Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/11/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
a.jpg){kind=link}
![114 File:Surrealmageddon Visual Poetry in "Two renowned artists with the largest Milton Folio in the world." Williamsburg Art & Historical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.jpg](#File:Surrealmageddon_Visual_Poetry_in_"Two_renowned_artists_with_the_largest_Milton_Folio_in_the_world."_Williamsburg_Art_&_Historical_Center,_Brooklyn,_New_York,_United_States_of_America.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
著作者の許諾を示す根拠を見つけられなかったため。 10-DONMAN (talk) 00:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded wrong I don't have the rights please delete Mordorgirladar (talk) 02:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Non-free character. Astrinko (talk) 02:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
{{SD|G1}} MLTRock (talk) 04:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|I want this gone}}
I'm trying to edit the Rolla, Missouri Wikipedia page by adding the city flag and logo and other stuff. KristopherTheWikiMaster (talk) 03:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
- So why are you nominating it for deletion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense nomination rationale. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm trying to edit the Rolla, Missouri Wikipedia page by adding the city flag and logo and other stuff. KristopherTheWikiMaster (talk) 02:45, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Kept - still not a reason for deletion. (Non-admin closure.) Omphalographer (talk) 04:29, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
I'm making a new file with a comma in it KristopherTheWikiMaster (talk) 04:41, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:33, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm trying to edit the Rolla, Missouri Wikipedia page by adding the city flag and logo and other stuff. KristopherTheWikiMaster (talk) 05:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept per every other time. (Non-admin closure.) And why has this user not been blocked yet? Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 03:38, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
同じファイルがあるため かなえゆうじん (talk) 05:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Question You're saying it's a duplicate file? What's the filename it's a duplicate of? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Because I made a mistake. あぅあぅあぅ (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Hee is Wrong Jpg Nasiralikhan000 (talk) 08:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
documenet en doublon -erreur Céline Husetowski WMFr (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake WL.WL.WL (talk) 12:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
This image was uploaded by a puppet user who used the name Vium Mundi immitating an administrator in eswiki (Virum Mundi) in order to write an article which has now been deleated. Recommend to bloque the user as well. Virum Mundi (talk) 13:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Copied from alamy, see watermark. --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Non-free character. Astrinko (talk) 13:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
It is for non-commercial use only. Allan warren (talk) 14:55, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Keep - No, it isn't. You have already licensed this image under the CC BY-SA license; adding a more restrictive license after the fact does not revoke the existing license. I've reverted this change (Special:Diff/946172923), as the CC BY-NC license is not permitted for content on Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: with all due respect to the great contributions by Allen Warren, no reason in policy to delete. Uploaded under free license. License changed more than 2 months later (too late for automatic deletion by user request, and no courtesy deletion was asked for.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:58, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
Because it is for non-commercial use only. Allan warren (talk) 14:56, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, unless VRT says there is a problem with the ticket.
- @Allan warren: Michael Bednarek, a member of the VRT gave it a ticket approving it. Do you have any specific reason to believe they were wrong? Have you contacted them? - Jmabel ! talk 16:47, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. As with File:Kyle Schroeder 1.jpg, you edited in a CC BY-NC license before nominating the file for deletion: Special:Diff/946173372. You cannot revoke an existing CC license by adding an additional, more restrictive license. I've reverted this change. Omphalographer (talk) 19:01, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Not valid reason for deletion; situation same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kyle Schroeder 1.jpg. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:59, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- Deleted, invalid VRT ticket added by non-VRT user. No license, no permission. --Krd 17:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Empty; plus Iowa has only one classification for municipalities and that is a city. They may be the size of a village in another state, but they're still cities in Iowa.
Speedy deleted by Yann: per COM:SPEEDY. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as "Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere." (cf. file history) Grand-Duc (talk) 09:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'd tend to Keep, though more specific description and categorization would be helpful. This is not what I think of as a typical vacation snap, as no-one is posed in the picture, and it's definitely of a potentially useful motif. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Did you see the upload history of the photographer of this challenged picture? He provided a plethora of images with a naming pattern of "Trip Photo by Immanuelle 4-digit-number", leading me to assume he wandered around Bangkok, Thai temples and Kathmandu, snapping pictures of stuff that caught his eyes. This behaviour, or at least the published results, does still look like "vacations snaps" for me, I'd expect people posing mostly only when you're travelling in groups. Of course, vacations snaps (e.g. from city trips) aren't useless per se, but I think that the combination of "vacation snap + huge lack of provided information about depicted subject" makes for a falling out of our project scope. I'd gladly retract the DR if and when Immanuelle (or any other knowledgeable person) provides more useful information about the motif (yes, it is indeed theoretically useful). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc this is one of the Wat Arun corner shrines. It is shaped kind of like a diamond with these shrines on each end. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 17:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Immanuelle: thanks for the additional information! That IMHO makes a huge difference between simply stating a picture origin as "Bangkok" and having these explaining details. When I'm back home, I'll retract this DR (that would be a hassle to do it on my mobile phone). You could add the data in the information template meanwhile. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 19:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- I processed the file myself, it's now under File:Wat Arun - Corner shrine 2024-09-29.jpg. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Grand-Duc this is one of the Wat Arun corner shrines. It is shaped kind of like a diamond with these shrines on each end. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 17:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Did you see the upload history of the photographer of this challenged picture? He provided a plethora of images with a naming pattern of "Trip Photo by Immanuelle 4-digit-number", leading me to assume he wandered around Bangkok, Thai temples and Kathmandu, snapping pictures of stuff that caught his eyes. This behaviour, or at least the published results, does still look like "vacations snaps" for me, I'd expect people posing mostly only when you're travelling in groups. Of course, vacations snaps (e.g. from city trips) aren't useless per se, but I think that the combination of "vacation snap + huge lack of provided information about depicted subject" makes for a falling out of our project scope. I'd gladly retract the DR if and when Immanuelle (or any other knowledgeable person) provides more useful information about the motif (yes, it is indeed theoretically useful). Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 13:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Retracted: the issues behind the DR rationale have been solved. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
used for advertising and copyvio from https://www.digivak.be Hoyanova (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:44, 20 November 2024 UTC: used for advertising only and copyvio from company website digivak.be --Krdbot 20:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
used for advertising and copyvio from company website Hoyanova (talk) 16:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 16:56, 20 November 2024 UTC: used for advertising on nl-wiki and copyvio from company website --Krdbot 20:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Aurora at Foynhagen - Norway - Concert 2023-Jul-21 - Knut-N-Borgund - stagephoto (68).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was uploaded by mistake by me. It isn't providing any value Runemh (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
File:DALL·E 2024-11-20 12.13.29 - A modern illustration of global eCommerce privacy challenges, featuring interconnected world maps with data streams represented as glowing lines, shie.webp
[edit]
Out of scope: unused, unusable AI-generated graphic. A bunch of poorly rendered icons and phrases like "data security precurtion" overlaid on a map do not meaningfully illustrate "privacy challenges". Omphalographer (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 - this is their only contribution to any Wikimedia project. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:48, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Pointless personal photo with no encyclopedic value Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 23:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:46, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Romas Vilčiauskas is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Romas Vilčiauskas is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:55, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Estonia, sculptor Terje Ojaveri is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:54, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSF F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:52, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Personal art, please see COM:WEBHOST/COM:SCOPE Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Wildly inaccurate - this appears to be illustrating a body of water adjacent to the earth's core? Omphalographer (talk) 20:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:51, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: unidentified, likely AI-generated logo; related article speedily deleted from frwiki. Omphalographer (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10 - this is someone's Minecraft guild. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:50, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Estonia, sculptor Terje Ojaveri is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
I don't have to download it. I apologize. File:BEKIPEDIYA.svg #yozishma 14:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:49, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
user request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 17:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete G7 per uploader's request, was uploaded recently and unused. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:45, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Goshuincho 2 Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 17:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G7 per uploader's request, was uploaded recently and unused. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:44, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
because I changed my mind about uploading it SandFrex (talk) 21:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:43, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vium Mundi (talk · contribs)
[edit]User blocked for copyvios, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 17:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not own work. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete account is clearly a vandal as it is trying to impersonate Virum Mundi, an eswiki admin. Günther Frager (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and clear consensus. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Photography by Henry Clarke (1918-1996). It is still copyrighted in France its country of origin (see source). We can undelete it in 2067. Günther Frager (talk) 21:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 11:11, 21 November 2024 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Studio Harcourt 1937 to 1953 --Krdbot 14:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
SpaceX videos are not under Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 Generic Artem.G (talk) 14:13, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Yet another fake image manipulation (see File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.png, File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.jpg etc.) based on https://defencedirecteducation.com/2022/02/01/indian-navy-ssc-it-notification-2022-for-b-e-b-tech-graduates/ KylieTastic (talk) 15:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Also users other images appear to be fakes I just haven't located the source images yet! File:Rmr.ragulvarma.jpg and File:RMR.DEEPA RAGULVARMA.jpg KylieTastic (talk) 15:55, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, good catch, thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 11:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:21, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Uldis Sterģis is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, sculptor Uldis Sterģis is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:11, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Latvia, architect Eižens Laube died in 1967 A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in Lithuania, architect Marius Šaliamoras is still alive and Vytautas Nasvytis died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Kazys Kasperavičius died in 2015 A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Gintautas Lukošaitis is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Juozas Burneika died in 2016 and architect Rimantas Dičius is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, sculptor Antanas Kmieliauskas died in 2019 A1Cafel (talk) 04:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, both sculptor Stasys Žirgulis and architects Edmundas Makštutis, Valentinas Mazuronis are still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted screen A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:12, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Azerbaijan A1Cafel (talk) 04:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission from the source and author A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:13, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Identifiable man - no information in COM:CSCR / COM:IDENT whether Thailand has consent requirements (nomination for deletion per COM:PRP). Grand-Duc (talk) 09:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
