Commons:Deletion requests/mobile tracking/archive 9

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:44, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe there is sufficient creativity in this logo to be legitimately copyrighted, mainly due to the shading. With regard to the text and any graphic outline, this would be marginal and I doubt that without the other elements of design could be copyright. I am nominating under the precautionary principle. (talk) 22:31, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:15, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:09, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User contacted me, I rescind the request. This is a photo of a member of the band http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pure_(band)

Kept: INeverCry 02:16, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:20, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:02, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aren't photos taken by US administration officials de jure in public domain? This picture is part of a mugshot taken after the arrest. vıכıaяפ 08:30, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Can you prove, that this made after arrest? Taivo (talk) 12:28, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Unclear copyright status. Unless we have definitive, explicit written and/or textual, tangible evidence from a credible, verifiable source naming this file as freely licensed under a Commons compatible license, we simply cannot host it on Commons FASTILY 19:57, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, no approval by author. NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 10:22, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Not own work, no proper source. Delete per COM:PRP. Dschwen (talk) 23:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep Although I still have not identified a good source for this image, and the uploader has not specified it, this appears to be public domain as a photograph taken of a prisoner in the US. The photograph would have been taken by someone employed by the US Government (or a direct agency) in the conduct of their duties. Neither the photographer or the subject are in a position to make any claim of copyright of the photograph or reproductions of it. -- (talk) 12:17, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD US Gov seems very plausible. Dschwen (talk) 23:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

upload error Obemat (talk) 12:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


upload error Obemat (talk) 07:11, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As per nomination. tsca (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Orton_4th_WWE_Title.jpg Proshob (talk) 14:38, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: for the reason given by the nominator, with no objection MBisanz talk 03:57, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is crap Proshob (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stating that it's crap is not a reason to delete. Flickrworker (talk) 21:56, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The lighting is poor on this image, but the resolution compares favourably to others on the same topic, see stats below. -- (talk) 04:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Target file File:Male anus 2 2013-05-27 20-50.jpg
Width x Height = 2448 x 3264
Source category: Human anus (filter by mime 'image')
Total number of unique images in category, 5 child and 14 grandchild categories: 241
Number with resolution (width x height) >= target resolution: 32 (in top 13%)
Number with file size >= target file size: 33 (in top 14%)
Report completed: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 05:04 (57.3s runtime)

Kept: It doesn't seem especially awful to me. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:32, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is crap Proshob (talk) 20:01, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stating that it's crap is not a reason to delete. Flickrworker (talk) 21:57, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I checked that other discussion about a similar file, and I change my vote to  Keep. -- Tuválkin 22:33, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: Not the best quality but can be used on other projects. In scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PENIS: very similar to and no better than existing images. — TintoMeches, 21:33, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The statistics show that this image is in the top 1/3 by resolution and considering it is in focus, reasonably lit and a suitable framing, this makes easily better than 70% or more of the existing comparable images. Here's the report: -- (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Target file File:Immagine dell'apparato genitale maschile dall'esterno 2013-08-23 22-56.jpg
Width x Height = 2272 x 1704
Source category: Uncircumcised human penis
Total number of images in category and child categories: 457
Number with file size >= target file size: 138 (in top 30%)
Number with resolution (width x height) >= target resolution: 119 (in top 26%)
  • It seems Fæ smashed my count of indictment... so  Keep because this picture actually is better than other already existing images. — TintoMeches, 18:50, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • After following some API tips, I was able to make the query more efficient, so could compare statistics for a much larger sample using all files in the parent category and its child and grandchild categories which more convincingly shows this file in the top 20%-ish using this quality metric. At the same time this flushed out a bug in the original report which was actually using the wrong figures for height and width (which we did not notice at the time). -- (talk) 11:39, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Target file File:Immagine dell'apparato genitale maschile dall'esterno 2013-08-23 22-56.jpg
Width x Height = 2448 x 3264
Source category: Human penis
Total number of unique images in category, 28 child and 48 grandchild categories: 2436
Number with resolution (width x height) >= target resolution: 414 (in top 17%)
Number with file size >= target file size: 553 (in top 23%)
Report completed: Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:54 (4m 19.7s runtime)

Comment - yes, this one actually looks decent. Sufficient lighting, high res, in focus, does not look like a CopyVio either. Still, it could be "not superior", or even slightly inferior, to others. I don't see anything it is very similar to, though. (Link if you think otherwise, please.)

