Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/02/13
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_الاسم_عمر_ادم.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_18_-_Dunkin'_Donuts.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_07_-_Rego_Center_I_IND.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_05_-_IND.jpg){kind=link}
_13.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_03_-_IND.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Schalen-Frucht_(1960)_und_Ellsworth_Kellys_White_Ring_(1963)_Foto_E_Duch.jpg){kind=link}
![172 File:Luis Noah Witte als Hans Höss in "The Zone of Interest".webp](#File:Luis_Noah_Witte_als_Hans_Höss_in_"The_Zone_of_Interest".webp){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
accidental duplicate PhiliptheNumber1 (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Potential copyrighted file, after it was suppressed by a transparent version of this file. Mod creator (talk) 01:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete Appears to be above the threshold of originality. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Obviously Flickrwashed footage. The Flickr account does not own the content. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry. Didn't realize. Personisinsterest (talk) 03:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:05, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Unuseful. NewUniverse (talk) 02:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo "My son" 🤷🏽♂️. Wikimedia is not a personal photo repository iMahesh (talk) 02:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
File:WikiCon Brasil 2022 - Como promover equidade de conhecimento no Brasil - Stela Madruga (02).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per the request of the person depicted. I'm the uploader EPorto (WMB) (talk) 03:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
#File:WikiCon_Brasil_2022_-_Como_promover_equidade_de_conhecimento_no_Brasil_-_Stela_Madruga_(02).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Courtesy G7 outside of window. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
appears to be a music video still, thus unlikely free license Gnomingstuff (talk) 03:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:08, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
It was uploaded as part of a promotional article on es.wiki ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 04:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:09, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:10, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
This is a book cover photo, and surely copyrighted. It is not an "own work" of the person who took a photo of the cover. Indy beetle (talk) 05:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:12, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of non-free book covers Johnj1995 (talk) 05:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible derivative of non-free comic book covers Johnj1995 (talk) 05:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F3. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation - lifted from https://www.muzej-nz.si/si/blog/1201-Volitve-8-aprila-1990, no evidence of permission. — Yerpo Eh? 09:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Aspere as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 What's the issue with this version? Yann (talk) 13:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Does G7 requre more than the fact that I am the uploader? It was uploaded less than 7 days, and it is currently unused. I think it qualifies the conditions for speedy deletion. --Aspere (talk) 14:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, that's OK. I thought you want it deleted because the file has some issue (No thumbnail, 0 × 0 pixels). Yann (talk) 14:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD G7. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:17, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://elcinema.com/en/person/1015570/gallery/124514129 ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:06, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Boris Breuer M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Restored per ticket permission. --Krd 09:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
i want to delete all the photos are upload on wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:09, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This is one of my work and I want to delete it. Awinology (talk) 15:56, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- If it's not abstract art, this photo is not even worth the time to discuss it. Delete. 200.111.17.211 22:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: dup submission, see above. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:10, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
I want to delete all the photos uploaded to Wikimedia with this account Awinology (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope personal image. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
This is my artwork and I want to delete it. Awinology (talk) 15:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Which art? OOS? Delete. 200.111.17.211 22:05, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope personal image. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:53, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Delete Source is accurate, but there is no indication at the source that the image is available under the here stipulated cc-by-4.0 license nor any other license compatible with Commons. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 11:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation? wrong license Xocolatl (talk) 17:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Could be. Author is Maximilian. 186.172.182.48 08:42, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi!
- the origin of the photo as Theocharis N. Grigoriadis told me https://www.wiwiss.fu-berlin.de/studium-lehre/master/economics/dozierende/zentralinstitute/20_Grigoriadis.html
- Could you help me please to register it correct! Fanastasia (talk) 18:19, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: no free license mentioned at the source website. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:57, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 20:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
i dont want my photos to be on social media Izaddad (talk) 20:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Is Amine not a female name? Delete anyway.200.111.17.211 22:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 20:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85_%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%85.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%A7%D8%B3%D9%85_%D8%B9%D9%85%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D8%AF%D9%85.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is Omar in scope? 200.111.17.211 21:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Is Botan in scope? 200.111.17.211 21:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope as COM:SELFIE --DannyS712 (talk) 22:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep (see user talkpage); no usage and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Movie posters are under copyright, unless I’m completely off my sneakers. Kirham (talk) 22:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:19, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted software, which is represented in the screen of the LCD game. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:17, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:DW of packaging. Grandmaster Huon (talk) 23:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Arte amateur o no es trabajo de la usuaria 181.203.14.200 01:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D/3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Woman, Life, Freedom -3 - Commemorating Mahsa Amini's Murder - زن، زندگی، آزادی - بزرگداشت قتل مهسا امینی - 53200175297.jpg
[edit]
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
File:Free Biafra and free Nnamdi Kanu - Biafran separatist leader imprisoned in Nigeria. (24843210903).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of copyrighted banners A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Violates COM:FOP Japan. (Oinkers42) (talk) 04:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
-20240213043900-File:Mario_Pipe_Statue.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_18_-_Dunkin%27_Donuts.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_18_-_Dunkin%27_Donuts.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
_18_-_Dunkin'_Donuts.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:44, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_18_-_Dunkin'_Donuts.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope: fictitious map (hypothetical, and largely nonsensical, groupings of powers in a future war). Omphalographer (talk) 07:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious map. Omphalographer (talk) 07:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: screenshots of non-notable software.
Omphalographer (talk) 07:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:45, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_07_-_Rego_Center_I_IND.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_07_-_Rego_Center_I_IND.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
_07_-_Rego_Center_I_IND.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_07_-_Rego_Center_I_IND.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_05_-_IND.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05_-_IND.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
_05_-_IND.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_05_-_IND.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_13.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
_13.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_13.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image of sole-purpose account Bedivere (talk) 07:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
EXIF data shows "Copyright holder: asifmakandar". We need a permission from this person. Yann (talk) 12:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
I did not find the claimed free license at the source weblink. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Probable COM:TOYS. Commercially-licensed image may violate the life-sized toy designer's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a banner. There is no Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines. We need commercial Creative Commons licensing permission from the banner designers who are the copyright holders of the subject
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:52, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Arsenio Lacson in Manila. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Same case as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Arsenio Lacson in Manila. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:16, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The copyrighted Louvre Pyramid takes much of the central part of the image and is no longer incidental or secondary (the Flickr file name suggests it is the main intent of the image). As there is no commercial Freedom of Panorama in France, this image infringes the posthumous copyright of the author I. M. Pei. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:London protest against Saudi Arabia's detention of prisoner of conscience Raif Badawi.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
- DM but if it disturbs you so much just blur the photo. (All the same it's illegible.) 200.39.139.0 17:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus/G4. --Wdwd (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:20, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Remove Kanyeh911 (talk) 04:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Kanyeh911 That is not a valid deletion rationale. Why should it be removed? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
educational value? 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 07:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Speedy delete test upload / joke image Andy Dingley (talk) 23:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
COM:TOYS photos of Lego minifigures. (See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego minifigures.)
