Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/10/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 24th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palácio do Planalto reflexcao em Rosa.jpg

[edit]

This image is in the wrong category. 2804:14C:6584:4958:E840:535D:BBDF:211 12:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: and fixed desc & cats. --Achim55 (talk) 15:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hopecenter19csnd.jpg

[edit]

هذا الملف خاصي بي واريد تعديل الصور والمعلومات Hope Cente (talk) 15:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

تكرار معلومات Hope Cente (talk) 17:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cristinini en 2022.png

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake ElfotoTecni (talk) 15:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Никитручо.png

[edit]

Загружен по ошибке, нарушает авторские права KALEV040407 (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 04:14, 25 October 2022 UTC: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) --Krdbot 07:33, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Potapov A.I.webp

[edit]

False license, image can be found in other sources, wrong date of creation Kamolan (talk) 16:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 18:11, 25 October 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 07:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:M-47 Patton.jpg

[edit]

Picture of M-48 tank mistakenly uploaded under the name of M-47 tank. Pr0pulsion 123 (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Only a rename is necessary, and the file has already been renamed. Brianjd (talk) 08:31, 26 October 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Li Lanqing.jpg

[edit]

Apparently not the right copyright license Chengdawei676 (talk) 20:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:COPYVIO. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Ortsschild Alfhausen

[edit]

Reason: new Category:Zeichen 310 in Alfhausen — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramsch (talk • contribs) 13:49, 24. Oct. 2022‎ (UTC)

Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:49, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Uzun Long Kemer Istanbul.jpg

[edit]

Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Yann at 09:21, 29 October 2022 UTC: as per COM:SPEEDY. --Krdbot 13:22, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vögel 2.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Pantona (talk) 09:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tieger.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Pantona (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gepard.png

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Pantona (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tieger 2.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Pantona (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vögel.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Pantona (talk) 09:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Affe 2.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Pantona (talk) 09:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, somewhat belated courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:44, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eule 3.jpg

[edit]

I uploaded it by mistake Pantona (talk) 09:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, somewhat belated courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:45, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Olympe de Gouges BETTER CONTRAST.jpg

[edit]

Joke image CzarJobKhaya (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marie Olympe de Gouges.jpg

[edit]

Joke image CzarJobKhaya (talk) 16:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marie-Olympe-de-Gouges, new picture.jpg

[edit]

Joke image CzarJobKhaya (talk) 16:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mouawad Wajdi.png

[edit]

Joke image modified CzarJobKhaya (talk) 16:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A1217.jpg

[edit]

Because it is Nonsense Andraas (talk) 21:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Not nonsense, but not in use. Is this a better photo of shaved vulva than whichever ones are in use? As an overall composition, it's not bad but would be better if her hand was not blocking part of her face (though that's obviously intentional). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment If you look at the rest of this user's work, it's all more or less erotic photos of women, so I'd give them latitude, except that the lack of reasonable EXIF information and the quality of the photos makes me wonder whether they are not stolen. RichardMB1217, can you tell us why you did not include EXIF information and what camera and settings you are using for each photo, or should we delete them all as likely copyright violation? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek But was the hand position intentional? I haven’t seen this image, so I can’t comment on it. But I have long wondered about Ribka2.jpg. At first, it looks like the subject is covering their private parts, but in fact part of their left areola and most of their vulva are visible. Brianjd (talk) 09:46, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That was posed, too. In the case of this photo, her hand covered part of her face, not her private parts. Anyway, this photo was deleted for copyright violation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:47, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 11:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A1217 01.jpg

[edit]

Because it is Nonsense Andraas (talk) 21:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Elcobbola. --Rosenzweig τ 11:48, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cover of The Lesbians of Berlin (1928) (6268415449).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1969, still under copyright protection in Germany A1Cafel (talk) 06:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Ruth Roellig (1878-1969) is the author of the book, but not known as an artist, and I could not find out who the actual artist for this 1928 book cover was. So the file can be restored in 2049 with {{PD-old-assumed-expired}}. --Rosenzweig τ 14:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cosmetics Mayami (1921) (3200691717).jpg

[edit]

Artist Herman Kosel died in 1983, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2054. --Rosenzweig τ 14:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The elegant shoe (c-1920) (31107227577).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:26, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The elegant hat (c.1920) (45666210422).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:UROSTIFTEREN (1920) (29369598502).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1970, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is da:Sven Brasch; the file can be restored in 2041. --Rosenzweig τ 14:28, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Der Mode Ball (1927) (3218111425).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Distinctive blouses and silk fabrics (c.1920) (47500814351).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:30, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Benger's Ribana, Swimsuits (1925) (4477174924).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1960, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Hans Neumann (Werbegrafiker); the file can be restored in 2031. --Rosenzweig τ 14:39, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:See-Restaurant Starnberg (1924) (6915071719).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Denmark Senior School Dance (1921) (26423117143).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1970, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is da:Sven Brasch; the file can be restored in 2041. --Rosenzweig τ 14:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fencing, gymnastic, swimming, tennis Female Students' Association (1919) (26752179610).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1970, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is da:Sven Brasch; the file can be restored in 2041. --Rosenzweig τ 14:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boccaccio, operetta (1920) (8501445114).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Der Tanz ins Glück Operette (The Dance into Happiness) (1921) (5446188842).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1961 still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Marcel Vertès; the file can be restored in 2032. --Rosenzweig τ 14:41, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Students Ball (1929) (3294873091).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1997, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is Karl-Heinz Dallinger; the file can be restored in 2068. --Rosenzweig τ 14:43, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Strand Hotel Staffelsee, Bavaria (1929) (3589538441).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1965, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Otto Ottler; the file can be restored in 2036. --Rosenzweig τ 14:44, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reigen Ball, Marmorsaal Zoo, Berlin (c.1920) (32472639092).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1956, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 06:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Josef Fenneker; the file can be restored in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FLORAL SUMMER NIGHT REDOUTE (1928) (14546167777).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1966, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is Willy Stieborsky; the file can be restored in 2037. --Rosenzweig τ 14:48, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bonbonniere Eremitage (c.1920) (3166555454).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mode Ball (1928) (3218914592).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:40 years silk Grieder (1929) (14188464213).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1961, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Otto Baumberger; the file can be restored in 2032. --Rosenzweig τ 14:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:For winter sports (1920) (15858723310).jpg

[edit]

Artist Julius Engelhard died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Querubin, Munich Hotel Vier Jahreszeiten (1929) (6823943119).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Mysterious Lady (1929) (26752179690).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1970, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is da:Sven Brasch; the file can be restored in 2041. --Rosenzweig τ 14:35, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Filmball (1927) (6482967953).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1955, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The artist is Viktor Otto Stolz; the file can be restored in 2026. --Rosenzweig τ 14:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CHERUBIN (1929) (6482967789).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1955, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is Viktor Otto Stolz; the file can be restored in 2026. --Rosenzweig τ 14:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Spring Garden Restaurant (1925) (4253951271).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Victoria - wheels, Nuremberg (1921) (46734622514).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1964, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Julius Ussy Engelhard; the file can be restored in 2035. --Rosenzweig τ 14:36, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christmas gifts (1920) (46341009462).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1965, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Otto Ottler; the file can be restored in 2036. --Rosenzweig τ 14:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Heidelberg (c.1920) (2950910117).jpg

[edit]

Artist Fred Taylor died in 1963, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 07:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2034. --Rosenzweig τ 14:57, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kri-Kri, die Herzogin von Tarabac, film (1920) Marmorhaus, Berlin (33112942122).jpg

[edit]

Artist Josef Fenneker died in 1956, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Josef Fenneker; the file can be restored in 2027. --Rosenzweig τ 14:45, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Circus Koxélski (1926) (3331783958).jpg

[edit]

