Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/09/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
_-_Nicolas_de_Stael_(1914_-_1955)_(39167570305).jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_due_to_an_explosion_at_a_gasoline_warehouse.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_050.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Monument_aux_morts.jpg){kind=link}
diphenylsilane.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_Message_Board.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_Minsk_(29092897538).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in France, artist Albert Bourget died in 1956 A1Cafel (talk) 03:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Pymouss. --Rosenzweig τ 09:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:VikDog99
[edit]- File:VikDog selfie.jpg
- File:Vikdog in bells.jpg
- File:Vikdog snaps.jpg
- File:Vikdog black and white.jpg
- File:Vikdog school friends.jpg
- File:Vikdog Full body.jpg
- File:Vikdog and villyon.jpg
- File:Vikdog Biodata.jpg
A combination of out of scope and images of identifiable people with no way of knowing if they have consented to the images being shared. Suntooooth (talk) 06:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, in my opinion here is no copyright or privacy problems. Deleted as part of advertising campaign of non-notable musician. Taivo (talk) 08:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Raymond as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: painter died 1955. Until 31.12.2025 still copyrighted Yann (talk) 13:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_Nicolas_de_Stael_(1914_-_1955)_(39167570305).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Nicolas_de_Stael_(1914_-_1955)_(39167570305).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Raymond as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: painter died 1955. Until 31.12.2025 still copyrighted Yann (talk) 13:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_Nicolas_de_Stael_(1914_-_1955)_(39167570305).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
_-_Nicolas_de_Stael_(1914_-_1955)_(39167570305).jpg-1){kind=link}
Falsches Dateiformat, kein transparenter Hintergrund. Es wird eine neue Version eingestellt (.tif) Balou20 (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Falsches Dateiformat, kein transparenter Hintergrund. Es wird eine neue Version eingestellt (.tif) Balou20 (talk) 11:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
double upload Wolfgang pass auf (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I anonymized people, please delete first version of this file MBq (talk) 12:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: kept the file as such, deleted the first version as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Injured ethnic Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh due to an explosion at a gasoline warehouse (2).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I wasn't attentive while uploading, this photo is from Reuters, not VoA Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 14:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
I wasn't attentive while uploading, this photo is from Reuters, not VoA 37.252.89.136 14:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Injured ethnic Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh (Artsakh) due to an explosion at a gasoline warehouse.png
[edit]_due_to_an_explosion_at_a_gasoline_warehouse.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_due_to_an_explosion_at_a_gasoline_warehouse.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I wasn't attentive while uploading, this photo is from Reuters, not VoA Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 14:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1910 German photograph, likely to be public domain in Germany and the US. Abzeronow (talk) 15:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Missing license added. --Yann (talk) 15:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, poorly photographed penis selfie. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Erreur dans les commentaires d'import du fichier. Besoin de réimporter le fichier. Synchroniseuse (talk) 15:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
personal photo of user राजकुमार (talk) 06:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 17:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indo British Wikipedian (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
- File:Indian General Election 1937.svg
- File:Election Results 2025.svg
- File:Election Results 2030.svg
- File:SB Studies.svg
- File:Sbblog1.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-09-14-15-36-16-284690-15750953927427729967.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-09-02-06-35-10-000265-2118192211951048748.svg
- File:BE2035 Parliament.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-05-06-03-04-22-983936-12618682290092250835.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2023-05-06-02-28-52-169346-9234863201725715573.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indo British Wikipedian (talk · contribs)
[edit]fantasy diagrams are out of project scope
- File:Bengal House of Commons Parliament 2035.svg
- File:Bengal House of Commons 2030.svg
- File:Bengal House of Commons Parliament 2026.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 19:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Indo British Wikipedian (talk · contribs)
[edit]data do not match with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1946_Bengal_Legislative_Assembly_election fake data, misleading diagram
- File:India Bengal Legislative Assembly (4) 1946.svg
- File:India Bengal Legislative Assembly (2) 1946.svg
- File:India Bengal Legislative Assembly (1) 1946.svg
- File:India Bengal Legislative Assembly 1946.svg
_1946.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1946.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1946.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
personal photo of user राजकुमार(talk) 06:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
looking like an invitation for small community gathering which may include user's photo राजकुमार(talk) 06:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- What is the reason 157.38.70.213 07:59, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete: Lack of COM:EDUSE. --Achim55 (talk) 08:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:44, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused low resolution image with colored atom labels. File:Nostocarboline.svg is of better quality. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-quality chemical structure in small resolution, opaque (white) background and not drawn according to MoS guidelines. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused photo of unidentified object. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 11:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:47, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Pedrogcarmona (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: plain text content. Self-published historical novel.
Omphalographer (talk) 17:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:48, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VulpesVulpes42 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: personal artwork. The "CJK characters" are self-created and meaningless; POOVV42 is an unused decorative pattern.
Omphalographer (talk) 19:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment Out of scope? Sure, I’ll give you that. Meaningless? Although they indeed are self‐created, I assigned each and one of the characters a meaning when creating them. One could describe them in several ways. Perhaps ‘silly’, ‘naïve’, ‘amateurish’, etc. None of this makes these self‐coined characters ‘meaningless’, however. —VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)- Delete: no apparent educational value from these personal creations. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 19:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Northern Ireland.svg. Fry1989 eh? 23:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Also smaller and not in use, so I don't object to deletion in this case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:17, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:52, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Émile Gilioli died in 1977 A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
File:Mémorial pour la paix au Japon - 4 statues réalisées par le sculpteur français Louis Derbré.jpg
[edit]
No FoP in France, artist Louis Derbré died in 2011 A1Cafel (talk) 03:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Alphonse-Camille Terroir died in 1955 A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Alphonse-Camille Terroir died in 1955 A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Robert Coin died in 1988 A1Cafel (talk) 03:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania, artist Romulus Ladea died in 1970 A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Romania, artist Romulus Ladea died in 1970 A1Cafel (talk) 03:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 03:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954 + COM:URAA (still copyrighted in USA until 2028) A1Cafel (talk) 04:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Africa A1Cafel (talk) 05:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:12, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Found here https://www.danielpbloch.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/IMG_4611.jpg - unlikely to be own work. Needs VTRS to keep Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
This photograph was taken from a journal article ([1]) which is distributed under the {{Cc-by-4.0}} license (not the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license the file was uploaded with). If you look at the article PDF (from which the file was most likely taken), you will see (Figure 3, p. 1165) that there is a photographer named (Sabine Suhr), and that the photograph was not taken by the author(s) of the article, but is credited to “LAKD M-V, Landesarchäologie”. So it is a photo of a German state institution. Unlike some other illustrations in that journal article, which are explicitly stated to be under a CC license, this one is just credited to the LAKD. I've looked at the LAKD web site, and I didn't see any indication that their works are under any kind of free license. Per German copyright, they are also not in the public domain, but regularly copyrighted, and the photo is also obviously recent and not so old that some kind of PD-old could apply.
So we have to ask ourselves: Does the CC license under which the article is distributed automatically also include any illustrations which the article uses, including those by third parties like this one? Did the photograph's author (or rights holder, which is most likely the LAKD) agree to put the photo under this CC license?
Since we don't have any evidence (at all) confirming that the author/rights holder of the photo did agree to such a CC licensing, we should, per the precautionary principle, assume that they did not, and delete the file. Rosenzweig τ 09:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gevelinghausen bronze amphora.jpg for a similar case. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Similar case as in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Peckatel 1.jpg: This drawing was taken from a journal article ([2]) which is distributed under the {{Cc-by-4.0}} license (not the {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} license the file was uploaded with). If you look at the article PDF (from which the file was most likely taken), you will see (Figure 6, p. 1169) that the drawing is not the work of the author(s) of that journal article, but credited to a 2008 publication in the journal de:Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica. That journal is online here (the specific volume the drawing was taken from is here, the article PDF is here). The (recent, not old) drawing is credited to Antje Hasford. I don't see any indication anywhere that the Acta Praehistorica et Archaeologica journal, the article from it or the drawing taken from that article is under any kind of free license.
So (again) we have to ask ourselves: Does the CC license under which the article is distributed automatically also include any illustrations which the article uses, including those by third parties like this one? Did the drawings's author (or rights holder) agree to put the photo under this CC license?