- File:Lego 2023 59.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 58.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 57.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 56.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 55.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 54.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 53.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 52.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 51.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 50.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 49.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 48.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 47.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 46.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 45.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 44.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 43.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 42.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 41.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 40.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 39.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 38.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 37.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 36.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 35.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 34.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 33.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 32.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 28.jpg
- File:Lego 2023.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 31.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 30.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 29.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 27.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 26.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 25.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 24.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 23.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 22.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 21.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 20.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 19.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 18.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 17.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 16.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 15.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 14.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 13.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 12.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 11.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 10.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 9.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 8.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 7.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 6.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 5.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 4.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 3.jpg
- File:Lego 2023 2.jpg
Belbury (talk) 11:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
The image is so small that it seems to be a random one from the Internet. 223.74.230.191 14:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Indeed, it's a stock photo: https://depositphotos.com/photo/peacock-with-fanned-tail-18724447.html Omphalographer (talk) 03:29, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:22, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_03_-_IND.jpg){kind=link}
_03_-_IND.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
_03_-_IND.jpg){kind=link}
Keep. The reflections blur out the advertisement sufficiently to make it de minimis. This is particularly true because it is clear from the image title that the intent was to capture the intersection and/or subway station and not the advertisement. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: The focus of the image is the back of the subway station enterance, not the poster. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
_03_-_IND.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Rasalgethii (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
- File:Дизайн без названия (2).png
- File:Дизайн без названия (1).png
- File:Дизайн без названия.png
- File:Marketer VK--transparent-white.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gnomingstuff (talk) 05:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not used / Не используется Виктор Пинчук (talk) 05:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope? Windows Never Release (WNR) logo. メイド理世 (talk) 07:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
This is no longer my company's current logo. I ask that you delete it because our company can no longer identify with this logo. 185.12.88.7 10:00, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Historical logos are in project scope. No reason for deletion. Krd 11:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
copy violation, naming right violation, see here: https://terra-australia.ch/scippis-bush-skin-riding-coat.html no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 10:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
commercial catalog image, no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 10:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:35, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Unusable image This, that and the other (talk) 11:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: either out of scope or a copyvio depending on if it's a real logo or not. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
File:A couple of face-painted humans happily gazing into each other's eyes - crop 3 - inpainted (DSC03824).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
6 more or less identical photos. Reduce to 1 remaining SuperFlight1 (talk) 11:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Which one(s) are you suggesting should be deleted? Most of them are part of the discussion in Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:A couple of face-painted humans happily gazing into each other's eyes - crop 2 (DSC03824).jpg, which IMO should be kept. The inpainted ones required significant work. The uncropped one that you nominated contain more contextual information but is not as visually pleasant. The squared version has been assessed as a QI. --Trougnouf (talk) 14:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted 3, 3i, and 4 per nom. Kept 1 (quality image) and 2 and 5 (for archival reasons as they were part of a failed FP nom). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 20:40, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per COM:TROPHY, images of the Vince Lombardi Trophy are considered copyrighted. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 01:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. There were no copyright notices on the original Lombardi trophy. The design is consequently in the public domain per {{PD-US-no notice}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:05, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoylev. -- Geagea (talk) 02:24, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The uploader said at w:WP:Teahouse#Saddam Hussain "My friend gave it me, whom i met in Iraq last year." ColinFine (talk) 11:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 02:27, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Weak keep: the image is probably public domain. The image looks like an American pin-up girl from World War II, possibly of Rita Hayworth. Many US images from this period are public domain. The text and lettering are too simple to copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. DW may well be from an old PD pinup, but no confirmation of that. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
educational value? 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 07:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: Low-quality content = out of scope. - THV | ♂ | U | T - 09:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Comment. Per COM:SCOPE: "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project." Personal images don't have to be of yourself. That is just one example. It's uploaded by an active user, created by an active user, and favorited by an active user. I don't see the harm as long as User:Queen of Hearts did indeed release it freely (as it was originally uploaded to a discord server, I can't verify this). I think it is probably ok to keep. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:53, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
- I indeed did. Queen of Hearts ❤️ (she/they/ella/elle) 04:10, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sourced from https://pixabay.com/photos/view-jump-alone-sunset-sky-valley-1695361/, uploaded on 29 September 2016, {{Pixabay}} indicates that "media published on Pixabay from 9 January 2019 onwards is not considered to be freely licensed and can't be accepted on Commons" Nutshinou Talk! 09:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- I take it I was barely awake making this nomination? 2016 obviously comes before 2019. Feel free to close this unless another reason for deletion arises -- Nutshinou Talk! 15:04, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Old logo for Hartlepool Sixth Form College, appears when searching for college 194.83.56.222 12:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Commons is for historic as well as current images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Locking Piece - Henry Moore (LH 515, Arp Museum Bahnhof Rolandseck, Remagen)
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1986; no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
The image has watermark, so it can't be own work. 223.74.230.191 14:25, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CV, false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:11, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I have got an updated and higher resolution version of the same file. ATE205 (talk) 14:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: that's not a reason for deletion, but prompt uploader request is. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I have a higher resolution of the file ATE205 (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: that's not a reason for deletion, but prompt uploader request is. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I have a higher resolution of the file ATE205 (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: that's not a reason for deletion, but prompt uploader request is. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I have a higher resolution of the file ATE205 (talk) 14:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: that's not a reason for deletion, but prompt uploader request is. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:14, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I have another copy of the file ATE205 (talk) 14:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: that's not a reason for deletion, but prompt uploader request is. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Image of Mexico Mediateca are CC BY-NC [1] Librero2109 (talk) 14:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I have another copy of the file ATE205 (talk) 14:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: that's not a reason for deletion, but prompt uploader request is. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:15, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 15:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 15:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Because I'm not the original author of the photography. Furthermore, the context is wrong. Catwiki01 (talk) 15:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Because I'm not the original author of the photography. Catwiki01 (talk) 15:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Colombia is an 80 year jurisdiction, so still under an active copyright. --RAN (talk) 18:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Slovenia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. A09 (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Because I'm not the original author of the photography. Catwiki01 (talk) 15:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Flag of Slovenia (1945–1991).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
- Speedy delete per nom. A09 (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Logo of the JNA.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. A09 (talk) 18:18, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Emblem of the SKJ (Slovene).svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Speedy delete per nom A09 (talk) 18:17, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
educational value? 💚Kelly The Angel (Talk to me)💚 15:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Photoshops of actor Nubel Feliz Yan's face onto photographs from unspecified sources. User's other uploads were some Netflix promotional photos of the same actor, not identified as such and claimed as own work.