COM:PORN  Delete This image does not add ANYTHING to our exsting tons of penis pics. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 455 images in the category. This image doesn't improve commons. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:19, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless and blurry personal image, out of scope. — TintoMeches, 21:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 21:45, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:37, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Not the uploader's work. See their contribs. Dismas (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Not the uploader's work. See their contribs. Dismas (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Not the uploader's work. See their contribs. Dismas (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Not the uploader's work. See their contribs. Dismas (talk) 01:01, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Not the uploader's work. See their contribs. Dismas (talk) 01:02, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright violation. Not the uploader's work. See their contribs. Dismas (talk) 01:03, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screencap of television programme; copyright not likely owned by uploader discospinster (talk) 01:05, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted, clear copyright violation. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:39, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screencap of film; copyright not likely owned by uploader discospinster (talk) 01:06, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Stemoc (talk) 01:36, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:58, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope and not educational by ReviDiscussSUL Info at 02:49, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 02:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by INeverCry as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: complex copyrighted logo. But we also have File:Star Alliance Logo.svg, which is {{PD-textlogo}}. O ( • висчвын) 03:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Other Things Exist is not a reason to keep this one. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:22, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked, likely copyrighted image. I doubt the uploader has rights to this photo. Dismas (talk) 05:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Speedydeleted: Copyright violation Steinsplitter (talk) 07:14, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tomi Jurić representing the Socceroos vs China in EAFF Cup 2013-08-16 14-31.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have the Iranian flag in SVG. The description belongs as a Wikipedia article about alcohol control in Iran, not on a file. Fry1989 eh? 18:18, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:12, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

automobilsport.com gives credit "Photos@DPPI & Alain Rossignol". With this information the source and author informtion presented here on Commons seems incorrect. Martin H. (talk) 13:15, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:50, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:18, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:19, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:27, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture of user, out of project scope. Martin H. (talk) 13:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of unknown artworks, probably copyright violation A.Savin 17:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:01, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope / no educational value / private image Torsch (talk) 18:24, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:02, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image / no educational value Torsch (talk) 19:16, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:03, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermarked image. Likely copyvio. Given the uploader's other contribs, it's doubtful that they own the rights to this or any other photos. Dismas (talk) 02:49, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted, copyright violation. Yoinked image, uploader has no authority to license. -- Infrogmation (talk) 03:38, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from IMDb (http://www.imdb.com/media/rm265988096/nm2953573) Stemoc (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to come from http://baocongthuong.com.vn/co-khi-luyen-kim/4968/an-giang-phat-trien-kinh-te-bien-mau.htm. Unless there is a verifiable free release on the website (I cannot see anything obvious), then this requires a verifiable release statement from the photographer or current copyright holder. (talk) 13:15, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From his official website, but not without permission (http://robertcapron.com/biography/) Stemoc (talk) 13:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy Vio (http://www.locatetv.com/person/arjay-smith/40542) Stemoc (talk) 13:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, no educational value Mormegil (talk) 15:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:12, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mjrenee styles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: unused personal image, out of scope FASTILY 05:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a screenshot, probably non-free. No source indicated, no license. Letartean (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted text russavia (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of copyrighted logos russavia (talk) 17:21, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no obvious possible educational use. russavia (talk) 17:32, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative works of copyrighted content/logos russavia (talk) 17:34, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of copyrighted works russavia (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a photo of a TV screen. russavia (talk) 18:00, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted content russavia (talk) 18:02, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, other uploads from the same user have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 21:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:18, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, other uploads from the same user have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 21:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, other uploads from the same user have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 21:18, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, other uploads from the same user have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 21:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be the work of the uploader, other uploads from the same user have been copyright violations MilborneOne (talk) 21:25, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image / no educational value / poor quality Torsch (talk) 07:15, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Low quality. King of 03:56, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incomplete upload Obemat (talk) 08:53, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


incomplete upload


Deleted -FASTILY 05:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused low quality personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:20, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete Per nom. Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. --Rsberzerker (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete This *MIGHT* have some value if it were categorized or used. It looks to be a poster on the side of some building, possibly an ad of some sort, which brings copyright issues into play (another deletion reason). But as it is, it has no educational value and is therefore out of scope and should be deleted on that basis alone. --Rsberzerker (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

