Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2024/01/10
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
copy. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mənsum_İbrahimov.jpg Atakhanli (talk) 01:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy as duplicate. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
useless worl Mattress Home (talk) 03:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Russia except architecture.
- File:Nagatinsky Zaton carp.jpg
- File:Nagatinsky Zaton European Perch.jpg
- File:Nagatinsky Zaton with arriving train 81-775.jpg
- File:Карась на станции Нагатинский затон.jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Бычок».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Голавль».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Головастик».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Карась».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Лещ».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Окунь».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Плотва».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Ротан».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Судак».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Уклейка».jpg
- File:Настенное мозаичное панно «Щука».jpg
Komarof (talk) 03:35, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Nagatinsky Zaton with arriving train 81-775.jpg per de-minimis. Unlike other files in this list, which are fully focused on fish mosaics, it shows the entire station hall and focused on its platform, and the art of the fish is not the main subject of this photo, just a secondary element. Other files, if it possible, should be moved to Russian Wikipedia before deletion and added to category ru:Категория:Изображения:Нагатинский Затон (станция метро). Is there any automatic file transfer tool which allows to move files from Commons to RuWiki? Xenotron (talk) 14:13, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Russia for such artworks (even if photos are from a freely licensed website - this website is not proper copyright holder for artist's works).
- File:Nagatinsky Zaton Bleak(2).jpg
- File:Карась (Нагатинский затон).jpg
- File:Налим (13 на 3,5 метра).jpg
Komarof (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see also COM:FOP Russia. --Wutsje 06:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Not properly sourced picture uploaded by an unreliable account as own work. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 05:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Appears to be self-promotion by a poorly behaved user who is now blocked. - Jmabel ! talk 05:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10). --Эlcobbola talk 05:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G10. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep (blocked on other wiki for spam), no use outside sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep (blocked on other wiki for spam), no use outside sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
No evidence from the description that this image is in scope, it seems to be a personal image. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
from metadata: Author: STR, Sergio Torres; not Own work Ankry (talk) 14:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy: clear copyvio. --Ankry (talk) 14:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm the uploader - no objection for deletion. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW by Flickr photographer; uploader concurs. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
news photo, not uploader's own work. see google lens search results ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
non free - 2023 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
social media photo. https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1035448-put-shoe-on-head ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
non free: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Confessions_of_a_Nazi_Spy_1939_poster.jpg ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Foto: Pfeifer und Langen. article: https://www.display.de/mit-zuckerrueben-zum-sieg-mit-pfeifer-und-langen ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Image metadata shows it is a copyright violation of a Getty Images photo. Harrias (talk) 16:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyright violation, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
linkedin as source ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Bourse Vodacom Exetat, 126 finalistes ont pris part au test national, 25 meilleurs candidats attendus pour une prise en charge académique.jpg
[edit]I uploaded it by mistake Celestin60 (talk) 16:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: Fantasy map.
More detailed: A ridiculously ahistorical over-estimation of the Abbasid Caliphate; see for comparison Category:Maps of the Abbasid Caliphate, some of these maps also show disputed areas not held for long, but never go the length displayed here. As far as I know, the Abbasids never ruled over Somalia, Mali/Senegal, Russia, Colcata, or Tarim - and if they had a presence in either of those areas, it was neither simultaneous nor significant. Enyavar (talk) 10:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and also blatant false license claim, yoinked from facebook. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CptKeyes as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Importé de transportinfo.fr. Pas de crédits, pas de métadonnées, pas d'autorisation. Copyvio assuré. --CptKeyes (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC) — billinghurst sDrewth 11:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Proposant. --CptKeyes (talk) 12:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination blatant copyviol. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CptKeyes as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Importé de transportinfo.fr. Pas de crédits, pas de métadonnées, pas d'autorisation. Copyvio assuré. --CptKeyes (talk) 10:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC) — billinghurst sDrewth 11:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Proposant. --CptKeyes (talk) 12:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per above confirmed with reverse image search. Blatant copyviol, false claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Video screenshot is not own work Miklogfeather (talk) 15:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
uploaded for vandalism purposes discospinster (talk) 15:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & user's actions on en:w. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative of File:Clara (2).jpg, an image deleted due to licensing issues. Günther Frager (talk) 09:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, FB MD Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; CV with false license & creation claim. (Subject uses this as his personal image on various social media platforms, and has done so for years before this was uploaded to Commons). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
{{Duplicate}} MargitSimon (talk) 13:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Better version at File:Yoopa logo.png Yoopa qub (talk) 18:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Kadı. --Rosenzweig τ 19:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457246866. Photo attributed to Яков Берлин. Avsolov (talk) 18:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/altankhuyag.norov/photos/a.227192900625959/624748684203710/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457244219. Photo attributed to "ЦКС г. Чебоксары". Avsolov (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/altankhuyag.norov/photos/a.227192900625959/624748684203710/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. fot.-Katarzyna-Anna-Kubiak. https://nockultury.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/fot.-Katarzyna-Anna-Kubiak-3-800x534.jpg ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/504618466239263/photos/a.507629455938164/1593374124030353 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright © 2022 The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids). All rights reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=359039400199663&set=pb.100082808170630.-2207520000 (publ. 6 Jan 2024) ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
not uploader's own work. see google lens search results ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; image in multiple places on social media before Commons upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
www.colombiaɡiɡra.decolombia 2804:431:CFC9:A09C:D5D:1F3A:7565:593A 12:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
© 1992 - 2024 | National Security Council of Mongolia. https://nsc.gov.mn/en/p/104 ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.upi.com/News_Photos/view/upi/63ba2b14ffed5f337df35bbc85b19256/President-of-Mongolia-Natsagiin-Bagabandi/ Copyright © 2024 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright © Electronic Times Internet. All Rights Reserved. source: https://premium.etnews.com/stats/detail_stats.html?id=14192# ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457246872. Attributed to Яков Берлин. Avsolov (talk) 19:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
False license MRTFR55 (talk) 06:14, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license MRTFR55 (talk) 19:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Redeleted; same image by same uploader as previous deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate AlyssaLVS (talk) 21:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
courtesy of Xinhua News Agency. article: https://russian.news.cn/20221126/0d0f7efed08b4d92a8d72fe8cfa92c7b/c.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 05:33, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio d'une image du site : https://www.iledefrance-mobilites.fr/actualites/mi20-design-futur-rer-b-resultat-vote-consultation Poudou99 (talk) 00:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. (Wikisource page also nominated for deletion; it's out of scope there as well.) Omphalographer (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- It is not out of scope here nor there. -- Beardo (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. It is certainly in use on Wikisource, and certainly within scope there as well, as the deletion discussion there shows. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 19:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep, how does text make this out of scope? There are numerous scans of texts on Commons. There are whole sets of categories for books and their scans. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- My bad. I thought this was something the uploader had written themselves and uploaded as a PDF. I'll follow up on the Wikisource discussion. Omphalographer (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Could we (read: the closing admin) reasonably read that as "Withdrawn by nominator. Nominated in error."? Xover (talk) 07:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes; in fact, I'll do that myself, since there's no remaining arguments for deletion... Omphalographer (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Omphalographer: Could we (read: the closing admin) reasonably read that as "Withdrawn by nominator. Nominated in error."? Xover (talk) 07:03, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- My bad. I thought this was something the uploader had written themselves and uploaded as a PDF. I'll follow up on the Wikisource discussion. Omphalographer (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept - withdrawn by nominator. Omphalographer (talk) 07:06, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Flickr washing
- File:粉红理论 GAP THE SERIES.jpg
- File:Freen-Sarocha-Chankimha.jpg
- File:Pink theory.jpg
- File:文咏珊.jpg
- File:Xulu徐璐.jpg
- File:Janice man.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:20, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all and blacklist, per nom. --2001:FB1:38:B809:11FD:728C:6418:DEB 13:06, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all - very obvious flickrwashing -- Whpq (talk) 15:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:10, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Likely flickrwashing for the first four images (uploaded on Flickr the same day it was uploaded, pictures return images online). The last one seems to be from Instagram.
- File:00798bUXgy1hjlcw4b0nqj30u011ik0b.jpg
- File:Xulu徐璐.jpg
- File:Janiceman.jpg
- File:Freen.jpg
- File:Melanie.jpg
Spinixster (talk) 12:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: all files were already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright علی ترکمان (talk) 17:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Celestin60 (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. (c) Sabau Gabriela. source: https://www.ijf.org/judoka/1544/pictures ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Wutsje. --Rosenzweig τ 07:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
screenshot, hase copyrights איש עיטי (talk) 20:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 07:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eliteextant (talk · contribs)
[edit]- this has probably been first posted to https://www.freepik.com/free-ai-image/view-bicycle-silhouette_69878537.htm .
- it is allegedly generated by AI? "Base model Midjourney 5.2"?
- https://www.freepikcompany.com/legal#nav-freepik-agreement appears to be non-commercial?
RZuo (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. This is clearly not the uploader's own work; the file description of "ps to freepick" makes it clear that Freepik was the source. Per {{Freepik}}, the Freepik license is non-free, as it discriminates against specific sectors of use, including but not limited to its inclusion in image libraries like Commons. Omphalographer (talk) 20:07, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 02:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: promotional photo, image has been published previously: https://medium.com/@wrapofthedaytoday/veteran-music-industry-session-drummer-larry-cox-launches-website-for-aspiring-drummers-voice-c881db2679c1. Please send VRT permission to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 14:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- I took this photo and own it. I granted use of this photo to Larry Cox for his website and marketing purposes, such as in the web article you referenced. JesseCan (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @JesseCan: since the image has been published previously it is best that you send a VRT permission to explicitly grant permission here. You can use Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator. MKFI (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, I sent the Wikimedia VRTS release email granting permissions. JesseCan (talk) 22:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @JesseCan: since the image has been published previously it is best that you send a VRT permission to explicitly grant permission here. You can use Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator. MKFI (talk) 20:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024011010011609 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
photo non libre de droit, meric de votre compréhension FanMusik (talk) 14:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by FanMusik as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: photo non libre de droit, merci de votre compréhension Ankry (talk) 16:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @FanMusik: Why this photo is copyright violation? Was it copied from somewhere? Where from? We need some evidence of your statement. Ankry (talk) 16:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for your reply. Because it's my photo... I don't autorized to add it on wikipedia...
- Quelles preuves dois-je fournir pour vous prouver qu'il s'agit de ma photo svp ?
- [1]https://clients.saif.pixtech.fr/home?search=151704982554
- Avez-vous demandé à la personne qui a posté la photo de prouver que c'était la sienne ?