- File:Nubel Feliz Modelo Fitness.jpg
- File:Nubel Feliz.jpg
- File:Nubel Fuerzas Especiales.jpg
- File:Nubel Actor Dominicano.jpg
Belbury (talk) 14:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own work: visual characteristics suggest screengrab (note the icons at the bottom of File:Nubel Feliz Yan and Hwang Jung-min behind the camera during the production of Narcosantos.jpg). Unreliable uploader with previous copyvios.
- File:Nubel Feliz Yan and Park Hae-soo behind the camera during the production of The Narcosantos.jpg
- File:Nubel Feliz Yan and Hwang Jung-min behind the camera during the production of Narcosantos.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as edits of copyrighted images https://m.imdb.com/name/nm14025762/mediaviewer/rm3725001473 and https://www.imdb.com/title/tt14518692/mediaviewer/rm3192589569 Belbury (talk) 16:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I speedily deleted one of the two images as a copyright violation. The other doesn't appear to be the same but unlikely own. ─ Aafī (talk) 16:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- File:Nubel Feliz Yan and Hwang Jung-min behind the camera during the production of Narcosantos.jpg is exactly the same as https://m.imdb.com/name/nm14025762/mediaviewer/rm3725001473 except a different face has been crudely superimposed on the person on the right (there's a visible diagonal line in the hair and the image extends into the top border). Belbury (talk) 17:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chagallfenster (Fraumünster)
[edit]Marc Chagall, who created those stained glass windows in a Swiss church, died in 1985, so the windows are still protected for several decades. No freedom of panorama inside buildings in Switzerland accd. to COM:FOP#Switzerland.
- File:7202 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7208 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7210 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7211 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7213 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7215 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7220 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7222 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7223 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7227 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7228 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7229 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7231 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:7232 - Zürich - Fraumünster.JPG
- File:Fraumuenster Chagallfenster 120421 1500x2000px.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-03-56 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-04-16.JPG
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-06-00 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-06-28 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-07-14 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-08-04 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-08-16 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-08-32 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-11-44 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-13-48 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-15-28 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-16-00 ShiftN.jpg
- File:Fraumünster - Chagallfenster 2010-08-27 17-20-22.JPG
- File:Kirchenfenster Expressionistisch.jpg
- File:Reform.-Kirche Fraumünster A.JPG
Rosenzweig τ 17:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Alan (talk) 21:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chagallfenster (Fraumünster)
[edit]As before: Marc Chagall, who created those stained glass windows in a Swiss church, died in 1985, so the windows are still protected for several decades. No freedom of panorama inside buildings in Switzerland accd. to COM:FOP#Switzerland.
- File:Switzerland-00091 - Windows by Chagall (18619376783).jpg
- File:Switzerland-00092 - Windows by Chagall (19052349000).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 13:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chagallfenster (Fraumünster)
[edit]Marc Chagall, the painter of the stained glass windows died in 1985 and Switzerland has a standard of life plus 70 years and COM:FOP Switzerland only applies for places permanently accessible to the public. Fraumünster church has opening hours and is not permanently accessible to the public. FoP Switzerland further says that Freedom of panorama does not apply to works located in interior spaces and that Commons opinion is that stained glass windows should be considered part of interior spaces
. I suggest to undelete in 2056.
- File:Iglesia de Fraumünster, Zúrich, Suiza, 2023-03-05, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg
- File:Iglesia de Fraumünster, Zúrich, Suiza, 2023-03-05, DD 25-27 HDR.jpg
Paradise Chronicle (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 08:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chagallfenster (Fraumünster)
[edit]Copyright violation; artist died in 1985; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Fraumünster (1).jpg
- File:Fraumünster (2).jpg
- File:Fraumünster (3).jpg
- File:Fraumünster (4).jpg
- File:Stained Glass In Fraumunster (140456135).jpeg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per above Paradise Chronicle (talk) 18:37, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo illegally uploaded from https://www.flickr.com/photos/194471658@N06/51717776530/ 95.87.235.200 18:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyright violation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Low quality unused penis pictures. Nothing of value
- File:Eichel Penis.jpg
- File:Hoden rasiert 1.jpg
- File:German Penis.jpg
- File:Penis mit Penisringen.jpg
- File:Penisringe.jpg
- File:Dicker Pimmel.jpg
- File:Harnröhre Nahaufnahme.jpg
- File:Hoden rasiert.jpg
- File:Die Eichel.jpg
- File:Glans penis close up.jpg
- File:Harnröhre penis.jpg
- File:Circumcised Penis von oben.jpg
- File:Nachwachsende Schamhaare.jpg
- File:Scrotum high temperature.jpg
- File:Radikal beschnittene Eichel.jpg
- File:Eichel beschnitten.jpg
- File:01 erigierter Penis beschnitten.jpg
- File:Beschnittener Penis eines Europäers.jpg
- File:Eichel des Penis.jpg
- File:Circumcised human penis 40.jpg
- File:Circumcised Penis 41.jpg
- File:Latex-freies Kondome.jpg
- File:Penis nach dem Sex.jpg
- File:Beschnittener Penis mit Hodensack.jpg
Nutshinou Talk! 18:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep the images appear to be of quite high quality, and being unused doesn’t mean they couldn’t be used. Dronebogus (talk) 02:58, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus for bulk deletion. No prejudging relisting individual or smaller related subsets (I noticed at least one was out of focus; I'll let others look in more detail if they wish). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Photo is from Liverpool FC Twitter and not Public domain 2pattywhack27 (talk) 19:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Screencap of YouTube ad; unlikely free license, and likely spam Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:02, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 2024 200.111.17.211 21:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CV. "This image is used freely by journalistic sources." does not equal PD-US. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No permission 200.111.17.211 21:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unlikely to be own work. https://www.instagram.com/gitagyann/p/C2j_IgfPS11/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:05, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
What is? 200.111.17.211 21:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
boring selfie by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: "boring" is subjective; the rest per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:22, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CV. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
As I'm bald I was looking at the people in Category:Bald men to find a good userpage image, however I see that the place is full of out-of-scope guys. This one, or for example, File:Alex Normanno 2020.jpg Bald Ollie (talk) 01:10, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is in use. --Wdwd (talk) 11:14, 25 February 2022 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:24, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to think otherwise offered nor found. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Who is this person? 200.111.17.211 21:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: I don't know either, but reverse image search shows reusage from here. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- yes,This photo is one of many from a session that the writer had but that never went out on the web Macaroto24 (talk) 16:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
