Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/12/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 15th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy G10. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wunsch des Benutzers; vgl. BD:Spaulke Rolf acker (talk) 10:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Jsbsjojl (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Name Celemens ist falsch. Name Clemens ist richtig. Es wurde schon neue richtige Datei angelegt. TREM-RRRR (talk) 12:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не тот размер фотографии Leokosterrr (talk) 13:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

not worked quality Leokosterrr (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

не тот размер изображения Leokosterrr (talk) 13:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CHAR. The character copyright for Popeye doesn't expire until 2025. Nosferattus (talk) 16:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CHAR. The character copyright for Popeye doesn't expire until 2025.

Yann (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CHAR. The character copyright for Popeye doesn't expire until 2025. Yann (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:CHAR. The character copyright for Popeye doesn't expire until 2025. Yann (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TokioHotelEnthusiast (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clear COM:NETCOPYVIO, reserve image search return plenty of results, some images have even watermarks. Creating a individual SD request, as I did with some of them, is a waste of effort due to the large amount of files uploaded in the last 3 days.

Günther Frager (talk) 01:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr: All rights reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please read Commons:License review. --Yann (talk) 18:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO, Peanuts characters are still under copyright, unable to be used commercially Oaktree b (talk) 15:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete - this is also obviously an advertisement (for a bootleg T-shirt, at that). Tagged two other similar images by the uploader for speedy deletion. Omphalographer (talk) 18:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph: Pa Archive/PA - https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/apr/30/mcqueen-royal-wedding-dress-modern-kate ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © 2023 Tsem Rinpoche ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright: Jeff Binns ZimskoSonce (talk) 00:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tiktok photo ZimskoSonce (talk) 15:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot - The Super Mario Bros. Super Show! ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

published on twitter on 21 November 2020 https://twitter.com/TroyWD98/status/1329944344363581440 ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.get-the-most.at/2020/beswingt-aus-der-krise-am-melker-tweedride/ by Johannes Haselsteiner) ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded without permission. ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Check out File:Twinks4Trump J in White.jpg. It is released under CC-BY-SA 4.0. My derivative is within the terms of that license. Zanahary (talk) 16:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 10:53, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An altered image from a set by Lucian Wintrich that was deleted (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jvander22). Wintrich, to my knowledge, never released photos under free licenses. gobonobo + c 22:50, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weren’t all those photos uploaded by Wintrich himself? 173.77.183.96 22:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, look at the nom: the nominator doesn’t understand that Lucian Wintrich is the photographer, not the subject. 173.77.183.96 22:52, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
G8, marked for SPEEDY. 186.174.134.132 13:16, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Even if Wintrich is Jvander22, there is no proof of this, so this should be deleted absent COM:VRT permission/confirmation. But this is not G8; and it was previously kept, so declining speedy. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:57, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We need proof via VRT confirmation for every 'own work' upload? Zanahary (talk) 18:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No, however, a VRT permission/confirmation is needed for this file. Thanks, -- Ooligan (talk) 20:42, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Why this one? Zanahary (talk) 07:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann Previously undeleted - can you weigh in here? Gbawden (talk) 18:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the UDR, people seem to agree that this license is valid. Anything new since then? Yann (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I am deleting as the source file has been deleted. If this file is to be undeleted again we first need to undelete the source image from which this image was derived. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shrek movies character - © 2011 - Dreamworks/Paramount Pictures ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

using google lens I can find this photo on many pages: https://www.booking.com/hotel/at/happy-flachau.sl.html (in gallery); https://www.instagram.com/p/Cka7_5WMpD5/ (uploaded 1 Nov 2022); https://www.zammagazine.com/boekenclub/1647-animal-farm-has-been-translated-into-shona-why-a-group-of-zimbabwean-writers-undertook-the-task; ETC,... ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded without permiassion - there's no commons 4.0 license on youtube page ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EgitimPusulam.com © Copyright 2023, Tüm Hakları Saklıdır. ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2022 © - Hội Đồng Giám Mục Việt Nam ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded without permission - no commons license on youtube page ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded without permission - no commons license on youtube page ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uplaoded without permission - no commons license on youtube page ZimskoSonce (talk) 16:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo by Luo Kulinsky, Jr. https://www.leokulinskijr.com/p435247198/h7B07CED2#h7f53c024 ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Pfitzinger (petepfitzinger@gmail.com) was granted permission to use that photo from the 1984 U.S. Olympic Marathon Trials by the photographer, Leo Kulinski, Jr. Pfitzinger has bought the right to use several photos from Kulinski, as Kulinski will verify. The photographer is also credited just below the photo on the wiki page. Magnetarian (talk) 22:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

google maps copyvio ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can find this photo on many pages, like: https://fanakafinance.com/; https://firmwayscredit.com/about-us/; https://www.whoownsafrica.com/blog/how-entrepreneurs-can-propel-middle-income-status/; https://africa.businessinsider.com/local/careers/africa-claims-the-top-three-spots-for-highest-concentration-of-women-businesses/h2jcrtb; etc,... ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://laodong.vn/phap-luat/thai-binh-xu-ly-loat-vi-pham-tai-phuong-tran-lam-tu-nam-2000-toi-nay-1122808.ldo (1 Dec 2022) ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.facebook.com/destinationkivubelt/photos/pb.100063538814687.-2207520000/1377314969409742/?type=3 (10 May 2022) ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

courtesy of UFC ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Machiko Kyô and Masayuki Mori in Ugetsu monogatari (1953) © 1946 - Shôchiku Eiga ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dragonball - copyright: Bandai Namco Entertainment Inc. ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded without permission © SJ Photography ZimskoSonce (talk) 17:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free - 2020 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Una mujer frente al Mar (2020) movie screenshot ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2023 french magazine cover ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2023 movie poster ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Wireimage https://www.teenvogue.com/story/harry-styles-grows-mustache ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo: Wireimage https://www.teenvogue.com/story/harry-styles-grows-mustache ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.instagram.com/sakatatsu000/p/CwrlH-DvykH/?img_index=1 (2 Sep 2023) ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minions promo © 2019 UNIVERSAL STUDIOS ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from the internet . I can find it on twitter, pinterest, quora... ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr: All rights reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please read Commons:License review. --Yann (talk) 22:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright 2022. All Rights are Reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Vesti.kg Все права защищены ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad and stupid photoshop of The Scream by Edvard Munch ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

social media photo uploaded without permission ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© copyright ndtv convergence limited 2023. all rights reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright: FSeventphoto Franz Scherer ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded without permission ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.uhs.org.uk/news/?pid=27&nid=1&storyid=62 © 2023 UXBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free - tv show promo ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

shutterstock watermark https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/banana-cat-holding-bloody-knife-vector-2354332939 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SOURCE: http://www.nuvolearte.org/exhibitions/mirjam-hinn/ (8 Oct 2022) © Nuvole Arte 2009 — 2023 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright protected https://ml.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?curid=280207 ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Institut national de l'audiovisuel logo ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear ZimskoSonce. I hope this message finds you well.
As far as we know, that is the only colourfull image we have got from Sayad. We picked it up from a short video that the Institute du Mond Arabe, in Paris, sent to me. As the subtitle carefully explains, Sayad joined a TV programme at the France 3 channel in 1978. That is the link to access: https://www.ina.fr/ina-eclaire-actu/video/i17327280/abdelmalek-sayad-a-propos-de-l-immigration
Looking forward to hearing from you,
Best
Gustavo 179.162.19.78 19:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

flickr: (c) All rights reserved ZimskoSonce (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://canvasrebel.com/meet-van-ethan-levy/ CanvasRebel © All Rights Reserved. ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded without permission. possible source: https://glamsham.com/tv/telly-news/vandana-vithlani-joins-the-cast-of-upcoming-tv-show-shubh-shagun ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© WWW.SUDOUEST.FR 2023 https://www.sudouest.fr/culture/litterature/litterature-la-fille-de-deauville-de-vanessa-schneider-la-petite-bourgeoise-devenue-terroriste-11066659.php ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source: https://www.iroszovetseg.hu/feher-jozsef-2/ (same exif data) © 2023. Magyar Írószövetség ZimskoSonce (talk) 20:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myalopez99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

From user contributions this is likely part of Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#"Off_the_rails"_school_project_resuming where students are asked to make three or four short fashion-related edits to enwiki articles and then make a draft article about an artist or designer ... with no guidance given about image copyright. File:Melianjunuisadnstarangel.jpg appears in monochrome at https://melianj.com/pages/about, reverse image search suggests File:Fivewomen.jpg is from the same site. Doubtful any of this is own work.

