Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/09/29
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
Agence_Rol_btv1b53155615p.jpg){kind=link}
Agence_Rol_btv1b531556147.jpg){kind=link}
![49 File:Sculpture "Vacances au bord de la mer" plage du Larvotto Monaco.jpg](#File:Sculpture_"Vacances_au_bord_de_la_mer"_plage_du_Larvotto_Monaco.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5331807.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5288562.jpg){kind=link}
![56 File:Dublin Airport "Supersize" poster, Belfast (March 2017) - geograph.org.uk - 5319212.jpg](#File:Dublin_Airport_"Supersize"_poster,_Belfast_(March_2017)_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5319212.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_4713378.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_06.jpg){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_05.jpg){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_07.jpg){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_08.jpg){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_09.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I uploaded it by mistake Mylenavr (talk) 23:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mylenavr (talk) 23:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mylenavr (talk) 23:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mylenavr (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mylenavr (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mylenavr (talk) 23:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Mylenavr (talk) 23:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope, Greitkan does not exist N Panama 84534 04:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
incomprehensive photos. Nonsense. Lemonaka (talk) 08:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:WEBHOST. Personal images from non contributors. --Yann (talk) 11:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Koavf as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 11:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Per nudity: "Please note that low-quality images with no realistic educational use nor a purpose within the Wikimedia projects may be deleted." This is a low quality image and can easily be replacable. Plenty of other images can be used to illustrate nudity, if that is the intent. The same goes for illustrations of the location. Sven Manguard (talk) 03:18, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Historical photo. Day nursery in Berlin 1958 George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
not appropriate image 2A06:C701:9819:5A00:440C:7BED:BA88:78C9 12:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: nonsense request. --Rosenzweig τ 13:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deceptive map, derived without attribution, malformed SVG. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 16:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Because it is a selfie which is not used in any article Callangas (talk) 16:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- How is it a selfie when there is no person it it? A.-K. D. (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist when they saw the button. --Achim55 (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
No creo que sea trabajo propio 191.126.171.38 01:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; CV per reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This is illegal. 77.10.206.231 07:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Keep a kid and a horse? Multichill (talk) 19:39, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Эlcobbola talk 21:35, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Not appropriate image 2A06:C701:9819:5A00:440C:7BED:BA88:78C9 12:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep COM:INUSE, and your problem is? You think children should never be seen in photos? Anyway, that's irrelevant. See COM:NPOV. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Not appropriae nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
This photo is inappropriate because it reveals a girl's bottom through an unbuttoned dress. 24.130.50.163 01:03, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep nonsense --Achim (talk) 10:45, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep no child porn, "I don't like it/It's against my personal values" is no reason to delete. -- Milad A380 talk? 16:45, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: COM:NOTCENSORED. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:58, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion Krd 14:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
Not appropriate image 2A06:C701:9819:5A00:440C:7BED:BA88:78C9 12:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. Also nonsense. Nude babies are not pornographic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Not appropriate nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope - a montage of File:Toni Braxton press photo 2015.png with a different background and a fabricated description "used for political roleplay purposes". GeorgR (de) (talk) 19:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
-20230929195300-File:RepresentativeBraxbury.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, speedied also for possible personality-rights violation. --Túrelio (talk) 07:51, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Incorrect license Fossiladder13 (talk) 21:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- To clarify FA13's point here a recent paper published in GeologyToday, a Wiley publication (direct link Wikipedia Library link) claimed that this illustration was under a CC BY 4.0 license. However the post on the website from which the image originates from includes no reference to any kind of license, and never appears to have done so [1], and a 2019 post on the website states that unless otherwise noted, the images published on the website are under a CC-BY-NC license. I am inclined to think the authors of the GeologyToday paper goofed here, and the images are under a NC license, and thus incompatible with commons. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:19, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Pantallazo no se considera trabajo propio. 191.126.171.38 01:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- A screenshot should not mean it is not my work as I have no digital version of this. You must remember, that digital was not common back in the 1980s. As such, it is a photograph of my original work which is obviously printed out. Carey3146 (talk) 01:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete unless the VRT ticket proves conclusively that you are entitled to upload and licence the file. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 06:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ok, then what was the point of a ‘discussion’ if the ultimate responsibility and authority is left to the VRT system? This seems like an organised space to ridicule me, when I have followed the correct process. The only reasoning behind this is a ‘hunch’ or a ‘suspicion’ that I have done something wrong with this upload when that is clearly incorrect. Carey3146 (talk) 07:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023092910000289 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 02:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 19:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
duplicated Jianwu Tan (talk) 21:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 19:00, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Not good version Robin Terrasse (talk) 22:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:57, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
not good picture Robin Terrasse (talk) 22:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not good picture Robin Terrasse (talk) 22:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
not good version Robin Terrasse (talk) 22:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:58, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
not good version Robin Terrasse (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Agence_Rol_btv1b53155615p.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Agence_Rol_btv1b53155615p.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not good photo Robin Terrasse (talk) 22:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Agence_Rol_btv1b531556147.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Agence_Rol_btv1b531556147.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
not good photo Robin Terrasse (talk) 22:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I, the Owner of the Pic am not sure, that I have full absolute copyright by allowance to take the photo. Please delete. Shark1989z (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Shark1989z I don't see any copyright problems in here (doesn't seem like a derivative work and definitely not COM:FOP), especially when you already said that this is your own photo. I think you might be referring to Commons:Personality rights as to whether the people in the photo allowed you to post onto Commons, is that what you mean? S5A-0043Talk 09:02, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Right and also cause it was on an event. Shark1989z (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- I see, in that case,
Speedy delete as G7. S5A-0043Talk 09:10, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- I see, in that case,
- Right and also cause it was on an event. Shark1989z (talk) 09:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I, the Owner of the Pic am not sure, that I have full absolute copyright by allowance to take the photo. Please delete. Shark1989z (talk) 23:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I, the Owner of the Pic am not sure, that I have full absolute copyright by allowance to take the photo. Please delete. Shark1989z (talk) 23:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I, the Owner of the Pic am not sure, that I have full absolute copyright by allowance to take the photo. Please delete. Shark1989z (talk) 23:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I, the Owner of the Pic am not sure, that I have full absolute copyright by allowance to take the photo. Please delete. Shark1989z (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
I, the Owner of the Pic am not sure, that I have full absolute copyright by allowance to take the photo. Please delete. Shark1989z (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
File:TAF Deutsche Meisterschaften 2023 Orientalischer Tanz - Bauchtanz - Siegerehrung Video.webm
[edit]I, the Owner of the Pic am not sure, that I have full absolute copyright by allowance to take the photo. Please delete. Shark1989z (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:56, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Purely promotional upload. The same goes for the creation of Category:Gabbie Odonkor, which should also be deleted along with the image. Adamant1 (talk) 18:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. These look like they may have been intended as captions for photos uploaded as part of Commons:GOIF-Nubuke Photo Contest, but it's unclear what photos they refer to; in some cases, there isn't any photo in the user's uploads matching the description.