License mislabeling (it was labeled {{PD-US}}), presumably copyright ineligible since there is no authorship on the flag. The organization has been virtually inactive for decades, so it is not known whether it has such rights. Taichi (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. source:https://www.butlr.com/about ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope, for selfpromo. Taichi (talk) 21:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Advertisment and most likely copyright violation. Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Fictional Nation. Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Fictional Nation. Private usage. Out of SCOPE. 運動会プロテインパワー (talk) 21:43, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Claimed free license not seen at source website Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the licence appears to be valid. If you click on the LEGE OHARRA link at the bottom of the page you get a legal notice. The "Jabetza intelektuala eta industriala" paragraph includes "Webgunearen edukiaren, diseinu grafikoaren eta kodearen egile-eskubideak Gertuko-ANBOTOrenak dira, baina partekatu daitezke Creative Comons Aitortu Partekatu lizentziaren bitartez (CC-by-sa)." Google translate from Basque gives this as "The copyright of the content, graphic design and code of the website belongs to Gertuko-ANBOTO, but it can be shared using the Creative Commons Attribution Share license (CC-by-sa)." Verbcatcher (talk) 23:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. What's the correct tag then, Cc-by-sa-1.0 or Cc-by-sa-1.0+ or something else? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:37, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, apparently free licensed though correct CC license issue seems unresolved. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/proplusglogovce/photos/a.301879549929/10156167247989930/?type=3 ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Porque me equivoqué al subirlo Alexsw07 (talk) 21:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I could not find the claimed free license at the source website Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the licence appears to be valid. The photo is a crop of a page on the anboto.org website.[2] If you click on the LEGE OHARRA link at the bottom of the page you get a legal notice. The "Jabetza intelektuala eta industriala" paragraph includes "Webgunearen edukiaren, diseinu grafikoaren eta kodearen egile-eskubideak Gertuko-ANBOTOrenak dira, baina partekatu daitezke Creative Comons Aitortu Partekatu lizentziaren bitartez (CC-by-sa)." Google translate from Basque gives this as "The copyright of the content, graphic design and code of the website belongs to Gertuko-ANBOTO, but it can be shared using the Creative Commons Attribution Share license (CC-by-sa)." Verbcatcher (talk) 23:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:23, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Magazine picture without source. Not own work - Copyvio. Herbert Ortner (talk) 21:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Annnd the scope iss? 200.111.17.211 22:09, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Wrong dates, Dubious claim of own work
- File:Manuel del Águila 2005.jpg
- File:Portada Trío Richoly - Primero - 2.jpg
- File:Filarmónica Kiev - Trío Richoly.jpg
- File:Concierto debut Biblioteca Villaespesa 1951.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kleber Zuñiga L (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible F10, Logo
- File:Sesión musical en el estudio de grabación.jpg
- File:Foto para la canción Destino o casualidad.png
- File:Logotipo artístico.png
- File:Foto para prensa.png
- File:Fotografía para prensa debut artístico de kleber Zuñiga.jpg
- File:Sesión 2019 promocional.jpg
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:30, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo of a football club CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unsupported license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:28, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: logo of a game CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:45, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, complex logo with artwork; no evident permission. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:29, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The source indicates a copyright CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Claimed to be "own work" but EXIF indicates that the author is Hamed Barchian. —holly {chat} 22:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. I posted a detailed response on VRT Noticeboard concerning some files uploaded by this user. ─ Aafī (talk) 10:33, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Dubious copyright status, inadequate lisencing, likely above threshold of originality Prodraxis (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Photo invisible Abiba Pauline (talk) 23:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, failed upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
I do not find the claimed free license at the source website Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the licence appears to be valid. If you click on the LEGE OHARRA link at the bottom of the page you get a legal notice. The "Jabetza intelektuala eta industriala" paragraph includes "Webgunearen edukiaren, diseinu grafikoaren eta kodearen egile-eskubideak Gertuko-ANBOTOrenak dira, baina partekatu daitezke Creative Comons Aitortu Partekatu lizentziaren bitartez (CC-by-sa)." Google translate from Basque gives this as "The copyright of the content, graphic design and code of the website belongs to Gertuko-ANBOTO, but it can be shared using the Creative Commons Attribution Share license (CC-by-sa)." Verbcatcher (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. What's the correct tag then, Cc-by-sa-1.0 or Cc-by-sa-1.0+ or something else? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know which CC-by-sa version is needed, or if is ok without a number. Commons:Village pump/Copyright might give some guidance. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. What's the correct tag then, Cc-by-sa-1.0 or Cc-by-sa-1.0+ or something else? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Own work? 186.173.219.201 01:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination [3]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Author's request Zolgoyo (talk) 21:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per belated uploader request, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PridePreneur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images taken from various different Instagram accounts of Indian pride events. Can't see anything on those accounts to suggest that they're releasing these photos under a free licence or (as is claimed in the uploader licence) that the copyright has somehow already expired in the US.
- File:Rainbow Celebration Varanasi.jpg
- File:Girl with rainbow flag.jpg
- File:People at Queer Walk.jpg
- File:People posing at Pride.jpg
- File:Rainbow couple.jpg
- File:People celebrating at Pride.jpg
- File:Rainbow flag expanding.jpg
- File:Own representation.jpg
- File:Rainbow balloons.jpg
- File:Man under rainbow umbrella.jpg
- File:Poster breaking gender dynamics.jpg
- File:People celebrating under rainbow flag.jpg
- File:Posters for support LGBTQ.jpg
- File:Red and green bride at Pride.jpg
- File:People at Pride Walk.jpg
- File:Rainbow spreading.jpg
- File:LGBTQ Corporate.jpg
- File:Gay couple under rainbow umbrella.jpg
- File:Poster proposal.jpg
- File:People at Pride.jpg
- File:Desi Queer Style.jpg
- File:Mothers supporting their queer kids.jpg
- File:Girls representing rainbow love.jpg
- File:Gay rua Poster.jpg
- File:SHE representing rainbow love.jpg
- File:Rainbow flag in air.jpg
- File:People dancing at Pride.jpg
- File:Bengali wedding outfit with Queer tadka.jpg
- File:Rainbow in Air.jpg
- File:Rainbow on high.jpg
- File:Queer Flag Stage.jpg
- File:Out and Proud Girl.jpg
- File:Pride Walk.jpg
- File:Self-representation.jpg
- File:Stage Show at Pride.jpg
- File:Out and Proud Boy.jpg
- File:Trans flag rally.jpg
- File:Bisexuality Visibility.jpg
- File:Queer rally.jpg
- File:Breaking gender dynamics.jpg
- File:Rainbow umbrella.jpg
Belbury (talk) 13:58, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 11:49, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.
