Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/December 2018

File:Chacal de lomo negro (Canis mesomelas), parque nacional de Chobe, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 93.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2018 at 20:00:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Exemplar of a black-backed jackal (Canis mesomelas), Chobe National Park, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 20:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 21:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Very nice jackal. However, I'm reacting to the background as probably neither faded enough nor - if you chose to go the other way - sharp enough. I'm not sure how or even whether I'll end up voting on this picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:56, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background is indeed problematic, but the face makes the photo for me. Daniel Case (talk) 05:49, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 06:14, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:54, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose rather ordinary Charles (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunset Toronto Skyline Panorama Crop from Snake Island.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2018 at 01:06:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created by Jchmrt - uploaded by Jchmrt - nominated by Jchmrt -- Jchmrt (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like this crop of this larger panorama I took of the Toronto skyline. -- Jchmrt (talk) 01:06, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good detail and light. I like your larger pano too. -- Colin (talk) 09:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin --Milseburg (talk) 14:33, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:44, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PtrQs (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --@Boothsift 06:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 22:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:32, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 19:16, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Old house - Bajcsy-Zsilinszky Street, Esztergom.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2018 at 19:02:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 19:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:11, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special.--Peulle (talk) 00:29, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If it didn't have that streetlight pole in the middle I might have supported. Daniel Case (talk) 04:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:49, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, more or less per Peulle: Good idea, but not quite special enough. I do think this kind of motif can be properly an FP in the right circumstances, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:04, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:ArtScience Museum, Marina Bay Sands, Singapore.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2018 at 06:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 11:13, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:27, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:51, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Since FP is supposed to be the "finest on Commons", I checked what other photos we had of this unusual building. This I'm afraid has to be one of the least interesting viewpoints of the building and the worst light. The underside of the curve appears to be a very matt material, making for very boring grey curve compared to the other surfaces or other metallic buildings. The building randomly overlaps other skyscrapers in this composition. Compare view from above, lights and reflections at night, and another night, combination with other interesting buildings, isolated, above again, another combination. All this angle/light does is show what a "carbuncle" it is. -- Colin (talk) 16:34, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of all these pictures is quite bad, unfortunately. I like the water here, this space-exploration building, and the pastel colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
+1 for the pastel colors. I also like the very urban perspective. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I would term "pastel colours" as being light and colourful. This is mostly shades of grey, with very ordinary water, and from this angle/light, the curve of the building doesn't actually have any shades -- it is very flat matt. If you are concentrating on the technical quality of the other pictures, then you are missing the point, which is about light and composition and angle of view. Yes this space-exploration building is unusual, but we have 100+ photos of it and taking a picture with a DSLR is not how one makes an FP. There are far more interesting pictures, with better light and better view, of this building on Commons. QI is for DSLR-technical-quality photos that lack the other aspects. This is really very much a QI. FP should show that the photographer knows how to take a great photo and has had or made a great opportunity to capture an image with wow. Technical quality is just a baseline, say thanks to the Canon engineers, and lets consider wow. Compared to the category on Commons, I see no wow. -- Colin (talk) 08:49, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Isiwal (talk) 15:31, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:54, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Ebrach Baumwipfelpfad Aussichtsturm 170353.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2018 at 08:14:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:58, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:32, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:59, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 14:50, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 19:01, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P999 (talk) 02:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

File:Giuseppe Barberis - Carlo Cornaglia - Giuseppe Verdi's Don Carlo at La Scala.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2018 at 23:47:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media

Info created by Giuseppe Barberis and Carlo Cornaglia - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info As with the nomination below, the previous nomination was reversed three years later due to a sockpuppet issue. I think this still has all the historic relevance, and that makes up for the typical issues found with ephemera. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:47, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Absolutely. Historically important, good print, and the reproduction is of high enough quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:50, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:08, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:57, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:34, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:42, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P999 (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Fort Monostor, Komárom - interiors 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2018 at 11:12:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 11:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 11:12, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I like that I can feel and almost smell that space, but could you possibly include more of the left wall? The composition feels unbalanced to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I only have only a this photo shot --Pudelek (talk) 10:11, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is lacking something. The room is a bit too bare to be interesting enough on its own. Quality in the smallish photo isn't super high. -- Colin (talk) 16:40, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. However, I do think it might stand a chance cropped in on the right, with perhaps some lifting of the shadow. Daniel Case (talk) 22:29, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the bare scene, not every image needs some clutter to make it interesting. --Msaynevirta (talk) 20:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Msaynevirta. --Milseburg (talk) 14:40, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it a lot, it shows a great atmoshpere; negative space on the right side adds a lot.Paolobon140 (talk) 11:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I do not see here anything special, image too dark, nothing interesting. -- Karelj (talk) 22:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:39, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Neptuul (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark in my view, without so striking elements. I also agree with Ikan the composition is unbalanced. Overall not a special image -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:47, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P999 (talk) 02:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I cannot see a composition or subjet here that wows me, --Poc o² 10:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Piazza Navona Gange fontana dei Fiumi Roma.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2018 at 17:49:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Fountains
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:49, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - That's about as high-quality a photo of that subject as possible, but I feel like I want a slight bit more room for his foot on the right side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:29, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Yeaa, and he fortunately kicked already some bothering tourists from there ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:20, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Of course I realize the crush of tourists is a challenge for photographers. I've been among the tourists there a few times. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:49, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support great perspective! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:01, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 15:15, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Busy but I love the colors and light. Daniel Case (talk) 03:44, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Isiwal (talk) 15:25, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excellent technical realisation but the people in the back convert it into a tourist shot. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:14, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excesive DoF (F/5 should work) resulting on a background distracting --Photographer 00:08, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basotxerri. -- Karelj (talk) 22:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P999 (talk) 02:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting people and building, not sure whether this angle was the best for this shot. Using a lower DoF as suggested by The Photographer may have helped --Poc o² 10:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP for me. The tourists make a natural background for this tourist attraction. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Fountains

File:Тавче Гравче.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2018 at 13:59:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
Info created by Cuklev - uploaded by Cuklev - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed.--Peulle (talk) 15:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Food photography is one of our weak spots. I'd like to see more like this. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ - Definitely a useful VI, but nothing exceptional about the composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:16, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support At 100% it looks a little over-sharpened, but at 30MP that's no concern. Composition is fine and fairly standard for food photography, with the brown-grey background helping highlight the colourful food. I think there's a few other photos in this person's upload log that look FP worthy. -- Colin (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have no problems with the composition—the colors are nice and earthy, the burlap nicely emphasizes the rustic quality that it seems the photographer wanted. But, per Peulle, I have problems with processing. The wood planks in the background should at least look like wood; I like the rest of the photo well enough that I would have given them a pass on slight unsharpness. However, this wood looks like it's disintegrating into pixels, like something that cannot be explained by a photographer's choice to focus on his subject. Daniel Case (talk) 22:42, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but oversharpened. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Peulle, Daniel, Basotxerri, I am wondering why you think the oversharpening is an issue in a 30MP photo. Sure, it's a flaw and we could suggest it be processed differently. But I can only see it at 100% at which point this image is 170cm tall, which is 5x the height of my 27" monitor and would break through the ceiling in my study. Is it fair to judge such a huge image from a 30cm distance? It could be printed at 300dpi at A2 poster size, a resolution so fine that pixel-level "flaws" are invisible. Compare downsized a bit to 7MP and I don't see any issue, and that downsize is still well well above our minimum threshold and a level where many people would support if nominated as an "uploaded from Flickr" candidate. The wood does look like wood, unless I'm looking at them with the equivalent of an electronic magnifying glass. We neither need or even want the wood to be in focus, as it should not be getting our attention, which is on the colourful food. So why are we concerned with oversharpened wood, which isn't even the subject? I wonder if we have got so in the habit of looking for flaws, and flaws we think could be fixed like noise, CA, sharping, and assuming that means those flows should and must be fixed, and then we mistake "I'd have processed this differently" from, "This image has important flaws that prevent it being used". Picking on pixel flaws is an easy game that doesn't even require any artistic or photographic appreciation or ability.

This particular composition might not be everyone's taste, but I look at the photographer's upload log and see many images that would easily illustrate a quality cook book (as I think this would with no problem at all). They are all a bit oversharpened, hence my concern that we could miss out on several FP food photos if we keep being only concerned about the pixels. We have very little pro-quality food photography on Commons, and here's a new photographer with pro-level photos and they get pixel peeped to death by people who've never shot any food photography at that level. It would be nice to have one of these "Wiki loves ___" competitions generate some new regulars at FP, but currently I can't see any reason why a pro photographer would bother joining us. -- Colin (talk) 10:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Well, I'm glad you mentioned that. I see some photos in that list with what I consider much more harmonious compositions. For example, I'd vote to feature File:Домшана паста од спанаќ и моркови.jpg without hesitation. I also like File:Мусака од компири.jpg and File:Шпагети.jpg pretty well. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have no problem with the food. I do have a problem with the wood looking like a pointilist painting, like it isn't even wood. Sure it's not the subject, but in a 40MB image like this with a rather short DoF you expect it to look like wood, even unsharp wood. Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel, if it looks like a "pointilist painting" to you, then you are looking at it far far too closely. I am really really struggling to not see perfectly ordinary wood. All you are noticing are pixel-level over-sharpening artefacts. If printed at A4 size for a glossy magazine, there would be 574 pixels per inch, which is double the 200-300 ppi needed for high quality colour printing. So the issue you think stops this being featured would vanish below physical printing limits. A 30MP image far exceeds the resolution needed for most purposes. Most food photos don't even fill A4, but are smaller to leave room for recipes. Why are you punishing the uploader for not downsizing to 6MP, which I know you'd support without question? The only reason you can see these artefacts is because your browser lets you magnify the image to 100ppi. If I took a 3x magnifying glass to a magazine, I'd see the dots too. -- Colin (talk) 08:47, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, if the image was going to turn out like this at its current resolution, it should have been downsized (but, it is true, we strongly encourage uploading at the highest resolution available, for reasons none of us argue with, so maybe this is on us). And perhaps the sharpening could have been applied just to the food if that was desired? It could have been cropped out, but I kind of like the pseudo-vignetting the corners create. Daniel Case (talk) 03:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:32, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin. --El Grafo (talk) 09:10, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find it a perfect photo for a magazine.Paolobon140 (talk) 17:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'll buy that and end my opposition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support as per Colin Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:45, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 10:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:06, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Food

File:Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 24.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2018 at 14:10:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. I did not notice that it was my third current nomination. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:16, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:46, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

File:Uitzichtpunt bij Breil-Brigels (actm) 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2018 at 15:56:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural #Switserland.
* Info Viewpoint at Breil-Brigels. Beautiful view over the valley of the For Rhine towards Dardin.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:56, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sure it was a lovely place to visit and reflect on the memorial, but I'm not seeing what makes it an FP. It is a good capture of the memorial and scene, but just a QI imo. -- Colin (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:00, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin.--Peulle (talk) 00:07, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 15:32, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Motif is well chosen and presented. The composition is great.--Milseburg (talk) 14:36, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - For me, the ayes have it. Vivid, with great clouds. I could only ask for the rest of the pedestal to be in the picture, but that's really no big deal. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --El Grafo (talk) 09:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For the half tree on the right, the cut pedestal and the general composition.Paolobon140 (talk) 12:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) and GNV Cristal (ship, 1989).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2018 at 20:47:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support This edition creates an extra special atmosphere that we do not see with the original colors. + We don't have so many images of several big ships at the same time. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I prefer this version, too. But please mention what kind of filter you used in your file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a software presetting, I added more details in the description. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:20, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:43, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:34, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 18:59, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the reducing of blue light on top of the GNV Christal could have been a bit less harsh. So it creates an unrealistic black area on top of the bridge. --PtrQs (talk) 00:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but I share PtrQs concern about the area around the blue light. --El Grafo (talk) 09:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:53, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative image with natural colours.

Neutral Not my favourite, but I propose it because this is a different version of the same RAW file. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:47, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since I'm not a filter enthusiast, I prefer this version. The tracks of the vehicles bring the picture to life.--Ermell (talk) 21:18, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 16:16, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:16, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good to have this as a "normal" version of the above, but I find this mixture of very differently colored light sources pretty … meh. --El Grafo (talk) 09:20, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The colors don't take away any of the wow effect. --MB-one (talk) 16:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 20:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

The chosen alternative is: File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) and GNV Cristal (ship, 1989).jpg

File:RhB ABe 4-4 III 56 and 51 Lago Bianco.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2018 at 21:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail vehicles
Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know, we already have File:RhB ABe 4-4 III mit Bernina-Express am Lago Bianco.jpg, but I like this one so much better that I think it deserves a nomination. And no, I'm not cross if somebody nominates the other one for delisting...
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 21:14, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support this better Seven Pandas (talk) 21:31, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 04:09, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 04:14, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:26, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:30, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:24, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:48, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 14:11, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 16:39, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 19:13, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:02, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:45, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:47, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wouldn't mind if we kept both. Daniel Case (talk) 14:17, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 10:23, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:50, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

File:Autumn colours in Heinola, Finland (October 2018).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2018 at 20:24:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Finland
Info Autumn colours on the shores of Jyrängönkoski, Heinola. Photograph by me. --Msaynevirta (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Msaynevirta (talk) 20:24, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again I see what you were hoping to get but it doesn't come across in the final image. Daniel Case (talk) 00:24, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'd love to see what's further to the right, but that's not a deal-breaker. Lovely atmosphere and pleasant light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:27, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is no subject: divide the composition in 3 horizontal layers and 3 vertical layers. In the low horizontal layer (foreground) there must be a subject which is missing here; in the central horizontal layer (middle ground) there must be a secondary subject which is missin here. The top horizontal layer must be a well composed background which is missing here. Result is an empty frame with no subject.Paolobon140 (talk) 13:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Freiburg Münster Hochaltar 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2018 at 09:52:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info High altar of Freiburg Minster, Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. Painted by Hans Baldung, 1512–16. All the rest by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:52, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very good (both the subject and the photo). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Does this old triptych really have such a hard contrast? For me the colors look rather harsh and this and the blotchy look seems to be the price for a high ISO. --PtrQs (talk) 01:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PtrQs, you can compare with other images of this altarpiece: the colors are indeed vivid, and there is a high contrast especially between white garments and black background at the wings. --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --PtrQs (talk) 20:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:11, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:49, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:27, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P999 (talk) 02:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Quai de la Poissonnerie in Colmar 04.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2018 at 08:13:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

[reply]

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would certainly be good without the crane, the tourists and the overflowing garbage can in better light.--Ermell (talk) 08:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Ermell. But a nice motive. Try again. -- -donald- (talk) 09:39, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above and also overprocessed. There are no blacks or highlights in this image, only midtones. It also has that caffeinated buzz from too much Clarity. Could you please go easy on those Lightroom sliders. -- Colin (talk) 12:41, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose i am afraid Colin is perfectly right about lights: result is again something like a drawing more than a picture. In this case i dont agree even on the composition you chose: while i agree shwoing the wall on the left (i sometimes use walls to frame a picture and give the sense on "where" a building is) i must say that "Le Quai" sign is terribly disturbing: it occupies a strategic spot in the whole composition, in the top left quadrant, exactly where our eyes will fix their attention when looking at one photograph and on the diagonal of the photo. That specific part of the picture should be used to place something extremely interesting in the composition: some main subject or something which is considered as "important" in the message a photographer wants to give those who are looking at the picture. The diagonal line of any composition like this is extremely important and should be watched carefully. I also have some doubts about the format you chose (too much square), probably due to some cropping you did. My suggestion is: never crop a picture to make it better than it looks; choose the compositoin while shooting and if it doesnt satisfy you, then move around the subject and find the perfect point of view. A photographer shouldnt crop pictures in landscapes photos, the photographer should compose while shooting the perfect picture. IMo, of course Paolobon140 (talk) 13:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"never crop a picture to make it better than it looks"..."A photographer shouldnt crop pictures in landscapes photos". Paolobon140, you are very generously handing out advice here about crop, "rule of thirds", composition, light, whatever, advice that I don't see you following rigorously in your own photos. I'm beginning to wonder what you are doing. Are you really here to vote for photos, or to troll and create a bad atmosphere on this forum. --Cart (talk) 14:14, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Assume good faith, Wikipedia:No personal attacks I do not think im creating a bad atmosphere, I only try to explain my thoughts with the poor English I can handle. And I comment on pictures, not on peple. If you dont like to read my few comments you still can avoid to read them. Of course im not following rules always, rules are made to be broken when can be broken; I usually talk about generic rules which are considered rules in photography and being this a photographic forum I am perfectly on-topic. You have found one of my pics made to be displayed in an Italian WP article about a chinese city panorama and that picture works fine for that use. But, as you have noticed, I did not propose that pic to be a Featured picture. What is not clear to you?Paolobon140 (talk) 15:05, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just asking. If you are serious about this, I would suggest you read Commons:Staying mellow and try not to be so abrasive in your comments, as have been suggested before. --Cart (talk) 15:16, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By thw way: i spend time to adduce arguments to my comments and i spend energies in trying to write in the poor English i know; I always write long comments trying to analyze what i see, when I oppose a pic and also when i support a photo. I am always constructive: i find what i see as flaws and give an explanation and even a possible solution; when i see something i appreciate i explain what and why i appreaciate. Do you do the same? Others do not; plus, when somoene opposes my very few pics i never argue and just read their comments unless they ask explanations for some choice i took in my pics. I always try not to be "abrasive" and, as you seem to be a very smart and clever person, im sure you will put some effort in understanding that im trying my best in English and im also sure you will be able to pick the good parts of my thoughts. Use Wikipedia:Common sense.Paolobon140 (talk) 15:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree the aspect ratio of this image isn't ideal, I don't think that "don't crop" advice follows from that. There's really nothing special about 3:2 ratio, being a legacy from a 100-year-old decision by Leica. There's a reason why TV is 16:9 and movies usually much wider. Anyone doing commercial work will have their images cropped to suit the publication. While some photographic greats claim to never crop or dislike their work being cropped, it doesn't particularly matter if one frames perfectly at the time or later. What's more important is people consider how framing and aspect ratio affects their work. Gone are the days when you composed in a little viewfinder and couldn't see the results till the chemist gave you 24 6"x4" prints two weeks later. Advice that worked in the days of film isn't great today. The problem with stating rules, is that you'll only find that a week later you want to suggest a picture would be improved by a little crop. All sorts of famous photographers have their quirky rules and advice. "F8 and be there"; "The decisive moment"; "If your photographs aren't good enough, you're not close enough"; "If you want to be a better photographer, stand in front of more interesting stuff". These famous dictums might apply to some photography and not others. Some advice is simply outdated. Paolobon140, I suggest you be a bit less dogmatic about "rules". -- Colin (talk) 15:31, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Apart from the processing issues, the composition is just an overwhelming riot of shapes. I didn't even notice the tourists until I looked at it in closeup. Daniel Case (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of unattractive light and the crane. I do think this might be a featurable motif without such problems, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment In a picture showing a Quai I expect a crane to be there.Paolobon140 (talk) 19:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but nevertheless, it disturbs the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:40, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ladinas, Andiast, Resgia Gneida Sägerei (d.j.b.) 11.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2018 at 18:41:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects Detail of the machines in the old sawmill.
Info Detail of an old nostalgic sawmill on water power.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:41, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I miss the bottom with the saw and the trunk being cut -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A lot of clashing forms, in addition to the awkward crops. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Consular House in Saint-Cere 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2018 at 14:10:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Maybe I'd support a similar photo taken in light that's less gray, but I'd have to see it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:02, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose On-center and with a blue sky I might have considered it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Tournasol7 (talk) 14:47, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cobalt complexes.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2018 at 05:36:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Leiem - uploaded by Leiem - nominated by Leiem -- Leiem (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Leiem (talk) 05:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: image quality far away from FP standard (tilted, sharpness, ... However, you can nominate it as Valued Image --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Facocero común (Phacochoerus africanus), parque nacional de Zambeze, Zimbabue, 2018-07-28, DD 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2018 at 20:02:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Exemplar of Common warthog (Phacochoerus africanus), Chobe National Park, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 20:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:02, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support but see note --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:02, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Martin: cropped Poc o² 10:38, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:31, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:52, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info File name and description don't match. Was the picture taken in Zimbabwe or in Botswana? -- B2Belgium (talk) 10:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
B2Belgium: true, it was pretty messy, it's fixed now. Zimbabwe. --Poc o² 14:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:40, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Halflege zaaddoos van een speerdistel (Cirsium vulgare) in verval. (d.j.b.) 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2018 at 16:50:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants # Family Asteraceae.
Info Half Empty seed box of a spear thistle (Cirsium vulgare) in decline.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:36, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:22, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:43, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The light could be nicer, but this is too beautiful not to support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:54, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P999 (talk) 02:45, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:42, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Asteraceae

