Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2022-08

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Photo of a burning tobacco barn, locations unknown. Photo was included with shots of Tobacco Border Belt Market Opens, Shown are scenes of the tobacco warehouses on opening day of the Border Belt (8514311144).jpg

The source at Flickr states that the photo was published in the Raleigh News & Observer on August 4th, 1948, and that it is still copyrighted. However, neither the photo nor the newspaper proper had their copyright renewed in 1975 to 1977. So this is {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. @Rosenzweig: FYI. De728631 (talk) 13:51, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

This one, amongst others is from the same source. Guess no need for deletion then. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 15:31, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Rosenzweig: , sorry but am I missing something here? (puzzled) Lotje (talk) 15:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Only two were nominated for deletion, I didn't search for others. If it is positively determined in the course of this undeletion request that those images were not renewed, that text declaring them to be copyrighted should be removed from all of those uploads. --Rosenzweig τ 16:18, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Rosenzweig, I'll leave that in your capable hands. Lotje (talk) 16:33, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Rosenzweig and Lotje: Thank you both. I started with checking the News & Observer category. Most of the files there seem to be out of copyright (not renewed or expired) but for the reference, I nominated a good lot of them for deletion too: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:The News & Observer. De728631 (talk) 17:04, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Restored with {{PD-US-not-renewed}} after checking for renewals with [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] and not finding any. Also restored File:Photo of a burning tobacco barn, locations unknown. Photo was included with shots of Tobacco Border Belt Market Opens, Shown are scenes of the tobacco warehouses on opening day of the Border Belt (8513200239).jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 18:05, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MJUlla.jpg

Hola, tengo un permiso d ela autora de la fotografía para su publicación. Por ello, la subi a mi cuenta de Flickr [6]. Solicito, por tanto su restauración. Gracias.--Hard (talk) 08:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

@Hard: But you are not the author of the photo (the original photographer who took it in 1969 is). Please, read VRT and instruct the author how thay need to provide a free license permission for the photo. False authorship claims are against Wikimedia Commons policy. Ankry (talk) 11:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

@Hard: Es decir: vea Commons:Equipo de respuesta voluntaria, que se necesita por subidas de non-autores (si no hay otra evidencia). –LPfi (talk) 09:09, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:KV IIT Kharagpur main building.jpg

This image was a panoramic photo taken with Lumia 650 Dual Sim. It's an image of a school building of KV No. 1 IIT Kharagpur. It was taken during my farewell from my school on 22nd February 2019. So I request the undeletion of this image. I claim full copyright to this image. Thanking you Debjyoti Gorai (talk) 15:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

@Debjyoti Gorai: The problem is that your earlier uploads were either images copied from copyrighted sites where no evidence of free license was present or Own work claims for previously published images, which are both against policy. We apply COM:AGF to users who do not violate policy, especially do not fail to provide precise and correct information about copyright. So I think, you need to follow VRT process and convince VRT volunteers that you are indeed the photo author. Ankry (talk) 09:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: The image would be undeleted when the permission is received. --Yann (talk) 19:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Original Audio Documentary Cover R.H.

I am the owner and designer of this cover. I have the rights to everything. I am Jackson Caesar. I am the producer of this Audio Documentary. I wanted to share it with you because it's resourceful information about the music, life, and legacy of Roland Hayes.

About this 3 discs audio documentary:

[content removed by Thuresson (talk)]

I am Jackson Caesar. I own the rights to this Audio Documentary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jcaesar131 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 28 July 2022‎ (UTC)

•  Comment This request is apparently about File:Spirituals Celebrating the Music, Life, and Legacy of Roland Hayes.jpg which was deleted as mere advertising. Apart from that I would like to note that for all recent works that have been published before without a free licence, we need evidence from the copyright holder that it may now be used freely at Commons. The procedure is explained at COM:VRT. De728631 (talk) 15:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

 Info I have taken the liberty of removing part of OP:s text in this deletion request since I considered it advertising for goods and services that OP provides. The removed text is available in the history here. Thuresson (talk) 23:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:52, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:XXXTentacion by Jack McKain.jpg

The image was previously removed for an incorrect assumption of copyright violation, and the author of the image, Jack McKain had requested undeletion and gave Wikimedia permission back in May to the Volunteer Response Team. No reason to not undelete the file. --User:TheXuitts (talk) 6:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

@TheXuitts: First, the permission needs to be verified and accepted in order to undelete the photo. Second, promotional content is out of scope here; in order to host the image in Wikimedia Commons you need to explain which exactly page in Wikimedia services (eg. Wikipedia) it is intended to be used on, or why it is educational. We generally do not host images of non-notable people. Ankry (talk) 08:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 19:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Schaerbeek - Avenue Émile Verhaeren n°73 - Maison De Jongh (2).jpg

Please restore the following pages:

• File:Schaerbeek - Avenue Émile Verhaeren n°73 - Maison De Jongh (2).jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: if this image depicts exterior of a building or an outdoor public art (not a plaque or commemorative marker), then this must be OK now as Belgium has Commons-acceptable FOP since July 2016. I cannot see deleted photos. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

 Info@JWilz12345: The photo presents a commemorative plaque with bilingual text and an image on a brick wall in an unspecified location. Ankry (talk) 09:41, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

 Support It's basically a close-up of the plaque you can see in File:Schaerbeek - Avenue Émile Verhaeren n°73 - Maison De Jongh (1).jpg. There's a small logo (?) of some kind there plus some short and simple text (in French and Dutch) that I would classify as {{PD-ineligible}}, while {{FoP-Belgium}} should take care of the logo. --Rosenzweig τ 10:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:47, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bank Mellat logo.svg

already https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mellat_Bank.jpg?uselang=fa Baratiiman (talk) 16:01, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

When this image became logo of Bank Melat? See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mellat Bank.jpg. Ankry (talk) 23:21, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Saddam and Rajavi.jpg

This file was deleted in this discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam and Rajavi.jpg.

I think it has the 3rd condition in Template:PD-Iraq ('It is a photographic or cinematic work that is not compositive (artistic in nature) first published before 1 January 1999'). This picture was taken from meeting of two politicians in 1980s in Iraq, so per [7] article 20 of Iraqi old law applies and in 1993 this picture was in public domain. So the current law (effective in 2004) could not extend copyright until 2038. Maybe this is the reason VOA (source of this file) says it is PD. HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:55, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ellywa: can you, please, comment how the deletion rationale you provided related to the abovementioned clause in {{PD-Iraq}}? Ankry (talk) 21:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

• This deletion of the same image may be helpful. Ypatch (talk) 02:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

In both deletion discussions, there is no evidence of who the author or publisher is. Also there doesn't seem to be a verified date of actual publishing (why 3rd condition in Template:PD-Iraq does not apply since there isn't any evidence that the image was published before 1999) or permission to use it. Per policy, it is up to uploader to provide an evidence of the photo PD status, which has not been provided. Ypatch (talk) 02:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

The deletion discussion links to al-Jumhūrīyah, with a claim that it was published in that paper in 1987 (and elsewhere in 1988) and the deleting admin did not contest that. 1987 is before 1999; it seems the admin just didn't notice that the current law doesn't apply to images published at that time. –LPfi (talk) 07:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

A "claim" is not a substitute for evidence. In the first deletion of this image, the uploader had credited Shahab Mirzaei from BBC Persian as the author of the image, also with no evidence at all. We can make claims all day long, but policy requires evidence of the photo PD status. Ypatch (talk) 08:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ankry: and others, answering your question. I did read Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iraq and I did not see why this image - taken 1986 or 1987 - would be in PD. Under the old legislation from 1971 - valid until to 2004 - I did not find a rationale. Perhaps I misunderstood the sentence "Copyright in photographic and cinematographic works which only give automatic transfer of landscapes expired 5 years from the date of the first publication of the work.". I thought "automatic transfer of landscapes" was not the case in this photo - because it is a room. But in hindsight this sentence could be the basis for the statement in the template: "It is a photographic or cinematic work that is not compositive (artistic in nature) first published before 1 January 1999" (as the new law started in 2004 and 2004-5=1999). So if this is true, the image can be undeleted on basis of the law of 1971. I would advice to change the text of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iraq so the sentences read the same. But perhaps somebody fluent in the original language could first explain what "automatic transfer of landscapes" means (In arabic الصُّور الضوئِيَّة التي نشرت أول مرة قبل 1 يناير 1999، شرط أن تكون نقلاً للمناظر الطبيعية نقلاً آلياً.) I will try to find a village pump in Arabic. Ellywa (talk) 08:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

My question about the text can be found on Commons:الميدان#Copyright_Iraq Ellywa (talk) 09:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you Ellywa. That aside (as said before) evidence of publication needs to be provided by the uploader otherwise we're merely guessing date and place of publication. Ypatch (talk) 09:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes indeed. The oldest version I could find is from 2007, but I am certainly not an expert in searching. http://www.iran-ghalam.de/2Haupt/2132.yaddasht.30.11.07.HTM . HeminKurdistan said on the DR they found the photo in a 1987 printed newspaper. I have no reason to disbeleive that. Ellywa (talk) 10:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Ellywa. The last claim by the uploader concerning this image proved to be false. If evidence hadn't been asked for we'd still have a false publisher and false author for this image live on Commons. My concern here is the integrity of the process. Understandably, policy requires evidence instead of just taking uploaders at their word. Ypatch (talk) 11:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Please let us keep assuming good faith. Remember the photo was published with a Public Domain tag of VOA. I checked that. We are questioning that imho. Ellywa (talk) 12:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

I think the older Iraqi copyright law was more on snapshot-like photos -- I have seen another translation as "mechanical transmission of scenery"; might be nice to have Arabic speakers give their opinion on what the original Arabic says (in article 20). But, only protecting snapshot-type photos for a shorter term was fairly common in older copyright laws (and still is part of many), so if it was a photo just capturing a public scene it could well fall under that old definition, and be PD today in Iraq due to that. Or, since the U.S. does not have any copyright relations with Iraq right now, maybe it is only PD in the U.S. due to that, which the VOA was relying on. If it was a foreign photographer though, the VOA could not make that public domain claim, so I would at least assume an Iraqi publication. I would tend to  Support, given this looks more like a snapshot type of photo from Iraq in the 1980s, so seems to fall under their older shorter-term photograph law. It would rest on the interpretation of that law though. The VOA declaration does seem to back that up a bit as well. The standard per COM:PRP is "significant doubt"; there can be theoretical doubts but we can still keep those. That can come down to a community decision of course. For me, I'm leaning that this fell under their shorter copyright terms at the time. Carl Lindberg (talk) 13:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

It seems to me that Ypatch is diverting this discussion. I did not upload File:Saddam Hussein..jpg and I don't know anything about it or its deletion (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saddam Hussein..jpg). This is the second time that this user is making this false accusation against me, a few months ago the same user claimed that I "lied" ([8]) about that file and when I complained that I am not aware of it and that I am disappointed by this accusations to an admin, he said "I would not give much weight to what Ypatch said... the report seems to be politically motivated". ([9])

I expect an apology from Ypatch otherwise I would think that it is an intentional smear. Ypatch claims that VOA (source of File:Saddam and Rajavi.jpg) is wrong in saying that it is in public domain and I am also a liar so that this file should be deleted. OK, I no longer care about this file but I want to clarify my comment on its deletion page. My finding that it was published before 1999 was from this book that contains many documents and a copy of the front page of that Iraqi newspaper was one of them. So I did not access the newspaper itself, it was from a book that I found out about it. I regret that 3 months ago I did not take a picture or scan that part because I have no longer access to it. But from what I remember, it was a back and white and low resolution thumbnail from front page of that newspaper, which had this image. The date (19 February 1987) was not readable from thumbnail but came from image caption. I tend to believe that VOA (the source that this image is taken from) is professional and credible enough. As you can see in the source, there are pictures that have 'AP', 'AFP', 'Official website', etc. But this image that we are taling about is 'Public Domain'. ([10]) This is all I can say. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, File:Saddam Hussein..jpg is a totally different image, of course you cannot view it any more. Ellywa (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

I can't remember exactly what the File:Saddam Hussein..jpg file looked like, but I do remember it was about Rajavi and Hussein (in the same room?). I also remember that the copyright information was wrong, and here we also dont know who the author, publisher, or date of publishing was (despite VOA hosting the image). This has nothing to do with politics and everything to do with policy...Ypatch (talk) 15:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

If it was a snapshot with a shorter term and it got published, it is PD. The author and exact publication date should be included in the info if we can trace them, but deleting images for which there is no significant doubt about them being PD because of some information lacking is destructive; that's not what the precautionary principle requires. I don't see any reason for significant doubt (unless the law indeed covers only natural sceneries). –LPfi (talk) 08:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

You don't remember but you accuse me of uploading that file and "lying". HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:52, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

COM:PCP applies here. Ypatch (talk) 18:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per Carl L. above. --Yann (talk) 20:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Record Shop(Inside).jpg

Initially deleted because the uploader claimed the copyright under a CC license, the proper license would be "PD-US-no notice" or "PD-US-not renewed". The image was made public per Commons:Publication when the negative was copied to a print and sent to the sitter, where it became part of this family's archive, the uploader is the granddaughter of the sitter. The image has no copyright notice and an image of this description does not appear in either the copyright registration database or the renewal database. See: Category:Bain copyright notice for example of a legally binding copyright symbol. --RAN (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Per my knowledge, publication means making available to the public (anybody who want to see it), not to a limited group of people (family in this case). If there is a consensus about your interpretation of this legal term, please point it more precisely. I doubt the photo album with this photo was available in a public library or a similar place where anybody can come and see it. Ankry (talk) 08:53, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• You are incorrect. You are referring to the family of the sitter, in this case, viewing the image, while Commons:Publication and the Berne agreement refers to the family of the photographer viewing the image. The quote is about the creator, not the person posing for the image: "persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered". --RAN (talk) 16:05, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose In the context of the public performance or display of a work, s:United States Code/Title 17/Chapter 1/Section 101 uses the words "a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances" as being equal to "the public" (full quote: "To perform or display a work ‘‘publicly’’ means—(1) to perform or display it at a place open to the public or at any place where a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances is gathered [...]") So by US definition, a photographic print sent to a paying customer is not publication ("the distribution of copies or phonorecords of a work to the public by sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending") because a customer is not "a substantial number of persons outside of a normal circle of a family and its social acquaintances". --Rosenzweig τ 16:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Per Carl Lindberg's comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg (and not per Commons:Publication, because there is nothing about this there), it seems that because the current US definition of publication was introduced in 1976 (and became effective in 1978), older US works (before 1978) might be considered published when sold to a customer accd. to Common Law based US court decisions. If they were sold without a notice (likely), PD-US-no-notice would fit. This image is from no later than 1958 (because the person shown died in that year), so we could have one of those cases. --Rosenzweig τ 17:41, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: PD-US, as per above and linked discussions. --Yann (talk) 20:18, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Konrad Fajt.png

Similar to the Rudolf valentino.png case, this picture was also taken by me. The portrait was created in Milena Pavlović Barilis Belgrade period of work (1922-1926), so it should returned to Wikipedia commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZazaSRB (talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

---

 Done: PD-Art|PD-old-70-expired. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gloria Swanson (Milena Pavlovic Barili).png

Similar to the Rudolf valentino.png case, this picture was also taken by me. The portrait was created in Milena Pavlović Barilis Belgrade period of work (1922-1926), so it should returned to Wikipedia commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZazaSRB (talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

---

 Done: PD-Art|PD-old-70-expired. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Glorija 2.png

I apologise if I spammed this request. I am not sure how to make more requests in one edit. Similar to the Rudolf valentino.png case, this picture was also taken by me. The portrait was created in Milena Pavlović Barilis Belgrade period of work (1922-1926), so it should returned to Wikipedia commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZazaSRB (talk • contribs) 19:27, 1 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

---

 Done: PD-Art|PD-old-70-expired. --Yann (talk) 19:39, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1000 Nights Cover.jpg

I am requesting an undeletion of this cover as every other Ed Sheeran song/single has the cover art there, such as South Of The Border, Antisocial, I Don't Care, and etc.