w:File:Waar 2013 film.jpg Stefan4 (talk) 13:22, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I find this might be a public domain image (as most of these types of astronomy image turn out to be) however a source copy found via Tineye at http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/01/photogalleries/100105-week-in-space-pictures-76/#/hydrogen-magellanic-stream_11781_600x450.jpg gives credit as "Image courtesy Nidever, et al., NRAO/AUI/NSF and Meilinger, Leiden-Argentine-Bonn Survey, Parkes Observatory, Westerbork Observatory, Arecibo Observatory", checking NRAO, their default licence at http://images.nrao.edu/image_use.shtml is encouraging but states "If an image credit names persons affiliated with other institutions, it is possible that the person(s) or their institution(s) could assert ownership of the image; the user should contact the named institution(s) to secure permission." At this point my time to research this ran out. Without a verifiable source, and with multiple parties that might want to restrict republication, there is significant doubt about this mobile image upload that has no EXIF data to check.

Note, a Google search will show matches to a PD NASA image, but this is not highlighted in the same way. (talk) 04:32, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 05:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain colour swatch which is easily replacable by a colour code. Fails to meet scope. (talk) 05:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 05:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a blurry and underexposed selfie from a 9 year old. Appears to fail project scope as not of any educational value and more of an (unused) personal album photo. As a fully identified photo, there may be issues of consent, and for that reason a verifiable release might be required if kept. (talk) 05:43, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 05:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a screen grab, and unlikely to be the uploader's own work. DAJF (talk) 06:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 05:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has been downloaded for vandalism. Spillik (talk) 07:12, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete There is even watermark in lower left corner, so no own work. Taivo (talk) 12:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:25, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has been downloaded for vandalism. Spillik (talk) 07:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Probably copyrighted toy. Bytheway, file name does not pass censorship. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has been downloaded for vandalism. Spillik (talk) 07:26, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 05:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has been downloaded for vandalism. Spillik (talk) 07:27, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Probably copyrighted toy. Bytheway, file name does not pass censorship. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File has been downloaded for vandalism. Spillik (talk) 07:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Very bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:13, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:40, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add here for deletion File:Famoso cantante 2013-08-28 03-32.jpg. Taivo (talk) 15:19, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspect copyright violation + out of scope: Commons is not Facebook. El Grafo (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 05:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo was apparently uploaded for the purpose of being added to the en.wiki article on the serial killer Roger Kibbe. Adding it to the article and trying to edit war it back when removed is the only thing the uploader enwiki user:Jcjr8982] has done on Wikipedia. Whoever it's a picture of, it's not Kibbe, who looks like this. The complete dissimilarity makes it a bit difficult to assume good faith re the uploader's claim on his talkpage that "i think its roger". It's sourced as "own work" and presumably is, considering the poor quality. We don't want a picture of an unknown person knocking about on Commons, least of all one uploaded for such an abusive purpose. Please delete. Bishonen (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC). Bishonen (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: This is utterly absurd — the photo was clearly taken in the 2000ies, late 1990ies at most, judging from the the fashion and electronic items it shows, while portraying Kibbe (born in 1941) in his early 20ies. Even if properly renamed, dated, geolocated, and licensed, this would still be a low quality trivial item — we have plenty of Male DuckFace and Retards Wearing Trucker Caps Indoors While Thumbing. And cheers again for the inanity of MobileUploads enabling trolls and vandals: (Sarcasm: Because serious editors cannot wait to edit Wikipedia, they have to add a pic to an article right after they snapped it!) Take it down, now! — Both this photo and MobileUploads. -- Tuválkin 21:07, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete So this is what the "add an image to this page" feature that was recently added to the mobile Wikipedia version does? If yes, I wonder if the people responsible for this ever actually thought about how that was supposed to be used? darkweasel94 23:24, 28 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:36, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:50, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: Fairly good photo, usable for many educational ends. Note that among Category:Blue-green eyes, this is the only photo that is neither a closeup, nor one where the subject is merely incidental — the blue-green eye is here visible even in thumbnail/gallery size, yet framed in a face. -- Tuválkin 20:03, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This file could use a renaming, though — no need to mortify Niall over some ophtalmological / anthropometric minutiae. -- Tuválkin 20:05, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, then. I change my vote to  Delete. -- Tuválkin 17:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; per filename and description evidently uploaded in order to defame the depicted identifiable persons. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:56, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; per filename and description evidently uploaded in order to defame the depicted identifiable persons. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation (his official Twitter account). Rapsar (talk) 09:22, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:58, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE and probably a derivative of the flower template. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:47, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 20:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, as this seems to be a personal image of a non-notable person (name in description not provided) and not in use. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:23, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 20:16, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:39, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:03, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 02:08, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted plaque and text Crazypaco (talk) 08:14, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  • Comment - I never saw anything that said historical markers are copyrighted. If so, there are multiple images of historical markers that are already on Commons that would need to be considered too. Dough4872 01:41, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Based on copyright law, historical markers installed before 1978 without a copyright notice are public domain. This particular marker was dedicated on May 1, 1965 without a copyright notice, which would make it public domain. Dough4872 02:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: ok apparently FASTILY 01:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, missing EXIF.