The template {{PD-Italy}} is for photographs, this cover has a painting and it has a 70 years pma protection in Italy. Günther Frager (talk) 11:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
The uploader shared a screenshot of a chat with the supposed copyright holder via VRT which was not enough of a evidence. 1 week has passed since I asked them to follow the correct instructions but haven't received any response. Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:14, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Work by Italian illustrator Adolfo Busi (1891-1977) [1]. It is still copyrighted in Italy, its country of origin, where protection is 70 years pma. We can undelete it in 2048. Günther Frager (talk) 17:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Derivative image. Sreejith K (talk) 18:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Photo by French photographer Sam Levin (1904-1992). It is still copyrighted in France (70 years pma). We can undelete it in 2063. Günther Frager (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for murals in the US. Günther Frager (talk) 21:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:31, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
This image triggers several warning signs for a copyvio:
- PGN (often typical for screenshots) instead of JPG for a photographic image
- quite small, going by the pixel count
- in combination with the points above: first upload by the uploader
- a reverse image search brings up several web pages where this image is quoted as taken from Instagram
COM:PRP would mandate a deletion. Grand-Duc (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aghyadghzil322 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not sure if these are malformatted or tests, but they look like static at the moment
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
AI image supposedly depicting a real person. Should never be used in any educational context because it has no basis in reality. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, images exist of her aged 17 and she does not look like this. The car behind her and the double yellow lines in the road are also at least fifty years early. Belbury (talk) 12:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not useful. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lithuanian Bishops Conference
[edit]No FoP in Lithuania, architect Stefan Narębski died in 1966
- File:Lithuanian Bishops Conference1.JPG
- File:Lithuanian Bishops Conference2.JPG
- File:Lithuanian Bishops Conference3.JPG
- File:Lithuanian Bishops Conference4.JPG
- File:Lithuanian Bishops Conference5.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete It's also out of focus.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per above. Ratekreel (talk) 09:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ferxxo3052 as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1. This could qualify for {{Pd-textlogo}} Sreejith K (talk) 04:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete That is not PD-Textlogo, at least not in the US. It might be a fancy version of a PD-Textlogo, but it goes way beyond simple text and symbols.--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright infringement, the freedom of panorama does not apply to temporary works of art in Germany. Lukas Beck (talk) 07:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, selfpromo ReneeWrites (talk) 11:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, selfpromo ReneeWrites (talk) 11:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
This media is out of scope. Astrinko (talk) 12:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Unused and unpolished (it says "Paris" twice) AI-generated logo, unclear whether "ePower Paris" even exists. Belbury (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:42, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Herbertrczdx (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
- File:Linux 6.png
- File:Linux 5.png
- File:Linux 4.png
- File:Linux 3.png
- File:Linux 2h.png
- File:Instalação OCS Agent 5.png
- File:Linux 1.png
- File:Instalação NSClient1.png
- File:Instalação OCS Agent 4.png
- File:Instalação OCS Agent 3.png
- File:Instalação OCS Agent 1.png
- File:Instalação OCS Agent 2.png
- File:Instalação NSClient 2.png
- File:Instalação NSClient 3.png
- File:Instalação NSClient 4.png
Didym (talk) 14:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:43, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
out of project scope
- File:Pani Dagmara.jpg
- File:Smołka 8.jpg
- File:Klasa pani Dagamry.jpg
- File:Pani Dagmara 3.jpg
- File:Smołka 7.jpg
- File:Smołka 6.jpg
- File:Smołka 5.jpg
- File:Nauczycielki.jpg
- File:Pani Dagmara 2.jpg
- File:Pani Dagmara 1.jpg
- File:Smołka 2.jpg
- File:Smołka 3.jpg
- File:Smołka1.jpg
- File:Florian Brom10.jpg
- File:Florian Brom9.jpg
- File:Florian Brom8.jpg
- File:Florian Brom7.jpg
- File:Florian Brom6.jpg
- File:Florian Brom5.jpg
- File:Florian Brom4.jpg
- File:Florian Brom2.jpg
- File:Florian Brom3.jpg
- File:Florian Brom.jpg
Didym (talk) 15:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Fails COM:SCOPE, AI art that offers no encyclopedic value and uses a copyrighted character Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Saudi Arabia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:48, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, useless quality (tilted), better view e.g. here. Grand-Duc (talk) 15:56, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. Tilted but good quality, no need to hide. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused logos.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused promo materials.
- File:Entrega Guarda-mais-que-chuva ONG CENHA.jpg
- File:Troca de campanhas nas laterais das máquinas.jpg
- File:Máquina RB03.jpg
- File:CPDSC.jpg
- File:RB01.jpg
- File:Nathan e Freddy - CEOs Rentbrella.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
out of scope Krd 16:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file of a non-contributor. Cross-wiki self-promotion of a non-notable individual using multiple accounts. Marbletan (talk) 16:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Out of scope personal photo. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:43, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:51, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pskkannan02 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and text documents.
- File:Egfinal28.png
- File:Eg2.3282024.png
- File:Eg2.2282024.png
- File:Eg22828204.png
- File:Powerdm282024.png
- File:Contribution282024.png
- File:Eg1 2024-08-04.png
- File:Final 102024-08-04.png
- File:Eqn10 2024-08-04.png
- File:Eqn2024-08-04.png
- File:Figure1-4.8.2024.png
- File:Pdtfile1fig1.jpg
- File:Cpdillsimg.jpg
- File:Pd1ills.jpg
- File:Fig3illspdt.jpg
- File:Pdtills4img.jpg
- File:Pdtfig4ills.jpg
- File:Figure2pdtills.jpg
- File:Pdt theorem expl 2.jpg
- File:Pdfig1 pdt theorem.jpg
- File:Equation for pdtpage.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:52, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete F10, personal photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Humberland (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts.
- File:Cpcleadership2022polls.png
- File:2022 CPC Leadership Polling Among Conservative Supporters.png
- File:Abortionvsreligionus.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- There is no reason why it would be out of scope. These are charts. Your rationale does not make sense. Keep for that reason. However, the actual issue is that there is no datasource – it just says Polling data from Gallup was used to create this chart. so if no specific datasource is added Delete because of that. Prototyperspective (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alejandro981372 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete out of scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crafterflance12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nomination. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:45, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
File created as advertisement Astrinko (talk) 17:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope Astrinko (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guzcot2017 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:DieterLaser2.jpg
- File:Dieterlaser.jpg
- File:Lacroix-riz2.jpg
- File:Elizabeth Gurley Flynn.jpg
- File:Egido2.jpg
- File:Olarieta2.jpg
- File:Enriquepalazuelos.jpg
Didym (talk) 14:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not own works. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, but it would be best for you to say why as nominator. One thing I'd say is that although small size and problematic EXIF are not per se deletion reasons, photos this small are really unlikely to be uploaded by the photographer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Elizabeth Gurley Flynn is PD, but we already have a larger version of the image. --RAN (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
a.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
usuless blurred photo; there is a better one File:1938 Ford Tudor (24534690826).jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
a.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete blurry photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not keen on quality-based deletions, but we already have one here that's a near-duplicate. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
a.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, bad quality: blurred, obstructions in front of dirty lens. Better view of motif also here. Grand-Duc (talk) 17:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete blurry low quality photo. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete This time, I agree. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
appears to be some kind of advertisement Clarinetguy097 (talk) 18:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete G10. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, no educational value. Astrinko (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
File:Surrealmageddon Visual Poetry in "Two renowned artists with the largest Milton Folio in the world." Williamsburg Art & Historical Center, Brooklyn, New York, United States of America.jpg
[edit]
Unused promotional montage of non-notable artist, out of scope. And COM:DW as well. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Blakkez; this is part of a pattern of self-promotional uploads. Omphalographer (talk) 19:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:00, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Counselor D (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional upload of screenshots of a website that appears to have shut down by now. No educational value.
Nakonana (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Corriepinkney (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: plain text. I'm dubious that this accurately represents the Gullah language.
- File:Savannah, Ga version of Gullah language 05.jpg
- File:Savannah, Ga version of Gullah language 04.jpg
- File:Savannah, Ga version of Gullah language 02.jpg
- File:Savannah, Ga version of Gullah language 03.jpg
- File:Savannah, Ga version of Gullah language 01.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 20:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- How well do you know Gullah? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm admittedly no expert, but the text in File:Savannah, Ga version of Gullah language 02.jpg looks like mostly English to me, not a distinct dialect. Regardless, these images are essentially plain text - the lines of emoji or the sticker of a person in the corner don't add any educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I think scope is the more important question, yes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm admittedly no expert, but the text in File:Savannah, Ga version of Gullah language 02.jpg looks like mostly English to me, not a distinct dialect. Regardless, these images are essentially plain text - the lines of emoji or the sticker of a person in the corner don't add any educational value. Omphalographer (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:30, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Image published in Italy in 1982 and still copyrighted in the US due to URAA-restoration. Günther Frager (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:08, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Photo published in Italy in 1980. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin, but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. Thus, it is still protected by copyright in the US. Following PCP we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:07, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Photo published in Italy in 1984. It is currently in the public domain in its country of origin (20 years ppa), but it was not in 1996 at URAA time. That is, the usage of {{PD-US-URAA}} is incorrect. As it is still copyrighted in the US we cannot keep it. Günther Frager (talk) 19:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 20:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:05, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Florian Schroetter - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 22:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
I saw no confirmation of the claimed CC license at the facebook source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:04, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio? Name of uploader does not match name in EXIF data. Nakonana (talk) 23:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Has Facebook metadata. Likely a copyvio. May need VRT verification with original file to confirm uploaders own work claim. --Ratekreel (talk) 10:57, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 09:03, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Copyright content from https://www.gettyimages.in/detail/photo/cannons-gulbarga-fort-karnataka-india-asia-royalty-free-image/636878014 NXcrypto (talk) 15:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
user request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 17:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
user request Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 17:22, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio © ANDREAS DANZER - we would need a COM:VRT permission to keep this M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright El Mercurio. Santiago : Talleres El Mercurio, 1900- . v., (5 sep. 1976), p. 4 Librero2109 (talk) 18:38, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no counter-argument. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
I am nominating most (but not all) of the Indigenous Flags uploaded by Xasartha. These are all flags that are too complex to be PD-ineligible. Xasartha has consistently uploaded these files claiming to be the author on the basis they recreated an image they saw elsewhere on the internet, and "released" it as Creative Commons. Consistently, the true designers of the flags are not credited. These files fall under a mix of US and Canadian copyright jurisdiction, but as I understand it, neither nation will let somebody reproduce a copyrighted work, claim authorship, and then attempt to change the copyright status of the work.
