Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/09/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
<copyvio> Arn6338 (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Violation de copyright H2O(talk) 16:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Sun bland
[edit]- File:15 yr old male bulge.jpg
- File:15yr old male bulge hard.jpg
- File:15yr old male flaccid penis.jpg
- File:15yr old hairy semi large pubescent ballsack.jpg
- File:15 yr old boys hairy ballsack. Semi large pubescent boy.jpg
- File:15yr old boys hairy ballsack. Semi large pubescent boy.jpg
Delete per COM:NUDITY and the age of the subject. Johnj1995 (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Per Section 4 of the Terms of Use. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 13:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Random nude photo, used as exhibitionism per category A1Cafel (talk) 04:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted, although Commons is not censored, Commons is not a nest for exhibitionists either. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:48, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
re upload Clavlcle (talk) 05:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- And since the name was declared too long, I plan to upload it again. Clavlcle (talk) 05:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
trademark infringement of the word "Flege". The word is owned by Flege FZE worldwide. 83.110.15.7 07:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep. No, you do not "own" every instance, like this one, where someone has misspelled the German word for "fly" (fliege). Omphalographer (talk) 08:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Its purely misguiding folks as it ranks for the term "Flege". It should be deleted off google search results 83.110.15.7 08:10, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: We are not responsible for Google's search results. --Achim55 (talk) 08:15, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Well, sure u might be responsible for ranking directly... but sure can rename the it from "Flege.jpg" to "Fleige.jpg and reapply for indexing" 83.110.15.7 08:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- And we’re still pandering to IPs, I see. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:14, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Well, this might be easier on you. I respect the German language, you don't need the FULL page as such, just need to remove this redirection https://postimg.cc/8Jz6mbrF.
- Maybe you didn't notice that the file is already renamed to "Volucella inanis, golden brown colored insect.jpg". So we have to care about Google's cache?? --Achim55 (talk) 08:28, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- OK, I added
__NOINDEX__to File:Flege-braun1.JPG. --Achim55 (talk) 08:39, 5 September 2023 (UTC)- Wow, I read it now: This is a corparate drone misusing Wikimedia Commons deletion request system to demand we help him (it must be a he…) to
scamimprove the S.E.O. value of his client — even worse than a a random I.P. troll. This person has no interest in cicada photos not in the free sharing thereof. Three wrongly filed D.R.s in as many days not enough for a ban? Apparently not, and we even had an admin going out of their way to help out this vandal I.P., making sure that no instance of "Flege" in Commons infringe on the “owner” of that word. Truelly appalling. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:25, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wow, I read it now: This is a corparate drone misusing Wikimedia Commons deletion request system to demand we help him (it must be a he…) to
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, problem should be solved now. --Rosenzweig τ 20:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
The word is still there in the page: Flege-braun1.JPG (file redirect). Kindly rename it 5.194.66.243 14:31, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion of this file. Stop it. --Rosenzweig τ 14:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
FRPIR IY ADDYD 149.74.60.204 11:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep No reason to been deletion, it seen non-sense reason. Also has been used in many wikis. TentingZones1 (talk) 12:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: by GPSLeo, no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 15:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Есть более чёткий дубликат, предоставленный РИА Новости в 2012 году - file:RIAN archive 186607 German Chancellor Angela Merkel pays a working visit to Russia.jpg. Необходимо ставить приоритет размера изображения в данной ситуации. MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete, per nom: scaled-down duplicate of File:RIAN archive 186607 German Chancellor Angela Merkel pays a working visit to Russia.jpg. Please tag duplicate images with {{Duplicate}}. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 00:39, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4 Yann (talk) 16:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: The university was established in 1984, so its logo will enter public domain in 2034 (50 years after date of first publication in China). Larryasou (talk) 04:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Josi (talk) 17:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, deletion requested by the uploader soon after uploading. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Ya No Me Sirve OrlandoR503 (talk) 21:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Ya No Me Sirve Este Archivo OrlandoR503 (talk) 21:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:04, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Molgreen (talk) 02:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Molgreen (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
the image should be deleted due to privacy reason. It may be retrieved in future if needed. Saurabhsaha (talk) 03:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 20:18, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Aliva Sahoo (talk) 07:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake RitikaPahwa4444 (talk) 09:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Aleksander Oppenkowski (talk) 10:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:15, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Similar image or SVG graphic was uploaded on deviantart.com by another author 3 years earlier, without the statement of a usable license. See https://www.deviantart.com/daj/art/SVG-Computer-14712550 2005 by daj (AJ Ashton) https://www.deviantart.com/daj - In addition, there is a questionable source (clker.com) given with the upload here on Commons by uploader and at same time a claim that it is own work. Chris2ma (talk) 18:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- The author on deviantart reported that they placed the image in the public domain: [1]
"Sure, the svg (without the border/background) is included in the Open Clipart Library at [link] (and is therefore public domain for anyone to use however they want). If you want to use this jpg for something I don't mind that either."
- Oh, you're right! I'm very sorry that I didn't read the correspondence with the image on deviantart.com. I read the "© 2005 - 2023 daj" in the description below the image. Thanks a lot for your investigation! – How should I proceed? Can I close / remove the delete proposal? – I found the file on Openclipart.org https://openclipart.org/detail/17924/computer (couriously upload there is of 2008). Chris2ma (talk) 18:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- No idea. Hopefully, an admin will come along and help. Regardless, I think you did stellar detective work and your approach is a good one. So do keep up the good work! Smasongarrison (talk) 02:49, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept, realized that there was a usable license Smasongarrison (talk) 02:53, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singermiladbd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope
Trade (talk) 21:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: both files already deleted by Gbawden. --Rosenzweig τ 14:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
No es trabajo personal 191.126.184.50 23:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Dieses Gebäude ist in meinem Besitz! Eine Zustimmung zur öffentlichen Darstellung habe ich nie erteilt. Ich verlange sofortige Löschung! 2003:CF:F72B:E780:BC97:D7B5:D479:64EB 12:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Für das Fotografieren und Veröffentlichen im Internet ist keine Genehmigung notwendig, wenn sich die Objekte in der Öffentlichkeit befinden. Das ist hier auch klar der Fall. Siehe Recht am Bild der eigenen Sache Was darf fotografiert und im Internet verbreitet werden? Liebe Grüße, Migebert (talk) 12:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Obvious case of Freedom of panorama. There is no legal reason to delete the photo. XenonX3 (talk) 12:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Comment There is no prohibition on photographing buildings from public streets, so on what basis would this photo be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
This logo does meet the threshold of originality. These are not simple geometric shapes. DCB (talk) 12:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational use, uploaded for vandalism Drakosh (talk) 12:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational use, uploaded for vandalism Drakosh (talk) 12:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Abstract-water-3D-sphere-blue-crystal-drop-jewellery-1920x1080-px-computer-wallpaper-fashion-accessory-product-macro-photography-organism-liquid-bubble-jewelry-making-cobalt-blue-crystallography-780874.jpg
[edit]see EXIF: copyright holder is wallup.net DCB (talk) 12:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:17, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
see file name ("www.ArtFile.ru"), doubtful that this is an own work DCB (talk) 12:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
"© Helen Sloan/HBO", see https://www.rnd.de/promis/sophie-turner-ihr-game-of-thrones-thron-steht-nun-bei-ihr-zu-hause-JQJCIKWV4HNPMUQOPIU5A46YBY.html DCB (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
"Du Yu/Xinhua/Alamy Live News", see: https://www.alamy.com/tokyo-japan-5th-aug-2021-viviana-bottaro-of-italy-competes-during-the-womens-kata-ranking-round-of-karate-at-tokyo-2020-olympic-games-in-tokyo-japan-aug-5-2021-credit-du-yuxinhuaalamy-live-news-image437503953.html DCB (talk) 13:05, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
very doubtful that this is an own work, see https://www.facebook.com/233713097184230/posts/episode-242-john-edward-robinson1-john-edward-robinson2-lisa-stassi-and-paula-go/919403948615138/ e.g. DCB (talk) 13:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph by Aldo Sessa (b. 1939) taken in 1994. This image is PD in Argentina (25 years after publication), but it is still protected by copyright in the United States (70 years pma) Günther Frager (talk) 13:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:18, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
grabbed from BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/441694.stm (please also check other uploads from this user) Albinfo (talk) 10:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania, artist Vladas Vildžiūnas died in 2013 A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Latvia, artist Andris Vārpa is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 02:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:15, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Ousmane Sow died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Ousmane Sow died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in USA. Note that the house on top is the "artwork" called Fallen Star, by artist Do Ho Suh A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy, artist Do Ho Suh is still alive A1Cafel (talk) 03:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 03:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, needs permission from the artist "Irony" A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, needs permission from the artist "Trafik" A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in UK, needs permission from the artist "Jimmy C" A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 09:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 09:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 09:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 09:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
This is an Italian painting, not a photograph. 1945-1946 so pd-old-70 license is dubious. Abzeronow (talk) 17:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 20:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:45, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:46, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Latvia for monuments.
