Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
This file was initially tagged by Adeletron 3030 as no license (No license since) Túrelio (talk) 15:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as no-perm >7 days (DR was own misclick). --Túrelio (talk) 16:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Text-only file, not in use, out of scope as excluded educational content. Chiolite (talk) 05:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 05:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Out-of-scope publicity thumb image. Pierre cb (talk) 11:26, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:Scope: personal images.
MKFI (talk) 12:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dugganp2001 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: Personal fantasy nation for en-WP Sandbox; not used since February 2018. Otherwise, non-contributor.
- File:Blanccommonwealth.png
- File:NStarflag.png
- File:Crestnewstar.png
- File:Commonwealthcrest2001.png
- File:FederalFlag2001.png
- File:FederalSeal.png
- File:FederalFlag.png
- File:Federal Flag.png
- File:Federal Ensign.png
Enyavar (talk) 13:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal fantasy map Enyavar (talk) 13:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope:Personal fantasy map Enyavar (talk) 13:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joyanto chandro roy (talk · contribs)
[edit]useless images, unlikely own work, used by xwiki spammer
- File:Joyanto Roy 01.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 02.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 03.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 05.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 04.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 06.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 000.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 07.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy10.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 08.jpg
- File:Joyanto Roy 09.jpg
Praxidicae (talk) 13:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo Shanker2battu (talk) 08:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- It is not. My pictures have appeared in the press often, but I have the original. Check at https://pbase.com/dosseman/mudurnu where you can see I have had lots of Mudurnu pictures since 2009. Also, I do not like anonymous deletion requests who have no more "prove" than "it is Press photo". What press, where? Did "the Press" show copyright information? And how would "the Press" publish a 33 Mb picture? Learn to think before you accuse. Dosseman (talk) 09:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user who could not resist. --Achim55 (talk) 19:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Every other upload from this user has been a copyvio, a mix of line drawings and photos found online to illustrate martial arts articles. Their final remaining images are a black and white photo and a video still. I can't find a source for either, but they are very likely to also be copyvios. Neither makes any attempt to identify the location or person, both are low resolution with no exif, both have borders suggesting a screenshot, and the colour video still appears to be taking place in the US, yet was uploaded to the Korean Wikipedia.
Lord Belbury (talk) 09:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
will replace with newer one Dbr200 (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Goodbye world — Preceding unsigned comment added by YearAccount 213234 (talk • contribs) 02:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Author's request. --Achim55 (talk) 21:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 93.148.93.86 as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 20:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is very small and has no EXIF data. Can you upload the original image if you are the photographer. Otherwise, it needs a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 20:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. I have uploaded the original image, please review it. Claybox (talk) 01:42, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 09:06, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
間違えてアップロード Exproud (talk) 04:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:04, 15 September 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: 「いちのみやスカイランタンPROJECT実行委員会」公式ウェブサイトに掲載されている画像（[1]）。 --Krdbot 01:29, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused private images of non-notable person, self-promotion only.
--Pitlane02 🏁 talk 07:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:07, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a newspaper 186.139.151.241 02:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted as copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:23, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
possible derivative of non-free content, there is no FOP for text/2D works in the US FASTILY 22:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- The Hebrew Cemetery (which is right across the road from the Shockoe Hill African Burying Ground) has an image of their historic highway marker on their Wikipedia page. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hebrew_Cemetery_(Richmond,_Virginia) Why is there an issue regarding this one? It is a public sign, installed by the Virginia Department of Historic Resources for the purpose of educating. 2nd ABG (talk) 12:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept, see ticket:2022091610006808 -FASTILY 04:09, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
DW, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:27, 17 September 2022 UTC: Uploader request --Krdbot 13:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry, why has the picture been requested for deletion and how can you see in my sandbox? Thomasthesecond (talk) 16:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Thomasthesecond: All Sandboxes are public (just not "published" in the lexicon) and your upload went to Commons anyway, where we host non-copyrighted material to be potentially used on any Wiki-page in any language. My suggestion is to make a similar screenshot from OpenStreetMaps (osm.org), it's free to use and pretty complete for London! Maps from GoogleMaps are owned by Google though, so we can't have them on Commons. Sorry. On another note, I really appreciated your "little italy's all over the world" map! We didn't have that before :-) --Enyavar (talk) 18:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:02, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Obvious copyright infringement 109.71.220.186 15:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Kann wieder gelöscht werden falls es Bedenken zur Werbung gibt. Neptun22 (talk) 16:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:01, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded this photo after it was published on the FinnishGovernment Flickr page under a Creative Commons 4.0 licence. After looking at the metadata I have come to the conclusion that the FinnishGovernment account posted it without permission, because the same image can be found on the European parliament website (https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/photo/ep-plenary-session-this-is-europe-debate-with-sanna-marin-prime-minister-of-finland_20220913_EP-136131B_PB9_AH_015) Ur Nan123 (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:00, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot of a logo which already exists with a better quality Chabe01 (talk) 01:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OF-5 (1982–2006).svg Ђидо (talk) 01:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OF-4 (1982–2006).svg Ђидо (talk) 01:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Better version: File:Yugoslavia-Army-OF-3 (1982–2006).svg Ђидо (talk) 01:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Tgeorgescu as no license (No license since). At moment copyright problems are resolved, but we have another problem. This is uploader's unused signature, maybe out of project scope as unused personal file. Taivo (talk) 08:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Charming, however it’s unclear how this is supposed to be educational. Dronebogus (talk) 12:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Low quality COM:PORN
