Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/03/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Because i have a great idea Zaner12 (talk) 01:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per very prompt uploader request (despite irrelevant text). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work: https://www.eldiadecordoba.es/semanasanta/legado-Gamez-Laserna-Cordoba_0_1773723689.html How old is this? Yann (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete. The photo was taken in 1946 so is ruled by the 1879 law, which sets a protection time of 80 years post mortem auctoris: [1]. LMLM (talk) 11:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by LMLM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work: https://www.abc.es/espana/andalucia/cordoba/semana-santa/sevi-esperanza-cordoba-tocara-homenaje-jose-vega-y-gamez-laserna-201901310822_noticia.html How old is this? Yann (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Pedro Gámez Laserna was director of the band Soria 9 between 1957 and 1967. Therefore, the photograph is copyrighted in Spain. Less than 70 years old: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Spain. LMLM (talk) 11:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: [https://www.google.com/searchbyimage?image_url={{filepath:Download-2.max-2048x2048.jpg Yann (talk) 18:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- This file can be found in a better resolution, prior to its upload on Commons here: http://web.archive.org/web/20120608054256/http://blog.komen.org/?p=745 -- Nutshinou Talk! 18:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The coloring and outlining of the wheel and the text puts it around TOO territory. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Can't we
Keep it per w:0 A.D. (video game)? "0 A.D.[a] is a free and open-source real-time strategy video game under development by Wildfire Games. It is a historical war and economy game focusing on the years between 500 BC and 1 BC, with the years between 1 AD and 500 AD planned to be developed in the future.[2][3] The game is cross-platform, playable on Windows, macOS, Linux, FreeBSD, and OpenBSD.[4] It is composed entirely of free software and free media, using the GNU GPLv2 (or later) license for the game engine source code, and the CC BY-SA license for the game art and music.[5][6]" Looks very definitive. I can't see why on Earth we'd delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination per User:Ikan Kekek. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Did not realize beforehand that this game was free and licensed under GNU. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: nomination was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 10:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete this file because a vectorized version of it exists. So if anyone is reading this, please delete this file. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 04:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Delete There isn't much point in keeping this file if there's a better vectorized version of it. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- There seems to be a slight difference between the two, comparing the above with File:Flag of Mashiki, Kumamoto.svg. As this is appears to be the initial file, I'd keep it. Enhancing999 (talk) 09:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete this file because a vectorized version of it exists. So if anyone is reading this, please delete this file. OperationSakura6144 (talk) 04:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete this file because a vectorized version of it exists. So if anyone is reading this, please delete this file OperationSakura6144 (talk) 04:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete this file because a vectorized version of it exists. So if anyone is reading this, please delete this file OperationSakura6144 (talk) 05:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There isn't much point in keeping this file if there's a better vectorized version of it. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
w:WP:LTA/FUERDAI Blakegripling ph (talk) 12:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 10:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
uploaded with the wrong account Wompwompwompwompwomp (talk) 16:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Author request Christopher-Photo (talk) 21:48, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
Kept: not a recent upload, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 08:03, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Author request: Low Quality. Christopher-Photo (talk) 20:12, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per last DR, not a recent upload and file is not low quality. Tm (talk) 23:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussions. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Not in use. Black and white, and quite dated. The author himself requested its deletion 3 years ago. Wikisempra (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
Comment None of those are deletion reasons. If there's no copyright issue, the photo should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:53, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
No longer want it published. Also Black&White. Christopher-Photo (talk) 16:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Author request, within reason. Not in use, no loss for Commons nor a good picture. Christopher-Photo (talk) 16:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
این تصویر حاوی اطلاعات خصوصی سایر است لطفاً پاک گردد Monotheist22 (talk) 17:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
The original photographer Toni Ott declined the usage Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat mich kontaktiert. Er hat nie sein Einverständis zur Verwendung gegeben. Bitte umgehend um Löschung! Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat mich kontaktiert und sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung widerrufen. Der Freundeskreis war nicht berechtigt eine Genehmigung zur Verwendung zu erteilen. Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat nie sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung des Bildes gegeben. Bitte umgehend löschen Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat mich kontaktiert und sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung widerrufen. Der Freundeskreis war nicht berechtigt eine Genehmigung zur Verwendung zu erteilen Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
The photographer Toni Ott declined the usage of the image. He never gave permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tocquevillosia (talk • contribs) 17:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat nie sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung des Bildes gegeben. Bitte umgehend löschen! Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat nie sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung des Bildes gegeben. Bitte umgehend löschen! Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat nie sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung des Bildes gegeben. Bitte umgehend löschen Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat nie sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung des Bildes gegeben. Bitte umgehend löschen Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat nie sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung des Bildes gegeben. Bitte umgehend löschen! Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:17, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Der Fotograf Toni Ott hat nie sein Einverständnis zur Verwendung des Bildes gegeben. Bitte umgehend löschen! Tocquevillosia (talk) 17:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete But not for the stated reason. Per {{PD-Art}} a faithful photograph of a 2D artwork does not create a new copyrighted work. However, given that Koenig died in 2017 the original artwork is not yet in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 21:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded a better version of it without unnecesary text in the images. PaleoNooby (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 10:14, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Haumea SINC files
[edit]These files use an unattributed photograph of Haumea from https://www.agenciasinc.es/Noticias/El-planeta-enano-Haumea-brilla-con-hielo-cristalino (credit: SINC/José Antonio Peñas). The licensing terms " El uso de los contenidos bajo la licencia Creative Commons BY 4.0, no permite, en ningún caso, la explotación, sea o no con fines comerciales, de los contenidos de SINC para la creación de publicaciones, en cualquier soporte, cuando estén integradas mayoritariamente por contenidos de la agenciasinc.es" appear to be in contradiction to the CC license so the photograph of Haumea appears to be unfree.
File:10 Largest Trans-Neptunian objects (TNOS)-id.pngreplaced with well licenced version.File:10 Largest Trans-Neptunian objects (TNOS).pngreplaced with well licenced version.File:EightTNOs af.pngreplaced with well licenced version.File:EightTNOs-fr.pngreplaced with well licenced version.File:EightTNOs-pl.pngreplaced with well licenced version.File:EightTNOs-ta.pngreplaced with well licenced version.File:LargestTNOs-de.pngreplaced with well licenced version.
Abzeronow (talk) 19:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- It will be nice to translate the text of this copyright infos to English.
