallas (old).svg

Template:Autotranslate Gamaliel ([[User talk:Gamaliel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hong Kong road sign 113.svg

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC) Jarekt ([[User talk:Jarekt|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:59, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument).svg

Last year you tagged File:Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument).svg with Template:Tl. I think it is pointless to convert this historical document into vector image. Rather I extracted the raster image and make it a PNG image. Please double check for me that I have filled out the details at File:Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument).png correctly. Also how shall we replace the SVG image by the PNG image? --Quest for Truth ([[User talk:Quest for Truth|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Finland Air force squadrons without squadron emblem.svg

Template:Autotranslate Stefan2 ([[User talk:Stefan2|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Categories for discussion/2015/11/Category:Images including source code in their description

Just an FYI. CFD was initially done wrong, so you didn't get a notice. - Jmabel ! talk 00:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:A map of the Arab World with flags.png

Template:Autotranslate Neymar1384 ([[User talk:Neymar1384|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:A map of the Arab World with flags.svg

Template:Autotranslate Neymar1384 ([[User talk:Neymar1384|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RE: File:TakingPolaroidInsideSupermanBriefs.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?diff=46260252

The narrow purpose description was added by WhisperToMe, not the uploader. --Michaeldsuarez ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:01, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jihad

Please do not use emotionally-laden religious/political words in Deletion Nominations. All users are to assume Good Faith, see COM:AGF and I personally feel your comments in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of North Mexicorea.JPG to BrightRaven were not particularly on topic, nor cogent to the discussion. Please reread all the sections on Deletion Nominations and COM:AGF. Perhaps consider that we are all people behind our computers, and treat others as you yourself would wish to be treated. This is not any form of a warning, merely that your use of "Template:W" is not used in any manner other than to create emotional loading. I believe you owe BrightRaven an apology. Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:09, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Authors of the Flag of NATO

Hi AnonMoos,

I removed the credits for the Flag of NATO because these credits do not belong to the present file. It belongs to the file that preceded it. This file was found by me and re-saved using Inkscape, because it did not appear using an web browser. The file to whom the credits

Vectorized by Mysid and uploaded to Flag of NATO.svg
Code cleaned up by Artem Karimov.

belong is this one: [6] and the current file is this: [7]

The source section is also different for this file, and I noted where I found the new vector graphics.

Thanks a lot, 475847394d347339 ([[User talk:475847394d347339|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:08, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:ISO 7010 E003 - First aid sign.svg

Yours sincerely, --Mdann52talk to me! 20:20, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to reply to this one

I forgot to reply to this one: Well, I am not sure either, as I am one of those «ignorant foreigners», using my rusty command of high school French to stress the point. The fact that I defend someone’s right to use their language of choice doens’t mean that I’m a speaker of that language. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:29, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:FatFetishFlag.png

Template:Autotranslate Kevin Seguin ([[User talk:TheCosmopolitan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:40, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Serbian Kosovo Cross.svg

Template:Autotranslate Zoupan ([[User talk:Zoupan|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:41, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Hello!!!! AnonMoos!!

Could you please help me with the Coat of Arms of Prince Harry of Wales weapons File:Coat of Arms of Henry of Wales.svg; I made a modification on it including the collar of the coat File:Royal Victorian Order in Heraldry.svg. However, the collar of the Royal Victorian Order does not remain visible in the coat, it seems to me to be wrong halgo, please help me.

- Thank you so much!!!! --Edward Mendes ^✉ 17:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

File:Cincosoles.jpg

Yours sincerely, Gunnex ([[User talk:Gunnex|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:02, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Frances Benjamin Johnston

I generally start uploading my restoration work at the point it's better than what's here. The border (a backing card) will get cropped as the restoration's LAST step. The old scan (a previous LoC scan of the image) is somewhat terrible - see the dark areas, for example - so I think that the benefits far outweigh a couple days of border. Adam Cuerden ([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Vicente de Alcántara.svg

Template:Autotranslate 176.10.65.7 19:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palestine-Mandate-Ensign-1927-1948.svg

Template:Autotranslate 94.38.217.80 13:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Need to Hire an Artist

I'm looking to hire artists to design vector coats of arms for coadb.com. I pay $1.75 USD per arms. That’s not much, but I purchase a huge +10,000 image clipart package (called Armorial Gold) for you to use, which makes the process much faster and easier. I currently have two artists who work for me, and they have earned several thousand dollars over the last 12 months. Please contact me coadb@mail.com if you are interested Template:Unsigned2