Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Above COM:TOO China --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:32, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- User:Minorax: China? Isn’t this a French work? Besides, I think this isn’t original: merely an unstylized letter with a color gradient applied. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 00:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Whoops. Probably meant for another file.
I withdraw my nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:11, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Whoops. Probably meant for another file.
Kept: withdrawing. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
........ Ko1Ku1ator (talk) 13:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- source reads "Any use of the materials published by the user for commercial purposes is possible only with the permission of the copyright owner." --Achim55 (talk) 14:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & no permission. --Achim55 (talk) 14:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Wutsje at 14:50, 30 August 2022 UTC: Content created as advertisement (G10) --Krdbot 19:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Terminator99990 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos. Violation of COM:SCOPE
Renvoy (talk) 20:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anatoliy (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Image taken from https://www.ncp-e.com/en/company/company-profile/ DecorumForum125 (talk) 00:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of claimed free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Image taken from https://www.ncp-e.com/en/company/company-profile/ DecorumForum125 (talk) 00:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Image taken from https://www.ncp-e.com/en/company/company-profile/ DecorumForum125 (talk) 00:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation: logo did belong to trader on etsy. Not sure they are still trading but logo does not belong to uoploader as claimed Headlock0225 (talk) 02:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparent CV, dubious authorship claim, OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Fictional Mexican municipal flags
[edit]- File:Bandera de Carmen.png
- File:Bandera de Campeche.png
- File:Bandera de Palizada.png
- File:Bandera de Tapachula.png
- File:Bandera de Guanajuato (Guanajuato).png
- File:Bandera de Salamanca, Guanajuato.png
- File:Bandera Cuajinicuilapa.png
- File:Bandera de Iguala.png
- File:Bandera de Atotonilco de Tula.png
- File:Bandera de Tizayuca.jpg
- File:Bandera de Tolcayuca.jpg
- File:Bandera de Tulancingo de Bravo.png
- File:Bandera de Arandas, Jalisco.png
- File:Bandera de Bolaños, Jalisco..png
- File:Bandera de San Juan de Los Lagos.png
- File:Bandera de San Julián, Jalisco.png
- File:Bandera de Tequila.png
- File:Bandera de Apaxco.png
- File:Bandera de Atlacomulco.png
- File:Bandera de Hueypoxtla.png
- File:Bandera de Ixtlahuaca.png
- File:Bandera de Malinalco.png
- File:Bandera de San José del Rincón, México.png
- File:Bandera de Tenancingo.png
- File:Bandera de Zumpango.png
- File:Bandera de Uruapan.jpg
- File:Bandera de Cuernavaca.png
- File:Bandera de Tlayacapan.png
- File:Bandera de Compostela.png
- File:Bandera de Huaquechula.png
- File:Bandera de Felipe Carrillo Puerto (Quintana Roo).png
- File:Flag of José María Morelos (Quintana Roo).PNG
- File:Bandera de Kantunilkín (Lázaro Cardenas).png
- File:Bandera de Solidaridad (Quintana Roo).png
- File:Bandera de Tulum.png
- File:Bandera de San Luis Potosí.png
- File:Bandera de Caborca.png
- File:Bandera de San Luis Río Colorado.png
- File:Bandera de Tlaxcala de Xicohténcatl.png
- File:Bandera de San Rafael, Veracruz.png
- File:Bandera de Santiago Tuxtla.png
- File:Bandera de Tahdziú.jpg
All of these flags are clearly invented and sourceless, a hoax. Most or all were created by Marrovi, who has since been blocked. Please see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. --Flagvisioner (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted book cover. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; clearly modern artwork. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clearly way over TOO. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
It was a test of the upload wizard; has almost no encyclopedic value; is not licensed correctly; and likely is not public domain. Bernanke's Crossbow (talk) 09:53, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
The file history of my video August 28 is very embarassing - I have a very tiny micropenis, I don't want anyone to seeing it. please delete immediately thanks! Manscaper69 (talk) 14:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment You uploaded it, it's not a penis, and I guess you're a troll or something. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
I would like to remove this picture Erdti (talk) 20:39, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - blank image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
I would like to remove this picture Erdti (talk) 20:40, 14 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - blank image. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Blank page 191.126.29.184 23:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. There's a deletion error, so I will move the file. --Rosenzweig τ 13:16, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused file of no educational value. Looks like part of a classic oil painting but which one? Seems to squat rather than original profile. Clearly not the uploadees own work. Headlock0225 (talk) 02:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Derivative of unsourced. Apparent personal joke by uploader only active here one day in 2019. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Not educationally useful. The person in the photo is neither a notable figure nor a contributor. Lt2818 (talk) 05:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 06:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:04, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Fake profile for abuse 2003:C1:9724:4F00:2CEA:8329:1C22:8410 08:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo, bad quality, no educational use Drakosh (talk) 09:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
unused, out of scope hand made drawing Ske (talk) 11:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:06, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
unused, out of scope hand made drawing Ske (talk) 11:50, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Useless made-up troll creation Dronebogus (talk) 12:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and my comments at Commons:Deletion requests/File:8seal.jpg. Grayfell (talk) 01:27, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:07, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photos.
