Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vilnius Synagoga, J.Kamarauska-2-.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vilnius Synagoga, J.Kamarauska-2-.jpg

The painting is by an artist who died in 1946, and this was also a pre-1923 work. Abzeronow (talk) 01:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 11:22, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YingChiYuet_MrLittleCat_photo.jpg

This photo is owned by me and I followed the procedure to upload the file to Wiki allowing user to use publicly, please undelete the photo, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shellng (talk • contribs) 14:16, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Photo or screenshot of a photo. No evidence that OP is the photographer. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:19, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to be accomplished here @Shellng: For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder (i.e. the photographer/creator of the original image) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:15, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YingChiYuet_MrLittleCat_photo.jpg request undeletion

The file is owned by me and I followed the procedure to load to Wiki for use publicly, please undelete the file.--Shellng (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Duplicate request. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:14, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:浙江越秀外国语学院校徽.png

Permission pending since 31 Jan. 2021. It does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion.--Larryasou (talk) 04:23, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Larryasou: FYI. However, it will be redeleted under CSD F1 as there is no evidence of a free licence at source and the work is a recent creation. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:19, 1 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:טקס-חניכת-השביל.png

אבקש להחזיר את הקובץ מאחר ונשלחו כל האישורים בהתאם לדרישות--Golani Association (talk) 09:45, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Golani Association: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Pater Josef Wagner OSB.jpg

Die Freigabe von Stift Admont, muss heute beim OTRS-Board eingegangen sein. ----- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 10:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

An OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2021020110002523.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and verify that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can add {{subst:OR|id=2021020110002523|reason=processing}} or {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance for your help. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 10:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

@Olaf Kosinsky: Hallo Olaf, sorry, da steh ich auf der Leitung. ;-) --lg -- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 11:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
@Karl Gruber: Es liegt jetzt eine Freigabe im OTRS vor und das Bild muss durch einen Commons Admin wiederhergestellt werden. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 12:17, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
jetzt klar, danke ;-) ---- K@rl (talk) Mid Abstond hoidn xund bleibn 12:27, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Olaf Kosinsky: FYI. Please read the note I left in the ticket. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tolga Akcayli.jpg

Permission was granted by the CEO to Wikipedia permission-commons email address.

--Tolgaria (talk) 13:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Tolgaria: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:24, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:江南棋院.jpg

I requested a deletion of this photo myself in 2016. And now I think it's still useful to the public. --Lt2818 (talk) 15:33, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Lt2818: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:41, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Theaterfotograf Fred Erismann bei der Arbeit.png

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2020111910011019 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 19:50, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. Please confer with the OTRS agent handling the ticket before processing. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:59, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:刘柏辛 Gone Gold 上线了1.jpg

I own the copyright of this picture, therefore requesting undeletion of the picture — Preceding unsigned comment added by 哆来咪哆来咪 (talk • contribs) 07:47, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This has been published before on YouTube without a free licence. Therefore we require a permission by email from the copyright holder as explained in COM:OTRS. Please note also that the copyright of a photograph is usually not held by the person depicted, but by the photographer. De728631 (talk) 13:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per De728631. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:15, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Justin Packshaw.jpg File to undelete

The image in question, a profile photograph by Alex Turnbull has been given permission to be published on Wikipedia by the photographer and by the subject. The image itself has been used for other public purposes.

In order to better complete the biography page of the subject the image should be used to illustrate that page.

GeoLen85 (talk) 13:46, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to be accomplished here. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. No evidence of an accepted free licence. @GeoLen85: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:17, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christina Zurbrügg.jpg

Hello,

I request the undeletion of the file in question as you can see on the page http://www.zurbruegg.cc/media/fotos/ that Joseph Gallauer has permitted the use of the photo as long as the name is mentioned.

If you need any more information to process the request please let me know.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheCatWithTheHatBerlin (talk • contribs) 15:19, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

It would be better to have something more explicit directly from Joseph Gallauer. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:52, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to be accomplished here. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. No evidence of an accepted free licence. @TheCatWithTheHatBerlin: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Theodore Stephanides visiting Corfu with the BBC in 1967.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2020122410007914 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:59, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

The source says "photos belong to the family" but the question is was this photo created by the family? -- Asclepias (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
@Asclepias: This particular file was created by a family member, from whom we have permission.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:11, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:31, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mostaqbal-watan-logo.png

Peace, mercy and blessings of God,, Why was the file deleted ?? please clarify. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelrhman2007 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. No evidence of an accepted free licence. @Aelrhman2007: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:20, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A Brunette Kiss behind the scenes set01.jpg

Asking to undelete the file, as it was taken by us. --Brasilmoura (talk) 19:00, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Edilberto Restino award.jpg

Asking for undeleting as it was taken by me --Brasilmoura (talk) 19:01, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Signatur und Firmenstempel.png

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2020111910011019 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:02, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

ملف: Moe-eg.png

ملف: Moe-eg.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelrhman2007 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

@Aelrhman2007: Hi, and welcome. No such page found, did you mean File:Moe-eg.png? Why do you want it undeleted? Please sign your posts.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. Unambigious copyright violation. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Thysanoteuthis rhombus.jpg (version deleted 2011)

The original file with this name was moved to English Wikipedia in 2011 (where it remains), as a result of this DR. The rest of the files in the DR were undeleted in 2020, but it appears that this one was skipped. It should be undeleted, but moved to a new name. (For example, File:Thysanoteuthis rhombus (Naef).jpg.) Wikiacc (talk) 02:39, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Same goes for File:Ocythoe tuberculata.jpg and File:Sepiola rondeleti.jpg. Wikiacc (talk) 02:52, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Should be restored. Rename seems appropriate. Abzeronow (talk) 02:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: All three files processed: File:Thysanoteuthis rhombus (Naef).jpg, File:Ocythoe tuberculata (Naef).jpg and File:Sepiola rondeleti (Naef).jpg @Wikiacc: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:33, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Karvadan.jpg File:Perfil Carles Batlle.jpg File:Versuchung.jpg File:Monroe-Lamarr.jpg File:Combat de Carles Batlle.jpg File:Temptació.jpg File:Sota l'ombre del drac de pedra.jpg

Buenos días,

Les escribo porque me han borrado las imágenes especificadas en el Sujeto/Asunto de este mensaje. El dueño de estas imágenes me ha dado permiso para utilizarlas con el fin de actualizar sus páginas de Wikipedia, ya que contenían información pasado y ya no fiable. Las imágenes me las ha confiado para hacer sus páginas más atractivas.

Espero que esta explicación solucione el malentendido.

Muchas gracias.

Cordialmente,

--Carla Trevin (talk) 11:10, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Files not deleted as of 13:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC). @Carla Trevin: Please follow instructions on the speedy deletion tags if you seek to challenge their nomination for deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:23, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cambridge Thermo Galvanometer 1905.jpg

Old enough to be in Public Domain? --101.78.190.130 03:29, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No evidence provided as it to the file's copyright status in the UK. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:07, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:CamilaMerino.jpg

No corresponde la eliminación. La fotografía es del archivo personal de Camila Merino; cuenta con los derechos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Almacendebarrio (talk • contribs) 02:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No evidence provided of an accepted free licence; no valid rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stampalshami.jpg

Kuwait stamps published in 1965. Should be in PD now. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.78.191.147 (talk) 03:08, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose A 1965 publication does not automatically mean that the work is in public domain everywhere. A 1965 publication may mean public domain status in Kuwait, however, U.S. laws (COM:URAA) would apply as the work was definitely not in public domain in it home country in 1996. Earliest possible date the file could be undeleted would be in 2061 (1965+95+1). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 05:03, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:13, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AndreiCarabelea wiki.jpg

Foto este proprietatea d-lui Andrei Carabelea si vestea.net a utilizat-o cu acordul d-lui Carabelea.

--Cipo2k4 (talk) 06:48, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@Cipo2k4: Evidence of permission from the photographer? pandakekok9 07:11, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO. No evidence of an accepted free licence. @Cipo2k4: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. N.B.: Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:01, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by KimmySchmidt

== [[:File:Zoe Beth, International Music Artist]] ==

This person is my friend, and she and I were working on getting her Wiki Article up because she is now being stalked, harassed, and hacked by an immigrant. She is an actual celebrity internationally, who goes by Zoe Beth and she owns the trademark. We both need this to go through so that the bank can identify her, as this is also a racist hate crime against her since the immigrant assumed both her trade mark name and her acting persona. Please put this back up for her? -I have the rights for all trademark items as well as copyright items; they are directly from my personal collection, as I have been her assistant, and she was sitting here approving everything. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KimmySchmidt (talk • contribs) 01:36, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

@KimmySchmidt: Hi, and welcome. I think I got the other two filenames correct, but I need some help with this one. Please be exact and sign your posts.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:58, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

== [[:File:Zoe Elizabeth .jpg]] ==

I am Zoe Elizabeth's friend, she owns the trade mark Zoe Beth, that is an International trademark. Zoe has been here with me making these edits and released each of these photos and the copyrights for this website. She has been the victim of a hate crime, and hacking, stalking, and yes, kidnapping as well as identity theft. She needs this wikipedia page up, as she is an actual celebrity thanks to many things at this point, and the hate crime is racist, as the idenity thief is not of the same race. It is not an advertisement, both Zoe Beth's wiki page and Zoe Elizabeth's page as well as Marie Captain's page is to save their lives right now, as well as their bank accounts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KimmySchmidt (talk • contribs) 01:42, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

== [[:File:Marie Captain in Silver Tux at the Marriott Pasadena after the Red Carpet.jpg]] ==

I am Zoe Elizabeth's friend, she owns the trade mark Zoe Beth, that is an International trademark. Zoe has been here with me making these edits and released each of these photos and the copyrights for this website. She has been the victim of a hate crime, and hacking, stalking, and yes, kidnapping as well as identity theft. She needs this wikipedia page up, as she is an actual celebrity thanks to many things at this point, and the hate crime is racist, as the idenity thief is not of the same race. It is not an advertisement, both Zoe Beth's wiki page and Zoe Elizabeth's page as well as Marie Captain's page is to save their lives right now, as well as their bank accounts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KimmySchmidt (talk • contribs) 01:43, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done Per Nat. Thuresson (talk) 20:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cognola_catasto_storico.png

The file has been deleted because the source and its copyright of the derivative work has supposedly not been specified. But the source has been specified: Servizio Catasto della Provincia Autonoma di Trento, https://www.catastotn.it/mappeStoriche.html (direct link to the image https://webgis.provincia.tn.it/geodati/mappestoriche/im082.zip). The copyright of the original image is CC-BY 4.0, as stated in the metadata page at https://dati.trentino.it/dataset/mappe-storiche-d-impianto This information has been provided as metadata during the upload, it is not clear what additional data is required.

Note that other images taken from the same map are available on Commons, e.g. File:285-02 - dettaglio.jpg, with no information on the original map. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pizetaquadro (talk • contribs) 22:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I checked the given source https://www.catastotn.it/mappeStoriche.html} and only got a 404 error. The map was not created in 2021 and you were not the creator of it, as claimed oin the descriüption page. Which are the correct values for that? --JuTa 06:16, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

The link I provided is working for me, your link does not because it has a spurious "}" at the end, I do not know where it comes from. I am not the creator of the map (which has been created in 1859), I just extracted the part of the image relevant to the subject as derivative work. Please advise on how to correctly upload the image and the metadata, as this should be possible according to the guidelines, since the original image is licensed as CC-BY 4.0. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pizetaquadro (talk • contribs) 12:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored and description page fixed. --JuTa 01:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:TCS 10주년 로고.png

https://tcs-asia.org/en/board/notice_view.php?idx=3741&pNo=1 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 121.129.97.219 (talk) 09:04, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

That page says Copyright (c) 2019 TRILATERAL COOPERATION SECRETARIAT. All Rights Reserved.. What's your reason for undeletion? --rimshottalk 13:06, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: procedural close. unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO. no rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:26, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Philosophyofexplanation.jpg

Hello, After a long delay I have returned and would very much like to have my file undeleted. Thank you for your consideration. Unclecom1 (talk) 14:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Philosophyofexplanation.jpg

After a long absence I have returned and would very much like to have my file undeleted. Thank you for your consideration. Unclecom1 (talk) 14:44, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose No rationale for undeletion. Thuresson (talk) 20:40, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. No rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rostam Dastan.jpg

Please! What can I do? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.183.126.253 (talk) 17:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close. Image not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 20:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Emblema 2.svg

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Emblema 2.svg|2=Wrong license and logo still under copyrights.|3=|base=Copyvionote}} ==

The following file was subject to speedy deletion by the user Glourious93

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Emblema_2.svg

However it isn't a copyright infrigement, as the user Arcdmendiga represents that instituition, as the username indicates, the said user, shared that file through Wikimedia Commons to allow for anyone to use it and to allow the club wikipedia page to be complete with the club logo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arcdmendiga (talk • contribs) 22:36, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Files not deleted as of 23:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC). @Arcdmendiga: Please follow the instructions on the speedy deletion tag if you wish to challenge deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:46, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by JuTa

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS permission received janbery (talk) 00:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: There is no license applied. I renewed the problem tags niow. --JuTa 01:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:The Nandi, their language and folk-lore (1909)

(Above per original listing.) This work was first published in the U.S., where it is in the public domain; thus, it is acceptable for inclusion at Wikimedia Commons. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 23:56, 17 January 2021 (UTC).

 Not done No consensus to undelete. Thuresson (talk) 11:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hallgrimskirkja files

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Architect Guðjón Samúelsson died last 1950, so the church is now PD since the start of this year. Also many images of this church have been undeleted recently, as part of PD year 2021. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:14, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Also:

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:24, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

 Support as the architect's copyright has now expired in Iceland. Abzeronow (talk) 23:22, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done All undeleted except File:Interior of Hallgrímskirkja.jpg who according to [1] is from Getty Images. Thuresson (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files in Category:Internet Archive document agrarianproblem00tawn

(Above per original listing.) This work was simultaneously published in the U.S., where it is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 17:38, 18 January 2021 (UTC).

 Not done No consensus to undelete. Thuresson (talk) 14:51, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jorge Hank Rhon.png

Can somebody please stop deleting this image ? Its no violating any kind of copyright because i granted the url of origin and the author. Thanks!--Alberto0617 (talk) 07:02, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Alberto0617: statement on description page alone is not sufficient. The copyright holder must submit email correspondence (via COM:OTRS) to verify the copyright holder's release of this work under public domain licensing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:51, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Alberto0617: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:32, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:La Mélodie De La Morphine - Poster 2019 - 72px.jpg

Hello, My name is Ali Erradi, from the company "Caravan Chergui Productions" owner and creator of the official posters below:

File:La Mélodie De La Morphine - Poster 2019 - 72px.jpg

File:Melodia Al Morphine - Poster 2019 72px.jpg

File:The Morphine Melody - Poster 2019 - 72px.jpg

The three poster (Arabic, Fench and English) are produced and owned by the company "Caravan Chergui". We hope to use them in the wikipedia pages of the movie 'Arabic, French, and English).

The posters were deleted for possible copyright infringement but we assure and confirm that we are the owner and producer of the posters.

--Hichamme81 (talk) 11:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Hichamme81: Please send an email to the OTRS team. Thanks, pandakekok9 11:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Hichamme81: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:29, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Eva Stæhr-Nielsen 1969 sitting.jpg

We have OTRS permission for this file at ticket:2020112310012304 – we must've forgot to tag it properly when closing the ticket. Jon Harald Søby (talk) 14:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jon Harald Søby: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:37, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YUAN LIN - Editorial.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS ticket received: ticket:2021020310004983 . -- Ivi104 (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - The photographer release does not identify the photographs to which it applies. It is not acceptable in this format (i.e., with this omission). This is also a COM:NOTHOST issue regardless of copyright, as the subject is not notable (indeed, all of the uploader's sister project contribs have been deleted.) Эlcobbola talk 18:56, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:17, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Masahiko Kimura and Nori Bunasawa.jpg

To Whom this may concern,

This photo was originally published in the The Toughest Man Who Ever Lived book in 2003 (1st edition). I am the owner of the copyright of this book and it was published under my company, Judo Journal.

https://books.google.com/books?id=UHYcx0cJ16cC&pg=PA10&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q=copyright&f=false

It is registered in the Library of Congress Catalogue under my name Nori Bunasawa.

The picture can be found on page 284 of The Toughest Man Who Ever Lived :

https://books.google.com/books?id=UHYcx0cJ16cC&pg=PA10&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=3#v=onepage&q=imperturbable%20kimura&f=false — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110347nbtough (talk • contribs) 02:58, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Does not look like a selfie. Please ask the photographer to verify the license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 13:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:16, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gregor-A-Mayrhofer Portrait 2019.jpg

Anfrage, die Datei: Gregor-A-Mayrhofer Portrait 2019.jpg wieder herzustellen.

Die Rechte dieser Bilder wurden vom Fotografen auf den Bildinhaber übertragen. Die Abgebildete Person (Gregor Mayrhofer) stellt die Bilder ausdrücklich zur veröffentlichen frei zur Verfügung, unter Angabe des Namens des Fotographen (Urban Ruth).

