Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2023/03/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 25th, 2023
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sorena Monazami (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On reviewing the image after uploading, I see that the quality is very poor. It is out of focus and not worthwhile to keep. Acediscovery (talk) 16:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as G7. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed, not used Iojhug (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Change My photo as I uploaded wrong one Frank864597 (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uničena v požaru Bojan Marušič (talk) 19:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: F7. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version here. 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 03:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:32, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version here 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 03:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Col._Geo_W._Baylor_(signature,_see-through).png 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 03:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Col._Geo_W._Baylor_(signature,_see-through).png 𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 03:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. Zafer (talk) 08:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 09:30, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by John Langley Author (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam from spam only account

Dronebogus (talk) 12:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all files already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, inappropriate use of Commons as a web host Dronebogus (talk) 12:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your problem is what, exactly? 2.25.62.141 13:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete See File:John Langley Photographer (Bristol) 2008-01-01.jpg and Johnlangleybristol (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log too. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Mdaniels5757. --Rosenzweig τ 09:29, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Sgef1211 (talk) 16:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deepakk patel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal files.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Account blocked on en wp for advertising. --Herby talk thyme 11:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Contacted photographer linked and they said “ I definitely did not give any permission to anyone about posting that to wikipedia.” Elijahandskip (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. Didn't know that. Go ahead. Poodle23 (talk) 22:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This shouldn't be a DR, just speedy delete it as a copyright violation. DecafPotato (talk) 05:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:06, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the person not like Jahaanaa (talk) 12:41, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

She not like 2405:201:F00F:6109:DCB5:3D78:9410:1528 17:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request, the user's only upload. Small photo without metadata. Courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a picture that presumably has copyright Freedom4U (talk) 10:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Polarlys. --Rosenzweig τ 11:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 18:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:39, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the scope Michel Bakni (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 11:40, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

author??? Xocolatl (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyvio, source is Facebook, author: "Facebook". --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect (see File:Triitico di San Moisé ricostruzione.jpg) with obvious error should be deleted ZandDev (talk) 02:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Typo in file name, renamed on day of upload. --Achim55 (talk) 18:48, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope personal photo * Pppery * it has begun... 22:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Personal photo by non-contributor (F10) - again. --Wutsje 16:13, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More spam Dronebogus (talk) 15:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete: Obvious spam, but please find a way to preserve that copypastable image description. ~ Pbritti (talk) 06:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    English: In 2007 a critically acclaimed, highly controversial Westcountry based photographer called, John Langley,had his work exhibited at the internationally prestigious, Tate Modern gallery, in London in a show called 'Personality Plus', which he founded.
    Not many have achieved this in England, but more importantly this was a first for the South West: and he's the only Westcountry photographer to have ever had his images on display there to date. Quite an achievement given that there are cutting edge photographers from all over the world who would give life and limb for the same opportunity. An ambition which few, if any, will ever reach.
    This was headline making material which the media jumped on. The story ran on radio, television, and in the press. The Westcountry had won the equivalent of an Olympic gold medal in the arts, and the profile of this relatively unknown photographer took him to another level overnight. As a result of this his life and work was filmed by the BBC for broadcast later in 2008.
    Never being one to shy away from highly emotive subjects his most radical work reflects suicide, violent attack, and sexuality: all in graphic detail which quite deliberately provokes a viewer's response. He's the bad boy of photographic art. An anarchist who American Christian artists ganged up on to have his work banned from a number of high profile USA internet art sites for being too honest and reflective of life for their sensitivities. Somewhat hysterically they saw his work as dangerous and him as the anti-Christ, or Devil incarnate. Yet his whole ethos is one of reflecting life, the extremities of human behaviour: and a small aspect of the viewer's own personality they, in some way, feel uncomfortable with. And it works!
    Date Dronebogus (talk) 09:57, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 11:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:35, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OsirisConseil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 11:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hippolocous (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent copyvios by sock of serial copyright violator--low res, no EXIF, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Golden Temple,Amritsaar.jpg is here; File:Entry of Amritsar Junction Railway Station.jpg credited as a HindustanTimes file photo here; etc.)

Эlcobbola talk 11:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:37, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Miamicd11 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 13:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Peymanmajidimoeiniran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/promotional photos. out of com:PS.

