Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/12/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
created in error Nick Number (talk) 01:40, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, broken redirect. --Rosenzweig τ 11:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
No longer needed. TheMariosonic15 (talk) 02:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Redirect to nowhere. Sumanuil (talk) 03:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- This could be speedy deleted. Zscout370 logged out 2600:100B:B013:F149:0:5C:ECFF:B901 04:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Broken redirect, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Warren Commission exhibit 697 (JFK motorcade).jpg. --Achim55 (talk) 09:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake because I miscalculated dates. Photograph, published in 1950, is in public domain in Australia, having been published prior to 1 January 1955 without identifying the photographer. However, it is not in public domain in the United States under the terms of URAA, which renewed its copyright until 1 January 2046 because it was not yet in public domain on Australia's URAA date, 1 January 1996. Arsonal (talk) 07:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Image à caractère raciste 213.162.6.130 10:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep: In use all over the place. Wikimedia sites don't pretend racism doesn't exist; instead, they cover it. And Sinterklaas is a hundreds-of-years-old tradition in the Netherlands. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Keep: Historical picture (2005) and reflection of Zwarte Piet as he was presented 17 years ago. Year added to several Wiki pages that have this picture in use. Vysotsky (talk) 11:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: added to a Wikimedia Commons category. —DerHexer (Talk) 17:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Z thomas as Speedy (speedy delete) and the most recent rationale was: Request of the uploader --Z thomas 20:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC) . In use, so not COM:CSD#G7 eligible. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- the image is unflattering and violates the personal rights of the person depicted. It was used to replace the original uncropped image, so there is no loss. Ailura (talk) 20:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Einfach entlinken und fertig. -- Gruß, 32X (talk) 22:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per author’s request. -- 32X (talk) 22:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Voulveur (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:41, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Voulveur (talk) 16:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Voulveur (talk) 16:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:40, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
I already uploaded a picture Iad Elmassalemah (talk) 19:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
uploaded a map Iad Elmassalemah (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Unaccurate cropping by me, intended to show one player Jamal047 (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 07:37, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Probably copied from the internet [1] Boylarva99 (talk) 11:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Looks like these low res montages are assembled from tourism photos found online, with no credit. The first image I checked, File:El Jadida Montage.jpg, contains photos from https://www.booking.com/hotel/ma/sofitel-eljadida.html?activeTab=photosGallery and https://www.expedia.com/things-to-do/private-el-jadida-azemmour-full-day-tour-with-lunch.a298454.activity-details.
- File:Tétouanm.jpg
- File:Casablancam.jpg
- File:Salém.jpg
- File:Agadirm.jpg
- File:Marrakechm.jpg
- File:Rabatm.jpg
- File:Meknèsm.jpg
- File:Tangerm.jpg
- File:Fès montage.jpg
- File:El Jadida Montage.jpg
Belbury (talk) 20:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 15:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
blatant advertising Veracious (talk) 02:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:19, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This monument has been designed by the Senegalese Pierre Goudiaby Atepa (b. 1947) who is still alive. As there is no Freedom of Panorama in Senegal, the pictures depicting this building have to be removed from Commons. TadejM (t/p) 03:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. An identically-named photo is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:African Renaissance Monument. They may not be of same content but may show the monument as the intended subject. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:25, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Michigan State Representative Laurie Pohutsky at podium in Michigan House of Representatives chamber.jpg
[edit]This file was posted on the website of the Michigan Democratic Party. There is no indication this organization releases their photos into the public domain. There is no additional context to suggest that it is legal to use this image. There is a chance this photo was taken by an employee of the Michigan state government, but the Michigan state government is unlike the US federal government, in that it does not have to release its works into the public domain, and it does not do so. RoundSquare (talk) 04:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I thank you for your concern because I promise I am acting in good faith. Here is my reasoning for believing this picture is appropriately being used: The image is on the "Media & Images" page of the website it is sourced from,( https://housedems.com/laurie-pohutsky/ ) these pages are commonly put in place to allow the public to easily use their media. Furthermore, the sourced image is not from the Michigan Democratic Party as the deletion request claims, but rather the Michigan House Democratic Caucus, I believe this info to be important because of the Michigan House of Representatives policy shown here ( https://house.mi.gov/disclaimer ) which says that they allow photographs and information to be "... granted non-profit use." Nonprofit use being allowed by the source, it is important to remember that Wikipedia is a nonprofit as stated under the "Cultural Impact" section here which cites a study done by Wikipedia itself ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia ). Thank you again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RedWingedBlueJay (talk • contribs) 05:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, licenses which do not allow commercial reuse are not acceptable on Wikimedia Commons. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:22, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Flickrwashing. Metadata credits a photo agency. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 04:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:26, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Taken from FB per MD, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arcul de Triumf (Arad)
[edit]The monument was completed in 2004 by Ioan Bolborea (born in 1956, still alive). There is no freedom of panorama in Romania, permission from the architect is required.
- File:Arad - Monumentul Reconcilierii (30932376648).jpg
- File:Arad - Monumentul Reconcilierii (44753836562).jpg
- File:Arad - Monumentul Reconcilierii (44753837272).jpg
- File:Arad, náměstí Piaţa Pompierlor, vítězný oblouk.jpg
- File:Arad, Piaţa Pompierlor, vítězný oblouk II.jpg
- File:Parcul Reconcilierii din Arad - panoramio (1).jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:28, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope. Larryasou (talk) 07:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:27, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
File:"Our revenge will be the laughter of our children" Bobby Sands Republican Mural, Sevastopol Street, West Belfast (42111867161).jpg
[edit]No FoP for "graphic works" like posters or murals in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 07:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising Headlock0225 (talk) 07:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising Headlock0225 (talk) 07:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This seems to have been spuriously marked as "own work". Larry Hockett (talk) 19:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Source spuriously marked as "own work". Larry Hockett (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Image used in the deleted Minecraft server article (ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/BabelServer) on Japanese Wikipedia. Like the deleted article, it could be self-promotion. Rhcnisoll (talk) 19:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused tiny and low quality photo of nondescript and indistinguishable squirrel, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. Also added for same reason:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"Jerome Bon" quebec
[edit]Very small and very poor quality images of nondescript locations (many without identifiable items, or of locations with numerous better alternatives already), no context, unusable therefore out of scope. All unused.
