Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 29th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hhfggjnhghhhhhhhhhhhhhh 168.221.158.44 15:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 15:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hhhhhhggggg 98.254.249.41 16:44, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism by known LTA. --Achim55 (talk) 16:50, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 16:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Niet nodig Riannehenckel (talk) 14:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|Should not be used widely}} Riannehenckel (talk) 14:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PORN and questionable licensing Lukas Beck (talk) 17:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PORN and questionable licensing Lukas Beck (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:PORN and questionable licensing Lukas Beck (talk) 17:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of Panorama in the United States only applies for buildings Lukas Beck (talk) 18:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image was taken for the Emory Public Art Committee and is already online here: https://campus-tours.opentour.site/campus-public-art/cox-bridge-mural Kcolli2 (talk) 18:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, but on commons we can not accept work, which are protected by copyright. If you don't have a permission to do so, I guess it should better be deleted. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination COM:DW --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nearly a duplicate to this file. Lukas Beck (talk) 18:35, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I made a mistake the first time I cropped the image, so this one should be kept an the other (with a bad file name) should be deleted! The first one is the "duplicate" :) Thanks! Mbulig (talk) 18:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted the other file, this is the true. --Ezarateesteban 19:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its wrong file Mike528528 (talk) 19:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am not the photographer (not my camera, not in the location that day) Lucyin (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the wrong version Foldiphoto (talk) 13:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 16:36, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese PNG-Datei wird in de-Wiki nicht korrekt angezeigt (in beiden Versionen), Andere Version als JPG unter neuem Namen hochgeladen. Privat-User (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:35, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe hiervon eine neue Abbildung mit geeigneteren Farben erstellt. Dieses ist in der PNG-Version redundant geworden. Sciencia58 (talk) 14:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist redundant geworden. Sciencia58 (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild ist redundant geworden. Sciencia58 (talk) 15:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 16:34, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 03:35, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work. Ong Kai Jin (talk) 08:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily (F1). —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:34, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake MjhdNfl (talk) 07:04, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per IronGargoyle. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:42, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Betonus PIERRE, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Betonus PIERRE, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Betonus PIERRE, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Crystal Carpenter, Teach For America, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit: BNSF Photo by Ken Fitzgerald, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit: Michael Bonfigli/The Christian Science Monitor, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Credit: Office of Portland Mayor Sam Adams, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 06:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:15, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Facebook per the Metadata. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw. Better hosted. Headlock0225 (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Courtesy of American-Swedish Institute, not a work from the US Embassy, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Courtesy of American-Swedish Institute, not a work from the US Embassy, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Courtesy of American-Swedish Institute, not a work from the US Embassy, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo Courtesy of American-Swedish Institute, not a work from the US Embassy, thus the CC license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 08:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere Headlock0225 (talk) 08:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 08:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 08:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:17, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational. Raw text. Better hosted elsewhere. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:CUR Slovenia Lukas Beck (talk) 09:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Excluded educational content. Raw text. Headlock0225 (talk) 09:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:20, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Bookish Worm (talk) 10:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Credited to Reuters, unlikely to be free. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Oh, yeah, own work! 186.173.157.170 18:20, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:53, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scott Galan Public (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal self promotional images

Herby talk thyme 11:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please leave my bio as LG — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.22.49.11 (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:21, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il est remplacé par le semblable sur fond blanc suffixé pdf et plus utilisé donc Philippe rogez (talk) 12:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remplacée par image sur fond blanc en suffixe pdf et plus utilisée Philippe rogez (talk) 12:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remplacée par image sur fond blanc en suffixe pdf et plus utilisée Philippe rogez (talk) 12:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remplacée par une image sur fond blanc de suffixe pdf et plus utilisée Philippe rogez (talk) 17:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without sufficient evidence that the artists of this outdoor painting have been dead for more than 50 years, this commercially-licensed photo of suspected copyrighted outdoor painting must be removed, as DR Congo does not provide freedom of panorama for free publications of photos of copyrighted architecture and artworks in public spaces of DR Congo on the Internet without asking architects' or artists' permissions. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Out of project scope‎. ~Moheen (keep talking) 13:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2003 American photograph. This photograph with an unknown author won't be able to be hosted here until at least 2099. (95 years after 2003, if this was published that year). Abzeronow (talk) 15:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