- https://www.fanmusik.com/report-live/5999-umberto-tozzi-15-juillet-2012-festival-de-mirande/
- thank you FanMusik (talk) 14:16, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024011010006259 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 17:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete Per the links provided by @FanMusik: . It is highly plausible that she owns the copyright, whereas we have no evidence at all that the uploader owns any right on the image. ‒ Selon les liens fournis par @FanMusik: . Il est tout à fait plausible qu'elle détienne les droits d'auteur, alors que nous n'avons aucune preuve que l'auteur du téléchargement détienne quelconque droit sur l'image. --Mussklprozz (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:39, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo from Melissa's social media account. article: https://malaysia.news.yahoo.com/no-ic-21-born-penang-230000088.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. @ZimskoSonce: Why a regular DR rather than a copyvio tag? I tagged it as a copyvio of https://www.malaymail.com/malaymail/uploads/images/2023/09/03/143640.jpg as displayed by https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2023/09/03/no-ic-at-21-born-in-penang-to-malaysian-father-stateless-woman-seeks-help-from-home-ministry/88698 2023/09/03. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:10, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:30, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
bad image, not realistically useful Broc (talk) 22:15, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, bad quality, and we have plenty of alternatives. --Yikrazuul (talk) 14:22, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - this is pretty good in thumbnail, just low res is an issue. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:14, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- Keep High quality images like this will rise reputation of commons to unforeseen levels! A must-have for every site which wants to be taken seriously! -- smial (talk) 22:02, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- What exactly do you refer to "high quality"? --Yikrazuul (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete I think it's low quality even in thumbnail. Unlikely to find an educational use. --99of9 (talk) 12:30, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- We don't have anything else quite like it though. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:59, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom--Hold and wave (talk) 10:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Tough one. I can't decide... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:02, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom Jcb (talk) 22:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Lowest quality penis image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:17, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- Delete --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 15:08, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 01:51, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PENIS Dronebogus (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; out of focus penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 14:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Low resolution photograph of a poster (source is Facebook) for an opera. No idea when this poster was first published. Abzeronow (talk) 00:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGE A1Cafel (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work. 1989 (talk) 15:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DWR of PR (FICTION) (talk · contribs)
[edit]fantasy diagrams (FICTION) are out of project scope
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable personal fiction, clearly OOS, IMO speedy delete would be ok here. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo by Marion Curtis - © Starpix via Paramount. https://imdb.com/name/nm2982626/mediaviewer/rm3802484481/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Magazine cover, fair use not allowed in Commons Rodm23 (talk) 17:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata: DERFRITZ Grafik und Fotografie e.U. // derfritz.at //. source: https://www.ses-european.com/en/center/huma-eleven/ (© 2024 All rights reserved.) ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
music video screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:25, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Foto: Instagram: @thinifieldss. article: https://www.elpais.com.co/entretenimiento/la-actriz-porno-thaina-fields-se-habria-suicidado-0623.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS, AI image of platypus Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS; AI image of mundane objects which we have substantial actual photos (and artwork) of Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Is there any other high quality/resolution image that features within one image three or more different typical glasses of alcoholic drinks? (Not separate images but the glasses standing next to each other for comparison.) Prototyperspective (talk) 21:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS; AI image of mundane object Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
AI "Bust of a Roman Emperor" (but not any one in particular). OOS Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:The Eiffel Tower completely covered in multicolored plates arranged in a checkerboard pattern, with the Seine river flowing at its base, by ChatGPT 4.0 & Dall-E 3.0 (2024).png
[edit]OOS AI art Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS, AI depiction of location we have a wealth of actual photos as well as historic paintings of Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I also don't see the value of AI-generated images that 1) merely depict places 2) we already have multiple better pictures of. The cat for AI-generated works by country of setting is another case of basically categorization and images of little meaning, it's basically irrelevant where the work is set. Unlike many other images by this user, these images don't illustrate anything where illustration could be useful, are not creative but merely depict, and usefulness (at least any realistic one) is unclear to nonexistent. Prototyperspective (talk) 21:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 20:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 20:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
appears to be a commercial sports broadcast; if so, is a copyvio and not uploader's own Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope. Till (talk) 21:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata: Independent Photographer - ©2014 Lauren McKinnon, all rights reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
screenshot: The Patterning Instinct – Trailer https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eY6Y1Qdwgqs ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo by non-contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:17, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2022 MIHR Theater ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright 2024, Inc. All rights reserved. JMC Pty Ltd ZimskoSonce (talk) 22:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abuomer Mohammad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation: these slide shows and handouts all contain numerous unsourced images.
- File:Approach to Rheumatology.pdf
- File:Insulin therapy.pdf
- File:حساب-الكربوهيدرات-في-النظام-الغذائي.pdf
- File:Immunomodulation.pdf
- File:Acromegaly.pdf
- File:Rheumatoid Arthritis.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:44, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Es handelt sich um eine veraltete, nicht mehr genutzte Form des Logos. Das aktuelle Logo kann hier heruntergeladen und zu Wiki Commons hinzugefügt werden: https://www.klu.org/about-klu/press-room#c8056 77.20.250.89 10:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per {{Logo history}}, outdated logos are neither overwritten not deleted. The new version is available as File:Kühne Logistics University logo 2019.svg. --Leyo 09:49, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Very beautiful interior architecture (spiral staircase), but unfortunately this is in France that does not allow commercial freedom of panorama. The fact that one image was promoted as a "featured picture" does not exempt these uploads from possible architectural copyright problems. Per Archdaily, the new components of the museum were completed in 2015 and authored by Herzog & de Meuron. A commercial Creative Commons licensing authorization from the architecture firm is required.
- File:Musée Unterlinden - escalier (Colmar) (1).jpg
- File:Musée Unterlinden - escalier (Colmar) (2).jpg
- File:Spiralised (41460744140).jpg
- File:The spiral staircase (43453301774).jpg
- File:Treppe III.jpg
- File:Wendeltreppe I.jpg
- File:Wendeltreppe II.jpg
- File:White square (43392122722).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, JWilz,
- I am not perfectly speak englisch. This pictures are my own work. It is right, it; in the Museum Unterlinden in Colmar.
- I do not really understand, what the problem is ? Let say, the pictures Treppe III, Wendeltreppe I und Wendeltreppe II are my pictures.
- kind regards
- Barbara Englandfan~commonswiki (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Englandfan~commonswiki you took photos of a copyrighted work of architecture. The staircase is a component of interior architecture. The new building was a whole was designed by Herzog & De Meuron (architectural firm). As the country (France) does not give a freedom of panorama right to freely publish images of copyrighted works of architecture under commercial licenses, your photos as well as photos of others are all violations of architect's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
personal photo of user राजकुमार(talk) 04:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in France, architect Jacques Depussé died in 1982 and Jean-Jacques Ory died in 2020 A1Cafel (talk) 07:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary building, and Oman does not provide freedom of panorama. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 50 years, so the work is unfree for commercial licensing use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary building, and Oman does not provide freedom of panorama. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 50 years, so the work is unfree for commercial licensing use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. The building is clearly intentional here and not incidental. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary building, and Oman does not provide freedom of panorama. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 50 years, so the work is unfree for commercial licensing use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. Intentional in the image, not incidental. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary building, and Oman does not provide freedom of panorama. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 50 years, so the work is unfree for commercial licensing use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary building, and Oman does not provide freedom of panorama. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 50 years, so the work is unfree for commercial licensing use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP in USA Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 13:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 13:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Very low quality, no conceivable use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 14:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Very low quality, no conceivable use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 14:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused random photo of nondescript ground, no context, no educational use, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Taiwan A1Cafel (talk) 15:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Looks like a video screenshot. 1989 (talk) 15:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:DW; no indication original is free licensed Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS, not useful Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS, not useful Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
OOS, not useful Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary building, and Oman does not provide freedom of panorama. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 50 years, so the work is unfree for commercial licensing use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. The building is clearly intentional and right at the center. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Contemporary building, and Oman does not provide freedom of panorama. The architect isn't yet dead for more than 50 years, so the work is unfree for commercial licensing use. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sultan Qaboos Grand Mosque. Intentional and not incidental. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:59, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DOstreet.art.nyc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused and uncategorised: maybe out of scope. More important: if within our project scope then we need a formal permission from the artist via com:VRT.
- File:Exhibition at G-Gallery.jpg
- File:Exhibition MADNESS.jpg
- File:Exhibition 2017.jpg
- File:Saint Hare.jpg
- File:Cow Soup. Warhol Layers series.jpg
- File:"Angels On My Screen".jpg
- File:Made in Russia.jpg
- File:Top Ten Hits.jpg
- File:Denis OUCH at his studio.jpg
- File:Denis Ouch.jpg
- File:Angels On My Screen.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed Alsanani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
- File:هوية الفنان فيصل المهتدي.jpg
- File:المطرب اليمني فيصل المهتدي.png
- File:فيصل علوي المهتدي.jpg
- File:فيصل المهتدي.jpg
- File:الفنان فيصل المهتدي.jpg
- File:محمد الصديق.jpg
- File:Membership Card.3.png
- File:Membership Card.2png.png
- File:Membership Card.png
- File:ID card.png
--Alaa :)..! 13:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed Alsanani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 20:10, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohamed Alsanani (talk · contribs)
[edit]user for spam on ar.wp
- File:صور فيصل المهتدي.jpg
- File:فيصل المهتدي بروفايل.jpg
- File:صورة شخصية فيصل المهتدي.jpg
- File:فيصل علوي عبدالله المهتدي.jpg
- File:فيصل علوي.jpg
- File:فيصل المهتدي شخصية.jpg
- File:فيصل المهتدي المطرب.jpg
- File:معي العود فيصل المهتدي.jpg
- File:فيصل علوي المهتدي.jpg
- File:فيصل المهتدي.jpg
- File:فيصل المهتدي فوتو.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: g10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:27, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
© 2024 Notimérica. Está expresamente prohibida la redistribución y la redifusión de todo o parte de los contenidos de esta web sin su previo y expreso consentimiento. ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete clearly not within the rights of the uploader. Sadads (talk) 17:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Not likely to be own work as uploader claimed. KrebsLovesFiesh (talk) 17:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The New Foxy (talk · contribs)
[edit]looks like a stealth shot without consent. anyway commons have more and better photos of women in sports attire.
RZuo (talk) 15:15, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Low quality, probably either personal image or copyvio. Clarinetguy097 (talk) 17:31, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Source link is obvious Flickrwashing. Omphalographer (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion; Flickr user clearly taking 3rd party photos and giving them false licenses (will add to Flickr user user blacklist). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:32, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The New Foxy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Violations of COM:De Minimis and COM:PACKAGING.
