Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/10/06

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 6th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake ШЕКПЭЭР (talk) 19:53, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LuchoCR

[edit]

I have noticed that in the folder of photos I have, there are some that were taken by a former coworker. Therefore, I ask you to delete the 50 photographs that I uploaded so that I can make an individual review of each photo I have, identify only the ones that I took (Canon EOS T7i and NIKON D3200), and be able to upload them again. I'm sorry for the inconvenient.

LuchoCR (talk) 00:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 00:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidental upload Gksyy (talk) 03:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich selbst habe diese Datei hochgeladen und wurde danach auf mögliche Copyrightprobleme hingewiesen, bitte daher vorsichtshalber entfernen. (Bin noch nicht lange hier aktiv) Llydia (talk) 15:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC) [Engl. version: deletion request of my own work, due to copyright doubs regarding the design on display. My apologies, I haven't contributed here for a long time!][reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Google maps satellite imagery is copyrighted 129.133.240.225 15:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 16:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot per Metadata, appears to be taken from a porn site A1Cafel (talk) 05:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Clearly not own work. 20 upper 15:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot, maybe taken from a porn site, dubious claim of own work A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Poor quality. 20 upper 15:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ja som jeho autor a už ho tu nechcem. Alex. M. 39 (talk) 19:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ja som jeho autor a už ho tu nechcem. Alex. M. 39 (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality image of a non-notable person, most likely used at enwiki to defame the subject. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 21:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by AntiCompositeNumber. --Rosenzweig τ 22:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Copyvio|Non-free logo}} Luis fragar (talk) 07:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but it's unclear to me that there's a logo. The real question is whether the photo is really own work. User:Oliviarguts, did you really shoot that photo? If so, where and when did you shoot it and with what camera? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted. Available online years prior to upload. --GMGtalk 12:18, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I will upload it to the englisch wikipedia under fair use clause. V0671 (talk) 11:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

COM:INUSE at d:Q122920886. --Rosenzweig τ 15:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 06:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Guliverguliver (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files of unknown source declared as "own work".

GeorgHHtalk   12:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 05:07, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2015, a proper source and license is needed. Even if it is own work, there is no freedom of panorama in Argentina for non-architectural works, the artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 05:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in Argentina A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in France. Note that the background is intentionally blurred to highlight the poster, also the title indicated that the poster is the subject of this photo, therefore de minimis cannot be applied A1Cafel (talk) 06:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contested F1. Found here before upload - https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=204313481063606&set=a.204313467730274 - tight crop, no exif. Uploader needs to confirm authorship via VTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:43, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per [1], this is a 1948 work by English artist William Albert Green (1907–1984). So it is still protected in the UK, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2055. Rosenzweig τ 15:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo of nondescript building, no context/location, little educational use, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred, failed photo, unusable. P 1 9 9   16:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 18:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 18:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE - Uploaded for self-promotion and used in a promo/ad article Arian (talk) 18:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:44, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 14:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons. We are not sure whether the uploader is Gabriel Knight or not, and identity verification is required A1Cafel (talk) 14:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata - Author Hans Gorter Fotografie Copyright holder Hans Gorter Hoyanova (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 14:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata Author Hans Gorter Fotografie Copyright holder Hans Gorter Hoyanova (talk) 14:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.pexels.com/photo/group-of-people-street-dancing-1105014/ GuillaumeG (talk) 22:44, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Free to use does not look like a proper licence... Anthere (talk)

Deleted: per nomination - copyvio (https://www.pexels.com/license/). -- Darwin Ahoy! 23:24, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instagram screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 14:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:12, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 15:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:11, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not look like an own work. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 01:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Because it's an unused personal image. 20 upper 15:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The provided source does not give a date for this photo; there is not evidence of its publishing except for on the immedate 2015 web link. Indy beetle (talk) 02:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Even if unpublished, images prior to 1903 have entered the public domain under US copyright law. To be eligible for a copyright up to 1964 required registration and then filing a renewal notice. --RAN (talk) 04:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per RAN. 20 upper 15:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:03, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to be a still captured from video (see [2]). No metadata and the relatively small size of image reinforce this. Ravensfire (talk) 03:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 04:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of Scope, Also it contain personal information and email of the uploader. Probably a test upload by him. Miniwark (talk) 11:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nudity photo Michel Bakni (talk) 23:05, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete we have enough of this Dronebogus (talk) 05:12, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Com:Penis — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 181.43.193.211 (talk) 16:39, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It has a weird yellowish hue. 20 upper 15:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, poor quality photo of very common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random nude photo, poor composition, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 05:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep Borderline, but this isn't too bad, and has more context than just another nude photo. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per A1Cafel. 20 upper 15:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the low resolution clashing with the Proffesional quality photography and well-groomed, carefully posed model seem like telltale signs this was stolen from a porn site. Dronebogus (talk) 15:51, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Probably spam and/or copyvio. The only other image of the uploader is even more pornographic see File:Anatomy of vagina.jpg a may be nominated too. Miniwark (talk) 11:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976