- File:Centrs, Centra rajons, Rīga, Latvia - panoramio (184).jpg
- File:Esplanāde, Raiņa piemineklis 2, Rīga.JPG
- File:Janis Rainis Latvian writer.jpg
- File:Jānis Pliekšāns (Rainis), (1865 - 1929) - panoramio.jpg
- File:Monumento a Rainis en Esplānade, Riga, Letonia, 2012-08-07, DD 01.JPG
- File:Rainis Monument in Riga Esplanaade 1.jpg
- File:Rainis Monument in Riga Esplanaade 2.jpg
- File:Rainis Monument in Riga Esplanaade 3.jpg
- File:Rainis-Denkmal in Riga.jpg
- File:Raiņa piemineklis 2018.jpg
- File:Riga (13.08.2011) 097.JPG
- File:Riga (13.08.2011) 098.JPG
- File:Rīga, Raiņa piemineklis 1999-08-12 - panoramio.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:07, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
The monument was completed in 1965 by Laimonis Blumbergs (1919–2014) and Aivars Gulbis (1933–). There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia, permission from the artists is required.
- File:20181225 132212 December 2018 in Riga.jpg
- File:20181225 132230 December 2018 in Riga.jpg
- File:Janitis.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:36, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
very doubtful that this is an own work, picture can be found elsewhere on the internet: https://lens.google.com/search?ep=gisbubb&hl=de&re=df&p=AUM6UZAv0hGEca0qEPT7dZN8mP0CEBG7Lt9CsZa2zLgYkGGI08B_dWPfgCjf_46-kq8xxu9dz62QJpy0vSfezqW04sAIRHpqlUC9fkLylgVWE4U9EmvcSq-b84KIsIeY6rwWHfd1PRD_tuqYSb3RBQy-TOYupEMckYylgnnWxHvAs47xjxsCm5LNDoTII-Kx4AeuTXXNOScDbxbvB4EoQVrJ#lns=W251bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsbnVsbCxudWxsLG51bGwsIkVrY0tKR1poT1RZek5UaGxMVGxtTWpJdE5EZzFOaTA1WkROakxURTJPV1ZtTXpoaU5HSXlPQklmUVRsdE1UbHJkbGczUzFWbGIwUk1aa3hPVEZCZlpWQmhiMUUxWTNCU1p3PT0iLG51bGwsbnVsbCxbW251bGwsbnVsbCwiMi0wIl0sWyIxNmQ5NWE3MS1lMzllLTQwYTUtYTQ2NC0zZjkyZWY0MGY4MGUiXV0sMSxudWxsLFtudWxsLG51bGwsWzAsMCwxMDAwMDAsMTAwMDAwXSxudWxsLDVdXQ== DCB (talk) 11:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, bad quality, no educational use. Drakosh (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Personal photo, bad quality, no educational use. Upload for vandalism Drakosh (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:39, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted works. No FoP in US for artworks.
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue!1.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue!3.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:09, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 08:38, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Copyrighted statues (or after images of said statues) of copyrighted characters. Fails COM:FOP US.
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 01.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 02.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 03.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 05.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 06.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 07.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 09.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 10.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 12.jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! 13.jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 21:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:37, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. Replaced by File:Allyltrimethylsilane-2D-structure.svg as high-quality version drawn according to MOS guidelines. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:25, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
It seems to be a JPG derivative of File:Desktop-PC.svg or https://www.deviantart.com/daj/art/SVG-Computer-14712550 - if then no own work like stated. Chris2ma (talk) 18:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Source is in the public domain [2] Smasongarrison (talk) 19:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept, realized that there was a usable license. --Chris2ma (talk) 09:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in Iceland, artist Einar Jónsson died in 1954 A1Cafel (talk) 09:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Almost 70 years ago. What’s the point here? 2804:14D:5C32:4673:941B:2CC5:F29A:73A3 11:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. 1927 sculpture; the file can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 20:38, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
doublon exact de File:Enthroned_Virgin_and_Child_MET_DP102902.jpg Pierre Tribhou (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 20:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
плохое качество Sshut (talk) 11:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 20:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
circa 1930 German photograph, possibly public domain in Germany if photographer died before 1953. Wouldn't be public domain in the US until 2026. Abzeronow (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 20:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:23, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Rajshahi Government Madrasa 03.jpg 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
{subst:delete2|image=File:David Gilabert Hernández.jpg|reason=}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgilabern (talk • contribs) 07:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion; appears to be a non-notable user. --Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
No FoP in France, artist Ousmane Sow died in 2016 A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Bonjour A1Cafel,
- Effectivement l'oeuvre d'Ousmane Sow n'est pas libre de droit, mais ne pourrait-on pas mettre la photo dans Wikipédia comme « exception au droit d'auteur » à l'instar de https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:2012-Chapelle_Notre-Dame-du-Haut.jpeg afin de la conserver dans les articles Wikipédia qui l'utilisent. JGS25 (talk) 15:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Peut-être, mais pas à Commons. Lisez Commons:Fair use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:05, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2087. --Rosenzweig τ 20:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lundaholan.jpg Steinninn ♨ 09:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 20:42, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:André Maurois
[edit]Maurois died in 1967. Not PD until 2038.
- File:Maurois - Les bourgeois de Witzheim, 1920.djvu
- File:Maurois - Les Silences du colonel Bramble (Grasset 1918).djvu
- File:Maurois - Les silences du colonel Bramble, 1918.djvu
— Racconish 💬 13:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Question Two of them are in use at fr.wikisource. Do they allow such files there, should the files be transferred before they are deleted here? --Rosenzweig τ 20:28, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- @VIGNERON: please advise. — Racconish 💬 13:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: transfer is not possible per local rule. The texts are only used on Wikisource because of some grandfather rule, before the French Wikisource defined clearly what is acceptable or not on French Wikisource. Exceptionally, dont take it into account here (but thanks for considering it!). SO, Delete here. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 13:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Rosenzweig: transfer is not possible per local rule. The texts are only used on Wikisource because of some grandfather rule, before the French Wikisource defined clearly what is acceptable or not on French Wikisource. Exceptionally, dont take it into account here (but thanks for considering it!). SO,
- @VIGNERON: please advise. — Racconish 💬 13:05, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Advertorial spam with no possible educational use. Hullian111 (talk) 07:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 01:35, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Scope? Own work? 191.126.166.100 10:56, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. In addition to the potential licensing issue, this is a personal file outside of COM:SCOPE that was only uploaded for attempted self-promotion on English Wikipedia. Marbletan (talk) 19:36, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michael15401 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stuipd post (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:What Commons is not#Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:18, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
probably not own work, no description, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 17:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
wrong date - copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 17:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
again: wrong date, wrong author and source... Xocolatl (talk) 22:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:29, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
wrong date - copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 17:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
probably copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 17:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation? see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 18:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
3 kb, no metadata - probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:19, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:57, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:41, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Iranian banknotes issued after 1993 are still protected by copyright
- File:Iran CBI 10000 rials 2021.02.08 r.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 10000 rials 2021.02.08 f.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 20000 rials 2021.02.08 r.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 20000 rials 2021.02.08 f.jpg
- File:Iran 1000000 Rials banknote f b.jpg
- File:Iran 1000000 Rials banknote r b.jpg
- File:Iran 1000000 Rials Banknote r.jpg
- File:Iran 1000000 Rials Banknote f.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 500000 rials 2019 r.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 500000 rials 2019 f.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 1000000 rials 2022 r.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 1000000 rials 2022 f.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 1000000 rials 2020 r.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 1000000 rials 2020 f.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 2000000 rials r.jpg
- File:Iran CBI 2000000 rials.jpg
- File:Iran 500000 Rials Banknote re.jpg
- File:Iran 500000 Rials Banknote ob.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly copyrighted. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:25, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Illegible, not necessary. 191.126.166.100 17:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Broken redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 18:36, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: OOS, Personal picture from a non-contributor CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 23:51, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket:2023090110009921 claims release under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and https://colombia.puramas.co/ specifies the same. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket:2023090110009921 claims release under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and https://colombia.puramas.co/ specifies the same. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket:2023090110009921 claims release under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and https://europe.puramas.co/ specifies the same. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket:2023090110009921 claims release under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and https://colombia.puramas.co/ specifies the same. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:06, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket:2023090110009921 claims release under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and https://colombia.puramas.co/ specifies the same. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket:2023090110009921 claims release under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and https://colombia.puramas.co/ specifies the same. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket:2023090110009921 claims release under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, and https://colombia.puramas.co/ specifies the same. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per ticket permission. --Krd 13:07, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Arrow303 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This coat of arms seems to have been acquired from another document, therefore it does not appear to be the author's own work. It appears to be the official work of the municipality, still in use on some official channels: https://it.linkedin.com/company/comune-di-taranto, https://m.facebook.com/ComuneTaranto1
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, if the original COA is still in copyright. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- The image is free to use, there is no copyright, the municipality took the image from commons and there is no exclusivity written on the image itself. The image was taken from a tourist site that has been closed for years.Thank you.--ParisTaras (talk) 13:26, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- The municipality itself uses another symbol on its website, as you can see here [3]. Thank you.--ParisTaras (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ParisTaras: , so the image is not "own work" as you wrote, but it was downloaded from a website (Which? Is there any proof of the free license?) Anyway, the municipality of Taranto didn't download the image from Commons, as they were in possession of the original, for two reasons: a) the image used by the municipality does not show that strange light blue background; b) The image was already shown on the municipality's official website in 2005 (proof), while your upload dates back to 2012. This CoA should also be replaced by File:Taranto-Stemma.svg as svg file, based on the blazon with elements under CC-BY-SA-4.0 Thank you. --Arrow303 (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
- I believe the image comes from here ZioNicco (talk) 08:33, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- I changed the license to free use,I don't know which site it is,it must have gone out of business 20 years ago,is there any evidence of copyright? the image was already on commons but was deleted,then I reworked it a bit. I didn't say they copied it from mine ,I said from commons.There is in fact no mention on the commons site of the copyrigh of the image,and we are not talking about the replacement,anyway I don't like that image if I have to be honest,but its copyrigh. Thank you. ParisTaras (talk) 12:38, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- The fact that we don't know from which website the CoA has been taken makes the image missing evidence of permission as we are not sure if its original creator agrees to the CC0 license. Furthermore, since the image is not useful to the project (because it has been replaced by File:Taranto-Stemma.svg), if you agree @ParisTaras @ZioNicco, we could consensually close this DR and ask an admin to delete the image. Thank you Arrow303 (talk) 18:09, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, I disagree, if there is no copyright evidence the image can stay. And it is not used because you have replaced it not because it is useless. ParisTaras (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ParisTaras We are not the ones who have to prove that the image is protected by copyright, but it is the uploader who has to prove that the image is free. I kindly ask for @Ruthven's opinion, because I'm not very expert in this. Thank you. Arrow303 (talk) 19:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- You have to prove that it has a copyright, if it does not exist, how can I prove what does not exist? Thank you. ParisTaras (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Allora, @ParisTaras parliamoci chiaro, qualunque immagine ha un autore che ne detiene i diritti. Poi il titolare può decidere di concederla sotto una licenza libera, come facciamo peraltro qui su Commons.