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488779606).jpg
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488779356).jpg
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488779826).jpg
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488285448).jpg
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488284383).jpg
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488780786).jpg
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488284898).jpg
- File:C4 Explosive Energy Drink (49488285198).jpg
- File:Crystal Pepsi (28413609294).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49419369343).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49419838171).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49419840016).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49419369678).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49420059762).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49419371098).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49419371083).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49420061552).jpg
- File:Neuro Drinks (49419840116).jpg
- File:PS4 (49483526211).jpg
- File:PS4 (49483525446).jpg
- File:Nintendo Switch (49495224422).jpg
- File:Nintendo Switch (49495224382).jpg
- File:Nintendo Switch (49495033381).jpg
- File:Nintendo Switch (49495232507).jpg
- File:Icelandic Yogurt - 49507965171.jpg
- File:Icelandic Yogurt - 49508186232.jpg
- File:Icelandic Yogurt - 49508186312.jpg
- File:Icelandic Yogurt.jpg
- File:Icelandic Yogurt - 49508186277.jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 18:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep neuro drink is simple shape The New Foxy (talk) 20:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- With the Neuro Drink, I am more concerned with the banner advertisement above the drink. (Oinkers42) (talk) 17:12, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:01, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The New Foxy (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files contain copyrighted characters (or copyrighted versions of characters) and either violate COM:COSTUME or COM:FOP US.
- File:Fantasmic! (27663775213).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28244793326).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (27663774113).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28279150485).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (27663772443).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28244795946).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28244790776).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (27663283504).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (27663274684).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28244746416).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28244743936).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28244741946).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (28244740386).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21430664816).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (20835781963).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21268831790).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21430662776).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21465426801).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21465425671).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21445914672).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21269975599).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21456863315).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21430650236).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21269963159).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21269019838).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (20834159394).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21445859192).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21445854292).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21456806175).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17109801720).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (21465361541).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17296874321).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17109800580).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (16677098913).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17109587288).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (16674882564).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17109586388).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17296868331).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17109792890).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (17295511932).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (14838559359).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (15022221931).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (14838685118).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (14838555879).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (15022217461).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (15022199931).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (14838619400).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (14838535409).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8710757763).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8711882224).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8711881476).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8711879792).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8711875992).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8711872474).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568133706).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568132960).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568127752).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8567026667).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8567027953).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568125112).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8567025107).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8567024643).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8567024139).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568122958).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568122480).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568121686).jpg
- File:Fantasmic! (8568120694).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Pinocchio (3921908765).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Pinocchio (3922692362).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Princess – Snow White – Beauty and the Beast – Little Mermaid (3921913251).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Princess – Snow White – Beauty and the Beast – Little Mermaid (3922698026).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Mickey Mouse (3922689112).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Mickey Mouse (3921901921).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Mickey Mouse (3922688666).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Mickey Mouse (3922687156).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Mickey Mouse (3921903869).jpg
- File:Disneyland – Fantasmic – Mickey Mouse (3921902397).jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 22:40, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete user is known for a history of copyright violations as well. SDudley (talk) 16:25, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The New Foxy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope uploads from flickr. No educational puropse.
- File:Minecraft steve (kinda) and minecraft blocks in gingerbread.jpg
- File:Minecraft gaming night.jpg
- File:Minecraft dinner queue (6348790751).jpg
- File:Minecraft dinner queue (6348788475).jpg
- File:Minecraft dinner queue (6348786773).jpg
- File:Steve says it's time to eat (6349531846).jpg
- File:Minecraft desserts (6349529564).jpg
- File:Minecraft water (6348783765).jpg
- File:Minecraft cookies (6349526804).jpg
- File:Minecraft entrees (6349523532).jpg
- File:Minecraft mushroom stew (6348767977).jpg
- File:Minecraft roasted fish (6348770515).jpg
- File:Steve, the maître d' (6348764447).jpg
- File:Minecraft pork (6348761455).jpg
- File:Eye see you (6348758359).jpg
- File:Minecraft mushroom stew (6349506672).jpg
- File:Minecraft milk (6349493572).jpg
- File:Minecraft pork (6348754273).jpg
- File:Minecraft apples (6349501334).jpg
- File:Minecraft bread (6348748131).jpg
- File:Fish ready for roasting (6349489566).jpg
- File:Ellen in the kitchen (6348732155).jpg
- File:Melon slices (6349486404).jpg
- File:Karen in the kitchen (6348728655).jpg
- File:Minecraft entrees (6348725999).jpg
- File:The cake was not a lie (6349470124).jpg
- File:Mushroomaboom (6348722261).jpg
- File:Fish preparation (6349467570).jpg
- File:Morgan in the kitchen (6349466090).jpg
All the best -- Chuck Talk 19:42, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
Comment I speedy deleted a bunch that had copyrighted game art in them. I don't think File:Morgan in the kitchen (6349466090).jpg is in scope, but some of the cooking and food photos might be. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)
- Keep File:Minecraft steve (kinda) and minecraft blocks in gingerbread.jpg, File:Minecraft gaming night.jpg, File:Minecraft mushroom stew (6349506672).jpg, File:Minecraft pork (6348754273).jpg, File:Karen in the kitchen (6348728655).jpg, File:Fish preparation (6349467570).jpg, and File:Morgan in the kitchen (6349466090).jpg Within scope--Trade (talk) 17:02, 24 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Bedivere (talk) 05:01, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
Likely original research Acajacka (talk) 00:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:NOR is an English Wikipedia policy, not one on Commons - but this image is currently unused, and given the history of its attempted usage in the context of unsourced defamatory claims on en:Richmond Hill High School (Ontario), it seems fairly clear that this isn't going to change. Omphalographer (talk) 04:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per Omphalographer. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:43, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:48, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Sourced from the Internet, photoshopped image, has no right being on Wikimedia IDontHaveSkype (talk) 01:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope per nom. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation: https://www.gradprijepolje.com/poznate-licnosti/nadir-dacic/ Ђидо (talk) 02:58, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy delete The source website states "City of Prijepolje © 2004-2024. Sva prava zadržana.(All rights reserved)." 0x0a (talk) 06:20, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
A screenshot from a computer game, Supreme Commander. Thus, it is unlikely the uploader's work. See here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UHSq2C_uISs?si=pv2eKhHRTDpSS2VX&t=48 Piterkeo (talk) 04:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gnomingstuff as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10 Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Uploaded by company account ("SafeLinegc") with advertising copy ("One stop solution for all electrical needs"), this is spam and it isn't even subtle spam. Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:51, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Apologies if I have this wrong, but this seems to be derivative of two works by Leonor Fini (d. 1996). How is this not a violation of the copyright that would now belong to her heirs? Jmabel ! talk 05:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete It looks as if the two works are displayed there in a showcase for sale, with price tags. The photo may have been taken from public ground, but freedom of panorama in Switzerland applies only to works permanently displayed in a public place, and I think the "permanent" requirement will not be met in this case. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:53, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Portrait painted by Simmie Knox (b. 1935, still alive) A1Cafel (talk) 06:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
The origin of the images is not clear Kelly The Angel (talk) 06:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I checked all the photos and it turns out that they were mostly from Unsplash, followed by Pexels. Overall, there is little in the video that is truly original. 0x0a (talk) 20:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
personal art Kelly The Angel (talk) 06:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:42, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:54, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep (blocked on other wiki for spam), no use outside sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep (blocked on other wiki for spam), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 06:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
not educationally useful Kelly The Angel (talk) 06:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:55, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Walidhawary6661 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 13:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:56, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Tamil Film actor Vijay Celebrating World Environment Day at the U.S. Consulate Chennai 1.jpg
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 13:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete as per Nomination Perumalism (talk) 14:42, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:57, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Courtesy of JUNGHEUNG Group ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
http://www.agsholdingco.com/bitumen.html. Copyright © 2020 AGS HOLIDING CO. - All Rights Reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 21:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
low quality photo from the internet. Not uploader's own work. ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
low quality selfie by non contributor ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:22, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Professorsolo2015 (talk · contribs)
[edit]I propose these flags for elimination since they were attempts to create "(3-2)" versions by the user Professorsolo2015 but there are already versions with this proportion of the national flags that are much more precise and correct. These flags can cause confusion. Other flags of this user were renamed since there were no "(3-2)" versions. These flags could not be removed using "Duplicate" since they are not exactly the same. There are some flags that are still used in some articles and should be replaced by the existing "(3-2)" versions or directly the national flag, since I think the user did not know that some national flags already had that proportion.
- File:Venezuela Flag.svg
- File:Paraguay Flag.svg
- File:El Salvador Flag.svg
- File:Bahamas Flag.svg
- File:Slovenia Flag.svg
- File:Belarus Flag.svg
- File:Syria Flag.svg
- File:Palestine Flag.svg
- File:Jordan Flag.svg
- File:United Arab Emirates Flag.svg
- File:Ethiopia Flag.svg
- File:Sudan Flag.svg
- File:South Sudan Flag.svg
- File:Niger Flag.svg
- File:Lesotho Flag.svg
- File:Equatorial Guinea Flag.svg
- File:Moldova Flag.svg
- File:Guatemala Flag.svg
- File:Egypt Flag.svg
- File:Afghanistan Flag.svg
- File:Andorra Flag.svg
- File:Comoros Flag.svg
- File:Congo DR Flag.svg
- File:Cape Verde Flag.svg
- File:Central African Republic Flag.svg
Goldsztern ✶ 14:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. These are all effectively duplicates of canonical national flag images, which always have names of the form "Flag of Country.svg", e.g. File:Flag of Venezuela.svg, File:Flag of Paraguay.svg, File:Flag of the Central African Republic.svg, etc. These should all be converted to redirects. Omphalographer (talk) 00:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, all except File:Slovenia Flag.svg which is extensively used. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://www.marshall.edu/jmc/hof/jim-comstock/. © 2024 Marshall University ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Republishing an historic image does not transfer copyright or restart the copyright clock. The rote copyright notice would only cover the novel text published by Marshall University. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:30, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457244218. Attributed to "ЦКС г. Чебоксары". Avsolov (talk) 19:04, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:29, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457245337. Attributed to Ирина Яковлева. Avsolov (talk) 19:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Nondescript holiday snap from panormino COM:SCOPE 62.216.207.45 19:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely copyright violation: small resolutiona and watermark says www.farabiasl.com although that website is now only accessible through the internet archive. Can't easily find this photo over there, but the watermarks are identical. HyperGaruda (talk) 19:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Original research file regarding the w:2024 conflict in Ecuador. Lacks any form of reference. Ecrusized (talk) 19:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have added 2 sources to it. Anybody can update it to include information. Lukt64 (talk) 19:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- This file is the work of user NordNordWest, will you give him proper attribution instead of claiming it as your own work? c:File:Ecuador location map.svg. Ecrusized (talk) 19:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have given him attribution as creator of the map. Lukt64 (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- This file is the work of user NordNordWest, will you give him proper attribution instead of claiming it as your own work? c:File:Ecuador location map.svg. Ecrusized (talk) 19:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete There is no information on this map, it indicates that the government controls 100% of the territory.