A1Cafel (talk) 05:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete A work by Erminio Blotta. Not yet in the public domain. there is also no de minimis in this image. (a warning or a delete in the cat may be useful for later potential uploaders) Miniwark (talk) 11:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no attribution, not own work Poliocretes (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete look like AI generated to me with no attribution of the engine in the description. Miniwark (talk) 11:59, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976

A1Cafel (talk) 05:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete not in the Public domain. Miniwark (talk) 11:58, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: reason=Subjects' consent not granted. I am a producer and represent Yeo Siew Hua, I hereby declare that Yeo Siew Hua has not signed a model release, and prefers that this photo be removed. Thank you. Dan Koh (damnkohl.com)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Here the complete text added by User:Adsfghj to the image-page : "Subjects' consent not granted. I am a producer and represent Yeo Siew Hua, I hereby declare that Yeo Siew Hua has not signed a model release, and prefers that this photo be removed. Thank you. Dan Koh (damnkohl.com). Permission from subject is needed. You can refer to the Wikimedia Commons policy here, which states "In many countries the subject's consent is needed to just take a picture, and/or to publish it ... even if the person is in a public place ... Commons requires photos to be legal in all of the following polities: (a) the country in which the photo was taken." https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photographs_of_identifiable_people The photo was taken in France, which requires permission to take and publish a photo: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements". --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep As the section of Commons:Country specific consent requirements on France says "It is generally recognized both by case law and legal doctrine that consent is implied or not needed for pictures of..public figures performing their public functions or activities (not in private life).." Celeberities are inherently public figures and one attending a film festival clearly qualifies as "as a public figure performing their public activities." Their consent to be photographed is also implied by the fact that they are standing right in front of the camera and smiling at it. Its not like either person in the image wasn't aware of the fact that their being photographed or didn't have a chance to say if they didn't consent to it either. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Basically true, but this image doesn't look like it was taken at a film festival, unless I'm missing something. The background shows railway tracks, not a red carpet. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I can't find the discussion right now, but I thought that's what the person who originally nominated the image for deletion had said. Regardless though, its not like the people in the image were minding their own business shopping for groceries or whatever and someone just randomly shoved a camera in their faces for no reason. They obviously knew they were being photographed and consented to it at time. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Per Adamant. And I add: looking and smiling into camera generally means consent for photographing. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The look at the camera & smiling mean tacit consent. Also, by looking by the other photographs, by the same author, at the same date, il look like it was done during a public event : "Festival International des Cinémas d'Asie". This event is related to the subject. Miniwark (talk) 12:16, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Thiraluek Nai Kansadet (1963, p 188).jpg. This unsourced PNG file should be deleted and/or redirected to the JPG file, which is well-sourced & of a better quality. Asembleo (talk) 07:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value Aszx5000 (talk) 09:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In particular this seems to have been photographed from an older paper image, so dubious own work claim. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Probably not own work, because of the glass reflexion. Miniwark (talk) 12:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value Aszx5000 (talk) 09:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:56, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:11, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of scope Miniwark (talk) 12:32, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menu in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 13:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:13, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 05:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976 A1Cafel (talk) 05:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