Belbury (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (speedy as mostly confirmed-copyvio and the others quite likely). --DMacks (talk) 22:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 04:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo may meet all the requirements for {{PD-Italy}}, but since it was taken in 1984, it was not in the public domain in Italy on the URAA restoration date for Italy (1996-01-01), and its US copyright was restored by the URAA. Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are explicitly freely licensed, or that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work (Commons:Licensing). And contrary to what many here claim or believe, a file being copyrighted in the US because of the URAA is a reason for deletion (Commons:URAA-restored copyrights). Rosenzweig τ 22:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete I agree myself on the deletion, but because it is not clear if this picture has been realy taken in Italy (or in Tunisia ?).
Tisourcier (talk) 14:33, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader agrees. --Yann (talk) 15:07, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph of English actress Diana Rigg with Australian actor George Lazenby was uploaded with a {{PD-Portugal-photo}} license tag. While the photo was taken in Portugal in 1969, does that make Portugal the source country? The source country is (usually) that of first publication. Peter Stone/Mirrorpix is named as the photographer at the Gettyimages source page. Per [3], Peter Stone was a British photographer working for the Daily Mirror newspaper who died in 2010. So it seems much more likely that the source country for this photograph is the UK, where it is still protected until the end of 2080. Therefore, unless some really convincing rationale to the contrary is presented, the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. It can be restored in 2081. Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,
You forgot specifying that a debate is pending about the PD-Portugal-Photo here :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:PD-Portugal-photo
Note that I consider the interpretation of the notion of "Source country" and "usually" first publication are weak, from a legal portuguese point of view because its not specified in their laws (before 1970).
Note also that Getty often pretends to sell pictures rights of PD free pictures. For instance :
https://www.gettyimages.fr/detail/photo-d%27actualit%C3%A9/meeting-of-the-dada-group-in-paris-louis-aragon-photo-dactualit%C3%A9/542359729
Regards. Tisourcier (talk) 12:35, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is not a matter of Portuguese law, but of the Berne Convention and Wikimedia Commons policy. And I didn't "forget" to mention the discussion at Template talk:PD-Portugal-photo. I did not mention it because it is irrelevant for the matter of the source country, which is at the core here. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berne_Convention#Country_of_origin
"It is not clear what this may mean for determining "country of origin". In Kernel v. Mosley (2011), a U.S. court "concluded that a work created outside of the United States, uploaded in Australia and owned by a company registered in Finland was nonetheless a U.S. work by virtue of its being published online". However other U.S. courts in similar situations have reached different conclusions, e.g. Håkan Moberg v. 33T LLC (2009). The matter of determining the
country of origin for digital publication remains a topic of controversy among law academics as well."
This point is still relevant and I understand its complexity. But I will not argue further with you as you asked elsewere. Regards (anyway).
 Delete I agree myself on the deletion, because the criteria are not certain.
Tisourcier (talk) 14:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader agrees. --Yann (talk) 15:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if we accept that Studio Harcourt photos are collective works in France, those are still protected for 70 years from publication there. This one is (said to be) from 1954, so (if that is correct) clearly it cannot be in the public domain in France before 2025 2026. Also, since it was still protected by French copyright on the URAA date for France (1996-01-01), the URAA restored its US copyright (which runs until the end of 2049 2050).

There were claims in another deletion request that all Harcourt photos were released under a Creative Commons license, but I haven't seen any evidence for that. User:Studio Harcourt, in June 2010, uploaded a bunch of Harcourt photos from the 1990s and 2000s under a CC license, but that is all I have seen.

So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2050 2051 when its US copyright will have expired. Rosenzweig τ 22:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


The source site says "Droits d'auteur: Droits : Etat" and "Photo (C) Ministère de la Culture - Médiathèque du patrimoine et de la photographie, Dist. RMN-Grand Palais / Studio Harcourt" btw. Also, where does that 1954-01-01 date come from? The source site doesn't date the photo. Anouk Ferjac was born in 1932, so 1954 could be correct, or the photo could have been taken later than that. It's hard to say if she is 22 or 29 in that photo. --Rosenzweig τ 23:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per [4], the photo is from 1955. That moves all expiration dates by one year. --Rosenzweig τ 23:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
This case of collective work (Studio Harcourt) is a mistake because the actual date is 1955 and not 1954. Please consider that I agree this deletion.
Regards. Tisourcier (talk) 11:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
About the Studio Harcourt evidence :
Studio Harcourt photos have been judged to be collective works [5]
This judgement makes a "juris prudence" in France and any Collective work (for instance another photograph agency) is covered by the same status : 70 years after the picture has been taken (not necessarily published), the picture is under PD-France.
Regards. Tisourcier (talk) 11:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're wrong about the "has been taken (not necessarily published)" issue, this is clearly from publication. The {{PD-France}} tag says so, and art. L123-3 of the CPI says so as well. --Rosenzweig τ 11:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, even if this were a collective work published in 1954, it would still be protected by copyright in France until the end of 2024; it would enter the public domain on January 1, 2025. As of right now, even collective works published in 1953 are still protected by copyright in France for 16 more days (including today); those will enter the public domain in France on January 1, 2024. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I agree myself on the deletion, because the picture (Studio Harcourt = collective work) is more thant 70 years ago.
Tisourcier (talk) 14:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Uploader agrees. --Yann (talk) 15:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: screengrab or small crop from unknown source. P 1 9 9   18:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: F1. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:41, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

at the request of the uploader יודוקוליס (talk) 14:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 13:21, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OOS - fun image for social media, maybe, but not realistically useful for Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's valuable because it:
  • Shows the concept of a fictional being placed into a contemporary realistic daily life setting; it probably even is the only image of that
  • Demonstrates juxtaposition of contemporary daily life experience with fantasy world kind in a humorous way, illustrating how such combinations is/can be humorous to humans
  • As one of the highest rated images of Stable Diffusion on the reddit AIart sub of the year, it is valued by that community and thereby illustrates what this or a large community finds to be of good value/quality
  • High-quality illustration of human humor and a specific kind of humor
  • Is fine with all Wikimedia policies and more educational than hundreds of humorous porn images by the same photographer that are kept; if those are kept why would this high-quality image not?
  • Is an innovative and humorous high-quality digital art for "Category:Shopping in art"
  • Is one of the only few images of "Nazgûl" and the only humorous "Middle-earth fan art" and one of very few if not the only humorous fantasy fan art
  • One of the best if not the best illustrations of AI-generated humorous images / the phenomenon where AI images are made for humor (there may even be a Wikipedia article or sth similar on that which could find this image useful)
  • It's one of very few images that illustrates a cultural phenomenon of our current century/ies where large cultural concepts or works are accompanied by, referred to, and/or adopted in Web art
Moreover, no valid deletion rationale has been provided, I directly addressed and refuted the rationale, and even just any one item from the list above would be enough yet the list is not even complete. Prototyperspective (talk) 00:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Prototyperspective: Here's a thought experiment: Would you argue as strongly that it is in scope if it weren't AI generated? What if the image weren't done with the cool toy of the day, but instead was a photo or a drawing? What if someone with a camera got a friend to dress up as a knight and took their photo in a supermarket aisle - not as part of Halloween nor any other cultural tradition, just someone in a knight costume in a supermarket. Or what if it were a drawing - not by a famous nor notable artist nor cartoonist. Just someone with some drawing skills, whether with pencil & paper or a computer drawing program, drew a knight in a supermarket aisle. Would you still feel so strongly that it was valuable for the Wikimedia Commons project? IMO those examples would not be in scope, and that an image is AI generated does not change something out-of-scope into in-scope. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 10:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yes. Those few points that would drop if it's not AI-generated would be replaced by other points that make the image more valuable when it was made manually via conventional art.
Please don't disregard AI image generators as "cool toy of the day"; that is not an actual point; the same could be said about Photoshop, especially at version 3. Regarding costumes etc, why ask about so many hypotheticals – that's irrelevant as it's not what this image shows anyway. Those examples are not in scope but softporn that would be interpreted as to showing human humor while having nearly no or no images of this type of humor is reasonable to you. that an image is AI generated does not change something out-of-scope into in-scope Maybe you need the points again, this at most addresses only point #8 and is a strawman – in fact it seems like it's you who is arguing an image being AI-generated makes it intrinsically out of scope. Prototyperspective (talk) 13:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete obvious copyvio of the film version of Sauron. Dronebogus (talk) 15:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good point. I wondered about that but figured it didn't look similar enough and that a person wearing armor with a helmet that has spikes isn't copyrighted. However, I didn't notice beyond those spikes the helmet face mask looks similar to Sauron in the film and this: File:Morgoth by SpentaMainyu.jpg. That file is displaying Morgoth, not Sauron and seems to be fine isn't it? I thought the uploaded image was alluding to Nazgûl. Such armor is also displayed here, is that file fine then?: File:Sauron replica.jpg. I think the appearance of Sauron etc in films are according to Tolkien's descriptions. If it is indeed a copyvio it needs to be deleted but I don't know whether it is. Prototyperspective (talk) 16:19, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(Does web search for Sauron images...) Yes, that is clearly the character, not a generic or generalized character. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: COM:DW, per Dronebogus, who notes "obvious copyvio of the film version of Sauron". Prototyperspective, who had been the image's strongest advocate, acknowledges. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this file really free media? This appears to be taken from the company with no mention of licensing. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS18:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't remove this. This was submit to update the Birthright Israel wikipedia page and the logo is owned by their organization. 2605:BC0:1141:24:E533:265B:BF75:BB91 18:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If we do remove this from Commons, we can still upload this as a local fair-use copy on the English Wikipedia—see w:en:WP:NFCC for more information. — 3PPYB6TALKCONTRIBS19:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:24, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text." HyperGaruda (talk) 21:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license: it is apparently a photo of en:Central Department Store (Rostov-on-Don), but processed by some neural network, not just an own work. Metadata says "screenshot". Wikisaurus (talk) 22:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Screen shot because I had to crop the photo, I took the photo while driving and the original photo was several times larger space capture. Well and suspicions of using artificial intelligence, it is groundless and unprovable, I do not understand what is in the head of the nominee. This is something from the series of accusations of witches in the Middle Ages :) JukoFF (talk) 22:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, there are some artifacts such as unnatural transparency of some objects. Those are hard to explain unless image is AI processed. Siradan (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, it's a fake. I put the file up for deletion myself. JukoFF (talk) 22:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Original source was found [6]. It's clear that you deliberately cropped and blurred a watermark and then uploaded photo under fake license. Siradan (talk) 23:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes we trust people like we trust ourselves. And judging by what I've seen in other parts of the city, what they sent me on watsap as an illustration didn't make me feel bad. My wrong is that I took the person at his word and agreed to post his photo under a free license. JukoFF (talk) 23:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Just an hour ago you wrote that you took the photo by yourself. Now you're saying that you received it from someone. Siradan (talk) 23:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I it's not my picture and uploaded it not under the right face, implying good noms. My mistake. I think the photo will be deleted soon. JukoFF (talk) 23:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 21:23, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bulk upload of generic AI art. Out of scope as unused and unlikely to be used.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 05:19, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enciclope04 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Moslty text files without any historical importance, COM:SCOPE problem.