4TheLuvOfFax (talk) 21:53, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@4TheLuvOfFax: Commons doesn't accept fair use content of any type as explained in COM:FAIR. My guess is that those other files you're referring to were uploaded locally to English Wikipedia as non-free content, and were not uploaded to Commons. So, unless you're the copyright holder of this particular file, Commons can't keep this file without the COM:CONSENT of its copyright holder. Pretty much all of the album and song covers you see used in Wikipedia articles are uploaded as non-free content. Most likely this particular file could be uploaded as non-free content as well. If you're not sure how to do that, you can ask for assistance at en:Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Songs and someone there should be able to help you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 22:10, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

ohhhh ok thank you

4TheLuvOfFax (talk) 01:19, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done No Fair Use on Commons. Ankry (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rachel Wang Image 2021.jpg

This image is not liable to copyright as it is a public image. This image is public property and is not under any form of copyright MelissaMart (talk) 16:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Didym: as deleting admin. Yann (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Published on December 3, 2021 at facebook.com without a free license. I can't help notice that OP claims to own the copyright. Thuresson (talk) 19:26, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kooroshghorbani.jpg

Hi, I uploaded this file to use in a article. its biography article which is reviewing by the manager right now. I notice the photo is deleted so I started to search about the reasons. I think its deleted because of not having license. I uploaded this photo on my flicker account months before and I learned to change the copy right (all rights reserved) to (copyright free). with this change that I made I want this photo back please. and the article will be reviewed by manager so if he decides that its unnesasary they will remove it.

I saw most of the biographies does have the photo and I think reading an article that contains photo is much more attractive for everyone.

I also have few other photos that are nominated for deletion because I didn't know about the license and how to prove, still I have serious question and I hope wiki media don't see me as a person who violent the copy right rules. I try my best to learn as soon as possible and don't messed up.

Thanks you in advance for helping me best regards

Neginghaderii (talk) 09:20, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

@Neginghaderii: Which article do you wish to use the photo in? And note, that for photos already published elsewhere without a free license, the VRT procedure is needed. Ankry (talk) 08:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you so much for reply and helping me figure it out.

about the photo, I personally took it, I usually go to motorsport races and photography there not as a job, for free for my interest. I also know most of the riders like the one in the picture. in this case photo is taken by me and if the rider used it some where I can tell him to give me the permission or even delete it (if it will solve the problem), but I prefer do not ask to people to delete the photos that were taken by me.

about the VTR, I have no idea what is it.

I just need to figure out how to publish photos and attach the license because if I learn I have many photos even not just in case of sport which I think can help the image source of wiki media to be bigger and up date with good quality photos.

the article that I used this photo as a main photo (portrait) in it:

https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%BE%DB%8C%D8%B4%E2%80%8C%D9%86%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B3:%DA%A9%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%88%D8%B4_%D9%82%D8%B1%D8%A8%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C

Thanks in advance Neginghaderii (talk) 15:05, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@Neginghaderii: I just noticed the deletion reason as it was not scope related: the deleting admin raised doubts whether you are the photographer as you claim. You may need to contact VRT providing a written free license via email together with an evidence of your authorship (eg. providing them the original photo version with complete camera settings info in EXIF). Ankry (talk) 21:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for reply, Yes I have the information of camera and photo, How can I connect VRT? I checked this page, but still I don't know where should I send this information? I mean wikipedia should give me a chance to prove if I couldn't prove that I am the photographer yes, delete the photo even restrict my account, but I want to give the photos information, who should I send the information?

thanks Neginghaderii (talk) 12:29, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

The abreviation is linked to the instruction. Ankry (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 15:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fleur-de-farine

File:Smolny Institute, dance lesson2.jpg

The photo was done before the Revolution, no copyright (PD-Russian Empire). Moreover this file was nominated and deleted by same person, Sealle who has been blocked for sockpuppetry afterwards and chased me in ruwiki. --Fleur-de-farine (talk) 22:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Support I agree with the lack of procedure here where a sock of Sealle created Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Fleur-de-farine. It should be revisited thoroughly if not mass-undeleted. The only problem for this particular image, however, is that there was no proper source mentioned. You merely wrote "internet" there without a link. On the other hand, the Smolny Institute where this ballroom dancing was taught existed only before the Russian Revolution, so the image must be from the imperial days. {{PD-Russian Empire}}. De728631 (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support {{PD-Russian Empire}} for the image and others taken before 1917. By the way, these images are notable. --Shonagon (talk) 00:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Moscow before 1917

1. File:Lubyanka1870s.jpg
2. File:Christ the Saviour, 1880.jpg
3. File:Bolshoi1865-1875.png
4. File:Bolshoi1880s.jpg
5. File:Bolshoi-in1890s.png
6. File:Bolshoi1890s.png
7. File:Bolshoi1896.jpg
8. File:Bolshoi1900s.png
9. File:Bolshoi1909.jpg
10. File:Bolshoi1910s.jpg
11. File:Bolshoi1912.jpg
12. File:Bolshoi1913.jpg
13. File:Bolshoi1914.jpg
14. File:Bolshoi1915c.jpg
15. File:Metropol1907c.png
16. File:Teatralnaya1907-1910.jpg
17. File:MoiseevSquare1910s.png
18. File:Bolshoi-and-Maly.jpg (not sure for this one, no date indication in the name of file)
19. File:Bolshoi-TagankaAudience.jpg (same)
20. File:Senatskaya Square, Kremlin.jpg
21. File:Chudov monastery.jpg
22. File:Vue du Kremlin.jpg
23. File:Kuskovo-Parter-Oranzhereya.jpg
24. File:KremlinPalace-sunroom.jpg
25. File:Rogozhskiy poselok.jpg (no date indication, but may be also pre-revolution)
26. File:TroitskyLane-postcard.jpg (before-the-revolution postcard I suppose)
27. File:KremlinArmouryCard.jpg (before-the-revolution postcard I suppose)
28. File:Yar-postcard.jpg (before-the-revolution postcard I suppose)

All these photos were done before the Revolution, no any violation of copyright (PD-Russian Empire). Moreover these files was nominated and deleted by same person, Sealle who has been blocked for sockpuppetry afterwards and chased me in ruwiki --Fleur-de-farine (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

Russian mansions before 1917

1. File:BakhrushinGate.jpg
2. File:BakhrushinHouse.jpg
3. File:BakhrushinHouse1.jpg
4. File:BakhrushinHouse2.jpg
5. File:DiningRoomBakhrushin.jpg
6. File:BakhrushinDiningRoom.jpg
7. File:Bakhrushin-dinner.jpg
8. File:Bakhrushin-DiningRoom.jpg
9. File:Bakhrushin-Bedroom.jpg
10. File:Bahrushin-MusicRoom.jpg
11. File:Bakhrushin-Stairs.jpg
12. File:Bakhushin-Room.jpg
13. File:Bakhrushin-study.jpg
14. File:Bahrushin-hall.jpg
15. File:Bakhushin-parlour.jpg

Plus without date indication (before 1917 probably) :

1. File:TroekurovMansion.jpg
2. File:GolitsynMansion1.png
3. File:GolitsynMansion2.png
4. File:KschessinskaMansion.jpg
5. File:Kschessinska's dacha.jpg

These photos were done before the Revolution (Bakhrushin Mansion - for sure), no any violation of copyright (PD-Russian Empire). Moreover these files was nominated and deleted by same person, Sealle who has been blocked for sockpuppetry afterwards and chased me in ruwiki --Fleur-de-farine (talk) 23:09, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

@Fleur-de-farine: coming across your request for undeletion, I was wondering if this is the building you are referring to. Also, Category:Памятники в охранных зонах Курортного района Санкт-Петербурга should, imo be in English. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello! As far as I know, Kschessinskaya had only one summer house outside Saint Petersburg, so it should be the same building probably. As for category, the proper name is Cultural heritage monuments in protected areas of Kurortny District. --Fleur-de-farine (talk) 14:39, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@Fleur-de farine: thanks! BTW, your username is inspiring. Do you speak French? Lotje (talk) 16:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Lotje, Yes, I do. As for my username, it's a character from The Sleeping Beauty ballet, Enchanted Garden Fairy. Together with Canary Fairy it's one of two shortest ballet variations ever, just 35 sec and done )) Fleur-de-farine (talk) 04:12, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

 Comment {{PD-Russian Empire}} applies to photos that were published is Russian Empire before 1917, not to the photos that were made there at that time. Any evidence that any of these photos was indeed published in Russia before 1917? Ankry (talk) 22:03, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Corrected own mistake :-) Lotje (talk) 04:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

 Support undeletion, but the source, license, etc. should be corrected. @Fleur-de-farine: Will you do it? Yann (talk) 19:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Yann, before uploading I had these files in a cloud and didn’t keep in mind where did I find them. Had no idea it could be important for quite old pictures. And now I can't do a search because don't have any access to deleted files. Actually I hardly remember what kind of images they are, just guessing from titles.)) So really can't do it unfortunately. Fleur-de-farine (talk) 03:32, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

@Fleur-de-farine: As ulploader and requester, it is your responsibility to provide the complete information. We can't have images hanging indefinitely without source and correct license even if they are in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:33, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per above. @Fleur-de-farine: Please fix the source. Can anyone help?. --Yann (talk) 20:31, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by me - Elshad Iman, The pictures belong to me, i.e. I took them and I own the copyright.

• File:Azərbaycan Nar İstehsalçıları və İxracatçıları Assosiasiyasının fəxri üzvü olan Elşad İman şəxsən ANİİA-nın sədri Fərhad Qaraşova beynəlxalq səviyyəli İSNİ sertifikatını təqdim etdi.jpg - This was taken with a tripod, that is, I pressed the button, and then the camera automatically took the picture.
• File:ANİİA-nın sədri Fərhad Qaraşov, Azərbaycan Dövlət Rəsm Qalereyası Galereya 1969 "Nardan doğan rənglər" adı altında keçirilən fotosərgidə.jpg
• File:Azərbaycan Nar İstehsalçıları və İxracatçıları Assosiasiyasının logotipi.jpg

The reason for deleting the images was "cross wiki spam" but an error occurred because my account was mistakenly disabled due to "cross wiki spam" but the stewards determined there was no "cross wiki spam".(The stewards determined that the block was invalid and the block was cancelled. My user account is currently open.) For this reason, my block was opened and based on this discussion, I am applying for the restoration of my 3 photos that were mistakenly deleted. Please restore. --Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 18:16, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@Elshad Iman (Elşad İman): Can you please indicate what pages you intend to use these images on? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:31, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: Page 1, page 2 Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 19:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

 Support undeletion per discussion unless there are copyright related issues. Ankry (talk) 23:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

there is no problem with it, copyright belongs to me. Thanks. Elshad Iman (Elşad İman) (talk) 04:47, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 14:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Michael A. Gilbert.pdf

I am a well-known professor of philosophy specializing in Argumentation Theoryas well as gender theory. Someone I know tried to post an entry for me several times. For some reason, it has never been posted, and now it seems it has been deleted. If you look at Academia.edu you will see that I have several hundred citations. The file is also available as MAG D5 Bio wiki.docx. As students around the world are interested in my work, I would like them to have access to some wiki information.

Michael A. Gilbert, [e-mail removed]. Cheers,

Michael

18:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC) Michael A. Gilbert, Professor Emeritus Department of Philosophy [e-mail removed]

Gilbert1111 (talk) 18:38, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Gilbert1111: The purpose of Wikimedia Commons is to host multimedia files such as images, audio, and video. In general we do not host text files such as CVs; text belongs on other Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia. If you meet our notability guidelines for academics, you may be eligible for a Wikipedia article, but it is recommended that you let other people create one for you because it is hard to write about yourself in a neutral way. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi Gilbert1111. Just going to add that Wikipedia pretty much has no interest in something helping you with things such as As students around the world are interested in my work, I would like them to have access to some wiki information. since Wikipedia articles aren't really intended to serve such purposes. If that's what you're primarily looking for when it comes to Wikipedia, then perhaps that are other better ways to help you accomplish that. A Wikipedia article can be written about you if you meet the above-mentioned notability guidelines for academics, but you will have pretty much zero control over any such article and won't be able to use it to "promote" or otherwise "spread the word" about your work in any way. -- Marchjuly (talk) 06:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done out of scope. Ankry (talk) 16:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by User:Zul muhaimin hmn

Many files of this user have been deleted, because a correct licence template was absent. The list below concerns photos that are older then 120 years. These can be safely undeleted per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template. A Template:PD-old-assumed can be added, in addition to Template:PD-IDOld-Art29.