Alex (talk) 00:09, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:22, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely COPYVIO because photo is from a new user and uploaded via Mobile Web. The picture is of a celebrity on the red carpet taken from a location accessible only to professional photographers. Senator2029 03:21, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 05:44, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - blurry - no educational value INeverCry 05:47, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siddiqua8888 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - blurry pics - personal drawings - low quality pics - etc - no educational value

INeverCry 05:53, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 01:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - blurry - low quality INeverCry 05:56, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope INeverCry 05:59, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aamna malick (talk · contribs)

[edit]

possible copyvios - photos of Amna Malik uploaded by account named Amna malik - these are obviously not selfies - some look like pro portraits - I CSD tagged 2 blatant copyvios

INeverCry 06:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 22:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:07, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 06:11, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alokshukla670 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 06:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 01:16, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 06:18, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


  •  Keep: It shows, and well enough, rimless eyeglasses, which we do did not have even categorized as such. Surely there’s a whole bunch of them in 17 million files, but I wouldn’t exclude the usefulness of the photo right away, regardless of the goofy, unencyclopedic demenour of the subject. -- Tuválkin 06:40, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unused personal image. out of scope FASTILY 01:17, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has a low pixel count and there are no valid EXIF information. It is highly likely not the uploader's own work. High Contrast (talk) 11:03, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 18:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of non-free software. Azusa (talk) 14:31, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPEMono 19:17, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be free image. Appears to be a photoshopped or scanned image, or a grab form a web site. Timtrent (talk) 21:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaangpeter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:05, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FASTILY 01:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:06, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:50, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - promotional - unused text logo of non-notable company - single upload of user INeverCry 23:08, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:10, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - old BnW photo from 1971 per desc - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 23:13, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 08:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is promo/poster artwork not uploaders Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation (http://www.sheknows.com/beauty-and-style/hairstyle-photo-gallery/curly-hairstyles/jurnee-smollett) Stemoc (talk) 02:44, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedy deleted as copyvio. January (talk) 07:02, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 03:27, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nom Julo (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been taken from a fashion shoot of model Loulou Robert (see example site) based on Google image matching. However I have been unable to find this particular image apart from unattributed on Tumblr. The precautionary principle applies unless verification by the original (professional) photographer is provided. (talk) 07:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:45, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower-resolution duplicate of, say, http://www.midlandsbusinessnews.co.uk/media/663391/rickybalshawimage.jpg used by the Midland Business News. Likely copyright violation. Huon (talk) 12:48, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chooch1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album covers and promo photos. I think permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:32, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also interesting in this photo is the reflection on the sunglasses, showing the subject’s outstreched arm holding the camera — this is the quintessential selfie. -- Tuválkin 01:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: unused personal photo. out of scope FASTILY 06:28, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspiciously high quality considering user's other uploads. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 00:56, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my friends art work and this is stolen Shammu99 (talk) 07:25, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 03:00, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my friends art and is stolen Shammu99 (talk) 07:27, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 03:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 07:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 03:08, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my friends art work and is stolen Shammu99 (talk) 07:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deepali bansal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos and software screenshot. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 16:49, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This hand-drawn user generated likeness of an article subject has been uploaded for commercial reasons, it seems, and is unlikely to be of use. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:32, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:50, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be of educational use, from a user who has stated (elsewhere) that these portraits have been uploaded for sale Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:53, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from another website, no value to any WMF project. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:43, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyvio. INeverCry 00:09, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blatant copyvio (http://us.24h.com.vn/ca-nhac-mtv/dung-lam-be-phuong-my-chi-hoang-mang-c73a563398.html) DHN (talk) 06:16, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:29, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated to be an album cover, although unusually I'm not finding any matches in Google Images. If it's genuine it's presumably copyright of the relevant record label (the swords would put it above COM:TOO), if it's made up or for an unknown band it's out of scope. January (talk) 11:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution image with no EXIF. The uploader's other two uploads were copyvios, unlikely this one is own work as claimed. January (talk) 12:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedy deleted by User:Hedwig in Washington. January (talk) 17:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; unused mobile-shot of obviously non-notable person. publication might even violate personality rights of depicted person. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:39, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Same: File:Caldwell in 2013 2013-09-03 06-03.jpg --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; unused mobile-shot of obviously non-notable person. publication might even violate personality rights of depicted person Túrelio (talk) 12:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on de Nolispanmo 12:44, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image created as vandalism for Adam MacDonald article on English Wikipedia Bazonka (talk) 18:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:28, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not the uploader's own work High Contrast (talk) 00:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file was uploaded at another website: http://blog.zini.vn/phuong-my-chi-con-gio-la-toa-sang-tai-the-voice-kids/ on Aug 6, 2013. AlleinStein (talk) 00:54, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:15, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blatant copyvio like other uploads by this user DHN (talk) 04:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio (http://www.yousaytoo.com/bollywooad-actress-hot-dressed-in-colour-screen-awards/1756047) Stemoc (talk) 08:06, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:43, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, fansite (http://pureasin.com/) / facebook (https://www.facebook.com/ASINFANZ) Stemoc (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, fansite (http://pureasin.com/) / facebook (https://www.facebook.com/ASINFANZ) Stemoc (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio Getty (http://www.gettyimages.com.au/detail/news-photo/actor-spencer-breslin-attends-a-special-screening-hosted-by-news-photo/82865155) Stemoc (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Speedied as clear copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo of subject with no apparent notability and no description. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Warthog5 has not been repeatedly reminded not to upload such files. LX (talk, contribs) 12:58, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:41, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MisterPolitics (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 19:32, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Caffeyw as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Commons is not for pictures of new borns Dschwen (talk) 14:38, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]




