Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/09/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_❀_青草に寝ころんで青空がある（種田山頭火）_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
_Part_of_the_climate_movement.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4408-1.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4409-1.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4410-1.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![169 File:Pirelli skyscraper "Pirellone" Milan, Italy.jpg](#File:Pirelli_skyscraper_"Pirellone"_Milan,_Italy.jpg){kind=link}
_3233_OrigX-R.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-ru.png){kind=link}
-ru1.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal group photo uploaded by mistake. So it has to be deleted. Thanks. PJeganathan 00:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Delete Uploaded 3 days ago. Courtesy deletion is the right thing to do. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Writenewstar32 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Eldar Zakirov Kfc xo blog.jpg
- File:EldarZakirov 1.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 45.jpg
- File:EldarZakirov 2.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 3.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 4.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 5.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 7.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 6.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 8.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 9.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 10.jpg
- File:11 Eldar Zakirov.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 12.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 13.png
- File:Eldar Zakirov mary senn xo.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 15.png
- File:Eldar Zakirov 14.png
- File:Eldar Zakirov 16.png
- File:Eldar Zakirov 79.png
- File:Eldar Zakirov впш игорь синяк.png
- File:Eldar Zakirov.png
- File:Eldar Zakirov 17.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 18.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 19.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 22.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 21.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 23.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 24.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 25.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov.jpg
- File:Eldar Zakirov 26.jpg
- File:EldarZakirov.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Horrible quality, unlikely to be in scope A1Cafel (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Horrible quality, unlikely to be in scope A1Cafel (talk) 16:37, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
This image is low quality and blurry. It haz been flagged as such since 2013 giving the uploader entry of opportunity to up loads improved version. There are plenty of much better images of similar subjects available on Commons. Headlock0225 (talk) 17:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete As nomination. Common enough subject, quality is too low. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Young Stong (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vanity/self-promotion. Commons is not your free personal web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Young stong.jpg
- File:Young Stong artist in Nigeria.jpg
- File:Young Stong image.jpg
- File:Young stong artist.jpg
- File:Youngstong.jpg
- File:Young Stong Nigeria.jpg
- File:Young Stong.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 18:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk · contribs)
[edit]A large number of discrepancies casts doubt on this user's work in general: For File:KhadijaErrmichi.jpg, File:RosellaAyane.jpg, File:SabahSeghir.jpg we received "permission" per Ticket:2022090510000085 from a person who is not the photographer who is mentioned in the photos' metadata. Other files like File:ElodieNakkach.png and File:SofiaBouftini.png are stills from nonfree videos and thus are clear copyright violations. A lot of other files lack metadata and are certainly not original files from the camera, hence there is no evidence that they are really the uploader's own work. Uploader must provide watertight proof in each individual case that he owns the rights to the respective image.
French translation: Un grand nombre de divergences jette un doute sur le travail de cet utilisateur en général : Pour File:KhadijaErrmichi.jpg, File:RosellaAyane.jpg, File:SabahSeghir.jpg nous avons reçu une "permission" par Ticket:2022090510000085 d'une personne qui n'est pas le photographe qui est mentionné dans les métadonnées des photos. D'autres fichiers comme File:ElodieNakkach.png et File:SofiaBouftini.png sont des images fixes de vidéos non libres et sont donc clairement des violations du droit d'auteur. Beaucoup d'autres fichiers manquent de métadonnées et ne sont certainement pas des fichiers originaux de la caméra, il n'y a donc aucune preuve qu'ils sont vraiment le travail de la personne qui les a téléchargé. Le téléchargeur doit fournir une preuve irréfutable dans chaque cas individuel qu'il possède les droits sur l'image en question.
File:KhadijaErrmichi.jpgFile:RosellaAyane.jpgFile:SabahSeghir.jpgFile:MarwaHassani.pngFile:LouisaDjemaï.png- File:NisrineDaoudi.jpg
- File:FatimaAkif.png
File:Hanane.jpgFile:SaoudImane.jpg- File:ElodieNakkach.png
- File:NesryneElChad.png
- File:SalmaAmani.png
- File:SalmaBouguerch.png
- File:NouhailaSedki.png
- File:ZinebRedouani.png
- File:GhizlaneChebbak.png
- File:YasminMrabet.png
- File:SamyaHassani.png
- File:FatimaTagnaout.png
- File:SofiaBouftini.png
File:ImèneYzeure.pngFile:AlliceEva.pngFile:SamiaFikri.pngFile:Panneau Zidouh.jpg
Mussklprozz (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Alors les photos suivantes sont bien de Marouane Hamousse.
- Je l'ai contacté dans un premier temps sur son compte instagram pour savoir si il était d'accord qu'on utilise ses photos. Il a accepté. Il m'a alors envoyé les fichiers originaux et vous a contacté via le mail de permission. Les métadonnées disent que l'auteur est : " Maarten Middelkoop " mais l'appareil photo appartient bien à Marouane Hamousse, puisqu'il était présent à la CAN 2022. Si vous avez un doute et que vous ne me croyez pas, alors je vous invite à le contacter, il vous dira la même chose. Peut-être que l'appareil photo appartenait à " Maarten Middelkoop " et qui l'avait vendu à Marouane Hamousse.
- Les photos suivantes sont les miennes. Je les ai prise avec mon propre appareil photo :
- Les images suivantes sont des captures d'écran issus des diffuseurs des matchs des chaînes youtube officielles. Je les ai renseigné dans la partie auteur.
- La photo suivante est la mienne, je l'ai prise avec mon téléphone portable l'été 2019 lors de mon séjour au Maroc :
- Les photos suivantes proviennent de Mohammed Ayman Nechchad (MomoCaptures sur instagram).
- Il m'a envoyé les fichiers originaux que j'ai téléversé dans Commons. Il vous a contacté via le mail de permission pour autoriser d'utiliser ses photos. Si vous doutez là aussi, alors je vous invite à le contacter. Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 16:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- C'est le même cas pour la photo qui illustre celle de Sakina Karchaoui, c'est une capture d'écran d'une vidéo youtube
- Pourquoi alors elle n'a pas été supprimée ?
- L'image : File:Tête à tête avec une Bleue - Sakina Karchaoui 5-42 screenshot.png Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 19:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Khalil Le Rajaoui : Merci de ta réponse. Alors ...:
- En ce qui concerne les images supposées provenir de Marouane Hamousse : Nous avons besoin d'une clarification de sa part en personne. Je lui ai écrit depuis l'Équipe bénévole (VRT), par Ticket:2022090510000085, et devons attendre sa réponse.
- Les cinq fichiers png suivants ne sont certainement pas des images originales d'un photo. Merci de télécharger les originaux ou d'en envoyer trois au VRT pour prouver que c'est bien toi qui les as prises.
- Les vidéos Youtube ne sont pas sous licence libre, sauf si cela est expressément spécifié dans la vidéo concernée. Nous ne sommes pas permis d'utiliser les images fixes qui en sont extraites.
- File:Panneau Zidouh.jpg. Accepté que la photo est de toi. Demande de suppression retirée.
- Photos de Mohammed Ayman Nechchad: Elles ont une autorisation valide. Demande de suppression retirée.
- File:Tête à tête avec une Bleue - Sakina Karchaoui 5-42 screenshot.png Ce vidéo porte une license cc
- English translation:
- Images said to be taken by Marouane Hamousse: We need a clarification from him in person. I wrote to him on behalf of VRT, per Ticket:2022090510000085. Need to wait for his answer.
- The five following png files are certainly not originals from a camera. Please upload the originals, or send three of them to VRT to prove your point.
- The Youtube videos are not free, unless this is explicitly stated with the respective video. We may not use stills from them.
- File:Panneau Zidouh.jpg. Accepted that is is your own work. Deletion request withdrawn.
- Photos of Mohammed Ayman Nechchad: Valid permission is given. Deletion request withdrawn.
