Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/08/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![131 File:Labyrinth for Sword of Fargoal "Sword Level".png](#File:Labyrinth_for_Sword_of_Fargoal_"Sword_Level".png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_2022.jpg){kind=link}
![187 File:"not" G.png](#File:"not"_G.png){kind=link}
_k_13.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
هذا انا واريد حذف صورتي لو سمحتم شاكرا لكم شكرا جزيلا متمني لكم يوم سعيدآ احمد بيه الرائد (talk) 04:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
هذا انا ارجو حذف الصوره لو سمحتم اعتقد انني لا احب ان تكون علي اي موقع برجاء حذفها وشكرا لكم احمد بيه الرائد (talk) 04:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 06:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NordNordWest as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: "Amtlicher Stadtplan" ("official city map") is never "own work" Mussklprozz (talk) 07:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Stellungnahme des Hochladers, kopiert von dessen Benutzer-Diskussionsseite: „Es handelt sich um einen für jedermann zugänglichen Plan der Stadt Bonn. Eingetragen wurde darauf durch das Dezernat III (Planung) das Gebiet der "Zementfabrik", auf der sich damals noch die alten, stillgelegten Alagen des Zementwerks befanden. Den Plan habe ich seinerzeit fotografiert, für das spätere von mir bearbeitete städtebauliche Gutachten 1991. Es handelt sich um ein eingescanntes Dia aus meinem Archiv. Diese Daten habe ich unter dem Bild auf Wikimedia Commons gerade ergänzt.“ --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Ticket:2023082310003075 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 08:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Amtliche Karten sind in aller Regel frei zugänglich, aber nicht frei im Sinne von Creative Commons. Dass eine Stadt, wenn sie eine Ausschreibung macht/ein Gutachten in Auftrag gibt/u.Ä., auf amtliche Karten zurückgreift, ist klar, aber auch das entspricht nicht einer Freigabe im Sinne von Commons. NNW 10:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 11:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
No accurate Zhu Zi Ling (talk) 22:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and speedy close. No reason for deletion given. File is in use. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:29, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fake map world history 202.56.3.135 12:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
kept again, still in use. Disputes about the contents of the map should be addressed on the talk page or the relevant wikipedia article. --PaterMcFly (talk) 14:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Not indicated on the website of Team Reptile that this is a freely licensed file. BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4 (talk) 09:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Not indicated on the website of Team Reptile that this is a freely licensed file. BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4 (talk) 09:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
File:Jayvee Enaguas - Harvett and His Folks - Singing Fox, The (without clothing variant, raw version).webp
[edit].webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File:Jayvee Enaguas - Harvett and His Folks - Singing Fox, The (raw version).webp
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by The Harvett Vault Kelly The Angel (talk) 04:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 18:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Mohamed Yayyo.jpg incorrect date, author, copyright Drakosh (talk) 09:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
La qualité de l'image est insuffisante Tusaure (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
انا صاحب هذه الصوره برجاء حذفها احمد بيه الرائد (talk) 11:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
برجاء حذف هذه الصوره لو سمحتم ف انهو انا واريد حذف صورتي و شكرا احمد بيه الرائد (talk) 11:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shaunpassaic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small files without metadata, seen the user's upload history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:BAC lecture.jpg
- File:BAC bee.jpg
- File:BAC-Boston-Architectural-College-studio.jpg
- File:McCormick Gallery.jpg
- File:Passaic City Hall.jpg
- File:YBH Hillel - Passaic.jpg
- File:Passaic County Community College.jpg
- File:3rd Ward Park Passaic.jpg
- File:Aycrigg House.jpg
- File:Old Passaic City Hall.jpg
- File:Third Ward Park.jpg
- File:TESU event.jpg
- File:Glen Cairn Hall.jpg
- File:TESU campus.jpg
Yann (talk) 20:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shaunpassaic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Some of these are taken direct from university websites without credit (https://img.sfc.edu/content/uploads/SFC-at-179-Livingston_2022-10-28-154500_gmds.png, https://www.adelphi.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/untitled-8.jpg) and claimed as own work, user has ignored previous warnings about this.
- File:St Francis College.webp
- File:Adelphi Brooklyn Center.jpg
- File:Adelphi Manhattan Center.jpg
- File:Levermore Hall and Nexus Academic Building.jpg
- File:Blodgett Hall Garden City.jpg
- File:Blodgett Hall.jpg
- File:Barry Gardens.jpg
- File:Public School 11 - Passaic.jpg
- File:Passaic663MainAve.jpg
Belbury (talk) 12:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Undated/unattributed postcard scan, not the uploader's own work. Belbury (talk) 12:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I want to add again Kpp100 (talk) 13:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. Is this not a copyvio anyway?. --Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Al*from*Lig (talk) 13:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Scheint Scan aus Tageszeitung zu sein, daher unwahrscheinlich, dass der Hochlader Rechteinhaber ist. Quelle vermutlich Artikel von Andreas Zwingmann: Noch viele Fragezeichen. Debatte um Trasse der Schozach-Bottwartalbahn kommt in Fahrt. Was die Kommunen sagen. In: Heilbronner Stimme , 18. August 2023, Uliraush (talk) 14:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio (yes, it is from that newspaper). --Rosenzweig τ 18:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Ufckvudydydyf 199.195.109.41 17:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. --Achim55 (talk) 18:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
copyviol from digilander.libero.it — danyele 00:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
not an "own" work; copyviol from corriere.it — danyele 00:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Enkhmunkhb (talk) 06:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:17, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. No evidence on the source page that Cheshire Police have licensed it as CC BY-SA 4.0. LittleDwangs (talk) 12:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 07:16, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lu0912fer as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Lu0912fer (talk) 15:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC) with "{{Speedydelete|G4 G7}}" infix Yann (talk) 16:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Delete per COM:CSD#F10; G4 and G7 are unproven. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:44, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:25, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
1950 painting by an artist who died in 1964. Undelete in 2046 when all copyrights expire (UK copyright expires in 2035) Abzeronow (talk) 18:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Nice book. Can we keep it? 181.43.0.231 19:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Only if User:Ruyferreira is in fact Ruy Ferreira. User:Ruyferreira, please read COM:VRT and send the appropriate email. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
1943 Albanian photograph, would need more information to verify if it's public domain. Abzeronow (talk) 20:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deletd by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
1968 American painting, undelete in 2064. Abzeronow (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 07:05, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cómico el dibujo :) 191.126.135.129 22:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Carregamento Elizaveta 191.126.135.129 22:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 07:00, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
{{Duplicate |1=ЦДІАК 49 1 1795 Документи які відносяться до маєтків Полонського ключа.pdf |2="uploaded fixed pages order version"}} Alexandrtovmach (talk) 23:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johannnes89 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of project scope. Not speedy eligible, but appears out of scope + maybe a copyvio? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy as copyvio (including even the image-description prose). --DMacks (talk) 09:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
Very likely copyvio: Derivative work, catalogue image from around 1980. 2003:C0:8F1F:FF00:40AC:AC80:D331:5346 14:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Die Bilder des Basket Korbstuhles in dieser Gruppe wurden effektiv ca. 1980 von meinem Vater gemacht. Er brauchte sie für seinen Verkaufskatalog. Nun gibt es seine Firma seit ca. 2000 nicht mehr und er ist 2015 gestorben.
- Ich habe diese Bilder damals zu einem Gesamtbild zusammengestellt. JeanMeaulnes (talk) 13:21, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023082510004418 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Basket-groups.jpg” under ticket:2023082510004418. --Mussklprozz (talk) 18:26, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 07:24, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Derivative work from here. Who is the copyright holder, and where is their permission? 2003:C0:8F1F:FF00:40AC:AC80:D331:5346 14:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Ticket:2023082510004338 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Designobjekte12querohneSKopie.jpg” under ticket:2023082510004338. --Mussklprozz (talk) 18:19, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Uneven bond-lengths and angles. Have a bunch of nicer alts (in better file-formats) in Category:Cysteamine DMacks (talk) 07:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:06, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Small and poor format for bitmap (if even there is value to bitmap). Have a bunch of nice alts (higher-quality bitmap, and also vector) in Category:Monoethanolamine DMacks (talk) 07:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Low quality diagram, not used, many alternatives in Category:Glucuronic acid. Wostr (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:11, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Low quality diagram, not used, many alternatives in Category:Glucuronic acid. Wostr (talk) 16:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:22, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Simple text, out of scope. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
clearly a copyviol; a TV screenshot taken from Italian channel Telemontecarlo — danyele 00:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Seems to be a commercial photograph; copyright status obscure Hoary (talk) 01:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Business promotion CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Yes, and image title doesn't match content. PaterMcFly (talk) 06:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: G10. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Hilmar Zill
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the designer. In this case the designer of these stamps, Hilmar Zill, died in 2022. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO until 2,093.
- File:DBP 1993 1704 Paracelsus.jpg
- File:Frauanders.jpg
- File:GDR 1981 MiNr2580-2581 SD B002.jpg
- File:GER 1992 Bell MiNr1607 mt B002.jpg
- File:Se-tenant 1986 GDR MiNrWZd677 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Se-tenant 1986 GDR MiNrZu3001 pm B002c.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1984 GDR AlterSchwedeWismar pm B004a.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1984 GDR Beierfeld MiNr2829 pm B003.jpg
- File:SouvCard 1982 GDR Lützow1813 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2869 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2870 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2871 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1984 GDR MiNr2872 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1985 GDR MiNr2939 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1985 GDR MiNr2961 pm B002.jpg
- File:Stamp 1985 GDR MiNr2962 pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2109 Blaues Wunder.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1579.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1581.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1582.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1970, MiNr 1583.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1636.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1637.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1638.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1639.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1640.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1641.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1642.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr 1643.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr Kleinbogen 1636-1643 mirrored.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1971, MiNr Kleinbogen 1636-1643.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2370.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2371.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2372.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2373.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2374.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1978, MiNr 2375.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2580.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1981, MiNr 2581.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2702.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2703.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2704.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1982, MiNr 2705.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1983, MiNr 2778.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2869.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2870.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2871.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2872.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2939.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2961.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2962.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr 3001.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1986, MiNr Zusammendruck 3001.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3267.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr 3268.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1989, MiNr Block 099.jpg
_1970,_MiNr_1579.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_1581.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_1582.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1970,_MiNr_1583.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1636.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1637.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1638.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1639.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1640.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1641.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1642.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_1643.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_1636-1643_mirrored.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_1636-1643.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2370.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2371.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2372.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2373.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2374.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1978,_MiNr_2375.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_2580.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1981,_MiNr_2581.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2702.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2703.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2704.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1982,_MiNr_2705.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_2778.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2869.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2870.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2871.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2872.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2939.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2961.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2962.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_3001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1986,_MiNr_Zusammendruck_3001.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3267.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_3268.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_Block_099.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 06:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Reason for deletion is copyright infringement. Author ja:玉本奈々 is alive. Voncercue (talk) 06:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:52, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Syedmazharuddintaj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images that are outside the scope of our project. The user is blocked on most wikis they have "contributed" too
Herby talk thyme 06:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:07, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Bert Jäger
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the designer. In this case the designer of these stamps, Bert Jäger, died in 1998. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO until 2,069.