Hanooz 13:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:41, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ElMaestroProfesional (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded is blocked as an LTA, no evidence that they have permission to license screenshots of this game, no evidence that they are useful for an educational (rather than promotional) purpose.

* Pppery * it has begun... 16:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete most of them, which are Roblox that is copyrighted (non-libre) and probably taken as gameplay footage from YouTube, but depending on others, causing the quality to be atrocious. - The Harvett Vault | he/him | user | talk - 20:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC); edited: 11:14, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sosob80mr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.

Achim55 (talk) 18:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 龍驤鳳翔 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely all copyvios, just like every other copyrightable file this user has uploaded.

—‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, above COM:TOO —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is unlikely own work. Maybe the red dot is own work. Where the source map comes from? Who's the map author? Taivo (talk) 09:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not understand, which point of the license applies. If none, then uploading the photo into Commons violates photographers' copyright. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 11:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 11:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 11:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 11:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 11:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 13:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, also unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, also unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, blurry, of a common species with hundreds of better photos already on Commons MPF (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 14:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 14:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality, badly blurred; common species with hundreds of better photos on Commons MPF (talk) 15:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source site has a copyright notice at bottom and this has multiple hits on TinEye from Zing News. Abzeronow (talk) 16:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:56, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:PS Hanooz 17:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Todos los derechos reservados. © GLOBAL COOLT 2021" at site. Should be deleted per COM:PCP Abzeronow (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1970 photograph whose source is Facebook. Won't be public domain in France until at least 2041 or maybe much longer. Abzeronow (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph published in 1939. Renewal for the periodical by the Seaman's Church Institute should be checked to verify if it's public domain or copyrighted until 2035. Abzeronow (talk) 19:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:57, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commons is not a free host of users' artworks https://twitter.com/abnormalityadv . com:out of scope.

RZuo (talk) 01:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 13:32, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elfabiomartins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three of them are clear copyright violations. Then, per COM:PCP, I suppose the fourth one should be deleted as well.

RodRabelo7 (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong category 75.91.42.246 07:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from an advertisement PigeonChickenFish (talk) 08:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Ikan Kekek. --Strakhov (talk) 13:33, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seth7481 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejandro23gonzalez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, also unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 13:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 13:40, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AliHayri93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sn1104 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this image is a copyright violation, and not the uploader's own work.

I stumbled upon this page because I was reading the wikipedia page on Yantra tattooing and was curious as to the identity of the lady in the image - it appears to have been taken at some kind of "red carpet" event. Arriving on commons the title of the file indicates it's the celebrity Angelina Jolie, so I wondered how it could be the uploader's own work. Reverse image searching the file shows the it is used extensively on the web before the date of upload, and what seems to be the same image is available from Getty Images. 87.196.72.113 17:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion, unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file’s source does not show IQ data; it is therefore either synthesis or original research or requires another source. Raquel Baranow (talk) 16:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion. --Krd 06:04, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced. The listed source does not exist: It links to a generic Census page. The archive link goes to a page that does not contain this graphic. 108.5.130.55 19:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the chart was generated by the contributor, which may explain its absence from the linked (archived) page except that the archived page also does not have the data required to make such a graph. 2600:4040:AE06:2000:3D69:D78B:1168:FAE4 19:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The contributor, in creating this image, has also editorialized it: There exists no minimum IQ required to graduate, making the title of the contributor-generated graph misleading, containing their own opinion on whatever data they reviewed rather than a factual account of the data by its originating source. 2600:4040:AE06:2000:3D69:D78B:1168:FAE4 19:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 13:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too large of size KDSells (talk) 19:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Uhai as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as IMO this image is usable as a stock-image of a male carrying a surfboard to the beach. -- Túrelio (talk) 20:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep the photo dont has license problems and it is not personal photo. not even see his face. we can use this image somewhere else in projects. ----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 17:23, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 13:45, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helonoob2023 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:PENIS