- File:Tête à tête avec une Bleue - Sakina Karchaoui 5-42 screenshot.png This video is provided with a cc license
- Best, --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:47, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Mussklprozz (talk) 20:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pour le paragraphe 2, j'ai envoyé un mail au VRT qui contient les photos originales Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 23:28, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Pour Marouane Hamousse c'est pas que les photos ne sont pas supposées venir de lui, elles viennent de lui, je vous le confirme.
- J'ai eu une conversation avec lui, il m'a dit que l'appareil photo qu'il a, il l'avait acheté en bonne occasion sur Marrakech
- Mais il n'a pas modifié les paramètres de la caméra. Ce qui fait que les photos qu'il prend avec mentionne encore " Maarten Middelkoop " comme étant l'auteur, alors que c'est bien Hamousse derrière la caméra qui prend les photos.
- Ok pour les captures d'écran de video youtube, je pensais que c'était tolérer vue la video pour Karchaoui. Khalil Le Rajaoui (talk) 21:44, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- OK pour le paragraphe 2, on a reçu les photos originales par Ticket:2022091210012479. OK aussi pour le photos de Marouane Hamousse. On a reçu une déclaration de lui digne de confiance par Ticket:2022090510000085.
- OK for section 2, we received the originals from you per Ticket:2022091210012479. OK also for Marouane Hamousse's photos. We received a trustworthy declaration from him per Ticket:2022090510000085.
- Cheers, --Mussklprozz (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Khalil Le Rajaoui : Merci de ta réponse. Alors ...:
Kept: files without permission deleted. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
https://www.amazon.com/Choses-dites-sens-commun-French-ebook/dp/B01C61PHN0 [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 01:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of free licensing provided. --Strakhov (talk) 09:01, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:SCREENSHOT violation, taken from YouTube SeanJ 2007 (talk) 01:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source, probably complex enough, COM:PRP. --Strakhov (talk) 09:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
it is low quality photo by someone else, original is File:Faisal Mosque from far.jpg KhhHan432 (talk) 06:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weak
Keep: Yes, it's low-quality, but unless there's a better photo of this view, it might be useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- it is already available on wiki at (File:Faisal Mosque from far.jpg) KhhHan432 (talk) 06:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's unclear to me which of those photos is the better one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:13, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently the same photograph, copyvio/authorship issues. --Strakhov (talk) 09:05, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
not picture of jamia faridia KhhHan432 (talk) 07:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use. If you know we're looking at something else, correct the description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Ikan Kekek, feel free to correct description or to propose changing the filename. --Strakhov (talk) 09:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Very poor quality, redundant and amateur porn. Achim55 (talk) 07:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Yeah, that really sucks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: bad quality. --Strakhov (talk) 09:07, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
unused, personal photo Estopedist1 (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality portrait of an unknown person, apparently not useful. --Strakhov (talk) 09:09, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
This image violates Ragnador's copyright. https://twitter.com/ragnador_grams/status/1436887293177040897 Mugenpman (talk) 12:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work, COM:VRT needed. --Strakhov (talk) 09:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Was in use for hoax article en:Wade hampton iv, out of scope Nutshinou Talk! 13:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, also has potential COM:DW issues. Chiolite (talk) 08:48, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, too many issues. --Strakhov (talk) 09:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
No educational value, joke edit of the North Korean flag Fenn-O-maniC (talk) 14:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: As per nomination. —VulpesVulpes42 (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently a fantasy flag. --Strakhov (talk) 09:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KIMIA 11 MIPA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:PAS 21.png
- File:Pas 8e.png
- File:Pas 8d.png
- File:Pas 8c.png
- File:Pas 8b.png
- File:Pas 8a.png
- File:PAS 8.png
- File:25PAS.png
- File:23EPAS.png
- File:23DPAS.png
- File:23BPAS.png
- File:23CPAS.png
- File:23APAS.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:23, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image.
- File:1° Clase 11-15 enero (M.C.D y m.c.m).pdf
- File:26° Factores primos.pdf
- File:24° Orden de operaciones y símbolos de agrupación.pdf
- File:25° Factores primos.pdf
- File:22° Orden de operaciones y símbolos de agrupación.pdf
- File:19° Potecias y Potencias de Base 10 (Math 7th).pdf
- File:20° Notación Científica (Math 7th).pdf
- File:21° Notación Científica (Math 7th).pdf
- File:18° Estadística ejercicios completos (Math 7th).pdf
- File:17° Gráficos Estadísticos Resumen (Math 7th).pdf
- File:16° Gráficos de dispersión (Math 7th)2.pdf
- File:14° Gráficos circulares (Math 7th).pdf
- File:13° Gráficos doble barras (Math 7th).pdf
- File:12° Gráficos de barras e histogramas (Math 7th).pdf
- File:11° Gráficos de barras e histogramas (Math 7th).pdf
- File:10° Tarea resuelta 7th A (Aplicaciones Estadística).pdf
- File:8° B Clase 12 al 16 de octubre (Aplicaciones Estadística).pdf
- File:9° Clase Resumen Parte I (Estadística).pdf
- File:8° A Clase 12 al 16 de octubre (Aplicaciones Estadística).pdf
- File:7° Clase B de octubre (tabla de frecuencias).pdf
- File:6° Clase A de octubre (tabla de frecuencias).pdf
- File:5° Clase C 30 de septiembre (Media, mediana y Moda).pdf
- File:4° Clase B 29 de septiembre (Media, mediana y Moda).pdf
- File:3° Clase A 28 de septiembre (Media, mediana y Moda).pdf
- File:1° clase (Población y Muesta).pdf
- File:2° Clase (Ejercitación Población y Muestra).pdf
- File:2 Clase 24 del 09 (Ejercitación Población y Muestra) video.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:25, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: selfies and personal documents.
- File:Ornelas e hija.jpg
- File:Viaje Agosto 2013 Jose Ornelas e hijas.jpg
- File:Prof Jose Encarnación Ornelas Goncalves Hija Adriana.jpg
- File:Profesor Jose Encarnación Ornelas Goncalves.jpg
- File:Foto Profesor Jose Encarnación Ornelas Goncalves.jpg
- File:Profesor Jose Encarnación Ornelas Goncalves 3.jpg
- File:Certificado Steam nombre y apellidos (1).jpg
- File:Certificado Roótica Jose Ornelas.pdf
- File:José Ornelas con el artísta Olivares.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Omphalographer (talk) 21:46, 2 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 08:41, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Copyright Vrasz (talk) 17:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- link. --Vrasz (talk) 17:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Source site reads Les Contenus ne doivent en aucun cas être téléchargés, copiés, altérés, modifiés, supprimés, distribués, transmis, diffusés, vendus, loués, concédés ou exploités (en tout ou en partie) de quelque manière que ce soit, sans l'accord exprès et écrit du CLUB. --Achim55 (talk) 18:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)- Also affected: File:Melissagomesgigi.png --Achim55 (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, no evidence of a free license. --Strakhov (talk) 09:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Irena_%C5%A0%C5%A5astn%C3%A1.jpg, 11 / 5 000 Výsledky překladu without using it 109.71.213.46 11:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
seems like a test file. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Old low quality image not posing any significance Jekader (talk) 12:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Really terrible quality. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Old low quality image not posing any significance Jekader (talk) 12:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Here I agree with you. Poor quality and surely not the only example of this automobile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 13:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
low quality, useless Joschi71 (talk) 13:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:46, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 185.172.241.184 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio Uploader not informed. Yann (talk) 21:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 22:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 22:11, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:16, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Debola Adebanjo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused images, not so familiar tennis player
- File:Melissa Nigerian and Russian Tennis Star.jpg
- File:Melissa Ifidzhen in Egypt.jpg
- File:Melissa Doubles Partner.jpg
- File:Melissa Ifidzhen.jpg
- File:Melissa Star.jpg
- File:Мелисса Ифиджен 17.jpg
- File:Melissa Ifidzhen at CBN Open 2016.jpg
- File:Мелисса Ифиджен 8.jpg
- File:Melissa trophy cabinet.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 23:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, non-notable person in sport. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:52, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable organization. Out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:TOYS Solomon203 (talk) 02:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a screen capture from a video ViperSnake151 (talk) 02:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, taken from https://www.chucktingle.com/about.html Di (they-them) (talk) 02:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
-20220911021800-File:Chucktheadshot_orig.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation © Mieks 2004 - 2021!