File:Moscow VDNKh Armenia Pavilion asv2018-08 img1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2018 at 14:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Russia
Info Interior of the central hall of "Armenia" Pavilion in VDNKh Park in Moscow. Stalinist architecture, built in 1954 ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:57, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find this photograph perfect. Square composition fits it a lot by dividing the image in 3 very balanced layers. The circular line of the ceiling ending at the 2 corners of the picture adds a sense of "escaping from the photo" which i personally appreciate a lot. The central oval on the ceiling is placed perfectly. Only doubt is about the bit dark areas in the sides but that is the photographer's choice and i will not discuss about it.Paolobon140 (talk) 15:11, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 06:08, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 12:56, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This isn't merely a snapshot; it's an interesting composition with interesting people who have interesting facial expressions, and the viewer can try to imagine what they are thinking and feeling, how they feel about each other, etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:53, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Paolobon140. --Aristeas (talk) 18:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:51, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 14:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 18:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 21:43, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Russia

File:Abandoned House in Altagracia ports.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2018 at 00:14:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Venezuela
Info All by -- Photographer 00:14, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Kind of blurry around the tree. --@Boothsift 00:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is literally water vapor in the Lake Maracaibo bay, it is a very hot city where it is common to have temperatures above 50 C --Photographer 00:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per above. --@Boothsift 06:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Good composition and contrast of the rotting and the living. I appreciate the explanation above, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure what the frame is supposed to present. The bridge in the background is much too blurry.--Ermell (talk) 08:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No, IMO it is not working. First of all the portal looks distorted. Old portals are often not straight but in this case it seems your lens have distorted the vertical lines. You should correct them and bring them to their vertical nature. Second matter: the low third should contain something, a secondary subject, an object, asomething: look at the central part of the lowe third; it looks empty and meaningless, while a human eye is always looking at one picture from the center down to the bottom and then up to the top. I dont care about non focused background, i care more about the general oomposition.Paolobon140 (talk) 15:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An interesting idea, per Ikan, but per Paolobon it doesn't make it to FP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexandre Lacauchie - Gilbert Duprez as Gaston in Verdi's Jérusalem.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2018 at 23:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info Created by Alexandre Lacauchie - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info So, yeah. Sockpuppets. I can't blame reversing three-year old decision to make sure they don't profit, but it's still kind of anooying. So, renomination it is. There will be a second nomination for the other one affected by this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:39, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This is a Verdi opera I'd never heard of. Valuable print and excellent reproduction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:56, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:06, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:13, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 17:28, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:09, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:58, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:53, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:41, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Thanks for your time and restoration work, however, color modification should not be part of a restoration process. IMHO, an incorrect white balance correction has been applied, this is an old publication and it is important to keep the passage of time. The uniform background has been "restored", in its place, a pale background with posterized greenish and reddish tones. --Photographer 02:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Photographer: While such might be true of a painting, this is a mass-printed work, meaning that multiple copies exist, and the image should provide an idealised "best preserved" Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Car in San Juan Street.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2018 at 00:22:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Automobiles
Info All by -- Photographer 00:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo represents the town where I grew up, from a country paralyzed in time, Venezuela. -- Photographer 00:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the setting, good enough for me.--Boothsift (talk) 00:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. That's some vivid colour on that car, though. Is the image slightly oversaturated? I think it's in the acceptable bounds even if it is, though, as it simply looks a bit artisticly shot, not unnatural. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not overly happy with the level of sharpness. Also, those blobs of smoke or whatever they are, leave some light spots around the trees.--Peulle (talk) 08:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Much uninteresting road and a disturbing cyclist in the background ruin the composition. The light is not really fascinating either. The dust or fog patches on the picture, however, are mysterious.--Ermell (talk) 08:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the car itself very much, but for me the surrounding scene is not interesting enough to take up this much space. --El Grafo (talk) 09:25, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the idea, but you should crop a big part on the right (see note), removing the cyclist and the ugly pylons. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:01, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:39, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ziemestalbrücke 8169267.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Dec 2018 at 21:38:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:38, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The horizontals could be improved a bit. --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:44, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The bridge is bent.--Ermell (talk) 22:34, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:50, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- P999 (talk) 02:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Impressive view - but: Is it possible to fix the CAs in the upper left corner (see image notes)? --PtrQs (talk) 15:42, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Hopefully better now.--Ermell (talk) 09:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --PtrQs (talk) 20:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:37, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

File:Foro Romano visto dal Vittoriano Roma.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2018 at 08:58:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info created & uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:58, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ah! Rome! ~~But see note~~ --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1 to your suggested crop. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:18, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice light. Gorgeous sky. Stellar composition. I like the current crop.--Peulle (talk) 12:54, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I disagree, but in this picture we can't see the Foro Romano. Hi is situated behind "Chiesa dei Santi Luca e Martina". In foreground is Foro di Cesare, but we can't see - trees cover everything. Nice shot, but not FP for me. Your photo of Foro Romano taken from Via Monte Tarpeo was much better. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:03, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Right, the lower hidden part is the ‘’Forum Cesari’’ but all of the upper half, including the ‘’Chiesa dei Santi Luca e Martina’’ and the ‘’Mamertinum’’ are part of the ‘’Foro Romano’’. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:16, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - CommentOk, my mistake. Thanks for the explanation. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:20, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, what a great view! Colours, contrasts and detail are marvelous. You can even spot San Giovanni in Laterano. --Code (talk) 19:45, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Code. --Cayambe (talk) 21:37, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Its title is perhaps a little misleading to a casual viewer, but I wasn't really thinking of it—I saw an excellent cityscape with colors so vivid I could practically smell the pine as I was looking at it in closeup. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:03, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel Case. --Aristeas (talk) 18:31, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I will not oppose becasue of the long list of supporters up here but there is something I find not working: the sky is in some way distracting with that big cloud above San Luca e Martina and those jet trails. I also find there are too many trees taking a large part in the composition, but its my point of view and of course there are many pine trees in Rome:-)Paolobon140 (talk) 16:37, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light and nice scenery. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 18:54, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 18:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Porsche 911 GT3 Touring, IAA 2017, Frankfurt (1Y7A2766).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2018 at 15:51:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info all by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support as nominator -- MB-one (talk) 15:51, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SDKmac (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 21:43, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - My advice: Don't pixel-peep. The photo looks very good up to 300% of the size of my 13-inch laptop. If you're looking at the pixel level and minute amounts of color noise are bothering you, I think you're looking too closely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:00, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 03:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:22, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Ooh, shiny! I knew one of Matti's images would get here eventually. What you'd expect to see in a sales brochure. Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 10:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice shot, good colour matching between the car and the background. No disturbing elements.--Peulle (talk) 11:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:30, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles

File:Pujari in Janaki Temple-6495.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2018 at 17:22:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing_people
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 17:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 17:22, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support - Very striking portrait, but I'd support more strongly if the face were a bit sharper. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: bit sharpness increased :) -Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 05:20, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Still not ideal, IMO, but a good improvement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not sharp enough for me, I'm afraid. Daniel Case (talk) 06:38, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel Case. --Granada (talk) 07:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support As usual: sharpness cannot be considered the only benchmark for a photograph. There are horrible photos with a great sharpness and wonderful pictures which are not sharp. I find this a very elegant portrait, well composed, with a very interesting subject who is showing a traditional figure of (for me) a distant world, and i appreciate it. It is a good documentaristic portrait, colourful and interesting to see in all its details. Maybe a bit dull in light (i like shades a lot). I love the composition: the 2 dooors create an interesing background, being a perfect frame to the subject. It is a well organised composition, divided in 3 identical vertical parts (the 2 doors at the sides and the black space in the middle, where the subject is perfectly silhouetted. The dress finishes where it should finish, at the very low part of the composition. The model himself looks handsome and with a sweet smile. Thank you for this picture, I will see if i can upload it into some italian WP page.Paolobon140 (talk) 16:50, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Paolobon140. Image is not downsized and no need for pixel level sharpness at 22MP. Possible cause is 1/40s, which is relying on lens IS and the subject being still. Best to take several shots, so perhaps one will be sharp. Overall the image is lovely and colourful. -- Colin (talk) 21:48, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In these cases a tripod is needed. If there is no tripod, the photographer can lean on someone to use as a human tripod. With a 50 mm you can easily shoot at 1/20 sec if you use a human tripod. I do not use stabilized lenses and i want to remind everyone that to take a firm picture we need at least a time which is the reverse of the lens lenghth: 1/50 sec for a 50 mm; 1/100 for a 100 mm lens: 1/35 sec for a 35 mm lens. It is easy to remember and useful to remind if a human tripod is available:-)Paolobon140 (talk) 22:01, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to the EXIF the lens used has IS (though might have been turned off) and the camera is a crop sensor, so the effective 35mm focal length is 110mm. If you haven't got IS (I have it built into my Sony camera) then you won't appreciate how wonderful it can be and helpful for keeping ISO low. Modern IS can achieve up to 4 stops extra beyond the reciprocal rule you quote, though that rule predates pixel-peeping. I'd say this image still falls into the "acceptably sharp" range the old rule aimed for (it prints large just fine), but not pixel-peeping sharp for those who judge FP by looking at little crops of picture at 100% on their monitors. The more you push beyond the rule, the less guaranteed the IS will help. Many instructors suggest that when pushing the shutter speed limit, to fire off several frames just to be sure. Tony Northrup recommends a Rule of Doubles technique to shoot guaranteed well below the old limit. That works fine for static subjects, but 1/40s is also a bit slow for photographing people, unless they keep very still. -- Colin (talk) 08:46, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for what you shared Colin. As i said i do not use stabilised lenses (i still use an old Rolleiflex and an Hasselblad sometimes:-) ); that is why I always try to lean on someone as a human tripod when needed: even if I drink 3 coffees a day (espresso, which is strong and make hands shaking a bit) i can be still most of the times: here File:Innocenzo Fraccaroli (1805-1881) Eva prima del peccato (1842) tre quarti posteriori.jpg i shot at 1/30 freehands with a 50mm (fullframe sensor, Canon 5d mark II) and the pic is quite sharp. But it is a simple documentaristc pic which is meant to be printed in a small size and, of course, the subject aws very still:-).Paolobon140 (talk) 09:05, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've just added "Reciprocal rule" and "Rule of doubles" to Commons:Photography terms. -- Colin (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Yann (talk) 10:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 14:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:29, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schwäbisch Hall - Sankt Michael - Chor - Gewölbe 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2018 at 21:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 21:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 21:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MB-one (talk) 22:14, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support --PtrQs (talk) 01:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@PtrQs: Here in FPC, only the support and oppose votes can be counted, so any "strong support" votes have to be appended to the original Support votes as I have done, or else they will not be taken into account by the FPCbot. Cheers :) ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 06:32, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@GerifalteDelSabana: Thank you for this hint/help. So I just emphasise my support with: Wow . --PtrQs (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - per Ikan -- P999 (talk) 02:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great! --Biser Todorov (talk) 02:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:21, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like something out of Inception, hahaha. --― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 06:21, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 07:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:13, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice quality and symmetry Poc o² 10:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 11:57, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 13:07, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 22:25, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 20:54, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:48, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:Elefantes africanos de sabana (Loxodonta africana), parque nacional de Chobe, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 25.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2018 at 08:25:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Baby African bush elephants (Loxodonta africana) playing at the banks of the Chobe River, Chobe National Park, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 08:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 08:25, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very cute. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 12:02, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 23:49, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral CA on the elephants' legs, which from past experience I think you can fix. Also, the bush at top is blurry and distracting; I think you could crop most of it out as well as some of the sand below. Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:49, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are CAs around the hind legs of the juvenile as noted by Daniel Case and violet borders along the tail of the adult; correctable? --Llez (talk) 16:38, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Llez, Daniel: The CA is gone and I've cropped the bushes in the top a bit --Poc o² 19:59, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I still feel like you could crop in tighter. And the CA has definitely been addressed but not completely eliminated (look at the lead elephant's back legs). Not that it would likely matter to the outcome of this FPC at this point. Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Better now --Llez (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:52, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Daniel --Photographer 02:51, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:19, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Man with a beard-845709.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 11:21:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Leroy Skalstad, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 11:21, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support This image is used by hundreds of sites, so... -- Yann (talk) 11:21, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy,overprocessed and a bit outdated: there was a time when in Photoshop you might install an action which was giving this kind of result in any portrait. It was a kind of fashion which is already over (luckily) and was making any human being looking older than his age.Paolobon140 (talk) 19:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Paolobon. Daniel Case (talk) 19:29, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:21, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:NGC 3372a-full.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 11:24:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by N. Smith (University of California, Berkeley) and NOAO/AURA/NSF, uploaded by Huntster - nominated by Yann (talk) 11:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the colors, the resolution, and the level of details. -- Yann (talk) 11:24, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is there something wrong with the file? When trying to download the full size image, nothing happens. I can only look at the thumbnail.--Peulle (talk) 11:55, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is simply too large for your computer. Mine too. --Cart (talk) 12:52, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think so. It's a Macbook Pro and I have opened bigger images than this one before. Has anyone succeeded in opening this?--Peulle (talk) 23:50, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I can view it in browser and download to the computer and view without a problem. Not sure why you could be having issues except for possibly inadequate memory. — Huntster (t @ c) 00:36, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible for me also to download the file, I can only open it on my screen for a basic display. As it is practically not really usable in state for most of us, @Huntster: could you upload an alternative downsized version (example 8'000 or 12'000 pixels large) with a link on this one, so that we can reuse it easily ? I tried, but again the Wikimedia servers refused any higher resolution than 4000 pixels large only -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Peulle and Basile Morin: , I've uploaded File:NGC 3372a-12k res.jpg at 12k wide. How is that for you? I can reduce further if needed. — Huntster (t @ c) 07:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support but please "Images should have a meaningful file name" -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NGC 3372 is the scientific name for the nebula so the most exact name/designation it can have to not be mixed up with other nebulae. Sort of the space equivalent of names in Latin for plants and animals. --Cart (talk) 11:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I thought it was the name of the file from the camera. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, none of us can know everything. I made the same mistake with a damsell... Clearly not my area of expertise. :) --Cart (talk) 01:27, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a few Cocteau Twins album covers ... Daniel Case (talk) 19:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:09, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Probably unnecessarily large, but surely a worthy photo to feature! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:53, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 20:57, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Կեղծ անձրևասնկեր.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 12:14:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
Info all by Ավետիսյան91 -- Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ավետիսյան91 (talk) 12:14, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too harsh light for me, posterisation and not quite clear where the focus is set on. IMO by far not one of the finest images of its kind. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Pretty good, but I have to basically agree with Baso, not an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:38, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In addition to Baso's criticisms, its WB is overly warm. But even if all those things were addressed, it's rather busy and does not work as a composition compared to our other featured images of mushrooms. Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:PlayaLaPerlaMDP.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 20:15:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by me -- Ezarateesteban 20:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 20:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I can't help comparing this photo to the preexisting FP of this beach, File:BalnearioAlfonsina-LaPerlaMDP-feb2017.jpg, which is a much more sweeping view of the beach and much more colorful. I think this one is a good QI but not an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh light, too much sky, busy foreground -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blue sky is very nicely done, but the rest of the image does not rise any higher than a typical tourist snapshot. Daniel Case (talk) 00:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:04, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Mountains 3 sisters.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 04:27:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by User:HutheMeow - uploaded by User:HutheMeow - nominated by User:HutheMeow -- HutheMeow (talk) 04:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- HutheMeow (talk) 04:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, far away from FP. Bad image quality, too much sky, too dark mountains. -- -donald- (talk) 08:52, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice view but far from FP standards.--Peulle (talk) 10:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per others - - Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 12:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, especially per -donald-. Also, compositionally, I think there is too much sky. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per -donald- Daniel Case (talk) 04:09, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rocks, sand and ocean - CRONULLA.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 04:25:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by User:HutheMeow - uploaded by User:HutheMeow - nominated by User:HutheMeow -- HutheMeow (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- HutheMeow (talk) 04:25, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Tilted. -- -donald- (talk) 08:53, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A quite common scene, not an outstanding composiiton and technical issues. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:27, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Visibly tilted, and why frame this as a vertical when there are so many horizontals? Even if it was, it doesn't stand out from any other well-done pictures of the ocean from beaches. Daniel Case (talk) 00:23, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Linz Neuer Dom Innenraum 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 11:24:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Interior of the Cathedral of the Immaculate Conception (New Cathedral) in Linz, Upper Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:24, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful - - Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 12:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:44, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 17:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:31, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sehr schön. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:14, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Not quite as sharp as Diliff's photos, if I remember correctly, but I really feel the space, almost down to being able to feel the air inside the cathedral on my skin. And yes, it is a beautiful cathedral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:16, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 16:58, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 19:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:46, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 20:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm curious about the number behind "multiple frames" Poc o² 11:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