- File:Zakaria.pdf
- File:Gomaah Lambert - Wa Smock Maker (Batakari).pdf
- File:WEAVERS.pdf
- File:Nakore Mosque.pdf
- File:George Furgurson.pdf
Omphalographer (talk) 05:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Fictional and out of scope N Panama 84534 09:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
1964 artwork by an artist who died in 2007. Undelete in 2078. Abzeronow (talk) 15:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 00:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Prince William of gloucester and his father, prince Henry, duke of gloucester octuber,1943.jpg
[edit]
Adam Marcus died in 1959, this is a 1943 photograph so it would not be free in the US until at least 2039. Abzeronow (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 00:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Cecil Beaton died in 1980. Undelete in 2051. Abzeronow (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 00:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Cecil Beaton died in 1980, Undelete in 2051. Abzeronow (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 00:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
1952 photograph, this could be public domain in the UK as the photographer appears to be unknown, but would not be public domain in the US. Abzeronow (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 00:38, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Liqen Artista
[edit]- File:'TEA HEARON', 2014.png
- File:'Heaven', 2017.jpg
- File:El renacer, 2017.png
- File:'SHARK HEELS', 2022.jpg
- File:DIGITAL LOVE FEELINGS.jpg
- File:KEPHRA, 2019.png
- File:‘THE THREAT OF THE FRUITFUL’ 2020.png
- File:The madness, 2020.png
- File:‘100 WEGE EINEN VOGEL ZU ZEICHNEN’ 2013.jpg
- File:'HOWITZER' COLLECTION 2015.jpg
- File:‘KEPHRA’ WITH LIQEN 2019.jpg
- File:‘KEPHRA’ 2019.jpg
- File:LIQEN ARTIST IN EXHIBITION.jpg
- File:LIQEN ARTIST.jpg
- File:‘HOMODIGITALIS’, 2018 WITH LIQEN.jpg
- File:‘HOMODIGITALIS’, 2018.jpg
- File:‘CRONOMORFOSIS’, 2010 EXHIBITION.jpg
- File:DETAILS OF A PIECE IN ‘CRONOMORFOSIS’, 2010.jpg
- File:SCULPTURES IN ‘CRONOMORFOSIS’, 2010.jpg
- File:‘CRONOMORFOSIS’, 2010.jpg
- File:"EMERGENTE, 2017.jpg
- File:‘CUCATRÁFICO’, 2018.jpg
- File:‘RUSH HOUR’, 2017.jpg
- File:‘WALL STREET LABYRINTH’, 2011.jpg
- File:‘DRAGON FLY ’, 2017.jpg
- File:‘BLUE COBALT CAT’, 2018.jpg
- File:'EL DEVENIR FLOR-ANIMAL’, 2014.jpg
- File:‘EL CUIDADO’, 2016.jpg
- File:‘EL RENACER’, 2014.jpg
- File:‘LUNATIC’, 2010.jpg
- File:‘PALEOFUTURE’, 2014.jpg
- File:‘MONKEY TO ROBOT’, 2014.jpg
- File:Working in the Studio with "El intelecto".jpg
- File:Homo-digitalis, 2017.jpg
- File:Working in the Studio with ‘HEARON WALKING’,.jpg
- File:ARANEIDA, 2022.jpg
- File:ALICE, 2022.jpg
- File:AMBIPLYGIA, 2022.jpg
Selfpromotion/selfies. Use of Commons as personal image host service. The user is the artist, who tried to create his own article on eswiki with a sockpuppet.[2] --MexTDT (talk) 08:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the artist is not notable. These images look like real art (big oil-on-canvas paintings) and the exhibition seems quite large. We need to have more information about the artist and/or the notability of the art gallery showing his works. PaterMcFly (talk) 09:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I create this page about Liqen's art because I have a project related to his works, so I think is necesary his wiki. but I'm not the artist, of course! I get confused on how to create an article and should not put my user as "Liqen Artista" I thought that it would be the name of the article. All the images and his work are very real and amazing! So, I think a solution if you can help me is to Change my user name with my name, in order to create his article! Can you please help me with this? I can give all the info you want! thank you in advance! Liqen Artista (talk) 21:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm the same person of the another article "liqen", Harena, I created another because of the same problem of the confusion about my user name. The best solution for all this, I think is to remove this user Liqen Artista, and only left the another with my name! Harena, there I will upload the images! If you can help me with this, please!! I just want to write about this artist :(. Thank you! Liqen Artista (talk) 21:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Timeline:
- 01:17 27 September 2023: User Liquen Artista is registered at eswiki.[3]
- From 21:17, 27 September 2023 to 10:34, 28 September 2023: User Liqen Artista ( local | logs | global ) uploads several images, including selfies, of the artist known as Liquen.[4]
- 05:18 28 September 2023: Sockpuppet Harena LM (as confirmed above) is registered at eswiki, very likely to avoid a swift permanent block for conflict of interest and promotion.[5]
- 06:48 28 September 2023: Sockpuppet Harena LM creates Liqen.
- 06:53 28 September 2023: Harena LM is warned about the impending deletion of Liqen.[6]
- 07:53 28 September 2023: Harena LM starts to look for solutions to stop deletion of article.[7]
- 09:16 28 September 2023: Harena LM makes a petition to restore the article, lying about being the artist by saying he is a different person who admires Liqen's work.[8]
- 19:14 28 September 2023: Once more, looks for advice and sounds very eager to keep adding stuff to his own biography, not if, when it gets restored. This is the last contribution of either accounts.[9]
- 21:23 28 September 2023: Restoration of article denied.[10]
- Since the user only has had the sole purpose of using Wikipedia en español for self promotion and his contributions have been only to create and defend his own biography and his picture files and nothing else, then his uploads fall into criteria F10: Personal photos by non-contributors.
- I really don’t understand Wikipedia Commons. Even though you have certain criteria for deletion, all that matters in the end are copyright issues; as long as someone gives you written permission or doesn’t violate copyright, anyone can use the project as his/her free mirror to a DeviantArt or Pinterest galleries or to insult and harass other users without consequences. MexTDT (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Liqen Artista The first point you need to clarify is whether the artist is "notable" (=known well enough to have an article in Wikipedia). Every wiki has it's own rules there, but generally, that means that the artist must have had exhibitions in well-known locations, have had publications over him and/or a very large social media coverage (in the order of Millions of followers). There seems to be a public exhibition visible in the images, but I can't find any information about that exhibition center.