The use of territorial maps in conflicts are useful if the parties to the conflict dispute territories (such as in Syria, Ukraine, Palestine, etc.), but in this case there is no need to show since one of the parties to the conflict does not even have its own territory. Taichi (talk) 17:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Guagua Municipal Hall.jpg seav (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Poor quality. Icesome55q (talk) 19:55, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. File is currently in use. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: in use (also, I fixed the file). --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
copyvio. Day’s Edge Productions. source: https://www.quantamagazine.org/evolution-fast-or-slow-lizards-help-resolve-a-paradox-20240102/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
twitter as source ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ZimskoSonce could you advise if twitter/social media would require a diferrent attribution, thanks for your guidance - i used this but happy to defer to your advice. Thank you. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Images_from_social_media,_or_elsewhere Noxoug1 (talk) 08:37, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - @Noxoug1: The issue is that there's no evidence of the CC-0 license at the linked source. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:24, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @The Squirrel Conspiracy thanks, i see your point. Noxoug1 (talk)
copyvio. metadata: (c) Sang Dao ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
non free - 2019 book cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- This is the cover of a book produced and edited by Hellenic Institute of Maritime History. It is posted to the new article for ΕΛΙΝΙΣ (talk) 11:42, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:23, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of the Czech Republic.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
The used licenses are for Japan and the US, yet the image was published in the Netherlands in 1956. In its country of origin is still copyrighted as protection is 70 year pma. Günther Frager (talk) 23:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:21, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammed aweiaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 13:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
personal photo of user राजकुमार(talk) 13:50, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
"Photo James Hampton": VRT permission from James Hampton needed. MKFI (talk) 14:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:05, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Very low quality, no conceivable use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 14:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; poor quality photo of mundane subject, no evident compensating value. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:06, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
© Diageo 2023 ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:07, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Issmar Rouse (talk) 04:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
He subido una foto con mejor resolución del mismo templo. Issmar Rouse (talk) 04:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Most of the user's uploads are copyvios. ─ The Aafī (talk) 15:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Not used. Way better version here : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2008_Bhutanese_National_Assembly_election_-_Round_results_by_constituency_(vote_share).svg Aréat (talk) 00:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Not used. Wrong colors. Way better version here : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Bhutanese_National_Assembly_election_-_Second_round_results_by_constituency_(vote_share).svg?uselang=fr Aréat (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Bad quality. Not used. Better version here : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2013_Bhutanese_National_Assembly_election_-_Second_round_results_by_constituency_(vote_share).svg?uselang=fr Aréat (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Signature of non-notable individual who is blocked on other wiki, out of scope/SD:F10 may apply Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:37, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hyju as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://ladythatsmyskull.tumblr.com/post/189598536484 - Nominator has not addressed PD license so unknown if they considered it The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 02:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: A bit of web searching confirms this is 1972 US publication without the then required copyright notice. (Multiple scans online eg [2]). License info changed accordingly; trademark notice added. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
It's taken from a 2022 book. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 02:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of vagina photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The category has only 25 images and lacks ethnic diversity. If I were to publish an anatomy book I would want representation for regional publishing. --RAN (talk) 20:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Also, if you were to publish an anatomy book, you'd probably want a higher quality photo and probably also a model release. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. While I respect RAN's statement, unfortunately poor photo quality. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:52, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
It's wrong/inaccurate (date stated in title is wrong) American39853 (talk) 06:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Please use template {{Rename}} to request a better name, then. PaterMcFly (talk) 08:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: While files can be renamed, this one is of no evident usefulness. OOS --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:53, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 07:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 07:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:54, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Aline Mesquita
[edit]The source doesn't indicate any license, so the attributed CC-BY-SA license is unfounded. We cannot keep these images without a COM:VRT ticket.
- File:Aline-Mesquita-Danca-do-Ventre-shamadan-danca-do-candelabro2.png
- File:Aline-Mesquita-Danca-do-Ventre-Ghawazee-Snujs-Zills.jpg
- File:Aline-Mesquita-Danca-do-Ventre-shamadan-danca-do-candelabro.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 09:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 11:27, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Unlike own work, metadata points to Facebook. Günther Frager (talk) 10:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Both sources state NC which is incompatible with commons
Gbawden (talk) 11:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
This seems to be a fictional football club. Little or no educational value. Malcolma (talk) 12:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:57, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: image has been published previously in https://rmfusa.org/charlie-hanna-2/ (https://rmfusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Charlie-Hanna-scaled.jpg). VRT permission needed to verify copyright. I will note that the claimed date (14 November 2023) does not match with file EXIF date (21 august 2023). MKFI (talk) 12:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author UMESH LUTHRA Copyright holder www.SHINESSTUDIO.com". VRT permission from Umesh Luthra needed. MKFI (talk) 12:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyrighted book or album cover. MKFI (talk) 12:12, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Image taken from Xing [3]. The user name is Nakano666 so this may be a personal photo. Günther Frager (talk) 12:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:04, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Venezuela's incorrect civil flag that can cause confusion . Goldsztern ✶ 13:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused blurred image, lots of other and better similar images, difficult to see in what circumstances it would be useful. Chris j wood (talk) 13:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm not sure it's really worth deleting a single rather blurred picture for being rather blurred, but now that it's been nominated, why not? Slightly to my surprise we even have several better pictures of this particular bit of Cherwell Valley Services: File:Cherwell valley services on the M40 - geograph.org.uk - 3535155.jpg, File:M40, Cherwell Valley Services - geograph.org.uk - 4981110.jpg, File:Greggs at Cherwell Valley Services - geograph.org.uk - 4273727.jpg, File:Coffee Stop - geograph.org.uk - 2655914.jpg bjh21 (talk) 13:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. It is a geographbot uploaded image that needs work on categorisation/structured data, but frankly it is too blurred for me to think it worth the effort of doing this. Nominating for deletion seemed a more sensible use of my time. -- Chris j wood (talk) 12:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:06, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIOs - no camera EXIF, uploader copyvio history, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Gn adolfo pineda.jpg is here; File:Gimnasio nacional SS.png is here; File:Iglesia Rosario.png is here; File:San Benito SS.jpg is here; etc.)
- File:Millennium Tower SS.png
- File:Gn adolfo pineda.jpg
- File:Gimnasio nacional SS.png
- File:Gim JAP.jpg
- File:Arena José Adolfo Pineda.png
- File:Gym JAP.jpg
- File:Estadio Cuscatlan.png
- File:CUSCATLAN.png
- File:San Benito SS.jpg
- File:Plaza Las Americas.png
- File:San Salvador wiki collage.jpg
- File:Iglesia Rosario.png
- File:Terran.jpg
- File:Plaza Cívica Capitán General Gerardo Barrios.jpg
- File:Catedral Metropolitana de San Salvador, ElSalvador.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 13:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:07, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sam Vermant
[edit]- File:SV Favorit Magdeburg.png
- File:FC Eintracht 1898 Hannover.png
- File:SC 1903 Eisfeld.png
- File:FV 1900 Sachsen Dresden.png
- File:Mittweidaer FC 1899.png
- File:Bonner FV 01.png
- File:BC Arminia Leipzig.jpg
- File:Viktoria Leipzig.jpg
- File:SC Blücher Stettin wappen.png
Logos of German football clubs. Not own work. --bdijkstra (overleg) 14:17, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Many of those are probably either below COM:TOO Germany or old enough to be in the PD. --Rosenzweig τ 07:33, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Okay but moral rights still apply: the uploader should try to find out the real authors. bdijkstra (overleg) 14:33, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: different versions of the image have been published before (https://www.instagram.com/p/Cy3qBaqoEw4/, https://www.amazon.com/stores/Vladimir-Angelov/author/B0BRBXTG3R). Please send VRT permission to verify copyright. MKFI (talk) 14:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:08, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The artist Gloria Friedmann is still alive and the picture was not taken in public space, so no FOP Hinnerk11 (talk) 14:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Likely not own work, nor is the video creative commons Miklogfeather (talk) 15:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not own work. This seems to be the case of someone not understanding the licenses, or at worst, trying to upload a newer version for the sake of it. SDudley (talk) 15:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C.o.borges-rodz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos taken off the web claimed as PD in the USǃ
- File:Ramón Vega Sosa, alcalde de Humacao.jpg
- File:Juan M. Higgins Santana, alcalde de Humacao.jpg
- File:Julio C. López Sanabria, mayor of Humacao.jpg
- File:Julio C. López Sanabria.jpg
- File:Reinaldo Vargas Rodríguez.jpg
- File:Luis R. Sanchez Hernandez.jpg
- File:Marcelo Trujillo Panisse.jpg
- File:Plaza de Recreo de Humacao 2018.jpg
- File:Centro Judicial de Humacao.jpg
- File:Concatedral Dulce Nombre de Jesús de Humacao.jpg
- File:Centenaria Banda Municipal de Humacao.jpg
- File:Centro Cultural Dra. Antonia Sáez.jpg
- File:Placa conmemorativa en el Monumento al Cacique Jumacao.jpg
- File:Puente de Patagonia Humacao.jpg
- File:Interior de la Concatedral Dulce Nombre de Jesús.jpg
- File:Primer Festival Tito Rojas.jpg
- File:Lugar del Festival Lancha Planua.jpg
- File:Interior del Estadio Néstor Morales.jpg
- File:Plaza del Mercado de Humacao.jpg
- File:Julio L. Gegiel Pérez.jpg
- File:Concatedral Humacao.jpg
- File:Centro de Bellas Artes Humacao.jpg
- File:Alcaldía Humacao.jpg
- File:Centro de Arte Humacao.jpg
- File:Monumento al Cacique Jumacao.jpg
- File:Coliseo Marcelo Trujillo Panisse.jpg
- File:Punta Santiago.jpg
- File:Bandera de la Ciudad de Humacao, Puerto Rico.jpg
- File:Logo de Humacao hasta 2020.jpg
- File:Logo de Humacao 2021-2022.jpg
- File:Logo de Humacao desde 2022.jpg
- File:Alcaldía y Pueblo de Humacao.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 15:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Adding 3 uploaded afterwards:
- File:Modesto de León, Alcalde de Humacao.jpg
- File:Atanacio Martínez, Alcalde de Humacao.jpg
- File:Atanasio Martínez Díaz, alcalde de Humacao.jpg
--Achim55 (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://hotpinklotus.com/meet-the-team/. Copyright © 2024 Hotpink Lotus ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Not subject of debate but of copyright; I previously nominated for speedy deletion but it looks like Twinkle has a bug there and Template:Db-multiple doesn't exist. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:25, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:11, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
No longer used. Was previously used in now deleted Wikidata item. Uploader is subject, implies self promotion. William Graham (talk) 16:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
© PDG5 MEDIA, LDA. ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
metadata: photo by Ruhul Amin Jou ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:09, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by José Tomás Parker (talk · contribs)
[edit]Covers of newspapers and magazines, probably taken from the internet. The fair use is not allowed in Commons.