• File:Suiker Fabriek Kemanglen 1890.jpg
• File:De binnenkant van de bandjardawa-suikerfabriek, ca 1888.jpg
• File:Renovatie van de Bandjardawa suikerfabriek circa 1888.jpg
• File:Suikerfabriek Bandjardawa circa 1888.jpg
• File:Sfeer suikerrietmolen Bandjardawa suikerfabriek, ca 1888.jpg
• File:Groepsportret voor de Suikerfabriek Bandjardawa, ca 1888..jpg
• File:Gerenoveerd suikerfabriekgebouw Bandjardawa, circa 1888..jpg
• File:Adresboek van Nederlandsch-Indië voor den handel, 1884(1).jpg
• File:Hasil produksi PG Banjardawa pada tahun 1848(1).jpg (not yet deleted, but marked with "no licence since".
• File:Maribaja suikerfabriek vacature advertentie 1882(1).jpg
• File:Maribaja suikermolen gegevens, 1875(1).jpg
• File:Maribaija Suikerfabriek vacatures, 1882(1).jpg
• File:Rumah Administrasi Pabrik Gula Balapulang Tegal tahun 1890(1).jpg
• File:Rumah Admistator PG Pagongan sekitar tahun 1886(1).jpg
• File:Pemandangan Selatan 1900(1).jpg
• File:Jembatan sungai pelus 1900(1).jpg
• File:Jembatan kayu 1900(1).jpg
• File:Kereta api mengantuk hasil gula PG Purwokerto tahun 1900(1).jpg
• File:Para staf PG Purwokerto 1900(1).jpg
• File:Rumah lama Brandes 1880(1).jpg
• File:Gunung Slamet dilihat dari Tegal tahun 1890.jpg
• File:Pasar Ketapan (pasar lawas) di Slawi Tegal tahun 1890.jpg
• File:Persawahan di belakang Pabrik Gula kemanglen Slawi tahun 1890.jpg

Then I have a question in relation to some of the other deletions. Can photos from Indonesia which older then 100 years also be undeleted? My rationale for this is that in Indonesia photos become PD 50 years pma, versus 70 years pma in many other countries. Thanks, Ellywa (talk) 21:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

In US photos of unknown authors become PD 120 years after creation regardless of copyright protection period length in the country of origin. This should also be taken into account. Ankry (talk) 22:57, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support for 120 years old photos. Ankry (talk) 22:58, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Thanks Ankry, 2 times. Ellywa (talk) 23:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per above. @Zul muhaimin hmn and Ellywa: Please correct the date, source, author, etc. and add categories. --Yann (talk) 19:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Noelia Gómez Calvo.jpg

Email message template for release of rights to this file has been already sent by the creator. --Chairego apc (talk) 16:20, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose @Chairego apc: after the permission is verified and accepted by a VRT volonteer, they will either undelete the image themselves or request to undelete here. If you have questions about processing, you can ask at COM:VRTN providing the ticket number. Ankry (talk) 16:15, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

@Ankry, we now have the permission at VRT. See at the bottom. Cheers, Mussklprozz (talk) 12:04, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done per VRT request. Ankry (talk) 14:21, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ullman.png

The file, presuming that it is the same as en:File:Ullman.png, appears to be under COM:TOO. It was deleted as a copyright violation where, I presume, it was not tagged correctly. (Oinkers42) (talk) 14:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

 Info Same image, same size in pixels. Thuresson (talk) 15:42, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support Below US TOO and used. Ankry (talk) 16:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:05, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Al-Aqsa Mosque distance.jpg

I've designed it via Photoshop in 2015 and uploaded it to Wikipedia, You say that I stole it from this page that created in 12 March 2022 !!!!!!!, It avoise that this website stole it from Wikipedia. -PhD_IMAD (talk) 11:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@عماد الدين المقدسي: the image was not deleted due to be copied from another site but due to be based on another non-free image. I have converted the speedy deletion to a DR so you vcan discuss this issue in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Al-Aqsa Mosque distance.jpg

---

 Done converted to a DR. Ankry (talk) 14:34, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Noelia Gómez Calvo.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2022080210009084. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 11:53, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 14:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gurudwara Tooti Gandi Sahib, Sri Muktsar Sahib.jpg

Not to delete it just rename it from Tooti to Tuti.

This is not the place for that kind of request. To require a rename, use the link "More > Move" on the upper right of the image description page. --Mussklprozz (talk) 12:07, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

User:1989/common.js

Please restore the following pages:

• User:1989/common.js

Reason: User request 1989 (talk) 12:46, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

 Info Interface admin needed to do this. @1989: Unless you need a specific revision that I can copy to my userspace. Ankry (talk) 16:07, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:sumedh.jpg

request for undeletion of the file sumedh.png as it was my work so i have giving licence policy that anyone can use this pic. --Hellohiii (talk) 15:33, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

Related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sumedh.jpg. @George Chernilevsky: as deleting admin. Yann (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

@Sumedh Yadavalli and Hellohiii: We need a permission from the copyright holder, who is usually the photographer. This is not a selfie. Do not create multiple accounts. Also be aware of conflict of interest while editing your own biography on Wikipedia. Yann (talk) 17:59, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

 Question deleted as out of scope. @Hellohiii: Why it is educationally useful or which page in Wikimedia it is intended to be used on? Ankry (talk) 16:34, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Ankry. No answer. --Yann (talk) 18:01, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Will Shu Deliveroo CEO 2022.jpg

== Will Shu Deliveroo CEO 2022 to undelete ==

Please re-upload image of Will Shu work belongs to my organisation. --10797bkr (talk) 13:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

@10797bkr: No free license at the source site. And you have clear information on your talk page what is needed in order to undelete the photo (If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT.). You need to ask the photo copyright holder to follow it. And please note, that if you have not such permission, your upload here and license declaration is blatant copyright violation. Ankry (talk) 16:22, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MDRatner.jpg

This file is no longer on IMDB. Please allow it to be used for Wiki matters.

Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 19:38, 2 August 2022 (UTC) (talk • contribs) Sheps2010 (UTC)

• Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
• @Sheps2010: In order to host it in Wikipedia Commons the photo copyright holder (presumably the photographer) needs to send a free license permission followin VRT instructions. Ankry (talk) 16:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 17:58, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Здание президиума Коми НЦ УрО РАН.jpg

Запрашиваю отмену на удаление, поскольку согласно правилам фотографии достаточно старых зданий не относятся к нарушениям авторских прав. Сама фотография была взята из публичного и общедоступного источника (ссылка указана в атрибутах файла).

Requesting cancellation for deletion, because according to the rules, photographs of fairly old buildings don't qualify as copyright infringement. This photo was taken from a public source (the link is indicated in the file attributes). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Philipp Legki (talk • contribs) 07:06, 5 August 2022‎ (UTC)

@Philipp Legki: Are you saying that photos of buildings in Russia are always public domain? Note: the source is vk.com. Thuresson (talk) 20:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Recent photo, obviously under a copyright. No permission. --Yann (talk) 10:23, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Swedbank skylt.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

• File:Goteborg Looking Back 1.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
• File:Goteborg Looking Back 2.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
• File:Swedbank skylt.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: files were deleted via COM:Deletion requests/File:Goteborg Looking Back 2.jpg and COM:Deletion requests/File:Swedbank_skylt.JPG, on the reasoning of the Swedish court ruling against Wikimedia Sweden. But as per COM:FOP Sweden#Public art, that ruling should not be used as the basis for deleting any public art from Sweden as it is subject to contention: "Following the WMF official statement on 9 August 2017, it's strongly recommend not to submit any deletion requests just based on simple reasons like 'no FOP for artworks in Sweden,' and try the best to keep the de facto uploads, with {{FoP-Sweden}} template permanently tagged." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:16, 1 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per above. {{FoP-Sweden}} added to the files description. --Yann (talk) 16:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bacon and Egg in Skillet.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

• File:Bacon and Egg in Skillet.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: No reason Sjgdzn (talk) 00:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose per lack of reason. Ankry (talk) 14:35, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

• @Sjgdzn: You requested deletion with the rationale: "I did not fully understand the upload policy of Wikimedia Commons or licensing when originally submitting the file." What exactly did you mean, and why have you now changed your mind? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Not done, no response. From the instructions for this page: "State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion." Thuresson (talk) 18:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Podium Literaturzeitschrift

Please undelete the file https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Zeitschrift_Podium_203-204.png?20220804233658

I stated yesterday that the copyright statement was on the way-

Here it is now: "Lieber Gerald,

wir bestätigen, dass das File: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Zeitschrift_Podium_203-204.png?20220804233658 mit der Quellseite: https://www.podiumliteratur.at/die-zeitschrift/podium-nr-203-204-neustart/ unter der Lizenz CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 für Wikipedia genutzt werden kann.

Patricia Brooks podium@podiumliteratur.at"

I can forward the original mail to an address of your liking, or you may check the accuracy of the statement by asking the Podium secretary Patricia Brooks at podium@podiumliteratur.at

Regards, JG

This is about File:Zeitschrift_Podium_203-204.png. Please note that a CC license that has an "NC" (non-commercial) component is NOT acceptable for Wikimedia Commons. Generally, permission e-mails of this kind should be sent to the Volunteer Response Team, see COM:VRT. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 17:53, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: All uploads at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose even outside Wikipedia. A non-commercial licence is therefore not acceptable, nor do we accept forwarded statements like this one. To undelete the file, we need a free licence granted by email directly from the copyright holder. --De728631 (talk) 17:50, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Դավիթ Գևորգի Պետրոսյան.jpg etc

• File:Դավիթ Գևորգի Պետրոսյան.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
• File:Եղիպատրուշ, Սուրբ Աստվածածին վանական համալիր.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• File:Ախթալա Դ․ Պ․.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• File:Թուր կեծակի.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• File:Վիլյամ Սարոյան Դ․Պ.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• File:Կարմրավոր Դ․Պ.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

• File:Հաղպատ Դ․Պ.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
• File:Արտաշատ պեղումներ.jpg - Kindly ask you to undelete the requested picture, because the page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան) has a link to this. --Areshka (talk) 15:23, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Noted Deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Areshka, but I do not see all files on that list. Partly deleted at the time on request of uploader. Ellywa (talk) 09:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, tats way I'm surprised because of mentioned files were not included in the Deletion requests/Files and my uploads list is empty.

Should I upload them once again or there is a way to recover all of them (8 pictures total)? With a lot of thanks, I'm Looking forward to getting positive feedback. Areshka (talk) 15:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Areshka , can you please explain who took this pictures? And who made the drawing of the church building? We need this information for reasons of copyright. They can be recovered so please do not upload again. Ellywa (talk) 21:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

Ellywa thank you for the question. The pictures were taken by me to complete my own work on Wikipedia (Armenian language). The drawing of the church was made by my nephew. He pass away 10 months ago and I creit a page on Wikipedia (Armenian) in honor of him as a public person. I used his personal archive.

You can find more information on his page Դավիթ Պետրոսյան (ճարտարապետ, մշակութաբան)

Thank you for understanding and let me know if there is required any action from my side. Areshka (talk) 19:21, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi@Ellywa, hope you are doing well. One week has passed since my kind request to recover selected/mentioned pictures in the conversation above. Is there any news? Do I need to make some changes to the description or else? Your positive feedback is appreciated. Areshka (talk) 17:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Those files were included in the original deletion request by User:Gbawden, see [11], before User:Areshka removed them (and introduced a lot of clutter with sub-headings along the way). I asked the deciding admin User:IronGargoyle a week ago to have a look at them, and he deleted them. --Rosenzweig τ 21:42, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

The pictures I select for recovering were not include to the deletion list ( 06:53, 14 February 2022 (UTC)) and I never request remove them.

I believe the pictures I kindly request to restore were removed by mistake.

Thank you for supporting Areshka (talk) 19:24, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

They were nominated for deletion by another user. You seem to think that you can choose which of those actually get deleted and which not, but that is not the case. Please inform yourself about the deletion process at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you. Regards --Rosenzweig τ 19:48, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

The photos are partly black and white, partly scans from other printed material and drawings - one as uploader writes made by a nephew (in that case VRT permission is required). All uploaded without mentioning the source and without EXIF data. Until Areshka clearly mentions the source of each image, they cannot be undeleted. Ellywa (talk) 10:48, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the comments, just let me know what does it means "clearly mentions the source of each image" and where I need to mention it. Do I need to upload the again and mention the source to each of them? I kindly remind you that all of them are from the personal archive. Areshka (talk) 16:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

you can mention them here per file. "Personal archive" is not sufficient. To consider the copyright the original source is needed. For instance "book title, name author, birth year an possible death year, publication date, country of origin. Or name photographer, birth year and death year, location, publication date and country. Please read the help pages from the welcome message on your talk page. Regards, Ellywa (talk) 13:29, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

@Ellywa, Please temporarily undelete these eight images and allow me to proceed with the VRT verification. I'm handling a related ticket at ticket:2022080810004238. ─ The Aafī (^talk) 17:47, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

 Done - @TheAafi: , undeleted as requested. You will note these images are from various sources. I added the template "permissing pending" for now. Please nominate images for a speedy delete if permission is not sufficient. Regards, Ellywa (talk) 21:33, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: per request of VRT agent. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ZSU-37-2 Yenisei.jpg

Deleted without a valid reason, the given deletion reason was thoroughly debunked in the deletion request for the image (several times over as you can see). Not to mention that the original reason for the deletion request had been fixed long before it was closed, it instead was hijacked to arguing a different licensing issue entirely. Deletion in fact only occurred after I asked the [admin] who had commented in the thread the reason why the deletion request was still active (once on the request itself, which went unanswered, then again on his personal page several days later) despite there being no further evidence being provided that proved the image in question had any further issues. Also note that the deletion request was originally closed before with the verdict of keep due to coming to the uncontroversial conclusion that Russian Law either did not grant any copyright protection to the file and/or explicitly placed it in the public domain. It was only reopened after another user personally contacted the referenced admin asking to reopen it, which I can't imagine any valid reason to do considering the circumstances. The following is the explanation that details the licensing status of the file as given in the deletion request, see the last three-four responses in the referenced deletion request thread for their counterpoints and my refutations to those points which came to an ultimately uncontroversial conclusion as per Russian Law.

"As I've said over two separate times now, this image was created as a part of an official Soviet government document, which is covered by the below exception article {{PD-RU-exempt}}). By the literal word of the law this image is not an object of copyright, I cannot understand how there is anything else left to say on the matter.

And even if this exception did not exist/did not apply to this image it would still not be afforded any protection under Russian copyright law. That's because the actual author of the image (the person who took the picture) was an anonymous employee of the Soviet government and it was never actually published. As a result, the holder of this image's right of attribution would be unknown or defaulted to the organization who authored the report (the Soviet MoD, a defunct organization who's legal successor has little interest in copyright litigation on archival material). But, since this image wasn't actually published and is instead material from archival internal government documents, there is even less grounds to apply any copyright protection to it since there are no laws covering works of this kind in the Russian Federation (except of course the above exception in Article 1259, which explicitly places works such as this in the public domain)."Sxbbetyy (talk) 19:35, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

• @EugeneZelenko: FYI. Ankry (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

  User was explained several times simple fact that photos are not covered by {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

  "User was explained several times simple fact that photos are not covered by {{PD-RU-exempt}}." At this point you're just distorting what actually occurred to those who don't have the proper context, anyone can read the deletion request thread and see that all you did was repeat the same blanket, incorrect statement (without even the most basic attempt at supporting it with actual evidence). I've cited the relevant laws to you (multiple times) and gone into detailed explanations that you outright ignored, so at this point I don't see any real reason to continue debating this point with you as it seems like you came into this topic with a determination already in mind, with no intention on changing it.