- Can you provide more information about any of the previous points? Additionally, if you're not the artist, you need to contact COM:VRT with a written approval from the artist that he agrees to putting the works under a CC-BY license. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you!! Where should I clarify this? All is on internet, I will contact COM: VRT but now I only want to delete all the photos in Liqen Artista and event Delete the User! As I have another as Harena, I want to use only Harena User because I can contribute to more thnings and it is my user, no Liqen Artista, I created Liqen Artista because I thought it was the article but No. Delete LIQEN ARTISTA, please! Thank you <3 Liqen Artista (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Users cannot be deleted, just locked. But that doesn't really matter much here, just make sure that if you don't want to use the Liqen Artista name, then don't do so. You're still logged in as that user. PaterMcFly (talk) 11:43, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you!! Where should I clarify this? All is on internet, I will contact COM: VRT but now I only want to delete all the photos in Liqen Artista and event Delete the User! As I have another as Harena, I want to use only Harena User because I can contribute to more thnings and it is my user, no Liqen Artista, I created Liqen Artista because I thought it was the article but No. Delete LIQEN ARTISTA, please! Thank you <3 Liqen Artista (talk) 23:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
- Timeline:
Deleted: the files were all nominated separately as well and then deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 16:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
seems to be more a personal contribution rather than something clearly within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 00:05, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Very low quality; over 80 other far better photos of the same group of trees MPF (talk) 00:35, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Monaco, artist Stéphane Cipre is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
![04:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/29#c-A1Cafel-20230929041600-File:Sculpture_"Vacances_au_bord_de_la_mer"_plage_du_Larvotto_Monaco.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
![17:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/29#c-Krd-20231006172000-File:Sculpture_"Vacances_au_bord_de_la_mer"_plage_du_Larvotto_Monaco.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in France, artist Stéphane Cipre is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Stéphane Cipre is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Monaco, artist Fernando Botero died recently (in 2023) A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:20, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Georgia, needs permission from the artist Avtandil Monaselidze A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5331807.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5331807.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5331807.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5331807.jpg){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5288562.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5288562.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5319212.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_5319212.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
AgnieszkaeM uploaded 3 files. After deleting 2 of them as blatant copyright violations, I have a strong feeling, that this is not own work either. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
In my opinion the cover is not own work. I suspect copyright violation. At least real author and correct license are needed. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Very low quality, no location information, makes identification impossible; no realistic use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 10:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 10:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
This is either out of scope as not educational and created by a user; or copyright violation and out of scope. as not own work. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work: visual characteristics suggest screengrab, and user name also indicates that subject is same as uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:21, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative reproduction of likely non-free original material from EAPE MPF (talk) 14:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Norway, artist Ørnulf Bast died in 1974 A1Cafel (talk) 14:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Norway, artist Ørnulf Bast died in 1974 A1Cafel (talk) 14:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, artist Enrico Saroldi died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 14:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, artist Ovidiu Maitec died in 2007 A1Cafel (talk) 14:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, artist Ovidiu Maitec died in 2007 A1Cafel (talk) 14:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 15:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in South Africa, artist Coert Steynberg died in 1982 A1Cafel (talk) 15:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in South Africa, artist Coert Steynberg died in 1982 A1Cafel (talk) 15:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in South Africa, artist Coert Steynberg died in 1982 A1Cafel (talk) 15:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 15:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
False claims and dubious license. Clearly a scan of a pre-digital black & white photo, not a 2023 photo as claimed by uploader. Reverse image search shows that the image has been online at hdimagegallery.net since 2015. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:23, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
I did not find this image in a reverse image search, but the companion image by the uploader, also claimed to be from September 2023, was found to be on the cover of a 2004 book ([11]). I suspect the source and licensing claims are no more honest for this image. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Classwork assignment according to the description. No other description about why this graph is in scope. Abzeronow (talk) 20:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
1987 Swiss photograph that has halftone. I think we need VRT for this. Abzeronow (talk) 20:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
not educational — billinghurst sDrewth 23:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Requires COM:OTRS permission for all the cartoons, photos, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Not own work. Source is iNaturalist with NC license. Requires COM:OTRS permission for all the cartoons, photos, etc. https://www.inaturalist.org/check_lists/2792148-Solpugids-of-southern-Africa Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:24, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
no clear educational purpose, seems more a personal image than something within scope — billinghurst sDrewth 00:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete If there was information as to where this congregation was, and what type of congregation, it might be arguably in scope despite the rather poor image quality. However with no context information it is useless. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo? not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 00:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Promotional material- out of scope Ooligan (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:07, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Low quality file unlikely to be useful Ooligan (talk) 01:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of COM:SCOPE. — Haseeb (talk) 03:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammed amin zahran (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
- File:محمد أمين زهران الكانب الصحفي والسيناريست ومؤلف الروايات والقصص.jpg
- File:محمد أمين زهران كاتب صحفي ومؤلف روايات وقصص.jpg
- File:الكاتب الصحفي محمد أمين زهران.jpg
- File:المستشار يحية محمود عبدالرازق.jpg
- File:محمد أمين زهران.jpg
- File:صورة شخصية للكاتب الصحفي محمد أمين زهران.jpg
--Alaa :)..! 10:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 19:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality file of a character owned by PBS Trivialist (talk) 02:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per above, derivative work of non-free content, out of scope, uploaded by a vandal. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted film poster. VRT permission needed. MKFI (talk) 10:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Fitindia. --Kadı Message 07:33, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
User with bad history, small files, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.
Yann (talk) 11:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Whatever ultimate means here, this is a template completely without reason. Also only one page included, so even more useless. TU-nor (talk) 11:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete Agreed. I'm not sure that series of galleries is useful. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:34, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 13:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I agree, Delete. The monument was erected in 1996. --Fundacja Nomos (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Fundacja Nomos: Since you are the uploader you can personally request an immediate deletion from an admin to take care of this quicker.--KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I agree,
Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:42, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio (c) Franz Zetzl M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The copyright holder apparently is the owner of the company advertised in the image, and possibly the uploader (considering that user name and website name are almost identical). Hence this is probably less of a copyright issue than outright advertising. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
possible copyvio (c) Franz Zetzl M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete The copyright holder apparently is the owner of the company advertised in the image, and possibly the uploader (considering that user name and website name are almost identical). Hence this is probably less of a copyright issue than outright advertising. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by User:2tables
[edit]Unused files meant to be used for the Scratch Forums. Probably against COM:WEBHOST.
--SergioFLS (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:36, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Is this simple geometry? Trade (talk) 22:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Nope! Over any country's COM:TOO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:49, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 08:50, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Requires COM:OTRS permission for all the cartoons, photos, etc. Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete thought not because of the cartoons (think the photos are drawn by the uploader himself/herself/themself, background is possibly COM:DM), but potentially out of scope as a user photo. S5A-0043Talk 09:16, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Just still another non-sensical collection of flags without any logical structure or inclusion criteria. And whatever is ultimate about it? Except perhaps ultimate nonsense. TU-nor (talk) 11:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant fork of Sovereign-state flags in 1900. --Achim55 (talk) 19:21, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
La personne sur cette photo n'est pas Andrée Lacelle. 216.223.91.190 17:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete COM:INUSE but very unlikely to be the banned sockpuppet's own work, considering how small it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:53, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:26, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) El Correo M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:44, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1934 Bassano photograph, public domain in the UK but not in the US, Undelete in 2030. Abzeronow (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
No authority by the artist Susanne Zuehlke, born 1962 Bahnmoeller (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
NoFoP in Ukraine Dgho (talk) 10:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete No Permission from the architect. --Микола Василечко (talk) 15:33, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate file to File:US Army G6 meeting, March 2022.jpg SmartyPants22 (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author Steve Thompson Copyright holder @ ThompsonPhotographic.com 2020". VRT permission from Steve Thompson needed. MKFI (talk) 10:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tulssltutuu (talk · contribs)
[edit]I doubt these images are all own work / 2023 as claimed.