- File:Jardin Colonnes - Paris XIV (FR75) - 2021-07-30 - 1.jpg
- File:Jardin Colonnes - Paris XIV (FR75) - 2021-07-30 - 2.jpg
- File:Jardin Colonnes - Paris XIV (FR75) - 2021-07-30 - 3.jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (31846221334).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (31846226234).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (31846229864).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (31846232624).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (32310019750).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (32310027030).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (32566954481).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (32566978501).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (32648408896).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (32689062435).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Montparnasse @ Paris (32689067405).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes @ Place de Séoul @ Paris (34501830013).jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes, Montparnasse, Paris 002.jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes, Montparnasse, Paris 003.jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes, Montparnasse, Paris 004.jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes, Montparnasse, Paris 005.jpg
- File:Jardin des Colonnes, Montparnasse, Paris 006.jpg
_-_2021-07-30_-_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-07-30_-_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2021-07-30_-_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. This is simply repetition of a simple geometric arrangement. There is no copyrightable element in the design. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:04, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note that COM:TOO France is pretty low, such repetition can exceed TOO. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note that "can" and "does" are not equivalent. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 11:48, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
- Note that COM:TOO France is pretty low, such repetition can exceed TOO. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:49, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete, pretty much elaborately-designed architecture by a noted architect (w:en:Ricardo Bofill). The information board claims the modern architecture is in neo-classical style. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:44, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
_-_2021-07-30_-_1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Oval with Points - Henry Moore (LH 596, Arp Museum Bahnhof Rolandseck, Remagen)
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1986; no freedom of panorama.
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1986; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Arp-museum-2017-11.jpg
- File:Arp-museum-2017-22.jpg
- File:Arp-museum-2017-36.jpg
- File:Arp-museum-2017-37.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:57, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Not in use, not educationally useful -- Adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, outstandingly poor quality (very low resolution, high loss due to JPEG compression, high amount of noise) Webfil (talk) 22:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I do increasingly wonder if the overhead that Bull-Doser's many images, and their multifarious problems, dump onto the rest of us is really worth the trouble? Andy Dingley (talk) 23:53, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Seems I'm not alone in thinking that: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Bull-Doser Andy Dingley (talk) 00:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- User:Andy Dingley Mind you, though, some people do value their work. --Webfil (talk) 02:25, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete - Resolution so low it was pushing the bounds of usable (and hence acceptable) quality even in the absence of anything better. That's no longer the case. Ubcule (talk) 22:47, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
- Seems I'm not alone in thinking that: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#Bull-Doser Andy Dingley (talk) 00:26, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I'm surprised this one isn't closed yet. A minuscule 13 KB image that won't be used. The nominator has uploaded two images of the subject that are of vastly better quality. Even with my face just inches from the screen, I can't make out facial features in the nominated image. Shawn à Montréal (talk) 20:07, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Unusable. -- Asclepias (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:58, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Morning Star flag.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 05:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Het Volk no 11736 Snuffelgraag en Knagelijntje
[edit]Copyright violation? Why should these images be in the Public domain? What is the basis for that? 1) These are NOT drawings by Gerrit Rotman because they were made after 1927, see w:nl:Gerrit Rotman. 2) As far as I know, the text was written by Arie Pleysier, who died in 1980, so less than 70 years ago.
- File:Het Volk no 11736 Snuffelgraag en Knagelijntje fig 1.jpg
- File:Het Volk no 11736 Snuffelgraag en Knagelijntje fig 2.jpg
- File:Het Volk no 11736 Snuffelgraag en Knagelijntje fig 3.jpg
- File:Het Volk no 11736 Snuffelgraag en Knagelijntje.jpg
- File:Het Volk no 11736 Snuffelgraag en Knagelijntje.djvu
JopkeB (talk) 08:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- According to lambiek.nl roundabout 1928 the cartoon was taken over by Albert Funke Küpper, who (like Rotman) died 70+ years ago. So the drawings are in the PD in the country of origigin. However on the text you are right, according to socialhistory.org Ary Pleysier used the pseudonym Mr. Punch for this cartoon, so the text is not yet PD. Sorry for missing that. Thanks for finding out. I will correct this on Wikisource. Vincent Steenberg (talk) 09:07, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Conclusion:
- The first three files are in the Public Domain (PD) in the Netherlands. Please still change the author in these files (in the "Beschrijving") to the correct name of the drawer, Albert Funke Küpper.
- The last two files should be deleted until 2051, because the text is not in PD yet.
--JopkeB (talk) 09:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - artist died 1934, so under copyright after URAA date. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation; artist died in 1986; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
File:GKM Ausstellungsansicht Neubau mit den Arpaden (1923), Schalen-Frucht (1960) und Ellsworth Kellys White Ring (1963) Foto E Duch.jpg
[edit],_Schalen-Frucht_(1960)_und_Ellsworth_Kellys_White_Ring_(1963)_Foto_E_Duch.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Schalen-Frucht_(1960)_und_Ellsworth_Kellys_White_Ring_(1963)_Foto_E_Duch.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fotograf*in möchte nicht, das Werk in hochaufgelöster Version gemeinfrei zur Verfügung gestellt wird. Bitte löschen Sie die beiden vorherigen Versionen. Danke! GKM Berlin (talk) 14:54, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
Kept: free license is irrevocable... there could be some issues with the pieces of art shown on a picture but I consider them as de-minimis. --rubin16 (talk) 17:11, 11 July 2021 (UTC)
File:GKM Ausstellungsansicht Neubau mit den Arpaden (1923), Schalen-Frucht (1960) und Ellsworth Kellys White Ring (1963) Foto E Duch.jpg
[edit],_Schalen-Frucht_(1960)_und_Ellsworth_Kellys_White_Ring_(1963)_Foto_E_Duch.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio, contemp. artworks, no fop Yann (talk) 13:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright violation; artist died in 1986; no freedom of panorama. Yann (talk) 13:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
horizon is bad Vaija (talk) 13:51, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Dieses Logo ist veraltet und nicht mehr gültig! Novum-RGI (talk) 14:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not a reason for deletion, we keep historic logos. I wonder if this logo is in project scope though, it's the logo of some insurance software which may not be really notable. --Rosenzweig τ 20:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, i have the permission of the Artist and Original File. Majwina (talk) 17:13, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- on top Link to instagram posting oin A24 gallery https://www.instagram.com/a24_movies_art_gallery/p/C1_OEhqIHxK/ Majwina (talk) 17:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Send permission to VTRS, otherwise it's clear copyright violation. I can claim to have all the permissions in the world, it's just that I'd have to prove it. Wojciech Pędzich Talk 15:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination This image will be restored automatically, without further action by the uploader, if and when a free license is received, read, and approved at VRT. The current backlog at VRT is 3 days. . . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
![15:08, 13 February 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/02/13#c-M2k~dewiki-20240213150800-File:Luis_Noah_Witte_als_Hans_Höss_in_"The_Zone_of_Interest".webp){kind=link}
Delete screen shot from recent movie "Zone of Interest" Copyright would certainly belong to producer / promoters of the movie--Headlock0225 (talk) 07:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
![07:58, 22 February 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/02/13#c-Headlock0225-20240222075800-File:Luis_Noah_Witte_als_Hans_Höss_in_"The_Zone_of_Interest".webp){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
![16:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2024/02/13#c-Jameslwoodward-20240409161700-File:Luis_Noah_Witte_als_Hans_Höss_in_"The_Zone_of_Interest".webp){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 15:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 15:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:John Nilson in Lumonics booth at a New York laser conference showing the first commercially available high energy TEA laser (002).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Replaced by "File:John Nilson in Lumonics booth at a New York laser conference showing the first commercially available high energy TEA laser.jpg" Robert Presto (talk) 15:08, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: version 002 is much higher resolution. Deleted and redirected the other version as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 23 December 2022 (UTC)
File:John Nilson in Lumonics booth at a New York laser conference showing the first commercially available high energy TEA laser (002).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Previous DR only dealt with duplication issue. But it is a historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
copyvio, no permission for the photo on the wall; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 17:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
telifli olduğunu unuttuğum için. Alp Beğ (talk) 17:18, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as COM:G7, author requests deletion (the above translates as "I forgot it was copyrighted"). Belbury (talk) 14:28, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:04, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sahina.muzaffarpur (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
- File:ZAHRA IT SOLUTION logo.jpg
- File:ZAHRA IT SOLUTION LLP LOGO.png
- File:ZAHRA IT SOLUTION LLP logo.png
Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Not a violation. I created and own this image.