- The root inside of Commons is File:Haumea y sus lunas.png. The licence over there is Template:cc-by-3.0. In case this licence is not a correct tranlation of the original text and File:Haumea y sus lunas.png is not with free licence, this problem shoudt be solved first by uploading a version with another image of Haumea. See Category:136108 Haumea for modifications of that ambiguous image. In case, the only problem is a missing of telling the author, this can easily be repaired. Antonsusi (talk) 22:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The part with Haumea is replaced with a part of File:2003EL61art-edit.jpg wich has a free licence from hubblesite.org. No deletion of the actual image needed. In case the cc-by-3.0 licence of File:Haumea y sus lunas.png is wrong and that image not free, please delete only the old versions or tell me for uploading with different name. Antonsusi (talk) 22:42, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Keep those where the image of Haumea is replaced. Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, so I'll continue replacing... Antonsusi (talk) 17:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- All TNO files with the critical image inside are changed. So the is no longer any reason for deleting. Antonsusi (talk) 17:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with
Kept: revisions with the unfree image are all suppressed now. Raymond (talk) 18:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Because it is nonsense, absolutely unusable in any article ČsrVK (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sreejith K (talk) 04:34, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Non-free TV Poster on Viu. メイド理世 (talk) 08:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Evelyn Heinemann has decided to remove here foto from wikipedia. Frago4711 (talk) 20:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded on March 1, but already COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Frago4711: If you want us to delete the file, remove it from the Wikipedia article first. --Rosenzweig τ 10:13, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info - how can I do this? Please give me a hint. Thanks. Frago4711 (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- You added this file to the article de:Evelyn Heinemann, and now you don't know how to remove it again??? That is very strange. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- yes you are right - but I have deleted it meanwhile. Thanks for your patience! Frago4711 (talk) 09:08, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- You added this file to the article de:Evelyn Heinemann, and now you don't know how to remove it again??? That is very strange. --Rosenzweig τ 12:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info - how can I do this? Please give me a hint. Thanks. Frago4711 (talk) 12:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Guitar is above COM:TOO Japan. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete In this case, I think you are clearly right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:17, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alisandal222 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
- File:Elevani Co..png
- File:ELEVANI LOGO 1.jpg
- File:ELEVANI LOGO GREEN 2.png
- File:ELEVANI LOGO.svg(2).png
- File:ELEVANI LOGO.svg
Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:23, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
AI artwork supposedly illustrative of historic event with dubious results (eg, accounts say aurora was visible as far south as Mexico, not that it was such a splendid display; questionable period fashion, etc) Not realistically useful Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- La descripción de la ilustración es clara respecto a su origen (IA) y tiene el fin de ilustrar, lo mismo ocurre con otro tipo de ilustraciones como representaciones del neolítico u otras etapas históricas en donde no hubo nadie que haya estado ahí para ilustrarlo. Además, la ilustración no forma de ningún artículo de Wikipedia. Dione Murrieta (talk) 23:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This is not the flag of Nauru, but simply a distorted image of some person. Obviously useless. 78.81.104.72 22:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope? Random Facebook screenshot Nutshinou Talk! 23:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:31, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation, uploader claims it is their own work but a reverse image search check shows it was first published by the Daily Mail. Devonian Wombat (talk) 23:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedly Delete for Copyright Violation for Uemura Studio (from EXIF) 2400:4153:D041:4200:A18F:F521:D0CE:EF1D 10:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality AI-generated portrait of a person who we have many actual photos of (Category:The Weeknd). Belbury (talk) 12:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Prototyperspective (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:16, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Ο χάρτης και τα χρώματα αναλόγως Με το πόσο κοντά είναι κάθε χώρα στην κεντρική μοναρχικοί εξουσία.jpg
[edit]Likely CopyVio, see bottom right copyright notice Enyavar (talk) 13:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
version obsolète remplacée par une version à jour Rayman78 (talk) 14:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Ce fichier comporte des erreurs, il est remplace per :Carte region naturelle A2 Rayman78 (talk) 17:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Speedy keep Appears to be COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
It is somehow problematic to post somebody's ID on Commons with their personal data. As per Commons:DOX. Msb (talk) 14:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
nouvelle version Rayman78 (talk) 14:08, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Keep le fichier / Keep the file. Mauvaise idée d'avoir ajouté les limites de département. Cela n'apporte rien d'intéressant et la carte perd en visibilité.--Pitthée (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Not clearly superseded. BrightRaven (talk) 12:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
il est remplacé Rayman78 (talk) 15:47, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
il est remplacé par un fichier à jour Rayman78 (talk) 07:30, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - please do not ask again. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:47, 24 October 2016 (UTC)
remplacer par un autre fichier Rayman78 (talk) 08:33, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Pitthée in the first nomination, this is not superseded. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
pour le remplacer Rayman78 (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: on peut remplacer le fichier en téléchargeant par dessus. Ruthven (msg) 07:05, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
remplacé par une version à jour Rayman78 (talk) 14:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep What's changed since all the other times this was nominated for deletion that makes this of no historical value? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This statue was installed in 2003 [2]. NoFoP-Japan Qurren (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This statue was installed in 1992 [3]. NoFoP-Japan Qurren (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
AI artwork supposedly depicting 2 different events 9 years apart - 1920 Wall Street bombing, and 1929 stock market crash (the later of which did not actually cause buildings to crash to ground). Front of nearest automobile of a style not seen before the 1940s. Not realistically useful. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:11, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
No files from Forgemind ArchiMedia Flickr stream can be confirmed to be their own work mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused (fictional?) flag. "Dido flag" doesn't yeild any meaningful results. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:12, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
As depicted Muhammad Tani died in 1989, own work is under doubt. Real source is needed. Taivo (talk) 15:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Seems like screenshot from television (look categories). Taivo (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
1923 photos are not own work. Real source, real author and his/her death year are needed. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Georgia. Complex logo, needs VRT-permission from company representative. There is year 1881 on the logo, but logo itself is apparently much younger. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
One of the Angono street arts based on paintings by w:en:Botong Francisco (died 1969), but realized as reliefs by Charlie Anorico, who is probably still alive today (see [4]). As there is no Freedom of Panorama, commercial licensing permission from Charlie Anorico is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
AI artwork depicting landmark which we have a wealth of real images of. Not useful for project scope. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. There is an entire category of real images of Westminster Palace and Big Ben from this specific angle: Category:Westminster Bridge with Palace of Westminster. Omphalographer (talk) 04:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Different variations and colorings from the blue text maybe above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Maybe, but considering this from COM:TOO Japan, probably not: "Tokyo High Court's ruling: although the shape is stylized, the text is in a normal arrangement and keeps its function of being read as a sequence of letters." I think it can probably be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the collage of colors has some artistic value, which merits originality. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Can you cite a case in Japan that was based on that? Are colors treated differently from shapes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Complex Color patterns and mosaics can be copyrighted. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I understand that, but "although the shape is stylized, the text is in a normal arrangement and keeps its function of being read as a sequence of letters". This isn't calligraphy. Unless someone brings to bear more expertise, it's best to just see how the closing admin rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Can you cite a case in Japan that was based on that? Are colors treated differently from shapes? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ikan Kekek, below COM:TOO Japan. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
unused file. Out of scope Estopedist1 (talk) 06:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
art work, permission not visible Alabasterstein (talk) 06:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stefanogiglio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality AI image of a common architectural feature for which we have ample freely licensed images (generation issues visible in railings in full size image)
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aahed.Alhamamy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality AI fake historical photos - we have ample freely licensed actual photos of 'similar' buildings
- File:حوش موصلي يحوي نافورة واشجار.png
- File:حوش موصلي.png
- File:بيت تراثي قديم من بيوت الموصل القديمة ذات الحوش الداخلي المفتوح على السماء ويحتوي على نافورة داخلية وشجرة توت.jpg
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:53, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:54, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, spam copy; no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 08:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