Ras67 (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be a social media image published in 2017. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 02:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot + Multiple image from Instagram A1Cafel (talk) 03:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:35, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abiodun544 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work - stripped exif, Una05.jpg has a watermark
Lymantria (talk) 07:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
rsrifat house Rsrifat house (talk) 08:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- No deletion reason given, but doesn't seem useful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no useful upload. --Polarlys (talk) 13:36, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Urheber ist nicht der Fotograf Dirk Lenke (talk) 08:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:11, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
I am Andrea Pallaoro. This portrait is not approved and I'm requesting for it to be removed immediately. Theboywholovedmichelangelo (talk) 11:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- J'ai un jour rencontré Andrea Pallaoro à Tournai lors d'un festival de cinéma, je lui ai demandé si je pouvais le photographier, il a accepté et a tout simplement posé pour la photo. Je ne vois aucune raison de supprimer celle-ci. --Jamain (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Hi Jamain, My name is Andrea Pallaoro and I'm kindly asking for its removal. Thank you very much Theboywholovedmichelangelo (talk) 11:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Comment Both these photos look good to me, and they seem to be duly licensed, so I think it'll be hard to get the agreement of an admin to remove them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Polarlys (talk) 13:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- J'ai un jour rencontré Andrea Pallaoro à Tournai lors d'un festival de cinéma, je lui ai demandé si je pouvais le photographier, il a accepté et a tout simplement posé pour la photo. Je ne vois aucune raison de supprimer celle-ci. --Jamain (talk) 07:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 13:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Was in use for hoax article en:Wade hampton iv, out of scope Nutshinou Talk! 13:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Not using 191.125.154.152 00:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:48, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Was in use for hoax article en:Wade hampton iv, out of scope Nutshinou Talk! 13:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
not educational purpose possible Ezarateesteban 13:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Randomly taken from the Internet. Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 13:40, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Le fonti della ricerca
[edit]The sculpture was created by Arnaldo Pomodoro (1926–). Unfortunately, there is no Italy|freedom of panorama in Italy, permission from him is required.
- File:Dettaglio - attraverso.jpg
- File:Dettaglio - gear.jpg
- File:Dettaglio - skyscrapers.jpg
- File:Dettaglio centrale interno.jpg
- File:Dettaglio centrale.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 01.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 02.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 03.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 04.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 05.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 06.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 07.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 08.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 09.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 10.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 11.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca 12.jpg
- File:Le fonti della ricerca.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is a WLM permission. Ruthven (msg) 07:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Some of the C–H bonds are mis-asligned. Category:Benzene has a ton of geometrically-correct ball-and-stick models available. DMacks (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:11, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 08:31, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Some random dude is photoshopped into it^^ Cookies4ever (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fake/hoax of File:Подписание Пакта Молотова-Риббентропа.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 08:55, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Some random dude is photoshopped into it^^ Cookies4ever (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fake of File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1976-063-32, Bad Godesberg, Münchener Abkommen, Vorbereitung.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 08:50, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Some random dude is photoshopped into it^^ Cookies4ever (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fake/hoax of File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-R69173, Münchener Abkommen, Staatschefs.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 08:52, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
You need to check the license.--195.19.125.137 19:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a copyvio of https://ok.ru/profile/574100319490/pphotos/608593015810. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Yann. --Rosenzweig τ 08:46, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Habe die gleiche Datei mit besseren Titel nochmal hochgeladen (s. Duplikate) Hufkratzer (talk) 22:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 08:47, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Some random dude is photoshopped into it^^ Cookies4ever (talk) 16:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Rosenzweig at 08:55, 19 September 2022 UTC: per nomination, fake/hoax of File:Подписание Пакта Молотова-Риббентропа.jpg. --Krdbot 13:22, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio; clearly not original work as seen in reverse image search on google (e.g., luscious dot net/albums/edible-asses_397214/) EvergreenFir (talk) 23:26, 11 September 2022 (UTC) Child pornography — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.76.41.231 (talk) 22:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 14:24, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio; edit of another images found on Tineye https://i.imgur.com/LUL7DY6.jpg EvergreenFir (talk) 23:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Achim55 (talk) 14:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free use image Edl-irishboy (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Infrogmation at 17:16, 23 September 2022 UTC: Missing essential information such as license, permission or source (F5) --Krdbot 01:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist is generally considered out of project scope. But if this is not own work, then maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is my own work. How can I prove that it is my own work? you can check my blog or deviart website for this Matsyameena sanju (talk) 08:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- I believe you. The problem is that the file probably lacks educational value. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep File has educational value, as it can be used to illustrate Matsya, and there are very few other modern-day illustrations of Matsya in Commons. Chiolite (talk) 08:43, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
unused file. Looks like some sort of personal art work. Out of the project scope. Estopedist1 (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:22, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peru Pavilion of Expo 2020
[edit]No COM:FOP in the UAE, per COM:FOP UAE. Needs permission from Habitare Arquitectura e Ingeniería and Studio 17 architects via COM:VRT.
howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 07:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:41, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NoonIcarus as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G4 Yann (talk) 21:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nomination. The original file was titled File:Pérez Pirela Caracas, 2022.jpg --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:35, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:48, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
This file is no longer needed. Robert Neustadter (talk) 00:17, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Because? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:13, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
a duplicate of Jason McArthur in goal 73.215.208.215 04:52, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The other file is identical to this one except that the file is a bit larger. Both of them shouldn't be deleted, only this one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - unless permission can be confirmed through VRT. A cropped version is also uploaded to the English Wikipedia with a statement "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license Attribute: by Elite Prospects Image has not been altered" and with no claim of own work. It's very odd that this image is claimed as own work given the declaration on the English Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 12:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of jason mcarthur in goal1 73.215.208.215 05:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - unless permission can be confirmed through VRT. A cropped version is also uploaded to the English Wikipedia with a statement "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license Attribute: by Elite Prospects Image has not been altered" and with no claim of own work. It's very odd that this image is claimed as own work given the declaration on the English Wikipedia. -- Whpq (talk) 12:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for that. Supporting vote crossed out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:02, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photo is taken from a website, though the uploader claims it is his own work. I see no VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 04:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
This meme of a minor seems to be derived from a YouTube video, which would not actually be made available under the terms of a license under CC-BY-SA 4.0. Some YouTube videos are under CC-BY 3.0, but the particular source video does not appear to be. For these reasons, this meme is a derivative work of a non-free source video and should be deleted from Commons as such. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 05:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Support, please delete. --NiTenIchiRyu (talk) 11:40, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Does not seem like own work, easy to find in Internet. Italia Ispania (talk) 05:12, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Its is your hypothesis and opinion, but not a fact. If you can easy to find in Internet, its not mean that is not my own work. Ильгиз Рависович (talk) 10:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Any proofs it is your work?Italia Ispania (talk) 07:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with bo EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
copyrighted promotional poster Mateus2019 (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Ipso fact copyvio. Movie poster 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:04, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Gone. --Herby talk thyme 11:48, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Unclear source [1] Boylarva99 (talk) 13:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:49, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be uploader's own work, considering the low quality and lack of information. – Rhain ☔ 16:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. Screenshot depicts proprietary software and is not free as a result. Vt320 (talk) 16:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- What software, specifically. And please cite what local,
- federal irnnatit laws and/or Wikimedia Commons rules specifically prohibit this screenshot. Mfcallahan (talk) 03:50, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Corrected for typos:
- What software, specifically? And please cite what local,
- federal or international laws, and/or Wikimedia Commons rules specifically prohibit this specific screenshot. Mfcallahan (talk) 03:52, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - clearly not the work of the uploader as claimed, but a screenshot of Windows proprietary software under a non-free licence. Obvious copyright violation. - Ahunt (talk) 23:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Leonel Sohns 10:39, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:51, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Non free book cover. Kiran Gopi (Talk to me..) 16:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:52, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 22:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:54, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 07:28, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality teddy bear photo, we had better choices in the category A1Cafel (talk) 16:11, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Low quality low res photo with no useful source info, likely that it’s a screenshot or web download Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:10, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: found here. --Yasu (talk) 15:08, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
Low res photo with metadata that indicates this is a screenshot or a web download. Not enough source info to verify license. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: found here. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:00, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
_%E2%9D%80_%E9%9D%92%E8%8D%89%E3%81%AB%E5%AF%9D%E3%81%93%E3%82%8D%E3%82%93%E3%81%A7%E9%9D%92%E7%A9%BA%E3%81%8C%E3%81%82%E3%82%8B%EF%BC%88%E7%A8%AE%E7%94%B0%E5%B1%B1%E9%A0%AD%E7%81%AB%EF%BC%89_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%9D%80_%E9%9D%92%E8%8D%89%E3%81%AB%E5%AF%9D%E3%81%93%E3%82%8D%E3%82%93%E3%81%A7%E9%9D%92%E7%A9%BA%E3%81%8C%E3%81%82%E3%82%8B%EF%BC%88%E7%A8%AE%E7%94%B0%E5%B1%B1%E9%A0%AD%E7%81%AB%EF%BC%89_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete substantial appearance (not trivial) of Cupid's Span, authored by anti-Wikimedia artist w:en:Claes Oldenburg (who died this year) as well as by his wife who died earlier. Copyright violation: undelete/restore 70 years after Oldenburg's death, by that time this sculpture falls public domain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:01, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 3D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 02:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
The building was completed in 2010 by Adrian Smith. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates, permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 02:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the United Arab Emirates A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
There is no acceptable Bahraini freedom of panorama. FOP in Bahrain is limited to broadcasting media and non-commercial only. As per enwiki article, it was opened in 2008 and designed by architectural firm Atkins. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:15, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:02, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio. Uploaded to Flickr by same username as here just two weeks ago (with a new account and no other images shared). I wasn't able to find the original source of the image, but it has been circulating around the web for years: [2] is a 2016 blog post containing it, [3] (via [4]) claims in the HTTP headers to be from 2013, and [5][6] are 2012 blog posts with the same image at a lower resolution. JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
![[3]](https://s3.hulkshare.com/song_images/original/a/9/d/a9df99a115342925649a09c2b2314f61.jpg?dd=1388552400){kind=link}
- Esta contribución hecha por mi autoria, circula en la web desde ese tiempo porque había sido aportada sin ninguna licencia y por ende cualquier persona hacia uso de ella sin mayores restricciones o reclamaciones. Si bien, la comunidad puede considerar esta aportación como una contribución al legado culturar de la República Dominicana, ya que, el personaje presentado en la imagen, es un cantante urbano que ha contribuido al genero de música urbana por mas de 12 años. Johan Nicolas Castro (talk) 14:09, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
this is not own work + Fake License [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 07:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:03, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Old low quality image not posing any significance Jekader (talk) 12:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Usable image of a particular kind of van. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:55, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
_Part_of_the_climate_movement.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Part_of_the_climate_movement.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
should be SVG, is unused. But mainly: It is unsourced. What timeframe is covered. What about countries with no data, is the data missing or were there no protesters. In the green countries: How can be known that there were 100-1000 protestors. If there were only 80 protestors, is that not worth mendioning? Does the data come from FFF or from journalists?? C.Suthorn (talk) 12:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
_Part_of_the_climate_movement.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:04, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
_Part_of_the_climate_movement.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Appears to be some form of flickr washing happening here. The image appears to be a reproduction of a publicity shot. The flickr account mentions a blog (name watermarked on the image) [7] which says the image may be from the 1990? It's pretty clear this isn't from the flickr account and is highly unlikely they own the copyright. Ravensfire (talk) 14:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, the patterning in the image suggests that it is a copy of a printed photo in a newspaper or magazine. A higher-quality version is available online,[8] suggesting that the Flickr uploader does not have access to the original photo. Too recent to be public domain, see COM:INDIA. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Rejoy2003 uploads from Frederick Norohnha
[edit]- File:Stories in stone, Velim, Goa - 4600065412.jpg
- File:Stories in stone, Velim, Goa - 4599446019.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599453781.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599452641.jpg
- File:Stories in stone, Velim, Goa - 4599451345.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4600077294.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4600074982.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4600073656.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4600081536.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4600079940.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599460857.jpg
- File:Stories in stone, Velim, Goa - 4599417789.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599517331.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599519055.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599520423.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599521979.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599528773.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa - 4599525987.jpg
- File:Velim, Salcete, Goa.jpg
- File:Stories in stone, Velim, Goa - 4599420793.jpg
- File:Stories in stone, Velim, Goa - 4599415803.jpg
- File:Stories in stone, Velim, Goa.jpg
There's an conflict in the license of each of these files copied from a Flickr account. The images are tagged as CC-BY-2.0 license. In the description for each of them, faithfully copied over by the uploader, the license mentioned is CC-BY-SA for non-commercial purposes. COM:CC explicitly calls out "all "nc" (Noncommercial) and "nd" (No Derivatives) licenses are not acceptable.". So the tag on the image says CC-BY 2.0, but the description from the image on flick has NC. That's a more manual request from the uploader, giving a clearer statement of the license they want. As the images are NC, they should be deleted. Ravensfire (talk) 15:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete using the precautionary principle, because there is significant doubt whether the CC-BY-2.0 license on Flickr was intentionally applied by the Flickr uploader. Verbcatcher (talk) 12:05, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep These images have been given multiple licensing tags. Read the description properly, it has a "comma" between Creative commons and non commercial. Hence these images should be kept as the author has the copyright and is a notable person. Rejoy2003 12:23, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- The description of the first file on Flickr is:
- Photo copyleft Frederick FN Noronha. Creative Commons 3.0 attribution, non-commercial. May be copied for non-commercial purposes. For other purposes, contact fn at goa-india dot org[9]
- If ', non-commercial' not a qualifier of the Creative Commons license what is its function in the sentence? This is clearly a non-commercial license. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- I agree Verbcatcher. Interpreting that as two different licenses (CC-BY-SA and non-commercial) is a stretch. When you also factor in the phrases after the period "May be copied for non-commercial purposes. For other purposes, contact fn at goa-india dot org" the intention because very clear - CC-BY-NC 3.0, which is not compatible with Commons. Ravensfire (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- The description of the first file on Flickr is:
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:05, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
- Restored: per clarification from the author. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Recursive Pen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hello! I'm still working on this article; I just had to pause to switch to something else. Could I get a couple of weeks time before you consider deleting? When I'm done, anything superfluous will be deleted, if any. Recursive Pen (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 15:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in the United Kingdom A1Cafel (talk) 17:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - I've photoshopped the poster out, Not sure if the street or shops could still be of relevance although granted not much can be seen but I sort of see some value to the image as we don't have any images showing the street/area so for the time being I would say this image is better than no image. –Davey2010Talk 20:50, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Having just looked more indepth through the cat - The building to the right of the image can be seen in full at File:Cross Bones Graveyard.jpg so as such there's no use for this image, Had this image not have existed I still would've gone with a Weak Keep irrespective of the !delete below. –Davey2010Talk 21:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - the redacted image is of no value. If the original image is deemed unacceptable (which, speaking as the photographer and uploader, is a shame), then there may as well be no image. Doyle of London (talk) 15:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete the original image violates graphic artist's copyright (no COM:FOP UK for such). The censored image is useless, with no forseeable use – even in FOP campaign as British FOP is already balanced enough between the netizens/general public and the artist's livelihood rights (thus I see no indication to widen British FOP further to include 2D graphic works and no need for a censored image like this). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:25, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality files in Category:Bettlach, Switzerland
[edit]Apparently taken from a moving train, these blurry images are in my opinion of too low quality to be of potential use.