- File:Quebec (141558969).jpg
- File:Quebec (141558997).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557550).jpg
- File:Montreal (141554994).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557980).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557602).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557663).jpg
- File:Montreal (141556707).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557753).jpg
- File:Montreal (141556795).jpg
- File:Baleine (3225248481).jpg
- File:Baleine (3225248489).jpg
- File:Montreal (141554845).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557565).jpg
- File:Montreal (141556970).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557691).jpg
- File:Arc en ciel (141559620).jpg
- File:Montreal (141557998).jpg
- File:Plattsburgh (141558241).jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Promotional biography of a non-notable individual. Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 20:10, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused poor composition image of nondescript plant and glass, nothing particular indistinguishable, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of nondescript stub, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, no educational value, out of scope. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
COM:DW of this image; there is no FoP per COM:FOP Azerbaijan and image is not de minimis (inclusion is deliberate, central to image, in title and category, etc.) Эlcobbola talk 21:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:40, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Hjart (talk) 21:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No evidence for cc licence no Metadata and uploaded by sock Shadow4dark (talk) 23:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2A02:908:2810:95A0:F456:722B:22B7:4B6D as Speedy (Löschen) and the most recent rationale was: Aus Datenschutzrechtlichen Gründen, Adresse im Zusammenhang mit Autokennzeichen, bitte ich um Löschung des Fotos. Darüber hinaus bitte ich die drei Dateiverwendungen in anderen Wikipedia Einträgen dementsprechend ebenfalls zu überarbeeiten und das Foto zu entfernen. Der Author hat sich die Erlabnis im Vorfeld nicht eingeholt. --2A02:908:2810:95A0:F456:722B:22B7:4B6D 22:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC) GeorgDerReisende (talk) 23:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Autokennzeichen unkenntlich machen! 2A02:908:2810:95A0:55FA:7D03:F47:34FC 21:34, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:12, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
That's my photo and i don't want it to be on wikipedia anymore. That's was just a bad joke from friends, first it was funny, now i want it to be deleted form the internet forever. 86.229.41.21 08:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Despite the highly questionable nomination, this file is low quality and probably out of scope anyway. Brianjd (talk) 14:53, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/File:MSC Seaview Genova.jpg
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 08:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC) Kept: why?. --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:F541:B95:6F8:8E59 11:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No evidence of infringement, username matches EXIF. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:03, 19 December 2022 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Copyright infrigement Frartn (talk) 17:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: already kept twice, we would really need a bit more explanation than just "copyright infringement" in this case which seems fine. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement 2A01:E11:5010:4650:DCA5:AB19:9258:9AD3 14:28, 18 January 2023 (UTC) Kept: Vandalism. IP blocked for 1 month. --Achim55 (talk) 14:41, 18 January 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyright infringement Frartn (talk) 16:09, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
We have given you multiple chances to improve here and to provide evidence for your deletion request, but you blew them all. I will be reporting you and your IP address to the Wikimedia Commons admins for vandalism, false reporting, and block evasion. Angelgreat (talk) 16:18, 22 January 2023 (UTC) Kept: Vandalism. User:Frartn blocked for 2 weeks. --Achim55 (talk) 16:27, 22 January 2023 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
delete this, please Frartn (talk) 22:39, 25 March 2023 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 20:08, 9 April 2023 (UTC) |
Net copyright violation. Where do you find your Admins? 181.43.7.29 18:51, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
- One time uploader. Did you ask him to obtain OTRS permission? 181.43.7.29 19:00, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. Needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Rosemarie Rataiczyk
[edit]Artist is still alive so artworks need OTRS. Photo also needs OTRS
- File:Rosemarie und Werner Rataiczyk, Kunst und Wissenschaft.jpg
- File:Rosemarie rataiczyk vegetation gobelin.jpg
- File:Rosemarie rataiczyk am morgen 1991.jpg
- File:Personalfoto.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. 4ing (talk) 10:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Based on the file description and category, this is a random person, and it's also a tiny file, so probably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unidentified room copied from Facebook. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Group portrait of unidentified people copied from Facebook. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Very small and probably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
low resolution, no EXIF, most likely screenshot Magnus (talk) 10:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
low resolution, no EXIF, most likely screenshot Magnus (talk) 10:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I think this is clearly over COM:TOO. I suspect all this user's images are copyvio, too. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Totally tiny, fuzzy, unused, and with no EXIF. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Very small user art? Not in use. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Small, no useful EXIF, probably copyvio of a professional portrait photographer. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Small, poor-quality file with no useful EXIF. In use but probably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Small file with no useful EXIF. In use but probably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Small file with no useful EXIF. In use but probably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Smal file with no useful EXIF. In use but probably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Small file with no useful EXIF, probably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Small image with no EXIF and a nonsense description, so presumably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Tiny file with no EXIF, presumably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Tiny file with no EXIF, presumably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Small file with no EXIF, presumably copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:18, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
From YouTube: LICENSES BMG Rights Management (Europe) GmbH, UMG, SME (on behalf of Universal Music LLC); AMRA BR, UMPG Publishing, BMI - Broadcast Music Inc., AMRA, LatinAutor, LatinAutorPerf, BMG Rights Management (US), LLC, Kobalt Music Publishing, CMRRA, ARESA, MINT_BMG, Abramus Digital, SOCAN RR, and 10 Music Rights Societies. Should I have tagged this for speedy deletion? Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Yes. --Didym (talk) 01:05, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unless the user is Gregg DeGuire, this is copyvio. Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This map is small enough to not be useful and it has no source. We have already enough of unsourced maps for ethnic groups in Iran and this one differs too much from the CIA map (File:Iran-Ethnicity-2004.PNG). HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted image from IRIB News HeminKurdistan (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
low quality Gampe (talk) 12:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
"The author of the file is unknown" is not a valid PD reason. ✗plicit 13:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Not own work. And if it is, it requires a permission ticket. MarioGom (talk) 13:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res screengrabs and DW's. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits.
- File:IMAGE AWARD STAR SCOUT SIAGA.jpg
- File:IMAGE AWARD STAR SCOUT PENGGALANG.jpg
- File:Dewan penggalang.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Copied from https://www.guardiacivil.es -Tomukas (talk) 15:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Not own works: low-res/web-size images with disparate quality and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data. Many found elsewhere online or screengrabs from Google Streetview (e.g. File:GoaCBDtraffic.jpg - see here; and File:UMAresidences.jpg - see here). Unreliable uploader.
- File:UMAresidences.jpg
- File:MetroNagaCityatNight.jpg
- File:NewPublicMarket.jpg
- File:Libertycommercialcenter.jpg
- File:AerialviewCalabanga.jpg
- File:HighlandViewofLegazpi.jpg
- File:BDOUnibank.jpg
- File:Calabangaterminal.jpg
- File:Calabangapublicmarket.jpg
- File:AngenaNabua.jpg
- File:AlamidFunctionHall.jpg
- File:GoaCBD.jpg
- File:GoaCBDtraffic.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- FWIW, it is used in Wikidata. Still, it's a spammy looking page and this edit plus the 0-follower Flickr account created this week tells me this is COM:FLICKRWASH. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 19:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:59, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:27, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:28, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
unused selfie Trade (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope? Trade (talk) 15:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Trade (talk) 15:42, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted screenshot A1Cafel (talk) 16:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- speedy Delete Юрий Д.К. (talk) 15:58, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbols and diagrams of questionable notability.