Deleted: unused personal photo. out of scope FASTILY 07:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lyssaswift2314 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like promo photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).

  1. File:Love Will Remember photoshoot 2013-09-02 19-39.jpg
  2. File:Official cover of "Me & You" 2013-09-02 15-38.jpg
  3. File:Official cover of "Be Who You Are"- 2013-09-02 15-22.jpg
  4. File:Official cover of "That's The Way"- 2013-09-02 15-00.jpg
  5. File:Beatrice Miller in 2013 2013-09-02 13-26.jpg
  6. File:Lyssa Ann photoshoot in 2013 2013-09-02 11-16.jpg
  7. File:Lyssa Ann in August 2013 2013-09-02 10-07.jpg
  8. File:Christina Grimmie 2013 2013-09-01 19-50.jpg

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • I took the liberty of numbering these for discussion purposes. #1 is a copyvio, and I've marked it as such. Taken from one of any of [1]. Similar for #5 [2]. Number 8 was also a copyvio, and has been deleted as such. The other five images likely are the property of a not well known artist named "Lyssa Ann". This person may have been attempting to use Wikipedia to promote themselves (see [3]). If in fact the person uploading the images here is her, we'd need more confirmation than just an anonymous editor here claiming that they are her. Regardless, the images have little, if any, value to us as the self promotional articles that were hosting these five images have been deleted. Therefore,  Delete on the five, and all the other three to be deleted as copyvios. --Hammersoft (talk) 21:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 19:33, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only by apparent hoax deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 17:34, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 19:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image was released before and there is no metadata, so it may be copied. http://tattoos.fansshare.com/gallery/photos/10919873/tumblr-bbrjbpra-qccxt-erica-reyes/ CennoxX (talk) 18:52, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 03:25, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:23, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE; nice effect, but rather unencyclopedic, unused. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Deleted by Fastily. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:18, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 23:14, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PENIS. Blurry shot of male genitalia, from poor angle. Avenue (talk) 19:59, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PENIS. Blurry shot of male genitalia, low res too Perumalism Chat 20:15, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Denniss (talk) 21:03, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not user's work DragonZero (talk) 01:26, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: As per nomination - clear copyvio. Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:17, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected copyvio like other images uploaded by same user DHN (talk) 05:51, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user Jean Nguyen is keen on uploading non-free images. Gaconnhanhnhen (talk) 07:41, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Suspected copyvio. Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected copyvio DHN (talk) 05:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: It is text only (which means it cannot be copyright violation, even though it may mean it is off scope), and it is in use. Probably better to replace its use 1st, then delete -- Tuválkin 15:25, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: As per Tuvalkin. Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:31, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Out of scope Justass (talk) 09:53, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, bandspam del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Album Proshob (talk) 16:09, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Album Proshob (talk) 16:09, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Album Proshob (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:02, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://malecelebbio.com/2013/07/09/steve-grand/ Marcus Cyron (talk) 01:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:49, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:30, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader seems to be uploading a foto of herself. The copyrightstatus is unclear. The foto is to good looking and is not likely to be a picture se made of herself. I think that a professional photographer made this picture so the copyright of this is probadly his. This kan be solved to mail a letter singen to the photographer to commons:OTRS. Natuur12 (talk) 17:09, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:13, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - Not educationally useful Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:54, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Also a DW of many figures .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this image may contain protected health information on an indentifiable person, and that we would need some sort of proof that it was uploaded by the individual involved. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:33, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:48, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this image needs an OTRS tag or some sort of confirmation that its posted by the patient herself. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

given the file name, i think we need proof that this is uploaded by the person herself. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:36, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that uploader is copyright holder. discospinster (talk) 03:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:49, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic was uploaded by mistake. This is my personal picture Sharmila kandee (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


This picture was uploaded by mistake Sharmila kandee (talk) 15:42, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Per Tuválkin. Uploader's request, unused and recently uploaded file (at the time of the first request anyway). whym (talk) 03:38, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Most likely a reupload of previously deleted File:A Great Dancer And Actor, Most Down to Earth! Rey in D3, contestant In DID2 and NB5!! 2013-09-06 12-44.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 10:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 21:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete we are seeing a lot of these screenshots in mobile uploads, very few are likely to be of educational use and most are doubtful from a copyright point of view, this image included. -- (talk) 07:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 21:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pnps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 21:58, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lo subi desde mi celular y no pude colocarlo en la categoria donde debia colocarlo, solicito borrado ya que soy el propietario de la imagen. Gracias BrunoSRivero (talk) 23:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted -FASTILY 09:32, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, unused, likely self-promotion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unused photo about non-notable person (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 13:00, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:57, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE, unused, likely self-promotion. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Yep, the rather clumsy Swedish text does read like an attempt at self-promotion. LX (talk, contribs) 08:54, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I marked this as no source after having the Tineye matches flagged (and checking out several Google Image matches later on), this was removed with no other explanation for the lack of EXIF and odd file resolution. The image has been digitally altered, possibly to avoid photo-matching software. The original version appears to be taken from <http://www.newrochelletalk.com/blogs/sound-shore-medical-center>.

The digital manipulation can be seen in the tree patterns, particularly bottom right when most of a tree has been cloned.