Günther Frager (talk) 01:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 05:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person died in 2018, can not be own work of 2023. Original date, author? Copyright status? Drakosh (talk) 06:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr account it was taken from is deleted. Contains identifiable person with no model release. Should be deleted in accordance with Commons’ precautionary principle. Marynmelnyk44 (talk) 06:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - we have plenty of other images of nude women where there aren't the concerns that the nominator raised. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:44, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vietnam's FOP was revoked since 2023, image uploaded afterwards are not allowed on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does the fact that the image itself was taken and uploaded to Flickr in 2013 not matter? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Seriously? What’s considered the main object of the picture? If that’s the statue, then it’s a sculpture since 1965 by the government of South Vietnam so not likely to be protected by the current government. If that’s the Bitexco you’re speaking of, then that would make little sense. Đại Việt quốc (talk) 14:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete @TUIBAJAVE: I think you were right, the two buildings take up more space. It's just a bad quality night time image anyway, not worth keeping. At least there are plenty other beautiful images of the statue like you said (unlike the images of Ba Xoài market, Tri Tôn market, Hồng Ngự market...) Đại Việt quốc (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the statue too small. I think image about 2 buildings. and we have many beautiful images about the statue. We do not want the bad image TUIBAJAVE (talk) 18:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skogshare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Random AI-generated out of scope images

TommyG (talk) 12:55, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Most of these images are unlikely to be usable for educational content. Notes on specific images follow:
Omphalographer (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep indiscriminate nomination. Most of these are easily in scope. They illustrate video game genres, social issues, tropes in LGBT manga and anime, etc. or are just unremarkable images of things like anime women in hijabs or JK Rowling. a few are out of scope or problematic but that’s an overwhelming minority. I think this should be closed as a bad mass nomination and the nominator can re-nominate ones they can actually think of a legitimate specific reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 18:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The nominator has not provided specific rationale(s) for deletion. All indiscriminately listed images glanced over seem fine and various seem useful. File:Farm sim AI.jpg and File:Jk rowling sketch AI.png are good examples of an images to keep, regarding the latter drawings/artworks showing specific well-known people are not prohibited. However, some of these images are low-quality because they include AI misgeneration (without being educational in regards to AI misgeneration or an early stage of AI art). --Prototyperspective (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: most, some individual images Deleted per discussion. No consensus to delete all en mass; no prejudging relisting individual images or specific subgroups of images for more specific reasons. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skogshare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Renominating a subset of images from the previous discussion.

Out of scope: These are all unused AI-generated images of women wearing head scarves (hijab). Commons has an adequate supply of real images of this subject, and these images are fairly low quality - all of the women in the pictures have doll-like faces and gigantic eyes. There's no foreseeable circumstance where these images would be preferable to a real image of the subject.

(I've left out one image - File:Hijab AI.png - which was in use on ckbwiki. I'm uncertain if the author actually intended to use an AI-generated image on that page, or if another image would be preferable.)

Omphalographer (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per nom. Low-quality and I don't see why they would be useful/valuable/in-scope.
Prototyperspective (talk) 22:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skogshare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope as unusably low quality - nonsense jewelry and clothing, and it's supposed to be a named religious figure but it's just a blue-skinned generic anime guy

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 00:22, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Skogshare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality AI images (everything looks too smooth and shiny, like plastic), which illustrate a concept for which a freely licensed photograph could easily be obtained.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:30, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom Dronebogus (talk) 09:59, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:09, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promotional images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use and out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At it again, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vgerbud. More fantasy flag. TU-nor (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At it again, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Vgerbud. More fantasy flag. TU-nor (talk) 20:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal/promotional image Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, possibly copyrighted, taken from https://www.deviantart.com/swordrist/art/The-Sublime-State-of-Persia-877851650 HistoryofIran (talk) 21:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency web site. Omphalographer (talk) 21:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency. Omphalographer (talk) 21:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused logo of a non-notable cryptocurrency. Omphalographer (talk) 21:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag (https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/7446n5/flag_of_quiggia_my_micronation/), out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional flag (https://www.reddit.com/r/vexillology/comments/7446n5/flag_of_quiggia_my_micronation/), out of scope Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep (promotional username), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep (Gtl => Gateway Technolabs), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use outside old sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:45, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this appears to be a screenshot from a video (it has the play button on it but is not a video), and the base image was also found online elsewhere https://tineye.com/search/3b71500863dd08734bd8bb67dc0af332a74c2281?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1 Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 22:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM: FOP Canada, no FoP for 2D works. Yeeno (talk) 22:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 23:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

online shopping promo material https://www.amazon.com.be/-/en/Yerba-Mate-Citrus-Taragui-Citricos/dp/B00K6MIZ3G, etc.(see google lens results) ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 04:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:50, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeat upload? Violation of architect's copyright, see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tour D2. We do not accept non-commercial licensing that the French law wants to oblige. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:29, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in India A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:09, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to UK, no freedom of panorama for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see watermark; Dubios own work, possible stock photo. Wdwd (talk) 10:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by the publisher of "GACKTの勝ち方特装版朗読CD試聴動画vol.110" AKA "GACKT's How to Win Special Edition Recitation CD Trial Video vol.110" and maybe the photographer. See User talk:Jeff G.#Gackt - Creative Commons license YT.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:10, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Зарваницький регіональний ландшафтний парк.jpg. I doubt this image file meets the criterion that it should have no independent economic value that harms architect's economic rights; the building here is prominent and is the only significant element of the image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:11, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG is a bad format for this type of image and it's redundant to File:New Mexico Presidential Election Results 1984.svg GraydenCat (talk) 02:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A svg file of this map is made TylerKutschbach (talk) 07:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

speedy keep, an SVG version being available is no valid reason for deletion. The raster image can still prove useful and isn't at all out of scope. Kingofthedead (talk) 06:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:53, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG is a bad format for this type of image and it has simplified many of the county borders GraydenCat (talk) 02:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG is a bad format for this type of image and it's redundant to File:Hawaii Presidential Election Results 2004.svg GraydenCat (talk) 02:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:39, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 02:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The size of the state is too narrow TylerKutschbach (talk) 01:48, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Not a valid reason for deletion. All maps are distorted in some way.  Mysterymanblue  07:05, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --P 1 9 9   01:51, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This type of election map is done with SVGs nowadays with File:Idaho Presidential Election Results 1976.svg replacing this png file TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:20, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 09:54, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file GraydenCat (talk) 02:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG is a bad format for this type of image and the state is misshapen in this file 2600:1009:B055:740:B5BE:8FEE:1DE4:F0D5 01:40, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted as the aspect ratio of Idaho is badly wrong beyond recognition in this image. And this image is unused, hence this is simply out of COM:SCOPE. The corresponding en:wp article uses File:Idaho Presidential Election Results 1976.svg instead where the aspect ratio is correct. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:47, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG is a bad format for this type of image and it's redundant to File:Connecticut Presidential Election Results 1980.svg GraydenCat (talk) 02:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate and unused TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 15:52, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and already has a svg file with File:Connecticut Presidential Election Results 1980.svg GraydenCat (talk) 02:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG is a bad format for this map and the map is misshapen GraydenCat (talk) 21:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Disruption by sock. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:40, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Tina Götz M2k~dewiki (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Tina Götz M2k~dewiki (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:34, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I added this photo and im want to delete Akkirman (talk) 00:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image tagged as {{Low quality chem}} due to ambiguous stereochemistry. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 14:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:32, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is secretly taken, is out of scope (not educational). I'm the uploader of the photo, but I can't log in. 223.74.241.186 05:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of scope. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted, OOS, no use. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:44, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader does not hold the copyright, photographer is H. Balmain for C. Robinson. Image is not in public domain. 83.148.238.230 10:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Can't find the proof of the photographer claim above but very unlikely to be own work, [7]. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Heypatell

[edit]

Possible copyvio: Screenshots from TV, Logos --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination, the TV channel logos might be below TOO but we have better versions for Star/ZEE ones already and the others are OOS. -- CptViraj (talk) 06:58, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, this is not a selfie and metadata points to Facebook. Günther Frager (talk) 15:00, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:03, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI generated fantasy woman; OOS Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Unused machine-generated content with no reasonably foreseeable use case. Omphalographer (talk) 17:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete – Low quality and I don't see why it could be valuable/inscope. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above. OOS, no use. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FilmTalks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Portraits of celebrities, probably screenshots of interviews or TV shows from YouTube and unlikely Own work.