- File:2021 July Nordovan Senate layout.png
- File:July 2021 Nordovan Parliament Layout.png
- File:2021 Nordovan Parliament Layout.png
- File:Coat of arms of Nordover.png
- File:2018 Nordovan Senate Layout.png
- File:2018 Nordovan Parliament Layout.png
- File:Flag of Nordover.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Found elsewhere on [2], COM:OTRS permission needed. Larryasou (talk) 16:17, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No permission by artist (died 1970) Bahnmoeller (talk) 17:06, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Low-resolution file which has little educational value {userpage! | talk!} 17:09, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![24 File:"Our revenge will be the laughter of our children" Bobby Sands Republican Mural, Sevastopol Street, West Belfast (42111867161).jpg](#File:"Our_revenge_will_be_the_laughter_of_our_children"_Bobby_Sands_Republican_Mural,_Sevastopol_Street,_West_Belfast_(42111867161).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Anna_De_Weert,_1928,_Koninklijk_Museum_voor_Schone_Kunsten_Gent,_1950-BC.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo of not active contributor. Out of project scope Ignatus (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:49, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo of not active contributor. Out of project scope, self-PR Ignatus (talk) 17:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Scope. Presumably an ethnic map of Iran, but without a legend for colors. No source mentioned. Low quality. Not used in any project. We don't need this map as we have many similar maps. HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Scope. A poor quality map of ethnicities in Iran whithout any source. Not used in any wiki. HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:01, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of a picture, COM:PCP! Ras67 (talk) 18:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Fantasy election map Enyavar (talk) 18:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Enderman0515 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: 1 fictional map of Spain having cancer; 1 apparently personal picture that is not used on any page in the wikis; otherwise seemingly no contributions?
Enyavar (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This is an edit of the deleted image File:David Liebe Hart.jpg with Hart's mouth artificially widened. Belbury (talk) 18:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyvio, taken from this page https://eeva-johanna.net/media/. The website says that the pictures can be freely used by the media, but needs proper licencing. Ur Nan123 (talk) 18:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Ethylmalonic-acid-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Outside of project scope, not realistically useable for educational purposes. Does not seem to be uploader's work. Liance (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted, copyvioVera (talk) 14:26, 4 December 2015 (UTC)
Found on internet Shadow4dark (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
not own work. Got from Instagram, as linked in the Summary section Engr. Smitty (talk) 19:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- posted by Alex Cabagnot himself on his official instagram account. Aileen.n.dc (talk) 19:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Question We get the idea. Do you mind telling us why you want all your uploads deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:19, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- How could it be used to identify you? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, that I will not disclose, for it would defeat the entire purpose of attempting not to be identified in real life. Compusolus (talk) 05:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- The problem is you're just telling us to trust you. Maybe you can communicate privately with COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Does the VRT assist in deletion requests of such a nature? Thank you for your assistance. Compusolus (talk) 06:14, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ask them. I can't think of any other alternative for you, as I'd expect the files to be kept otherwise. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- If the time and date in the EXIF data were removed, that would be enough also. Can that be done? Thanks. Compusolus (talk) 07:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see why not. Let's see what an admin says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- But as I said, you may need to give VRT a reason privately. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see why not. Let's see what an admin says. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- If the time and date in the EXIF data were removed, that would be enough also. Can that be done? Thanks. Compusolus (talk) 07:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ask them. I can't think of any other alternative for you, as I'd expect the files to be kept otherwise. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Does the VRT assist in deletion requests of such a nature? Thank you for your assistance. Compusolus (talk) 06:14, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- The problem is you're just telling us to trust you. Maybe you can communicate privately with COM:VRT. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, that I will not disclose, for it would defeat the entire purpose of attempting not to be identified in real life. Compusolus (talk) 05:51, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Comment Uploader seems to have nominated all their uploads with the same rationale. Brianjd (talk) 14:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Right. So Compusolus needs to establish to COM:VRT that that's somehow a legitimate threat to them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:15, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:14, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
I no longer wish for it to be on Wikimedia Commons for personal reasons. Compusolus (talk) 10:52, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:00, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
I am concerned that it may be used to identify me (in real life), and as such would like it removed with the utmost haste. Compusolus (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 01:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This logo is not text-only, and almost certainly meets the threshold of originality. Adam9007 (talk) 02:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:13, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Tightly cropped, low quality with no meaningful exif, unlikely to be own work. PCP Gbawden (talk) 08:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
The larger photo this was cropped from is clearly a de minimis use of Spiderman's design, per COM:COSTUME. However, this cropped image depicts nothing except for Spiderman -- the photo would have no utility if the copyrighted parts were blacked out, so it is not a de minimis use of Spiderman. IagoQnsi (talk) 02:55, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Claimed 2009 date for musician who died in 1982. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 07:19, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:47, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 07:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Georgia A1Cafel (talk) 07:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in Crimea A1Cafel (talk) 07:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in South Korea A1Cafel (talk) 17:39, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in South Korea. Architect Zaha Hadid died in 2016, still within the copyright length A1Cafel (talk) 17:41, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Italy. Architect Zaha Hadid died in 2016, still within the copyright length A1Cafel (talk) 17:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Completely out-of-scope picture with no educational potential {userpage! | talk!} 00:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:00, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D A R C 12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:New covid cases per day Poland (2).png
- File:New covid cases by day for Taiwan (20).png
- File:New cases NSW (2).png
- File:Daily new cases Australia (2).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:03, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D A R C 12345 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These diagrams appear to be screenshots of the web application StarGen. The home page indicates "All Rights Reserved" while the manual says: "StarGen is freely distributable on the conditions that you distribute the whole package, that you give credit to at least Stephen Dole, Martyn Fogg, Matt Burdick, Ian Burrell, Carl Burke and Chris Croughton AKA Keris, and me in any derivative works, and that you make a reasonable effort to inform me of any additions you make to it or public distributions that you make of it." Per Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses, I don't believe this is considered a free license because notification of the authors is required rather than requested.