----modern_primat ඞඞඞ TALK 22:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: low quality file, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 13:46, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleteobviously just more lame exhibitionism. Surprised we didn’t get measurements and a phone number. Dronebogus (talk) 12:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 07:36, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete purely exhibitionistic Dronebogus (talk) 12:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for "graphic works" in Canada A1Cafel (talk) 08:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I have gone ahead and blurred the sign. If the original un-blurred version somehow qualifies as De minimis, it can be reverted. If not, the previous file versions should be deleted. Now deciding if the file is still within scope is debatable.
PascalHD (talk) 01:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, I don't think it is still in scope. Just a blurred object showing nothing. --A1Cafel (talk) 03:21, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
One could make the argument it serves a purpose as being a photographic example of blurring or censoring an object. However it would not bother me to see this image deleted. PascalHD (talk) 04:33, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:54, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by -sasha- as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10
Not sure if that is an active user or not. DaB. (talk) 09:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 10:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete According to the guidelines in order for a work to qualify for FOP "it has to put there with the intention of leaving it in the public place indefinitely or at least for the whole natural lifetime of the work." Which clearly isn't the intent behind political posters. No one expects them to be in a public place for the natural lifetime of the work. In fact, many are quickly taken down, often against the wishes of the person who placed them there. That's kind of the nature of the thing. So images of modern posters like this one should clearly be deleted as copyvio. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 10:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete According to the guidelines in order for a work to qualify for FOP "it has to put there with the intention of leaving it in the public place indefinitely or at least for the whole natural lifetime of the work." Which clearly isn't the intent behind political posters. No one expects them to be in a public place for the natural lifetime of the work. In fact, many are quickly taken down, often against the wishes of the person who placed them there. That's kind of the nature of the thing. So images of modern posters like this one should clearly be deleted as copyvio. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:POSTERs are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 10:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete According to the guidelines in order for a work to qualify for FOP "it has to put there with the intention of leaving it in the public place indefinitely or at least for the whole natural lifetime of the work." Which clearly isn't the intent behind political posters. No one expects them to be in a public place for the natural lifetime of the work. In fact, many are quickly taken down, often against the wishes of the person who placed them there. That's kind of the nature of the thing. So images of modern posters like this one should clearly be deleted as copyvio. --Adamant1 (talk) 13:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist Scartezzini died in 1967; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:55, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fundacionlakasaazul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shirotenshii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work, also out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AGinAZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 14:25, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enpsychledelica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:53, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:17, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 7aidin68852 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amirhoseini15251 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:51, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE. Nondescript food item. 62.216.206.101 21:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:50, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Red was erroneously added to the papal tiara on the file this was derived from. Use of the false flag has spread to flag manufacturers and emojis. See redditor horizontalhole's post in r/vexillology and the thread from Depths of Wikipedia. gobonobo + c 02:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid request. Animation is now fixed.
I have scripted the creation of those flag animations from the source file.
Fixing them is less work then writing out a response to a deletion request.
Next time, could you please be so kind to ask me to rerender the animation before making a deletion request?
-- MichaelFrey (talk) 08:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you MichaelFrey. The new version looks good. I'll ask for a rerender if our paths cross again. Consider this deletion request withdrawn. gobonobo + c 15:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:10, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:11, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image still copyrighted in USA due to COM:URAA A1Cafel (talk) 08:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per: Commons:Massive restoration of deleted images by the URAA, closed as: "URAA cannot be used as the sole reason for deletion"; also per DR: Files uploaded by Fma12, and this DR about PD-AR-Photo files, which referred to files upload after
PascalHD (talk) 01:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. "If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under U.S. or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.". —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private fan-fiction or so. Useless Ciacho5 (talk) 11:16, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:22, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private fan-fiction or so. Useless Ciacho5 (talk) 11:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private fan-fiction or so. Useless Ciacho5 (talk) 11:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private fan-fiction or so. Useless Ciacho5 (talk) 11:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private fan-fiction or so. Useless Ciacho5 (talk) 11:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:23, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. Not a work by Mehr News HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Z2250 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not freely licensed: "Copyright © 2006 - 2020 DiyarMirza"

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Z2250 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I don't trust the own work claims by the uploader because metadata shows the photographs are taken with multiple cameras, including:

  • iPhone 7
  • iPhone 6
  • iPhone 5
  • Canon EOS 350D DIGITAL
  • Canon EOS 450D
  • Canon EOS 10D
  • Canon PowerShot G10
  • Canon EOS-1D Mark II N
  • Nokia N82
  • Nokia E90
  • Nokia N95
  • Nokia N93
  • Nokia 5630d-1

The files are:

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:20, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete It's possible they rented the cameras and phones, but probably they didn't and just uploaded the work of someone else. So probably better to just delete the images out of caution regardless. --Adamant1 (talk) 06:13, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:49, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim (no metadata, low size) HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moein4321 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One file is a logo (copyrighted and out of scope) and the other is a questionable own work claim (low quality portrait of politician without metadata)

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim (low quality without metadata) HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:41, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vehij (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claim (no metadata, low resolution)

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richard Karuna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope/copyvios

Юрий Д.К 08:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: Logo of a radio show CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:47, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The model in the picture is marked as the author CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: The name of the uploader from the author in the metadata CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 02:37, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Dimethylolpropionic-acid-2D-structure.svg as high-quality vector replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete per nom. Of all the arbitrary layout choices, why not make the central carbon at least a little more visible than just where two lines cross each other, and two OH groups within kerning distance. DMacks (talk) 03:16, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As an alternative version, we also have File:Dimethylolpropionsäure.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:15, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malek27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality professional modeling photographs, questionable own work. Also out of scope.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 07:48, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source page lists this under the stated license, but the image contains cartoon characters for which the author of the image is unlikely to have the rights. Daniel Mietchen (talk) 01:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ordinary person Mateus2019 (talk) 02:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not used on user page. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Low quality photo. SCP-2000 02:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination Per above. My mistake. SCP-2000 04:38, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as withdrawn. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:47, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not Own Work, with watermarks F (talk) 06:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:48, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems that it is a random COM:NUDE photo providing little educational value A1Cafel (talk) 07:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion; good quality and no personality rights doupts. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture without any realistic educational use. R555445 (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems that it is a random nude photo providing little educational value, just a nude men lying and doing nothing A1Cafel (talk) 07:43, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Doing nothing? He's abusing the open door policy of Commons to mock you guys. Continue like this... 181.203.153.32 09:14, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; good quality and no personality rights doupts. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems that it is a random nude photo providing little educational value, just a nude men lying and doing nothing A1Cafel (talk) 07:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion; good quality and no personality rights doupts. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:52, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to be own work. Widely used on the internet Ориенталист (talk) 10:04, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to be own work. Ориенталист (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to be own work. Ориенталист (talk) 10:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously a photo of a TV screen, also declared on flickr as taken from "l'écran géant de la BT London Live Hyde park" Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark.D CoffeeEngineer (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyright is also not clear. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jdxent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 13:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope? Lukas Beck (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion requests isn't a good place for questions. See Commons:Bar. Matlin (talk) 14:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
don't misunderstand me! ;-) I'am pretty sure, this does not fit in our project scope. The only question is, what the admin's point of view is. Thank you for your constructive feedback. Lukas Beck (talk) 15:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:01, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proven notability CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional picture for a TV series, certainly not own work. Harold (talk) 12:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. It seems like a membership card of someone named "Ashkan Persia" HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iloveyoug (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claim. One has watermark and the other seems like a screenshot

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:03, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hobbymessenger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 15:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary Berserker276 (talk) 15:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:04, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaynaby (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo of a UK-based organization. No proof of Creative Commons license.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:37, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:05, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyroghted Materials Michel Bakni (talk) 19:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: seems like a screesnhot, no metadata. --Kadı Message 20:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems like a screenshot. Questionable own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:06, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Baluch Editor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:28, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: F10. --Kadı Message 20:07, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation and infringement of the apparent copyright of property copyright holders, such as Himno de Navarra.ogg! Vichycombo (talk) 22:13, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Krd. --Kadı Message 20:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: why?. --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:F541:B95:6F8:8E59 11:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No evidence of infringement, username matches EXIF. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

Copyright infrigement Frartn (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: already kept twice, we would really need a bit more explanation than just "copyright infringement" in this case which seems fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:DCA5:AB19:9258:9AD3 14:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. IP blocked for 1 month. --Achim55 (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Frartn: We warned you multiple times to stop filing false deletion requests, but you didn't. Also, you have failed to provide evidence that the file is a copyright violation whatsoever. To top it all off, you used to ip adress 2A01:E11:5010:4650:DCA5:AB19:9258:9AD3 to file these false deletion requests.