British photograph created before 1965. If it was created from 1953 to 1965, it would not be public domain in the UK. If created before 1953, it could be public domain in the UK. Abzeronow (talk) 15:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality: minute, blurred, and of very common topic with thousands of better photos on Commons MPF (talk) 15:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: visual characteristics and EXIF data suggest screengrab. P 1 9 9   16:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: visual characteristics and EXIF data suggest screengrab. P 1 9 9   16:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshot, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data/watermark not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   17:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Circa 1930s photograph that was published in 1983 "Tringham, Ruth (1983): Review: V. Gordon Childe 25 Years after: His Relevance for the Archaeology of the Eighties. In Journal of Field Archaeology 10 (1), pp. 85–100." Looking at the JSTOR page, the photo is captioned "Figure 1. V. Gordon Childe holding a present from some of his students at Brno University. Date unknown. (Picture supplied by the Institute of Archaeology, University of London)". If 1983 was the first publication, it won't be in the public domain until the 2050s. Abzeronow (talk) 17:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:42, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work, likely some TikTok source (see the comic eyes) Polarlys (talk) 21:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   23:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 08:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused image, cannot see the object clearly A1Cafel (talk) 08:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsplash photo uploaded after change to restrictive license terms: https://unsplash.com/photos/DlTwjSIup0A Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Free to use under the Unsplash License.Unsplash photos are made to be used freely. Our license reflects that.
-All photos can be downloaded and used for free
-Commercial and non-commercial purposes
-No permission needed. DescheemaekerK (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@DescheemaekerK Please see Template:Unsplash. Unsplash used to publish photos under a CC-zero license, but they've switched to a license that is too restrictive for our purposes. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of a deleted Wikipedia draft and of User:Historicbiography. Unneeded as a PDF duplicate on Commons: outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 12:46, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 13:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Was this just a mistaken DR? Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Berserker276: What on earth is that as a rationale for deletion? - Jmabel ! talk 15:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In looking further, I'm guessing this was meant to be a DR for File:111-SC-34968 - NARA - 55229157 (cropped).jpg instead, which is a crop of File:111-SC-34968 - NARA - 55229157.jpg (a very similar but different photo), which was then better re-cropped at File:111-SC-34968 - NARA - 55229157 (cropped) (cropped).jpg. This file however was a direct upload from NARA and should be kept. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:38, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is 13 years old, very outdated (Terminals 2 and 3 no longer exist) and of abysmal quality. 2001:A61:10FE:E801:3479:B59D:AECF:7349 16:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unacceptable licence?? Follow Web link to source and you will find the document is marked "Open Access" which means different things to different people. Futher down the licence is given as "CC by" which is also pretty open ended (it could be NC or ND), The terms and conditions of the web site are No Dervatives and No Commercial . I think we need clarification Headlock0225 (talk) 21:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, and of dubious quality, without showing much of the vehicle (G)jabz (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, and of dubious quality, without showing much of the vehicle (G)jabz (talk) 22:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:41, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details and file's name. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 00:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata available, possible copyright infringement 181.199.60.36 00:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; likely taken from https://cynthiaalcaldesa.com/. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yanlışlıkla yükledim. David BULOVA (talk) 00:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for promotion. The user didn’t made any other uploads. MexTDT (talk) 06:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious claim of own work when this the image is obviously cropped from [1]. No other uploads by the uploader Mormegil (talk) 07:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikley to be own work, no metadata and different results on TinEye Lukas Beck (talk) 09:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred and unused image, probably out of Project scope. Lukas Beck (talk) 10:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shobin karimzadeh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: subject is same as uploader.

P 1 9 9   16:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:Scope Lukas Beck (talk) 17:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:Scope, unused personal file Lukas Beck (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Supermæn (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Merhabalar kaynağı da belirtmiştim neden silme işlemi başlatıldı Cogitosuzergosum (talk) 17:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Supermæn (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Supermæn (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfaq14 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent copyvios - either low res, no EXIF or professional shot--stolen from social media (e.g., File:Mariana davalos.png is here; File:Camila Davalos.png is here,. etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 18:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable person, insulting file description Rudolph Buch (talk) 18:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, unused private picture Lukas Beck (talk) 18:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Geohakkeri (talk) 18:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Anthere (talk) 00:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lukas Beck (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 10:26, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW: Author still lives, COM:VRT is needed to overcome the DR. A09 (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of an old photograph (COM:DW). We don't have the name of the original photographer, nor any context (country where it was taken for instance). Probably not free. Titlutin (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of an old photograph (COM:DW). We don't have the name of the original photographer, nor any context (country where it was taken for instance). Probably not free. Titlutin (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:25, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion. —Ismael Olea (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion. —Ismael Olea (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Leonce Pascal

[edit]

User:Leonce Pascal uploaded several pictures of old photographs (COM:DW), often bad quality, and never crediting the original photographers nor providing context (where the picture was taken for instance). Without a proper authorization from all the original photographers, those pictures should be deleted. --Titlutin (talk) 20:47, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lists of files:

Other files whose deletion was asked separately before I opened this mass deletion:


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Neeraj Dheeraj Singh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

images from the web, missing metadata, logos without permission, uploader with serious copyright issues in the past

Polarlys (talk) 21:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imhellimusic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope if en:draft:Helli won’t get accepted as an article.

Geohakkeri (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, uploader clearly not the copyright holder, Spike 'em (talk) 22:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

website copyrighted, see https://www.marziabertelli.com/ © Tutti i diritti riservati Marzia Bertelli Threecharlie (talk) 22:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kabarteknisi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 22:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fire Response Videos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Geohakkeri (talk) 22:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran. The architect, en:Hossein Amanat, is still living. Sorry for the large nomination, but this only really makes sense handled together. I de-selected anything that didn't prominently show the tower, and the few remaining can be handled individually.