- File:Portada el mercurio 14 de diciembre del 2023.jpg
- File:Revista Sabado 19-08-2023.webp
- File:Revista Wiken 11-08-2023.jpg
- File:Cuerpo A El Mercurio 16-09-2023.jpg
- File:Revista VD Edición Dia 17 de Junio del 2023.jpg
- File:Img-3448-1128x694.png
--Rodm23 (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:13, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Zdjęcie: Śląska policja. not uploader's own work ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:36, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
source: Facebook. article: https://www.voasomali.com/a/6414686.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
A higher-res version was found copyrighted on the Indian Super League website. Would need a VRT permission from the copyright holder. 0x0a (talk) 18:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
source: https://lnam.edu.ua/uk/exhibition/marta-luchinec.html. © 2024, ЛНАМ ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:14, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457246870. Photo attributed to Яков Берлин. Avsolov (talk) 18:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Эскизы карельских костюмов для народного хора. Автор – Хельми Мальми. Из архивов ансамбля «Кантеле»(1).jpg
[edit]Copyright violation. Artwork by Хельми Мальми (1911—1990). Undelete in 2060 (in 2064?). Avsolov (talk) 18:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Эскизы финских костюмов к танцу «Летка-Йенька». Автор – Хельми Мальми. Из архивов ансамбля «Кантеле»(2).jpg
[edit]Copyright violation. Artwork by Хельми Мальми (1911—1990). Undelete in 2060 (in 2064?). Avsolov (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457243235. Attributed to Владимир Полысалов. Avsolov (talk) 18:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Hak Cipta © 2020, Jabatan Perdana Menteri ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:45, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:17, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
probable derivative of non-free content, there is no FOP for signs/2D works in the USA Fastily 23:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. The sign was created by the City of Monterey, so this is {{PD-CAGov}}. The photographs are all obviously in the public domain due to age. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:18, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
The copyright of the picture taken in the 1960s by an unknown author has not expired. The uploader is not the creator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collectie Scherft (talk • contribs) 18:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
The copyright of the picture taken in the 1960s by an unknown author has not expired. I have messaged the uploader, he is not the creator. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collectie Scherft (talk • contribs) 18:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Collectie Scherft (talk • contribs) 18:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:19, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Not enough info for a user-owned photo (such as where and when the pic was taken) Wedjet (talk) 01:24, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
Looking at the Flickr photostream, this may be Flickrwashing. 1989 (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Unused and unexplained diagram. No useful description. Non educational use. Malcolma (talk) 15:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Looking at the Flickr photostream, this may be Flickrwashing. 1989 (talk) 15:32, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:39, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Machine translation. Uses the english words "pebbles" and "lush" in Icelandic subtitles. Also the words "vaxið í grjót" would not be used in Icelandic in any context. Snævar (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nude Female Wolf Archer (Photo was Created By Ketty on Patreon).jpg A1Cafel (talk) 05:15, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Per Nosferattus at the linked thread: "We don't host personal artwork unless there is some compelling use for it. We have no shortage of yiff images on Commons and it's trivial to generate 100 more in a few minutes." - The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:30, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Much better example than the non-AI generated dragon Yiff images we have--Trade (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete OOS personal fantasy artwork. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:04, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tilly Dog (mural)
[edit]Similar to the United Kingdom, there is no freedom of panorama in Canada for "graphic works" such as posters and murals
- File:Tilly Dog - Mural by Kevin Ledo (32544013940).jpg
- File:Tilly Dog - Mural by Kevin Ledo (32800695061).jpg
- File:Tilly Dog - Mural by Kevin Ledo (32884112916).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran. W7070 (talk) 14:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Fitindia. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
"Own work" is a lie: According to https://www.bettina-mittendorfer.de/galerie it is © Nena Jägersberger. So Hans Wembacher would have to be Nena Jägersberger. But Nena Jägersberger is professional photographer. Why would she then write parts of the German Wikipedia article of Bettina Mittendorfer? Additionally according to File:Maurobergonzoli-atelier-espresso.jpg Hans Wembacher would even have to be photographer Seifert or Übler. 178.9.208.223 12:26, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyright violation. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:46, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
"Own work" is a lie: According to File:Bild02Mittendorfer.jpeg " Hanswembacher" would have to be photographer Nena Jägersberger, but at https://shop.maurobergonzoli.com/ is the very same picture with file name "CountryAtelier_Bergonzoli3_SeifertUebler_0818_1080x.jpg". "Seifert Übler" ist the name of a photographer duo. So "Hans Wembacher" would have to be Nena Jägersberger and Seifert or Übler at the same time. 178.9.208.223 12:27, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyright violation. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:47, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Image is not available under the specified license, photographer died in 1991. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 14:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- What is the name of the photographer? --RAN (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyright violation. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:48, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
User's only upload, highly unlikely to be a valid "own work" selfie Fuzheado (talk) 03:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Promotional files.
- File:PARTZSCH - linkedin 1.jpg
- File:PARTZSCH-Unternehmensdarstellung-Website-Desktop-2000x1200px-NEU-69f5f9d3.webp
- File:2016 erster-im-Hause-PARTZSCH-gefertigter-Generator-6f2c956a.webp
- File:1996 1-428ceb12.webp
- File:Halle Produktion PARTZSCH.webp
- File:1954 Geschäftseroeffnung-.webp
Spinixster (talk) 07:30, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep for File:2016 erster-im-Hause-PARTZSCH-gefertigter-Generator-6f2c956a.webp, Images showing technical equipment are clearly in scope. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- The file was provided by the PARTZSCH Group via their website and we need a VRT permission from them. 0x0a (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- True, I was expecting the uploader to be a company rep, as normally PR people upload such advertising content. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:09, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- The file was provided by the PARTZSCH Group via their website and we need a VRT permission from them. 0x0a (talk) 18:56, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
This file is a scaled-down version of File:Pom gerecht.JPG. Melsj (talk) 07:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment same image, though not an exact duplicate (declined there). One of the pair is cropped. — billinghurst sDrewth 09:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment in use. I suggest replacing usage and redirecting to the higher res image. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Deleted: per nomination and redirected as duplicate. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
It's pretty doubtful this is the uploaders own work since Giuseppe Barone's died in the mid 1950s and there's zero evidence the file is freely licensed in the meantime. So the image should be deleted as COPYVIO unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 11:08, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy and USA. Italy is a 20 year copyright jurisdiction. If we deleted image uploaded by a noob who chose the default settings, we would not have many images. --RAN (talk) 20:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Copyright on "simple photographs" lasts for 20 years. Otherwise it's 70. So I guess it comes down to how you define "simple." In this case it looks posed. So I'd say it isn't. Otherwise no photograph taken in Italy could be deleted as COPYVIO. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- If the photographer is really anonymous, it would still be PD, as the image is more than 70 years old. But not old enough for PD-old-assumed according to commons rules. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- True. But then it only says the photograph is anonymous because RAN changed it to say that from "own work" after I nominated the file for deletion. So there's no way to know if it's actually anonymous or not. A photograph certainly doesn't magically become anonymous just because a user changes the description on it to try and make the file look more legitimate. Same goes for the date BTW. Originally it said the photograph was from the 1950s, but RAN changed it after I opened this to say it was from the 1920s. --Adamant1 (talk) 14:08, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- If the photographer is really anonymous, it would still be PD, as the image is more than 70 years old. But not old enough for PD-old-assumed according to commons rules. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Copyright on "simple photographs" lasts for 20 years. Otherwise it's 70. So I guess it comes down to how you define "simple." In this case it looks posed. So I'd say it isn't. Otherwise no photograph taken in Italy could be deleted as COPYVIO. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:38, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- You are nominating for deletion because it was not taken in 2019 and the license is wrong, and it was not taken by F.cirrone. yet when the information is corrected you restore the incorrect information. Is your goal to fix mistakes, or just get the image deleted? You must agree the image is more than 20 years old. As to PD-Italy. The license distinguishes between "works of photographic art" and "simple photographs". For example this is a "work of photographic art": File:Salvador Dali A (Dali Atomicus) 09633u.jpg with elaborate staging and costuming. Works of art are in museums, as is the the Dali image. "Simple photographs" are sold to the sitter or kept by the family or given to friends. Pressing the shutter to take an image is something a monkey can do. See : File:Macaca nigra self-portrait (rotated and cropped).jpg. This is not the image of a 63 year old man. This is an image of a man in his 30s or 40s. He lacks grey hair and crows feet around his eyes. --RAN (talk) 18:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yet when the information is corrected you restore the incorrect information What were you basing the information on? I could really care less if someone wants to fix something in the description, but it's not "correcting" anything to just pick a random decade and source. You don't know if the photograph was taken in the 1925. Otherwise you should have provided a reference in the DR as a courtesy. Otherwise it just looks like you picked a date that would be closest to the term expiring in the United States. While I agree that it isn't 20 years old, that doesn't mean it was created in 1925 since he looks older then his mid 30s in the photograph. Otherwise what source are you basing the date on and how do you know it's a scan?
- In general I'd say it's not good practice to alter files that are nominated for deletion. At least not without making a note of it the DR before you do it. Otherwise people will be voting and commenting based on outdated, possibly bad information. Plus, the person who opened it should have the option to retract the DR if new information comes along that shows the file is PD. They obviously can't do that if they don't know the file was changed though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:41, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Estimating dates based on contextual clues, and the birth and death years is done to every image prior to cameras recording the date. Everyone should check the file history whenever they work on an image. If you think that correcting incorrect-data is wrong, then lobby to have files locked when they are nominated for deletion. Until then there is no rule, just a personal preference. Restoring incorrect information during the up to 6-month nomination period, just leaves bad information to be copied elsewhere. --RAN (talk) 20:22, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- Now your just being disingenuous. I never said I have a problem with people "estimating dates based on contextual clues" or whatever. Just to repeat myself since you didn't seem get it the first time, what I have a problem with is someone estimating the date of an image after it's nominated for deletion in order to make the photograph seem like it's in the public domain. Especially when it's done without evidence and/or the person doesn't leave a note about the change in the DR. All you had to do was leave a message saying you changed the date based "X, Y, and Z" and I probably would have cared less. But you changed it without discussing or mentioning it, and to date that was clearly picked to right before the cut off for a work to be public domain in the United States. Both of which of just come off as bad faithed gaming of the system. Again, especially since you didn't say anything about it. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:29, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and PRP. The so-called "corrections" by User:RAN are just assumptions; we need proof. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 14:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
I am suspicious about the own work / 2022 claim. Original source and author of the painting is unknown. MKFI (talk) 14:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not usable without information. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:51, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Different crop of a previously published photo: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=842292797417103&set=pb.100049091726414.-2207520000&type=3, please provide license statement to email address shown at COM:VRT Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:54, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457246867. Attributed to Яков Берлин. Avsolov (talk) 18:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response of uploader. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Source: https://vk.com/photo-3480581_457246881. Attributed to Яков Берлин. Avsolov (talk) 19:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no response of uploader. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:56, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
Снимка: фейсбук на ПФК Крумовград. article: https://www.bta.bg/bg/news/sport/bg/382563-miroslav-kosev-vliza-v-shtaba-na-todor-yanchev-v-parviya-tim-na-tsska-1948 ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 21:57, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
not well located https://picsaroundme.com/#17.565905041271915/14.650037295196839/-17.4275007498602/92300837 Tbo47 (talk) 11:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Tbo47. The image represent the Ancien palais de justice in Dakar - as indicated in the category Category:Ancien palais de justice in Dakar, which is a well-known building in Dakar, location for many exhibitions and former palace of justice of the city.