* Pppery * it has begun... 15:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused photoshopped image of a coin. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 15:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Failed blurred photo, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, unusually bad quality -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:12, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, personal silly doodle, possibly private joke -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:13, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake RedKrtek (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:59, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
UPDATE: I retract my deletion request, please close --FMSky (talk) 13:09, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep. The "replacement" has newspaper dots. I think there is room for both (all three) images. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)- Keep per Ikan Kekek. Nothing wrong with having different versions. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:16, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: DR was withdrawn. --Rosenzweig τ 17:08, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
メタデータ付きでアップロードしたため Hagurekusa (talk) 11:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
نیازمند اصلاح است و چون خودم صاحب اثر هستم میخواهم عکس جدید بارگذاری کنم. Spooriak (talk) 14:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
It's too small to be visible on the page. Also, the colors doesn't work with the background. Luke Hirst (talk) 15:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:11, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
ملف تالف Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:08, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
ملف تالف Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
معلومات غير صحيحة Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, broken file, nominated by uploader. --Rosenzweig τ 17:14, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
ملف تالف Iyadaldarabea232003 (talk) 16:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete, it does not look corrupted to me, but it does qualify for COM:CSD#F10. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Wdwd. --Rosenzweig τ 17:15, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Je souhaite supprimer ce fichier car celui-ci n'a pas d'utilité et je souhaite finalement garder ce fichier personnel Macusse (talk) 20:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Clearly in scope, quite a decent photo of a seemingly notable and certainly nice building, uploaded too long ago for automatic deletion, and what personal information? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Please notify us why this was deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The file was nominated for speedy deletion by the uploader, one day after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- I see. Pity, but they have that right. Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 14:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Low quality logo not used on any projects Yeeno (talk) 17:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo. Contribuine34 (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 11:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope also duplicates. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:43, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:56, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:28, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Autograph of un-notable person, no educational use, author banned in ruwiki. Drakosh (talk) 09:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
logo of un-notable team?, no educational use, author banned in ruwiki. Drakosh (talk) 09:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope, unused personal logo. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:21, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
duplicate YitzhakNat (talk) 00:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
duplicate YitzhakNat (talk) 00:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
duplicate YitzhakNat (talk) 00:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
duplicate YitzhakNat (talk) 00:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment User photo by new user, uploaded 2 days ago. If they make other in-scope contributions, permissible. (Uploading a user photo first thing is IMO not a good idea, but as far as I know is not prohibited. I'd wait a week or two to see if they are here to contribute to the project or not before deleting.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Typical self-promotional upload for a Wikidata item. Also qualifies for CSD F10. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 02:59, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Trade (talk) 23:47, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:02, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
This image appears to be a duplicate of another image present at wikicommons. I have never nominated an image for deletion, but I am working on a WP page for this person and came across this file. DaffodilOcean (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Question Which image is it a duplicate of? Please link it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Seems to me to be a lower-resolution copy of File:ETH-BIB-Vayena, Effy (1972-)-Portr 18863.tif, which I presume the OP was referring to. Felix QW (talk) 10:28, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you.
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:24, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, badly cropped and not properly extracted TAC PlazaMaster (talk) 03:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Image is not in the public domain, poorly edited to get around Copyright TAC PlazaMaster (talk) 03:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
I highly doubt that this image was really uploaded by the original author. Either it is an F1 or an F10 case. Same for the other uploads by this user.
- File:Yasin ahmed shawon.jpg
- File:Md Rakib Hasan Bappy.webp (background seems to be F1 for this one [1]) Hangman'sDeath (talk) 05:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:22, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Wohl professionelles Studiofoto, hier wohl eher eine URV ohne Freigabe durch den Urheber-Fotografen Jbergner (talk) 06:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo Jbergner. Kein Problem. Ich habe noch ein anderes Foto. 2A02:908:D78:8500:2D86:FC35:420:68FA 22:22, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, mising permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:23, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Ronny Raychend Ronny Raychend (talk) 07:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: User requested deletion in own user space /U1. --Wdwd (talk) 14:26, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![30 File:Возможно вы имели в виду "ромео и джульетта"?.png](#File:Возможно_вы_имели_в_виду_"ромео_и_джульетта"?.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.PNG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:21, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused duplicate file in low res. --Wdwd (talk) 14:29, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KirmiziAdam as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong upload
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion and explaination of "wrong upload" after 5 years. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep novalid reason. --RAN (talk) 23:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KirmiziAdam as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong upload
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion and explaination of "wrong upload" after 4 years. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:49, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Das Bild ist bereits seit dem 19.08.2017 im Internet zu finden: http://www.classiquenews.com/author/benjamin_ballifh/ zudem nahm das Orchester lt. Webseite am 9. Dez. 2016 kein Konzert im Festzelt vor.: https://www.gstaadfestivalorchestra.ch/de/konzerte/konzerte-2016, verm. URV. Das Bild taucht auch an anderen Stellen und Seiten auf: https://www.hr-sinfonieorchester.de/konzerte/konzerte-22-23/gstaad-,auf-tour-gstaad-100.html, verm. Profiaufnahme. Benutzer:WvB (talk) 11:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
alive person; probably without premission Euro know (talk) 12:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Is a journalist / correspondent from Israel: see Google. Permission is needed, but better use {{subst:npd}} instead of nominating the file?. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 12:43, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 19:41, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
unused personal photos
File:Md. Ashraful Alam Shemul (2020) - Square.jpg(used in user page)- File:Muhammad Ashraful Alam Shemul (2020).jpg
_-_Square.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Afifa Afrin (talk) 09:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:19, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Son éminence, le Cardinal Jean-Marc Aveline, à Rome, le 27 août 2022, jour de son accession au cardinalat.jpg