- Ora, mi pare di capire, anche dai link sopra, che tu non sia il creatore originario del file e quindi non mi spiego le licenze self-CC-BY-SA-3.0 prima e self-CC-0 adesso.
- Hai scritto che l'immagine è stata scaricata da un sito: qui su Commons ci occorre sapere quale sito (source) e l'evidenza che il materiale pubblicato su quel sito ha licenza libera. Se questo non avviene, non ci sono garanzie sulla provenienza dell'immagine. Grazie, Arrow303 (talk) 20:56, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- There is no guarantee that it even has a copyright. If there was, I'd be the first to request its removal but it's an image that everyone in Taranto uses with no copyright issues whatsoever. If there is no copyright the image is free. Sorry if I write in English but it's so that everyone understands and I find myself better anyway. Thank you. ParisTaras (talk) 21:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Aggiungo una nota su araldica civica è stato messo come stemma "ufficiale", se uso l'archivio vedo che qui c'è uno molto simile, devo presumere che quello stemma sia stato recuperato o dal sito o da altra pubblicazione del comune per cui soggetta a copyright e non libera. ZioNicco (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- "Official' does not mean anything, it must say: 'copyrighted image'. Moreover, it need not be presumed but must be written. So says the law. The municipality uses another image on its site. Thank you. ParisTaras (talk) 11:50, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- Aggiungo una nota su araldica civica è stato messo come stemma "ufficiale", se uso l'archivio vedo che qui c'è uno molto simile, devo presumere che quello stemma sia stato recuperato o dal sito o da altra pubblicazione del comune per cui soggetta a copyright e non libera. ZioNicco (talk) 09:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- There is no guarantee that it even has a copyright. If there was, I'd be the first to request its removal but it's an image that everyone in Taranto uses with no copyright issues whatsoever. If there is no copyright the image is free. Sorry if I write in English but it's so that everyone understands and I find myself better anyway. Thank you. ParisTaras (talk) 21:22, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- You have to prove that it has a copyright, if it does not exist, how can I prove what does not exist? Thank you. ParisTaras (talk) 20:27, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ParisTaras We are not the ones who have to prove that the image is protected by copyright, but it is the uploader who has to prove that the image is free. I kindly ask for @Ruthven's opinion, because I'm not very expert in this. Thank you. Arrow303 (talk) 19:50, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- No, I disagree, if there is no copyright evidence the image can stay. And it is not used because you have replaced it not because it is useless. ParisTaras (talk) 19:39, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- The fact that we don't know from which website the CoA has been taken makes the image missing evidence of permission as we are not sure if its original creator agrees to the CC0 license. Furthermore, since the image is not useful to the project (because it has been replaced by File:Taranto-Stemma.svg), if you agree @ParisTaras @ZioNicco, we could consensually close this DR and ask an admin to delete the image. Thank you Arrow303 (talk) 18:09, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- @ParisTaras: , so the image is not "own work" as you wrote, but it was downloaded from a website (Which? Is there any proof of the free license?) Anyway, the municipality of Taranto didn't download the image from Commons, as they were in possession of the original, for two reasons: a) the image used by the municipality does not show that strange light blue background; b) The image was already shown on the municipality's official website in 2005 (proof), while your upload dates back to 2012. This CoA should also be replaced by File:Taranto-Stemma.svg as svg file, based on the blazon with elements under CC-BY-SA-4.0 Thank you. --Arrow303 (talk) 20:04, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[rientro] @ParisTaras Su Commons vige la presunzione di licenza non libera... questa rappresentazione grafica dello stemma (che sia considerata "ufficiale" o meno a noi non importa, perchè anche se non fosse quella ufficiale del Comune, ha un suo artista che ne detiene i diritti) è stata scaricata da una pagina web, che non ci sai indicare, limitandoti ad asserire che "è un'immagine che tutti usano senza problemi di copyright". Questa informazione, oltre a non essere verificata, non è sufficiente: il copyright non è usucapibile, e la decadenza non è deducibile in via presuntiva. Il principio è che un'immagine ha licenza libera nel momento in cui il suo autore lo indica espressamente, altrimenti, se questa indicazione espressa non salta fuori, l'immagine è automaticamente ancora sotto il copyright del suo autore (almeno per tot anni dalla sua morte).
Nella policy che ti ho likato COM:EI è scritto chiaramente: If you are uploading a file that originally came from an external website, you should provide at least a link to the web page (i.e., the URL) on which the image or file is displayed. If that page does not also fully explain the freely licensed copyright status of the file, you should also provide a second link to a related page that discusses the website's content copyright, such as its terms of use.
Nel nostro caso, tutt'altro, emerge che questa rappresentazione grafica era già utilizzata dal comune nel 2004 e nel 2005 (nota, qui, l'avviso di copyright) e dunque è manifesto che non disponga di licenza compatibile con l'uso su Commons. Ciò detto, attendiamo il giudizio degli amministratori, che sapranno valutare tutti gli elementi che sono qui emersi.
P.S. Per quanto riguarda araldicacivica (che comunque pubblica sotto CC-BY-NC-ND, quindi non compatibile con Commons), io non assumerei quella come fonte dell'immagine (non ci sono risultanze nel webarchive sulla sua data di comparsa); è ben più manifesta la provenienza dal sito comunale del 2005. Grazie --Arrow303 (talk) 12:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
- I don't think so, certainly let's wait for those who know more than us and see. Bye. ParisTaras (talk) 13:38, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: It's up to the uploader to prove that the file comes from a source that provides it with a free license. Apparently this one comes from Araldicacivica, under NC license, so it cannot stay on Commons (and even in the case it came from a closed website, it has to be proved that the website wasn't "All rights reserved", which is unlikely). Ruthven (msg) 20:06, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
poor quality, too blurry Luda.slominska (talk) 14:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 00:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of Digital Devil Story: Megami Tensei Trade (talk) 21:14, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:10, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Request by the person on picture Patriks1990 (talk) 18:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Comment COM:INUSE at d:Q108831479. --Rosenzweig τ 20:22, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- not in use, photo was deleted from the other page Patriks1990 (talk) 09:54, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
requested by person on picture Patriks1990 (talk) 09:57, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion, apparently not really notable person. --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Statues of copyrighted characters, fails COM:FOP as statues.