Artist Walter Dexel died in 1973, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 16:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2044. --Rosenzweig τ 14:58, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:From A to Z Show, Berlin (c.1920) (32350017352).jpg

[edit]

Artist died in 1978, still under copyright protection A1Cafel (talk) 16:37, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The artist is de:Willy Herzig; the file can be restored in 2049. --Rosenzweig τ 14:59, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Demonstration k26 24 10 2022.jpg

[edit]

I did not know it would be publicly visible DieErkenntnis (talk) 21:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@DieErkenntnis  Speedy delete per CSD G7. Brianjd (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 15:00, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alpraz.JPG

[edit]

{{BadJPG}}, many replacements in Category:Alprazolam. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 06:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 17:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FAD FADH2.jpg

[edit]

Confusingly mixed represenations of chemicals indicated to be analogous. One structure has an atom cropped. And unusual background and in-image caption-number inhibit reuse. As the image-description notes, we have all these images (and other representations of each chemical) already. DMacks (talk) 07:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 17:19, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotis 23-10-2022.jpg

[edit]

Fails COM:SCOPE in that there is no plausible educational use for this peculiar image. "The orange-toned image shows Hector reflected in a mirror." Andy Dingley (talk) 00:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

PierreSelim (talk) 08:49, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TransformingTube-Poster-P1040876 (33706643055).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Earth Union Federal General-Assembly 0096.svg

[edit]

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 06:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:General dynamics (48727335196).jpg

[edit]

No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:23, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZZZFFFVVV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 07:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:24, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nallbe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 07:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Preeda.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, not as a personal image but as a possible copyvio from the (now deleted) Soundcloud page of the subject given as the source, with no evidence of permission. Belbury (talk) 19:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:29, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Christian McCaffrey 49ers.jpg

[edit]

Apparent copyvio - Getty Images pic, no evidence of the purported Creative Commons license. Larry Hockett (talk) 09:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, photo copyrighted to Ezra Shaw, taken yesterday. https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/christian-mccaffrey-of-the-san-francisco-49ers-warms-up-news-photo/1435957797 Belbury (talk) 19:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Preparing the home of Love.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Preran S.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:32, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PRIMO PIANO.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:35, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No other global contributions. Also, suspected copyright violation: uploader claims to be the subject, but the image does not look like a selfie. Brianjd (talk) 08:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:33, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goldenjerry (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 13:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of project scope per COM:SCOPE PierreSelim (talk) 09:20, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:51, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thurough.jpg

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete it is out of project scope. PierreSelim (talk) 09:17, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Penis flácido.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cloudpfleger (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bunch of low quality COM:PENIS photos, they are not special enough that showed no educational value on Commons.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:53, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Affiches IBK Saint-Denis.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Mali A1Cafel (talk) 16:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Durov's Code Logo.webp

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Krd at 11:16, 1 November 2022 UTC: No license since 23 October 2022 --Krdbot 14:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CyberForum Logo CMYK.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Krd at 11:15, 1 November 2022 UTC: No license since 23 October 2022 --Krdbot 14:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo dk.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Krd at 11:26, 1 November 2022 UTC: No license since 23 October 2022 --Krdbot 14:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:New Story Schools logo.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Krd at 11:28, 1 November 2022 UTC: No license since 23 October 2022 --Krdbot 14:35, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Stefan Thorsson.jpg

[edit]

Non-free, uploader claims copyright. Tournesol (talk) 09:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright by Einar Falur Ingólfsson, the photographer at the time. Cityclown (talk) 09:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Top Show Products.png

[edit]

Promotional spam Dronebogus (talk) 09:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete requires permission. Is above the threshold where logos are nodded though. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 11:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Backrooms Fandom Logo, Toolbar Screenshot.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete We already have the icon of the Wiki, so upon further review I see no point in keeping the toolbar logo. StuckInLagToad (talk) 14:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already deleted by Krd. --Rosenzweig τ 11:55, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brahmanandarana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only uploaded for use on a speedily-deleted self-promotional page on English Wikipedia. Outside of COM:SCOPE.

Marbletan (talk) 18:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lourdes M. Castro Ramírez.pdf

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE as a pseudo-article, no permission for use of photo. Belbury (talk) 20:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:عبد اللطيف أبو قورة مؤسس إخوان الأردن.jpg

[edit]

Exact duplicate file (F8). See File:عبد اللطيف أبو قورة.jpg --Karim talk to me :)..! 22:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Artist Xdree home.jpg

[edit]

Photograph of an artist who does not have a page in the encyclopedia and zithout the face showing. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Suspect copyright violation. Uploader claims to be the subject, but this does not look like a selfie. No camera metadata. Same for Artist Xdree.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 09:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Unused personal photo by non-contributors/F10. --Wdwd (talk) 13:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gimcheon-Stadion Supporterblock.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Yanikor as Speedy (SLA) and the most recent rationale was: bitte eigene Arbeit herunternehmen. Danke --Yanikor (talk) 16:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC) Biberbaer (talk) 17:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:25, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kościół Ducha Świętego w Krośnie.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Zwiadowca21 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: {{de|sehen source Zwiadowca 21 18:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:24, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ShyamalChandraLA.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by BriefEdits as Speedy (selfie). Does not qualify F10, as user seems to have made some constructive enwiki contribs. The photo still appears to be out of COM:SCOPE, so filing DR. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Georgian Manor Resort, Collingwood, Canada, May 2014 (14294354381).jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING. P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Georgian Manor Resort, Collingwood, Canada, May 2014 (14295743972).jpg

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING. P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2018 Yamaha YZF-R6-0.jpg

[edit]

This photo is no longer used. Photo replaced with "2018 YZF-R6 white.jpg". Kuro202 (talk) 04:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. So what? This looks like a better picture than that, and besides, where did you get the idea that a perfectly usable photo should be deleted from Commons the moment it's not used in a Wikimedia article? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jax 2.jpg

[edit]

Nominated for deletion. 2001:8004:1245:3E65:E81F:5334:F165:4599 05:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Ikan Kekek.   — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 04:20, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Missing reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 12:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jax 2.jpg

[edit]

Original owner requesting deletion for privacy reasons 2403:5814:C192:0:7C8D:4F3A:BA2:DBE0 18:31, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Lack of evidence that IP 2403:5814:C192:0:7C8D:4F3A:BA2:DBE0 is the "owner" of whatever. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:16, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am the original uploader, this picture appears when you search my real name and I’m no longer comfortable with it. I’ve already emailed the wikimedia admins so hoping they’re able to get this page removed. Thanks 2403:5814:C192:0:8913:6D1D:C618:853B 14:41, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
sorry, made another deletion request don't know how this all works {speedydelete|1=Privacy concern - Case 88019}
I originally uploaded this years ago and this picture appears when you search my real full name and I’m not comfortable with it. I’ve already emailed the Wikimedia admins so hoping they’re able to get this page removed 1.136.105.180 19:15, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Privacy concerns have been addressed by means of suppression, no need to delete the file. If your former username is the problem, then it can be resolved by other means too. Taylor 49 (talk) 20:50, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
yes but that's only half the problem solved, this pic still has some sort of link to my full name on google... why can't it be deleted if it's not in use anywhrre 1.136.105.108 21:02, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment It takes some time until it disappears from Google. If you consent into keeping, I can close this deletion proposal, and rename the file immediatey, so that damn Google won't find it anymore. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:17, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I mean, the wiki account with my name has been deleted for about 5 years now, surely that's enough time for google to update? 2403:5814:C192:0:4959:D28F:FA7A:1C3B 21:22, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
but sure rename it, im guessing you've probably dealt with google being tricky before. thanks again 2403:5814:C192:0:4959:D28F:FA7A:1C3B 21:23, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per agreement in favor of rename and other suppressions. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:36, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1179 (Ščaniaty).jpg

[edit]