Certainly you can improve the geographic coordinates. thanks and best regards, iopensa (talk) 12:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- We can add the coordinates here d:Q124247115, iopensa (talk) 12:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have added the coordinates 14.65215/-17.43197 and added the name of the building and the link to Wikidata on OpenStreetMap https://www.openstreetmap.org/edit#map=17/14.65215/-17.43197, best regards iopensa (talk) 12:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- We can add the coordinates here d:Q124247115, iopensa (talk) 12:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 21:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Das Bild ist nicht in meinem Eigentum, sondern gehört meiner Frau W.Schäfer (talk) 12:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Das Bild ist nicht in meinem Eigentum, sondern gehört meiner Frau W.Schäfer (talk)
- Aber ist nicht die Person auf dem Bild deine Frau und du hast das Bild gemacht? Dann bist du Urheber, nicht sie. --PaterMcFly (talk) 12:15, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. —holly {chat} 21:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Es handelt sich sowohl hier als auch beim Porträt und dem Fotoalbum um Aufnahmen aus dem Dokumentarfilm. Die Quelle ist angegeben und der Regisseur hat die Freigabe erteilt. Letzteres allerdings nur per Mail. Was muss ich tun, um eine Löschung der 3 Dateien abzuwenden? --Artessa (exDottoressa2) (talk) 09:48, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024012210003033 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 09:00, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep We have permission from the rights holder per Ticket:2024012210003033. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:20, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
- Verstehe ich das richtig und das Template
- {{Delete}}
- kann jetzt raus? Vielen Dank fürs Engagement! --Artessa (exDottoressa2) (talk) 09:32, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: VRT verification complete. —holly {chat} 21:22, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
same file higher resolution using a better compression is uploaded: Marshall Plan - Orientation -Turkey NAID-36095-1949.ogv Whitneybess (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Next time, you can use {{speedydelete|G7}} for your own recently uploaded and unused files. —holly {chat} 21:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
non free - 2024 book cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment. The underlying image is certainly in the public domain. It's a print from the 1770s titled "Frontispiece to the Encyclopédie". As to whether putting a simple blue circle with title on top of that is a transformative creative work according to COM:TOO France is another question. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Underlying artwork is PD, and there's no way the modifications are above TOO even in France. —holly {chat} 21:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I am not sure if the artist for the poster is the Belgian painter, but if it is the case, it is not in the PD yet. Yann (talk) 17:19, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: The artist appears to have signed the artwork, so it's still protected until 2032. —holly {chat} 21:58, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
courtesy of UTA. article: https://news.pollstar.com/2022/09/14/uta-names-david-kramer-president-jay-sures-vice-chairman/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024011610011474 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 22:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: License release recorded with VRT. —holly {chat} 21:59, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
© 2024 All Rights Reserved Mays Business School Texas A&M University ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hello there, this image is from Mays Business School. I work for Mays and have approval to use this image. There is also no copyright on the image. Thanks! BrookeatMays (talk) 23:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @BrookeatMays: Third party images require proof of free license from copyright holder. Please have such submitted per COM:VRT. - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:16, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; file may be restored when we have confirmation of lack of copyright from the University. —holly {chat} 22:04, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ad narragoniam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Artworks by Attila Mendly de Vetyemy (1911-1964). He was born in Hungary, but he resided in Portugal. These works are still copyrighted in both countries as they have 70 years pma protection. We can undelete these files in 2035, except for File:AMV TNSC 1941.jpg and File:AMV Busto do Infante D. Henrique 1960.jpg that we should undelete in 2037 and 2056 respectively due to URAA restoration.
- File:AMV Tempestade no Mato c.1938.jpg
- File:AMV TNSC 1941.jpg
- File:AMV ST 1937.jpg
- File:AMV Leão.jpg
- File:AMV Retrato de Osvaldo Orico.jpg
- File:AMV SNBA EIAA 1938.jpg
- File:AMV Busto do Infante D. Henrique 1960.jpg
- File:AMV CP504 1938.jpg
- File:AMV 1936b.jpg
- File:AMV 1936a.jpg
- File:AMV 1936c.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 19:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ticket:2024011010009078 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 20:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Dear Günther Frager,
- Thank you for supervising the publication of these images. The images were published with permission from the sole heir of his work, her daughter Verónica de Vétyemy, under the general permission she granted to the publication and illustration of my book Attila Menddly de Vétyemy, Um Artista Húngaro na Lezíria (ISBN in the Wikipédia article on him).
- Within the next week, if necessary, she will also issue a permission, similar to the one I sent, to Wiki Commons.
- António Joel Ad narragoniam (talk) 15:32, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
Keep We have heir's permission for all those artworks per Ticket:2024020310005271. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:41, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: License release confirmed with VRT. —holly {chat} 22:05, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Bewilligung das Bildmaterial des Fotoservice, an dem dem Bund die Rechte zustehen, kostenfrei zu nicht kommerziellen Zwecken, zu redaktionellen Zwecken von Medien und zu Zwecken im Bereich der politischen Bildung zu vervielfältigen, zu verbreiten, zu senden, öffentlich vorzuführen oder im Internet zur Verfügung zu stellen. Eine darüber hinausgehende Nutzung, insbesondere für Werbezwecke, ist nicht zulässig. https://fotoservice.bundeskanzleramt.at/nutzungsbedingungen.html ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:07, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @ZimskoSonce -. as i understood point 3, it gives right to use publicly on the internet as long as attribution is done? i updated license accordingly. let me know, thank you/danke. Noxoug1 (talk) 09:10, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Point 3 in the T&C specifically prohibits commerical usage of the photos. —holly {chat} 22:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Since this film was produced by an Uzbek film studio, its country of origin might be Uzbekistan, not Russia, placing it under Life + 70 years copyright. Huaqin (talk) 20:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Сountry of origin USSR. Since when is Uzbekistan the successor to the USSR? Трифонов Андрей (talk) 16:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:Soviet Union, copyrights of former Soviet republics are handled under the laws of their successor nations. —holly {chat} 22:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Better version at File:CMT Canada 2015 logo.svg CMT Corus (talk) 23:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by CMT Corus as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Better version at File:CMT Canada 2015 logo.svg|subpage=File:CMT Canada 2015 logo.png|year=2024|month=January|day=10 - Not eligibe for speedy because of different file types but should probably be deleted The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Better version at File:Vrak logo.svg Vrak Bell (talk) 22:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vrak Bell as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Better version at File:Vrak logo.svg|subpage=File:Logo VRAK.png|year=2024|month=January|day=10 - Not eligibe for speedy because of different file types but should probably be deleted The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
I'd like to nominate this for discussion, it doesn't necessarily have to be deleted at least I hope so. This documentary seems to be "Terminal F/Chasing Edward Snowden"; it thus should be titled properly and provide accurate credit. See the video description. I don't know how films are best credited but maybe roughly like: "Directors: John Goetz, Poul-Erik Heilbuth; Writers: John Goetz, Poul-Erik Heilbuth, Klaus Nedergaard". However, I don't know if the film is actually CCBY, maybe this yt account just rehosted the film. That it's also on the Internet Archive here suggests there is some merit in thinking this is actually CCBY alongside it having that license without being required to change it. So if it's indeed CCBY, I think the attribution needs to be changed. Prototyperspective (talk) 11:31, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete The YouTube page says "There is no copyright infringement intended for the video and/or material used in this video" and no longer is licensed CC-BY, nor is there any license indicated on the Internet Archive page. It's clear that Anonymous are not the film's creators, so they did not have the authority to release it under a free license in the first place. —holly {chat} 21:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, seems good to delete then. I thought maybe they were in contact with the documentary maker and were granted to license it under CCBY on their highly popular youtube channel. The remainder of the text next to the sentence you quoted makes it clear or suggests that isn't the case so it's not a matter of debate anymore and can be deleted now. Prototyperspective (talk) 22:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:18, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pierpao as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Given that this is 110 years old, I'd like to see an explanation of why it is believed to be copyrighted. - Jmabel ! talk 18:35, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- "publication" can be a tortured term, particularly in the U.S., but distributing printed copies to lots of people is pretty much the pinnacle -- that would be publication anywhere. In the EU, the 70-year anonymous term starts at the "making available to the public", which includes broadcast and public display ("publication" is more the distribution of actual copies), so strict publication is not at issue. It's fine in the U.S. as PD-expired. Only if an author named themselves within 70 years of publication could it be copyrighted as 70pma in Italy. Technically it should be using {{PD-anon-expired}} and not PD-old-70-expired because PD-old implies the human author is known and they are known to have died more than 70 years ago. Keep unless the particular author is known. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Due clarifications have been made, the description and template is now updated.--RVD3 (talk) 22:29, 19 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
Serbian lands in the 9th century
[edit](1)
There's some issue with tracking the history of the original File:Serb lands04.png which was in 2013 renamed "Serb lands in the 9th century (en).png". This map was created by User:PANONIAN on Serbian Wikipedia in or before 2005 (based on Serb_lands02.jpg; https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_talk:Serb_lands04.png) and moved to Commons in 2006 by User:Electionworld. It has basically two versions (this and this basic type). According to the claims by user Panonian in the linked talk page discussion on English Wikipedia, the file was primarily based on "Istorijski atlas" (1999, publisher Geokarta, location Belgrade). In that atlas the description of the map was, in English, "Serbian lands in 9th-10th century" among other details, showing that the original sourced map itself is a confusing synthesis of different centuries and historical contexts (late 9th en:Petar of Serbia and after 10th century assumed expansion during en:Časlav of Serbia#State borders for which there's no evidence in primary sources and was never well argued and sometimes is omitted in secondary sources because simply there's no evidence in historical sources to know what the borders looked like during his time). It is also confusing that the file on Wikipedia/Commons was titled only mentioning the 9th century (also instead of very late 9th century), although it is misleading mentioning only the 9th century or 9th-10th century, but also only the 10th century because such borders did not exist at the time. Until now nobody could verify the original map, but assume it can be established to have been kinda based on this map (Istorijski atlas, image; from 2005, publ. Geokarta, editor Nebojša Jovanović). The source map is identical to "second type" from 2005, while kinda identical to the "first type" from 2005 (with different western border on river Vrbas; "first type"'s "improved version" is OR/SYNTH as has some unsourced and unexplainable editing). On the link can be also seen two other maps on the left of it, but their borders of Serbia/Serbs are evidently even more exaggerated, claiming for Serbia/Serbs almost whole of Bosnia and Herzegovina (for more issue see en:Bosnia (early medieval), which modern scientific literature treats more as an independent polity), pushing the early medieval Croatia/Croats much westward similar to modern borders, and lands of en:Stari Ras/en:Raška (region) which became Serbian only in the mid-12th century pushing the Bulgarians/Byzantines much eastward. All such borders are not supported in historical sources and generally in scientific literature. It is obvious that this maps were created with pro-Serbian ideological-political narrative in the years of en:Yugoslav wars when such narratives were pushed by the nationalistic propaganda (but something similar could be found even in respective neighbouring sources – so all sources from the same time period should be carefully evaluated and used in comparison to other sources, or better simply avoided, because exist more reliable national sources in the last 10-15 years, international sources in the last 30 years and those published during the period of Socialist Yugoslavia).