out of scope: unused "clueless" testfile Enyavar (talk) 10:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as no source (No source since) Rasbak (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Op https://www.tela-botanica.org/flore/france-metropolitaine/ zijn veel afbeeldingen verwijderd, waardoor verificatie niet meer mogelijk is. Indertijd was deze afbeelding nog te vinden met de bijbehorende licentie. Dus graag laten staan.Rasbak (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK. I will not review them User:Rasbak. Sadly, Andrea Moro's images are still preserved Here But the missing images are by Thierry Pernot. Best and Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 11:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the image then --Leoboudv (talk) 11:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as no source (No source since) Rasbak (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Op https://www.tela-botanica.org/flore/france-metropolitaine/ zijn veel afbeeldingen verwijderd, waardoor verificatie niet meer mogelijk is. Indertijd was deze afbeelding nog te vinden met de bijbehorende licentie. Dus graag laten staan.Rasbak (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK. Keep the image then. --Leoboudv (talk) 11:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. This is promo material created by the investor/planner, previously published for promotion of the construction project (e.g. here). Likely not the uploader's own work like stated, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 13:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom, please use {{Speedy}} next time. A09 (talk) 16:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is likely, that the uploader is affiliated with the developer and might have permission to publish the image under the stated license. Someone should probably ask the uploader to provide proof via Commons:VRTS. Until then, the image should be deleted as obvious copyvio. -- Miha (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:03, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rajesh ku 123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some random files by non-contributor, including selfies, out of scope
- File:Images-2 (6).jpg
- File:Images-3 (5).jpg
- File:Rajesh gautam.jpg
- File:Rajesh ku 123.jpg
- File:Rajiv ku 123.jpg
- File:Rakesh Kumar 123.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 14:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 17:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Roblox again. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 23:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
fictional logos are out of the project scope
- File:New Project-379.png
- File:New Project-377.png
- File:New Project-350.png
- File:New Project-347.png
- File:New Project-345.png
- File:New Project-341.png
- File:Conservative Movement Logo.png
Nutshinou Talk! 17:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
nonsense, unused, only upload by user Nutshinou Talk! 23:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Non-free image, per here. BrazilianDude70 (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE, no valid deletion reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- That is, if the uploader is actually the photographer. If they're not the photographer, all their uploads will have to be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 08:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 07:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 07:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 07:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE and way beyond the courtesy deletion period. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 07:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 07:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:28, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 06:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE and way beyond the courtesy deletion period. We should probably just keep all, as no valid deletion reason is given. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 07:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 06:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 06:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 06:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 06:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Question Who's the author? Did you shoot this photo in 1958? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 06:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 03:29, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Poor quality. Low resolution. Better examples of subject matter on Commons. Unused Headlock0225 (talk) 07:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Poor quality. Low resolution. Better examples of subject matter on Commons. Unused Headlock0225 (talk) 07:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Poor quality. Low resolution. Better examples of subject matter on Commons. Unused Headlock0225 (talk) 07:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:44, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No realistic educational value. Poor quality. Low resolution. Better examples of subject matter on Commons. Unused Headlock0225 (talk) 07:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
circa 2001 plaque in the Phillipines. No FOP for post-1972 works there. Abzeronow (talk) 20:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlSaraFashion (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 20:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
I do not use this file anymore, I do not think this file is useful. 호로조 (talk) 09:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
unused file anymore. 호로조 (talk) 09:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
unused file anymore. 호로조 (talk) 09:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
unused file anymore. 호로조 (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Crosshairs and the stylized 3 with blood splatters give it artistic value that is above COM:TOO Japan and TOO in general. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete because of the stylized V and 3 and the blood spatters. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. A new version of the logo has been uploaded by User:VulcanSphere with several stylized details removed. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Shooting star definitely above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete While the rest of the text is debatable, I agree with the shooting star. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. A new version of the logo has been uploaded by User:VulcanSphere with the shooting star removed. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:52, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Potential copyright violation. Low resolution and lack of EXIF data. S8321414 (talk) 04:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France 1
[edit]- File:660-StadeDF.jpg
- File:Flickr - funky1opti - IMG 7224.jpg
- File:FRA-ECO - SDF - 130316.jpg
- File:Muse Stade de France.jpg
- File:Panorama stade de France.jpg
- File:Panoramique SDF.jpg
- File:Paris rugby fans.jpg
- File:Rugby match.jpg
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 5.JPG
- File:Stade de France - Rencontre Stade français – Racing Métro 92.jpg
- File:Stade de France 2005.jpg
- File:Stade de France November 21, 2009 a.jpg
- File:Stade de France November 21, 2009 b.jpg
- File:Stade de France Tribune Nord.jpg
- File:Stade de France, France-Suisse.jpg
- File:Stade de France, Paris, France.JPG
- File:Stade de France001.JPG
- File:Vue aérienne du nord de Paris le stade de France au milieu.jpg
LGA talkedits 06:01, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- It seems to me that File:Stade de France, France-Suisse.jpg can be kept as there is hardly any architecture in the image (de minimis). Lymantria (talk) 13:44, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- What about the big French shirt, that would also be protected as a work. LGA talkedits 20:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
For your information :
Règlement Intérieur du Stade de France (http://accueil.stadefrance.com/reglement-interieur), Article 31 :
Les prises de vues et enregistrements sonores ne peuvent être réalisés dans le Stade de France sans une autorisation expresse du Consortium Stade de France ou des personnes habilitées par lui.
De même, les installations ou équipements techniques ne peuvent être photographiés, filmés ou enregistrés sans une telle autorisation. Une tolérance est laissée aux amateurs n’utilisant ni pied ni flash pour leurs prises de vues, le Consortium Stade de France se réservant toutefois le droit d’interdire les prises de vues et enregistrements de toute nature dans certains espaces ou à l’occasion de certaines manifestations qu’il désignera spécialement.
So, LGA, please read conditions before request deletions...
Best regards, CSab80 (talk) 18:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Assuming that Google translate gets that right, it says "The filming and sound recordings can not be made in the Stade de France without express permission from the Stade de France or persons authorized by him" and only a "Tolerance is left to amateurs" - You will still need permission if you want to publish them. LGA talkedits 20:47, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Keep It's nedded for those who didn't go to the stadium. 174.91.72.204 18:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: There is no FOP in France FASTILY 08:01, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France 2
[edit]No FOP in France. Despite the warnings
- File:Sdf 060304.jpg
- File:Canal Saint-Denis - octobre 2012 - Saint-Denis - Bassin de la maltournee (2).jpg
- File:SAINT-DENIS-rue Micheline Ostermeyer.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 2.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 3.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 4.JPG
- File:SG1S1958.JPG
- File:SSL20121.JPG
- File:Stade de France - restaurant panoramique.jpg
- File:Stade Francais Paris Biarritz.jpg
- File:Top 14 2008 SF vs BO 05.JPG
Flickrworker (talk) 22:13, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep for
- File:Canal Saint-Denis - octobre 2012 - Saint-Denis - Bassin de la maltournee (2).jpg - Stadium is probably DM.
- File:SAINT-DENIS-rue Micheline Ostermeyer.JPG - Stadium is probably DM.
- Delete for
- File:SSL20121.JPG - Due to image quality the stadium is not relay visible, and the image is unlikely to be of any encyclopaedic use.
- File:Sdf 060304.jpg
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 2.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 3.JPG
- File:Sdf losc-benf 22.11.05 - 4.JPG
- File:SG1S1958.JPG
- File:Stade de France - restaurant panoramique.jpg
- File:Stade Francais Paris Biarritz.jpg
- File:Top 14 2008 SF vs BO 05.JPG
- LGA talkedits 23:59, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Kept 2, deleted rest per no FOP in France -FASTILY 06:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France 3
[edit]France has no commercial freedom of panorama, and these images are copyvios as missing permission for free licensing from architects Michel Macary, Aymeric Zublena, Michel Regembal, and Claude Constantini. "File:2003 Paris Saint-Denis stadium.jpg" seems a borderline case as a game was being played during the time this picture was taken, but the file title implies the stadium interior as the intended/priginal aim of the picture and is problematic, considering there is no FOP in France which is one of anti-FOP countries in the world (Greece is another).
- File:2003 Paris Saint-Denis stadium.jpg
- File:Eingänge A, B, C und D des Stade de France.JPG
- File:Estadio de paris.jpg
- File:France-Andorre Stade de France 01.jpg
- File:France-Andorre Stade de France 03.jpg
- File:Le Stade (from Metro) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stade de France - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Stade de France - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stade de France 1500 01.jpg
- File:Stade de France 1500 02.jpg
- File:Stade de France 1500 03.jpg
- File:Stade de France, Saint-Denis - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stade France St Denis Seine St Denis 4 sept 2019.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Pictures showing the field would be OK, but those showing large parts of the stadium are not, no matter what is happening on the field. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stade de France
[edit]These images heavily show the interior architecture of the stadium, even if games are ongoing. Per closing admin's input at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stade de France#Files in Category:Stade de France 3, "pictures showing the field would be OK, but those showing large parts of the stadium are not, no matter what is happening on the field." As France does not allow commercial Freedom of Panorama, these images are all infringing architect's copyrights.