- File:DBP 1956 243 Hebamme.jpg
- File:DBP 1956 244 Semmelweis.jpg
- File:DBP 1956 245 Mutter.jpg
- File:DBP 1956 246 Kinderschwester.jpg
- File:DBP 1961 369 Wohlfahrt Hänsel und Gretel.jpg
- File:DBP 1961 370 Wohlfahrt Hänsel und Gretel.jpg
- File:DBP 1961 371 Wohlfahrt Hänsel und Gretel.jpg
- File:DBP 1961 372 Wohlfahrt Hänsel und Gretel.jpg
- File:DBP 1963 391 Misereor.jpg
- File:DBP 256 Uni Freiburg 10 Pf 1957.jpg
- File:DBP 270 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau 7 - 3 Pf 1957.jpg
- File:DBP 271 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau 10 - 5 Pf 1957.jpg
- File:DBP 272 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau 20 - 10 Pf 1957.jpg
- File:DBP 273 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau 40 - 10 Pf 1957.jpg
- File:DBP Hebamme 7 Pfennig 1956.jpg
- File:DBP Ignaz Semmelweis 10 Pfennig 1956.jpg
- File:DBP Mutter 20 Pfennig 1956.jpg
- File:DBPSL 1957 404 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau.jpg
- File:DBPSL 1957 405 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau.jpg
- File:DBPSL 1957 406 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau.jpg
- File:DBPSL 1957 407 Wohlfahrt Kohlebergbau.jpg
- File:DBP 1959 325 Wohlfahrt Sterntaler.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 07 Pf.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 1971, MiNr 669.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (BRD) 40 Pf.jpg
_07_Pf.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1971,_MiNr_669.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_40_Pf.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 06:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Only the 1971 stamp can be under copyright until 2068. All the others will be {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} 70 years after publication. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 07:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Robert Weemeyer: I don't see how any of the stamps would qualify for {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}} when the template clearly says "This template is for German stamps published more than 70 years ago" and none of them were published prior to 1952. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Undelete the 1956 stamps in 2027, the 1957 stamps in 2028, the 1959 stamps in 2030, the 1961 stamps in 2032 and the 1963 stamps in 2034 (70 years after publication) according to {{PD-Germany-§134-KUG}}. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 06:08, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with colored atom labels & too much whitespace. Furthermore, the keto group (C=O) is slightly crooked. There are better alternatives in Category:2-Oxobutanoic acid. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Werner Klemke
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the designer. In this case the designer of these stamps, Werner Klemke, died in 1990. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO until 2,061.
- File:MiniatureSheet 1984 GDR MiNr29142919KB pm B002a.jpg
- File:Stamp GDR 1963 Michel 1142.JPG
- File:Stamp GDR 1963 Michel 1143.JPG
- File:Stamp GDR 1963 Michel 1144.JPG
- File:Stamp GDR 1965 Michel 1145.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1025.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1026.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1027.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1028.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1964, MiNr 1029.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1965, MiNr 1142.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1965, MiNr 1143.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1965, MiNr 1144.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1965, MiNr 1145.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2914.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2915.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2916.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2917.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2918.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr 2919.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1984, MiNr Kleinbogen 2914-2919.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2987.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2988.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2989.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2990.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2991.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr 2992.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (DDR) 1985, MiNr Kleinbogen 2987-2992.jpg
_1964,_MiNr_1025.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1026.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1027.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1028.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1964,_MiNr_1029.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1965,_MiNr_1142.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1965,_MiNr_1143.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1965,_MiNr_1144.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1965,_MiNr_1145.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2914.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2915.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2916.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2917.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2918.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_2919.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_2914-2919.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2987.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2988.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2989.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2990.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2991.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_2992.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1985,_MiNr_Kleinbogen_2987-2992.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 06:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stamps by Bernd Bexte
[edit]Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the designer. In this case the designer of these stamps, Bernd Bexte, died in 2011. So the images should be deleted as COPYVIO until 2,082.
- File:DPAG-1997-Sicherheit+Kinder+Straßenverkehr.jpg
- File:DPAG-1997-Sicherheit+Kinder+Straßenverkehr2.jpg
- File:SouvBf 1997 GER SBahnNeukölln pm B002c.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 07:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suleyman07531 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
- File:My Parliaчлвent.svg
- File:My Parliam88н.svg
- File:My Parliamудл.svg
- File:My Parliamen799vg.svg
- File:My Parli666ment.svg
- File:My Parliamen7777g.svg
- File:Млслвлвл.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:57, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suleyman07531 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
- File:00000цщчлао.svg
- File:Жжддщ9987.svg
- File:My Parliaэдмау.svg
- File:My Parliэвхвзузц9.svg
- File:67886пррр.svg
- File:My Parlillllgjfj.svg
- File:My Parliam0001.svg
- File:My Parl087.svg
- File:Ffffffff467.svg
- File:My Parl00000.svg
- File:My Parlia0000.svg
- File:My ннннParliament.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 10:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Suleyman07531 (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless test files
- File:My Parlждисg.svg
- File:My Parliamхщна.svg
- File:My Parliхх0099.svg
- File:My Parliжоав.svg
- File:My Parliзанщи.svg
- File:My Parli000ои.svg
- File:My Parl000001.svg
- File:My Parliamenхххх.svg
- File:My Parliam0000н.svg
- File:My Parliзшнкув8.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:40, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Recent mural, clearly above threshold of originality. Unfortunately, in the UK there is no freedom-of-panorama for such 2D-works. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm not well versed with Wikimedia guidelines so if my upload breaks any boundaries then I won't defend it from deletion.
- Just some extra information to help with your decision, the mural itself is a public art piece which encompases all the walls of a large underground tunnel. The photograph I uploaded only shows a small section of the art piece as there is no angle to take a photograph which captures even half the mural. In the background of the image is the Mini factory showing the art piece's location. I'm afraid I know very little about who made it or when. Set in Stone Project (talk) 09:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm currently reading through the Freedom of panorama link you sent me and I'm worried I may have been making a big mistake with my uploads. Set in Stone Project (talk) 09:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:Jamaican mural 3.jpg
- File:Jamaican mural 2.jpg
- File:Jamaican mural 4.jpg
- File:Jamaican mural 1.jpg
- File:Florence Park mural 7.jpg
- File:Florence Park mural 6.jpg
- File:Florence Park mural 5.jpg
- File:Florence Park mural 4.jpg
- File:Oxford mini mural tunnel 8.jpg
- File:Oxford mini mural tunnel 7.jpg
- File:Oxford mini mural tunnel 6.jpg
- File:Oxford mini mural tunnel 5.jpg
- File:Oxford mini mural tunnel 4.jpg
- File:Oxford mini mural tunnel 3.jpg
- File:Oxford mini mural tunnel 2.jpg
- File:Florence Park mural 3.jpg
- File:Florence Park mural 2.jpg
- File:Florence Park mural 1.jpg
- File:Greyfriars Cloister tiles 4.jpg
- File:Greyfriars Cloister tiles 3.jpg - except if this qualifies as "works of artistic craftsmanship"
- File:Greyfriars Cloister tiles 2.jpg - except if this qualifies as "works of artistic craftsmanship"
- File:Greyfriars Cloister tiles 1.jpg - except if this qualifies as "works of artistic craftsmanship"
- File:Blackwell mural 1.jpg - artist died in 1989
- File:Blackwell mural 2.jpg - artist died in 1989
- File:Blackwell mural 3.jpg - artist died in 1989
- File:Blackwell mural 4.jpg - artist died in 1989
- File:Blackwell mural 5.jpg - artist died in 1989
- File:Blackwell mural 6.jpg - artist died in 1989
- File:Blackwell mural 7.jpg - artist died in 1989
- I'll avoid uploading murals to wikimedia in the future. I'm struggling to understand the guidelines you sent me but surely I can rescue the Greyfriars Cloister tiles? They were created as part of a structure built during the medieval period. Also is there some way I can satisify these guidelines by perhaps photographing a mural from a faraway distance so that the majority of my image is features other objects?--Set in Stone Project (talk) 10:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Take your time. This DR will stay open for at least 1 week.--Túrelio (talk) 10:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- If the Greyfriars Cloister tiles qualify as "works of artistic craftsmanship", which I assume, the images of them are fine — no need to be rescued, ;-) . --Túrelio (talk) 10:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I assume that mosaics come under works of artistic craftmanship ? Set in Stone Project (talk) 12:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:58, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid depiction of a hydroxide which has no educational value; not used, we have File:CsOH.png which is a 3D depiction of a crystal structure. Wostr (talk) 09:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tuoitrenews (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
- File:Lê Đình Thương.png
- File:Lương Đình Lành.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Đức.png
- File:Đỗ Văn Thiện.png
- File:Hồ Văn Đức.png
- File:Nguyễn Doãn Anh.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Hiền.png
- File:Nguyễn Hải Hưng.png
- File:Trịnh Văn Quyết (QĐ).png
- File:Trần Quốc Tỏ.png
- File:Nguyễn Minh Chính.png
- File:Lê Tấn Tới.png
- File:Trần Thanh Nghiêm.png
- File:Phạm Thanh Ngân.png
- File:Phan Văn Giang.png
- File:Nguyễn Thế Trị.png
- File:Ma Thanh Toàn.png
- File:Lê Quang Xuân.png
- File:Huỳnh Chiến Thắng.png
- File:Đỗ Minh Xương.png
- File:Nguyễn Tuấn Anh.png
- File:Nguyễn Đăng Khải.png
- File:Trần Thanh Nghiêm (HQ).png
- File:Lâm Quang Đại.png
- File:Phạm Hồng Hương.png
- File:Phạm Trường Sơn.png
- File:Lê Quang Đạo (CSB).png
- File:Phương Minh Hòa.png
- File:Lê Xuân Đức.png
- File:Nguyễn Đình Hùng.png
- File:Phan Tuấn Hùng.png
- File:Vũ Hồng Sơn (KQ).png
- File:Nguyễn Quốc Duyệt.png
- File:Bùi Quốc Oai.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Hiền (KQ).png
- File:Hoàng Xuân Chiến.png
- File:Lê Đức Thái.png
- File:Nguyễn Trọng Bình 2022.png
- File:Hoàng Hữu Chiến.png
- File:Đinh Văn Nơi.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Long.png
- File:Vũ Đỗ Anh Dũng.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Trung.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Viện.png
- File:Hồ Văn Thái.png
- File:Lê Hoài Thanh.png
- File:Lê Hải Anh.png
- File:Lê Mạnh.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Được.png
- File:Tướng Tô Ân Xô.png
- File:Lê Quang Minh.png
- File:Nguyễn Tân Cương.png
- File:Nguyễn Trường Thắng.png
- File:Hà Thọ Bình.png
- File:Nguyễn Hồng Thái.png
- File:Nguyễn Như Hoạt.png
- File:Tướng Trần Việt Khoa.png
- File:Võ Tiến Trung.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Thành.png
- File:Nguyễn Minh Đức.png
- File:Đỗ Quang Thành.png
- File:Mai Quang Phấn.png
- File:Dương Đức Hòa.png
- File:Lê Hữu Đức.png
- File:Lê Văn Tuyến.png
- File:Võ Trọng Việt.png
- File:Trần Hồng Minh.png
- File:Nguyễn Quang Ngọc.png
- File:Trần Đơn.png
- File:Nguyễn Phương Nam.png
- File:Be Xuan Truong.png
- File:Nguyễn Văn Gấu.png
- File:Tổng tham mưu trưởng Quân đội nhân dân Việt Nam.png
- File:Tổng tham mưu trưởng Quân đội nhân dân Việt Nam (1945 – 2023).png
- File:Phạm Hoài Nam.png
- File:Nguyen Hai Trung.png
- File:Lê Hồng Nam.png
- File:Trương Quang Khánh.png
- File:Trần Việt Khoa.png
- File:Võ Minh Lương.png
- File:Đại tướng Phan Văn Giang.png
- File:Nguyen Hoa Binh.png
- File:Lê Đức Anh.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Questionable own work claim (low size and quality, no EXIF).