Since we don't have any evidence (at all) confirming that the author/rights holder of the drawing did agree to such a CC licensing, we should, per the precautionary principle, assume that they did not, and delete the file. Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
_050.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_050.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in South Korea. The statue was unveiled in 2009, authored by artist 박충흠. Therefore, it is copyrighted and this freely-licensed photo is a violation of sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
_050.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
_050.JPG){kind=link}
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in South Korea. The statue was unveiled in 1966. Presumed anonymous work since no artist is named. But even then, although the statue may fall public domain in South Korea very soon, its U.S. copyright courtesy of COM:URAA copyright restoration will last until January 1, 2062, 95+1 years after the publication or public display. Therefore, do not undelete/restore this image file until 2062. U.S. copyright can be ignored only if South Korea has commercial freedom of panorama (that is, the fourth condition at Article 35(2) has been removed): see {{Not-free-US-FOP}} for the information. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no commercial freedom of panorama in South Korea. The statue was unveiled "during the 70th anniversary of the Korean independence or the 116th anniversary of the founding of the Korean Railways" (per a photo here). It is unlikely that the sculptor died for more than 70 years. Copyright expires in South Korea 70 years after artist's death, or 70 years after the public display of the artwork if the artist is unknown. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Photo extraite d'une projection, travail dérivé dont l'original est probablement soumis au droit d'auteur Otourly (talk) 11:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Werner Conze died in 1986, Undelete in 2057. Abzeronow (talk) 15:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Werner Conze died in 1986, Undelete in 2057. Abzeronow (talk) 15:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Late 1960s or early 1970s Czech photograph, earliest it could enter the public domain would be late 2030s. Abzeronow (talk) 15:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope plain text list of journals mentioning es:Fermín Muñoz Urra. If you want that list in the Wikipedia article, just write it there in text, here at Wikimedia Commons such a file is out of project scope. Rosenzweig τ 17:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope plain text list of journal articles by es:Fermín Muñoz Urra. If you want that list in the Wikipedia article, just write it there in text, here at Wikimedia Commons such a file is out of project scope. Rosenzweig τ 17:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:14, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Poor quality. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Low resolution crop of a photograph of an area in Nepal. Has no EXIF. Abzeronow (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation: there is no freedom of panorama in the United States for copyrighted public art. Per this blog article, the statue dates to no earlier than 2009 and sculpted by Yossi Govrin. The sculpture is among the works listed in his portfolio. A commercial license clearance from the sculptor is needed. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
EXIF credits this image to George Kerrigan, contradicting the claim in the summary box. Belbury (talk) 15:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Uploader has since updated the summary box to credit Kerrigan and (presumably intentionally?) removed the CC licence. I've flagged the image for lacking a licence. Belbury (talk) 07:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Requires VRT from Kerrigan. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright infringement 213.61.72.34 08:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- What copyright infringement? Seems like a troll request. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 10:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep: Painter died in 1928. --Achim55 (talk) 10:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)- Keep Interesting story around this painting. The only possible copyright infringement would be if this version were the forgery. Since it is sourced to the auction house, which is apparently how the forger was selling the works he stole, it would seem this is the original and is clearly out of copyright due to Stuck dying in 1928. The image of the painting, per COM:ART, is the public domain because it is a faithful reproduction of a two-dimensional public domain work of art. —Tcr25 (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion , "copyright infringement" needs elaboration. --Strakhov (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
non inerente al luogo descritto 146.241.1.66 09:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not a deletion reason. You can edit the file description and request for the file to be renamed, etc. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 19:55, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Usharyi (talk) 12:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
1940s German photograph, could be public domain in Germany but not the US. Abzeronow (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
circa 1970s French photograph, won't be public domain in France until at least the 2040s. Abzeronow (talk) 15:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Color 1940s German photograph, would need a source to help determine its actual copyright status. Abzeronow (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 19:57, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT suggested. --Strakhov (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:42, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT suggested. --Strakhov (talk) 19:58, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
circa 1920s photograph from Mexico, too young for us to assume it's public domain there. Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Strakhov (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: joke micronation flag, cf. es:Special:Diff/152914065 Omphalographer (talk) 18:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT suggested. --Strakhov (talk) 19:59, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1952 by André Bizette-Lindet (1906–1998). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2069.
- File:L'Etat dicte à tort (47017246374).jpg
- File:Statue of Jean-Jacques Rousseau @ Panthéon @ Paris (33894749472).jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 1.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 2.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 3.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 4.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 5.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 6.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 7.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 8.jpg
- File:Statue Rousseau vers Panthéon Paris 9.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:39, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Robert Coin died in 1988
- File:Lille monument delory salengro.JPG
- File:Monument à Gustave Delory et Roger Salengro (Lille) - octobre 2020.jpg
- File:Monument à Gustave Delory et Roger Salengro (Lille).jpg
_-_octobre_2020.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1959 work; the files can be restored in 2059. --Rosenzweig τ 23:43, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Le Premier toit
[edit]No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954
- File:Orléans - parc Pasteur (27).jpg
- File:Orléans - parc Pasteur (28).jpg
- File:Orléans - parc Pasteur (29).jpg
- File:Orléans - parc Pasteur (30).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1920 work, the files can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 23:35, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This statue is inside a cimetery and was built in 1925. It seems to be under the license PD-US-expired. PierreConan (talk) 07:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; the file can be restored in 2025. @PierreConan: While this monument is already in the public domain in the United States, it is not yet in the public domain in France. --Rosenzweig τ 23:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument de la Victoire (Rouen)
[edit]The monument was completed in 1925 by Maxime Real del Sarte (1888–1954). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2025.
- File:Monument de la Victoire 10.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 11.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 12.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 2.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 3.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 4.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 5.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 6.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 7.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 8.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire 9.JPG
- File:Monument de la Victoire.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 04:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 23:33, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monument aux morts de Sare
[edit]No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954
- File:DSC5619monument aux morts du village de Sare, Pyrenées atlantiques.jpg
- File:Sare - Église Saint-Martin - 4.jpg
- File:Sare monument.jpg
- File:War memorial, Sara - panoramio.jpg
- File:Église de Sare 2.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1920 work; the files can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 23:29, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
A 1987 magazine is obviously still copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, 1987 UK magazine article. --Rosenzweig τ 23:25, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
A 1989 newspaper is obviously copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 07:00, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, 1989 Brazilian newspaper article. --Rosenzweig τ 23:22, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
A 1993 newspaper is obviously still copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, 1993 Swiss newspaper article. --Rosenzweig τ 23:21, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Maps of Google are protected by copyright law. See Template:OpenStreetMap for maps you may upload, but add the correct tag. JopkeB (talk) 16:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 23:19, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Paintings by Auguste Herbin
[edit]- File:Auguste herbin, parco a parigi, 1904.jpg
- File:Barbarini August 2023-Auguste Herbin - Landschaft auf Korsika, 1907 - Sammlung Hasso Plattner.jpg
- File:Neue Kunst - Katalog der II. Gesamtausstellung 1913 (25822918).jpg
- File:Composition PMA(05) (16525740241).jpg
- File:Museum De Fundatie - Auguste Herbin - Le Canigou (1913).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16525740241).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Auguste Herbin (Q706359) died 1960. Paintings are not in the public domain until 2031. --Reise Reise (talk) 17:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Obvious leletion case --Zen 38 (talk) 09:09, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2031, except for File:Composition PMA(05) (16525740241).jpg, which can be restored in 2036 (URAA). --Rosenzweig τ 23:18, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. Scans of the original journals and/or contemporary journals where they were published would be in scope; please consider uploading those if available. Omphalographer (talk) 18:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- I have uploaded two replacement files, as requested above. They are screenshots of two halves of the contemporary newspaper article in which the log was published (that is, the same 1827 newspaper source as given on the filepages). The replacement files are:
- * File:Log of HMS Nimrod 13-15 January 1827 (1).JPG
- * File:Log of HMS Nimrod 13-15 January 1827 (2).JPG
- I am happy for you to delete the pdf file. But please also explain to me why a pdf is not acceptable, since the system allowed me to upload it? Thanks. Storye book (talk) 20:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Commons uses PDFs for certain types of media which are difficult to represent in any other form, like scans of complete books which are in the public domain, for government publications which are distributed as PDFs, and for Wikimedia internal documents like slide shows and posters. It isn't intended as a "back door" to hosting any and all text content on Commons; that's what we have other wikis for. Omphalographer (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your explanation. Storye book (talk) 21:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Commons uses PDFs for certain types of media which are difficult to represent in any other form, like scans of complete books which are in the public domain, for government publications which are distributed as PDFs, and for Wikimedia internal documents like slide shows and posters. It isn't intended as a "back door" to hosting any and all text content on Commons; that's what we have other wikis for. Omphalographer (talk) 20:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 23:15, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
circa 1960s Russian photograph, not public domain in Russia or the US yet. Abzeronow (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 23:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Late 1970s Japanese photograph, the earliest this could enter the public domain in Japan would be the late 2040s. Abzeronow (talk) 18:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Was completely unaware of the statistics regarding the public domain laws in Japan. Thank you for the heads up in regards to that. Frippinator (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Japan used to be 50 pma but they non-retroactively extended copyight at the end of 2018 to 70 pma. Abzeronow (talk) 20:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 23:13, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Erreur dans les métadonnées d'import. Besoin de réimporter. Synchroniseuse (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Erreur dans les métadonnées d'import. Besoin de réimporter. Synchroniseuse (talk) 20:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:11, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Erreur dans les métadonnées d'import. Besoin de réimporter. Synchroniseuse (talk) 20:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 23:10, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Maxime Real del Sarte died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 03:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- A somewhat maximalist decision : the photo has been available for 12 years without issue and will be in the public domain in a year. Velvet (talk) 06:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Such claims are rejected by COM:PRP. It is not without any issue, just no one figured it out. --A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1927 work; the file can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 23:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for public art in the United States. The statue dates to 2001, and authored by Emmanuel Snitkovsky. Commercial license permission from Snitkovsky is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:01, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Emmanuel Snitkovsky died in 2005; the file can be restored in 2076. --Rosenzweig τ 23:50, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Albert Bourget died in 1956
- File:Laval - monument aux morts 01.jpg
- File:Laval - monument aux morts 02.jpg
- File:Laval53 memorial.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- OK for me, the author is not yet dead enough. Pymouss Let’s talk - 07:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- to the closing admin adding the DR to Category:Undelete in 2027 PierreSelim (talk) 10:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1923 work, the files can be restored in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 16:55, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Louis Derbré died in 2011 A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please, What do you mean with Louis Derbré? The monument is dedicated to Robert Buron, and I took the picture. Rei Momo (talk) 09:43, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Louis Derbré is the sculptor, that he died in 2011 means that this bust is still protected by copyright in France, until the end of 2081. The file can be restored in 2082. --Rosenzweig τ 17:15, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Albert Bourget died in 1956
- File:Le monument aux morts a montauban de bretagne - panoramio.jpg
- File:Montauban-de-Bretagne (35) Monument aux morts 01.jpg
- File:Monument aux morts de Montauban-de-Bretagne (35) - 01.jpg
- File:Monument aux morts de Montauban-de-Bretagne (35) - 02.jpg
- File:Monument aux morts de Montauban-de-Bretagne (35) - 03.jpg
_Monument_aux_morts_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete and to the closing admin adding the DR to Category:Undelete in 2027 PierreSelim (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1923/24 work, the files can be restored in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 17:00, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Albert Bourget died in 1956
- File:Laval - monument aux morts 03.jpg
- File:Laval - monument aux morts 05.jpg
- File:Laval - monument aux morts 07.jpg
- File:Laval - monument aux morts 08.jpg
- File:Laval - monument aux morts 09.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1923 work; the files can be restored in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 17:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Albert Bourget died in 1956 A1Cafel (talk) 03:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete DR to be added to Category:Undelete in 2027 PierreSelim (talk) 10:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1925 work, the file can be restored in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 17:13, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
_Monument_aux_morts.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Monument_aux_morts.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in France, artist Albert Bourget died in 1956 A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
_Monument_aux_morts.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete DR to be added to Category:Undelete in 2027 PierreSelim (talk) 10:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ca. 1920 work, the file can be restored in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
_Monument_aux_morts.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in France, artist Alphonse-Camille Terroir died in 1955 A1Cafel (talk) 03:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This sculpture is in a cemetery in Chile. It doesn't seem to me that FoP France would apply there. Seauton (talk) 16:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per COM:FOP Chile, assuming a cemetery is considered a public place there. --Rosenzweig τ 17:05, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1924 by Maxime Real del Sarte (1888–1954). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2025.