D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for all as per nomination. File:AmalaPaul2021.jpg has a (broken) youtube link to [8] where you can spot the captured frame at around the 7:30 mark. No free license for the video. --Adjoka (talk) 21:22, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 07:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AI-generated images of real people for whom we have real photographs. These are out of COM:SCOPE as they are not used and are unlikely to ever be used.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An additional concern when an AI generates an image of a real person is that it must either 1) be inaccurate, or 2) be accurate, which means that it's closely regurgitating the photos used to train it, which may be copyrighted. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And what are those photos whose copyright is being violated? Trade (talk) 10:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know, but Generative AI can't come up with new ideas, it can only regurgitate what it's been fed, which means that if the images are accurate, they must have been fed actual photos of the subject. Considering what we know of the indiscriminate nature of their content scraping, it's unlikely those source photos are freely licensed. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Training AI generation models does not violate copyright. The Patent Office have stated that ad infinitum  Keep--Trade (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom – these are mere AI-generated faces adding nothing special of people of whom we already have good-quality images of. The image of Putin's face is low-quality. Prototyperspective (talk) 10:58, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used for spam --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:22, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photo: Out of scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 10:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot? ZimskoSonce (talk) 18:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ToyitomaOda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality OOS selfies and other personal travel photos that were important from Flickr. Commons isn't a personal file host.

Adamant1 (talk) 00:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I looked at a few. Some are posed pictures, not selfies. Those can be deleted. The photos of the plants in the greenhouse are useful if the name and location of the botanic garden can be identified. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: I'm not up on the area, but some of the photographs in the same series are probably of South Korea. So it's possible the photos of the plants in the greenhouse were taken either at Universal Studios Korea or the Korean Botanical Gardens. If not some other botanical garden/theme park in South Korea. --Adamant1 (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Kept those scenery stuff. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ToyitomaOda (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS selfies and images of a trip. Commons isn't a personal file host.

Adamant1 (talk) 00:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept those scenery stuff. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as unused and unlikely to be used; these are supposed to be firearms but there's so much bad geometry that these don't fit the bill.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete – Very low quality and so far unclear how/why they could be useful/valuable. Prototyperspective (talk) 12:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:14, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: Personal selfie with bad positioning: for the one person we have plenty of better pictures; the other doesn't seem to be relevant for WP Enyavar (talk) 02:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: see COM:TOO Singapore. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:16, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 06:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sketch for the file :File:Konvergující pavučina.jpg Gampe (talk) 07:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sketch for the file File:Divergující pavučina.jpg Gampe (talk) 07:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sketch for the file :File:Oscilující pavučina.jpg Gampe (talk) 07:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to actually be copyrighted by Hospital News Ewingdo (talk) 07:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark 2001:448A:11A3:1CF9:8090:A68F:5BA8:3E64 08:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts about the copyrights. Big watermark on the picture Lefringant (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts about the copyrights. Watermark on the picture Lefringant (talk) 08:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photo: Out of scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 10:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Photo: Out of scope of the project Michel Bakni (talk) 10:17, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Michel Bakni (talk) 10:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was cropped from a copyrighted image. You can see the image at https://www.harpersbazaar.co.kr/article/78282 Motoko C. K. (talk) 10:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Starcow92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fake license of a logo. Can't be own. And also a useless chart. A part of a promo. Was :-)

Bilderling (talk) 10:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 10:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Serves no educational purpose, was only used on a sandbox page on nlwiki and that page has been deleted. Mbch331 (talk) 10:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Niconico. Solomon203 (talk) 11:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A cropped, slightly edited and unused version of File:Messier 106 composite.jpg (and not an own work) C messier (talk) 12:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LiveIsle2022 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probable copyvios, given the uploader's history.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:37, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Flyer for a show CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a website, Possible ad CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source should be own work; is it? Currently it says "Source Natural"; Moreover, it's not a the "work of a computer algorithm"; the cats and unclarities regarding what it should illustrate that this file is problematic Prototyperspective (talk) 13:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's very clearly somebody's photograph of what they're saying is a goat, but it's not particularly good image. Commons already has many better photographs of goats.  Delete Belbury (talk) 10:13, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-encyclopedic, out of scope of Wikimedia Commons. Till (talk) 13:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Described as a foto pessoal ("personal photo"), this image also appears at https://www.museudelisboa.pt/en/events/paulo-tato-marinho copyrighted to Museu de Lisboa. Belbury (talk) 13:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, no permission of Jacobo Medrano visible Alabasterstein (talk) 13:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scale-down duplicate of File:Tourischeva cortada.JPG. 0x0a (talk) 14:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubled at File:Meyers b7 s0238 b1.png Mapmarks (talk) 14:40, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: other file deleted by someone. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad license, the copyright holder demands "non-commercial" https://news.mit.edu/terms-of-use Mateus2019 (talk) 14:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

video of Google Maps; afaik not CCBY? Prototyperspective (talk) 14:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 15:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Skivsamlare (talk) 15:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Skivsamlare (talk) 15:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam by non-contributor, we already have File:Cristofano dell'altissimo, saladino, ante 1568 - Serie Gioviana.jpg Estopedist1 (talk) 16:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Soyo126 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: fictitious flags.

Omphalographer (talk) 16:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company rep ("My last company has asked me to upload this file"), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:22, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 16:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from the same original photo as was the file deleted IAW this discussion. Fourthords | =Λ= | 16:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: low-quality duplicate of File:A Friend in Need 1903 C.M.Coolidge.jpg with logo overlaid on one corner. Omphalographer (talk) 17:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: blurry photo of a recorder with a 3.5 star rating in the corner (?!!) and a spammy, machine-generated description. Omphalographer (talk) 18:04, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by nonnotable individual, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:54, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 20:55, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FLICKRWASH for couples of reason: File metadata says it was taken on 14 April 2021 (2.5 years ago). It was uploaded on flicker 27 November 2023 (same day it was transferd on commons by a new user). How does "user:Zaku Bro" knows someone uploaded this photo on Flicker? And on flicker Sajidul Islam Pathan has only one other upload from 2022. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 21:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mauricio Chemes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own work, the person depicted cannot be a the same time the photographer on these images.

Günther Frager (talk) 23:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused bad GIF, superseded by a PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talkcontribs), 23:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.instagram.com/cafeterialamiavita/ watermark ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javadst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of their other uploads have been deleted as copyright violations. Many of these look quite impossible to be own works.

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:25, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. I marked many of the user's copyvios recently and it is unlikely any of these images are "own work". Günther Frager (talk) 08:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment per metadata, File:نمایی از دریاچهٔ صورتی‌رنگ مهارلو به همراه پوشش گیاهی.jpg, File:نمایی از دریاچهٔ صورتی‌رنگ مهارلو.jpg and File:نمایی از دریاچه مهارلو در غروب.jpg are user's own work. Can be confirmed with a simple VTRS request. I can't speak for the rest.-- Arian (talk) 08:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
نمایی از دریاچهٔ صورتی‌رنگ مهارلو به همراه پوشش گیاهی.jpg, File:نمایی از دریاچهٔ صورتی‌رنگ مهارلو.jpg and File:نمایی از دریاچه مهارلو در غروب.jpg Captured by me.
File:Chalcomitra Rubescens.ogg This Sound Recorded by me.
پروانه طبابت رجایی راد.jpg Its Print screen captured (captured by me) from this website: https://membersearch.irimc.org/member/profile?id=eb1b1ca0-f599-4b08-b649-1e3cc05a3e7a
File:StoryDrrajaeerad.png I Print screen captured from Instagram (Story) account of Dr Fateme Rejaee Rad.
File:Achaemenid inscription in the Kharg Island.jpg This is not my work but it was released under public license and I improved the image quality.
File:نقشه پراکندگی.png Design by me. (I Use Openstreet map to design this.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Javadst (talk • contribs) 10:16, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:اندام‌های دستگاه تولید مثل زنانه.jpg I have retranslated this image and retouched it and improved the quality.
File:JavadRoohi.jpg This is not my work but I improved the image quality and retouched it.
File:Ancient-persian-queen-cylinder-seal.webp This is not my work but I improved the image quality.
File:JSNP-257-P11.jpg Its Captured from the Islamic Republic newspaper in 1980.
File:Navid Afkari's last statement in her own voice.ogg This is the voice of the article's owner (Navid Afkari - He has been murdered) and he himself published it for public release.(In this voice, he also says that he has recorded his voice for all the people of the world.)
File:The Great Darius Dam.jpg Its Captured from from keyhan newspaper in 1980.
File:ArtificialWaves.jpg This is not my work I got this image from here https://artificialwaves.bandcamp.com/album/fragile

Javadst (talk) 09:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, except File:نمایی از دریاچهٔ صورتی‌رنگ مهارلو به همراه پوشش گیاهی.jpg, File:نمایی از دریاچهٔ صورتی‌رنگ مهارلو.jpg, File:نمایی از دریاچه مهارلو در غروب.jpg (assume own work, AGF). --Wdwd (talk) 09:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Javadst (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Warning, explicit content ahead.

I would like to echo Chiselinccc's concerns expressed at en:User talk:Autisticeditor 20/Archive 1#Revert my Edit:

Nudity and sexuality are no problem, and Wikipedia isn't censored. However, why on earth do the women in your "art" need to be wearing stockings and other decorative accoutrements, but not the men? Do you have any capacity to reflect on the prurient nature of this Playboy-esque "design choice"? You may be shocked to find this out, but what you apparently think lesbian sex consists of is entirely drawn from the pornography industry's theatrical performativity. Your "lesbian sex" characterizations are frankly shameful, and solely represent what voyeuristic males wish to see.

I would say the concerns expressed in this quotation trump the educationality of the images, also in the light of having alternatives for them that do not suffer from these problems (well, except the piledriver images).