We have given you multiple chances to improve here and to provide evidence for your deletion request, but you blew them all. I will be reporting you and your IP address to the Wikimedia Commons admins for vandalism, false reporting, and block evasion. Angelgreat (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. User:Frartn blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg

delete this, please Frartn (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Net copyright violation. Where do you find your Admins? 181.43.7.29 18:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

One time uploader. Did you ask him to obtain OTRS permission? 181.43.7.29 19:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   16:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a bad feeling that this might not be the uploader’s own work. Geohakkeri (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 20:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern drawing of historical figure--no evidence work is pma+100 at source, or elsewhere. Actual evidence of provenance needed. Эlcobbola talk 10:32, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 17:02, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Este archivo no es el correcto con respecto al Escudo del Instituto Atletico Central Cordoba. Facundo Ellauri Obligado (talk) 18:58, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No cumple con las dimensiones correctas del escudo original de Instituto Atletico Central Cordoba. Facundoellauri (talk) 00:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Considero que este escudo no cumple con las dimensiones correctas del Instituto Atletico Central Cordoba Facundo Ellauri Obligado (talk) 15:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and redundant to File:Instituto acc cordoba logo.svg. --P 1 9 9   12:55, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm assuming that User:Berlin-George is not the same person as Giselle Clements. If correct, the work is in copyright and cannot be uploaded to Commons. Schwede66 02:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Giselle Clements is my partner, and she has abandoned her copyright for this painting now published at@ Wikipedia. Berlin-George (talk) 07:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kia ora, Berlin-George. In that case, could you please ask Giselle to go to Commons:Volunteer Response Team, scroll down until she sees the big blue button, get her to click on it and then fill out the permission form? Much appreciated and keep up your good work. Schwede66 09:14, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --P 1 9 9   16:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing by the United States embassy in Canada. Claude Guillet is an independent professional photographer in Canada [1]. He is not an employee of the U.S. government in any way. A1Cafel (talk) 07:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright by Omnipotent Youth Society 水餃喵 (talk) 11:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:06, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Norayr.M123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope, also unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 11:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE as plain text. Also might be copyrighted. Belbury (talk) 11:56, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:07, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private picture without any realistic educational use. R555445 (talk) 20:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I know, image was kept before, but I can't see, how this fits in our Project scope. Lukas Beck (talk) 11:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. "Private picture without any realistic educational use" = out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:08, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work and just plain bad Dronebogus (talk) 12:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it bad? Gazozlu (talk) 09:59, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I guess it’s not really “bad” because it’s a just an exact duplicate of a sketch (I assumed it was a worse copy) but it’s also not in the public domain and this is a 1:1 derivative work. Dronebogus (talk) 14:50, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete COM:DR as sketch was line traced. A09 (talk) 10:59, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Peter Parker (Spider-Man) as Speedy (Db-g7) and the most recent rationale was: g7
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy and nominator didn't provide any rationale. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:20, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no evidence for a free license; even not in 2021[2] Gnangarra 12:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:PS.

Hanooz 13:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:10, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission for a work by Majid Asgharipour HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and inferior to Taiyuan (Chinese characters).svg. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 13:54, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete --EEIM (talk) 23:53, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scrubzbody (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 13:58, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:12, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammad Khaksari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:13, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph from painting (derivative work), no permission HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:09, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW, no deminimis. Matlin (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nice document, but definitely wrong license: why should it be CC licensed? Albinfo (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Just a random "G" in a circle, not COM:INUSE, no educational potential --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 14:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:14, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has been superseded by a more accurate image in svg format EthanL13 (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:IE road sign F-400.svg. --P 1 9 9   16:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a notable artist, out of project scope Ignatus (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

es errónea la informacion EL RORRO24&5 (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   16:15, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Martj9 (talk) 15:22, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9   16:16, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Betadin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of com:PS.