~ Rob13Talk 16:24, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in Iran and architect living. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored per UDR - Jcb (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran

Elisfkc (talk) 03:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Azadi Tower in Tehran Iran was built in the early 1970's by the architect Hossein Amanat who is still alive. Since Iran has no FOP it would appear that the hundreds of images in this category should be deleted.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 07:13, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 15:35, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iran. Architect was Hossein Amanat, who is still alive.

Lukas Beck (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@L. Beck Have you read previous discussions such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azadi tower 9.jpg? Hanooz 10:51, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Amanat's work for hire is owned by the government of Iran (a legal entity) and more than 30 years has passed since public display. PD-Iran applies. HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Azadi tower 9.jpg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Артём 13327 (talk) 10:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, and these commercially-licensed photos violate the airport architects' copyright. Per w:fr:Aéroport international de Yamoussoukro (supported by this archived article), the airport was built in 1974. Assuming the architects are anonymous, the airport building remains copyrighted until 2045, 70+1 years after it was made, the time the architectural work falls in public domain.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:36, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, and this commercially-licensed photo violates the airport architects' copyright. Per w:fr:Aéroport international de Yamoussoukro (supported by this archived article), the airport was built in 1974. Assuming the architects are anonymous, the airport building remains copyrighted until 2045, 70+1 years after it was made, the time the architectural work falls in public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, and these commercially-licensed photos violate the architectural copyright. For work information, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hôtel Président à Yamoussoukro.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Received kind request from person on the picture to remove it as it's not up to date anymore. 5.173.194.32 13:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in Côte d'Ivoire, and these commercially-licensed photos violate the stadium designers' copyright. It was completed in 2022 and designed by SCAU Architectes.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbaCerinea20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copies of published works from various authors and sources, all claimed as own work. No evidence of permission from copyright holders. Uploader has a history of uploading files that have been deleted as copyright violations (and has an unheeded warning to stop doing so on their user talk page).

Marbletan (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:31, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbaCerinea20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files outside of COM:SCOPE. These files are of unidentifiable subjects - they have nonsense descriptions, nonsense categorization, and meaningless file names. They are therefore completely useless for Wikimedia projects. Some, such as File:3 GCIC datos de perfil.png appear to contain non-public personal information. Some of these files may also be screenshots of copyrighted software and therefore would need permission to be hosted on Commons (uploader has a long history of copyright violations).

Marbletan (talk) 18:23, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quite blurry, might not be own work. Geohakkeri (talk) 16:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmetakif.macellan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO.

P 1 9 9   16:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 17:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yanlışlıkla yükledim. David BULOVA (talk) 00:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yanlışlıkla yükledim. David BULOVA (talk) 00:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yanlışlıkla yükledim. David BULOVA (talk) 00:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. --Karim talk to me :)..! 02:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo credit: Steven E. Purcel, not a work from the US Treasury, thus the PD license is invalid A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Argentina only applies for buildings. Lukas Beck (talk) 07:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea Lukas Beck (talk) 07:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea Lukas Beck (talk) 07:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea Lukas Beck (talk) 07:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

8-year-old promotional logo and marketing, seemingly. Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Argentina only applies for buildings Lukas Beck (talk) 07:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in South Korea Lukas Beck (talk) 07:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Rwanda A1Cafel (talk) 07:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Argentina only applies for buildings Lukas Beck (talk) 07:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Argentina does only applies for buildings. Lukas Beck (talk) 08:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Argentina does only applies for buildings Lukas Beck (talk) 08:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too indistinct to have any use. Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused image, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 08:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 08:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:43, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be complex enough to be copyrighted. Geohakkeri (talk) 23:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: it is. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Matlin as no permission (No permission since), but it seems to be flicker reviewed. Please explain. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:31, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous delete and: no publisher or other place of publication and no date of publication which is required to use PD-Poland. Matlin (talk) 06:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Year of publication is 1991 (before 1994 = OK for PD-Poland); photo of Polish singer with her sister before her first out-of Poland trip to Broadway in 1992 (in Poland = OK for PD-Poland). The author name is not required. Kulawik.pl Napisz do mnie / Write to me 16:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - lacking publication datr and place makes impossible to establish whether it was *published* prior to 1994. Because the date of creation doesn't mean publication. --Masur (talk) 09:52, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hailduong (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 15:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:07, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, bad exposure, resolution low resolution of subject in which there is a surpless of much better example Headlock0225 (talk) 13:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:16, 14 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a cropped screenshot of a CNN video so it's probably copyrighted. Not to mention it's also extremely poor quality and there's already high quality logos of this station on here. So it's totally redundant. Adamant1 (talk) 20:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 16:18, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Артём 13327 (talk) 10:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Артём 13327 (talk) 10:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:50, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jimmy Yelzer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Content uploaded as a spam (G10).