errore nella nomenclatura del file Gbr 101 (talk) 06:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep you may better ask for a renaming, or ask with speedydelete if it's a duplicate. Miniwark (talk) 12:03, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its my personal photo Ardakocaa (talk) 18:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's my personal photo Ardakocaa (talk) 18:53, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: low quality unused personal photo, per uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want this photo to be visible anymore. Please delete it permanently. Ardakocae (talk) 21:44, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. F10 --Kadı Message 18:34, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My personal photo Ardakocaa (talk) 18:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo, per uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:14, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong author, wrong date... Xocolatl (talk) 18:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: false info corrected. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Law group advertisement CzarJobKhaya (talk) 20:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; murals by artist who died i 1968, no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious error William C. Minor (talk) 20:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal / social media content. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not own work, it is cropped version of this file: https://tineye.com/overlay/e94956908c36be5bcc9fd5341530e3b0673b161d/cfedebb20f1b45395ec1472a916ae1b0d25eb073b2704a1edbed15b6d0ba1319?m11=1.5618400573730469&m12=0.006537939887493849&m13=-299.8139953613281&m21=-0.006537939887493849&m22=1.5618400573730469&m23=-58.881500244140625 HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image seems to be first published here: https://media.mehrnews.com/old/Original/1392/07/06/IMG10043099.jpg. The photographer seems to be Chia Foadi (an official of Iran's football federation), according to this. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion; fraudulent license and authorship claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, looks to be licensed CC-BY-NC 4.0. Noncommercial license restrictions aren't permitted on Commons and there doesn't appear to have been an earlier preprint licensed under a less restrictive license. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 22:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:09, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daniel Ciommiento (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Trade (talk) 22:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete A self-claimed "online celebrity" with 32 subscribers on YouTube; what a joke! Furthermore, at least the first photo is not a selfie (I don't plan to look at the others). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete all as out of COM:SCOPE. The uploader appears to be the subject of these photos, but not the photographer; if so, explicit permission from the photographer(s)/copyright holder(s) is needed in order for them to be hosted on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 13:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Trade (talk) 22:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Cjp24 (talk) 22:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE + used for spam Renvoy (talk) 22:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo by non-contributor. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per [3], this is a work of Austrian artist Alexander M. Kaiser (1887–1971), who went by A. M. Cay. So this poster is not in the public domain in Germany and Austria yet, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2042.

Rosenzweig τ 23:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:06, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 3D works in Argentina, artist Erminio Blotta died in 1976

A1Cafel (talk) 05:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 05:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Miniwark (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by FredWalsh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work. No FOP for artworks in Germany.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion. Contrary to nominator's statement, there is FoP for artworks in Germany. However, the question is whether it is applicable on such a poster, which is not permanently installed. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Germany has FOP for almost everything, but it must be permanently placed in public. This is not the case for posters or advertisements. PaterMcFly (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic value Aszx5000 (talk) 09:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete it is a clear F10. Günther Frager (talk) 16:03, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

چون من از این عکس در صفحه تمرین استفاده کردم. و این عکس یک عکس شخصی هست Mhoossein (talk) 10:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This is ugly but i do not see why this must be deleted (it can be used as an exemple for photograph filters). Can you please explain in english the rationale for deletion ? Miniwark (talk) 12:23, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader request of recently uploaded file. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IMG.nonelinostella.jpg

Claimed to be own work but is likely a stock photo. This is all over the web [[4], [[5] and a variety of pintrest too. Whpq (talk) 11:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete most probably copyvio. Miniwark (talk) 12:24, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:49, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file. Redhemry (talk) 12:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion Miniwark (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file. Redhemry (talk) 12:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion Miniwark (talk) 12:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file. Redhemry (talk) 12:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep not valid reason for deletion. The file has no personal name in its metadata. Günther Frager (talk) 16:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file. Redhemry (talk) 12:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:50, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the watermarks indicate, the copyright belongs to the West African province of the Islamic State and not to "saharan kotogo".

Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert - Uploaded by Ad User Arian (talk) 12:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nominator. HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Was uploaded probably to prove "ownership" of a photo. Also, includes third party data (bank data) not intended for publishing. 2003:C0:8F32:D800:C08E:7670:4469:3DA5 12:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of scope / spam or test. Miniwark (talk) 12:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License laundering - from a YouTube account that posts official trailers and behind-the-scenes material. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The CC-BY as no rationale here, not on the Youtube Chanel either because this obviously use use copyrighted material by marvel Studio without crediting it Miniwark (talk) 12:46, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio : book cover is under copyright Culex (talk) 14:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete copyvio Miniwark (talk) 12:48, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGE Solomon203 (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cpoyrighted logo. It should be uploaded locally. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Yadhu Krishna BP (talk) 14:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. It should be uploaded locally. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:52, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Multiple issues with this file including incorrect licensing information and very clearly not an SVG file. This appears to be a reupload of File:Meet the Press 2023.png in SVG format while not being vectorized at all. Limmidy (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very clearly not a real SVG file. File was previously deleted for the same reason. Limmidy (talk) 18:43, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:38, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover, The source does not indicate a Creative Commons CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the metadata, this is from a soundtrack for a computer game (or rather smartphone game, compare [6]) and most likely copyrighted. Rosenzweig τ 15:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture by Jesus Lizaso (1961- ). No evidence of permission by the artist. Rsteen (talk) 16:27, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a painting by Rithika Merchant (1986- ). There is no evidence of permission by the artist. Rsteen (talk) 16:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advice for running a business. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 16:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work celebrating Julio Antonio. (1889-1919) created by an unknown artist for an exhibition in Tarragona, Spain in 2019. There is no evidence of permission by the contemporary artist. Rsteen (talk) 16:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused very poor photo of nondescript dog, no educational use, unusable, out of scope. Innumerable better alternatives already on Commons. Also added for same reason:

--P 1 9 9   16:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:58, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused poor quality photo of non-notable performer, no educational use, little distinguishable and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xerodegrees india (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. Out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:59, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Big Frosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promotion, out of scope.

GeorgHHtalk   17:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/ASpursFan

[edit]

These images are unlikely own work. The images are SVG but the complex drawings are a PNG image. The only true vectorization is the path that hides the text in English. Thus, to keep these images we need to ensure that the original images have a free license. Notice that many of these emblems are in enwiki under fair use [7][8][9][10][11].

Günther Frager (talk) 17:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:00, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: primarily plain text. Omphalographer (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:38, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-notable individual, likely copyvio (see https://instagram.com/linzhuu) QuickQuokka [⁠talkcontribs] 18:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 20:24, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong date. Probably wrong source/ author. Established 1620 (talk) 13:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

warum löschen sie mein bild .... das sind meine Verwanden Grossonkel, das bild ist seit 2017 in wikipedia ich habe nur die namen von meinen onkeln mit rein geschrieben also was soll das bitte . Ironmike1975 (talk) 14:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ha, super dass es dich nnoch gibt. Das habe ich auch gerade geschrieben. Dein Problem war, dass du angegeben hast, das Foto wäre von 2017. Und das ist ja offenkundig falsch. Kannst du sagen, wann das Foto gemacht wurde? Steht irgendwas dran? Grüße --h-stt !? 14:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hallo nein nein das Bild ist von 1910 laut Familien Chronik , ich meinte das Bild ist seit 2017 in Wikipedia, ich habe nur die Namen hinzugefügt und plötzlich heißt es das es falsch wer.. Ironmike1975 (talk) 08:08, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das Bild ist auch im Buch Mittenwald im Wandel der Zeit von Markus Gschwendner und da wird auch 1910 angegeben. Ironmike1975 (talk) 08:11, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Laut dem Zeitungsartikel https://www.merkur.de/lokales/garmisch-partenkirchen/mittenwald-ort29073/heute-vor-75-jahren-bruchlandung-auf-einem-mittenwalder-haus-10121796.html, der sich mit dem anderen Foto beschäftigt, das der Benutzer hochgeladen hat, gibt es in Mittenwald eine Familien deren Hausname Kerl-Martl heißt. Das spricht dafür, dass es sich beim Hochlader um jemanden aus der Familie handelt, der Bilder aus dem Familienalbum hochgeladen hat. Das Datum stimmt dann natürlich nicht. Aber der Rest ist glaubwürdig: behalten
en-summary: A newspaper article related to they other image uploaded by the same user, confirms the name Kerl-Martl that appears here too. Most probably the uploader is related to that person (a heir?) and took the picture from the family album. The year would be wrong, but the other data is plausible. keep --h-stt !? 14:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Das ist Richtig , ich bin von der Familie und die Familie schreibt sich Bader ( Kerl-Martl) Ironmike1975 (talk) 08:09, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I changed to "PD-EU-no author disclosure", if we deleted every image when a noob uses the default upload date instead of the creation date, we would almost no images. If you have a better date than circa 1920 speak up. --RAN (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per discussion, photograph is about 110 years old. Thanks to Richard for adjusting the license. --Achim55 (talk) 08:17, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per [12], this is a 1978 photo from Spanish newspaper El Pais. It may or may not be in the PD in Spain as a "simple" photograph, but it is definitely still copyrighted in the US and should be deleted. As a 1978 photo, it would be protected for 70 years pma in the US if the photographer is known. Since we're not told the name of the photographer, it's probably protected for at least 95 years from first publication (which presumably happened in 1978). Rosenzweig τ 15:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per [13], it's a photo by Spanish news agency en:EFE. --Rosenzweig τ 16:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ponieważ tak chcę Szymonolesi (talk) 15:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:58, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be caught in a licensing circular loop. The target page claim CC-BY-4.0 but also links back to this page at Commons, suggesting it was pulling the licensing from there. Given we have a named photographer and agency, I think we need to be clear where the CC license claim originated from Masem (talk) 12:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. I used the Google tool for Creative Commons images and also found this file https://snl.no/Jon_Fosse but it says CC BY 2.0 so I thought this one was better. It seems that these websites are similar and well known lexicons. But I'am not the photographer so not completely sure of course. VisbyStar (talk) 12:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
And also the cropped version. —— Eric LiuTalk 16:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have tried to find some images at the agency but they do not use Creative Commons (on Jon Fosse by the same photographer), they call their license "for media use". So I also think it is better to delete those files. VisbyStar (talk) 18:58, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is worth noting that I already reported this image, which was previously uploaded by Gurota (talk · contribs), and it was deleted. You re-uploaded the same image, at the same filename no less. This is a clearly copyrighted news photograph that never had any indication that permission was given. This is absolutely a licensing circular loop. Delete it already. Οἶδα (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wait. The image was provided by Jon Fosse's publisher Samlaget and an proper permission is on it's way by OTRS. Nbo-VHI (talk) 08:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Great to hear! Οἶδα (talk) 06:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticketr permission. --Krd 15:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