Initially marked as duplicate of File:Stamp of Belarus - 2017 - Colnect 678014 - French Bulldog Canis lupus familiaris.jpeg. However was kept for not being exact copy. I think that this file is of much worse quality and could be removed. Jarash (talk) 05:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:11, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Social Finance logo.png

[edit]

This logo is outdated and a duplicate. The current logo is at File:SoFi logo.svg NBfromSoFi (talk) 16:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. We don't delete historic logos just because they're historic, and e also don't delete raster file just because there is no also a vector version available. --Rosenzweig τ 10:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Social Finance logo.png

[edit]

This logo is outdated and a duplicate. The current logo is at File:SoFi logo.svg 4.78.162.18 19:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 10:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shiva Amini.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by DejaVu as Screenshot
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, about whether PD-US-Gov is applicable here, despite being not under a free license at source. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To stay. The picture I uploaded is a screenshot of media owned by VOA which is legally allowed for us to use in Wikipedia. For example, there are 21,570 other pictures here uploaded on Wikipedia with the same licensing. I think there is no licensing issue with this picture, but if there is any please let me know that so I can solve the issue.Iranwatcher (talk) 15:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone dispute that the cited video is by VOA? If not, I don’t see the problem. Brianjd (talk) 09:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Define "by VOA" ;-) . At least for images/photographies it is well known that VOA also publishs images that are not their own work (and thereby don't fall under PD-USGov). Typically they are detected by sharp-eyed patrolers who recognize the very small, easy-to-miss letters AP in one of the image's corners.
Wrt the discussed screenshot: no, I am not aware of a specific claim against the underlying video, offered by "VOA Farsi"[1]; except that they omit any mentioning of license or PD by themselves. As I can't neither read the writing nor understand the language of the video, I cannot estimate whether it's likely their own material or taken from another channel. --Túrelio (talk) 10:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are over thinking here. As a person who can read the writing and understand the language of the video, I can let you know that this is a video of an interview with Shiva Amini by a VOA program, which means that the video is owned by VOA. It is uploaded originally here on voanews.com, so I believe there should not be any more doubts. Iranwatcher (talk) 03:06, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, as also offered on VOA-website. --Túrelio (talk) 09:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eritrea corner's 19.jpg

[edit]

Modern building, no freedom of panorama in Eritrea A1Cafel (talk) 03:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:08, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nano-DESI setup.jpg

[edit]

{{BadJPG}}, orphaned/replaced by File:Nano-DESI.jpg by uploader. Leyo 07:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lao language font in iOS.png

[edit]

White text on transparent background, seems out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:09, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20220721-FS-MRD-BloomingtonLake2-JoeBeck (52232205585).jpg

[edit]

Photo courtesy of Joe Back, not from the Forest Service of USDA, thus invalid PD license A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BloomingtonLake-CTNF-20220721-FS-MRD-1-JoeBeck (52231729023).jpg

[edit]

Photo courtesy of Joe Back, not from the Forest Service of USDA, thus invalid PD license A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:20220721-FS-MRD-C-TNF-BloomingtonLake3-JoeBeck (52232205620).jpg

[edit]

Photo courtesy of Joe Back, not from the Forest Service of USDA, thus invalid PD license A1Cafel (talk) 04:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sheekhhh.jpg

[edit]

This File:Sheekhhh.jpg is signed "Abdilaahi Persia" in the picture, and File:Sacdadiin 2.jpg is signed "Apdala Adam," but both them were uploaded by User:Seepsimon with comment "own work". Either license (perhaps both) is wrong. Freetrashbox (talk) 06:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:FamilyFlag.gif

[edit]

Out of project scope: unused private artwork George Chernilevsky talk 07:56, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:14, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pp sign222.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as no useful description or valid categories, low quality and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 08:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:15, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ppablo2018.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PR THE BAD BOY.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pr. Ibrahim Kamel.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Praagnya.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pradeep kumar rajput photo.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pragalbh Ojha.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 08:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Praiziño Chavez.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prajwal devraj.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Watermarks, COM:ADVERT Mztourist (talk) 08:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:17, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prakash cool in place.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prakash Parmar The Singer.jpg

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prasanta best music.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prasanth chinthapudi.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PraSanthi Theater .jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 09:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:19, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prasham profile.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prashanta Mondal.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PrashantSahay.jpg

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 09:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and DW. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:18, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pravin chakravarty.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:11, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:22, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prayetietia.png

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Most of this batch of deletion requests looks good, but you are again nominating too many to check out, so I hope you pause for a few days. I'm doubtful about this one because, based on press coverage in his native Ghana that comes up in a web search of Praye Tietia, he seems to be a celebrity there. I would  Keep the photo if there are no copyright problems, but the lack of any real EXIF info is troubling. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are being deliberately inflammatory. Can you ever possibly drop a discussion, or is it essential to you to have the last word? If so, go ahead. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek I think the nominator has a point. The community, not you alone, are responsible for responding to deletion requests. And there is no time limit. So there is no reason that deletion requests need to be throttled. At least the nominator is starting discussions instead of tagging the files {{SD}}. Brianjd (talk) 06:50, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mztourist has some history of nominating photos that are in use or that are of individuals with Wikipedia pages or art by such individuals, on the basis that those are "personal" photos or photos of self-made art by "non-notable" individuals. Therefore, it is important for all their deletion requests to be checked. To be fair, not only have their nominations improved greatly as of late, but there has not been the same volume of deletion requests by Mztourist more than two days in a row this time, so that's manageable, and it's very good that you are helping to check these nominations. As long as 2-3 of us can manage to check these deletion requests before they are acted upon, I am satisfied. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:11, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    @Ikan Kekek I agree that it is important for someone to check deletion requests, especially F10-style requests. But that someone is not me. I scan DR lists for requests that look interesting or within my area of expertise; F10-style requests rarely meet those conditions. And I’m not sure whether anyone else is checking them either, based on the lack of any votes/comments on most of them.
    It doesn’t help that we have little guidance on whether something/someone should be considered notable if they don’t have a Wikipedia article. Brianjd (talk) 07:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek No hits on TinEye. Brianjd (talk) 08:09, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as a photo of a live performer, identified in the description as Ghanaian musician Praye Tietia, taken from the audience. Belbury (talk) 19:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not notable. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:24, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Preeda - 2018.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:25, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Preeti Rao.jpg

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST, COM:ADVERT Mztourist (talk) 09:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Premio IDEAS 2007.jpg

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 09:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Presentacion gerardo.png

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 09:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Presentacion liliana.png

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 09:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Presi Kiss.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:President7171.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 09:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Presidential Inaguration.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, useful image, depicts a member of the catering staff at a South African presidential inauguration event. Belbury (talk) 19:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A personal image can also be educationlly useful. It's showing what catering staff at a particular type of event wears to perform their job, and how they balance that with the need for security in the form of a lanyard. --Belbury (talk) 07:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The image is useful: the lanyard is (kind of) readable, and the information on the lanyard can be checked. But before checking that, I noticed that the uploader also uploaded Tshepang at 2019 presidential inauguration. .jpg, whose filename is a red flag. Indeed, the name ‘Tshepang’ from the filename matches the uploader’s username, and ‘Masilo’ from the lanyard also matches. As the subject is usually not the copyright owner, these files appear to be copyright violations. Brianjd (talk) 08:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:27, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Press-freedom.png

[edit]

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 09:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete great piece of artwork with obvious use, but it looks like a copyvio: https://www.mediareform.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Press-Freedom-petition.png Belbury (talk) 19:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pressebild Firebeat.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:28, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pride In your skin.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:29, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PRIMAC IMPERMEABILIZACION TRANQUE.jpg

[edit]

COM:ADVERT, COM:WATERMARK Mztourist (talk) 09:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Primary photo.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prince gujjar.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prince mj the vocalist .jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 09:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DSC 7760 (14800546576).jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 09:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ericbendross (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional spam

