Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/11/09
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Dubious own-work claim. Their other uploads were clear copyvios.
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 03:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Italy. --RAN (talk) 05:21, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake George Muttathil Pulikurumba (talk) 06:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake George Muttathil Pulikurumba (talk) 06:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake George Muttathil Pulikurumba (talk) 06:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
По помилці завантажив Олександр Гаркуша (talk) 09:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I do not own the rights or permission to upload this file. Katuada (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Only page history is vulgar nonsense seemingly requesting sex Dronebogus (talk) 12:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 18:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Ansony89 (talk) 14:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake CroatianPalpatine (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake CroatianPalpatine (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake CroatianPalpatine (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake CroatianPalpatine (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Spam and missing permission. The uploader has been blocked on zhwiki due to spam.
- File:AZTTKIA smart watch P2.jpg
- File:AZTTKIA.jpg
- File:ACCLAFIT.png
- File:Shenzhen Xiongjiujiu Technology Co Ltd.jpg
SCP-2000 17:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:24, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
no source no metadata no author given Hoyanova (talk) 15:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Low quality porn Dronebogus (talk) 12:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:24, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:27, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside userpage Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep ("Neo" in username), no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:28, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by seeming company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by likely company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:29, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
copyrighted Veracious (talk) 03:57, 7 January 2023 (UTC)
- Comment. Unquestionably too simple for copyright. The only issue is whether the company is within project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:27, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:10, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside deletion discussion on id wiki; previous deletion request said "the only question is whether this is in scope" and it seems clear it is not Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of several promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use outside user sandbox Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, one of multiple promo images uploaded by presumed company rep, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:30, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nikusha Magaria (talk · contribs)
[edit]Behind the perosn are one or more works of art, presumed original and presumed in copyright. Permission to feature these should be lodged with COM:VRT. COM:PCP applies.
- File:Temo's workshop in Kyiv. 2008.jpg
- File:Temo Svirely. Kyiv, Ukraine, 2007.jpg
- File:Robert Sturua in Temo Svirely’s workshop in Kyiv, Ukraine, 2006.jpg
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I have just accepted heir's permission per Ticket:2023111010008892. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination based upon VRT's positive involvement 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 23:08, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use Gnomingstuff (talk) 00:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 01:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:04, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete low quality garbage Dronebogus (talk) 11:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama is absent in the United States. While this is a graffito, the artist w:en:Revok is one of the litigious US graffiti artists, and he has successfully tamed one commercial user (H&M), to agree on a settlement in his favor (see this and this, regarding H&M's use of a Brooklyn graffito by Revok in an ad campaign). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete In any case, this looks like an approved mural and parts of two others, not illegal graffiti. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as nomination. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:05, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama is absent in the United States. While this is a graffito, the artist w:en:Revok is one of the litigious US graffiti artists, and he has successfully tamed one commercial user (H&M), to agree on a settlement in his favor (see this and this, regarding H&M's use of a Brooklyn graffito by Revok in an ad campaign). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Very elaborate. Unlikely to be illegal graffiti, I would think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as nomination. Andy Dingley (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:06, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
hoax - used for hoax page on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 07:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
unusable resolution, unclear source — Draceane talkcontrib. 09:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:SPAM, promo image uploaded by company, no use outside wikidata Gnomingstuff (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Пам'ятник поету, письменнику, художнику Шевченкові Тарасу Григоровичу в Великих Бірках.JPG
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 19959. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor М. Невеселий. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 2006. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2000 (ISBN 9789608472808), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2001 (ISBN 9789600331912), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2006 (ISBN 9789604171606), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2020 (ISBN 9786185453251), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2004 (ISBN 9789604170616), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2023 (ISBN 9786182071564), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2021 (ISBN 9786185556778), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:17, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work; Wallis died in 1957. Two other user uploads are also questionable. Ymblanter (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Canada. Images created to prior to January 1, 1949 are pd in Canada. If she was 50 in the image that would only take us to 1910. --RAN (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text. (A brief overview of the term "cloud storage".) Omphalographer (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:14, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
"Own work" seems very unlikely for record jacket, needs COM:VRT verification even if true. Jmabel ! talk 22:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