Siehe Homepage des Bildinhabers: https://gregor-a-mayrhofer.com/#photos

Bitte darum, die Löschung Rückgängig zu machen und das Bild auf dem Wikipediaeintrag von Gregor Mayrhofer wieder sichtbar zu machen

Ear-Mind-Spirit --Ear-Mind-Spirit (talk) 12:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

You uploaded this claiming own work. Please ask the copyright owner to follow the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 13:33, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. @Ear-Mind-Spirit: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UEFA Europa Conference League.svg

اعتفد بانه ليست هناك مشاكل — Preceding unsigned comment added by NxAhmedy (talk • contribs) 00:38, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UEFA Europa Conference League.svg

(ahai) اعتقد بان ليست هناك مشكله — Preceding unsigned comment added by NxAhmedy (talk • contribs) 00:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sangam Dairy.jpg

Hi the image Sangam Dairy.jpg is a logo of Sangam Dairy which is available in public Domain as their Brand logo. Please undo the deletion.

It is similar to apple logo present in public domain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Juggernaut4AP (talk • contribs) 15:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

When you uploaded this you claimed that it is copyrighted and that you must be credited if I want to use it. Please ask an official representative of the dairy to verify the license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 14:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:03, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amiens Métropole Volley-Ball (AMVB).png

Bonjour,

Je suis l'auteur de ce logo et j'en possède moi-même les droits (travail personnel). Merci de remettre mon logo sur la page Wikipédia de l'Amiens Métropole Volley-Ball. En mettant ce travail personnel sur Wikimedia Commons, j'autorise le partage sous la licence créative libre de Wikimedia Commons.

Cordialement, Benjamin Calippe

--Benj4benj (talk) 21:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Benj4benj: Pour la possibilité de restauration, le titulaire du droit d'auteur doit envoyer une autorisation sous license dite «libre» par courriel à l'OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ou permissions-fr@wikimedia.org) Une fois que l'OTRS a déterminé qu'il a reçu une autorisation suffisante et qu'il n'y a pas d'autre raison de suppression, un(e) agent(e) de l'OTRS effectuera ou demandera la restauration. Merci de votre compréhension. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:50, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rév.jpg

OTRS authorisation in progress, you should receive letter confirming authorisation from author and copyright owner, Gábor Klaniczay presently. StB (talk) 12:46, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @StB: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bára Gísladóttir performing live by Juliette Rowland.jpg

The photographer, Juliette Rowland, has sent in a correctly formatted Creative Commons Copyright permission before this photograph was rudely deleted.

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Brainlove: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Elcastillodebellver.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elcastillodebellver.jpg

Joaquin Mir died in 1940. This is now public domain in Spain. Abzeronow (talk) 02:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Abzeronow: FYI. Ankry (talk) 02:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Karvadan.jpg

Please restore. We have a permission at OTRS under Ticket:2021020310005991.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:20, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per OTRS member request. @Mussklprozz: FYI. Ankry (talk) 01:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Argentum Online.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: should most probably have never been deleted: obviously FLOSS videogame with both code and game content assets licensed under free license (GPL3+) since 2003. should be fine under {{free screenshot|{{GPL}}}}. possibly also File:LogoArgentumOnline.png Reseletti (talk) 18:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I checked and
According to en:Argentum Online it does seem to be GNU GPL license. So unless I'm missing something I think we can undelete. --MGA73 (talk) 19:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done as per MGA73


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:María Laura Stratta.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2018041010012641 regarding File:María Laura Stratta.jpg. Apparently permission was granted by @Ezarate (talk · contribs) but file was deleted anyway. Other file in the ticket, File:María Laura Stratta junto a Gustavo Bordet.jpg, it's still on. I think there was some kind of mistake. Can you please undelete the file to studie the case? Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:35, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done @Ganímedes: the deletion does not seem to be by a deleting admin mistake: OTRS permission template has never been added to the image description. Ankry (talk) 02:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:MeneWanum.ogg

I think its a wrong file that's why i want to delete it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Big Aryeh Gh (talk • contribs) 02:16, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done procedural close: file is not deleted - nothing to undelete. Ankry (talk) 02:15, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Murderous Trance 1.jpg

Hi,


This poster is being published by Art Films productions, the producer company, and the rights owner of the film Murderous trance. We need to change the poster because the current poster is the one used in Europe. Also the movie carries a different name in US than in Europe. The same movie is called the Guardian Angel in Europe and Murderous trance in the United States. Currently the poster is the European one with the wrong title, so I would like to change the poster to the US one, owning the copyrights to that very poster to match the title of the article. Thank you!

--Elokuvaaja (talk) 09:08, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The official logo of USJ has been deleted. It has been marked as a possible copyright violation, but it we have the complete copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usj.edu.lb (talk • contribs) 10:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close: No file name referenced and user has no deleted contribs. Please review our instructions. --Эlcobbola talk 16:22, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:USJlogo16.jpg

This logo belongs to the us exclusively. The university has the right to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Usjliban (talk • contribs) 10:27, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nowe UnFaced skład.png

Please, undelete the file File:Nowe UnFaced skład.png, a proper agreement from author has been sent to OTRS ticket:2021020710004869 Polimerek (talk) 10:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This is not a proper agreement. The "permission" is from one of the band members depicted (i.e., the subject). Permission must come from the author (photographer) or be in the form of the document that transferred rights from the photogrpaher to the sender. Эlcobbola talk 16:12, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ParionsSport.jpg

Merci de ne pas supprimé le logo Parions Sport — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 165.225.76.211 (talk) 11:30, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close: 1) there is no file by the name of File:ParionsSport.jpg and you've posted whilst logged out so we cannot review your deleted contribs; and 2) this is not a reason to restore. Please review our instructions. --Эlcobbola talk 16:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rachel_Parris1.jpg

I own the rights to this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rhonda Lidgold (talk • contribs) 15:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Radio MARS.png

Undelete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sxmi (talk • contribs) 16:24, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Tolga Akcayli.jpg

The email approving publishing was sent to the OST a week ago. Has there been any updatE? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tolgaria (talk • contribs) 17:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Tolgaria: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 09:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Iluminante.jpg

Iluminante is a bankrupt, closed and currently non-existent firm (since 1950). The logos I created were based on a detailed description of them and were not removed from the net, being my own work. The Desportivo Iluminante cycling team, which ceased in 1946, was the first truly professional cycling team in Portugal. It is important that their logos appear on his page, as were the subject of a great own research work. Try to find the logos in the Internet. You will not find, except these, made by me. Thank you.
--Seigokanportugal (talk) 22:07, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done image not deleted. If you disagree with the deletion nomination, please click "Challenge speedy deletion" and discuss issues in the deletion request page. Ankry (talk) 02:26, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why deleting useful files?

There are many other images of Goguryeo murals on Wikimedia commons. They have no copyright, no author is known. These are public domain. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightbearer03 (talk • contribs) 05:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, not a request. Please use Commons:Village pump for general discussion. Thuresson (talk) 06:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ethiopian Abyssinian Church, Jerusalem 09.jpg

Also:

Files were deleted because of "no FoP for Israeli paintings". (Ref. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ethiopian Abyssinian Church, Jerusalem 09.jpg). But one deleted photo of the same subject (probably) was successfully undeleted: Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2010-08#Request for undeletion File:EAC IMG 6549.JPG, applying the argument that the church is a public place and these paintings in the Israeli legal literature are integral part of it, as religious paintings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

@Kameraad Pjotr and O: Can you comment what do you think of this inconsistency if you are still around? Ankry (talk) 20:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
 Weak support to have consistency in Wikimedia Commons admins' decisions. However, I still have doubts whether this painting is covered by ToO or not. Ankry (talk) 00:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
It appears the undeleted file File:EAC IMG 6549.JPG is used in a userspace FoP essay, User:Pieter Kuiper/Freedom of Panorama in Israel. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: This deals with a larger question that cannot be determined here. The correct venue is COM:VPC. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg

Speedy deleted by Gbawden on 10 September 2019 as G7. Content was not G7 eligible (created 17 August 2017, not within 7 days) and deletion requests had already failed multiple times: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg. ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:39, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Also all the following files which were deleted. Not sure if solely author requested is a valid rationale?

ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Looking back File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg shouldn't have been deleted. Not the best quality true but my error.
As for the other 2 - File:Nicholas_Alahverdian_and_Senator_Sheldon_Whitehouse.jpg is low quality with no exif and I suspected a copyvio although I didn't comment on that at the time. File:Nicholas Alahverdian photo.jpg was a terrible quality crop of another photo so there was no reason to keep it. The photo it was a crop of has since been deleted Gbawden (talk)
I have undeleted the first one. Others can decide on the others Gbawden (talk) 14:07, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
How do we decide if we can't see them? What pic was it a crop of? ProcrastinatingReader (talk) 01:52, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nicholas Alahverdian and Andre Dubus III.jpg, opened January 8th. --Ruthven (msg) 17:16, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No consensus to undelete the latter two, and the former was deleted by WMF Office Action and therefore out of our hands. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:52, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nicholas Alahverdian 2013-07-05 23-55.jpg

Please undelete the following files:

The files were deleted in 2015 as out of scope, following this discussion. An article for the subject was subsequently recreated on the English Wikipedia and has survived a deletion discussion. Cheers, Genericusername57 (talk) 18:28, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

 Not done: Due to WMF Office Action concerning other photos of the subject, we cannot proceed until that issue is resolved. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:00, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vitral Templo Maipu.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: File was deleted because there was no knowledge on Chilean FOP ca. 2009. (Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Vitral Templo Maipu.JPG) Now we know that there is COM:FOP Chile if the works are situated permanently in public places. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:50, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per {{FoP-Chile}}. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:43, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A forensic analysis of construction litigation, U.S. Naval Facilities Engineering Command (IA aforensicnalysis109451046).pdf

According to the NPS Calhoun Web-site, this is a work of the U.S. government, and is thus is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:07, 18 January 2021 (UTC).

  •  Oppose For the work to qualify as the work of the US Government, 17 U.S.C §101 clearly note that "work of the United States Government' is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties". The work in question was prepared and submitted by the author as a graduate student of the University of Texas Austin as part of the requirements of their degree, and as such it was not part of any official duties if the individual was an employee of the U.S. Federal government. The assertion by NPS Calhoun is, therefore, unreliable. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:45, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aerosol optical depth model assessment with high resolution multiple angle sensors (IA aerosolopticalde109451216).pdf

Only three figures are under third-party copyright; they may be redacted. Otherwise, this work is in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:16, 18 January 2021 (UTC).

@TE(æ)A,ea.: Do you request temporarily undeletion to provide a redacted PDF version? Ankry (talk) 01:47, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Original version can be found on IA. A redacted version may be uploaded. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aerosol optical depth retrievals from high-resolution commercial satellite imagery over areas of high surface reflectance (IA aerosolopticalde1094510119).pdf

There is no image on p. 38. There are some images which might be copyrighted, but the indications are not clear. Only a few images would have to be redacted for the document to be entirely PD-USGov. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2021 (UTC).

For the record, this is obviously about Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aerosol optical depth retrievals from high-resolution commercial satellite imagery over areas of high surface reflectance (IA aerosolopticalde1094510119).pdf. On page 38 there is in fact only original text and calculations by the author, but two copyrighted images are on page 9 (Copyright Digital Globe). Those can be blanked though. So I support undeletion. The document in question can be seen here (PDF). De728631 (talk) 03:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
If the document is available elsewhere, I see no reason to undelete. The redacted version may be uploaded under the same (preferred) or another name. Ankry (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No consensus to undelete. A redacted version may be uploaded. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:25, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bhupinder Singh.jpg

For the last upload. It's from odishaassembly.nic.in/memberprofile.aspx?img=408, see bottom: "The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 06:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Info It is not clear to me who should be attributed as the author of the photo (while attributing the author is clearly required by the license). Ankry (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Odisha Legislative Assembly should be attributed as the author of the photos uploaded from 'odishaassembly.nic.in'.--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 06:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @CptViraj: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files found with "scotland.gov.uk/CrownCopyright"

Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "scotland.gov.uk/CrownCopyright" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drchriswilliams (talk • contribs) 09:33, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

This recent deletion of a batch of files occurred following them being nominated for deletion when a problem was identified with the license on the Scottish Government and their Flickr account. These images had been uploaded by several users over a period of several years. There was a similar nomination to this, led to discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "OGL v1.0" "gov.scot", and to Scottish Government being contacted by @Sara Thomas (WMUK): . That led to the Scottish Government making alterations to the licensing details for many of their images to be wiki-compatible / in-line with OGL, with a small number of exceptions which have had to be left on -NC. I believe most or all items on this list should now have an appropriate license associated with them. Drchriswilliams (talk) 09:27, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Comment As an FYI, the license on the Scottish Government Flickr account has now been updated on most photographs from CC-BY-NC to CC-BY, link here, they were happy to clarify. Sara Thomas (WMUK) (talk) 09:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Files deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "scotland.gov.uk/CrownCopyright"

Hi, I'm requesting the undeletion of the following images deleted as the result of Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "scotland.gov.uk/CrownCopyright" that I started. They had the same issue with conflicting licenses as Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "OGL v1.0" "gov.scot", but Sara Thomas (WMUK) contacted the Scottish government and received clarification that photographs taken by the Scottish government and appear on Scottish government websites are freely licensed.

Thanks and apologies for creating extra work. Ytoyoda (talk) 22:28, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

@Nat: This comment from Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with "OGL v1.0" "gov.scot". My reading is that all images found on Scottish government websites are licensed under OGL or a CC license compatible with OGL. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:10, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
 Comment As an FYI, the license on the Scottish Government Flickr account has now been updated on most photographs from CC-BY-NC to CC-BY, link here, they were happy to clarify. Sara Thomas (WMUK) (talk) 09:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ytoyoda, Drchriswilliams, and Sara Thomas (WMUK): FYI. Please check the files in question and resubmit for licence review if necessary. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:11, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pointer, oil on canvas, Painting by Kristoffer Zetterstrand.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Hi. I am the copyright holder of this image. You can undelete it and return it to the page. Zetterstrand (talk) 10:10, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

@Zetterstrand: Anybody can say this and we need an evidence of free license. Please provide the license either on the source site or following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 01:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here.@Zetterstrand: For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Johannes Müller Abgeordneter der Grünen.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS permission received: ticket:2021020310005508 Ivi104 (talk) 13:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ivi104: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:40, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Low Poly Cars in Blender 3D Modeling.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I created this using the 3D animation software Blender, I have created and uploaded several images of my original work. I also create YouTube tutorials walking through how to build these. I will add a link to one of my YouTube tutorials walking through how to make these cars. If you look in the description, you will see my website link, kurtkaiser.us. This is my work. youtu.be /Qcx-FH_tmD0 Kurtkaiser (talk) 14:54, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Kurtkaiser: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Penguin 2D Animation.png

This file is my original work. I have uploaded many 3D animations I created using Blender. I uploaded a tutorial to YouTube of me creating this work. If you search on YouTube for "Blender Beginner Tutorial - Penguin Animation with Modifiers - No Ads - No Keyboard Shortcuts", you will find my video. Notice in the description, a link to my website, kurtkaiser.us. I create this work. I will post the direct link with a space in it youtu.be /fWq4ErXOvwA File: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Penguin_2D_Animation.png&action=edit&redlink=1 Kurtkaiser (talk) 15:03, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Kurtkaiser: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Janosch Moldau. Feld 2.jpg

Warum wurde diese Datei gelöscht? Die Aufnahme stammt von mir und somit habe ich auch Das Copyright.

 Not done: Rationale can be found on the original file uploaded File:Janosch Moldau, Musician. The Fields II.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:27, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Janosch Moldau. Feld 1.jpg

Auch für diese Datei die Anfrage: Warum wurde sie gelöscht? Die Aufnahme habe ich gemacht. Ich besitze die RAW-Datei und auch das Copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tennislehrer1974 (talk • contribs) 19:48, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Rationale can be found on the original file uploaded File:Janosch Moldau, Musician. The Fields I.jpg. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The siyar-ul-Mutakherin, a history of the Mahomedan power in India during the last century (IA siyarulmutakheri00ghulrich).pdf

There is a community consensus for keeping PDF and DjVu files where both exist, refer to Commons:Village pump/Proposals#Keeping PDF and DjVu duplicates.

In this case the DjVu file is not identical to the PDF as it has watermarks. The unwatermarked PDF has obvious additional educational value because it is unwatermarked. The speedy deletion of the PDF means there never was a consensus to delete this file, and there never has been a consensus to delete PDFs only because a DjVu exists. --Fæ (talk) 16:22, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Fæ: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:30, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Rita Asfour Self Portrait.jpg

I own the copyright to this image. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggae1885 (talk • contribs) 16:40, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

@Ggae1885: We need an evidence for this. Please, follow COM:OTRS instructions is you are the copyright holder. Ankry (talk) 02:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here.@Ggae1885: For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:29, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BEST-PLAYERS-MEN.webp

Hi the following three images has been deleted when it belongs to me

File:BEST-PLAYERS-MEN.webp File:BEST-PLAYERS-WOMEN.webp File:The launch of the 2019 World Cup Kabaddi.jpg

I own the website www.gosports.com.my and I the World Cup 2019 was organised by me as the organising chairman and the photos were taken by me.