Dronebogus (talk) 09:41, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:31, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mongolia (6246928770).jpg

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 09:42, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vand (7977015528).jpg

[edit]

Out of scope low quality and not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 09:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cordel (18816951414).jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as self-created artwork without obvious educational use Mztourist (talk) 09:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ainhoa Muñoz Padilla.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Tulokitaklk as Speedy (destruir) and the most recent rationale was: lo he subido sin el consentimiento de la otra persona, porfavor borrarlo rapido,gracias
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Delete, obviously, and why was this ever raised as a DR other than to waste all of our time? Andy Dingley (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete We generally don’t require consent for photos taken in public, so I don’t see why that is an obvious reason to delete. But this looks like a selfie, suggesting that it is a copyright violation; that is an obvious reason to delete. Brianjd (talk) 08:39, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Basilica in Katowice Panewniki Bells.mpg

[edit]

file was not loaded properly Abraham (talk) 11:13, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per self-nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:33, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:TropicalstormKai-Tak09.58.592017.jpg

[edit]

Extremely poor map, only used on contributor user page (globally locked user). No educational value --> Out of Scope Enyavar (talk) 12:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by مصطفى محمود شحاته (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)

JopkeB (talk) 13:20, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete out of project scope COM:SCOPE. PierreSelim (talk) 09:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ssematimba bonny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors). Commons is not a family album

JopkeB (talk) 13:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I like The African Child in the digital era.jpg; it is a good depiction of a child using modern technology. At least, I would like it if it were a decent resolution (it is only 270 × 270). The low resolution together with the lack of metadata suggests a copyright violation. Brianjd (talk) 08:42, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Smslocalcom.png

[edit]

Image used for promotion on Wikidata, out of project scope. Jianhui67 T★C 15:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:العلم اساس النجاح Al 3ilm assas al najah.png

[edit]

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EMCI logo.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Excalibur logo.png

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:How to get a dog.pdf

[edit]

Outside of COM:SCOPE. If this bit of text were to be needed anywhere on a Wikimedia project, it should be text on that project not a PDF on Commons. Marbletan (talk) 16:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Krishna Chaitanya Rao Kathala.png

[edit]

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prof. Dr. h. c. Marcio Farias.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 16:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:44, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:دیدار پوتین با رهبر ایران.jpg

[edit]

Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:حاج منصوری.jpg

[edit]

Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mid-infrared light.png

[edit]

Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CITOR3-logo.jpg

[edit]

Out-of-scope personal logo. IceWelder [✉] 19:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:45, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Johan van Oldenbarnevelt - bust.jpg

[edit]

three dimensional object, photographer "unknown" Polarlys (talk) 21:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9  ✉ 02:46, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sweden deploys.jpg

[edit]

Very low quality, blurred and severe jpeg compression faults; also lacking in information ('Sweden' is also incorrect, as birds and vegetation do not fit) MPF (talk) 00:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above --Lukas Beck (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:-moevagirl mahlaghajaberi wearing her shiny orange Ally swimsuit (2) (51235817230).jpg

[edit]

Flickerwashing, from Instagram. also all files on Mahlagha Jaberi Category are faked by Flickr. AzeriCux (talk) 02:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:09, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarah Mapps Douglass(1).jpg

[edit]

This is not an image of Sarah Mapps Douglass. It is an image of Nannie Helen Burroughs and should be deleted. See the full version of the image: File:Nannie Helen Burroughs.jpg Johnj1995 (talk) 02:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as misidentified duplicate image. A higher res version with only slight variation in contrast is at File:Nannie Helen Burroughs, 1879- (LOC) - Flickr - The Library of Congress.jpg. Belbury (talk) 19:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete lowres and overcompressed. --RAN (talk) 06:23, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Johnj1995 for spotting this! Should at least be renamed. Syced (talk) 08:33, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete - lesser quality image, with misidentification --Hsarrazin (talk) 08:52, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bird sculpture at the national museum of Botswana.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Botswana A1Cafel (talk) 03:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Animal table decorations.JPG

[edit]

Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mafuta.jpg

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 03:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:10, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files found with Special:Search/kunstwerk plaswijckpark -reliefs

[edit]

Copyright violation. These sculptures are in Plaswijckpark. You have to pay for access, see https://www.plaswijckpark.nl/reserveer-je-ticket/, so no FOP (Netherlands). And the sculptors of these sculptures are not dead for at least 70 years, two of the four are even still alive. So no public domain. And I do not see VRT tickets.

JopkeB (talk) 08:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:11, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pratik Ghosh - Barrackpore 2017-03-31 1296.JPG

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 09:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Who is he? How are these photos educationally useful? Mztourist (talk) 08:28, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Pratik Ghosh - Barrackpore 2017-03-31 1299.JPG

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST Mztourist (talk) 09:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 11:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arc de Triomphe, Wrapped, Paris (51549547634).jpg

[edit]

keine Panoramafreiheit in Frankreich, nicht bleibend Ralf Roletschek 11:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then definitely delete (or revert). That sort of sophistry is not what we're here for at all. You've also thus broken the masthead image on the L'Arc de Triomphe, Wrapped article. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Christo hasn't.
As this is INUSE, I would suggest moving it to WP. It would meet NFCC for L'Arc de Triomphe, Wrapped.
A bulk deletion of Category:L'Arc de Triomphe, Wrapped (or most of it) might be justified. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete the image has become a generic street scene in front of Arc de Triomphe. The file's original context has also changed. Perhaps migrating a copy of it to some Wikimedia sites that allow fair use files is fine. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:21, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Patricia Lajara de Camilleri.jpg

[edit]

Dubious own work (low resolution and no EXIF). Although I couldn't find the original, in this 2021 article the depicted person is wearing the same clothes [2], so it's probably from the same photoshoot. -sasha- (talk) 11:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per above. Ivanbetanco43 (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by USERWIKIUSEROK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sir ,
These Images were Used by me on a Wikipedia page , but later they got removed .
If its a Wikipedia Norm to remove such images , then I am fine with it .
Thank You Sir For Trying to make Wikipedia Better . USERWIKIUSEROK (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:12, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kupetskaya Julia.png

[edit]

Unconfirmed free license, credited as own work, but can be found in other sources https://mytyshi.ru/structure/azarov-viktor-sergeevich-689, apparently was taken from there Kamolan (talk) 16:39, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Свято-Успенська Почаєвська Лавра, світанок.jpg

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in 2011-2013. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 野红 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not own work. see https://twitter.com/8xflyxLXsC4ikmg/status/1441924632060125185 .

Roy17 (talk) 19:32, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Global web sites.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The filename, captions and the link under the {{Information}} template (which appears to be a link to a porn site) suggest that it was uploaded for promotional reasons. Brianjd (talk) 08:55, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Human penis 5cm.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete If the ‘5cm’ in the filename is the penis length, then it has some information about the penis, which puts it ahead of most penis photos. Unfortunately, despite a resolution of 3264 × 2448, it is low quality, with no details of the penis (or anything else) clearly visible.
No other global contributions, except for 图像.jpg, which does not look promising either. Brianjd (talk) 08:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elyotto SD Virtual 029-695x1042.jpg

[edit]

There is no evidence to suggest that this image has been released under any free license. Aplucas0703 (talk) 16:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Circumcised1.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Newfoundland 108 (2634775216).jpg

[edit]

Out of scope as no useful description, location or valid categories and so not educationally useful Mztourist (talk) 09:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep, as it's part of the Tensorflow dataset used for machine learning model training. 2601:602:8001:310:EE60:DE03:9FA8:B138 17:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Some elements may be useful. --Kadı Message 16:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Davis L. Mellville.jpg

[edit]