No identifable author, anonymous work of uknown data. Might be in public domain. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 03:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


No identifable author, anonymous work of uknown data. Might be in public domain. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 03:53, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


No identifable author, anonymous work of uknown data. Might be in public domain. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 10:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Does not look old from my first impression. Also, anonymous works can be copyrighted under South Korean law. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:37, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 03:52, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: exaggerated map of Goguryeo, as supported by Korean pseudohistorians as the description also admits. Only used in a wikiversity project that is about to get deleted anytime now. Enyavar (talk) 00:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yesyesyes. Two options how this is going to work: Wait until User:Omphalographer has the page that uses it deleted, he set a deadline of 2023-09-20. Or just remove this horrible graphic from the defunct project page. I'm going for (a) right now, waiting is not hard, deletion requests currently take months anyway. --Enyavar (talk) 10:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. No source for base map, so probably derivative work anyway. --Yann (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by FredWalsh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work. No FOP for artwork in Germany. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ 04:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete 20 upper 15:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The photo is my own work. The poster is a political poster of a political party. Acording german law, its not protected by copyright. Documentation is allowed. Ostendfaxpost (talk) 16:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The Picture is not so important and can get deleted. But i insist on it that no copyright violation is present. But if, than this picture (https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deutsche_Kommunistische_Partei#/media /Datei:DKP_Wahlplakat_2014_HRO.jpg) would also be a copyvio. But if there doubt, a agree a delite.
16:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC) Ostendfaxpost (talk) 16:34, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is undated, but no evidence about this photo published in 1952, which it needs to support the license tag. MirrorPlanet (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep It is dated as 1952, and we host over 100 Bachrach images using the same license. USA case law has sided with an image being made public when it leaves the custody of the creator. UP until 1989 you still had to register for a copyright. --RAN (talk) 11:43, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bollettino delle leggi dell'impero francese Gbr 101 (talk) 06:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep you may better ask for a renaming, or ask with speedydelete if it's a duplicate. Miniwark (talk) 12:04, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Gadir as Copyvio (db-copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no exif data info|help=off
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion and/or to gather further evidence. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:59, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Several copies on the Net. --Yann (talk) 12:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata looks promising, but says copyright holder MUHSIN AKGUN, presumably [14]. The uploader may or may not be him. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep copyvio. Miniwark (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry? Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 18:10, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:37, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mashafalconova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A kind of 'information' about a non-notable person. Russian article is wiped out. Not in use.