- File:Green Army Men Soldier at Disney's Hollywood Studios (May 2023).JPG
- File:Lightning McQueen's Racing Academy (May 2023) - 6.JPG
- File:Lightning McQueen's Racing Academy (May 2023) - 7.JPG
- File:Miss Piggy Fountain (Orlando) May 2023.jpg
- File:Toy Story Land at Disney's Hollywood Studios (May 2023).JPG
(Oinkers42) (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all of these are displaying characters that will long be copyrighted, and are depicting the characters in very clear terms. The only one that feels kind of ok is the Miss Piggy Fountain, but I would still say delete all. MonkeyBBGB (talk) 17:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: All these photos depicted copyrighted works in Orlando, FL, United States, where we don't have COM:FOP for these kind of works (see also COM:TOYS). --AFBorchert (talk) 17:15, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
lRequest for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:39, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete It is not shown even in [4] SVG-image-maker (talk) 00:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author, From Facebook CoffeeEngineer (talk) 00:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:40, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Is this own work? 191.126.166.100 01:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted - procedural close. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Does it need a permission? 191.126.166.100 01:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted - procedural close. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Own work? 191.126.166.100 01:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted - procedural close. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Film poster 191.126.166.100 01:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted - procedural close. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Poster. I guess all uploads of this user must be speedyed. 191.126.166.100 01:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted - procedural close. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:41, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted design; the bag says "all rights reserved" on it. Di (they-them) (talk) 02:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Also: File:HEYTEA x Genshin Impact bag Shenhe.jpg & File:HEYTEA x Genshin Impact Acryl Stand Ganyu.jpg--Larryasou (talk) 05:48, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 04:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Used for vandalism on English Wikipedia. * Pppery * it has begun... 01:27, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:42, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 04:15, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The uploader is not the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: The picture cannot be from 2018, as the model died in 1983 CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:43, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
poor guality Luda.slominska (talk) 14:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:44, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
Not own work, as evident by sharp quality and no metadata. https://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/why-evan-ferguson-snub-man-utd-transfer-brighton/blt7663aad8d04140c9 84.69.125.219 23:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 04:06, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- It isn't a fictional flag source.--Facquis (talk) 08:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:47, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Extracted from a copyrighted poster A1Cafel (talk) 03:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Even the source image is deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:48, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Motion blur Doomhope (talk) 03:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Doomhope HI, here motion blur creates kind of surreal spooky feeling, though it was not intendent effect, just as coincidence, sure can be deleted, thanks EgorovaSvetlana (talk) 15:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unusable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:49, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:50, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Appears to be a screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 04:32, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 04:18, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:51, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this file almost a decade ago, but I just recently saw this again and realized that this does not belong here. Please delete it, thanks. Megacane (talk) 04:41, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. Unusable tiny fuzzy icon. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this file almost a decade ago, but I just recently saw this again and realized that this does not belong here. Please delete it, thanks. Megacane (talk) 04:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded this file almost a decade ago, but I just recently saw this again and realized that this does not belong here. Please delete it, thanks. Megacane (talk) 04:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, many alternatives. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted photos of the Legal Aid Foundation. Solomon203 (talk) 04:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Logo of a British television program originally created by GMTV. Given the United Kingdom's low level for threshold of originality it may not be appropriate to host this logo on Commons. A copy does already exist on the English Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Toonattik_logo.svg ) Salavat (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:52, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:Redundant, this file is redundant to and lower quality than File:Body snatchers at work, Old Crown Inn, Penicuik.JPG. —The Editor's Apprentice (Talk) 06:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:54, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Small and unused satellite image of Usagi, can be replaced by alternatives A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Which of "small", "unused" or "can be replaced" are valid reasons for deletion from Commons? Andy Dingley (talk) 16:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep None, and this is a public domain image, too. Please consider not wasting time requesting deletion of this kind of file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Small + unused + can be replaced = redundant. Many better ones in its category, such as File:Usagi 2018-11-24 0635Z.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:58, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1|與中華愛國同心會無關. As original uploader is Kokuyo and redirect creator is LR0725, the redirect does not qualify for speedy deletion and I allow a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G1|與中華愛國同心會無關. As original uploader is Kokuyo and redirect creator is LR0725, the redirect does not qualify for speedy deletion and I allow a regular deletion request. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: unused redirect. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:00, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
File erroneamente caricato (è leggibile la marca del pallone). Pubblicata immagine simile. Mi scuso per il disguido e porgo cordiali saluti. AD 151.64.213.159 09:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Redundant to File:Palmi - Comune di Palmi - 2.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:01, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted book covers in Taiwan. Solomon203 (talk) 09:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrigthed television screenshot TentingZones1 (talk) 10:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:02, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Diploma CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and personal doc, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
see EXIF: author "Deric Raymond", no permission for release under a free license DCB (talk) 11:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am the subject of this photo. Under the conditions the photograph was taken, the photographer Deric Raymond gave me full rights to license and distribute the headshot. Dbader13 (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- And where is the proof? A mail from an official account to Wikimedia for our system would be great! Marcus Cyron (talk) 19:12, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:03, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
see EXIF: author "Deric Raymond", no permission for release under a free license DCB (talk) 11:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:David A. Bader, 9 May 2022.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:04, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Same as File:Josepsantacana.jpg. 186.175.98.227 11:26, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
Kept: already solved another way. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:47, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Is this an own work? Not too small? 191.126.166.100 14:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: non-notable person, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Doubtful this is in the public domain as its creator, Franciszek Bunsch, is still alive. This image is taken in a way that makes the cards easily reproducible. Countakeshi (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:08, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Published photograph of a 1992 Canadian piece of performance art (which may be covered by FoP), I doubt the enwiki uploader was the original photographer. Abzeronow (talk) 15:57, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- I agree with this rationale. Chamaemelum (talk) 22:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
This is a selfie, so not own work by the uploader (who's not the person on the selfie), as its currently listed. Mondo (talk) 15:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:09, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
This is claimed as own work, but seems to be a print advertisment for a telecoms company or service. Copyright is most likley held by the telecoms entity , not by the uploader. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: this is a fantasy map created by a Twitter user, not an official map of real or planned transit lines. Omphalographer (talk) 16:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- The map does not have any fantasy lines, all the routes are either in operation, construction or officially planned. Here is the officially published version for reference. The file page could use better description to indicates sources and also license correction to CC-by-sa. Voting to keep --Planemad 03:29, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, are you sure? The page at the source link describes the map as a "future concept", which I assume to mean that there's some degree of invention involved on the part of the author. Omphalographer (talk) 04:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, I've vetted the map and can confirm. The issue that can cause confusion is that lines under construction are marked as if it's ready, which is why it's labelled as a future map for 2026 when all the lines are expected to be ready. These are not fantasy proposal but all are officially in the works --Planemad 11:47, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm, are you sure? The page at the source link describes the map as a "future concept", which I assume to mean that there's some degree of invention involved on the part of the author. Omphalographer (talk) 04:21, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: in use. If disputed, use {{Fact disputed}} or {{Factual accuracy}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:11, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text content. To create a Wikipedia article, please see nl:Help:Nieuwe pagina aanmaken. Omphalographer (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArtistWikier (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no evidence that this is the uploader’s own work.
- File:Preview (aka If Van Gogh Works with Raphael...) by CH, 2015, Oil on Canvas.jpg
- File:CH SIGNATURE.png
WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 17:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:13, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, probably not own work, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 17:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep All fixed, valid Uruguay license. --RAN (talk) 02:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And what evidence is there that it was "published in Uruguay as anonymous or pseudonymous"?. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:27, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
5 kb, no metadata? probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:29, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
wrong date and source, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Spain-photo --RAN (talk) 03:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And what evidence is there for PD-Spain?. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Probably from Facebook 191.126.166.100 17:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, FB code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:16, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 18:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
clearly a copyviol; photo by Marco Brondi / CIAMILLO-CASTORIA, cf. metadata — danyele 18:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo, taken off web, of comedian Adir Miller Poliocretes (talk) 19:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:17, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Not educationally useful Crazyheart1 (talk) 20:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:18, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 20:28, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Worldlydev (talk) 20:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and low resolution. Also incorrect design missing the crown. Worldlydev (talk) 20:40, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, superseded by an .svg file, and an exact copy of the newer updated vector variant. Worldlydev (talk) 20:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
not useful and possibly problematic Prototyperspective (talk) 20:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
No global usage, and an exact and scaled down duplicate of another .png variant of the coats. Worldlydev (talk) 20:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Cover page from a 1968 book Sammyday (talk) 21:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Photomontage with a cover page from a 1968 book Sammyday (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:19, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Wrong source: Cannot find the animation on NASA' website, dubious copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 07:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep This is likely an image by NASA. I agree that the URL in the source is wrong and @Kattie Katey (Storm) should fix the source. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, source not fixed, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 18:20, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Date fixed, PD-Peru. --RAN (talk) 02:27, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. And what evidence is there for PD-Peru?. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Iranian banknotes issued after 1993 are still protected by copyright
HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Files casually taken from the internet. The banknote is still protected by copyright.
- File:Ibrahim Ibn Malek Ashtar.jpg
- File:الکاظمین الغیظ.png
- File:فاتح خیبر.jpg
- File:لا فتی الا علی.jpg
- File:العادیات.jpg
- File:لیله-المبیت.jpg
- File:اقامت-پیامبر-در-شعب-ابی-طالب-و-حوادث-آن.jpg
- File:رکن یمانی، محل شکاف کعبه.jpg
- File:Rohulamin Hassan-Asadulah.jpg
- File:حرم بابا رضا (ع).jpg
- File:هزار رو.jpg
- File:پادشاه محمود غزنوی.jpg
- File:مهرداد دوم.jpg
- File:دریک.jpg
- File:سکه 5000 ریالی معادل 500 تومان ( دوره جمهوری اسلامی ).jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
As before these are various old press photos (eg. https://www.facebook.com/roozonline.net/photos/a.584646518230530/1668501543178350/) falsely claimed as own work.