Copyright violation? This certainly cannot be not "own work" by Drdredredre because the photo was made in the 1920s, see https://cz.pinterest.com/pin/69313281750088382/?mt=login. Unknow photographer. So unclear when the photo is in the public domain, may take another 20 years.When I Google with the name Davis L. Mellville I get photos that do not look like the person depicted here. No VRT ticket JopkeB (talk) 13:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, https://www.flickr.com/photos/33147718@N05/7390163072 describes this image as Untitled portrait of a man, possibly of the surname 'Richardson' and says that it is "not be used for any commercial or for-profit purposes without the permission of the museum". Belbury (talk) 19:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Definitely copyright violation. Belbury: Thanks for your research. --JopkeB (talk) 03:26, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: initiatior withdrew nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:48, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Demmin-1945-HolstenstrasseRuinen-saeu.jpg

[edit]

Author is Karl Trettin (1872–1954). [https://www.welt.de/geschichte/zweiter-weltkrieg/article176015129/Massenselbstmord-von-Demmin-Muetter-banden-Steine-an-ihre-Kinder-und-ertraenkten-sie.html Link. There is no permission to set this photo under CC0. Erell (talk) 08:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did some modifications on the pictures you signaled (this one and Demmin-1945-LuisentorDie-linke-Seit.jpg), hoping it will be good enough. I'm not very used to Creative Commons license since, usually, I don't upload pictures more recent than the end of WWI. These pictures were an exception for an article on the French WP. What do you think of the modifications I did ? Also, what license can be the most appropriate for these pictures ? Othrod (talk) 13:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete This picture is still under copyright of the original photographer (70 years after death). We cannot keep it or derivative works of it. Undelete in 2025! -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Accd. to [3], he took these photos to paint watercolors after them, so assuming they were not published until after 2002, their US copyright is 70 years pma as well and the file can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 18:20, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Demmin-1945-LuisentorDie-linke-Seit.jpg

[edit]

Author is Karl Trettin (1872–1954). [https://www.welt.de/geschichte/zweiter-weltkrieg/article176015129/Massenselbstmord-von-Demmin-Muetter-banden-Steine-an-ihre-Kinder-und-ertraenkten-sie.html Link. There is no permission to set this photo under CC0. Erell (talk) 08:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Accd. to [4], he took these photos to paint watercolors after them, so assuming they were not published until after 2002, their US copyright is 70 years pma as well and the file can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Selección de Argentina (Escudo).png

[edit]

No real source 170.246.91.106 01:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: already. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Coats of arms of towns in Donetsk Raion

[edit]

Unofficial CoA projects by S.Akatov. Non-free. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Soviet coat of arms

Anatoliy (talk) 16:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Coats of arms of towns in Bakhmut Raion

[edit]

Unofficial CoA projects by S.Akatov. Non-free. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Soviet coat of arms

Anatoliy (talk) 16:49, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Coats of arms of towns in Horlivka Raion

[edit]

Unofficial CoA projects by S.Akatov. Non-free. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Soviet coat of arms

Anatoliy (talk) 16:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Coats of arms of towns in Kramatorsk Raion

[edit]

Unofficial CoA projects by S.Akatov. Non-free. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Soviet coat of arms

Anatoliy (talk) 16:53, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Coats of arms of towns in Pokrovsk Raion

[edit]

Unofficial CoA projects by S.Akatov. Non-free. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Soviet coat of arms

Anatoliy (talk) 16:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:23, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dmitrii Vlasov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST.

Mitte27 (talk) 15:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Новий герб м Севастополя.png, File:Новий прапор м Севастополя.png, File:Новий герб АР Крим.png, File:Новий прапор АР Крим.png, File:Прапор род Власових.jpg, File:Прапор ВО НСУ.jpg, File:Логотип ДБК ОНСУ.jpg, File:Прапор ДБК ОНСУ.jpg, File:Герб род Власов.png, File:Прапор НСУ.png, File:Логотип НСУ.png and File:Штандарт голови НСУ.png, since the fourth file is the usual flag of the Crimean Tatars, and the rest of the files are actually used, see [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13]. You can do whatever you want with the rest of the files. 95.55.214.216 19:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 23:19, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Black Verified.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Unclear to me how this is an ad. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, unused out of scope logo for serial self-promoter. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:45, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Graffiti in Augsburg 4361 planet B.jpg

[edit]

possible copyvio Mateus2019 (talk) 19:50, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:USN1.gif

[edit]

Logo too complex to be simple for this project to use. Uploaded as "own work", but the logo clearly belong to a news agency US Newswire. George Ho (talk) 20:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The logo in question was used by the company U.S. Newswire until 1999 when it merged with Medialink. The logo can be viewed on the Internet Archive at https://web.archive.org/web/19980128145319/http://www.usnewswire.com/] I worked for the company from 1995 to 2006. Not sure why you feel this logo needs to be deleted. Please clarify BT20005 (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@BT20005: Please see COM:TOO US. If that's not enough, please see COM:Licensing and COM:Trademarks. To summarize, the logo's US map is visually stunning and more graphical enough to qualify for US copyright. You worked for the company, so why not request permission from the parent company of the news agency or the news agency itself? Or email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (seen at COM:VRTS)? George Ho (talk) 22:22, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asif Raihan verified.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Haseeb55 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Unclear to me how this is an ad. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Because of the file name, the uploader (User:Md Asif Raihan) tried to mean that he is a verified person. — Haseeb (talk) 06:15, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Asif File.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. Unclear to me how this is an ad. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 07:51, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PRESTO .jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:29, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:PRESTO.jpg. Brianjd (talk) 08:15, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:PRESTO.jpg; no other responses calling for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 08:13, 30 December 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PRESTO.jpg

[edit]
See also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:PRESTO .jpg.

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:30, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mztourist The same uploader also uploaded the following files, which are not nominated for deletion:
Naturally, before nominating a file for speedy deletion under F10, you check the uploader’s contributions, right?
So what’s the difference between the two files you nominated and the three you did not? Brianjd (talk) 08:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes I did. The photo I nominated is not in use and the uploader has no constructive global contributions. I don't look at the few other photos they uploaded. Mztourist (talk) 08:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mztourist But here’s the problem: the one photo that is in use suggests that the subject is notable. If the subject is notable, then these are not personal images and not covered by F10. Right? Brianjd (talk) 09:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I googled his name, nothing came up. If he has a wikipage then sure it seems he notable. I'm happy to rescind this nomination. Mztourist (talk) 02:58, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Mztourist Something I only realised recently: the upload that is in use is a constructive global contribution, so F10 can’t apply to any of their uploads anyway. Brianjd (talk) 08:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawn by nominator; no other responses calling for deletion. Brianjd (talk) 08:13, 30 December 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Melissa Nungaray.jpg

[edit]