  And I apologize if you really are trying to explain your position and there's just some sort of difficulty in communicating it on your end, but from what you've said thus far that's the message I'm getting (that you don't really care to explain your position and believe I'm wrong regardless of what's said, even if it directly counters your point or that you didn't care to properly explain and just wanted to conclude the issue as quickly a possible without getting into a conversation on the topic to begin with). Regardless that's why I'm posting here, to get help from another admin who can come to a proper conclusion and either: give an explanation as to why I'm incorrect or restore the file pursuant to what I've already detailed. Sxbbetyy (talk) 15:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@Mosbatho: FYI. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

I don't see what that person has to contribute to this as they're not an admin and know even less on this topic than you seem to. I say this as they contacted you specifically seeking help to counter what I said, as they did not know what to respond with. All of this can be seen in their responses on the deletion request thread and in their appeal for help on Eugene's talk page, unfortunately for him Eugene seemed to offer little additional help in this matter (beyond of course his admin powers allowing him to enforce their viewpoint and delete the file regardless). Sxbbetyy (talk) 18:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

In order to say it again: {{PD-RU-exempt}} cannot be used for photographs. Sxbbetyy is on a mission. I am out. --Mosbatho (talk) 23:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

Man I was completely wrong, that was a really productive statement right there. Totally wasn't just the exact same thing that was just said by Eugene, not even two messages ago on this very page (let alone every other time).

But in all seriousness what even is the point in repeating this again? Like seriously every time you repeat the exact same answer when asked to explain said answer, you just make yourself look like you have no idea what you're talking about. Sxbbetyy (talk) 04:06, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

---

Not done, no consensus to undelete. This matter should probably best be discussed further at Template talk:PD-RU-exempt with references to case law, relevant court cases and links to articles by legal experts in this field. Thuresson (talk) 22:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo_de_la_Cervecería_Moctezuma.png

They argue that the Logo is trivial, but it was used by Cerveceria Moctezuma from 1896 until the 1990s when the company was merged with the Cuauhtemoc-Moctezuma corporate. In the links that I attach you will find that the Logo is used in the brewery museum, which was eliminated indiscriminately without consulting the history of the company.

https://dynamic-media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-o/11/41/0f/f9/20171108-180128-largejpg.jpg?w=300&h=200&s=1 https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/11/41/0f/fb/20171108-175731-largejpg.jpg https://www.tripadvisor.com.ph/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g1082256-d7351735-i289476603-Museo_de_la_Cerveza-Orizaba_Central_Mexico_and_Gulf_Coast.html

--Gilberto IV (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

@Gilberto IV: Could you, please, elaborate how do you date use of the logo basing on these photos? Evidence that it was used in the past (without dating) is not enough to prove its expired copyright status. Ankry (talk) 22:58, 4 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: No answer. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Del water gap - holden jaffe - seated.jpg

I AM THE OWNER OF THIS FILE I WOULD LIKE IT TO BE AVAILABLE ON WIKI COMMONS

I hereby affirm that I SAMUEL HOLDEN JAFFE, the SOLE OWNER of the exclusive copyright of BOTH THE WORK AND THE MEDIA as shown here: [exact URL of the file uploaded on Wikimedia Commons],[4] and have legal authority in my capacity to release the copyright of that work.

I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: CREATIVE COMMONS ATTRIBUTION-SHARE ALIKE 4.0 INTERNATIONAL

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

SAMUEL HOLDEN JAFFE CEO DEL WATER GAP LLC, COPYRIGHT HOLDER OF IMAGE AUGUST 6, 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fulroster7965 (talk • contribs) 18:54, 6 August 2022‎ (UTC)

@Fulroster7965: User:Deer876 uploaded this file and claims to own the copyright. How can you be the sole copyright owner if Deer876 also owns the copyright? Thuresson (talk) 03:47, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Deer876 has been sourcing information for the Del Water Gap wikipedia page and asked me for permission to upload the image

I gave them written permission to add the image to the commons

I'm assuming they made a mistake in claiming that they were the copyright owner

I can provide further proof that I am the owner of the image if necessary

Thanks for your help! Fulroster7965 (talk) 04:32, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: As per Thuresson. Permission should be handled via COM:VRT anyway. --Yann (talk) 08:20, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Göteborg Energi building.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

• File:Göteborg Energi sign.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
• File:Göteborg Energi building.JPG (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: if both show the exterior of a building in Sweden, then these must be restored. As per COM:FOP Sweden: Following the WMF official statement on 9 August 2017, it's strongly recommend not to submit any deletion requests just based on simple reasons like "no FOP for artworks in Sweden," and try the best to keep the de facto uploads, with {{FoP-Sweden}} template permanently tagged. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:11, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per above. Also there is nothing to get a copyright here. --Yann (talk) 21:26, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1919 Giroux Lake JA Lyttle Farewell (37060121700).jpg

Deleted, but educational. The low resolution image has led to the finding of higher resolution versions of the news articles, only because we kept this version, and there are more to find and match to this image. It also represents an image of the family archive. --RAN (talk) 05:57, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

You neglected to mention and link the corresponding deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:1919 Giroux Lake JA Lyttle Farewell (37060121700).jpg. I'll just repeat what I wrote there: “I don't see how this collection of three barely legible newspaper clippings pasted on a sheet together with a low-resolution photograph is in scope. Three of the four exist as separate files as well, the fourth even has cut off text here.” --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

• There is no obligation to link to the deletion, it is understood that if a file has been deleted, the text of the deletion can be accessed. The deleted original contains an image of an article that is still being searched for. As I pointed out previously, we need the lowres images if we want to replace them with hires images. --RAN (talk) 23:54, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment A newspaper article can be anonymous, if not signed. Here it is so small we can't even read the text. Yann (talk) 10:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

If you want to continue searching, you can still access the photos at [12] and [13]. You don't need the Commons files for that. --Rosenzweig τ 14:58, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done still out of scope. Ankry (talk) 17:49, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Larissa Kerner in 2019.jpg

Hi, I would love to undelete this photo, as it's my own Work. This photo was taken by me at the Nena Concert on the 18th of March 2022 in Strasbourg, and I used this photo specifically cause I knew I wouldn't have any Copyright problems as it's my own Work. Thanks --Randomgxrl (talk) 11:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

As you claimed that for all your uploads, that were clear and unambiguous copyvios, why should we trust you with this picture? Looks like any other of your stolen pics from somewhere in the net. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 13:05, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

@Randomgxrl: , many of your uploads have been deleted. The file you mention on top is obviously not created in 2022 but possibly 2019. It is copied from this professional photo on instagram: https://www.instagram.com/p/Bxu_w4toPM8/?hl=de. Can you please indicate which photo was made by yourself in Strasbourg? The 3 photos from 2022 were deleted by User:Rosenzweig because they were copyright violations. Ellywa (talk) 13:07, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

They uploaded File:Nena 2020.jpg again as well, that looks a wee bit like a selfie by Nena, but could be as well really one of the uploader from a 2020 concert. This time they inserted a copyright sign in there at the top. It was as well deleted before. Grüße vom Sänger ♫ ^(talk) 13:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

It is not the same file though, it is the file that was deleted as File:Nena in 2020.jpg. Looks like a cropped screenshot from a video to me. --Rosenzweig τ 14:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to know why a screenshot would not be allowed? I can understand for some of them, but in this case, the Video was taken by Nena herself, so why not allow me to post a screenshot of this Video? I don't think Nena would blame me at all... thanks for your reply Randomgxrl (talk) 15:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Because the copyright is owned by the author, and in that case that is Nena, not you. It's not about "would not mind", it's about free content. This means either you own the copyright and can release an image (or another media file like a video) under a free license, or someone else did release an image under a free license, or the image is so old that the copyrights have expired. Please read Commons:Project scope and Commons:Licensing if you haven't already done so. --Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Larissa Kerner 2022.jpg had that date in the image description, so the user probably means that one. Though I have a hard time believing these claims after deleting a whole bunch of clear copyvios uploaded by that user. --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

i did mean this photo actually and not the 2019, sorry for the confusion. This photo was taken by me but if you need any proofs could you maybe tell me how to prove it to you? Randomgxrl (talk) 15:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

How about uploading the full, unedited, full-size photo with Exif data? That should be considerably larger than the rather small file (55 kB) that was uploaded previously. Even compact cameras and cell phones produce photos with a size of several MB and dimensions of 3000 x 4000 pixels or larger. --Rosenzweig τ 17:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done Uploading the full-resolution file does not require undeletion. Ankry (talk) 17:50, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Татьяна Поп.jpg

I uploaded the photo at the request of the person on it. The photo is needed in order to place it in an article about this person: https://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Поп,_Татьяна_Ивановна&editintro=Шаблон%3AEditnotice%2FНыне_живущие

Probably concerns Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tatiana Pop.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 11:28, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose We need the permission from the copyright holder (probably the photographer) for a free license. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:30, 8 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 09:39, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Radio Dalsan Logo.png

We added the CC mark to the footer of our website and give full permission to Wikipedia / wikimedia commons to use this our works.

Dalsanmedia (talk) 07:15, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: @Dalsanmedia: Please add categories. --Yann (talk) 09:42, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg

The artist who took the picture, Helen Britton, has mailed her permission to permissions-de@wikimedia.org on August 9. Please undelete. --Kaethe17 (talk) 18:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:08, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Koorosh Ghorbani childhood.jpg

Hi, I uploaded this file to use in a article. its biography article which is reviewing by the manager right now. I notice the photo is deleted so I started to search about the reasons. I think its deleted because of not having license. I uploaded this photo on my flicker account months before and I learned to change the copy right (all rights reserved) to (copyright free). with this change that I made I want this photo back please. and the article will be reviewed by manager so if he decides that its unnesasary they will remove it. I saw most of the biographies does have the photo and I think reading an article that contains photo is much more attractive for everyone. I also have few other photos that are nominated for deletion because I didn't know about the license and how to prove, still I have serious question and I hope wiki media don't see me as a person who violent the copy right rules. I try my best to learn as soon as possible and don't messed up. Thanks you in advance for helping me best regards

Neginghaderii (talk) 09:27, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

@Neginghaderii: Which article do you wish to use the photo in? Ankry (talk) 08:22, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi, Thanks for replying.

https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/پیش%E2%80%8Cنویس:کوروش_قربانی

this is the article which has some problems because I'm almost new user and try to learn and write more, but we are figure it out and make it correct based on wikipedia rules. I wrote for the manager to read it and accept it if the problem is solved.

I hope that I solve copyright problem, too. if wikipedia needs a license please tell me how can I attach that and where I should look for, in the camera options or in the flicker which I uploaded it or I don't know anywhere.

Thank you in advance Neginghaderii (talk) 14:55, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

@Neginghaderii: So you only need to provide an evidence to VRT that you are the original photographer of this non-digital photo as it was requested in the DR. Ankry (talk) 11:15, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Yes, But how?

If I learn I can upload couple of photos which they are kinda rare, from motorsport riders, bikes. most of the files that are being used now its so very old. I mean the bikes is not like that anymore or even clothing its improved, they really needs to be up to date. thanks in advance Neginghaderii (talk) 16:50, 14 July 2022 (UTC)

If you are the photographer who made the old photos, you likely have negatives. And it is up to you how will you prove the authorship. If you are not, the photographer should contact VRT. If the photographer is unknown, we can do nothing until copyright expires (in US 95 years after publication or 120 years after making the photo). Ankry (talk) 17:38, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done No response. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Ser.Silv. taken by Mário Novais

• File:Salazar 10.png
• File:Mário Novais, António de Oliveira Salazar (1959).jpg
• File:Américo Thomaz.png
• File:Gertrudes Thomaz.jpg

Although this user has laundered licenses for the vast majority of his photographs, as well as added false claims of file reviews from other reviewers, treated to remove deletion requests and no permission marks and –in a more personal case– he has said that he was going to report me, the truth is that these four photographs are in the public domain in Portugal and in the United States according to the PD-Portugal-URAA template.

In addition, I've myself reviewed three of those photographs –the one of Salazar in black and white already presented the complete information when I saw it–, and they were taken, according to information from the sources of the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation, by Portuguese photographer Mário Novais, deceased in 1967.
83.61.234.200 13:48, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

 Question Were they published before March 1989? If no, URAA does not apply and they may be copyrighted in US if their author(s) died less than 70 years ago. Ankry (talk) 18:28, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

For File:Mário Novais, António de Oliveira Salazar (1959).jpg, it's dated in 1959. Something that applies also to File:Salazar 10.png which is a colored version from the same photo session. For File:Américo Thomaz.png and File:Gertrudes Thomaz.jpg, both files come from the same archive from the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation. here is one of the other files alvailable in the same archive, uploaded by @RAN and, in the soruce from which this image comes, it is dated circa 1960. According with RAN's comment in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Américo Thomaz.png, "images prior to 1970 were not eligible for copyright so they do not fall into the URAA loophole". 83.61.234.200 18:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@Ankry: Yes, it's prior to 1989 because in Flickr there is a credit to those files:

• File:Américo Thomaz.png - here
• File:Mário Novais, António de Oliveira Salazar (1959).jpg - here
• File:Gertrudes Thomaz.jpg - here.

This credit says in Portuguese: "Fotógrafo: Mário Novais (1899-1967). Produzida durante a actividade do Estúdio Mário Novais: 1925-1985." (Photographer: Mário Novais. Produced during the activity of the Novais Study (1925-85).)
83.61.234.200 21:51, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

The question is not when were the images taken, it is when were they first published. That is not the same thing. --Rosenzweig τ 16:17, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

According with the article of Mário Novais in portuguese, his photographs were adquired by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation and transferred to its archive in 1985, this is, prior to 1989.
83.61.234.200 00:33, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done Discussion has gone stale. As these were deleted in an IAR mass purge, it is best for the discussion to continue in a DR when the situation is not clear. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BSMRAU Logo By Lava.png

Hello, the file in question has been redone by me and uploaded, no copyright intended. Can you help me restore it cause our university page doesn't contain a logo currently. So how can I do that without infringing a copyright? Thanks.