- File:Proxima Centarii diagram.png
- File:Wolf 359 plant system as know in 2022.png
- File:The Lalande 21185 planetary system.png
- File:The Ross 128 planetary system.png
- File:Lacaille 9352 star system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The Struve 2398 B (Gliese 725 B) planetary system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The Gliese 1061 planetary system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The Groombridge 34 A planetary system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The YZ Ceti planetary system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The Luyten's Star planetary system.png
- File:The Teegarden's Star planetary system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The Kapteyn's star planetary system as understood in 2022AD.png
- File:The Wolf 1061 planetary system as understood in 2022AD.png
- File:The L 1159-16 planetary system as understood in 2022AD.png
- File:The Gliese 674 planetary system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The Gliese 687 planetary system as understood in 2022.png
- File:The Gliese 876 planetary system as understood in 2022AD.png
- File:The unconfirmed Groombridge 1618 planetary system as understood in 2022AD.png
- File:The Gliese 832 planetary system as understood in 2022AD.png
- File:The 40 Eridani A planetary system as understood in 2022AD.png
- File:Diagram of the fictional Q'ronos star system, home of the Klingons from the USA tv series Star trek.png
- File:System diagram of the fictional planet Batazed on the TV series Star Trek form the USA.png
- File:Diagram of the fictional Cardassian Star System.png
- File:Diagram of the (fictional) planetary system of Cardassia from the American SiFi series Star Trek.png
- File:Diagram of the fictional Kallee Star System from Starwars.png
- File:Diagram of the fictional Yautja Prime.png
- File:Diagram of the fictional star system Vega System (Fictional Planet).png
- File:Diagram of the fictional star system Prime from Azimov Nightfall.png
- File:Diagram of the fictional star system Saula (fictional planet).png
_planetary_system_as_understood_in_2022.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_planetary_system_of_Cardassia_from_the_American_SiFi_series_Star_Trek.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ixfd64 (talk) 04:11, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- It appears that the copyright claim is about the software, not the images that the software produce, am I reading that right? --RAN (talk) 17:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's true that files produced with non-free software are usually accepted. But it could be an issue if these files contain copyrighted assets. Ixfd64 (talk) 17:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I've noticed these images - they're all fairly low-quality, and as mentioned there may be licensing issues with the use of StarGen assets. They probably should be deleted. There are more that aren't included in the nomination; see the user's uploads. SevenSpheres (talk) 03:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:08, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Wedding Palace in Tbilisi
[edit]The Palace was completed in 1984 by Victor Djorbenadze (1925–1999) and Vazha Orbeladze (born in 1941, still alive). There is no freedom of panorama in Georgia, permission from the architects is required.
- File:Cityscapes of Tbilisi. September 2006.jpg
- File:Palace of Rituals, Tbilisi (July 2018).jpg
- File:Sasakhle 2.JPG
- File:Tbilisi Wedding Palace.jpg
- File:Wedding Palace cred Vladimer Shioshvili 2016.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 07:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
The grave was completed in 1946 by Adolphe Wansart (1873–1954). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright length was 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2025.
- File:Fernand Arbelot-Père Lachaise-division11-IMG 3841.jpg
- File:Fernand Arbelot-Père Lachaise-division11-IMG 3842.jpg
- File:Fernand Arbelot-Père Lachaise-division11-IMG 3843.jpg
- File:Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Bellenot-Vincent 01.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 07:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation https://kontakt24.tvn24.pl/leje-konwekcyjne-nad-glubczycami,3997173,ugc 5.173.41.25 15:29, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:09, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP in South Korea. Architect Zaha Hadid died in 2016, still within the copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 17:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Media published on Pixabay before 9 january 2019 are still considered to be freely licensed and are accepted on Commons. Please read https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Unreviewed_files_from_Pixabay and https://pixabay.com/fr/photos/hyundai-porter-secours-vue-de-nuit-616312/ 37.170.24.131 22:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Excluded content, out of scope. funplussmart (talk) 20:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 05:01, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Julio Severo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Julio Severo (Q115551329) says author died in 2021. please send proper permission via com:vrt.
RZuo (talk) 04:58, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:35, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Low quality copy of File:Локация для подкаста АВРОРА МЕДИА.jpg Drakosh (talk) 07:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
car je suis la personne sur la photo tout simplement ! 185.153.43.36 13:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unlikely to be own work --Didym (talk) 01:02, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 19:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Uploads by ArtistSource
[edit]- File:The Stare In My Beautiful Nightmare By QueenNoble Dr. Elle Ramirez.jpg
- File:HUS By QueenNoble Dr. Elle Ramirez.jpg
- File:Iceland by QueenNoble Dr. Elle Ramirez.jpg
- File:The Native Scandinavian By QueenNoble Dr. Elle Ramirez.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Dr. Elle Ramirez Live Minimal Art Book.png
- File:The Cart Season 1 by QueenNoble.jpg
- File:The Heavenly River By QueenNoble Dr. Elle Ramirez.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Dr. Elle Ramirez Trust Artwork.jpg
- File:QueenNoble El Lobo.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Darya Art.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Fine Art.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Sahara Desert Art.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Pharaoh Art.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Nordic.jpg
- File:QueenNoble CLEOPATRA art.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Modern Abstract Textured Original.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Modern Abstract City Life.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Minimalist.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Dyna Abstract.jpg
- File:La galería de QueenNoble.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Modern Minimalist.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Modern Abstract.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Wall Art.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Gallery.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Wall Sculpture.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Collage.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Midcentury.jpg
- File:QueenNoble abstract modern.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Sculpture.png
- File:QueenNoble Art Sculpture.jpg
- File:QueenNoble Art midcentury modern.jpg
- File:QueenNoble.jpg
Accounts of uploader (there was socking) were locked over a year ago for cross-wiki spamming. All of the files this user uploaded are promotional/copyvios.--funplussmart (talk) 05:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:41, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
errore d inserimento Virgivirgivivi (talk) 19:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Il sito di riferimento è un sito di notizie sui programmi tv.