Hanooz 15:30, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be an avertisement, used in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Ch_Amir_Kalasa (deleted) and https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Daira_CH_Amir_Kalasa&oldid=2470690 (deletion request pending), similar case as File:Ch Amir Kalasa.jpg -- FellTiger (talk) 15:57, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unusable, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:17, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyright infringement 多多123 (talk) 16:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per above. --P 1 9 9   16:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Landscape or trees background very creative enough for copyright. Background not plain and simple. George Ho (talk) 17:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screenshot of something, no EXIF to prove own work -- DaxServer (talk) 18:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, small crop of unknown source. --P 1 9 9   16:18, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image can be found online, one article [3] specifically credits the images to Viral Bhayani. No evidence of a compatible license. Ravensfire (talk) 19:00, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar case to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Miyanka and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Takosab. Almost certainly not own work, being identical to [4], which was posted days before this was uploaded. Delete per COM:PCP. ミラP@Miraclepine 19:27, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, too little data to prove/satisfy PD A09 (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rasaneh2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claims. No metadata, all with low resolution. Some found on the internet.

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles. --P 1 9 9   16:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keavinhaber (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images by non-contributor. Out of commons scope. Possibly this is not their own work.

Yahya (talkcontribs.) 20:34, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:23, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   16:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rezagkdk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope files uploaded for promotional abuse

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:40, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:24, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE 62.216.206.101 21:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Montage of two photographs with unknown sources and authors. HeminKurdistan (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution version of File:Galileo orbiter arrival at Jupiter.jpg but not an exact duplicate. Huntster (t @ c) 22:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9   16:27, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; artist died in 2004; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:15, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo User:Martin Sg., was bedeutet "no fop"? -- Johamar (talk) 20:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keine Panoramafreiheit. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Photo by Getty Images for Gibson Lounge" at the given link (https://www.flickr.com/photos/dce76/79935963/) Jovian Eclipse (talk) 17:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative from https://www.flickr.com/photos/dce76/79935963/ (Description given as "Photo by Getty Images for Gibson Lounge") Jovian Eclipse (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; contemp. artworks; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 12:34, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich hab an der Kasse gefragt ob ich Fotos machen darf. Ich sollte nur kein Blitzlicht nehmen. --sk (talk) 12:38, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Da warst Du nicht optimal beraten. Es braucht hier eine gültige Freigabe, da nur gemeinfreie Werke möglich sind. Martin Sg. (talk) 13:36, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Gut, dann löschen. --sk (talk) 14:37, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 23:34, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio; contemp. artwork; no fop.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hufnagel Pütz and Rafaelian were the architects of the building and all three are still alive, in Germany there is no Freedom of Panorama for interior views and Germany has also a standard of life + 70 years

Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with the deleting of my images. So we must wait or the museum give us free images. --sk (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1940s American photograph. This could have been from a negative and only published when the Flickr user uploaded it in 2013. Abzeronow (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Very unlikely. But what it is is a photo of a physical print of a photo, released on a Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 Generic (CC BY-SA 2.0) license. I don't find the suggestion that the original print, creased in the upper right corner and with old-style printing on it, could have been newly developed from a negative to be a credible idea. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted on Wikipedia for "No evidence of permission." SelfCloak (talk) 21:11, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio of a US stamp, not released under CC license by the author Oaktree b (talk) 22:53, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Explain where you found this copy vio? Odd Fellows Windmill mock stamp art concept.CaptJayRuffins (talk) 03:18, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Question number one is: Who took the photo on which the mock stamp is based? I see no information about that. And question number two: Are artworks like this one within the scope of Wikimedia Commons? I don't think so.  Delete. -- Robert Weemeyer (talk) 11:23, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The request for deletion was for a copyright Violation of a U.S. postage stamp, not for other reasons. Since it's not, finding other issues seems a bit, 'Oh, But..!' Keep. CaptJayRuffins (talk) 15:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Personal art, out of scope. Also no evidence that the photo is PD. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is not free: it was published in 1955—1959 Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 12:06, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author of the text on the photo is Yefym Barban (Єфим Барбан), so also his permission is needed. Andriy.v (talk) 12:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thought it was another author which authorized republication but it wasn't. Lillian Rínkū (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:20, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nash Izumrud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Icons taken from various Nokia phones where it's likely that:-

  • They're above threshold of copyrightability (i.e. we assume they're able to be copyrighted)
  • Any copyright is owned by Nokia or someone else (i.e. they're not the uploader's "own work" as claimed)
  • There's no evidence given that whoever owns the copyright has released them under a free license.