"Own work" seems very unlikely for record jacket, needs COM:VRT verification even if true. Jmabel ! talk 22:16, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope. Self promotion. Jorge Barrios (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Promotional biography of a musical group. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 14:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
In my opinion the photo is too blurry for educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- I agree. Perhaps a speedy delete? Sturm (talk) 15:17, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:38, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution image with misleading geometry of the azo group (bond angle should be 120°, not 180°). There are plenty of correct high quality images in Category:Congo red that should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete, misleading and low-quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This chemical structure is missing the key stereochemical information that distinguishes procyanidin C2 from the other procyanidins. We have File:Procyanidin_C2.svg as a high quality replacement with full stereochemical information. Marbletan (talk) 15:51, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete, superseded and missing stereochemical information. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Comment Per w:Gregory Yeghikian, he died in 1951, so there's no way to know if this photo is in the public domain without the essential info P199 notes is lacking.-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)- Keep Iran is a 30 year jurisdiction, and this is a circa 1930 image. Even if taken in 1951 would still be pd. --RAN (talk) 02:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for that! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Unichoŭski House
[edit]No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Belarus.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:34, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This image is too old and needs a proof the uploader is the copyright owner. Donarius (talk) 18:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" --RAN (talk) 03:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This painting is too old and needs a proof the uploader is the copyright owner. Donarius (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Art. --RAN (talk) 03:02, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This image is too old and needs a proof the uploader is the copyright owner. Donarius (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU, 1890 image. --RAN (talk) 03:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
New monument. No FOP in Romania. Donarius (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
New church. No FOP in Romania. Donarius (talk) 18:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
New church. No FOP in Romania. Donarius (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
New church. No FOP in Romania. Donarius (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:OOS and blurry. Ooligan (talk) 18:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 03:00, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. Created 2002. Derivatives of work - photo nonfree sculpture. No Permission from the sculptor І. Сонсядло. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 02:59, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete Corporate logo. It is highly unlikely the company wishes to release its logo under the stipulated cc-by-sa-4.0 license or any other license compatible with Commons. Below TOO? I don't think so, but I'll leave that to others. Hammersoft (talk) 01:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 德輔道西 Des Voeux Road West banner 新民黨 葉劉淑儀 Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee November 2021 SS2 01.jpg
[edit]Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SYP 西環 Sai Ying Pun 德輔道西 Des Voeux Road West banner DAB 陳學鋒 Chan Hok Fung November 2021 SS2 02.jpg
[edit]Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 唐德街 Tong Tak Street 香港區議會選舉 District Council Election Lui Man Kwong candidates banners November 2019 SS2 04.jpg
[edit]Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK TKO 將軍澳 Tseung Kwan O 唐德街 Tong Tak Street 香港區議會選舉 District Council Election candidates banners November 2019 SS2 03.jpg
[edit]Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK SW 上環 Sheung Wan 皇后大道西 Queen's Road West banner Benson Luk Hon Man December 2021 SS2.jpg
[edit]Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK TST 尖沙咀 Tsim Sha Tsui 柯士甸道 Austin Road banner 鄭泳舜 Cheng Wing-shun Vincent December 2021 SS2 03.jpg
[edit]Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
File:HK WC 灣仔 Wan Chai 皇后大道東 Queen's Road East banner 潘焯鴻 Jason Poon November 2021 SS2 002.jpg
[edit]Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Banners are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim. This is a 3d rendering. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. If depicted human is holding smartphone, then the sculpture is not enough old for public domain. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbol. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo, above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Drawing made for a deleted article on enwiki, I don't see how this is in scope. Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work; Wallis died in 1957. Two other user uploads are also questionable. Ymblanter (talk) 21:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Highly unlikely to be own work, two other user uploads are also questionable. Even if it were own work, not free until 2028. Ymblanter (talk) 21:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
© 2023 TRIBUNnews.com Network,a subsidiary of KG Media. All Right Reserved Urang Kamang (talk) 02:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is an extracted image, and the original has been deleted in August 2022 because of missing permission. That is after the current source has been added as "permission" on 10 June 2022 (compare the file's history). The file page currently claims that it was deleted for unrelated reasons; I do not believe that's enough. The photo also seems unlikely to be useful, and is currently not in use at all. Renerpho (talk) 03:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
As shown on the watermark its copyright owner is Sowkot. But the upload name on Flickr is AbdulAzizMiah. — Sojol Rana Talk 04:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:46, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Obvious scan of a profile image done in the past. This is highly unlikely to be the uploaders own work - they may have scanned the picture but that's not something that transfers copyright. Ravensfire (talk) 01:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is probably a viable image to be uploaded to EN as a fair-use image, but with accurate attribution for the source of the image. Ravensfire (talk) 18:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:45, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. I can't find any sources to suggest that an "anti-fetishism center" (or various other permutations of those words) exists and is represented by a flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag (?). Omphalographer (talk) 01:54, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:48, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Photograph of a printed map, unlikely that the Flickr uploader was the author of the map, no indication that the map is available under the specified license. Verbcatcher (talk) 06:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:50, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a crop of a deleted copyrighted image. Based on information from the source image's nomination, this is probably not the uploader's own work. HejTuWou (talk) 07:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