- File:Rockin'1000 au Stade de France 2022 - Après Concert.jpg
- File:Rockin'1000 au Stade de France 2022 01.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 01.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 02.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 03.jpg
- File:Stade de France France Croatie 04.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:54, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this is the uploader’s own work. The image lacks sufficient permissions. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
There is no evidence that this is the uploader’s own work. Lacks sufficent permission. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 02:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio, photo by Boeri: https://www.archiobjects.org/vertical-forest-in-milan-boeri-studio/ mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alessa Land (talk · contribs)
[edit]promotional/personal photos, outside the project scope.
0x0a (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- 999K subscribers, but somehow, this website doesn't consider any kind of online presence notable. Illogical and a pity. By the way, is there any silver YouTube button on this site that wouldn't be threatened with deletion as somehow irrelevant? That by itself would clearly be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- They do seem to have a reasonable amount of subscribers. This is actually a point for evaluating notability of new item in Wikidata (we don't have a notability test at Commons). But I'm not sure if it's enough to establish notability in Wikidata. If it were, we could keep the first picture as a representative photo of this channel. 0x0a (talk) 18:12, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Seems like a relevant, although not to the Wikipedia standards, influencer and has a high number of subscribers. These images could be of some use and they're freely licensed. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alessa Land (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of identifiable child. The parent's consent is needed to publish these photos according to the law of Ontario, Canada, where the business is located.
0x0a (talk) 06:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- User:Alessa Land, I'm sure you have such release forms. If you're reading, please contact COM:VRT, so this unnecessary deletion does not take place or the photo is restored if already deleted (really, hidden from everyone but site admins) by the time you see this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as no consent and no VRT request since a month. Contributers2020Talk to me here! 14:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no relevant authorship is provided for these images: Alessa Land uploading the pictures of Alessa Land is nonsense. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:02, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: various fictional flags and flag proposals.
- File:Alternative Flag of Poland (National Movement).png
- File:Flag map of Ukraine (deiure 2023).png
- File:Fictional flag of Prussetia.png
- File:Fictional Flag of Ash-Sharq Al-Arabi Al-Mutahid.png
- File:Proposed Flag of Himalaya.jpg
- File:Fictional Flag of China (Fidem Pacis).png
- File:Fictional flag of Maphilindo.png
- File:Fictional Flag of Pan-Slavism Poland.png
- File:Flag of Bulgaria (alternative. with coa).png
- File:Fictional Flag of Ghana-Ashanti.png
- File:Fictional Flag of Deseret.png
- File:Proposed Flag of Central Africa - Kolingba.png
- File:Flag of Margiot Locals.jpg
Omphalographer (talk) 02:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 02:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 04:17, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
This is not a simple letter inside a circle like Mario, Luigi or Wario's emblems, it is a drawing of a crown which appears to be above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- It's a very simplified geometric representation of a crown. My interpretation of COM:TOO Japan is that this should be below their TOO as a "relatively simple graphic element". -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Relatively simple graphic elements are letters or simple shapes, this is a collection of shapes that combined is above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is the wavy line on the Cup Noodle Seafood Noodle simpler or more complex than this? I think it's more complex. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- simpler than this. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is the wavy line on the Cup Noodle Seafood Noodle simpler or more complex than this? I think it's more complex. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Seems to be too simple and TOO Japan is not too strict anyway. --Bedivere (talk) 04:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Same rationale as this. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- And Keep per my remarks on Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Peach_emblem.svg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
It is a picture of an egg, not a simple piece of geometry, depictions of things are not utilitarian and are subject to copyright and I think this applies here too. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure about this one. Is it more irregular than the wavy lines in the Cup Noodle Seafood Noodle shown in COM:TOO Japan? Or is that the right question? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- It has nothing to do with cup noodles, I think the Egg is not Pac-Man-like simple. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I agree that this geometry is somewhat irregular. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Crosshairs above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I disagree. "Relatively simple graphic element." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Crosshairs are a bit more complex geometry. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not very complex. We'll see how the closing admin rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The crosshairs might give some artistic value to the logo which makes it exceed COM:TOO Japan. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not very complex. We'll see how the closing admin rules. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. A new version of the logo has been uploaded by User:VulcanSphere with the crosshairs removed. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
The speech bubble with the Eye and rainbow has some artistic merit that puts it above COM:TOO Japan. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, above COM:TOO Japan, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The Pacman-shaped figure has been removed. Hide previous revisions with the logo should they be found to be above COM:TOO Japan. Sr. Knowthing (talk) 16:19, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Bedivere (talk) 04:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 10:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SonofJacob (talk · contribs)
[edit]GoogleMaps CopyVio
- File:Distribution of the Kartvelian peoples around 200BC.png
- File:Situation of Caucasus.png
- File:Geopolitical.svg
Enyavar (talk) 11:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright holder is Götz Wrage, not the uploader, no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:42, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fantasy map Enyavar (talk) 13:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
On the internet, the photo is attributed to Philippe Fleury. Examples: [5], [6], [7]. The uploader presents it as a photo taken in 2016 [8], but versions of this photo were published in a newspaper in 2010 [9] and on on the website of the subject in 2013 [10]. Probable copyvio. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per Asclepias' debunk. Webfil (talk) 15:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:39, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
No longer needed GP377 (talk) 18:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 08:38, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Subbass1 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: moderne Kunst, durchgerutscht, sry Yann (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader, artwork is presumably still protected by copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 08:37, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Unused file anymore. 호로조 (talk) 09:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Matrix(!) {user - talk? - contributions} 18:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nativacartacea (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Mimmo Della Corte e Marcello Veneziani.jpg
- File:Premio Della Corte.jpg
- File:Mimmo della Corte convegno.jpg
- File:Mimmo della corte ed Ermanno corsi.jpg
- File:MimmoDellaCorte.jpg
Yann (talk) 11:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
User blocked for copyvios, small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Dwór Groblewskich w Bystrej.png
- File:Dwór w Grudnej Kępskiej.png
- File:Działka.png
- File:Obraz Trianon.png
- File:Zajęcie Zaolzia.jpg
- File:Rozbiór Czechosłowacji.png
- File:Bartosz Bekier.png
Yann (talk) 12:19, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 12:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FelixSigurd (talk · contribs)
[edit]GoogleMaps CopyVio (background map)
Enyavar (talk) 08:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Personal fiction - alt-history? Enyavar (talk) 08:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality. Not reasonably useful. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Same as ever. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not in use, not realistically useful for any educative purposes -- outstandingly poor quality (very low resolution, high loss due to JPEG compression, high amount of noise). Out of scope. --Webfil (talk) 00:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
The photo is taken from so far that we can hardly see the said subject. It is way out of COM:SCOPE as it has no educational value. Myloufa (talk) 03:40, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. In use on Wikidata and project-space pages of a number of other projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 14:44, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Per the previous nomination. The reason to keep was that it was in use at that time. Removed from Wikidata a year ago. Not in use anymore, except in a discussion complaining about it. -- Asclepias (talk) 13:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Andy Dingley (talk) 13:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and very wide metadata. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not remotely usable for any realistic purpose; out of scope. --Webfil (talk) 00:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kritzolina (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata, image was previously published before, needs COM:VRT Nutshinou Talk! 22:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with colored atoms & not drawn according to MoS guidelines. In addition, the areas around the oxygen atoms have a strange white background. Replaced by File:Geranyl-butyrate-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:11, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
not a work from NASA vip (talk) 00:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