--Bm.lava (talk) 06:55, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done @Bm.lava: Please have an official representative of the university send a license release via email, following the instructions at COM:VRT. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:59, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The cover of the book "Anthology" - the books of Eliezer Glaubach-Gal.pdf

שלום, אני שדמה שני שאולוף, ויקיפדית מזה שנתיים. אני עושה שירות לאומי עם קשיש ניצול שואה בשם פרופ' אליעזר גלאובך-גל. אליעזר הוא כותב הספר שהעלתי את תמונתו, והוא ביקש ממני להעלות תמונה זו לויקיפדיה. אבקש להסיר את מחיקת הקובץ. לפרטים נוספים ניתן לפנות אלי. תודה רבה. --שששאולוף (talk) 10:13, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Book cover. Permission needed via COM:VRT from the copyright holder (probably the publisher). --Yann (talk) 07:47, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:מעטפת הספר אנתולוגיה- ספרי אליעזר גלאובך.pdf

שלום, אני שדמה שני שאולוף, ויקיפדית מזה שנתיים. אני מתנדבת בשירות לאומי עם קשיש ניצול שואה בשם פרופ' אליעזר גלאובך-גל. אליעזר הוא כותב הספר שהעלתי את תמונתו, והוא ביקש ממני להעלות תמונה זו לויקיפדיה. אבקש לבטל את מחיקת הקובץ. לפרטים נוספים ניתן לפנות אלי. תודה רבה. --שששאולוף (talk) 10:17, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Book cover. Permission needed via COM:VRT from the copyright holder (probably the publisher). --Yann (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:כריכה קדמית ואחורית של הספר "לצידו של ענק".jpg

שלום, אני שדמה שני שאולוף, ויקיפדית מזה שנתיים. אני מתנדבת בשירות לאומי עם קשיש ניצול שואה בשם פרופ' אליעזר גלאובך-גל. אליעזר הוא כותב הספר שהעלתי את תמונתו, והוא ביקש ממני להעלות תמונה זו לויקיפדיה. אבקש לבטל את מחיקת הקובץ. לפרטים נוספים ניתן לפנות אלי. תודה רבה. --שששאולוף (talk) 10:21, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Book cover. Permission needed via COM:VRT from the copyright holder (probably the publisher). --Yann (talk) 07:48, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:כריכה קדמית ואחורית של הספר "ר' משה זימרמן".pdf

שלום, אני שדמה שני שאולוף, ויקיפדית מזה שנתיים. אני מתנדבת בשירות לאומי עם קשיש ניצול שואה בשם פרופ' אליעזר גלאובך-גל. אליעזר הוא כותב הספר שהעלתי את תמונתו, והוא ביקש ממני להעלות תמונה זו לויקיפדיה. אבקש לבטל את מחיקת הקובץ. לפרטים נוספים ניתן לפנות אלי. תודה רבה. --שששאולוף (talk) 10:22, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Book cover. Permission needed via COM:VRT from the copyright holder (probably the publisher). --Yann (talk) 07:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:אחד ממפעלי איכות חיים וסביבה שיזם הפרופ' אליעזר גלאובך-גל.pdf

שלום, אני שדמה שני שאולוף, ויקיפדית מזה שנתיים. אני מתנדבת בשירות לאומי עם קשיש ניצול שואה בשם פרופ' אליעזר גלאובך-גל. אליעזר הוא כותב הספר שהעלתי את תמונתו, והוא ביקש ממני להעלות תמונה זו לויקיפדיה. אבקש לבטל את מחיקת הקובץ. לפרטים נוספים ניתן לפנות אלי. תודה רבה. --שששאולוף (talk) 10:28, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Book cover. Permission needed via COM:VRT from the copyright holder (probably the publisher). --Yann (talk) 07:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1920 - before the storm.jpg

IIRC this file had an OTRS permission and/or was uploaded by the creator. I am 100% sure I personally corresponded with the artist, who agreed to do this, and I am 95% sure I remember seeing either the OTRS permission or his name as the uploader in that file. I see the same fate also met File:Jakub Różalski.jpg and File:Jakub Rozalski.jpg which I also believe to have been uploaded by the author (selfies, IIRC). PS. The artist wiki account is User:JRozalski. He uploaded the image himself, correctly described it as his, correctly released the rights (used the free license), and in the description noted it's his artwork: "Before the storm is one on the most characteristic painting in the style and aesthetic of my 1920+ world.". Please undelete all affected images and revert Commons Delinker who removed the image(s) from various Wikipedia articles. Note I also found my correspondence to the author (although I was never CC'ed on an OTRS @ if one was sent), nd I notified him of this discussion. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 10:02, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Ping User:Fitindia, the deleting admin. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 10:14, 11 August 2022 (UTC) PPS. Also ping User:Masur, nominator (eh, namieszałeś tym razem). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 10:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Have restored the said files.- FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 12:10, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: See above. --Yann (talk) 07:46, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marcel Douwe Dekker down.jpg and File:Marcel Douwe Dekker inactive.jpg

Derived works of File:Marcel Douwe Dekker.jpg, which was restored recently, see here. These images were designed in 2010 especially for Wikipedia to serve as illustration for my own user page. For the sake of preservation I like to have them restored, thank you. -- Mdd (talk) 13:32, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per previous decision. --Yann (talk) 07:55, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:7agon4ix.jpg

eklemiş olduğum fotoğraf dosyası telif hakkı ihlali nedeniyle silinmiş. silinen dosya telif hakkı ihlali olarak işaretlenmiş. ayrıca ortada bir telif hakkı sahibi yok bir tv dizisinden ekran görüntüsü olması telif hakkı ihlali yaptığımı ispatlamaz. zaten o tv dizisi telifsiz bir dizi. dolayısıyla silinen fotoğrafında telif hakkı yok. Kuruntu ailesi (talk)(UTC) 21:22, 11 Ağustos 2022

---

 Not done: Screenshot from a TV series, no permission. --Yann (talk) 07:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sasa Mirkovic u 2021.jpg

Hello, please undelete this image, Sasa_Mirkovic_u_2021.jpeg, it is not copyright. If you check the email of wikipedia commons you will see that the image is uploaded in march of 2021. Since that news article is after in that year, it can only mean that the image was taken from wikipedia. The images in its first, is the owners sole ownership, taken from private archive, which was also confirmed in the email for copyright commons.

Please do not go arround and verify something that is not correct, just to do something in a day. Please be thorough, because this errors create a lot of problems for this kind of edits.. Regards,

Dj — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spawnjfk (talk • contribs) 18:22, 12 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Probbaly out of scope. The only edits by this user are his own biography. Yann (talk) 18:26, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 07:45, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:New moon. Snapshot RVB.jpg

Thank you so much.

File:New moon. Snapshot RVB.jpg

Description English: MOON: ASH LIGHT.

This is a phenomenon that takes place a few times a year.

The Moon sporting an earthshine on Friday February 4 twilight.

Earthshine is considered one of the most beautiful astronomical phenomena, and was first explained at the beginning of the 16th century by Leonardo da Vinci.

There was a request to delete my file so I wanted to let it known that this area was extremely thin at the time of filming. https://mobile.twitter.com/veronicaindream/status/1489753723597381632

I thought it was good to share this file precisely because of this.

This is pretty great data (from a ongoing project since 2018) so I don't think I posted anything useless.

This file contains a series of knowledge. Besides, in the PDF on my web space, we see a galactic view of the crescent and how thin it is at that moment.

To obtain the crescent like that and the moon a little visible, therefore the phenomenon, it was not easy. In addition without a tripod.

Optical illusion. (Astronomy)

This snippet shows a light portion very different from what is seen from the ground at the time.

So this is an image that demonstrates two phenomenons, an ash light and, the astronomical optical illusion (which is wide in terms of phenomenons, but here is one.

Everyone can make mistakes) Date ‪4 February 2022‬ Source Own work Author VeronicaInDream

Date/Time 00:24, 6 February 2022

Dimensions 360 × 202 (10 KB)

User VeronicaInDream

---

 Done given the lack of consensus that this file is out of COM:SCOPE. The original DR had no activity besides the nominator and uploader, and this request has sat for days with no response. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:24, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Степаненко Олександр Данилович.jpg

The photo that now is posted in the biography of Stepanenko Oleksandr Danilovich is not his. The photo shows a person who has nothing to do with Oleksandr Danilovich Stepanenko. So I uploaded his real photo. I am his relative. Stepanenko Oleksandr Danilovich died a long time ago. I scanned his photo and uploaded it. What else do you need to have real photos of my relative on your resource. Now the photo of my grandfather shows some unknown person. Please undelete the photo of my grandfather, so I can set it in his biography. Now it looks like a desecration of my dead grandfather. On his page is a photo of another person. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrii13 (talk • contribs) 08:33, 13 August 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose File:Степаненко Александр Данилович.jpg and File:Степаненко Олександр Данилович.jpg. is the same photo, uploaded by different users with different copyright claims. Subject died in 1975 and it is unlikely that a Wikimedia user owns the copyright. Thuresson (talk) 14:43, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

That's a strong case for socking. Yann (talk) 16:50, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

I am his relative. Yes, he died, but I have his passport. And the photo in the passport proves that I uploaded his photo, and other users uploaded a photo of some person unknown to me who is not my grandfather. Andrii13 (talk) 08:07, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

@Andrii13: The copyright is owned by the photographer. So we need a permission via COM:VRT from the copyright holder. Thanks, Yann (talk) 08:11, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

I don't understand. What copyright?

I have the wrong photo of some unknown person on the page of my relative:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11LZD1HO1gT5kd2WVRo9tFhhqbMtSo-EP/view?usp=sharing

I also have the correct photo of my relative, that i made myself from his archive pictures:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/11Mjm20vkX07YKCeWtJA6dd6V-N0PR6Hi/view?usp=sharing

I want to set correct photo to the page of my relative.

No-one can have copyright to my photo, because i made it myself.

What should i do to set my correct photo to my grandfather's page on wiki? 185.132.2.93 10:51, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: No, you don't own the copyright of this, since you are not the photographer. Owning a copy, or being a relative doesn't give you the copyright. --Yann (talk) 15:50, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Madeira wine Borges polosuché 10 leté Portugal Shop.jpg

I made this picture Madeira wine Borges polosuché 10 leté Portugal Shop.jpg for this shop www.portugalshop.cz. I have also the source files. Thanks for undeletion. --Hlavomet (talk) 20:10, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

@Túrelio: , if you agree, this file could be undeleted imho, I beleive what the uploader is writing here. Ellywa (talk) 09:18, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose I think an evidence that the requester is the author and that they are still authorised to grant a free license are needed (as for any previously published image). These can be provided in VRT process if the original source image(s) cannot be published for any reason. Ankry (talk) 12:21, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 15:53, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DERICHEBOURG-multiservices.png

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2022081210004364. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:02, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: per request. Please add permission template on the file page. --Ellywa (talk) 10:51, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Runtu Office RC1.png

Please restore the following pages:

• File:Runtu Office RC1.png (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Runtu Office is free software. Here is an example of his screenshot File:Screenshot of Runtu Office.png Артём 13327 (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Which is the license and who should be credited as the copyright owner? Thuresson (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: Per pl:Runtu, the licence is GNU GPL. --De728631 (talk) 15:10, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Russian Olympic Committee flag.svg

Per User:Primefac's comment:

Opposed to this because it (and the Paralympic variant) were vetted more than a year ago and some of most on-top-of-it Commons admins (some of which I consider friends) have tacitly cleared it for use (and I should know, I've been dinged a few times now for not-quite-free flag files in the past). In other words, the licensing information is accurate. Primefac (talk) 07:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Pinging @Ellywa and ShinePhantom: File:Russian Paralympic Committee flag (2021).svg should also be kept for the same reason. Tholme (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose The Template:PD-RU-exempt listed on the file page is not applicable for this flag. It is valid for "State symbols and signs (flags, emblems, orders, any forms of money, and the like), as well as symbols and signs of municipal formations". This flag is not of the State of Russia. Therefore it cannot be maintained on Commons imho and I deleted it per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Russian Olympic Committee flag.svg. I am still seeing no evidence why this flag is in PD. Ellywa (talk) 05:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: per Ellywa. --De728631 (talk) 14:59, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tesslo Logo.jpg

This Logo is in the public domain, It is the Official Logo of the Tesslo Brand and has no copyrights of any kind attached to it. Here is the website of the Tesslo Brand www.tesslo.shop,. The Logo can be used by not Just Wikipedia but anyone, anywhere in the world — Preceding unsigned comment added by Classicman2021 (talk • contribs)

• Since March 1989 any creative work is copyrighted automatically, regardless of copyright notice existence and this logo seems to be above US TOO. If the logo was published earlier, please provide an evidence. Ankry (talk) 00:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Ankry. --Yann (talk) 07:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:First Russian National Army.jpg

The reason stated by User:Well-Informed Optimist for deletion was «Exact or scaled-down duplicate (F8)», which in my opinion, is not correct since the new file is a modern drawing (reconctruction) while the deleted one is a photo of the original emblem. In any case, I believe, that for educational purposes it is better to keep at least one photo of every original object and a particular Wikipedia community may decide whether to use a graphical reconstruction or a photo of an original object. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

I can't see the original but  Support if one was a photo, and the other a drawing. Those are not in any way duplicates. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:06, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 07:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:No. 25 Squadron B-24 Liberator c January - August 1945 on a bombing mission over the Netherlands East Indies (aka the DEI - now Indonesia).pdf

Please restore the following pages:

• File:RAAFPhotoJune196725SQNDarwin.pdf (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)
• File:No. 25 Squadron B-24 Liberator c January - August 1945 on a bombing mission over the Netherlands East Indies (aka the DEI - now Indonesia).pdf (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: Both files appear to be {{PD-AustraliaGov}} but used free text instead of the template — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:38, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

@Yann and Ruthven: You are the deleting admins. Would you review? — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

@JJMC89: Actually these should be uploaded as JPEG instead of PDF. Yann (talk) 07:49, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

 Not done @JJMC89 I agree with Yann: reupload the files using a correct format, and add a valid license template. Ruthven (msg) 07:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: See above. --Yann (talk) 10:16, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two Flickr PDMark owner images from Premsa Liceu

• File:4726- 023 -® A Bofill (25438811316).jpg
• File:4726- 008 -® A Bofill (25464967025).jpg

were both deleted back in 2016, before we had Template:PDMark-owner. They're images of ballet and/or opera dancers from the Liceu, a respected opera house, just under 200 years old, so seem to be exactly what PDMark-owner is intended for. Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 14:07, 10 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose {{PDMark-owner}} applies when the photo originates from the photographer's Flickr stream. Premsa Liceu is not the photographer and we have no evidence that they are the copyright holder. Ankry (talk) 12:35, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

Don't see the word photographer anywhere on the template; it says "copyright holder" in the text and "owner" in the title. These are photos of the dancers performing for the Liceu, which is an organization. They own the rights to these photos and are releasing them. This is what the template is for. --GRuban (talk) 00:37, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

For what it is worth, both of these photos on Flickr (25438811316, 25464967025) indicate in their subtitles that the photographer is A Bofill. This is almost certainly Barcellona photographer Antoni Bofill, who is credited online with many photos from Gran Teatre del Liceu. However, I don't know the rights relationship between him and Liceu. —RP88 (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

Aha! https://operafashion.blog/2020/08/04/bofill/ "... Antoni and Toni Bofill, two generations of legendary visual artist, official photographers at the Gran Teatre del Liceu since 1977.