Besides that source, user PANONIAN listed a number of other sources, but mostly unreliable links (which are basically showing copies of the same map). From the sources, en:Vladimir Ćorović (d. 1941) "Ilustrovana istorija Srba" (supposedly expanded edition of originally unreleased work, considering how it is described it is obviously edited by others, released 2005) has this map for the 10th century (which has different western border on river Vrbas with Croatian border being longer and more eastward, and with different eastern border including Ras); Petrit Imami is not a scientist; en:Sima Ćirković (d. 2009) "Srbi među evropskim narodima" (2004; English edition) has this map for 950 CE (with roughly the same western border at river Vrbas, but different eastern border without Stari Ras which is correct). Hence it seems that the user PANONIAN while creating the "first type" map predominantly based it on the stated original source "Istorijski atlas" (1999-2005), keeping the eastern border including Stari Ras and surrounding land, but putting the border on river Vrbas.
Serbian historians en:Mihailo Dinić, Ilija Sindik, Dragoljub Pavolvić, and en:Svetozar Radojčić wrote the VII chapter "Srpske zemlje u ranofeudalno doba (do XII. Stoljeća)" in Historija naroda Jugoslavije (1953, en:Školska knjiga, Zagreb), showing for the time an elevated level of critical viewpoint and neutrality which would lack in some later Serbian scholars. Correspondingly, the Serbian academic historian and geographer Ilija Sindik was also obligated making maps and for the first section about early medieval Serbia written by Dinić made a map "Srpska država sredinom X. stoljeća" (Serbian state in the middle of the 10th century) looking like this map, with text "Državne granice nisu unesene, jer se ne mogu pouzdano utvrditi" (State borders aren't included, because they cannot be reliably determined), with almost identical position and depiction of the name Srbija/Serbia can be seen below in a good map (File:Balkans925.png). Also, relevant for other derivative maps below, according to Sindik this map (with part of border line having "?" marks) is what's looks like "Dukljanska država u drugoj polovici XI. stoljeća" (Dioclean/'Serbian' state in the second half of the 11th century).
Another problem is that there's not only one file, but the fact that the original file/idea was repeatedly copied, and also titled to represent different centuries from 9th to 10th up to 11th century. These are its derivative, COM:Dupe (duplicate) and COM:Redundant (redundant) files also for deletion:
1st type
- File:Territoires serbes_IXe.jpg - created by User:Boki, original upload date 2006 on French Wikipedia, moved to Commons in 2010 by User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske)
- File:20070716111140!Serb lands old ver.png - created/uploaded by User:Ajdebre in 2010, based on File:20070716111140!Serb_lands.png by PANONIAN, 2007
- File:Serb tribes pl.png - created/uploaded by User:Ałiku, 2009
- File:Serb lands in the 9th century (hu).svg - created/uploaded by User:Sepultura, 2022
2nd type
- File:Serb lands02.jpg - created by PANONIAN, original upload date 2005 on Serbian Wikipedia, moved to Commons in 2007 by User:Lumen roma
- File:Serb lands in the 9th century.png - created/uploaded by PANONIAN (originally "File:Serb lands03.png"), 2010
- File:Serb lands pl.png - created/uploaded by User:Ałiku but re-edited by PANONIAN (based on "Serb lands04.png"), 2009-2010/2014
- File:Serb lands in the 10th century (sr).png - created/uploaded by PANONIAN, 2013
- File:Serb lands in the 10th century (en).png - created/uploaded by PANONIAN, 2013 -> not for deletion, see conclusion below!
3rd type
- File:Serb lands in the 9th century-es.svg - created/uploaded by User:Rowanwindwhistler, 2016 (derivative of "Serb lands in the 9th century (en).png: PANONIAN")
- File:Serb lands in the 10th century es.svg - created/uploaded by User:Rowanwindwhistler, 2021 (derivative of "Serb lands in the 10th century (en).png: PANONIAN")
4th type
- File:Srbsko IX ru.svg - created/uploaded by User:Jaspe, 2008 (derivative of "Image:Serb lands04.png")
- File:Srbsko IX sr.svg - created/uploaded by User:CrniBombarder!!!, 2009
- File:Srbsko IX HE.svg - created/uploaded by User:Amirki, 2011
- File:Srbsko IX es.svg - created/uploaded by User:Rowanwindwhistler, 2014
- File:Srbsko IX pt.svg - created/uploaded by User:Renato de Carvalho Ferreira, 2017
- File:Srbsko IX v2 es.svg - created/uploaded by User:Rowanwindwhistler, 2016
- File:Srbsko IX v2 pt.svg - created/uploaded by User:Renato de Carvalho Ferreira, 2017
From them were made identical 11th century (?!) derivatives of 10th century derivatives of 9th century original file, also for deletion:
- File:Serbian lands in 1050 pl.png - created/uploaded by Ałiku, 2010
- File:Zeta in 1084 pl.png - created/uploaded by Ałiku, 2010
(2)
In addition to that, there exist also other poor and not used files spreading even more extreme fringe propaganda, also for deletion:
This file was created/uploaded by User:Kbh3rd in 2005. Arguably the worst map of them all, as it has nothing to do at all with the description of Serbian and other borders in the 10th century De Administrando Imperio. As was observed almost 15 years ago ([5]), it is based on an unreliable 2004-2005 source which was not officially published, written by an unauthoritative and almost anonymous author Aleksandar J. Vukosavljević (there's hardly any information about them, but according to Google search it is a en:Greater Serbia propagandist and amateur possibly with fake name, link, link). The map is identical to the map in the source ([6], [7]), with some striking similarities to the 1999-2005 map & user Panonian's map. It is nothing alike the map of other listed source Arnold Toynbee - Constantine Porphyrogenitus And His World Compressed (1973, link).
- File:Southeastern Europe in 850.png
- File:Expansion of Serbia under Višeslav.png
- File:Границе Србије за време Часлава Клонимировића према различитим историчарима.png
- File:Земље западног Балкана након смрти Часлава Клонимировића.png
- File:Мутимирова Србија и суседне државе.png (different from previous four, but still total OR/SYNTH)
These files were created/uploaded by User:SerbianPaleontologist in 2017. Like the previous map, are pure wishful thinking, not even "science fiction" - a total fantasy. The maps are evidently identical to the map by Aleksandar J. Vukosavljević's unreliable source which is listed. Some files have additional original research editing (if cannot be called even as a "research" because nothing in other sources supports such visual projection). They are not based on any other listed international and national source, some of which are even from 19th century (with outdate issues). The lists of sources are again used only as a ploy to make it seem as if the author evaluated various sources before making the map - sometimes not even listing the actual source the maps were based on, making it difficult for other editors to verify its source and (in)accuracy.
Conclusion:
There already exist other better maps on Commons based on international scientific literature for the respective time period (9-10th century), although some of them have other inaccuracies but not of such a scale and most importantly not of Serbian borders. These are File:Europe 814.svg and its derivative named File:Balkans in the 9th century.png, because the borders didn't change much throught the 9th century but even 10th century, is a map created by editors from a 19th century original which has many inaccuracies, with corrections based on relevant and reliable scientific literature; File:Balkans850.png; File:Map of the Balkans in the 10th century.png (arguably most accurate and satisfying for all viewpoints); File:Balkans925.png; File:Central and Eastern Europe around 950 AD.png (has a distorted perspective of space).
In short, the maps requested for deletion in each case were made using only 1 source with dubious reliability and neutrality (often instead of attributing one source listed bunch of other unrelated references and links to make it seem they are based on more sources or editor's evaluation of various sources or same/very similar borders can be found elsewhere, but do not). Files with such an idea and sheer number of derivative copies make a confusing mess with misleading representation and impressions about the history. Also, all maps have no release or source given for the underpinning map of Europe and program used which must be verifiable per COM:PRP as could be violating copyrights.
I am requesting deletion of all these files (and related derivative/duplicates of the same file/idea; with the exception of one "2nd type" version file - File:Serb lands in the 10th century (en).png - because is identical to the sourced map from an atlas and useful as an example of exaggerated depiction of borders, but needs editing of the description and having a detailed notification of having specific factual inaccuracies so it would be more careful/less used and copied around). Some of these files are not used anywhere on Wikipedia. These are files of poor quality, based on unreliables sources, original research-synthesis, mistitled, for which subject and time period already exist better maps. Their educational purpose is seriously twarted and misleading because are based on fringe theorization and nationalistic propaganda which was not in good faith. There were made too many duplicate and redundant derivatives of the original file, spreading further the propagandist representation of history, and with sheer quantity making it seem to have weight. Making and having such files for spreading further such propagandist visual viewpoint is ultimately not in good faith/constructive/neutral and hence not of educational purpose.--Miki Filigranski (talk) 01:11, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Keep. While I understand your frustration, most of these images appear to be COM:INUSE on one or more articles. Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but they are misused and overused on other Wikipedia editions (articles poorly edited/watched anyway). I or anyone else could go there now and replace them with better images, then almost none would be INUSE. Currently not in use on any article:
- File:Srbsko IX pt.svg
- File:Srbsko IX v2 es.svg
- File:Serbia - 10th Century - De Administrando Imperio.png
- File:Expansion of Serbia under Višeslav.png
- File:Границе Србије за време Часлава Клонимировића према различитим историчарима.png
- File:Земље западног Балкана након смрти Часлава Клонимировића.png
- File:Мутимирова Србија и суседне државе.png--Miki Filigranski (talk) 13:10, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Miki Filigranski: Current usages must be replaced before we can delete here. —holly {chat} 21:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. Map is syntesis of many sources, and there are no sources for medieval Serbia till Vrbas river. Between Vrbas and river Bosnia is Vrbas county, which is part of latter Slavonia, which was made as succesor to Pannonian Croatia. Also, more than half of Croatian Imota county is in the map part of Zahumlje, which was only eastern of Neretva river.
- Why are southern adriatic sclavinias referenced as Serbian? DAI is half of the 10. century, and it doesn't include Diocletia.