The squiggly outlines of the text are slightly above TOO? They are not simple geometry. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Unquestionably above COM:TOO UK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Do you have any evidence to support your claim? Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Huh? COM:TOO UK is very strict, and I'm supporting your deletion request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:48, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Baibaozolina
[edit]Originally these files were uploaded for use in article lv:Baiba Ozoliņa (since then they have been removed). On the captions uploader included credits to respective photographers (first image was credited to KatShoot, second to Krists Šēners, third to Iveta Jaunalksne), so that makes it clear they are not an own work. These images in these sort of high resolutions are not avaliable on the internet and also the uploaded seems to be a single purpose account (either the person depicted or someone connected to them), but that still means we need permissions from photographers. --DJ EV (talk) 09:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio foto- Anna Fixová Lutheraner (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:21, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by بافلي مجدي (talk · contribs)
[edit]This Algerian are not the public domain you can upload them on Wikipedia articles but not to commons
- File:Algeria-200-dinars-2012.jpg
- File:Algeria-200-dinars-2012 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-100-dinars-1994.jpg
- File:Algeria-100-dinars-1994 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-50-santimat-1964.jpg
- File:Algeria-50-santimat-1964 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-50-dinars-2018.jpg
- File:Algeria-50-dinars-2018 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-20-santimat-1964.jpg
- File:Algeria-20-santimat-1964 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-20-dinars-2018.jpg
- File:Algeria-20-dinars-2018 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-5-santimat-1964.jpg
- File:Algeria-5-santimat-1964 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-5-dinars-1992.jpg
- File:Algeria-5-dinars-1992 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-2-santiman-1964.jpg
- File:Algeria-2-santiman-1964 (1).jpg
- File:Algeria-2-dinars-1992.jpg
- File:Algeria-2-dinars-1992 (1).jpg
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 11:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 01:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Author seems to be Wilfried Wulff (see EXIF data); license missing SuPich (talk) 12:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
probably not own work, small jpg without Exif metadata Nutshinou Talk! 12:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
random images, out of the project scope
Nutshinou Talk! 12:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: No indication what this map shows Enyavar (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anishasingh12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own work, suspicious file names, tiny jpg images without Exif metadata. Uploader has an history of copyright violations
Nutshinou Talk! 15:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 06:07, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SubToXatOnTheSpace (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE.
Marbletan (talk) 17:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete the first and the third ones taken from Roblox. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 23:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC); edited: 01:27, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Team Banglandesh.png as it is in use, PD-textlogo and the flag of Bangladesh. The other two should be deleted. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- FWIW, the page where that file was used has been deleted. File:Team Banglandesh.png is no longer in use. Marbletan (talk) 12:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sarakanazy (talk · contribs)
[edit]random unused files that are most likely self-advertisement, no educational use either way
- File:PICTUE4.jpg
- File:PICTUE1.jpg
- File:PICTUE2.jpg
- File:PICTUE3.jpg
- File:SECTIONS FOR APPS.jpg
- File:New Project (2).jpg
- File:New Project (1).jpg
- File:SARAKANAZY1.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 17:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tehonk as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3 Yann (talk) 09:54, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. Bremps... 12:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Kadı should be familiar with this vandal, one of the links I put in the edit summary was a deletion request from him. Tehonk (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image found online as early as 2011, before claimed date; not uploader's own https://tineye.com/search/67b3f81575fd742875e9ef2cdc29ffabbc3c918e?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 The logos and the text are PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 10:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This is a very close tracing of the photograph at https://www.forbes.com/sites/joshuadudley/2020/08/26/avery-trufelman-finds-optimism-in-the-relaunch-of-the-cut-podcast/, which under COM:BASEDONPHOTO would require the photographer's permission to release as CC-BY under the tracing artist's name. Belbury (talk) 12:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Uagpps 33 87 9338 569-5 tehervagon gyári táblája.JPG Beroesz (talk) 14:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Already redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
The file description gives "Coypright Tourist-Info Seebach" - this crashes with the free CC license. The "own work" claim is somehow incorrect. Mosbatho (talk) 14:40, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Plain text document outside of COM:SCOPE. If this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Duplicated. Already uploaded, this file looks too bright with the attempt to reduce light. Chaseleithold (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Requested under G1. "Test page, accidental creation, or page containing nonsense or no valid content." as a Courtesy deletion. Goal was to enhance the file that I uploaded in February. Chaseleithold (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn, and in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I violated Terms by submiting it as Own Work despite being featured in website FamousBirthdays. It is not mine, unlike one I previously posted of the actor at his team's request. As I do not seek problems, I am asking for its deletion. Chaseleithold (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:06, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Skazi as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Not an advert, but educational value is unclear. Maybe she is non-notable, at least she is not mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 16:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Guys, this photo was uploaded to a spam article on Russian Wikipedia. The article was immediately deleted. What's the problem? Skazi 17:13, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't seem that notable, based on a web search. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Vernon Evans family leaving South Dakota drought area for west - NARA - 196413 (cropped).tiff
[edit]Redundant TIFF; use JPEG instead File:Vernon Evans and family of Lemmon, South Dakota, near Missoula, Montana, 8b28037.jpg Erik den yngre (talk) 17:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: all NARA images have TIFF versions, which is lossless. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Same image as File:Screenshot 20171015-151053.png (minus the image icon at the top left), probably not worth keeping both -- Nutshinou Talk! 18:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I had completely forgotten about these - I was 10 when I uploaded them. Delete away, by all means. Alexstore06 (talk) 23:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Looks like a familiar file that has been got of the internet, probably not their work, delete per COM:PCP. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Although there is META data, the size is small and the author is not the uploader. Furthermore, numerous sources of that photo according to Tineye.com. The original source seems to be Telepro a copyrighted magazine. Pierre cb (talk) 04:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete this file because a vectorized version of it exists. So if anyone is reading this, please delete this file OperationSakura6144 (talk) 05:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Flag of Nankan, Kumamoto.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
by the decision of the author Ljosxa (talk) 07:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE and way beyond the courtesy deletion period. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep These were uploaded and licensed for use some years ago. Authors can't revoke a licence like that. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:30, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ljosxa (talk • contribs) 07:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 03:53, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2014, there is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan - photographer needs permission from the architect IPPON01 (talk) 10:56, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan - photographer needs permission from the architect IPPON01 (talk) 09:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Uzbekistan - photographer needs permission from the architect IPPON01 (talk) 20:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Files don't work on Wikisource Sundanese.
[edit]All files cannot be read on Wikisource Sundanese. Please delete them. Example --Akbar Soepadhi (talk) 09:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope Yann (talk) 18:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search Yann (talk) 18:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search Yann (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:16, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This logo is fictitious, as stated by its author, and uses modern spelling, not the one that was used during the existence of the party. 78.81.104.72 19:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This logo is fictitious, as stated by its author, and uses modern spelling, not the one that was used during the existence of the party. 78.81.104.72 19:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
How can it be "own work" being low resolution and having no Exif data? Stego (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from https://www.pcp.pt/faleceu-fernando-correia. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harish kumar 199 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: these papers are extremely poorly written and lack educational value. They may constitute academic fraud.
"Design and implementation of 3T based XOR/XNOR logic gate..." fails to actually present a 3T implementation of the logic gate as described in the title, and contains some obvious nonsense like the following passage, which is a mangled quote from the Microwind web site:
This is microwind simulation software which allows the addicts to pretend and design intertwined circuit at physical description position. This is stoner friendly circuit simulation software and it supported by huge symbol libraries. Microwind unifies schematic entry, pattern rested simulator, SPICE birth of schematic, Verilog extractor, layout compendium, on layout mixed signal circuit simulation.