--Karim talk to me :)..! 20:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment plus Category:Al-Agha Company, Category talk:Mohamed Alagha, and Category:Al-Agha Group. --Karim talk to me :)..! 20:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Neutral. Not very spammy. I declined speedy deletion request. Can be used for illustrating businesses and little shops in this country. Filenames and descriptions can be changed. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I see elsewhere that I had looked up the company and found out it was in Egypt. So to an Egyptian, not an Iranian, and sorry for mistaking one language that uses Arabic script for another one that's completely unrelated to it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:52, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: two per User:Taivo (in scope for businesses and street scene - likely in Qus). Deleted one that was more focused on store signage. --P 1 9 9   15:45, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 191.165.254.120 06:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. --P 1 9 9   15:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Declared to be taken on 2011, but on the picture there is a well visible date 1981 Leokand (talk) 07:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We don't need this version in the wrong file format, ISS Expedition 68 Patch.png and ISS Expedition 68 Patch.svg are the right ones! Ras67 (talk) 08:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9   15:53, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free picture (screenshot of an Instagram post) AideDésintéressée (talk) 08:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by Suellen Rocca (died in 2020), still protected by copyright A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork by Suellen Rocca (died in 2020), still protected by copyright A1Cafel (talk) 08:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

don't understand the source Lukas Beck (talk) 09:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not own work as indicated. --P 1 9 9   15:55, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, missing metadata, new uploader Lukas Beck (talk) 10:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 02:06, April 21, 2023, by Krd (created by abuser). --P 1 9 9   15:59, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robkeating66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader claims to be rob keating, we need OTRS confirmation of this. His website https://keatingmedia.com.au/ says (c) so its unlikely that he just released these

Gbawden (talk) 10:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Any proof that these photographs exist on his site? Because I don’t see them. Quite likely they uploaded these. I have no doubts on the uploader. 119.18.0.15 11:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:King of Hearts. I also don't see evidence of copyvio here. --P 1 9 9   16:01, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:HomeBirth102

[edit]


Serious doubts about Source. Source claimed to be own work. All are low resolution pictures with no EXIF data. If they are all by Uploader then the Uploader must have travelled widely to take intimate pictures of home births. Not credible. --Headlock0225 (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and visual characteristics (borders, etc.) suggest screengrabs. --P 1 9 9   16:03, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have doubts if this file is on free licence. The autor of mature exam sheet informs that this file comes from Wikipedia, but didn't detail from where exactly. Superjurek (talk) 12:09, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. And unneeded montage. --P 1 9 9   16:04, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same like with Commons:Deletion requests/File:EHIP-R0-100-2205 zad.2a.svg Superjurek (talk) 12:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from this set: https://bringatrailer.com/listing/1939-buick-special-c8-2/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:07, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a download from https://www.rekuperatory.pl/dlaczego-my/, ownership is unclear Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:08, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has a better cropped PNG version VileGecko (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Huntster, can you check the lisence and author of this image. I couldn't find Chinakpradhan (talk) 05:56, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Made changes: diff. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --P 1 9 9   16:38, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Indonesia A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have doubts if this file is on free licence. The autor of mature exam sheet informs that this file comes from Wikipedia, but didn't detail from where exactly. Superjurek (talk) 10:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be usefull und also to be own work. The uploader is already known for copyright infrigement, questionable quality and so on. Lukas Beck (talk) 13:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose, personal image for crosswiki spam articles Ponor (talk) 13:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remplacée par image sur fond blanc et avec suffice pdf & plus utilisée Philippe rogez (talk) 13:41, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of blurry unusable image. --P 1 9 9   16:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