HeminKurdistan (talk) 10:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Missing permission. — Racconish 💬 10:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Название не адекватно Дендроархивариус (talk) 10:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, file is already renamed. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Low quality diagram, not used, we have File:Disodium hydrogen phosphate.png as a proper replacement. Wostr (talk) 11:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The Na/O bonds are more correctly represented as ionic rather than implying covalent. DMacks (talk) 11:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, also, the title is wrong (it should be Na2HPO4, not NaHPO4, as phosphoric acid has 3 hydrogens). Alfa-ketosav (talk) 10:27, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-quality file with unfavorable depiction of the actual ionic parts & wrong file name. Also remember to delete the file redirect File:Screen Shot 2561-02-08 at 18.13.51.png. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
http://www.hutter1.net/official/index.htm UltimoGrimm (talk) 11:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I took the photo myself of myself. This is my homepage. I own all right of my homepage and the uploaded photo. Please cancel deletion request. Marcus Hutter (talk) 23:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Keep per Marcus. --Achim55 (talk) 06:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)- Keep per the above - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:11, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per above. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
The description is: " ARDUINO® and other Arduino brands and logos are Trademarks of Arduino AG. All Arduino AG Trademarks cannot be used without owner’s formal permission." Isn't that in conflict with the license? If this is a case of "simple logo", shouldn't that be mentioned? Kitayama (talk) 12:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- This is the official Arduino logo and it can be used for descriptive purposes, precisely as it is on Wikipedia. The Arduino(TM) logo that is often seen is unauthorised. ArduinoTM (talk) 12:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep per COM:INUSE and COM:TOO Italy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: and updated licensing. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake map world history 202.56.3.135 12:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep In use in many projects. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep First of all, you aren't even using a real name. Secondly, you're making a claim without sources. The image is sourced. Third, you definitely have a Nationalist bias which questions the validity of your claim. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 19:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
No accurate Zhu Zi Ling (talk) 22:13, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep and speedy close. No reason for deletion given. File is in use. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:30, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Comment @Zhu Zi Ling: ¿Did you at least bother to read the sources given on the description of the map? --Milenioscuro (talk) 16:18, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:56, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
Fake map world history Cambodia never under colony Thailand of Cambodia national document. 202.56.3.135 12:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
This map fake world history different international historian according from Société Asiatique (1871) Journal asiatique ou recueil de mémoires, d'extraits et de notices relatifs à l'histoire, à la philosophie, aux sciences, à la littérature et aux langues des peuples orientaux, Volume 99, Publisher: Dondey-Dupré, Original from National Library of the Netherlands 202.56.3.135 12:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE; also read COM:NPOV. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake map world history. 45.119.135.50 05:49, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Obviously vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake map world history 202.56.3.135 12:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
File has wrong licence, on Flickr it's licenced as "All rights reserved".Michalg95 (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Michalg95: Keep as licensed when uploaded "01:04, 20 May 2014 (UTC)" and reviewed that same day, within the period April 8, 2014 at 3:38:01 PM EDT to March 9, 2016 at 3:26:23 PM EST. The license history on Flickr is as follows, with a bit of formatting. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 03:01, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
"Date: April 8, 2014 at 3:38:01 PM EDT
Old License: All rights reserved
New License: Attribution (CC BY 2.0)
Date: March 9, 2016 at 3:26:23 PM EST
Old License: Attribution (CC BY 2.0)
New License: All rights reserved"
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Low quality diagram, weird position of bonds (dashed one seems to be in front of the plane, while it should be behind the plane). We have few alternatives in Category:Bromomethane. Wostr (talk) 13:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The file is unused and we have much better versions in Category:Bromomethane. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 06:57, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gpereira99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:NOTHOST/COM:SCOPE - fake map alternative history nonsense untethered to any source or realistic educational use.
- File:Carter v Mondale (1980).jpg
- File:Rockefeller v Mcgovern (76).jpg
- File:Rockefeller v Humphrey (1972).jpg
- File:LBJ vs Rockefeller (1968).jpg
- File:Kennedy v Goldwater (1964).jpg
- File:Kennedy v Strassen (1960).jpg
- File:Nixon v Stevenson II (1956).jpg
- File:Nixon v Kefauver (1952).jpg
- File:Dewey v Stevenson v Thurmond (1948).jpg
- File:Long v Willkie v Thurmond (1944).jpg
- File:Long v Willkie (1940).jpg
- File:Carter v Dukakis 1984 Alt.jpg
- File:US 1988 Election Brown v Bush alternate.jpg
- File:1996 alt election usa al gore v buchanan.jpg
- File:2000 alt elections us gore v perot.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Эlcobbola talk 17:02, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- File:1992 Alt Election.jpg
- File:1996 alt election usa al gore v buchanan.jpg
- File:2000 alt elections us gore v perot.jpg
- File:2004 alt elections Gates v Kerrey.jpg
- File:2008 alt elections usa.jpg
- File:Us Alternate Elections 1992 Brown v Quayle.jpg
--Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete At best no encyclopedic value, but most likely an attempt to rewrite history. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 19:01, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gpereira99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]fake data, misleading diagrams
- File:US National Congress 1876.2.svg
- File:US National Congress 1876.svg
- File:US National Parliament 1872.svg
- File:US National Congress 1868.svg
- File:United States National Congress 1892.svg
- File:United States National Congress 1890.svg
- File:United States National Congress 1885.svg
- File:United States National Congress 1880.svg
Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by إبراهيم المريسي (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 18:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by احمد مهدي شلال (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikimedian: out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 18:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hassan Rouhani in 2017
[edit]Tasnim sure is freely-licensed, but these are obtained from president.ir and Tasnim does not hold the copyright.
- File:President Rouhani driving an electronic car 01.jpg
- File:President Rouhani driving an electronic car 02.jpg
- File:President Rouhani driving an electronic car 03.jpg
- File:President Rouhani driving an electronic car 04.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF; article on this subject already exists at es:Crisipo de Solos. Omphalographer (talk) 23:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany German stamps are copyrighted until at least 70 years after the death of the designer. It looks like one of the designers of these stamps is still alive and I couldn't find any information about the other. So these images should be deleted until an undetermined date.