"Decomposing of PET by using Ideonella Sakaiensis" describes the activity of w:Ideonella sakaiensis at a general level but presents no new scientific evidence, and uses multiple images from other scientific papers and publications without credit (e.g. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2853).
- File:DECOMPOSING OF PET BY USING IDEONELLA SAKAIENSIS.pdf
- File:DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF 3T BASED XORXNOR LOGIC GATE FOR HIGH POWER GAIN AND LESS PROPAGATION DELAY.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 20:18, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Amaterasu 1-1 as Fair use (Fair use) Yann (talk) 15:28, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: GJSTU does not apply to the logo. --Yasu (talk) 15:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
remplacé par une nouvelle version Rayman78 (talk) 14:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
version obsolète remplacée par une version plus récente Rayman78 (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
remplacé par une version mise à jour Rayman78 (talk) 14:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:28, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Not eligible for PD-government, per COM:Philippines#Commissioned works. As there is no Freedom of Panorama, commercial Creative Commons licensing permission from Sining Biswal ng San Josenyo is required.
- File:5766San Jose del Monte City 01.jpg
- File:5766San Jose del Monte City 02.jpg
- File:5766San Jose del Monte City 06.jpg
- File:5766San Jose del Monte City 07.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:45, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Former President Donald Trump Holds Campaign Rally In Rochester, New Hampshire (53481616894).jpg
[edit]Not educationally useful. Just about everything in the shot is covered by a railing. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- RodRabelo7: We've got tons of images of stars and stripes bunting. It's kinda the default wall decoration for political rallies. Category:Red, white, and blue bunting in the United States The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, OK, nice to know. Them
Neutral is better. RodRabelo7 (talk) 12:59, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oh, OK, nice to know. Them
- RodRabelo7: We've got tons of images of stars and stripes bunting. It's kinda the default wall decoration for political rallies. Category:Red, white, and blue bunting in the United States The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep A political rally is clearly is scope, quality is not so bad. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- A1Cafel : What, exactly, is being depicted in this picture? File:Former President Donald Trump Holds Campaign Rally In Rochester, New Hampshire (53481616674).jpg, from the same event, is a much better composition of the same thing - guests on the balcony - except that in this picture you can actually see the guests. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Also showed a placard of "Make America Great Again"--A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- The event is being depicted; in others in the category the main subject is the building or a person or group of people. Peter James (talk) 00:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per @The Squirrel Conspiracy. Category:Red, white, and blue bunting in the United States has many similar and better quality photos. -- Ooligan (talk) 12:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- A1Cafel : What, exactly, is being depicted in this picture? File:Former President Donald Trump Holds Campaign Rally In Rochester, New Hampshire (53481616674).jpg, from the same event, is a much better composition of the same thing - guests on the balcony - except that in this picture you can actually see the guests. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:12, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: part of series of photos of event; no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Not uploader or "Sharlin Farzana”s (subject in question) own work. We need original photo & permission from photographer. See https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=857328112#File:Sharlin_Farzana_2024.jpg আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The original photographer has been mailed to wiki and confirmed the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence. Haque2ehsan (talk) 17:50, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please follow COM:VRT. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 19:25, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Still no indication of VRT permission (can be undeleted if free license from copyright holder is confirmed). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
Quality issues. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Isabel Richer aux prix Gémeaux 2019.png Herbert Ortner (talk) 09:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and the other opinions in the other DR. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, this one seems to be equally problematic. Shawn à Montréal (talk) 11:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Is it Isabel Richer or Isabelle Vincent? Same opinion as the other one. Webfil (talk) 03:49, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:18, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- "In use" is not sacrosanct. Herbert Ortner (talk) 09:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- For scope issues it is (see COM:INUSE). Commons does not make content decisions for other projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Its in use only at haitian Wikipedia, inserted by the "photographer" himself. And I don't actually believe his "own work" claims on most of his sub-thumbnail sized files. Herbert Ortner (talk) 15:14, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- ... on a page that has two editors ― namely the creator of the page and the uploader of the file ―, watched by less than 30 (most probably the same 2, given that even the French page has only 5) and that has seen 48 visits in the last 4 years. Let's not pretend that Bull-Doser addition of his own material on Kreole Ayisyen WP has nothing to do with Commons. Webfil (talk) 16:06, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm confused why you seem to be implying that Haitian Wikipedia is a less important project or why the number of editors on a page is of any relevance. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Nothing against small projects but isn't it obvious? This is nothing but strategically dropping one's pixel garbage into a small project where nobody cares just to make them keepers forever. Just check his other contributions! Unfortunately the uploader seems to be resistant to suggestions concerning his photographic abilities. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I'm confused why you seem to be implying that Haitian Wikipedia is a less important project or why the number of editors on a page is of any relevance. IronGargoyle (talk) 16:59, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- For scope issues it is (see COM:INUSE). Commons does not make content decisions for other projects. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:26, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep COM:INUSE. One thing to add is that there doesn't seem to be a better-quality image of her and if there was then that photo-use should be replaced and only then can the file be deleted for quality issues. The delete-votes here make no sense at all and ignore policy. Prototyperspective (talk
) 23:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @IronGargoyle and Prototyperspective: Just noting that if the file is kept, then the other one should be undeleted. RodRabelo7 (talk) 03:56, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- It doesn't have to be undeleted and I don't know where the other file was used. This file here is used in 8 times, mostly on Wikipedia so it should be kept until it's not used anymore which should probably be because there is a higher-quality image of the same person that can substitute that image. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep This is the best photo we have--Trade (talk) 19:55, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I really debate the usefulness of an image this bad, taken by a notorious paparazzo Dronebogus (talk) 11:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The file is of very poor quality, but it seems that various projects deemed it good enough, and per COM:INUSE we don't overrule these local project decisions. Feel free to re-nominate for deletion if the file isn't used anymore. --Gestumblindi (talk) 16:37, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
Este escudo no pertenece al municipio de Villafrades de Campos según la documentación en poder de la diputacion de Valladolid. Es el escudo de armas de la familia Villafrades 77.230.24.182 18:36, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:51, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
The uploader's claim of authorship is dubious and the contradicting claim of PD-no disclosure needs to be sustained by a first publication date more than 70 years ago. — Racconish 💬 20:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I claimed at one point that I am the heir to the Théophile Lognoné archive and the copyrights, those images were taken by my ancestors : Théophile Lognoné (1869-1920) or Théophile Julien Lognoné (1895-1974). You can switch those to {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}} from their current CC license Kevlo007007 (talk) 21:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The sitter and the owner are not the author. — Racconish 💬 21:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Where can I file a VRT claiming that all the images were taken by Théophile Julien Lognoné or Théophile Joseph Lognoné and I am the heir and are releasing the images under a Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs license. Kevlo007007 (talk) 21:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- The sitter and the owner are not the author. — Racconish 💬 21:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Ticket:2024030510000029 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 01:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
No indication of an anonymous author in the Flickr source (which claims copyright) and no indication of a first publication more than 70 years ago. — Racconish 💬 20:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep We usually assume that old documents were published at the time of creation. At that time, a picture leaving the photographer's custody constituted publication. Pre-1936 French pictures should be OK with {{PD-France}} + {{PD-1996}}. Yann (talk) 10:22, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment We have no reason to assume the work was published anonymously, i.e. the author decided to hide their dentity. It is either a work for which the uploader ignores the identity of the author, which does not mean the author is anonymous, or a work for which sufficient but unsuccessful diligence to find the author can be proven, i.e. an orphan work which nevertheless cannot be considered to be PD in France and PD-France is therefore not applicable. — Racconish 💬 12:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per Yann. "anonymous" and "unknown" and using a pseudonym have the same legal ramifications in the EU and in the USA. However I believe a VRT has been filed where a family member is claiming that another deceased family member took the images and he is the heir to the copyrights. --RAN (talk) 14:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Anonymous (or pseudonymous) and orphan are not the same in French copyright law. Cf. CPI art 113-10 of French copyright law [11]. In practical terms, the orphan work is protected but can be used under some conditions, in particular, only for cultural, educative or research purposes and not for profit which is not compatible with Commons licenses. — Racconish 💬 14:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024030710010032 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 18:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
No indication of a publication which is requested for PD-EU-no author disclosure. — Racconish 💬 21:00, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment May be PD in Europe, but still under a copyright in USA. Yann (talk) 10:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024030710010032 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 18:00, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
It's a depiction of a chainsaw that is above COM:TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- But it is above COM:TOO Japan because this logo also doubles as an illustration of a chainsaw that has artistic merit. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 05:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- My bad. Yeah, it could be above COM:TOO Japan. I'm not sure, but it might be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep -- A simplified wordmark has been uploaded, revdel the old one instead.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 07:55, 12 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, per VulcanSphere. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Oppose The simplified wordmark isn't accurate. Better to axe it and let local projects use the actual logo if they care to. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:28, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
- But it is accurate to the logo font. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- They can still use the accurate logo locally if this is kept in modified form here. Also, not all projects give themselves the option of using non-free media. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:02, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Most projects don’t have a fair use policy like English-language Wikipedia does. RodRabelo7 (talk) 04:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Strong oppose of the status quo – what is there now is a fictitious logo. I am not qualified to determine if it has or has not a value, but if it is kept, it should be renamed and prominently described as unofficial.