شعار نادي Mohammed Qays (talk) 08:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
No source given, comment stated that this is a still image from TV series trailer. No CC license provided. Numbered (talk) 08:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
No source given, comment stated that this is a still image from TV series trailer. No CC license provided. Numbered (talk) 08:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Per Facebook/Insta-code in metadata likely not own work, but copied from social media. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
not own work, but GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 10:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:52, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not women world cup trohpy Farhan Shahriar Dipto (talk) 11:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not a deletion reason, but presumably copyrighted. What is it? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as copyvio. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: book published 1979 can't (still) be public domain 93.138.229.184 11:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Yugo. Republishing an historic image does not transfer the copyright, or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: book published 1975 can't (still) be public domain 93.138.229.184 11:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Yugo. Republishing an historic image does not transfer the copyright, or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 16:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: book published 1979 can't (still) be public domain 93.138.229.184 11:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Yugo. Republishing an historic image does not transfer the copyright, or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 16:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: book published 1979 can't (still) be public domain 93.138.229.184 11:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Yugo. Republishing an historic image does not transfer the copyright, or restart the copyright clock. --RAN (talk) 16:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Obviously does not meet PD-textlogo, the color of the font in the image as well as the angelic halo have clearly met the originality threshold GY Fan★ 11:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:55, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope text PDF. Rosenzweig τ 11:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The article itself might be in scope (although I somewhat doubt it), but this isn't even the article; it's a poorly formatted printout of a Researchgate web page about the article. Omphalographer (talk) 14:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:09, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is too blurry for any educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
grabbed from the web, published on Twitter in 2018 https://twitter.com/Heby_19/status/982533268426944512 Albinfo (talk) 12:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot of a video game, derivative work of a copyrighted work. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- It also looks like the same screenshot posted at https://www.pcworld.com/article/398813/ori-and-the-will-of-the-wisps-preview-extraordinary.html prior to being posted at Flickr, so it looks like a case of COM:FLICKRWASH as well. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. All images uploaded by Sarochlu should be deleted.Kacir (talk) 15:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:10, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a non-free logo, not created by the uploader. Fences and windows (talk) 12:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:11, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Extremely low-quality chemical structure in poor resolution, pixelated bonds and in-image text. Furthermore, the structure does not depict the file name. Replaced by File:4,4-Dimethylhexan-2-ol-2D-skeletal.svg and File:4,4-Dimethylhexan-2-ol-2D-structure.svg drawn according to MoS guidelines. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, per Chem Sim 2001. Marbletan (talk) 17:55, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, misleading and low quality and resolution. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
New monument. No FOP in Romania. Donarius (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Tagged as {{Low quality chem}} since 14 years, but finally, it is removed from fr:Hydrogénase. Only used on the list of (formerly) top 200 low-quality chemical structures. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 19:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. We have File:NiFeSe hydrogenase.svg as a high quality alternative. Marbletan (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom & as we have a high-quality replacement for this structure. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:43, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
{{Low quality chem}}, {{BadGIF}} and unused. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 19:09, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Besides the quality issues, the bond angles of almost all structures shown are incorrect. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 07:45, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo for advertisement, no educational value Zafer (talk) 19:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:13, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
У файла отсутствует источник. Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 22:50, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see anything copyrightable. --RAN (talk) 05:32, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Factuality is determined by local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Factuality is determined by local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Factuality is determined by local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The photo is not verified by sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Factuality is determined by local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:15, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep What is not confirmed, the date? or the identification of the person? --RAN (talk) 18:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Factuality is determined by local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:18, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a cover of a book published in 2009 (ISBN 9789604172214), so the cover artwork must be under copyright. ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