- File:Adwaith Pv.jpg
- File:Adwaith PV black belt.jpg
- File:Adwaith PV.jpg
- File:Adwaith Pv with radwa arafa.jpg
MKFI (talk) 11:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Author misused commons as testing ground Joschi71 (talk) 11:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:42, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality human anus photo, we had better options in the category A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality vulva and anus photo, we had better options in the category A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Not better Asian, if we delete, we have selection bias. --RAN (talk) 02:34, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete even if this was the only photo of an Asian vulva I’d still vote delete as it’s so poor as to be useless Dronebogus (talk) 14:27, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: screenshot of text content. Omphalographer (talk) 04:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Campaign posters for the 2023 Monegasque general election, two weeks before the election.jpg
[edit]
No freedom of panorama in Monaco A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Question Yes, Monaco has no "freedom of panorama" as described on Commons:FOP. But why do you think this collection of publicly displayed election posters falls under copyright protection in the first place? I don't see a reason for deletion. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I see various portrait photographs on the poster, and Monegasque copyright protection is applicable to photographic works and those obtained by a process analogous to photography, among others. --HyperGaruda (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:54, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
File:Campaign posters for the 2023 Monegasque general election, the day before the election.jpg
[edit]
No freedom of panorama in Monaco A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Question Yes, Monaco has no "freedom of panorama" as described on Commons:FOP. But why do you think this collection of publicly displayed election posters falls under copyright protection in the first place? I don't see a reason for deletion. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I see various portrait photographs on the poster, and Monegasque copyright protection is applicable to photographic works and those obtained by a process analogous to photography, among others. --HyperGaruda (talk) 12:21, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:55, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
not from CC video Veracious (talk) 04:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Veracious Nope, Its a video CC. I dunno why, The video was suddenly made private by him. But, it's true that before that it was a CC video. Fahri talk📬 14:37, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of Sangled Picrew Di (they-them) (talk) 04:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
-20230929045400-File:AMartenson.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 04:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_4713378.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_geograph.org.uk_-_4713378.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:57, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). American Photograph is undated at source but this could be a 1920s photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 19:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-US-expired. --Yann (talk) 12:14, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Files by SandeshLamsalNepal
[edit]- File:Christmas Day Celebration in Nepal 1.jpg
- File:Dr. Sandesh Lamsal.jpg
- File:Holi Celebration in Nepal.jpg
- File:Christmas Day Celebration in Nepal.jpg
- File:Dr. Sandesh Lamsal with Puspa Kamal Dahal.jpg
- File:Tihar Celebration in Nepal (Brother and Sister).jpg
- File:Tihar Celebration in Nepal (Brother).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by William Graham as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 01:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC) File:Tihar Celebration in Nepal (Brother).jpg
- Keep. I think the files should not be deleted. The uploader was registered months ago, and the photos are relatively high quality and participate in Wiki Loves Folklore 2023. · מקף Hyphen ෴ · 01:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:31, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
This is an old logo from the Private Bank Maerki Baumann. We have newer ones on Wiki and want to delete this one. Thank you so much. Mbc marketing (talk) 05:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep That is not a reason to delete the old one. We also keep historic images/logos. PaterMcFly (talk) 09:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:33, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission (No permission since) Krd 09:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Strange, the named copyright holder User:Mountain Wave Project doesn't seem to be the uploader. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
replaced promo spam logo - no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Nome del file errato Biagiulia (talk) 09:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- That can be changed. What should be the correct name? PaterMcFly (talk) 10:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:34, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lvova as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The user scanned the photo, not made it Yann (talk) 11:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:DW, no info on actual source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Upload of a color-television photograph of likely an in-copyright show, that doesn't have information about its origin or the specified show. The label for the photo suggests 1998 Sadads (talk) 11:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking info on original source. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Qué cuenta en la descripción? Porqué es tan larga? Es trabajo propio? 191.126.171.38 01:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @191.126.171.38 Translation: Long description without source, unlikely own work. Lemonaka (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright issue, a non cropped version exist in the web. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:20, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The screen of this file was taken with an iPhone LudwigSK (talk) 02:55, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - other uploads from the uploader deleted as well. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:29, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Architecture by Jože Plečnik (1872-1957); the architecture is still copyrighted, and there is unfortunately no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia. — Yerpo Eh? 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:31, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
The file is so much inaccurate (see the discussion page) that it seems that it was created in intentionally misleading way to misinform about the real popularity of sites and thus promote the Russian network VKontakte. Oleksiy.golubov (talk) 11:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Weak oppose
- There are indeed some peculiarities with this map, especially concerning the claimed popularity of VK. I encountered a similar issue when I had to correct the assertion that VK was the most popular social network in Bulgaria, as it was not accurate. I strongly suspect that this may also be the case for Germany and Finland, and the situation in Ukraine appears to have changed significantly as well.
- However, rather than immediately advocating for deletion, I believe our primary focus should be on rectifying these inaccuracies. We have the opportunity to make the map more reliable by providing credible sources to support the data, just as I did in the past.
- One significant concern I have is the map's lack of updates over the years. Social networks are known for their dynamic nature, and it's crucial to keep such a resource up to date. I might be more inclined towards supporting deletion on these grounds—that we might not have the necessary resources or reliable sources to maintain the map accurately.
- Regarding the suspicion that the map might have been created in bad faith, it's essential to investigate any such allegations thoroughly. If concrete evidence of malicious intent emerges, then deletion could be a more appropriate course of action.
- In summary, the question we should be asking is whether we can fix the map's inaccuracies. If it's possible, let's work towards that goal. If not, we might need to consider deletion. These are my two cents on the matter.
— Luchesar • T/C/U 13:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE in multiple articles. Also read COM:NPOV. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lvova as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The user scanned the photo, not made it Yann (talk) 11:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:33, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
No FOP in France. Yann (talk) 11:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ben oui, ça on le sait. Serait-il possible de savoir en quoi ce panneau est une œuvre unique. Si nous envisageons de faire disparaitre tous les panneaux, il y aura du ménage à faire.--François GOGLINS (talk) 17:14, 30 September 2023 (UTC).
- Il est suffisant original pour être sous droits d'auteur. Désolé. Yann (talk) 17:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- En quoi est-il original ? --François GOGLINS (talk) 17:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:35, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Architecture by w:Jože Plečnik (1872-1957); the architecture is still copyrighted, and there is unfortunately no Commons-compatible freedom of panorama in Slovenia. A09 (talk) 12:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bigbadfuds (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:Scope: personal artwork.
- File:Conspiracy Theorist 33 A.D. (Oil on board 133cm x 57cm).jpg
- File:Agenda 21 (oil on canvas 40cm x 50cm) Painted with Ursula Webber.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Painted_with_Ursula_Webber.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MKFI (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was moved to the Moroccan Arabic slot (ary); this redirect should be deleted. FunLater (talk) 20:06, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. -- CptViraj (talk) 16:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Дмитрий Константинович Иванов (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam. Self-adv. A mixture of a historocal photo plus some video as 'own' - some concerns about a license. Not in use.
Bilderling (talk) 08:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Добрый день!
- По поводу видео (File:Галина Вайнман.ogg) – Это видео было смонтировано мною, по просьбе Ольги Стожаровой – дочери Галины Вайнман-Стожаровой. Все права на видео-материалы принадлежат Ольге Стожар. (Она наследница). Использование съемок АРТ_ТВ и интервью художницы согласовано Ольгой. Цель видео – сохранить память о художнице. Никакой рекламы и пиара не планировалось. Дмитрий Константинович Иванов (talk) 12:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Clearly not
own. Lesless (talk) 09:23, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: not own works as per uploader's comments, need COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Wrong copyright. The image is designed, though not yet registered, by (or for) the Government of Kursk Oblast (see https://kursk.ru/news/42740-razrabotan-proekt-po-brendirovaniyu-obshchestvennogo-transporta-goroda-kurska/). Volgogradskij Avtobusnyij Park LLC (Russian: ООО "Волгоградский автобусный парк") is not listed as the copyright owner (https://companies.rbc.ru/id/1034702088519-ooo-volgogradskij-avtobusnyij-park/). ATI1999 (talk) 11:07, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HeminKurdistan as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10; the uploader has put his image on an irrelevant wikipedia article (of someone dead at the age of 81) Yann (talk) 11:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and vandalism/hoax. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:01, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
no author given, used for promotional puprposes on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope (no longer used). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
cannot be a selfie as is claimed, nu author given, no permission, out of project scope, used for advertising on nl-wiki Hoyanova (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from GeoGebra. The software company declares that it is released for non-commercial use only: https://www.geogebra.org/license
HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Self-promotion HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:42, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not used meaningfully. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Filippo Caccamo
[edit]OOS files uploaded by a non-contributor for the purposes of promoting the person in the photograph. Although it's unlikely the uploader owns the copyrights to the images anyway.
Adamant1 (talk) 18:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Per talk page message, uploader says "Le foto sono scannerizzate dall'originale cartaceo del proprietario che me le ha date per pubblicarle, ed io utilizzo Linux per ritagliarle e ripulirle. Dimmi tu che posso fare...grazie per le future indicazioni ciao." Google translate as "The photos are scanned from the paper original of the owner who gave them to me to publish, and I use Linux to crop and clean them up. Tell me what I can do...thanks for the future guidance bye."