"Since 1977 you are official photographers of the Gran Teatre del Liceu in Barcelona. How did the collaboration with one of the greatest opera houses in the world start?

Father-It happened so fast, because Gran Teatre del Liceu was looking for a photographer, and the laboratory I was working with (for photo development) knew that I worked in theater, dance, etc., so they told me about Liceu’s request. I contacted the theater (those years it was a private theater managed by the impresario Joan Antoni Pamias): Liceu offered me a first assignment for the opera “L’Africana” sung by my beloved Montserrat Caballé and Plácido Domingo!!! From that moment on, they took me for covering Liceu’s photographic needs." --GRuban (talk) 14:05, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support In this case I think we can work with PDMark-owner since it is clear now that Bofill is closely cooperating with Premsa Liceu. De728631 (talk) 15:19, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per De728631. Licenses reviwed. --Yann (talk) 13:41, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SS 114 percorso.png - PD work deleted as obsoleted by work with CC-BY-SA

As this work has less restrictive license, it was not obsoleted. I found it while reviewing copyright status of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:ITA_SS_114_route.png Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 14:24, 14 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: per request. Ruthven (msg) 13:01, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Escudo CUCEI.svg

Please restore File:Escudo CUCEI.svg, since it falls under {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. The file depicts the coat of arms of a recognized organization, in this case, the CUCEI, a recognized university operated by the University of Guadalajara. SistemaRayoXP (talk) 19:56, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support per nomination. PD-Coa-Mexico. De728631 (talk) 14:55, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: See above. @SistemaRayoXP: Please add a source and check the categories. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Remi Jones (journalist) Hampton's Fashion Week 2022.png File:Remi Jones (journalist).jpg

Hi, I would like to request undeletion for the File:Remi Jones (journalist).jpg I took these pictures myself. I am posting it here because it is free for everyone and anyone to use as well. as File:Remi Jones (journalist) Hampton's Fashion Week 2022.png File: Remi Jones(journalist) Hampton's Fashion Week 2022.jpg

There is no file by that names. Since the files you uploaded were previously uploaded elsewhere, you need to confirm the license via email. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Yann (talk) 07:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: See my comment above. --Yann (talk) 10:21, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Under the Stacks.jpg

I am the commissioned web designer of Atty. Saul Hofileña Jr. He is the owner of this uploaded book cover image and he wishes for it to be uploaded and be link on his page.

Thank you for your consideration! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AC 1987 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose - @AC 1987: , please closely follow the procedure described on VRT to show permission of the copyright holder. Ellywa (talk) 11:18, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: per Ellywa. Ruthven (msg) 13:03, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request by AC 1987

• File:Luna, Arquitecto.jpg
• File:Vestments of the Golden Leaf.jpg
• File:Elegy.jpg
• File:Cartas Philippinensis.jpg
• File:Quadricula (HOCUS II).jpg
• File:Juicio Final (HOCUS III).jpg
• File:The Last Bohemian.jpg

Good day!

I am Angeli Carlos, the commissioned web designer of Atty. Saul Hofileña Jr, the owner of the book cover images I am requesting for undeletion.

I am tasked to make a biography page for him (draft under approval) and he wished these images to be tagged on his page. You may view his website at [14] for verification of these images.

Thank you very much! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AC 1987 (talk • contribs) 11:34, 17 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

@AC 1987: Please follow the procedure at COM:VRT. (Draft was declined.) Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:43, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 13:37, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:We Were Hyphy Poster.png

I am the copyright holder and I have granted permission for this image to be used

---

@ThatGasolineSmell: I have sent you instructions on your talk page on what you need to do to prove that you are the copyright holder. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

@King of Hearts: Thank you! Appreciate the help!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThatGasolineSmell (talk • contribs) 02:59, 18 August 2022‎ (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LogoSangreFucsia.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Sangre_Fucsia.jpg

This is the logo of Sangre Fucsia, a Spanish podcast. The logo has been created exclusivly for the podcast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gaelx (talk • contribs) 07:19, 16 August 2022‎ (UTC)

@Gaelx: State the reason(s) for the requested undeletion. Thuresson (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done No reason for undeletion provided. Ankry (talk) 18:29, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:National Tiger Conservation Authority logo.png

The NTCA logo can be undeleted and restored as it is acceptable for Wikipedia to use logos belonging to others for encyclopedic purposes. This represents a government body which is operates in public domain and this logo image can be uploaded under fair use policy. --Anand2202 (talk) 03:35, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose The logo will be PD in India in 2066 and Wikimedia Commons does not accept Fair Use. You can probably upload the logo directly to Wikipedia if they accept Fair Use logos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ankry (talk • contribs) 18:20, 18 August 2022‎ (UTC)

---

 Not done: Per Ankry. --De728631 (talk) 08:38, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gif-version.gif

Hello. This media is part of an astract named The 21st century: ideologies, fears, unmet needs (Socrastic message)

In Eupalinos or the Architect: Paul Valéry stages a dialogue between Socrates and Phèdre in the realm of shadows. He uses the form of Socratic dialogue to revisit the Platonic concepts of mimesis, reality (or reality), or the effects of writing.

He thus puts back on the agenda this form of philosophical practice increasingly used from the 1970s, in particular by Gerd Achenbach, Michel Tozzi and Michel Weber.

The Socratic dialogue is also widely used in psychotherapy techniques, such as schema therapy.

More is coming by the next months.

Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VeronicaInDream (talk • contribs) 22:05, 18 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

---

 Not done: Not currently deleted. Add your comment in the deletion request. --Yann (talk) 22:06, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:京都大学.svg

According to Japanese Copyright law,a work made by organizations are copyrighted for 50years. The logo of Kyoto university officially adopted in 1990. However, the original logo was designed in 1951. Therefore,I guess this logo must be public domain. Thank you. Ramsal18 (talk) 00:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: Commons:Deletion requests/File:京都大学.svg. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JK Tech Logo.svg

re-upload it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jktechnosoft (talk • contribs) 12:18, 19 August 2022‎ (UTC)

---

 Done: Deleted today on the uploader's request and upload again. --De728631 (talk) 12:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mozilla_loading_animation_on_Solaris_10.gif

The GIF in question is a screencapture from a machine running Oracle Solaris 10 and Mozilla browser. While Solaris is not open source software, Mozilla is. I don't see why this isn't allowed on the commons.

 Oppose The logo visible in this GIF does not belong to mozilla but to Oracle and it is not free. Ankry (talk) 18:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Ankry is right. The Mozilla browser does not override Oracle's copyright for the Solaris logo. De728631 (talk) 08:36, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done per above. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:59, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DHCA Logo Shield & Bible.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

• File:DHCA Logo Shield & Bible.jpg (edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

Reason: This file is not currently guarded by any copyright laws. Additionally it has been uploaded with written expressed permission by the original creator and the entities currently using the file as a logo. OrrWillis (talk) 14:01, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

@OrrWillisa: every work made by a human being is subject to copyright, based on international law. As you hava a written permission for these images, please follow the procedure of VRT. If succesful, the images can be undeleted. Regards, Ellywa (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Uploader should follow VRT procedure. For now, this request can be closed. --Ellywa (talk) 20:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ana Varela Miño.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2022081910005734. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:52, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: @Mussklprozz: . --Yann (talk) 16:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ninoshima Academy.jpg

This photo is licensed under a Creative Commons License and may be used for commercial or non-commercial purposes provided that (1) attribution is acknowledged and (2) all rights reserved.Please explain why you removed it. stupid! JR East E231 (talk) 21:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

@JR East E231: It is an ND (no derivs) license, which does not allow for derivative works. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done per above. (BTW, don't call another user stupid, as such a comment is regarded as uncivil.) Yasu (talk) 15:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

این تصویر توسط خودم ساخته شده است و از اینترنت استخراج نشده است — Preceding unsigned comment added by Katusha90 (talk • contribs)

---

 Not done: Not currently deleted. Please provide a file name. --Yann (talk) 15:30, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ansu Fati.jpg File:Alex Collado.jpg File:Ez Abde.jpg File:Arnau Tenas.jpg

Hi, I am requesting undeletion for these files because they are indeed my own work. I have proof. They are screenshots from a video I took. Had this similar issue with File: Gavi (footballer).jpg but I proved my own work by emailing the video's metadata to a moderator. Where can I do this? again? Thank You TheSoccerBoy (talk) 03:26, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

@TheSoccerBoy: Please see COM:VRT for instructions how to verify your authorship. De728631 (talk) 08:58, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done per above: VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 17:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nnamdi Azikiwe PC.jpg

The file depicts the first president of Nigeria Dr Nnamdi Ben Azikiwe.

I hereby request undeletion of this file for the following reasons: 1. The image is an official photograph and there are no copyright liabilities or obligations in the United States. 2. The image has attained a level of use which is deemed as overly public, having been published several times and hung in government offices in official capacity in Nigeria and around the world. 3. The subject of the image has been deceased since 11 May 1996.

--Wordboss58 (talk) 10:53, 15 August 2022 (UTC) Wordboss 15.08.2022

•  Oppose I'm afraid, but none of these points are valid when it comes to Nigerian copyright.
  1. Even government works from Nigeria have a copyright term of 70 years after the first publication. This photo was allegedly created in 1963, so it cannot have been published more than 70 years ago. Also, Nigeria is a member of the Berne Convention which means that there are mutual copyright relations with the United States.
  2. Public availability does not make a work public domain. It would have to be transferred by the copyright holder which is apparently not the case here.
  3. The lifetime of the subject of a photograph is irrelevant because copyright is usually held by the photographer.

Per {{PD-Nigeria}}, the copyright protection for photographs expires 50 years after their first publication. Since this is an official portrait, we could assume that it is now public domain in Nigeria. However, it was not yet public domain in 1996, so it was retroactively copyrighted in the US by the URAA agreement. De728631 (talk) 12:33, 15 August 2022 (UTC)

We have had several cases where URAA didn't apply for government works. Yann (talk) 15:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Those might have been cases of {{PD-US-EdictGov}}, but I don't think photographs of any provenance would by exempt from URAA. De728631 (talk) 14:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Law doesn't change because of the medium, but because of the copyright owner. I don't see any reason why photographs of which the copyright is owned by the government would be a different case than other types of works. Yann (talk) 10:19, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

When a foreign government does not have a general copyright exemption for its works (like Nigeria), URAA will treat those works like any other type of work unless there is a specific exemption in US law. Per {{PD-EdictGov}}, this exemption applies to "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" but not the photographs. De728631 (talk) 08:50, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done the photo is copyrighted in US. A written free license permissio from the copyright holder is needed. Ankry (talk) 13:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Газета Костанайские новости первая полоса.jpg

Была заявка на удаление данной фотографии, так как она якобы нарушает авторские права. Я работаю в издании Костанайские новости и я автор данной фотографии. И накаких претензий у нас к этому фото нет. Почему оно удалено? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.76.91.178 (talk • contribs) 05:53, 19 August 2022‎ (UTC)

There was an application for the removal of this photo, as it allegedly violates copyright. I work for Kostanay News and I am the author of this photo. And we have no complaints about this photo. Why is it removed?

translator: Google Translator

Hello. The photo was removed because it shows several issues of Kostanay News, and our rules require that we get a permission by email from the copyright holder of these papers. If you work for this newspaper, please see COM:VRT for instructions how to send a permission email. Please note, however, that all photos uploaded here at Commons need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose, and not just for use at Wikipedia. De728631 (talk) 08:33, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done per above: VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 17:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:heimatland.jpg

Hi, I have received permission from the copyright holder of the image Heimatland.jpg and request that it be undeleted so I can post it to Wikipedia. I can forward the permission per email if needed. Regards, Cormac Walsh --Walshcormac (talk) 09:29, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi, permissions needs to be send directly from rights-holder to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS). Forwarding is not accepted. --Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

OK. I will organise that. Thanks! Walshcormac (talk) 09:48, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 13:35, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:bradleylabormanheadshot.jpg

This image was deleted from the 2023 Chicago Mayoral Election page. This photo is used with permission from Bradley Laborman, 2022. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VoteLaborman (talk • contribs) 04:27, 20 August 2022‎ (UTC)

@VoteLaborman: We need written free license permission sent to us directly by the photo actual copyright holder. See VRT for details. And note, that if the copyright holder is not the photographer, they may also need to provide an evidence of copyright transfer contract. Ankry (talk) 17:17, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Everything was emailed and submitted for the copyright claim VoteLaborman (talk) 17:47, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

Not done, a ticket submitted to Commons:VRT will be dealt with in an appropriate way and undeleted if required. Thuresson (talk) 05:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cartel Rock Bellavista 2022.jpg

El cartel es diseño propio. Solicito su recuperación — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aggnet (talk • contribs)

@Aggnet: Published here a week before your upload to Commons. See COM:VRT and COM:DW. Ankry (talk) 17:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:22, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marcin Drag08.jpg

This is my private photo and I have full copyright to it - Marcin Drąg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vertebrate755 (talk • contribs) 16:58, 21 August 2022‎ (UTC)

 Oppose This file was uploaded by User:Wineisgood who also claims to own the copyright. Competing copyright claims can not be resolved on this page. Thuresson (talk) 17:12, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

 Comment There is also the ticket numeber 2022011210009694 about this image. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:18, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

 Info This ticket is half-year old. @Vertebrate755: You may ask at COM:VRTN what is the problem with this ticket and why the permission has not been accepted yet if you do not know that. Note, than if the copyright holder is not the photographer, we need also an evidence of copyright transfer. Ankry (talk) 17:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:21, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Kevin Andres Amaya Ochoa In elegant suit.jpg

Solicito recuperar esta foto y para después corregir lo que está mal.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 2800:e2:5880:b6c:9cd5:9a7c:b928:5e49 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 22 August 2022‎ (UTC)

 Info From image description history: "Marking as possible copyvio because Forged permission; no ticket 2017823000107891 exists". Thuresson (talk) 17:30, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose - Per COM:NOTHOST - each attempt at this uploader's self promotion has been deleted (es:Usuario:Kevin Andres Amaya Ochoa, es:Kevin Andres Amaya Ochoa (twice), and es:Biografia Kevin Andres Amaya Ochoa), and the uploader has thus been blocked on es.wiki. The addition of the bogus VRT ticket (See Template:PermissionTicket/2017823000107891) is consistent with the addition of a bogus valued image claim. NOTHERE nonsense. Эlcobbola _talk 17:44, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Obviously not, as per above. --Yann (talk) 18:24, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elektrarna Brestanica.JPG

Hi, I think this deletion was a mistake. This is a purely utilitarian building, and there is nothing to copyright here (related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elektrarna Brestanica.JPG). Yann (talk) 15:44, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support See COM:TOO Slovenia which says that only original artworks in architecture are copyrightable. De728631 (talk) 08:54, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:ElektrarnaBrestanica.JPG. De728631 (talk) 08:56, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

• Yes, thanks. This should be undeleted as well. Yann (talk) 10:22, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: One support, no opposition. --Yann (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nando Almeida.jpg

O arquivo deletado foi postado pelo próprio Nando Almeida e está no seu Flickr, e pelo que sei, tal fato autoriza a postagem no artigo. Por isso peço o restauro, e uma possível resposta em português. Obrigado.--Msoj0694 (talk) 22:26, 19 August 2022 (UTC)Msoj0694 19 de agosto de 2022

@Msoj0694:

1. There are two deleted photos under this name; which one are you talking about?
2. You claimed to be the author of these photos (the photographer); this contradicts with your statement above. How can we rely on your words then?
3. See VRT for procedures applied to previously published photos.