- File:Carte postale - Dunkerque - Monument aux Morts de Champagne.jpg
- File:Carte postale - Dunkerque - Monument de Navarin aux Morts.jpg
- File:Ferme de Navarin (2017).jpg
- File:Ferme de Navarin War Memorial.jpg
- File:Ferme de Navarino May 1940.jpg
- File:Monument de Navarin en 2021.jpg
- File:Monument de Navarin.jpg
- File:Navarin 2.jpg
- File:Navarin 3.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-A.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-B.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-C.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-D.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-E.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-G.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-I.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-L1.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-L2.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-L3.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-L4.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-L5.jpg
- File:Navarin-FR-51-mémorial-L6.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 04:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Je vous sens très énervé pour accélérer la suppression; c'est une manie & je ne saurais m'y opposer. Ca me lasse simplement de continuer à contribuer & je suis à deux doigts de laisser tomber comme j'ai déserté le wiktionnaire. Je vous demande simplement de ne supprimer que jusqu'au 15 février 1924, car le 16 février 1954, cette vieille crapule droitarde de "Real del Sarte" aura été rappelé par Dieu (depuis plus de 70 ans) ; il faudra alors les remettre impérativement. --François GOGLINS (talk) 17:11, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @François GOGLINS: Copyright in France (and almost all other countries) runs to the end of the year, so to the end of 2024 in this case, not just to February 15, 2024. --Rosenzweig τ 17:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Star Game
[edit]Out of scope: unused photos/diagrams related to a bizarre board game. Some of these files are clippings from https://archive.org/details/TheStarGameonaForPersonalPsychicDevelopment which explicitly prohibits this reuse (CC BY-NC-ND).
- File:Greater Star Game Boards.jpg
- File:Star Game 3d.jpg
- File:Star Game Arcturus Board.jpg
- File:Star Game Piece Types.svg
- File:Star Game Sirius Board.jpg
- File:Star Game Spiral 3d.jpg
- File:Star Game winning pattern.jpg
- File:StarGamePieces.png
- File:TheStarGame.png
- File:TheStarGame.svg
Omphalographer (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:37, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright notice of the yearbook is here, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I could not find anything with Quax or Drake University and yearbook in the Catalogs of Copyright Entries at IA, nor in the Stanford Copyright Renewals, nor in the First copyright renewals for periodicals at Penn or the registered works database at the LoC. So I think this yearbook may have had a copyright notice, but it was not registered nor renewed (as would have been necessary after 28 years for a 1954 US publication). --Rosenzweig τ 16:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, per Rosenzweig. -- Ooligan (talk) 05:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Also found no renewal, which was required up to 1964. I have never seen a renewal for a yearbook, everyone who wanted one, bought it already, there was no market for a reprint. --RAN (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 07:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
This looks like it's an out-of-scope corporate logo; non-notable company. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 07:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Taken from [3], where it says that the file is published under a CC-BY-NC-SA 2.0 license (which is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons because of the NC, non-commercial, component). There is no evidence that the file is from the 18th century and in the public domain as claimed. Rosenzweig τ 10:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Turelio. --Kadı Message 07:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
While not tagged as {{Low quality chem}}, but it is of low quality due to low resolution (276 by 210px). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It's also got a gray background, and has bonds that needlessly are drawn crossing over each other. DMacks (talk) 12:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Replaced by File:Andrastin A.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:58, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Image is of low quality due to opaque background and colored atom labels. This means it doesn't conform to the MOS on molecular drawings. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The file was superseded by File:Trimethylsilylacetylene v2.svg and File:Trimethylsilylacetylene.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
diphenylsilane.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
diphenylsilane.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image is of low quality due to opaque background and colored atom labels. This means it doesn't conform to the MOS on molecular drawings. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
diphenylsilane.png){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. I have uploaded File:Tert-Butyldiphenylsilyl-chloride-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement drawn according to MOS. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:26, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:39, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
diphenylsilane.png){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:15, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 07:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Fitindia. --Kadı Message 07:40, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Probably COM:LL. No EXIF metadata. - hako9 02:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted per above, very unlikely to be own work. -- CptViraj (talk) 09:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Unused image with colored atom labels. File:Metaldehyde structure.svg has no colored atom labels. Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Colored atom labels does not automatically mean that the file is of low quality. Actually, this SVG has a high quality and contains no SVG errors. It might be used in some context. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:38, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:24, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Doclys as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation (F1), found elsewhere on the web. |source=http://images.gmanews.tv/webpics/2016/07/640_13719495_1018755131573378_4000014424044603736_o_2016_07_27_12_45_21.jpg Polarlys (talk) 12:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- The links is from 2016, the file on Commons from 2010. --Polarlys (talk) 12:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Reckonercult
[edit]- File:Artificial Living single cover.jpg
- File:False Empathy single cover.jpg
- File:Revolver single cover.jpg
- File:Reckoner @ The Old Bus Depot.jpg
Possible copyvio: Album cover, Photographs not taken by the uploader --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by FitIndia as No permission since 29 September 2023. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:25, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2007. No Permission from the sculptor Василь Вільгушак. Микола Василечко (talk) 09:25, 23 March 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Re-upload file. no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
And also
There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors and architects copyright. The building was built after 1990. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:27, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for public art. Two online articles (this and this) agree that it was unveiled in 2015 and authored by artist Phil Roberts. A commercial license from the artist is required.
The statue is not de minimis; it is not trivial and forms an essential part of the image, and cropping it away will leave an image of a kid without context, with no useful purpose. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo from an unknown origin CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:31, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also SCOPE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 16:28, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
This violates copyright. There is no indication the editor got permission for this image. HockeyDB has copyright ownership HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 04:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 12:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Roland Winkler M2k~dewiki (talk) 09:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023101010003602 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:01, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 09:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
There is a copyright holder. 181.43.0.59 17:25, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Yann (talk) 19:05, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
The EXIF says "Copyright holder: Chu's". Why was my deletion request a "nonsense"? Is it free to harass IPs? Then prohibit IPs from participating. If not do something about the person who is using admin tools to harass IPs 181.43.0.59 19:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep lack of actual evidence of copyright violation. Maybe OP used an image editing program that was set to automatically populate the copyright holder field in EXIF. Atomicdragon136 (talk) 01:37, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Closing as it has already been deleted by an admin under Commons:Licensing --Atomicdragon136 (talk) 23:01, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
Looks like copied from https://corporate.deliveroo.co.uk/ ( https://dpd-12774-s3.s3.eu-west-2.amazonaws.com/assets/9916/4813/7054/will_shu_CEO_deliveroo_953x1205.jpg ) and no meta data info for "Own work" claim // sikander { talk } 🦖 01:26, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Questionnable own work and seems to have reupload after the image already been deleted Special:Diff/679832340. May be we should leave a message to the user, that this image would need to go through VRT permissions to be uploaded. PierreSelim (talk) 10:03, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:07, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Habertix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non free logos (https://www.facebook.com/issisfax/photos/ http://mastere.utm.rnu.tn/ ). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:08, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kahramana
[edit]No FoP in Iraq, artist Mohammed Ghani Hikmat died in 2011
A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Save Iraqi culture monument
[edit]No FoP in Iraq, artist Mohammed Ghani Hikmat died in 2011
- File:Iraq baghdad 01.JPG
- File:انقاذ العراق.jpg
- File:تمثال انقاذ الحضارة.jpg
- File:نصب إنقاذ الحضارة .jpg
- File:نصب الحرية في بغداد.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 04:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: logo of non-notable web site which no longer exists Omphalographer (talk) 05:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Order of Life (heraldry).svg, this appears to be fictitious. Omphalographer (talk) 05:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
_Message_Board.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Message_Board.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image in question includes an image illustrating a "flame war" within the context of SRB2 (Sonic Robo Blast 2, a Sonic game in the DOOM engine). However, the image lacks essential context regarding the subject matter of the flame war. Given that SRB2 is a relatively lesser-known subject, this image serves as a poor example for most readers trying to understand flame wars. The depiction of a flame war may be confusing or even meaningless to those not acquainted with SRB2, making it an ineffective choice for an illustrative example on a Wikipedia page.