Ltalc (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And I forgot to note, I know these image are being used on Wikipedias, and this does not affect my concerns in any way. Ltalc (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Procedural keep COM:INUSE is pretty clear: it's not on Commons to make editorial decisions for other projects. If you think there are better images to illustrate the article these images are used in, follow those respective wikis' policies and procedures to replace them. While the images are legitimately in use, they're within scope here on Commons. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:41, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted non-free Ovedc (talk) 05:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Ovedc: Do you suspect an issue with the VTRS ticket? The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, didn't see it. If the ticket is OK, please close my request, thanks! Ovedc (talk) 05:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR withdrawn; If there are any doubts about the ticket, please ask at the Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard. --Wdwd (talk) 10:34, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim of own work is dubious. This image is typical of football player profile images from team web sites. Uploader's other images are copyright violations. Whpq (talk) 14:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 02:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - marked as users own work, but http://kunjanaghimire.com shows "Kunjana Ghimire © 2021 | All Right Reserved" Jonathan Deamer (talk) 12:12, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:23, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:20, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a 1964 photograph by French cinema still photographer Victor Rodrigue (1923–2016). While it was taken in Italy, that does not mean that Italy is the source country of the work as far as copyright is concerned, that is (usually) the country of first publication. For a photo taken by a French photographer on the set of a French film, the source country is much more likely France, where the photograph is still protected until the end of 2086. Therefore, unless some really convincing rationale to the contrary is presented, the files should be deleted per the precautionary principle. They can be restored in 2087.

Rosenzweig τ 20:18, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Per File talk:Tournage-Italie-Corniaud-1964.png, the photo was published in Italy in 1965. But was it first published there? Per IMdb, the film on the set of which the photo was taken was released in France first, on March 24, 1965. Five other countries followed before the film was released in Italy on November 26, 1965. That makes it quite unlikely that the photo's first publication was in Italy. --Rosenzweig τ 20:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I doubt that this is a photograph of the kind that is covered by {{PD-Italy}} ("[...] images of people or of aspects, elements and facts of natural or social life [...]"). It is also not a film frame, but a still photograph taken by a separate photographer with a separate camera, and neither is it a "reproduction[...] of figurative art". So this would appear to be a "work[..] of photographic art" per Italian law, protected for 70 years after the author's death just like in France. --Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello,
First I have to aknowledge before I began to import files several years ago, that I did refer to some qualified administrators as such as Patrick Rogel (RIP) or Racconish to have their expertise on those type of cases of a "simple photography taken in Italy" before 1976.
This type of case has been judged several times before by Commons administrators. You car refer to these decisions for instance :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:DeFunes-Dynam-1965-Italie.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Louis_de_Fun%C3%A8s_%E2%80%94_L%27Homme_orchestre_(1970).jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:FrancoiseHardy-1967-Venise-ReportagePhoto.png
This film has been exploited in 1965 in Italy ("Colpo grosso ma non troppo"). The Italian law doesn't refer to the origin of the photographer or his agency, neighter the "first publication" date, to be first published "in Italy", but :
"This photograph is subject to the provisions of Italy's Law for the Protection of Copyright and Neighbouring Rights because it was either created in Italy or may be considered an Italian work within the meaning of Italian law (Art. 189).
Italian law makes an important distinction between "works of photographic art" and "simple photographs" (Art. 2, § 7). Works of photographic art are protected for 70 years after the author's death (Art. 32 bis), whereas simple photographs are only protected for a period of 20 years from creation (Art. 92).
Simple photographs are defined by the law as "images of persons, or of aspects, elements or events of natural or social life, obtained by photographic or analogous processes, including reproductions of works of figurative art and stills of cinematographic film" (Art. 87).
This photograph is a part of several pictures used to make promotion of the movie around the world, including Italy, starting 1965.
You can also refer to this :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template_talk:PD-Italy
Regards. Tisourcier (talk) 11:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All of that is not new to me, and it isn't really the question. The question is: Is this really an "Italian photograph", or : Is Italy the source country of this photograph? Which usually means, was it published there first? This isn't a matter of Italian law, but of the Berne Convention and Wikimedia Commons policy. You did not address that question at all. As I explained above, I think France is much more likely to be the source country here. Also, as explained above as well, I do have doubts that this photo is a "simple" photograph per Italian law. It's not a film frame, it's not a photo of some 3D artwork, and I doubt it's an "aspect, element or event of natural or social life". Though that definition is so broad you could probably bend it to cover just about everything. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is your interpretation of the Italian law.
The origin of the photographer of agency is not specified in the italian rules but only if the photograph has been taken the picture there.
This picture is not a piece of art, so it is a "simple" photography according to Italian law.
Some Commons administrators had to refer to theses cases before, and they made the decision to validate their publication here.
In this case, the date before the year 1976 is very important, especially about Berne Convention. If a country has considered a photograph under PD, the others countries wich are under the same convention consider that they have to apply the same rules as reciprocity agreements.
Ragrds. Tisourcier (talk) 12:03, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reciprocity agreements :
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_of_the_shorter_term
So even for U.S.A (Commons), for the photograph taken before 1976, the PD-Itly applies. Tisourcier (talk) 12:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And another case closed in 2018 :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Dalida Tisourcier (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I know about the rule of the shorter term. But it isn't applied from one EU country to another, and it is not applied in the USA, both stated in en:Rule of the shorter term. This deletion request is still about Wikimedia policy, about which country we here at Wikimedia Commons consider to be the source country (or country of origin, as it is called in the Berne Convention I think) for our purposes, as per Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law. As I explained above, for this photo I think this is much more likely France than Italy. Please address the core questions and stop copying these walls of text that are irrelevant here. --Rosenzweig τ 13:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On this precise point :
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:1965_Eurovision_Song_Contest_-_France_Gall.jpg Tisourcier (talk) 13:40, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Italian law is precise about the "fist creation" and not the "first publication". So PD-Italy applies. Tisourcier (talk) 13:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is not "On this precise point". It does not at all address the question of the source country / country of origin. That Italian law perhaps or even probably considers the photo to be in the PD is completely irrelevant for Wikimedia Commons if the source country is France. --Rosenzweig τ 13:54, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First, you asked for "publication" (first) and the "origin" of the author or agency (non italian). Now you ask for new points.
The origin of the photographer or agency is not relevant. "Source" or "origin" country is not speficied in Italian law for PD about a photography taken before 1976. A lot of files of these types are allready published in Commons, for several years and have been approved. So please let others experts or admins involved to argue and decide if these files are PD-Italy and can be in Commons. Tisourcier (talk) 14:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, from your contributions it's clear that you don't really understand the core problem here, despite numerous attempts to explain. So further discussion with you is pointless, and I will stop discussing this with you. --Rosenzweig τ 14:24, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: as explained by those before me — danyele 16:23, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment With reference to Rodrigue's stills, though the Italian copyright law computes the copyright duration from the creation date, we still have to consider the first publication to assess which national copyright law prevails. The Berne Convention and the Geneva Convention signed by France and Italy are applicable to this matter. Since we have no argument to assert they were first published in Italy, we have to assume (principle of precaution) they were either (a) first published in France where the film was first released or (b) published simultaneously (i.e. within 30 days) in both countries. In the first case (a), per the Berne Convention, the French copyright applies. In the second case (b), per the Geneva Convention, the French copyright also applies since it is more favorable to the author. — Racconish💬 15:01, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Besides being a co-production, the film was first premiered in Italy in February 1965, and only more than one month later it was projeted in France [9]. It is then clearly an Italian film for Commons' guidelines, thus PD-Italy. Ruthven (msg) 08:47, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonfree: from w:Great Soviet Encyclopedia: [10] Altenmann (talk) 00:11, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with deletion. May you suggest a way to create a brand new map with similar information using i.e CC0 or CC BY-SA, avoiding copyviol? Thanks. Ciaurlec (talk) 22:26, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license at source. I don't speak the language, or know the country this is from, but this could be below applicable COM:TOO. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was not able to find out in which type of creative common belongs to, so I used the one I believed was right choice. This file is included in publicly open source (economic magazine) - only thing you can read from it (in english too) is that, you cant reproduce the article of it without approval of original author.
So if I made a mistake in this, please help me fix it. I used the website (and URL too) in this file. St64373 (talk) 13:02, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no evidence is free licensed by creator. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No free license at source. I don't speak the language, or know the country this is from, but this could be below applicable COM:TOO. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was not able to find out in which type of creative common belongs to, so I used the one I believed was right choice. This file is included in publicly open source (economic magazine) - only thing you can read from it (in english too) is that, you cant reproduce the article of it without approval of original author.
So if I made a mistake in this, please help me fix it. I used the website (and URL too) in this file. St64373 (talk) 13:03, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:14, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright either of the BBC or Capita (who operates TV Licensing for the BBC). {{PD-EdictGov}} does not apply (as suggested in Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2020/05#File:TV_licence_(3714001810).png_UK_TV_license_copyright) as the text does not have the force of law and is not perscribed by law. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, obviously not old enough to be in PD A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; "Source = art class", vague source; no verifiable free license from creator. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flagge-seminolen-mukasuki.png Rainbowlack (talk) 03:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mdaniels5757 as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ 03:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Definitely below TOO US, no clue re TOO Ukraine. Krd deleted an identical file Special:Undelete/File:Tabletochki_logo_1.png, but I don't know if they considered TOO--thoughts? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
{{PD-UA-exempt}} said something which seems indicate that logos in Ukraine are most likely PD per se?
(d) State symbols of Ukraine, government awards; symbols and signs of government authorities, the Armed Forces of Ukraine and other military formations; symbols of territorial communities; symbols and signs of enterprises, institutions and organizations;
Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 08:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hello! This is logo of a big Ukranian charity foundation, and they gave me permission to put this logo on wiki (and they can proof it by an email). Can You, please, help me to do it in a correct way? PopelonBelvil (talk) 12:31, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:VRT Copyright holder needs to show explicit permission from free license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, still no evidence of permission to free license from copyright holder. (If proper permission is recieved via VRT, image can be undeleted.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Bad angled selfie Enyavar (talk) 03:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: One of the two people is a regional politician of some note, caption suggests the other person might be as well. Mediocre snapshot, but seems in scope; categories edited accordingly. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:39, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious PD rationale, random date of creation, no evidence that Slovenian legislation is applicable and that the photo was published before 1970. Komarof (talk) 03:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ruditaly as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Bandera equivocada. La bandera de Reyes tiene los colores invertidos, es decir el rojo arriba y el blanco abajo. Ya - Not eligible for speedy deletion but also doesn't appear to be in scope The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:41, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Matthewfoliverathotmaildotcom