[edit]
Non libre de droits (copyright Europe1) Hyméros --}-≽ ♥ Yes ? 15:57, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope self promo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 11:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:04, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:55, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:05, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo. Contribuine34 (talk) 11:43, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo. Contribuine34 (talk) 11:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- duplicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 11:42, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo. Contribuine34 (talk) 11:44, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:05, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I see the history on en.Wikipedia, but the summary when I searched his name stated that: "Sandro Salsano is an Italian businessman. He is the chairman of Salsano Family Office and president of Salsano Group. In 2019, Forbes Mexico ranked him as the 6th richest person in Central America, with the combined assets of him/Grupo Salsano worth US$1.2 billion." I'm not sure why that would make him not notable to en.Wikipedia, but if the statement is true, he ain't no Joe Schmo, and therefore, I'd prefer for us not to remove pictures of him if they are properly licensed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment If we're considering it not useful to have more than one photo of him in that jacket, I'd suggest keeping one photo from the bunch. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:11, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable, but the photos are all over the place, not original work or educational. Here is the one in question as a profile https://starngage.com/plus/en-us/influencers/sandro.salsano Contribuine34 (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- and here is the same one deleted. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_27.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 18:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Seems reasonable, but the photos are all over the place, not original work or educational. Here is the one in question as a profile https://starngage.com/plus/en-us/influencers/sandro.salsano Contribuine34 (talk) 18:36, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:44, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicates, selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- formally deleted here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_27.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:06, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation. Copied from https://twitter.com/haru_ru_chan/status/1561318951656706049 . According to this tweet https://twitter.com/haru_ru_chan/status/1563551997453746176 , The contributor User:Haru run 25 seems to be inpersonation. In fact,this Wikimedia account has been blocked on jawiki as w:ja:LTA:TANS sock, who usually impersonates other Twitter/Instagram users. Thus, this file has not been uploaded by original author. 郊外生活Kogaiseikatsu (talk,contribs) 10:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yasu (talk) 15:26, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyvio, no metadata, uploader has no other uploads. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: insufficient reason for deletion. Not found using TinEye and Google Images. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:08, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Same as File:New York Presidential Election Results 1952.svg and SVG is favored over PNG. TylerKutschbach (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
We have a better version and this one is unused. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:06, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Probably not a "self work" as there is a external website watermark on the photograph. Miniwark (talk) 10:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artwork by Pierre Poisson (1876-1953) not yet in the public domain, and no Fredom of Panorama in France. Miniwark (talk) 10:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Personally I would ignore Freedom of panorama, it's nonsense to me, but if that are the rules, it possibly can't stay.. On my website's I don't care. :-) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 11:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, intentional subject and fails accessory doctrine of French de minimis. FOP cannot be ignored, @Richardwiki: . The restrictions on free uses of Millau Viaduct, the two court rulings on postcards bearing Grande Arche and La Geóde in 1990, and former French MEP Cavada's opposition to Wikimedian FOP movement in 2015 prove the problematic lack of commercial FOP in France in free culture media today. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation from an Instagram post. According to this tweet https://twitter.com/haru_ru_chan/status/1563551997453746176 , this file seemed to be reproduced from an Instagram post. In addition the contributor User:Haru run 25 is also impersonation of this Twitter/Instagram user and already blocked on jawiki due to w:ja:LTA:TANS, who usually impersonates other Twitter/Instagram users. The original Instagram post cannot been seen due to protected, since this Instagram user is scared, but I guess this file should be deleted. 郊外生活Kogaiseikatsu (talk,contribs) 10:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
copyvio - info states it is from Laisha magazine instagram and no OSTR is added DGtal (talk) 10:14, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:10, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
One can not take a photo of random protesters not related to Nazism and add a swastika to it, because it violates personality rights. Compare with COM:IDENT#Examples: "A man and woman talking, entitled "A prostitute speaks to her pimp" (possible defamation)". Wikisaurus (talk) 14:07, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: agree. This photoshopped image can really impact the reputation of the people in the image; not unlike the principles at COM:Vandalism. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
This map isn't backed by any source and seems to promote missinformation. Joanot Martorell ✉ 14:17, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment No longer in use. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It was only used here, added by the author of the file, where the text contradicted the information of the map. If the file is kept, it should be corrected according to the sources, and then we would have a duplicate map of File:Extensió del valencià al País Valencià.svg. FogueraC (talk) 07:10, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It should have some reference about the source of data used to make this map. According to Commons:Project scope, it has to be useful and educational about "providing knowledge; instructional or informative". As there's no information about how this map was made in the description page, it doesn't fit that purpose. Before tagging this file for deletion, I already tried to figure out around the web which data might be used for this, but I couldn't find anything. --Joanot Martorell ✉ 08:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not published under CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Photoshops of unattributed and likely copyrighted source images. File:Vincent Petillo (X Games édition du gouter 2002).jpg is using http://ww1.prweb.com/prfiles/2015/06/05/12772410/sam_beckett_xgames_2015_skate_vert_finals_01.jpg as its background.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:Vincent Petillo (X Games édition du gouter 2002).jpg
- File:Vincent Petillo (X Games 2002).jpg
- File:Vincent Petillo (X Games de la nuit 2002).jpg
- File:Vincent Petillo (Break Dance Games 1949).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 15:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a copy of an old version of an English Wikipedia article. It is pointless as a PDF at Commons and outside of COM:SCOPE. Marbletan (talk) 15:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
معلومات مزيفة Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
ملف تالف Iyadaldarabea232003 (talk) 16:31, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:53, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ملف مزيف Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:12, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
ملف مزيف Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
ملف زائف Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
ملف زائف Ahmed232003 (talk) 16:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:54, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
duplicate YitzhakNat (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:WTC-7 - IMG21 002.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
duplicate YitzhakNat (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate of File:WTC-7 - IMG16 001.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:57, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