It's crucial for Wikimedia Commons users to ensure that the content uploaded is relevant, well-explained, and pertinent to a broader audience. In this case, the image in question does not effectively represent the typical flame war scenario and is limited in its relevance due to the relatively obscure nature of SRB2. Please refrain from using Wikimedia Commons as a platform to promote personal drama or biases related to a specific, niche topic is imperative. Maintaining accuracy and relevancy in uploaded content is essential to uphold the educational and informative standards of Wikipedia. Kctobor (talk) 06:38, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
_Message_Board.png){kind=link}
- Hi!
- Sorry for the image. I am trying to represent what flame wars (in this case, gaming) would look like. I just missed a spot which would talk about the reusability (as the discussion was like reusability and the SRB2WS). However, please do note that it was the SRB2 Message Board and not the game itself. Appreciate the feedback, though! Pompom454cool (talk) 13:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for considering my feedback regarding the image representing a flame war in the context of the SRB2MB. While adding context is essential, it's important to consider the broader audience's understanding and relevance. Even with additional context, like I said, using an image related to SRB2 (The message board is for SRB2 and as such is related) for illustrating a flame war scenario might still pose challenges in effectively conveying the concept to a wider audience unfamiliar with this niche topic. Upload an example that everyone can understand. Kctobor (talk) 11:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello.
- Note that I didn't consider your feedback, but rather appreciated it. And also, not planning to fish a flame war from 4chan (underage). I also don't plan on going to Discord. And anyway, finding flame wars are harder than finding a bottle with a letter in it.
- Thanks! Pompom454cool (talk) 13:35, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for considering my feedback regarding the image representing a flame war in the context of the SRB2MB. While adding context is essential, it's important to consider the broader audience's understanding and relevance. Even with additional context, like I said, using an image related to SRB2 (The message board is for SRB2 and as such is related) for illustrating a flame war scenario might still pose challenges in effectively conveying the concept to a wider audience unfamiliar with this niche topic. Upload an example that everyone can understand. Kctobor (talk) 11:19, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
- Hello. Please respond to my message in advance.
- It not appropriate to keep people waiting, and they can get a bit funny over time.
- Thanks! Pompom454cool (talk) 13:36, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello.
- This is the last reminder. If you don't respond, this discussion will be archived and possibly the file marked with Kept. Please respond to keep the discussion going.
- Thanks! Pompom454cool (talk) 15:39, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
_Message_Board.png){kind=link}
Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2022, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 06:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Dear, this picture belongs to me and my family 145.1.226.88 14:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- User:Kevlo007007, if that's you, please read COM:VRT and send an email stating who took the photo and what your relation to them is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:39, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:10, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Very simple logo, so it's fine copyright-wise, but I don't think that this file is within project scope. It seems to be a logo of a non-notable consultancy, so I'm bringing it here. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:58, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saad Abu 78 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fair use logos that are not CC-BY-SA-self unlike stated.
Onsilla (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blackcombify (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
- File:MeisterderÄxte+DeusVult.jpg
- File:Max Grundler mit Ben Metzner & Mieze MM.jpg
- File:Max Grundler 2023.jpg
Codc (talk) 08:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:11, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
copyvio, source: https://heimkinofan.de/ Alabasterstein (talk) 09:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, and copyrighted as above the threshold to be pd-logo Joseph2302 (talk) 09:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:27, 8 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, unlikely own work. Too detailed to be pd-logo Joseph2302 (talk) 09:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:12, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
No US copyright rationale. Probably copyrighted in US זָרַח (talk) 10:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 08:45, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). Circa 1940s Slovakian photograph. Could be public domain in the EU, if we can find evidence of publication before 1946, it would be public domain in the US too. Abzeronow (talk) 18:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this looks like more from around 1960. Yann (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Yann as no license (No license since). 1911 Uruguayian photograph. Source lists a 2011 publication. Possibly public domain if earlier publication of the photograph is found. Abzeronow (talk) 18:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: License OK now. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)
previously published at https://myuu.jp/?p=14934, authorship. unclear Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:25, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
Who is Selene? 181.43.0.59 13:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Who is Selene? What is the scope? Why have I been harassed? 181.43.0.59 19:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file of a non-contributor. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 13:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No any news about her, not notable. 0x0a (talk) 16:22, 20 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Invalid licence. Dorsetonian (talk) 19:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:49, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Painting by Mary Riter Hamilton, “Isolated Grave and Camouflage, Vimy Ridge,” May 20, 1919 Peinture de Mary Riter Hamilton, montrant la tombe d’un soldat mort sur la crête de Vimy, 20 mai 1919 (6813489036).jpg P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:18, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Yes, and a much smaller image (counting the reproduction only). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:22, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States, for copyrighted public art. Per this article, it dates to no earlier than 2001 and authored by sculptor William Behrends. This commercially-licensed image violates sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:22, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:50, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wutsje as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 13:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
not own work Gampe (talk) 07:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 08:21, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
not own work Gampe (talk) 07:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
not own work Gampe (talk) 07:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
not own work Gampe (talk) 07:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [6]. Yann (talk) 08:22, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
not own work Gampe (talk) 08:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:53, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Vocalists from Belarus
[edit]Photos of probably non-notable persons used in cross-wiki spam articles (pdc:Aleksandr Lisovskiy, pdc:Polina Malashenok, udm:Малашёнок, Полина Евгеньевна, cs:Polina Malašjonková) uploaded by sockpuppet accounts linked with this sockpuppet investigation on en.wiki.
Harold (talk) 08:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete as to Malashenok, she's of course pretty well-known Belorussian artist, but the articles were evidently filled with spam and promotional links, with even few insults added on pdc.wikipedia, so it was easier them to delete than to rewrite completely. Speaking of nomination, at least one of her photos File:Malashenok.jpg is not "one's own work" because it is the work of Minsk Oblast Cadet Academy (https://vk.com/albums-36124964?z=photo-36124964_457251822%2Fphotos-36124964) and therefore likely cannot be distributed under the CC license. I don't intend to believe the other two photos are "one's own works" as well, so delete per nom. --Protonmet (talk) 01:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also, the copyright status is unclear and needs to be rectified via COM:VRT. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
© Gillian Sweeney All Rights Reserved. No Unauthorised Use. Unlikely to be uploader's work A1Cafel (talk) 09:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Photo Dominik Plüss M2k~dewiki (talk) 14:41, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:55, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Who is Musa? 181.43.0.59 13:31, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Who is Musa? What is the scope? Why have I been harassed? 181.43.0.59 19:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:56, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
2017 Canadian banknote. According to COM:CRT/Canada#Currency, it's copyrighted. Facenapalm (talk) 20:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
2015 Canadian banknote. According to COM:CRT/Canada#Currency, it's copyrighted. Facenapalm (talk) 20:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Nativeatlanta2016
[edit]
Low resolution image missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, Possible copyvio: Album cover --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for public art. This article states it was unveiled in 2010, and authored by Christopher Slatoff. The artwork is included in the author's website. A commercial license permission from the sculptor is required to keep this image. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of a film as per the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, From Instagram CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
Possilble copyvio: The uploader is not the author, as per the description CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:53, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:59, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy EighteenChild (talk) 01:28, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Question Bad how? It's useful, beyond the automatic courtesy deletion period, and I'd rather keep it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek May I suggest hiding or oversighting the location in EXIF ? PierreSelim (talk) 10:05, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
- Sure. The location of the typewriter is unimportant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: granting courtesy deletion of unused photo. Many other typewriter photos already on Commons. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a map from the Soviet Union. The uploaed clearly knew this but asserten it is ok since SU no more. Someone else weirdly slapped {PD-USGov} onto the page (I removed it). Altenmann (talk) 02:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2015, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 05:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Bad quality Derbrauni (talk) 06:11, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to several better ones in its category. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2022, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2021, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 06:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, I don't think this was created in 2022, a proper source and license is needed A1Cafel (talk) 06:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Photographer Sameer Makarius died in 2009 A1Cafel (talk) 06:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
A 1970 poster is still copyright in the Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- The author Thijs Postma provided me this image for release on wikipedia. Etienne010 (talk) 10:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needed from artist via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
A 1983 photographs is obviously copyrighted A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- The author Thijs Postma provided me this image for release on wikipedia. Etienne010 (talk) 10:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Permission needed from author via COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
no proof of public domain PizzaKing13 (talk) 06:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author of the book Harry Sylvester died in 1993 A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Harry Sylvester was likely not the illustrator; nevertheless, all other essential info and permission missing. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author of the book Harry Sylvester died in 1993 A1Cafel (talk) 06:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Harry Sylvester was likely not the illustrator; nevertheless, all other essential info and permission missing. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fairly simple logo below COM:TOO USA, but I have doubts as to this file's adherence to project scope. Seems like a random non-notable consultancy. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Promo photo credited to Sam Burriss - needs VTRS to keep Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
no author no permission, data in metadata does differ from date upload Hoyanova (talk) 09:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, subject is same as uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Most likely a screenshot of a copyrighted video. Little evidence that the user is the actual copyright holder. Kigsz (talk) 10:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Most likely a screenshot of a copyrighted video. Little evidence that the user is the actual copyright holder. Kigsz (talk) 10:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Most likely a screenshot of a copyrighted video. Little evidence that the user is the actual copyright holder. Kigsz (talk) 10:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Most likely a screenshot of a copyrighted video. Little evidence that the user is the actual copyright holder. Kigsz (talk) 10:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:38, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be a behind-the-scenes photo from the "Want You Bad" music video shoot. Little evidence that the user who uploaded it is the copyright holder. Kigsz (talk) 10:59, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Self promo 24.211.70.219 18:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Author is credited as a named person who does not appear to be the uploader. No evidence of permission to host on Commons. Bri (talk) 18:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, per CoffeeEngineer. Evidence of permission is needed. Marbletan (talk) 15:05, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Cassette cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio © Marco Fischer M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a Google Maps screenshot, not own work Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama for non-architecture in the United States. The statue dates to 2001. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 22:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:34, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely own work. This logo is copyrighted, as above the threshold for pd-logo. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:30, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:04, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- The author allowed reuse through his official website (dornellesmusic.com.br) in the footer of the website "License - Creative Commons 2.0 Attribution License (reuse permitted)".