- https://angolodellenotizie.com/ Virgivirgivivi (talk) 15:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:45, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Author request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synorem (talk • contribs) 20:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This one is probably within or close to the time when files can be deleted just at the request of a user. The other two are not, are valuable, and you have to give a good reason for deleting them; otherwise, they should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:10, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- This one is merely a duplicate. The other two have been given a reason on their respective discussion pages. Synorem (talk) 13:35, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Maybe I'm missing something, but the source https://newsroom.ucla.edu/file?fid=58c717812cfac22f82015e82 doesn't mention any license and instead says "Courtesy of the Harmony Project, which means the HP gave the UCLA Newsroom the right to use the picture, but that doesn't mean it can be freely used by anyone else.I didn't see mentions of free licenses anywhere on the website. kyykaarme (talk) 12:44, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete Extracted from https://www.gettyimages.ie/detail/news-photo/president-barack-obama-presents-margaret-martin-with-the-news-photo/129761821?adppopup=true. "Astrid Riecken/Tribune News Service". Cryptic-waveform (talk) 17:44, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- The Getty image is very similar, but they're actually from a slightly different angle. You can also see someone's hand below the handshake in one but not in the other. kyykaarme (talk) 22:47, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no free license on source. --Captain-tucker (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
1973 U.S. magazine cover - presumably under copyright. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Unless it never had a copyright, as per the discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vol4no8.jpg. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- It probably makes sense to
I withdraw my nomination. I'm not sure how to close this nomination and will check the instructions later if I have the time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- It probably makes sense to
Kept: nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
1974 magazine cover: in use, but presumably under copyright. Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-US-no notice, there doesn't appear to be a copyright notice in any of the scanned versions online, and no registration or renewal in the copyright index. I think that was the whole point of the 1970's alternative/antiestablishment press. --RAN (talk) 17:48, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- If that's the case, we can keep this and the other cover of this magazine. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:25, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- It probably makes sense to I withdraw my nomination. I'm not sure how to close this nomination and will check the instructions later if I have the time. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)
- It probably makes sense to
Kept: nomination withdrawn. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:09, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology at Harvard College (IA bulletinofmuseum147harv).pdf
[edit]Copyright notice is on p6. As per Commons:Hirtle chart, this enters PD on 2070. {userpage! | talk!} 18:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Per BHL, this volume is CC BY-NC-SA 3.0. Per Harvard, past Bulletin issues are CC BY-NC 2.0. As both licenses have non-commercial restrictions, the volume’s still not allowed. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:06, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:13, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Unused screenshot, no context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- @P199 Looks potentially useful, but I am not sure, being unfamiliar with the subject. Pinging @Bubba73 as original uploader. Brianjd (talk) 12:08, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The wave form of a grandfather clock ticking is absolutely of educational value and in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I uploaded this several years ago. It may have been in an article at one time, I can't remember. It was to show that the "tick" is different from the "tock". Bubba73 (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Bubba73 You might want to add that to the description. Brianjd (talk) 04:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Good idea - done. Bubba73 (talk) 04:56, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Bubba73 Better. Could you also elaborate on the word Screenshot, if you can remember? Brianjd (talk) 05:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- With respect to scope, I think that there is a reasonable educational purpose explained above. I don't see a scope-based reason for deletion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:26, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
I also uploaded this File:Grandfather clock tick tock 2.jpg. It doesn't seem that I uploaded the sound file - I might not have known that you could upload sound files. Bubba73 (talk) 01:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:15, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Unused screenshot snippet, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Clear educational value, as shown in the updated description. Linked at en:Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 132#Reference wrapping to the next line as an example of the issue discussed there. Brianjd (talk) 12:04, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Pinging @Bubba73 for comments on scope and on removing {{Self}} (I doubt there is any separate copyright in the screenshot). Brianjd (talk) 12:06, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- This is a screenshot of a Wikipedia page that I was using to illustrate a problem. Bubba73 (talk) 04:20, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Bubba73 I see that. Any comments on the licensing? (I added {{Wikipedia-screenshot}} and suggested removing {{Self}}.) Brianjd (talk) 05:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. Bubba73 (talk) 05:13, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Question What Wikipedia page is this a screenshot of? — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:27, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Red-tailed hawk Searching for a sample of text, then looking up the revision corresponding to the screenshot’s date quickly leads to revision 634626813, which is by the uploader. The text and ref numbers all match the screenshot, so we can be confident that this (or a very similar revision) is indeed the source of this screenshot. The article is Philae (spacecraft).
- While checking this, I noticed that the screenshot also shows a beta label next to the edit link, possibly another reason to keep this file (unless we have better screenshots of that – I don’t know of any). Brianjd (talk) 07:51, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 00:16, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Colourful_Acryllic_color_dissolving_in_water.jpg 131.130.179.44 10:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Pictures from Rawpixel are neither CC0 nor Public Domain, but may be used under a free commercial license.
- They may not be redistributed
- https://stock.adobe.com/images/Acryllic-color-dissolving-in-water/341155149 Anajemstaht (talk) 10:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I contacting the Minnesota Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board on this matter. The State of Minnesota owns the copyright I will see what can be done. Myotus (talk) 22:42, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:16, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I contacting the Minnesota Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board on this matter. The State of Minnesota owns the copyright I will see what can be done. Myotus (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Qatar 2022 stadium models
[edit]- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 01.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 02.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 03.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 04.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 04 (cropped).jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 05.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 05 (cropped).jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 06.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 06 (cropped).jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 07.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 08.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 08 (cropped).jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 09.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 10.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 10 (cropped).jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 11.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 12.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 12 (cropped).jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 13.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 14.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 14 (cropped).jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 15.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 16.jpg
- File:HK 中環 Central 租庇利街 Jubilee Street 中環街市 Central Market mall sign 足球世界杯 FIFA World Football Cup 模型 展覽 exhibition 足球場館 stadiums November 2022 Px3 16 (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Superceding the literal dozen or so deletion discussions created by A1Cafel, which severely fractured the discussion on this series of images. The primary concern deals with freedom of panorama; more specifically freedom of panorama in Qatar and Hong Kong. This series of photographs depicts scale models of the stadiums of the 2022 FIFA World Cup, which were on public display in Hong Kong. Per COM:FOP Hong Kong, images of "3D works" are permitted as long as they are "permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public". This may not apply here, as these models are allegedly part of a temporary exhibition. Additionally complicating things is the fact that these models are derived from architectural works which, per COM:FOP Qatar, are copyright protected under Qatari law.
Perhaps the original creator of these images, SUAXINGPWOO Kaliu, can provide more details about the exhibition these models were showcased at. Seeking opinions from Adeletron 3030, Brianjd, and Lee Vilenski as participants in the preceding discussions, and also seeking opinions from Amakuru, Didym, Krd, and Tvx1, who participated in similar deletion discussions over Qatar 2022 stadium images uploaded to Commons. — AFC Vixen (talk) 08:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- @AFC Vixen COM:FOP Qatar is not directly relevant to these photos. It might be relevant to the models, if the models were created in Qatar. But what little FoP Qatar has is unlikely to apply to the models anyway.
- Other Qatari copyright laws, such as threshold of originality and copyright terms, are relevant to the architecture (and therefore the models and photos, to the extent that they derive from the architecture). But there is no need to discuss the details here: it is clear that this architecture is non-free (and will be for a long time). And this means that any separate copyright in the models is a moot point.
- So the only issue left to discuss is COM:FOP Hong Kong. If such FoP is available, then it should apply to these models, even though they are derivative works; I have never seen an FoP case where such derivative works were an issue. But is such FoP available? The key question is whether this is a permanent exhibition, but I know nothing about this exhibition. Brianjd (talk) 12:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- If someone more knowledgeable than me can back up this analysis, then we should remove this DR from the Qatari FOP category. Brianjd (talk) 12:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not really knowledgeable as such, but surely the point of a FOP ban is that in those countries the architectural work itself, and images thereof, is copyrightable. I'd have thought therefore, that scale models of the work fall under the same umbrella - the model is a derivative of the original stadium and therefore subject to the same copyright laws as govern the original? Amakuru (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Does Qatari FoP law apply in Hong Kong? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Amakuru Your first sentence contains a misunderstanding of FoP that I recently saw in another discussion, so I want to correct it. The lack of FoP does not mean that works are copyrighted. It just means that if the works are copyrighted (which they happen to be in this case), then reproducing (etc) those works requires permission.
- Your second sentence is basically correct: the models are derivatives of the architecture and therefore subject to the same copyright laws as the architecture. Actually, we should say that the models are subject to at least the same laws as the architecture – maybe more, as the models may have their own copyright.