--Tirunaavuckarsu (talk) 02:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Tirunaavuckarsu

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Tirunaavuckarsu: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:33, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bebcare Logo Square.jpg

Bebcare is our company logo, which we own the USPTO trademark for. We do not believe there is any copyright violation with the company logo. Please undelete. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jacobcflatter (talk • contribs) 02:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@Jacobcflatter: Copyright violation is your claim that you own copyright personally. (1) We do not host logos that are not intended to be used in Wikimedia services; where is this logo intended to be used? (2) For company owned copyright we need a written free license permission from the company authorities following COM:OTRS instructions, especially for any copyrighted logo.
Both issues needs to be resolved prior to undeletion. Ankry (talk) 02:23, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aaron.Quigley.jpg

This file is available open and freely here https://www.flickr.com/photos/aquigley/50915354901/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaron.quigley (talk • contribs) 08:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

This is a company logo. How can I use a copyright free image describing for a logo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mmr.johnny (talk • contribs) 10:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - To the extent this refers to File:PBL-Logo-English (1).png, the quality is poor (at least by virtue of size) and thus likely out-of-scope as not realistically useful in its current state. If this company is notable and the logo free (i.e., pd-textlogo), simply reupload a better quality one. It should also likely be a svg. Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Servicio Nacional de Fronteras (SENAFRONT) - escudo - Panamá 2011.png

This is a logo of Law Enforcement of Panamá and is public domain. I draw the logo. --AnelGTR (talk) 17:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Works of the government are not exempted from copyright protection per COM:PANAMA. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:23, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo el camino de Costa Rica.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I have asked Asociación Mar a Mar (Copyright owners) and they were OK with posting it. 2001:871:246:859E:8CE5:97E5:9A9F:6333 19:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JET KINTANA.png

Restore :Logo JET KINTANA.

I'm the designer of this football team logo and i want to create the wikipedia page of the team. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jafetrason (talk • contribs) 21:04, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @Jafetrason: Please read COM:DW. For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder (i.e. the creator of the original work) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Escudo09.png

Diseño creado por mí. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galan Manchego (talk • contribs) 21:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@Galan Manchego: personally created, non-official logos are out of COM:SCOPE. See also COM:DW. Ankry (talk) 02:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EscudoCDManchego wikipedia.jpg

Esta imagen es creada por mí. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Galan Manchego (talk • contribs) 21:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

@Galan Manchego: personally created, non-official logos are out of COM:SCOPE. See also COM:DW. Ankry (talk) 02:38, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BG_Paul.jpg

Please restore the following images:

Reason: I have gained the consent from Census and Statistics Department HKSAR to upload the following images to the wiki page '2021 Population Census in Hong Kong', 'Census in Hong Kong', '2021年香港人口普查' and '香港人口普查'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Statisticsisfun (talk • contribs)

@Statisticsisfun: you need to provide a link to a web page where the license is declared by the image(s) copyright holder, or the copyright holder needs to follow COM:OTRS instructions. We need a clear license evidence for any image that has already been published elsewhere or is not a personal work by the uploader. Ankry (talk) 02:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JET MADA.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is the old logo of the Jet Kintana football team. Jafetrason (talk) 05:45, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No valid rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Murderous Trance.jpg

The file Murderous Trance is posted by the copyrights owner Art Films Productions and is the correct one for the North American English version. In Europe the movie is called the Guardian Angel and in the United States it is called Murderous Trance thus we have created a poster for it matching it's US name. It would be great if you would allow us to post the correct photo on the Wikipedia page. Here is a link to the movie's home page in English https://guardianangelmovie.net/en/ and if you change the language to Finnish the name changes to the Guardian Angel - Suojelusenkeli.

Thank you for your help, Art Films Production--Elokuvaaja (talk) 09:42, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

== [[:File:Murderous Trance.jpg]] ==

Hi,

I see that the file has been deleted twice and that I've been asked to not to post it again. I am an intern at this company, I have not updated Wikipedia before, I clicked something wrong when I was doing it the first time. Can you please help me how I can as a representative of the production company Art Films Production post the correct poster? I do not know how to claim the company's the copyrights to the movie. Thank you

Sincerely, Art Films Production--Elokuvaaja (talk) 09:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Elokuvaaja: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:43, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Statisticsisfun

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS permission has arrived, please restore the files! Bencemac (talk) 10:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Bencemac: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

"‪File:Govt. Medical College, Patiala - Logo.jpg‬"

File has been as photographed by self — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toakashdeep (talk • contribs) 11:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Unambigious copyright violation. @Toakashdeep: Please read COM:DW. Taking a photo of a work does not extinguish the copyright held by the author of the underlying work. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Life Remixed Book Cover.jpg undelete this image

File:Life Remixed Book Cover.jpg

I am writing to request the restoration of the above file because this file is personally owned and created by me the account owner.

--Mark Wilkinson (Author) (talk) 14:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Mark Wilkinson Official and Mark Wilkinson (Author): As already explained here, previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

https://www.ritaasfour.com/

The self portrait of Rita Asfour comes from the website of Rita Asfour.

How can there be any copyright violations? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ggae1885 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No valid rationale for undeletion. Ymblanter has already left an explaintion on Ggae1885's talk page as to why their uploads constitute a copyright violation. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Paakwasi.jpg

I personally snapped this picture so I believe there's no copyright placed on it. Thank you! --Big Aryeh Gh (talk) 18:05, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Regardless who the copyright owner is, image may not be in scope since en:Draft:Paa Kwasi is rejected. Thuresson (talk) 20:27, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:13, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Two photos of Comtes Le Grelle

Please undelete

We received a permission at OTRS under Ticket:2021012710007651.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:A Malabar Thiyyar Tharawad.jpg

Please restore. We have a permission, double-checked by another OTRS agent, under Ticket:2020122610000981.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:37, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:18, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Creative Cloud 2020 Logo.svg

Requesting that Creative Cloud 2020 Logo.svg be undeleted, because of a lack of a photo that adequately represents the application. This is the official logo released by Adobe Inc, on June 2020 as seen on the Adobe website. Shaddai Wright (talk) 21:36, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No valid rationale for undeletion. @Shaddai Wright: Please read COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:08, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cyanide and Happiness Logo.png

Request to undelete this file, due to there not being an available image that properly displays the franchise. Logo and characters are simple geometric shapes, with the latter being made in circles, rectangles, and lines. The franchise was also not published until 2005, nor does the website mention that the copyright ran since 2000, as claimed by Kinu. Instead, it suggests that it ran since 2005, the year the comic was released. Shaddai Wright (talk) 21:52, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Undeletion already rejected in December 2020. Copyright notice not necessary for copyright protection. File(s) affirmed to be unambigious copyright violations at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cyanide and Happiness.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cyanide and Happiness Logo.png. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:04, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Riya Sharma.jpg

We have an OTRS ticket Ticket:2021020810009522 for this image. Please restore so I can compare it to the file the photographer sent to the ticket. Ww2censor (talk) 22:48, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ww2censor: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ficheiro:Gilberto Perin e Marcos Paulo - Em Teu Nome - foto Divulgação Accorde Filmes.jpg

Nobres colegas da WikiCommons. Venho por meio desse apelo solicitar que o ficheiro Ficheiro:Gilberto Perin e Marcos Paulo - Em Teu Nome - foto Divulgação Accorde Filmes.jpg seja restaurado. Já subi o mesmo por mais de uma vez, e o mesmo segue sendo removido. Sinceramente não entendo o motivo. Encaminhei por diversas vezes o documento assinado pelo titular da foto ao e-mail permissions-commons-pt@wikimedia.org, o mais recente obteve o [Ticket#: 2021020910009566]. Nesse documento o titular do ficheiro claramente deu autorização expressa para que a foto seja publicada além de abdicar de quaisquer direitos conexos ao ficheiro em questão. Gostaria de entender melhor o motivo pelo qual o ficheiro vem seno removido sempre que upado. Grato.--Lucashempa (discussão) 21h26min de 09 de fevereiro de 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucashempa (talk • contribs) 00:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Ticket:2021020910009566 has yet to be processed @Lucashempa: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:10, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AMSA Intl logo.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: otrs ticket recived, CC-BY-SA 4.0 janbery (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Janbery: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:20, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:RamBahadurGhale.jpg

I am the copy rights so please do not delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramghale (talk • contribs) 04:19, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Ramghale: As already clearly explained on your talkpage, for the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder (i.e. the photographer/creator of the original image) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Prof. Dr. Dr. Dieter Leyk.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I am the copyright owner but the file has been previously published https://www.dshs-koeln.de/forschungsgruppe-leistungsepidemiologie/team/prof-dr-dr-dieter-leyk/ McMcDeath (talk) 06:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @McMcDeath: Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:13, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:BildMGPSV.jpg

Dear Sir or Madame,

I am new to wikipedia and I officially represent Mario Götze. That is why I signed up and wanted to update the pictures of Mario in info boxes with the attached picture.

Mario sent them to me directly.

How can I make sure that this picture will be uploaded and saved to the page. He is still being displayed in a wrong and old jersey.

Best

Max thumb|im Trikot von PSV Eindhoven (2021) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maxhuesch (talk • contribs) 18:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Gettyimages.com: "EINDHOVEN, NETHERLANDS - OCTOBER 6: Mario Gotze of PSV during the Contract singing PSV at the Philips Stadium on October 6, 2020 in Eindhoven Netherlands (Photo by Photo Prestige/Soccrates/Getty Images)" Please contact the photographer and ask him or her to follow the instructions at COM:OTRS to have the license verified. Thuresson (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:George_R._Wodicka.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: we've received Ticket:2021020210010791 regarding File:George_R._Wodicka.jpg. Please restore in order to verified veracity and finish the process. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 19:35, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ganímedes: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Gurpreet Singh 'Prit Music' (Born 12th September 1990) is a punjabi music producer and songwriter. He started producing music in 2016, with his first track being Kasoor sang by C Jay Malhi, music and writer Prit music. This track led to him receiving a PTC Punjabi award for 'Best Debut Song'. He then became popular from producing hit tracks like Tadap - sang by Garry Sandhu, Bekadra - sang by Khan Saab, Lekh - sang by Hansraj Hans, Pegg Nachda - sang by Jass Bajwa, Koka - sang by Johny Seth, Brandy - sang by Raj Dhillon, Kamzori - sang by Jatinder Brar, Khaas Gall - sang by Monty Waris, MH One Studio - sang by Sugandha Mishra, Saun Teri - sang by Jay Maan and then Love Hate - sang by Raj Dhillon Ft Karan Aujla plus many more. He also produced a tradition Indian shared called Baba Teri Bani - sang by Raj Dhillon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prit Music (talk • contribs) 02:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No files listed in this request, no valid rationale provided. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:석굴암 십일면관음보살상과 제자상 Seokgoolam, Silla.jpg

This is allowed to share. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightbearer03 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted as of 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:석굴암 부석상 신라 한복 Silla hanbok.jpg

This picture is already allowed to share when it's uploaded. It's checked allowed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightbearer03 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No valid rationale for undeletion. Unambigious COM:NETCOPYVIO: No evidence of accepted free licence at source @Lightbearer03: While works depicted may be in public domain, the photos attract their own copyright. Please read COM:DW. Previous published works require that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Goryeo hanbak 한복 고려시대.png

these pictures are public domain. It's not drawn by the author of this book. It is public domain, the author could insert it inside a book. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightbearer03 (talk • contribs) 04:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted as of 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:백제 오악사 Baekje korea hanbok.jpg

This is a relic from 1500~2000years ago. There is no copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightbearer03 (talk • contribs) 04:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. File not deleted as of 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Filologisk Forening logo.png

Hi,

Filologisk Forening is a Norwegian student association based at the faculty of Humanities, Universitet i Oslo. This file was marked as a possible copyright violation, but our logo is not copyrighted, nor do we really care how our logo is used.

This file is our current logo that was created in the spring of 1995 by both Bernhard Ryeng and Geir Amdal - quite likely in a pub setting initially. Filologisk Forening (Philologic Association) has the right to use this logo as we wish, this includes altering it in any way we desire.

We also do not mind if someone would like to use the owl standing on the pillar (AKA the best bit), a nod towards us is polite, but if it is at another university in Norway/the rest of the world, whatever - spread the owly goodness!

Kind regards, Asa-Jane Stuart-Campbell, Vice-Chairman of the Filologisk Forening --Ajscishly (talk) 11:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Ajscishly: As a purely technical matter, we cannot assess, determine, or confirm your assertions here. Please note that, unless exempted by law or as a result of the expiration of protections under the law, works are generally and automatically afforded protections under copyright law. For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder (i.e. the creator of the original image, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Séraphine de Senlis.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Séraphine de Senlis.jpg

Artist died in 1942, and so this is public domain in France. Abzeronow (talk) 01:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: File can be undeleted in 2026. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rév.jpg

OTRS agent (verify): request: Ticket:2021020710003995 alleges permission. I request temporary undeletion to assess the validity of that allegation, mark as {{subst:OR}} or otherwise appropriately, and ping me.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Jeff G.: Please proceed. --De728631 (talk) 10:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Drs. Kishan, Hostin, and Wiesman.jpg

This picture is not copyrighted. My company photographer took the picture for us. It is a pictures of our board certified scoliosis physicians. Thank you, Robbie Reed (Redacted) --Robbie Reed (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Robbie Reed: As a purely technical matter, we cannot assess, determine, or confirm your assertions here. Please note that, unless exempted by law or as a result of the expiration of protections under the law, works are generally and automatically afforded protections under copyright law. Previously published works require that the copyright holder (i.e. the creator of the original image, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Por favor no borren, por soy el mismo autor y editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde justamente los archivos que colgué, se publican; no se infligido ningún derecho autor, soy la misma persona.

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que soy editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publican las investigaciones que hagan de diferentes temas con fotografías, por favor no borren todos los archivos publicados aquí, todos y cada uno fue publicado antes en el Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, soy el único editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 19:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

== Por favor no borren, por soy el mismo autor y editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde justamente los archivos que colgué, se publican; no se infligido ningún derecho autor, soy la misma persona. ==

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que soy el editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publican mis investigaciones con fotografías, que es justamente lo que hice al colgarlos aquí, no se han infligido ningún derecho de autor por soy la misma persona y el único editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 19:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

== Por favor no borren, por soy el mismo autor y editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde justamente los archivos que colgué, se publican; no se infligido ningún derecho autor, soy la misma persona. ==

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que soy el editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publican mis investigaciones con fotografías, que es justamente lo que hice al colgarlos aquí, no se han infligido ningún derecho de autor por soy la misma persona y el único editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 19:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

== Por favor no borren, por soy el mismo autor y editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde justamente los archivos que colgué, se publican; no se infligido ningún derecho autor, soy la misma persona. ==

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que soy el editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publican mis investigaciones con fotografías, que es justamente lo que hice al colgarlos aquí, no se han infligido ningún derecho de autor por soy la misma persona y el único editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 19:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

== Por favor no borren, por soy el mismo autor y editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde justamente los archivos que colgué, se publican; no se infligido ningún derecho autor, soy la misma persona. ==

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que soy el editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publican mis investigaciones con fotografías, que es justamente lo que hice al colgarlos aquí, no se han infligido ningún derecho de autor por soy la misma persona y el único editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 19:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

== Por favor no borren, por soy el mismo autor y editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde justamente los archivos que colgué, se publican; no se infligido ningún derecho autor, soy la misma persona. ==

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que soy el editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publican mis investigaciones con fotografías, que es justamente lo que hice al colgarlos aquí, no se han infligido ningún derecho de autor por soy la misma persona y el único editor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 19:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close. No specific file requested for undeletion. Thuresson (talk) 19:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Salted cheese.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Permission was granted by the CEO to Wikipedia permission-commons email address. We have received the OTRS permissions: ticket:2021013110003245 and ticket:2021013110003227. Allo002 (talk) 07:29, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: You are not a member of the OTRS team, so please wait until they initiate an undeletion request. --De728631 (talk) 10:16, 12 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

2 wine labels

Please undelete

We have a permission in Ticket:2021012710007651.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:46, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: Please attach the OTRS labels. --De728631 (talk) 10:01, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Coat of arms of the Philippines (monochrome).svg

This is clearly in the scope of Template:PD-PhilippinesGov as it is a derivative of the coat of arms in a monochrome color which is in the public domain. Other than that, it's deletion request was in the motive of "Out of scope" but closed as kept. Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Coat_of_arms_of_the_Philippines_(monochrome).svg

But then it was deleted by a file mover @Jcb due to having no source even though it is public domain. Basing from the title, I think it qualifies for undeletion. I will update it and add a source if it is proven out of public domain. PyroFloe (talk) 14:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @PyroFloe and De728631: FYI. Licensing updated. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui

Soy el único propietario de la publicación : Aypate, en el Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde.

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que soy el único editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publicó : AYPATE : Tierra de los Guayacundos(Wayakuntur) Ayahuacas, fue solo un tambo del Camino Incaico Qhapaq Ñan : Visitada A Vuelo de un Quinde.......; Publicado el 27 de marzo del 2016; cuya página web es : https://piuraenlambayeque.blogspot.com/search?q=Aypate ; Por lo tanto no se está infrigiendo, derechos de autor porque soy la misma persona Mi correo electrónico es: <redacted>

Leyenda de la imagen:HPIM3232 (1) Aquí en la imagen observamos la puerta principal de entrada a las instalaciones de las Ruinas Incaicas de Aypate, se nota claramente la majestuosidad impresionante con piedras talladas al estilo clásico incaico como símbolo de dominación, es probable que hubo algún techo o alguna instalación horizontal desde donde se rendía culto al visitante Inca. Según se observa toda la gradería de entrada está hecha de piedras tal como se hacía en los diferentes lugares que pasaba el Qhapaq Ñan o camino incaico. Foto: Archivos del Blog: A vuelo de un quinde. (´´´´) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 01:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Soy el único propietario de la publicación: Templo Nuestra Señora del Pilar.jpg, que originalmente de publicó en el Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde.