- Upper Neretva should be part of Zahumlje, or Croatia (in DAI Croatia is north of Zahumlje).
- Serbia should be only till Srebrenica, and around Upper Bosnia there should be "little country" Bosnia. Ras should be part of Bulgaria, etc. --Čeha (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE, deleted 1 that was not in use. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7|2=Begründung: Die Gemeinde Gründen hat nie zum Bezirk Visp gehört. Daher Karte ungültig. --Tschubby (talk) 17:49, 9 January 2024 (UTC); 2013 file and not eligible for speedy deletion — billinghurst sDrewth 11:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Tschubby: Can you fix the map and reupload it under the same name? —holly {chat} 21:19, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, unfortunately I can't. There was no merger in the district of Visp in 1923. The municipality of Gründen, which belongs to the district of Raron, is where the merger was filed. File:Karte Bezirk Raron Gemeindeveraenderungen 1923.png. Greeting --Tschubby (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- OK, well the map is still in use at de:Bezirk Visp and needs to be removed from there first before we can proceed with deletion. —holly {chat} 17:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
- No, unfortunately I can't. There was no merger in the district of Visp in 1923. The municipality of Gründen, which belongs to the district of Raron, is where the merger was filed. File:Karte Bezirk Raron Gemeindeveraenderungen 1923.png. Greeting --Tschubby (talk) 07:58, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Established 1620 (talk) 15:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- I have the full publishing rights to this picture, otherwise I wouldn't have uploaded it. Sigmund Perner (talk) 15:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Sigmund Perner: In diesem Fall soll bitte der Urheber des Bildes (also der Fotograf, das ist anscheinend Bruno Tenschert) eine E-Mail an Wikimedia Commons schicken und bestätigen, dass die Datei hier unter einer freien Lizenz hochgeladen werden durfte. ({{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} ist offensichtlich nicht zutreffend, da nicht vom Urheber hochgeladen). Details zum Vorgehen, zum Wortlaut der E-Mail und die E-Mail-Adresse siehe unter COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Danke für die Info, habe ich zwischenzeitlich auch schon von anderer Seite erhalten. Bruno Tenschert ist ein guter Bekannter von mir, hat aber keinen Wikipedia-Account und will auch keinen. Daher hat nun ein anderen Bekannter (mit Account) ein passendes Bild dem Artikel beigefügt. Muss ich denn jetzt mit diesem File hier (CARPETBRECHTBUEHNE40.jpg) noch irgendwas tun – wieder runternehmen oder löschen oder sonstwas – und wenn ja: wo und wie? (Sorry, bin noch ein Newbie hier…) Tausend Grüße, Sigmund Perner Sigmund Perner (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Wenn die beschriebene Genehmigung nicht geschickt wird, löscht irgendwann ein Admin die Datei. Dazu musst du nichts weiter tun. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 15:51, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- Danke für die Info, habe ich zwischenzeitlich auch schon von anderer Seite erhalten. Bruno Tenschert ist ein guter Bekannter von mir, hat aber keinen Wikipedia-Account und will auch keinen. Daher hat nun ein anderen Bekannter (mit Account) ein passendes Bild dem Artikel beigefügt. Muss ich denn jetzt mit diesem File hier (CARPETBRECHTBUEHNE40.jpg) noch irgendwas tun – wieder runternehmen oder löschen oder sonstwas – und wenn ja: wo und wie? (Sorry, bin noch ein Newbie hier…) Tausend Grüße, Sigmund Perner Sigmund Perner (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Sigmund Perner: In diesem Fall soll bitte der Urheber des Bildes (also der Fotograf, das ist anscheinend Bruno Tenschert) eine E-Mail an Wikimedia Commons schicken und bestätigen, dass die Datei hier unter einer freien Lizenz hochgeladen werden durfte. ({{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} ist offensichtlich nicht zutreffend, da nicht vom Urheber hochgeladen). Details zum Vorgehen, zum Wortlaut der E-Mail und die E-Mail-Adresse siehe unter COM:VRT/de. --Rosenzweig τ 07:31, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Sigmund Perner: Please have your friend visit COM:RELGEN to release it under a free license. —holly {chat} 21:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT permission from Bruno Tenschert. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Looks like a video screenshot. 1989 (talk) 15:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In case, also File:Daniela Shima Miss KEIT at Miss Universe Albania 2020 (cropped).jpg should be deleted. --Horcrux (talk) 18:47, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Maybe enlighten me how is "Looks like a video screenshot." a valid reason for deletion of a file? If it was a screenshot of a video the uploader had rights to, I'm pretty sure he could upload a screenshot of it. Mithoron (talk) 20:57, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, looks like a rip from a television broadcast (as evidenced by watermarks in lower right). --Abzeronow (talk) 18:09, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
A medal designed in 1964 cannot be in the PD in France as works are protected for 70 years pma. Günther Frager (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- ok, thanks you for the message. I'll do as you advise. Simboz (talk) 15:12, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Reply to the deletion nomination I object to the request for deletion, on the following grounds. I start with my view on the matter, then I take up the issue of derivative works, simply because this concept was raised in the discussion following the deletion request:
- The picture that I provided to WP is the picture of one side of a medal that was made in 1964 in France for the purpose of serving as a prize for the the Best stamps exhibited at a French stamp exhibition, Philatec 1964.
- This side of the medal is relatively simple in its design, but crucially its design is little more than a reformatting of graphic material used otherwise in the context of Philatec 1964. The designation "PHILATEC 1964 PARIS" — in capital letters, using various but similar fonts, and in rounded shape like a postal rubber stamp — appears in all (or almost all) printed items related to Philatec 1964. Some additional very simple graphic elements, consisting of lines and a sort of horn, also appear in both the medal and other Philatec material. In addition to the said horn, which looks like being the element designed in the top centre of the medal, the medal also integrates a star, at the bottom, which is also part of the general Philatec design. Lastly, the medal has an empty rectangle on its right, which seems to simply fill an empty space.
- For reference, other philatec material are to be found here:
- A representation of the star can be seen on wikitimbres.rf: [8] and on catawiki.com: [9]
- The name "PHILATEC 1964 PARIS", in various fonts and shapes, but always in capital letters, at: [10] and at: [11]
- Conclusion: the design on this side of the medal quite obviously does not present any "creation of the mind" and fails to fulfil both requirements of "originality" and "individual character". Like most medals made for a practical purpose, it is the simple reformatting of pre-existing graphical material adjusted to fit well in the circular shape of a medal. Thus, the design of this side of the medal is not copyrightable.
- This leads to the next question. Could the medal be protected under other provisions of IP law?
- One route is the trademark law. It could be assumed that the original graphic material used to design the medal was itself protected as a trademark (both the name and its design and the rounded logo). Unlike copyrights, which last only for a limited period of time, trademarks last for as long as the trademark is actively used, even 100 or 200 years, without requiring the trademark owner to fill applications for extension. In that sense, it is a much stronger protection than copyrights. The flip side, which is directly relevant for the case at hand, is twofold. First, even if duly registered, a trademark protection automatically elapses, or disappears, if the trademark is no longer used for a some time. Second, unlike copyright, which is protected automatically, trademarks (and the corresponding logo), are protected only after filling of an application, which may include the detailed shape and graphism of the trademark and corresponding logo, in addition to the name of the mark.
- Philatec 1964 was a one-shot, two-weeks event, that was not meant to be repeated and was actually never renewed. For this mere reason alone, even if a trademark had been registered, it would have elapsed more that 50 years ago. Besides, the material relating to Philatec 1964 is relatively homogenous, nevertheless it presents crucial variations and is not totally uniform. Different font types are used; the shape are sometimes horizontal and sometimes rounded, the work sequence differ as well, where "PHILATEC PARIS 1964" coexists with "PHILATEC 1964 PARIS" or "PHILATEC '64". If a trademark had been applied for and granted, it would require the registration of a very exact mark and logo, and one would rather expect that the registered design would then be used uniformly across all Philatec printed material. I tried to check if Philatec 1964 is registered as a trademark in France, and found nothing, which can be explained by either or both of those reasons. In addition, a trademark application form must indicate the owner of the mark, which has to be a juridical person or a natural person, while Philatec, as a one-shot two-weeks event, assuming it was constituted as juridical person, ceased to exist in the meantime.
- Conclusion: the route of a possible trademark protection must be rejected, in the case at hand.
- What other avenues are possible? One possibility is the so-called design patent.
- A medal like this one, which is mainly an object made for utilitarian or practical purposes, may be protected by design patents. It is typical of utilitarian objects that the normal route for protection is a design patent, if such patentability exists in the national jurisdiction. Design patents do not impose requirements in term of threshold of originality, or individual character of the creator, they must be distinctive enough for the consumer to distinguish one object from other similar ones. Similar to trademarks, design patents are not automatic, but are granted only after successful application for registration by the owner. However, even under the assumption that a design patent had been granted for this medal in 1964, a simple design patent does not prevent shooting a picture of an object for illustrative purpose e.g. in wikipedia, and very logically wikipedia criteria for uploading of images do not address design patents.
- Conclusion: the design patent route must also be reflected.
- As stated above, I need to take up the issue of "derivative works" since this has been raised in the discussion following the deletion request.
- In the discussion, it seemed that the request was motivated by some view that the medal could be a derivative work. I contested that view and I firmly maintain my position. The definition of a derivative work is rather clear in most jurisdictions, including France, and cannot capture a medal like this. First, it is not an a priori instance of derivative work, and second, it fails to meet, as already stated, the requirements of originality and individual character, which are applicable to derivative works.
- After I challenged the fact that the medal would, per se, constitute a derivative work, the other discussant stated that my picture (rather than the medal itself) would be a derivative work and thus could not be uploaded. I equally reject that argument. This picture is a simple picture, shot with a mobile phone without particular preparation or skills. Really, anyone else could shoot that picture. And even assuming that this picture would be a derivative work, then it is my problem if I decide to upload it in Commons, and actually I think that people uploading their pictures are actually the preferred input to Commons, if I understand correctly. I am free to do whatever I want with this picture...
- Conclusion the hypothesis of a possible protection as derivative work shall also be rejected, whether in respect of the medal itself being a derivative work, or in respect of my picture of the medal constituting a derivative work.
- Based on the above considerations, I propose to reject the deletion request.
- Keep based on the above considerations. Simboz (talk) 16:26, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 22:11, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
This image (of the full tree) does not appear in the given source. However, the bottom half of it is in the given source (Fig. 2, C), and the source is under the CC-BY 4.0 license. Hoping someone with more experience woirking with journal articles can shed light on this. (There is a much larger version of the image, with slightly different color balance, on Twitter). The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP, this version of the photo is not published with the CCBYSA licence. The 4 photo's of the articles are shown here: ;Category:Sapranthus pinedai. --Ellywa (talk) 21:36, 19 March 2024 (UTC)