The uploader is not the original photographer (metadata indicates this is a screenshot). Abzeronow (talk) 19:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Grazie del suggerimento. Tuttavia, sono stato proprio io a chiedere la cancellazione, in quanto non è in linea con i rapporti col Pilota in questione. Se vorrà un giorno pubblicare le sue foto deve farlo rivolgendosi ad un team professionista. Purtroppo, alla voce 'Antonio Giovanni Maria Zetti', su Google, è associata questa immagine. Il che, non deve più essere. Grazie. A presto. zebulo22 (talk) 19:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:29, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The author / rights owner does not agree with the publication. Pippich (talk) 20:50, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused file that's now superseded by a better-quality, multilingual version. Alhadis (talk) 20:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused file that's now superseded by a better-quality, multilingual version. Alhadis (talk) 21:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused file that's now superseded by a better-quality, multilingual version. Alhadis (talk) 21:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
The artist of this 1929 French drawing, fr:Gabriel-Antoine Barlangue, died in 1956, so it is not in the public domain in France yet, and the file should be deleted. It can be restored in 2027. The US copyright will have expired by then as well. Rosenzweig τ 21:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete agreed. 2027 isn't too far off anyway. surprised its been on the Commons for 10 years with no notice. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 02:27, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Unused file that doesn't appear to have ever been used, now made redundant by SVG version. Alhadis (talk) 21:28, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kurttrainerr (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence that the Flickr user hold the rights to the posters
Trade (talk) 21:32, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible derivative work Trade (talk) 21:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete Unnecessary image and No Freedom of Arts.
- Baqotun0023 (talk) 04:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence that the YouTuber own the right to the poster Trade (talk) 21:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete same as here.
- Baqotun0023 (talk) 04:46, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused file and duplicate of Political Compass standard model.svg, a multilingual SVG that now supports Turkish. Alhadis (talk) 22:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:33, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Lacks a license for home country. Even if we added {{PD-Liechtenstein-old-unknown}}, it fails this clause: Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is not enough to qualify the image as public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Historisches Lexikon extracts files from the Liechtenstein national archives and attributes credit where it available as per many of their other images. If the image does not provide credit on it, then it is not known. Liechtenstein law does not require a burden of proof. TheBritinator (talk) 12:09, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I don't think the reliable source part is part of Commons policy or their law. Just that the author can't be "generally known". The source of this is the state archives, with an explicit credit to them, so they apparently did not name a photographer when giving it out. I'm fine with assuming "unknown" (which their law uses, not "anonymous"). If this was published in 1925, it should be fine. However, I'm not sure I see a clause in their law about limiting unpublished works (i.e. 70 years from creation if not published in that time). So if this was a long-unpublished work, there may be an issue. Their law looks like it conforms to EU principles in general, but maybe not all the details like that, which would have removed all doubt. So I guess the question is how the archives got it -- may have been considered published at the time of donation if not before. I'm not sure the possibility of being unpublished until recently is a significant doubt at this point, but I think that would be the only reason to delete. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:53, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The Liechtenstein National Archives can be considered a reliable source, even if the name of the photographer isn't known. With these conditions in mind, the photo being first published in 1925 puts it in the public domain. ReneeWrites (talk) 12:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1956 monument. Sculptor appears to have been named Ненашева http://pamyatnikpushkinu.ru/en/figures-sitting/308-figura-karaganda-kazakhstan-1956.html --Abzeronow (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Created in 1999. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:15, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Monument created in 1999. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:16, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Regrettably a delete. Was built in 1967 by sculptor N.S. Zhuravlev, architects were I.I. Tokar, B.P. Voronin per English Wikipedia. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:21, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per English Wikipedia "Installed in 1980. Sculptor – B. A. Abishev, architect – Sh. I. Valikhanov.". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:24, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per English Wikipedia "It was opened on February 15, 2003. Sculptor: Kazbek Satybaldin. Architects: Tokhtar Yeraliev and Vladimir Sidorov". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:26, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per English Wikipedia "Opened on December 6, 2001. Sculptor – E. A. Sergebaev". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:29, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per English Wikipedia "It was opened on February 15, 2003. Sculptor: Kazbek Satybaldin. Architects: Tokhtar Yeraliev and Vladimir Sidorov". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:35, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: same statue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Temirbek Zhurgenov 2.jpg. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:38, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: same statue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Temirbek Zhurgenov 2.jpg. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:40, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not solely own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1999 monument. Per English Wikipedia "Sculptor T.S. Dosmagambetov, architect A.S. Kainarbayev" --Abzeronow (talk) 20:42, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1996 monument. Description through Google Translate says "Sculptor B. Abishev, architects S. Baimagambetov, S. Fazylov, T. Eraliev.". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:44, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1972 monument. Per English Wikipedia "Sculptors – T. Dosmagambetov, O. Prokofiev, architects – Sh. Valikhanov, A. Kainarbaev". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 1980 monument. Per English Wikipedia "Sculptor – E.A. Sergebaev, architects – O.Zh. Baimurzaev, A.S. Kainarbaev.". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mukhtar Auezov monument 5.jpg. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:52, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 2010 monument. Enwiki says "sculptor Nurlan Dalbay and architect Rasul Satybaldiyev". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: 2004 monument. Per Enwiki "Sculptor N.A. Dalbaev, architect R.M. Satybaldiev". --Abzeronow (talk) 20:57, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: same monument as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:ALAvoinamafgantsam.JPG. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is not own work, the photographer is not the sculptor and there is no Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 2004 monument. per Enwiki " Sculptor N.A. Dalbaev, architect R.M. Satybaldiev". --Abzeronow (talk) 21:01, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Cette affiche n'est absolument pas sous licence ouverte : pas mention sur la notice dans la bibliothèque numérique de l'argonaute, https://argonnaute.parisnanterre.fr et voir rubrique réutiliser du site sur même page (où La contemporaine précise explicitement sa politique: toutes les fichiers sous licence ouverte ont une mention explicite le précisant) Richardbresse (talk) 17:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- As with File:Affiche de recrutement de l'Armée de Vichy - Les F.T.A. (Forces terrestres antiaériennes) 2.jpg, if I'm understanding COM:FRANCE correctly, even if the artist made the lithograph as an employee, he would still have a copyright stake in it. If that's the case, Sogno died in 1978, so the image would still be under copyright until 2049. That said, Bibliothèques spécialisées de la Ville de Paris has other posters of his from the Vichy period listed as being in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- This image was released under licence ouverte.
- See > Affiches de la Seconde Guerre mondiale > Conditions d'utilisation : Sauf indication spécifique au niveau de chaque document, les affiches présentées ici sont sous licence ouverte.
- -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, that makes it clear. Keep —Tcr25 (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- The image was released under licence ouvert by mistake. In fact it is under copyright as the artist died less than 70 years ago. See https://argonnaute.parisnanterre.fr/ark:/14707/1r60m3nfpgl2 MarianneLC (talk) 09:51, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, that makes it clear.