remplacée par image sur fond blanc en suffixe pdf et plus utilisée Philippe rogez (talk) 13:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of blurry unusable image. --P 1 9 9   16:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:12, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 水餃喵 (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 02:15, April 21, 2023, by Krd (No license since 13 April 2023). --P 1 9 9   16:16, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation 水餃喵 (talk) 14:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical image missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: "Foto: Hoge Noorden/Jaap Schaaf". VRT permission from photo studio needed. MKFI (talk) 14:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commercial, not own work. MKFI (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   16:22, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Metadata Copyright holder Bright Ayisi Photograghy COM:VRT may help. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@user:Herbythyme. Not a copyvio. User:Kwameghana IS Bright Ayisi. Anthere (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Anthere. --P 1 9 9   16:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a copyrighted board A1Cafel (talk) 16:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please feel free to delete this photo Tanglimara1234 (talk) 09:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User account refers to an organization but the image information and EXIF refers to a professional photographer who is not of the same name (organization).If the photographer has given a free license to the image, it should be sent via email to Commons:VRT. kyykaarme (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:25, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright infringement / Vermoedelijke auteursrechtenschending StuivertjeWisselen (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, DW. And out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:Scope Lukas Beck (talk) 17:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. And likely not own work as indicated by filename. --P 1 9 9   16:26, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:TOY Lukas Beck (talk) 18:11, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Hi! Ok I guess the problem is the reproduction of the Toy. This is not a Toy but a commemoration statue at MIPCOM in Cannes Mastertvon (talk) 18:17, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
However, it should be protected by copyright most likely Lukas Beck (talk) 18:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely not own work: alraady posted on FB in Oct. 2022. --P 1 9 9   16:31, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Supermæn (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mehabalar dosyaları kaynak göstererek yüklemiştim ama sanırım kaynak göstermeyi beceremediğim için böyle oldu Cogitosuzergosum (talk) 21:48, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyrighted image from a newspaper Rudolph Buch (talk) 18:29, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lukas Beck (talk) 19:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality, the faces of the players aren't even visible. It looks like a screenshot taken from a very pixelated video. We don't have any source, nor context, nor name of the author ("own work" claim is doubtful). Probably not free. Titlutin (talk) 20:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture published since July 2021 on this Facebook page (while uploaded in January 2023 here). Considering the uploader's copyvio history (see User talk:Leonce Pascal), "own work" claim is very doubtful. Titlutin (talk) 20:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quién es el maricon este? 191.126.158.133 21:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Huntster, can you check the lisence and author of this image. I couldn't find Chinakpradhan (talk) 06:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: couldn't find source but most unlikely that a young aspiring teacher took the official portrait of a Russian cosmonaut. --P 1 9 9   16:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete this is 3d art, but still not OK per COM:FOP US. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:25, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. plicit 07:11, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by IagoQnsi as no permission (No permission since). It sounds like IagoQnsi hasn't seen an original. Stolen images tend to be in a smaller size than this (1,732 × 2,309 pixels), actresses may pose for amateur photographers for a fee. I would say there is a too weak basis for speedy deletion ("Unless this issue is resolved, the file will be deleted seven days after this tag was added "), so I'm converting this to a regular deletion request. whym (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the file I uploaded has been nominated for deletion.
I followed the guide and sent a license approval email to VRT (March 25th).
What else can I do?
I trimmed it when I uploaded it, but I also have the original image (with Exif information created by my digital camera) before trimming.
If you would like to send it for proof, please indicate where to send it.
Thank you.
--Kuro itengineer (talk) 14:30, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep No reason to assume the uploader stole it from an unidentified source. The original deletion rationale is refuted, from my perspective. A non-trimmed version would be nice but not strictly necessary, given the lack of argument for deletion. whym (talk) 12:50, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    thank you.
    I am ready to upload the original photo, so if there is an opinion that it should be deleted, I will upload the original file.
    However, since it is a landscape and has an unnecessary background, I would like to avoid re-uploading if possible.
    --~~ Kuro itengineer (talk) 13:17, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I thought it was concluded that the file subject to the deletion discussion would survive, but it seems that it was deleted today.
    I don't understand the reason or the basis.
    I also sent the permission to VRT as instructed, but was there any reason why it didn't work?
    You asked me to request the cancellation of the deletion after 14 days, but do I have to wait until then?
    I would appreciate it if you could let me know.
    12:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC) Kuro itengineer (talk) 12:13, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment A ticket is mentioned in the file: ticket:2023032510003115. Yann (talk) 14:24, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ticket:2023032510003115 was closed 2 weeks ago, which does not mean a rejection. In this case, the ticket is deemed unnecessary. [2][3] If we have reasons to be extra careful, we could do more (like requesting and verifying other versions of the picture as suggested above), but that costs extra time and effort and I would rather do that only when necessary. whym (talk) 03:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
ticket:2023032510003115 is accepted now. A new email arrived. Although I personally didn't demand it, I have no problem with accepting voluntarily sent evidence. whym (talk) 12:39, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Permission OK now. --Yann (talk) 13:30, 30 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Time has passed since the photo was taken Kuro itengineer (talk) 21:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • You probably removed it from the article where it was being used. But what is your issue? You jumped through hoops this April to make sure it could be used, and now you want it deleted in November? How is that logical? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:07, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    thank you for your reply. I apologize for making a request that is difficult to understand.
    For a long time, there was no photo of "Tsubaki Sannomiya" on the Japanese version of Wikipedia, so I thought some kind of photo was needed, so I added the one I took to Commons, and then added it to the Japanese version of Wikipedia.
    However, the photo was extremely unpopular, with many saying it was drastically different from the person's appearance, and multiple channels advised me to take it down.
    For this reason, I immediately removed the photo from the Japanese Wikipedia that I had added.
    However, during that period, it was discovered that another user added the photo to the Chinese version of Wikipedia, causing the inappropriate photo to be displayed in searches.
    For this reason, I decided that I wanted to delete the original Commons file.
    I don't know the details, but even if I created a photo, can I delete it if I think it's inappropriate?
    Thank you for your judgment.-- Kuro itengineer (talk) 21:31, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • What did people consider inappropriate about the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    The photo was taken by me, but it was pointed out that it was far from the actual appearance of the person, perhaps because my skills were inexperienced, the timing of the photo was bad, or there was a lighting issue. If you were an ordinary person, you might not have made such a point, but since he is a person with many fans, I think they are particularly concerned about his appearance. I myself am confused and exhausted and would like to escape from such problems.-- Kuro itengineer (talk) 21:00, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm sympathetic to you, but I just looked at the category, and this is the only photo of her on Commons, so I have to oppose deletion on that basis. However, if you are able to take a better photo and upload it, you'd have a much stronger argument for a courtesy deletion of this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Thank you for your kind reply. In fact, I have already uploaded and published new another photos that I took in the Japanese Wikipedia article. However, in consideration of unintended disclosure like this, I chose to upload the Japanese version locally. There is a way to upload this file to Wikimedia Commons instead of requesting its deletion, but I cannot decide on this right away at this time. Kuro itengineer (talk) 06:06, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can't delete anything, but could you link the photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:54, 13 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't really understand the detailed mechanism or procedure, but if you can't delete it, you can leave it as is. I apologize for the inconvenience. The new photos that were in the Japanese version locally were imported to Wikimedia Commons, and the original local files were also deleted. I would like to add this Commons image to the Chinese version as well. Old photos will remain, but there will be no objections as long as they are actually used. thank you very much. Kuro itengineer (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Time has passed since the photo was taken Kuro itengineer (talk) 22:09, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --plicit 06:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