- File:Female performing fellatio to orgasm with ejaculate.jpg
- File:Female performing fellatio.png
- File:Female starting perform fellatio on male.png
- File:Female preparing to perform fellatio on a male.png
Dronebogus (talk) 12:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nomination. AshFriday (talk) 02:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:47, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, useless picture for wiki Bestalex (talk) 13:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr Michael David (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope
Estopedist1 (talk) 15:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:50, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused low-quality image; seemingly fanmade. IceWelder [✉] 16:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Rachel Tugutu at Brooklyn Bridge.jpg Bleiomo (talk) 16:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Rachel Tugutu at Brooklyn Bridge.jpg Bleiomo (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No deletion reason given, but probably not notable and I also don't recognize this as any part of the Brooklyn Bridge. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:22, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Rachel Tugutu at Brooklyn Bridge.jpg Bleiomo (talk) 22:41, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope – doodle TFerenczy (talk) 16:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Also has possible copyright issues, as the christmas tree and presents are clearly clip art and not own work. Chiolite (talk) 08:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diplomatis gamer (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal files, used on eswiki for an article deleted for selfpromo
TFerenczy (talk) 17:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Deletion request by the author Keiri (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete User art, fine to delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
No indication of notability and no encyclopedic use outside of a user page. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 23:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Account is globally locked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:53, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Low, likely family photo. We already have plenty of identical images that are much higher quality. Ilovemydoodle (talk) 23:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
The information on this map is probably completely wrong. It claims to be sourced from a specific Wikipedia page, but the map bears no resemblance to the information on that page. The map should either be changed, or the description, legend and summary should be changed, or the file should be deleted. It is currently displayed on dozens of pages in many languages, so it is potentially misleading many readers. Ornilnas (talk) 04:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: in use. Update as needed (I don't think Russia has had free universal health care in a long time, for instance, but deletion is not a solution). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I believe almost none of the countries marked as having "free universal health care" actually have that. I would update myself, but I've never edited an .svg on Commons before. It would also be a huge job to actually source the information from the Wikipedia article as the summary claims has been done. If it was a question of making a few individual updates, I agree deletion would be unnecessary. But to my eyes, the entire map looks arbitrary, and multiple complaints on the Discussion page have led nowhere. I'm not sure what's common to do with images in these circumstances. Ornilnas (talk) 11:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I don't know, and I understand the problem. Maybe discussing the file at some presumably high-visibility page where it's in use such as w:Talk:Health insurance might help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and update. What the description needs too is a definition of "free" healthcare. I don't know of any totally free healthcare whatsoever because even in countries where you don't have to pay at the doctor's office or in the hospital, health care is still financed by taxes or fees which are collected from the citizens. De728631 (talk) 10:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use, feel free to update it. --Strakhov (talk) 14:39, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
whether people in photo is Yang naiwu and Xiaobaicai is doubtful Kegns (talk) 07:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Historical photo in use. Discuss the description on the photo's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, feel free to edit the description, the file name,. --Strakhov (talk) 14:40, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion--Sima Sam (talk) 22:33, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
wrong redirect Kegns (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
see above, The file was kept but the redirect with wrong name can be deleted.--Kegns (talk) 08:25, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleting redirect - file is at File:清末犯人.jpg. --Gbawden (talk) 11:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Cover art of the copyrighted/commercial game. Developer's site states: "© All Rights Reserved Klei Entertainment 2022" Xplt (talk) 07:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Upload of a Fair Use image from en.wiki. The original game is still under copyright ("© All Rights Reserved Klei Entertainment 2022"), so it must be removed Xplt (talk) 07:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
It is "own work" of the user. The metadata give Auteur Greg S. Kornmueller Auteursrechtenhouder GSKdesign Still + Motion (c)2021. What about the copyright? Wouter (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. EXIF data includes a vague "Edward R. Humphreys Campaign has full permission to use as needed for all media needed.": not enough for Commons. --Strakhov (talk) 14:41, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Film character. No evidence that uploader is the copyright holder. Chiolite (talk) 10:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