To be kept on Commons, verification from the photographer should be given, along with some explanation of the provenance. (talk) 14:13, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have raised Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_40#JJEBlack after further investigating uploads under this account. -- (talk) 14:33, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete Just compare the pattern of the smoke. Both appear to be identical. A little but too much coincidence. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: INeverCry 18:56, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:58, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims to be from a photoshoot. No EXIF showing camera used. Dubious claim of ownership. Other uploads by this editor were copyright violations Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Girl is good, photograph is bad. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fails COM:SCOPE...without knowing what the subject of this unused image is, there's no expectation it could be useful for something obviously educational. Also uploader has history of claiming as his own works he takes from others. DMacks (talk) 17:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Commons is no private photo album High Contrast (talk) 14:33, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just the state arms of Belgium with the motto removed. No scope. Fry1989 eh? 19:35, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:49, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Operating systems are copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 00:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Copyright violation High Contrast (talk) 19:29, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, and appears to be s scan of the logo or label on T Shirt. There is nothing to assert the contributor's genuine right to place the image here. Timtrent (talk) 10:16, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:17, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: The image comes from here; copyright violation High Contrast (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 22:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete: Per nom. (Adding bad quality — “personal” should never be a reason for deleting, especially when it is also demanded proof of “personal” authorship or “personal” permission from the author.)
I want to point out that the seemingly chilling mention in the filename is probably just a spelling mistake for "rap", judging from the uploader’s name, apparently Brazilian: Local pronounciation of English "rap" being something like ['ʀapi], which is consistent with the spelling "rape" in Portuguese orthography. Eitherway, I’d suggest urgent renaming of the file should it be kept (e pedir pro pessoal não escrever em “ingréis”, já que aqui no Commons é aceitável colaborar em qualquer língua). -- Tuválkin 00:47, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per the two presented opinions High Contrast (talk) 19:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نقض حق تکثیر Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk)‍ 06:46, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copied from licensed website Mardetanha talk 15:23, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is one of two files uploaded by an editor whose only other contributions to any Wikimedia projects have been vandalism on English Wikipedia. The user is now indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia as a vandalism-only account. The two files on commons have never been used for any purpose other than vandalism on English Wikipedia articles, they are both currently unused, and they have no plausible prospect of ever having any constructive purpose on any Wikimedia project. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:02, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: / .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is one of two files uploaded by an editor whose only other contributions to any Wikimedia projects have been vandalism on English Wikipedia. The user is now indefinitely blocked on English Wikipedia as a vandalism-only account. The two files on commons have never been used for any purpose other than vandalism on English Wikipedia articles, they are both currently unused, and they have no plausible prospect of ever having any constructive purpose on any Wikimedia project. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:04, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: / .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:08, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No details of the image sources, searching the internet to reach the this page, in done says the image comes from layexdaiyo-clato-luv-hungergames.tumblr.com, however such a link is broken. It is clearly not their own work. Gusama Romero (talk) 18:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not possible to determine which is the original photo and who is its author, the photo is widespread in the network, however, is image is a derivative work of a color photograph (see http://pbs.twimg.com/media/BKB6TFvCcAIGJh0.jpg:large) Gusama Romero (talk) 18:33, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently this image is derived from this one (note that states that the author is B. cruveiller). Obviously not own work. Gusama Romero (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work of this picture. Therefore it is not their own work. Gusama Romero (talk) 19:05, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No aporta información sobre lo que representa la imagen. Puede tener derechos de autor. Ver: http://es.minecraftwiki.net/Creeper Raimundo Pastor (talk) 19:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Telstra" logo suggests a screenshot. January (talk) 20:37, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:51, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: personal image Acroterion (talk) 23:10, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used as vandalism Mattythewhite (talk) 23:36, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 16:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:09, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:13, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChinaBee52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:11, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 17:40, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 09:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, previously circulating (higher res, but watermarked) via https://plus.google.com/photos/111763682057061111026/albums/5909044073331665425/5909044074043684418?pid=5909044074043684418&oid=111763682057061111026 (08.2013) Gunnex (talk) 09:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF, most likely grabbed & cropped from http://zakspade.bandcamp.com/track/city = http://f0.bcbits.com/img/a0497138379_10.jpg Gunnex (talk) 09:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:14, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. See also User talk:Twilight balok... Gunnex (talk) 09:46, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:15, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Per title similar to what was already recently deleted via File:An Amazing Actor! Was seen as Ela on BFF, Contestant in NB5!! 2013-09-06 12-54.jpg. Related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:A Great Dancer and Actor, Most Down to Earth! Rey in D3, contestant In DID2 and NB5!! 2013-09-06 20-42.jpg Gunnex (talk) 10:01, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 11:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: COM:PS Alan (talk) 21:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, advertising. January (talk) 12:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:16, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, advertising. January (talk) 12:38, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:42, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, this was uploaded for use in a speedily deleted joke page on enwp, w: Brandon everrett eli faulkner. (This is not the DJ w:Brandon Block.) January (talk) 13:08, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 01:17, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mobile screenshot of enwp which seems to have been uploaded by mistake, unlikely to be used. January (talk) 17:35, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:46, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of SCOPE,personal,unused file. Revi (discuss|SUL) 18:24, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 17:48, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]