- As with File:Affiche de recrutement de l'Armée de Vichy - Les F.T.A. (Forces terrestres antiaériennes) 2.jpg, if I'm understanding COM:FRANCE correctly, even if the artist made the lithograph as an employee, he would still have a copyright stake in it. If that's the case, Sogno died in 1978, so the image would still be under copyright until 2049. That said, Bibliothèques spécialisées de la Ville de Paris has other posters of his from the Vichy period listed as being in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:27, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
File:Affiche de recrutement de l'Armée de Vichy - Les F.T.A. (Forces terrestres antiaériennes) 2.jpg
[edit]_2.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cette affiche n'est absolument pas sous licence ouverte : pas mention sur la notice dans la bibliothèque numérique de l'argonaute, https://argonnaute.parisnanterre.fr et voir rubrique réutiliser du site sur même page (où La contemporaine précise explicitement sa politique: toutes les fichiers sous licence ouverte ont une mention explicite le précisant) Richardbresse (talk) 17:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- The image is available via the Ministère des Armées's Service historique de la Défense site: https://www.servicehistorique.sga.defense.gouv.fr/ark/39983 The legal notice on that page makes it look like archival images may be freely used/reused, if there are no third-party rights at stake. If I'm understanding COM:FRANCE correctly, even if the artist made the lithograph as an employee, he would still have a copyright stake in it. If that's the case, Sogno died in 1978, so the image would still be under copyright until 2049. That said, Bibliothèques spécialisées de la Ville de Paris has other posters of his from the Vichy period listed as being in the public domain. —Tcr25 (talk) 19:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- This image was released under licence ouverte.
- > Affiches de la Seconde Guerre mondiale > Conditions d'utilisation: Sauf indication spécifique au niveau de chaque document, les affiches présentées ici sont sous licence ouverte.
- -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:42, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, that makes it clear. Keep —Tcr25 (talk) 12:45, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, that makes it clear.
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:28, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Cette affiche n'est absolument pas sous licence ouverte : pas mention sur https://argonnaute.parisnanterre.fr/ark:/14707/hwjmq0bndfpv et rubrique réutiliser sur même page (où La contemporaine précise explicitement sa politique: toutes les fichiers sous licence ouverte ont une mention explicite 2A04:CEC0:11A4:6F26:C9F6:FBE1:9BF2:9F9A 17:37, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- > Affiches de la Seconde Guerre mondiale > Conditions d'utilisation : Sauf indication spécifique au niveau de chaque document, les affiches présentées ici sont sous licence ouverte. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:39, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour, comme pour les autres affiches de cet artiste, la licence a été mise par erreur et a été retirée depuis. Voir ici : https://argonnaute.parisnanterre.fr/ark:/14707/hwjmq0bndfpv MarianneLC (talk) 09:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:26, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Kazakhstan. Stop these statues. KazyKazyKazakhstan (talk) 14:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm leaning towards Delete here since this probably is more modern than the early 1950s, the city this monument was in was only founded in the 1930s. Anybody have information on when Appak Baizhanov Monument was built and by whom? Abzeronow (talk) 20:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 21:16, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP, not uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:30, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyvio (c) Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Rheinisches Bildarchiv Köln M2k~dewiki (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Film poster CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo would need to be taken before 1973 to meet "originally published more than 50 years ago" of the PD-Afghanistan claim. Subject would have been nine years old in 1973. Cited payam-aftab.com source does not include the full photograph, release it under any kind of licence or say where it came from. Belbury (talk) 13:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Same image has been posted online elsewhere prior to upload (eg. https://www.tiktok.com/@yaranwafadar/video/7265658193072688427 with wider detail, https://www.facebook.com/HazaraInternational/photos/a.150411911642445/3956288127721452/ at lower res). This image looks digitally upscaled. Unlikely that the uploader is the original photographer. Belbury (talk) 16:14, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Franz Zetzl M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:25, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The copyright holder apparently is the owner of the company advertised in the image, and possibly the uploader (considering that user name and website name are almost identical). Hence this is probably less of a copyright issue than outright advertising. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Franz Zetzl M2k~dewiki (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The copyright holder apparently is the owner of the company advertised in the image, and possibly the uploader (considering that user name and website name are almost identical). Hence this is probably less of a copyright issue than outright advertising. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
possible copyvio (c) Franz Zetzl M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete The copyright holder apparently is the owner of the company advertised in the image, and possibly the uploader (considering that user name and website name are almost identical). Hence this is probably less of a copyright issue than outright advertising. GeorgR (de) (talk) 20:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Visit of Belgian ambassador Stefaan Thijs to Mekelle University (Tigray, Ethiopia) on 22 september 2023 06.jpg
[edit]_on_22_september_2023_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_06.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Already posted on the ambassador's LinkedIn account Jnyssen (talk) 13:56, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Visit of Belgian ambassador Stefaan Thijs to Mekelle University (Tigray, Ethiopia) on 22 september 2023 05.jpg
[edit]_on_22_september_2023_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_05.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Already posted on the Ambassador's LinkedIn account Jnyssen (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Visit of Belgian ambassador Stefaan Thijs to Mekelle University (Tigray, Ethiopia) on 22 september 2023 07.jpg
[edit]_on_22_september_2023_07.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_07.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Already posted on the Ambassador's LinkedIn account Jnyssen (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Visit of Belgian ambassador Stefaan Thijs to Mekelle University (Tigray, Ethiopia) on 22 september 2023 08.jpg
[edit]_on_22_september_2023_08.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_08.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Already posted on the Ambassador's LinkedIn account Jnyssen (talk) 13:58, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Visit of Belgian ambassador Stefaan Thijs to Mekelle University (Tigray, Ethiopia) on 22 september 2023 09.jpg
[edit]_on_22_september_2023_09.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_22_september_2023_09.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Already posted on the Ambassador's LinkedIn account Jnyssen (talk) 13:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio, see [12], was submitted by a red-linked user, same username as the subject of the photo but no proof of authorship sent to VRT Oaktree b (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Random date of creation, missing date of the first publication, no evidence of PD. Komarof (talk) 14:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This file comes from the an official verified Facebook page of the 40th_Tactical_Aviation_Brigade_(Ukraine) and is licensed under terms of Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, see "Intro" on the page here https://www.facebook.com/Vbtaps and license info in the footer here https://www.mil.gov.ua/. Keep. Appsoft4 (talk) 16:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Appsoft. Photo from an official Ukrainian Air Force Brigade FB account so likely that either they got permission from the original artist to post it or they themselves are the copyright holders. Even if there are copyright problems I suppose it's not really Commons' issue that the Ukrainian Air Force, an official account of a military force, licensed the photo that way. S5A-0043Talk 08:55, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- There is no proof that the Ukrainian Air Force obtained the permission of the artist. VRT verification should be required. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Mural itself is a derivative work based on the 2019 photo made by MoD of UA and published under
CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 Internationalon the official site of MoD of UA. - See: File:Andrii Pilshchykov in a helmet, 25 April 2019 (1).jpg
- According to license: “No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.”,- so, artist can't restrict from using even derivative work under original Creative Commons license.
- See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Appsoft4 (talk) 03:43, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Mural itself is a derivative work based on the 2019 photo made by MoD of UA and published under
- There is no proof that the Ukrainian Air Force obtained the permission of the artist. VRT verification should be required. --A1Cafel (talk) 09:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, mural is copyrighted by artist Andriy Kovtun. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:18, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Mural itself is a derivative work based on the 2019 photo made by MoD of UA and published under
CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 Internationalon the official site of MoD of UA. - See: File:Andrii Pilshchykov in a helmet, 25 April 2019 (1).jpg
- Appsoft4 (talk) 15:01, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete no FoP in UA. Kursant504 (talk) 11:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
- Mural itself is a derivative work based on the 2019 photo made by MoD of UA and published under
CreativeCommons Attribution 4.0 Internationalon the official site of MoD of UA. - See: File:Andrii Pilshchykov in a helmet, 25 April 2019 (1).jpg
- According to license: “No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.”,- so, artist can't restrict from using even derivative work under original Creative Commons license.