この写真を撮影後、長い時間が経過したことで実際の人物の写真としては不適切です。このため削除依頼を提出し、その議論の中で代替となる新しい写真もアップロードし、削除されるものと認識していました。理由は不明ですが、最終的に削除依頼が撤回されたのは納得がいきません。再度削除依頼を提出いたします。 Kuro itengineer (talk) 14:41, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:14, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. These are contemporary buildings. plicit 00:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roman Kubanskiy as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: If it was published by the FBI, it does not mean that it is the author of this photo or the copyright owner of it

King of ♥ 04:57, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 09:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Japan only applies for buildings Lukas Beck (talk) 10:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Italy A1Cafel (talk) 16:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Postcard in 1961 is still copyrighted in Canada, unlikely to be Flickr user's own work A1Cafel (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although micropenis in scope, this image is in low quality and unused, and can be replaced by many alternatives in the category A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete bad Dronebogus (talk) 05:48, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 01:48, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old logo, is not used anymore. Wikimedia commons is not a data storage for former logos imo. The recent Cersion of the logo is published on another page. -> https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Kiesel_Logo_NEU.svg Gigas52 (talk) 12:55, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Fargoh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: по личным причинам
Converted to regular DR, as this image has external uses, which might be checked for hot-linking. -- Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Google shows at least 3 external uses. --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This image may violate the laws of Russia. To protect myself, I requested a quick deletion. — Fargoh (talk) 16:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per privacy concerns + uploader’s request + not in use anymore. Fargoh (talk) 23:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, uploader's request is valid request only on first week after upload. Here more than year has passed. The file has VRT-permission, it has no personal information and in my opinion the file is even clean by Russian laws. It is used externally. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 13:44, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep near-meaningless rationale for deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 15:25, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My only guess is that this was a incorrect crop of File:111-SC-38551 - NARA - 55236261.jpg, with the correct attempt being done at File:111-SC-38551 - NARA - 55236261 (cropped) (cropped).jpg, such that this one really isn't needed. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:26, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This one is listed as the source for File:111-SC-38551 - NARA - 55236261 (cropped) (cropped).jpg. holly {chat} 21:11, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iraq A1Cafel (talk) 14:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: This image was taken in 2003, the law regarding freedom of panorama was revised in 2004. Chuf321 (talk) 09:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: At the time of taking this picture Bagdad was occupied by US, and under occupation the relevance of local law is really questionable. Bináris (talk) 09:39, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion; Iraqi FOP law was not in effect at the time the photo was taken. holly {chat} 21:09, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identical image can be found on this website: https://www.tritonia.fi/en/vaasa. If it's possible to get a free license for the image, it should be sent via email to Commons:VRT. kyykaarme (talk) 17:07, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:07, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, bad quality, no metadatas Lukas Beck (talk) 18:58, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; need evidence of copyvio, especially for a file that was uploaded nearly 10 years ago. holly {chat} 21:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Might be complex enough to be copyrighted. Geohakkeri (talk) 19:05, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nominationl this is above TOO even in the US. holly {chat} 21:05, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious GFDL claim. Small size pic with no metadata. Probably a copyvio image. BorgQueen (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cela va bientôt faire 20 ans que cette photo a été importée sur Wikipedia/Wikimedia. Les circonstances de prise de la photo sont données : "Les Nuls photographiés en juin 1999 devant les locaux de la chaine Comédie lors de la dernière de La Grosse Émission. Photo sous GFDL prise par Utilisateur:Jgremillot." Le recadrage et recentrage de la photo est responsable de sa taille. Cela ne signifie pas pour autant qu'il s'agit d'une photo volée. L'absence de metadata s'explique aisément par la méthode de recadrage utilisée. Une recherche rapide permet de confirmer que cette photo n'a pas été publiée avant 2004 en-dehors de la sphère Wiki. Par ailleurs, si cette photo est supprimée, il faut être cohérent et supprimer également celles présentes dans la Category:Les Nuls du même photographe. Bloody-libu (talk) 05:55, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 21:03, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure if it is under Copywright. It seems to be a reprint from over 200 years old drawing. Superjurek (talk) 12:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Although this is public domain, it's a bad format image (not really SVG), and there's no indication of what is being depicted here, so its education value is questionable. holly {chat} 21:24, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in the public domain in the source country, undelete in 2050 (70 year plus year fulfilled of longest-living camera person László Schäffer per German law as it is a still, see Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2023-03#File:NosferatuShadow.jpg) Hekerui (talk) 13:03, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 21:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid source given. Brunnaiz (talk) 10:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Brunnaiz: No need to hurry or to bite newcomers more than strictly necessary. According to ca:Discussió:Antoni Ballester i Nolla the image was uploaded in good faith by a new user after asking permission to the institution mentioned in sources. That user needs to sort the paperwork to document that the permission given is enough for Commons but that might need some time. Starting a deletion request 10 minutes after the image being uploaded may not be the best way to ease that process.
@OBSpallerola: Com pots veure, cal enviar el permís per fer servir la imatge. Si no, acabarà esborrada d'aquí uns dies.--Pere prlpz (talk) 09:43, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hola, bon dia. La persona de l'arxiu del CSIC - ICM em va escriure això: "en el archivo del ICM están las fotos que se usaron para el libro "Homenatge a Antoni Ballester i Nolla. Recull d’escrits". No estoy segura de si conocemos la autoría, y también desconozco el tema de los derechos. Lamentablemente es un tema en el que el CSIC central tampoco nos soluciona las dudas.
Entiendo que si no hay autoría específica y las imágenes están a cargo del ICM, el propio ICM puede publicarlas en Wikipedia".