A google search for Melissa Nungaray shows multiple images with or without the same background. It is very hard to judge whether those came forst or uploading here came first. Evens there are no camera details. Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 19:51, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Etcher 1.4.9 running on Windows 10.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ctaetcsh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Uploaded w/o proper understanding of commons policy; not own work. Etcher is open-source; is it freely licensed? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Etcher is licensed under Apache 2.0 (link). I said "not own work" because I have no stake in Etcher and wasn't sure if a screenshot counted as own work.
Both of the files I marked as speedydelete were uploaded quite a while ago before I did any kind of reading and understood what was actually useful to upload to commons and in-turn add to Wikipedia. Both have outlived their usefulness, as they were either not used or others replaced them with different photos that were updated as the software was updated.
I suppose there's an argument to be made about version history preservation but a screenshot of what the UI looked like isn't really that useful for that. The binaries, source code and every modification to it are basically stored indefinitely if not on GitHub, then mirrored somewhere else or on tape buried in the arctic. Ctaetcsh (talk) 03:31, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As a screenshot of the opening screen of notable (at least to me) software, it is clearly in scope. Also, it is currently in use in es:Etcher and he:Etcher. Brianjd (talk) 15:58, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The file is in use on both of those pages however the screenshot was entirely removed from the English Wikipedia. The screenshot that was on the English Wikipedia, showing an updated version of Etcher, was deleted for F5. Ctaetcsh (talk) 03:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ctaetcsh Your reply is very confusing: you acknowledge my scope issue but then, mid-sentence, switch to a copyright issue. At least, I assume that is what you are doing; I assume you are referring to en:Special:Diff/1073481531 (bot removal of the image after the F5 deletion you refer to). Brianjd (talk) 11:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, what I meant in the first sentence was that as the screenshot was removed from the English Wikipedia, but not from the Spanish and Hebrew Wikipedias, I assume that a contributor translated the articles into those languages, keeping the image as it was at time of translation, but when the image was replaced and then deleted on the English Wikipedia, those changes weren't made to the Spanish and Hebrew Wikipedias.
If dependency is an issue in removing the file, then removing the image from the Spanish and Hebrew Wikipedias to make it the same as the English Wikipedia would be the preferred route, however I don't speak Spanish or Hebrew so don't know how to communicate that so that it is not seen as vandalism. Ctaetcsh (talk) 18:19, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ctaetcsh Copying a legitimate change from project to another clearly demonstrates good faith; it shouldn’t be seen as vandalism. That doesn’t mean it’s a good idea. There is no expectation that different language projects have the same pages, let alone the same material within those pages. Each project needs to decide for themselves whether to include this image (or any other image).
You say: If dependency is an issue in removing the file …. This assumes that the ultimate aim is to delete the file. But the file is legitimately in use on other projects, so by definition, it is within Commons’ scope (even if it weren’t used on other projects, it would still be clearly in scope). The only legitimate reason to delete it is a copyright violation, but per your own comment, the software and therefore this file is freely licensed.
You say that a screenshot of an old UI is not useful for version history preservation. Actually, it is useful. Being able to open an old version of the article and see the images that were there at the time, instead of red links, is clearly useful for history preservation.
You say that the code is stored indefinitely somewhere. It won’t be if everyone takes the same attitude as you are taking in this nomination. Even if it were, how would anyone find it? We certainly don’t want to rely on GitHub, which is owned by a for-profit company and has no obligation to preserve anything (beyond the notice period for changing their terms of use). Brianjd (talk) 05:24, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ctaetcsh Actually, given that all three articles use their respective screenshots in their infoboxes, it might be a good idea to update the Spanish and Hebrew versions. Maybe that starts with BalenaEtcher v1.5.97.png (and BalenaEtcher v1.5.95.png, and any other versions that might be out there) being undeleted and correctly tagged. That still wouldn’t be a good reason to delete this file. Brianjd (talk) 05:33, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's too much effort to meaningfully engage when every reply is "You say X but actually I think you'll find Y", so fine, you win. Ctaetcsh (talk) 06:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep License tags fixed (I hope – this is my first time tagging a screenshot). I removed the {{Self}} tag because I don’t think there is any new copyright vested in the uploader. Does everyone else agree?
If this DR turns out OK, I intend to request undeletion of the other cited screenshots, which were both speedily deleted for lacking copyright information (COM:CSD#F5). Brianjd (talk) 05:45, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Agree Ctaetcsh (talk) 06:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: under a free license. --Rosenzweig τ 07:38, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Firefox 65 running on Windows 10.png

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Ctaetcsh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Wish for file to be removed; No longer relevant or of use. Too old for G7; referring to community. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Going to duplicate what I said here since it also applies:
Both of the files I marked as speedydelete were uploaded quite a while ago before I did any kind of reading and understood what was actually useful to upload to commons and in-turn add to Wikipedia. Both have outlived their usefulness, as they were either not used or others replaced them with different photos that were updated as the software was updated.
I suppose there's an argument to be made about version history preservation but a screenshot of what the UI looked like isn't really that useful for that. The binaries, source code and every modification to it are basically stored indefinitely if not on GitHub, then mirrored somewhere else or on tape buried in the arctic.
Ctaetcsh (talk) 03:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The other DR has additional comments that are relevant here, but not duplicated here. Brianjd (talk) 16:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Everything shown is in the PD or under a free license. --Rosenzweig τ 07:40, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosenzweig: , did you mean to delete the file or keep it? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:01, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Thamir AlSadoun.png

[edit]

لعدم اكتماله Darina Mohammed (talk) 07:52, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the nomination translates to "for its incompleteness" (?) I don't know what that is supposed to mean. Anyway, deleted per the precautionary principle because reverse image search suggests this is a COM:NETCOPYVIO, namely a large JPG available on the web transformed into a PNG with image editing software. --Rosenzweig τ 17:00, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Florent.bocquet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

"Own work" doesn't apply for web maps - also these look like screenshot from Google --> GoogleMaps CopyVio
Pardonnez-moi, peut-être vous essayer avec une carte de OpenStreetMap?

Enyavar (talk) 12:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; very likely GoogleMaps copyvios. --Rosenzweig τ 18:19, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bad Uploads.png

[edit]

Personal essay in the form of an image, which means it can't take the {{Essay}} template or be edited easily, can't link to any policies for further information, and that non-English speakers have reduced options for translating it if they don't understand it. An official-looking essay "with Commons-Tan!" where she's depicted taking a photo of her genitals and being the subject of a "creepshot" also seem off-brand.

The image has had minimal use on a deletion discussion and two talk pages at the start of this year, the final use being as a user talk page warning in its entirety. Belbury (talk) 09:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete agree, should’ve been an essay or a wikitext template. Also even though Commons-tan was supposed to be a W:super-deformed adult here it could easily be misconstrued as W:lolicon. I might re-upload the chibi in the corner though, it’s pretty cute. Dronebogus (talk) 09:27, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Licensing tutorial displayed in the Upload Wizard.
 Weak keep ‘Personal essay’? Really? It seems like standard upload advice. And it wouldn’t be the first time that such advice came in the form of an image. I don’t know about the ‘lolicon’ issue though. Brianjd (talk) 06:59, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The delete vote above is from the uploader, who only embedded the image three times and has since stopped using it. Advice images presented in Commons' voice should be written collaboratively and be open to input, and this one seems to have been abandoned. Belbury (talk) 07:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Striking vote above. Although the file is (kind of) in legitimate use, the few pages where it is used can survive without it: I have added links to Commons:Fair use to the user talk pages where it is used. For the record, I don’t see why a cute drawing of Commons-tan taking a photo of her genitals is any worse than the photos shown in Commons:Nudity. Brianjd (talk) 14:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anonyguise (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bunch of low quality COM:PENIS photo, not special enough and had no educational value on Commons.