Yo Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro que son editor único del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde publicó : AYABACA - TIERRA QUERIDA : UNA VISITA, A VUELO DE UN QUINDE; A LA PLAZA DE ARMAS Y AL CERRO CALVARIO, QUE HOY SE LLAMA: ASENTAMIENTO HUMANO SEÑOR CAUTIVO..........A VUELO DE UN QUINDE; el 31 de Mayo del 2019; cuya página Web: es https://piuraenlambayeque.blogspot.com/2019/05/ayabaca-tierra-querida-una-visita-vuelo.html Allí está una de las muchas imágenes el Templo de Nuestra del Pilar; cuya Leyenda dice: Aquí en la imagen observamos al Templo Nuestra Señora del Pilar, símbolo emblemático de Ayabaca, por que en su interior en el altar mayor está la imagen del Señor Cautivo, esta fotografía se tomó del mirador en las faldas del Cerro. Foto: Archivos del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde . Cuya fotografía corresponde a la imagen : IMG_2428 (2) Por lo tanto no se ha infrigido ningún derecho de autor por que soy la misma persona, tanto como del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, como dueño de la publicación. Mi correo es : <redacted> (´´´´) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 02:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Soy el único propietario de la publicación: :Naylamp, balneario en Lambayeque.jpg

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro ser el único editor y propietario del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publicó: MUNICIPALIDAD PROVINCIAL DE LAMBAYEQUE: TALLER DE FOTOGRAFÍA PUESTA EN VALOR PLAYA NAYLAMP, el 30 de Diciembre del 2019, cuya página web es: https://piuraenlambayeque.blogspot.com/2019/12/municipalidad-provincial-de-lambayeque.html Por lo tanto no se ha infrigido ningún derecho de autor por que soy la misma persona, propietaria del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde y de la publicación. Cuya leyenda dice: Aquí en la imagen observamos la fotografía que ganó el 1° Puesto en el Concurso de Fotografía Turística - Puesta en Valor Playa Naylamp 2019. Fotografía denominada: "Disfrute familiar en la playa Naylamp, La Salidulce de Lambayeque 2019". Foto: Archivos del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde. Corresponde la fotografía : IMG_3873 (1) Mi correo es : ayabaca@gmail.com (´´´´) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 02:31, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

soy el único propietario de la publicación: :Playa de Naylamp.jpg

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro ser el único propietario del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publicó : MUNICIPALIDAD PROVINCIAL DE LAMBAYEQUE: TALLER DE FOTOGRAFÍA PUESTA EN VALOR PLAYA NAYLAMP; el 30 de Diciembre del 2019, cuya página web es: https://piuraenlambayeque.blogspot.com/2019/12/municipalidad-provincial-de-lambayeque.html Por lo tanto no se ha infrigido ningún derecho de autor, por que soy la misma persona tanto como el editor y propietario del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde y de la publicación. Cuya leyenda dice: Aquí en la imagen observamos a la playa Naylamp con tan solo una veraneante, convertíamos esta maravilla de la naturaleza en la visita y disfrute de miles de veraneantes, que nos ofrece arenas limpias y aguas cristalinas, paz y tranquilidad para el descanso placentero. Foto: Archivos del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde. Corresponde a la imagen IMG_3837 (1) Mi correo es : <redacted> (´´´´) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 02:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Soy el único propietario de la publicación: SECTOR PROGRESO DE SOCCHABAMBA.jpg

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro ser el único propietario del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publicó: SOCCHABAMBA -MI TIERRA DE NACIMIENTO : UNA VISITA AL SECTOR PROGRESO DE SOCCHABAMBA; A VUELO DE UN QUINDE.... el 31 de mayo del 2019, cuya página web es : https://piuraenlambayeque.blogspot.com/2019/05/socchabamba-mi-tierra-de-nacimiento-una_62.html Por lo tanto no se ha infrigido ningún derecho de autor, por que soy la misma persona como editor y propietario del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde y de la publicación. Cuya leyenda de la imagen dice: Aquí en la imagen observamos la fachada del I.E. N° 20601, donde se imparte la enseñanza de primaria en el Sector El Progreso de Socchabamba, con un amplio patio. Foto: Archivos del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde. Corresponde a la imagen IMG_2972 (3) Mi correo es : <redacted> (´´´´) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 02:58, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Soy el único propietario de la publicación: Municipalidad Provincial de Ayabaca.jpg

Yo, Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui, declaro ser el editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde, donde se publicó: AYABACA - TIERRA QUERIDA : UNA VISITA, A VUELO DE UN QUINDE; A LA PLAZA DE ARMAS Y AL CERRO CALVARIO, QUE HOY SE LLAMA: ASENTAMIENTO HUMANO SEÑOR CAUTIVO..........A VUELO DE UN QUINDE, con fecha el 31 de mayo del 2019, cuya página web es: https://piuraenlambayeque.blogspot.com/2019/05/ayabaca-tierra-querida-una-visita-vuelo.html Por lo tanto no se ha infrigido ningún derecho de autor, porque soy el propietario y editor del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde y de la publicación. Cuya leyenda dice: Aquí en la imagen observamos al Palacio de la Municipalidad Provincial de Ayabaca, ubicado en la calle Salaverry N° 260, frente a la Plaza de Armas, una construcción emblemática y símbolo histórico de la Ciudad de Ayabaca. Foto: Archivos del Blog: A Vuelo de un Quinde . Cuya imagen es : IMG_2456 (1) Mi correo es : <redacted> (´´´´) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui (talk • contribs) 03:15, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Hola, @Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui: . Tal como funcionan las cosas en esta página web (Wikimedia Commons), es necesario que pruebe que usted es propietario de ese blog de donde se habrían tomado las imágenes pues, aunque con toda probabilidad esté diciendo la verdad, es necesario "oficializar" esto mediante el procedimiento COM:OTRS: cuando se encuentra material en Commons publicado previamente en otra página web no basta con afirmar que somos realmente los autores originales, es necesario probarlo. También puede, claro, si es usted propietario del blog, colocar una licencia libre compatible con Commons (CC BY-SA, CC- BY, CC0,... por ejemplo) en su blog a estas imágenes. Por otro lado no es suficiente con que usted sea "propietario y editor del blog", realmente es necesario que usted sea el fotógrafo en cuestión, pues en caso contrario lo más probable es que no posea los derechos de autor de las fotografías. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 16:17, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

@Strakhov, Cookie, and Explicit: Can you please check what this is about? I don't read Spanish, but from what I got here, I'd say we still need an OTRS ticket for this request. De728631 (talk) 10:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

@De728631: Yes. They basically claim to be the owner of the blog. But we need: 1) OTRS permission proving that or that... 2) they release the content through a free license in that blog. Strakhov (talk) 16:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here.@Guillermo Gonzalo Sánchez Achutegui: For the possibility of undeletion, it requires that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Brian A. Metcalf.jpg

I took this photo of Brian A. Metcalf at a Netflix event on June 6th 2017.

This is my photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mona1975 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Previously published at [4]. Please follow the instructions at COM:OTRS to verify that you are the copyright owner. Thuresson (talk) 16:43, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Mona1975: Previously published works require that the copyright holder (i.e. the creator of the original image, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:27, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:File:Andy Sophie avec l'AS Sainte-Suzanne.jpg

Je suis le proprietaire de la photo elle proviens de la page foot de l'île 974 dont je suis le community manager --Dadam97490 (talk) 17:06, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Dadam97490: Propriétaire d'une photo titulaire du droit d'auteur. Le titulaire du droit d'auteur d'une photo est la personne qui a pris la photographie, sauf si le droit d'auteur est transféré par opération légale ou contrat écrit. Pour la possibilité de restauration, le titulaire du droit d'auteur doit envoyer une autorisation sous license dite «libre» par courriel à l'OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org ou permissions-fr@wikimedia.org) Une fois que l'OTRS a déterminé qu'il a reçu une autorisation suffisante et qu'il n'y a pas d'autre raison de suppression, un(e) agent(e) de l'OTRS effectuera ou demandera la restauration. Merci de votre compréhension. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sborrisgr.jpg

File from is from http://www.siegfriedborris.de/download.html, which states the images as "Bildrechte frei", or Image rights free. I'm pretty sure this means the image free to use, but I'm unsure which license it would be compatible with. Yeenosaurus (talk) 18:00, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose For the same reasons as in Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2021-01#File:Sborrisgr.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 20:40, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
I did not see that deletion request before, thanks for bringing it up. Knowing this, I withdraw my request. Yeenosaurus (talk) 00:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:24, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JesusAVGN312.jpg

The photo is in the public domain and the author of the photo has consented to its use. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boy312 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Boy312: Previously published works require that the copyright holder (i.e. the creator of the original image, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

West Coast Landscape 1992 48"x88".jpg

The file in question was digitized from the artist's collection of 35mm slides. The copyright holder is Thyra Wexler who inherited the collection upon her husband's (George Wexler) death in 2006. Daniel Wexler is Thyra Wexler's son and has power of attorney. Daniel Wexler is also the creator of the wikipedia draft for "George Wexler" and disclosed his COI when submitting the first draft for review.

As legal representative for Thyra Wexler, I am releasing the image in question for public use in Wikimedia Commons.

Buxtoni (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Buxtoni: As a purely technical matter, we cannot assess, determine, or confirm your assertions here. For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Alain Cugno.png

Please restore. We got a permission with Ticket:2021021210006348.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 10:04, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: For your information. --De728631 (talk) 14:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

John P Silvaggio Hopped Up File:Mug chair.jpg

Going to send premission from author to email listed on other page as a forward.. whoever can see mailbox, if we can take care of that before continueing to edit my sandbox to make the page live. Thanks for your undertstanding.. expect the emaiil soon with the [File:Mug chair.jpg] subject/reference ... I have been a member on this time for some time, although, not much editing experience; I felt the job was done with great effort; but, after reading the comments i understand one wants more local news storys, inturn I will edit the page to include external links verifiying an array of things from bearding to politics! thanks again! — Preceding unsigned comment added by JPSilvaggio (talk • contribs) 17:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @JPSilvaggio: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

dit zijn gewoon mijn fotos — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artodeto (talk • contribs) 19:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No files listed for undeletion. Nothing to be accomplished here. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Nolan North Interview.gif

Die Datei wurde von mir erstellt. Ich stelle sie hier zur Verfügung. Eine Löschung ist somit nicht rechtens. Wenn jemand darüber reden möchte, bin ich jederzeit erreichbar. Dettmero (talk) 21:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Dettmero: Previously published works require that the copyright holder (i.e. the author of the original work, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sebastian Höffner.gif

Die Datei wurde von mir erstellt. Ich stelle sie hier zur Verfügung. Eine Löschung ist somit nicht rechtens. Wenn jemand darüber reden möchte, bin ich jederzeit erreichbar. Dettmero (talk) 21:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Dettmero: Previously published works require that the copyright holder (i.e. the author of the original work, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:51, 13 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Concordia Britz beim Spiel auf dem Sportplatz am Buschkrug.gif

Die Datei wurde von mir erstellt. Ich stelle sie hier zur Verfügung. Eine Löschung ist somit nicht rechtens. Wenn jemand darüber reden möchte, bin ich jederzeit erreichbar. Dettmero (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here @Dettmero: Previously published works require that the copyright holder (i.e. the author of the original work, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyance) send permission and a specific release under an acceptable free licence to OTRS at permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:52, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:PSB logo.png

Importante para identificar o partido, assim como todos os outros partidos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sr. Freak (talk • contribs) 00:28, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done The drawing of the pigeon with the olive branch goes much beyond a simple text logo. Thuresson (talk) 18:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Grandville, Jean-Jacques — Pérégrinations d'Une Comete.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The reason given ("Exact or scaled-down duplicate") was probably wrong. As far as I can remember, my upload was colored while the existent so-called duplicate was b/w. There was no prior discussion whatsoever. Please feel free to delete the b/w one. Mateus2019 (talk) 11:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: My bad. — Racconish 💬 18:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The Soviet Union 1969 CPA 3825 stamp (Kremlin Red Star and USSR Arms) coil.jpg

This image of the Soviet stamp was issued in 1969 and it was released into public domain under {{PD-RU-exempt}}. --Frontman830 (talk) 00:52, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: File does not qualify for {{PD-RU-exempt|stamps}}. No evidence of accepted free licence at source. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:46, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Faisal Alam Dihan.jpg

This is a Picture of faisal alam dihan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faisaldihan (talk • contribs) 15:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Out of scope since Draft:Faisal Dihan was speedily deleted. Thuresson (talk) 04:32, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:57, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Frédéric Fréry.jpg

The author of this picture, Wojciech Wojcik, sent an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org in September 2020 in order to confirm the image can be published under Wikimedia commons license --Turboloop (talk) 09:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Turboloop: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:54, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Findlinge von Hüven

Please restore

We have a permission with Ticket:2021021410005452

Thank you, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Mussklprozz: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Rodica_Ojog-Braşoveanu.jpg

Requesting undeletion to be able to upload the picture onto a newly created page--Stefan Trandafir (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Info: It is still on ro:wp ro:Fișier:Rodica Ojog-Braşoveanu.jpg --Achim (talk) 16:14, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Romanian law apparently allows some kind of fair use exemption, which Romanian Wikipedia follows. Commons does not allow fair use, so that such images cannot be uploaded here. --rimshottalk 19:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
 Not done Photo is available at a different Wikimedia project. Thuresson (talk) 20:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amerie.jpg

It is not copyrighted when I have been given permission from the photographer "Gabe Montero" to showcase his work for Amerie's biography. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CrimsonC 02 (talk • contribs) 22:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @CrimsonC 02: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:34, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Painting by L. Lauretano.jpg

I would like to upload again, having gotten permission to do so from the artist, Luke Lauretano. Thank you.Jacquesmort (talk) 23:21, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Jacquesmort: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Lenz .pdf

Dear Madam, dear Sir

Okofilm, for whom I work, is the owner of the copyright of the above mentioned movie poster. Thomas Imbach, the owner of the company can send an Email from his work-address, if you kindly let me know where to send this Email.

Thank you and best wishes

Flora Grolitsch Okofilm Productions Neugasse 10 8005 Zurich Switzerland flora@okofilm.ch

--FirelleMcLaughlin (talk) 10:15, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @FirelleMcLaughlin: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Geraka Street in Gerakas 01.jpg

The poster only occupies a small portion of the image, can be removed/blurred without affecting the image much--137.189.204.121 06:29, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

  •  Support For the sake of this discussion I have temporarily restored the image. I suggest blurring most of the poster leaving the red footer with the ΣΥΡΙΖΑ slogan visible. This allows a connection to the banner on the fence. De728631 (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Whether the poster is included or not, this seems an unremarkable street/chain link fence and is neither used (although not entirely a fair consideration as it had been deleted) nor of particularly good quality. What is the expected educational utility of this image? Эlcobbola talk 20:35, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
    • "What is the expected educational utility of this image?" - presumably as an example of how en:Syriza or its supporters communicated at that time and place (even after blurring most of the content of the communication for copyright reasons). De728631 already mentioned that above. For my part, I'm merely guessing as someone who doesn't read Greek, though. whym (talk) 13:09, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
      •  Support undeletion (blur if neceesary or if warranted) as per both De728631 and Whym. I see no reaso to say that this lacks usability (or, a redundant file), as we have allowed thousands of Judgefloro files for years. The overall image is not dim nor is blurry. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:31, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: No comment for a month. --Yann (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yew Avenue Lowther Castle circa 1900.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yew Avenue Lowther Castle circa 1900.jpg

Old enough to use PD-old-assumed for this it seems. Abzeronow (talk) 03:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

Does circa 1900 mean before 1901? I would suggest waiting few years more unless the creation date can be established more precisely. Ankry (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Do you have a specific time frame in mind? Abzeronow (talk) 19:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD-old-assumed. --Yann (talk) 09:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ernest Martin Hennings - The Sheep Herder.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ernest Martin Hennings - The Sheep Herder.jpg

I don't remember the exact reason why I put this as "Undelete in 2022" but this link http://www.artnet.com/artists/ernest-martin-hennings/the-sheep-herder-KmTBIXZllNN8dsSkdSlH4g2 points to it being a 1925 painting. Hennings was an American artist so his 1956 death would be relevant if it were unpublished. Abzeronow (talk) 01:33, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD-US-expired. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Joseph Clement Delano.jpg

File:Joseph Clement Delano.jpg

This file is open copyright under Library of Congress. please undelete. please visit:

https://www.loc.gov/item/2002723602/

From LOC about this image:

Rights Advisory: No known restrictions on publication. Reproduction Number: LC-USZ6-1040 (b&w film copy neg.) Call Number: Illus. in AP2.H32 (Case Y) [P&P]

Thank you,

Template:Binx1966 --Michael Carolan 7 Feb 2021Binx1966 (talk) 21:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

N Seoul Tower photos were deleted without FoP

These photos have been deleted because there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. However, Photos of general cityscape are photos of a country where there is no freedom of panorama, but they usually weren't deleted.

For example:

One photo of general cityscape in Iran without the freedom of panorama.

Some photos of general cityscape in UAE without the freedom of panorama.

Therefore, I think it is good to restore only the photos that can be judged as general cityscape among deleted N Seoul Tower photos.