I have excluded from this bulk delete request a number of flags that Xasartha uploaded that I understand as either PD-ineligible, or that appear to be PD due to age. It may be that there are a few more that are PD due to age, but given the sheer number of how many flags need to be sourced and how few of the ones I researched are PD due to age, I think the most prudent thing to do is bulk delete.
- File:Flag of the Nanticoke Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Woodstock First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria.PNG
- File:Flag of the Karuk Tribe of California.PNG
- File:Flag of the Natchez Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nipmuc Indian Association of Connecticut.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nipmuc Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pokanoket-Wampanoag Federation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Port Gamble S'Klallam Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray Reservation.png
- File:Flag of the Yerington Paiute Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Shivwits Band of Paiute Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the San Juan Southern Paiute Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Reno-Sparks Indian Colony.png
- File:Flag of the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah.png
- File:Flag of the Moapa Band of Paiutes.PNG
- File:Flag of the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Western Shoshone Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Te-Moak Tribe of Western Shoshone Indians of Nevada.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mesa Grande Band of Mission Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the La Posta Band of Mission Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Inaja-Cosmit Band of Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Soboba Band of Luiseño Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Luiseño Band of Pauma-Yuima Mission Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the La Jolla Band of Luiseño Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pala Band of Cupeño Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Augustine Band of Cahuilla Mission Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Yavapai-Apache Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Tu' Tssn Nde Band of the Lipan Apache Nation of Texas.PNG
- File:Flag of the Tonto Apache Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the San Carlos Apache Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mescalero Apache Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Lipan Apache Band of Texas.PNG
- File:Flag of the St'at'imc Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska.PNG
- File:Flag of the Traditional Abenaki of the Mazipskwik & Related Bands.png
- File:Flag of the Première Nation d'Odanak.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nulhegan Band of the Coosuck-Abenaki Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Madokawando Abenaki Indian Tribal Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Koasek Traditional Band of the Sovereign Abenaki Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Cowasuck Band of the Pennacook-Abenaki People.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pueblo of Tesuque.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pueblo of Santa Clara.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pueblo of Sandia.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pueblo of Laguna.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pueblo of Isleta.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pueblo of Acoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pueblo of Zia.PNG
- File:Flag of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute.png
- File:Flag of the Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Coyote Valley Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cowlitz Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Washoe Tribe of Nevada & California.PNG
- File:Flag of the Wicocomico Indian Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Saanich Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Squaxin Island Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the T'souke Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of Louisiana.PNG
- File:Flag of the Biloxi-Chitimacha-Choctaw of Louisiana.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nipissing First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community.PNG
- File:Flag of the Gila River Indian Community.png
- File:Flag of the Ak-Chin Indian Community.png
- File:Flag of the Narragansett Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pocomoke Indian Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Eastern Pequot Tribal Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Mashantucket Pequot Tribal Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Unconquered Seminoles of Florida.PNG
- File:Flag of the Affiliated Tribes of Northwest Indians (ATNI).png
- File:Flag of the Shoalwater Bay Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Wapanum Tribe.PNG -- EDIT #2: see note below about this flag being under TOO
- File:Flag of the Tulalip Tribes.PNG
- File:Flag of the Menominee Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Robinson Rancheria of Pomo Indians of California.PNG
- File:Flag of the Modoc Tribe of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Peoria Indian Tribe of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Penobscot Indian Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Chemehuevi Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Hopi Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nottawaseppi Huron Band of Potawatomi Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Forest County Potawatomi Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Wahta Mohawks.PNG
- File:Flag of the Tuscarora Nation of New York.PNG
- File:Flag of the St Regis Mohawk Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Southern Band of the Tuscarora Indian Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the Six Nations of the Grand River Territory.PNG
- File:Flag of the Seneca-Cayuga Tribe of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Onondaga Nation of New York.PNG
- File:Flag of the Oneida of the Thames First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin.PNG
- File:Flag of the Oneida Indian Nation of New York.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mohawks of the Bay of Quinte.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mohawk Nation of Kahnawake.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mohawk Nation of Akwesasne.png
- File:Flag of the Kanatsiohareke Mohawk Community.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cayuga Nation of New York.PNG
- File:Flag of the Thunder Mountain Lenapé Nation of Pennsylvania & Ohio.png
- File:Flag of the Ramapough Lenape Indian Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Powhatan Renape Nation of the Rancocus Indian Reservation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nanticoke Lenni-Lenape Indians of New Jersey.PNG
- File:Flag of the Kansas Delaware Tribe of Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Delawares of Idaho.png
- File:Flag of the Delaware Tribe of Western Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Delaware Tribe of Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Munsee Delaware Indian Nation, USA.PNG
- File:Flag of the Kickapoo Ttribe in Kansas.PNG
- File:Flag of the Kickapoo Nation of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nation Huronne-Wendat de Wendake.PNG
- File:Flag of the Wyandot Nation of Kansas.png
- File:Flag of the Wyandotte Nation of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Kamloops Indian Band.PNG
- File:Flag of the Shawnee Nation United Remnant Band.PNG
- File:Flag of the Piqua Shawnee Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the Piqua Sept of Ohio.png
- File:Flag of the Loyal Shawnee Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Yamassee Muskogee Nation of Florida.PNG
- File:Flag of the Miccosukee Seminole Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Oklevueha Band of the Seminole Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Seminole Tribe of Florida.PNG
- File:Flag of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Miami Nation of Indiana.PNG
- File:Flag of the Miami Nation of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Piikani Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mt Arafat Embassy Clan of Yamassee Native Americans.PNG
- File:Flag of the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana.PNG
- File:Flag of the Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas.PNG
- File:Flag of the Poarch Band of Creek Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Machis Lower Creek Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Muscogee Nation of Florida.PNG
- File:Flag of Thlopthlocco Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of Kialegee Tribal Town of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Creek Nation of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Chickasaw Nation.PNG - see Edit #4
- File:Flag of the Choctaw Nation.PNG
- File:Historical Flag of Choctaw Civil War Confederates.PNG
- File:Flag of the Chickahominy Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Native Council of Prince Edward Island.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pictou Landing First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Benoit First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Aroostook Band of Micmac Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Whati First Nation (Lac la Martre First Nation).PNG
- File:Flag of the Muscogee Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Gameti First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Dechi Lao'ti First Nations (Wekweti).PNG
- File:Flag of the Behchoko First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Vuntut Gwitchin First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Aklavik First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Village Nordique de Kuujjuaraapik et Village Cri de Whapmagoostui.PNG
- File:Flag of the Red Earth Cree Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cree Nation of Wemindji.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pimicikamak Cree Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nisichawayasihk Cree Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Mikisew Cree First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the James Smith Cree Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Fisher River Cree Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Beaver Lake Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Kijicho Manito Algonquin Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Long Point First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Ottawa Algonquin First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Nishnawbe Aski Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Serpent River First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Pays Plat First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Burt Lake Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians.png
- File:Flag of the Wahpeton Dakota Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sioux Valley Dakota Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Kaliakh Kwaan Tlingit Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Makah Indian Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Quinault Indian Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Quileute Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Puyallup Tribe of Indians.png
- File:Flag of the Lummi Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Swinomish Indian Tribal Community.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cow Creek Band of the Umpqua Tribe of Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Coquille Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mowa Band of Choctaw Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Western Cherokee Nation of Arkansas & Missouri.png
- File:Flag of the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the United Cherokee Ani-Yun-Wiya Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Texas Cherokee (Tsalagiyi Nvdagi).PNG
- File:Flag of the Tallige Cherokee Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Southern Cherokee Nation.PNG - EDIT #3: this flag is from 1861 so is PD [2]
- File:Flag of the San Diego Cherokee Community.PNG
- File:Flag of the Northern Cherokee Nation of the Old Louisiana Territory.PNG
- File:Flag of the Lone Wolf Band of Cherokee Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Georgia Tribe of Eastern Cherokee.PNG
- File:Flag of the Four Winds Tribe-Louisiana Cherokee Confederacy.PNG
- File:Flag of the Florida Tribe of the Cherokee Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama.png
- File:Flag of the Chickamauga Cherokee Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cherokees of California.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cherokee Tribe of Northeast Alabama.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cherokee of Georgia Tribal Council.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cherokee Nation of Mexico.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cherokee Delaware Tribe of the Northwest.png
- File:Flag of the Cherokee Band of Texas.png
- File:Flag of the Appalachian Cherokee Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the New Jersey Taino Jatibonuco Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the United Confederation of Taino People.png
- File:Flag of the Organized Village of Kake.PNG
- File:Flag of the Chilkat Indian Village.PNG
- File:Flag of the Central Council of the Tlingit & Haida Indian Tribes of Alaska.png
- File:Flag of the Otoe-Missouria Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Tohono O'odham Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Omaha Tribe of Nebraska & Iowa.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sac & Fox Nation of Oklahoma.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sac & Fox Nation of the Missouri in Kansas & Nebraska.PNG
- File:Flag of the Ponca Tribe of Nebraska.PNG
- File:Flag of the Iowa Tribe of Kansas & Nebraska.PNG
- File:Flag of the Whitefish River First Nation.png
- File:Flag of the White Earth Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians of North Dakota.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sokaogon Chippewa Community.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sandy Lake Band of Mississippi Chippewa.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sachigo Lake First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Roseau River Anishinabe First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Red Lake Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Red Cliff Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.PNG