I was the uploader. Not needed anymore, a better image is avaliable under https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Helena_Steinhaus_by_C._Stollwerk.jpg TheRandomIP (talk) 11:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, that's a better-quality image, but why is it bad to have two photos of someone? I'd tend to oppose deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'm not so happy about the image after the new and better one is available. This one is just a lousy screenshot from a YouTube video (CC-BY, so no worries), it's embarrassingly bad in contrast. Maybe I should have thought twice before uploading it. But at that time I thought this YouTube video is the only free source available. TheRandomIP (talk) 17:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I understand. Is the YouTube video linked in the de.Wikipedia article about her? If so, it would be less of an issue to delete this screencap. I'd be content to leave the decision to an admin, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: IMO having both files is OK. --Strakhov (talk) 14:43, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Bot63828929 (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: Uploader's request and no evidence of a free license. --Achim55 (talk) 20:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. --Strakhov (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a crop of photo at https://www.velonews.com/news/road/us-pro-nationals-emma-langley-tops-road-race-podium-in-knoxville/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:VRT needed. --Strakhov (talk) 14:45, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
I've placed this photo into the wrong category for the Wiki Loves Monuments competition. Mark Warren 1973 (talk) 20:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Not a good reason to delete. Mark Warren 1973, is there anything that prevents you from editing the categories? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Comment Mark Warren 1973, great photograph! I've changed title, category, and file description. Is it OK now? Strakhov (talk) 14:51, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: well, it was reuploaded (File:Wirral - New Brighton Lighthouse - 20211105172650.jpg). --Strakhov (talk) 14:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
This is not Celestin Montcocol. It's a fake ! Evynrhud (talk) 02:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Of course it's fake. It is the same fellow as the one on this image, which was uploaded today by the same person. IJzeren Jan (talk) 18:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete as an obvious hoax. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Célestin at graduation.jpg. - Whpq (talk) 21:15, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:FOP US does not allow for 3D works of art. This was dedicated in 2006. Sennecaster (talk) 02:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
File:HK 港鐵 MTR 南港島線 South Island Line 利東邨站 Lei Tung Station January 2021 SS2 poster 多國語言 multi language.jpg
[edit]No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:54, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:19, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
No indication of authorship from original uploader (e.g. EXIF), file is clearly lower quality than its original format. – Rhain ☔ 04:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:20, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Praguegirl15 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution & low quality images (especially for the standards we expect in 2022). These images contain only objects we have photographed many times in greater quality. These images bring no additional value, so I propose to delete them.
- File:Náměstí Jiřího z Poděbrad.png
- File:Grotta jeskyně.png
- File:Vinohradská vodárna 2022.png
- File:Městská knihovna Praha Idiom.jpg
- File:Aberdeen port Scotland.jpg
- File:Neuschwanstein Castle entry.jpg
- File:London telephone boxes.jpg
- File:Paris from Eiffel Tower 2021.jpg
- File:Neuschweistein Castle Germany.jpg
— Draceane talkcontrib. 07:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'd tend to support deletion per nom. The one of Aberdeen port is the least bad, I think, but it's pretty bad. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- After review, I'm not sure about File:Náměstí Jiřího z Poděbrad.png, because it seems that's the only photo of the pedestrian crossing after reconstruction ([2]). But it would be easy take better photo anyway. — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Official photo -> not personal work Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 10:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, no EXIF, unlikely own work. Solomon203 (talk) 12:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality; a photo of a better quality of this badge has been uploaded Elżbieta Kossecka (talk) 12:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Mario is a copyrighted video game character, even if recolored. MKFI (talk) 12:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted product packaging (see COM:Packaging). Also possible copyright violation: file EXIF shows "Author RYAN LEONARD". MKFI (talk) 12:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:22, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
copyright promotional image - OCN production Evaders99 (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:23, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Source (url) not provided, possible copyvio Mateus2019 (talk) 18:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from Inst[3]. --Túrelio (talk) 09:03, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
A low-quality artwork of a book. It is not even the original artwork, but just a photograph of a computer screen on which the original artwork is displayed, which further degrades its quality. Only use outside userspace is in a declined AfC submission which clearly was intented as a hoax. Chiolite (talk) 11:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:48, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete request by the author Keiri (talk) 18:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- The picture contains some private data like the location which I don't want to publicize. --Keiri (talk) 01:34, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:49, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
copyright image - GQ Evaders99 (talk) 19:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation, screenshot of a newspaper/magnize. ☆★Sanjeev Kumar (talk) 20:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 08:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
The source is clearly wrong AprilDass (talk) 02:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep When you scan an image, the derivative copy you make, is your own work. --RAN (talk) 03:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The original picture may be in the public domain already but "author" means always the original author. "Source" in that case should be scan or reproduction or the title of the source book or whatever. -- Herbert Ortner (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above; no actual source or other info needed to determine copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free map. 61.120.241.1 03:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
dubious own work, likely taken from social media Jan Myšák (talk) 07:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:30, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Asturmiel is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. In my opinion the logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:31, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
This image is taken from a newspaper, making it a copyright violation. RickyCourtney (talk) 13:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:32, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Own work? It is a crop of a higher resolution image found here with the watermark Inna Grinn. This is a photo from this website Wouter (talk) 13:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:34, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
rights belong to the TV channel, PD-release seems to be fake rubin16 (talk) 14:20, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