--Ox1997cow (talk) 05:01, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@Ox1997cow: We only keep/restore files taken from noFOP countries if they meet COM:DM, they are too simple to be copyrighted or they are already public domain (either the architect(s) is/are dead for 50~70 years, or they are national symbols and PD-XXX-exempt applies). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:07, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@Liuxinyu970226: Therefore, it is recommended to recover only photos that are judged to be general cityscape photos to which De minimis can be applied. Which of these photos is considered a general cityscape photo? If not, please add a {{not done}} template and close this undeletion request. Ox1997cow (talk) 02:32, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 Comment I restored a few cityscape images. I wonder whether this tower has any architectural originality, or only a utilitarian design. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:01, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
@Yann: SoKor has a very low bar on TOO, and even simple houses and mansions are copyrighted too. One such simple house was the focal point of a case (see "Examples" section of COM:FOP South Korea). However, I  Support the undeletion of the skyline pictures, as Ox1997cow has proven the existence of de minimis concept in SoKor's copyright law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I boldly removed {{Delete}} and added {{Temporarily undeleted}} for 5 files restored by Yann, these don't seem to be permanently restored by now. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Cityscapes only restored, as per JWilz12345 above. --Yann (talk) 09:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mt. Damota.png

No fruitful discussion made on the Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mt. Damota.png, I do not believe in the deletion of this file, File:Mt. Damota.png. Please undelete it. Yitbe (talk) 09:33, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No consensus to undelete. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Manila Filipina Comfort Women Statue 01.jpg

Request temporary undeletion Requesting temporary undeletion of the frontal image of the statue, a statue with an unknown status (not anymore in the public place it was originally installed; reportedly stolen). This will be moved to the English Wikipedia and uploaded under fair use for en:Filipina Comfort WomenHariboneagle927 (talk) 16:28, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Hariboneagle927: Please let me know when you have transferred the file to the English Wikipedia. --De728631 (talk) 13:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bharatiya Janata Party (icon).svg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Both these are free images. This it the political symbol of Bharatiya Janata Party in India and as per Election commission of India, all party symbols are in free domain. See deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:BJP election symbol.svg -783x768.png for the details. Either all of them has to go or all of them should be kept. Sreejith K (talk) 05:39, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

 Support Nobody would claim a copyright on this. Let's say for the justification "Standard lotus flower, no originality." Regards, Yann (talk) 20:10, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Sreejithk2000 and Yann: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Добровольская-Завадская Н. А.jpg

Please, restore this file, as it was fragment of a newspaper of Russian Empire from early 1910s, definitely expired copyright. You'd better also check on these deletions also: User_talk:Brickdorn#Статус_файлу_File:Dudin's_Gravestone.jpg. --Brunei (talk) 09:09, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: PD-Russia. --Yann (talk) 20:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

2 files by Suse Byk (1884-1943)

Please undelete 2 files by Suse Byk (1884-1943)

I don't know these files, I would suggest {{PD-old-75}} Mutter Erde (talk) 18:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
These files are as legal or illegal as all her other works in Category:Suse Byk. If you don't want to restore them, please name the sources, so I will upload them by myself. Mutter Erde (talk) 19:08, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
File:Edmund_Meisel.jpg was apparently published in 1928 and will only become PD in the US in 2023 (1928 + 95 years). For File:Evi_Eva_1928-1929_Suse_Byk_001.jpg, going by the file name, the situation is similar. The situation was much simpler when we didn't honor URAA restoration of copyrights. --rimshottalk 22:38, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: COM:URAA applies. Files can be undeleted in 2023. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Comment URAA for these files will expire on 01-01-2024. Category:Undelete in 2024 added. Yann (talk) 09:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

I would like to request that this be undeleted and a new photo will be uploaded in lieu. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeaMitchell (talk • contribs) 04:08, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

File:AFS-Summer side view.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by LeaMitchell (talk • contribs) 04:19, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Procedural close. File is not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 16:55, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:YELLINEK 01 square half.jpg

How can you delete pics that are mine? Pictures that belongs to me, that was made by me and in which I'm taken too. I hope it was done only by mistake.

Waiting for undelete. Thanks

Rockfan77 (talk)

Please ask copyright owner Piotr Knap to verify the license by following the instructions at Commons:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Rockfan77: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:02, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: San Cristóbal de La Laguna.png

Me gustaría editar la ficha de mi ciudad, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, con una imagen más renovada, moderna y actual de la ciudad. Para ello, he utilizado imágenes de internet, de libre uso y realizado un collage. Me gustaría así, contribuir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lalagunaenaccion (talk • contribs) 11:36, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Unambiguous COM:NETCOPYVIO: No evidence of free licence at source @Lalagunaenaccion: Please read COM:L/es and COM:DW/es. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mathis Haug 1.jpg

This picture is from and by the singer Mathis Haug himself, and is totaly free of rights. No idea why it has been removed, as there is no detail given. --RawWriter (talk) 22:37, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - 1) You'd claimed yourself to be the author, which you acknowledge to have been a lie ("This picture is [...] by the singer Mathis Haug himself"); 2) previously published images require COM:OTRS evidence of permission; and 3) copyright initially vests in the author (photographer), not the mere subject (Haug). Permission from Haug is thus not meaningful unless in the form of the document that formally transferred copyrights from the photographer to Haug. Эlcobbola talk 22:43, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @RawWriter: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Sorry my english is not so good, as im not native. I mean i have done the pic, and i have the permission to use it on wiki, given by mr Haug (i thought the picture was belonging to him). But if you say his agreement is not needed, then mine is needed, but that what i though i have done when uploading the pic... What should i do to place this pic on wikimedia ? Thanks for your help. --RawWriter (talk) 09:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IHO Medals.jpg

The reported reasons for deleting this were that it seemed to be taken by an outside party. However, I affirm that I took this picture, and am actually pictured in the photo, and feel that it is vital for the International History Olympiad Wikipedia page. Thank you. BrinaWiki9 (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @BrinaWiki9: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IHO Flags.jpg

The reported reasons for deleting this were that it seemed to be taken by an outside party. However, I affirm that I took this picture, and am actually pictured in the photo, and feel that it is vital for the International History Olympiad Wikipedia page. Same reason as File:IHO Medals.jpg Thank you. BrinaWiki9 (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @BrinaWiki9: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:26, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IHO History Knockout.jpg

The reported reasons for deleting this were that it seemed to be taken by an outside party. However, I affirm that I took this picture, and am actually pictured in the photo, and feel that it is vital for the International History Olympiad Wikipedia page. Same reason as and File:IHO History Knockout.jpg Thank you. BrinaWiki9 (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @BrinaWiki9: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

JPG was used b y Maria de Lourdes Santiago at Facebook — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.171.221.148 (talk) 10:22, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No file enumerated in this request, no valid rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:23, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sphere revolution.gif

This file is from problemasyecuaciones.com, which is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You can check it in the homepage.Garand377AB (talk) 12:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose Wikimedia Commons does not accept non-commercial licences. All uploads here need to be free for anyone to use for any purpose including commercial reuse. De728631 (talk) 13:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: clearly incompatible license. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:25, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EmmaLedden.jpg black and white photo

Hi, I'm updating the wikipedia of my sister, Emma Ledden at her request. She has asked see to attach the photo to her page. It is her picture. Can this please be added back in? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Obriec80 (talk • contribs) 14:04, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: That photo was of her, not by her. So it was a copyvio, see COM:L. If she was your sister, I suggest to upload a photo of her you took yourself. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:UltraStar WorldParty.jpg

Hola, la foto tomada File:UltraStar WorldParty.jpg es de una captura de pantalla de un juego gratuito y de código abierto que tiene licencia GNU GPL v3 (adjunto licencia: https://github.com/ultrastares/ultrastar-worldparty/blob/master/LICENSE )

¿no se puede usar este tipo de foto? Mariac84 (talk) 18:18, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 Question Any opinion about this file? Yann (talk) 20:05, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per {{GPLv3 only}} @Mariac84 and Yann: FYI. Mariac84: It is your responsibility to properly note the source and apply the proper licence to files you upload. Please be mindful of this in the future. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 01:10, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Image1 - copie تهران ایران در سن ۵۰ سالگی.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: because this photo was taken over 70 years ago and belongs to my private album and is used on the page of https: //fa.wikipedia .org / wiki / محمود_شهابی_خراسانی so please re store this photo ,Regards Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

@ Thuresson,

it's simple this is the photo of my father which was taken in a family setting is featured in our family album. --Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 07:26, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

  • @Docteur Mansour Chehabi:  Oppose Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Please note that in some jurisdictions, the law may not permit transfers or assignment of rights. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Hello NAT, this photo is not the work (it is not taken by a professional photographer) of a photographer, it was taken in a family setting by me or my brother more than 60 years ago in Teheran and is part of our family album, so being the author of this photo we can consider that I have the right to publish it, is not it?The subject photo is the portion of our inheritance by the rule of law. For you to discriminately removing it without any ethical and legal grounds is indicative of the lack of diligence and kindness. Thank you for your immediate reconsiderations.--Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 16:07, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

  • This matter is being greatly convoluted distastefully and perhaps deliberately.

Under what lame state of mind, one adheres to the presumption, that publishing our deceased father’s picture requires a license and what country’s law you are repeatedly referring to. Kindly, elaborate and do what is right thing to do, in any fair and balanced medium manifestations. Your reluctance establishes incoherency. Thank you for your timely replacement of our father’s family’s priceless subject picture. Respectfully,--Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 13:38, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

    • It is a general principle of copyright law in practically any country that copyright is held by the original photographer only, and not by their relatives or by the person depicted. Specifically for photos from Iran, the protection term lasts for 30 years from the date of first publication or first public presentation, so we need a permission from the actual photographer, namely your brother. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions how he may send a permission by email. De728631 (talk) 13:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  • As I was asked to comment, I opened a series of DRs of files uploaded by User:Docteur Mansour Chehabi because they were not sourced and/or licensed properly. I personally have nothing against "family album" pics not published anywhere to be used here; however, our admins know better the procedure how or when to keep them. BTW I would also like to request User:Docteur Mansour Chehabi to kindly review their wording while asking for a favour. Nothing else to say. E4024 (talk) 14:24, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per foregoing. And the image was a tiny low-res image, more likely a screengrab than a scan of a personal photo. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 14:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: no consensus to undelete. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Hh1718

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The deleted images have been tagged as "no source" by User:-akko. Well, all the files listed are obviously in the public domain and a source was given. Even the correct licensing was added. It would be a wrong decision to delete free PD files just because there is no direct link. In exactly such cases (and really only in such cases) the "no source" tag is counterproductive and wrong. I ask for a restoration of these files. Mosbatho (talk) 09:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

In fact, these files do not give accurate sources. Like File:Okopowa and Leszno ca 1762.jpg. We can not find this file from the source. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 09:11, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
In fact, these files from the 18th/19th century are obviously in the public domain. All relevant information are given, esp. the dates. --Mosbatho (talk) 09:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Obviously in the public domain. Yann (talk) 09:29, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above @Mosbatho and Yann: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

--Darshana ponkiya (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)--Darshana ponkiya (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)--Darshana ponkiya (talk) 12:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

@Darshana ponkiya: Which file would you like to be undeleted and why should it be done? Please provide a proper file name and a reason for undeletion. De728631 (talk) 14:01, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: 1) Requestor has not bothered to provide a file or a rationale; 2) requestor has only two deleted files, both of which are unambiguous spam per Achim; and 3) even if not spam, both appeared elsewhere, in whole or in part, before upload here (e.g., File:QLUX LED Night bulb.jpg was here). --Эlcobbola talk 16:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Philip Awadalla.jpg

Photo is 3 years old and is owned by Philip who has requested I add it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lafmm (talk • contribs) 15:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - 1) Previously published works require COM:OTRS evidence of permission and 2) per both the source and per you (!!!) this is the work of Christopher Katsarov. Awadalla (Philip), as the mere subject, would not own the copyright unless transferred by Katsarov (or The Globe and Mail Inc. if Katsarov was acting as an employee) to Awadalla through a formal written conveyance--evidence of which would need to be provided. Эlcobbola talk 16:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Lafmm: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:14, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:志崎樺音.jpg

I was adding an image for Miss Shizaki Kanon which was published publicly on her own Twitter. But the image was deleted for unknown reason and I hope it can be restored. Thank you. Ashhhh1004 18-2-21 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ashhhh1004 (talk • contribs) 17:06, 17 February 2021‎ (UTC)

 Oppose Did you read the message posted on your talk page February 7, 2021? Thuresson (talk) 18:30, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Ashhhh1004: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder (i.e. the photographer, unless the copyright was transferred by operation of law or by contract) must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undelete picture of Emma Ledden - emmaledden.jpg I have permission to use it by Emma and the image is clearly in the public domain (Facebook, istamgram and google images).

The picture is available in google images / instagram and Facebook. I also have permission from the subject in the photo (Emma Ledden) who has requested that I add it to her page. Thank you. --Obriec80 (talk) 17:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose for three reasons, @Obriec80: . a) permission must come from the photographer who is the true copyright holder and not the person in the photo who I assume is the photo owner, and unless there is a written contract or formal document transferring the copyright, copyright is assumed to be held by the creator. Note that copyright ≠ physical ownership. b) you should not assume that everything you see on the Internet and on social media are free images. In most cases, these images are actually copyrighted, and they may not be reused commercially (Commons doesn't accept noncommercial content, see COM:Licensing). And c), you must contact the photographer and ask if they are willing to release the photo under a free license, and this is accomplished through COM:OTRS correspondence. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to be accomplished here. @Obriec80: For the possibility of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Katie Callaway.jpg

Please undelete this photo as it is my property and I have the rights to use it fully - thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by HimilayanSaltLamp (talk • contribs) 19:21, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Uploaded by User:Kecallaway who claims to own the copyright. "Photo by Nicely Made Media" at [5], eg. professional photographer Carson Nicely. Thuresson (talk) 21:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @HimilayanSaltLamp: Permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS from Carson Nicely is required. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Charles_Hoskinson_20201031_121532.jpg

Please undelete. As you can see in this e-mail Charles Hoskinson took a selfie and released the rights. From: Charles Hoskinson Date: za 31 okt. 2020 om 19:43 Subject: Re: [Ticket#2020103010020678] Permission CCL Release of Photo To: Permissions - Wikimedia Commons <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> Here I took a new picture. I hereby release this picture under a Creative Commons license for any and all who desire to use it. --FlippyFlink (talk) 19:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @FlippyFlink: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

OTRS did not determined anything on this image. The email was from 31 okt 2020 (mainly concerning other images rights) and this image was uploaded in december. This is the first request for undeletion on this image. The email is mearly proof on copyright release. Or is there another proces for undeletion? --FlippyFlink (talk) 20:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AnnSophie Replay (c) Leoni Marie Hübner.jpg

An OTRS permission has been provided – ticket:2021021710009498.

As an OTRS agent (verify), I will investigate the undeleted media and verify that the permission is sufficient to keep it (rights on media work + depicted work, FOP, copyright owner, country specific restrictions, etc.). I will also update the license (if needed) and add the appropriate OTRS template.
If you want, you can add {{subst:OR|id=2021021710009498|reason=processing}} or {{Temporarily undeleted}} on the media page to make sure a follow-up is done.

Feel free to notify me and thank you in advance for your help. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This ticket is from the subject, not the author (photographer) and no useful purpose would be served by restoration. Permission directly from Leoni Marie Hübner (who is credited in the file name itself) or, alternatively, a copy of the document that transferred copyright from Hübner to Sophie is needed. Эlcobbola talk 20:03, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @Olaf Kosinsky: The file will not be undeleted until sufficient permission from the copyright holder is received. Please also respond to the message that I left on your talk page(s) regarding another file that was improperly processed. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 20:19, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

In the release it is stated: "Holder of the full right of use" From my point of view this is sufficient. --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 20:27, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
It's not--thus "a copy of the document that transferred copyright from Hübner to Sophie is needed." Copyright cannot transfer from the author to the subject but by written conveyance; the sender must provide evidence of their claim. Эlcobbola talk 20:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
I'm aware ("Das Urheberrecht ist nicht übertragbar, es sei denn, es wird in Erfüllung einer Verfügung von Todes wegen oder an Miterben im Wege der Erbauseinandersetzung übertragen." § 29). It's a distinction without a difference in germane respect, however; since German/Austria authors can grant licenses (which is what users ignorant of legal formality may conflate with conveyance of those rights), the concept of requiring documented evidence remains. Эlcobbola talk 20:53, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. The file will not be undeleted until sufficient permission from the copyright holder is received. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:39, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

file:Reward in The Reincarnationist Papers (web res).png

I created this image as a screenshot of my own work. Can you please undelete? Thanks D. Eric Maikranz --HelloDenver (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This appears a COM:NOTHOST issue. Non-notable work and non-notable author. Even if in scope, previously published works require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. The United States Copyright Office (registration TX0007369587) lists David Eric Maikranz as the rightsholder and includes an associated email address. If this is indeed you, as suggested above, the address listed there should be used for that correspondence. Эlcobbola talk 21:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Reward in The Reincarnationist Papers (hi res).png

I created this image as a screenshot of my own work. Can you please undelete? Thanks D. Eric Maikranz --HelloDenver (talk) 20:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - This appears a COM:NOTHOST issue. Non-notable work and non-notable author. Even if in scope, previously published works require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. The United States Copyright Office (registration TX0007369587) lists David Eric Maikranz as the rightsholder and includes an associated email address. If this is indeed you, as suggested above, the address listed there should be used for that correspondence. Эlcobbola talk 21:09, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:08, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Margaret Talmadge The Talmadge Sisters.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Enter1your1information1below, the DR has a claim of publication in 1924 which would make it public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 02:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aerothermodynamics of a jet engine Test Cell. (IA aerothermodynami00nico).pdf

ShakespeareFan00: What of this constitutes a third-party copyright claim? I didn’t find anything on p. 85 (or /85 of the PDF) that has any more copyright than the rest of the document. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:10, 18 January 2021 (UTC).