- File:2011-01-13 Lebern (Foto Dietrich Michael Weidmann) 051.JPG
- File:2011-01-13 Lebern (Foto Dietrich Michael Weidmann) 054.JPG
- File:2011-01-13 Lebern (Foto Dietrich Michael Weidmann) 055.JPG
- File:2011-01-13 Lebern (Foto Dietrich Michael Weidmann) 056.JPG
- File:2011-01-13 Lebern (Foto Dietrich Michael Weidmann) 057.JPG
_051.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_054.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_055.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_056.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_057.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gestumblindi (talk) 17:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from TV/software screenshot. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:HK WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港會議展覽中心 HKCEC 中國嘉德國際拍賣 China Guardian Auctions preview October 2021 SS2 15.jpg
[edit]
No FOP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted notice A1Cafel (talk) 15:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Iceland A1Cafel (talk) 16:07, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:52, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:HK WCD 灣仔會展 HKCEC WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港書展 Hong Kong Book Fair booth stationery supply dealers July 2021 SS2 05.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of copyrighted covers A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:HK WCD 灣仔會展 HKCEC WCN 灣仔北 Wan Chai North 香港書展 Hong Kong Book Fair booth stationery supply dealers July 2021 SS2 06.jpg
[edit]
Derivative work of copyrighted covers A1Cafel (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted book covers A1Cafel (talk) 16:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted book covers A1Cafel (talk) 16:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in San Marino A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in San Marino A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in San Marino A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in San Marino A1Cafel (talk) 16:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 16:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Turkmenistan A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:53, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in New Zealand A1Cafel (talk) 17:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Ireland A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:54, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Gambia Kanifing Municipal 2020-04-16 163 - Mapillary (0rSIcWaCKzWYsqmyEew9Iw) (cropped).jpg
[edit]_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Gambia. The company that operates this shopping mall began operations in 1993, though the building may be built earlier or later. Without sufficient information on when the building was completed and who was its designer/architect, COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle rolls in. The Mapillary free license does not overwrite the artistic copyright of the architect, sculptor, or muralist of his/her public work and/or art. Unlike all other images in its category, this image shows the mall in a non-de minimis/non-incidental way. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
One of source images was deleted as copyright violation, making whole collage copyvio as well. Replacing deleted image is possible. Do you want to add en:Muhammad Ali? Taivo (talk) 10:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 16:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:46, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 16:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Bulgaria A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Tanzania A1Cafel (talk) 16:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No freedom of panorama in Tajikistan A1Cafel (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete The logo isn't the property of the uploader, but that of the w:Hellenic Basketball Federation. Copyright violation. Hammersoft (talk) 17:03, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:47, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 16:51, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
copy vio and out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 13:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: It might not be a copyvio since the uploader is claiming to be the husband of the artist who painted it and also claiming that he inherited the copyrights to his wife's artwork when she died. Other files with the same claim (File:Restaurant By The Sea.jpg, File:Rita Asfour Self Portrait.jpg and File:Champagne-Glass.jpg) are awaiting VRT verification; so, perhaps this would also be covered by the same VRT ticket. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:53, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Rita Asfour painted thirteen images of Malibu, photographed them, and had the photographs printed in the calendar, then sold copies of the calendar and gave all the proceeds to the Sherriff. At all times she was in charge of the operation and owned all the rights. Upon her death, as her husband, I inherited all those rights. I was asked for a copy of Rita's WILL and I did send it and hopefully it will be considered for all the images I have submitted. Fapaa (talk) 05:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep. Ticket:2022082910000229 for File:Rita Asfour Self Portrait.jpg and Ticket:2022082910014705 for File:Restaurant By The Sea.jpg were merged into Ticket:2022090110011106, which concerns other files as well (all the photos uploaded by Fapaa), and contains an attached will in Article 24. I have just accepted permission for all of the uploads of that user under Ticket:2022090110011106. See also COM:VRTN#Commons:Deletion requests/File:2006 Malibu Calendar.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:37, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:20, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Note: COM:VRTN#Commons:Deletion requests/File:2006 Malibu Calendar.jpg was archived to Commons:Volunteer Response Team/Noticeboard/archive/2022#Commons:Deletion requests/File:2006 Malibu Calendar.jpg. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 12:30, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I uploaded this, a robot tagged it as no license, and called for speedy deletion. I left a note on the flickr desription page...
I uploaded this image to the wikimedia commons, and it was challenged there, over the public domain assertion.Can you further expand on how this image came to be in the public domain?Thanks!
Geo Swan (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- It's from the 1950s with no copyright notice (at least on the front), so I think {{PD-US-no notice}} works here? If I were more certain, I'd just change the license and re-run Flickrreview. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:13, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Adeletron. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 17:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_2B1A4408-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4408-1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate Norman.seibert (talk) 18:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
_-_2B1A4408-1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_2B1A4408-1.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4409-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4409-1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate Norman.seibert (talk) 18:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
_-_2B1A4409-1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_2B1A4409-1.jpg){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4410-1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_2B1A4410-1.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate Norman.seibert (talk) 18:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
_-_2B1A4410-1.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:23, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
_-_2B1A4410-1.jpg){kind=link}
The watermark gives copyright joejennelle. Wouter (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:49, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Is this "own work"? Higher resolution can be found here or here. Wouter (talk) 09:00, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Réunion (France) A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Sorry for that, please delete it (I don't find the way to do so). If possible for you, please also delete the other contributions that I did in October and December 2017 (all are pictures of street art in La Reunion. Thanks in advance Vherbreteau (talk) 16:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in the United States A1Cafel (talk) 15:56, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- The file is my own work and has not been previously published on another website. The image depicts a work created by someone else (creator unknown). The work is located in a public place in Washington, DC. The work is not protected by copyright -- it has no copyright statement or symbol. I believe there is no reason to delete this file. BethGuay (talk) 22:22, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Beth. I know it seems like common sense that anonymous street art should free of copyright restrictions, but unfortunately that's not the case. In the US, public art created within the last few decades is automatically covered by copyright, even if the creator has not formally filed for copyright protection, and even if there is no copyright notice or symbol attached to the work. You can read more about this at COM:PACUSA. The fact that it's right there on the street for anyone to see and photograph doesn't change the legal status, because US copyright law does not allow Freedom of Panorama for public art. (In other words, "displayed in public" does not equal "public domain.") While photos like yours can be used for many purposes (and the creator of the art may well be happy to see it widely reproduced), they cannot be uploaded to the Commons, because only works with NO copyright restrictions are allowed here. You can sign away your own copyright on the photograph itself, but you cannot sign away the anonymous artist's copyright on the painting in the photograph. -- Choliamb (talk) 01:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Statement like "Nobody knows who the copyright owner is, so it really doesn’t matter.", are rejected per COM:PRP--A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the explanation. With best regards, BethGuay (talk) 16:06, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks you for the detailed explanation. With best regards, BethGuay (talk) 16:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Beth. I know it seems like common sense that anonymous street art should free of copyright restrictions, but unfortunately that's not the case. In the US, public art created within the last few decades is automatically covered by copyright, even if the creator has not formally filed for copyright protection, and even if there is no copyright notice or symbol attached to the work. You can read more about this at COM:PACUSA. The fact that it's right there on the street for anyone to see and photograph doesn't change the legal status, because US copyright law does not allow Freedom of Panorama for public art. (In other words, "displayed in public" does not equal "public domain.") While photos like yours can be used for many purposes (and the creator of the art may well be happy to see it widely reproduced), they cannot be uploaded to the Commons, because only works with NO copyright restrictions are allowed here. You can sign away your own copyright on the photograph itself, but you cannot sign away the anonymous artist's copyright on the painting in the photograph. -- Choliamb (talk) 01:14, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment COM:UA? I guess the transformer box is the main topic instead of the artwork drawn on it. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:28, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Is there a way for these deletion discussions to be bundled together? It's literally the exact same doll in both pics, but with different accessories so the outcome of the discussion should be the same either way. My intention was demonstrating the visual difference of how you could accessorize the dolls to have different gender expressions. I thought it would likely be okay because there are many pictures of toys like Barbie etc, but I'm aware that that likely isn't a very good deletion argument. Anyways, based off my reading of COM:TOYS, I can see why this deletion discussion was started. The whole point the manufucturer was trying to make is that there aren't really gender neutral dolls commercially available and I can see why someone would think that would pass the threshold of originality, you know? Clovermoss (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- there is a procedure for putting several files together, Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request but I don't know if two is enough. Unfortunately, I do think COM:TOYS is applicable here and both this and File:Creatable World Doll Example 2.jpg will be decided for deletion. Nurtam85 (talk) 10:27, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 16:25, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – Is there a way for these deletion discussions to be bundled together? It's literally the exact same doll in both pics, but with different accessories so the outcome of the discussion should be the same either way. My intention was demonstrating the visual difference of how you could accessorize the dolls to have different gender expressions. I thought it would likely be okay because there are many pictures of toys like Barbie etc, but I'm aware that that likely isn't a very good deletion argument. Anyways, based off my reading of COM:TOYS, I can see why this deletion discussion was started. The whole point the manufucturer was trying to make is that there aren't really gender neutral dolls commercially available and I can see why someone would think that would pass the threshold of originality, you know? Clovermoss (talk) 17:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality as well as potentially unfree 2600:100C:A203:FD7F:8808:AA63:9B10:E739 09:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- What do you mean by "potentially unfree". It's free: the videos of the Mother Love radio talk show were published under the free CC-BY license. Regarding the quality, it's not especially good but I suppose it's well enough until we have some better free photo. INS Pirat (talk) 09:29, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- In wide use, and if Pirat's remark is accurate, we should Keep the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: In use and no evidence image is unfree. Image is well-sourced to CC-BY YouTube channel. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Works by Raúl Vásquez Sáez (1954-2008). COM:VRT from copyright owner (presumably the painter).
- File:NIÑA MALHUMORADA RAUL VASQUEZ 1989-SML.jpg (already deleted as File:Niña malhumorada.jpg)
- File:Ella cuida jaguar herido.jpg (already deleted as File:Ella cuida de jaguar herido.jpg)
Strakhov (talk) 19:44, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No clear license. Taichi (talk) 06:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Exif says author is "domkamper". An authorization is needed from this author (see Commons:Email templates). Titlutin (talk) 20:14, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The building was completed in 1960 by architect Gio Ponti (1891–1979). Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Italy. The copyright terms of Italy lasted for 70 years, and the images can be undeleted in 2050. A1Cafel (talk) 16:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
![16:46, 11 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/11#c-A1Cafel-20220911164600-File:Pirelli_skyscraper_"Pirellone"_Milan,_Italy.jpg){kind=link}
Question I think you mean 70 years after the architect's death, don't you? Because if the copyright is 70 years after completion, it would expire in 2030. Though the photo would have to be deleted now, either way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
![17:39, 8 January 2023 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/09/11#c-Well-Informed_Optimist-20230108173900-File:Pirelli_skyscraper_"Pirellone"_Milan,_Italy.jpg){kind=link}
not a picture of this place KhhHan432 (talk) 07:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In use. If you know it's a photo of another place, please correct the description. It should also have suitable categories. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:17, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
_3233_OrigX-R.jpg){kind=link}
_3233_OrigX-R.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My reading of FoP-Switzerland - in particular, the part about how "it must not be possible to use the picture for the same purpose as the original" - is that this 111-megabyte photo of an artwork at the Zurich Zoo is not covered. DS (talk) 13:13, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
_3233_OrigX-R.jpg){kind=link}
- Same issue with this image of a different artwork at the same zoo, which is admittedly of much lower resolution. DS (talk) 13:20, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- The original image - if anyone wants to see it, I can email it - is covered in bright small spots, which looks like bird droppings to me. I've spent many hours retouching this poo using Photoshop. I consider this retouching as an enhancement of the image and would be sad if this media file were deleted.
- But maybe you're right, and it really should be deleted. So do it, I'll accept it. Roy Egloff (talk) 12:42, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless of how much effort you put into polishing it, it's still a derivative work. DS (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- You're right, please delete it. Thank you. Roy Egloff (talk) 19:20, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
- Regardless of how much effort you put into polishing it, it's still a derivative work. DS (talk) 00:37, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep. While it is high resolution, I do not think that this can be used for the same purpose as the original. It seems to be a small section of a larger mural. As for the other image, that is an image of a sign with a raised black outline of a monkey. The distinctive 3D texture of the original means that the 2D photograph cannot duplicate the same purpose. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:04, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: The interpretation favored by the nominator would result in nearly all 2D art being banned from COM:FOP Switzerland. A DR is not the place to make novel arguments that can apply to a broad category of situations; instead, propose a change to the guideline first. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
_3233_OrigX-R.jpg){kind=link}
COM:DW containing another artwork within the photo, original source and permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:02, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- The newspaper 'canvas'? Plain text and De minimis unrecognisable images, come on. Kingsif (talk) 21:19, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- I think it would need the "non-free graffiti" tag added and left as-is, but the work itself is not original like say a Banksy work, but rather it's a photograph that was painted even with sponsor logos (Nike and Wilson Blade) and in a public space. Not really original... 350z33 (talk) 22:19, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Wait, now you mention it, I do think A1Cafel was saying that the painting of Raducanu (rather than the newspaper it was on) was the other artwork within the photo. Well, yeah, but the license section on this file has always mentioned the Freedom of Panorama re. it's a 3D artwork in a public space - dude just needs to click through the massive Commons gallery of the rest of Brick Lane to see that there is nothing non-free/in need of deletion about this photo. Kingsif (talk) 22:21, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no freedom of panorama for graphic works in UK. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:01, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
COM:POSTER are temporarily display, cannot benefit from FOP A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- I guess COM:FOP Switzerland is relevant. It mentions posters, but also "Works whose lifetime is restricted" which may be peculiar for posters for popular votes such as this one. If the uploader intended that the photo should be kept. The photo has a series of relevant tags. Enhancing999 (talk) 10:41, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:15, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
I wrongly asked for another version to be deleted, i.e. File:Cave Myra Saint Nicolas church courtyard 5509.jpg After advice from administrator Platonides (at that picture) I think it better to delete THIS picture and let the other one remain. Dosseman (talk) 08:54, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Dosseman, you mentioned the same file twice. Which file should be deleted? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for pointing this out, I made a series of mistakes, it seems. I have just asked that the other picture not be deleted (at that picture). And I hereby ask that Cave Myra Saint Nicolas church courtyard 5509.jpg be deleted.
- I see you are at Wikivoyage, I would - if not for Covid - have travelled to Turkey some ten times more by now, and would have contributed pictures that show the country, as is my want. Instead working at home on Wikimedia Commons I feel I have made some good contributions, but sometimes I get confused and create a mess. Maybe for a lack of travel. Dosseman (talk) 06:56, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Completely understood. I took more than a day trip last month for the first time since the summer of 2019, and I was nervous but managed to avoid catching COVID again. Which photo do you want to be kept? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- With two stays in Berlin (I live in Amsterdam) during the period you mention I have been more of a traveller than you. Luckily virtual travel is not too bad nowadays.