[edit]

User Matthewfoliverathotmaildotcom mass-uploaded files from Art UK and classified all as Creative Commons licenses, many even with the uploader incorrectly marked as the creator of the work; however, these appear to be copyrighted by the artist's estate with no evidence of free licensing. Dan Leonard (talk) 04:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all but one per nom & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:43, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: one file, as per [11]. Yann (talk) 08:10, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Undeleted another file, which has the same case as above. Abzeronow (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kacamata as no source (No source since) ... I don't see a reason why the uploader's 'own work' claim should not be regarded as credible. Geo Swan (talk) 06:05, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I see no reason why it was tagged; looks consistent with user's other uploads; not found elsewhere in reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:46, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt regarding license. This photo is also being used by the official website of his employer https://www.nporadio5.nl/sterrennl/nieuws/social-update/ab22c7d8-bb02-4b17-b0b8-424044f780fc/babynieuws-perry-kramps-wordt-vader TheGoodEndedHappily (talk) 08:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The NPO website says that use of their photos is not allowed without permission: https://over.npo.nl/organisatie/privacy-en-security/algemene-voorwaarden-online#copyright
So I support this deletion request.  Support Mondo (talk) 11:25, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I  Support this request. MLTRock (talk) 15:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:47, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ça contient une erreur. Afek91 (talk) 09:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request; collage of unsourced images. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:48, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il y a une erreur Afek91 (talk) 10:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per uploader request; unsourced collage. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of source images was deleted already in 2018 due to missing permission, making the whole collage copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File is in use in many places, so replacing the offending image is the way to go, not deletion. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep; I've uploaded a new version with the deleted image gone. (Some of the images were stretched awkwardly in the original collage; I've corrected that as well.) An admin will need to revdel the original collage. Omphalographer (talk) 17:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: new version; old version with copyviol in collage Deleted. Text link to deleted image removed. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded twice Afek91 (talk) 11:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flag is a hoax. A republic of Alrawashdeh does not exist. Wolverène (talk) 11:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • This is part of a cross-Wiki hoax. The flag is a fantasy flag elsewhere presented as the flag of a non-existant russian okrug. A declined article draft at en:Draft:Alrawashdeh-Orda Buryat Okrug is just stuff copied from articles about the Ust-Orda Buryat Autonomous Okrug that did exist until 2008 with a few changes made to it. Element at Wikidata (now speedily deleted) was similarly combining this flag and maps of Ust-Orda. --TU-nor (talk) 12:07, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:54, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

inSign is no longer part of iS2. The logo is redundant. 2003:D8:9F4E:1100:4DEB:6091:C44D:2EE8 12:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep doesn't seem to be a valid reason to delete. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image, with better quality alternatives (such as File:Reading station 20th June 2022 07.jpg. Chris j wood (talk) 14:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: poor quality, but no consensus to delete. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:00, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be from Jill P. Carter's campaign website, and the pixels visible from zooming into the image suggest that this photo was taken on the uploader's computer monitor. Y2hyaXM (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:01, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Stephmorales022 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios uploaded as part of en:Wikipedia:Education_noticeboard#"Off_the_rails"_school_project_resuming. User's other two uploads were photos found online and falsely claimed as own work (because these students are being given no guidance about copyright); I can't trace the source of these two other images but assume it's the same situation.

Belbury (talk) 15:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:02, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COPYVIO, the Peanuts characters are still under copyright, unable to be commercially used by others Oaktree b (talk) 15:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:03, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is a work made by Yandex. Yandex do not allow to use its content. Nord794ub (talk) 16:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be an own work, probably from Google Earth. Harold (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality sunset snapshot with no educational value Q0ywo (talk) 18:39, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; low quality image without evident compensating value. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is of course not own work and the upper two logo's are not only containing letters or simple geometric shapes. IHengeveld (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:23, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation appears to be a screen grab from a Defence Matrix video FOX 52 (talk) 20:28, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:29, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If you don't know the author, how can you be sure at the close of this photo and the assumption of the author's death 70 years later Wilfredor (talk) 20:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy Keep Photo from 1906, has been in the public domain for many decades already. Also, the applicable law for this case in Portugal (pre-1997) do not cares about who is the creator, but only the time of the creation, to determine what is in the public domain. Darwin Ahoy! 21:20, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: Wilfredor, you’re walking stomping on thin ice, again. -- Tuválkin 01:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keep the date is right there. Rkieferbaum (talk) 02:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:33, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source hence no evidence it is public domain Altenmann (talk) 23:46, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per RAN. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown photograph, photo without date. Suzanne Cesaire lived 1915-1966, so the photo cannot be from 2021. Nicola (talk) 23:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep If we deleted every image where the uploader used the default upload date as the date of creation, we would have no images. We know the image is circa 1945 from other dated images of her and the style of dress. --RAN (talk) 01:57, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    • If this image was taken 1945 it is fair to expect that the unknown photographer survived the next decades, perhaps he/she ist still living. Your attitude toward legal rights of creators is bad for Wikimedia Commons. There is no proof when it was published the first time, it was just scanned fron a unnamed source. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 12:37, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion; NOT a scan from original, web resolution image without source given; reverse image search shows online for more than a decade before Commons upload. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:37, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deplicate image. See better definition version at File:北海道霊芝の鹿角霊芝収穫前.JPG Pompilos (talk) 16:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rising27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

movie screenshot or sth?

RZuo (talk) 17:10, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licença imcompativel Silvana de Souza (talk) 20:47, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by krd. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:55, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created from incorrect data bluetime93 💬 13:26, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Zhxy 519 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Marking as possible copyvio because A restoration work during 1987-1989 by Choi Kwang-su (1932-1990), no copyright released. MGA73 (talk) 10:41, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

More for reference:

--Zhxy 519 (talk) 13:44, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... That is indeed a special case, as the restoration was basically a recreation of half the image. That's clearly not an usual restoration task. Do we know when the original was that badly damaged and whether there exist pictures of the image before it was destroyed? If the image was destroyed long ago and there are no pictures how it looked before, the restoration would indeed include the artists creative activity. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
According to [12], the original was damaged on 26 Dec 1954. Unfortunately no photo found taken before the damage. Zhxy 519 (talk) 03:33, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as the WMF does not recognize "sweat of the brow" copyright. holly {chat} 23:06, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created from incorrect data bluetime93 💬 13:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination since it's unused anywhere. holly {chat} 23:26, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur de la carte. Création du fichier avec la mauvaise extension. Import d'un autre fichier au format SVG. Augusta 89 (talk) 14:14, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Next time, you can use {{speedydelete|G7}} for your own recently uploaded and unused files. holly {chat} 23:27, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Ukraine. The monument was inaugurated in 1987 and the cited authors were sculptor Обезюка Миколи Наумовича (still alive) and architects Босенка Миколи Олександровича and Жигуліна Валентина Костянтиновича.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:09, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The park apparently dates to 1966, so the sculpture must have been displayed there in the same year (or later).

Assuming 1966 as the year of public display, it is a pre-1978 fine art still copyrighted in the United States (established by the 1994 Uruguay Round Agreements Act that Commons must follow). U.S. copyright expires on January 1, 2062 (provided that it is also from 1966 just like the park). However, there is no immediate information on when this monument was exactly erected or who was its sculptor, to determine copyright status in Ukraine. As Ukraine does not allow commercial freedom of panorama, Commons may need to take this image down per COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:34, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michaelnacario24 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of these images and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the originals overwrite these FB-derived images, if the images are truly self-photographed works of the uploader.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 21:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:41, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Protected by copyrigt, Freedom of panorama is not working ether. Lukas Beck (talk) 21:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 23:42, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicts a person in a vulnerable position, as well as several easily identifiable individuals. COM:DIGNITY LevandeMänniska (talk), 23:01, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - doesn't seem to be in scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from Vasiliy Takhtay's official Instagram account: https://vesti.kz/mixedfights/obschiy-rekord-94-0-top-10-nepobejdennyih-boytsov-kazahstana-319028/, https://tengrisport.kz/tnsport/obschiy-rekord-94-0-top-10-nepobejdennyih-boytsov-kazahstana-482039/ ZimskoSonce (talk) 23:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial freedom of panorama is not granted in Ukraine. The monument was erected in 1974. This means the sculptor is not yet dead for more than 70 years for the monument to be in public domain in Ukraine. Also, as a pre-1978 monument, may be eligible for U.S. copyright through Uruguay Round Agreements Act, which means even if this monument becomes free in Ukraine, the images should not be undeleted until U.S. copyright expires (1974+95+1 years). URAA can be ignored if Ukraine had commercial FoP (which would have made {{Not-free-US-FOP}} applicable here).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