100 --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:42, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Subhrajyoti07 talk 09:04, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 15:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Enceladusstripes cassini.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2018 at 06:43:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by NASA/JPL/Space Science Institute - uploaded by Startaq - nominated by The NMI User -- The NMI User (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The NMI User (talk) 06:43, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, though crops are tight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:44, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too many issues, both with the edges and the right side (stitching). It's from 2005, this, fairly old.--Peulle (talk) 09:47, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Many stitching problems -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Sorry for missing the bad stitching problems on the right side. There's also some green CA - I know there aren't surface-level plants on this moon. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:15, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Juveniler Japanmakak (Macaca fuscata) im Jigokudani Yaen Kōen.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2018 at 14:25:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:25, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support very very nice. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:17, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great light, excellent composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm touched by that face. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:43, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:44, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seven Pandas (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 08:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wouaouw :) - Benh (talk) 19:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great job Poc o² 11:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:07, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very human expression! - Subhrajyoti07 talk 09:02, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support indeed. Charles (talk) 18:29, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Snow on Ayase river, Rijksmuseum RP-P-2016-66-8.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2018 at 16:11:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Japan
Info created by



Alternative names	Takahashi Hiroaki
Description	Japanese painter and ukiyo-e artist
Date of birth/death	2 January 1871	11 February 1945
Location of birth/death	Asakusabashi	Shinagawa-ku
Work location	Japan
Authority file	: Q526437 VIAF: 259917335 ISNI: 0000000386991214 LCCN: nr2006032518 GND: 1135504970 NDL: 00487834 CiNii: DA09594287 WorldCat

- uploaded by Wittylama - nominated by Jane023 -- Jane023 (talk) 16:11, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Jane023 (talk) 16:11, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info - This is a 1915 woodcut print, of a Japanese river, now in the collection of the Rijksmuseum, Netherlands. -- Wittylama (talk) 16:26, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think we can consider fixing the tilt and cropping out the border. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's what en:Template:Css image crop is for. Do fix the tilt, of course. but if you remove too much paper, it makes it impossible to print it in a way that resembles the original artwork: There's no paper grain to cover the edges, and unless the aspect ratio is absolutely identical, gutters will need added, or parts of the image cropped out. The border is absolutely part of this style of print.

Support as it stands, though. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support More Ukiyo-e/Shin Hanga! :-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:17, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LOC (as always) has an extensive high-res collection that could/should be considered for Commons --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:39, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info Typo in the file name ('Rijsmuseum'). Should be fixed. -- B2Belgium (talk) 10:49, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Info Typo in file name fixed. (I did not rename this or the other ‘Featured picture candidates’ sections/subpages to avoid confusion while the featured picture discussion here is going on. However, the image file itself is renamed and all links in Wikipedia articles to it are updated.) --Aristeas (talk) 15:10, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I did move it, as it'll simplify closing. The bots, as I recall, are dumb. All the links should be fixed, though. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:08, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you! (And it is good to learn that this will simplify closing. OK, if I ever move again a file which is a featured picture candidates, I will move the related stuff too.) --Aristeas (talk) 19:14, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 09:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:12, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 19:14, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Japan

Question - I just processed this for a feature, but shouldn't the category be about the art, rather than places#Japan? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tufted capuchin on a branch in Singapore.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Dec 2018 at 08:33:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created & uploaded by Basile Morin - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 08:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:33, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent animal portrait. A tiny bit unsharp (I guess due to 1/60s at 400mm) but that's not a dealbreaker at all --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:05, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Suspicious capuchin :-) Thanks, Tomer T, for the nomination. The face gets sharp at 8 MPx -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:13, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:17, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low quality for a zoo picture, the only vaguely focused area is a small section the photo and lack of depth of field --Photographer 17:07, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like it, mainly for the face. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:46, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The face is the only sharp area, but I'm bokeh with that. Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support bokeh too :) Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:46, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:49, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:36, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:49, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 20:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Wooden fence in Si Phan Don (2).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 01:55:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:55, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:42, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 19:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like the prow of an earthen ship ... Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Similar to this--Ermell (talk) 20:23, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 07:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:06, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. IMO, the composition is different enough from the FP linked by Ermell to merit a star. Of course the point is debatable, but no-one has debated it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Laos

File:Kreuzberg (Rhön) im Nebelmeer.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 19:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#fog
Info Rhön Mountains looking out of the fog about 30 minutes before sunset. All by me -- Milseburg (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seven Pandas (talk) 23:25, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:32, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:08, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 07:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:15, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 11:20, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Armenak Margarian (talk) 15:44, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:41, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#fog

File:Church of the Sacred Heart of Rodez 20.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 23:03:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I love the church, and I have a lot more tolerance for parked cars as part of an urban landscape than most other FPC voters, but the cars, temporary fencing, pile of scrap metal for recycling (I think that's what it is), poles and so forth are just too distracting for me to consider this other than a very good QI/VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:41, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me the cloud background makes it. Daniel Case (talk) 05:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'm surprised. I thought you'd be the first to object to the cars, etc. I like the clouds, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't really think you can do much about the cars etc. They are also pretty small in relation to the church. Daniel Case (talk) 18:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fried beetles.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 01:12:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Food
Info Fried beetles in Asian cuisine (Entomophagy). Created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral for now, highlights are slightly blown, could you fix them? Strong support when fixed. :) ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 06:28, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Highlights softened. Agree they were a bit strong, but please @GerifalteDelSabana: also consider this shiny metallic aspect with glistening oil as part of the style (like hyperrealism) -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:26, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong support :) sharp and crisp. Disgusting! ― Gerifalte _Del Sabana 14:05, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:17, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A mass. Technically ok, but in my opinion the motif has no FP-potential. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 10:37, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The idea to nominate this picture here came after I met it by chance on this website (2), while searching "Acrididae Laos" on Google :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:19, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Milseburg --Ermell (talk) 09:32, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Why not? Yummy ;-) Excellent work IMO -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:47, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Milseburg --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:49, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Milseburg. -- Karelj (talk) 10:13, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hipopótamos (Hippopotamus amphibius), parque nacional de Chobe, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 79.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 22:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Hippos (Hippopotamus amphibius), Chobe National Park, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 22:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 22:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 06:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:24, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 07:56, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:10, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:14, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a mouth! --Schnobby (talk) 12:39, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice capture. Charles (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:10, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Photographer 19:28, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! -- MartinD (talk) 18:57, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Ida Husted Harper photograph by Aime Dupont.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Dec 2018 at 10:15:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Aimé Dupont - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:34, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait, excellent restoration. --Yann (talk) 10:47, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:29, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 11:41, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ezarateesteban 20:18, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 00:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:50, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm pretty sure the lady wouldn't agree with her orange peel face. Is that from the restoration or is that on the original already so. No FP for me.--Ermell (talk) 09:30, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ermell: That's film grain, I believe. Every photo I've seen from about this time has that sort of thing to some extent. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:18, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 18:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support (assuming that the “orange peel” is film grain, as Adam explained ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 19:37, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - The Library of Congress digital ID you give goes to a "Handle System Error Report Form" for a broken link, so please correct it if you can. It's hard for me to tell what the original dimensions of the photo are. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: Oh, yeah, the division=mss thing. I'm so used to the tag just working. It's fixed now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Thanks. And now that I know the original size: Her face is crinkly at the original photo size, so I'll oppose in a losing cause. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:09, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Park Royal on Pickering at dusk from Hong Lim Park Singapore.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 01:47:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Singapore
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - We'll see what other people think, but this is just not an interesting enough scene for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much conflict between the regularity of the buildings and the chaos of the park (This may be why it's not interesting). Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The park is more interesting than the buildings. The buildings are per se boring to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Visible lack of enthusiasm... Thanks for the reviews -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vittoriano vittoria alata Roma.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 08:48:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Architectural elements
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 08:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a good angle. Basically looking up her skirt. Can't see face or the hand holding a snake. -- Colin (talk) 12:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin; really too far away to work. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Weird angle and ugly foreground breaking the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 10:04, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stift Wilhering Kirche Deckenfresko 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 09:10:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Assumption of Mary – Ceiling fresco in the nave of Wilhering Abbey Church (Upper Austria). Painted by Bartolomeo Altomonte (1741), all the rest by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Deserving, but I prefer the more IMO spectacular File:Stift Wilhering Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, so I hope that can also be nominated here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I plan also to nominate either the one you mention, or maybe some alternative I am still working on. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:55, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support There is room for improvement in terms of symmetry when comparing both sides, still great quality and a very nice motif Poc o² 11:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support- Anisha Maharjan (talk) 11:24, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:58, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support It's a little distorted and unsharp at the corners, but that's something that seems to be unavoidable when shooting vaulted ceilings. Daniel Case (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:28, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:57, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Dülmen, Merfeld, Dülmener Pferde im Merfelder Bruch -- 2018 -- 1618 (bw).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 18:16:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 18:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info It's black-and-white, yes. IMO black-and-white improves the details better than the colored version. And it is taken with a large focal length, because it is a wild horse. You can't touch them, a minimal distance is necessary. --XRay ^talk 18:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 18:16, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This DoF isn't working for me.--Peulle (talk) 20:19, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 04:40, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition doesn't work for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you for your reviews. --XRay ^talk 05:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:18, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Snowy road Sosonka 2017 G1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 20:05:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:05, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful, and I really feel nearly transported there (except that fortunately, I'm not that cold and the snow isn't falling on my head). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brr.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support This picture tells a story -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:38, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I'm not transported by this photo. The road is dirty brown from the traffic, the vehicle not well lit, and although it is snowing the camera settings have not captured this effectively -- instead the frame just has some fuzzy blobs. It isn't easy to photograph snowfall (or rainfall) in a still photo and make it feature nicely (e.g. File:White-tailed eagle LGphoto.jpg). We have plenty "roads in snow" images on Commons (Category:Snowy roads by country and Category:Vehicles in snow) and I don't see anything special about this one. -- Colin (talk) 08:52, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 14:10, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. -- B2Belgium (talk) 21:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --El Grafo (talk) 08:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:47, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support-----Armenius vambery (talk) 10:37, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. Sorry, I'm simply not wowed by this. Photographing falling snow isn't easy, only sometimes will it cooperate with the camera. --Cart (talk) 08:38, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Basotxerri (talk) 20:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Aristeas (talk) 15:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:51, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seine et Musée du Louvre Paris.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 20:51:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#France
Info all by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Paris in a way it has always been at this time of year, yet I had not seen and appreciated until now. Daniel Case (talk) 22:03, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Lovely, great work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:17, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seven Pandas (talk) 23:24, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose high quality for sure but I'm not that thrilled about the angle/perspective... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:16, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Leaning out, and maybe some minor stitching errors at the signs of Pont du Carrousel --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Done @Uoaei1: and @Ermell: Uploaded a corrected version. Thanks for the precious hints --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:03, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment You solved the problem quite well but there are two stitching errors visible. See annotation.--Ermell (talk) 13:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done Don't trust those stiching machines. Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 16:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately the verticals in the middle and left are not correct. In addition there are some stitching errors.--Ermell (talk) 08:19, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:13, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wrong stitching. The horizontal is broken here. And compression could be stronger without most (everyone?) not seeing the differnce. - Benh (talk) 19:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Question @Benh: could you please be more clear and more specific --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 01:22, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination No answers to my question and response to corrections --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ghostscript Tiger.svg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 18:19:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
Info created by Ghostscript authors - uploaded by Ysangkok - nominated by Habitator terrae -- Habitator terrae 🌍 18:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Habitator terrae 🌍 18:19, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment COM:SCOPE? Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Nice, but this is rather a user page image. Have a look to such promoted images (computer-generated) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is in scope, because it is a very important example picture of PostScript, see de:PostScript#Verbreitung --Habitator terrae 🌍 11:20, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ordinary clip art, nothing special -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This file, in EPS file format, was one of the most interesting examples packed with many (all?) Ghostscript distributions in the 1990s. It was really impressive to see the PS code rendered as a tiger picture ;–). On my old Quadra 840AV this took quite some seconds. Good old times! ;–) … Today, of course, there is nothing special anymore about this graphics. IMHO it is of historical interest only — really nice for an article about Ghostscript or PostScript or the history of computer graphics. I do not know: Do we “feature” such images of almost purely historical value? If yes, this is a good candidate. --Aristeas (talk) 19:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Historic photos can be featured, but if they aren't considered good enough for FP, they can be nominated at COM:VIC. Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Well, at the moment all of this is not apparent to the reader – the file description page would need to provide a bit more in-depth information. Feels kind of weird to use SVG for a historic Postscript example, btw. --El Grafo (talk) 09:07, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:45, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Common and easy to do --Photographer 19:30, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergtocht van Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië) 25.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Dec 2018 at 16:13:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tree stump.
Info Whimsically shaped partially decayed tree stump, covered with lichensin the Stelvio National Park (Italy).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I read in the notes that this stump is consumed by many different organisms that, I believe, designed interesting textures on the wood. I wonder if taking a close up of selected parts of the wood would create some interesting artistic design, for example like this one [1] As i can see you are often walking in the woods and finding interesting stumps or consumed trees should be easy. Have you ever thought going macro instead of catching general photos? I am sure it would give you big satisfactions, as your fantasy could find hundreds of interesting subjects. In this particular photo I would have chosen a very shallow depth of field, leaving the background completely out of focus and avoided that grass in the foreground. With a very shallow dof the wood would be standing in the composition, as the background is not so much interesting.Paolobon140 (talk) 09:39, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Paolobon's implication that this would be better as, perhaps, a tighter closeup on the stump surface. As it is there's just too much going on here to easily settle on one subject. Daniel Case (talk) 15:53, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:12, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose better, no FP-potential --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:11, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose - It's a matter of taste, but this composition doesn't speak to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with S. Déniel Poc o² 11:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative

Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:38, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- like too Seven Pandas (talk) 21:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Much more interesting composition, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:11, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Like too -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:51, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I'll have to disagree. This feels utterly crammed to me, I like the original much better. --El Grafo (talk) 14:58, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per El Grafo. Yann (talk) 19:07, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Still not perfect, but the texture is nice. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no FP-potential --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 15:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support But i find the other more interesting --Llez (talk) 21:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with S. Déniel Poc o² 11:18, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 08:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:10, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Others_2

The chosen alternative is: File:Bergtocht van Cogolo di Peio naar M.ga Levi in het Nationaal park Stelvio (Italië) 25 A.jpg

File:Inzell 2017 Kat A1 ZBYSZEK Kunert -9513.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 17:00:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created & uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Isiwal (talk) 17:59, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I love it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support What tongues ! -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Nikhil B (talk) 05:12, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:18, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:54, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great wow factor. :) --Peulle (talk) 14:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I might have cropped in more tightly, but that's a matter of personal taste. Fine as is if the photographer is fine with it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:30, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally again a sports photo! --Granada (talk) 06:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:01, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:56, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:27, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Egon Schiele - Eduard Kosmack - 4702 - Österreichische Galerie Belvedere.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Dec 2018 at 15:58:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info painting by Egon Schiele, photo by Johannes Stoll of the Belvedere, Wien, uploaded by BotMultichillT - nominated by Multichill -- Multichill (talk) 15:58, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Multichill (talk) 15:58, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good digitization ... I really like the way the brushwork comes through. Daniel Case (talk) 21:57, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:02, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 22:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I don't like the painting at all, but I agree with Daniel, and Schiele is famous, so whether I like the work or not, it's notable in the current era. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 13:42, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:12, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Viking Sky (ship, 2017) - Sète - December 2018.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 19:08:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:08, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps because the same ship from the same angle has been nominated here several times recently, I don't find this shot very different from the others -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:34, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:22, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 16:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, we have seen quite a few views of this vessel, but "at dawn with brilliant orange and red clouds behind it against a blue sky" has not so far been one of them." Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:55, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Msaynevirta (talk) 23:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 23:41, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