it seems that the file was published long before here: for example, 2016 - link. We need a VRT proof to accept the file rubin16 (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Metadata suggests copyright belongs to a photo agency. COM:VRT ticket is likely needed. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:27, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Please delete. Editor who added it is brand new to Wikipedia and I suspect it be connected to the subject. Leontrooper (talk) 19:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be from the web at a larger resolution. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:35, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Watermark logo makes this a likely copyvio and highly unlikely to be "own work" as claimed. ~Anachronist (talk) 16:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:37, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
This screenshot contains copyrighted aerial imagery from Microsoft in the background. The OpenStreetMap project has special permission to trace from these images, but the aerial imagery itself cannot be republished under the terms of a CC license. Tobias K. (talk) 12:41, 12 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete replaced by File:Potlatch2.png. --Saibo (Δ) 19:59, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: per above Trycatch (talk) 02:48, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
Dubious "Own work" claim. Note that https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Staffan_Jacobson~commonswiki also exists and has more credible "Own work" claim for this author. Commons:Deletion requests/File:Potlatch2.jpg was unrelated discussion about deletion of OSM editor screenshot Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:38, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Hoax flag SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 18:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia Matr4x-404 (talk) 21:05, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I accidentally uploaded it Matr4x-404 (talk) 12:21, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Image uploaded from https://picclick.com/India-40s-Print-ARJUNAs-CHARIOT-STANDS-BETWEEN-TWO-363874906540.html says it's from the 1940s and unknown author. Does not provide any other info that verifies its timeframe. Is that a run-off-the-mill marketplace website? -- DaxServer (talk) 22:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Lacking info to determine actual souce/copyright status. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.ebay.com/itm/403417489804 Doesn't provide any proof of the timeframe that this portrayal is from the 1940s (thus the claim of public domain) -- DaxServer (talk) 22:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.artranked.com/topic/Hindu+Mythology#&gid=1&pid=9 Obviously looks old, but no proof that this is from w:Raja Ravi Varma, neither does it give any timeframe details for this to fall in public domain -- DaxServer (talk) 22:11, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 02:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 02:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Finland A1Cafel (talk) 02:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep it is small to see the poster and the image of the people is not clear.--Wpcpey (talk) 13:16, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Keep In my opinion De minimis-policy applies in this case. Estormiz (talk) 17:26, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:DM. No individual work of art is the leading motive of the picture. See also COM:CRT/Finland#Freedom of panorama. Similar case: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Parliamentary election posters Finland 2019.jpg. ––Apalsola t • c 16:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
File lacks source and correct license AprilDass (talk) 01:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:08, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution versions of professional photos, likely not own works as claimed.
Xunks (talk) 02:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:46, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
The photographer of this image seems to have been alive at least until 1985 and copyright in Canada lasts for at least 50 years after the death of the photographer. So this image is copyrighted until at least 2,035 at the earliest if not longer. The same goes for the following images:
- File:Yonge Street and Eglinton Avenue looking east 1962.jpg
- File:Peter Witt streetcar Toronto Exhibition Fort.jpg
- File:Last Dupont streetcars 1963.jpg
- File:PCC streetcar in Toronto, circa 1960 -a.jpg
- File:Streetcars at the CNE.jpg
- File:PCC streetcar on Bloor Street West.jpg
- File:Coxwell car house.jpg
- File:Westbound streetcar 4226, Dundas and Bathurst Streets.jpg
- File:Streetcar to the CNE.jpg
- File:Yonge at Eglinton looking south Toronto 1963.jpg
- File:Coxwell-Bloor streetcar 4491.jpg
- File:Loop at St Clair TTC station.jpg
- File:West side of Yonge Street, north of Eglinton, showing Parkwood Cinema.jpg
- File:Christmas bus - Avenue Road Run (10966849976).jpg
- File:Christmas buses in service (10967016633).jpg
- File:Sight-seeing coach in front of Eaton's Queen Street store.jpg
- File:TTC PCC 4531 at Bathurst station.jpg
- File:Bloor-Danforth opening 9571071694.jpg
- File:Opening ceremonies of Bloor-Danforth subway line.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 07:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
PNG version available: File:Formhyperbel4.png HerrAdams (talk) 08:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:05, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Remnants of a SPAM of a politician before elections. Wiki is not a hosting. Bilderling (talk) 10:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:48, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
poor picture quality Indianspy007 (talk) 16:17, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 21:21, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
bad quality Indianspy007 (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use, and the quality could be a lot worse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:34, 9 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 21:20, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
claimed by copy-right holder Indianspy007 (talk) 13:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Indianspy007, this is a different issue from your previous deletion rationales. Can you document this? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:21, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work by own admission, missing permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:56, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
already uploaded same picture Indianspy007 (talk) 16:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: taken from FB as per EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:54, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Redundant against File:Crystal Dynamics Logo.svg, unused, and quite low-quality. IceWelder [✉] 16:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I agree, the newer svg version is much better and makes the old png redundant. -Jeanjung212 (talk) 21:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:58, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Justuxtvenslesy (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused duplicates of symbols, not sure what's the point
- File:Šiaurės Airija.png
- File:Šiaurės Airijos vėliava.png
- File:Šiaurinės Airijos herbas.png
- File:Šiaurinės Airijos vėliava.png
- File:Šiaurės Airijos herbas.png
- File:North Ireland.png
- File:Ruempflg.png
- File:Rusempflg.png
TFerenczy (talk) 16:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Justuxtvenslesy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Redundant to File:Getjet-logo.png.