 Question Any opinion about this file? Yann (talk) 09:06, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Info Copyright notice on page 71 (85th page of the pdf):

    PHOENICS VERSION 1.3, 03 SEPT 1986
    (C) COPYRIGHT 1984
    CONCENTRATION HEAT AND MOMENTUM LTD
    ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
    CHAM LTD, BAKERY HOUSE, 40 HIGH ST
    WIMBLEDON, LONDON, SW19 5AU
    TEL: 01-947-7651 TELEX: 928517
    FACSIMILE: 01-879-3497
    THE OPTION LEVEL IS -18

    THIS CODE MAY ONLY BE USED UNDER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS
    OF A LICENCE AGREEMENT WITH CHAM LTD.
    REPLICATION OF THIS CODE IS PROHIBITED UNLESS
    SPECIFICALLY AUTHORISED IN WRITING BY CHAM LTD.

    --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Appendex B is copyrighted code, and as such the document as a whole cannot be hosted on Commons. A redacted version may be uploaded. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:36, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Крупнейшие национальности по муниципальным образованиям Российской Федерации второго порядка, 2010.png

I appears to me that the deletion of file:Крупнейшие национальности по муниципальным образованиям Российской Федерации второго порядка, 2010.png has not been warranted. Author of the map was the Wikipedia user ru:user:PiroGGG, so there shouldn't be an issue with a licence. As for the source of the data, it is the Russian Census of 2010. For the aforementioned reasons, I'd like to request the undeletion of the image. — Nickel nitride (talk) 18:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

The problem seems to be the basic map of Russia that was used for this file. It is not clear if PiroGGG used an existing, copyrighted map or created it from scratch. De728631 (talk) 13:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:EiffelToweratNight.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: As per Yann's comment, ordinary light of Eiffel Tower doesn't have any copyright. A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Support Yann (talk) 17:54, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Category:South Korean FOP cases/deleted

After finding the de minimis clause in the Korean copyright law, I thought it would be right to restore some of the deleted photos.

These many photos have been deleted because there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. However, it is recommended to recover only photos that are judged to be general cityscape photos to which de minimis can be applied.

However, the photos below, which were agreed upon in the last undeletion requests, are exceptions.

Photos undeleted by meeting de minimis:

Photos that were not undeleted because they did not meet de minimis :

Ox1997cow (talk) 03:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Cityscape images already undeleted. No FOP for others. --Yann (talk) 17:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Николай Подгузов.jpg

The reason for the named photo undeleting is that I used it defining the source (link from the website) and the creator's name. Despite that fact, the copyright wasn't recognised.

--FrauReptiloid (talk) 09:31, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

  • @FrauReptiloid: The reason the file was deleted was because it lack an appropriate licence tag. Naming a source and attribution is insufficient if the appropriate licence tag is not used. Photos are protected works under Kyrgyz law, and while it is the work of the government, article 8 of Law No. 6 of January 14, 1998, on Copyright and Related Rights does not exempted all works of the government from protection -- only official documents, official symbols and signs, works of folk art, and regular press information that constitute the daily news or information on current events are exempted. The Kyrgyz Law No. 6 of 1998 is not as expansive as Title 17 of the United States Code. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No valid rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:34, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo Liechtensteiner Fussballverband.jpg

Ich (Florian Hepberger | https://www.lfv.li/lfv/organisation/geschaeftsstelle/team) arbeite in der Marketing & Kommunikationsabteilung des Liechtensteiner Fussballverbandes und der Verband genehmigt die Nutzung dieses Logos auf der Wikipedia Plattform. Um die Artikel über den Verband mit dem richtigen Logo zu versehen, bitten wir die Löschung rückgängig zu machen. Hepflo (talk) 12:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Hepflo: Permission and a specific release under a acceptable free licence using OTRS from the copyright holder/authorised officer of the organisation is required. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:29, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:81qJzx1xUGL. SS500.jpg

I own every right to this picture. I need to use it for an article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgalthera (talk • contribs) 20:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

How did you become the copyright owner of an album cover? Thuresson (talk) 20:53, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

RK — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 2409:4043:301:4217:FAE0:8FC0:A2FE:97F3 (talk) 02:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No file(s) listed for undeletion, no rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Meraner Hof in Meran, Grandhotel um 1900.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Meraner Hof in Meran, Grandhotel um 1900.jpg

According to a websearch, the author Franz August Carl Maria Reisch possibly died in 1942. https://www.dorotheum.com/en/l/7000477/ & http://www.museum-kitzbuehel.at/downloads-presse/ (the second has a typo where there's an 8 where a 9 should be). The 1900 date would make it old enough that any uncertainty has acceptable minimum risk. Abzeronow (talk) 02:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:47, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Place dela Concorde-Obelisk Night-Tour Eiffel.JPG

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Per Yann' comment, ordinary light doesn't have any copyright A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination--A1Cafel (talk) 06:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Sealle

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Attention! These are files with OTRS permission, river uniforms and river transport. (There are also high-quality files of the winner of the competition Wiki loves ... For example, the wheelhouse of a motor ship.). Part of a large project Wikimedia RU Uniformology (ex: WMRU Annual Report 2019, p. 29). Please restore, as this is not an advertisement. Removal is like hidden vandalism. Captains in river transport uniforms were also used in the Vodokhod article. Niklitov (talk) 19:38, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 Question Any opinion about these files? Yann (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Undelete. Good photographies --Butko (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Niklitov: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cambridge Thermo Galvanometer 1905.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: License {{PD-old-70-expired}} can be used A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Done per A1Cafel. ~riley (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Cam Gill Lombardi.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This page should be restored. The picture has been widely circulated among news sources as copyright for this image belongs to me. I took the picture myself while on the field and therefore, I own the copyright, and therefore it is not a copyright violation. Aarogill23 (talk) 04:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Aarogill23: As a purely technical matter, we cannot assess, verify or confirm your assertions. Works previously published elsewhere require that that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:38, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sarpsborg Beer Collection.jpg

This image is taken by me in my studio, why is it deleted? This also is relevant to Sarpsborg Beer.jpg which is also deleted. --Magnus Schaft (talk) 07:31, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @Magnus Schaft: COM:UDR is not the forum to inquire as to why a file was deleted. The rationale is clearly noted on the page of the deleted file and on your talk page. Please read COM:DW. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:33, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SKV.png

I have no idea why the file was deleted, as I created the logo for my football club myself roughly 15 years ago and it has been in use ever since. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MirekTrnka (talk • contribs) 12:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @MirekTrnka: As a purely technical matter, we cannot assess, verify or confirm your assertions. Works previously published elsewhere require that that copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Portretfoto van Rami Kooti Arab.jpg

The reasons for this application go as follows: - The Creative Commons license was done correctly, namely Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. - Permission has been requested from the photographer and has indicated the Creative Commons license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. - There is no valid reason for removal of the photo

Thank you.

Kind regards,

RKAvm — Preceding unsigned comment added by RKAvm (talk • contribs) 13:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Please ask Marieke de Lorijn to verify the claimed license by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 18:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:41, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ijachi Collections.jpg

I want my image contribution in the Wiki Loves Africa 2021 named Ijachi Collections to be undeleted because it was wrongly reported as a copywrite violation. i have full rights to use that picture anywhere and however i please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adeyemi Kamil (talk • contribs) 13:04, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose From license information: "What is not allowed: Don't redistribute or sell the photos and videos on other stock photo or wallpaper platforms." Thuresson (talk) 18:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Thuresson. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:QueerSportSplit logo.png

This file was deleted today as not notable but it is being used by Wikidata and the three Wikipedia pages linked to that Wikidata item. - Nikki (talk) 14:05, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

  • @Jianhui67 and ImprovedWikiImprovment: It would be great if you could explain how this mistake happened. I see other DRs being created today with exactly the same issue, making them invalid by default. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 14:11, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
    Deletion requests are not invalid purely because they are in use. Often this is the reason it is used instead of CSD. All of those pages are going through the relevant deletion processes. Whether or not an admin chooses to close the deletion request and delete is no business of mine; take it up with the admin. I simply started a deletion discussion for the community to have on the topic. IWI (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
    If I recall correctly, there were also copyright issues with the logo. IWI (talk) 20:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The file needs to be undeleted.
Deleting the file, then later thinking of new reasons to delete the file that were never raised, is not the correct way to proceed here.
The DR was incorrectly closed, the file was deleted for Out of scope. Non-notable organisation, no other reason. "Notability" as defined on the Simple Wikipedia is not how Commons functions. The file was very clearly not "Out of scope" because it was in use.
If anyone wishes to raise a new deletion request based on a copyright rationale, that's fine, but Commons policies apply and should be understood.
Thanks --Fæ (talk) 20:46, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
If the image is copyrighted, that is a CSD and there is no reason for community input in the matter. IWI (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I should note that at the time of the nomination, I assumed all of the Wikipedia articles would be deleted. Two out of the three remaining are going through deletion processes. It seemed like clear spam to me, with the uploader having the same username as the organisation. IWI (talk) 20:57, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Nobody should be manipulating a deletion process on other projects by advance deleting files which are in use in those sister project articles. Doing so would clearly bias the sister wiki process and may easily be a means to misuse Commons as a way to game the system.
"If anyone wishes to raise a new deletion request based on a copyright rationale, that's fine" however folx need to be able to examine the particular file and make an assessment, if the CSD is challenged, by anyone, then it needs to escalate to a DR.
The deleted file is now an exemplar case for deletions being propagated from simple.wp, please consider it automatically challenged for any CSD rationale in advance, as a DR is certainly needed.
Thanks --Fæ (talk) 21:02, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The statement "All of those pages are going through the relevant deletion processes." is patently untrue as the Croatian Wikipedia is not discussing deleting the article where this logo was in use. -Yupik (talk) 21:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
I didn’t say that though, did I? I said two out of three. IWI (talk) 21:18, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
So IWI you are in the same time creating mess with calling it spam (because user has 'same', though it is just very similar name - implying it is inadequate self-promotion) and claim it is Copyright infringement (as if the user is not able to upload its own logo under CC licence)...that sounds a bit schizoid to me. Not to you? I would ask you kindly to work on retracting your request for deletion of the file now and do not preemptively act in the future on behalf of other projects, especially if both language, context and regulations are different. Zblace (talk) 00:08, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
  • I sincerely apologise for not checking thoroughly. It was an oversight on my part. I will be more careful and thorough in my deletions next time. I have restored the file and removed the deletion request template. Jianhui67 T★C 01:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: see my comment above. --Jianhui67 T★C 01:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Smedsrud image - rights are OK

Hello.

I have been granted permission to use this image. Just failed to add this when I uploaded.

--Islarsh (talk) 14:22, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Islarsh: Works previously published elsewhere require that that copyright holder (the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyence) send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 08:45, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Vikash Passport.png

this file use for user identity not for publicity. so plz don't delete this file. thank you. विकाश शर्मा जी (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close; file has never been deleted.Thuresson (talk) 18:30, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:May watching Cricket World Cup, England v. India.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: @Clindberg and ~riley: Now appears on https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/twitter/10DowningStreet?year_from=2015&year_to=2020&amount=15&sort=date_newest&from=2340. A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Support as it would appear to be {{OGL}} now. Carl Lindberg (talk) 03:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Per A1Cafel. Please update source link. ~riley (talk) 03:42, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logo SMK Bukit Bandaraya.jpg

Hi, I'm the user who added this logo image. It's for my school's Wikipedia page, I replaced the previous logo because that's the old one. Sorry if I'm wrong, but I dont think this violates copyright laws, since it has been used by multiple blogs and even a famous sports news site in my country (https://www.stadiumastro.com/sukan/blog/blog-butiran/dua-bekas-pelajar-smk-bukit-bandaraya-berjuang-dalam-sukan-asia/3657) without facing any copyright problems. I also noticed that it is tagged as an "image without license". If that's why it's removed, my bad. I dont know much about copyright related stuff so I just ticked the one with the "I found on the Internet". If it still cannot be approved, then it's okay, I'll accept that. I understand that Wikipedia takes these things seriously. Also sorry if my reasoning sounds stupid, I don't know what else to write.AMNFHN (talk) 04:40, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose The logo seems to be sufficiently creative to be copyrighted to the original designer, so you may not grant any licences without permission. The fact that it has been used elsewhere is irrelevant. What we need though is a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder. Usually this is the original artist. De728631 (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @AMNFHN: For the possibilty of undeletion, copyright holder (the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyence) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:37, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:IHO History Knockout.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: OTRS permission recieved: ticket:2021021710007007. Please undelete. Ivi104 (talk) 14:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Ivi104: Please add the OTRS templates. --De728631 (talk) 18:54, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Charin performing with the Symphony Orchestra of Sri Lanka at BMICH in 2009.jpg

I have been given free copy rights release to publish this image.


Yours sincerely, Tashiya Jayatilaka 20 February 2021 Tashiya Jayatilaka (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose Unfortunately we cannot accept forwarded permissions. Please ask the copyright holder to send an email as explained in COM:OTRS. De728631 (talk) 18:43, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Tashiya Jayatilaka: For the possibilty of undeletion, copyright holder (the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyence) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:28, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files of User:Garand377AB

Files of User:Garand377AB. The source https://www.problemasyecuaciones.com/ had no evidence of CC-4.0. The web-page was recently updated and shows the CC-4.0 now propperly (see bottom of the web-page). I find the license believable now and hope for the un-deletion of these files. --Jahobr (talk) 20:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Oppose I just saw it is a NC (non commercial) licence. Not ok for commons. Sorry --Jahobr (talk) 20:39, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Request withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Affiche mode Fournery.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Affiche mode Fournery.jpg

Work was by Félix Fournery who died in 1938. 1925 publication means URAA would no longer apply to it. Abzeronow (talk) 02:18, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. Please enter the correct source information if possible. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Logotyp för Stockholm Frame Fotboll.png

--Fredrikq (talk) 10:01, 21 February 2021 (UTC)== [[: Undelete File:Logotyp för Stockholm Frame Fotboll.png]] ==

I have bought and own the rights to Logotype for Stockholm Frame Fotboll.png. I have a signed contract. I now want to upload this logo of Stockholm Frame Football under CC-license. Someone deleted this file. I want it to be undeleted. If I should do it in any other way - please let me know how. Thank you. Best regards. Fredrik — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fredrikq (talk • contribs) 10:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Fredrikq0: As a purely technical matter, we cannot assess, verify or confirm your assertions here. For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Boros Misi 2019, Körtvélyesi László felvétele to undelete.jpg

It is a picture on the Wikiedia Page "Boros Misi". I do not understand, why it was deleted. --Johannita 1.0 (talk) 10:03, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Johannita 1.0: The rationale for why the file was deleted is clearly listed on your user talk page. For the possibilty of undeletion, copyright holder (the photographer, unless copyright was transferred by operation of law or by written and signed conveyence) must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 10:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files found with Special:Search/bulletinsofameri248254pale

(Above per original listing.) This work (which is from 1970, not 1895) does not have a copyright notice, and was not timely registered; it is therefore in the public domain in the U.S., where it was published (see PD-US-no notice). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 15:04, 13 January 2021 (UTC).