У файла отсутствует источник. Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 22:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I don't see anything copyrightable. --RAN (talk) 05:31, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Not confirmed by reliable sources Андрей Очурдяпов (talk) 21:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In use. Factuality is determined by local projects. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:16, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 14 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:30_Days_Of_Motivation.pdf” but not processed yet, ticket:2020021810006259. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 15:09, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:30_Days_Of_Motivation.pdf” under ticket:2020021810006259. Ìch heiss Nat ùn ìch redd e wenig Elsässisch!Talk to me in EN, FR, PL, GSW-FR(ALS). 18:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Kept: per OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Out of scope. The previous deletion discussion addressed the issue of image copyright, but the contents of this file are almost entirely plain text and appear to be outside the educational scope of any Wikimedia project. Omphalographer (talk) 22:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation 2A00:23C5:FF94:6F01:C522:6993:FD1A:5A9B 23:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:26, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
I do not own the rights or permission to upload this file. Katuada (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
I do not own the rights or permission to upload this file. Katuada (talk) 11:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:22, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request: Wrong information - cone response curves don't look like this (they look like the chart here - Cone cell). The information here is simply a derivative from CIE 1931 color matching functions -Vinokurov Demis (talk) 00:06, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Can't be deleted as long as it's COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 13:11, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
No permission from the source
- File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh2.jpg
- File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh1.jpg
- File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh5.jpg
- File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh4.jpg
- File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh3.jpg
- File:Chodaumoihoacuonganh6.jpg
- File:Chodaumoihoacuong2.jpg
- File:Chodaumoihoacuong.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
High quality with no meaningful exif, uploaded by a new user and credited to ICCR , PCP Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- This is a photograph that I took out and I have permission from the person that I took the image off. Shayomo (talk) 14:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:12, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
No confirmation of license on source site. 95.155.87.99 07:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the "!" mark is clearly designed GY Fan★ 11:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: per GY Fan VegBird3 (talk) 15:00, 20 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:13, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
better scan of the exact same photograph now available: File:5697644.Erwin Quedenfeldt.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 14:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ich denke nicht, dass ein "better scan of the exact same photograph" ein Grund für den "delition request" ist oder gibt es zum Beispiel mit dem Urheberrecht oder einer Richtlinie Probleme.
- Beste Grüße Jula2812 (talk) 15:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, as the photos are not at all similar. Did you mean another filename? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
better scan now available: File:5723066.Erwin Quedenfeldt.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 14:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Auch hier denke ich nicht, dass ein "better scan of the exact same photograph" ein Grund für den "delition request" ist. Nochmals beste Grüße Jula2812 (talk) 15:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- I think so, too. -- Kürschner (talk) 21:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:14, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
File:Düsseldorf, Wirtschaftszeichen am Hause Ratingerstr. 14–16, "Zur Uel", Erwin Quedenfeldt, 1909.jpg
[edit]besserer scan verfügbar: File:5697643.Erwin Quedenfeldt.jpg Carl Ha (talk) 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- No relevant reason for delation -- Kürschner (talk) 09:27, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:15, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:17, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:18, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:56, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:19, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:57, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:21, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 09:58, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:22, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Superseded by SVG EthanL13 (talk) 10:10, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:40, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
Superseded by SVG. EthanL13 (talk) 10:11, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Closed - moved to mass deletion request. EthanL13 (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
As the creator of this photograph, I have been contacted by the University of Central Florida's Office of the General Counsel. I was asked to delete the file on the grounds that it allegedly constitutes trademark infringement. Although I do not acknowledge any infringement, I am willing to comply with their request, and I ask that Wikimedia please delete the image to assist with that, since I am unable to delete the image myself. - Steevven1 (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Question What is the rule in the U.S.? Is this considered a sculpture and therefore not OK under COM:FOP US, or is it considered part of a building, and therefore OK? If it's OK in terms of copyright, we should keep it because it's COM:INUSE, and Commons does not enforce trademarks, nor could a university demonstrate that you injured their trademark just by posting for free a photo of their logo on a building. If it's not OK per COM:FOP US, it should be uploaded locally at en.wikipedia as fair use, and the Wikimedia Foundation can then dare the university to try to sue them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, seems copyrightable modern artwork. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:34, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The source of this file is a photograph from Google, but there does not appear to be any evidence of a suitable free license at source. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 01:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: fictitious flag. Omphalographer (talk) 01:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:35, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Glitcher By Geranlodes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: various personal and unofficial flags, unused outside a ruwiki sandbox.