While the rest is true, the comment about URAA is confusing here. We've never cared about URAA for pictures of monuments that fall under FOP.
I really think somebody should ask the Ukraine government to establish FOP, as a precondition for entering the EU ;-) Most of these monuments will anyway be destroyed at the end of the war, unfortunatelly. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:57, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@PaterMcFly no hope for Ukraine in my opinion. Ukrainian Wikimedians lobbied for an adequate FoP at least for public outdoors and exteriors, beginning in 2014, but look at what their legislature gave in Dec. last year (2022): a non-commercial FoP (see COM:FOP Ukraine), with their legislature making a dubious claim that the 2022 amendments, such as the non-commercial FoP, they introduced are in accordance with EU model. (Non-commercial FoP in accordance with EU model? Very dubious claim.) The fact that their legislature introduced non-commercial FoP may have been a big slap to Ukrainian Wikimedians that had been lobbying for a sufficient FoP for about eight years (from 2014 up to last year). This also means the famous Kharkiv Regional Administration Building (the target of Russian strikes in March last year) still remains not free for commercial CC licensing on Commons (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Sumska 64, Kharkiv).
For URAA, many public domain Slovenian monuments have been redeleted because of direct conflict with URAA (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sveti Janez Marija Vianej.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Trnovo Bridge as two examples). If Slovenia had commercial FoP, we wouldn't mind about URAA and instead slap all Slovenian monuments with {{Not-free-US-FOP}} tag, whether still under copyright or not. The same is true for Ukrainian monuments, whether copyrighted or in public domain, U.S. copyright doesn't matter as long as we can slap those images with that tag. But as Ukrainian FoP is invalid (non-commercial only), that tag is also invalid for Ukrainian monuments. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, understood. Thanks for the clarification. I thought you where arguing that URAA would need to apply even for countries that do have commercial FOP, such as germany. PaterMcFly (talk) 09:37, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:59, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial freedom of panorama is not permitted in Ukraine. Removal in 2014 does not magically eliminate sculptors' posthumous copyrights. The statue dates to 1957 and is co-authored by late sculptors Макар Вронський (d. 1994) and Олексій Олійник (d. 1977) as well as late architect Олександр Сидоренко (unknown death date).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:51, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Erastophanes as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.rifugi-omg-formazza.it/?page_id=141 Friedo (talk) 13:15, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Die Seite ist öffentlich (Link enthalten bei Rifugio 3A). Der Fotograf ergab sich nicht daraus; sicher kann man auch eine andere Lizenz wählen. Einen Löschgrund sehe ich allerdings nicht.--Friedo (talk) 13:23, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Die Seite hat keine Angaben zum Urheberrecht, zumindest habe ich nichts gefunden. Daher kann man nicht davon ausgehen, dass die Inhalte Public Domain sind, das Internet ist kein rechtsfreier Raum. Der Fotograf wäre, wenn er das Foto direkt nach Erbauen der Hütte geschossen hätte, und dann gestorben wäre, grade mal 44 Jahre tot, das ist weniger als 70. Du hast doch, nach deriner Benutzerdisk hier, schon mehr Erfahrungen mit dem Urheberrecht gemacht. Ohne Freigabe des Fotografen geht nix, bei unbekanntem fotografen greift die pragmatische Lösung 100 (oder 120?) Jahre nach Veröffentlichung ... Erastophanes (talk) 19:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich werde versuchen, den Fotografen herauszufinden oder eine Erlaubnis des Vereins zur Veröffentlichung zu erhalten. Friedo (talk) 08:45, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich habe den Verein angeschrieben, bislang aber noch keine Antwort erhalten. --Friedo (talk) 09:32, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; if the website releases it under a free license, we can restore it. holly {chat} 18:03, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ist mir nicht verständlich, wieso das bereits früher veröffentlichte Bild gelöscht wurde. Ich bitte um Wiederherstellung. Friedo

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date and not own work Xocolatl (talk) 18:33, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; note that the EXIF info indicates the file was created by a Samsung phone, so "own work" probably refers to the fact that the uploader took a photo of an existing photo with their phone. holly {chat} 18:05, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably wrong date and not own work Xocolatl (talk) 18:38, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; note that the EXIF info indicates the file was created by a Samsung phone, so "own work" probably refers to the fact that the uploader took a photo of an existing photo with their phone. holly {chat} 18:06, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I contest this licence on flickr. The account is very new, no followers, no nothing, and Kocaelispor does not have a link from the official website to this flickr account. Looks like someone simply took the official photos and created this flickr account to falsely claim cc licence.... https://kocaelispor.com.tr/ If this flickr account IS a valid account, Kocaelispor should confirm this to Commons. Xia (talk) 19:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Xia: , I am founder member of Wikimedia Community User Group Turkey, We are encouraging content sharing with this type of sport clubs. Last year photographers sharing with his acoount FFÇetin, you can see linkedin and instagram his personal accounts. And this year they decided create new account for club. As you can see almost all photos studio photos. I hope this explanation is OK. Regards, Zafer (talk) 19:36, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zafer They should link this account from an official page or send a letter to commons. Anyone can make an account on flickr and claim it's official. Having personal connections is great but we need to think about traceability of licences in 10, 20, 30+ years too. Xia (talk) 19:43, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Xia: , I can ask them for this type of icon for their website but If they close website or change domain how can we trace after 10 years? "I think" Community members are reliable users, aren't we? Regards, Zafer (talk) 19:50, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zafer: archive sites like The Internet Archive, and Licence Reviewers.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 01:31, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Jeff G.: , you sent warn meesage, but i didn't commit any violations. Our last year cooperatin news release is here and also You can find evidence of the meeting here last July. Zafer (talk) 05:52, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zafer: You uploaded File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Justice and Development Party (Turkey) - İsmail Kaşdemir - Canakkale.JPG in violation of COM:POSTER. There are more redlinks on your user talk page and the edit history thereof.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 16:26, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dear @Jeff G.: , I was uploaded many years ago, as you can see my recent uploaded there are no any upload like this. I have more then 10.000 files. I am not deleting or hiding deleted file message. All of them staying there. Also you can see my deleted changes more than 4500 deleted change. Almost all of them delete request. I always try to be a useful user. Please consider this too. Regards, Zafer (talk) 16:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And also if you are search on Google here resolution is 1080 × 1350, Flickr copy is 3.814 × 4.488. Regards, Zafer (talk) 06:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I will trust that Zafer did everything properly. However, it would definitely be a plus if the club could link to their Flickr account from their website. holly {chat} 18:19, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vladlenlos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader's account is not verified as Kira Yarmysh's personal account. It is unlikely that the depicted person is the photographer too.

A.Savin 18:58, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Info: after this DR was started, @Skazi: marked File:Kira Yarmysh.jpg as possible copyvio because it’s avalable also at https://www.instagram.com/p/CHIEUSzjfrr/. -- Tuválkin 12:58, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And another photo was published at the Guardian website. Skazi 13:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ordered a universal replace of both with File:Berlin UdL Navalny's Cell Opening asv2023-01 img16.jpg, but CommonsDelinker doesn't seem to be running at the moment, so we can delete after the bot comes back online. holly {chat} 18:10, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I have replaced the images. --A.Savin 18:39, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 19:27, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source is open access (meaning it's available without payment), but I can't find any evidence it's relased under what Commons consideres a free license * Pppery * it has begun... 18:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I cropped to the ultrasound which is PD-medical. Hid the original version that had a possibly unfree photograph. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:14, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this is available under a free license * Pppery * it has begun... 18:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep {{PD-automated}} -- as an MRI image, no human creativity was involved. holly {chat} 23:40, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Holly. PD-medical could also work. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:15, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ahecht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images from an MRI machine are not CCTV or traffic enforcement camera footage, so PD automated doesn't apply.. Previously kept at DR. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:26, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-medical}} would presumably be the more approprivate PD tag if this is indeed in the public domain. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:29, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Pppery {{PD-medical}} links to meta:Wikilegal/Copyright of Medical Imaging, which generally only endorses the idea that medical images are public domain in the United States. I'm not sure whether it applies to images created in Turkey. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 01:19, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, these are not purely automatic photo's, arrows are added for analysis of the results. So therefore this is copyrighted imho. --Ellywa (talk) 19:50, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was uploaded with a {{PD-France}} license tag and the claim that it is a "Collective" work (a category in French copyright law), but the site it was taken from clearly says it's a photo by French photographer fr:Jean Moral (1906–1999). So this photo is not "collective", but the work of an individual, and it is still protected in France until the end of 2069. So the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2070. Rosenzweig τ 21:52, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright holder is not necessarily also the author. In this case, the author is named as Jean Moral. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to the French law, if the author (photographer) works officially for an agency, even when his name is specified, this is collective work.
Studio Harcourt photos have been judged to be collective works [13]
This judgement makes a "juris prudence" in France, so the "70 years after the photo has been taken" rule applies.
Regards. Tisourcier (talk) 12:44, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've read quite a bit about collective works in French copyright for another deletion request. We have {{PD-France}} for collective works, which says right in the template The collective work status is quite restrictive, please make sure that it is actually established. Is it for this case? en.wp has an article on these collective works, en:Collective work (France), which says The concept of a collective work (œuvre collective) in French law is complicated and unclear, [...] The article goes on to say that all authorities agree that the concept of an oeuvre collective in France covers dictionaries, encyclopaedias and periodical works such as newspapers or magazines.