 Question Any opinion about these files? Regards, Yann (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOO US? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:00, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
{{O}} 1969-1970 issue available undev CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 license, so not suitable for Commons. Ankry (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)  Support per COM:Hirtle chart and 1969/1970 publication date as {{PD-US-no notice}} Ankry (talk) 19:44, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @TE(æ)A,ea.: FYI. Please make sure the info on the description pages is correct. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 21:33, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sanxenxo, Vilalonga, campo de futbol 01-03.jpg

La fotografía es mía (hecha por mi) y conozco las normas de Commons. Se trata del escudo de un equipo de fútbol pintado en el exterior del campo, que da a una plaza pública, por lo que se aplica la libertad de panorama. ¿Por que no se pregunta antes de proceder al borrado? Pedro --Lameiro (talk) 20:14, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per {{FoP-Spain}}. Ankry (talk) 19:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Strajk Mediów Wirtualna Polska.png

I'm not an author of the content, however it is not eliglable for copyright, as it consists only of a small part of text and a page, which is normally a news site, was deliberately blackened then. If I took and published a screenshot of that website right now it would obviously violate copyright, but then it was almost empty, containing mostly a black background. Generally below COM:TOO. ~Cybularny Speak? 22:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

  • @Nat: You refer to text or logo? Because WP logo is available in much higher resolution as obvious PD-logo, as well as multiple others Polish logos (not claiming that all of them are properly licenced but definitely WP logo is not the most complex of them). As for the text, according to this paragraph simple press information is PD. The text from this file was just a simple press message. I don't promise I'm totally right, but the case is a bit too complicated for SD, DRs are usually performed for more obvious cases. ~Cybularny Speak? 23:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Cybularny and Ankry: FYI. If one disagrees with this decision to undeletion, please open a DR. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:34, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:René, Cateautbriland, , extrait 8p ill Malo-Renault.pdf

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:René, Cateautbriland, , extrait 8p ill Malo-Renault.pdf

URAA for this has now expired since this was published in 1925. Was already public domain in France since 2009. Abzeronow (talk) 02:31, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done duplicate. Ankry (talk) 18:37, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Canal Famille1995.svg

This logo is copyright free since 2003.

http://www.ic.gc.ca/app/opic-cipo/trdmrks/srch/viewTrademark?id=0815266&lang=fra&tab=reg&posNum=3&search=%7B%22selectField1%22%3A%22all%22%2C%22textField1%22%3A%22canal%20famille%22%2C%22category%22%3A%22%22%2C%22type%22%3A%22%22%2C%22status%22%3A%22%22%2C%22viennaField%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22searchDates%22%3A%5B%5D%2C%22selectMaxDoc%22%3A%22500%22%2C%22language%22%3A%22fra%22%7D&length=25&start=0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by SXPortelance (talk • contribs) 11:00, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:24, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by KoliaGeorgian

File:Interior of SU-25KM.png

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I work at this company and the image is property of the company. I am uploading this image on wikipedia on behalf of the company and I believe this image shouldn't have been deleted. KoliaGeorgian (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Chad Air Force Mi-24's being overhauled by TAM Management.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Reason: I work at this company and the image is property of the company. I am uploading this image on wikipedia on behalf of the company and I believe this image shouldn't have been deleted. KoliaGeorgian (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

File:TAM management workers working on Su-25's.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: I work at this company and the image is property of the company. I am uploading this image on wikipedia on behalf of the company and I believe this image shouldn't have been deleted. KoliaGeorgian (talk) 11:49, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Discussion

  •  Oppose In such cases we need a permission by email coming directly from the copyright holder of the image. Please see COM:OTRS for instructions. De728631 (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - Previously published works require COM:OTRS evidence of permission. @KoliaGeorgian: Is there a reason you've failed to read and/or follow our terms of use, to which you've agreed with every edit, which require disclosure of your employer in either a statement on your user page, your talk page, or in the edit summaries accompanying any paid contributions? Does your firm's management know their employee, you, is violating our terms of use whilst acting on the company's behalf ("I am uploading this image on wikipedia on behalf of the company")? Эlcobbola talk 17:57, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

reply

Sorry, feel free to delete the image. I do not contest this anymore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KoliaGeorgian (talk • contribs) 18:14, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done withdrawn. Ankry (talk) 18:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Affiche film Face au Vide.jpg

Hello, I am full owner of the rights of the image Affiche film Face au Vide.jpg and wish to register it as creative commons. Thank you Marc — Preceding unsigned comment added by MarcBrulard (talk • contribs) 17:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per above. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Christ Esabe 1er Championnat de France.jpg

Why it's deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by EsabeSquad (talk • contribs) 22:24, 21 February 2021‎ (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Serviced Accommodation Clayton House by Your Lettings Peterborough.jpg

Hello The following files was deleted from Wiki Commons due to possible copyright violation Serviced Accommodation Clayton House by Your Lettings Peterborough.jpg There is no copyright violation on this image as this image was taken by myself and I uploaded the same image on Trip Advisor, www.Booking.com, www.YourlettingsUK.com and other Serviced accommodation booking websites. Please let me know if you require any further information with regards to this matter. Thank you Best Regards Tarun Garg--Yourlettingsuk (talk) 03:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)Tarun Garg 22/02/2021

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Yourlettingsuk: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Ence-logo-2021-png.png

Hi,

I'm requesting to undelete the file File:Ence-logo-2021-png.png which is used as a logo on ENCE eSports (https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENCE_eSports) Wikipedia -page. The file provided is freely found for media usage on the team website https://ence.fi/work-with-us and files can be found from a Google Drive Folder https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1_m7-4mf5WZ4dbh49-2rnyqqAX-Ok8BBv.

--Chibulis (talk) 09:00, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Chibulis: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:44, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yerevan Wine Days Tasting Package.jpg

Dear Wikimedia Commons, I request undeletion for this file because it's a work by Bogossi Production. Recently the director of Bogossi has sent an e-mail proving that they are the copyright holder of an image which contained their logo and that the logo captured on all their photos indicates that Bogossi Production is the copyright holder. The file File:Yerevan Wine Days Tasting Package.jpg bears the logo of Bogossi Production. That's why another request for the image that already contains the logo has not been send. Just because I hadn't known that for every single image a permission request-letter should be send, I will request Bogossi Production again to send another permission e-mail. Hope the file will be undeleted after the permission letter is received. Thank you for the notice. --Litmar11 (talk) 09:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Litmar11: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Roundelay on Saryan Street on Yerevan Wine Days.jpg

Dear Wikimedia Commons, I request undeletion for this file, too, because it's a work by Bogossi Production. Recently (on 28 January 2021) the director of Bogossi has sent an e-mail proving that they are the copyright holder of an image which contained their logo and that the logo captured on all their photos indicates that Bogossi Production is the copyright holder. The file File:Roundelay on Saryan Street on Yerevan Wine Days.jpg bears the logo of Bogossi Production. That's why another request for the image that already contains the logo has not been send. Just because I hadn't known that for every single image a permission request-letter should be send, I will request Bogossi Production again to send another permission e-mail. Hope the file will be undeleted after the permission letter is received. Thank you for the notice. --Litmar11 (talk) 09:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Litmar11: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Yerevan Wine Days Visitors.jpg

Dear Wikimedia Commons, I request undeletion for this file just like the former 2 uploaded images because it's a work by Bogossi Production. Recently (on 28 January 2021) the director of Bogossi has sent an e-mail proving that they are the copyright holder of an image which contained their logo and that the logo captured on all their photos indicates that Bogossi Production is the copyright holder. The file File:Yerevan Wine Days Visitors.jpg bears the logo of Bogossi Production. That's why another request for the image that already contains the logo has not been send. Just because I hadn't known that for every single image a permission request-letter should be send, I will request Bogossi Production again to send another permission e-mail. Hope the file will be undeleted after the permission letter is received. Thank you for the notice. --Litmar11 (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Litmar11: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:22, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Statue-with-jacket-lk2.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Deleted via these deletion requests (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue-with-jacket-lk.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue-with-jacket-lk2.jpg). Country of origin of the work/s was not identified, and the admin suspected it was U.S.. But through a deep browsing of various Wikimedia logs (from Commons Public logs to English Wikipedia public logs, which led me to the contributions of the files' uploader at enwiki), I found out that one of the files was used at [6] and [7], and the artistic work (a sculpture?) is located in Letterkenny, County Donegal, Ireland. If ever, {{FoP-Ireland}} applies. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:28, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

 Question Any opinion about these files? Yann (talk) 09:10, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support It seems the deletion reason was FoP questions, and if in Ireland, then the FoP question is answered, so no more reason for deletion. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done per Carl. Ankry (talk) 19:35, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:JE-MM campaign poster.JPG

There is still no consensus achieved at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:An-Nur Great Mosque should be focused by professors in this grey area. Until a consensus is reached, any FoP-related discussion on Commons must not be unilaterally closed. dwf² ✉ 10:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

I withdraw the request. dwf² ✉ 14:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Resquest withdrawn. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Jake Angeli (Qanon Shamon), seen holding a Qanon sign (cropped).jpg

The reason to delete makes no sense, and is against every single explanation in that discussion. Sorry but what about simple red and blue face paint - and a black square tattoo - is derivative, and how on earth would that not be de minimis anyway? Also applies to the uncropped image File:Jake Angeli (Qanon Shamon), seen holding a Qanon sign.jpg. Kingsif (talk) 18:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. DR closing admin has revised their decision. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Emmagch

Please restore the following pages:

Reason to undelete all of these files: I just need to add the permission to show that these were uploaded under a license that permits the free use of the images in the infographics.

What I would put for each permission would be the following: "This infographics was created through the website Canva and all images used were provided by Canva and are free media that can be used for free for commercial and noncommercial use. Here is the Free Media License Agreement for Canva: here"

These infographics were created through the website Canva and all images used were provided by Canva and are free media that can be used for free for commercial and noncommercial use. Here is the Free Media License Agreement for Canva: here These files were not derivative work and they did not violate any copyright terms. The images in the infographics are free to use for commercial and non-commercial use in designs made through Canva. Emmagch (talk) 23:29, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose - The referenced Canva Free Media License includes, among others, the following: "Don’t sell unaltered copies of a photo, music or video file" and "Don’t redistribute or sell the stock media on other stock media platforms." These are unacceptable restrictions on redistribution and commercial use. The definition of free license, for example, which is incorporated into COM:L by reference, includes "There must also not be any limit [...] on where the information can be copied." Эlcobbola talk 19:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Dermonbldgconst.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dermonbldgconst.jpg

Published in the US in 1925, its copyright has now expired. Abzeronow (talk) 02:04, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Abzeronow: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:28, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Bcraft-bg.jpg

This pic was taken by me and it is used at some website. So, this doesn't break copyright rule. So, please being back that file. Safuan12616 (talk) 05:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

If it was used elsewhere, using {{Own}} declaration is against policy. How did you make the image? Ankry (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. @Safuan12616: Please read Commons:Derivative works. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:54, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:All Roads.png

File:All Roads.png

Kindly Undelete the file as its our own work and it represents the existing and proposed road on which Motorway and National Highway Police (NHMP) is currently doing patrolling and will will patrolling in the future. The file was created by me on my personal computer to be included and displayed in the NHMP Wikipedia pages so that general public gets idea about current and future operational plan of the Motorway and National Highway police. LyricBeast (talk) 07:48, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: No response to query. @LyricBeast: Please read COM:DW. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:БЯЛА КНИГА - финален пълен вариант.pdf

Hello, I've send an email template with request for release of this file, as noted here below:

I hereby affirm that I, Методий Иванов, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following media work:

I agree to publish the above-mentioned work under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work, even in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that the copyright holder always retains ownership of the copyright as well as the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by the copyright holder. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Best regards, Metodiy Ivanov TheAlcostar (talk) 16:02, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Book is collective work of 8 authors. Page 3 states: © Владо Тренески, Деян Танчовски, Ерлин Аго, Иван Николов, Илия Стояновски, Методий Иванов, Румен Сребранов,Спас Ташев, автори, 2021 © Издателство „Орбел“, 2021. Permissions from all authors and publisher must be given. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @TheAlcostar: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Корица на БЯЛА КНИГА ПО ЕЗИКОВИЯ СПОР МЕЖДУ БЪЛГАРИЯ И РС МАКЕДОНИЯ.jpg

I've been notified that this file has been deleted, presumably because of the lack of copyright tag. I'd add this info, but the file is deleted and I can't edit it. Would you please undelete it, so that I can add the tag? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheAlcostar (talk • contribs) 16:13, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @TheAlcostar: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:GC Salta.jpg File:GC Vicente López.jpg

Both deleted files are under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence since 18th May of 2020. The User:Gbawden deleted the files according to a nomination. However the mail was sent from SomosNOSArgentina@gmail.com in the date above but apparently the OTRS system didn´t do anything. Please, reload both files, check the email and give me a response ASAP. Thanks Copy of the email sent: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Q9qCqaPLsiz6ObK82gZHGO0lTVkGz94y/view?usp=sharing --El Restaurador (talk) 22:32, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. (Re: Ticket:2020051810009438) No response to query sent to sender by OTRS agent. @El Restaurador: Once OTRS has determined that they have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:05, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Abu_Issawi.jpg

Please, don't delete the image and remove the copyright violation template. The file is under The Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence since 15 February 2021. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User4721 (talk • contribs) 22:49, 22 February 2021‎ (UTC)

 Not done: procedural close. Image not deleted as of 23:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC). @User4721: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. If deleted, once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Gurdeep Pandher Painting by Yukon-Based Artist, Colin Alexander.jpg

I have written permission from the artist, Colin Alexander to use photograph of his painting on wikipedia. I have emailed the written an signed permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lena Premack (talk • contribs) 23:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Lena Premack: To quote the instructions on the main undeletion request page: If the file was deleted for missing evidence of licensing permission from the copyright holder, please follow the procedure for submitting permission evidence. If you have already done that, there is no need to request undeletion here. If the submitted permission is in order, the file will be restored when the permission is processed. Please be patient, as this may take several weeks depending on the current workload and available volunteers. (the bolding added for emphasis) Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:52, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:United 328 Incident - Exterior 01.jpg, File:United 328 Incident - Exterior 02.jpg

I, Hayden Smith, am the copyright holder of the photos uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Any appearances of the 50+ incident photos I have taken on media outlets was done with my prior permission. The photos I uploaded have been slightly edited to better suit appearances in wiki articles, however, all original files can be found in the Dropbox folder linked. UA328 Incident Photos 2-20-21

--Speedbird5280 (talk) 00:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Speedbird5280: Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. If deleted, once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:37, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:United States Navy Band - Tiến Quân Ca.ogg

File:United States Navy Band - Tiến Quân Ca.ogg is public domain in Vietnam. "Tiến quân ca" was donated by the family of the composer to the people and motherland Vietnam in 2016. Both the lyrics and the music. [8] [9] [10] [11] Đức Anh (talk) 01:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

 Question Any opinion about this file? Yann (talk) 09:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
If copyright was transferred to a specific collective of people, what about users who do not belong to "the people and motherland Vietnam"? Thuresson (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
 Info Especially, the copyright status in US is important; the URAA date for Vietnam is 23.12.1998. Ankry (talk) 19:09, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Please wait for a discussion in ViWiki. Đức Anh (talk) 13:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
This article states that the song is owned by the people. That means this song is in the public domain. 118.68.41.30 15:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
"Donation to the people and motherland Vietnamese" is another way of saying donation to all people in the world (including Vietnamese and non-Vietnamese). Đức Anh (talk) 15:25, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
  • @Đức Anh: Can you provide evidence that supports your assertions here? Even the articles that you've provided note that song was to be donated to the State and to the Vietnamese people and that, [a]fter donation, the State has the right to use the song in any form. This does not support your assertions here that the work is in public domain or that it can be used by anyone who is not the Vietnam State or the Vietnamese people. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Please read this letter. This letter was sent by the musician's wife [12][13][14]. "Tôi là Nghiêm Thúy Băng, 80 tuổi, vợ cố nhạc sĩ Văn Cao - tác giả quốc ca Việt Nam (đã mất từ 7/1995), đại diện cho gia đình đang thừa kế các tác phẩm âm nhạc của ông, xin trân trọng ngỏ lời hiến tặng công chúng, Đảng, Quốc hội và Nhà nước tác phẩm "Tiến quân ca" đang là Quốc ca Việt Nam từ năm 1946 đến nay là 64 năm." hiến tặng công chúng = thuộc phạm vi công cộng = in the public domain . Đức Anh (talk) 01:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  • @Đức Anh: Per your second link: "Trong thư, bà Nghiêm Thúy Băng viết rõ: “Tâm nguyện của ông nhà tôi là Quốc ca không của riêng ông nên tôi xin hiến tặng Nhà nước, Quốc hội." (In the letter, Ms. Nghiem Thuy Bang clearly stated: “My family's wish is that the National Anthem is not his own, so I would like to donate to the State and the National Assembly.). --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Nat: In communist countries like Vietnam, saying "I donate to the State, the National Assembly" is synonymous with the phrase "I donate to everyone". In the Vietnamese constitution, it says "The State belongs to the people". Thus, donating to the state means donating to everyone. Đức Anh (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Nat: I can't. I only know the Vietnamese Constitution says "The State belongs to the people". She has donated to the state which means donating to the people. In communist countries it is common to say "all people" instead of "public domain". Đức Anh (talk) 14:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
  • @Đức Anh: A work can enter public domain through 3 different methods:

    (1) it is exempted from protection under the law;
    (2) protections have expired;
    (3) if the law permits, an abdication of rights

    The case here does not fit into any of the three conditions listed, rather it is a assignment or transfer of rights to the State and the National Assembly. And as such the work is still under copyright and the copyright is held by the State and the National Assembly -- very much not in the public domain. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:18, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

I'm thinking about why people are free to sing Vietnamese anthem, which is copyrighted by the state, without infringing copyright. Đức Anh (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
I think if I ask the state, they will agree to let us use the national anthem. If the state allows, can this file be restored? Đức Anh (talk) 16:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
If the files are not recovered, can you post them in ViWiki? We will insert {{Non-free use rationale}} there. Đức Anh (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


 Not done As far as I can tell from the news sites linked above, the family of the composer have transferred the copyright to the government of Vietnam (not to "people and motherland") but the government has not made any provisions except to instruct the copyright authority of Vietnam not to collect royalties for performing the national anthem. No government decree regarding this can be found at WIPO:s web site. Thuresson (talk) 16:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC) (signature added after archiving)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Servicio Nacional de Fronteras (SENAFRONT) - escudo (shadows detail) - Panamá 2011.png

Solicito deshacer el borrado de este logo, porque es de mi autoría y lo borraron sin razón. Lo dibujé hace muchos años y diez años después lo borraron --AnelGTR (talk) 04:31, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Works of the government are not exempted from copyright protection per COM:PANAMA. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Stadtentwaesserung-Stuttgart-Logo RGB 250px RZ.svg

Wir bitten um Wiederherstellung der im Betreff benannten Datei

File:Stadtentwaesserung-Stuttgart-Logo RGB 250px RZ.svg

Das Logo ist im Eigentum der Stadtentwässeung Stuttgart, die Stadtentwässerung Stuttgart hat der Veröffentlichung des Logos in Wikipedia zugestimmt. Das Logo wird zur Verfollständigung des Beitrags zur Stadtentwässerung Stuttgart auf Wikipedia benötigt

Vielen Dank.

