User talk:GhiathArodaki

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, GhiathArodaki!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:30, 15 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ispifoney Flag.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Abanima (talk) 19:55, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot delete anything on Commons. I nominated the file for deletion because you described it as a flag of an organization. You can draw a flag or a logo but this does not make it your own, and you cannot license it. The administrator who reviewed the file found the argument convincing. You may address the administrator who deleted the file and tell them your arguments. --Abanima (talk) 22:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:IsraeliSyriarevolution.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 20:02, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Greater Syria Map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 20:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploads

[edit]

Hi. In your uploads of File:SovietandSyriameeting.jpg, File:RussiaandSyriameeting.jpg, File:Meetingcyprusprisedint.jpg, and File:Unitedeconomicofarableague.jpg, you claim to be the author of these images. Are you intending to claim that you, personally, holding a camera in your hand at these historic events, took these photos at these historic events? If you scanned these photos in out of a book or captured them from a TV show or photographed them at a museum or some such thing, that does NOT make you the copyright holder of the photos. Commons has more restrictive licensing rules than Wikipedia and, though there may be a "fair use" reason to use these images on Wikipedia, Commons does not accept "fair use" images. --UserB (talk) 19:29, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The man in the picture is my grandfather,it was given to the family and then to me, So i'm the copyright holder.GhiathArodaki (talk) 20:14, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Is that the case for all four of these images? Can you edit the image description pages to say something to that effect - you are the heir of the photographer and the photos are in your personal collection. Thanks. Also, do you have access to a scanner? A couple of them have what looks like a reflection (I guess they are behind glass?). If you take them out from behind the glass and scan them in, you may get better results. --UserB (talk) 22:15, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I have no scan, but the description thing is done.GhiathArodaki (talk) 11:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If the man in the photograph is your grandfather, then how can he be the photographer? As this is an official diplomatic event it seems unlikely that he would be taking the photos himself with a tripod. Is it not the case that these are publicity photos released by the Syrian government, or press photos taken by journalists covering the event? —Psychonaut (talk) 17:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The taker of the photo gave the copyright to my grandfather.GhiathArodaki (talk) 11:17, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
OK, fair enough. Thanks for the confirmation. —Psychonaut (talk) 11:28, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your Welcome.GhiathArodaki (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]
bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:YABOOKCOVER.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 22:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Levant Flag Map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 23:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:21, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:MuftiHassoun.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Psychonaut (talk) 14:28, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"You found it on the internet" does not mean it is freely licensed sadly. --Herby talk thyme 15:49, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:YABOOKCOVER.gif has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Herby talk thyme 15:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no license statement for the book cover on the link you gave. Publishers will not usually freely license covers - please do not re-upload it. --Herby talk thyme 18:03, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The copyright of a book cover belongs to the publishers not to anyone else - you may own the book - you do not own the copyright. It has been deleted again and you are liable to be blocked if you re-upload it again. --Herby talk thyme 18:22, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked others to deal with the issue now having posted here. --Herby talk thyme 18:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:The photo of Hassoun Mufti of Syria.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:The photo of Hassoun Mufti of Syria.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you claim that it was released as PD? Where is the evidence for that? --Túrelio (talk) 15:51, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Source can be found there, you can go and read before DELETING.GhiathArodaki (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even read before writing? I asked for evidence that the image is "public domain" as you have claimed. If it is anywhere on the source, then state exactly where, as I didn't find anything. --Túrelio (talk) 16:01, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First, Don't be complex for a license, It is not Important, Then , The pictures are freely published , download don't download , it's the problem of the site, Every day people download many pictures then publish them, i'm using this to put it on the articles you see, Stop Being complex for a license.GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

O.k., I see. You simply do not understand anything about copyright and licensing. Well, no big problem, just stop uploading anything to Commons before you have thoroughly read Commons:Licensing and Commons:CB. The fact that something has been put on a website has absolutely no relevance for the copyright. It is not free because it has been put on a website. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

, Funny , I Understand Better than anyone , Stop Saying that every time, it's old, License is not important,And You can Read Every thing on the website.GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:16, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid if you use Commons for images you must be precise and correct about licensing. Those are the rules here. --Herby talk thyme 16:09, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:The photo of Hassoun Mufti of Syria.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  العربية  asturianu  azərbaycanca  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  Lëtzebuergesch  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  Bahasa Melayu  Malti  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  தமிழ்  тоҷикӣ  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

Herby talk thyme 15:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags

[edit]

español  galego  English  français  Deutsch  suomi  עברית  Plattdüütsch  македонски  polski  Nederlands  中文(简体)  Tiếng Việt  українська  русский  svenska  +/−


Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from images that you have uploaded yourself. If you do not believe the image deserves to be deleted, then click "Challenge speedy deletion" to convert the tag to a regular deletion request. Thank you.