- @Ikan Kekek I say ‘no’. I have never seen an FoP case that referred to the country of origin of the relevant work. Why should this case be any different? Brianjd (talk) 10:53, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: thanks for clarifying and correcting my error. Just as a matter of interest, if there's a country A which lacks FOP and another country B across the border where there is FOP, am I allowed to take pictures of copyrighted structures in country A while I'm standing in country B? Because the laws I must follow are those in the country where my derivative is created... It seems like creating a model of a Qatari stadium in Hong Kong is a similar case. If Qatar doesn't allow reproductions of their 3D art anywhere then it might be subject to that. Or perhaps it's fine, because the work created in HK isn't covered by Qatari law, only HK and US law needs to be satisfied...? Amakuru (talk) 11:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Amakuru I’ll just give this quick response for now: I’m assuming that the models were created with permission, so FoP is irrelevant there. Brianjd (talk) 11:21, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Amakuru When standing in country B (with FoP), you should be allowed to take photos of copyrighted structures in country A. Regarding Qatari copyrights, strictly speaking, Qatari law applies only in Qatar. But countries generally respect each other’s copyrights (this is required by the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works, whose parties include Qatar and Hong Kong). So work created in Hong Kong is subject only to Hong Kong law, but in this case, it is indirectly subject to Qatari law as well. But not US law. That only applies when it comes to uploading media to Commons. Brianjd (talk) 13:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- No, Qatari law should not apply here. FoP is an explicit exception to copyright, where anyone is allowed to freely reproduce a publicly visible work (under varying conditions) without permission. In practice, FoP pretty much never applies to 3D models. So either this 3D model is itself a copyvio made without the architects' permission, or more likely it was made with permission, and once the architects allow it to be placed in HK then only HK law applies. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- If I'm not mistaken, many pictures of 3D models on exhibit have been deleted because of FoP concerns. If those are misplaced, all such photos should be undeleted, as models on exhibit in places like museums or government buildings would not have been made and exhibited in violation of architects' copyrights. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- No, Qatari law should not apply here. FoP is an explicit exception to copyright, where anyone is allowed to freely reproduce a publicly visible work (under varying conditions) without permission. In practice, FoP pretty much never applies to 3D models. So either this 3D model is itself a copyvio made without the architects' permission, or more likely it was made with permission, and once the architects allow it to be placed in HK then only HK law applies. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:43, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Brianjd: thanks for clarifying and correcting my error. Just as a matter of interest, if there's a country A which lacks FOP and another country B across the border where there is FOP, am I allowed to take pictures of copyrighted structures in country A while I'm standing in country B? Because the laws I must follow are those in the country where my derivative is created... It seems like creating a model of a Qatari stadium in Hong Kong is a similar case. If Qatar doesn't allow reproductions of their 3D art anywhere then it might be subject to that. Or perhaps it's fine, because the work created in HK isn't covered by Qatari law, only HK and US law needs to be satisfied...? Amakuru (talk) 11:07, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Does Qatari FoP law apply in Hong Kong? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not really knowledgeable as such, but surely the point of a FOP ban is that in those countries the architectural work itself, and images thereof, is copyrightable. I'd have thought therefore, that scale models of the work fall under the same umbrella - the model is a derivative of the original stadium and therefore subject to the same copyright laws as govern the original? Amakuru (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- If someone more knowledgeable than me can back up this analysis, then we should remove this DR from the Qatari FOP category. Brianjd (talk) 12:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I think a key point is whether those 3D models are considered permanently placed and/or publicly visible/outdoors in countries that have those requirements. Do you have any examples of DRs I can look at? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not off-hand, but I'll try to remember your remarks the next time I see one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- I think we have established that this is not a Qatari FoP issue. I have removed that category. Brianjd (talk) 03:31, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not off-hand, but I'll try to remember your remarks the next time I see one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:56, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - models of this sort are almost always part of temporary exhibits. If we get evidence that they are permanently displayed, then they would be allowed by COM:FOP HK. -M.nelson (talk) 11:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). This is clearly public domain in Belgium as the author died in 1940. I cannot find a date for this painting so it's unknown if there is an URAA issue here or not. Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete without the year it's made known we have to assume the worst case: 1940 (year of death). Than we can undelete it in 2036. Multichill (talk) 13:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
File:Bloemenmarkt in Menton (Cote d Azur), Anna De Weert, 1928, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1950-BC.jpg
[edit],_Anna_De_Weert,_1928,_Koninklijk_Museum_voor_Schone_Kunsten_Gent,_1950-BC.jpg){kind=link}
,_Anna_De_Weert,_1928,_Koninklijk_Museum_voor_Schone_Kunsten_Gent,_1950-BC.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Author died in 1950 so it is public domain in Belgium. 1928 date poses an URAA issue since this was not public domain in Belgium in 1996. 2024 would make this essentially free and clear in the U.S. Abzeronow (talk) 18:35, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete agree and undelete in 2024. Multichill (talk) 13:21, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Near duplicate of File:Territoire des Beni Amer.jpg by the same author, appears that one is the intended version. funplussmart (talk) 20:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without clear purpose, should be in wiki-markup if needed, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Sometimes a simple diagram is what you want. I can see this having an educational use. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:46, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Agreed. It shows where things were in an ancient city. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:56, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
- Could someone show the wikitext for this diagram? --Matr1x-101 {user page - talk with me :) - contribs!} 00:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Maome.jpg Rock3003 (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. In use and somewhat higher resolution than the duplicate (which is also in use). I am not certain if this higher resolution duplicate reflects actual improved quality though. Someone with a better eye for image quality may want to take a close look at it. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:20, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:24, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Author request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synorem (talk • contribs) 20:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Valuable. Should be kept if possible. Why do you want it deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Not my work. Synorem (talk) 13:33, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- Then it's an uploader request, not an author request. So what you're saying is that these uploads violated someone's copyright. If so, they do have to be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that's what I'm implying. The Kent Police logo does not belong to me, nor did I create it, thus why I am asking for it to be removed. The file is obtained somewhere off of google images, if I remember correctly. Synorem (talk) 17:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- Then it's an uploader request, not an author request. So what you're saying is that these uploads violated someone's copyright. If so, they do have to be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Maurice Mo Jordan (talk · contribs)
[edit]None of these are own work as claimed, PCP
- File:Roscoe White.png
- File:C. Leigh Purtill Author.jpg
- File:C. Leigh Purtill promotional Picture.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File:Roscoe White.png for non registration or renewal, I haven't ever seen a mugshot in the renewal database. --RAN (talk) 17:37, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Keep Roscoe file, mugshot from 1963; I sent an email to Purtill, pictures are on her blog and Amazon profile. Where on Wikipedia was the Roscoe file transferred? Raquel Baranow (talk) 22:34, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Kept File:Roscoe White.png as PD-US-not renewed. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:03, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
A logo is placed inside the map, which is tought to be protected by copyright HeminKurdistan (talk) 15:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:42, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Old versions of File:Avon Fantasy Reader 05.djvu
[edit]The two versions uploaded on 22 November 2022 should be deleted as they been found to contain copyrighted material, see the discussion on Wikisource: s:en:WS:PD#Avon Fantasy Reader/Issue 05/The Gold Dress.