- File:A25be77af2-450.webp
- File:Flag of the Fireland.png
- File:Flag of the FAS.png
- File:Flag of Bir Tawil.png
- File:Flag of Jawa.png
- File:Flag of SINZ.png
- File:Flag of the Colin Republic.png
Omphalographer (talk) 01:43, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:36, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as no permission (No permission since) The uploader has sourced the Geospatial Infomrarion Authoriy of Japan, which publishes satellite photos with a CC license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 03:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: No verifiable source link. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Imagevio ? https://cz.linkedin.com/in/kamilhouska?trk=public_post_feed-actor-image OJJ (talk) 04:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:37, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gampe as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Bohumil Rames 70 let.jpg - Not an exact duplicate but much lower quality and unused. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused lower res from same original. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:38, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted, according to the metadata, and no evidence that the uploader is actually the copyright holder Fram (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi , i am creating a page behalf of Dr Mohan Gundeti. Please let me know, how to get evidence or proof of this image...share if any process for the same. thank you Gashriram (talk) 10:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Sure. Have the photographer (not the subject, unless he can prove the copyright was transferred to him) contact COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, still no evidence of permission from copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Not own work & previuosly published here: https://www.industriaitaliana.it/gruppo-fedrigoni-chiude-2022-record-fatturato/ (see this file) Bradipo Lento (talk) 11:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The metadata says Roger Harris is the copyright holder. The original flickr file has two competing licenses: one saying cc-by and the other saying it is copyrighted. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no indication Flickr user has rights to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:40, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, missing permission, credit on map not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo, above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete User:P199, you say it's unused? It's COM:INUSE in 8 Wikipedia articles! However, the en.wikipedia article states that it was founded "10 July 1992 (as Workers' Party); 15 February 2015 (rebranding)," so it's way too new for their logo to be in the public domain, and I'd have to think it's above COM:TOO Turkey. So a representative of the party would have to give permission for it to be licensed here. Despite the inconvenience, I think it'll have to be uploaded locally on Wikipedias as fair use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Oops, how did I miss that?!?! Anyway, my main argument is that it is above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:41, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Unidentifiable subject, nonsense description, outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 18:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Behind the perosn are one or more works of art, presumed original and presumed in copyright. Permission to feature these should be lodged with COM:VRT. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 19:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I have just accepted heir's permission per Ticket:2023111010008892. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:21, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per VRT ticket. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
copyright violtaion, see:https://openverse.org/image/4bddef76-dbb3-4b24-9038-7cd772b925df?q=DDoS%20attack BahYajé e Y4guarEtã (talk) 19:29, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused file. Photo without much information about purpose. Zafer (talk) 19:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; collage of unsourced photos. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:46, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
It is dubious to say this screenshot is not copyrightable. It contains a clearly copyrightable and recognisable layout. By this logic software like Photoshop and Sibelius aren't copyrightable (even though they clearly are) —MATRIX! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 20:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Delete Now is complex.--EEIM (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The video thumbnails are copyrighted. Huaqin (talk) 20:28, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
While it seems doubtful to me that the raster image would be in the public domain, the svg tracing also weighs in favour of its copyrightability. The image is also hosted as non-free on enwiki, so it would be good to have a verdict either way. Felix QW (talk) 20:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Per this aeticle about the history of the logo it orginates from a shield that the company created the design for in the earlier 1900s. Although this verison is admittedly a few iterations from that, but its essentially the version from the 1960s which probably wasn't copyrighted due to a lack of a copyright symbol on it at the time. But a shield is a shield regardless. So you could argue its either to close to the 1960s version to be copyrighted since that kne probably wasn't or the one from the early 1900s hundreds if you want to go that far back. But its PD either way. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:23, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The logo was published without a copyright notice from at least the 1920s to the 1970s, which is a time period when a copyright symbol and other formalities must have been attached to "every published copy" for copyright to vest. The Copyright Office was occasionally willing to overlook occasional technical noncompliance with the copyright laws and register a copyright in the 1970s, but millions of copies of the logo without a notice over decades certainly injected the historical logo into the public domain.
- Whether the drop shadow, changes to the stem of the logo, and outlining could perhaps be sufficient to create a new copyright for current version is more difficult. IMO the changes fall below the TOO for the US. Streamline8988 (talk) 00:39, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:47, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Very unlikely own work, numerous prior publications on the internet. Only question is the threshold of originality. The Brazilian one is very high, but I am unsure whether this even matters for the US copyright status of contemporary works. Felix QW (talk) 21:00, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Current logo of a large open television station in Brazil, in this case I don't think it's a simple image, so much so that all previously uploaded logos have been eliminated. Eric Duff (talk) 18:45, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Hoax flag with no sources confirming it, and is probably taken the coat of arms of Algeirs. Strenatos (talk) 22:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flags of Algiers - Wikimedia Commons Strenatos (talk) 22:36, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:48, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
The uploader, who gave permission is not real copyright holder of the recording. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no indication that uploader has authority to license work of contemporary poet. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:50, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text, dubious mathematical claims.