Què faig, busco una altra fotografia, on quedi clar l'autoria i els drets? OBSpallerola (talk) 10:10, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ICM may upload any photos that it owns the rights to. Please have them see COM:VRT. For this specific image, if they don't know the photographer and have no way of finding out, it's still under copyright for 70 years. holly {chat} 17:40, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Without sufficient evidence that the architects have been dead for more than 50 years or (if anonymously-designed) the buildings were completed more than 50 years ago, these commercially-licensed photos of suspected copyrighted architectural works must be removed, as DR Congo does not provide freedom of panorama for free publications of photos of copyrighted architecture and artworks in public spaces of DR Congo on the Internet without asking architects' or artists' permissions.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:33, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es mi propio trabajo 191.126.183.22 10:45, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich um das Bild meines vaters Egon waibel. Dieses befindet sich in Familienbesitz. 2003:C6:372E:A960:F993:4011:80AC:AA2 10:49, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Dann bist Du wohl PW8869? Du hast angegeben, dass Du das Bild selbst erstellt hast, demnach bist Du wohl schon in jungen Jahren professioneller Fotograf gewesen.
Der Urheber ist der Fotograf, der das Passbild (sieht zumindest so aus) erstellt hat. Dessen Name muss angegeben werden, und dann der Nachweis, dass der schon 70 Jahre tot ist. Erastophanes (talk) 07:10, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 17:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure if it is PD, this drawing probably comes from XIX-XX centuries są it can be PD as well. Superjurek (talk) 12:34, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Author was Creator:Wilhelm Scholz, who died in 1893. holly {chat} 17:30, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure if it is PD, this drawing probably comes from Middle Ages so it can be PD as well. Superjurek (talk) 12:37, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-waaaaaaaay old. holly {chat} 17:24, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plagiatverdacht und nach dessen antisemitischen Äußerungen entfernt Anton-kurt (talk) 12:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: FOP was valid at the time the photo was created. holly {chat} 17:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential Copyvio, but I'm not sure it such simple scheme is under Copyrights Superjurek (talk) 12:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-ineligible}}. holly {chat} 17:18, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plagiatverdacht und nach dessen antisemitischen Äußerungen entfernt Anton-kurt ( talk) 12:39, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Waren die zum Zeitpunkt der Aufstellung nicht als dauerhaft vorgesehen? Damit wären die Regeln für FOP zum Aufnahmezeitpunkt erfüllt. Wenn Urheberrecht kein Problem, sollte man das Bild daher für dokumentarische Zwecke behalten. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:10, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: FOP was valid at the time the photo was created. holly {chat} 17:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plagiatverdacht und nach dessen antisemitischen Äußerungen entfernt Anton-kurt (talk) 12:40, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: FOP was valid at the time the photo was created. holly {chat} 17:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plagiatverdacht und nach dessen antisemitischen Äußerungen entfernt Anton-kurt (talk) 12:42, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: FOP was valid at the time the photo was created. holly {chat} 17:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plagiatverdacht und nach dessen antisemitischen Äußerungen entfernt Anton-kurt (talk) 12:43, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wie auch für die anderen: Wenn die Aufstellung als dauerhaft gedacht war, sollte Panoramafreiheit zum Aufnahmezeitpunkt erfüllt sein. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 19:12, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: FOP was valid at the time the photo was created. holly {chat} 17:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 113.254.182.96 as no permission (No permission since). If these are real handprints and not a sculpture, is it even copyrightable? The text is COM:DM IMO since the focus is clearly on the handprints. King of ♥ 05:06, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 18:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video comes from CCTV military Weibo content, and the copyright may not belong to China News Service. Cwek (talk) 07:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is very likely that CNS was authorized to publish the content as both CNS and CCTV were run by the Chinese government, which owns the copyright. Belarus101 (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Both entities are part of the Chinese government, so no reason to doubt the license. holly {chat} 18:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video comes from CCTV military Weibo content, and the copyright may not belong to China News Service. Cwek (talk) 07:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is very likely that CNS was authorized to publish the content as both CNS and CCTV were run by the Chinese government, which owns the copyright. Belarus101 (talk) 01:15, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Both entities are part of the Chinese government, so no reason to doubt the license. holly {chat} 18:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video comes from CCTV military Weibo content, and the copyright may not belong to China News Service. Cwek (talk) 07:21, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is very likely that CNS was authorized to publish the content as both CNS and CCTV were run by the Chinese government, which owns the copyright. Belarus101 (talk) 01:14, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Both entities are part of the Chinese government, so no reason to doubt the license. holly {chat} 18:48, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The video comes from CCTV military Weibo content, and the copyright may not belong to China News Service. It appears to be a cropped version of File:两栖攻击舰广西舰训练画面公开-3.png. Cwek (talk) 07:23, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is very likely that CNS was authorized to publish the content as both CNS and CCTV were run by the Chinese government, which owns the copyright. Belarus101 (talk) 01:13, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[5]This is the original source. The original source and its user profile do not expressly state whether copyright is reserved. I am skeptical about whether CNS has really obtained CCTV's copyright authorization. Whether to just download the video from the corresponding account and upload it again. It seems that it has already been mentioned whether CNS has copyright issues for reprinting materials from other media in this way, especially from the website from CCTV, which clearly marked "copyright reserved". --Cwek (talk) 00:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
But on the other hand, if CNS has obtained authorization from CCTV, the details of which may not be made public, and since both CNS and CCTV are state-run media, it would be reasonable to assume that the Chinese gov will not use its left fist to beat the right hand. Belarus101 (talk) 5:32, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Kept: Both entities are part of the Chinese government, so no reason to doubt the license. holly {chat} 18:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like an official portrait, also missing EXIF data and this is his/her only uploads make the "own work" claim suspicious A1Cafel (talk) 08:08, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; ordered a universal replace with File:Shinzō Abe and Paul Kagame at the Prime Minister's Office 2019 (1) (cropped).jpg as that looks like it could be an official portrait. holly {chat} 18:44, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably the wrong license. Very similar to File:Icon-windows os.svg Артём 13327 (talk) 08:26, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-ineligible. holly {chat} 18:41, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