- File:Bm-michel-berlin852.jpg
- File:DPAG 2007 2597 Post, Briefkasten.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1441 Arp-Schnitger-Orgel.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 923 Jugendstil.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 924 Jugendstil.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 925 Jugendstil.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 941 Wilhelm Emmanuel von Ketteler.jpg
- File:DBP 1977 Block 14 Jugendstil.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1018 Hildegard von Bingen.jpg
- File:DBP 1979 1032 Weihnachten.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1054 Losungen der Brüdergemeine.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1064 Vollendung des Kölner Doms.jpg
- File:DBP 1980 1067 Albrecht Altdorfer Landschaft mit den zwei Fichten.jpg
- File:DBP 1982 1149 Franz von Assisi.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1167 Schwäbisch-alemannische Fastnacht.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1192 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP 1983 1196 Weihnachten.jpg
- File:DBP 1984 1233 Weihnachten.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1240 Markt- und Münzrecht Verden.jpg
- File:DBP 1985 1263 Fritz Reuter.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1295 Wohlfahrt Zierflasche.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1296 Wohlfahrt Flügelglas.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1297 Wohlfahrt Reichsadlerhumpen.jpg
- File:DBP 1986 1298 Wohlfahrt Pokal.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1306 750 Jahre Berlin.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1319 Deutscher Sängerbund.jpg
- File:DBP 1987 1330 Europa-Schützenfest Lippstadt.jpg
- File:DBP 1988 1388 Tag der Briefmarke.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1402 2000 Jahre Bonn.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1402-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1989 1437 Wohlfahrt Postreiter.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1437-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1989 1438 Wohlfahrt Fußpost.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1438-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1989 1439 Wohlfahrt Postbus.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1439-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1990 1474 Motorpostwagen.jpg
- File:DBP 1990 1475 Vermittlungsstelle.jpg
- File:DBP 1990 1476 Paketpost.jpg
- File:DBP 1991 1491-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1611-R.JPG
- File:DBP 1992 1626-R.JPG
- File:DPAG 2004 2393 Weißstorch Prinzesschen.jpg
- File:DPAG 2007 2596 Post, Absender.jpg
- File:DPAG 2007 2620 Post, Postbote.jpg
- File:DPAG 2007 2621 Post, Empfänger.jpg
- File:DPAG-1997-Kartoffelanbau.jpg
- File:DBP 1989 1441-R.JPG
- File:Schnitger Briefmarke.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1995 MiNr1812 Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedächtniskirche.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1996 Briefmarke Akademie der Künste.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1998 MiNr1999 Hopfenanbau.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2084 Weihnachten I.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 1999 MiNr2085 Weihnachten II.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2098 Johannes Gutenberg.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2106 Post.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2111 Greifswald.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2116 Naturschutz.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2000 MiNr2137 Bundesgerichtshof.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2001 MiNr2169 Martin Bucer.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2232 Bautzen.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2235 Toleranz.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2002 MiNr2271 Deutsche Welthungerhilfe.jpg
- File:Stamp Germany 2003 MiNr2346 Deutscher Musikrat.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1979, MiNr 613.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1983, MiNr 707.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1984, MiNr 729.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1987, MiNr 772.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1987, MiNr 773.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1987, MiNr 774.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1987, MiNr 776.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1987, MiNr Block 8.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1989, MiNr 852.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1989, MiNr 853.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1989, MiNr 854.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1990, MiNr 876.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1990, MiNr 877.jpg
- File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1990, MiNr 878.jpg
_1979,_MiNr_613.jpg){kind=link}
_1983,_MiNr_707.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1984,_MiNr_729.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_772.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_773.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_774.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_776.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1987,_MiNr_Block_8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_852.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_853.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1989,_MiNr_854.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_876.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_877.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1990,_MiNr_878.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 07:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- File:DBP 1979 1032 Weihnachten.jpg and File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1979, MiNr 613.jpg have been taken from initials of medieval Cistercian illuminated manuscripts of Altenberg Abbey. The adaptions for these stamps appear to be below the threshold of originality. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- That's fine. I didn't want to just assume they were close enough to the originals to not be considered new works, since it's possible the stamps are different enough from the artwork in the manuscripts to retain their own copyright, but I'll take your word that's not the case. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I've found the original of File:Stamps of Germany (Berlin) 1979, MiNr 613.jpg in the Abbey Altenberg manuscript MS-D-34 - Antiphonale (pars hiemalis) at p. 88, created c. 1550 (now in the library of Heinrich-Heine Universität, Düsseldorf). --AFBorchert (talk) 11:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Cool. Thanks for finding it. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- And likewise the original of File:DBP 1979 1032 Weihnachten.jpg can be found in the Abbey Altenberg manuscript MS-D-35 - Graduale (pars hiemalis) at 16r, created 1545 (now likewise in the library of Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Düsseldorf). --AFBorchert (talk) 11:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Cool. Thanks for finding it. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:08, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept those rescued by AFBorchert. --Materialscientist (talk) 01:18, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Same as her deezer et al pic -https://www.deezer.com/en/album/358506477 - which was uploaded before this. Its probably from this video https://www.instagram.com/p/CM7fce8lR3P/?hl=en - PCP Gbawden (talk) 11:12, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Same as his linkedin profile - https://www.linkedin.com/in/adam-eid-ramsey-md-48513b175?trk=public_post_feed-actor-image - PCP Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source (not found on stated website), date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Likely not own work: taken from WhatsApp as per filename. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
No reason for claimed free license. (Uploader has uploaded multiple false license claims in past.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
No reason for claimed free license Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
No reason for claimed free license. Not PD-Mexico, as artist died 1969. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Author de:Fritz Koch-Gotha died in 1956 so this 1912 work is not public domain in Germany yet. No issues with URAA so this can be restored in 2027. Abzeronow (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
False license; relevant TOO uncertain Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Unsupported license claim; looks well over TOO Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Invalid license CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Meme image CzarJobKhaya (talk) 01:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation. I mistakenly uploaded this file a couple of years ago as "public domain from 1900 with unknown authorship", but the photo was actually taken in 1970 by A. J. Martin (died 1998). Werter1995 (talk) 06:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:21, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/198937628@N03
[edit]Flickrwashing, account has 0 followers etc and only 4 photos, 1 of which was already deleted from commons
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:22, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.173.183.228 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file lacks metadata to make sure it's own work (like information added by the digital camera)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep (this and the others) Missing exif might be a hint for a copyright, but is in itself not a reason for deletion. Some people also remove the exif for personality right reasons. PaterMcFly (talk) 14:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence that this isn't own work. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.173.183.228 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file lacks metadata to make sure it's own work (like information added by the digital camera)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence that this isn't own work. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.173.183.228 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file lacks metadata to make sure it's own work (like information added by the digital camera)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence that this isn't own work. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 179.4.240.95 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file does not have metadata to make sure it's own work (like information added by the digital camera)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence that this isn't own work. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.173.183.228 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file lacks metadata to make sure it's own work (like information added by the digital camera)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:23, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.173.183.228 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file lacks metadata to make sure it's own work (like information added by the digital camera)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 186.173.183.228 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: The file lacks metadata to make sure it's own work (like information added by the digital camera)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no evidence that this isn't own work. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
fake map world history 27.109.114.117 07:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. Also read COM:NPOV. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- 1889 date for mappublished by F. Appel, Parrot et Cie., mistyped date Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 08:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- If you are citing Political map of Indochina, published by F. Appel, Parrot et Cie., then in this case you are incorrect. The map Political map of Indochina, published by F. Appel, Parrot et Cie. depicts Indochina in 1886, this map is depicting 1780, with research being done by Tim Piltron extensively. To claim that this is a fake history map, I would think that you misunderstood the dating. Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 08:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- We don't delete files in use from Commons because of disputes or inaccuracies, period. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake map world history, check Political map of Indochina, published by F. Appel, Parrot et Cie. 27.109.114.117 07:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- If you are citing Political map of Indochina, published by F. Appel, Parrot et Cie., then in this case you are incorrect. The map Political map of Indochina, published by F. Appel, Parrot et Cie. depicts Indochina in 1886, this map is depicting 1780, with research being done by Tim Piltron extensively. To claim that this is a fake history map, I would think that you misunderstood the dating. Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 08:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- 1889 date for mappublished by F. Appel, Parrot et Cie., mistyped date Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 08:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:24, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Fake map world history. 27.109.114.117 07:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This map fake and different acording by international historians Thomas Jefferys 27.109.114.117 07:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Small and pixelated (some bonds don't even meet clearly), have a bunch of nice alts in Category:Monoethanolamine. DMacks (talk) 07:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Small, pixelated & with opaque (white) background. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 08:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Probably taken from https://www.facebook.com/N24MuhammadSanusiMdNor/posts/senyum-alhamdulillah-ramai-sungguh-yang-hadir-yang-tonton-live-pun-ramai-panaih-/1783975865319701/, also stated in https://m.malaysiakini.com/news/660215. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 08:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file belongs to The Beatles Revival Band Frankurt GbR, and has not been uploaded by any of the rights owners. Copyrights belong to Claus Fischer webmaster@claus-fischer.de 91.97.232.223 10:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
I have serious doubts that it is his own work UltimoGrimm (talk) 11:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stevecooliofan2017 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious logos of questionable notability.
- File:Neo versa party of jammrock.png
- File:Nazi party of jammrock.jpg
- File:Liberal party of jammrock.jpg
- File:Conservative party of jammrock.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stevecooliofan2017 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Collection of personal photos and drawings. Not in use.