- File:How many primes less than 10⁵⁰.pdf
- File:GOLDBACH'S STRONG AND WEAK HYPOTHESIS.pdf
- File:MOCNA I SŁABA HIPOTEZA GOLDBACHA.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 16:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
- These articles are from my book Jan Lubina "Number Symmetry", published on Amazon. Najanibul (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: additional similar plain text content.
- File:SYMETRIA LICZB PIERWSZYCH I ICH ILOCZYNÓW.pdf
- File:Ile liczb pierwszych jest mniejszych od 10.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 13:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- These articles are from my book Jan Lubina "Number Symmetry", published on Amazon. Najanibul (talk) 19:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:21, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text, dubious mathematical claims.
Omphalographer (talk) 17:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 15 December 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ksalcedocif1031 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Marcela Benjumea.png
- File:Jorge Herrera Colombia.png
- File:Luis Mesa.png
- File:Mario Duarte.png
- File:Ricardo Mejía.png
- File:Andrés Felipe Martínez.jpg
- File:Jorge Cao.png
- File:Diego Cadavid.png
- File:Aida Bossa.png
- File:Julio Cesar Herrera.png
- File:Luis Eduardo Arango.png
- File:Kepa Colombiano.jpg
- File:Maru yamayusa.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ksalcedocif1031 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works: low quality, missing EXIF.
0x0a (talk) 12:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Metadata credits ARDA GULER. Please confirm that this is the same person as the uploader. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused, bad JPEG, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 16:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Unused logo for advertisement, no educational value. Zafer (talk) 19:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Senate Seal (Mexico).svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:41, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We can keep both, png is a different format from svg. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
No we do not. Not when the SVG pre-exists the raster image by over a decade. I've had this debate numerous times and have always been deemed correct in my interpretation of policy. Fry1989 eh? 20:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Chamber of Deputies (Mexico).svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:42, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We can keep both, png is a different format from svg. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
No we do not. Not when the SVG pre-exists the raster image by over a decade. I've had this debate numerous times and have always been deemed correct in my interpretation of policy. Fry1989 eh? 20:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:39, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
https://jemika.ir/farzaneh-naz-biography-farzaneh-naz-pictures/ Hosseinronaghi (talk) 10:02, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
https://jemika.ir/farzaneh-naz-biography-farzaneh-naz-pictures/ Hosseinronaghi (talk) 10:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
A crop of this photo is found at https://www.instagram.com/p/CyuSlizt8Cy/?ref=xlLbWXw0&hl=am-et&img_index=7 with a photographer credit that doesn't match the uploader name. Please verify the source/license via COM:VRT. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 17:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Home of Daniel Nelson - Nelsonville, Ohio - Athens County, Ohio - DPLA - 9d4dc78c0d5322573a23575b31c97745 (page 254) (cropped).jpg
[edit]duplicated Wolfgang8741 (Ohio University) (talk) 18:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I can't find a duplicate - this is an extract of a larger image. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Plain text document, promotional biography. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Even if this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 18:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Poster for a music event CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello! I made the poster myself and I took the photos in the poster. I made all the artistic elements. Related concert photos of the musicians are coming to commons soon. Fabebk (talk) 00:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Fabebk, Thank you for your answer. In this case, as it is related to an event, it might be that you need to create an OTSR request as instructed on this page Commons:Volunteer Response Team. Please let me know if you have any questions. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 09:52, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023113010007391 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 16:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Krd. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 2 January 2024 (UTC)
https://catalog.archives.gov/id/7665726 is clearly the original image, and was taken in California, not Sweden. The Nobel Prize Committee photographs are not necessarily by the Nobel Prize organization, which seems to be the fundamental mistake made here, by presuming that, since this was published alongside the Nobel Prize announcement, that it was taken in Sweden. We know the photographer per that link: It's Donald Cooksey, who is not Swedish. Clearly, given the National Archives has a less-cropped version of the photo which copyright is claimed on, this was not taken in Sweden, is not an "Official Nobel Prize photo" in any sense that would move the copyright to Sweden, and the argument based on it being a Swedish photo is not accurate. Now, it sucks to have to delete it, I fully agree, but, we do have a good photo of him, File:Luis Alvarez with a magnetic monopole detector.jpg, which I would argue is in some ways better.