- Is also credited here:
- https://countjayeandthehardbeats.bandcamp.com/album/you-belong-to-you-2022 Morristemple (talk) 09:37, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- The link you shares indicates a copyright. Could you please follow the instructions on this page to clarifiy the situation and allow the use of the cover on Commons? [4] CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Morristemple Please send permission following the process at COM:RELGEN. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
not authorized by model Werttt (talk) 21:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- In addition, the filename suggests that this is a screenshot. --Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio - artist died in 1992 M2k~dewiki (talk) 21:03, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
This image, apparently uploaded under a Creative Commons license, is as far as I can tell retained as the intellectual property of the artist Tom Lovell, and if not him by his commissioner, The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. (See https://www.illustrationhistory.org/illustrations/tom-lovell-mormon-abridging-the-plates) The upload did not provide compelling evidence for thinking this source was released under a Creative Commons license. This image should not be hosted on Wikimedia Commons. P-Makoto (talk) 23:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
No source link and no license link. On bottom of file is nansha.org.cn - but this Ooligan (talk) 02:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That a website slapped their watermark on a copyright expired work does not remove it from the public domain. Any reason to doubt the license? Seems very plausible to me. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see a reason to doubt the license itself as Infrogmation says. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:13, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Metadata credits Wissam Smayra (the subject). If the uploader is the person being photographed and the photographer, they should disclose it. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT confirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aaajit22700 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely Flickrwashing, these were all uploaded to the same Flickr account on the day of the Commons upload. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Patterson playing for Portimonense in 2022.jpg concluded last year that one such image from this Flickr/Commons user had previously been published on Facebook.
- File:In conversation with Gurudas Kamat on issues related to the Indian film industry.jpg
- File:Inspection after fire on the sets of the serial Ghum Hai Kisikey Pyaar Mein at Filmcity.jpg
- File:After Leopard's attack in Filmcity, he went to make-up artist Shravan house and inquired about his health.jpg
- File:Inspection after fire at Cinevista Studios.jpg
- File:Inspection of sets at Film City during COVID 19.jpg
- File:Meeting of the Indian film industry at the Chief Minister's office.jpg
- File:Demonstration with Nana Patole outside Mantralaya.jpg
Belbury (talk) 12:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Adding two more from the same Flickr account, uploaded by Shwet Ghost (talk · contribs) on the same day that they were posted to Flickr:
- File:Suresh Gupta met Tunisha Sharma's mother at her home.jpg
- File:Suresh Gupta discussed issues of Indian Film Industry with Rahul Gandhi during Bharat Jodo Yatra.jpg
--Belbury (talk) 15:14, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Please undelete this image and the following:
- File:Piso Caravan, San Nicolas (2024) 02.jpg
- File:Piso Caravan, San Nicolas (2024) 03.jpg
- File:Piso Caravan, San Nicolas (2024) 04.jpg
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Once the New Generation Series (NGS) are no longer legal tender. When this series ascends into the public domain these works should be additionally tagged as government works. When they are ready to be undeleted I would like to request the undeleting admin to notify me so I can properly categorise and describe them. For more details, please see: "Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Currency". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 15:11, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
- Comment Speedy deletions declined, files DR tagged. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:36, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Reply, the Deletion Request (DR) is to set up future undeletion and categorisation as the files from this series will get undeleted together once the depicted banknotes are no longer legal tender. I tagged them for speedy deletion to have them deleted now and in the future when an admin will go through all the files in "Category:Philippine currency-related deletion requests/deleted" they will systematically undelete these files and then notify me. Maybe I should have worded this more clearly in the above. Note that it's more difficult to categorise or organise deleted files, so I created this DR to be organised and point to the right files to be undeleted later. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 00:07, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:39, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
The same same-day flickrwashing as past uploads of photos of this person (Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aaajit22700, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Suresh Shyamlal Gupta.png, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Zgz.or), possible block evasion. Belbury (talk) 15:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:41, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Based on Commons:Deletion requests/File:PVV logo (2006–present).svg, this one also does not meet the requirements Dajasj (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- When this file will be deleted, the newly made Category:Flags of the Partij voor de Vrijheid can be deleted as well, as this is the only file in that category. Pennenetui3000 (talk) 17:40, 15 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, similar to file deleted in previous DR. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:43, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by 2240133keerthanadevraj (talk · contribs)
[edit]PNG files rendered from the vector versions they are superseded by. Should be redirects
Nutshinou Talk! 17:27, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: We can keep both raster and vector versions. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:05, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 18:28, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
advertisement MarinaMann (talk) 18:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Probably shows the same statue as the one deleted by Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statue of Arsenio Lacson in Manila. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: It is the same statue. Undelete in 2067. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:08, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo illegally uploaded from https://www.flickr.com/photos/137241490@N07/49639604623/in/album-72157698726993830/ 95.87.235.200 18:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:26, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DeepakArya (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:SPAM, several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no usage and out of scope
Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:12, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:19, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP, doubtful it is an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
does the bird work have originality? eien20 (talk) 07:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: imho this is below threshold of originality per COM:TOO Japan. --Ellywa (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP, doubtful it was an own work. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Commons upload is before any webhits. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Photograph from a newspaper CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Martín del Águila (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DRUMmerB63 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvio: Possible F10, Screenshot
- File:Gustavo Pozo F. en Blue Deep Night (Vernácula - Barranco).jpg
- File:Toque de Queda shared Gustavo Pozo F.'s event.jpg
- File:Primera imagen del videoclip "Happy Sad Story on Christmas Eve".jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