In the later version, uploaded on 5 December, the copyrighted material has been redacted. so I ask not to remove it. -Nonexyst (talk) 19:23, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: kept the file as such, hid the first two versions as requested. Since the copyrighted material is from 1942, it should enter the PD in the US in 2038 and can be restored then. --Rosenzweig τ 14:23, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
uploaded a map Iad Elmassalemah (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use at es:Copa Africana de Naciones 2023. --Rosenzweig τ 15:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Author request. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Synorem (talk • contribs) 20:45, 5 December 2022 (UTC) (UTC)
- Valuable. Should be kept if possible. Why do you want it deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:11, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ties into my own personal life, notably my career with the Kent County Constabulary. Image has been replaced with one that is more generic now. Synorem (talk) 13:32, 10 December 2022 (UTC)
- That sounds fair. Could you please link the replacement photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- By 'replacement' I meant I have updated the Warrant Card Wikipedia page to display a Metropolitan Police warrant card holder instead, which is a more generic, bigger, and overall more notable police force. Synorem (talk) 16:59, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
- That sounds fair. Could you please link the replacement photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment This is for all the deletion requests for this memorial: You are calling a memorial assemblage of charred remains of the World Trade Center a sculpture? On what basis? This seems entirely wrongheaded to me, and if I'm right, they should be kept. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. They took 6 steel girders from the ruins of the World Trade Center and welded them into the shape of an "A" for America. There is no listed sculptor. This would fall below the threshold of originality for me. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. There’s no work to which one may apply the freedom-of-panorama doctrine. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:24, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. They took 6 steel girders from the ruins of the World Trade Center and welded them into the shape of an "A" for America. There is no listed sculptor. This would fall below the threshold of originality for me. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:05, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- What’s the work? The scrap isn’t a work, because no one made it. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:23, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- And the "9-11-01" monumental inscription? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:22, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. They took 6 steel girders from the ruins of the World Trade Center and welded them into the shape of an "A" for America. There is no listed sculptor. This would fall below the threshold of originality for me. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keepper IronGargoyle, utilitarian object, {{Useful-object-US}} may apply to it. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 11:26, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:9/11 Memorial (Colgate Center, Jersey City). One of the "other" photos in category, only showing recycled metal from the old WTC ruins and assembled together. Such thing is not artistic enough. The inscription is probably trivial. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:06, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This photo is a duplicate. Pascal Fousset (talk) 14:46, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:07, 26 March 2023 (UTC)
This file has a clear copyright watermark. The uploader has relinquished that copyright by uploading under a wikimedia commons compatible licence, but the watermark is incompatible. Another user has created a derivative work without the watermark. I suggest this image is now deleted, or the modified image is overwritten in its place. 2.31.200.187 19:30, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep The uploader has licensed that copyright under CC BY-SA 4.0, which is accepted on Commons. But the file is still copyrighted, and there is nothing wrong with saying so, including via a watermark. Of course, the file would look better without the watermark, so the crop is good, but that is no reason to delete this file. Brianjd (talk) 11:35, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Superseded by 20220305-DSC 0254-XAM-E1.jpg. IMO pictures should work as thumbnails, too. The purpose of the watermark is defeated if you’re transcluding it via
[[File:20220305-DSC 0254.jpg|thumb]](especially on a high-DPI display). ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 17:12, 18 December 2022 (UTC)- @Kai Burghardt This file should be kept as a record of attribution; the crop was uploaded by a different user. Brianjd (talk) 06:00, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image is indeed copyrighted and with free license. The cropped file is dependent on this source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Creative corporate/organization logo, seems above TOO. DMacks (talk) 00:33, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Looks less complex than some of the examples at COM:TOO US, and this organization is based in the United States. It is also worth noting that the spiral seems to be a golden spiral. It is mathematically constrained and not a creative work in and of itself. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Kadı Message 15:02, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Not representative of the company's actual logo Jackie2599 (talk) 18:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. I do not like the rationale here. Logos are not deleted simply for being old, and this is clearly an old logo of a UK television channel. The threshold of originality in the UK is low, but this is also an exceptionally simple logo. The pivot point for me I guess is the red dot. I am guessing this has something to do with Red Nose Day. I think it pushes the logo over the line of COM:TOO UK. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:04, 14 April 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Sean Fraser (politician)
[edit]Source is the Canada Hub YouTube channel, which is unlikely the creator or copyright holder. The channel collects news footage from all over the world, and there is no indication that they created or have the rights to any of that footage.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yeeno (talk) 04:38, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for pointing this out, I did not check this properly at the time of uploading. Delete. Mottezen (talk) 10:05, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. The uploader has acknowledged above that this should be deleted. From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:40, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 21:17, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Source says (C) - needs OTRS or proof of PD claim Gbawden (talk) 09:13, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, @Gbawden. As written on this page, images from this database are free to use only requiring attribution, which is provided on the image. Per reference, the exact quote: "A utilização é livre, desde que seja dado o crédito ao fotógrafo (quando identificado) e ao Instituto (exemplo: "José da Silva/IEA-USP")". Thanks. -- Joalpe (talk) 00:05, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
ː@Joalpe: Hi. Next time if the license is not in the same location as the file, please add it to the permission field so that we can easily verify. Gbawden (talk) 05:50, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Keep, per Joalpe. RodRabelo7 (talk) 01:00, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 21:18, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Inappropriate/child abuse SitcomyFan (talk) 10:50, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Question What is Commons policy on this? Do photos of child abuse get deleted to protect the privacy of the abused child or can they be kept to show abusive behavior? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Are you suggesting that the conduct depicted in this file is indeed child abuse?
- The nominator removed this image from en:Washing out the mouth with soap shortly
afterbefore creating this DR, even though the article itself is not clear on whether this conduct is child abuse. @SitcomyFan: You should have mentioned this here. Brianjd (talk) 15:07, 5 December 2022 (UTC)- Source is given as Flickr: Matthew Getting Mouth Washed Out With Soap. The image is still available there. Brianjd (talk) 15:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- I removed the photo before the nomination, not after. That article was how I discovered the photo in the first place. I removed it then thought maybe the photo itself should be removed so came here to nominate it. I wasn't trying to hide this (I knew it would be seen in the photo's history) nor did I think to mention it here. Now that you've pointed it out, I agree it's probably worth mentioning here, if for no other reason than it highlights the photo is now not attached to any articles (unless someone puts it back). Will see what everyone else thinks now - whether the photo is suitable for the wiki or not. I don't think it is. SitcomyFan (talk) 06:10, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- @SitcomyFan: So you did. If you say that hiding it was not the intended result, I believe you. Even so, that was the actual result. We don’t have a file usage history; I only found it by chance when I was looking for more information on the subject.