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:11, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
promotional spam ("starlet"), also "musical artist and actor" while photo is of a toddler (if someone ouploaded own photo when they were toddler then "own work" is not true). Not good enough to be in scope as image of human. Continuation of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hardy Nation 6.jpg - likely all uploads by this user should be also deleted (is there simple way to nominate all uploads?) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:57, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
This screenshot contains copyrighted aerial imagery from Esri in the background. The OpenStreetMap project has special permission to trace from these images, but the aerial imagery itself cannot be republished under the terms of a open licenses. Likely also OSM Wiki cannot use this image (Esri allowed use in tracing, not in documentation) but that is problem for people handling https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:RapiD_screenshot.png Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Mateusz Konieczny: I uploaded a new version without the copyrighted map images. I used the OpenTopoMap layer instead. ~★ nmaia d 23:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks! Note that CC-BY-SA 2.0 claim (a bit dubious here) appears to be for heightmap which is not OSM provided. And old version of image still needs to be deleted Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 08:03, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: resolved but original version deleted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
This screenshot contains copyrighted aerial imagery from Microsoft in the background. The OpenStreetMap project has special permission to trace from these images, but the aerial imagery itself cannot be republished under the terms of a open licenses. (Likely also OSM Wiki cannot use such images but that is a separate story to be solved in a different project) Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:42, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note to self: after this is processed look through https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:ID_(software) if that was a valid deletion request Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:13, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
This screenshot contains copyrighted aerial imagery from Microsoft in the background. The OpenStreetMap project has special permission to trace from these images, but the aerial imagery itself cannot be republished under the terms of a open licenses. (Likely also OSM Wiki cannot use such images but that is a separate story to be solved in a different project). Though maybe here aerial imagery can be treated as de minimis? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 17:43, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- The file is no more required. Otherwise it would be possible to change the satellite background for an amorphous grey background.--Ulamm (talk) 05:41, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:12, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
作者本人请求删除；缺乏教育意义 Keiri (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
作者本人请求删除；缺乏教育意义 Keiri (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for my request due to personal reasons. This photo really makes me mentally disturbed these days. Because it is too private I am not able to explain. So sorry but I don't know if a picture of a bus stop would be potentially useful. However, I will be appreciated it if the admin helps me delete the photo. --Keiri (talk) 02:09, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused poor quality image. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:59, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Temporarily artwork, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:57, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:51, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:58, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:56, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:CUR Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:50, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 15:48, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Blåhaj BlankpopsiclesilviaASHs4 (talk) 18:46, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:04, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
René Pottier died in 1968. Copyright violation. Chassipress (talk) 19:49, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2039. --Rosenzweig τ 15:08, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Lokki (Wikidata:Q22575817), in Pori, Finland. Unveiled in 1987. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Harry Kivijärvi (Wikidata:Q5911678), died in 2010. No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet. Htm (talk) 03:32, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Lokki (Wikidata:Q22575817), in Pori, Finland. Unveiled in 1987. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Harry Kivijärvi (Wikidata:Q5911678), died in 2010. No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet. Htm (talk) 03:33, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Kasvu, unveiled in 1974. Derivative work of Finnish sculptor Terho Sakki (Wikidata:Q11896941), died in 1997. No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet. Htm (talk) 03:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Krating Daeng
[edit]Per COM:PACKAGING.
Wcam (talk) 13:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 15 December 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Russia for sculptures and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. This is 1959 sculpture, so the copyright cannot be expired. Taivo (talk) 07:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- In the USSR, a monument to Lenin stood in almost every locality of the country. Such a large number of sculptures were made by mass production, so copyrights are not violated. After the collapse of the USSR, a significant part of them was destroyed. Now there are 6 monuments to Lenin left in the Tula region. Котельников (talk) 07:52, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Mass produced objects can be copyrighted as well. We have deleted a lot of sculptures of Lenin from Commons. If we know the sculptor and his/her death year, then we can add restore date (70 or 74 years from sculptor's death). Taivo (talk) 09:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's just that most of these sculptures were given away for scrap. And to find out the name of the sculptor is a rather difficult task, it is necessary to conduct research in the archives, it takes a lot of personal time. There is another problem Lenin monuments often do not fall into the lists of objects of cultural and historical heritage, which makes it possible to easily dismantle them. The project "Wiki loves monuments" draws attention to the heritage, thereby giving a chance to some monuments not to disappear at all. Котельников (talk) 10:04, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Mass produced objects can be copyrighted as well. We have deleted a lot of sculptures of Lenin from Commons. If we know the sculptor and his/her death year, then we can add restore date (70 or 74 years from sculptor's death). Taivo (talk) 09:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Päivänkierto (Wikidata:Q22575824), in Pori, Finland. Unveiled in 1990. Derivative work of Finnish sculptors Ossi Somma (Wikidata:Q16990601, died in 2020), Pertti Mäkinen (Wikidata:Q3376181, born 1952) and Reijo Paavilainen (Wikidata:Q16989602, born 1946). No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland, not in PD yet Htm (talk) 03:58, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:56, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
This image is from Flickr and appears to be copyrighted on that site. Although the uploader claims that the photographer gave their permission for the image to be used on Wikipedia. That doesn't cover other uses that are required for something to be hosted on Commons though. Plus there's no actual evidence that the photographer gave their permission to use the image anyway. Just a copy of the letter the uploader sent them. So this should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Same goes for the following images.