- File:Flag of the Neskantaga First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Muskowekwan First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mnjikaning First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mississauga First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Minnesota Chippewa Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Lac Seul First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Lac du Flambeau Ojibwe Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Koocheching First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Grand Portage Band of Chippewa.PNG
- File:Flag of the Eabametoong First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Chippewas of the Thames First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Alderville First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Bloodvein First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Bay Mills Indian Community.png
- File:Flag of the Ottawa people.PNG
- File:Flag of the Ottawa Tribe of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Sheshegwaning First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mackinac Bands of Chippewa & Ottawa Indians.png
- File:Flag of the M'chigeeng First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Wikwemikong Unceded First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Little Traverse Bay Bands of Odawa Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Little River Band of Ottawa Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa & Chippewa Indians of Michigan.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sapotaweyak Cree Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Peepeekisis Cree Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Oujé Bougoumou First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Kitchenuhmaykoosib Inninuwug (aka Big Trout Lake First Nation).PNG
- File:Flag of the Kapawe'no First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Enoch Indian Band.PNG
- File:Flag of the Driftpile First Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Grand Council of the Crees & the Cree Regional Authority.png
- File:Flag of the Cree Regional Authority.png
- File:Flag of the Grand Council of the Crees.png
- File:Flag of the Cree Nation of Nemaska.PNG
- File:Flag of the Bigstone Cree Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of Nunavik.PNG
- File:Flag of the Alexis Nakota Sioux Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Stoney Nakoda Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Dakota Plains Wahpeton Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Fort Belknap Indian Community.PNG
- File:Flag of the Shakopee Mdewakanton Dakota Community.png
- File:Flag of the United Sioux Tribes.PNG
- File:Flag of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe of Washington.PNG
- File:Flag of the Snohomish Tribe of Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Suquamish Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Heiltsuk Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Haisla Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Muckleshoot Indian Tribe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Ketchikan Indian Community.PNG
- File:Flag of the St Croix Chippewa Indians of Wisconsin.PNG
- File:Flag of the Sault Ste Marie Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Michigan.PNG
- File:Flag of the Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Michigan.PNG
- File:Flag of the Chiniki First Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Mishkeegogamang Ojibway Nation.PNG
- File:Flag of the Mille Lacs Band of Ojibwe.PNG
- File:Flag of the Little Shell Tribe of Chippewa Indians of Montana.PNG
- File:Flag of the Bois Forte Band of Chippewa Indians.PNG
- File:Flag of the Spirit Lake Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the Gwich'in Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community of the L'Anse & Ontonagon Bands of Chippewa Indians.png
- File:Flag of the Tonkawa Tribe of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Ponca Tribe of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Pawnee Nation of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Naskapi Nation of Kawawachikamach.png
- File:Flag of the Osage Nation of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Mandan, Hidatsa & Arikara Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Iowa Tribe of Oklahoma.png
- File:Flag of the Siksika Nation.png
- File:Flag of the Blood Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the Mohawk Warriors' Society.png
- File:Flag of the Yankton Sioux Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the Upper Sioux Community.png
- File:Flag of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the Mendota Mdwakanton Sioux Community.png
- File:Flag of the Lower Sioux Indian Community.png
- File:Flag of the Lower Brule Sioux Tribe.png
- File:Flag of the Kalispel Indian Community.png
- File:Flag of the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua & Siuslaw Indians.png
- File:Flag of the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of Oregon.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Intervex (talk) 01:02, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Edit #1 to add: if you look at User_talk:Xasartha/Archive_1 you'll see this user was warned from the very beginning that their uploads were Derivative Works. Large numbers of their uploads have already been deleted as copyright violations. Intervex (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Edit #2 to add: the inclusion of File:Flag of the Wapanum Tribe.PNG was included in error. It's below TOO, and I'm updating its information accordingly... but once I tried to update its information I could not find any WaPANum Tribe, and the WaNAPum Tribe appears not to use this flag? I retagged it with factual inaccuracy but maybe it should be deleted. Intervex (talk) 23:17, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
- Edit #3 to add: while checking other Cherokee flags I determined that File:Flag of the Southern Cherokee Nation.PNG is from the 19th century and hence PD. I updated its author and license information and do not think this file needs to be deleted.
- Edit #4. Since creating this deletion request, 6 flags were speedy deleted because I found them in the US copyright office's database. While researching the Chickasaw flag for File:Flag of the Chickasaw Nation.svg I determined it is PD-ineligible because the colourized seal is based on a black and white seal from 1856 [3] [4]. However, as Xasartha notes, their recreation is not a faithful one, so it may still be worth deleting on the grounds of inaccuracy. Intervex (talk) 23:19, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete some and transfer it to the Wikipedia articles but only if the designs are accurate. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 23:38, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
pornography YitzhakNat (talk) 22:13, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 06:59, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
low quality and I think its fake. will says 👋 Willbill6272 (talk) 01:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Not low-quality. What looks fake to you? We don't see any genitals, if that's what you mean, but the position is shown. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Nah, I disagree with Ikan Kekek, this one *is* low quality. Weird camera angle, poor lighting, too tight a crop. I don't see this one ever being used. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete there are definitely better images available compared to this one. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Category:69 (sex position) has 12 files in it, and five with straight partners, and the only one that has non-White people in the photograph. I see no reason to quibble about crop and camera angle with that limited a selection. As I've groused about before, Category:London Bridge has 14 subcategories and 279 photos in the main category. Why are we purging files from a category with 12 photographs?--Prosfilaes (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I think it’s worth keeping for the PD license— if I’m not mistaken it’s the only modern photo with this license. Having a variety of licensing options enables wider use. Dronebogus (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete. Not a great photo, but ok to illustrate. We only have 10 photos, only a couple are much better quality. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violations as derivatives from Google Earth imagery. On "BY 105 crash site.png", it's clearly stated as such in the description ("English: graphic of the crash site derived using publicly available information and put on Google Earth Pro map"), for the other nominated files, it stands in the legends of the images on EN-WP, e.g. in Inex-Adria_Aviopromet_Flight_1308#Accident: "Fig. 2 JP1308 flight pattern - a derivative graphic created from publicly available information and put on Google Earth map as a background."
- File:YU AHZ Final Approach.png
- File:BY 105 Crash Site.png
- File:YU-AJO Crash Site.png
- File:YU-AJO Final Approach.png
- File:JP 1308 flight Aljosa Pavelin.png
Grand-Duc (talk) 02:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
no fair use in commons Gitartha.bordoloi (talk) 05:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Might be OK per COM:TOO India except for the symbol on the left of the black rectangle, but is that symbol so small, indistinct and hard to copy that it might possibly be de minimis? I don't think the closing admin will rule that way, but I wonder about it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:50, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license claim, uncertain TOO. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:04, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." This still is blurry and suffers from stray light likely caused by a dirty lens. Grand-Duc (talk) 09:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please link another photo of the same view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:34, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- COM:SPAM and the other points under COM:Project scope (-> COM:EDUSE, COM:NOTUSED) do not name the prerequisite that views and motifs are duplicated for ascertain that a picture falls out of scope. I likely did not quote the best rationale, though. Maybe COM:NOTUSED would be more concise. "For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs." Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 14:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's not so bad as to be unusable if it's the only photo we have of this motif, and that's all that needs to be said, IMO. So for now, I vote to Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's not so bad as to be unusable if it's the only photo we have of this motif, and that's all that needs to be said, IMO. So for now, I vote to
- COM:SPAM and the other points under COM:Project scope (-> COM:EDUSE, COM:NOTUSED) do not name the prerequisite that views and motifs are duplicated for ascertain that a picture falls out of scope. I likely did not quote the best rationale, though. Maybe COM:NOTUSED would be more concise. "For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs." Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 14:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; unobjectionable, no superior alternatives mentioned. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." This still is blurry and suffers from stray light. Grand-Duc (talk) 09:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please link another photo of the same view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- COM:SPAM and the other points under COM:Project scope (-> COM:EDUSE, COM:NOTUSED) do not name the prerequisite that views and motifs are duplicated for ascertain that a picture falls out of scope. I likely did not quote the best rationale, though. Maybe COM:NOTUSED would be more concise. "For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs." Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 14:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's not so bad as to be unusable if it's the only photo we have of this motif, and that's all that needs to be said, IMO. So for now, I vote to Keep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's not so bad as to be unusable if it's the only photo we have of this motif, and that's all that needs to be said, IMO. So for now, I vote to
- COM:SPAM and the other points under COM:Project scope (-> COM:EDUSE, COM:NOTUSED) do not name the prerequisite that views and motifs are duplicated for ascertain that a picture falls out of scope. I likely did not quote the best rationale, though. Maybe COM:NOTUSED would be more concise. "For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs." Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 14:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." This still is blurry. Grand-Duc (talk) 09:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, badly blurred with no evident compensating value, no useful categorization,. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as "Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere." (cf. file history). Without subject identification, the educational usability of this image is remote at best. Grand-Duc (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, perfectly good quality photo. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope as "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." This still is blurry. Grand-Duc (talk) 09:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, unobjectionable ok photo, in scope. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Currently not realistically useful for educational purposes as the plant depicted is not identified. Categorization and description are too much boilerplate and do nothing to make the (technically decent) still reusable. Grand-Duc (talk) 09:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep The plant is not yet identified, as thousands of others, but can easily be identified since what is represented is precisely the inflorescence. Since the camera coordinates are recorded too, the photo is of very obvious educative and scientific interest. I would suggest Grand-Duc to refrain from doing this kind of nonsense nominations, and instead dedicate his volunteer time to helping with the curatorship and categorization of the files. Darwin Ahoy! 10:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed. Detailed photo that needs better categorization. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- DarwIn, I'm doing exactly what you suggested, curating. And yes, the inflorescence is clearly depicted, but we lack the circumstances of the find, especially if the plant is man-planted or occurs naturally. Additionally, the form, position and number of leaves are also important criteria for plant identification, and these are not visible here. I did a quick image search though which point to a possible cultivar of Celosia argentea, but I'm not knowledgeable enough to ascertain it with enough certainty.