lt Metadaten stammt Bild von einem Fotografen (Ehefrau??), eine Genehmigung von diesem ist nicht gespeichert Nordprinz (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- This is his official portrait that is hosted on official government pages, I think it's pretty clear that he approves of this photo. The photographer is Lauri Heikkinen who works as a photographer for the Finnish government. I really don't understand what the problem is, the source that is listed clearly states that all the pictures of ministers are licenced under CC-BY-4.0. Ur Nan123 (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Source states: Use and rights: Ministerikuvat ovat hyödynnettävissä CC-BY-4.0 -lisenssillä https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.fi // sikander { talk } 🦖 20:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per sikander. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
lt Metadaten stammt Bild von einem Fotografen (Ehefrau??), eine Genehmigung von diesem ist nicht gespeichert Nordprinz (talk) 22:41, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This is his official portrait that is hosted on official government pages, I think it's pretty clear that he approves of this photo. The photographer is Lauri Heikkinen who works as a photographer for the Finnish government. I really don't understand what the problem is, the source that is listed clearly states that all the pictures of ministers are licenced under CC-BY-4.0. Ur Nan123 (talk) 00:48, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Source states: Use and rights: Ministerikuvat ovat hyödynnettävissä CC-BY-4.0 -lisenssillä https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.fi // sikander { talk } 🦖 20:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per sikander. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:38, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Inge Lila Urquidi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible F10
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:47, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: They are a soprano opera singer, and seem notable enough to keep photos of. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:55, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ione Reis art (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible F10
CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:54, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: The first one lists the photographer as Thais Gobbo, the 2nd is art in their studio, which I imagine is not a public place. Would need VRT permission for either. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs VRT confirmation. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Claimed free license not seen at source site Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the licence appears to be valid. If you click on the LEGE OHARRA link at the bottom of the page you get a legal notice. The "Jabetza intelektuala eta industriala" paragraph includes "Webgunearen edukiaren, diseinu grafikoaren eta kodearen egile-eskubideak Gertuko-ANBOTOrenak dira, baina partekatu daitezke Creative Comons Aitortu Partekatu lizentziaren bitartez (CC-by-sa)." Google translate from Basque gives this as "The copyright of the content, graphic design and code of the website belongs to Gertuko-ANBOTO, but it can be shared using the Creative Commons Attribution Share license (CC-by-sa)." Verbcatcher (talk) 23:38, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:24, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Claimed free license not seen at source website Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the licence appears to be valid. If you click on the LEGE OHARRA link at the bottom of the page you get a legal notice. The "Jabetza intelektuala eta industriala" paragraph includes "Webgunearen edukiaren, diseinu grafikoaren eta kodearen egile-eskubideak Gertuko-ANBOTOrenak dira, baina partekatu daitezke Creative Comons Aitortu Partekatu lizentziaren bitartez (CC-by-sa)." Google translate from Basque gives this as "The copyright of the content, graphic design and code of the website belongs to Gertuko-ANBOTO, but it can be shared using the Creative Commons Attribution Share license (CC-by-sa)." Verbcatcher (talk) 23:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks I couldn't find that. What is the appropriate tag then, Cc-by-sa-1.0? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. CC-BY-SA 4.0 is fine for a 2015 collection of photographs. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:25, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Free license not seen at source site Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, the licence appears to be valid. If you click on the LEGE OHARRA link at the bottom of the page you get a legal notice. The "Jabetza intelektuala eta industriala" paragraph includes "Webgunearen edukiaren, diseinu grafikoaren eta kodearen egile-eskubideak Gertuko-ANBOTOrenak dira, baina partekatu daitezke Creative Comons Aitortu Partekatu lizentziaren bitartez (CC-by-sa)." Google translate from Basque gives this as "The copyright of the content, graphic design and code of the website belongs to Gertuko-ANBOTO, but it can be shared using the Creative Commons Attribution Share license (CC-by-sa)." Verbcatcher (talk) 23:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Verbcatcher. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:26, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, this requires evidence of permission from the author of the artwork. The uploader mainly uploads files that relate to the Basque Country, so it is probable that this work is in Spain or France. It appears that Freedom of Panorama in Spain does not allow works indoors (see COM:FOP Spain). Freedom of Panorama is not allowed in France (see COM:FOP France). Verbcatcher (talk) 23:55, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, would need VRT permission from the artist. The info text is in Spanish, so Spain would be the FOP country. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:28, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, this requires evidence of permission from the author of the artwork. The uploader has added Category:Durango (Biscay), indicating that this is located in Spain. It appears that Freedom of Panorama in Spain does not allow artworks indoors (see COM:FOP Spain). Verbcatcher (talk) 23:59, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, would need VRT permission from the artist. --Abzeronow (talk) 23:30, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of an association CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:49, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- I'm inclined towards deletion especially since there is no info about the ToO of Uruguay. @Bedivere: Abzeronow (talk) 22:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think cropping leaving just the letters would let the file stay Bedivere (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I'd be fine with that solution. Abzeronow (talk) 23:21, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think cropping leaving just the letters would let the file stay Bedivere (talk) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
Kept: cropped out copyrighted elements, leaving the letters, which are ineligible for copyright. --Bedivere (talk) 01:54, 4 May 2024 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Bahnhof Berlin Eberswalder Straße 30er Jahre.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:42, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete both. German photograph from the 1930s. Not public domain in the US, and copyright status is uncertain in Germany. Abzeronow (talk) 17:18, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