It's possible that the University of California copyright claim is one that we at Wikipedia shouldn't accept per {{PD-Art}}. That's a fair arguement if we can show that Donald Cooksey was working for the federal government - He's Donald Cooksey, so this shouldn't be hard - or we could argue a PD-US-no-notice if it was published without a copyright claim. However, that's not at all what's being argued for the reason the photo is out of copyright, and we'd need to update the file pages to a valid copyright claim at a minimum.
So, to bulletpoint the problems:
- The author is not the Nobel Foundation, it's Donald Cooksey
- It was not taken in Sweden, it was taken in California, at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
- It was not taken in 1961; it was taken on January 2, 1962.
- He got his Nobel Prize in 1968, so the dates don't even add up for this being anything to do with the Nobel Prize Foundation.
- {{PD-Sweden-photo}} does not apply to photos taken in California by Americans. Forgive me if that comes off as really sarcastic, but the point is that, if it's kept due to other arguments than the ones currently made for it being out of copyright, we really need to fix the bullshit documentation. We can't keep using an obviously incorrect license for it.
- For {{PD-US-no-notice}} to apply, we'd need evidence of it being published in the United States without a notice during the period where that caused it to lose copyright. A modern Dutch archive or a modern Swedish webpage won't do that.
- For {{PD-USGov-DOE}} to apply, we'd need to get around the Federal Government asserting a copyright for the University of California. Now, bullshit arguments for copyright exist all over the place, and Cooksey was Associate director of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, so there's probably good reason to think this is bullshit, especially as the phrasing might indicate that the University of California are claiming copyright for scanning it ("has asserted a continuing legal interest in the digital versions of the images included in the NARA accession"). But it's not completely clear whether that's the exact claim made.
Adam Cuerden (talk) 09:03, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- In File:Luis Walter Alvarez 1961.jpg, I have uploaded front and back of a photo published in U.S. by Keystone Press. There is no copyright notice, and hence {{PD-US-no-notice}} should apply. Materialscientist (talk) 10:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's fair. In that case, as long as we update everything, we're good, but we really do need to get all this right. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- I've updated everything, and think we're good now. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:43, 13 November 2023 (UTC)
- That's fair. In that case, as long as we update everything, we're good, but we really do need to get all this right. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Materialscientist --RAN (talk) 16:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Materialscientist. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the color of the font and the word "死" are clearly designed GY Fan★ 11:50, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: See Cup Noodles case in COM:TOO Japan. BlackShadowG (talk) 08:00, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:TOO Japan is one of the higher TOO bars. This appears to be fine. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the letter ”p" and "t" are clearly designed GY Fan★ 11:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The 'T' is just a connected line and two circles, I don't think they are complex enough to be copyrightable. The 'P' has swooshes but still clearly read as 'P'.--Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 23:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- When these line and circles are just simply placed on the image, it may meet PD-textlogo. But in this images these elements are clearly elaborate designed to show some arts.--GY Fan★ 07:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:TOO Japan is one of the higher TOO bars. This appears to be fine. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not meeting the PD-textlogo, the japanese characters are clearly designed GY Fan★ 12:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:TOO Japan is one of the higher TOO bars. This appears to be fine. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Fake license — 1. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 16:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
From the talk page: Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 07:38, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Sorry, I accidentally submitted this nomination before completing it. The message on the talk page is:
This image was created by the contractor operating LLNL on behalf of the Department of Energy. The contractor is the Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC. This image however is available under the CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. See [1]https://www.llnl.gov/copyright-reuse. 128.12.200.84 00:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
In the {{PD-USGov-DOE}} template there is a link to some discussion at w:en:Template talk:PD-USGov-DOE regarding the copyright policies of various national laboratories. LLNL is listed under "Labs with ambiguous or nonexistent copyright policies". Anon126 (✉ ⚒) 07:41, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This is from 1995, which predates CC licenses, but LLNL claiming copyright on their work is probably a longstanding tradition of theirs. —holly {chat} 22:35, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Préservation anonymat Rémi sim (talk) 12:53, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Preserving anonymity how? Everyone's faces are already blurred out. However, as this is your own upload and it's not being used, I'm OK with doing the courtesy deletion. —holly {chat} 22:40, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Not own work, but an unidentified Webmap. Doesn't look like OSM, so likely a CopyVio of a service like Google, Bing, Yandex. Enyavar (talk) 13:39, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:41, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Fake license — 1. Engelberthumperdink (talk) 16:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I see you uploaded the duplicate file File:Mikhail Kozlovsky. Selected (2014-03-21) 08.jpg. Next time, please just fix the details on already-existing image instead uploading it again as a separate file. —holly {chat} 22:44, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
Files in Category:Election commissions
[edit]No indication of CC licensing.