- Nickywikip (talk) Nickywikip (talk) 20:25, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- I see it, too. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 21:02, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - Unused, out of scope self-promotional image.--Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 00:33, 30 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - According to the information available on the Official Website, the image in question is duly licensed under the terms of Creative Commons, which grants legal authorization for its use, as long as the conditions stipulated by the license are respected. Additionally, in the Gallery tab, the website explains that the images have a "License to use images from the Gallery - Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 3.0)". This license statement eliminates the possibility of any infringement of the rules of this platform. I highlight that the image was uploaded by myself and will be destined for a project that will later be incorporated into the author's Wikipedia. The aforementioned project is already on my test page, and the image is an integral part of this work. In light of the above, I respectfully request the closure of the deletion request, as the central allegation for such request, "Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author", does not apply to the image in question, given the clarity and legitimacy of the license Creative Commons under which it was made available.--Nickywikip (talk) 23:00, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Even if this image were not a copyvio (which is questionable) this image is out of scope and self-promotional. Commons is not a free web host or a place to advertise. It's a media file repository for educational content and media that can be used in the WMF projects. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with Kacamata, it is for promotional purpose, a G10 I think. It should be deleted. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CoffeeEngineer and @Kacamata In order to support a claim, it is essential to present evidence. So far, I have only seen unfounded theories, considering that it is an image intended for a project on Wikipedia, which, incidentally, is in the development phase. Otherwise, there would be no reason to include this information in this context. --Nickywikip (talk) 01:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Nickywikip I'm also active in the pt.WP. You tried to use that Wikipedia as a means for promotion. Both the article you have created there, were deleted by AfD. This so-called project, of yours, is nothing but yet another attempt to re-create an article for a person that the editors in the pt.Wp said more than once that is not notable. So, again, this picture is out of scope and simply self-promotion, just like your article in the pt.WP. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata The absence of self-promotion is evident, since the use of Wikipedia for such a purpose is neither necessary nor justified, as previously mentioned. As expressed by yourself, the environment here differs from "there" referring to the other part of Wikipedia. I am aware of the current regulations and recognize your right, as well as mine, to include content on a platform like Wikipedia. The purpose of this image is simply to wait for a favorable opportunity and recognition of notoriety for the eventual recreation of the article. This plan is not subject to impediments, even in the face of possible vandalism attempts by other editors. Furthermore, given that the image is already in use on my testing pages, there is no reason to remove it since it serves a specific purpose. I note, however, a possible bias in their actions to closely monitor my edits. Nickywikip (talk) 11:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- On the contrary, the presence of self-promotion is evident. You are a SPA which is here only to use WMF projects as a means for promotion. Again, this picture is only self-promo and out of scope and should be deleted. You have no "right" to use WP or Commons. This is not a free web host, the images and files here needs to serve a purpose. Your image serves for no purpose other than using WMF projects as a means for promotion. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 19:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata To assert something, you need to provide evidence, which was not done in your comment. I also note with your comment a possible violation of the Commons code of conduct, specifically in Topic 3 on unacceptable conduct, including sub-items 3.1 and 3.2. If such behaviors persist, I will be required to report them. It is worth mentioning that the use of this platform presupposes the right to contribute, evidenced by the option to create an account. The purpose of my image is legitimate, as it is essential to the use of this platform. I'm not looking for self-promotion here. Nickywikip (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please, if you feel so, report me. Let's see what happens. You have no valid contributions here, others than images related to Dornelles and a non-notable website called UpdateCharts. You have no valid contributions in the pt.WP either. Only attempts to use pt.WP to promote Dornelles and the non-notable website UpdateCharts. This is exactly the definition of SPA. Given that both articles created by you in the pt.WP were considered spam/non-notable and deleted. And also, given the fact that both accounts participating here considered this image self-promotion, I feel very comfortable to say that you are not here to contribute with WMF projects and are only trying to use that as a means for self-promotion. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 20:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Your claims are unfounded. My contributions go beyond images related to Dornelles and the UpdateCharts website. Furthermore, the term "SPA" does not apply as my actions do not fit the definition of a single specific purpose. As for the articles on pt.WP, they were removed not due to lack of validity, but due to subjective interpretations. Allegations of self-promotion are unfounded, as my presence here is motivated by a genuine desire to contribute to WMF projects, not self-promotion. This discussion is going beyond the scope of what should be judged here. My actions do not disqualify the permanence of this image, as it complies with the established guidelines. Nickywikip (talk) 20:28, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment @Kacamata, I gently ask you not to bite newcomers. Do not harass them nor use ad hominem against them. Cheers and happy Christmas, RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @RodRabelo7 They are not newcomers. They are SPA and a spammer. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 21:48, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Please, if you feel so, report me. Let's see what happens. You have no valid contributions here, others than images related to Dornelles and a non-notable website called UpdateCharts. You have no valid contributions in the pt.WP either. Only attempts to use pt.WP to promote Dornelles and the non-notable website UpdateCharts. This is exactly the definition of SPA. Given that both articles created by you in the pt.WP were considered spam/non-notable and deleted. And also, given the fact that both accounts participating here considered this image self-promotion, I feel very comfortable to say that you are not here to contribute with WMF projects and are only trying to use that as a means for self-promotion. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 20:06, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata To assert something, you need to provide evidence, which was not done in your comment. I also note with your comment a possible violation of the Commons code of conduct, specifically in Topic 3 on unacceptable conduct, including sub-items 3.1 and 3.2. If such behaviors persist, I will be required to report them. It is worth mentioning that the use of this platform presupposes the right to contribute, evidenced by the option to create an account. The purpose of my image is legitimate, as it is essential to the use of this platform. I'm not looking for self-promotion here. Nickywikip (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- On the contrary, the presence of self-promotion is evident. You are a SPA which is here only to use WMF projects as a means for promotion. Again, this picture is only self-promo and out of scope and should be deleted. You have no "right" to use WP or Commons. This is not a free web host, the images and files here needs to serve a purpose. Your image serves for no purpose other than using WMF projects as a means for promotion. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 19:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Kacamata The absence of self-promotion is evident, since the use of Wikipedia for such a purpose is neither necessary nor justified, as previously mentioned. As expressed by yourself, the environment here differs from "there" referring to the other part of Wikipedia. I am aware of the current regulations and recognize your right, as well as mine, to include content on a platform like Wikipedia. The purpose of this image is simply to wait for a favorable opportunity and recognition of notoriety for the eventual recreation of the article. This plan is not subject to impediments, even in the face of possible vandalism attempts by other editors. Furthermore, given that the image is already in use on my testing pages, there is no reason to remove it since it serves a specific purpose. I note, however, a possible bias in their actions to closely monitor my edits. Nickywikip (talk) 11:11, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Nickywikip I'm also active in the pt.WP. You tried to use that Wikipedia as a means for promotion. Both the article you have created there, were deleted by AfD. This so-called project, of yours, is nothing but yet another attempt to re-create an article for a person that the editors in the pt.Wp said more than once that is not notable. So, again, this picture is out of scope and simply self-promotion, just like your article in the pt.WP. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 01:46, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @CoffeeEngineer and @Kacamata In order to support a claim, it is essential to present evidence. So far, I have only seen unfounded theories, considering that it is an image intended for a project on Wikipedia, which, incidentally, is in the development phase. Otherwise, there would be no reason to include this information in this context. --Nickywikip (talk) 01:19, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with Kacamata, it is for promotional purpose, a G10 I think. It should be deleted. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Even if this image were not a copyvio (which is questionable) this image is out of scope and self-promotional. Commons is not a free web host or a place to advertise. It's a media file repository for educational content and media that can be used in the WMF projects. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 23:17, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I'll be the devil's advocate here as I agree the user has quite a few issues with promotional tone/edits on pt.wiki. However, Dornelles is not a completely irrelevant person to say that this image's only purpose is promotion. He has appeared in some reliable sources, including some which give significant coverage. For example, [7] (en:Universo Online). With this in mind, I've created a Wikidata item for Dornelles at d:Q123996297 which meets Wikidata's notability criteria point 2, and the image is now COM:INUSE. Regarding the image itself, it is validly licensed through CC-BY 3.0 per the singer's official website. Skyshifter (talk) 21:12, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Skyshifter His article was deleted in pt.WP by the community, and you know very well that. So, this singer is not notable by any means. You also know that this account is a SPA and a spammer. They have no valid contributions, neither here nor in the Commons. You know that very well, too. What I don't understand is why a sysop in the pt.WP is going to this length to help a SPA and spammer to keep a self-promotion image that is being used on a draft for an article which was deleted by the community. Even, to the point of creating a WD for item for them. Nickywikip is a SPA and spammer, and RodRabelo7 is banned from pt.WP. I understand their motivation. I don't understand yours. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 21:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- I am not helping anyone — I even mentioned that the uploader has issues with promo edits. So yes, I know everything you said in your comment. However, this doesn't mean the image isn't valid, as I explained above. The item was created because it meets the Wikidata notability criteria: "It refers to an instance of a clearly identifiable conceptual or material entity that can be described using serious and publicly available references." Skyshifter (talk) 22:04, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Skyshifter His article was deleted in pt.WP by the community, and you know very well that. So, this singer is not notable by any means. You also know that this account is a SPA and a spammer. They have no valid contributions, neither here nor in the Commons. You know that very well, too. What I don't understand is why a sysop in the pt.WP is going to this length to help a SPA and spammer to keep a self-promotion image that is being used on a draft for an article which was deleted by the community. Even, to the point of creating a WD for item for them. Nickywikip is a SPA and spammer, and RodRabelo7 is banned from pt.WP. I understand their motivation. I don't understand yours. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 21:57, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep, freely licensed image of a notable Brazilian singer [8] [9] [10]. RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:15, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- LMAO, furthermore it is COM:INUSE. Can someone close this ASAP? RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not in use. It's used in a draft, not in an article. Also, the single is not notable, his article was deleted several times in the pt.WP. Interesting enough, you are also banned from pt.WP. It seems a huge coincidence. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 21:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Also, note that this picture is a screenshot from Picasa per EXIF metadata. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 21:59, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- Not in use. It's used in a draft, not in an article. Also, the single is not notable, his article was deleted several times in the pt.WP. Interesting enough, you are also banned from pt.WP. It seems a huge coincidence. Kacamata! Dimmi!!! 21:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
- LMAO, furthermore it is COM:INUSE. Can someone close this ASAP? RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:17, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Kept: A freely licensed image of a notable Brazilian singer, which was proven by reliable sources—so, obviously within scope, even if it was not in use on any Wikimedia project. Suspicions were raised over the legitimacy of the license, but they were not substantiated. -- Darwin Ahoy! 00:30, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
This seems to be unveiled the same time as this statue, see this article. The sculptor is apparently the same, 박충흠. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:25, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation. Instagram photo not own work (https://www.instagram.com/p/CwX8nuQsc7p/) Masti (talk) 16:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Janakjk21
[edit]- File:Free charity concerts for remote villages by (gorkhali takma band).jpg
- File:In fusion walking firiri (growing popularity of gorkhali takma).jpg
- File:A pair of Nabobukko's Walking Firiri (Gorkhali takma).jpg
- File:Wavemagazinenepal.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Screenshot of magazines and photographs of newspapers --CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- These screenshots are in the public domain or are released under licenses that permit free use, redistribution, and modification, such as Creative Commons licenses, so it do not violate the rule of copyright infringement. Janakjk21 (talk) 04:25, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- The Copyright Act of Nepal, 2059 (2002), provides legal provisions relating to copyright. In this act, copyright protection is extended to various types of original works in the fields of literature, art, science, and more. The act defines key terms and outlines the acquisition and protection of copyright, including economic and moral rights of the creators.