Bilderling (talk) 10:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book covers from China. Solomon203 (talk) 11:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There more than one book and there is FOP in PRC. Miniwark (talk) Miniwark (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted food menus in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There more than one menu and there is FOP in PRC. Miniwark (talk) Miniwark (talk) 12:29, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file. Redhemry (talk) 12:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. Günther Frager (talk) 16:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file. Redhemry (talk) 12:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Which name are you talking about? Hazrat Masoumeh has apparently died more than 1000 years ago. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the uploader is trying to remove the image using a nonsensical argument. Günther Frager (talk) 16:06, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 12:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file. Redhemry (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion. Günther Frager (talk) 16:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False PD rationale, not an official document of state government agencies. Komarof (talk) 13:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nervous ned~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope.

Thibaut (talk) 13:54, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep File:Geoduck man.jpg; it's not a great photo but we don't have many photos of Category:Panopea generosa in ecological context (e.g. not in seafood markets).
 Delete File:Kirbylight.jpg; it's a badly made photocomposite, probably a joke. Omphalographer (talk) 21:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Photo- Anne Günther M2k~dewiki (talk) 13:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from this book https://editions-empreinte.fr/produit/la-mecanique-des-echecs/ Culex (talk) 14:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only contribution of Abeshon (talk · contribs). Low resolution for a 2016 upload, no metadata except a transmission code: "Y7zwV7rrES5M5rZ9KtG1". Such transmission codes are typically present on images taken from Twitter or some other social media sites. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pexels images published after July 2018 cannot be hosted on Commons A1Cafel (talk) 15:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il y avait une erreur avec l'emplacement de la portella. L'emplacement correct est maintenant indiqué sur Portella-Orlu--Serra-Blanca--3.jpg. Alan Mattingly (talk) 15:51, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:46, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crisman'sPhotography (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution images, plus one (File:"Appreciating Nature's Best Amidst The Crisis ft. Mount Olango".jpg) was most likely previously published on Facebook: FBMD code seen at the metadata.

Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for images previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRTS#Email message template for release of rights to a file. Better still, have the original overwrite this FB-derived image, if the image is truly self-photographed work of the uploader.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:53, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:47, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait already exists at File:John Randolph Tucker (1823–1897) portrait photograph.jpg; subject is John Randolph Tucker (1823–1897), not John Randolph Tucker (1879–1954). Rockhead126 (talk) 16:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, it is an SVG file, but the the emblem is a PNG of the emblem including the name (in latin script). The only vectorized part is the a path element that hides such text. The original emblem probably was take from enwiki [15] that is hosted because it is fair usage. Günther Frager (talk) 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The ant at the top of the image makes this above WP:TOO, there's no proof that the author of the work is the one that uploaded the image. Nacaru (talk) 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo of nondescript wall, no context, no educational use, nothing meaningful distinguishable and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:25, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Artistic and nice, and per COM:SCOPE: 'The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative".' A good photo is instructional in itself, or this could possibly be used to illustrate translucency or the use of light and shadow in photography, for example. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep, agree with Ikan Kekek. It is artistic and has educational value/ in scope. --
Ooligan (talk) 03:16, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it’s poorly categorized but it’s an above average photograph Dronebogus (talk) 03:32, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MrMrsPositive (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Judging by EXIF, the images come from Facebook. Better sourcing and licensing are advisable than the default values.

Gikü (talk) 17:29, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a color-modified and cropped version of the copyvio file File:Vila Urbană până la renovare.jpg. Gikü (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a color-modified and cropped version of the copyvio file File:Casa Individuală până la renovare.jpg. Gikü (talk) 17:32, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope

--Alaa :)..! 18:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its my personal photo Ardakocaa (talk) 18:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

this is my personal photo. Ardakocae (talk) 12:31, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my personal photo and i don't want it to be based on internet anymore. Ardakocae (talk) 13:17, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mejor suba una foto de su auto. 186.172.220.38 01:21, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. --Yann (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.therealmyroyals.com/page/25/?ssp_iabi=1683592177543 Xocolatl (talk) 18:14, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marius130432 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:30, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marius130432 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: plain text.