- File:LA Girls cover art.png
- File:June 2021 club calamity electoral map.png
- File:Club Calamity October 2020 1st week election.png
- File:Titanic's Stern section (1912).png
- File:Titanic wreck in 1912 (Animation).png
- File:Titanic sinking animation by Steve Coolio.png
- File:Robert Stephen Allen-Lott.jpg
- File:Steve killz.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Smooth O (talk) 12:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
- No other global contributions, unless you count their user pages. Speaking of these, the current revision of their Commons user page sounds like a threat; is this acceptable? Brianjd (talk) 14:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:29, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Stevecooliofan2017 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Appear to be trying to promote someone
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 11:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:27, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
as stated by the uploader: "ALL RIGHT RESERVED(c)" LeFnake (talk) 12:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Speedy delete This is blatant copyright violation. 185.172.241.184 10:33, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright (https://www.aftenposten.no/sport/i/Kzar8G/nora-moerk-flytter-utenlands-igjen-blir-esbjerg-spiller-fra-neste-sesong) LeFnake (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
copyright (https://www.ba.no/hva-med-fremtiden-for-asane-arena/o/5-8-1901103) LeFnake (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Esmeralda Avila Paz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Zafer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photo, from photo
Converting to a DR for discussion. Turkish photograph created after 1952 and no indication that the original photograph is freely licensed. Abzeronow (talk) 15:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot of a 1982 video game, uploader is not making any clear or implied claim to be the game's developer or copyright holder. Belbury (talk) 15:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
![15:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/08/23#c-Belbury-20230823153600-File:Labyrinth_for_Sword_of_Fargoal_"Sword_Level".png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
![05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/08/23#c-The_Squirrel_Conspiracy-20230830053200-File:Labyrinth_for_Sword_of_Fargoal_"Sword_Level".png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Composer&singer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:29, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Polarlys as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no free license at source: https://onb.wg.picturemaxx.com/?16756386081222671803
1939 photograph. Should be discussed. Abzeronow (talk) 18:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The providing institution has a restrictive licence and in the absence of further information it is not possible to say whether this file is in the public domain, which is unlikely. --Polarlys (talk) 06:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Image is from South Wales Police (per https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-66419302), whose copyright statement at https://www.south-wales.police.uk/hyg/terms-conditions/ does not allow free use. Raised per this discussion about UK police mugshots not being automatically OGL2 or Crown Copyright. Belbury (talk) 18:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete it. FireDragonValo (talk) 18:33, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
False license claim; relevant TOO uncertain -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Quite simple, but hard to judge per COM:TOO France. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:35, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
False license claim; seems over Commons:Threshold_of_originality#United_Kingdom Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Most definitely. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
False license claim contrary to source site; seems over TOO Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:TOO France. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Para editar Wikipedia, consulte es:Ayuda:Cómo se edita una página. Omphalographer (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. Copy of deleted Spanish Wikipedia article w:es:BIOGRÁFIA DE RODDY HITLER MATA MOREIRA. Outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 19:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:38, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused screenshot with vague, nonsensical description. Omphalographer (talk) 23:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused placeholder graphic. Omphalographer (talk) 23:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Minecruft. (An unused Minecraft avatar graphic.) Omphalographer (talk) 23:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused, low-quality photograph of someone's diploma. Omphalographer (talk) 23:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Si digo que mi propio trabajo, sería mentira, ya que dice © 2023. 191.126.135.129 23:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Republishing an historic image does not transfer the copyright, or restart the copyright clock. The boilerplate copyright notice covers the novel text, not republished images --RAN (talk) 00:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 05:36, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Yo hice esta foto, antes que el muriera... 191.126.135.129 23:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, several reverse image search hites going back to 2014. --Rosenzweig τ 07:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Mi trabajo screenshot 191.126.135.129 23:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PCP, given that the user's other uploads were copyvios. --Rosenzweig τ 07:11, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Yo saqué está foto en 1980, cuando estudiaba en Reino Unido. 191.126.135.129 23:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Images appears to be from a football trading card, and appears at https://vintagefootball.cards/rip_notices/rip_1990.html (see entry for "Bosco Jankovic" on the rathger lengthy page). Kathleen's bike (talk) 10:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 07:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: plain text PDF content. Omphalographer (talk) 23:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 06:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Twitter o X 191.126.135.129 23:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, someone else's phot grabbed from Twitter. --Rosenzweig τ 07:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- 2023 - 1950 = 73. So indeed it is older than 70 years. But probably still not ok, due to URAA. PaterMcFly (talk) 10:59, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: This is said to be a 1950 aerial photograph by the company La société LAPIE, but per [1], that company did not start aerial photography until 1955. So the 1950 date is wrong. That company's photographs seem to be in the French National Archives now, but while they write Reproduction autorisée, selon les modalités en vigueur aux Archives nationales, that does not sound like a free license acceptable for Wikimedia Commons. So a French photograph from 1955 or later is presumably still copyrighted in both France and the US. The company seems to have employed multiple photographers, which presumably died not die right after taking the photo. So the earliest year this file could be restored, with {{PD-old-assumed}}, is 2076. --Rosenzweig τ 07:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 14:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:30, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
CONTIENE INFORMACION PERSONAL RELEVANTE 190.152.157.117 15:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 07:32, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Philine Hofmann M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, grabbed from Facebook. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
possible copyvio (c) Philine Hofmann M2k~dewiki (talk) 20:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, grabbed from Facebook. --Rosenzweig τ 07:25, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
a too "posed" photo, clearly not an "own" work; cf. Google Lens — danyele 00:39, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work, the uploader declared the source as unknown (sconosciuta) and himself as the author of the uploading (caricamento) only. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:59, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Liceo Cervantes
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as blatant evidence for copyvio is missing. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. Small size, no EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 08:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Probably taken from https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10160927761367904. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 08:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
I just realized that Google Lens does not accept images directly from Facebook Photos. I looked back into the link I have provided in Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dr_Akmal.jpg and found a TikTok account there. I found a specific series of videos with a similar background image:[2][3]. Based on the date, I searched Akmal Saleh's Facebook profile Photos and found this image. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 12:30, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:01, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Universidad Central
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. No EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:02, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Universidad Central
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:56, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. No EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Universidad Central
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. No EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Universidad Central
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:58, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. Small size, no EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Universidad Central
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. Small size, no EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
possible copy vio, copyright holder (Arredoluce Archives Milano/FragileMilano) is not identic to the person how made the upload Alabasterstein (talk) 09:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no proof that the copyright holder has released the image under this licence. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:08, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Universidad Central
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. Small size, no EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Carlos yo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright Universidad Central
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as there is no blatant evidence for copyvio. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PRP. No EXIF, uploader with a history of copyvios. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:06, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
obvious copy vio, source url is given by uploader Alabasterstein (talk) 09:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: non-free source. --BrightRaven (talk) 11:09, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Copyright violation MJXVI (talk) 13:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Vraisemblablement sous droit d'auteur Kirham (talk) 13:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Photo qui semble non libre. Présent sur https://www.dupuis.com/auteurbd/arthur-de-pins/1286 DocMuséo 13:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from goodreads.com without clear information, author, date and location of publication is unknown. PD-Iran questionable. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:38, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Not own works: low-res/web-size images with FB and transmission code in EXIF data.
- File:Jimmer Ariate Photos.jpg
- File:MagbuwagTaKayPresscon.jpg
- File:Davao Eagle Online Team.jpg
- File:Jimmer Ariate.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:33, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Senecionine chemicalstructure1.png that has more distinct hashed bond to the H. DMacks (talk) 18:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The newer version clearly has a better depiction of the hashed bond. Therefore, this file is no longer needed. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:38, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
self promotion —Ismael Olea (talk) 19:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:34, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
This is a video by Project Meshkat <https://zil.ink/projectmeshkat> republished by Tasnim. I don't believe Project Meshkat is freely licensed. Streamline8988 (talk) 21:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:14, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:35, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Versao final do personagem 191.126.135.129 22:26, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Carregamento 191.126.135.129 22:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 18:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Feysbukk 191.126.135.129 22:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 18:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The creator (İbrahim Çallı) died in 1960, therefore his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:36, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The creator (Feyhaman Duran) died in 1970, therefore his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The creator (İbrahim Çallı) died in 1960, therefore his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
The creator (İbrahim Çallı) died in 1960, therefore his paintings are not PD yet. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:38, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 18:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Feysbukk 191.126.135.129 23:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: COPYVIO. --Kadı Message 18:37, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Billinghurst as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not own work https://www.nps.gov/features/yell/slidefile/thermalfeatures/hotspringsterraces/upper/Page-2.htm
Same photograph as File:MorningGloryPool1970.jpg. Lower resolution version in an inferior format to a jpg. Abzeronow (talk) 19:42, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- delete as duplicate and not sourced — billinghurst sDrewth 23:37, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 21:21, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
Violation of COM:TOY. Copyrighted toy model and character design. (Oinkers42) (talk) 19:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
-20230823190900-File:Figurine_Sunny_Starscout_en_rollers_-_My_Little_Pony.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 07:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
Unused personal COM:PENIS picture 78.83.124.250 13:59, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 00:49, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hailcolombia2009 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <La imagen tiene derechos de Autor> Yann (talk) 16:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: even if it works is anonymous, it cannot become PD earlier than in 2031 (and it is quite possible that it was not published immediately which makes this term even more remote). --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:14, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
_2022.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2022.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Symphonium264 as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of project scope Yann (talk) 16:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
_2022.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination: out of scope. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:12, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
_2022.jpg){kind=link}
Punto G? 191.126.135.129 23:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
![23:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/08/23#c-191.126.135.129-20230823232200-File:"not"_G.png){kind=link}
Deleted: Might be notable and currently in use but uploaded by the pictured person himself, so real authorship is not disclosed and the permission form the real author is missing. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
![22:18, 9 September 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2023/08/23#c-Андрей_Романенко-20230909221800-File:"not"_G.png){kind=link}
Files in Category:Oppenheimer (film)
[edit]Unlikely to be “permanently exhibited on publicly accessible roads”.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:44, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- When I photographed the tenement house at 2 Chopina Street in Katowice (Poland) it was not my intention to photograph the movie poster, but the building, because at the same time I created a separate article for it in the Polish-language Wikipedia. This building, due to its location in one of the most crowded places in the city, serves as a large advertising medium (it is very rarely without advertising) and it was completely by chance that the advertisement for the Oppenheimer film was hanging on this building at the time of taking the photo. Fortunately, after four days, another user uploaded a photo of the same tenement house from 2021 without advertising on the building, replacing the ones I took - it was also replaced on the article page. I leave the decision to remove these photos to other users. MacQtosh (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: I understand totally the reasoning of the uploader but we cannot keep it as the picture of the building if the building is completely covered with the copyrighted banner. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 22:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
Uncertain if copyright permission was obtained; refer to reflective@reflectivedesire.com and source website’s Terms of Use section 8.2c Apollo489 (talk) 00:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Reflectivedesire.com files uploaded by Alex444111 and 444112
[edit]- File:Girl-in-total-enclosure-latex.jpg
- File:Heavy-rubber-layered-hood.jpg
- File:Woman-funnel-gag.jpg
- File:Woman-in-blue-latex-catsuit-and-rope-bondage.jpg
- File:Woman-in-blue-transparent-latex-catsuit-and-rope-bondage.xl.jpg
- File:Woman-in-inflated-catsuit.jpg
- File:Women-in-latex-suits-with-gas-masks.jpg
Reasons for deletion request: Unproven copyright permissions (no proof of public domain releases from the source website; possible violations of its Terms of Use section 8.2c) --Apollo489 (talk) 01:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:20, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
As per the discussion, logo is not within the scope of {{PD-PRC-exempt}}. Larryasou (talk) 13:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown Watermark visible HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Instagram, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Instagram, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Instagram, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Instagram, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Instagram, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
Low res web quality photo, does not appear to be original work. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, confirmed by reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Taichi as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: TOO uncertain; claimed license certainly false. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
COM:TOO Iran HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Image taken from Facebook, no proof of publication in Iran +30 years ago HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Photo: courtesy of The Third Line, Dubai [4] Noo proof that PD-Iran applies HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:19, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Author and date of publication unknown, PD-Iran not questionable HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Credit: Austin History Center [5] Photo taken outside Iran, publication and PD-Iran claim questionable HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:22, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lucas da Feira
[edit]All files seem to be fictional and fantastical representations of Lucas da Feira, without any notoriety not educational value, thus falling outside the scope of Commons. Additionally, the ones marked Crispiano/Cipriano Ruy Barbosa may be copyvios, though I couldn't find anyone using that name.