File:Lobby hall with couches and chandelier at The Fullerton Bay Hotel Singapore.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 07:48:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Singapore
Info created & uploaded by User:Basile Morin - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Quite an interesting interior to me. I could see the the window criticized as blown, but the way the photo was taken, seems very good to me overall, and I really like the reflected circle-like figures on the floor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe the noise could be reduced a little bit.--Ermell (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, Ikan, for the nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, and the noise reduction made the photo even better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:42, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:24, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow --Isiwal (talk) 16:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very immaculate lobby. It is a shame it wasn't taken from the absolute centre and so the photo isn't symmetrical. HDR might have kept some more detail in the window frame area (though they sky should still be blown in a JPG). -- Colin (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:04, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Finally a hotel lobby we can all like ... Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:30, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this stitched? There are reflections at the shiny floor which look like stitching errors. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:24, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To me it looks more like the floor sections/boards are a bit uneven, reflecting the light at slightly different angles. --Cart (talk) 10:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No stitching, I confirm. Wide angle used here. No editing of any kind either on this picture. So just a normal reflection on irregular tiles -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:39, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks for explanations. Very good image indeed! --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Brackenheim (talk)
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:53, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Singapore

File:Orléans, l'automne est là !.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2018 at 16:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Anthony Bourgouin - uploaded by Anthony Bourgouin - nominated by Pline -- Pline (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pline (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice composition and interesting colors, but way too overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks good at thumbnail size but quality issues when you look closer. -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very poor sharpness and detail. It's a cell phone snap shot. dllu (t,c) 23:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the technical quality falls far short of FP standards.--Peulle (talk) 23:53, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kagbeni Mustang-WLV-0756.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 22:14:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info created by Bijay chaurasia - uploaded by Bijay chaurasia - nominated by Bijay chaurasia -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 22:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 22:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadow, electric poles and wires. --Yann (talk) 06:12, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, shadow. Daniel Case (talk) 16:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Busy image and per Yann -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination - Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 08:00, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bruderwald Nebel 286411.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2018 at 21:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the pseudo-sepia toning. Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good mood --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 07:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Catches the mood of a late autumn day in the woods impressively. --Aristeas (talk) 08:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:08, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:04, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:17, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This one was much better -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 09:38, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 11:21, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:40, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excellent composition, but a big lens flare on the top left part.Paolobon140 (talk) 14:09, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:26, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Carrie Chapman Catt - National Woman's Party Records.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 06:21:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info credited to the Joint Suffrage Procession Committee - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:21, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Given that the original print was 4 x 5.5 inches, blowing it up to any larger than the default size on my screen when I open it is a mistake. It's a very good portrait at its original size. However, I'd suggest noting the original size in your file description. The information can be seen here (duly linked in the file description). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:58, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- - @Ikan Kekek: That won't be quite right, of course, as it's cropped a little bit (truncated oval to rectangle with a little added background. Doesn't really remove or add anything of note due to the chiaroscuro fadeout on her, but I really loathed that part of the original layout). Anyway, having done that, there was a lot of empty space at the bottom, and I believe the right, so the area shown will be significantly smaller. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC) Oh, wait, I have the pixel values. I can give the size of the area shown no problem. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:47, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added to description, with an explanation of the calculations in a note. 14:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Support --Yann (talk) 10:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:06, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Kuzhenkino TverObl asv2018-08 img08.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Dec 2018 at 12:28:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Russia
Info Kuzhenkino railway station near Bologoye, Tver Oblast: 1900s wooden architecture, Cultural Heritage ----- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 12:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:28, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:41, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the transformer on the left side could be cropped or cloned out, but otherwise a great pic. -- -donald- (talk) 07:15, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice railway station but the cropped power post just spoils it --Poc o² 11:16, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant oppose per Poco. I think this building could be the subject of a featured image, but not from this angle. Daniel Case (talk) 14:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Poco and Daniel. --Rbrechko (talk) 14:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:41, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nürnberg St. Lorenz Dreikönigsaltar Geburt 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2018 at 10:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media#Religion
Info Nativity of Jesus by Hans Pleydenwurff, around 1460. Painting at the Altar of the Magi (Dreikönigsaltar) in St. Lorenz church Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany. Photographed, uploaded and nominated by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 12:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:51, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 14:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 19:29, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - What a really odd baby! (Intentionally, of course.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 22:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:35, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:15, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 15:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media#Religion

File:CSIO4 Linzer Pferdefestival 2017-Thomas Velin-Chopin van het Moleneind-6116.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Dec 2018 at 18:48:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created & uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:48, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Superb capture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 22:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice watch :-) Though more space at the bottom would have been better. And the whites are a bit too gray in my view. Sharp and impressive action shot anyway -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Color and detail on horse and rider offset the distractions created by the background and bottom (TBH I think it could do with a bit more cropping). Daniel Case (talk) 05:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The bottom can't be cropped, because then, what would the horse be jumping over? I don't really see room for any crops, and the background is mostly pretty faded. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Does it really matter what the horse is jumping over? It looks great as is. It might have been better, if we want to include what the horse is jumping, to show more space below it as well so we can better appreciate the exertion required. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I still have some tens of show jumpers on stock: with more/less obstacle, with bottom, without bottom and obstacle. Maybe I will come up eventually with one of them. But the wider the crop the more distracting advertisments will appear. Sports at this level is big business. One of my personal favorites is File:CSIO4 Linzer Pferdefestival 2017-Davide Sbardella- Triomphe van Schuttershof-6055.jpg, but it has to be reworked before I could think about a nomination. --Isiwal (talk) 21:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:30, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks to all for support and comments --Isiwal (talk) 11:00, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It looks very dark and strange to me, as if the highlights have been all pushed away. I think the processing could be improved. --Cart (talk) 18:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have uploaded a new version with more brightness, specially in the whites , as rightly required by Basile Morin and Cart. Thanks for advise! --Isiwal (talk) 20:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A bit better. The first upload is still best IMO, because now there are halos around the bottom part of the horse and in some other places. --Cart (talk) 20:43, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not sure what happened with the different uploads, or if the feed to my computer is playing tricks with me, but it looks fine now. --Cart (talk) 09:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 21:32, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:57, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment btw the horse is a Belgian Warmbood [2], but I´m sure you know that --Isiwal (talk) 21:16, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:20, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Fondation Pescatore in Luxembourg City 02.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 16:15:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:15, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think this cylindrical projection is something we usually like in FPs. Daniel Case (talk) 22:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It's per se a really good photo, IMO. I support, conditional on the nature of the distortion being clearly indicated in the file description, as the general note about stitching in Lightroom doesn't indicate that the building doesn't actually have the shape shown in the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I removed my support because my condition was not met. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:45, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Daniel, sorry --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cylindrical projection is fine for some photos but definitely not for architecture shots like this. dllu (t,c) 23:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cylindrical projection and asymmetrical crop -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Tournasol7 (talk) 13:56, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Québec city 2018 05.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 23:21:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Canada
Info All by -- Photographer 23:21, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I like the atmosphere, but the disembodied boots are weird, and could you possibly get this scene with light that isn't gray, or at least less gray? Is Quebec gray for the entire month of December? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:15, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; seems to be trying to take in too much. Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice spot but I won't support cut-off legs and the person on the right on a FP, sorry. --Basotxerri (talk) 19:58, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I just don't see what is so special about this shot.--Peulle (talk) 08:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite ordinary scene and I don't really like the composition with the walls left and right -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comments and reviews. --Photographer 18:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:40. Schwimmzonen- und Mastersmeeting Enns 2017 100m Brust Damen-9834.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 18:09:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Isiwal -- Isiwal (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 18:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 23:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shot at the right time -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:10, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:28, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 07:12, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good aim.--Peulle (talk) 07:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:33, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice expresion --Photographer 23:14, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:59, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 23:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:25, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Branches of a Ficus kurzii reflecting in the water at Singapore Botanic Gardens.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 01:40:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very nice. Reminds me of Impressionist paintings, among others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:36, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support absolutely impressive! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:31, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:45, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some purple CAs at the leaves, e.g. in the upper left corner – should be easily fixable. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:52, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

CAs have been fixed in Lr already. Maybe remain some local imperfections yes, but really minor IMO. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:46, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support It is a wonderful, effective and fascinating photo: I love every single part of it, nothing more to say.Paolobon140 (talk) 08:03, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, fine balance between shadows under the tree and the sunshine of the outer areas. --Isiwal (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:59, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 10:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The vines for me are what makes this. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 06:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 15:08, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. Charles (talk) 23:33, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 23:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:33, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:24, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Leichtathletik Gala Linz 2018 men´s 110m hurdles Okafor-6401.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 10:51:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info Leon Okafor, decathlete, Linz June 2018, created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Isiwal -- Isiwal (talk) 10:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Isiwal (talk) 10:51, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very good capture but possible processing problems; look at the red/yellow on the shoes - compression artefacts? Also the skin on the face and arms - too much noise reduction? Definitely a VI, btw. --Peulle (talk) 11:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I scaled up the original crop 3500x2333 to 4200x2800 - maybe therefore you can see more than necessary --Isiwal (talk) 12:17, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The rules say: you shall not upscale an image to make it appear less detailed. --Granada (talk) 13:29, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The rules are talking about downsizing to let appear better quality - I could not find anything about upscaling, it is not favourable anyway. I´m going to upload the original crop size immediately --Isiwal (talk) 14:06, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As in QI, the guidelines say "Do not save edited JPEGs with a significantly higher quality than the original - doing so increases an image's file size but not its quality". (section JPEG compression) Please always upload the original resolution of your images -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for advise - in German we say " mit der Nase draufstoßen" - but don´t know the right phrase in English --Isiwal (talk) 14:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think that would be something like "having to spell it out for you". --Cart (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent sport picture. And I don't see major problem in the shoes -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:37, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:19, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 17:41, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent form by the hurdler (would you expect anything less at this level, though?) and great detail. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:34, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 12:38, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 23:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 09:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Leones (Panthera leo) deborando un búfalo africano negro (Syncerus caffer caffer), parque nacional de Chobe, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 94-96 PAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 11:02:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Pack of lions (Panthera leo) devoring an African buffalo (Syncerus caffer caffer), Chobe National Park, Botswana. Poc o² 11:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 11:02, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment see note --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:00, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Martin, thanks, that was bad cloning, fixed now --Poc o² 19:31, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:56, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I love the satisfied look of the lion resting on the right with his harem of - is it 8 lionesses? By the way, is that what a pride is? One lion and multiple lionesses? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Pretty much. If a new lion takes over, he not only kills the other lions, but the lions those lions fathered. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not so. He might kill very young cubs. Charles (talk) 15:05, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Seems to be some slight motion blur, but that's the lions' fault, not the photographer's. Daniel Case (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Local editing errors on the top right corner -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Basile gone --Poc o² 11:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting too harsh. Charles (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Charles, at 8:15 a.m. We must have tons of images like this with this resolution and this moment, please, nom you then one that deserves FP --Poc o² 19:27, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 21:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:50, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 20:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Sun and moon with a cloud bank.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 13:38:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
Info Getting the sun and a good visible moon in the same image isn't that easy up here in the north, unless you have an eclipse or a very wide panorama. However, if you are lucky to get a waxing moon close to the winter solstice, they are only about 90° apart. On this day a cloud bank came in from the south, forming a nice "night and day" transition arc between the moon and the setting sun. The image is not distorted, it really looked like this with the curved cloud. The contrails and the magpie in the spruce were bonuses. -- Cart (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 13:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Between day and night very little happens here. The branches are rather disturbing and the processing errors should be repaired.--Ermell (talk) 17:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge errors fixed. Thanks for letting me know. I agree, this is a very "clean" version of this scene since with more going on, the moon might almost get lost. Let's hear what the others think. --Cart (talk) 17:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose All those branches in the foreground bother me.--Peulle (talk) 21:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Ok, let's try the other one instead, no use prolonging it. I didn't think the braches would be such an issue. Thanks anyway. :-) --Cart (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cherry Resort inside Temi Tea Garden, Namchi, Sikkim.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 16:26:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Cherry Resort inside Temi Tea Garden, Namchi, Sikkim
All by -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 16:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 16:26, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice view but the colors seem oversaturated, and the fields are not very sharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:53, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Saturation dialled down. Image taken at f/8 at 1/200 sec, so sharpest setting of the lens with very low chance of body movement during the shot. However kit lens may have a limitation on absolute sharpness achievable at the sides/corners. However did some local sharpening adjustments. Hope it addresses the sharpness in the field issue - Subhrajyoti07 talk 02:42, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Improved. But f/8 "the sharpest" setting works at the focus area only. At f/11 or f/13 obviously you get more depth, thus more details over the surface of such landscape -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Agreed Subhrajyoti07 talk 13:46, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nonetheless; sharpness on left side really needs work. Ambitious, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition. Sharpness is not *that* bad IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:45, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per King. Since this photo is not meant mainly to show the precise features of tea plants, we can judge it a bit more like a landscape painting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 13:59, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent picture! MartinD (talk) 18:54, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk)
Support --Tozina (talk) 17:45, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:28, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:01, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg (d.j.b.) 12.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Dec 2018 at 16:43:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings. Pipe organ.
Info Reformierte Kirche Waltensburg. The church of Waltensburg was built in the 11th century as a chapel on the site of a pre-Romanesque hall building with an existing tower. Pipes from it pipe organ with beautiful frescoes in the background.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The cut plant suggests a part of the organ is also missing at the bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: The photo is taken from the keyboard upwards. The organ pipes are the main motif.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 19:10, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing extra. Normal good photo. -- Karelj (talk) 10:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:00, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Karelj --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:36, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Cart (talk) 22:02, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Coast at Chinamada - Tenerife 04.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 08:55:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I might wish for a little more sky above the land on the right, but I love the rocks, with all their shapes and colors. I advise you all not to pixel-peep at full size. The photo looks great at 3x my 13-inch laptop monitor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:11, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well captured. I know the place. --Cayambe (talk) 18:23, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Since the sun was clearly obscured , or more likely occulted, by clouds, the softness isn't really a problem because of reduced contrast. In fact, combined with the high saturation it gives the whole image a slightly dreamlike quality ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing extra. Normal good photo. -- Karelj (talk) 10:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special -- S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:41, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sure that was a breathtaking view IRL, but it doesn't really come across like that in the photograph. --El Grafo (talk)
Oppose I'm afraid I agree with El Grafo -- MartinD (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Brackenheim (talk)
Support Nice distribution of main topics.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 07:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo. --Basotxerri (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 18:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:06, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:29, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Spain

File:Ewer with Elephant-Headed Spout.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2018 at 10:55:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info This bronze ewer with an elephant head pouring spout originated in Vietnam from the late 2nd to 3rd centuries during the Han dynasty and is part of the Asian art collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York and created by the museum - uploaded by Cquoi - nominated by Cquoi -- Cquoi (talk) 10:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cquoi (talk) 10:55, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good image, very interesting. --Peulle (talk) 13:26, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support What you would expect from a major museum's cataloging efforts. Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. -- B2Belgium (talk) 19:54, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 21:15, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm surprised they didn't use a bit more light for the photo, but that's purely a matter of taste. Very good, of course. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:58, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:44, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 02:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please add more information to the image description like period (period of Chinese Han occupation), date (late 2nd–3rd century) and others information from the references web sites. Thanks --Photographer 17:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 19:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Obernberg am Inn Adlerwarte Rotmilan-0136.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Dec 2018 at 19:35:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes
Info created - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:35, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:35, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:24, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is great, the colors wonderful, unfortunately a main element bothering me at first sight is the chain-link fence in the background, immediately identifiable despite the blur. The bird seems enclosed, even if it's just an impression, it's enough to break the feeling of freedom a flying animal naturally evokes. But much more distracting than this is the low depth of field. F/2,8 at 200 mm is far too low. Only the eyes are in focus, the beak is completely blurry. (Beside, the left part would gain being cut to be more balanced) -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:51, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Fence makes nice pattern Seven Pandas (talk) 13:32, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 14:02, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:21, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support ...and off course I love my babies even when they are considered not to be handsome :-) --Isiwal (talk) 16:27, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although I think it could be cropped in more on the left, squaring it up. Daniel Case (talk) 16:38, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:11, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basile is misunderstanding: This is the Red Kite of Emancipation standing guard at the fence. It was developed by Great Britain, Spain, France, and Italy (and sold to Germany and Poland) [1] in order to replace the outdated Bald Eagles of Freedom they imported from the US 40 Years ago. It was a prestige project that took longer than expected, but now the first couple has been deployed for active duty. SCNR :-P

But seriously, somehow I like the pattern in the background. And although I'd like a little bit more DOF, the beak is not an issue for me. Also, please don't cut it, every close crop I tried ended up being too crammed.--El Grafo (talk) 08:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:35, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile --S. DÉNIEL (talk) 11:45, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose background Charles (talk) 15:03, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I love the facial expression, and I'm OK with the chain link fence in the background (why not? there are wild things near fences), but I'm really not OK with the blurry beak being the frontmost thing I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:04, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo. --Aristeas (talk) 15:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. —Granada (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Graphic. --Cart (talk) 23:45, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:27, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Well done, however, IMHO need more DoF --Photographer 17:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes

File:Millicent Fawcett.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 19:25:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Bain News Service/Elliott & Fry - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:25, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 21:48, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:13, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent restoration work, please be carefull with excesive contrast filter resulting on lossing detail information (see note added). --Photographer 17:30, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Photographer, Seven Pandas, Daniel Case, Yann, Martin Falbisoner, Aristeas, and George Chernilevsky: Thanks for pointing that out, Photographer: I've made a tweak to make sure the detail there is a bit clearer. It WAS there, but the lower ranges of black don't seperate as well... Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IMHO very well executed restoration work. Could be interesting access to the original negative/picture and try it again, however, its another subject. Thanks for do it --Photographer 22:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tozina (talk) 19:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 01:59, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 06:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Roof of auditorium in Beacon Park, British Columbia, Canada 04.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 07:41:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Canada
Info created & uploaded by User:Podzemnik - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Not perfect, as the upper left corner is somewhat unsharp, but definitely an interesting photo for me, and I think a good one that's worth your consideration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:53, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting texture and abstraction. Could probably be cropped in a bit on the left to eliminate the unsharp part, but that's not a dealbreaker for me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 20:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Royal Navy Submarine HMS Astute Returns to HMNB Clyde MOD 45153733.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2018 at 10:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info created by LA(Phot) Paul Halliwell - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Msaynevirta -- Msaynevirta (talk) 10:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Msaynevirta (talk) 10:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm just not convinced by the detail or colours (they seem a bit dark). It's on the lower end of resolution for FPs, and way below the resolution of most modern cameras. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:33, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Adam and because it's been overprocessed (haloes along high-contrast edges due to oversharpening). --El Grafo (talk) 10:48, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I personally feel that this kind of "colourless" scene fits the subject much better, as it makes it look a little ominous. The technical quality is imo adequate, the resolution is over double of the required 2 MP. --Msaynevirta (talk) 10:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This is FPC, not QIC. We're looking for a lot more than "adequate" here. I'm not voting yet, but I'll say that I agree on "colorlessness" but the photo is very small for FPC in 2018 and the technical quality is not overwhelming. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:15, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Not bad but not very good either.--Peulle (talk) 10:55, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Contra per Adam Cuerden and El Grafo. --Granada (talk) 11:47, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a really striking composition, really. Daniel Case (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gautama Buddha (India).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2018 at 14:43:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Fitindia - uploaded by Fitindia - nominated by Fitindia -- FitIndia ^Talk 14:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- FitIndia ^Talk 14:43, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The asymmetric composition does not wow me. It also does not offer a lot of detail due to strong denoising and shows some halos around sharp edges due to strong sharpening. I won't blame the Samsung Galaxy for not being able to take great pictures, but this time it failed. --Granada (talk) 14:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Granada. Daniel Case (talk) 20:13, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wandelen over de Planken Wambuis vanuit Mossel 059.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2018 at 16:19:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena #Fog
Info Walking the Planken Wambuis from Mossel. Morning mist hangs over the Planken Wambuis.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grows on you when you look at it in full-res. Daniel Case (talk) 20:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice capture and morning mood -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 02:38, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice autumnal atmosphere --Isiwal (talk) 22:32, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:15, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel --Cart (talk) 08:53, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 18:09, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it.--Claus 08:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Do not walk! --Tozina (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Fog

File:Giechburg Abendlicht P1103921efs.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Dec 2018 at 23:05:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 23:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 23:05, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Not magical for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:52, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:05, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Nice tonal perspective, but it is not enough for FP. No Wow for me. --Rbrechko (talk) 12:25, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite an ordinary sunset photo. Sorry. --Msaynevirta (talk) 12:02, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Claus 08:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 05:08, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pelecanus onocrotalus cleaning its feathers at sunset.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Dec 2018 at 02:03:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family_:_Pelecanidae_(Pelicans)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:41, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support and good job leaving the background in the dark.--Peulle (talk) 07:34, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine --Isiwal (talk) 08:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice composition. Charles (talk) 10:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:21, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 20:01, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 22:03, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:03, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent contrast, composition, well done --Photographer 17:20, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Definitely a FP. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:08, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 17:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 19:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 02:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:40, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family_:_Pelecanidae_(Pelicans)

File:Sunset port Durrës Albania 2018 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2018 at 22:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment tilted? Charles (talk) 12:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp, oversaturated, tilted -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. --Granada (talk) 09:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile, sorry! --Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of the above opposes

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Many thanks to all supporter... --Karelj (talk) 19:51, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:CSIO4 Linzer Pferdefestival 2017-Natalia Belova-Cosimo 48-6208.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2018 at 09:05:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Isiwal
I have removed a distracting yellow spot at the right side - maybe this is an issue?-- Isiwal (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Isiwal (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too busy. Sharp animal but the horizontal framing is not adapted. The background is overloaded with distracting elements. A portrait format would have displayed more of the subject. The bottom is cut. What is this horse jumping over ? The back legs are hidden and the crop is very tight. Nice action shot but not exceptional enough for FP IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. -- Karelj (talk) 09:53, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The angle doesn't work for me; the rider is barely visible.--Peulle (talk) 12:36, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw this nomination --Isiwal (talk) 12:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2018 Speedo meeting Wels Aicher Emilia-2009.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2018 at 12:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Granada -- Granada (talk) 12:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the awkwardness of the view of her being totally shrouded by water while already having popped up from the waterline. -- Granada (talk) 12:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This one doesn't work for me; too much of the person is obscured.--Peulle (talk) 13:21, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Might work as a tighter crop on the swimmer, since I like the way the refraction makes her look like a platypus or something, but the red reflection is distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hidden subject, and the big dark shadow (of a pillar ?) reflecting in the water is very distracting. But I will support this swimmer by the same author -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:27, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for nomination, reviews and comments. The mentioned image is in my queue already --Isiwal (talk) 12:30, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The dark in not a shadow but the center line on the bottom of the swimming lane. The red reflection comes from a canopy above the starting blocks which provides shadow for the time keepers and other officials, visible because of the low angle to the surface of the water. The low position of camera imo was necessary to isolate the head from the background. --Isiwal (talk) 17:34, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I find the whole too busy. Maybe the same swimmer without red water nor center line shadow could have worked well for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:30, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Perfect frozen moment with a surrealistic touch.--Ermell (talk) 16:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ermell, Daniel (though I think she looks more like an otter in this picture). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw this nomination, thanks for comments and supports --Isiwal (talk) 12:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:20180924 UCI Road World Championships Innsbruck Women Juniors ITT Tetyana Yaschenko (UKR) DSC 7564.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2018 at 10:50:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created by Granada - uploaded by Granada - nominated by Granada -- Granada (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tetyana Yaschenko at the UCI Road World Championships 2018 in Innsbruck during the women juniors individual time trials. Isiwal encouraged me to nominate either this or another one of one of the Ukrainian riders I photographed in Innsbruck. I went for this as the other one is not 100% perfectly sharp. -- Granada (talk) 10:50, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great portrait! I'd suggest cropping it just a little on the right to eliminate the part of a dark green tree, but I won't let that affect my vote as it's a minor point. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:54, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with the suggested crop. --Yann (talk) 11:27, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent of course --Isiwal (talk) 15:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 15:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 17:10, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Photographer 17:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the smile that you don't see at first. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Msaynevirta (talk) 22:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support A square framing would also be fine for me -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 05:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 19:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:39, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Famberhorst (talk) 17:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:41, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 12:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 13:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Castle of Cenevieres 07.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 16:11:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Info During QIC Ikan Kekek founded that this image has potential for FP, so I nominate it. --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 16:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I can see why Ikan saw that potential, but I'd like to see it with the highlights/exposure dialed down a bit. Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+1 -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I think I said I liked it but that I would expect people here to object to the "harsh light and shadows". I support, because at 300% of my laptop screen, only the clump of flowers in the foreground really makes me think twice about the strength of the light, but I think that as a strategy for passing FPC, you would do well to take Daniel's advice. If you lower the highlights too much, though, you won't present a realistic picture of what you saw. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:47, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cropped flowerbed, branches on the left side and in the right bottom corner are not good for FP. Sorry... --Rbrechko (talk) 12:20, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Rbrechko. --Basotxerri (talk) 22:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Suboptimal lighting conditions, casting a faint shadow over the building. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elefantes africanos de sabana (Loxodonta africana), Elephant Sands, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 114-117 PAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Dec 2018 at 19:04:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info African bush elephants (Loxodonta africana) visiting the water hole in Elephant Sands, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 19:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 19:04, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 20:26, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captivating. --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:27, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent.--Peulle (talk) 21:46, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful --Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 22:20, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support My god, well done Poco. Please fix the vertical distortion on the two right houses (the wood columns are inclinated) --Photographer 23:13, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The Photographer: Done Poc o² 10:59, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good --Photographer 16:37, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Harsh light and distracting background. Haha, just kidding, but the fact that people routinely make such objections certainly occurred to me. The scene is as it is and the elephants, watering hole and funny background are all photographed most impressively. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now if you only had a couple of humans standing around drinking beers or whatever on the edge of the water ... that would make it a real watering hole. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:11, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe you could crop out the last hut on the right to improve symmetry --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:36, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Uoaei1: Done Poc o² 10:59, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 12:35, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not my scene, but perfect for advertising the camp. And you've got a blacksmith lapwing in the water. Charles (talk) 23:31, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately the elephant, which is the main subject, gets mixed up with the background Paolobon140 (talk) 09:36, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 17:35, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:23, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 22:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fine! --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:11, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Paolobon140. -- Karelj (talk) 22:52, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Espoo Cultural Centre (December 2018).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2018 at 12:16:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Finland
Info Blue / purple facade lighting of the Espoo Cultural Centre in December 2018. A photograph by me. -- Msaynevirta (talk) 12:16, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Msaynevirta (talk) 12:16, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Saw this at QIC and figured we'd see it here eventually. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 02:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 18:22, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:08, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 09:23, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:08, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture#Finland

File:Nadar - (Gioacchino Rossini) - Google Art Project.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 08:46:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Nadar / Google Art Project, uploaded by Smalljim, nominated by Yann (talk) 08:46, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality reproduction of a historical portrait. -- Yann (talk) 08:46, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ - It's a good and obviously historically important photo. I guess that's as sharp as they could (or wanted to?) get in those days? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, Ikan Kekek, wet plate collodion images appear super sharp (!) in reality. But they are not made for digital close-ups. Take my own portrait as an example (though this is technically an ambrotype and not an ~~albumem copy of a glass plate negative~~ as is Nadar's image here) ;-)
  - Ok, Nadar's image is a Calotypie as I've just noticed... doesn't really matter though --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see. So the original photo was sharp but small. I have to wonder whether we're doing any service to these historical photos by enlarging them so much. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:31, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Having a large size reproduction allows us to do a good restoration, when needed, but the result should only be seen in a small size. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:05, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a decent restoration (though I wish the colour had been left alone, and would have probably removed a few more dust specks), but we have another image of Rossini, File:Composer Rossini G 1865 by Carjat - Restoration.jpg which is already featured, and the original file here just is nowhere near as good as the source on that one. I mean, maybe? I don't know. It's good for what it is, I'm just not sure what it is is featureable. Adam Cuerden (talk) 06:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - That photo is so much better, or at least in such better condition that I've struck my supporting vote for this one. The comparison is really stark. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:29, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree with Adam. Some more spots could have been removed. The comparison with the already featured photograph is not in favor of thie candidate. Please have a look to the original [3]...--Jebulon (talk) 17:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jebulon, Ikan Kekek, and Yann: [4] And this is why checking multiple archives is a good idea. Unfortunately, the existence of this Metropolitan Museum of Art copy - well, variant, but also Nadar - kind of kills this nomination. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination as per above comments. --Yann (talk) 05:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Notgeld fritz quant 10 millionen mark.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2018 at 18:00:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Palauenc05 -- Palauenc05 (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 18:00, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks pristine.--Peulle (talk) 21:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:39, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:39, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 19:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Schaffhausen - Schwabentor - Ram.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2018 at 09:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That ram has big balls! But in all seriousness, excellent sharpness and an interesting picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:56, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - agree Ikan Seven Pandas (talk) 15:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 18:08, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice framing! Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golden testicles :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good all round. Charles (talk) 11:09, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:03, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:42, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Stift Wilhering Kirche Innenraum 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2018 at 11:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created & uploaded by Uoaei1 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rococo as rococo can --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:42, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 15:36, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can hardly tell where the photograph ends and the painting begins ... Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yes, definitely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FP 4 me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 18:06, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:19, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perhaps cutting one fifth on top would make the aspect less distorted in its whole, but that's not a major inconvenient. Rich in ornamentation -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for nomination --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:42, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Aristeas (talk) 10:21, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 13:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Two Arecaceae in the fields viewed through a hole in a tree stump in Laos at sunrise.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 03:31:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:31, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'll probably support, but I find all 4 alternate versions more interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the feedback. I hesitated with this close-up at sunset. That was my first photo in the evening before I come back early morning the next day before sunrise to take the 4 other ones, including this shot. If more opinions join your feeling, I may nominate the alternative instead, and maybe come back again to the spot for another full view with a more special sky (without guarantee). But here I like the stump well isolated and the deserted horizon, except the 2 palm trees inside. I will be grateful for more opinions. Kind regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:20, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Best version IMO.--Ermell (talk) 08:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me, both concept and execution. Charles (talk) 11:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cool. --Cart (talk) 12:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lovely composition - Subhrajyoti07 talk 13:25, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 16:17, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:26, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- What an idea! Cool! Tozina (talk) 19:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Now I know it works, I'm going to dig holes like this in every trunk on my way -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I suppose the "wow" would wear off rather quickly --El Grafo (talk) 09:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Taking pictures through holes (normally rocks) is an old idea, but why it's so brilliant here is that it looks like a magnifying glass. And the elongated portrait style with good lighting works really well. POTY potential. Charles (talk) 10:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, definitely. --El Grafo (talk) 14:34, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good idea. --Milseburg (talk) 22:14, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine, but really not easy to decide between this one and the one at sunset. --Isiwal (talk) 23:33, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice idea. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:13, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The hole thing is great ... Daniel Case (talk) 06:52, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 17:30, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:20, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:44, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per se interesting enough to feature, though I haven't changed my mind about the 4 other photos. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The view through the tree hole is truly striking. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Top of the tree unsharp, but wow effect.--Jebulon (talk) 10:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Top sharpened a bit. Due to the very wide angle, I was much closer to the base of the tree than to the top. But I think this part looks better now. Thanks, Jebulon -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:14, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 30 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Coat of arms of the British Antarctic Territory.svg (delist), delisted

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Dec 2018 at 16:56:37

Info Does not meet the quality standards of a featured picture. (Original nomination)
Delist -- Pbroks13 (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Could you be more specific as to why it does not meet those standards? Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I should clarify. It fails all four categories for non-photographic media. It is not notable in its own right, and it is not of high artistic, historical, or illustrative merit. In regards to the quality of the illustration, the most glaring issue is the lion. The line-work is shoddy, and gives no depth; contrast that to the depth of the penguin. The grass is also very poorly done. Compare this coat of arms FP to others in the same category, and it is very apparent that this one is leagues below the others. I believe this was promoted at a time when standards for FP were lower (2007), and does not meet the standard that FP should be held to today. Pbroks13 (talk) 20:03, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Pbroks13. --Peulle (talk) 21:00, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delist now that we can see why. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nomination Seven Pandas (talk) 02:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per Pbroks13--Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 19:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom --Cart (talk) 10:07, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. --A.Savin 19:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:1375 Atlas Catalan Abraham Cresques.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 08:57:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps
Info created by Abraham Cresques / BNF, uploaded by Crisco 1492, nominated by Yann (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Atlas from the 14th century. High resolution and quality. -- Yann (talk) 08:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support But good luck for the translation of the description in other languages :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 13:52, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support the promotion of the image itself, but I think that the long description coming from Gallica is complex enough to be protected both by french and USA copyright laws. And Gallica is not freely licensed. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 21:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great document in excellent condition, but if the description is copyrighted and can't be used, it needs to be replaced with a fair-use summary. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support but with Christian's advice heeded. Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I removed the description, pending more opinions. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:31, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Maps

File:Church of the Holy Sepulchre of Villeneuve 08.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 08:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:35, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:27, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:01, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Resolution a bit low for the church interior genre but otherwise good. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered support Crop's a bit on the tight side, but otherwise very nice detail. Daniel Case (talk) 06:54, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question What are the artifacts on the keyboard? --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It seems that the keyboard is hidden behind the glass and reflections are visible. But I'm not sure... Tournasol7 (talk) 16:14, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Msaynevirta (talk) 12:44, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:45, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 12:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:15, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#France

File:Nile monitor lizard (Varanus niloticus) head.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 14:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 14:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 14:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Good enough to my eyes. This type of monitor lizard is a lot better-looking than the ones I saw in rural Malaysia, but I'd be likely to cast just as wary an eye toward this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crispy sharp close-up photograph -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 10:10, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some very faint dust spots above the neck at the upper left. Support now. Daniel Case (talk) 02:33, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please remove the dustspots mentioned by Daniel Case --Cayambe (talk) 10:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done Charles (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 11:49, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:21, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Vents du Sud - Le Grau-du-Roi 03.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 18:10:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:10, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is it aground? Charles (talk) 18:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it seems to be aground... however there is no tide in my region, and I wonder how he got here...see also 1 and 2. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:44, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is likely that the level of this body of water exceptionally increased during some bad weather and rainfall, giving the opportunity to this boat to be transported here. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 05:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tozina (talk) 19:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful light, peaceful atmosphere, and it gets even better at full size, with the exception of a bit of blur really close in. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:25, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:50, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 06:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Msaynevirta (talk) 12:42, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 13:43, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 16:32, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 17:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:34, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:38, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:10, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:50, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poc o² 12:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport

File:Parc linéaire de la rivière Saint-Charles, Quebec ville.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2018 at 02:45:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info All by -- Photographer 02:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The camera's level, but the way the trees have grown leaning to the left is not restful to the eye. Charles (talk) 10:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles, just not quite "on". Daniel Case (talk) 07:04, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blaubeuren Blautopf 20180804 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2018 at 08:22:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info The Blautopf pond in Blaubeuren (Baden-Württemberg, Germany) is famous for its intensive blue color. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 08:22, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful. The Wikipedia article about this pond is fascinating, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:28, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:46, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice colors and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 08:58, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cart (talk) 09:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 17:27, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:37, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:52, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Has some minor imperfections, like the sun on the leaves, but who cares when the cool colors are so relaxing to take in? This defines "languid" in one scene. Daniel Case (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Granada (talk) 11:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 12:59, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Julitta und Quiricus, Andiast (d.j.b.) 20.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2018 at 16:23:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects. Crucifix.
Info A nicely decorated crucifix on the cemetery of Andiast. With in the background the Alps of Graubünden (Switzerland).
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - One of the most beautiful pictures of a crucifix I've ever seen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:57, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:36, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:12, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 11:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I'd remove the three dust spots (birds?) right of the hip of Jesus --Llez (talk) 11:54, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done. spots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:45, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Makes sense to have a washed-out background with this in the foreground. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:00, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 12:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
useless support Very good, very good light and very good background.--Jebulon (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Scrapped manholes and covers in Brastad.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Dec 2018 at 23:38:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info We have hundreds of photos of manholes but very, very few of the hole and cover out of the street, so I'm taking a shot with this. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much in the shadow. The light drains attention toward the uninteresting grass. This composition could have worked maybe with a better lighted subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:48, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support because this is the only way you can have a lot of artifacts in the picture and still have a credible nomination. Although I do think Basile has a point that a slightly higher angle of the sun would give you even better texture. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It's a very interesting assemblage of objects, it's interesting to move my eyes around them, and sometimes, you just have to take the opportunity to get a shot that won't present itself in any other kind of light. This is a photograph of found objects, opportunistically shot in situ. Anyway, I disagree that the light on the grass spoils anything. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:05, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
weak Hmmm, doesn't really work for me, sorry. On the one side, there's the lighting (per Basile Morin). On the other, I'd generally prefer a way more radical approach, i.e. an image concentrating on selected, abstract details (cf. note, but please don't crop). Any chance you can retake the pic? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, Ikan is right that this was an opportunistic photo. This was during the road works here and the pile was there one day and gone the next. I like having the whole pile in the shot with all the shapes it presents. The low raking light helps enhance the outlines of the covers, I'm not that sure a higher angle of the sun would have made the pile this interesting. I also like the contrast between the fresh sunlit spring grass and the old tired darker rusty object. --Cart (talk) 08:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- As per Ikan and Daniel. And I belive having too much in the shadow also works well sometime.Thanks Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 20:13, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Martin.--Ermell (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very common panorama and nothing special IMHO, sorry --Photographer 17:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Karelj (talk) 10:00, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sectioned portion of a branch grown around a chain-link fence.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 02:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Others
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Fun, but not interesting enough to be an FP, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it! And the square format is a good choice here. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first I thought this was one of Cart's. Depth of field isn't great but it doesn't need to be here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The low DoF was voluntarily chosen so as to create a bokeh that isolates the subject. I have the same picture with higher DoF but prefer this one. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly, I think the narrow DoF is essential here. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose as per Ikan. --Yann (talk) 08:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 10:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 13:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Болотные Кипарисы.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2018 at 12:05:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Russia
Info Swamp cypress (Taxodium distichum) near Sukko, Krasnodar Krai, Russia. Сreated by HoroshilovAleksandr - uploaded by HoroshilovAleksandr - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 12:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 12:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Gorgeous -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Great colours, great composition, perfect usage of the light tele (70mm) to compress the view of the trees. --Granada (talk) 13:12, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome --Isiwal (talk) 13:46, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Yesyesyes! Per everything above; and all of that without the 500px-style overprocessing we see so often from WLM uploads. More of this, please! --El Grafo (talk) 14:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice autumn colors, composition and light - Benh (talk) 18:22, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per everyone. I love the red color and light on the leaves. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Granada. --Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--KSK (talk) 10:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Very Game of Thrones-evocative ... and not so much because of the orange leaves suggesting weirwood trees, but their odd tapered trunks. Daniel Case (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic! --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:37, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Effective use of simplification to enhance the impact of the scene. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 20:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-Basile Morin (talk) 13:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Russia

File:River bank of Don Khon with stilt wooden houses and leaning Arecaceae at golden hour from Don Det Laos.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2018 at 02:06:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Basically very nice, but could you give us more of the palm tree? It should be rooted somewhere but it seems to hover. --Isiwal (talk) 20:12, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There was foliage at the base, and I really did my best to get the best angle, considering the relief and features of the landscape, with this light. The picture is 6403 px large, and the small part I cut was on the right side, not on the left. But if it seems to hover, this tree has definitely a very special shape, having grown almost horizontally. See how the top is curved. Thanks for your comment -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Imo the palm tree is the dominating and formative element of the picture and should not hover. Without the tree it would be a trivial exposure of a river bank with huts. I am not really convinced to support, but also can´t decide to oppose. Therefore a weak pro for the fine overall impression. --Isiwal (talk) 09:25, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Between support and oppose you can also vote {{Neutral}}, but of course here a weak support is a better choice objectively . Thanks for your vote, Isiwal, by the way instead of the template {{Weak support}}, that is not recognized here by the bot, for your information only {{s}} and {{o}} are valid for the score, thus you have to write something like {{s|Weak support}} so that your vote is taken into account. I've fixed it for you. Thanks for your review -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correction. I know about the vote neutral - imo it is a bit too fainthearted and at last there has to be a yes or no. --Isiwal (talk) 10:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I like the way the palm looks like it's photobombing the town. Daniel Case (talk) 20:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support This makes me wanting to visit that place. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is really worth it ! Especially at this season. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Photographer 00:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:54, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice!--Famberhorst (talk) 16:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kind of shocking. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:47, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:42, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#Laos

File:Black worn leather jacket detail 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2018 at 10:02:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Clothing
Info created and uploaded by cart - nominated by Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another fine example of cart's keen eye for details, lines, and shapes --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just be aware that the whole jacket is probably copied in. --Cart (talk) 10:23, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Excellent composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:26, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cart, I really enjoy your work. Sometimes I don't agree, sometimes I don't get it, but I always enjoy it. --Podzemnik (talk) 14:37, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:41, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support My taste !--Jebulon (talk) 17:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:15, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:01, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple and successful -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Here the chaos and randomness helps, accentuating that this is a black leather jacket with a lot of stories to tell, as long as we're buying . (Cart: is it yours? I think I remember seeing a portion of this jacket in one of your other photos, of your car's shifter or something?) Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, it's my favorite jacket and it's behind many of my photos here. I love it, so I had to come up with something else than setting it on fire to make it interesting. We have very few really good photos of clothes here, so guys, surely some of you must have something worth shooting? A sleek pinstripe, the pleats of a tartan, hats, that ghastly sweater your mother knitted you for Christmas, even a scruffy-looking camera bag would be welcome. I challenge you! --Cart (talk) 11:17, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:37, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:43, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great abstraction. Practically a B&W image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 20:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Clothing

File:Perchtoldsdorf Pfarrkirche Türkenfenster 01.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2018 at 07:28:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Stained glass
Info Turks Window at the parish church Perchtoldsdorf, Lower Austria. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:28, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:03, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Really good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive! --Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poc o² 12:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:34, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:53, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 22:02, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like that we can see some detail on the muntins. Usually photographs of stained glass windows leave that out in their quest to get the colors. Daniel Case (talk) 03:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support thanks !! Olivier LPB (talk) 10:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:46, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Stained glass

File:Seine Pont Royal Louvre Paris.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2018 at 12:46:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#France
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:46, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ausgezeichnet. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:31, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support works this time --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 15:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Strong distortion, please see the Ferris wheel, its should be circular and not a oval, also big bird distracting (see note) --Photographer 16:43, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I corrected the aspect ratio. The wheel was only slightly distorted because it is parallel to the Seine therefore its not a frontal view as the Seine River and it must be oval. I don't think the bird is distracting, I rather like it --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think keeping the notes is important for the candidacy process. Please, my reviews take time and dedication. --Photographer 17:34, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- You put the note directly on the file while there is a special note button on the FPC file (you probably haven't noticed) for notes regarding the FP review process --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, and in the future it would be better to say me it and not just eliminate the note, which I consider a contempt and rude. --Photographer 18:26, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm terribly sorry, didn't want to offend you and even less to be rude with you --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem --Photographer 18:40, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support The wheel is seen a bit from the side, so it is ok for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment You should eliminate the blurred, flying bird by masking. It disturbs. --Milseburg (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - The gray blur? Yeah. I like all the other birds, but that is purely a blur, it's pretty big at full size, and it should be edited out. Great panorama, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I’d rather edit out the busses but I guess it’s an impossible task. Thanks for your support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:41, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I think I said last time, Paris in a way it certainly always is but as I have not experienced it. Daniel Case (talk) 06:52, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:18, 16 December 2018 (UTC)--Claus 08:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light is unbalanced between the left and the right, between the bridge and the palace. And I do not like the composition either.--Claus 08:24, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 13:37, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but with this disturbig blurred bird it is not perfect enough for FP in my opinion. --Milseburg (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:48, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:08, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:43, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bird. + the choice of the moment of the day. You should have had a better balanced light in evening rather than in morning (per Claus).--Jebulon (talk) 10:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? It was a wonderful atmosphere in the morning which I and imo the reviewers also appreciate a lot --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Sorry, only my poor opinion. As I look to this panorama 4 times a day, I am maybe a bit too hard to please... A very good picture anyway !--Jebulon (talk) 10:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:56, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 15:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places#France

File:Ida M. Tarbell.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Dec 2018 at 13:49:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by James E. Purdy - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:53, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Good portrait. I'm not seeing what the size of the print was. Do you know? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: I'd guess about 4-7" wide - a bit smaller as cropped - but that's just a guess from the text on the original. Much smaller than that and the smaller text becomes ridiculously small, and much bigger and the big text is ridiculously big. Probably on the larger end, given the amount of detail. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:20, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support - That seems like good detective work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The bottom half of this image appears to have been doctored - judging from the similar one on the Britannica website. Charles (talk) 11:08, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a 1900-1920s thing. It was considered artistic to fade out. Sarcasm I can't quite resist: You probably didn't need to point to the Brittania image: She had a lower half, you know. She wasn't noted for disappearing at the waist. But seriously, it's just how images at this period were presented. You can sometimes find ones that aren't like that, but, really, it's no different than an oval frame or a crop. Note the photographer's mark on it. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: Having researched a bit, it looks like the one on the Brittania site DID do that as well, just a bit lower down, and they cropped it. See http://www.icollector.com/Ida-M-Tarbell_i14233542 Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This should have photographer's mark then? Same sitting. Charles (talk) 14:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: It does. It's kind of hard to see. Look in the lower left, maybe 1/3rd of the way across the image. It's white on light grey. It'd probably be more visible on the physical copy, due to three-dimensionality? Not sure. All this photographic company's logos are white, though, from what I've seen (Category:James E. Purdy) so that's not that odd. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:55, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it got semi-removed during an over-zealous restoration. Charles (talk) 16:58, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: Compare for yourself. File:Ida_M._Tarbell_-_Original.tif is the original Library of Congress scan. I'm pretty sure I haven't touched it, and if I did, I want to know so I can put it back. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:23, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't display photos (at any size) other than the nominated pic since FPC Bot will misinterpret it as an "Alt" and it will mess up the closing of the nom. Please see: Commons talk:Featured picture candidates/Archive 20#Extra images disrupting the FPC closing process. --Cart (talk) 17:59, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: Crap, sorry. Forgot the colon before File: Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support "But where's the rest of me?" Daniel Case (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Daniel Case: I did consider using burn tool and fixing up enough of her, well, chest that it can be cropped without the fadeout. But A. I wasn't happy with the results, and B. we probably should feature the one nearest the photographer's intent. Adam Cuerden (talk) 18:38, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jebulon (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:20, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Nobel Pierre et Marie Curie 1.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2018 at 16:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Sofia Gisberg - uploaded, stitched, restored and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Two reasons for this nomination. First, this is a rare document, the first Nobel Prize awarded ever to a women, the first Nobel Prize awarded to a couple, man and wife. The second reason is the very high quality of the reproduction (by BNF). One can see the very delicate work of the author/designer Sofia Gisberg (1854 - 1926), and read her signature. The Curies shared this 1903 prize with Henri Becquerel, his name is quoted on the document. -- Jebulon (talk) 16:49, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great historical value and quality picture — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:58, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - No doubt. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:45, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:51, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:35, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Great historical value, and also excellent reproduction. MartinD (talk) 09:18, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:22, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Teriberka.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2018 at 16:54:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Teriberka village, the Barents Sea coast

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info The view of Teriberka village on the coast of Barents Sea. Created by Dmitry A. Mottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 16:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 16:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magical place. Photo conveys the atmosphere! JukoFF (talk) 18:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 21:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Really striking. That's quite a sobering foreground of decayed ships. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like seeing the differences and similarities with the Canadian Arctic. Daniel Case (talk) 16:33, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting colors. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:35, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Bamberg Grain Silo 6140208.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 08:21:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 08:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 08:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The temperature seems excessively cold. How do you explain this intense blue hue ? -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It's actually more night than day here. The mood was the same as in the picture. --Ermell (talk) 07:38, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, this could be a very cool photo but with blue hue, dark photo and the barge and its reflection superimposed on the building and its reflection, it all comes out a bit too much. A daytime photo of the scene may be better. --Cart (talk) 12:42, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cart. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:49, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support works for me. --Milseburg (talk) 22:07, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Milseburg. There might possibly be a very thin margin of magenta CA on the top of the BayWa building; worth checking, but I'm not sure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've been trying to improve on that. Thanks for the hint.--Ermell (talk) 07:35, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:33, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Karelj (talk) 09:58, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Cart, a very cool photo but not in a good way. Daniel Case (talk) 16:15, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Milseburg. --Aristeas (talk) 10:07, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Baobab (Adansonia digitata), parque nacional Makgadikgadi Pans, Botsuana, 2018-07-30, DD 03-08 PAN.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 20:11:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Baobab (Adansonia digitata) in a typical landscape of the Makgadikgadi Pans National Park, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 20:11, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:11, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:48, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support high quality. Charles (talk) 16:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 20:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice horses there. --Podzemnik (talk) 09:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Kapelle St. Martin-Caplutta Sogn Martin. (actm) 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 16:34:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Doors #Wooden main door of the chapel. (Detail).
Info Detail of an old, weathered church door.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Is this degree of contrast natural? It doesn't make it comfortable to look at. Might be ok to push b&w image that much, but in colour this looks a bit strange. -- Colin (talk) 17:19, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: the photo of the complete door is below this photo. The settings are Faithful and daylight. The color of the rust on the doorknob in my opinion looks like rust. What change do you propose?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Version with a modified WB. Thanks for your reviews.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:13, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:24, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 10:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 15:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 20:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Excellent Seven Pandas (talk) 23:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Doors

File:Kyiv - Podil Panorama - April 2018.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 10:10:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info all by me. -- Lystopad (talk) 10:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lystopad (talk) 10:10, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Has FP possibilities but should be done in better light, and, perhaps, in summertime. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mild Oppose, more or less per Daniel. Might be a good VIC nominee, because of the great labeling. Good achievement but very gray. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:19, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malagasy green lynx spider (Peucetia madagascariensis) and green bottle fly (Lucilia sp.).jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 11:43:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida
Info Will you you walk into my parlour, said a Spider to a Fly? All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 11:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 11:43, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 09:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:56, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Great capture [smile], but what's deterred me from voting for the picture is that the degree of blur at the hairy margin of the leaf distracts me, especially since some of the green parts of the leaf seem less blurred. If you feel inspired, you could try doing something to make the background more relaxing to look at, so that it's easier to concentrate more singlemindedly on the act of violence being perpetrated below. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:43, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. I also find the DoF too shallow. Although I know the difficulty for such small and close subjects without focus stacking, at full size the legs and the leaf are repulsive (more repulsive than the spider itself :-)). Any chance to return to the site for another shooting session ? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Return business class tickets in the post will guarantee another shot, though he might have finished dinner by then... Charles (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 00:18, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:48, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:12, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida

File:Varano del Nilo (Varanus niloticus), parque nacional de Chobe, Botsuana, 2018-07-28, DD 56.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 12:40:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Info Nile monitor (Varanus niloticus), Chobe National Park, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 12:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 12:40, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know this image is not a portrait, but it is soft compared to my recent nom. Charles (talk) 14:28, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've nominated it because I found it funny and original, and the quality is also ok. Not much to do with a portrait. Poc o² 20:21, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Too much wood and not enough of the lizard, IMO. I'd suggest a narrow crop around the lizard, but then the file would probably be too small and the lizard probably wouldn't be sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:29, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, it has something very special. --Uoaei1 (talk) 07:37, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:25, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Poc o² 20:07, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мармалад од кајсии 2.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 08:35:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
Info created by MadMona - uploaded by MadMona - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:35, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support but where's the butter ? :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: Here it is. :)--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I'd probably vote for that for FP, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:10, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question Interesting, but why the flowers ?--Jebulon (talk) 10:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered Support - Very good food photography, but the photo would IMO look better without the unsharp lavender (which I guess is there because it smells good, as I doubt anyone would just eat it up off the stem). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:11, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support ok for me Olivier LPB (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lavender is fine. --Yann (talk) 10:39, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:01, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:03, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although that's the darkest marmalade I've ever seen ... if it weren't spread on the bread I would've taken it to be tomato sauce (in the North American English meaning). However, I'm no one's idea of a marmalade expert, and there may well be places in the world where marmalade comes out looking more orange-red than orange). Daniel Case (talk) 19:26, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear FP to me, lovely --Photographer 00:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am not into marmelade/jam, but this is really appetizing. --Aristeas (talk) 10:24, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support OK.--Jebulon (talk) 10:43, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 15:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 00:00, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:43, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 12:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:39, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:15, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food and drink#Food

Xylophanes mirabilis mounted specimen, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 10:24:59 (UTC)