Omphalographer (talk) 23:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Graag reageer ik om toelichting te geven.
Mijn broer André Lehr was klokkengieter campanoloog bij de klokkengieterij Eijsbouts te Asten. Toen daar geen opvolger in de familie Eijsbouts was is hij meerdere jaren directeur geweest. Hij overleed onverwacht in 2007.
Hij heeft talrijke publicaties op zijn naam, waaronder 18 boeken en bijna 300 artikelen.
Tijdens zijn leven ontving hij meerdere onderscheidingen, waaronder de Zilver Anjer van Prins Bernard en een eredoctoraat van de Utrechtse Universiteit.
Na zijn overlijden heb ik, mede op verzoek van mijn schoonzus, echtgenoot van André, op mij genomen te zorgen dat zijn werk niet in de vergetelheid raakt. Ik weet zeker dat studenten van de beiaardscholen in Mechelen en Amersfoort veel profijt van zijn geschriften hebben. Ook gewoon geïnteresseerden zullen zijn geschriften graag lezen.
Na zijn overlijden heb ik lange tijd veel gepubliceerd op beiaarden.nl. Nu ik zelf op hoge leeftijd ben, 91, wil ik graag deze zaken op wikipedia plaatsen. Ik heb geen enkel financiëel voordeel. Ik doe het graag en voel het als mijn plicht.
Ik hoop dat ik u voldoende heb ingelicht.
Met vriendelijke groet,
Marius Lehr
6814 JX Arnhem
06 4532 4432. Marius130432 (talk) 10:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In mijn mail van vanmorgen vergat ik nog iets te vermelden.
Ik doe dit werk ook voor museumklokenpeel.nl te Asten. Zij gebruiken sinds kort klokkenwiki.nl
Deze website kan niet overweg met pdf.bestanden. Zij adviseerden mij dat ik voor pdf-files gebruik kan maken van Wikimedia.commens.
Aldus deed ik. Het resultaat hebt u al zelf opgemerkt. Er volgen er nog wat.
Vriendelijke groet,
Marius Lehr. Marius130432 (talk) 11:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You'll have to pardon me for replying in English. I'm reading your reply using Google Translate.
There are two main issues which need to be addressed here:
  1. You are not the author of these articles. This is problematic because Wikimedia Commons requires all content to be released under a free license (e.g. a Creative Commons or compatible license), and there is no evidence that these articles are licensed this way. Since your brother is no longer living (my condolences), he cannot relicense the articles; you may need have his heirs contact Commons:VRT to provide the appropriate license.
  2. More generally, though, Wikimedia Commons is a media repository for Wikimedia projects. While files uploaded at Commons can be used by other web sites, that does not mean that Commons is a public web host. If you are uploading these files specifically so that they can be used at Klokkenwiki, it may be more appropriate for you to work with them to find a way to host the files there.
Omphalographer (talk) 16:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
At least one of these includes non-text content: File:Gilden.pdf has some illustrations, although they look old enough to be public domain. If the uploader isn't the author of the text, though, they need to show that they have permission to upload it here under a CC licence, and should credit the authors in the summary fields. Belbury (talk) 10:27, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not "own work", see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio (c) Zeljko Mrnjavac M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:44, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has claimed on en.wiki to not have a professional connection with subject. Image is presumptively copied from a portrait and not the uploader's own work. C.Fred (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:57, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has claimed on en.wiki to not have a professional connection with subject. Image is presumptively copied from a portrait and not the uploader's own work. C.Fred (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Redhemry as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: The owner of this file is not satisfied with her name being registered in the file.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image has been uploaded 2 years ago. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivatives of the deleted file.

Komarof (talk) 19:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, no proof of licensing in source PizzaKing13 (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation, no proof of licensing in source PizzaKing13 (talk) 20:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file appears in Vogue ( https://www.vogue.fr/vogue-hommes/article/lacoste-collabore-pour-la-premiere-fois-avec-un-rappeur-moha-la-squale/66708 ) and nothing proves that the uploaded is linked to the photograph. Symac (talk) 21:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