Whether or not there's a case for these being legitimate "fair use" at en.wikipedia, they shouldn't have been uploaded to Commons which is for freely-licensed images only.

Ubcule (talk) 13:26, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tajvidinejad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope + Questionable own work claims

HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:24, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I made a much better version at File:Lizard steals spider eggs.webm. Jidanni (talk) 08:19, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arilang1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/madam-chiang-kai-shek-makes-statement-about-japanese-news-footage/98441957 "Madam Chiang Kai Shek makes statement about Japanese bombing raids in Nanking and elsewhere in China / She asks for boycott of Japanese goods / Chiang Kai-shek stands by her side. Madam Chiang Blasts Japanese War Terrorism on October 13, 1937 in Nanking, China" "Credit:Film Audio Services - Footage. Editorial #:98441957"

probably still copyrighted.

RZuo (talk) 15:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's unclear who's the copyright owner. it's also unclear whether this footage was "first published in china", so chinese copyright rules may not apply. https://www.britishpathe.com/video/VLVAA9ZQN9GEVOJ0WJOE65FYIVU3W-CHINA-DEFENCE-CHINA-FIGHTS-ON is the same clip, and they claim this is owned by reuters and british pathe?--RZuo (talk) 18:03, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The information at British Pathe suggests that this was first broadcast as part of the British Paramount Newsreel, so the place of first publication seems to be the UK. This will make it protected in the UK on the URAA date and thus protected in the US unless it was simultaneously broadcast there without a copyright notice. Felix QW (talk) 21:21, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Imho it is higly likely that this film, dating 1940, has been lawfully published in China at some moment, but more then 50 years ago, so the film is in pd per {{PD-China-film}}. Therefore I decided to keep the file. --Ellywa (talk) 23:09, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arilang1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

4m0s still copyrighted 1943 TIME cover. 5m30s TV series screenshot? full speech (20+min) available File:Madame Chiang Kai Shek of China Addressed the House of Representatives on 18 February 1943.mp3.

RZuo (talk) 14:10, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: imho the 5m30 possibly TV screenshot can be considered "de minimis" for the full film. --Ellywa (talk) 23:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arilang1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

04:00-04:30 = 30s . 05:30-06:00 = 30s . (30+30)/657 = 9.13% . The images taking up the whole screen lasting for 30s each are not "incidental inclusion". 9.13% is not de minimis. And these are only two of the obvious copyvios. Whole video is full of unsourced photos.

RZuo (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, use File:Madame Chiang Kai Shek of China Addressed the House of Representatives on 18 February 1943.mp3 instead. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arilang1234 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

includes footage not produced by VOA.

RZuo (talk) 15:48, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Abzeronow (talk) 20:13, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Matinius (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence that this is a work by Fars News. No watermark, no photographer credited

HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:14, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim (Low resolution, no metadata) HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:50, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim (lack of metadata and proper size) HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work claim (no metadata, low size) HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and copyrighted logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:08, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that it is a work by Fars. No watermark, no photographer credited HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:28, 27 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 186.175.186.25 22:24, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: low resolution, no EXIF info. holly {chat} 23:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 186.175.186.25 22:29, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep
if the user proves that this image is their property if not : Delete JosefinaDiLeo (talk) 01:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: low resolution, no EXIF info. holly {chat} 23:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? 186.175.186.25 22:31, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: low resolution, no EXIF info. holly {chat} 23:37, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright source. Looking at the GODL, it seems it may override the copyright statement on the PM's website? DIscuss. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: See above. --Yann (talk) 17:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. https://volleybox.net/alexander-osokin-p590/clubs 87.69.242.88 18:18, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:53, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YousefAbdolrezaie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable own work claims (no metadata, low resolution)