Male dorsal
Male ventral
Female dorsal
Female ventral

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Xylophanes mirabilis mounted specimen male and female created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Olivier LPB
Support -- Olivier LPB (talk) 10:24, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Excellent and complete, but all should have the same scale IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 10:32, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I do not have the original files with me, there is no anomlie for the male, it is possible that there is one with the ventral side of the female, I must see the RAW correction Is simple. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:28, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 10:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:12, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Corrections made. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:42, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:18, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 23:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:14, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:37, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:22, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:54, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 12:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:05, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:11, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Sun and moon at sunset.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Dec 2018 at 21:57:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
Info Ok then, let's try this one instead from the next day and a slightly different angle where the braches are not so prominent. Getting the sun and a good visible moon in the same image isn't that easy up here in the north, unless you have an eclipse or a very wide panorama. However, if you are lucky to get a waxing moon close to the winter solstice, they are only about 90° apart. All by me, -- Cart (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 21:57, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Again an outstanding motif, but the technical implementation isn´t. There are too many colored artefacts in the clouds. --Milseburg (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - You withdrew the other one too quickly for me to have a chance to look at it (I saw the nomination very quickly but had no time to view the file), but the clouds look fine to me in this one. It's got a kind of poetry I enjoy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark, too sky, nothing particularly interesting just sky. Sorry --Photographer 01:36, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The point of this was to photograph both the sun and the moon in the same image, so of course it will be dark and sky. --Cart (talk) 09:04, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Somewhat better than the previous image which suddenly disappeared. On the far left there are also some processing errors that should be fixed.--Ermell (talk) 07:26, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I can't find the errors you speak of. Could you be more specific, please. --Cart (talk) 08:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment At the house on the left you can see a step in the gable. In addition, the shadow at the left edge looks as if the picture was taken through the window. At least the moon is correctly exposed but it is probably copied in.--Ermell (talk) 13:42, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for spotting the gable, I totally missed that. Not sure how the shadow on the left came to be. I was leaning out of an open window taking these photos. Saying that the moon was copied in is a very serious accusation. When I get home I will upload all the nine photos and the raw files in my dropbox and post a link to to it here. After that you might want to withdraw your faulty comment. Is such a thing really what you think of me or is this payback for my opposing your photo? I have been waiting for years to be able to do this photo since a waxing new moon only occurs at winter solstice about every 19th year, and then to be accused of pasting is unbelievable! You can take a look at the Photographer's Ephemeris and see and compare the positions of the celestial bodies that day and time. Taking the photos, I put the focus on the moon and the sun in those photos, since I wanted those features as sharp as possible. For the shots in between, I focused on the treeline since focus didn't lock on the clouds. Matching the exposures in Lightroom wasn't easy since the light varied so much over the scene. The left side had to be stepped down a bit to match the right side, but I wanted to keep the moon bright and visible so I did a local exposure adjustment on it back to original exposure. Some bits of sky up right and a small piece of dark land down left were missing after the panorama merge/projection, and I used aware fill for those. Last some light and color adjustment. That's it. --Cart (talk) 14:19, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have been advised by another user that I shouldn't need to upload all the original photos, Ermell should AGF and take my word for this being real, but at least I want to show the original for the moon photo. Here it is in my dropbox, jpeg and raw. Anyway, I've taken a lot of shit here FPC because of my experimental photos, including being accused of devaluing the FP status with them. Now being accused of cheating was the last straw, and as of now I'm leaving FPC and the FP project. --Cart (talk) 16:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'd encourage you not to let a single person drive your actions, but of course I can understand leaving a place where you're not getting paid, if the atmosphere is unpleasant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment I did not mean that it is so but that it would be possible which would not have been easy work. The moon fits very well into the picture and is just perfectly exposed which is often a problem with such pictures. I don't really understand the excitement.--Ermell (talk) 18:45, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Ermell, don't play misunderstood and innocent. Your English is excellent and you are perfectly capable of expressing exactly what you mean. If it truly was a mistake saying that the moon "is probably copied in" and insulting me, then just apologizing would have been easy to do. But you did not do that. I came here again because Colin 'pinged' me, I will not make a habit of it. --Cart (talk) 19:07, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the compliment, but I find it rather mediocre. What can be read between the lines is not always easy to see. By "copied in" I did not mean that there was no moon. If it would have been overexposed one could have improved it so. Sorry if that caused so much excitement here but I never thought about fraud. Impositions do not help in any case and are unfair.--Ermell (talk) 19:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

On processing the RAW file supplied, I have uncovered that this is no moon. Cart has turned to the Dark Side of the Force. But seriously, Ermell, your "moon .. is probably copied in" looks like you are accusing Cart of faking this photo's special composition of sun and moon together. At the very least, if you just meant an exposure blend was used, then you should have asked that as a question rather than an allegation. Why say "probably copied" when you can ask Cart for yourself? It comes across as hostile. I don't see the "faults" you claim. If I greatly increase the brightness and examine the bottom few pixels of this 50MP image, I can see a slight uncertain line of white gable, but this is definitely being petty to oppose over that. The bad faith and petty nit picking make me think you are taking the votes at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bamberg Grain Silo 6140208.jpg in a bad way and revenge voting here. I ask Ermell that you apologise for your accusation of cheating (composition or exposure) and bad faith towards Cart. If you are indeed in a bad mood over your other candidate, then strike your vote and take a break from FPC. -- Colin (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have not accused anyone of fraud here, that is now itself an accusation and revenge vote is not my thing. I would have a lot to do. Those who cannot live with criticism always have a hard time in life.--Ermell (talk) 19:09, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Colin and I read your remarks exactly the same way Cart did. Regardless of your intent, you should apologize for what it appeared that you were saying. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:06, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That my comment could possibly be taken as such by all English-speaking here as a fraud accusation was not intended and that would also not be very constructive. How this is to be understood I have now explained in detail enough. If I have come too close to anyone with this, please excuse me. Since I, like many of you here, use the translation machine, I usually hold myself back a little because to conduct extensive dialogues can be very time-consuming.--Ermell (talk) 22:40, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose A valiant and ambitious effort but the other one was better since it showed both the moon and the setting sun, plus the cloud was more coherent. Daniel Case (talk) 07:00, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:360°-Panorama vom Tour de Moron.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 14:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Switzerland
Info Panoramic view from the Tour de Moron over the Jura Mountains up to the Alps. All by me -- Milseburg (talk) 14:48, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 14:48, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful, impressive quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful panorama--Ermell (talk) 07:25, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 15:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Switzerland

File:Ramparts of the historic fortified city of Carcassone 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 08:03:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Though colors are good, composition is not the best, especially the framing of the bottom and right crop. Right side is also leaning in slightly. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:53, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. There's also some unsharpness on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:52, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose, sorry. On the one hand I really like this image, as it is not easy to take a photo of the historic city of Carcassone without a mass of people – I was there two times and did not see much of the city walls, they were hidden behind the tourists. ;–). However, King of Hearts and Ikan are right, and I also see some halo (?) at the right side of the roofs of the two towers at the left which bothers me. --Aristeas (talk) 17:17, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Aristeas. I think that the unsharpness is a by-product of the compositional problems noted by King. This picture really seems to want to be about the entrance to the castle just left of center. Daniel Case (talk) 17:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Tournasol7 (talk) 23:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Speyer - Gedächtniskirche der Protestation - linke Querhausrose (Märtyrerfenster).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 11:04:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Stained glass
Info Left rose window of the Gedächtniskirche der Protestation in Speyer, Germany (1903). Stained glass window design by Jakob Bradl (1864–1919), photograph etc. by me.
This window shows important persons and events of the Protestant Reformation. One may consider this kind of Gothic Revival art as kitsch, but certainly it is of high historical value.
Please have mercy on me: this is my first nomination ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Aristeas (talk) 11:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Welcome, and good for you for nominating! However, I'm respectfully voting no. The subject is featurable, but the photo is too noisy and not sharp enough for FP. Also, wider crops all around would be appreciated. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:47, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Question @Ikan: Is the complete image too noisy or just the dark area around the window? --Aristeas (talk) 12:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly the dark areas. But you've picked a very tough category for your first nomination. Have a look at the FPs in Category:Stained-glass windows. They're pretty much all quite magnificent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:11, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the FPs of stained-glass windows do not show the stone around the window, just more or less black. So maybe my error is rather that I made the stone around (and between) the stained glass too bright (this also caused the noise you see in the dark areas). Would the image be better for you if I just make the stones darker again, showing (more or less) the stained glass only? --Aristeas (talk) 12:57, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm afraid I don't see at all the issues Ikan notes. Even at 100% the stained glass is noise-free and sharp (I wouldn't want any more sharpening applied). There's good detail. I don't have any problem with the crop -- not interested in the stone. On the monitor I'm using just now, the stone is very dark so hard to tell what is texture and what is noise or to care. If you do decided to adjust that bit, consider painting the stone with a -ve sharpening local adjustment (equal in magnitude to your +ve global sharpening amount), rather than painting with +ve NR (or using global NR) -- best to eliminate any noise-enhancement caused by sharpening. Another option is to apply more global sharpening mask (hold down Alt while you adjust it to see where the mask is applied).

The bottom left quadrant is a little less bright (looking at your first upload, I wonder if there is an issue with the light shining in) and perhaps the exposure/highlights in that area could be adjusted a little more to even it out. If I'm being picky, there's a little purple CA especially at the bottom edge. If you decide to fix that, be careful with Lightroom's CA dropper tool and a global fix -- it can cause a thick grey edge to appear on areas of the photo that are genuinely purple (such as a coat). So either try to fix it with +ve CA removal local adjustment tool on the CA areas, or fix it globally and then use -ve CA local adjustment to protect purple coat areas from being harmed. But the CA is only noticeable if I pixel peep. -- Colin (talk) 12:31, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your instructive review! I will try to follow your hints, as soon as I can spare some time. --Aristeas (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poc o² 15:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support too protestant... just kidding ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you all for your support, reviews and criticism! ;–) While checking Colin’s suggestions for improving this image, I found another shot of the same window which offers much better reserves for raw file processing (it is ISO 100). I had rejected and almost forgotten that shot (because it looked worse at the first glance), but now I think it would be wiser to develop that almost forgotten shot instead; it would be a worthier FP candidate than this one. Sorry, I should have realized that before nominating this shot here, but (as I said) I almost forgot the alternative one.

Therefore I withdraw this nomination, thank you again for your reviews, I am sorry if I have wasted your time, and hope that you will like the alternative shot (even) better. I will probably upload it only next year, as processing it will take some time (masking the dark areas etc.) and this will not be possible before Christmas and New Year’s Eve. Thank you again!

I withdraw my nomination Aristeas (talk) 17:03, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Colin, your hints were not in vain! I will use them when editing the alternative image file and probably also update the present one accordingly.

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gasthof Friedrichshöhle 01.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2018 at 05:55:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 05:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 05:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --Pudelek (talk) 08:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question What is the purpose of this image? It's not used in ANY pages in Wikipedia. --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:47, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It shows a very good reflection of a building in water in autumn. The inn is a well-known locality nearby the Wimsener Höhle (also called "Friedrichshöhle"). BTW, I didn't know that it is mandatory for FP that they illustrate a wikipedia article. Please have a look at all the other current nominations, NEARLY NONE of them appears in a wikipedia article. Not even for VIs an article is mandatory. --Llez (talk) 19:02, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Funny, you are right! :-) Many of them lacks the links from Wikipedia. Are we making the next Flickr? :-)))) --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 20:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose of Commons, as I understand it, is to be a repository of Copyleft images, for the use of all Wiki projects and anyone else who wants to use them with proper credits. Wikipedia is the largest Wiki and Commons is a sister site, not simply a poor spinoff or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too awkwardly composed and too dark. Daniel Case (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I suspect I may like this photo more than Daniel does. I think the dark water is fine. However, I don't feel comfortable without more room above the Gasthaus. If you have more room and choose to add it, I will look at the edited photo and see what I think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As the picture is not cropped I see no chance to give more space. Perhaps another time. Therfore I I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 17:30, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:54, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ludwigstadt Trogenbachbrücke 8231710-PSD.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 14:27:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info all by me -- Ermell (talk) 14:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 14:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really cool image and IMO perfect for use of B&W. There is some artifact of cloning out (I think) in the right lower corner, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri (talk) 15:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thanks for the hint.--Ermell (talk) 20:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I may have preferred if the bottom of the bridge was not that dark but still showed some details, but I understand what you wanted to achieve and you really got it. Very nice! --Aristeas (talk) 17:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I've dimmed the shadows so the noise doesn't get too strong.--Ermell (talk) 17:59, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I understand very well (see my recently withdrawn nomination where lifting the shadows actually caused noise ;–). Your image is good as it is, the dark shadows give it a nice classic black-and-white appearance. --18:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
Support --XRay ^talk 20:26, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I like the starkness of this. It looks very much like a classic Modernist photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:35, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Highway through the door of night -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:59, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 06:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poetic. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another album-cover-quality image. Daniel Case (talk) 23:33, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:41, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:08, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

File:Masih Alinejad.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Dec 2018 at 19:13:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Kambiz Foroohar - uploaded by Elnaz - nominated by محک -- Ταπυροι (گپ) 19:13, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ταπυροι (گپ) 19:13, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Truly excellent. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:02, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've been looking at and thinking about this for a while now. The look on her face is interesting, and it puzzled me in the beginning. To me it looks a bit like they were doing a fun, light-hearted photo shoot, but something distracted her she's somewhere else now mentally. Her mouth is still kind of smiling, but her eyes look distant, wistful, melancholic. With the overcast sky, this would look downright sad and broody if it weren't for the bit of smile and the flower in her hair. Putting that in context with what I've read about her, I'll have to agree with Adam above. --El Grafo (talk) 14:31, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:24, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality street photo of a notable person. Natural expression. The crop is a bit large but the hair make it -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per El Grafo. Daniel Case (talk) 03:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:38, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:45, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Jeannette Rankin, Bain News Service, facing front.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2018 at 03:11:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Bain News Service - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:11, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support One could argue that the original photo was not perfect (is the face blurred a bit due to the long exposure or is it slightly out of focus? at the left the cover of the armchair seems sharper than the face), but the expression of her face is good, and the restauration very well done. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If you'd care to look at the alternatives from the same portrait session, they're linked in "Other versions" Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Adam Cuerden: Thank you for the hint! I have looked at the alternatives. This one (here) is IMHO the best, and I still think it makes a FP, regardless of the slightly blurred face: Both the overall effect of the original photograph and your restauration are excellent. --Aristeas (talk) 09:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support "You can no more win a war than win an earthquake." Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel Case, but with the opposite conclusion. The restoration is obviously excellent as usual, but the original is really too blurry. I'm sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 10:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jebulon: Um ... I think you mean Aristeas's !vote? Mine is just the quote she's most famous for ... I don't really know how an "opposite conclusion" is possible. Daniel Case (talk) 19:22, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, a probable misunderstanding by me. Anyway, I understood that it was a quote by her...--Jebulon (talk) 10:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:31, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:11, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:14, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Short-horned chameleon (Calumma brevicorne) female Andasibe.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 22:13:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Info About 130mm long with her tail curled up at night to keep warm. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 22:13, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Tournasol7 (talk) 23:42, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition, sharp subject. The flash light makes it a bit artificial but that's still a striking image -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

the slave off-camera flash helped, but a night-time photo is never as natural as daylight. Charles (talk) 08:32, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Yes. I love the curled tail. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 06:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:29, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 12:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support A snail, a snail!...Uuups - a chameleon --Llez (talk) 12:34, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice Poc o² 18:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:57, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, very beautiful picture. I like the contrast with the black background Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:16, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:28, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:39, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:13, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Braun&Hogenberg Trier 1572.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2018 at 09:25:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Palauenc05 -- Palauenc05 (talk) 09:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 09:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I love it, and it's in good enough condition not to need digital restoration. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:58, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Been there many times and it's nice to see such an old picture of it. I especially like the detail of the oxen dragging the boat from land, a transportation method typical of rivers and canals from the middle ages and right up until the 19th century.--Peulle (talk) 11:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:25, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question « created » by Palauenc05 ? --Jebulon (talk) 12:18, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:28, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. (Aber mit dem Turm von Liebfrauen übertrieb es der alte Grafiker wohl arg.) -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media#Landscape

File:Esztergom by night 03 - Széchenyi tér.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2018 at 08:24:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 08:24, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 08:24, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but I'm not really seeing anything that makes me go "wow, that's special".--Peulle (talk) 11:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle and I think that the round object should either be exactly in the centre of the image or thoroughly decentred. The way it is, it looks very unharmonic to me. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:27, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Baso. Daniel Case (talk) 19:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:57, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Panorama of Umag, Istria, Croatia.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2018 at 12:30:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures#Places
Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. I like -- Podzemnik (talk) 12:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author. -- Podzemnik (talk) 12:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light, high level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poc o² 20:33, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:58, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:06, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:38, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:02, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Лежка моржей на острове Нортбрук.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2018 at 12:58:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Walruses lying on Northbrook Island. Russian Arctic National Park. Сreated by Timinilya - uploaded by Timinilya - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JukoFF (talk) 12:58, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:05, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good! --Granada (talk) 13:09, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah! -- Benh (talk) 18:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite nice but too small for me.--Peulle (talk) 21:30, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Yes, it is a little small, but it's a great capture and even more impressive as a drone picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 23:15, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:21, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:30, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--KSK (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 12:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:17, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:42, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:47, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:36, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poor beasts in freezing water. ;o) --Yann (talk) 10:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 19:30, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:36, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:35, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals

File:Joseph Stalin, Franklin D Roosevelt and Winston Churchill, in Teheran, 1943, edit.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2018 at 17:10:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by D. C. Oulds, uploaded and nominated by Yann (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historical picture in high resolution. I also like it for the faces of Roosevelt and Churchill. -- Yann (talk) 17:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 18:43, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 22:47, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 22:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:14, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:37, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Rostock asv2018-05 img31 University.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Dec 2018 at 15:23:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
Info Neo-Renaissance gable of the Main building of Rostock University ----- All by A.Savin --A.Savin 15:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 15:23, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose needs a crop at the bottom. The arch and the two busts are cut off. Renata3 (talk) 03:50, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a QI IMO. The bottom part with clumsy cuts is not successful. The sky dull -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm also not really happy about the bottom part --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per others above: too much or too little. Yann (talk) 10:36, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 10:32, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile Morin --Rbrechko (talk) 19:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Without exaggeration; for me the bottom cut is ok. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:43, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kolvitsa panorama.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2018 at 11:54:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Dmitry A. Mottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 11:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 11:54, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - That's really pretty. One detail I like is the layers of different colors in the clouds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:24, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:43, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support About time we started seeing some good images of this portion of the non-Siberian Russian Arctic. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just a sunset --Photographer 00:39, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:28, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:09, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per The Photographer and low sharpness. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Low sharpness? You kidding? --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 13:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 12:23, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:51, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:2018-08-30 Pelargonium zonale 'Appleblosom Rosebud'.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2018 at 13:50:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Flowers
Info created & uploaded by YvoBentele - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to shadows. Renata3 (talk) 03:49, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Love the colors, but more of it could be sharp. Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:30, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel Case. -- Karelj (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 21:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Caligavis chrysops - Lake Parramatta Reserve.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2019 at 19:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by JJ Harrison -- JJ Harrison (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JJ Harrison (talk) 19:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back! --Poc o² 20:30, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 20:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charles (talk) 22:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Impressive sharpness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:18, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice image. Tournasol7 (talk) 08:27, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:49, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:54, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Welcome back! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:33, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 16:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 18:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:22, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another good bird picture, I want more!!! --Photographer 02:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes

File:Corvus coronoides - Doughboy Head.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2019 at 19:22:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by JJ Harrison -- JJ Harrison (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JJ Harrison (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poc o² 20:31, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 20:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment can you do something about the over-exposed rock? Charles (talk) 22:13, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not overexposed. JJ Harrison (talk) 08:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - I meant the barnacles. Charles (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:19, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:48, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:34, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (r) 16:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 18:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:23, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:51, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:21, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:24, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hight Dinamic range and good colors, quality in general. well done --Photographer 02:21, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:11, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes

File:L.A. Ring, Road in the Village of Baldersbrønde (Winter Day), 1912, NG6658, National Gallery.png, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2019 at 13:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media#Landscape
Info created by National Gallery, London - uploaded by Villy Fink Isaksen - nominated by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the Christmas card! -- Colin (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 20:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:59, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:42, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:35, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:47, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 10:32, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:12, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Sunset in The Trossachs, Scotland.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jan 2019 at 20:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info All by me. I got inspired by Pudelek's nomination so I put my gumboots on and went to take this one. -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! Could be even better if you can remove "Xerox"-effect between the mountains and the sky --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 09:41, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:02, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:09, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GeXeS (talk) 12:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:34, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:32, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:15, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:46, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Pretty scene, but I feel no arabesque at all from this picture, absolutely no circular movement, just several discrete horizontal layers. I won't oppose by myself, but I find it pretty hard to understand the overwhelming acclamation for this work. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The fog effect is what makes the difference. Yann (talk) 17:39, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) --XRay ^talk 17:17, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dreamy. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality and lovely --Photographer 02:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:10, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United Kingdom

File:Ayubia National Park Pipeline Track 03.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2019 at 11:46:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Kamranki - uploaded by Kamranki - nominated by Kamranki -- Kamranki (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kamranki (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Probably a QI, if nominated at QIC, but nothing extraordinary for FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:09, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Seems to be trying to evoke that Life photograph of the photographer's two children, similarly in silhouette from behind, walking down a path in the woods (I can't find it or I'd have linked to it, but someone has to know what I'm talking about) but with less charm. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Полнети пиперки 1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 08:23:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food
Info created by MadMona - uploaded by MadMona - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:23, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very beautifull composition and colors, good light, but unsharp at full size in my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 10:06, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support - Yes, this is FPC, and yes, it would be better if it were sharper, but I think it's sharp enough at a big enough size and is really beautiful. If it's reasonable to sharpen it a little more, that would be helpful, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sharpness and colors too cold (blue). --Yann (talk) 10:40, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jebulon. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Very attractive layout, sharpness and resolution are fine for me. Yes, WB is a bit blue but within my range of tolerance. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:42, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:29, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Christmas card 2018.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2019 at 14:32:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info Please don't vote for me. I just wish you all a Happy Christmas. Charlesjsharp-- Charles (talk) 14:32, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good job! ;) Poc o² 10:25, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Merry Christmas! --Neptuul (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Merry Christmas! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Merry Christmas! -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:04, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Merry Christmas everyone! I just wanted to say thank you for your support. This year, when I started to contribute to FP & QI, I found a lot of supportive people here. Your constructive critique pushed my photography skills waaay further. We're all living in different parts of the world, we're at different ages and speaking different languages. But we're all working on the project with very noble idea, the project that is muuuch bigger than us. So let's thank ourselves for another good year of our good work because nobody else will do it :) All the best, --Podzemnik (talk) 19:40, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment :) JukoFF (talk) 21:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Merry Christmas! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
strong Abstain I mean Merry Christmas -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I hope all of you enjoyed the day! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:48, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am a bit late, but Merry Christmas to you all! Yann (talk) 17:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have had a Merry Christmas indeed, but it's not too late to say Happy New Year! Daniel Case (talk) 01:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lake Baikal in winter.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 15:20:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Russia
Info Frozen lake Baikal near Olkhon island. Created, upload and nominated by Sergey Pesterev -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 15:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 15:20, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose visually striking but overprocessed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:04, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:02, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The foreground is very blurry, even at small size, and the right side is unsharp -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This one really works for me, as I love the composition. I can easily tolerate some unsharpness at the near right for that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Although there are much better pictures from this series I find this FP worthy. If the noise could be reduced a little bit it would be perfect.--Ermell (talk) 07:24, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Very dramatic, though corner sharpness could be better. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:45, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great composition and motif but the quality is below the bar IMHO Poc o² 15:49, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:56, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile and Poco. Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 06:05, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- On balance, yes, qualifies as FP. MartinD (talk) 09:15, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 12:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per opposers and over processed.--Jebulon (talk) 12:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support something not boring for a change - Benh (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 12:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:16, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--KSK (talk) 14:07, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Russia

File:Moonlight in the Sahara.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 15:58:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Morocco
Info Moonlight in the Sahara. Created by Sergey Pesterev - uploaded by Sergey Pesterev - nominated by Sergey Pesterev -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose also striking but totally overprocessed --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:05, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Martin.--Peulle (talk) 17:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed and noisy -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:33, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Yeah, that looks really weird. Any possibility of a reversion to an earlier version not uploaded here or redevelopment from a raw file? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Corrected version uploaded -- Sergey Pesterev (talk) 14:38, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Basotxerri (talk) 15:58, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We've seen better nighttime long-exposure landscapes. Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Seems worth a supporting vote to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 06:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Henry39 (talk) 20:34, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Has the wow-factor for me. :) MartinD (talk) 09:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:30, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:43, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:30, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Morocco

File:The juvenile greater flamingo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jan 2019 at 14:24:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created by hobbyfotowiki - uploaded by hobbyfotowiki - nominated by hobbyfotowiki -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 14:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hobbyfotowiki (talk) 14:24, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The image is great but can you tell us where it was taken (Captivity I guess? Or in the wild?). Thanks! --Podzemnik (talk) 18:29, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support, pending your addressing the issue mentioned above. Geographic coordinates would be appreciated. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:13, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
InfoThe photo was taken in the wild, on the Island of Malta. In the Għadira Nature Reserve.35°58′11″N 14°20′50″E https://birdlifemalta.org/nature-reserves/ghadira/ and on wikimedia: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:G%C4%A7adira_Nature_Reserve. The great thing (unbelievable) I found minutes ago a photo on this wikimedia commons shot the same day! This shows the same bird! This one here: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8c/History_and_Nature.jpg. It is quiet sure, we were part of the same group visiting this nature reserve this day! 7/30/2017 But we don´t know each other.

That's very cool! Please add the coordinates to the file. Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done.User:hobbyfotowiki (talk) 23:50, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Unbelievable, yes, the world is small -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support I added more information into the description. --Podzemnik (talk) 06:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:21, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:25, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Isiwal (talk) 22:37, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Bijay Chaurasia (Talk) 15:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:21, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice moment. --Photographer 02:20, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:13, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Cálaos de pico rojo del sur (Tockus rufirostris), parque nacional Makgadikgadi Pans, Botsuana, 2018-07-30, DD 14.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Dec 2018 at 20:13:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info A couple of Southern red-billed hornbills (Tockus rufirostris), Makgadikgadi Pans National Park, Botswana. All by me, Poc o² 20:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:13, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blurred birds and noise background, chromatic aberration and Dust spot (notes added) --Photographer 00:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep in mind that this is 34 MP, a size rarely encountered for wildlife. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@The Photographer and King of Hearts: : I've uploaded a new version (the dust spot and slight CA are gone, I applied some sharpness too and reduced the highlights) --Poc o² 10:08, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Its a bit better, however, the CA is there (I added another note) --Photographer 01:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't consider this a serious judgement / oppose reason given the high resolution and the fact that I see nothing that I can improve. --Poc o² 11:18, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are right, my vote is not because the

chromatic aberration problem, my vote is because the picture quality itself. I can see noise and motion focus problem and a and a quality that we should expect from a compact (like Canon SX30) camera but not a 50mpx DSLR Canon EOS 5DS. IMHO, the light was good and f/9 was probably excessive, the quality in general is not at the level of other FP of birds to which we are accustomed. --Photographer 19:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support Per King of Hearts. --Aristeas (talk) 11:29, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It's two birds, not one, so I take that into account. It's also a very nice composition. I think it's not at all crazy to oppose, but this is over the line for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:55, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 14:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and quality. The fact that it is 34 MP is not important. The quality is actually no better than you would get with a smaller sensor/fewer pixels. Charles (talk) 16:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed - but it is also no worse. I was merely pointing out that we should not judge such a high-resolution image so harshly at the pixel level. —- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:20, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, we should examine all images in detail. Charles (talk) 21:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support — King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:20, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support- Benh (talk) 22:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice symmetry. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:16, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:42, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:29, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:42, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:20171129 Rybak na Tonle Sap w Kambodży 6131 DxO.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2019 at 08:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Fisherman on Tonle Sap Lake. All by me -- -- Jakubhal 08:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -- Jakubhal 08:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment fishing? Charles (talk) 10:49, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unnatural composition, thing space. Turn your back without any landscape in front, main object difficult to find. --Photographer 02:19, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the Photographer. Daniel Case (talk) 01:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination -- Jakubhal 06:22, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:New York Botanical Garden October 2016 004.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 09:05:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:05, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I regret that I find the weird perspective distortion unattractive and unpleasant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:50, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 18:22, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unless we can do something about that distortion at right. Daniel Case (talk) 18:03, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very pleasant image, and good. The thing that disturb me is the green hedge at left. It is a little too predominant, that breaks the good perspective. In general terms two possible solutions with a disturbing element that we can not avoid, 1/ a different lighting which also changes the colors and therefore the key points of the image, and/or 2/ a different composition that integrates precisely this element (make it even more predominant). Happy Holidays, regards, Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alt

Info @Ikan Kekek, Peulle, and Daniel Case: I've made a 5:4 crop of the right which I think might help it look more natural. Otherwise this is simply how this scene actually appears with a wide-angle lens, and since I've already made verticals straight there's not much else I can do. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Thanks, but I'm going to continue to oppose. If the perspective distortion is unavoidable and uncorrectable, this may not be a good subject for a wide-angle lens. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan, I'm afraid.--Peulle (talk) 22:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mallard (Anas platyrhynchos) chick.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jan 2019 at 10:06:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 10:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 10:06, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't give me the fizz; the left side is dark and not too much detail.--Peulle (talk) 11:53, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor quality, some detail are lost -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:43, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination and I thought it was soooo cute! Charles (talk) 12:56, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is cute, I'll give you that. :) --Peulle (talk) 20:28, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:31, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Water helicopter over the Coconino National Forest.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2019 at 23:59:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport
Info A photograph of the Coconino National Forest during the Schultz Fire, framing a helicopter bucket - both helicopter and line down with bucket visible - in front of the trees; created by Deborah Lee Soltesz on Flickr - uploaded by Kyerjay - nominated by Kyerjay
Support beautifully framed, great layer in the trees and beautiful colors captured, and depiction of a complete helicopter bucket during a devastating wildfire -- Kyerjay (talk) 23:59, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I admit that the subject is good, but everything else is not. Might have been an FP in 2010, but I don't feel that it is in 2018/19.--Peulle (talk) 11:54, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy, unsharp. As for the composition: I'd like to see the helicopter either exactly in the middle or thoroughly decentered, it's unharmonic like it is. --Basotxerri (talk) 16:58, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose agree Baso and Puelle. Too hazy helo too far away. Seven Pandas (talk) 18:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I haven't voted on this nomination because I haven't decided, but that probably means no from me, too. However, this might be a really useful VI in the right scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Insufficient quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:27, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it doesn't look like these opposes will be overcome anytime soon. Daniel Case (talk) 16:02, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:33, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Precolumbiangold.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2019 at 17:47:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by E.3 - uploaded by E.3 - nominated by E.3 (talk) 17:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- E.3 (talk) 17:47, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and illustrative, but not quite good enough for FP. The camera can shoot 16MP, is that not so? This one is pretty small. And the lighting and detail are also so-so.--Peulle (talk) 21:58, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nowhere close to QI. Charles (talk) 22:35, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ As you can tell, I need a lot of help knowing when my images are good and when they are not. Thanks E.3 (talk) 06:09, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid vote. Only one vote per user. Please {{Withdraw}} your nomination if you've changed your mind -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I note it would be easy enough for someone who's actually a good photographer to pop in in Bogota - this appears to be rather illustrative. Thanks E.3 (talk) 06:13, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The picture looks too yellow to me and it looks like a slight haze over it. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 14:24, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality, color and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:25, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:26, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sunrise in Pieniny, Poland 02.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 20:23:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 20:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 20:23, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Nice sunrise, but the form isn't really doing much for me, although the ideas are nice. This may be a case in which the mist smudges too many of the things my eyes would otherwise experience as more of a rhythm while looking around the picture frame. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:04, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Half of the image is composed of dark-dark shapes in the foreground, not particularly interesting. The sky looks dull and a bit ordinary for a sunrise. The cloudy part is not bad but not striking enough IMO for a feature here -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. Great colors, great time. --Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 13:38, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support A relaxing vista that wouldn't be out of place on an office wall. Daniel Case (talk) 02:16, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely. --GeXeS (talk) 12:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rbrechko (talk) 20:06, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support An interesting layered scene. --Msaynevirta (talk) 02:26, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why the sun is oval? --Photographer 02:23, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Henry39 (talk) 17:44, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:25, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Oustalet's chameleon (Furcifer oustaleti) male feeding Anja Community Reserve 1e.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jan 2019 at 17:07:30 (UTC)

1 of 4
2 of 4
3 of 4
4 of 4

Info Shots taken in burst covering about 1/2 second. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 17:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support very well done! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:34, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tozina (talk) 23:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:23, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 09:46, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Very cool! Can you identify the victim to any extent, other than that it's some kind of insect? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:17, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unknown grasshopper... 10:40, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 10:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:30, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support We saw something like this in Madagaskar, but the victim was a butterfly! --Schnobby (talk) 14:27, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:52, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:39, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Subhrajyoti07 talk 18:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:41, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Chamaeleonidae (Chameleons)

File:Castle of Belcastel 20.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Dec 2018 at 23:40:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France
Info All by --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author --Tournasol7 (talk) 23:40, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 08:26, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! I think I have spotted two traces of sensor dust, and a little dark dot (maybe a bird, but not recognizable) which is not advantageous; I would remove them. I have marked them with an image note on the nomination page. Personally, I would also remove the dead branches at the top right which irritate my eyes ;–). No offence, just wanting to help, --Aristeas (talk) 11:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Aristeas: Done. Thanks for your notices. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:30, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @Tournasol7: Thank you! IMHO your photo is even more attractive now ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ - High-quality picture of the castle, a fine QI/VI photo, but the composition leaves me cold. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Henry39 (talk) 20:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - (surplus, sorry) Henry39 (talk) 20:30, 29 December 2018 (UTC) Double vote. Tournasol7 (talk) 17:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As Ikan says, sorry... --GeXeS (talk) 12:42, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the contrails are a problem. Charles (talk) 15:21, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose editing out contrails. Charles (talk) 22:32, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Sorry, but I don't understand. Before the contrails are a problem and after when they are removed you make the opposite vote ... Tournasol7 (talk) 17:52, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose First, it could have been cropped more tightly onto the castle; second, the contrails, which in this case are too big to discreetly clone out. Support now Daniel Case (talk) 17:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Daniel Case, Charles, GeXeS, Ikan Kekek; contrails removed. It's better? Tournasol7 (talk) 19:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

- Better. I am still not convinced by the composition, but at least I won't oppose anymore. --GeXeS (talk) 19:46, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Same. I'll live with it and make a decision, but it's good enough at least not to oppose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:31, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 15:20, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
SupportJacek Halicki (talk) 15:49, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 20:38, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. It's simple, but pleasant and calming composition. --Podzemnik (talk) 11:34, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:51, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#France

File:Dülmen, Privatrösterei Schröer, Kaffeebohnen -- 2018 -- 0547.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Dec 2018 at 11:19:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info created & uploaded by XRay - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 11:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:19, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Smells like coffee spirit ;–) --Aristeas (talk) 11:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A competitor to this one, I guess, so if this one is featured, the old one should be delisted IMO.--Peulle (talk) 12:36, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While I don't dislike the image, the lighting doesn't convince me for an FP. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:28, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Respectfully Oppose - I think this is a really useful QI/VI, but the arrangement of the coffee beans feels random to me, so while it's a very high-quality photo and useful, I don't find that its composition really works, and therefore, I don't consider it an FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. -- Karelj (talk) 10:59, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Baso. Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:24, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]