- See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- And so, FoP in UA is even out of scope there. Appsoft4 (talk) 03:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Appsoft4 will that be supported in a U.S. court in case the artist sues a user of this image (like a vlogger or postcard maker)? In case of works from no-FOP countries, the unfree U.S. FOP is taken into account (U.S. has no FOP for public artworks). Works of yes-FOP countries can be hosted here with {{Not-free-US-FOP}} tag as a first line of defense against artists going to the U.S. to sue commercial reusers in U.S. courts. But for artworks in countries with no-FOP, there is no defense against artist suing reusers through U.S. courts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
will that be supported in a U.S. court in case the artist sues a user of this image (like a vlogger or postcard maker)?
- @Appsoft4 will that be supported in a U.S. court in case the artist sues a user of this image (like a vlogger or postcard maker)? In case of works from no-FOP countries, the unfree U.S. FOP is taken into account (U.S. has no FOP for public artworks). Works of yes-FOP countries can be hosted here with {{Not-free-US-FOP}} tag as a first line of defense against artists going to the U.S. to sue commercial reusers in U.S. courts. But for artworks in countries with no-FOP, there is no defense against artist suing reusers through U.S. courts. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
- Mural itself is a derivative work based on the 2019 photo made by MoD of UA and published under
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don't know, but I not see any reason how does author(s) of mural even could sue any user of this photo, because:
- Mural is derivative work based on
CC-BY 4.0photo, and according to license terms[1] even derivative work could not be converted into non-commercial work and should be shared with preserving terms ofCC-BY 4.0, and a photo of this mural, as a derivative work of this mural, also should preserv terms ofCC-BY 4.0— so, mural author can't claim any commercial restrictions on this photo and mural (even if mural would be an artwork separate from building/wall) in any way. - Building architect could not claim no-FOP violation here either, because building is not an object of this photo (there is only part of single plain wall which is not an unique architectural work, but just a wall of a simple shapes typical structure) — the object on the photo is mural (that is covering the plain wall) de facto licensed under terms of
CC-BY 4.0, due to being derivative ofCC-BY 4.0licensed original photo of pilot.
- Mural is derivative work based on
N.B. In 2022-2023, there are new changes introduced with the Law of Ukraine №2811-IX on FOP legal status in Ukraine: now if making a photo of architectural works in public space (without asking permissions) resulted photo should be under terms sorta like a "free for non-commercial use, with architect(s) attribution" (very similar toCC-BY-NCand/orCC-BY-NC-SAterms, but there is no mention of any Creative Commons licenses in the text of this law).[2][3]
But, as I said above, actual photo is not a "photo of architectural work", so FOP is out of scope here (because a non uniquie/simple shape part of architectural work is "covered" by mural).
P.S. That is how I understand actual state of all the things related to this exact photo of mural.- Other photos, where building would be shown as a main object and mural would be just a part of scene might(?) be a case for no-FOP violation.
- The only thing I missed according to this file is to attribute mural authors on the file description page (as there is only MoD of Ukraine atrributed yet) — this would be fixed. Appsoft4 (talk) 01:26, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
- I don't know, but I not see any reason how does author(s) of mural even could sue any user of this photo, because:
Deleted: per nomination 1/license of the source of our file applies only for the photo of the mural (not the mural itself) 2/ an adaptation of a CC BY can be "all right reserved" (and anyway only the copyright holder can give a specific license). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission from SA History A1Cafel (talk) 15:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:32, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
No permission from the source A1Cafel (talk) 15:23, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Can you guide on how to use the image from any news website? YankaAD (talk) 12:00, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails this clause: Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is not enough to qualify the image as public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep You cannot prove a negative, but you can perform due diligence, and Tineye can find no attributed author in searching 15 billion images. "Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is is not enough to qualify the image as public domain." The statement does not appear in Liechtenstein law and the burden of proof is beyond what we require in any other country template. We expect due diligence to be performed to determine that no author has been attributed. --RAN (talk) 02:44, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep As stated above. TheBritinator (talk) 12:05, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN, due diligence performed and source cited in image is a reliable one which would be expected to have author information if available. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:18, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Obviously not original work, and provided source is vague and does not infer copyright status. ~ Saur (talk • contribs) 17:09, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:03, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for copyrighted public art. According to this article, the park was opened in 2004, and the statue was donated to this park at the same time. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 20:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:42, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/josef hoop
[edit]Fails this clause: Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is not enough to qualify the image as public domain.
.jpg){kind=link}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Historisches Lexikon extracts files from the Liechtenstein national archives and attributes credit where it available as per many of their other images. If the image does not provide credit on it, then it is not known. TheBritinator (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree, I can find no attributed author. You cannot prove a negative, but you can perform due diligence, and Tineye can find no attributed author in searching 15 billion images. "Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is is not enough to qualify the image as public domain." The statement does not appear in Liechtenstein law and the burden of proof is beyond what we require in any other country template. --RAN (talk) 02:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per TheBritinator. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Fails this clause: Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is not enough to qualify the image as public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The image is cropped from a file that has been already uploaded as public domain as it is dated from 1921. How exactly does this one fail to meet that clause, yet the original does? The original was uploaded in 2019. TheBritinator (talk) 01:12, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep You cannot prove a negative, but you can perform due diligence, and Tineye can find no attributed author in searching 15 billion images. "Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is is not enough to qualify the image as public domain." The statement does not appear in Liechtenstein law and the burden of proof is beyond what we require in any other country template. We expect due diligence to be performed to determine that no author has been attributed.--RAN (talk) 02:21, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per TheBritinator. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:40, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Lacks a license for home country. Even if we added {{PD-Liechtenstein-old-unknown}}, it fails this clause: Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is not enough to qualify the image as public domain. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep He died in 1929. This is a {{PD-Liechtenstein-old-unknown}} at worst. Liechtenstein law does not require a burden of proof, as stated. TheBritinator (talk) 12:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep You cannot prove a negative, but you can perform due diligence, and Tineye can find no attributed author in searching 15 billion images. "Note that this applies only if a reliable source is cited to indicate that the author is not publicly known; just not knowing who the author is is not enough to qualify the image as public domain." The statement does not appear in Liechtenstein law and the burden of proof is beyond what we require in any other country template. We expect due diligence to be performed to determine that no author has been attributed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 22:41, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- The Liechtenstein law does seem to say if the author is generally unknown (not using the term "anonymous"), the term is 70 years from publication. The author would have had to become generally known within that 70 year period. The old, pre-1999 law was 50pma, with 50 years from publication for anonymous (not "unknown") works. The 1999 law was retroactive for works from other EEA countries, but unsure about their own works -- seems explicitly non-retroactive for those[13]. The easy way to disprove the unknown or anonymous claim is to show a named author somewhere (and it would have needed to be known long ago). It would be nice to know the original source of this image, as it seems to be scanned from an old publication. The source credits it to "LI LA", which not sure but may be the Liechtenstein Landesarchiv, but not sure where to go from there. Given its nature, which may have been a legislative portrait, I am fine assuming anonymous. There is nothing in their law which requires a reliable source; that seems an overreach on the tag. Keep for me. Carl Lindberg (talk) 16:31, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, it's from the Landesarchiv. Though if it does not any credit, then there is none. TheBritinator (talk) 22:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 09:41, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Diedrich Westermann died 1956 Mapmarks (talk) 20:30, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Mapmarks Oh that is frustrating. I thought it would be in the clear being published in 1921 but the German copyright laws are much stricter than I was aware. عُثمان (talk) 20:53, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Maybe I was wrong and this File can stay on Commons under US copyright, but at least the 70 years license template (PD-scan) is wrong. Greetings --Mapmarks (talk) 21:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; undelete in 2027. —holly {chat} 23:15, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1921 Norwegian photograph, possibly public domain in Norway and the US. Source doesn't correspond with this file so I cannot check if the author was anonymous or not. Abzeronow (talk) 15:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Source appears to be correct (at least it links to the book this image is from), but it requires a Norwegian IP address to access. —Tcr25 (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I stand corrected. Hopefully a Norwegian user could confirm if this is an anonymous photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 17:40, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Norway, the book is credited to A. M. Hanches, there are no image credits. --RAN (talk) 02:01, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 00:03, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
One pound coins made after 1972
[edit]These coin designs were made after 1972, and are therefore protected by crown copyright. Should be deleted as copyvio.