This discussion suggests that this template incites copyright violations, as the concerned Swiss court ruling does not apply worldwide (especially not in the US, where the files are stored). In other words, this is a next to useless template. Based on a decision by the Swiss Supreme Court in one case some people like to argue that e.g. simple press conference shots were PD in Switzerland. Even if that might be so, it is a personal interpretation only, not backed by any reputable legal opinions, and the decision itself was rather heavily criticized. Furthermore, even if such photos might be PD in Switzerland, they'd be PD in Switzerland only. Such images do pass the threshold of originality in many other countries, the EU and the U.S. included. That's not good enough for Wikimedia. We even deleted for that reason the very image this template emerged of, namely Image:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg! Many files which actually use this template can be retained by correcting the license (e.g. pd-old or pd-official, where possible) should be retained, the rest must be deleted. 2A02:1205:504F:8300:2D7E:A32C:369D:46D8 23:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep but apply the template only to reproductions of 2D (or nearly 2D) documents. Basically, you are right. Although Image:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg is in the public domain in Switzerland with absolute certainty (as the Swiss Supreme Court has ruled in that specific case), it's most likely protected in the US, and per Commons policy that images need to be free in their country of origin as well as in the US, the outcome had to be deletion. However, the lack of copyright protection for simple photographs in Switzerland might come in handy for Commons when it comes to 2D reproductions. Unlike e.g. Germany, there is no special protection for simple photographs in Switzerland (Germany's Lichtbildschutz of 50 years after first publication, even if the photo isn't protected by regular copyright) and this makes a case like the (German) Reiss Engelhorn Museum's lawsuit against Wikimedia highly unlikely in Switzerland. As Commons/WMF policy is that reproductions of 2D works, including high-quality photographic reproductions of paintings and the like, are not considered to be protected by copyright based on US view (per Bridgeman Art Library v. Corel Corp.), {{PD-Switzerland-photo}} is a good option to affirm this also for Switzerland. I think that the template is useful for photos like File:Bund von 1353 zwischen Bern, Uri, Schwyz und Unterwalden.jpg or File:Pepinquentovicdenier.jpeg. - I do think that the template needs to be handled more restrictively and e.g. photos like File:Madame de Meuron.jpg may need to be deleted (as likely protected in the US), but not outright deleted. There are also some uploaders using the template for their own works such as File:ABe 8-8 23 Locarno 12.01.08.JPG which doesn't make much sense in my opinion, but has a certain logic to it: If you're Swiss and convinced that your own photo isn't creative enough to warrant copyright protection, you might feel inclined to use this template... Gestumblindi (talk) 14:29, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Wikimedia Commons already permits explicitly the hosting of photographs that carefully reproduce a two-dimensional public domain work, see Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs. And if a Swiss feels inclined to use this template instead of an existing license, it's misleading. --2A02:1205:504F:8300:40C:E63F:6B:91FB 22:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
- I'm a little wary about this vote. Notice the v6-IP numbers? Both came from Zurich, Switzerland. I wonder whether both are of the same person. --George Ho (talk) 10:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Well, according to the Whois tool, they're Swisscom IPs; Swisscom is Switzerland's largest ISP (I'm a Swisscom/Bluewin customer, too), but they do look very similar... Gestumblindi (talk) 20:01, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
- Keep +1 Gestumblindi. This template is useful for photos/reproductions of "free" 2D works (free= the original it is enough old). Or for uploaders, to use the template for their own works. --Bobo11 (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
Kept: disruptive DR, probably part of the vandalism DR series about a Swiss family. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:58, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
There are no files left using this template, succeeded by {{PD-Switzerland-photo-non-individual-50-years}} after the 2020 amendment to the Swiss Copyright Act; for background see this discussion. No future use cases for the old template. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:48, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: there are currently two files using this template: File:Lina Baumberger (grayscale).jpg and File:The Most Reverend Bishop Vitus Huonder.jpg. Abzeronow (talk) 17:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Abzeronow: Well, such things can happen when the processing of deletion requests takes too long (I don't see what could be the issue here, the case seems pretty clear), so of course there was a risk that the deprecated template was used again by mistake in the meantime. I replaced the template in File:Lina Baumberger (grayscale).jpg and will nominate File:The Most Reverend Bishop Vitus Huonder.jpg for deletion, as PD-Switzerland-photo cannot be used for uploads after April 1, 2020 if the image isn't older than 50 years. Gestumblindi (talk) 18:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. No use on file pages after deleting The most reverend Bishop. In addition 8 suppages were deleted (translation and documentation). --Ellywa (talk) 21:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Note: Text below is copied from the talk page of the template, which I deleted, but which might be usefull:
It is absurd that the only image that was certified by the Swiss Supreme as lacking protection, was deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg. I have requested undeletion, see Commons:Undeletion requests/Current_requests#File:Christoph Meili 1997.jpg, but discussion is not going anywhere. See also Category:PD Switzerland (Individuality). /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:26, 4 November 2010 (UTC)
Template outdated
[edit]Hi,
The template is outdated. Since April 2020, CopA art. 2 al. 3bis makes an exception for photography of three-dimensional objects, which do not need individual character anymore. It still applies to photography of 2D objects, e.g. photography of a painting though. --Omnilaika02 (talk) 13:31, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
- You're right. Sadly it seems that we need to deprecate this template and delete files that are otherwise not properly licenced. I'll open a discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Switzerland. Sandstein (talk) 16:15, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
FYI: There were a number of speedy deletion requests for files that relied on this license template. I've converted them into one merged deletion request for better discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/PD-Switzerland-photo Cases. --AFBorchert (talk) 14:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
i am uploader and will reupload file but without these files in history Mrmw (talk) 13:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Duplicate not found. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
This seems a little over TOO. It's not just a squiggle, few lines, or simple geometric shape. Parent company is claimed to be Atari, so I assume COM:TOO France, which seems to have a low bar for creative works with artistic intent. DMacks (talk) 15:44, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, photographer is "kuhnle+knoedler", but not mentioned (naming right violation), no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 19:15, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, I do not see a reference to kuhnle+knoedler. @Alabasterstein: can you please explain so I can reconsider (please ping me in that case, thanks). --Ellywa (talk) 21:33, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
copyright violation, photographer is "Julian Spanhof", but not mentioned (naming right violation), no permission visible Alabasterstein (talk) 19:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. The username User:Jule.s-997 sounds a lot like Julian Spanhof. There is also a specificity to the dates and times among this and the other uploads which are not usually found on copyvios. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make this photo, per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 21:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MrDoctorWho6 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Shirly-Balas-2020.png
- File:Craig-Revel-Horwood-2022.png
- File:JustinFletcherperforming.jpg
- File:SugarSammy@justforlaughs.png
- File:BrunoTonioliin2009strictlytouratwembley.png
- File:Brunostrictlytour.png
Didym (talk) 19:21, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Why? (I didn't find earlier hits in sample reverse image searches) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make these photos, per remark of Infrogmation. --Ellywa (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nice car, no own work 200.111.17.211 21:10, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make this photo. --Ellywa (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make this photo. --Ellywa (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make this photo. --Ellywa (talk) 21:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Is this an own work? 200.111.17.211 21:32, 13 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no reason to think uploader did not make this photo. --Ellywa (talk) 21:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