- Looking through some of the relevant categories on Commons and the English Wikipedia, it looks like this type of article generally doesn’t have real images, nor are such images available on Commons (at least where I looked). The one exception I found, known to be underage (or at least in school), was Hand caning.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 11:18, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- Used at en:User talk:Orangemarlin/Archives June-July 2011, but for once I think the use is incidental and not a reason to keep the file. Brianjd (talk) 14:57, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Am I suggesting that washing a boy's mouth out with soap is indeed abusive? You bet your ass I am! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:08, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. —howcheng {chat} 21:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
College Logo without Copyright McKaby (talk) 11:49, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Likely {{PD-textlogo}} per COM:TOO Israel. IronGargoyle (talk) 00:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 21:40, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
This looks to me like it meets the threshold of originality. Given that the game was released as Sim Theme Park in the US, that almost certainly isn't the country of origin. Adam9007 (talk) 02:47, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. The question revolves around who is responsible for the logo of this game? The developer was from the UK but the publisher was from the US. If it is a UK logo, it is certainly copyrighted. If it is a US logo, it is most likely below the threshold of originality. IronGargoyle (talk) 12:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
- Well, the US version not only has a different name, but also a different logo, so I'd be surprised if this is a US logo. Adam9007 (talk) 21:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete The fact that the U.S. release had a different logo makes me think that simultaneous publication in the U.K. and U.S.A. is unlikely; this appears to be a U.K. work published in the U.K. and not simultaneously published in the USA. As such, COM:L would pin the source country as the U.K., and this looks too stylized to be below the very, very low COM:TOO UK. As such, this looks like a U.K. work that is copyrightable in the U.K. for which no evidence exists as to a free license, so this should be deleted in light of COM:PRP. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:05, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:56, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
This image is copyrighted under § 12 (8) (a) of the South African Copyright Act, 1978 2600:8800:2C00:BC00:D8CB:5E46:3EEE:C392 06:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- You mean "no copyright shall subsist in official texts of a legislative, administrative or legal nature" etc.? (source: [3]) RoodyAlien (talk) 09:05, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
"The Copyright Act protects a wide range of work, including artistic work from being copied. The national Coat of Arms qualifies as an artistic work. Section provides that the State will enjoy copyright in any work made under the direction or control of the State. Thus, the State, as represented by the Government Printer, has copyright protection until the year 2050." See Protection of the national Coat of Arms Zaian (talk) 14:45, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- With all due respect, what’s wrong the Coat of arms with a different color as long as it doesn’t violate copyright protection laws? FireDragonValo (talk) 22:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
- It's not directly relevant to the copyright status of this image, but there are alternative versions at File:Coat_of_arms_of_South_Africa_(heraldic).svg and File:South_Africa_emblazon.svg. Zaian (talk) 08:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete copyrighted artwork, as explained in [4] and [5]. See previous deletion discussions at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Coat_of_arms_of_South_Africa.png and Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:PD-South-Africa-exempt. Zaian (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
- Where is the proof that this particular image is copyrighted? Mar545 (talk) 10:17, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- I did provide the proof above, but one of the links I provided no longer works. The best source I can find today is this document - page 1 has the artwork, and page 17 of the PDF (Section 1.4 "Protecting the national Coat of Arms") describes the laws that apply. Zaian (talk) 14:55, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: According to the law, the State will enjoy copyright in any work made under the direction or control of the State, and the national Coat of Arms qualifies as an artistic work. Thus, the State, as represented by the Government Printer, has copyright protection until the year 2050. Therefore, it would be appropriate to delete the file as copyrighted artwork, as suggested in previous deletion discussions. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:01, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
This may be text-only, but it's very stylised. Might well meet the threshold of originality. Adam9007 (talk) 03:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. This was the same title text released worldwide (cf. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Themeparkworld.png). The location of the developer is in the UK, but the publisher is in the US. It's obviously above the threshold of originality in the UK, but I think it is below the threshold of originality in the US (note that each letter matches each other instance of that same letter, giving it the characteristic of a font). I would be inclined to think that the developer would be responsible for in-game content and and the publisher would be responsible for marketing materials (like packaging). Because this text does occur on the packaging and it was published in the US, I would lean towards keeping it. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:36, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Livio Castiglioni was born in 1911; this is clearly not a photograph of a sixteen-year-old boy, so the claim of publication before 1927 is patently false.
This editor is an obvious sock of globally-locked long-term abuse/nuisance/hoax editor Alec Smithson – please see Category:Sockpuppets of Alec Smithson and Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/Alec Smithson. Nothing, exactly nothing, that this editor says or claims can be trusted.
Other uploads by the same sock are:
- File:Kodra.png – no source, no EXIF, no permission from the photographer
- File:Pier Giacomo Castiglioni.png – no source, no attribution, no permission from the photographer
- File:Scorcio di Lierna Lago di Como, Italo Giordani, 175x169, 1925.png – Giordani died in 1956, so the PD claim may be false
- File:Piazzetta Lierna Lago di Como, 1920.png – no evidence of the date, that claimed may be false (or not?)
- File:Piazzetta Lierna Lago di Como, 1910.png – no evidence of the date, that claimed may be false (or not?)
- File:Lierna Lake Como, 1910.png – no evidence of the date, that claimed may be false (or not?)
- File:Lierna Lago di Como, scalinata reale scolpita da Castiglioni.png – no source, no EXIF, no permission from the photographer
- File:Lierna Lago di Como, scalinata reale e pennone porta bandiera scolpiti da Castiglioni.png – no evidence of the date, that claimed may be false (or not?)
- File:Corsa di resistenza Lierna Lago di Como, 1910.png – no evidence of the date, that claimed may be false (or not?)
- File:Lierna Lago di Como, pubblicità Cioccolato Caffarel, 1827.png
Some or all of these may be acceptable under the short Italian copyright for non-artistic photographs, but it'll need someone cleverer than me to evaluate that. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:54, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- NB Mistakenly hit Return while writing this in the silly little window provided, have completed it above the earlier signature. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:31, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
- With regard to the file nominated, my attention has been drawn to this file on it.wp. If the claim made there is valid, then presumably this copy of the image could be kept once it's been provided with a suitable rationale and description. Ping Cl3phact0, who mentioned the Italian copy of the image. My doubts/reservations about the other uploads by this sockpuppet remain – no factual claim made by Smithson can be trusted. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:05, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Uncategorized images of Ontario
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
Unused photo of non-notable events/persons, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
|
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: Deleted most per nom, Kept File:HC08043 (46925811085).jpg per Mindmatrix. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:29, 16 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Uncategorized images of Ontario 2
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:22, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Uncategorized images of Ontario 3
[edit]Extended content
|
|---|
|
More unused photos of non-notable events/persons, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:21, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
|
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(30648007251).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, majority non notable, you cannot expect an admin to sort this all out. In addition. the files are lacking evidence they are in PD or are having another free license, so therefore have to be deleted per COM:PRP as well. --Ellywa (talk) 19:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)