- I still maintain my opinion that there are not enough information yet attached to this file to make it useful enough and re-usable or at least easily findable in our collections. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 10:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Those are not good reasons to hide the photo so that no-one can ever do the work you're discussing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Out of scope as "Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." This still is blurry (possibly motion blur). Grand-Duc (talk) 10:14, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm guessing there are probably better photos of this motif on Commons, but I believe it's your responsibility, as the one who nominated this photo for deletion, to link at least one. Because otherwise, you're asking people who'd evaluate your DR to do the work you should have done, which could be very time-consuming. Consider that if there are actually no other photos of this monument on Commons, we should keep this photo if Thailand has freedom of panorama or it's old enough to be public domain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- The official scope guideline does not mandate that bad images must be kept only because there is no replacement available. But in this case, there are actually better illustrations, see Giant Swing. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. And in view of the examples you gave, Delete. By the way, I agree that some photos are of such poor quality that they'd be of no use even if they were the only images of a particular motif. It's just that my standards for that, especially keeping in mind that images are usually used online as thumbnails, are lower than yours. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks. And in view of the examples you gave,
- The official scope guideline does not mandate that bad images must be kept only because there is no replacement available. But in this case, there are actually better illustrations, see Giant Swing. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 00:33, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; low quality without evident compensating value. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.
For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:
- public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
- all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice
An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.
Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source on October 27, but they never replied. (VRT ticket:2024112010006024)
Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.
 | Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Rlandmann (talk) 10:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; unconfirmed license status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.
For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:
- public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
- all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice
An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.
Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source on August 31, but they never replied. (VRT ticket:2024112010006131)
Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Deleted: per nomination; unconfirmed license status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party.
For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:
- public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
- all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice
An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.
Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the creator named in the attribution at the source on October 26, but they never replied. (VRT ticket:2024112010006221)
Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
This image has been uploaded from a National Weather Service web page, where it is attributed to a third party, who is an NWS employee. The wording of the attribution "picture submitted by [name], Mount Holly DAPM.(Surf's Up!)" creates significant doubt whether this photo was taken as part of the employee's official duties.
For many years, hosting such images on the Commons was done in good faith under the rationale that:
- public submissions to the NWS all entered the public domain and/or
- all files hosted on NWS websites were in the public domain unless they carried a formal copyright notice
An extensive review of this rationale in 2024 revealed that neither of these beliefs held up to scrutiny. These findings were confirmed in an RfC conducted from August to October 2024.
As part of this review, I have investigated several images attributed, like this, personally to NWS employees, and in every case, the image has turned out to be the employee's personal property, to which they claim copyright. Although it is certainly possible that this image was created while on duty, it would be a highly unusual exception.
Per COM:ONUS it is the responsibility of the person uploading an image to the Commons or anyone arguing for its retention here to provide evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Nevertheless, I reached out to the NWS for clarification over the ownership of this image on October 31, but they never replied. (VRT ticket:2024112010006284)
Since this is an image created in the US after 1989 and is attributed to a creator eligible for copyright, this is a presumably unfree file and we must delete it as a precaution under COM:PRP.
| Closing admins should familiarise themselves with the evidence and discussions at this RfC when closing this request. |
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
It is a copy of another file. This one has a bug in the root of the file name. Demonocrazy (talk) 11:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW of uncredited. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:18, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGE Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio: https://maoz-il.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/httpsadmission.maoz-il.orgwp-contentuploadssites13202202%D7%90%D7%95%D7%A8-%D7%A9%D7%97%D7%A3-1-206x200-91.jpeg Kershatz (talk) 14:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Formatted. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:19, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
- File:Salvador-tavora-coria-644x362.jpg
- File:Antonia la negra.jpg
- File:Feria el viar.jpg
- File:Pilar el viar.jpg
- File:Isidro el viar.jpg
- File:Amor y perdon.jpg
- File:Colonos El Viar.jpg
- File:Vista aerea El Viar.jpg
- File:Plaza Mayor (El Viar).jpg
- File:Plaza Mayor.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 14:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, for various reasons, including the FBMD code in some EXIFs and the fact that File:Colonos El Viar.jpg is obviously much older than 2016 and presumably a photo of a photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Is it PD? 200.39.139.24 14:52, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unsupported license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Wrong image Zhemkun (talk) 15:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per prompt uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:20, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Yet another fake image manipulation (see File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.png, File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.jpg etc.) based on https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/udhayanidhi-stalin-likely-to-be-appointed-as-deputy-cm-of-tamil-nadu-soon-795553 KylieTastic (talk) 15:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, good catch, thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 11:16, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Possibly against COM:FOP India if the advertisements are both deemed not permanently placed and not De minimis. Grand-Duc (talk) 15:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Possibly de minimis as part of the scene. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:24, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Copy right violation taken from here and erroneously tagged and uploaded as "own work". NXcrypto (talk) 16:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Copy right violation taken from here and erroneously tagged and uploaded as "own work". NXcrypto (talk) 16:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Unknown source or permission. Description says own work but also "all the credits goes to respective owner". Doing a reverse image search, this image is hosted on various stock image and image sharing sites. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 16:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
All of these files are AI-generated images created by the same user as part of a personal school project. Although some of them are being used on user pages, but the usage seems to be from one off accounts that were created purely as part of the afformed school assignment. Which at least IMO doesn't mesh with Commons:Project scope. Especially since we don't generally host user created amateur artwork to begin with. So these images should be deleted as OOS.
- File:Artificial General Intelligence Illustration.png
- File:Cubism 2022 Machine Learning Trio.png
- File:Cubism and Mind.png
- File:Dragon Tree 6 by David S. Soriano.png
- File:Fantasy Afrt The Dragon Revives.png
- File:Fraternal Twins Cubism.png
- File:Ibogaine Bwiti Rite Of Passage.png
- File:Overriding the Psychedelic Dream by David S. Soriano.png
- File:Paranormal Graphic Design David (S) Soriano.jpg
- File:Pop Art 2022 Fashioning The Dream.png
- File:Pop Art 2022 Loved You Too.png
- File:Pop Art 2022 Sun In Ascension.png
- File:Pop Art 2022 The Bird.png
- File:Pop Art Cubism Mind in Cave by David S. Soriano.png
- File:Science Fiction Art Robot Narcissist.png
- File:Stroll Through the Woods.png
- File:Surrealism 2022 Death Valley by David S. Soriano.png
- File:Sweet Dreams by David S. Soriano.png
- File:The Cubism Perspective.png
- File:The Tin Men.png
- File:Torsional Cubism Woman In Thought by David S. Soriano.png
- File:Visionart Art Dream Dream Away by Soriano.png
- File:Visionary Art 2022 Pineal Gland and Mindfulness.png
- File:Visionary Art OCD We Are Controlled by David S. Soriano.png
- File:Woman at Door with Angel.png
_Soriano.jpg){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 09:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I stand corrected. File:Dragon Tree 6 by David S. Soriano.png is being used on Wikitionery. It's not really clear to me what purpose it serves or how it's educational though, but whatever. From what I can tell the other files are being used on user pages and a couple of random galleries about people on Wikiquote. Again though, I seriously question how that qualifies them as "reasonably educational." Like if you look at File:Pop Art 2022 Loved You Too.png it's being used here as part of a qoute. But it looks nothing like the guy who wrote it and doesn't even have anything to do with the quote itself. So it appears to be in use for absolutely no reason what-so-ever. I'd say the same goes for the other images. Although I'm not going to list them but, but I don't think keeping an image like that simply because someone added it to a random page completely out of context on another project that it is in the spirit of COM:SCOPE. Usage isn't a free pass. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- BTW, if your wondering what I was talking about when I said the usage is part of a school project, see this user page. There's a few others with the comment. Although admittedly they could have all just stumbled on the same images for no reason, but it's more likely that they are associated with David S. Soriano. It doesn't really matter either way though, because they are still one off accounts that were only using the images as part of a school project regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- It's not our place to decide on usage, COM:INUSE says A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. [...] If an image is in use on another project (aside from use on talk pages or user pages), that is enough for it to be within scope. There are clear mainspace usages, the first file on your list appears in mainspace on four languages of Wikipedia.