Ankry (talk) 17:25, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

I dont know answer in the English language.

As fotos usadas anteriormente eu baixei no Google e publiquei, não sabia que eram necessários os direitos autorais. Quanto à foto atual, foi postada pelo autor no Flickr, (tive contato com ele) quando ele foi informado que assim a foto poderia ser usada. Msoj0694 (talk) 22:51, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

The Flickr photo is under a non-commercial license. Non-commercial licenses are not accepted in Wikimedia Commons and only the author can change the license, not you. Ankry (talk) 13:41, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: The licence at Flickr is non-commercial and no-derivatives which is not allowed here at Commons. All uploads here need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose. --De728631 (talk) 12:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PAK 91 - 06 - Atelier Marcel Douwe Dekker.jpg

This is a self-portrait and part of a series of 14 images, see here, a documentary made be me of which I am the maker and own the copyright (author and sole owner of copyright). This picture was nominated with the rational "it is possible Mdd made these using a camera on a tripod and a self timer..." and the nominator already explained "The files below I am giving the benifit of the doubt and can be maintained unless somebody else judges in another way."

Now indeed this picture was made on a tripod, and this tripod was used in the pictures of all ten studio's in the old factory. It was so dark inside that building that a pretty larger closing time was used for all ten pictures of the studio's. In one of the last pictures, see here, you can also see the tripod which is held by one of the participants. Also those pictures where taken in 1993 with the Canon AE-1, I had bought years before, which containes the self timer which was used. -- Mdd (talk) 22:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

@Ellin Beltz: This seems to be an accident? No one at the DR was arguing for the deletion of this photo. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:39, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

If I may I like to comment on this, that the deletion request itself was beyond my comprehension at the time. The nomination ground in itself was, what I can now call, an oversimplification, a fallacy:

All of these photos are showing the uploader in person, User:Mdd. Mdd claims to be the author, but this appears highly unlikely. There is no evidence these image are indeed photographed by Mdd...

First of all I didn't understood the phrase highly unlikely... Over the last thirty years I have created over 500 self-portraits and self-staged portraits, see here on Flickr. Nowadays this is nothing special, but in the early days it was. I have published these works on Flickr in a special album online about 15 years ago, as a special branch of my work. The presentation also contains an album on my life with photographs mostly by others, see here. I had published those works as my own with a few exceptions. Now I have learned that such a publication alone grants you the right to be named the maker according to Dutch law, see Auteurswet H.1, art. 4)

Second the nomination speaks of there is no evidence..., as if this is a requirement to explicitly deliver proof. There is evidence in the circumstances, especially that most of the 20 nominated images were part of series of images. Such as the image of the undeletion-request here.

Third the nomination ground speaks of There is no evidence these image are indeed photographed by Mdd... Maybe here I have a limited understanding of English, but I read "photographed by Mdd" as me "taking the picture". It is obvious that if I am on the picture, I didn't directly took the picture. I only learned recently that the key question here is Who Owns the Copyright to the Photo If a Friend or Stranger Takes a Picture of You.

In the past two years I have spend quite some time reconsidering those images, this mass nomination and the outcome. Now I would also like to admit that this has had quite an alienating effect on me and others involved. The nomination itself and it outcome goes beyond what I consider good and enduring Wikimedia practice. Yet I in my own way can understand the decision Ellin Beltz make. I guess he thought "let's meet the nominator and the nominee half way...!?" -- Mdd (talk) 14:09, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done Apparent mistake, no response from deleting admin. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:04, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Adamillheadshot.png

Unable to upload again and first time using this system my apology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silverstatetechs (talk • contribs) 21:09, 22 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

 Oppose Photo available all over internet, including subject's official website. Thuresson (talk) 05:24, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Thuresson. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PodpiwekPRL.jpg

I am the author of the photo, so it’s public domain. Please restore it [К𝖗𝖆к𝖆𝖚К𝖗𝖆к𝖆𝖚] (talk) 00:52, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose The image description says it is from the 1970s and it looks like advertising from Poland. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Poland anonymous works from Poland are protected for at least 70 years. Thuresson (talk) 05:31, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

• It’s not anonymous work, I am the author. It’s not “advertising from the 1970s”, it’s a pack of Polish drink [К𝖗𝖆к𝖆𝖚К𝖗𝖆к𝖆𝖚] (talk) 22:13, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

• See COM:PACKAGING. Yann (talk) 09:13, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: The original packaging has a copyrightable and non-free image, so any derivative photos cannot be hosted without permission from the copyright holders of the Podpiwek packaging. --De728631 (talk) 12:53, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Алкалія (панорама).jpg and File:Алкалія (2).jpg

Hi folks! These photos were made by me and I uploaded them first to my own project Akkermanika (local wiki about my home region): the first photo and the second one. They're uploaded under the license Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 which is written on these pages. I cannot understand why these images were deleted :/ --Nykyforiv (talk) 19:57, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

These files are sourced from [15] with author Енциклопедія Білгород-Дністровщини, which translate to "Encyclopedia of Belgorod-Dniester region". Here the file has a free license, but the author is Аккерманіка. Can you explain this please? Yann (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Before my project had domain "wikibilhorod.info" and name "Encyclopedia of Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi region" but month ago I moved it to "akkermanika.org" and added name "Akkermanika". I made these photos but posted them under the name of my project. Nykyforiv (talk) 00:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support OK then, but you should put your usename as author instead. Otherwise it is confusing. Yann (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: @Nykyforiv: Please add your username to the |author= fields to avoid future confusion. --De728631 (talk) 12:50, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Érica Esmorís.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2022082210006558. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 19:58, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: please add the ticket details. --Rosenzweig τ 20:51, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Img-62a75891bdaa8.jpg

Greetings of the day, I'm appealing regard the subject matter of the above file. The file submitted was a original work of me. Currently I live and have family with Tanzania. I visit safari location several time and warm springs. The picture send was a capture onsite post about Tanzania landscape in the tropical. I urge the nominate committees to reconsider my submission and struggling to get the art work cover in a restricted location . Please kindly reconsider my piece put in savd harms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Oa42 (talk • contribs) 22:16, 23 August 2022‎ (UTC)

Procedural close. Please do not request undeletion of a file that has not been deleted. Discuss this nomination at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Img-62a75891bdaa8.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 22:32, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

Deleted. The copyright owner should send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 09:20, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UU3Tahun2011 ttg Transfer Dana.pdf

Want to upload from https://www.dpr.go.id/dokjdih/document/uu/UU_2011_3.pdf but found out that it is deleted as a copyvio. File is a law text (and published by the Indonesian Government, officially), hence it is public domain, as stated on {{PD-IDNoCopyright}} and/or {{PD-IDGov}}. Hans5958 (talk) 05:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support Mistagged as missing license. Yann (talk) 09:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: I changed the licence to PD-IDGov. --De728631 (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Kevin Andres Amaya Ochoa In elegant suit.jpg

Voy a solucionar el problema de la licencia, tengo una autorización para la cuenta VRTS ya encontré la solución voy a quitar el ticket que es falso según el sistema de eliminación rápida, para corregir la información de mi fotografía pido restaurar la imagen para corregir su información.

•  Oppose Please wait for the Volunteer Response Team (VRT) to initiate the undeletion of this file. When your email has been processed and accepted, they will ask for the restoration of the file, but this may take a few weeks due to a large backlog. De728631 (talk) 12:47, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per De728631. --Yann (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mersad missile.jpg

Please undelete this file, it is a photograph taken by Vahid Reza Alaei for Mehr News Agency which is freely-licensed (Template:Mehr).

• Direct link: https://media.mehrnews.com/old/Original/2010/04/527718.jpg
• Album link: https://www.mehrnews.com/news/1061792/%D8%B9%DA%A9%D8%B3-%D8%AE%D8%A8%D8%B1%DB%8C-%D8%AA%D9%88%D9%84%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B4%DA%A9-%D8%B4%D8%A7%D9%87%DB%8C%D9%86-%D9%88-%D8%B3%D8%A7%D9%85%D8%A7%D9%86%D9%87-%D9%BE%D8%AF%D8%A7%D9%81%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87%D9%88%D8%A7%DB%8C%DB%8C-%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B4%DA%A9%DB%8C-%D9%85%D8%B1%D8%B5%D8%A7%D8%AF

Thanks. HeminKurdistan (talk) 11:02, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support per nomination. See {{Mehr}}. De728631 (talk) 12:38, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per De728631. @HeminKurdistan: Please add the source and categories. --Yann (talk) 07:58, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Avión Viva Air.jpg

Trabajo en Viva Air. La fotografía es de nuestra propiedad y para alimentar la correcta visualización de nuestra información la cedemos con la licencia necesaria para uso libre. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pascual.jimenez2 (talk • contribs) 15:06, 24 August 2022‎ (UTC)

•  Oppose - 1) Previously published images (direct) require COM:VRT evidence of permission and 2) permission limited to Wikipedia ("para que sea usada en Wikipedia") is not adequate. Эlcobbola _talk 15:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Эlcobbola. --Yann (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Request from 83.136.182.123

These images should be undelted because I can't find a source for them anywhere. This information should be preserved and the original deletion requests suggest that the images could easily be reconstructed using free caligraphy fonts. That is something I am willing to do. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.136.182.123 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 21 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

• File:Shanghai delegation's flag of the National Games.png
• File:Beijing delegation's flag of the National Games.png

Related DR: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Poor Hamilton. Yann (talk) 19:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

@83.136.182.123: Do you request temporary undeletion? In order to upload your work, you need to log in. Ankry (talk) 20:29, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done no response. Ankry (talk) 23:59, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1980-04 AFRICAINS lettre anonyme.jpg

Je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous détruisez une telle illustration. Ce document m'appartient (je parle de la lettre anonyme), et je l'ai scanné pour le mettre en ligne. C'est pourquoi je voulais aussi renommer mon site de collaboration avec Commons, pour que mon pseudo ne cache pas mon identité ː je suis le réalisateur/scénariste/écrivain/historien du cinéma Jean-Claude Morin et en plus collectionneur de caméras de cinéma (j'en ai 170 exactemet). J'espère, et je renouvelle cet espoir, que votre démarche globale n'a pas été inspiré par un collaborateur agressif des sites Wiki. Que soient appellées à disparaître des photos de ma défunte épouse Marie-France Briselance, photos que j'ai extraites de mes albums de famille, me semble une démarche douteuse d'un quelconque collaborateur. Que certaines photos de caméras expliquant leur mécanisme sont appelées également à disparaître me semble aussi une démarche suspecte. Tout ceci s'appuyant sur le fait que j'ai introduit une illustration sur Wikipédia, que j'avais prélevée sur Commons et croptée afin de mieux la présenter (j'avais indiqué que cette transformation était de mon fait, que j'en étais l'auteur afin de la différencier de l'originale). Depuis, tout ajout de ma part était réputé comme mensonger. Raisonnement bizarre ǃ Qu'amplifie certainement le côté ultra méthodique des bots ǃ Enfin, aidez-moi, les lecteurs de Wikipédia en sont dignes ǃ Ne supprimez pas à tour de bras ǃ Merci à tous les administrateurs.--PODZO DI BORGO (talk) 08:15, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

I deleted that, it was a re-uploaded of File:Série LES AFRICAINS (France 3) Lettre anonyme ayant provoqué l'embargo des ventes à l'étranger en 1980.jpg that I had deleted just two hours before the re-upload occurred when working on Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by PODZO DI BORGO (where I kept most of the nominated files, but not this one). It's a French anonymous letter from 1980 and not the work of the uploader (he was the addressee). Anonymous works are protected for 70 years from publication in France per COM:France. I don't know when this letter was first published, but even if that was right in 1980, 70 years are not over yet. I don't think the content qualifies for {{PD-ineligible}}. --Rosenzweig τ 08:52, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: The letter is certainly under a copyright. No permission. --Yann (talk) 20:16, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Manning_Warren_1Dbw.jpg

This photo was taken by John Michael Carter (https://johnmichaelcarter.com/). CC BY-SA 4.0 rights to the photograph were granted to the subject, Manning G. Warren III, for his personal and public nonmonetary use. Attribution and licensing information has since been provided by the subject and can be added to the file or comments as needed. --Kimberleysanders (talk) 17:28, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

@Kimberleysanders: Can you clarify the contradiction between "personal and public nonmonetary use" (which sounds like a prohibition against commercial use) and the terms of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, which permits commercial reuse? Nonetheless, if you are not the photographer, but have received permission from the original photographer to upload the file to Commons under the terms of a free license, you can follow the procedure at Commons:Volunteer Response Team. —RP88 (talk) 17:46, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: Needs action by VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:12, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:1. FC Union Berlin 1966 - 1990.gif, File:1. FC Union Berlin Logo.svg