HeminKurdistan (talk) 20:51, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Most probably not own works. --Yann (talk) 17:54, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that this is a work by Mehr News. No watermark, no photographer credited HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:46, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 18:32, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Red was erroneously added to the papal tiara on the file I'm assuming this was based on. Use of the false flag has spread to flag manufacturers and emojis. See redditor horizontalhole's post in r/vexillology and the thread from Depths of Wikipedia. gobonobo + c 02:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't seem to be uploaded by an official branch of dangcongsan.vn. This channel have a suspiciously low number of suscribers and I have yet to find any links to it from the website. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 14:48, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The Communist Party video site hosts many videos with the CPV watermark [5]. I cannot find any links to this YouTube channel from that website, and the number of subscribers is suspiciously low. 25stargeneral (talk) 19:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subh Sukh Chain was made by w:Abid Hasan for the lyrics and w:Ram Singh Thakuri, the latter of them died in 2002. India before 1957 was governed by the Copyright Act 1911, which is 50pma (I think). Now, there is a question; if this was first published in Azad Hind, then is the copyright Indian, Japanese, or non-existent for URAA?

--Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:01, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by LifetimeWiki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright source Looking at the GODL, it seems it may override the copyright statement on the PM's website? Discuss. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manik Saha Official Portrait 2023.jpg. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:52, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PCP. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:06, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete and incomplete SVG, license unclear or impossible to verify. It says CC-Zero, but the license is unstable and the deletion is raised. I understand that there is no problem with copyright, but of course, it causes overlapping results with other files, and files uploaded to SVG need to be deleted. Care must be taken when uploading from PNG file format to SVG format later. 220.77.173.83 19:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Official Arabic seal of the Governor General of French Algeria.svg. holly {chat} 17:47, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete and incomplete SVG, license unclear or impossible to verify. It says CC-Zero, but the license is unstable and the deletion is raised. I understand that there is no problem with copyright, but of course, it causes overlapping results with other files, and files uploaded to SVG need to be deleted. Care must be taken when uploading from PNG file format to SVG format later. 220.77.173.83 19:21, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That license of the vector file is correct. The reference source's license was also a public domain, and I indicated the source. Also I just made the png file in vector format and nothing new I added. -- Samhanin (talk) 04:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Recently, an agreement on the use of SVG has been needed. Please ask M.Bitton to agree and discuss the use of SVG. I tried to change it from Wikipedia to SVG, but M.Bitton returned it. File editing dispute procedures are required, and please find a solution to them. I'd like to request M.Bitton who uploaded PNG. --220.77.173.83 17:00, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
First, visit the M.Bitton User Talk on SVG use and find solutions with detailed explanations. --220.77.173.83 17:04, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
If it was a different license, you're right. But the file was a PUBLIC DOMAIN. If constraints are needed to make a public domain into svg file, it is not a public domain license. And give a link to what the regulation you mentioned is.--Samhanin (talk) 03:11, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are no regulations. I'm contacting you for a moment because of an editorial dispute. Regulations are not applied in this regard. I'd like you to help me get an agreement and use the SVG file because there's a simple editing dispute. I don't know the rules. You should go to M.Bitton, French Algeria and to check the cause of the editing dispute. The regulations are not applied yet. You have to talk to M. Bitton first. I'm here to ask questions because there's an editorial dispute, so I don't know the rules or anything. 220.77.173.83 04:09, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
We are calling M.Bitton, who was led by the cause of the editorial dispute, so please wait. Editorial dispute issues need time. --220.77.173.83 04:22, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In other words, your argument is groundless. Since M.Bitton has already uploaded the original file to the public domain, no other permission is required to produce it as svg format. If he needed permission, he would have raised it to another license.--Samhanin (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I know. I'm aware of it, and I ended up in this situation because I ended up in an editorial dispute. I knew it was a public domain. Currently, M.Bitton has not heard from me, so I would like to ask for an agreement on the use of SVG due to an editorial dispute, but it will not be easy to close now. --220.77.173.83 15:51, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to acknowledge that it is public domain and ask for an editorial dispute to be closed, but it is difficult to do so without witnesses. There is already one more duplicate file, but I'm worried about how to handle it. First of all, I think that M.Bitton should leave an opinion so that there will be no inconvenience in solving it, so I think we need to create a way to solve this situation. --220.77.173.83 15:58, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. holly {chat} 17:46, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]