ملف زائف Iyadaldarabea232003 (talk) 16:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. Zafer (talk) 17:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Subject is claimed to be the author of the work, yet the uploader is asserting it's their own work? C.Fred (talk) 18:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It's possible that it's a selfie and uploader User:IamNasirZaman is Muqadas Farooq. However, it contradicts them uploading File:Muqadas Farooq Awan.jpg which is not a selfie and yet they also claim it's their own work. And when uploading one's own selfie, there'd usually be more exif data. In any case the image will no longer be in use in few days as the AfD at enwiki is heading straight towards deletion. The image should then be deleted as out-of-Commons scope/personal files by non-contributors. Njd-de (talk) 20:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks for those points. I guess I can't argue for keeping on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - claim of own work is dubious given the other claims. -- Whpq (talk) 18:43, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Collage of unsourced images; unused, no evident in-scope usefulness Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:01, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
We have a better version and this one is unused. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:26, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
We have a better version and this one is unused. Nanahuatl (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Supersed image with better resolution, also with correct details. Niketto sr. (talk) 21:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete May 2021 must have been a bad month for me. WQUlrich (talk) 23:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- don't worry it happens to me in my uploads too! Some sources can be deceiving! Niketto sr. (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Also you can find other interesting images on the source I found the correct informations, https://www.finestresullarte.info/mostre/torino-mostra-regina-margherita-di-savoia-palazzo-madama Mind that two have incorrect infos in fact the image under the Demetrio Cosola one is Affetti (Affections) by Giacomo Balla and the one below is the Lovatti's one. Niketto sr. (talk) 18:47, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- don't worry it happens to me in my uploads too! Some sources can be deceiving! Niketto sr. (talk) 18:41, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:03, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Collage of 2 small unremarkable photos of unidentified location by user active here only one day in 2014. No evident in scope usefulness. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Anne Le Louarn.jpg Pierre Bodin (talk) 10:16, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep What's the reason for doing the deletion request? Because there doesn't seem to be one. --Adamant1 (talk) 12:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot 191.125.61.109 23:38, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful own work per uploader's talk page on enwp. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 13:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Weltweit einziges 11-Sterne Hotel Burj Al Arab mit detailgetreuem Nachbau des Schiefen Turm von Pisa als grosser Attraktion fuer die Gaeste 01.jpg
[edit]
Name des Bildes ist irreführend, abgebildet sind nicht das Hotel Burj Al Arab und ein Nachbau des schiefen Turms von Pisa. Name sollte geändert werden. 77.8.51.17 16:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file renamed. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:13, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Clearly above COM:TOO UK --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Clearly above COM:TOO UK. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:43, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. File from Twitter Dgho (talk) 12:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Renvoy (talk) 13:06, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Naval ship mages seemingly incorrectly claimed as own work
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
This images were all uploaded by User:Drachinifel. I believe they should be deleted for Invalid license and incorrectly claimed as own work. Set of images by seemingly newbie user likely good faith but ultimately invalid licence as e.g. difficult to claim photograph of image of HMS Duncan in 1905 is own work when it is ultimately license status of the underlying photograph that is important. Seems like a fairly classic good faith newbie mistake of a new user having created an image from another incorrectly buts in an "own work" claim against the original image. It is quite probably but not certain the underlying images are public domain and a more specific license under {{PD-old}} might be applicable. Per en:Special:Diff/934102808 & en:Special:Diff/934226847 Parsecboy seems to have let the uploader know the issue a couple of years ago but it doesn't seem to have been corrected. File:Fulminant1894.png appears to have been uploaded a little later and some not contain Exif. May be possible to mark these for undelete at a later date. If a valid license can be resolved for these I'm happy to withdraw the nomination. Thankyou. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 14:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-UK-unknown, just fix obvious errors, and save everyone's time. And when you scan an old photo, the derivative copy you create is your own work. --RAN (talk) 23:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- I assume you are talking to me as nominator, though you may be tlaking to everyone in general. I read that {{PD-UK-unknown}} requires that whatever reasonable attempt to ascertain the author has been documented in the file description, and I certainly do not see evidence of that in Special:Diff/685897160 for example at the time I am posting this. Thankyou. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 23:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC) User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 23:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Reverse image search against over 1 billion images did not find the name of an author attached to these images. --RAN (talk) 22:32, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- I did see what I believe were references to the uploading of these images on twitter. So there is the capability of further investigation. If I add more specific details details here there are possible privacy outing concerns, though there are also the possibilities of some people impersonating others. To quote Parsecboy who is a respected administrator on the English Wikipedia in the edit summary "Can't use that, Drach - it's not your work so the license you have is incorrect - we need info on the photographer and when/where it was published". I might try to follow up the tweet but I need to find my twitter credentials first. But I've had multiple issues here all today, cars, cars, and other stuff I can't mention from a decency viewpoint. In fact my head is spinning. However I have managed to enable a family member to fulfill a hospital shift rather than having to call an absence at the last minute so overall probably worth it. But I am convinced this has not been followed up sufficiently to justify all reasonable enquiries being made. THankyou. User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 18:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC) User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 18:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): : Reading you statement "Reverse image search against over 1 billion images did not find the name of an author attached to these images" at first glance led me to believe you did not find examples of this image in use. However I am finding "https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENeHAe0WkAE5f-4?format=jpg&name=360x360" for example. And in particular I would have expected you to have found "https://twitter.com/drachinifel/status/1213733398302412806". In particular the Twitter user, Drafinifel has said: "I've added Duncan, Sans Pareil and Inflexible to their respective wiki articles already. Does that automatically put them on commons as well?". While Drachinifel has said of the images "So, some of you will know of my current side-project of purchasing old photos and glass lantern slides to keep these images in public circulation. After a bit of experimentation with a camera and lightbox, here are some of the first glass lantern slide images." There is no indication of whether he has knowledge of the original author or not. Since you have placed at Special:Diff/685897160 a {{PD-UK-unknown}} I view it some to satisfy "This UK artistic or literary work, of which the author is unknown and cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry," requires at attempt be made to specifically ask "Drachinifel" whether the author or the photographs/lantern sides is known. Per my contributions en:Draft:Drachinifel I have specific reasons for choosing not to make that enquiry myself. Thankyou. User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 21:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- The link at https://twitter.com/drachinifel/status/1213733398302412806 is just someone reposting our copy of the image. The link