- Personally, I think this simplified version should not exits at all. I regard it as of a very limited illustrative value (if any) and potential irresponsibility of its reusers to mark it as (or even learn about it being) unofficial and Commons-invented might result in spread of a false information that this is the real logo. I think no logo on Commons is a better alternative to simplified logo on Commons. Janhrach (talk) 17:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 07:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
not a work from NASA but USSR vip (talk) 00:01, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
not a work from NASA but from USSR/Roscosmos/Russian Academy of Sciences/planetology.ru vip (talk) 00:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of this, which is the current official vectorization of the Stihl logo. Delete and turn this title into a redirect of the new logo. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Why did you upload this duplicate (to a new file name) yesterday? --Leyo 13:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- It was because I wanted to upload the stihl svg after I saw it in the official website. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- File:Stihl (Unternehmen) logo.svg was also taken from the official website three years ago. The only visible difference between the two versions is that one has a small (intended) margin. --Leyo 08:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- It was because I wanted to upload the stihl svg after I saw it in the official website. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 14:26, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:58, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
This is NOT A PICTURE CARRIE CROWLEY Youdepiela (talk) 13:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I can't say, for sure. User:James Kevin McMahon uploaded it from a video of DIFF day 1. I watched the video and she's in it, but there's no narration identifying her as Carrie Crowley. I reviewed older images of Carrie Crowley from the web, the most recent being from 2023. All the web images (including the 2023 one) show her as slimmer, but (within the limits of the resolution) the subject of this 2024 picture seems to have similar hair and facial features to the woman in the older pictures. She's 59 now and maybe she's put on a few pounds. But I'm still not sure. -- WikiPedant (talk) 18:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Although I got this one wrong, I am reassured that others are checking my work, I think on this occasion , I had too many videos on the go, I learnt to just concentrate on one video at a time. Apologies and thanks for the correction.James Kevin McMahon (talk) 19:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- COM:INUSE, so I'd Speedy keep, but I can't predict what the closing admin will do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Keep of course, but @James Kevin McMahon: now the uploader seems to admit that the lady in the image is NOT Carrie Crowley, the image should speedily be renamed and removed from the Crowley articles. Vysotsky (talk) 21:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Removed from Carrie Crowley articles. Description updated. I will rename the file as soon as the correct name of the woman in the image is known. Vysotsky (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Poor quality photo of an unknown person. Not within SCOPE. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not many "unknown persons" are in flash photography on the red carpet (DIFF video at 0:37 min.). Her name will pop up. Vysotsky (talk) 22:42, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Poor quality photo of an unidentified person. --Krd 08:59, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality. Not reasonably useful. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:03, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Terrible quality, nowhere near usable. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not in use, not realistically useful, as we have a better picture of the subject. Poor quality (high amount of noise, low resolution, bad lighting). Out of scope. --Webfil (talk) 00:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. Only free image we will soon have of subject, as other image in category seems likely to be deleted soon as a copyright violation. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Completely useless -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 08:12, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 09:00, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Flickr user most likely does not have rights to this photo; uploads no original content as far as I can tell mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- 1951 photograph, PD-Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 10:35, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- This photo is remake made by the Flickr user, but the original photographic work is taken in 1951 and 73 years have passed since the year the work was created, so I think that it's not unlikely to be a copyright violation. For more details, please read the Copyright Law of Taiwan: Article 30, Article 31, Article 32, and Article 35.--125.230.86.143 09:13, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: PD in Taiwan, but not the US. Undelete in 2047. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:03, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete this file because a rectified vector version of it[12] exists. So if anyone is reading this, please delete this file OperationSakura6144 (talk) 05:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded this file right before the rectified version exist. You can replace it with a new version. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 05:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ketil3 as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Ferrari 275 GTB-3509 (52371357218).jpg - Not an exact duplicate, but looks like a weirdly color-adjusted version instead. Probably not needed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say 'weirdly colour adjusted', I prefer the ...191 version to the ...218 as it's not so burned out in the sunlight areas.
- These are taken from two Flickr copies, uploaded originally (and differently) by the Flickr photographer. I don't know how sacrosanct we regard Flickr photographs as, should we ever adjust colours or crop them, or choose one image over the other in a case like this?