- File:Großbritannien- 2011 - Münzkabinett, Berlin - 5517271.jpg
- File:One Pound.jpg
- File:One Pound, Seventy Pence.jpg
- File:2015 pound coin.jpg
- File:2016 £1 coin.jpg
- File:2005 £1 coin.jpg
- File:2013 £1 coin.jpg
- File:2000 £1 coin.jpg
- File:2008 £1 coin.jpg
- File:2014 £1 coin.jpg
Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 16:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - If it's the case, let them go. Bit disappointed how they scanned out, anyway. It'd be poor form to keep them sticking around, regardless. —MonkeyStolen234 (talk) 18:46, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 00:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1910s or 1920s photograph, could be public domain. We'd know if we can more information on publication. Abzeronow (talk) 19:27, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- The uploader claims it is from a family photo album in their possession and that the image was originally taken prior to World War II. That it was taken with an iPhone per the metadata seems to support that claim. Per COM:POLAND photos can be complicated; if the photographer is known, then it's 70 years from the date of their death; otherwise 70 years after being made public. If this is pre-WWII, then it would be more than 70 years since the photo was taken/printed, but if there's information about the photographer available that would possibly extend the date. @Mrtonder can you provide more details? —Tcr25 (talk) 20:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree PD-Poland applies as well as PD-EU. Like the US Poland demanded a "clear copyright notice", if you wanted to copyright an image. --RAN (talk) 02:15, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 00:04, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Taken from here: https://www.iranianaviation.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/POSTER-PANEL-IRANIAN-AIRWAYS.png HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:10, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- سلام استاد، احتراما چیزی از موکاپ های فوتوشاپ به گوشتون خورده،
- جهت استحضار یه سری فایلهای آماده و اکثرا رایگان در زمینه های مختلف هست که با اندک آشنایی با طراحی فوتوشاپ می تونین تغییرات مورد نظر رو در رنگ و یا پس زمینه بهش بدین.
- جسارتا در قرن 21 هیچ طراحی نمیره برای نمایش رایگان یک اینفوگرافیک از مثلا هواپیمای DC3 اون رو از اول نقاشی یا طراحی کنه که! راه درستش اینه که اول موکاپ این هواپیما رو پیدا میکنه و بعد لیوری (طراحی بدنه هواپیما) و بعد پس زمینه مورد نظر رو در لایه های فوتوشاپ با چند کلیک روش پیاده میکنه.
- طرح لیوری ایران ایر که اون زمان ثابت بوده و تو عکسای قدیمی هست. لذا کار بنده و یا طراح زنده دیگه نبوده که بخواد مدعی بشه، اطلاعات ناوگان و شماره رجیستر ناوگان قدیمی هم که کاملا مشخصه، موکاپ هم که برای اکثر هواپیماهای قدیمی موجود و برای استفاده غیر تجاری در کیفیتهای پایین تا متوسط رایگان، حالا من یه پس زمینه و فونت دیگه انتخاب کردم، یه آقا یا خانوم طراح دیگه برای کار خودشون یه چیز دیگه، این وسط هم من میدونم داستان چیه هم اون طراح دیگه، لذا شکایتی هم از این موضوع نداریم. شما عزیز دل که احیانا فقط با دانش سرچ عکس تو گوگل که درست نیست راجع به طراحی های گرافیک قضاوت کنی! هوش مصنوعی گوگل در تشخیص مشابهات رو هم ولش کن، ببین عقل سلیم خودت چی میگه؟
- پینوشت: اینجا عکس یا نمونه فایل موکاپ نمیشه آپلود کرد. بجاش یه لینک از مثال موکاپ هواپیمای دی سی 3 که قبلا گفتم با یک لیوری یه ایرلاین دیگه میذارم، اگه تونستی تفاوت هاشو به غیر از پس زمینه، لیوری و رنگ شیشه ها با کار من و یا عکسی که به عنوان مدرک سند کردی بگی جایزه داری
- http://www.airline-empires.com/index.php?/gallery/image/24699-1947-douglas-dc-3/
- ارادتمند، امیرحسین صراف، طراح و مشاور هوانوردی امیرحسین صراف (talk) 03:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- سلام. رایگان یا در دسترس بودن یک فایل در اینترنت به معنای این که کپیرایت ندارد نیست. این ادعا که «کسی شکایت نمیکنه» از موارد غیرقابلقبول طبق اصل احتیاطی کامانز محسوب میشه. لذا توصیه میکنم در کنار مهارت کار با نرمافزارهای گرافیکی کمی هم در مورد قوانین کپیرایت و روال کاری ویکیمدیا کامانز کسب اطلاع کنید که جزء حیطه دانش کاری یک گرافیست محسوب میشه و ارتباطی با داشتن یا نداشتن «عقل سلیم» هم نداره. شما حتی اگر بابت فایلی که از آن اثر تلفیقی ایجاد کردهاید پول هم پرداخت کرده باشید نسبت به استفاده کردن از آن فایل حق دارید نه این که حقوق مادی و معنوی خالق آن به شما منتقل شده باشد. موفق باشید. HeminKurdistan (talk) 08:04, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:17, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Superseded by multilingual version. The only remaining use is on @Quotation Marks's user page that I don't have permissions to edit. Alhadis (talk) 22:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Alhadis: What is the multilingual version? —holly {chat} 23:19, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng It's just Political chart.svg. Alhadis (talk) 01:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Alhadis: You can ask for help at the admin noticeboard in replacing it. Once that's done, then we can delete this. Thanks. —holly {chat} 18:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- The old file's only in-use by a user page (User:Quotation_Marks), which I don't have permissions to edit. Can we delete this anyway? Alhadis (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm afraid not. See COM:INUSE. However, you could post a request (in English) at ko:위키백과:관리자 알림판 and someone will help you out. I had to replace an image on a user page in the Finnish Wikipedia recently and it was the same situation, and I got a local admin there to do it for me. —holly {chat} 17:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've asked for a local admin to do the file replacement. —holly {chat} 18:05, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- I'm afraid not. See COM:INUSE. However, you could post a request (in English) at ko:위키백과:관리자 알림판 and someone will help you out. I had to replace an image on a user page in the Finnish Wikipedia recently and it was the same situation, and I got a local admin there to do it for me. —holly {chat} 17:16, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
- The old file's only in-use by a user page (User:Quotation_Marks), which I don't have permissions to edit. Can we delete this anyway? Alhadis (talk) 19:47, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Alhadis: You can ask for help at the admin noticeboard in replacing it. Once that's done, then we can delete this. Thanks. —holly {chat} 18:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Holly Cheng It's just Political chart.svg. Alhadis (talk) 01:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Delete This file is redundant tu multilang file. 185.172.241.184 14:54, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - turned into a redir to fix user page issue. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:50, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
- ↑ CC BY 4.0 Legal Code. creativecommons.org.
- ↑ Закон України №2811-IX "Про авторське право і суміжні права" (in Ukrainian). zakon.rada.gov.ua. Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (15 April 2023).
- ↑ Спесивцева, Олена (18 July 2023). Свобода панорами в Україні: як фотографувати архітектуру та не порушити закон? (in Ukrainian). ceden.org.ua.