- As for pictures: Please delete, if you can, File:Cave Myra Saint Nicolas church courtyard 5509.jpg and keep File:St. Nicholas Church, Demre 5509.jpg. Do you know how one withdraws a deletion request: simply overwrite it, or ? Thanks for all. Dosseman (talk) 08:14, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I am not an admin and have no power to delete files, but I don't understand why you'd like to delete a larger file in favor of a smaller one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- I just uploaded a slightly improved full-size version of the picture at the one that until now only had a lower resolution picture. So there no longer is a difference in size betwen the two. I thought you had the power to delete, my mistake. I suggest now we just wait and see. It is not that terrible that the picture is in one category with two names, in due course that will be taken care of. I am working backwards from Z and today will publish Mudurnu pictures. Myra is old hat. Take care. Dosseman (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I see the change. I'd support the deletion request now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- So we wait and see. Thanks. Dosseman (talk) 18:38, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I see the change. I'd support the deletion request now. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:18, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I just uploaded a slightly improved full-size version of the picture at the one that until now only had a lower resolution picture. So there no longer is a difference in size betwen the two. I thought you had the power to delete, my mistake. I suggest now we just wait and see. It is not that terrible that the picture is in one category with two names, in due course that will be taken care of. I am working backwards from Z and today will publish Mudurnu pictures. Myra is old hat. Take care. Dosseman (talk) 07:44, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- I am not an admin and have no power to delete files, but I don't understand why you'd like to delete a larger file in favor of a smaller one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Completely understood. I took more than a day trip last month for the first time since the summer of 2019, and I was nervous but managed to avoid catching COVID again. Which photo do you want to be kept? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:38, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:28, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My mistake, as uploader. I intended to replace this picture with File:Casas de turma da antiga estação Laranjal - Conselho Tutelar.jpg. Both are the same, except the other is the original without cropping on the right side. Please, delete this and create a redirect to File:Casas de turma da antiga estação Laranjal - Conselho Tutelar.jpg. IgorEliezer (talk) 11:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:29, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Pala d’altare della Madonna della Provvidenza del 1503 attribuita a Cristoforo Scacco e conservata nella chiesa di San Benedetto da Norcia raffigurante la Madonna e Gesù Bambino sulle sue ginocchia e l’apostolo san Pietro e san Gi.jpg
[edit]
The fresco is a copy of the original from Cristofaro Scacco (1503). We've to decide if it's a derived work published in 2002, or a copy of the original without further additions, thus it stays PD. Ruthven (msg) 11:58, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi I do not want the photo to be deleted, I will contact the author and ask him for written permission by contacting Wikipedia Italy appropriately, and to have it received by Wiki as soon as possible, I hope to do everything within this week. GiovAngri (talk) 16:22, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I would say this is intended as an exact copy from the fresco of 1503, as close as possible. therefore imho this image can be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 22:55, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Settlement map of the Greek tribes before the start of the Peloponnesian War (no text)-ru.png
[edit]-ru.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-ru.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Этот файл должен быть удалён, потому что предназначался для перевода этой карты на другие языки, но я уже сделал эту карту в формате SVG Пётр Тарасьев (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:56, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
-ru1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-ru1.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Этот файл должен быть удалён, потому что предназначался для перевода этой карты на другие языки, но я уже сделал эту карту в формате SVG Пётр Тарасьев (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
-ru1.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
-ru1.png){kind=link}
Old photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. Estopedist1 (talk) 12:06, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:30, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The watermark mentions "Foto Sergio Cremonosi". The user gives "own work" What about the copyright? File:Numana panoramica-1.jpg is a cropped version. Wouter (talk) 13:47, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; both photos were unused anyway. —howcheng {chat} 22:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
More clear copy here. Zafer (talk) 14:27, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —howcheng {chat} 22:34, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Yes, I've seen that this was kept as "PD" per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded again by User:Esteban leonard. But I don't see at all why this file would be in the public domain. It was taken from a web site [10] and given a 2012 date (though the image itself was apparently uploaded in April 2016). The web site does not credit or explain the image at all, there is no date, no artist, no provenance, so I cannot understand how the uploader arrived at the conclusion that the artist is an "Artista guayaquileño anonimo" who died over 70 years ago (per the {{PD-Art|PD-old-70}} tag used for the upload). While the battle that is illustrated took place in 1820, that does not at all have to mean that the art is contemporary. On the contrary, this looks very much like a rather modern watercolor illustration to me. Unless it is convincingly shown that this work is either under a free license or in the public domain, this file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 14:31, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and motivation of Rosenzweig. I fully agree this design/painting looks rather contemporary. --Ellywa (talk) 23:00, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
File:10ª edición de los Premios a la Excelencia y la Calidad en la prestación de los Servicios Públicos (51495747138).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
and:
- File:10ª edición de los Premios a la Excelencia y la Calidad en la prestación de los Servicios Públicos (51495747273).jpg
- File:10ª edición de los Premios a la Excelencia y la Calidad en la prestación de los Servicios Públicos (51496449115).jpg
- File:10ª edición de los Premios a la Excelencia y la Calidad en la prestación de los Servicios Públicos (51496450165).jpg
- File:10ª edición de los Premios a la Excelencia y la Calidad en la prestación de los Servicios Públicos (51496448995).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from logo. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: cropped all files to remove the logo and deleted the versions with the logo. So files can be kept without the logo. --Ellywa (talk) 23:07, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for 3D works in Russia A1Cafel (talk) 16:30, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep as per COM:FOP Russia as elements of garden and landscape design. --Xunks (talk) 08:27, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per Xunks, {{FoP-Russia}} applies for garden designs. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:42, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Weak delete, this is more artwork than garden design. --Krd 10:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The plain meaning of “garden design” would seem to be the arrangement of flowers and other plants. The statues would have an independent copyright beyond the design of the garden. IronGargoyle (talk) 14:06, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per remark of IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 23:08, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I wan't update logo in the next weeks Editor506 (talk) 19:40, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 23:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
this is not own work + Fake License [[User:Modern Sciences|MSes]] (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 23:37, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
The image was published here in 2018. COM:VRT needed. Strakhov (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ignoro el interés personal en borrar el archivo. Por favor, aporte justificación. Gracias. Erreja (talk) 18:39, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Erreja: ningún interés especial (aunque si de verdad eres el dueño del blog, el hacerme quedar como un mentiroso cuando en la otra deletion request enlacé el blog diciendo que la imagen estaba publicada allí no me hace excesiva gracia). El caso es que si un archivo se publica fuera de Commons antes que acá, has de probar que tú posees los derechos de autor. Y, si bien puede ser indicio de que alguna relación puedes tener con el blog, que la imagen se evapore de allí no es un método válido para validar la licencia, lo siento. De nada. Strakhov (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Al margen de quién sea el blog, está bajo licencia Creative Commons Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (CC BY-ND 3.0 ES). "...intentar hacerme quedar como un mentiroso...", es una apreciación personal, yo no he dicho esta boca es mía. Pero es bien fácil, puedo publicar otra imagen distinta que no esté en ningún blog y asunto resuelto. Anto todo vaya la educación por delante. Gracias por el interés. Un saludo. Erreja (talk) 18:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- La licencia que mencionas del blog no se admite en Commons, toda licencia usada en Commons debe permitir realizar obras derivadas y el "ND" de la licencia... no permite esto. Gracias por tu interés. Un saludo. Strakhov (talk) 20:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Al margen de quién sea el blog, está bajo licencia Creative Commons Sin Obra Derivada 3.0 España (CC BY-ND 3.0 ES). "...intentar hacerme quedar como un mentiroso...", es una apreciación personal, yo no he dicho esta boca es mía. Pero es bien fácil, puedo publicar otra imagen distinta que no