A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel Are you sure? From my quick look through Commons penis photos, there are not many closeups of the glans penis and not many (none outside this nomination) showing a penis of a standing person pointing horizontally (‘90 degrees’). Brianjd (talk) 09:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Skywald Scream 04Werewolf cover.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: magazine cover DMacks (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader wrote "This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1927 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. Skywald did not put the proper copyright on their black and white magazine, so they were public domain when published. The comics do have appropriate copyright." There are some copyright-related details on page 3 of the publication. It states the publisher is US-based, "all rights reserved", and a more explicit denial of reprint-permission. However, it does not contain the date (there is a 1974 date on the cover, but that's not "close" to the rights note) and it does not contain the word "copyright" (or any abbreviation or symbol for it). I see a minor counter-argument, in that the notice says it is actually printed in Canada (despite a New York addres of the publishing company) and Canadian copyright is a 50-year term. But I think Commons:Publication indicates in both US and Canada the term publication is about the company doing the "making available", not the physical location of the printing-press. Therefore while I see clear and explicit intent to protect, I agree with the uploader that the publisher did not comply copyright notice terms in force at the time of publication and therefore this is keep as PD. Filing DR just to get confirmation and give a place to explain why I object to the copyvio tagging. DMacks (talk) 17:14, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Günter Binge.jpg

[edit]

Copyvio: https://www.uni-luebeck.de/?id=193 Wullenwewer (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The image at the above linked site has 200x270 pix; our upload has 20k x 20k pix. So, they may share a common source, but the external hit is surely not the source of our image. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 22:41, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fr-exciter.ogg

[edit]

The clip is saying "exister", not "exciter", and File:Fr-exister.ogg already exists. Thus this is effectively a duplicate with a misleading file name. SURJECTION ·talk·contr·log· 05:51, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Iva Zanicchi - Ciao Cara Come Stai - French Cover.svg

[edit]

Tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}, but there are graphical elements included. Ruthven (msg) 07:12, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know. Are the flowers and stylized branches problematic? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:31, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:42, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Decentraland Genesis Plaza at evening.png

[edit]

Not sure this can be packaged as CC-Attribution, as the linked and quoted licence has some specific clauses about redistribution, specifically: You may reproduce and distribute copies of the Work or Derivative Works thereof in any medium, with or without modifications, and in Source or Object form, provided that you meet the following conditions: [...] (ii) any modifications to the Work or the Derivative Works can only take place until six (6) months have elapsed since the release of the relevant Work or Derivative Works by the Contributor to the general public; Belbury (talk) 08:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, on the terms of use the section 13.3 says "You may add your own copyright statement to your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License."
At the moment I published the picture on Wikipedia I provided different license terms, "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International", as permitted by the Decentraland terms. Since that moment the conditions described in your comment no longer apply to the image. I've provided a different license terms and conditions for the image. Eibriel (talk) Eibriel (talk) 01:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't your providing different licence terms break the provided your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License of 13.3? The same clause also says You may add your own attribution notices within Derivative Works that you distribute, alongside or as an addendum to the NOTICE text from the Work, provided that such additional attribution notices cannot be construed as modifying the License (my bold). --Belbury (talk) 16:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also adding File:Hen.World Health Center.jpg to this discussion, another screenshot of the same game. --Belbury (talk) 08:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Do I understand correctly that after the strange six-month term has lapsed, modifications are no longer allowed? In that case, this seems a clear violation of the principle that we don't accept licenses restricting the creation of derivative works. But perhaps I am misunderstanding something? Felix QW (talk) 22:59, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It seems clear that after six months of the release of the work, the license becomes equivalent to CC-BY-ND. —howcheng {chat} 22:47, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PRATISKHA PUNE.jpg

[edit]

Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion F10: low-to-medium quality selfies and other personal images of or by users who have no constructive global contributions Mztourist (talk) 09:10, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment We don't have enough information about this photo, but it could be interesting if we get at least something other than the city, Pune, and whatever we can see. If anyone knows what her uniform is, who she is, or what building she's in, we might have some useful information. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Person pictured is Indian athlete en:Pratiksha Santosh Shinde. GeorgHH • talk   20:35, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 22:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Altazor98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:54, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nawaf- ALjame.jpg

[edit]

Perhaps copyright violation: photo is from https://www.instagram.com/p/CdDAhRKhoQF/, taken by Nawaf ALjame, not same name as uploader. And anyway out of scope (not used personal photo). JopkeB (talk) 14:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:49, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bir muktijoddha Mohammad Giasuddin.jpg

[edit]

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:09, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with what @Ikan Kekek said above: there’s no way this is out of scope, but it might have a copyright issue. I also note that it has no metadata, though there are no hits on TinEye. Brianjd (talk) 08:49, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep it's not out of scope, it is not an obvious copyvio (we would have hits on TinEye). PierreSelim (talk) 09:16, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 22:50, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rashonna Moore.jpg

[edit]

"Own work" status is doubtful given the author's upload of a prior copyvio file under the same name to the English Wikipedia. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:59, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:55, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2tushino.jpg

[edit]

The photographer's work is just a derivative one, no FoP in Russia for 2D artworks. Xunks (talk) 05:40, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Russia. --Ellywa (talk) 11:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tushino Lager.jpg

[edit]

This cannot be the work of 1828, since it is in modern Russian orthography (after 1918). It is necessary to know the years of the life of the real author in order to determine the copyright status. Xunks (talk) 05:47, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

the source stated is lib.ru and the author of the article is Oleg Mosin. Though Lib.ru could be considered as a non-reliable source (as a self-published one) but the picture itself has a text in the bottom that says the map is created by ru:Калайдович, Константин Фёдорович in 1828. Seems as a sufficient proof for me personally rubin16 (talk) 06:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@rubin16: So, the caption in the deliberately non-reliable source gives deliberately false information that mr. Kalaidovich in the 18th century drew a picture, using the spelling of the 20th century. Don't you see the flaws in your own argument? This is obviously modern picture, probably drawn by the author of the article, and this not only is non-free, but cannot be considered reliable, and may be simply a hoax made by the author of these belles-lettres.  Delete. --Xunks (talk) 06:55, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Xunks yes, it can be so. I am just arguing/discussing my way of thinking when I was evaluating the file before transferring it here. There is a serious rationale in your nomination, too. rubin16 (talk) 13:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 11:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flag of CasaPound.svg

[edit]

The source of this image has been deleted on :en as "non-free media file" (likely it was claimed as fair-use). It might be discussed whether the logo is above threshold of originality. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per COM:TOO Italy “the threshold for an industrial design product to enjoy copyright protection is still quite high and even famous industrial design products have been denied such protection by Italian Courts”. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. I consider this logo below the high TOO of Italy and decided it can be kept on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 11:53, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Omah Lay in 2022.jpg

[edit]

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:26, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: imho this is a photo by an amateur photographer, no reason to think it is not the own photo of uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 11:54, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files on Гербы городов Донецкой области

[edit]

Unofficial CoA projects by S.Akatov. Non-free. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Soviet coat of arms

Anatoliy (talk) 17:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Цілком згоден, ці радянські герби вже не актуальні, їх треба видаляти. Дякую. Kremin (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Тут проблема в тому, що вони навіть не були офіційними гербами, це фактично емблеми-значки.--Anatoliy (talk) 21:19, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and other remarks (translated with google translate). --Ellywa (talk) 14:16, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anyang-stadium.jpg

[edit]

This file was initially tagged by Yanikor as Speedy (SLA) and the most recent rationale was: Bitte runternehmen --Yanikor (talk) 17:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy and no rationale was provided. It seems the speedy-nominations by the uploader happened, because there were DRs against his articles over at :de-Wikipedia.-- Túrelio (talk) 19:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Same situation with:

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Turelio. The photos were nominated by the uploader, however they gave insufficient motivation for a COM:Courtesy deletion. Therefore these images should be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 14:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Techyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:DW, Telegram sticker.

Roy17 (talk) 19:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This reason is not valid as telegram is licensed under GPL. See TG website . Njzjz (talk) 00:48, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njzjz But the file as a whole is claimed to be CC BY-SA 4.0. While (from memory) CC BY-SA 4.0 material may be incorporated into a GPL-licensed work, the reverse is not true. So it seems that this file is still a copyright violation (unless the non-GPL parts are too trivial to be copyrighted at all). Brianjd (talk) 09:25, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am not sure, but I think it may be ok to republish the file to be GPLv3. Per [14], it's allowed to reuse CC BY-SA 4.0 work in a GPLv3 work. I assume that Techyan has licensed all the texts under CC BY-SA 4.0. Njzjz (talk) 21:12, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Njzjz I’m not sure what’s going on here, being unfamiliar with Telegram and unable to read that language, but it appears to be a conversation involving several parties. If that’s true, how can the uploader license all the text? Brianjd (talk) 02:34, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ping @Bluedeck: who is one of text authors. Njzjz (talk) 10:10, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just to make it clear, the screenshot contained non free telegram Sticker (messaging). Those users' discussions above are just distractors.--Roy17 (talk) 10:08, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Given the multiple text authors, it is unlikely the uploader is the sole author. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:46, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Techyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

for artistic works: Not OK {{NoFoP-Japan}} except in cases governed by Article 46.