MfG

Martin Marotz Modus vm (talk) 11:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@Modus vm: Per policy, Wikimedia Commons cannot host copyrighted logos without free license granted by the logo copyright holder. Deletion reason was copyright not scope related. Ankry (talk) 16:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @Modus vm: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore 540Conlylogo.svg

Dear Sirs, the file has been officially released to me by Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore for substitution on Wikipedia pages because of news official logo. How can I regularize the copyright of the logo image file? --Momomolinari (talk) 14:57, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

@Momomolinari: Either you need to provide a public evidence that the University granted the free license on their logo, or the the logo copyright holder or their official legal representative needs to send a free license permission following COM:OTRS instructions. Ankry (talk) 16:08, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
@Ankry: By tomorrow the Director of Communications of the University will send permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org following COM:OTRS email templates.--Momomolinari (talk) 16:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
So after the permission is verified and accepted by OTRS volunteers, the image may be undeleted. Ankry (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 17:19, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:ACEGAT Tw 194.JPG

Please restore,

we have an OTRS permission with Ticket:2021022310008334

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS received. --rimshottalk 22:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Capa web-01.jpg

Please restore,

we have an permission at OTRS with Ticket:2021022310009315

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: OTRS received. --rimshottalk 22:59, 23 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:SOMETHING talking to OMORI.png

Please restore, the image is being used for no purpose other than to identify the subject of the article.

The image must be used for clarification and identification in the context of critical commentary of the work from which the screenshot is taken. Plus, its use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original work, a single frame, being of comparatively low commercial value.

As a screenshot of an audiovisual presentation (in this case, a copyrighted video-game), the image is not replaceable by free content: • any other image captured from the same work would also be copyrighted; • any version that is not true to the original would be inadequate for commentary or identification; • specifically, the image heavily features a customized character name, "LKRO" which differs from the default character name, "Sunny" and therefore makes the image not replaceable itself.

Summarizing, this image makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article (which could not practically be conveyed by words alone), and its use does not detract from the video game nor inhibits its salability in any way.

Copyright in the audio-visual media shown is believed to belong to OMOCAT, LLC.

Thanks, --ELKeiaRo (talk) 00:07, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to be accomplished here. Fair use not permitted on Wikimedia Commons. @ELKeiaRo: Please familiarise yourself with our policies: Commons:Licensing, Commons:Fair use. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:57, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Korona live bei Rock im Park.jpg und File:André Vard.jpg

File:Korona live bei Rock im Park.jpg und File:André Vard.jpg

Beide Fotos sind zur Nutzung freigegeben, und ich habe die schriftlichen Bestätigungen in bester Weise eingeholt und an permissions-commons@wikimedia.org gesendet. WolfgangSchmidtHH (talk) 04:10, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 04:40, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

--95.102.230.250 07:50, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Procedural close, file not deleted. Thuresson (talk) 12:34, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Login USENIX Newsletter feb1983.djvu

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: This is a scan of the February 1983 issue of ;login:, a magazine published by USENIX for ~45 years. As a modern publication its copyrights have not expired, and it is not published by any entity that is automatically exempt from copyright (i.e. it's not PD-USGov).

However, the scan was uploaded to the Internet Archive (as login-feb83) by USENIX under a {{CC0}} public domain dedication. The upload was part of a bulk upload of all ;login: issues published before 1997. That the collection is curated by USENIX (and thus that the license tag can be trusted) is demonstrated by the link at the end of their homepage for the magazine labelled "Full ;login: issues prior to 1997 are available in the USENIX ;login: Collection at archive.org." (link in original).

Courtesy pings: Fitindia, EugeneZelenko, Sohom data --Xover (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per above. File licence reviewed. @Xover: FYI. @Sohom data: It is your responsibility to apply the appropriate licence/copyright tags to the files that you upload. Files with incorrect tags are subject to deletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:05, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Logo of the European Centre of Excellence for Civilian Crisis Management (CoE), File:CoECC Signet RGB neg 180x180px.png

I request to undelete the Logo of the CoE on the Centres Wikipedia Article as it makes perefectly sense at this position. I'm authorised to do decide on this as I work for for the organisation as I described in my User Page and the Artices Edit Summary. Please let me know how to go about correctly, if the logo should be deleted like this again. --Dalia Soliman CoE (talk) 07:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

@Dalia Soliman CoE: Being employee of an organization does not automatically grant you the right to license their property. And whether you are authorized or no, cannot be resolved on wiki - we need an evidence for this. But the main problem here is that you claimed to be personally the author of the organization logo (are you? I found no evidence for this on the organization webpage) who should be attributed by anybody reusing the logo. Note, that making false or incorrect claims makes your further statements unreliable, and we need to verify them basing on public records.
The crucial questions that needs to be resolved here are: (1) is the logo copyrightable or to trivial for this? And (2) where (which page in Wikimedia services) the logo is intended to be used? Ankry (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done No response in more than 24 hours. Ankry (talk) 01:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by User:A1Cafel

These files are deleted in the reason of "copyright violation". User A1Cafel seemed to believe that the author recoreded in EXIF information "Kats Sakuma" and the upload user of Wikimedia "Grayengineer" are different person without any researches or interviews. But, I, the user grayegineer (twitter: @grayengineer) is "Kats Sakuma" himself. You can see the web page "Kats Factory" [15] copyright by Kats Sakuma AND the page contains the twitter box of @grayengineer. So, this deletion has no proper reason, and these files must be revived as soon as possible. --Grayengineer (talk) 13:31, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Racconish. @Grayengineer: As a purely technical matter, we cannot verify, confirm, or assess your assertions here. For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:21, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Deutsches Kursbuch - Jahresfahrplan 1944 45, Fahrplanbild 454w, Bahnstrecke Pöltschach - Hohlenstein.jpg

Uploader argues in Ticket:2021022310008281 that this copy from an old railway timetable lacks originality, hence {{PD-text}}. If that does not fit, I think {{PD-Germany-§134}} applies.

Thanks, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I am the uploader. As far as I know the intellectual property right in the European Union, "tables" are not included in the IPE-regime as there is neither intellectual nor design height. --Dieter Zoubek (talk) 16:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
 Support Let's use both {{PD-text}} and {{PD-Germany-§134}} so we can deal with the country of origin and US copyright. De728631 (talk) 17:44, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Dieter Zoubek: The file was deleted to an absence of an appropriate copyright tag as required. Files without a valid and suitable tag are subject to deletion. It is your responsibility to apply the appropriate tag. Please be mindful of this in the future. @Mussklprozz and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Example.jpg

Am The person Who sponserd These pics I Requested u to undelted all our stuff — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurshch (talk • contribs) 16:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No files listed for undeletion, no valid rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Sudam Marndi.jpg

the file is uploaded from odishaassembly.nic.in/memberprofile.aspx?img=6, for licensing see bottom, where it is mentioned that "The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License".

previously 'File:Bhupinder Singh.jpg' was restored, which is also from the same site. Thanks!--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 17:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Licence reviewed. The file could not be previously licence reviewed due to an error in the URL of the source. The Odisha Assembly website is an unsecure HTTP rather than the secure HTTPS. As a result, the source was not accessible. This has been rectified. @MKar: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:13, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Pradipta Kumar Naik.jpg

the file is uploaded from odishaassembly.nic.in/memberprofile.aspx?img=99, for licensing see bottom, where it is mentioned that "The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License". Previously File:Bhupinder Singh.jpg was restored, which is also from the same site. Thanks.--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 17:35, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Licence reviewed. The file could not be previously licence reviewed due to an error in the URL of the source. The Odisha Assembly website is an unsecure HTTP rather than the secure HTTPS. As a result, the source was not accessible. This has been rectified. @MKar: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Mohan Charan Majhi.jpg

The file is uploaded from odishaassembly.nic.in/memberprofile.aspx?img=144, for licensing see bottom, where it is mentioned that "The content of this webpage is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License".

Previously File:Bhupinder Singh.jpg was restored, which is also from the same site. Thanks!--Mrutyunjaya Kar (talk) 17:45, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: Licence reviewed. The file could not be previously licence reviewed due to an error in the URL of the source. The Odisha Assembly website is an unsecure HTTP rather than the secure HTTPS. As a result, the source was not accessible. This has been rectified. @MKar: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Portrait of General George Smith Patton.jpg

--Yelros (talk) 18:22, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. Request by LTA. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:26, 24 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:AsafJah7 oathRajpramukh 1950.jpeg

1st para of discussion page is in German. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:AsafJah7_oathRajpramukh_1950.jpeg

Need clarity please. Wikibhai110 (talk) 06:06, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. No rationale for undeletion. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 12:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files deleted by Jcb, nominated by Sealle

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Attention! These files are wrongly nominated for deletion by Sealle: 1. "Extremely low res images" = These are icons for Wikidata (Property pictograms). 2. Not "probably scaled down derivatives of ones found on the Web" — found on Commons, ex: File:1-02-БелОрел.png ↔ File:Order of White Eagle Badge both sides.jpg with {{PD-RU-exempt}} (type=orders, decorations and medals), etc. — Niklitov (talk) 20:37, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

 Question Any opinion about these files? Yann (talk) 20:03, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
If they are useful and intended to be used, the deletion rationale seems to be invalid.  Support undeletion in such case. One can renominate with another rationale, if necessary. Ankry (talk) 01:34, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 00:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

B. M. Ruia Girls' College, Mumbai File:2-P40A0588.jpg

Dear Undeleters, The above image File:2-P40A0588.jpg was deleted because it lacked description etcetera. Now it appears that the uploader User:Bmrgirls also uploaded other images which i could indentify and categorise in Category:B. M. Ruia Girls' College, Mumbai. The name "Bmrgirls" suggests that the uploaders are students at B. M. Ruia Girls' College, affiliated to S.N.D.T. Women's University, Mumbai. The deleted image probably can be identified and might be useful like the other two, of an Indian Independence Day celebration and a school debating contest in Mumbai. So please undelete (and ping me if at all possible). Thank you!, Hansmuller (talk) 14:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Pinging @Nat Dear Nat, Please let's have a look - i never saw it - it seems to have been a picture of a public plaque somewhere. The other images that i could identify and describe in Category:B. M. Ruia Girls' College, Mumbai also were worthwhile, you agree?

 Not done basically per original DR. Ankry (talk) 16:56, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Serviced Accommodation Clayton House by Your Lettings Peterborough.jpg

deleted page File:Serviced Accommodation Clayton House by Your Lettings Peterborough.jpg (Copyright violation: taken from the internet – see e.g., https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/vr-splice-j/0b/27/aa/90.jpg, https://www.yourlettingsuk.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/00-Clayton-MAIN-Photo-1.jpg)

Hello I recently noticed my above image was deleted from Wiki commons due to "Copyright" reasons This is my own image and is available to public, I have posted this picture on my website , on trip advisor and other sites. Its License free and has no copyright restrictions. So I do not understand why this was deleted. Could you kindly explain what is required to get this undeleted please?

As you will see on my Flickr account , link below to the very same image. Has Attribution CC BY 4.0 ie the image is created by me and is mine but can be shared. ( ie some rights reserved) https://www.flickr.com/photos/190750303@N05/50527070133/in/dateposted/

You are free to: Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. This license is acceptable for Free Cultural Works. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

I hope this helps? Please let me know if you require any more info

Thank you

--Yourlettingsuk (talk) 05:03, 25 February 2021 (UTC)Tarun 25/2/2021

 Info promotional? Ankry (talk) 17:00, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 18:59, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:DBP 1974 822 Max Beckmann, Großes Stilleben mit Fernrohr.jpg

Bitte File:DBP 1974 822 Max Beckmann, Großes Stilleben mit Fernrohr.jpg wiederherstellen. Beckmann ist 1950 verstorben, also gilt jetzt {{PD-old-auto|deathyear=1950}}. Das auf der Briefmarke abgebildete Gemälde ist im Januar auch hochgeladen worden (File:Beckmann, Großes Stillleben mit Fernrohr.jpg). -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 08:09, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: @Robert Weemeyer: URAA applies. We can revisit undeletion in 2023. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:32, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:The soulexchange 2021.jpg

@Jadehammar: The uploader claims to own this picture.--Larryasou (talk) 13:02, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

  •  Oppose This image has (or these images have) appeared on the Internet without a free license prior to being uploaded here (or appear(s) to have based on the small size and lack of EXIF metadata), and was (or were) thus deleted by an Administrator. Policy requires that the actual copyright holder, which is almost always the photographer or image designer, must send a free license directly using VRTS. Ankry (talk) 16:22, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Anthony James sidebyside.jpg

I am working with the copyright holder to release the proper licensing. The original holder's assistant was assisting but Wikipedia will not allow her to release. She is going to be with the Copyright holder at the end of this month so she can have him send in the email himself. I should have proper licensing within two weeks, hopefully less. Mack22198 (talk) 16:10, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The image may be undeleted after the OTRS permission is received and accepted. Ankry (talk) 16:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Ankry. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Amber Van Day.png

The picture that I've uploaded is my own work in photoshop, it's a public photo that I've edited and changed background... As the picture is public, it is fully free to use. --Panda12hy (talk) 21:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 23:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File: Mito Haruka Live2D.jpg

上記ファイル名の画像はアップロード者が著作権保持をしております。 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 106.132.202.90 (talk) 02:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. Works previously published elsewhere require that the copyright holder send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. If deleted, once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:27, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:OFiodaMeada.jpg.jpg

Dear, I come again to request the restoration of a deleted image (File: OFiodaMeada.jpg.jpg). In fact, the copyright holder is the producer, director and screenwriter of the film “O Fio da Meada”, Flaviano Oliveira. However, he sent an email to the OTRS team (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org), attesting that this image was released to the public domain, for the purpose of promoting the film. In the text, he granted full permission to publish such an image under a free license. The e-mail was sent in December last year, but Oliveira did not receive a return. The film has no official website.

Certain of your understanding, I thank you in advance.

-LaMattos-LaMattos (talk) 02:16, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @LaMattos: Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion on behalf of the copyright holder. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:31, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

CFD Patch V2.png undeletion request

I discovered that a file that I uploaded, CFD Patch V2.png was deleted due to I believe no license being present. This patch is the official patch and or logo insignia for the Canton Ohio Fire Department. I don't believe that a license is required for this image as you are able to purchase copies of the patch online. If someone can provide a better explanation for copyrigting, that would be appreciated

Cop246 (talk) 03:21, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No valid rationale for undeletion. @Cop246: Owning a copy of a work (the tangible embodiment of the work) does not equate owning the work itself (the intellectual property) and holding the copyright. Unless the law/case law exempts a work from protection or protection has expired, everything is assumed to be copyrighted. Please familiarise yourself with Commons' licensing policy. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 03:55, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Banat (proposed flag).jpg

This is the most popular regional flag in the Banat. Further more,on at least two pages (Banat Republic and Bánság) you allow a flag which is neither the region's flag, nor a popular one, nor has any historical basis (either than the dark green used by fascist movements).--PetrusdictusA (talk) 22:55, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

The other flag PetrusdictusA is referring to, is discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Proposed flag of Banat.svg after they asked for its deletion. --TU-nor (talk) 00:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
Can you provide some evidence (eg. non-advertising photos) presenting use of this flag in real world? Ankry (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 Not done Deleted after deletion requests; Commons:Deletion requests/File:The proposed (unofficial) flag of the Banat.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banat, flag (proposed).png, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Banat, proposed flag.png and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Banat.jpg. Also, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Steagul Banatului. Flag of the Banat.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Carold.jpg

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carold.jpg

"this photograph has been taken out of the 1925 movie Sally of the Sawdust." Copyright for this in this US would apparently have expired. Abzeronow (talk) 02:16, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done Undeleted per above. @Abzeronow: FYI. Ankry (talk) 16:47, 25 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Simployer HQ.jpg

This image is a free work. The image is released by the company for usage on Wikipedia. --Magnus Schaft (talk) 16:06, 26 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: per Elcobbola. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:29, 26 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Oleksandr-kalonov-rukh-lviv-bukovyna-chernitvtsi.jpg

I have the approval of the author — Preceding unsigned comment added by WPhoto2021 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. @WPhoto2021: For the possibilty of undeletion, the copyright holder must send permission and a specific release under a accepted free licence using the OTRS process. Once OTRS has determined to have received sufficient permission and there is no other rationale for deletion, an OTRS agent will perform or request undeletion. Thank you for your understanding. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:13, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Hand INC.svg

In the deletion debate, the reason was stated that in india the political logo is copyrighted but there are other political logos for other political parties such as BJP LOGO

So, please tell me the reasonJogesh 69 (talk) 14:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Jogesh69

✓ Done: @Jogesh 69 and De728631: FYI. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 15:02, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Minecraft potato farm i built.jpg

File:Minecraft potato farm i built.jpg needs undeletion as it is supposed to be a minecraft Potato farm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fallencow30 (talk • contribs) 14:24, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No valid rationale for undeletion @Fallencow30: Please familarise yourself with our policies COM:L, COM:DW. and COM:SCOPE. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:36, 27 February 2021 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Firefox better.png

Rogue admin deleted the file just like the potato farm. why does everybody hate me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fallencow30 (talk • contribs) 14:39, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

 Not done: Procedural close. Nothing to be accomplished here. No valid rationale for undeletion @Fallencow30: Please familarise yourself with our policies COM:L, COM:NETCOPYVIO. and COM:SCOPE. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 14:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2021-02&oldid=537027377"