- Personally I would Keep this one and delete the other. As we're unlikely to ever see agreement on that, then I think we'd keep both. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:12, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. I prefer the other version. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:47, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of paperwork from Yoshida Steak House in Kyoto, Japan. Japan has been a member of the Berne Convention since 15 July 1899 per COM:JAPAN. Yann (talk) 10:16, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per my tag. This is a DW of modern paperwork and a business card from the 2000s. We need permission from the copyright holder(s). — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Not modern paperwork. Is it a Category:Tables (information) ? --Benzoyl (talk) 07:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 10:51, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:21, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 10:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:22, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 10:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 10:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Smaller copy of File:Babak nahrain - 2018.jpg, for which I can find any older copy on the Net. Yann (talk) 10:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: Do you mean "can't find" because no hits on TinEye. Abzeronow (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, sorry. Yann (talk) 19:29, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann: Do you mean "can't find" because no hits on TinEye. Abzeronow (talk) 19:25, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Now a redirect. No hits on TinEye for photo. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
remplacé par une nouvelle version Rayman78 (talk) 14:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. In general, though, the stated deletion reason is not valid. If maps were ever correct, they should be kept as historical documents. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:13, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Risk of copyright violation. The US public domain claim may be invalid because this image may have previously been published outside the US (most likely the UK), so the US would not be the country of origin. The same image was published in the UK magazine Melody Maker a few weeks earlier than the date in this file.[13] . The image was used in several European record covers in the same year.[14] As Mary Hopkin was a UK singer it is unclear that this would have been first published in the US. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:PCP. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Where is the proof? Yann (talk) 11:05, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:29, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Where is the proof? Yann (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: watermark matches uploader name; webhits are a few years after Commons upload. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:33, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Where is the proof? Yann (talk) 11:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 00:34, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:50, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://ketabdari66.blogsky.com/1393/06/16/post-163/ Yann (talk) 11:12, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The link provided links back to Commons. Watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:54, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 11:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:56, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Modern Sciences as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: this is not own work Yann (talk) 11:15, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: No hits on TinEye, watermark matches uploader name. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:57, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fonsagrada#/media/Archivo:Casa_do_Concello_da_Fonsagrada,_Lugo.jpg CulturaFonsagrada (talk) 11:46, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Missing photographer's permission, non-free photo of a 3D object. Quick1984 (talk) 13:10, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, can be restored if sources are given. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:32, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
image might not be by uploader, particularly consider lack of Metadata attatched SecretName101 (talk) 16:53, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: appears to be a lower resolution duplicate of File:2009-0805-SRosenfels.jpg. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:11, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
This page, not file should be removed to rename the file from Peru P-60.svg to Peru road sign P-60.svg WWBM (talk) 18:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Is this a deletion request or should it actually be a move, merge or split request? (I reverted your changing the tag to SD because this page had already been created.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 19:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- it should be actually a move of the File:Peru P-60.svg from
Peru P-60.svgtoPeru road sign P-60.svgWWBM (talk) 19:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)- If I understand correctly then, when Túrelio deleted the file that was once here, as a duplicate of File:Peru P-60.svg, you believe it was the wrong one or that this is the better name? I’m not sure how best to sort it out; it may require an admin to look into the history.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- I actually meant removing the redirect per Speedydelete. So it was a mistake that I nominated this file redirect for deletion instead of Speedydelete WWBM (talk) 06:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- If I understand correctly then, when Túrelio deleted the file that was once here, as a duplicate of File:Peru P-60.svg, you believe it was the wrong one or that this is the better name? I’m not sure how best to sort it out; it may require an admin to look into the history.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 01:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- it should be actually a move of the File:Peru P-60.svg from
Deleted: redirect deleted per discussion. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
No META data of a thumb size photo. Likely from a website with unknown copyright status. Pierre cb (talk) 19:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:25, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
not an own work, not PD, from 1960s, copyright vio PizzaKing13 (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, El Salvador is Life + 70. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:50, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
not an own work, from 1960s, copyright vio, not PD PizzaKing13 (talk) 20:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, El Salvador is Life + 70. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:51, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright vio, from 1961/1962, not PD PizzaKing13 (talk) 20:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, El Salvador is Life + 70. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:52, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Non respect des droits d'auteur (publication initiale : https://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2015/01/27/2037030-marie-reache-heroine-de-plus-belle-la-vie.html) LucasD (talk) 20:48, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:53, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Upload request, Damaged photo and the availability of alternatives {{User|POS78}} talk 23:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: per https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D9%85%D8%B1%DA%A9%D8%B2_%D8%A2%D9%85%D9%88%D8%B2%D8%B4_%D8%B9%D8%A7%D9%84%DB%8C_%DA%A9%D8%A7%D8%B4%D9%85%D8%B1, established in 1390. I presume that's AH, making it 1970 AD, ergo copyright violation of the architect in a non-FOP country. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Note that if I'm right, the entire Category:Kashmar Higher Education Center should be deleted, with all the files in it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:31, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- If I'm wrong and this is really a 1390 AD building, my deletion reason is void. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Hello Brother, In Iran, we have solar Hijri calendar and today is the year 1402 SH! So, this building was built in 2011-2012 AD.
The rest of the images do not need to be deleted. thank you {{User|POS78}} talk 12:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Hello Brother, In Iran, we have solar Hijri calendar and today is the year 1402 SH! So, this building was built in 2011-2012 AD.
- Thanks. Aren't the rest of the images in the category all of the same building, though? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Yes, all pictures are of the same building! I'm a little confused, sorry. :) {{User|POS78}} talk 17:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek Actually, I almost took the photos with the coordination of the university official. They even took my phone number and I should have uploaded the pictures and sent them, otherwise they would have sued me! Because I had taken pictures without permission and I got in trouble and I had to prove to them why I wanted the photos! Anyway I showed them I uploaded the pictures here and they trusted me. I really am an idiot!
{{User|POS78}} talk 17:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not an idiot at all. It's totally understandable not to immediately think of needing permission from the architect. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:57, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- If I'm wrong and this is really a 1390 AD building, my deletion reason is void. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:33, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Pinkoro_Jizo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_logo.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-id.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Pinkoro_Jizo.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Pinkoro_Jizo.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Pinkoro_Jizo.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
T.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.t.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
_portrait.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_logo.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_logo.svg){kind=link}
_logo.svg){kind=link}
![[12]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_Mifune,_Kumamoto_(rectified_version).svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Courtesy deletion granted. The rest should probably be deleted since 2011 is not 30 years ago. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:58, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Exceeds COM:TOO France; it's home country, and fonts are also copyrighted in France as well. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:55, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:35, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Metallic finish may be above TOO. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 04:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
May exceed COM:TOO France which is the home country of this sporting event and logo. Fonts are not public domain there, and the 24h mark may have some creativity that puts it above France's low Threshold of Originality. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 03:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Leoboudv as no source (No source since) Rasbak (talk) 11:20, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Op https://www.tela-botanica.org/flore/france-metropolitaine/ zijn veel afbeeldingen verwijderd, waardoor verificatie niet meer mogelijk is. Indertijd was deze afbeelding nog te vinden met de bijbehorende licentie. Dus graag laten staan.Rasbak (talk) 11:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Op https://www.tela-botanica.org/flore/france-metropolitaine/ zijn veel afbeeldingen verwijderd, waardoor verificatie niet meer mogelijk is. Indertijd was deze afbeelding nog te vinden met de bijbehorende licentie. Dus graag laten staan.Rasbak (talk) 11:25, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- I am having trouble loading the source link, but it also has a watermark that says a different site name on it. Abzeronow (talk) 22:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the watermark on the image suggests it is not copied from tela-botanica.org, so probably copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:43, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The picture does not originally publish by Chom pla celebrety, The original author is พรรคเพื่อไทย KaiserO5 (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
ประชาไท (Prachatai) is not the original author of the picture, The Thai Parliament Television (TPTV) is the original author and does not allowed to be use freely KaiserO5 (talk) 11:44, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:44, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nutshinou as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:CSD#F1, Possible copyright violation: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google search Yann (talk) 18:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- My bad, here's a link to the original image: https://www.gettyimages.fr/detail/photo-d%27actualit%C3%A9/american-civil-rights-campaigner-martin-luther-king-photo-dactualit%C3%A9/3362897 -- Nutshinou Talk! 18:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the link. There is a possibility to be in the public domain for lack of copyright notice. That's the case for a number of images from Hulton Archive. That's why it is not eligible for speedy deletion. It will be deleted after a week if no more information is provided. Yann (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep as lacking a copyright notice. The English US version of that page is here (I clicked on "France" as the last link in the first column of the footer and chose "United States"). Of course, if William Lovelace, Daily Express, or Hulton Archive registered or renewed the copyright, that info would be helpful. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:10, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence this is in PD or not renewed. Nobody took the trouble to look any further, therefore deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:47, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nemoralis as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: File 10: Personal photos by non-contributors Yann (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
- He appears to be a boxing coach, articles on Azeri and Uzbek Wikipedia have been deleted, uploader is supposedly the subject so inclusion seems to be self-promotional. I'm not seeing independent coverage of the subject either. Abzeronow (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, of no educational use, not used on the projects (except wikidata, a fossil remain of the deleted articles). --Ellywa (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