https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENeHAe0WkAE5f-4?format=jpg&name=360x360 does not name a creator. I stand by "Reverse image search against over 1 billion images did not find the name of an author attached to these images." --RAN (talk) 12:11, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Unless these images are suspected copyright infringements, there's no merit for this nomination. We don't delete images just to send a message to uploaders. Peter Isotalo 04:37, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination: I have or have has issues with the keep !voters here and am choosing to withdraw nomination rather than battleground. RAN does good stuff preserving stuff and his page has some excellent link but I really fear on the odd occasions for the licensing templating they put in place and how they handle it, and I particularly think of here. Special:Diff/654203440. With regards to Peter I did a twitter message to the tweet about per the offer on that twitter: "Glad to see. If you ever need assistance or advice with Wikipedia or Commons, please feel free to poke me. I've been active since 2005 and written a few articles on early modern naval history." As I'm writing this I also notice the following: "If they are in the public domain, would you be interested in getting them uploaded to Wikimedia Commons? With all appropriate metadata of course.". The primary reason for bring this here was the uploader has claimed own work and had not reacted to a warning to sort things out. hopefully someone sorts the licensing out correctly, or a closer might even choose to delete. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 12:34, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- I will also keep looking for more information on these images. --RAN (talk) 05:05, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): : I observe you've changed the licenses on some(?all) of the files and it is in my view possible/probable the problems have been corrected. As a likely co-incidence rather than consequence of you doing that I observe Liz removed my related draft under :en:CSD:G2/G11 at [2]. To be fair Liz has listened to my comments that en:Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom/twinkle has issues in presentation in relation to indef blocked users like myself. In my view I'd claim the the G2 was a little dodgy as it wasn't a test it was a marker that I might add sources to it at some point later. The G11 unambiguous advertising was also a little harsh for draftspace, it fails unambiguous advertising there in my opinion especially as I've grown other articles that way. As far as I am aware no reliable source picked up on the Bismark incident. Back to the more relevant situation here I've already withdrawn the nomination and my concerns of the licensing have now had good faith attempts to be addressed but I'll leave a handling admin to make the decision. Thankyou. -- User:Djm-leighpark(a)talk 09:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
- You can correct obvious errors yourself, when you scan an image you create a derivative copy with the current date as the creation date, and you as the creator. Wiki Commons needs to know the original creation date to determine the copyright status of the original. The best thing would be to have a form that has two dates. The changes I made are the best compromise, using template "Scan". --RAN (talk) 14:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:04, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Photo appears to be credited to News 1: https://www.wikitree.co.kr/articles/741102 Adeletron 3030 (talk) 16:23, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Insufficient permission and CC BY-NC-SA is not compatible with Commons. Needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Missing evidence of permission for the claimed BY-NC-SA license and, even if there was one, it is not a free license. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:26, 23 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:05, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:09, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose request as is: Di Caprio meets GNG, so the rationale cannot work for this file. There is no reason to delete it if its licence is correct. Place Clichy 13:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Place Clichy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose request as is: Masayoshi Son meets GNG, so the rationale cannot work for this file. There is no reason to delete it if its licence is correct. Place Clichy 14:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Place Clichy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:49, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep for now: the plane alone may be notable for Commons, so a Wikipedia decision about the businessman's article should probably not be considered sufficient rationale for the deletion of this file. Place Clichy 12:57, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Place Clichy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:12, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:11, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same profile photos
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:06, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:40, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:51, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose request as is: Matt Damon meets GNG, so the rationale cannot work for this file. There is no reason to delete it if its licence is correct. Place Clichy 13:23, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Place Clichy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:50, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose request as is: Charlie Munger meets GNG, so the rationale cannot work for this file. There is no reason to delete it if its licence is correct. Place Clichy 12:46, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Place Clichy. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:06, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, for selfpromo Contribuine34 (talk) 11:48, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:07, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:02, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
{{Agios Titus Skull}} OoM JaN (talk) 15:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
wrong file name. cant change it. will upload new OoM JaN (talk) 16:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment You can request a filename change. What name do you want? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:13, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Question And what will you do if they don't upload a new file? Shouldn't we either change the filename or wait for them to upload a replacement before deleting? For the record, I would have been happy to change the filename at their request. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Can't find a source URL because the site isn't searchable, but other similar uploads were taken from euroleaguebasketball.net without credit (eg. https://www.euroleaguebasketball.net/eurocup/players/yam-madar/011052/) Lord Belbury (talk) 17:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Iran Ministry of Defense photo. No Tasnim watermark, not by Tasnim, not freely-licensed Streamline8988 (talk) 19:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:49, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
From a highlight compilation video, unlikely that the video's creator owns the rights to all the footage Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
From a highlight compilation, unlikely Atlanta Falcons owns the rights to college football footage Adeletron 3030 (talk) 12:33, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:46, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused poor quality image of nondescript trees, no meaningful context, no educational value, out of scope. Superseded by innumerable better tree images already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:36, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Weak Keep: It's not terrible as a thumbnail, but the categories should be tweaked. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:32, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- "Not terrible as a thumbnail". LOL. That confirms it is unusable... --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Unusable as what? Are you aware of COM:VIC, where we determine which files are most useful as thumbnails? Thumbnails are used in articles on most Wikimedia sites. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: is geolocated and ok quality at web resolutions, shows a number of species which should be added to categories if possible. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 19:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:39, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of svg-Version, see Logo-web-full_red_2.svg Wikiinger (talk) 21:37, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
These Flickr-imported photos all show the interior architecture as well as interior design, in a recent building by living architects. Worse, the United Arab Emirates does not have freedom of panorama for free uses of architecture and public art in the said desert kingdom; free use rights is only granted to "broadcasts," not photos.