- File:رییسی 1.jpg
- File:روحانی 2.jpg
- File:روحانی 1.jpg
- File:احمدی نژاد 1.jpg
- File:خاتمی 2.jpg
- File:تنفیذ هاشمی 1.jpg
- File:تنفیذ هاشمی 2.jpg
- File:تنفیذ سید علی خامنه ای 2.jpg
- File:تنفیذ سید علی خامنه ای 1.jpg
- File:تنقیذ محمدعلی رجایی.jpg
- File:تنفیذ بنی صدر.jpg
Belbury (talk) 18:14, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted banknote published after 1993
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work Trade (talk) 21:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Les jeux pour la Tiger R-Zone sont peu communs et peu documentés. Mais ils restent des jeux aux fonctionnalités similaires aux jeux électroniques portables de Tiger. Bien qu'il s'agisse d'une œuvre distincte (et n'ayant pas grand chose à voir avec le matériau d'origine sur Mega Drive), créer une page entièrement dédiée pour ce jeu ne serait pas vraiment logique au regard de son contenu (ou alors il faudrait le faire pour tous les jeux de la R-Zone). Je pense donc que cette image a sa place dans cette section qui mentionne l'existence de cette version. Elle permet de mieux visualiser l'objet, et peu aider des personnes qui cherchent ce jeu à le trouver. De plus, il s'agit d'une photo de mon exemplaire, présent dans ma collection personnelle, que j'ai prise avec mon téléphone. Il s'agit donc de mon travail, au même titre que des photos amateurs représentant des œuvres protégées se trouvent sur d'autres pages. MacLeeraw (talk) 22:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 21:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: 05:32, September 28, 2023, by Krd (No ticket permission since 28 August 2023). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Tomando selfie 191.126.184.50 22:17, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
From a video game, not free StarTrekker (talk) 23:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:20, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation, drawing is based on a non-free photograph,[5][6] and it a derivative work of the photograph, see COM:DW. Needs permission from the original photographer. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:22, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:21, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Necesario? 191.126.184.50 23:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Брусника.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DragoljubJovicic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Non-educational images that were uploaded for creating promotional article on Serbian Wikipedia, which is now been deleted since it wasn't improved 7 days after creating it, to have a quality of article for Wikipedia. There is no reason for images to be kept on Wikimedia Commons, since it's not a generic hosting. Also, check for COPYVIO. Thank you!
Kizule (talk) 23:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:22, 11 October 2023 (UTC)
The file is identified as a non-free work that has been imported from another place due to suspected copyright. There is no reason for this file to be in the public domain of Wikimedia and it must be deleted. There's also no evidence that this flag is the flag of the Byzantine Empire and there's nothing in particular that symbolizes it. Takuyakoz (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: simple design, below TOO imho. --Ellywa (talk) 19:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep for now: COM:INUSE, already has a "fact disputed" tag, which is all we can do on this wiki. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. Ruthven (msg) 19:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This file does not represent anything. For special reasons, copyright is suspected in this file. It is presumed to be a non-free work for fair use content, and there is no evidence that it is necessary for Wikimedia publication. Takuyakoz (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. @Takuyakoz: , you could consider to add Template:Fact disputed to the file page, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. --Ellywa (talk) 19:50, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
Request for immediate removal of fictitious flag without source. 2001:2D8:647F:D8DD:7494:DA5A:C2ED:6E18 00:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:06, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. Ruthven (msg) 19:34, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of the two Bolyai
[edit]The statue was completed in 1957 by István Csorvássy (1912–1986) and Márton Izsák (1913–2004). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2075.
- File:Bolyaiak szobra.jpg
- File:Erdély, Marosvásárhely, Bolyai Farkas és Bolyai János szobra.jpg
- File:Bolyai tér, a Bolyaiak szobra. Fortepan 56897.jpg
- File:Marosvásárhely - 2013.07.12 (28).JPG
- File:The two Bolyai.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 02:46, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:35, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - I'd say this looks more like "work of artistic craftsmanship" than "graphic work"; it is also in 3 dimensions, so the 2-d restriction does not apply - MPF (talk) 23:37, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per MPF. Ruthven (msg) 19:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cookai1205 as no permission (No permission since)
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Neutral I can't tell is it above COM:TOO Taiwan or not. Cookai🍪 (💬talk) 06:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: very probably below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 19:36, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation: © 2023 Kinderspital Zürich, no free license Adtonko (talk) 09:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
pokazane tutaj logo to odwrocona kolorystycznie wersja logo TVP ktore pojawilo sie tylko kilka razy na antenie na poczatku 2022, nie jest uzywane aktualnie PanOreganko (talk) 21:10, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If it was used, even for a brief period of time, it has a place here. Fry1989 eh? 17:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Already kept, heavily in use. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Fanmade logo that was never used officially as a broadcaster logo. Only variants of this logo are used by a few statons ran by TVP, but as a broadcaster logo the 2003 version has been in use since its introduction Popek04 (talk) 13:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE all over Wikipedia, so cannot be deleted -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:57, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is the old logo was incorrectly replaced in many Wikipedia articles after uploading this file to Commons. These edits should be reverted because TVP has never used this logo. Popek04 (talk) 18:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- We can't solve that problem on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:07, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek. Ruthven (msg) 19:37, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore Marwin Hochfelsner (talk) 15:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: File uploaded more than one year ago, and there are no valid reasons for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 19:39, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 17:42, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Since it's open source, there's no copyright infringement. The author does not claim any rights over it, leaving the photo totally free to use and exploit. Authorization can be obtained in writing from the author if necessary, by contacting him directly: <email> Eflyz (talk) 09:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Eflyz: It's up to the photographer to write to VRT and give a proper permission for publication. Ruthven (msg) 19:40, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Donarius (talk) 18:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:41, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:2023 in Orlando, Florida
[edit]Statues of copyrighted characters, fails COM:FOP US as statues.
- File:Duff guys - Universal Studios Florida (May 2023.JPG
- File:E.T. Adventure (Orlando) May 2023.JPG
- File:Hedwig (Harry Potter) Kings Cross Station May 2023.JPG
- File:Hogsmeade (Islands of Adventure) May 2023 (3).JPG
- File:Interior of Moe's Tavern (Orlando) May 2023.JPG
- File:Lard Lad Donuts (The Simpsons) Universal Studios Florida May 2023.jpg
- File:Pizzeria Universal Studios Florida (May 2023).JPG
- File:Statue of Jebediah Springfield - Universal Studios Florida (May 2023).jpg
- File:Universal Studios Florida Clancy Wiggum (May 2023).jpg
(Oinkers42) (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The photo of Hedwig has beed deleted per COM:TOY. Ruthven (msg) 19:42, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Possible derivative work of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SeaOrbiter_Logo.png Trade (talk) 21:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This logo indeed DOES NOT consists of typefaces, individual words, slogans, or simple geometric shapes that i have created to depict / represent closely the logo of the SeaOrbiter company. Ruthven (msg) 19:43, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Nuotrauka.png Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:50, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yep, it's the same file as the previous DR. Ruthven (msg) 19:44, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The sculpture was completed in 1971 by Tibor Servátiusz (1930–2018) and Szervátiusz Jenő (1903–1983). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2089.
- File:Kopjafa 1977.JPG
- File:Kopjafa 1984.JPG
- File:Kopjafa3370.JPG
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (1).jpg
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (2).jpg
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (3).jpg
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (4).jpg
- File:RO HR Memorialul Tamási Áron (5).jpg
- File:Tamási Áron farkaslakai kopjafája elölről.JPG
- File:Tamási Áron farkaslakai kopjafája hátulról.JPG
A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Incity
[edit]Recent building, no FoP in France.
- File:Tour Incity (Lyon), face sud, le 28 Avril 2015.jpg
- File:Tour Incity 06-08-2013.JPG
- File:Tour Incity chantier - Lyon.JPG
- File:Tour Incity depuis fourvière.JPG
- File:Tour Incity en construction en mars 2014 à Lyon.jpg
- File:Tour Incity en construction.JPG
- File:Tour Incity Under Construction.JPG
- File:Tour Incity à Lyon 30mai2014.jpg
- File:Tour Incity, August 2014.jpg
- File:Tour-Incity 2015-03-05 construction.jpg
- File:TourIncity 01082014.jpeg
- File:TourIncity 25septembre2014 sud.jpg
- File:TourIncity 27mars2014 rue.jpg
- File:TourIncity 31aout2014 facade.jpeg
- File:TourIncity 31aout2014.jpeg
- File:TourIncity Lyon 1mars2015 cotéEst.jpeg
- File:TourIncity23052014 1.jpg
- File:TourIncity23052014 facade Est.jpg
- File:TourIncity23052014 facade Ouest.jpg
- File:TourIncityLyon 27mars2014.jpg
JeanBono (talk) 07:28, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:11, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Incity
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.
- File:Lyon Basilique Notre-Dame-de-la-Fourvière Esplanade du Site Tour Incity.jpg
- File:Lyon Tour Incity 1.jpg
- File:Lyon Tour Incity 2.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tour Méditerranée
[edit]In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France.
- File:Marseille Tour Méditerranée 1.jpg
- File:Marseille Tour Méditerranée 2.jpg
- File:Marseille Tour Méditerranée 3.jpg
- File:Marseille Tour Méditerranée 4.jpg
- File:Marseille Tour Méditerranée 5.jpg
- File:Marseille Tour Méditerranée 6.jpg
- File:Tour Méditerranée 2.jpg
- File:Tour Méditerranée.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Photos of Thai election posters are widely used in news media and other media, also for the 2020 election. --Per Meistrup (talk) 15:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- But it violated the copyright of the creator. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 03:39, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Photos of Thai election posters are widely used in news media and other media, also for the 2020 election. --Per Meistrup (talk) 15:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- But it violated the copyright of the creator. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alberto Lagos
[edit]Sculptures by Alberto Lagos (1893-1960) installed in Buenos Aires. There is no freedom of panorama for non-architectural works in Argentina and the copyright protection is 70 years pma.