- File:Lucas da Feira cangaceiro, pintura.jpg
- File:Lucas da Feira, cangaceiro, por Cipriano Ruy Barbosa 1940.jpg
- File:Lucas da Feira, cangaceiro.jpg
- File:Lucas da Feira.jpg
Darwin Ahoy! 20:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:20, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.bagimsizlikyolu.org/ PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann: The text part, yes, most probably it meets our criteria. However, the stylized interpretation of the star leaves me wondering if it's really ok for the file to remain here on Commons. What I mean is that if it was a normal star then most probably we would be ok with that, but in this case it looks slightly different, so maybe there's some part of original artistic creation in it. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:47, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- It depends on the country of origin. Yann (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Yann: In this specific case I guess we're in sort of a grey zone due to the particular status of that area. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 20:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- It depends on the country of origin. Yann (talk) 20:49, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: As I said to Yann as well, can we really consider this in accordance with Turkish law or local law? Due to the particular status of the area, it looks like we're in sort of a grey zone, meaning that it's not clear whether local (Turkish Cypriot) law prevails or that of its protector (Turkish law). 😕🤷♂️ 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 06:50, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I made an incorrect assumption based on the use of the Turkish language. If this is a Turkish Cypriot company, headquartered in Cyprus, we need to apply Turkish Cypriot law. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Yes, we're talking about a Turkish Cypriot political party to be more precise. 🏺ⲈⲨⲐⲨⲘⲈⲚⲎⲊ🏛️ ⲱⲑⲏⲥⲁⲧⲉ 09:20, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:36, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I made an incorrect assumption based on the use of the Turkish language. If this is a Turkish Cypriot company, headquartered in Cyprus, we need to apply Turkish Cypriot law. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Εὐθυμένης as no source (No source since) Sicherlich talk 04:40, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Weils so witzig ist habe ich den SLA mal umgewandelt. Das Bild ist gemeinfrei nach polnischem Recht. So stehts auch in der Lizenz. Ansonsten ist die Quelle schlicht die Gemeindesatzung bzw. deren Website. Das kann man leicht rausfinden wenn man auch nur eine Sekunde darüber nachdenkt. ...Sicherlich talk 04:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Sicherlich: . Did you create the JPG file? If yes, in my opinion, you should just add
{{Own}}in the source parameter to solve the problem. BrightRaven (talk) 10:53, 30 August 2023 (UTC)- No, I didn't. See file description. Doesn't matter anyways as it is PD by law. ...Sicherlich talk 10:56, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Sicherlich: . Did you create the JPG file? If yes, in my opinion, you should just add
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 21:11, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
_k_13.jpg){kind=link}
_k_13.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File name is needed for renaming another wrongly numbered file name Jenne1504 (talk) 07:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
_k_13.jpg){kind=link}
- Hallo Jenne,
- das File kenne ich nicht, ist auch nicht von mir eingestellt worden.
- Es entspricht auch nicht den Namenskonventionen für die Gartenlaube, es müsste ein b_Seite lauten. Siehe doch mal hier https://de.wikisource.org/wiki/Die_Gartenlaube_(1891)#Bilder . Es scheinen hier alle Bilder des Bandes vorhanden zu sein.
- Kannst du mir etwas zur Verwendung der beiden Bilder mit _k sagen?
- Hallo @Joergens.mi: – Es handelt sich um die Kunstbeilagen, die aber um eine Nummer falsch nummeriert hochgeladen wurden. Daher müssten die teilweise eben umbenannt werden und die Ursprungsdatei gelöscht werden, damit das jeweils nächste Bild wieder neu benannt werden kann. --Jenne1504 (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Danke für die Info, sag mir alle Namen dann verschieb ich die auf den Richtigen. --Jörgens.Mi Talk 16:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hallo @Joergens.mi: – Es handelt sich um die Kunstbeilagen, die aber um eine Nummer falsch nummeriert hochgeladen wurden. Daher müssten die teilweise eben umbenannt werden und die Ursprungsdatei gelöscht werden, damit das jeweils nächste Bild wieder neu benannt werden kann. --Jenne1504 (talk) 11:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)
- Please keep this file at the moment, when clarification about the usage of this and the other file is given, i will take action --Jörgens.Mi Talk 15:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Looks like the renaming was done. —holly {chat} 21:12, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
_k_13.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Chronus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Chronus (talk) 17:20, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as no evidence was provided. Túrelio (talk) 09:29, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Image might be a retouched copy of this image, published 2021 at https://www.acillimeira.com.br/noticias:limeira-e-destaque-em-ranking-nacional-de-cidades-empreendedoras-. --Túrelio (talk) 09:31, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Chronus and Túrelio: It is more likely reduced from from https://noticiadelimeira.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Cidade-de-Limeira.jpg , as displayed by https://noticiadelimeira.com.br/2017/04/29/limeira-fica-em-8a-no-ranking-de-100-melhores-cidades-do-brasil-para-se-viver-segundo-pesquisa/ , which states "Por: Cauê Pixitelli | Publicado em 29 de abril de 2017", published 29 April 2017, or a later post elsewhere. Delete. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 02:26, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, this file is under my ownership. I have forgotten my account password and do not intend to create a new one. However, I want to emphasize that I am the original creator of the mentioned file. Personally, I do not see any issues with maintaining my file here. Nevertheless, I will not interfere with the site administrators' discretion regarding whether the aforementioned file should remain on this platform. This image was initially provided in 2015 for this content: "https://www.limeira.sp.gov.br/sitenovo/downloads/6e9c2857f564c84a24fe4cfeb83c5def.pdf." Furthermore, I personally uploaded it to the following URL: "https://www.ferias.tur.br/fotogr/60954/fotoaereadirecaoaocentrolimeirasppormoacirmagusteiro/limeira/." Given that it is an older file, I do not foresee any issues with its continued presence here. However, as previously mentioned, I leave the final decision to the discretion of the site administrators. Warm regards, Moacir Magusteiro. 2804:1E68:C60B:BBBA:7C2D:9E2E:E188:AF0A 00:28, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- As I noticed from "https://noticiadelimeira.com.br/2017/04/29/limeira-fica-em-8a-no-ranking-de-100-melhores-cidades-do-brasil-para-se-viver-segundo-pesquisa/", Cauê Pixitelli is actually just the writer of the news and he is only using my work. 2804:1E68:C60B:BBBA:7C2D:9E2E:E188:AF0A 00:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Chronus and Túrelio: It is more likely reduced from from https://noticiadelimeira.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Cidade-de-Limeira.jpg , as displayed by https://noticiadelimeira.com.br/2017/04/29/limeira-fica-em-8a-no-ranking-de-100-melhores-cidades-do-brasil-para-se-viver-segundo-pesquisa/ , which states "Por: Cauê Pixitelli | Publicado em 29 de abril de 2017", published 29 April 2017, or a later post elsewhere.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (AGF). —holly {chat} 21:41, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
superior, cropped version exists (File:מאיר קלינטון.jpg) Poliocretes (talk) 15:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 21:43, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 19:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; PD in France in 2025, but not until 2050 in the US. —holly {chat} 22:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans JuliusMassius (talk) 19:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- You recently changed the date tp 1958, where did the date come from? --RAN (talk) 04:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; undelete in 2054. —holly {chat} 22:04, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Is this indeed own work? A much higher resolution can be seen at the start of this video. Copyright? With TinEye you can find this image, which is an uncropped version. Wouter (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 22:06, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Il y a un doublon. 2A02:A03F:C714:A300:74F2:4462:392E:3E85 20:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted the duplicate File:2006 - ' La Collégiale Saint-Ursmer à Lobbes' - Marie-Claire Lefébure.JPG instead because this one is older. —holly {chat} 22:08, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wikishovel as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: non-free image copied from https://www.reviews.io/company-reviews/store/crossnet Yann (talk) 20:43, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Oddly, the image has been removed from that page, but the source in any case appears to be https://www.crossnetgame.com/. Wikishovel (talk) 20:57, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- There is a PD-textlogo template. Let's see what others think about this. Yann (talk) 21:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- This is American, right? If so, it's below COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Uploader has commented at File talk:Crossnet.png FYI. Jonteemil (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I have permission from the Founders of the company to use Logo BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 23:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- @BeFriendlyGoodSir: Then please ask them to send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 17:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I have permission from the Founders of the company to use Logo BeFriendlyGoodSir (talk) 23:58, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
- Uploader has commented at File talk:Crossnet.png FYI. Jonteemil (talk) 22:24, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: because it's a duplicate of File:Crossnet Organization logo.png, which is easily below TOO US. —holly {chat} 23:21, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Claimed license not supported by source site. Looks to be over TOO. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Under COM:TOO US? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think not, which is why I nominated it (along with the source site not stating free license). There are multiple artistic elements that are neither simple text nor geometric designs - the racquet and ball might arguably be borderline, but figure of the woman swinging a tennis racquet with her other arm outstretched looks to be clearly copyrightable art to me. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:47, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:32, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Dubious license claim; TOO for Tunisia unclear Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:34, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
Fake world History 202.56.3.135 23:25, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- this map is depicting 1805, with research being done by Tim Piltron extensively. To claim that this is a fake history map, I would think that you would be mistaken. Nicolaus Alden Ashvashchandr (talk) 15:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 23:37, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doublon. JuliusMassius (talk) 19:20, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @JuliusMassius: What is the duplicate file? —holly {chat} 22:03, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 17:44, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Il file va rimosso perchè viola il copyright 87.19.208.111 15:53, 23 August 2023 (UTC) la foto fa parte di un archivio tutelato dai beni culturali e rientra nelle «opere dell'ingegno di carattere creativo», sul sito Formiche dove è stata pubblicata è ben visibile la dicitura "Umberto Pizzi - riproduzione riservata"
Deleted: This is a 1978 photo, so although it may be PD in Italy, it's still protected in the US until 2074 thanks to the URAA. —holly {chat} 18:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
The source (which is not available anymore) does not contain any information about the author, data or place of publication. PD-Iran questionable. HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Tineye find no author attributed, Iran is a 30 year jurisdiction. --RAN (talk) 18:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- RAN. We know that it was created more than 30 years ago, but do we have a proof that this photograph was published more than 30 years ago? Iranian law requires publication. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Case law has sided with images being made public when they leave the custody of the photographer. I could see if this image remained as a negative in an archive it would not have been "made public", but it appears to have been found in the wild. --RAN (talk) 01:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- What if this picture was made available to the public, say for example, in 2005? We don't know the date of publication to determine the period which it will be protected. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per RAN.