- File:Logo de la Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil Colombiana (versión negro).png
- File:Logo de la Registraduría Nacional del Estado Civil Colombiana.png
- File:REGIS SIG XXI.png
0x0a (talk) 13:05, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:19, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by PashtunHistorian as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: [2]
Circa 1979 photograph. Soonest this could become PD in Afghanistan is 2030. Converted to DR for discussion. Abzeronow (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; undelete in 2075 thanks to URAA. —holly {chat} 18:22, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Arrow303 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|2=DW of File:Brasão Algueiro.jpg, deleted for Copyvio from https://www.araldicacivica.it/comune/alghero/ (CC-BY-NC-ND as per https://www.araldicacivica.it/info/disclaimer/). Heavily used flag, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- The source image (File:Brasão Algueiro.jpg) was previously tagged by his uploader with a Commons-compatible license, but then tagged with Copyvio and deleted as is source was araldicavica.it, that publishes under CC-BY-NC-ND. I'm sure that the creator of the flag was in good faith, but now that the source image has been deleted, I think the flag should be deleted too as DW of a non-free image.
- Also, the intense use of this flag should not be a problem, as the image can be easy recreated using this CC-BY-SA-4.0 CoA. Anyway, this flag design does not seem to have an official recnognition by the municipality, as it's not mentioned in the Statuto comunale and the municipality itself uses the version without CoA. --Arrow303 (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Then perhaps we should edit and keep? The resulting flag would be below COM:TOO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts are you referring to keeping the flag, but without CoA? Arrow303 (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts Understood. But in that case this file would be a duplicate of File:Flag of Catalonia.svg. Arrow303 (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- It can always be the same design with a different file name. There are many similar cases in Commons. Since I'm the original uploader of this file and indeed I had no idea that the CoA was copyrighted when I created and uploaded the file, I agree that editing sounds reasonable. Any idea btw why this following file with the CoA hasn't been deleted too?
- Thanks. -- Argean (talk) 09:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Argean @King of Hearts, That CoA has been redesigned by the uploader, that published it under CC0. The copyright, in the context of coats of arms, it's measured by looking at the single representation that any artist can make starting from the same blazon (which, being a written description, is free from copyright). The CoA included in this image was mistakenly tagged by its uploader with CC-BY-SA, when it was not. I agree with changing the central coat of arms (we also have this version, that may be better)
, but shouldn't we upload this new version as a separate file as per COM:OW? I suggest to make this image a redirect to File:Flag of Catalonia.svg (also because the official flag seems to be without CoA), then create and upload the flag with the CoA, that can be named File:Flag of Alghero (de facto).svg, or something similar. Opinions? Thanks :) -- Arrow303 (talk) 22:38, 10 November 2023 (UTC)- Looking more closely at the policy, in this case it would seem that the CoA can be directly replaced. So for me Keep if edited. Thanks :) --Arrow303 (talk) 22:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Argean @King of Hearts, That CoA has been redesigned by the uploader, that published it under CC0. The copyright, in the context of coats of arms, it's measured by looking at the single representation that any artist can make starting from the same blazon (which, being a written description, is free from copyright). The CoA included in this image was mistakenly tagged by its uploader with CC-BY-SA, when it was not. I agree with changing the central coat of arms (we also have this version, that may be better)
- @King of Hearts Understood. But in that case this file would be a duplicate of File:Flag of Catalonia.svg. Arrow303 (talk) 21:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Yes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts are you referring to keeping the flag, but without CoA? Arrow303 (talk) 21:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
- Then perhaps we should edit and keep? The resulting flag would be below COM:TOO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:26, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Apperenty nobody took the effort to edit the image with the PD version of the COA. If somebody is willing to take action, the image can be temporarily undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:00, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Per en:Template talk:PD-USGov-DOE, works by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory are not PD. howcheng {chat} 16:43, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep
Probably {{PD-US-no notice}}./Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:29, 15 April 2010 (UTC)- "Probably" isn't good enough. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
- This is the official Nobel photo, {{PD-Sweden}}, see here. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 21:30, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- "Probably" isn't good enough. howcheng {chat} 23:08, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Kept, just squeezes into {{PD-Sweden}}. Stifle (talk) 11:33, 7 September 2010 (UTC)
Update: See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Luis Walter Alvarez 1961.jpg. Long story short, the rationale is wrong (it's not a Swedish photo, it's a US one, but does come under {{PD-US-no-notice}}), but it's still public domain, so no need to reopen this. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:17, 30 January 2024 (UTC)