陳白腸 (talk) 15:16, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:18, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Southern Ring Nebula james webb.png

[edit]

Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To pick a random example, Asteroid 6481 Tenzing captured by JWST.gif is tagged {{PD-USGov-NASA}} (‘solely created by NASA’) but its ‘Author’ line says: ‘NASA, ESA, CSA, and B. Holler and J. Stansberry (STScI)’. Is that file also incorrectly tagged? Brianjd (talk) 09:32, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd feel pretty sure that it's accurate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:37, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek But how can it be ‘solely created by NASA’ if the ‘Author’ line lists parties other than NASA? Brianjd (talk) 11:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It obviously cannot be. I appreciate your knowledge and points; can you tell me how I could make it clearer to you when I've agreed with or acknowledged the validity of them? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:56, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted and redirected as duplicate. The copyright status of the original file can be discussed separately if needed. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:44, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Franz Kafka and Max Brod on the beach.jpg

[edit]
  • G7. Uploader requests deletion.
  • Image has a lot of contradictory informations surrounding it. Some places say it is Max Brod, others say it is Ernst Weiss. Some places say it is 1907, others say it is 1911.
  • Dubious authorship, rely purely on unattribution, very little information about the photograph to claim that. Outside of {{PD-old-assumed}} scope.
  • Precautionary principle. AnAkemie (talk) 20:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep We don't have a case of "Dubious authorship" we correctly state "Anonymous". When we have contradictory info on an image we state all info. The difference 1907 and 1911 for an undated image is trivial. We loaded 20,000 Bain Collection images marked as "1900" that were from between 1910 and 1930, that are being corrected one by one. --RAN (talk) 06:20, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@RAN: Have you verified it yourself? Because I am the uploader and I am admitting that I didn't research enough at the time to claim that it doesn't have an author. I uploaded these while knowing only the basics of licenses (and reading COM:VP/C I think I still have a basic knowledge). And the point of me pointing all inconsistencies surrounding this file is because if people don't even seem to know the basic informations of it, should we really trust this image is unattributed and not just that people did some lazy research and were not interested enough in finding the author? I am not really sure if we should take random photographs taken in Europe and slap a {{PD-anon-70-EU}} just because we couldn't find attribution at first glance. We probably should be checking books etc, because these news articles oftenly just slap a lazy "Divulgation/Reproduction" even when it's easy to find the author, now imagine an old photograph. I prefered to nominate it for deletion because I don't even know how to search properly, honestly. I am better at uploading new versions of already established files. The only source I know about photographs related to Kafka is Franz Kafka: Pictures of a Life by Klaus Wagenbach (1984), and this image is not in there. AnAkemie (talk) 07:41, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I could see arguing that any image was never made public because it remained with the photographer and was never seen by the public. We have many cases where an archive of images has remained as negatives with the photographer before being deposited in an archive. We have, for instance, the Bain Collection at the Library of Congress. The collection is photographic negatives donated by the creator, and those images are unpublished until proven published. We also make the same assumption for images from the commercialized Getty archive. --RAN (talk) 12:14, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that we are dealing here with an unattributed/"anonymous" work in Europe. COM:AW states:
  • "Anonymous works are different from situations where images on the Internet or elsewhere may simply lack a label, credit line or other appropriate attribution which credits the author"
  • "In all cases, detailed author information must be provided when uploading images to Commons, and claims of the anonymity of an author must be verifiable with reliable sources."
  • "Works that do not immediately cite attribution to an author are not automatically 'anonymous'. Across the Internet, websites often offer images without attributing the author. In most cases, the image was published by an author, but it was exhibited on a site simply without mention of them. This could be a failure of the site to accurately cite the author of the works they are hosting, or part of the distribution relationship with an organisation. For example, an organisation may release photographs it has purchased under its own brand name without specifying the individual photographers who were involved. For these reasons, it is typically not correct to assume an author has intended anonymity."
The burden of proof to prove the author is anonymous is on the uploader. I, as the uploader, am saying I don't have any proof that the author is truly anonymous. And since I am here in good faith, I decided to nominate my own files for deletion, because I am feeling uncomfortable with this situation.
Unless someone else finds a good source that says "Yes, the author is really anonymous", I don't see a reason to keep this file.
To make it worse, we are dealing with Germany as the country of origin here. AnAkemie (talk) 02:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please keep! It is an very interesting picture, because it shows Franz Kafka an Max Brod in an absolutely private situation. It is the only one on Commons, which doesn't show them in an official habit. And it is an very interesting witness about the close relationship of this important writers of the Prague German literature.
There are a lot of uses to find.
If you believe, that it is anonymous, and you cannot find an author, so you are in right (in my opinion).
If there are an author, and he says Hallo, that is my picture, and I am the rightholder, than you have to ask him. But surely it isn't.
In Germany an publication after 70 years of the death of an author is free, or 70 years after an anonymous publication.
But it is surely from Czechslovakia and not from Germany, because they didn't lived there at this time.
Maybe anyone else can upload this photo ones by his name, and so the first uploader could be feeling free ...
Thanks, --AnPa28 (talk) 16:41, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The image has also been used as cover art of an academic study, Kafka's Clothes: Ornament and Aestheticism in the Habsburg Fin de Siècle, which we happen to have in our university library.
As there seems to be some interest in keeping the picture, I ordered it from the library and will have a look if there are any clues either to its status as anonymous or to the photographer.
You would hope that an academic using a photo on a book cover has put some effort into ascertaining its status and history. Felix QW (talk) 23:23, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep My guy, nobody cares, the picture is from before 1924 as you can't hang out on the beach with zombies. 1924 was almost 100 years ago, of course it's in the public domain. Stop worrying! --Synotia (talk) 11:08, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per remark of Xover. The photo was made in 1911 or earlier, possibly in Germany. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany the copyright expires 70 years PMA. It is not known whether the photo has been published and if the name of the photographer has been published too. So therefore it must be assumed the photo is still copyrighted. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and {{PD-old-assumed}} an image which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this image must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1911 - in 2032 .. --Ellywa (talk) 22:21, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Franz Kafka and Felice Bauer.jpg

[edit]

(As consequence, also File:Photograph of Franz Kafka 7.jpg)

I'll just take some quotes from COM:AW.
  • "Anonymous works are different from situations where images on the Internet or elsewhere may simply lack a label, credit line or other appropriate attribution which credits the author"
  • "In all cases, detailed author information must be provided when uploading images to Commons, and claims of the anonymity of an author must be verifiable with reliable sources."
  • "Works that do not immediately cite attribution to an author are not automatically 'anonymous'. Across the Internet, websites often offer images without attributing the author. In most cases, the image was published by an author, but it was exhibited on a site simply without mention of them. This could be a failure of the site to accurately cite the author of the works they are hosting, or part of the distribution relationship with an organisation. For example, an organisation may release photographs it has purchased under its own brand name without specifying the individual photographers who were involved. For these reasons, it is typically not correct to assume an author has intended anonymity."
To make it worse, we are dealing with Germany as the country of origin here. AnAkemie (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per nomination and per remark of Xover. The photo was made in 1917, possibly in Germany. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Germany the copyright expires 70 years PMA. It is not known whether the photo has been published and if the name of the photographer has been published too. So therefore it must be assumed the photo is still copyrighted. Per community voting of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template and {{PD-old-assumed}} an image which is older than 120 years can be maintained. Therefore this image must be deleted but it can be undeleted 121 years after 1917 - in 2038 .. --Ellywa (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/10/24&oldid=741255676"