- I assume Soriano's artwork has ended up on random wikiquote entries and user pages because it has simple filenames about cubism and pop art, so is easily found by users who don't really know what they're looking for. I've never seen a school project that's asked students to put their teacher's artwork on their user page. Belbury (talk) 10:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't care either way, but I think your misconstruing what the guideline says and the intent behind it. And 100% it is our place to decide on usage, We do it multiple times a day for COPYVIO and the gives other examples where the "in use" clause doesn't apply. Ones your free to disagree, but there's no bright line there and it's not my issue if you think the guideline shouldn't have exceptions. Personally, I could really care less about any given image on here. Waves come in, waves go out. Some files are deleted even if they are in use, some are kept. That's life. I trust whomever closes this will make a correct call that's respectful of the guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE is policy and gives a very clear bright line. There's no exception for random galleries about people on Wikiquote, just talk pages and user pages.
- I think File:Cubism 2022 Machine Learning Trio.png is the only file you've flagged here which is in use but only on a user page, is that right? It's a little unusual for not being that user's own upload, just a picture they apparently found and liked. I'd rename it since it doesn't actually seem to be an example of cubism, but don't see a strong reason to delete. Belbury (talk) 11:18, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Admittedly they contradict each other to a degree, but COM:NOTUSED says "A media file which is neither realistically useful for an educational purpose, legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons." I'd argue a file being used on a random page that it has absolutely no relation what-so-ever to isn't "realistically useful for an educational purpose" as far as Commons:Project scope. I'd love to see that part of the guideline clarified at some point, but it is what it is in the meantime and it's clearly not serving a "realistic educational purpose" by being on a random page that has no relation to the image what-so-ever. The same goes for a lot, if not all, of the other images. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not seeing any contradiction there, COM:INUSE tells us that if an image is being used outside of user/talk pages on any Wikimedia projects - even a "random page" of Wikiquote, Wikitionary or Wikibooks - it's considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, so would pass the first bullet of COM:NOTUSED. --Belbury (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, it can pass the fist bullet point. Nowhere does it insinuate that's it absolute though. It's clearly saying "in use files are considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. Except in cases where a media file is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above." That's literally what the guideline says. Otherwise that whole thing would just be one four word sentence instead of multiple lines and as many paragraphs. Your just choosing to ignore the parts of it that you disagree with. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think you're misreading this policy, but I'll take this discussion to your talk page. Belbury (talk) 13:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- In fact Adamant1 was not just misreading the policy, but outright misquoting it in their above comment:
- It's clearly saying "in use files are considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. Except in cases where a media file is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above." That's literally what the guideline says.
- Contrary to Adamant1's claim, this is not the wording in the guideline, and Adamant1's misquote changes its meaning in an important way.
- Concretely, the first sentence of Commons:Project scope#File in use in another Wikimedia project (= COM:INUSE) reads
A media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like.
- We can already see here how the words at the beginning of the allegedly verbatim wording provided in Adamant1's comment were changed. But so far the meaning remains largely intact.
- However, anyone can verify that the second sentence in Adamant1's "quote" ("[...] Except in cases where a media file is neither: [...]") does not occur in the policy (not even in a reworded but equivalent form). Instead, Commons:Project_scope#File_not_legitimately_in_use begins as follows:
File not legitimately in use
A media file which is neither:
• realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor
• legitimately in use as discussed above
falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons.- Here, "legitimately in use as discussed above" refers to the preceding COM:INUSE section of the policy.
- In other words, under the policy, either of the two conditions (educational / in use) suffices to make an image in scope, contrary to Adamant1's claims that the second one does not suffice under the policy.
- And for context: Beyond this DR here, Adamant1 has outright misquoted this policy in other cases too - see the notes here about another DR comment where Adamant1 claimed I literally cited the guideline but COM:SCOPE did not contain the allegedly quoted text. (That was one of the various problems brought up this thread on the "User problems" noticeboard that lead to the current two-week block of Adamant1. Hopefully Adamant1 won't resume this kind of disruptive behavior once the block expires, but this pattern is worth documenting here for the purposes of this DR and in case it occurs again.)
- Regards, HaeB (talk) 03:16, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think you're misreading this policy, but I'll take this discussion to your talk page. Belbury (talk) 13:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I mean, it can pass the fist bullet point. Nowhere does it insinuate that's it absolute though. It's clearly saying "in use files are considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose. Except in cases where a media file is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above." That's literally what the guideline says. Otherwise that whole thing would just be one four word sentence instead of multiple lines and as many paragraphs. Your just choosing to ignore the parts of it that you disagree with. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:46, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Not seeing any contradiction there, COM:INUSE tells us that if an image is being used outside of user/talk pages on any Wikimedia projects - even a "random page" of Wikiquote, Wikitionary or Wikibooks - it's considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, so would pass the first bullet of COM:NOTUSED. --Belbury (talk) 11:37, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Admittedly they contradict each other to a degree, but COM:NOTUSED says "A media file which is neither realistically useful for an educational purpose, legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons." I'd argue a file being used on a random page that it has absolutely no relation what-so-ever to isn't "realistically useful for an educational purpose" as far as Commons:Project scope. I'd love to see that part of the guideline clarified at some point, but it is what it is in the meantime and it's clearly not serving a "realistic educational purpose" by being on a random page that has no relation to the image what-so-ever. The same goes for a lot, if not all, of the other images. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:27, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, I don't care either way, but I think your misconstruing what the guideline says and the intent behind it. And 100% it is our place to decide on usage, We do it multiple times a day for COPYVIO and the gives other examples where the "in use" clause doesn't apply. Ones your free to disagree, but there's no bright line there and it's not my issue if you think the guideline shouldn't have exceptions. Personally, I could really care less about any given image on here. Waves come in, waves go out. Some files are deleted even if they are in use, some are kept. That's life. I trust whomever closes this will make a correct call that's respectful of the guidelines. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- BTW, if your wondering what I was talking about when I said the usage is part of a school project, see this user page. There's a few others with the comment. Although admittedly they could have all just stumbled on the same images for no reason, but it's more likely that they are associated with David S. Soriano. It doesn't really matter either way though, because they are still one off accounts that were only using the images as part of a school project regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:08, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- I stand corrected. File:Dragon Tree 6 by David S. Soriano.png is being used on Wikitionery. It's not really clear to me what purpose it serves or how it's educational though, but whatever. From what I can tell the other files are being used on user pages and a couple of random galleries about people on Wikiquote. Again though, I seriously question how that qualifies them as "reasonably educational." Like if you look at File:Pop Art 2022 Loved You Too.png it's being used here as part of a qoute. But it looks nothing like the guy who wrote it and doesn't even have anything to do with the quote itself. So it appears to be in use for absolutely no reason what-so-ever. I'd say the same goes for the other images. Although I'm not going to list them but, but I don't think keeping an image like that simply because someone added it to a random page completely out of context on another project that it is in the spirit of COM:SCOPE. Usage isn't a free pass. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:03, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Changing my verdict to Keep all as COM:INUSE per JPxG's observation on use within the Indonesian Wikipedia, my mistake for taking the batch count at face value. --Belbury (talk) 06:34, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Changing my verdict to
- Keep all I personally don’t think these are very good, but I also respect INUSE. I’m also not taking the time to review every single file; please be more discriminating in the future. Dronebogus (talk) 18:10, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
- Keep All of these seem to be in use somewhere. File:The Tin Men.png, File:The Cubism Perspective.png and File:Fraternal Twins Cubism.png show up with no uses on the tool for some reason, but all three are in use at at the Indonesian Wikipedia. It is, extremely emphatically, not our business as Commons editors to decide what images other projects are allowed to use, and what their image use policies should be; Indonesian Wikipedia editors are grown adults and can make their own content decisions. The circumstances in which we should be overriding them are extremely limited. Basically, if they are violating copyright or breaking the law, COM:SCOPE permits us to override local projects' consensus, and neither of these things is remotely the case here -- "this image SUX!" is not a legal issue and Commons policy explicitly says so. JPxG (talk) 01:03, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- "this image SUX!" And that right there is exactly what I was talking about the ANU complaint. Where exactly did I say "this image SUX!" or anything else along those lines? --Adamant1 (talk) 01:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've explained this about a dozen times, and each time you've ignored the entire explanation and responded with vague insults, so I don't think I can explain this to you. Definitionally, if you refuse to provide a reason for why something should be done, the only reason you're giving is that you want it to be done.JPxG (talk) 01:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I gave reasons in my original messages. It's not me if you want to stick your fingers in your ears and go off about how I'm doing this because "this image SUX!" or whatever. I never said the image "SUX" in this or any other DR and it's rather insulting to repeatedly treat me like that's my position. --Adamant1 (talk) 01:55, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- I've explained this about a dozen times, and each time you've ignored the entire explanation and responded with vague insults, so I don't think I can explain this to you. Definitionally, if you refuse to provide a reason for why something should be done, the only reason you're giving is that you want it to be done.JPxG (talk) 01:51, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- "this image SUX!" And that right there is exactly what I was talking about the ANU complaint. Where exactly did I say "this image SUX!" or anything else along those lines? --Adamant1 (talk) 01:07, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
- Delete all. The fact that some are randomly used means nothing; like File:Science Fiction Art Robot Narcissist.png which can be seen at the Arabic entry for Narcissism in the workplace - it serves no purpose there. As for the ones in "use" in Indonesian-language WP, they are all posted in something called a wikistory (whatever that is); I would argue that using AI-generated images to illustrate an article about an art movement (or nearly anything else) is inappropriate. I don't have the time or energy to look at all of them; they can be churned out by the millions every minute and serve no purpose whatsoever. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:27, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
- Uh, no, being in use definitely does not mean “nothing”, “randomly” or not. It’s not our job to judge what other projects think of images unless we also contribute to those projects. Or has Commons decided to start engaging in Wiki-imperialism now? Dronebogus (talk) 17:41, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
Neutral about these five which do not seem to be in use currently (no opinion about those): File:Dragon Tree 6 by David S. Soriano.png, File:Fraternal Twins Cubism.png, File:The Cubism Perspective.png, File:The Tin Men.png, File:Woman at Door with Angel.png.- Keep all the others, per COM:INUSE. I went through each of these and am quite confident that the editors on other projects who had added them to pages of various kinds on many different projects did so in good faith in the sense of COM:EV, and the nominator has provided no evidence otherwise anyway. Regards, HaeB (talk) 02:31, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to bulk delete entire list. (No prejudging relisting individual images or selected subsets for specific reasons.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Nominating five images in this personal artwork category which are currently not COM:INUSE on any other projects, per past discussions. (If some were used on the Indonesian Wikipedia in July, they aren't any more.)