- File:George Canning estatua Buenos Aires.jpg
- File:José Evaristo Uriburu.jpg
- File:Luis Maria Drago.JPG
Günther Frager (talk) 00:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:14, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Antko as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-free logo. Tagged PD-textlogo, should be discussed. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not an expert in Copyright but this logo contains some graphics as well, not only text. So I'm not sure if it's available to be tagged as PD-textlogo. Antko (talk) 07:27, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 18:15, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 04:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- This toy was handcrafted in 2004 by my my mother, a great artisan not an artist? when she was 89, for my son Zhenze when i've adpoted him. Can be considered handcrafted items, if they are unique, a peace of art?
- Yes, handcrafted items can certainly be considered pieces of art if they are unique and exhibit artistic qualities. The distinction between a functional handcrafted item and a piece of art often blurs, as many handcrafted items are created with great skill, creativity, and attention to detail, making them not only functional but also aesthetically pleasing and unique.
- Art is subjective, and it encompasses a wide range of creative expressions. Some handcrafted items, such as pottery, jewelry, textiles, sculptures, and furniture, can transcend their utilitarian purposes and be appreciated primarily for their artistic value. Artisans and craftspeople who create such pieces often infuse their personal creativity and artistic vision into their work, resulting in one-of-a-kind or limited-edition pieces that can be considered art.
- Ultimately, whether a handcrafted item is considered art depends on how it is perceived and valued by individuals, collectors, and the broader artistic community. Unique, well-crafted, and creatively designed handcrafted items can absolutely be regarded as works of art. Mcapdevila (talk) 08:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Its also worth pointing out that the image is being used on a wikipedia page [7] Smasongarrison (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, right now, the image is being used on two wikipedia pages Mcapdevila (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- We need a written permission from your mother, we can't simply take your words. You can submit the permission to VRT--A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am sorry, she died in 2012, I am 78, I can send you her last will in wich I am the only heir, but she didnt specify the pig.. Mcapdevila (talk) 23:33, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- We need a written permission from your mother, we can't simply take your words. You can submit the permission to VRT--A1Cafel (talk) 08:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks, right now, the image is being used on two wikipedia pages Mcapdevila (talk) 13:59, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Its also worth pointing out that the image is being used on a wikipedia page [7] Smasongarrison (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No FOP in France at all. It looks like this piece of art is not yet in the public domain. I do not see a VRT ticket from the artist. JopkeB (talk) 09:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
This is a traditional form of basket. Is the treshold high enough? Gryffindor (talk) 11:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
- To me it looks like a work of art. I cannot judge whether this is indeed a traditional form of a basket and this is a common color for such a basket, but this exhibition was dedicaded to Nagakura Ken'ichi (1952-2018), who was an artist from Japan. So I guess there might be a twist to the original kind of baskets. Someone with knowledge of the Japanese culture should judge this. JopkeB (talk) 12:57, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Utilitarian article. --Yann (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
плохое качество Sshut (talk) 09:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Assuming that google translate was right in translating the reason with “poor quality” -- it took 10 seconds in GIMP to improve. Should be the same for the following two requests. Given that uploader also started the request it could be considered a courtesy request. Alas after 1 1/2 years changing his mind is not on. The image was published under an IRREVOCABLE CC license, thus should be kept. (Lousy images abound on commons) --Zenwort (talk) 08:19, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 18:17, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
"лишнее" Sshut (talk) 17:55, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
- лишнее translates as “excess” -- once more: no valid reason. --Zenwort (talk) 07:01, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Speedy keep not valid reason for deletion and COM:INUSE. Günther Frager (talk) 14:04, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 12:55, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Looks like a recent graffiti, but there is no FOP in Greece, so it must be deleted. C messier (talk) 10:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Sculpture by Alberto Lagos (1893-1960) installed in Buenos Aires. There is no freedom of panorama for non-architectural works in Argentina and the copyright protection is 70 years pma.
- File:Buenos Aires - Monumento a Carlos Thays.jpg
- File:Buenos Aires Botanical Garden (20986755).jpg
- File:Busto de Carlos Thays.jpg
- File:Carlos Thays - Jardín Botánico de Buenos Aires.jpg
- File:CarlosThays.JPG
Günther Frager (talk) 00:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Busto de Carlos Thays.jpg taken from the Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (GCBA) official website. GCBA owns the sculptures and can give the usage rights as they like (CC-BY 2.5 AR).
--Madamebiblio (talk) 01:01, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- The photography itself can have CC-BY license, and the government can own the physical object. Yet, the copyright of the sculpture belongs to Lagos' heirs. Notice that for 3D artworks we need two licenses: the license of the artwork and the license of the photograph, see {{Art Photo}}. Here we have only one. Günther Frager (talk) 01:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep for the File:Busto de Carlos Thays.jpg, which has a {{CC-AR-GCBA}} license. – Fma12 (talk) 15:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Fma12 Could you explain why the Argentine legislation regarding freedom of panorama (i.e. the lack of it) doesn't apply here? Because that is the argument to delete the file, not the license of the photo itself. Günther Frager (talk) 09:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Buenos Aires Botanical Garden (20986755).jpg. The small part of the photo occupied by the bust can be blurred, keeping intact the educational value of the photo as representing a corner of the Botanical Garden. Darwin Ahoy! 13:02, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:El mensaje de Mercurio
[edit]Sculpture by Ricardo Celma and Eduardo Lloreda created in 2006. There is no freedom of panorama for statues in Argentina where this work is installed.
- File:Buenos Aires Jardin Botanico Carlos Thays 01.jpg
- File:El mensaje de Mercurio 2021.jpg
- File:El mensaje de Mercurio.jpg
- File:Mercurio - estatua en el Jardín Botánico de Buenos Aires.jpg
Günther Frager (talk) 00:45, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
File:Mercurio - estatua en el Jardín Botánico de Buenos Aires.jpg taken from the Gobierno de la Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires (GCBA) official website. GCBA owns the sculpture and can give the usage rights as they like (CC-BY 2.5 AR).
--Madamebiblio (talk) 01:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- The photography itself can have CC-BY license, and the government can own the physical object. Yet, the copyright of the sculpture belongs to Celma and Lloreda. Notice that for 3D artworks we need two licenses: the license of the artwork and the license of the photograph, see {{Art Photo}}. Here we have only one. Günther Frager (talk) 01:08, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- ¿Y si en lugar de solo poner plantillas de borrado, ayudas a ubicar los derechos en el MOA? En este caso es una reproducción del original y no se les niega la paternidad de la obra. Madamebiblio (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- La información de los escultores lo saqué de la página del Gobierno de la Ciudad [8] donde también menciona que fue seleccionada en un concurso. ¿De dónde sacaste que era una reproducción del original? Günther Frager (talk) 02:04, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- ¿Y si en lugar de solo poner plantillas de borrado, ayudas a ubicar los derechos en el MOA? En este caso es una reproducción del original y no se les niega la paternidad de la obra. Madamebiblio (talk) 01:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
плохое качество Sshut (talk) 10:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
плохое качество Sshut (talk) 10:18, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
плохое качество Sshut (talk) 10:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
This is a still from the 1976 IMAX film To Fly!. Looking at the archived URL, it seems that Air/Space misattributed it to the US Navy; the still is most likely provided by Conoco or DuPont as the film's copyright owner, to the Navy, who then shared it with Air/Space. This can be seen in page 395 of this book, and can be seen in the film here, the only difference being that this image has a muted regrading. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 06:13, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- I am very sorry and it's some 15 years since I imported this file from wikipedia. Thank you for bringing it up. I uploaded a similar file from the U.S. National Archives, PD-USGov-Military-Navy. Cobatfor (talk) 12:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
- No worries-- I happen to be editing the article on that film and stumbled upon the image. I think this nomination can be archived now, though I suppose the previous image should be deleted from the history too. I'll leave that to the admins here, but please ping me if I can do anything on that part. Not really a Commons guy, you can tell. Gerald Waldo Luis (talk) 09:27, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: the original version of the file, Undelete and split the files in 2072 (EDIT: File was overwritten against policy during DR). --Abzeronow (talk) 18:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo of copyright work Yann (talk) 14:12, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- My Father was Chief Ebenze of Igueben Kingdom a title my brother now holds. I have entitlement to photograph any work from, and at Igueben Kingdom Royal Palace. The image was photographed on site and not downloaded from the internet. I have therefore not violated any copyright rules. I uploaded this photograph on Wikipedia free license use. Please remove the deletion requests. Thank you very much. Imanluk (talk) 14:49, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Imanluk It is not that we doubt your honesty. It is that this is the internet and we are unable to believe anyone. Please send proof to COM:VRT. I am sure you will understand this small formality. Com:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 15:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- What proof do you require? Imanluk (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Imanluk Read COM:VRT. It tells you what to do. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 15:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Imanluk (talk) 15:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. Imanluk. The process will now run its course. Even if this file is deleted in the meantime, the process will resinstate it if and when they are satisfied with what you have provided. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 16:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Imanluk (talk) 15:58, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Imanluk Read COM:VRT. It tells you what to do. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 15:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- What proof do you require? Imanluk (talk) 15:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Imanluk It is not that we doubt your honesty. It is that this is the internet and we are unable to believe anyone. Please send proof to COM:VRT. I am sure you will understand this small formality. Com:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 15:10, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete unless and until proof of the statement by Imanluk together with the right to upload images here is supplied to COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 15:11, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5005556352).jpg){kind=link}
![57 File:"Amy" by Irony Street Art - Camden London. (39563003861).jpg](#File:"Amy"_by_Irony_Street_Art_-_Camden_London._(39563003861).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_WIKIMEDIA_MUSICIAN_METAL_SCULPTURE_CITY_OF_ZHMERYNKA_STATE_OF_UKRAINE_20160830.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(FM77AV,_PC8801,_Sharp_X1,_MSX2).jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![173 File:Eduardo "Lalo" Paz Aguirre.jpg](#File:Eduardo_"Lalo"_Paz_Aguirre.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(Png)_v1.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5005556352).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5005556352).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(5005556352).jpg){kind=link}