- File:Renault R4230 Nancy (1).jpg
- File:Renault R4231 Nancy (1).jpg
- File:Renault R4231 Nancy (2).jpg
- File:Renault R4210 Perpignan (1).jpg
- File:Renault R4211 Lyon (1).jpg
- File:Renault R4200 Troyes.jpg
- File:SAVIEM R4201 Troyes.jpg
- File:AEC Regal IV Luxembourg (1).jpg
- File:AEC Regal IV Luxembourg (2).jpg
- File:Upload 2021-11-17 7.jpg
- File:Upload 2021-11-17 8.jpg
- File:Upload 2021-11-17 10.jpg
- File:Upload 2021-11-17 11.jpg
- File:Upload 2021-11-17 12.jpg
- File:Upload 2021-11-17 13.jpg
- File:Upload 2021-11-17 14.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 07:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Adamant1 I'm emailing the author right away so he can send his permission to ORTS. Arflhn (talk) 14:31, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 21:23, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Ticket:2022120610008631 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. VRT available. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
File name is misleading, it is not the listed building, File:The Ship Inn, High Street, Emsworth (May 2019).JPG is an arguably better image and this does not add to it. This image also has a person in shot which while not an absolute issue is not best practice desirable. On totality with all these issues in retrospect loading this was a mistake and it is out of scope and is better removed. User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 06:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: No valid reason for deletion, but none necessary (COM:CSD#G7). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:27, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Per COM:Japan, still under copyright in USA due to URAA A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not PD in the US. Syunsyunminmin (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:44, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, wrong source, wrong author... Xocolatl (talk) 16:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- For reference I got the picture from a book and I didn't say the source or author. Also the date was the one given by the book. Thomasthesecond (talk) 17:00, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Actually I see why I read the advice wrong I am fine with this picture being deleted. Thomasthesecond (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-UK-unknown" all the information listed is correct for the derivative copy printed in the listed book by the listed author. The original image is "PD-UK-unknown", you can fix these things yourself rather than nominate for deletion. --RAN (talk) 22:14, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-UK-unknown. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:09, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Henriette Porson
[edit]Henriette Porson died in 1963. Copyright violation.
- File:Costume breton (1).jpg
- File:Costume breton (2).jpg
- File:Costume breton (3).jpg
- File:Costume breton (4).jpg
- File:Costume breton (5).jpg
- File:Costume breton (6).jpg
- File:Costume breton (7).jpg
- File:Portrait de jeune femme.jpg
- File:Rue de village breton.jpg
Chassipress (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
obvious copyvio ripped from company website, not an own work RespectCE (talk) 23:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:24, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
wrong date, probably wrong source and wrong author Xocolatl (talk) 16:29, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- For reference I got the picture from a book and I didn't say the source, author or date. Thomasthesecond (talk) 17:02, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Actually I see why I read the advice wrong I am fine with this picture being deleted. Thomasthesecond (talk) 17:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Thomasthesecond: if you need this picture for something, you can still replace the date, source and author by the real one (the description currently says that you yourself took the picture in September 2022, when in reality it was someone else long ago). The picture could be kept, if you name the correct source (a book?) and the author/photographer (hope they are named in the book) and you can use the publication date of the book. If that date was more than 100 years ago, the picture is possibly qualifying for "Public Domain, old" ("PD-old"). Best luck, Enyavar (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you very much Thomasthesecond (talk) 18:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @Thomasthesecond: if you need this picture for something, you can still replace the date, source and author by the real one (the description currently says that you yourself took the picture in September 2022, when in reality it was someone else long ago). The picture could be kept, if you name the correct source (a book?) and the author/photographer (hope they are named in the book) and you can use the publication date of the book. If that date was more than 100 years ago, the picture is possibly qualifying for "Public Domain, old" ("PD-old"). Best luck, Enyavar (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-UK-unknown" all the information listed is correct for the derivative copy printed in the listed book by the listed author. The original image is "PD-UK-unknown", you can fix these things yourself rather than nominate for deletion. --RAN (talk) 22:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. This image is definitely not circa 1900. Look at the cars. If someone can convince me that they are maybe from the 1930s or 1940s, I would agree with RAN. I do not know a lot about British cars, but they look newer than that. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:15, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP and IronGargoyle. I see a en:Renault 4 among the cars, and that wasn't produced before 1961. So the photo is probably from the 1960s or 1970s. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Drakosh (talk) 06:23, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-textlogo}}. --Xover (talk) 20:13, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: TOO uncertain for Bulgaria; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
not clear how the source provided is considered to be free, seems to be copyrighted rubin16 (talk) 14:01, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Based on Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Georgia, it's possible the copyright has expired if the photo was taken in 1952 or earlier. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 14:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Subject was apparently born in 1904, making him 48 in 1952. That's about the youngest he could be in that photo so the probability of it having been taken before 1952 is low. Hence COM:PRP → delete. --Xover (talk) 20:17, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:26, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Presuming this is a U.S. work - it's hard to tell - or is from a country where the URAA would matter, how is this out of copyright? It's a derivative work from 1929, which is two years after the current date where things automatically leave copyright in the U.S.