- Ooligan (talk) 05:53, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
- What if this picture was made available to the public, say for example, in 2005? We don't know the date of publication to determine the period which it will be protected. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: It's reasonable to assume publication of photographs soon after creation. —holly {chat} 19:20, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
These are photos from original photos, i.e. derived works where we have no copyright status of the original photos.
AFBorchert (talk) 18:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment They're all either stills or promotional photos from German silent films released in 1927, Halloh – Caesar! and Üb' immer Treu und Redlichkeit. Both were directed by Reinhold Schünzel who died in 1954, but I'm not sure if it's the release date or Schünzel's (or someone else's) death date that matters here. —Tcr25 (talk) 18:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Tcr25: Thanks for the links. According to § 65 UrhG Abs. 2 the copyright of a film rests with the director, the authors of the script and the dialogs, and the composer of the music, if any. However, in case of a still we can focus on the director which is Reinhold Schünzel. Hence, this will be in the public domain in 2025. The file descriptions should be fixed accordingly. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep If it is a publicity photo and not a frame from the movie, then the photographer=Anonymous. --RAN (talk) 23:45, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- No, then the photographer would be unknown. {{PD-EU-anonymous}} requires research and this research needs to be documented. However, according to the captions by the uploader in the associated Wikipedia article, these images appear to be stills. --AFBorchert (talk) 23:51, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- It was not a screen capture of the film, we can see an embossed icon on the print. I am not-sure the uploader can distinguish that it is a still, rather than a publicity shot. Studios had photographers to capture publicity images, created during filming, to distribute to newspapers. They used photographers so that the original camera negatives were not disturbed. You said: "requires research and this research needs to be documented". I searched through 16 billion images with Tineye. --RAN (talk) 02:15, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Using Tineye does not replace real research. Firstly, for {{PD-EU-anonymous}} you need to provide proof of a publicstion more than 70 years ago, i.e. a bibliographic reference that can be verified. Secondly, you would have to check in these original publications whether the photographer was named or not. Then we can discuss {{PD-EU-anonymous}}. --AFBorchert (talk) 06:11, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Unless someone is going to watch the films and say these specific scenes are not actually film stills, I think it's best to assume they are, in which case they will be PD in a little over a year. —holly {chat} 19:25, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Sind kirchliche Wappen in Frankreich frei verwendbar oder greift hier das Urheberrecht? (Own Work? Copyvio?) GerritR (talk) 19:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Per COM:Coats of arms, user-created heraldry based on the description are perfectly fine to host here. If you can find an exact copy of this online that predates this file being uploaded, I'll be happy to delete. —holly {chat} 19:31, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Iran HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
COM:FOP Iran HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:48, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:32, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Photograph taken from Pinterest, critical information including author and date of publication unknown HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- PD-Iran and PD-USA, Iran only gives 30 years protection from when it was first made public. --RAN (talk) 00:54, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) The uploader has been reckless enough to assume every single old photograph from Iran in the public domain. For example, I have found out that in several instances these files were created by Western sources (like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shah and Shahbanu plahying volleyball.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammad Reza Shah official coornoration photo.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Shah in an official ceremony.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pahlavi royal family at Ramsar.jpg). Do we have an evidence that this file, taken from Pinterest, is not owned by a non-Iranian photographer and was published in Iran more than 30 years ago? I would withdraw my nomination immediately if that is proven. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:39, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- You cannot prove a negative, you can just perform due diligence, like using Tineye and comparing to 16 billion images, to see if someone has made a copyright claim for that image. We tend to use Occam's Razor, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one, until proven otherwise. Prior to exif data storing the date and the gps, and the photographer's name, we relied on contextual clues in image to get a date and location. The LOC is crowdsourcing such a project at Flickr Commons: See: https://www.flickr.com/photos/library_of_congress/52768575793 --RAN (talk) 14:48, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- I think your argument is not in line with the precautionary principle. This file is sourced from Pinterest, has watermark of a Facebook page, literally a case of "it can be found all over the internet". 'SAKO' watermark seems to belong to the original photograph and it is apparently taken in France. [6] HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- "from the personal collection of Princess Soraya, acquired by the consignor from the Succession de Son Altesse Impériale la Princesse Soraya Esfandiary Bakhtiary auction at Beaussant Lefévre in May 2002". [7] HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
- I think your argument is not in line with the precautionary principle. This file is sourced from Pinterest, has watermark of a Facebook page, literally a case of "it can be found all over the internet". 'SAKO' watermark seems to belong to the original photograph and it is apparently taken in France. [6] HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:01, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:33, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Headlock0225 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No Freedom of Panorama in Bulgaria Yann (talk) 20:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 19:38, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: fair-use material is not allowed on Commons PD-textlogo? Yann (talk) 20:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Seems to be more creative than the examples at COM:TOO Italy. —holly {chat} 19:41, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
critical information including author and date of publication unknown, no proof that this is PD-Iran. We know that this person lived in the U.S. after 1979 and he ssems old enough in this picture to assume it was taken outside Iran. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:17, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Up until 1989 in the USA you still had to register for a copyright and display a copyright symbol. No images of Fereydoon Hoveyda appear in the copyright registration database. --RAN (talk) 00:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) What if this image was published after 1989? In 1990, the person depicted (born 1924) was 55 years old, enough to doubt that this picture is in the public domain in the US. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; there's no reason to assume this photo was from the 1970s. Based on his appearance, he could easily have been in his 70s (mid-1990s) when this was taken. —holly {chat} 19:52, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Abzeronow as no license (No license since) Derivative work of public domain image. Yann (talk) 20:28, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Specifically of File:Head Odysseus MAR Sperlonga.jpg which I did not know when it was tagged but it still would require a license from the uploader. Abzeronow (talk) 20:32, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: Uploader added a license, but en:Draft:Dark Religion has been denied a second time, so we want to consider this as out of scope in a few months. —holly {chat} 19:56, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
This photograph was taken in October 1979 in Texas by an unknown photographer [8], available at the Austin History Center, Austin Public Library. Not sure of the copyright status, or if it was ever published. HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:34, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: The source page shows both front and back sides of the photo, so we can see there is no copyright notice. A search of the copyright.gov database only turns up one registration with Reza Pahlavi in the title, which is not this photo, so {{PD-US-1978-89}} can be used. —holly {chat} 19:59, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works, Polarlys (talk) 17:54, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
The person in this picture is deceased and I also have permission to use this image as my own work. This image is not available on the internet if not through Wikimedia Commons.--Abyan Malek (talk) 21:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Abyan Malek: If there is a permission by the author or rights holder of this photograph, it needs to be documented and approved per the COM:VRT procedure. --Rosenzweig τ 07:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I do understand but that’s the thing. The file has not been uploaded anywhere on the internet. The person in the picture is deceased, the copyright holder of this image was his family member and they granted me permission to use this image through social media. How do I prove that? Abyan Malek (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Abyan Malek: You can find instructions at COM:VRT. Thanks for your upload! —holly {chat} 21:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I do understand but that’s the thing. The file has not been uploaded anywhere on the internet. The person in the picture is deceased, the copyright holder of this image was his family member and they granted me permission to use this image through social media. How do I prove that? Abyan Malek (talk) 17:58, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Requires VRT permission. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:34, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/ Farrokh Fakhreddini
[edit]Farrokh Fakhreddini (the photographer) is still alive. I found no clue whether these portraits were published or not. If so, they will be in the public domain 30 years after publication, but this is unknown.