- However, the act does not explicitly state that screen shots of newspaper articles are not subject to copyright. 2405:ACC0:1204:4088:24CD:5553:9C6F:52C 04:30, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - derivative works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Kimberly Bender M2k~dewiki (talk) 18:32, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Offizielles Pressefoto, das bei RTL zum freien Download und zur freien Nutzung verfügbar ist. https://media.rtl.com/pressemappe/Stranger-Sins/ Mal3mal4mal5 (talk) 18:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Da steht: „Die Verwendung des sendungsbezogenen Materials ist nur mit dem Hinweis und Verlinkung auf RTL+ gestattet.“ - keine freie Nutzung. Kein Einstein (talk) 14:37, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
copyviol, cf. bolognafc.it — danyele 18:47, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, per Danyele. Dubious claim of own work Marbletan (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:23, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
copyviol, cf. calciospezia.it — danyele 18:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, per Danyele. Dubious claim of own work Marbletan (talk) 16:18, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
cut-out from a file in copyviol, cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Motta Spezia.jpg — danyele 18:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:22, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible copyvio: Photo already on the internet in 2017 according to TinEye CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Who is Nando? 181.43.0.59 13:30, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Who is Nando? This is an expression of doubt about scope. Many users have written "who is" in deletion requests. Is it "nonsense" when an IP uses the same wording? I hope there are no double standards in Commons. Therefore I have been harassed by User Yann. I want to hope that not all Admins protect each other and there will be an honest admin who will do something about this harassment. 181.43.0.59 19:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Personal file of a non-contributor. Marbletan (talk) 16:12, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal file of a non-contributor. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Album cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Permission from the artist/copyright holder is needed. Marbletan (talk) 16:19, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:19, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
duplicate image 79.26.60.221 20:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see any duplicate. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
No-Free Image. Taken from here [11] Librero2109 (talk) 20:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
![[11]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:North_Korean_embassy_attack_in_Lima.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:17, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
la foto è firmata Pejrò1 (talk) 22:33, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Question Dove? Non vedo nessun problema, ma spiega, per piacere. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:20, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: I was going to grant this uploader request, but I saw they have uploaded a new version without watermark. It should be ok now, isn't it? otherwise let me know. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyright violation 2A01:CB08:5CA:B500:211B:3370:C538:9047 22:37, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO A1Cafel (talk) 04:30, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Not a logo but a drawing of this monument, which was inaugurated in 1924. I haven't found biographical details about the architect(s), but here's what's stated at Category:Monument aux morts des Armées de Champagne: <<Monument aux morts des Armées de Champagne (1923-1924), dit aussi Monument-ossuaire de la Ferme de Navarin, communes de Sainte-Marie-à-Py et Souain-Perthes-lès-Hurlus, Marne, Champagne-Ardenne, France a été réalisé par Bauer (architecte) et Maxime Real del Sarte (sculpteur français, 1888-1954).>> My other sources didn't mention Sarte but instead mentioned Bauer & Perrin. But if this is accurate, 1954 is (barely) less than 70 years ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Ikan Kekek,
- Thx for your review.
- I am member of the association and all your information are true.
- The "logo" (Which looks like a draw) is from the first page of the bulletin the association publishes 2 twice a year.
- It appears since 2002 and can be reused for Wikipédia.
- I updated the license, tell me if now it is correct or feel free to align with the proper one.
- Thx a lot for your support, Joseph.girard (talk) 11:50, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, Joseph.girard, but I think for Commons, it would still need approval of the estate of the sculptor. Otherwise, it should be uploaded locally to individual Wikipedias that approve of COM:FAIRUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no permission (No permission since). COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - No information available for the ToO in Costa Rica. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:55, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Not own work. Photograph of an old photograph, probably displayed behind glass, copyright of which can not be verified. It is even doubtful if uploader was really the maker of the photograph of the photograph: small size, no EXIF data. Uploader should go out and take a picture of the building for herself (see Wiki Loves Monuments campaign). Henxter (talk) 09:17, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:50, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Seems to be part of the UK DfT logo, which is non-free and uploaded to enwiki as fair use: w:en:File:Department for Transport.svg Lentokonefani (talk) 11:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
no evidence for CC license Steinninn ♨ 12:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
,_Minsk_(29092897538).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Minsk_(29092897538).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Belarus A1Cafel (talk) 13:05, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
,_Minsk_(29092897538).jpg){kind=link}
- Where is the significant work of architecture that goes beyond COM:TOO in this photo? Unfortunately, we do not know anything here at Commons about the threshold in Belarus or the associated case law. But a building with just lots of glass and a round shape does not appear to be significant, at least not from the distance this has been photographed where it is just one building among others. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Even though many of other buildings are DM-able, the main one would still have unusual shape (TBH, if I didn't open it, I don't know why a building can be designed as-is). Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 13:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- To me these are just two round shapes connected to each other. Given the distance to the object and in context of the surrounding buildings I still think that this is more likely below COM:TOO. --AFBorchert (talk) 13:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, not an ordinary building (see here). For some information, it opened in 2015, so the architect is unlikely to have died for more than 50 years (and the work is still copyrighted). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:15, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - as per JWilz12345. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
,_Minsk_(29092897538).jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Wutsje as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10 Yann (talk) 13:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. By all appearances, just a personal file of a non-contributor. Marbletan (talk) 16:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hoben7599 as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 13:39, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: may be in PD however, there is no enough infos to determine the copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Dubious source; sole upload by editor; looks like a copy of a book or magazine page; does not look like the person named, Miguel Cancel from Menudo The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamzachpaul (talk · contribs)
[edit]missing full EXIF data, dubious claim of own work, out of scope
The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 14:40, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - may be out of scope, unused and without relevant categories. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a theater CoffeeEngineer (talk) 18:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- CoffeeEngineer, why do you think this is a copyvio? The Logo consists only of lettering, including the central B H and T. That's why I used the pd-textlogo license template. -- Ssilvers (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Ssilvers: , Because the letters are intricated. Meanwhile, I am not so aware of the acceptability of the logos from the USA. Is there a precedent? I am open to removing my request. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is common (on Commons) for similar US logos. See, for example, this, this and this. Ssilvers (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is good for me. I will keep this discussion as an example. Thank you. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
- This is common (on Commons) for similar US logos. See, for example, this, this and this. Ssilvers (talk) 20:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Ssilvers: , Because the letters are intricated. Meanwhile, I am not so aware of the acceptability of the logos from the USA. Is there a precedent? I am open to removing my request. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 19:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
User:CoffeeEngineer, why is the image still nominated for deletion? Can you withdraw it, please? -- Ssilvers (talk) 23:03, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
- It seems to me it is written I agree with you and that the reauest can be closed. An admin should close it. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 15:26, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
no own work Dirk Lenke (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. The uploader's username matches the name of the subject (therefore not own work most likely), so permission from the individual who took the photo is needed. Marbletan (talk) 16:16, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. EXIF data states someone else as the copyrights holder. This would require COM:VRT release. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Photo by George Călin / Inquam Photos, not a work from the US Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo by George Călin / Inquam Photos, not a work from the US Government, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 18:04, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A 1956 photographs is still copyrighted in the Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Jan-Hendrik Becking (1924-2009); Rechte bei Archiv Becking, Basel CH
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/97659285@N08/53219033791/in/datetaken-public/ Schaunochmal (talk) 19:54, 5 October 2023 (UTC)
- The Flickr Uploader (Albert Jan Becking) is the son of the original photographer de:Jan-Hendrik Becking He was born in 1957. Keep since they as an heir can license the photograph. Abzeronow (talk) 18:38, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per Abzeronow. HouseBlaster (talk) 21:33, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 18:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A 1956 photographs is still copyrighted in the Netherlands A1Cafel (talk) 06:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/File:1956.08.16.Elsbeek.RW,JH.Becking.jpg. HouseBlaster (talk) 21:46, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 18:07, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
above TOO? Krd 12:07, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: COM:TOO US for both logos. —holly {chat} 18:49, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Plenty of similar, better-quality alternatives already available on Commons, see Category:Coats of arms of the United Kingdom. Most likely not own work, thus missing proof of free licensing. Lentokonefani (talk) 11:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This appears to be a raster version of File:Coat of Arms of the United Kingdom (1801-1816).svg and is currently in use on fi:Käyttäjä:Princes Karoliina Kestilinna. I tried to replace it with the vector version, but on fi-WP apparently we are not allowed to edit other users' pages. I have asked for help so we can complete this DR once it's replaced (CommonsDelinker was not an option as it won't do raster → vector replacements). —holly {chat} 18:39, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