questionable licensing, no exit data, watermark, unlikely to be own work Lukas Beck (talk) 09:20, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not stock font. Is it "simple" geo shape. I doubt it. Just need other more expert in this field to comment Matthew hk (talk) 10:04, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Where do you see any grade of complexity or intervenction that makes this font copyrightable? this is (IMO) a simple text logo in a ESPN-style font – Fma12 (talk) 10:18, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment In Italy, logos does not have a so low TOO, as Asian countries do (see DR1, DR2). Fma12 (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: TOO in Italy is pretty high. holly {chat} 18:39, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation And some of the file data is very strangely formatted. Артём 13327 (talk) 10:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. holly {chat} 18:38, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 高専研究会 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Tagged as copyvio by Animataru, but the uploader clearly claims to be the copyright holder based on their username. They should send a permission email to COM:VRT to prove their affiliation. Alternatively, perhaps a simple line chart based on factual data is below COM:TOO Japan?

King of ♥ 04:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Regarding your claim to be the copyright owner, the copyright is held by "高専受験計画 (Kosen Entrance Exam Plan)", but the user who uploaded this image is "高専研究会 (Kosen Research Group)", and it is not recognized as the same person unless the copyright holder officially acknowledges that it. In addition, there is no statement that permits secondary use of the image on the copyright source site. --Animataru (talk) 08:19, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentSorry, I'm going to remove all images with the copyright mark. 高専研究会 03:01, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep All seem like simple charts. {{PD-chart}} would be adequate. whym (talk) 12:01, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept all as

Public domain This chart is ineligible for copyright and therefore in the public domain, because it consists entirely of information that is common property and contains no original authorship. For more information, see Commons:Threshold of originality § Charts

العربية | Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | română | русский | slovenščina | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/−

. holly {chat} 21:19, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]