Also, we don't have a death year for Miller, so how do we know it's out of copyright anywhere? Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:09, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Konrad Miller died in 1933 as in https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q108512 Lmichelsen (talk) 17:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- This isn't a U.S. work. Konrad Miller was German and lived in Germany according to the translation of his Wiki page. The fine print here in lower left says "Stuttgart 1928". He died in 1933. URAA may apply, I don't know. Bammesk (talk) 01:52, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Originality: The nominated file: [4] is a rotated version of this file: [5]. As Adam Cuerden says in This thread, the nominated file (Miller's map) is derived from This public domain Idrisi map. Miller recreated the Idrisi map and transcribed the Arabic text in Latin alphabet. Is there enough originality in Miller's work to grant it copyright? Bammesk (talk) 00:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- It does appear to be redrawn to some extent. I'm not seeing much connection in the way the oceans are drawn, for instance. Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:16, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Apparently work (derivative of public domain source) by German artist who died more than 70 years ago. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:29, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deletion request by the author Keiri (talk) 18:06, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Could be useful. Do you have a specific reason to request deletion? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:19, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I realized I didn't know if it was proper to take a photo at the supermarket recently. And there were also people included in the picture background. Sorry, but this makes me mentally disturbed these days as other pictures. --Keiri (talk) 01:41, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think there's any law against taking photos in supermarkets, and the people are in the background, but feel free to add a personality rights template. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:25, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. Actually, I feel better and not so obsessed to remove most of the photos now. But I still hope this and this to be deleted because the former contains private data and the latter is so low-quality also with some personal reasons. Keiri (talk) 12:14, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
- I'd support deletion of the first link and have no strong opinion about the second one, which could be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry but I wonder if the deletion request is open now. I want this to be deleted once again and will my request be seen by administrators?Keiri (talk) 22:24, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I see no valid deletion rationale. The uploader has changed their mind, but there's no policy-based rationale for why this image should be deleted. It's within SCOPE, properly licensed, does not appear to violate any relevant laws (privacy, etc.). --Xover (talk) 20:25, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: In scope, photo of bread in a supermarket. Only people visible are distant small dimly lit incidental figures. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:31, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Taken from a highlights compilation video, unlikely that the YouTube user has the right to read-license broadcast footage. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 18:39, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:46, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 02:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: This object is put on the area premises open to the public. Please note that the FOP law only mention "or", not "and"--Wpcpey (talk) 13:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete In my opinion, "permanently" applies to both "situated in a public place" and "in premises open to the public" here. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Not seeing a plausible claim of compatible licensing here. --Xover (talk) 09:31, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 10:07, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BilCat as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not a DOD image, and not from 1966. The image has a graphic in front of the left tailplane of the original creator. Speedy deletion challenged at COM:UNDEL, converting to DR for discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:30, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Some context from the undeletion request. The uploader scanned this from a DoD aperture card, which gives it a reasonable PD presumption. At the least, that makes it a good-faith upload. But the name "Aviagraphica", present on the image, appears to be a pen name of Michael Badrocke, who is a published illustrator of this kind of thing (and quite a prolific one, it seems). There are no public contact details for the artist. Lewis Collard! (talk). 09:31, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Collard. --Xover (talk) 09:32, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 10:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
It is a low-res copy of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Успенський_храм.jpg Bestalex (talk) 14:08, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As lower-res version the same photo. Could have been OVERWRITE, but uploader was apparently inexperienced with Commons. --Xover (talk) 20:20, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Indeedous (talk) 10:08, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Not "Own Work", gave a source and theres many stuff like this on google images made before he uploaded. also im pretty sure this was made by a government so thats adding PD-Cuba 2601:586:8381:6E0:45C8:39AC:6B18:FDEF 23:47, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Surely we can create such a map that has full provenance both in terms of authorship, licensing, and source of the underlying map data. --Xover (talk) 09:46, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Murals in Patelnia (Warsaw)
[edit]According to this news article murals in Patelnia are not permanently displayed but relate to current occasions and are being changed regularly. Thus polish FOP does not apply to them.