- ﹫Holly Cheng: Vaihdoin kuvan. Keskustelu kuvasta suomenkielisen Wikipedian ylläpitäjien ilmoitustaululla Help replacing image. raid5 22:20, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Logo of a t-shirt brand https://www.fastlifemerch.com/ CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:08, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Under COM:TOO if it's American. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:18, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: en:Draft:Fast Life Music was declined, so this is going to fall out of scope. —holly {chat} 23:12, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Counterfeit Purses as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This is an image from Furet's Instagram account. It was posted on 6 December, 2020, which is earlier than the claimed date of creation by the uploader. The cropped version was uploaded by a user who is now blocked on French Wikipedia. Username of original uploader matches EXIF, converting to DR. Whether or not the uploader of the cropped version is in good standing is not important. We need the original uploader to either upload a full-resolution version of the image showing the camera in the EXIF or to otherwise establish that they are the photographer via COM:VRT. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts Shouldn't the original image be restored and the cropped image moved to its own file? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 15:59, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Counterfeit Purses: Sure. But a violation of COM:OVERWRITE has nothing to do with whether or not the image should be deleted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- So is anyone going to do that, then? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- File history split. Cropped file is under current name, and the original version is at File:Photo portrait d'Andréa Furet 2020.jpg Abzeronow (talk) 19:23, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- So is anyone going to do that, then? Counterfeit Purses (talk) 19:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Counterfeit Purses: Sure. But a violation of COM:OVERWRITE has nothing to do with whether or not the image should be deleted. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:11, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: The date in the EXIF is still later than the Instagram post date (BTW the photo is no longer available on Insta), so it was probably faked. —holly {chat} 23:38, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Bodhisattwa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The author Sailendra Narayana Ghosal Sastri died in 1988.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as IMO here is nothing copyright on this book-cover and reproduction seems to be legit. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The book cover is PD-ineligible. —holly {chat} 23:52, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Per [12], these photos of Claus von Stauffenberg (two slightly different photos, but obviously from the same photo session) were taken in 1934 when he was a cavalry officer in Bamberg. They don't name a photographer, so the photos might be in the PD as anonymous in Germany, though by German law, the author does not need to be credited, just to be known, so the photographer might be named somewhere, and then those photos are protected for 70 years pma in Germany.
1934 photos were definitely still protected by copyright in Germany on the URAA date in 1996, so the US copyright for those, until the end of 2029, was restored, and the files should be deleted. They can be restored in 2030. One file was previously kept in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Madelgarius, but that was just a procedural keep without prejudice to renomination, and two of the files are a stamp and a crop of that stamp, but as we have known for over 10 years now, German stamps are not official works and not in the PD, at least not as official works.
- File:Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg small.jpg
- File:Claus von Stauffenberg (1907-1944).jpg
- File:Claus von Stauffenberg portrait (1907-1944).JPG
- File:Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg - Helmuth James Graf von Moltke.jpg
- File:Claus Schenk von Stauffenberg.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Rosenzweig τ 11:35, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. Frühere Rechtslage in Deutschland / Übergangsrecht does not apply here -> PD EU undisclosed author. --Madelgarius (talk) 12:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- PD here + unknown photographer by Gunnar D. Hatlehol.
- @Madelgarius: Though it does not affect the US copyright (see below), I want to ask: You just claim that “Frühere Rechtslage in Deutschland / Übergangsrecht] does not apply here”. But why do you think that is the case? --Rosenzweig τ 12:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- And why would a claim of PD by a Norwegian historian (if the claim is even by him) be relevant here? The photo might well be in the PD in Norway. But we need to determine the copyright status in Germany and the US. --Rosenzweig τ 12:55, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- That does not at all affect the US copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 12:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Files nominated for deletion due to the URAA should be evaluated carefully, as should be their copyright status under US and local laws. A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle. (URAA). I'll put the right license on it. And you claim it's under URAA... --Madelgarius (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- So we'll wait for you to provide proof that the copyright has been restored via the URAA and then we'll affix the licence:
{{Not-PD-US-URAA}}until any rightful owners take offence and ask for deletion, which, as far as Stauffenberg is concerned, would surprise me greatly. --Madelgarius (talk) 13:02, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- So we'll wait for you to provide proof that the copyright has been restored via the URAA and then we'll affix the licence:
- Files nominated for deletion due to the URAA should be evaluated carefully, as should be their copyright status under US and local laws. A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle. (URAA). I'll put the right license on it. And you claim it's under URAA... --Madelgarius (talk) 12:57, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- That does not at all affect the US copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 12:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- It is not a "mere allegation". I explained in detail above why the URAA does apply. If this were a French photograph from 1934, we could say that it (perhaps, if it was indeed anonymous) was not affected by the URAA because France had a copyright term of 50 years + several years of wartime extensions on the URAA date in 1996 (en:Wikipedia:Non-US copyrights). But Germany already had 70 years on that date. That's the kind of research which one needs to do (and which I did) to determine the applicability of the URAA. I get the impression that you're grasping at all kinds of straws here but are not really very knowledgeable about copyright. --Rosenzweig τ 13:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, and as for "until any rightful owners take offence and ask for deletion": No, that's now how it works at Wikimedia Commons. Per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, arguments that amount to "we can get away with it" (such as this one) are against Commons' aims. --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Just read the license URAA: If you are the copyright holder of this file, and do not wish to have it hosted on Commons, please contact our designated agent or nominate the file for deletion, explaining the situation.. --Madelgarius (talk) 13:21, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- But we are still waiting for a demonstration that the URAA applies here. --Madelgarius (talk) 13:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- I already did demonstrate it, see above. And the bit about contacting the designated agent does not mean that we can and do host any files where that does not happen. You appear to be very confused about what Wikimedia Commons actually is and what its aims are. --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- You seem to be a great specialist in image rights, but I've caught you red-handed on two or three occasions (by saying the wrong things). I'm a Wikipedian who's been trying to illustrate WP for over twelve years now. If you really want to, we can affix the URAA licence but, as this is your only argument, it's clearly not a criterion for deletion (you're not a copyright holder). And stop using that condescending tone, it's very unpleasant. --Madelgarius (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- There is no "URAA license" we could "affix"; {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is just a stopgap for older files uploaded before March 2012. That a file is still copyrighted in the US is a criterion for deletion, see Commons:Licensing. You don't need to be a "copyright holder" to nominate such a file for deletion. Given your contributions here, I get the impression now that further communication with you on this matter is pointless. --Rosenzweig τ 14:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Very impressed. I've said what I had to say. May it be done to the best of this project's ability and may its advocates understand. Best regards, --Madelgarius (talk) 14:23, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- There is no "URAA license" we could "affix"; {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} is just a stopgap for older files uploaded before March 2012. That a file is still copyrighted in the US is a criterion for deletion, see Commons:Licensing. You don't need to be a "copyright holder" to nominate such a file for deletion. Given your contributions here, I get the impression now that further communication with you on this matter is pointless. --Rosenzweig τ 14:10, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- You seem to be a great specialist in image rights, but I've caught you red-handed on two or three occasions (by saying the wrong things). I'm a Wikipedian who's been trying to illustrate WP for over twelve years now. If you really want to, we can affix the URAA licence but, as this is your only argument, it's clearly not a criterion for deletion (you're not a copyright holder). And stop using that condescending tone, it's very unpleasant. --Madelgarius (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- I already did demonstrate it, see above. And the bit about contacting the designated agent does not mean that we can and do host any files where that does not happen. You appear to be very confused about what Wikimedia Commons actually is and what its aims are. --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, and as for "until any rightful owners take offence and ask for deletion": No, that's now how it works at Wikimedia Commons. Per Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, arguments that amount to "we can get away with it" (such as this one) are against Commons' aims. --Rosenzweig τ 13:13, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I believe the Office of Alien Property Custodian confiscated German Reich copyrights in the USA, I am not aware that they were restored. --RAN (talk) 19:14, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Due to the nature of US copyrights, this photograph most likely wasn't even copyrighted in the US at the time, so there was nothing to "confiscate". There was a copyright treaty in effect between Germany and the US, but any German author / rights holder would have needed to register a copyright just like their US counterparts. A search for Stauffenberg at the Catalogs of Copyright Entries at IA does turn up a couple of books by another person from that same family, but no photographs. Per [13] (section Copyrights, Trademarks, and Patents), “only selected copyrights and trademarks were vested, [but] "all patents of nationals of enemy and enemy-occupied countries" were vested”. Vesting being what this process was called in the WW II era. Hitler's Mein Kampf was among the works which had their copyright vested, along with works by a number of European authors and composers, many of them French or Italian. The claim that "the Office of Alien Property Custodian confiscated German Reich copyrights in the USA" (or rather vested than confiscated) is true for works like Mein Kampf of Friedrich Beilstein's Handbuch der organischen Chemie, but as can be read in the linked article, this certainly does not apply to all German works as implied. So there was no impediment to the URAA restoring this photograph's US copyright in 1996. --Rosenzweig τ 20:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Per en:Wikipedia:Non-US copyrights#Wartime copyrights, “Any copyrights that were "ever owned or administered by the Alien Property Custodian" were not restored if the restored copyright would be held by "a government or an instrumentality thereof".” There is no indication that the copyright of these photographs were held by government. And per en:Wikipedia:Non-US copyrights#Germany, “A number of German cases indicate that the copyright in images or graphic works remains with the author, even if the works were produced for official use.