- File:Bread Street Kitchen and Bar - Gordon Ramsay (36732973263).jpg
- File:Atlantis The Palm (16200913248).jpg
- File:Atlantis The Palm (16200915818).jpg
- File:Atlantis The Palm (16388554835).jpg
- File:Atlantis The Palm (15766097604).jpg
- File:Atlantis The Palm (16201146540).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:45, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 12:46, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hungarikusz Firkász as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Valószínűleg nem a feltöltő a szerző. A dátum viszont egész biztosan nem stimmel. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:43, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
According to the description, it's taken in 1966. There is no proof that it's a public domain. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:29, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 17:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work copyright violation! UAE does not provide full freedom of panorama, their law only permits broadcasting of copyrighted works without the need of license clearances from the architects, sculptors, or muralists. This is a recent work of architecture, see prior deletions at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Atlantis The Palm. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:06, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- UAE law in this regard is understood. Please give us a week or two to discuss whether to upload the photo locally as fair use in the context of an article. Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:55, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Miniwark as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non free work by Andy Warhol 1928-1987 ––FormalDude (talk) 12:55, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete non public domain artwork (even if it's a reproduction and not the original) & no Freedom of Panorama in France. Miniwark (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Miniwark: Can you point me to why a reproduction is afforded copyright protection? ––FormalDude (talk) 13:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Simply because the original is afforded. Here the museum may probably have an authorisation by Andy Warhol rights owner(s), but the photograph need too to have this same authorisation. A copy, of a copy of a copyrighted work have the same copyright limitation than the original. I do not have legalese link to point you this, this is not my domain of expertise, but in Common, in case of doubt and with no VRTS proof then we need to delete the work. Miniwark (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Miniwark: Can you point me to why a reproduction is afforded copyright protection? ––FormalDude (talk) 13:46, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per Miniwark. ––FormalDude (talk) 02:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. A copyrighted work has to be in a fixed form. These balloons seem to be free to float about the room. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:00, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Reading about the display, these are just balloons (and not sculptural representations of balloons). As neither the position nor the composition of the balloons are fixed, this cannot be considered to be a work under U.S. law. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 03:29, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
From a highlight compilation video, unlikely that the YouTube user owns the rights to all the footage. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:04, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:56, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Found elsewhere on the internet prior to upload, usually means "own work" claim isn't true. 87.49.147.53 12:58, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: [3] from 2020. --Rosenzweig τ 00:05, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chaosandvoid (talk · contribs)
[edit]An IP claiming to be Andrew Catlin has challenged the authorship of these three images.
Original rationale:
This picture is incorrectly attributed. I am the author and it has been marked as free to use without my consent.
Andrew Catlin
ac@andrewcatlin.com — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 146.90.169.112 (talk) 07:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Reached out for clarification on the original permission ticket: Ticket:2012112310007826. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, We have had no reply to our attempt to reach out dated "Sun, 27 Mar 2022 08:57:46 +0000". PCP should rule. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:25, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Jeff G. --Rosenzweig τ 11:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chaosandvoid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission is suspect per the first section of this page.
- File:Ambo, henry krokatsis, 2008.jpg
- File:Sacha Craddock.jpeg
- File:Hardcore Punk Mott.jpg
- File:Hardcore Punk Mott book.jpg
- File:GO Manifesto.jpg
- File:GO ID Card.jpeg
- File:David Bowie Nacht Musik.jpeg
- File:RobertfraserGreyOrg.jpg
- File:3ftHighTobyPrint.jpeg
- File:GO life art.jpg
- File:GO City Angels.jpg
- File:GO Love Poem.jpg
- File:GO Everything is Good sculpture.jpg
- File:GO Everything is Good.jpg
- File:GO Poem.jpg
- File:GO Being Blind.jpg
- File:GO Drawing.jpg
- File:GO Religion.jpg
- File:Grey Organisation Brandenburg Gate.JPG
- File:Grey Organisation art action side view.JPG
- File:Grey Organisation art action ICA.JPG
- File:Grey Organisation Bankside.JPG
- File:Grey Organisation Red Wedge.JPG
- File:Grey Organisation Group.JPG
File:Grey Organisation Cabbage Head.JPG- File:Kraftwerk Install.jpeg
- File:Jubilee Install.jpeg
- File:JUBILEE, 2012 - SIXTY PUNK SINGLES, BOOK.jpeg
- File:Kraftwerk catalogue.jpg
- File:AliveandAwakeGO.jpg
- File:100 fanzines book.jpeg
- File:Vegas install shot.jpg
- File:TobyMottACAB.jpg
- File:Auto Italia Exterior.JPG