_(5005556352).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![04:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/02#c-A1Cafel-20230902040000-File:"Amy"_by_Irony_Street_Art_-_Camden_London._(39563003861).jpg){kind=link}
![05:43, 9 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/02#c-Krd-20230909054300-File:"Amy"_by_Irony_Street_Art_-_Camden_London._(39563003861).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_WIKIMEDIA_MUSICIAN_METAL_SCULPTURE_CITY_OF_ZHMERYNKA_STATE_OF_UKRAINE_20160830.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_WIKIMEDIA_MUSICIAN_METAL_SCULPTURE_CITY_OF_ZHMERYNKA_STATE_OF_UKRAINE_20160830.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_(1865_-_1929)_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_097.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_098.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(FM77AV,_PC8801,_Sharp_X1,_MSX2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(FM77AV,_PC8801,_Sharp_X1,_MSX2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_6.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_7.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_May_2023.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-20230902020600-File:HEYTEA_x_Genshin_Impact_bag_Ganyu.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_by_CH,_2015,_Oil_on_Canvas.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![17:24, 2 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/02#c-Xocolatl-20230902172400-File:Eduardo_"Lalo"_Paz_Aguirre.jpg){kind=link}
![23:15, 11 October 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/09/02#c-P199-20231011231500-File:Eduardo_"Lalo"_Paz_Aguirre.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_May_2023.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Kings_Cross_Station_May_2023.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_May_2023_(3).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_May_2023.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Universal_Studios_Florida_May_2023.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Png)_v1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(Png)_v1.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(Png)_v1.png){kind=link}
_(Png)_v1.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_face_sud,_le_28_Avril_2015.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Imanluk, thank you for uploading the photo and jumping through these hoops! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:54, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no VRT permission still. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:16, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Impuls Arena
[edit]FOP in Germany only covers external appearance of buildings and only when the image is taken from a public and publicly-accessible place, these are taken from a place (inside the stadium) that is not publicly-accessible (a fee would be charged for admittance) and therefore are not covered by German FOP. Two are taken from the air and are also not covered.
File:Gegentribüne-impuls-arena-leer.jpgnothing copyrightable here. --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 16 December 2013 (UTC)File:Gegentribüne-impuls-arena.jpgnothing copyrightable hereFile:Impuls arena 06-2009.JPGnothing copyrightable hereFile:Impuls Arena Augsburg 2011.jpgnothing copyrightable hereFile:Impuls-arena-2009-07-26.jpgnothing copyrightable here- File:Luftaufnahme Impuls Arena 2.jpg - the roof design might merit a discussion
- File:Luftaufnahme Impuls Arena.jpg - the roof design might merit a discussion
File:Panorama Impuls Arena vor NIG-JAP.jpgnothing copyrightable here
LGA talkedits 02:44, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep pls what its proprietary on this pitures? I dont see any work of art. No work of art, no problem with fotos are dont FOP. --Bobo11 (talk) 07:45, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Works of architecture are covered by German copyright LGA talkedits 11:08, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep @LGA: Please understand what FOP means in general. You are right, German FOP does not apply for these pictures, but still there is no problem with the photos as there are no or hardly any (→ De Minimis) copyright-protected parts in these pictures. The interior architecture of a usual football stadium cannot be considered protected when not having concrete indications (such as court decisions). Yellowcard (talk) 11:09, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- @LGA: Yes. Works of architecture are covered per § 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 UhrG. However, it's a requirement that there has to be a "geistige Schöpfung" (roughly translated with "intellectual creation") per § 2 Abs. 2 UrhG that limits Abs. 1 in its applicability. According to several German court decisions (Supreme Court decisions included), usual works of architecture are not protected. You have to individually reason what is speacial in each picture. Mass deletions are not possible with your arguments. Yellowcard (talk) 11:14, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep No need for FoP if no or only marginal copyrighted objects are visible. The architectur is rather functional and IMO doesn't reach the threshold of originality necessary to protect it from beeing photographed. --Martin Kraft (talk) 11:56, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Keep There is nothing copyrightable shown in these images... Chaddy (talk) 16:30, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- I have taken the liberty to strike the filenames of those images which show nothing copyrightable. IMO, the 2 aerial shots merit some discussion about whether the roof design has originality (Schöpfungshöhe) or not.
- Also: I have removed a personal attack against the nominator. Please stay on topic. --Túrelio (talk) 09:21, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete I think, that crossing the files was precipitate. All these photos, including the crossed ones, show enough copyrightable architecture. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please remember that the level for copyrightability (COM:TOO) in Germany is rather high. --Túrelio (talk) 11:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Túrelio Please revert the "Crossing" - there is more than enough copyrightable architecture on display in all of the images, it is all custom designed quite specifically for this stadium. LGA talkedits 12:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- I see no need to revert Túrelio's edit... --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:33, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- @LGA: Could you please eventually start to CONCRETELY point out WHAT elements (I mean, you state there's "enough") are supposed to be copyrighted? Thanks a lot. Yellowcard (talk) 12:45, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- All architecture is copyrightable, the only time that I am aware of architecture has not been afforded protection is in relation to prefabricated mass produced houses and not to independently designed sports stadiums, all of the elements you see in these images, the roof, the stands everything was custom designed with this stadium and this client in mind and is therefore copyright to the architect. LGA talkedits 13:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- @LGA: You're wrong. Please consider that German Urheberrecht applies here. The roof might be debatable (see Túrelio), the stands for sure are not copyrighted. Please respect the facts, see opinions (for keeping the images) of experienced users above. "All architecture is copyrightable" – that might be true for US or whatever country's laws, but not according to the German Urheberrechtsgesetz. Yellowcard (talk) 13:19, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- All architecture is copyrightable, the only time that I am aware of architecture has not been afforded protection is in relation to prefabricated mass produced houses and not to independently designed sports stadiums, all of the elements you see in these images, the roof, the stands everything was custom designed with this stadium and this client in mind and is therefore copyright to the architect. LGA talkedits 13:01, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- @Túrelio Please revert the "Crossing" - there is more than enough copyrightable architecture on display in all of the images, it is all custom designed quite specifically for this stadium. LGA talkedits 12:09, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Please remember that the level for copyrightability (COM:TOO) in Germany is rather high. --Túrelio (talk) 11:26, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Just in short, as I don’t have much time now. Per § 2 Absatz 1 Nr. 4, Absatz 2[9] of copyright law of Germany (UrhG), which is primarily applicable here due to the location of the building, buildings (or parts of them) are copyrightable only if they are a work of art (Baukunst) above threshold of originality (Schöpfungshöhe or Gestaltungshöhe).[10]
- Whether something qualifies as a “work of art” needs to be evaluated individually, of course. Nevertheless, § 2 Absatz 2 UrhG[11] clearly states that to be copyrightable per this law, a work needs to be “a personal intellectual creation”. Further qualifiers, as used in legal literature: it needs to be “clearly above the average” of comparable buildings.[12][13]; “individuality does not equal originality“[14]. Other refs: [15],[16],[17]. All my references are in German and IANAL, sorry.
- Now, applied to the above listed images, I am still convinced that they show nothing copyrightable, except possibly #6&7. --Túrelio (talk) 14:18, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- The fact that the stadium design is a "personal intellectual creation" can not be up for debate, it clearly is; and we are talking about an custom design, created for this tenant, we are not dealing with a mass produced chair, office block or house. LGA talkedits 19:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- It's a pity you keep repeating yourself instead of dealing with the arguments other users bring into this discussion based on publications. As Túrelio said before: Individuality is not originality. You say that each stadium is individual. That's fine. It doesn't say too much about the copyright protection due to German law, though, as the threshold of originality must be reached; this is not only reasoned with individuality. Yellowcard (talk) 00:28, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- The fact that the stadium design is a "personal intellectual creation" can not be up for debate, it clearly is; and we are talking about an custom design, created for this tenant, we are not dealing with a mass produced chair, office block or house. LGA talkedits 19:46, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
- Delete It seems that COM:FOP#Germany doesn't apply unless the camera is located in a public place, and it seems that places high up in the sky or inside a location which requires an entrance fee do not count as public places. The threshold of originality for applied art seems to be quite low, as established e.g. here. --Stefan4 (talk) 16:51, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are correct in your 1st statement about FOP, though it isn't an issue here. However, I have to question your analogy of a designer chair (image) to a complex building. I can easily see quite some originality in this chair, but not in the discussed arena. --Túrelio (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
- +1, that's two completely different things. I meanwhile feel honestly bothered by Stefan4's quotes and links to court decision that don't fit to the deletion requests at all. I only can speak for German UrhG and this deletion requests are senseless. Please close. Yellowcard (talk) 11:59, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
- You are correct in your 1st statement about FOP, though it isn't an issue here. However, I have to question your analogy of a designer chair (image) to a complex building. I can easily see quite some originality in this chair, but not in the discussed arena. --Túrelio (talk) 17:38, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom A.Savin 19:33, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Impuls Arena
[edit]per Gnom and H-stt in this discussion in German-language Wikipedia: This stadium is a work of architecture protected by copyright; freedom of panorama in Germany doesn't cover aerial photography, so aerial / drone photos of this stadium can't be kept. Though as mentioned in COM:FOP Germany, a regional court (Landgericht) in Frankfurt am Main ruled "that it is allowed to photograph copyrighted works even from the airspace and to use the resulting images for commercial purposes, provided that the works are in public spaces" in 2020, but apparently, a higher court (Oberlandesgericht Hamm) ruled differently since then (maybe H-stt can elaborate on that and update COM:FOP Germany accordingly). See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gelsenkirchen - Photographs of Arne Müseler (Hamm decision).