[DEauthorship] All of these German copyrights were extended in period to 70 years pma before the date of restoration, and so the US copyrights have been restored.” --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep These photos were taken in Germany in 1934 by an anonymous photographer. There is no formal proof that these images are protected in the United States -- Sincerely-- Adri08 (talk) 19:29, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- We don't need any "formal proof", I've demonstrated in detail that the URAA does apply. And it's not really sure if the photographer is really anonymous as claimed or just unknown to us. --Rosenzweig τ 20:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- I consider that in this case the application of the URAA is an abuse - Sincerely -- Adri08 (talk) 09:38, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- We don't need any "formal proof", I've demonstrated in detail that the URAA does apply. And it's not really sure if the photographer is really anonymous as claimed or just unknown to us. --Rosenzweig τ 20:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Adri08. The photographer is anonymous, and it was in 1934. DarkVador79-UA (talk) 23:19, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Adri08 and DarkVador79-UA.--Huguespotter (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Applying the URAA is not "abuse" (whatever that is supposed to mean), but official policy here at Wikimedia Commons. See Commons:Licensing and Commons:URAA-restored copyrights. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Oh yes, and I would like to remind everybody coming here from fr.wp (obviously) that Commons deletion debates are not votes (Commons:Deletion requests), so any more canvassing efforts there resulting in people coming here to "vote", but with zero arguments except claims of "abuse", are rather pointless. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Je ne vois pas pourquoi l'Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) s'appliquerait pour ce cas. Pªɖaw@ne 17:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; even if we assume {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} applies, they wouldn't be PD in the US until 2030 because of URAA restoration of copyrights. —holly {chat} 23:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Image was found on another website, {{Cc-by-sa-2.0-Scratch}} does not apply. SergioFLS (talk) 17:36, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: The current version of the Snap! documentation is licensed CC-BY-NC-SA, and this image came from the old one, which had no license terms in it (making it all rights reserved by default). —holly {chat} 00:01, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/ Iris Mittenaere
[edit]The source of the image is the Philippine News Agency and it is using {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} as license. The template basically says works by the government are in the public domain unless otherwise noted. The T&C of the news agency is quite explicit:
All contents of this site are protected by Philippines copyright laws under Republic Act No. 8293, known as the Intellectual Property (IP) Code of the Philippines, and may not be reproduced, distributed, altered, published or broadcast for commercial use without prior permission from PNA and its mother unit, the News and Information Bureau (NIB).
That is redistribution, derivatives and comercial use are not allowed, not fulfilling Common's licensing requirements.
- File:DOT Sec Teo, Miss Universe Mittenaere and Chavit Singson (cropped).jpg
- File:Miss Universe 2016 Iris Mittenaere press conference.jpg
- File:Miss Universe 2016 Iris Mittenaere press conference (cropped).jpg
- File:DOT Sec Teo, Miss Universe Mittenaere and Chavit Singson.jpg
- File:Iris Mittenaere (cropped).jpg
- File:Iris Mittenaere Miss Universe 2016.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Günther Frager (talk) 20:56, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, Philippine News Agency's copyright claims are already troubling enough. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jessie Lacuna 2020.jpg. I actually sent two emails to them for clarification about the possible conflict between their TOU and the copyright law (that categorically states all government works have no subsisting copyright) – one in November 2021 and the other in July 2023. In both responses, I got no single response from them. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 00:02, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
The statue was completed in 1939 by Maxime Real del Sarte (1888–1954). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2025.
- File:@scourtecuisse WikiLovesMonuments2018 8.jpg
- File:Champ-de-Mars Joffre1.jpg
- File:Champ-de-Mars Joffre2.jpg
- File:Champ-de-Mars Joffre3.JPG
- File:Eiffel Tower (10574275893).jpg
- File:Equestrian statue of Joffre (8183324827).jpg
- File:Equestrian statue of Joffre (8183327801).jpg
- File:Estátua próxima da École Militaire - panoramio.jpg
- File:Joseph Jacques Césaire Joffre - panoramio.jpg
- File:Paris - École Militaire (27412584895).jpg
- File:Paris monument joffre.jpg
- File:Paris Statue of General Joffre (9811866393).jpg
- File:Paris Tour Eiffel & Statue of General Joffre (9811950103).jpg
- File:Paris Tour Eiffel & Statue of General Joffre (9812115824).jpg
- File:Paríž maršál Joseph Jacques Césaire Joffre.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 03:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:37, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The information provided is that from the scuplture, but there isn't any information about the photograph itself, not known if it was taken in 1942 or in a later moment. 193.146.182.205 13:48, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Note: The photograph is available in the web, see here. 193.146.182.205 13:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This photo was produced more than 70 years ago by the Carmelite nuns monastery of Coimbra. International legislation in terms of the Public Domain provides for this situation, so the publication of this file is in accordance with the law. Anjo Sozinho (talk) 13:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Anjo Sozinho: Can you provide a reliable source confirming what are you saying? Note that the information you provided before is that from the sculpture, not from the photo itself. 81.41.175.237 15:52, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- This photo was produced more than 70 years ago by the Carmelite nuns monastery of Coimbra. International legislation in terms of the Public Domain provides for this situation, so the publication of this file is in accordance with the law. Anjo Sozinho (talk) 13:08, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: no proof this picture was taken more than 70 years ago. And judging from the picture's image quality I highly doubt the picture is that old. Veverve (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2023 (UTC)
- Keep: This photograph was taken more than 70 years ago by the nuns of the Carmelite convent where Sister Lúcia lived, and it was placed in the public domain for free use in prayer cards and other devotional materials. It dates from the completion of the sculpture, it was the model portrait. Anjo Sozinho (talk) 03:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Just like the IP has asked: do you have any proof of this datation claim? Veverve (talk) 20:28, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation from https://catolicosribeiraopreto.com/guia-para-a-pratica-da-devocao-reparadora-dos-cinco-sabados/. —holly {chat} 19:27, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PCP and discussion. It appears photo is still under copyright. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Apparently discharged from an internet site, Seems to be under copyright Limfjord69 (talk) 13:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Like most Edward Hopper works, {{PD-US-no notice}} should apply. —holly {chat} 19:35, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per Holly. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:49, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Transferred from SD. The uploader claims to be the creator of the works. Maometto97 (talk) 07:44, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This photo was taken by me and I would like it to be placed on Wikimedia. Thank You امیرعلی صادقی (talk) 06:48, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Maometto97: What is SD? @امیرعلی صادقی: Can you please upload the original JPG from your phone or camera? Thank you. —holly {chat} 17:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Transferred from SD. The uploader claims to be the creator of the works. Maometto97 (talk) 07:46, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- This photo was taken by me and I would like it to be placed on Wikimedia. Thank You امیرعلی صادقی (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
- @امیرعلی صادقی: Can you please upload the original JPG from your phone or camera? Thank you. —holly {chat} 17:33, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:38, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio, author is Brendan Finney, no permission visible, see https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nico_Sauer&oldid=237691652 Mautpreller (talk) 09:16, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- What I don't get is how this thing can have a VRT ticket. It seems so obvious, even before the uploader admitted the copyvio after my question. --2003:C0:8F3D:5500:EC98:D121:A861:1401 17:52, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
- Seems to me that this should go to Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard, not a DR. It is perfectly possible that the photographer granted a license that includes permission for the subject of the photo to be credited rather than the photographer himself. Only the VRT see the confidential correspondence, so only they would know. - Jmabel ! talk 20:58, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't it appear to be a selfie? ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Thedinosaurwhosseenitall: , can you explain why you uploaded the photo with author Nico Sauer per [14] in 2017 but added "2017 © Brendan Finney" to the photo per [15] in september 2023 . Ellywa (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- In addition, I think Brendan Finney is a fictional character... perhaps some sort of joke/vandalism. Ellywa (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Emha: You processed ticket:2021020810002903. Do you have any insight into the above? —holly {chat} 17:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
- In addition, I think Brendan Finney is a fictional character... perhaps some sort of joke/vandalism. Ellywa (talk) 10:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Thedinosaurwhosseenitall: , can you explain why you uploaded the photo with author Nico Sauer per [14] in 2017 but added "2017 © Brendan Finney" to the photo per [15] in september 2023 . Ellywa (talk) 10:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
- Doesn't it appear to be a selfie? ─ The Aafī (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
![[14]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Nico_Sauer_2017_Performance_Ethnological_Museum_Dahlem.jpg&oldid=531677206){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:PCP. --Krd 13:34, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