+ another version of the file at File:Moha la squale.jpg Symac (talk) 21:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jestem autorem pliku, nie chcę żeby moje zdjęcie było dalej dostępne. / I am the author od the photo, I dont want my picture to be available. Shikerius (talk) 21:18, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope anyway. --Yann (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It may be a packet of crisps / Chips, but this is a copyright work. Ipso facto copyvio. Unclear if creative enough to be copyrightable, converting to DR. King of ♥ 21:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • If COM:TOO Bangladesh applies, that's a red link, meaning that no-one on Commons who might know what their legal standards are has shared the information. I think the photo is OK per COM:TOO US, because the only part that could be over it (the upper left corner) is incidental, ergo de minimis, and blurry when zoomed in. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:39, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete on the simple basis that it is a picture of a copyright work. All written/designed/artistic work is ipso facto copyright, thus the underling work must be copyright. Trisha's been designed, even is a way so simple as to lay the text out in a way pleasing to the eye. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 06:47, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Copyrighted elements are de minimis. --Yann (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1937 photo tagged {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}, which means it was not PD in 1996 at the URAA date, so it's still copyrighed in the US until 2032. Recommend replacement with File:Princess Katherine of Greece and Denmark, 1935.jpg. holly {chat} 21:50, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; significant doubt exists as to this file's freedom. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:05, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VladBojko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most probably the fake license. Can't be own. The artist died in 2017.

Bilderling (talk) 12:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The painting are clearly protected by copyright. The portrait photograph is taken from this article published a month before the upload. Günther Frager (talk) 16:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep the photos are mine, not the artworks. those are the photos of the artworks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladBojko (talk • contribs) 08:41, 10 October 2023‎ (UTC)[reply]
@VladBojko as you stated you are not the copyright holder of the artworks, and that is the reason these images are nominated for deletion. See COM:DW for more information. We only host images that the photographer provide a free license and the subject photographer isn't protected by copyright (there are some exception like freedom of panorama, but it is not the case here). Günther Frager (talk) 13:43, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --FitIndia Semi-retired 05:06, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VladBojko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Most probably the fake license. A collection of historical images can't be own.

Bilderling (talk) 12:12, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the photos are mine too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VladBojko (talk • contribs) 08:41, 10 October 2023‎ (UTC)[reply]
So you are the photographer who took the photos many years ago? -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:38, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Wrong licence, no proper source. It seems like a cross-wiki spam. --Podzemnik (talk) 18:32, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Да будет цвет (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for modern sculpture.

Komarof (talk) 16:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:22, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work by German artist Jürgen Paas (1958- ). There is no evidence of any permission from him. Rsteen (talk) 14:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:30, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted posters in Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 14:34, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per ran. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:22, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book covers from Hong Kong. Solomon203 (talk) 11:49, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep There more than one book and there is FOP in PRC. Miniwark (talk) Miniwark (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:FOP China says "Not OK for 2D works like murals and outdoor paintings, unless their presences in images are not being main subjects", which appears to be the case here. holly {chat} 22:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a work by American artist Alicia Eggert (1981- ). There is no evidence of any permission from her as the copyright owner. Rsteen (talk) 14:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Is there really a copyright on that??? Yann (talk) 12:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann. Well, if you see it as an installation/sculpture exhibited in a gallery, why should it not be protected by copyright? Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 04:00, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:UA. holly {chat} 22:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo of a 3d object, photographer's permission required. Komarof (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Needs a better source, historical drawing, it could be public domain but we need verification of that. Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 22:51, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is definitely NOT Hauksbee. This is an image of James Gregory, not Hauksbee. So far, I have found no authentic image of Hauksbee the Elder. See this book plate, same image, identified for James Gregory https://www.mediastorehouse.com/heritage-images/james-gregory-scottish-mathematician-astronomer-14906030.html and portrait https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:James_Gregory.jpeg IGE (talk) 22:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and I removed it from articles. holly {chat} 22:54, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Prince Erik, Count of Rosenborg, 1924.jpg, but with a bad image format (PNGs should not be used for photos). All usages have been replaced with the JPG version. holly {chat} 21:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why should PNGs not be used for photos? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 20:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Per en:PNG#JPEG, JPEG uses a lossy encoding method specifically designed for photographic image data, which is typically dominated by soft, low-contrast transitions, and an amount of noise or similar irregular structures. Using PNG instead of a high-quality JPEG for such images would result in a large increase in filesize with negligible gain in quality. holly {chat} 18:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Duplicate dealt with. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:44, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]