Herby talk thyme 16:11, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You will be blocked from editing if you continue to remove these tags. --Herby talk thyme 16:24, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BLOCK.GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:29, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Herby talk thyme 16:39, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "The license was given on YABOOKCOVER,and saving the page from vandalizing is not a reason to block GhiathArodaki (talk) 16:45, 23 March 2013 (UTC)"[reply]
Decline reason: "Continuing to upload copyrighted images after warnings is a violation of policy, regardless of your reasoning. I've blocked you for 1 week. Please study COM:L and COM:CB. INeverCry 18:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

File:Greater Syria Map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 15:50, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

INeverCry 18:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  हिन्दी hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:SovietandSyriameeting.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:SovietandSyriameeting.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 18:56, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note that these images were already discussed at #Image uploads above. Back then I was inclined to give the uploader the benefit of the doubt that copyright in the photos had been transferred and inherited. However, his subsequent behaviour has led me to believe that he does not understand copyright and copyright licensing. —Psychonaut (talk) 09:59, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

no i understand the copyright , but you who don't understand meGhiathArodaki (talk) 11:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The author field on these images states: "? grandfather". What's the question mark for? Was/is this person the photographer or did/does he just own copies of the images? We need something a bit more certain than "? grandfather". INeverCry 16:17, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
He is not the photographer , he own the original copies , the author Yahya Arodaki , He had the original copies as it is his photos , copyright was given to him by the photographer, My grandfather is DEAD , all of his pictures were given to the family , The family gave it to me , and now holds both copyright and the pictures.GhiathArodaki (talk) 18:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "saving a file from vandalizing musn't be blocked"
Decline reason: "Sorry but no. You do not understand our rules, you refuse to read, you will just end banned from the site soon if you continue like this."
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

--PierreSelim (talk) 20:29, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


COM:AN/U

[edit]

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#User:GhiathArodaki. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Rd232 (talk) 21:45, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stay away from Fry1989's talkpage until the current dispute is resolved. And please go to the COM:AN/U discussion to help resolve it. Thanks. Rd232 (talk) 21:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, about the Yahya Arodaki photos - the main issue is probably copyright was given to him by the photographer. Unfortunately it's quite likely that (a) it was an official photographer and that the copyright wasn't the photographer's to give or (b) the photographer only gave copies of the photos, and not the copyright. The burden is on you to prove your claim, and that may be very hard to do. It would help if you at least proved you have access to the physical prints by uploading a much higher resolution version. You could then try emailing OTRS with as clear an explanation and as much evidence as you can provide. Rd232 (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

PS Depending on date and location of publication, there's an outside chance the photographs might be public domain anyway. Providing those details, if you can find them, would help. Rd232 (talk) 22:07, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your talk page question

[edit]

I'm from the United States, and I'm not an Arab and not a Jew -- and I have many diverse interests on Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia, as you can see from examining my various history listings and image galleries. I'm a linguist who has studied the Semitic languages, but my ability to actually write or read Arabic is not too great; I only started editing Arabic Wikipedia back around 5 years ago as an experiment, and because some important articles (such those for many national flags) were then either completely missing or pathetically thin. I had to change from "User:An-Namuus" to "User:AnonMoos", when Single Unified Login came in, and about that time I reached the limits of my Arabic-language abilities and my abilities to understand and deal with the various personal politics there, so I don't edit on Arabic Wikipedia anymore. Still, if you could tell me what the Arabic for "Naval jack" is (something I've never been able to find in any dictionary), I would fix the "Flag of the United States" article there... AnonMoos (talk) 00:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image for you