- File:Metro station (8020233443).jpg
- File:Mural upamiętniający Izraela Lichtensztajna i Gelę Seksztajn w Warszawie 01.jpg
- File:Mural upamiętniający Izraela Lichtensztajna i Gelę Seksztajn w Warszawie 02.jpg
- File:Mural upamiętniający Marysię Ajzensztadt w Warszawie 01.jpg
- File:Mural upamiętniający Polę Lifszyc w Warszawie 01.jpg
- File:Śródmieście Północne, Warszawa, Poland - panoramio (303).jpg
- File:Śródmieście Północne, Warszawa, Poland - panoramio (305).jpg
~Cybularny Speak? 15:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Czy mogę poprosić o dokładniejsze uzasadnienie bo w obecnej formie jest ono dla mnie niezrozumiałe. Mateusz Opasiński (talk) 15:45, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Wytyczne wolności panoramy w Polsce wymagają, aby dzieło było wystawione na czas nieokreślony, natomiast z artykułu w Wyborczej wynika, że murale na Patelni mają tymczasowy charakter i są systematycznie zmieniane, co sprawia, że nie podlegają pod wolność panoramy. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Rozumiem i ciężko mi z tym opanować. Zasugerowałem się troszkę innymi umieszczanymi w Repozytorium zdjęciami. W takiej sytuacji muszę zwrócić uwagę, że część prac (murali) w kategorii Category:Murals in Śródmieście (Warsaw) prezentowana była na czas określony tzn. w ramach dzierżawy powierzchni ściany lub umów z firmami reklamowymi np.:
- Wytyczne wolności panoramy w Polsce wymagają, aby dzieło było wystawione na czas nieokreślony, natomiast z artykułu w Wyborczej wynika, że murale na Patelni mają tymczasowy charakter i są systematycznie zmieniane, co sprawia, że nie podlegają pod wolność panoramy. ~Cybularny Speak? 19:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
File:2022 Warszawa Smolna, mural „stop war in Ukraine”, 1.jpg,Simple flag colors and text, not eligible for copyright, kept bij EllywaFile:2022 Warszawa Smolna, mural „stop war in Ukraine”, 2.jpg,Simple flag colors and text, not eligible for copyright, kept bij Ellywa- File:Jaworzyńska 8 sex education netflix.jpg,
- File:Jaworzyńska 9 11 sex education netflix.jpg,
- File:Koszykowa 64.jpg, ~
- File:Mural, Dom Braci Jabłkowskich, Warszawa (1).jpg,
- File:Mural, ul. Prosta 2-14, Warszawa (2).jpg,
- File:Dobra 26 28 warszawa.jpg
Mateusz Opasiński (talk) 11:27, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Agree with Cybularny. Artworks exhibited temporarily are not subject to the Polish FoP. Msz2001 (talk) 20:24, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Xover (talk) 09:34, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Kept 2, Simple flag colors and text. These are not eligible for copyright imho. --Ellywa (talk) 22:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deletion request by the author Keiri (talk) 18:15, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Could be useful. Keiri, are you trying to request deletion of every photo you've uploaded, or are there specific reasons for each deletion request, and if so, what are they? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you Ikan Kekek. I am actually trying to request all the photos I have uploaded to be deleted except the one of Kyusaku Yumeno (by the way, as this photo is available on the Internet, I uploaded it but I am not so familiar with the copyright issues so please submit another deletion request for it if needed). Some of the requests have specific reasons such as containing metadata I don’t want to publicize and others don’t. Sorry for my poor English. —- Keiri (talk) 01:46, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If you're uploading photos you downloaded from other sites, those are not your own work and (1) have to be credited to the photographer who took them and (2) if they are not public domain or don't have the right Creative Commons license, they have to be deleted as copyright violation. However, if the other photos are your own work, they might or might not be deleted as a courtesy to you, but usually, I don't think an admin would delete potentially useful photos like these that aren't photos of private people but of a hospital and so on. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- I wonder if the deletion request is open now. I thought the photo was taken by myself but I have no original file and I am not sure if I used other’s photo as mine. As there is such a possibility please help me delete it.Keiri (talk) 00:41, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The uploader's cold feet is not a reason for deletion. There may well be other valid arguments for deletion, but these have as yet not been (plausibly) presented. --Xover (talk) 09:36, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
- Delete the picture is unused and based on the comments above the user is unsure that he/she is even the copyright holder (though those might be cold feet)? Hekerui (talk) 14:08, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. Sufficient alternatives are available in the category. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
violates PD-Cuba by being a government work (btw should official CoA made by people not in the government be "Government Works") CubanoBoi (talk) 21:35, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep It is below the threshold of COM:TOO. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs)
02:07, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Flagvisioner according to that same link Cuba is "No information, assume 'Not OK'". CubanoBoi (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
- It does not matter as it is under the threshold of COM:TOO. The only elements are 2 semicircles, 2 diamonds, a circle and a simplistic shape. The background of the coat of arms is also not original enough, as it is very commonly used. Even this, and including the red bar, falls under COM:TOO. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 01:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
- It does not matter as it is under the threshold of COM:TOO. The only elements are 2 semicircles, 2 diamonds, a circle and a simplistic shape. The background of the coat of arms is also not original enough, as it is very commonly used. Even this, and including the red bar, falls under COM:TOO. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs)
- @Flagvisioner according to that same link Cuba is "No information, assume 'Not OK'". CubanoBoi (talk) 23:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://cdn.amebaowndme.com/madrid-prd/madrid-web/images/sites/761264/e2767ab3e248a623a00847f52d74ed9b_90efb6a8669f0e317f50dd843f8c3890.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg){kind=link}
_-_959.jpg){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg){kind=link}
_-_958.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[4]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:TabulaRogeriana_upside-down.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
- Delete Not quite buying TOO for this. The drawing may have been made by the uploader, but it is a COM:DW of the original which must be presumed to be copyright by the Cuban government. --Xover (talk) 09:41, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Cuba does not specify a level of originality. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image does not show sufficient creativity of the designer and it is therefore not eligible for copyright. The image will also be in PD in the USA, because it consists of simple geometric shapes. --Ellywa (talk) 22:16, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
violates PD-Cuba by being a government work CubanoBoi (talk) 21:40, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep It is below the threshold of COM:TOO. Flagvisioner (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Not buying TOO for this, though I acknowledge that it is a reasonable position to take (it's borderline). --Xover (talk) 09:44, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: COM:Cuba does not specify a level of originality. To determine whether a design is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image does not show sufficient creativity of the designer and it is therefore not eligible for copyright. The image will also be in PD in the USA, because it consists of simple geometric shapes. --Ellywa (talk) 22:17, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}