Beide Versionen des Logos bestehen aus einfachen geometrischen Formen (mit Ausnahme des Bären, dazu gleich) und weisen in ihrer Komposition keine ausreichende kreative Eigenleistung auf, um die Schwelle der Schöpfungshöhe zu überschreiten. Der Bär wiederum ist der 740 Jahre alte Berliner Bär, der längst gemeinfrei ist. Eine eigene kreative Leistung in der Gestaltung des Bären ist nicht zu erkennen und war vom Designer vermutlich auch gar nicht beabsichtigt. Die Logos sind beide nicht geschützt, weshalb die Löschung fehlerhaft war und rückgängig zu machen ist. Die beiden löschenden Admins Christian Ferrer und Wdwd wurden bereits angesprochen, der eine weigert sich aber, seine Fehlentscheidung rückgängig zu machen und der andere antwortete leider gar nicht. Siehe auch diese Diskussion. Und hier noch die Links zu den beiden LDs: Commons:Deletion requests/File:1. FC Union Berlin 1966 - 1990.gif und Commons:Deletion requests/File:1. FC Union Berlin Logo.svg. -- Chaddy (talk) 19:45, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support For those who don't understand German: Chaddy argues that, 1) except for the bear, the logo consists only of simple letters and shapes, and 2) the bear is a standard, non-original rendition of Berlin's 740-year-old heraldic animal and therefore in the public domain (to be protected according to German copyright, it would be necessary to have a somehow original rendition of the bear; but in this case, the intention apparently was to show that bear in the way in which it usually appears). I agree and would add that 3) it is not likely that the combination of these elements creates a new work that is copyrightable by the standards usually applied in Germany. Gestumblindi (talk) 20:11, 24 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support der Bär ist wahlweise wegen seines Alters oder als Amtliches Werk gemeinfrei, alle anderen Elemente sind zu simpel, um geschützt zu sein. --Ralf Roletschek 20:36, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment I closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:1. FC Union Berlin Logo.svg as deleted because it is very unlikely that the representation of the heraldic bear in the file I deleted is the same representation than the 740-year-old one. As per Commons:Coats of arms there is a difference between definition and representation. Furthermore I think the deleted version is likely above the ToO. Regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

  I think the question is not whether the rendering is exactly the same, but whether the difference between it and the closest PD version is above TOO. From Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Folklore and tradition, we see that in Germany a Räuchermännchen figurine is below TOO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

 Comment Chaddy, can you (or anybody else how support the undeletion) supply a link to an original representation of this bear? In order to be able to make a comparison between the original historical representation you are referring and the current drawing of the bear inside the logo. At the moment we don't have any evidence that the historical drawing of this bear is just the same (with only minor changes) as the bear that is in this logo. btw, the drawing file:Berliner Baer.svg which looks similar is from Ottfried Neubecker (1908–1992).  Info there a DR still pending with the same logo: File:Escudo Union Berlin.png.--Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

We have at least File:DEU Berlin COA.svg and a whole series of articles about it: en:Coat of arms of Berlin. Yann (talk) 09:57, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Category:Berlin bear has many old depictions of this bear. -- Chaddy (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Another point is: The official Berliner Bär is also in the public domain as a governmental work (PD-Coa-Germany). The football clubs bear only has slightly differences to the governmental bear which is not enough to be an own creative work (it is below ToO). That is another reason why the Union logo is in the public domain. -- Chaddy (talk) 13:06, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: per discussion. --De728631 (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tonsteinstollen 1 FB.jpg

I'd like to request the undeletion of File:Tonsteinstollen 1 FB.jpg, which George Chernilevsky deleted in 2021 (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tonsteinstollen 1 FB.jpg). He deleted it for having no realistic educational use, but I have new evidence suggesting that it is of educational use: the file has been used on OpenStreetMap at https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3177552633 since 2014. I think use on OpenStreetMap is educational in the broad sense described in COM:EDUSE and so the file should be undeleted. --bjh21 (talk) 11:13, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support "In use" does not need to be at Wikimedia projects only, but OSM will also do the trick. De728631 (talk) 13:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 15:15, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Assamese-alphabet-consonants.png

Requesting the undeletion of :File:Assamese-alphabet-consonants.png

This will be used in the English Wikipedia (Assamese alphabet) which currently does not have a representation.

Chaipau (talk) 11:44, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support This is a valid case of "in project scope". See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Chaipau for reference. De728631 (talk) 13:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
•  Question Why not create a text-based table instead as suggested in the DR? Ankry (talk) 23:50, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
  • This was my first thought, too. However, not everyone may have Assamese font support installed on their computer's OS. Those people would just see ASCII replacement symbols in a text-based table. See also Tengwar for a similar example. De728631 (talk) 13:10, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: Ideally, this should in SVG, or text-based table, but it still may be useful as it is. I also restored File:Assamese-alphabets-vowels.png. --Yann (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stolperstein ABG - Kornmarkt 21.jpg

This file was deleted in 2014 at the request of the uploader, HoDaABG, because it inadvertently contained their personal data (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stolperstein ABG - Kornmarkt 21.jpg). However, after submitting the deletion request, HoDaABG overwrote the file with a new version with the comment "IPTC-Daten minimiert" ("IPTC data minimised"). INeverCry then deleted both versions of the file. I think the second version of the file is the version without personal data that HoDaABG said they would upload, and so that version can and should be undeleted. The first version should stay deleted. --bjh21 (talk) 19:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support per above. Ankry (talk) 00:04, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: per request. --Rosenzweig τ 11:11, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Erik_Fyrwald,_Syngenta_Group.jpg

Please undelete. We have permission per Ticket:2022082310007742. Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 17:41, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: @Mussklprozz: . --Yann (talk) 18:18, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hemeroteka-Egunkaria-Azkena 2003-02-20.jpg

The contents of the Euskaldunon Egunkaria newspaper (1990-2003) were published with CC-BY-SA license in Euskaldunon Egunkariaren hemeroteka. 1990-2003 by the newspaper berria.eus (CC-BY-SA). For example all the images in the Commons category Category:Egunkaria. There is only one restriction related to images coming form agencies, But in this image the pictures come from Euskaldunon Egunkaria, so there is no copyright problems to upload this image to Wikimedia Commons. Ksarasola (talk) 20:21, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose This newspaper cover has a large photo of award winning professional photographer Brennan Linsley of Associated Press, famous for his coverage of various events in the Middle East (Iraq, Gaza etc.). Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't see that one of the picture came from AP agency. Thanks for deleting the picture Ksarasola (talk) 22:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 22:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Official Movie Poster.jpg

This is taken from a valid source and this is in public domain

https://www.lokmatnews.in/bollywood/bihar-childrens-film-sumi-written-by-sanjeev-k-jha-of-motihari-gets-national-award-b639/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijaysvijay (talk • contribs)

 Oppose The above source claims Copyright © 2020 Lokmat Media Pvt Ltd. This is not public domain status information. Ankry (talk) 22:36, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

can i use in wiki article ? Vijaysvijay (talk) 22:38, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose I agree that it cannot be kept on Commons. It might be possible to use in a Wiki article -- the rules vary from site to site. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done No free license. Ankry (talk) 13:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Scott L. Palk.jpg

When I originally uploaded this picture, I did not have the proper licensing attached. I have since added the correct licensing and would like to request the picture be reinstated.

MIAJudges (talk) 19:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Not a reupload but a completely different image from before. License and source look valid. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Mary S. McElroy.jpg I have inputted the correct licensing to this picture. This was taken from her senate judiciary committee hearing. The link for the meeting & even the time the image is from are also included. That is public content & images from those committee hearings have been used in countless other judicial pictures. The information has been updated on the picture.

@Jameslwoodward: FYI. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:57, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:04, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done per discussion. Ankry (talk) 13:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Löschung zweier Dateien

Die Dateien Das_Klassenorchester_in_gemischter_Besetzung_1.jpg und Meisterwerke_Olms_Inlaycard.jpg sind mein geistiges Eigentum. Ich habe diese Dateien am 22.10.2003 und am 20.8.2005 erstellt und den Verlagen zur Nutzung überlassen. Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung. Beste Grüße Wolfhard Bickel--Wolfhard Bickel (talk) 08:07, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

 Info This concerns File:Das Klassenorchester in gemischter Besetzung 1.jpg and File:Meisterwerke Olms Inlaycard.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 13:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

@Wolfhard Bickel: In solchen Fällen brauchen wir immer eine zusätzliche Freigabe per E-Mail. Siehe dazu bitte COM:VRT. Die Bearbeitung dauert ein paar Tage bis Wochen, aber die Dateien sollten dann quasi automatisch wieder hergestellt werden. De728631 (talk) 13:38, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done VRTS permission needed. Ankry (talk) 23:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cool_photo.jpg

This image doesn't violate copyright, I found it on the man's profile page, and I couldn't find someone who owns the image or a license. plus it's a photo from 2001-2005. AND there isn't much info from him in the web. (VTerminator90 (talk) 05:57, 27 August 2022 (UTC))

 Oppose The source page has an explicit copyright notice and no evidence of a free license. Most things on the Web are copyrighted and cannot be kept on Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gin_&_Tonic_-_Free_as_the_Sun_album_cover_(2003).jpg

I couldn't find anyone who claimed the image or someone who licensed it. There isn't a copyright seal on the art either. And again, there isn't much information about the band. (VTerminator90 (talk) 06:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC))

 Oppose The rule we use is that most things on the Web are copyrighted and must be freely licensed in order to be kept on Commons. The absence of a copyright notice is irrelevant.

The named source page, which does not contain the image, has an explicit copyright notice. In the absence of a source with an explicit free license, we cannot keep this. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:57, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:LVCS_Seal_Ofcl.png

I am the creator of the Seal for the Las Vegas City Schools located in Las Vegas, NM 87701. I am part of the IT Dept. and was notified about misinformation on our page and on Robertson High School. I have updated information and uploaded our official logo for the Las Vegas City Schools. Lenchento (talk) 17:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Policy requires that an authorized official of the school system grant a free license using VRT. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 16:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dilman 2.jpg

Please undelete the photo. It aims to provide an authentic and up-to-date photo of a world famous scientist in a quality far superior to previous copies. --Ortolanny (talk) 19:52, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Previously published uncropped and at much higher quality at [16]. Thuresson (talk) 21:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Dilman is probably notable, but this image certainly has copyright problems. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done VRTS permission from the actual copyright holder is needed. Ankry (talk) 23:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:David W. Dugan.jpg

I originally did not include the correct licensing for this picture. I now have the correct info, so I am requesting it to be reinstated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MIAJudges (talk • contribs) 21:41, 28 August 2022‎ (UTC)

@MIAJudges: What is the correct info? See also COM:SIGN.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 21:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The following should be in the licensing section of the picture...

==Licensing==

{{PD-USGov-Senate}}

Category:Judiciaries

MIAJudges (talk) 22:13, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

@MIAJudges: Who was the author of this portrait? An employee of the Congress or a contractor? We need to verify this as in the latter case {{PD-USGov-Senate}} does not apply. If the author is unknown, we cannot assume that they were an employee. Ankry (talk) 23:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

The author was the US senate judiciary committee. It was from the SJC hearing. I included the link & time it was taken in the "Summary" section. The senate judiciary committee hearings are government public usage as they are employees of Congress.

MIAJudges (talk) 00:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

To assist with this discussion I've temporarily undeleted File:David W. Dugan.jpg. There does not appear to be a link or time in description. —RP88 (talk) 00:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The link and time from the link where the image appears is in the “Summary” section next to “Source”.

MIAJudges (talk) 00:44, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

@MIAJudges: Are you perhaps confusing this file with some other file? There is no source link and time in File:David W. Dugan.jpg. You did include a source link and time in File:David Dugan.jpg, but that file has not been deleted or nominated for deletion. —RP88 (talk) 02:45, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

Oh, maybe there was some confusion. I was only talking about the second file you mentioned. That is the one that has the updated information I indicated & the one I am using for his page. The first one, File:David W. Dugan.jpg can be deleted.

MIAJudges (talk) 02:55, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: request withdrawn, wrong file. —RP88 (talk) 03:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Marthen Dira Tome.jpg

Gambar tersebut dibuat oleh pemerintah kabupaten sabu raijua sehingga terkategori sebagai milik publik bukan perorangan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jordan Diwi (talk • contribs) Yann (talk) 15:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC) (UTC)

 Comment Copied from [17], and no license provided. Yann (talk) 15:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

 Support I think this qualifies for {{PD-IDGov}}. De728631 (talk) 15:29, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose There is no license information on the source site. The source site does not appear to be a government site -- "Publisher PERS Company PT. NUSANTARA CULTURAL HERITAGE MEDIA." and "Welcome to the Archipelago Cultural Heritage Website..." .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 26 August 2022 (UTC)

@Jordan Diwi and De728631: any comment to this? Ankry (talk) 23:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose It seems that Jameslwoodward is right. On a second look there is no evidence that this is an official government photo. De728631 (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 17:15, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amshkurko.jpg

На фото мой отец. Фотография предоставлена для использования из личного архива. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shkurko (talk • contribs) 21:37, 27 August 2022‎ (UTC)

• Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

This would resolve scope problems if they were raised. But they were not. The deletion reason was copyright related: who is the photographer and where did they grant a free license to this photo? Ankry (talk) 01:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose This will require a free license from the actual photographer or his heir. It also will require explanation of why it is in scope, that is, why it serves any educational purpose. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 17:16, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion request File:Dulal Manki.jpg

The file permissions attached here ;

=={{int:filedesc}}==
{{Information
|description={{en|1=The President, Shri Ram Nath Kovind presenting the Padma Shri Award to Shri Dulal Manki, at the Civil Investiture Ceremony-III, at Rashtrapati Bhavan, in New Delhi on November 09, 2021.}}
|date=2021-09-09
|source=https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/Gallery/PhotoGallery/2021/Nov/H20211109103732.JPG
|author={{Institution:President's Secretariat}}
|permission={{GODL-India|President's Secretariat|https://static.pib.gov.in/WriteReadData/Gallery/PhotoGallery/2021/Nov/H20211109103732.JPG}}
|other versions=
}}


Thank you<br>
[[User:MaxA-Matrix|MaxA-Matrix]] ([[User talk:MaxA-Matrix|<span class="signature-talk">{{int:Talkpagelinktext}}</span>]]) 00:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

From the photo EXIF: Copyright Photo Division Ministry of I & B (PIB) Govt. of India Soochna Bhawan, CGO Complex, Lodhi Road, New Delhi-110003 . Photo Division Ministry of India is a part of Government of India so {{GODL-India}} applies, IMO. However, according to EXIF, the author is Manoj Kumar, not the President's Secretariat.  Support undeletion and fixing. Ankry (talk) 01:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Done: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Google Chrome Logo 2008.svg

Please undelete the photo and this is in public domain. Invictus1995 (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

 Oppose Why do you think this is PD?. It is recent and certainly above the ToO. I see no reason to believe that it does not have a copyright. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

---

 Not done: as per Jim. --Yann (talk) 17:18, 29 August 2022 (UTC)