- File:Ahmad Ebadi portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Javad Shahrestani portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Hooshang Seyhoun portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Rashid Behbudov portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Ebrahim Bouzari portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Gholamreza Takhti portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Faramarz Payvar portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Ataollah Khorram portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Ezzat Roubakhsh portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Hossein Dehlavi portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Khosrow Khosrawani portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
- File:Mostafa Kamal Pourtorab portrait by Farrokh Fakhreddini.jpg
HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:36, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Generally we assume images found in the wild have left the custody of the photographer and have been "made public". If the photographer donated his unpublished negatives to an archive, where they remained unseen by the public, I would agree that they are unpublished until proven so. We have several cases of that in the USA. --RAN (talk) 01:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- What if these photographs were first published on the internet in recent years, lets say 2010? Then they will be protected until 2040. I think Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle does not let us simply assume that they are in the public domain. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:22, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
- The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt, the doubt you are applying is just fear, uncertainty and doubt, that can be cast on any image we house at Commons. We need something specific, perhaps a link to an archive that states that the images were never circulated in the wild, and have been stored as negatives since creation at the archive. We have that, for instance, with the Bain Collection. It was donated as glass negatives by the creator to an archive. --RAN (talk) 03:45, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) By referring to en:Fear, uncertainty, and doubt, Are you suggesting that I am using a "manipulative propaganda tactic" (as it is described in the Wikipedia article)? The source for these files (http://farrokhfakhreddini.ir/) was accessible on the internet between 2018 and 2022. Reverse image search shows results for only two of them [9] [10] in 2014 and on the earliest time in 2012 (no results for the rest). This is the evidence of publication we have and that is not being circulated "in the wild" in my opinion. Photographs are not animals left stranded in the wild, the author/copyright owner is the one who decides to publish them or not. Iranian law recognizes publication date as the beginning for the 30-year copyright protection term of photographs. This is simple math, not using a propaganda tactic. If there is any evidence that these photographs were published more than 30 years ago (for example, in some book or media) I will be thrilled to know about it and immediately remove that file from the list above. HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of publication that would make these PD in Iran. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:36, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
old picture Marahmdz (talk) 20:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- And? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:09, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Abzeronow (talk) 21:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Not a clear pic. Unnecessary Photo! DeloarAkram (talk) 22:55, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: if Ferdous has no objection to its deletion, we can do it, but otherwise there's no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 22:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:02, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:03, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:11, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Why is that a problem? JopkeB (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; @JopkeB: it's a problem because neither PD-old-70 or PD-EU-no author disclosure can be applied. —holly {chat} 23:12, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:14, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:16, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 22:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:13, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Auteur décédé moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 23:21, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" --RAN (talk) 14:53, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- If the uploader figured out the author died less than 70 years ago, can RAN explain why he is so sure the name of the photographer was not disclosed when the postcard was published and also not in the 70 years following the publication? Because those are conditions that have to be met before you can use the {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} template! - Robotje (talk) 18:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- TinEye searched over 61.9 billion images. In the time that it took you to write, you could have run the same search. It is impossible to prove a negative, so we rely on due diligence. Instead of just presenting FUD, why don't you look for examples of the French publisher "Édition Petit" actually naming their photographers. That would convince me. We have at Commons over 10,000 postcards from the 1900s to 1940s, almost exclusively the publisher is named, if even that. --RAN (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- I just used TinEye and at the search result page I could read there "0 matches TinEye searched over 61.9 billion images but didn't find any matches for your search image. That's probably because we have yet to crawl any pages where this image appears. ..." Then I looked here at page 11 and there it is. The same postcard that TinEye couldn't find because they still have to crawl there. The uploader stated at the file description "Archives personnelles - Achat." This person indicates to have bought that postcard and than you can easily check both sides of that postcard. Why do you think your guess is better the the research of the uploader? - Robotje (talk) 19:23, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- If only Tineye searched 61,900,000,001 billion images, that last image might have had the information we were looking for. Still no evidence presented that French postcards from the French publisher "Édition Petit" named their photographers. Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle requires "significant doubt", not generalized hypotheticals. Édition Petit was run by Pierre Lanith Petit (1831-1909) and Auguste Petit (1849-1912), both were dead more than 70 years ago, if we assume they took all their own images they published as postcards. --RAN (talk) 19:42, 24 August 2023 (UTC)
- Wow, "61,900,000,001 billion images", more than 61 quintillion images, that would be impressive. OK, but now seriously. About the 10,000 plus postcards on Commons from 1900-1949, those include postcards like this one from 1937 where you can see the front and backside without a name of the author. Sure the {{PD-US-expired}} looks correct. Or take this 1938 postcard from Italy, there the {{PD-Italy}} template looks correct too because for photos of a streetview with many buildings the copyright there expires usually 20 years after creation. Or take this postcard from 1910 of a street in Tehran. There the {{PD-IRAN}} template seems to be correctly applied. In Iran copyright of photos sometimes expire after 30 years. Or take this postcard from France. The {{PD-old-assumed}} looks correctly applied for it is more than 120 years old. Or take these two files of the same postcard. The photographer is known and died in 1939. In that case the {{PD-old-70}} looks convincing. So yes, there are many reasons postcards from 1900-1949 can be uploaded on Commons. Of course those should stay. No doubt there are also amongst those 10,000+ that should not have been uploaded because the copyright did not expire yet. For example in case the copyright would end 70 years p.m.a. and the author is mentioned on the postcard but died only 32 years ago. Mentioning 10,000+ postcards on Commons from that period as an excuse to change the burden of proof to the person who nominates a specific file of a postcard doesn't seem correct to me. Just handle a nomination for deletion based on that specific situation without claiming many other similar files are not nominated for deletion. If I get a speeding ticket from the police, I could say that most likely at the same time tens of thousands of drivers are also speeding and by far most none of them get a ticket. That won't convince the officer to not give me that speeding ticket. If you claim as a fact the name of the author was not disclosed in a specific case, please try hard to prove that. Quite often you make such a claim when a file is nominated for deletion. Here you did that even for a whole bunch of postcards (... All are "PD-EU-no author disclosure", ...) event hough for most of them the publisher was not even clear. Especially in those cases such a claim seems to me to be a false claim. - Robotje (talk) 09:09, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: creator(s) identified and license updated to PD-old-100/PD-US-expired. —holly {chat} 23:08, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Auteur décédé moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 23:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:14, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Décès auteur moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 21:01, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Auteur de la photo décédé moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 21:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Auteur décédé moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 21:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —holly {chat} 23:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
False license, looks over TOO Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment I'm unsure whether this is over COM:TOO Italy and COM:TOO US or not. I'd lean toward deletion as a precaution, but I could be wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:04, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Appears to be above the ToO in both Italy and the US. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Auteur et photo moins de 70 ans JuliusMassius (talk) 21:18, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @JuliusMassius: This is a CIM postcard, where did you get the attribution of "Jean-Marie Combier (1891-1968)", please add a link to your source. --RAN (talk) 01:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:École élémentaire publique Pierre Lefebvre à Wasquehal(3).jpg: the logo indicates that the earliest the postcard could have been made is 1935. If we assume unknown author, it would not have been PD until 2006, after the URAA date. —holly {chat} 23:18, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: This looks like it's from the 1940s to me. URAA would apply in that case. Undelete in 2070. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:26, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Auteur décédé moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @JuliusMassius: The photo credit in the left corner reads Marclery?, or something similar, who do you think the author is? --RAN (talk) 00:44, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Hello, I think so, I hadn't paid attention. I had settled on Maugein Frères as the author. JuliusMassius (talk) 11:32, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- The photo dates from 1950, I think the photographer is very lucky to have died after 1952. JuliusMassius (talk) 11:34, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Undelete in 2071. --Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Auteur décédé moins de 70 ans. JuliusMassius (talk) 23:27, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Where did you get the attribution from, you have made attributions easily proven false in your other nominations. You need to present your evidence. --RAN (talk) 04:58, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Delete - The logo on that postcard was, according to this source, in use from 1935 to 1968 by that publisher. At the footnote & references section of fr:Jean Combier you can find more sources about Jean Combier; a French photographer and publisher who was living from 1891 to 1968. So on January 1st 2039 the copyright on his photos will expire. Looks like until then the postcard should not be visible on Commons. - Robotje (talk) 13:42, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep That is not how copyright law works! The copyrights for images belong to the photographer, and not the publisher, unless we have a contract where a photographer has assigned their rights to the publisher. All images published by his company are marked with the publisher's logo and not the logo of an individual attributable photographer. While Combier was a photographer, as well as a publisher, he was not a sole-practitioner. He had photographers on staff, and bought out other publishers and republished their catalogues. Wikipedia states: "Jean-Marie Combier bought the following photographic collections during his career: CLB (C. Lardier in Besançon) in the 1920s, René Prouho, photographer in Hussein-Dey (Algeria) in 1930". So we cannot attribute any single image to him, unless a reliable third party makes the attribution. They are, by the legal definition, "anonymous". We have the same with the Bain Collection we host, Bain was a photographer and ran a photographic news agency that employed other photographers, none of the images can be attributed directly to Bain himself. The decision to house CIM Images at Commons on that premise was made long ago: Category:Postcards published by CIM, all marked "anonymous" and none attributed directly to him, 246 images in total. I am not sure why you are arguing that this particular one is under an active copyright, while the 245 others, are in the public domain. --RAN (talk) 23:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I'm not sure en:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is the best argument here. I spot-checked a few random files in Category:Postcards published by CIM and I'm not seeing why any of these PD declarations should be valid. For example, File:3Fi025-011 - BREST ( FINISTERE - VUE AERIENNE - PLAGE SAINT-MARC.jpg is tagged as CC-0 and sourced from [11] but there's nothing there to indicate that it's public domain. There's not even a date listed that would allow us to say if PD-EU-no author disclosure could work. Others are tagged PD-old, but they don't list a creator and the source is "private collection", so without a reliable source for publishing dates, what's the justification for the displayed license? For this particular file, if we know that the earliest it could have been created was 1935 (due to the logo), then assuming truly unknown author, 2006 was the earliest it could have been PD, putting it after the URAA date. —holly {chat} 23:00, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
- The CC license for "File:3Fi025-011 - BREST ( FINISTERE - VUE AERIENNE - PLAGE SAINT-MARC.jpg" is from the Brest Municipal Archive. It could just as well be {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}}. We accept the right of archives to release scans of their images under a creative commons license or "no known copyright restrictions". We have over 500,000 scanned historical images from Flickr Commons under those licenses, even though the archive did not create the original image. So we have the Wikipedia en:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS versus Commons concept of recognizing institutions rights to release images into the public domain under a CC license or "no known copyright restrictions". --RAN (talk) 23:47, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Combier could be the author, and there's no evidence presented of when the postcard was published which would be required to see if it's public domain in the US. Undelete in 2039. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:54, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 17:20, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
![[12]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=838542620#File:%C3%89cole_%C3%A9l%C3%A9mentaire_publique_Pierre_Lefebvre_%C3%A0_Wasquehal(3).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
These files have not been uploaded to FlickR by the copyright owner (see EXIF), nor with a CC0 license. The conditions for {{PDMark-owner}} to apply are not met. Same situation as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 25 March 2021
- File:18.02.2020 Declarație de presă a deputaților Dumitru Alaiba si Stela Macari despre concursul pentru funcția de Director al Consiliului de Administrație al ANRE (49551712493).jpg
- File:18.02.2020 Declarație de presă a deputaților Dumitru Alaiba si Stela Macari despre concursul pentru funcția de Director al Consiliului de Administrație al ANRE (49551712548).jpg
- File:18.02.2020 Declarație de presă a deputaților Dumitru Alaiba si Stela Macari despre concursul pentru funcția de Director al Consiliului de Administrație al ANRE (49552446852).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gikü (talk) 01:25, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
These files have not been uploaded to FlickR by the copyright owner (see EXIF), nor with a CC0 license. The conditions for {{PDMark-owner}} to apply are not met. Same situation as Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 25 March 2021
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gikü (talk) 01:28, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by P199. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Claimed license not supported by source website, which states "© 2023 by Mighty Tennis Co" Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:07, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Probably OK per COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek, simple geometric shapes, uncopyrightable font and a PD tennis ball symbol. --Ellywa (talk) 19:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Dubious license claim; looks over TOO Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Probably OK per COM:TOO Italy and COM:TOO US. The only think that makes me a bit unsure is the texture of the inner ring. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP, uncertain if this is PD in Italy. --Ellywa (talk) 19:46, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
Dubious license claim; relevant TOO uncertain Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:15, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Should be OK for COM:TOO Mexico, considering the examples given there, and I believe it's below COM:TOO US. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:00, 23 August 2023 (UTC)
Kept: agree with Ikan Kekek COM:TOO Mexico. --Ellywa (talk) 19:43, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