- File:Fraternal Twins Cubism.png
- File:Ibogaine Bwiti Rite Of Passage.png
- File:The Cubism Perspective.png
- File:The Tin Men.png
- File:Woman at Door with Angel.png
Belbury (talk) 16:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Unlikely that the footballer in the photograph is also the photographer. Please provide the identity of the photographer and submit the copyright release to COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seen on Instagram, uploader has history of copyvios. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Apparently bad quality scan of File:1938 Ford V8 Standard (17724611525).jpg Pibwl (talk) 17:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep this photograph is the same as the source. Did you bother looking at the source? before making this DR? Bidgee (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Yep. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Jan Myšák as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.okman.com/artwork. @Willkinsart: Did you personally take this photograph? And do you have the copyright for the sculpture? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unclear licenses. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:35, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Agustonelli (talk · contribs)
[edit]Potential copyright violations. Depict copyrighted logos and fictional characters.
- File:Libro plim plim 2.jpg
- File:Libro plim plim 1.jpg
- File:Plim plim logo.png
- File:Profesor Burbujas.jpg
- File:Plim Plim Energía Musical.jpg
- File:Mei-Li personaje.jpg
- File:Bam personaje.jpg
~ Saur (talk • contribs) 13:12, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Files marked for speedy deletion based on uploader history. ~ Saur (talk • contribs) 13:23, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Not my own work, this image comes from another site. Astrinko (talk) 17:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Not my own work, this image comes from another site. Astrinko (talk) 17:42, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Saurmandal as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free work Yann (talk) 17:43, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all other uploads by user copyvios, no reason to think this better. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:51, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
This file is from a copyrighted video capture (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZ-oEuWMszs) Astrinko (talk) 17:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:48, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
The description of this file actually contains promotions/advertisements for agricultural businesses from Vietnam. Astrinko (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- That's not a deletion reason, as the description can be edited. The question is whether this is a logo of a notable company. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, uncat, dubious license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Not my own work, this image comes from another site. Astrinko (talk) 18:07, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not own work. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 18:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
probably not own work >> https://tineye.com/search/7437d56dc5b803b0ed0864d6818ec261c5302960?sort=score&order=desc&page=1 Mateus2019 (talk) 18:09, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Non-free logo, meets copyright protection thresholds. Astrinko (talk) 18:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unsupported license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Derivative image. If the original image is in public domain, we can update the license and keep it. Sreejith K (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
{{vd}} Keep per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- 19th-century photo per the file, so public domain. However, this image of the photo has FBMD codes. I get confused about what the policy on faithful reproductions of flat art means in terms of the usage of the reproductions. We use museums' photos even when they claim copyright over them, but is it OK to use this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy and US. Italy only protects for a period of 20 years from creation. Sreejithk2000: You can just fix these yourself rather than nominate for deletion. Iwaqarhashmi, please don't vote if you are unaware of how international copyright law works. Ikan Kekek: Yes can use! Even if the museum/website claims an active copyright on a PD image, the Wikimedia Foundation has chosen to ignore copyfraud. --RAN (talk) 21:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yet sometimes, reproductions have been deleted because of the reproduction photographer's copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- 2D work covered by {{PD-Art}} or {{PD-Scan}} shouldn't be deleted based on a claim to copyright for the reproduction. 3D works are a different thing. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm aware of that and wasn't referring to pictures of statues and the like anywhere in this thread. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- 2D work covered by {{PD-Art}} or {{PD-Scan}} shouldn't be deleted based on a claim to copyright for the reproduction. 3D works are a different thing. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yet sometimes, reproductions have been deleted because of the reproduction photographer's copyright. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per RAN. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, problems seem resolved (though a better quality scan would be welcome). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:54, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Wrong license. Unlikely own image. If the image is in public domain, we need to upload the license accordingly. Sreejith K (talk) 19:04, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
{{vd}} Keep per nom. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)- 19th-century photo, so it's in the public domain. Are there any issues about the reproduction? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy and PD-USA. Iwaqarhashmi: Why would you want to delete a clearly public domain image? Read up on international copyright law before kneejerk responding. Even the nominator recognizes it may be public domain. --RAN (talk) 20:59, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per RAN. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:16, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Personal art, Commons is not a COM:WEBHOST Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete not in scope. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 19:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
en:Cara al Sol is still copyrighted and the license for this file doesn't cover music, only laws and legal texts. Abzeronow (talk) 19:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:56, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Because Copyrighted 2A01:E0A:C25:4270:4449:4D70:4BA1:B4B4 19:58, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Even if the uploader owns the copyright, isn't this out of scope? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Someone ON DA 2A01:E0A:C25:4270:7900:144D:9822:D733 13:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Please explain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:33, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Someone ON DA 2A01:E0A:C25:4270:7900:144D:9822:D733 13:52, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused siliness; OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
User:Danimasetoma no es el autor del Cara al sol. La música es de Juan Tellería, que murió en 1949. La letra es una obra colectiva de gente que murió recientemente así que no estoy seguro de cuándo entra en dominio público. No creo que la interpretación sea de Danimasetoma tampoco. Error (talk) 21:09, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Spain was 80 years pma for authors who died before 1987, so this will be under copyright until at least 1/1/2030. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 18:10, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Song is still copyrighted in Spain and the U.S. Abzeronow (talk) 20:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
COM:PENIS 186.174.68.162 20:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- The labeling is useful. Do we have a clearer labeled example? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Keep obviously educational, illustrates what a penile raphe is. Dronebogus (talk) 04:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
This user has uploaded lots of photos of birds by different photographers. Email permission is required for any photos which are not the work of the uploader, who appears to be the same as "Cheta Chua".
File:Apo Myna.jpgFile:Green-faced Parrotfinch.jpgFile:Mountain Shrike.jpgFile:Benguet-bush Warbler.jpgFile:Yellow-faced Flameback.jpgFile:Celestial Monarch Bislig.png- File:Blue-capped Kingfisher.jpg
File:Whiskered Pitta.jpgFile:Flame-templed Babbler MADS.jpg- File:Spotted Imperial Pigeon Illocos2.jpg
- File:Spotted Imperial Pigeon Flock.jpg
- File:Spotted Imperial Pigeon Illocos.jpg
- File:White-eared Tailorbird.jpg
- File:Ducula carola mindanensis.jpg
- File:Mindanao White-eye.jpg
- File:Whiskered Flowerpecker Davao del Sur.jpg
- File:Whiskered Flowerpecker.jpg
File:Camiguin Hawk-owl.jpg- File:Azure-breasted Pitta.jpg
- File:Flame-templed Babbler.jpg
- File:Camiguin Bulbul.jpg
- File:Grey-hooded Sunbird.jpg
- File:Olive-capped Flowerpecker.jpg
- File:Lina's Sunbird.jpg
File:Prioniturus waterstradti.pngFile:Otus mantananensis mantanensis.jpgFile:Palawan Scops Owl.jpgFile:Visayan Bulbul.pngFile:Visayan Fantail.pngFile:Cinnamon Ibon.jpgFile:Cryptic Flycatcher.jpgFile:South Philippine Dwarf Kingfisher.jpgFile:Bagobo Robin.pngFile:Spot-throated Flameback.jpgFile:Red-headed Flameback.jpg- File:Philippine Spinte-tailed Swift.jpg
- File:Northern Silvery Kingfisher Juvenile.jpg
- File:Northern Silvery Kingfisher Adult.jpg
- File:Nisaetus pinskeri BIF.jpg
- File:Nisaetus pinskeri.jpg
File:Hypsipetes siquijorensis siquijorensis.jpgFile:Negros Jungle Flycatcher.jpgFile:Female Taiwan Green Pigeon.pngFile:Taiwan Green Pigeon MaleMale Taiwan Green Pigeon seen in Batanes, Philippines. Photo by George Inocencio.pngFile:Magnificent Sunbird Male.jpgFile:White-fronted Tit.jpgFile:Palawan Striped Babbler.pngFile:Luzon Striped-babbler.jpgFile:Golden-crowned Babbler.jpgFile:Amethyst Brown-dove.pngFile:Luzon-flameback.pngFile:Visayan Shama.pngFile:Grand Rhabdornis.jpgFile:Bicolored Flowerpecker.jpg- File:Philippine Fairy-Bluebird.jpg
File:Ashy Ground Thrush.jpgFile:Mindanao Pygmy-Babbler.jpgFile:Northern Black-crowned Babbler.jpgFile:Pink-Bellied Imperial Pigeon.jpg- File:Isabela Oriole.jpg
File:Celestial Monarch Male.jpg- File:Azure-rumped Parrot Male.jpg
- File:Blue-backed Parrot Female.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:27, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Ashy ground thrush is mine. I'll get the email permission for the owners. How will update here if the original owners sent it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetatata (talk • contribs) 08:44, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Northern Black-crowned babbler and camiguin hawk owl sent their permission — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chetatata (talk • contribs) 12:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021091910002166 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 13:00, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Palawan Striped Babbler.png” under ticket:2021092010000389. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:14, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021092010005473 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 20:00, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Visayan Bulbul.png” under ticket:2021092010005473. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021092110000789 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 19:00, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021092210007619 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021092210008083 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021092610003893 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Mindanao White-eye.jpg” under ticket:2021092610003893. --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Whiskered Flowerpecker Davao del Sur.jpg” under ticket:2021092610003893. --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:45, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Azure-breasted Pitta.jpg” under ticket:2021092610003893. --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:46, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Grey-hooded Sunbird.jpg” under ticket:2021092610003893. --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Olive-capped Flowerpecker.jpg” under ticket:2021092610003893. --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Lina's Sunbird.jpg” under ticket:2021092610003893. --Mussklprozz (talk) 06:48, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Kept those that were struckthrough and those that had OTRS. Deleted the rest. Can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
Incompatible license at the source page (CC BY-NC).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Uploaded as CC BY 4.0. Ratekreel (talk) 20:47, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
despite this images is under a CC license in Flickr, the image of this cover and the design have copyright 190.194.131.161 21:24, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW, Flickr user does not have rights to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused, literal screen shot of File:Mori Ogai in the atelier of Sculptor Takeishi Kozaburo in 1916.jpg, inarguably lower quality, thus unusable and out of the project scope. Nutshinou Talk! 22:27, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manager football (talk · contribs)
[edit]File:Coach Bayrem Mokhtari 2.jpg was copied from Facebook (see metadata). The others appear webgrabbed as well, based on resolution and metadata.