esté en ningún blog y asunto resuelto. Anto todo vaya la educación por delante. Gracias por el interés. Un saludo. Erreja (talk) 18:57, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Erreja: ningún interés especial (aunque si de verdad eres el dueño del blog, el hacerme quedar como un mentiroso cuando en la otra deletion request enlacé el blog diciendo que la imagen estaba publicada allí no me hace excesiva gracia). El caso es que si un archivo se publica fuera de Commons antes que acá, has de probar que tú posees los derechos de autor. Y, si bien puede ser indicio de que alguna relación puedes tener con el blog, que la imagen se evapore de allí no es un método válido para validar la licencia, lo siento. De nada. Strakhov (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 14:01, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Imagem com direitos autorais, modelo anterior das imagens padrão de perfil de deputados da Alerj, conforme link a seguir: Perfil da legislatura passada de Thiago PampolhaPaladinum2 (talk) 22:23, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The image appears to be a web-ripped standard profile picture with no evidence of compatible licensing. Per COM:PRP it needs COM:PRP (exceedingly unlikely now) or it needs to go. --Xover (talk) 14:12, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:34, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The preview - if not the whole image itself before clicking on it - is invisible. Sebiiyaa (talk) 23:04, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- @Sebiiyaa: You know you can upload a new version of a file to fix a problem, right? Alternately, since it is your own upload you can request speedy deletion as uploader's request (although at this point it might be faster to simply wait for this request to be closed). Xover (talk) 14:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Nothing to been seen on this image. --Ellywa (talk) 14:51, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52345186772).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is focused specifically on the advertising billboard, which itself and the embedded image has an inherent copyright that cannot be waived by the photographer (see Commons:De minimis). "Blacking out" the problematic part simply makes the image almost useless, ad UK copyright laws are strict (COM:UK). - 2001:4453:54A:CA00:C099:89CB:167C:FA1E 23:28, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: just blur the advertising billboard can acceptable--Wpcpey (talk) 01:58, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- That would make the photo both acceptable, yet completely useless. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:03, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The nomination seems very confused. De minimis has no relevance here. Nor does copyright (no-one is challenging that it isn't). However this work (in its entirety, as a public announcement) is clearly a major document in the recent history of the UK. Before deleting it I'd want to see it addressed as to why it's not under OGL, as we would usually expect such a document to be. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:02, 12 September 2022 (UTC) (but see comment below)
- If the poster is actually released under the OGL, you would already point out where you could get it. As far as I know, this is not the work of a government official, and even if it is the photograph might not be under a free license, and unless that it is proven beyond doubt that both the billboard and the underlying shot of the late Queen Elizabeth II is under OGL (or another suitable license), it should be removed under Commons:Precautionary Principle - 2001:4453:54A:CA00:71C6:D58E:4B2D:B864 05:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- (Also as I see it is only found on JCDecaux electronic billboards so it could be that it is their employee instead of the UK Government who made this poster) - 2001:4453:54A:CA00:71C6:D58E:4B2D:B864 06:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: Not sure if this will help at all but I figured I'd throw this information in, just incase it is useful. I did a reverse image search on the original image and I found a plethora of council, govermnent and NHS websites using this image to announce the Queen's passing. Unhelpfully, neither of them provide any thing to say who the copyright holder is. I'm pretty positive JCDecaux isn't the copyright holder of the Queen's photograph. As it seems this image is an "official" image of the Queen, wouldn't Crown Copyright apply? 82.23.20.168 23:42, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- (Also as I see it is only found on JCDecaux electronic billboards so it could be that it is their employee instead of the UK Government who made this poster) - 2001:4453:54A:CA00:71C6:D58E:4B2D:B864 06:04, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- If the poster is actually released under the OGL, you would already point out where you could get it. As far as I know, this is not the work of a government official, and even if it is the photograph might not be under a free license, and unless that it is proven beyond doubt that both the billboard and the underlying shot of the late Queen Elizabeth II is under OGL (or another suitable license), it should be removed under Commons:Precautionary Principle - 2001:4453:54A:CA00:71C6:D58E:4B2D:B864 05:55, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Confusing nomination. 180.241.208.87 11:38, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (see COM:DW) unless it can be demonstrated that the image on the billboard is free-content. —Granger (talk · contribs) 21:19, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per confirmation with JCDecaux that the poster was made in-house. Relevant quotation from our email exchange:
Hello – the photograph of The Queen was supplied to JCDecaux by Buckingham Palace’s Custodian of the Official Royal Image Library, for our in-house designer to create the artwork for the tribute to run across our digital screens.
I don’t have any information about who took the picture.— Janet Guest, Head of Communications, JCDecaux UK
- If any administrator wants to verify this, please send me an email (using SendMail) and I would gladly forward the mail. Unfortunately, even if we somehow confirm that the supplied image is under OGL or a similar license, the correspondence state that it was created in-house (and while in the US it is debatable if this has created a new copyright, the UK threshold is low enough that JCDecaux would have a separate copyright). Gacel Perfinian (Commons talk) 09:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Definitely oppose any sort of "speedy deletion"! This is why we have discussion, not just speedies.
- If this is JCD's work rather than government, then OGL would be unlikely to apply to it overall, so I withdraw my first argument.
- We're now looking at a COM:DW. Which in this case is an image (that probably still is under OGL), with added text by JCD. But does that text reach COM:TOO ? I'd still keep this, as the derivative work is insufficient to attract separate copyright protection, and I see no reason to believe the original image would be unusable either (after all, JCD seem free to use it). Andy Dingley (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Photo: your arguments sounds like the common complaints on the Commons:Precautionary Principle. Has someone actually verified that it is actually OGL? Photos of royal figures done on royal grounds are usually taken by the household itself and should not be presumed to be taken by HM Government and therefore not covered (automatically) by OGL (see Commons:UK Open Government Licence). It's more complicated if it's HM Government or MoD (that's what Commons:Deletion requests/File:Queen Elizabeth II March 2015.jpg is all about that), but we'll get there if it is proven to be shot by HM Government.
- Poster: regardless if it the text per se is covered or not (probably not, it's just a statement of fact), I believe that the poster is covered by COM:UK#Typographical copyright, which protect the poster for at least 25 years. Gacel Perfinian (Commons talk) 12:06, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I mentioned this further up the page, but wouldn't Crown Copyright be more applicable? 82.23.20.168 23:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Possibly. Crown Copyright is only applicable if the photograph was "made by Her Majesty or by an officer or servant of the Crown in the course of his duties" [11]. Whether the photograph is now being used as an "official" image of the Queen doesn't play a direct role, though the fact that JCDecaux got it directly from Buckingham Palace would lead one to think that Crown Copyright applies. Anarchyte (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The outcome of this would also effect the following files, because they are almost identical to this one and will have the same problems. There's a few more, but you'll be able to find them on Category:Announcements_of_the_death_of_Elizabeth_II. 82.23.20.168 00:08, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346568890).jpg - slightly modified from this image.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346568760).jpg - different image but will have the same problem as being discussed here.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346390543).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346390383).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346389298).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346568560).jpg - same image of the Queen as discussed here.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346451204).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346451174).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346450994).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346450989).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346450934).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346390538).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346390413).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346145531).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346145521).jpg - as above.
- File:The roadsides and bus stops of London England UK with notices about Queen Elizabeth - mostly digital billboards but one chalkboard too (52346145241).jpg - as above.
- Keep The advertisement is blurred, now should bw fine. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:21, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
- The old version is still visible. Lukas Beck (talk) 03:59, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. There is not evidence that the photo of Queen Elizabeth used on the billboards can be used with a OGL/Crown Copyright or other free licences, per COM:EVID. Blurring was not convincing imho, it still showed the image of the queen. All other photos deleted for the same reason. --Ellywa (talk) 14:59, 20 January 2023 (UTC)