- File:Augsburg Stadium, Germany (9655832783).jpg
- File:Impuls Areana 100428 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Impuls Arena 090726 03 Tag der Eröffnung - panoramio.jpg
- File:Impuls Arena 090726 06 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Impuls Arena 090726 20 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Impuls Arena 0909 01 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Impuls Arena 0909 02 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Impuls Arena 980726 09 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Impuls Arena1008 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Stadion 1106 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Vorbereitung 1106 - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gestumblindi (talk) 13:19, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: Ich sehe keinerlei SH bei der Gestaltung des Daches. Das ist so simpel wie nur möglich gestaltet. Bitte begründen, wo da die SH sein soll.
- Außerdem wären davon unzählige Luftaufnahmen betroffen. Das wäre eine Grundsatzfrage, die besser erstmal grundsätzlich geklärt werden sollte, statt hier vorschnell ein Exempel zu statuieren. -- Chaddy (talk) 13:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Es ist etwas ungünstig, die Diskussion parallel auf zwei Seiten zu führen. Den Ausführungen zur Schöpfungshöhe, die h-stt gerade hier gemacht hat, würde ich mich anschliessen. M.E. muss aber jeder Fall für sich betrachtet werden, ich würde diesen LA also auch nicht als "Exempel" betrachten, sondern eben eine Einzelfalldiskussion. Gestumblindi (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Das finde ich allerdings auch. Hätte man vermeiden können, indem man mit dem LA noch etwas abwartet. Die Diskussion auf UF hat erstmal gelangt...
- Zu den Ausführungen hab ich mich drüben geäußert (@abarbeitender Admin: bitte auch die Diskussion drüben berücksichtigen).
- Ja, das sind natürlich immer Einzelfallentscheidungen. So ist das bei den U-Bahnstationen aber auch. Und trotzdem ist es auch eine Grundsatzfrage, weil so quasi alle Luftaufnahmen von Gebäuden, die noch nicht alt genug sind, betroffen sind. -- Chaddy (talk) 22:47, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Wenn man ihnen Schöpfungshöhe zuspricht. Die sehe ich hier zwar, du siehst sie nicht, das ist nun also zu diskutieren... Gestumblindi (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Es ist etwas ungünstig, die Diskussion parallel auf zwei Seiten zu führen. Den Ausführungen zur Schöpfungshöhe, die h-stt gerade hier gemacht hat, würde ich mich anschliessen. M.E. muss aber jeder Fall für sich betrachtet werden, ich würde diesen LA also auch nicht als "Exempel" betrachten, sondern eben eine Einzelfalldiskussion. Gestumblindi (talk) 14:26, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- I just updated COM:FOP Germany. And yes, the vast majority of aerial photography from Germany has to go, if modern buildings are the center of the image. Only those buildings, where the copyright has expired, where the modern building is just one of many in the picture or the building is extremely simple, we can keep the picture. And with extremely simple I mean exactly that. The public toilet building on a highway rest station was declared protected, the box shaped toilet building of an public inn in Bavaria is even a listed building, because the proportions of the windows are considered typical for the time of construction de:Waldwirtschaft Großhesselohe. --h-stt !? 14:43, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- I would guess that buildings like merely functional agricultural sheds or typical warehouses / storage buildings (basically boxes with no aesthetical aspirations whatsoever) would still be below the threshold of originality, but buildings like this stadium do aspire to a certain aesthetic appeal, see for example this article published when it opened: "Das Stadion selbst ist ein architektonisch ansprechendes Gebäude (...)", an "architecturally appealing building". Gestumblindi (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- In dem Absatz geht es aber nur um Sicht, Akustik und interne Infrastruktur. Zur äußeren Form - und nur um die geht es bei FOP - heißt es: "das Dachtragwerk hingegen ist eine Stahlkonstruktion mit Fertigbauteilen". Man könnte vielleicht darüber diskutieren, ob die an Lochkarten erinnernden Fenster an der Eingangsfront Schöpfungshöhe aufweisen (eher nicht, das sieht man an jedem zweiten Bürogebäude-Neubau heutzutage), aber solche Konstruktionen sind weder "architektonisch ansprechend" noch ragen sie "aus der Masse des alltäglichen Bauschaffens" hervor (s.u., OLG Karlsruhe). Chianti (talk) 17:22, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
- I would guess that buildings like merely functional agricultural sheds or typical warehouses / storage buildings (basically boxes with no aesthetical aspirations whatsoever) would still be below the threshold of originality, but buildings like this stadium do aspire to a certain aesthetic appeal, see for example this article published when it opened: "Das Stadion selbst ist ein architektonisch ansprechendes Gebäude (...)", an "architecturally appealing building". Gestumblindi (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
- Delete because at this point I’m assuming German FOP only exists on alternate Thursdays in November if they aren’t public holidays except in Bavaria where it’s exclusively Wednesdays in September Dronebogus (talk) 13:15, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- ? -- Chaddy (talk) 14:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- The questions we have to answer here are difficult, but not that complicated. First question: Does German freedom of panorama apply? If yes, we keep the pictures. Second question: If the answer to the first question is no and German FoP doesn't apply, is this building above the threshold of originality (TOO)? If no, we keep the pictures, as they then don't need FoP. Now, Chaddy and Ralf who argue for keeping the pictures both argue with the TOO. They don't argue that FoP applies, so I assume thet they concur with the assumption that FoP isn't applicable for aerial/drone photography in Germany. So, I'd say that the state of this discussion is: No FoP, but maybe (I think otherwise) not meeting TOO. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, they are difficult, and complicated. Because TOO is meaningless guesswork (how the crap do I know if this stadium is “artistic”?) and German FoP law only applies to, basically, one very specific situation (street-level photography of permanent installations in completely unrestricted public areas). So yes, I’d say that the stadium is above TOO because it’s not some mass-produced, purely utilitarian industrial building and also that FoP obviously doesn’t apply Dronebogus (talk) 06:24, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
- The questions we have to answer here are difficult, but not that complicated. First question: Does German freedom of panorama apply? If yes, we keep the pictures. Second question: If the answer to the first question is no and German FoP doesn't apply, is this building above the threshold of originality (TOO)? If no, we keep the pictures, as they then don't need FoP. Now, Chaddy and Ralf who argue for keeping the pictures both argue with the TOO. They don't argue that FoP applies, so I assume thet they concur with the assumption that FoP isn't applicable for aerial/drone photography in Germany. So, I'd say that the state of this discussion is: No FoP, but maybe (I think otherwise) not meeting TOO. Gestumblindi (talk) 19:19, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- ? -- Chaddy (talk) 14:40, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Icxh kann hier keinerlei SH sehen. --Ralf Roletschek 08:42, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- Ich auch nicht, und das OLG Karlsruhe sieht es ebenso: "... individuellen Züge, die das Bauwerk als persönlich geistige Schöpfung qualifizieren" bzw. "nicht nur das Ergebnis eines rein handwerklichen oder routinemäßigen Schaffens darstellt, sondern dass es aus der Masse des alltäglichen Bauschaffens herausragt" [18]. Hier nicht der Fall, das ist eindeutig eine bautechnisch bedingte Konstruktion, vergleichbar mit dem seriellen Baustil einer Fabrikhalle. Da ist überhaupt keine persönliche geistige Schöpfung erkennbar - nicht, was "aus der Masse des alltäglichen Bauschaffens herausragt". Chianti (talk) 17:11, 4 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. (Perhaps keep File:Impuls Arena 090726 06 - panoramio.jpg, File:Impuls Arena 0909 02 - panoramio.jpg and File:Stadion 1106 - panoramio.jpg as DM.) --Krd 10:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Krd: Bitte lies mal Chiantis Kommentar. Der fasst es auf Basis eines Gerichtsurteils gut zusammen. -- Chaddy (talk) 14:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, most since aerial photographs are not covered by FOP and German standards for DM are strict (kept three per Krd). --Abzeronow (talk) 17:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
- This is a very wrong decision. Chianti’s input unfortunately was completely ignored. This stadium is not copyrightable at all. -- Chaddy (talk) 18:28, 31 December 2023 (UTC)