Sinigh (talk) 22:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:01, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Yet another fake image manipulation (see File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.png, File:RAGULVARMA PRABHU.jpg etc.) based on https://www.dtnext.in/news/tamilnadu/udhayanidhi-stalin-likely-to-be-appointed-as-deputy-cm-of-tamil-nadu-soon-795553 KylieTastic (talk) 15:48, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, good catch, thanks. Wikishovel (talk) 11:15, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 20:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused redirect. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 07:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- I have no objections. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 09:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- Update: The redirect is now ready for speedy deletion. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 01:55, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Is it PD? 200.39.139.24 16:18, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Si no, borrar talk page tb. 200.39.139.24 14:53, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jan Myšák as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.okman.com/artwork. @Willkinsart: Did you personally take this photograph? And do you have the copyright for the sculpture? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:38, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
Copyright issues. Image copied from https://www.abplive.com/lifestyle/mughal-hindu-queens-interesting-facts-history-in-hindi-2209894 NXcrypto (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:36, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
File:EMB244 Kwiatek kukurydzy JOOP 20x17 mm. Eksponat Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach.jpg
[edit]
Błędna nazwa Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach 2 (talk) 16:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Ma błędną nazwę, powinna być: EMB244 Stylizowany chaber JOOP! 20x17 mm. Eksponat Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach.jpg Muzeum Miniaturowej Sztuki Profesjonalnej Henryk Jan Dominiak w Tychach 2 (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not own work, it came from the developer's website. But is this logo PD? I don't think so, it probably meets threshold of originality. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 16:17, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- The uploader's username suggests they might actually be the developer and is own work. However, it seems this is more used for self promotion. It is currently used for a draft article on Persian Wikipedia that is currently unsourced. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 16:20, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:32, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Planning the Tuolumne Experience Alternative- 3 Minimum Activities & Services (43b3472f-e259-4832-8e3a-2161b551efd1).tif
[edit]Date was formatted incorrectly and is actually 1995 (not pre-1929), author is not an NPS employee (Cal Poly Pomona graduate program). – BMacZero (🗩) 16:35, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Complete list of affected files:
- File:Planning the Tuolumne Experience Alternative- 3 Minimum Activities & Services (43b3472f-e259-4832-8e3a-2161b551efd1).tif
- File:Ranger Camp Proposal 2 (3e8bf086-edc5-4f57-b034-e6b16a64f77c).tif
- File:Map of Tuolumne with slopes of landscape marked (2558b18e-8d6d-493c-b2e6-d88110c7d29a).tif
- File:Lateral view drawing of Gaylor Pit area (31c392f1-4095-45ae-9f0f-f5efeb463de4).tif
- File:Map of Tuolumne with vegetation types marked (053f1757-60fc-4054-b044-bc90eb2c9617).tif
- File:Map displaying slope analysis across unknown landscape (262d02bd-0d37-471f-8690-dc5c4288248e).tif
- File:Ranger Camp Proposal 1 (2d556177-d410-41ce-92e3-20e3f7f06fa3).tif
- File:Planning the Tuolomne Experience (2f277af3-5749-46c1-b8a7-c89fd39764b5).tif
- File:Planning the Tuolumne Experience Alternative- B Phased Campground (2a9e8163-03be-41c0-97f0-ab8f694ca97b).tif
- File:Aerial map layout of environmental sensitivity zones near river (0f626b8b-0602-46df-ab3b-1d609ad251aa).tif
- File:Planning the Tuolomne Experience (181bfd54-172a-48e8-a649-c44b3da46289).tif
- File:Map of Tuolumne with vegetation types marked (22970b7e-a87b-4107-a5a6-b8e28e0b154f).tif
- File:Ranger Camp GMP (Option 3) (387dd2b0-a191-465a-ad71-943c50859e0d).tif
- File:Local Roads & Drainage (26b41c88-37c8-4fe3-b4df-2e1bc1f301a8).tif
- File:Tuolumne Roads and Rivers (2a6c54f2-ff85-4e4d-8770-585055189535).tif
- File:Map of Tuolumne with riverriparian and meadowwetland marked (04a11258-0ceb-43f8-8f84-14fdd45d9249).tif
- File:Aerial view map of amenities in Tuolumne (3d6ae66d-187f-42a5-9b21-033c871ea445).tif
- File:Map of Tuolumne with geological profiles marked (4045e61d-50c3-4789-82eb-12e503cc6e78).tif
- File:Human Use and Landscape Sensitivity (33606863-f101-463f-a38c-a9199fa683ed).tif
- File:Ranger Camp- NPS Housing Planning the Tuolomne Experience (01559875-9e69-4055-97e8-c3beae584d72).tif
- File:Map of Tuolumne with slopes of landscape marked (42f7065a-b4ab-46af-a263-4f4572ec01f1).tif
- File:Planning the Tuolumne Experience Elevation Local Map (3db74cf6-c558-43cc-bf09-2e3b7e4646d5).tif
- File:Planning the Tuolumne Experience Alternative- C Revised GMP (3f27f4be-d901-4b63-a9e4-ff3844673767).tif
- File:Ranger Camp- NPS Housing Planning the Tuolomne Experience (16ef6fd2-9221-4aa1-b894-82a0868be52d).tif
- File:Map of river with buffer of best viewing locations marked (3362974a-aaae-45e6-ba42-83d207a67e81).tif
- File:Aerial map of river showing point source and non--point source pollution (234f0a4b-21e0-49aa-b53e-d738d45ed23a).tif
- File:Planning the Tuolumne Experience Alternative- D 1980 General Management Plan (177c7864-629a-405c-a25b-67ba333de461).tif
- File:Map of Tuolumne with slopes of landscape marked (3c2a4f34-bca5-4bab-9fed-4824811c5048).tif
- File:Planning the Tuolumne Experience Alternative- A Status Quo (3b236511-f91b-49ef-8a37-6c552da2b014).tif
– BMacZero (🗩) 16:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham
[edit]COM:SPAM: out of scope, useless vacation snapshots, often also really bad quality (blurred).
- File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0190.jpg
- File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0191.jpg
- File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0192.jpg
- File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0194.jpg
- File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0207.jpg
- File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0209.jpg
Grand-Duc (talk) 17:06, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0190.jpg kinda looking good. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 18:49, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed. Keep that one, though with a category of chicken added, and it's probably fine to Delete the rest. Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- These two File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0209.jpg and File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0207.jpg have a chicken climbing which gives insight about the temple too. I think they should be kept. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 19:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- True. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- These two File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0209.jpg and File:Wat Umong Suan Phutthatham-0207.jpg have a chicken climbing which gives insight about the temple too. I think they should be kept. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 19:57, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed.
- Delete the blurry ones and Keep the quality pictures. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 03:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
- Delete the blurry ones, others Keep איז「Ysa」 • For love letters and other notes 23:31, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Kept: as per discussion, the most blurred are deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:29, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image is under ESA Standard Licence, per source; it's not compatible with commons. Artem.G (talk) 14:21, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:45, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work
- File:Finder Yesly 2018.jpg
- File:Finder Yesly.jpg
- File:IMG 0513 (Groß).jpg
- File:Finder Trebur.jpg
- File:Zuse Z3 Finder.jpg
- File:Peter krutzek piero giordanino.jpg
- File:Finder Mexico.png
- File:Pkrutzeksen.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Is my own work (all). Logox44 (talk) 16:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
- Great, Mr. Loredana. Why are the EXIFs and sizes so different from one another? You had a Canon EOS 5D Mark IV in March 2018, but you used it only once in this group of photographs. How come? OK, so sometimes you had only your cellphone with you, but why do some of these EXIFs show neither the Canon nor the cellphone? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:00, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - one of the files have a catch in 2016 with Google. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:42, 20 December 2024 (UTC)