Here and here are two articles about court cases from 2014 and 2017. The second one immediately starts by saying that such court decisions declaring photographs to be collective works are rare ("Rares sont les décisions de justice admettant qu’une œuvre photographique est une œuvre collective"). The French Ministry of Culture, in this guideline for photographs in cultural institutions, calls collective works "rare exceptions". So it's not like such decisions are common. On the contrary, the norm in French intellectual property law, as confirmed in the first article linked above, is not collective works, but works by individual authors, persons, not corporations. Collective works were introduced in 1957 mainly for the cases I mentioned above (dictionaries, encyclopaedias and periodical works such as newspapers or magazines), even if at least one court has now applied them to specific photographs.

Both of the court cases, decided by the same court, same pôle (the one for intellectual property law), same chamber, in Paris, revolve around photographers employed by companies, in 2014 the Studio Harcourt, in 2017 some online merchant of clothes, shoes and fashion accessoires, hence the 2014 "studio" case and the 2017 "fashion photos" case. The first was brought by the photographer, the second by the company, but essentially in both cases the photographers wanted to retain control of their photographs and also additional payment for additional uses, while the companies wanted complete control over how the photographs were used, without any additional payments beyond what they had payed the photographer initially. So the companies argued that these photos were collective works because all the prerequisites demanded for this by article L.113-2 alinéa 3 of the French Code de la propriété intellectuelle (intellectual property law) were fulfilled, namely that (my summary) the work was created upon the initiative of a (natural or legal) person which edited this work, published and distributed it under his/her/its direction, and that the individual contributions of the various people involved cannot be distinguished anymore ("sur l’initiative d’une personne physique ou morale qui l’édite, la publie et la divulgue sous sa direction et son nom et dans laquelle la contribution personnelle des divers auteurs participant à son élaboration se fond dans l’ensemble en vue duquel elle est conçue, sans qu’il soit possible d’attribuer à chacun d’eux un droit distinct sur l’ensemble réalisé"), and the court agreed.

The court then decided, after hearing the case, reviewing evidence that was brought etc. that the photographers and other people involved (stylists, lighting, make-up) were basically working under such tight guidelines regulating every detail of the photographs that they did not have any room to express any creativity of their own, so that the resulting photographs basically reflected the studio's or company's style and one cannot identify any individual contributions anymore; therefore these photos are collective works by the reasoning of this court.

That court was able to decide these two cases after reviewing the facts brought in each case, which apparently included detailed insights into how photographs are created in these companies. For this photo, we have nothing of the sort, we don't know how it worked back then for Jean Moral. Unlike the 2014 and 2017 cases, we don't have a court case for Jean Moral or this ageny. Finally, a 1934 photographer certainly wasn't expecting his photographs to be "collective works" when that whole category was only introduced into French IP law in 1957.

tl;dr: For the reasons given above, we should definitively not jump to the conclusion that all photos where some kind of French agency is attached are collective works. Unlike a court, we don't have the necessary insights and resources to make that determination, and we should therefore only label French photos as "collective works" if, like in the Harcourt case, there is a specific court decision declaring such. --Rosenzweig τ 13:48, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No evidence that the photographer didn't own the copyright. Yann (talk) 13:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Yann,
Here a source wich indicates that à this period, Jean Moral was employed under contracts by companies for fashion and advertisement (example : "Seul photographe français sous contrat annuel avec Harper’s Bazaar" and also "Carmel Snow") but he was independant for others purposes.
https://journals.openedition.org/focales/2221
But we do not have any copy of his contract so... Tisourcier (talk) 14:29, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, that's interesting. May be further research would give more information? Yann (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And would that change anything as far as copyright is concerned? That a photographer has a work contract for a magazine does not mean that he is not the author of his photographs anymore. Nor does it mean that they suddenly become collective works because he worked for said magazine. --Rosenzweig τ 19:16, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2070. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:16, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falls too far into the derivative work territory to be acceptable per COM:FANART. -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 17:56, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 23:59, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographer is not specified, so PD rationale cannot ground on term of author's life. 188.123.231.51 17:30, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Now fixed, it comes from a PD-Taiwan book. --RAN (talk) 01:47, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Delete. This is published in USSR for China. The photograph is no way of Chinese origin but Russian, so Chinese PD terms are not applicable. --188.123.231.51 06:50, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      Are you claiming that Chinese photographers were not allowed to visit the USSR? -- Wesha (talk) 02:07, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
      • Wesha, are you claiming that Soviet officials, wishing to publish any brochure home in the USSR in Chinese, had to invite a Chinese photographer to Moscow? Otherwise they wouldn't have managed it? And for 50 identical books in different languages - 50 photographers from the corresponding countries? Your logic resembles one of the old joke, when, in order to get three half-length photographs, you should dig three holes. As far as I see, you are on the side of those who want to prove that the photo is in the public domain? So do it and don't ask me for proof. --188.123.231.51 03:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence". Do you have that book? Does it explicitly state that its creators were Soviet people? When I see a book in a langiuage not terribly widely spoken outside of country X (unlike English, which is well better widespread), I'm giving 95% chance that such book was written by a native of the country X. Otherwise, it would be quite harkening to a case of Chinglish (in reverse). -- Wesha (talk) 03:54, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
        • It just got more fun. If you make the extraordinary claim that the Soviet Union is not capable of publishing a brochure in Chinese for its own embassy in China, then you read your favorite coffee table book. And wouldn’t it be difficult for you to finally explain how all these thoughtful talks about languages have to do with the photography under discussion? And don't forget to open the link to the policy above. It clearly states who must prove what to whom. --188.123.231.51 04:35, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Shizhao and A1Cafel: Could you possibly look at File:DRNH-9900006666 蘇俄外交政策.pdf and tell us if there are any author/publishing details? My Chinese is so bad that all I could get was a 1947 publication date. holly {chat} 23:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographers photographing members and buildings of the Legislature of the Virgin Islands are not employees of the United States federal government deserving of exemption from federal copyright law under {{PD-USGov}} without evidence. Vague references to https://legvi.org/ are insufficient.

  — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:19, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I added File:Seal of Virgin Islands Legislature.png, designed by someone who is not a federal employee either.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Jeff G., are the Virgin Islands not covered by Template:PD-USGov-Unincorporated? "Used for work created by governments of 'W:Unorganized territories' (excluding American Samoa), because they are considered part of the US Federal Government) and hence their works are ineligible for copyright" according to Commons:Copyright tags/Country-specific tags#US_Territories. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 18:48, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @BottleOfChocolateMilk: Who were the photographers? Were they working for the US federal government at the time of photography? Exactly what pages did these photos appear on?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 20:49, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Jeff G. I'm not sure what point you're trying to make. If you read the copyright tag I posted, it says that the territories are "considered part of the US Federal Government." Why do we need to know the name of the photographer if we know it was created by the territorial government? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 04:36, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @BottleOfChocolateMilk: To satisfy our COM:EVID policy.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 15:59, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Jeff G. All that page says is that the uploader must show "the file is in the public domain or is properly licensed...as far as can reasonably be determined." If it's an official headshot of a legislator posted on the official website of the legislature, it seems fair to assume it was produced by a government employee. By your logic, no official portrait of any politician in any government can be posted on Commons, since we basically never know the exact person who took the photo; I challenge you to find a file posted using one of the many US government copyright tags where the name of the photographer is known. Tens of thousands of files would have to be removed from this site, potentially hundreds of thousands. It really seems like your interpretation of this rule is vastly different from the prevailing consensus. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 21:01, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @BottleOfChocolateMilk: That is how copyright laws and our policies work. There once was a headshot of an certain orange-haired POTUS that was taken during his candidacy and that his supporters really liked. Despite pleas by his supporters, we couldn't host it because we didn't have permission; it was not produced by a government employee. Candidates for office frequently get their headshots taken by professional photographers, who in some cases do not release their copyrights unless they are paid an exorbitant price. I have seen signed contracts and bills for prices at or above US$10,000, which I believe is the typical size of the fine for copyright infringement. Does the USVI Senate have one or more official photographer(s)? Are they on the payroll for that Senate? What is/are their name(s)? I would accept a pool of names, one of which would be the actual photographer. If we did not protect the rights of the actual photographers, they could file DMCA complaints with us and our reusers, or sue for copyright infringement. We have lots of photos taken by named and ranked US Navy photographers in the course of their duties released by the Navy, I believe through a system called NIBIN; we host them cheerfully.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 23:17, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Jeff G. I'm confused. Are you calling to remove the official headshots of all U.S. senators unless a photographer can be named? Again, I don't get why you're trying to act like your interpretation of the rule is actually the consensus when 99% of government-produced images on here don't have a named photographer listed. If you really think you're right, then feel free to nominate every single congressional headshot for deletion. I'm serious. Go to File:John Fetterman official portrait.jpg--which does not have a photographer listed, and thus, by your interpretation of the rule, should be deleted--and nominate it for deletion. Since that file is used on Fetterman's Wikipedia page, the deletion discussion will attract more attention, and we can see how many editors interpret COM:EVID the same way you do. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 00:23, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    @BottleOfChocolateMilk: I am not picking a fight with a sitting US Senator; you can if you want. This page concerns Senators in the USVI Senate, a lopsided unicameral body that probably can't afford a staff photographer. US Senators (and the US Senate as a whole) probably can. FYI, the uploader of most of these files, LiveIsle2022, has been blocked indefinitely for uploading unfree files after warnings. Who was the photographer of File:Vialet.jpg and File:Vialet (cropped).jpg?   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 00:56, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Jeff G. lol thanks, that talk page message gave me a laugh. Photographers are not that expensive, we shouldn't be picking and choosing based on which legislative bodies we think are too poor to pay for a photographer. Who was the photographer of File:John Fetterman official portrait.jpg? BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 03:45, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have submitted a question about copyrights to them at the contact page on the website. Let's give them a week or so to respond. holly {chat} 23:24, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]