[edit]
La Syrie rayonnante

Here -- you can use this to express your pride in Syria without giving people the impression that you want Bashar to rule the Congo or whatever... AnonMoos (talk) 04:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks i like it :) .GhiathArodaki (talk) 18:22, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

creating SVG files

[edit]

That's a very large topic. The majority of people use Inkscape (a free program) to edit SVGs, but I rarely use it. There's various info at Help:SVG... AnonMoos (talk) 10:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

State religions

[edit]

I have reverted your changes to File:State Religions Globally.png, File:State Religions.png, File:Secularmap.PNG, and File:Map of state religions.svg, in which you incorrectly claim that Islam is the state religion of Syria, Sudan, and Palestine. Though the 2012 Syrian constitution requires the president to be Muslim, it does not formally establish any religion. The Palestinian Convenant is a secular document which does not refer to Islam at all. While the Interim National Constitution of Sudan allows for implementation of Sharia law in regions where Islam is the majority religion, it expressly acknowledges the multifaith character of Sudan and does not establish any one religion. In the future please do not change such maps without citing a reliable source.

As you've continued to add these claims without justification, and because of your other recent activity here, I've raised the issues at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems. —Psychonaut (talk) 20:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:الوطن العربي.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Psychonaut (talk) 20:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:العقاب أسود.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Psychonaut (talk) 20:33, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Please calm down

[edit]

I understand that you are upset, but please calm down. Calling other contributors racists does not help your case, if anything it weakens it. I have seen some of your previous contributions and you seem like a decent person, this behaviour seems out of character. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:22, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you :) , i'll calm down because you gave me a respect .GhiathArodaki (talk) 21:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Syria falg on africa and arab world.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 01:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

please remove your personal attacks against another editors

[edit]

here and here, specifically the phrases 'you muslim racism' and 'you islam racism'. Thank you. Penyulap 03:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:IspifoneyFlag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

188.104.123.3 18:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


The regular flag maps (File:Flag-map of Syria.svg etc.) already include the Golan Heights... AnonMoos (talk) 20:50, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Map you are talking in including only the syrian controlled area , this map includes the all of arab syrian golan hights that it is occupied by israel and undof.GhiathArodaki (talk) 21:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure that's the case, but if it is, then it's an error... AnonMoos (talk) 21:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Irredentism on File:Syrian republic flag map.png

[edit]

Please name a specific year when Lebanon was detached from the Syrian mandate, but Alexandretta was not. If there's not a year when this was the case, then the map is irredentist... AnonMoos (talk) 05:28, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

During and After the mandtae until 50s or 40s the Iskandrun was in the syrian map Syrian Republic, Also don't skew in our land history, Syria is not yours.GhiathArodaki (talk) 10:32, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"Greater Iraq"

[edit]

Hard fight against that bullshit ;-) Best regards --Roxanna (talk) 17:30, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah your right , i haven't actually heard of a something called greater iraq ! , and that fry every move i do he says a political thing , thanks for helping me i'll fight until the result , i thanks god for the first stupid map that was deleted ;-).GhiathArodaki (talk) 17:38, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion.

Request reason: "No reason for blocking me"
Decline reason: "a)"No reason for blocking me" is not a valid reason to unblock b)Your comment "I Don't care what are the rules in this dirty place , i want to delete my images , i'm not leaving my images in the users hand , i'm not letting this dirty wiki steal it" is a valid reason for a block. You are accusing all of us of stealing. By uploading anything you are bound to the rules that govern Commons. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:20, 20 August 2013 (UTC)"[reply]
Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.
(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  magyar  Plattdüütsch  português  Simple English  Tiếng Việt  suomi  svenska  македонски  русский  हिन्दी  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  中文(臺灣)  +/−

I Don't care about the stupid rules , a stupid wiki don't bound me .GhiathArodaki (talk) 10:02, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:SyrianFlag(1920-1932).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 eh? 18:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I forcibly own My photos and you can not open your mouth on this subject.GhiathArodaki (talk) 20:40, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked Indefinitely
Blocked Indefinitely
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block.
See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you. Reason: [1]

azərbaycanca  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  hrvatski  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  kurdî  la .lojban.  magyar  Nederlands  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  македонски  русский  українська  हिन्दी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 06:25, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]