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Maybe we may keep File:GO Poem.jpg, on the ground that it is a two-dimensional representation of a {{PD-text}} artwork? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 10:46, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Ok, Keep the ones with Ticket:2012111310007971: File:Grey Organisation Cabbage Head.JPG, File:Grey Organisation Red Wedge.JPG, File:Grey Organisation Group.JPG, File:Grey Organisation Bankside.JPG, File:Grey Organisation art action ICA.JPG, File:Grey Organisation art action side view.JPG, File:Grey Organisation Brandenburg Gate.JPG, File:GO Drawing.jpg, File:GO Religion.jpg, File:GO Being Blind.jpg, File:GO Poem.jpg, File:GO Everything is Good sculpture.jpg, File:GO Everything is Good.jpg, File:GO Love Poem.jpg, File:GO City Angels.jpg, and File:GO life art.jpg. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:45, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Ok,
Deleted: ones with suspect permission, kept ones I could verify. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
Same as File:Pennsylvania Presidential Election Results 1932.svg and SVG is favored over PNG TylerKutschbach (talk) 02:20, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Please look carefully. The files are not the same. Can we count on you to know which file is a more accurate representation of all these election results? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: You can count on me on each file that is a more accurate representation, the SVG file is more accurate because it has better quality than the PNG file. TylerKutschbach
- Accuracy in the representation of the votes is much more important. Should we fear you may ignore that because of a preference for one type of file? Because if there's any risk of that, both files should be kept when there's any discrepancy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:28, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: My svg file of the map has been updated because of the mistakes I made and now they look the same. I fix the svg files of these maps if I found a mistake in them. TylerKutschbach
- Much appreciated. But please don't confuse the issue by claiming two files are the same when they are not. If you state that you corrected mistakes in the SVG version of the file, your deletion requests would have more credibility. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:01, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Not own work as claimed, all need permission
- File:Karjalan lapsia 2021 c.jpg
- File:Karjalan lapsia 2021 b.jpg
- File:Karjalan lapsia 2021.jpg
- File:Pentti Koskimaa 1 b.jpg
- File:Pentti Koskimaa 1 a.jpg
- File:Marja-Liisa Kuosmanen 1.jpg
- File:Panu Savolainen.jpg
- File:Mika Pohjola.jpg
- File:Unta ja totta.jpg
- File:On elon retki näin 2.jpg
- File:On elon retki näin 1.jpg
- File:Things happen that way.jpg
- File:Metsän lumo 2.jpg
- File:Metsän lumo.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Gbawden
- You have suggested the possible deletion of some Toivo Kärki’s album covers and other pictures. I’ll give some arguments why I disagree.
- I am a son of the well-known Finnish composer Toivo Kärki (1915-1992). As for the national significance of Toivo Kärki you may check the Wikipedia article on him (I did not write this). His music production is very large, more than 1600 recorded compositions. Most of them can be listened in the streaming services.
- I own all of my father’s musical property - morally, legally and physically. After his death I have produced several albums of his previously unheard compositions. On some of these albums I have written Wikipedia articles, which include album covers and some attached texts, which I also wrote. As I said, I have the rights to all this material.
- I seriously wish that the deletion of these pictures does not take place.
- Yours sincerely
- Xylita
- Nilsiä, Finland Xylita (talk) 12:19, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Xylita: I'm not sure why nobody has followed up on this yet (probably just lack of time: everyone here is a volunteer, and we're perennially understaffed in this area). In any case, for the situation you describe we use the process described at: Commons:Volunteer Response Team. You will need to provide various evidence that you really are legally able to license the relevant files, and the VRT team will guide you on what is needed.Before contacting VRT though, you may want to go through these files and consider them from a copyright perspective. For example, the album covers... Did your father design the covers himself? I don't mean in the sense "Did he control the process?", but in the sense "Did he sit down with Photoshop and do the work himself?". Did he take the photographs himself, or did a friend or hired photographer operate the actual camera? Was any material from a third party used? What are the contracts for any third-party effort or resources used? In copyright, the one doing the creative work generally owns the copyright unless a contract specifically assigns all or part of it to someone else. For record covers it will often be the case that a graphical artist creates it, but then assigns the copyright to the record company (one of the services record companies provide to recording artists like your father). It is not at all uncommon for an artist whose music is on a record to not actually own the rights to the graphical design of the cover. You will need to clear up all such aspects (authorship of each component, contracts in place, etc.).Fo example, in File:Karjalan_lapsia_2021.jpg, the photograph was most likely taken by a photographer. Who? What contract were they under, what rights did it assign, and to whom? The cover design also contains several decorative elements, as well as the overall cover design itself. Who designed this cover, what contract were they under, etc.? File:Karjalan lapsia 2021 b.jpg contains several thumbnail portraits. Who took these photos? How are they licensed? These kinds of issues apply to all or nearly all the files listed above. --Xover (talk) 21:32, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:06, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Speravir as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: There is an image printed on the CD. The uploader is the author of the song text and presumably owns this CD, but there is no indication about the rights for this image. Achim55 (talk) 15:56, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Halllo, das Foto habe ich selbst gemacht und damit ist rechtlich in Ordnung, Oder? Das Marmorpalais ist eine Öffentliche Immobilie (ein Denkmal), ein Teil der Geschichte Potsdams und wird täglich mehrfach fotogrfiert. Ich verstehe das Problem nicht. Vieleicht kannst Du mir erklären wo es ein Problem gibt. Danke MfG Jens 2003:D7:EF12:7491:807F:E93A:1895:2445 15:18, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Du hast das Foto von der CD gemacht, aber nicht das Foto auf der CD, das das Schloss zeigt. Dieses Foto ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und deswegen hier nicht ok. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Weil ich schon vermutete, dass es da Verständnisprobleme geben könnte, habe ich ihn auf seiner User-Disk. angesprochen, weil ich es hier kürzer halten wollte. Die Antwort hier oben ist nur eine von Achim übertragene Kopie. Laut seiner Aussage hat er auch dieses Bild gemacht (Ja, es hat ein unangemeldeter Benutzer geantwortet). — Speravir – 17:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- So etwas bitte unbedingt im Löschantrag festhalten. Wenn den jemand entscheidet, woher soll der wissen, dass auf irgendwelchen Benutzerdiskussionsseiten was dazu steht? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Ja, ist mir klar. Hatte ich auch beabsichtigt. — Speravir – 18:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- So etwas bitte unbedingt im Löschantrag festhalten. Wenn den jemand entscheidet, woher soll der wissen, dass auf irgendwelchen Benutzerdiskussionsseiten was dazu steht? Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 17:17, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Guten Morgen, ja ich habe das Foto auf der CD gemacht und auch das Foto von der CD. Wie kommst Du dazu einfach ohne Nachfrage anzunehmen, dass das Foto nicht von mir ist? Im Übrigen erhebe ich keine Urheberrechte. Das Foto darf jeder nutzen. Vieleicht sollte man diese Diskusion hier beenden, was bringt das alles? Jens Erdmann (talk) 09:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weil das der absolute Standardfall in solchen Diskussionen ist, die es hier ständig und immer wieder gibt. Daher auch der Löschantrag (bzw. der ursprüngliche Genehmigungs-Baustein), man kennt diese Fälle hier schon. Du bist tatsächlich der erste, von dem ich lese, dass er das Foto auf dem Datenträger/Umschlag/Medium etc. auch selbst gemacht hat, nicht nur das Foto, das dieses zeigt. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 09:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Es ist so und damit ist das Thema "Foto-Rechte" erledigt. Eine Urheberrechtsverletzung liegt nicht vor! Eine Urheberrechtsverletzung liegt vor, wenn es zu einer Beeinträchtigung der Rechte des Urhebers kommt. Das ist hier nicht der Fall. Da ich der Urheber bin, oder hat sich ein "Anonymer-Urheber" gemeldet? Ihr habt einfach in einer - verdächigten Annahme - ohne Rückfrage, einen Löschungsantrag gestellt und somit eine Konzequenz folgen lassen. Der Löschungsantrag wurde gestellt, auf Grund eines anonymen Hinweies. Klingt nicht wirklich Vertrauenswürig? Im übrigen, betrifft eine solche Urheberrechtsverletung die Verletzung des Urheberpersönlichkeitsrechts und des Verwertungsrechts des Urhebers die Rechte sind bei mir. Also hätte ich nur selbst reagieren können. Wer bitte war den der "Anonyme-Melder" und warum anonym, wer versteckt sich den da und warum? Übrigens eine falsche Verdächtigung stellt auch einen Tatbestand des deutschen Strafrechts dar. Gruß Jens Erdmann Jens Erdmann (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Du irrst Jens. Das Thema ist erst dann erledigt, jedenfalls in Deinem Sinn, wenn Du das tust, worum ich dich auf Deiner Benutzerdiskussionsseite bereits zweimal gebeten habe: Lade das Foto des Marmorpalais, das Du als Vorlage für die CD genutzt hast, als angemeldeter Benutzer Jens Erdmann hier in Commons hoch. Ich hatte noch eine weitere, für dich aber bedeutend aufwendigere Variante im Hinterkopf, nämlich dass der Urheberrechtsinhaber eine Genehmigung erteilt, der ja aber laut Deiner Aussage Du selbst bist. Siehe jedenfalls alles damit Zusammenhängende unter Commons:Volunteer Response Team/de. Für dich wäre hier der fast zu Beginn zu findende Punkt „Ich habe die Datei selbst erstellt, sie wurde noch nicht veröffentlicht und ich bin der alleiniger Inhaber des Urheberrechts.“ einschlägig, der genau das fordert, was meine Bitte ist. — Speravir – 22:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ach so, das war keine anonyme Meldung. Du kannst hier sehen, wer das Foto der CD als Urheberrechtsverletzung gemeldet hat: Special:Diff/658589596/685734197. Du hast aber auch auf Deiner Benutzerdiskussion eine Information darüber bekommen: User talk:Jens Erdmann#File:Original CD - Das Potsdamlied - aus dem Jahr 2004.jpg. Die besagte Person hat dort direkt noch einen kurzen zusätzlichen Text geschrieben und mir dir kommuniziert (wenn Du derjenige warst, der als unangemeldeter Benutzer dort reagiert hat). Es war die Person, die dir genau diese Antwort schickt: — Speravir – 22:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Guten Morgen Speravir, ich habe es neu hochgeladen mit dem Hinweis : Quelle eigenes Werk und Urheber. sollte jetzt richtig sein? Gruss Jens Jens Erdmann (talk) 09:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Aber nicht als angemeldeter Benutzer! :-( Unter welchem Namen hast Du sie denn hochgeladen? Oder etwas ist schief gelaufen und der Vorgang ist abgebrochen worden. — Speravir – 18:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Ich versuche es Sonntag nochmal vorher habe ich keine Zeit. Jens Erdmann (talk) 20:52, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Aber nicht als angemeldeter Benutzer! :-( Unter welchem Namen hast Du sie denn hochgeladen? Oder etwas ist schief gelaufen und der Vorgang ist abgebrochen worden. — Speravir – 18:57, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Guten Morgen Speravir, ich habe es neu hochgeladen mit dem Hinweis : Quelle eigenes Werk und Urheber. sollte jetzt richtig sein? Gruss Jens Jens Erdmann (talk) 09:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Es ist so und damit ist das Thema "Foto-Rechte" erledigt. Eine Urheberrechtsverletzung liegt nicht vor! Eine Urheberrechtsverletzung liegt vor, wenn es zu einer Beeinträchtigung der Rechte des Urhebers kommt. Das ist hier nicht der Fall. Da ich der Urheber bin, oder hat sich ein "Anonymer-Urheber" gemeldet? Ihr habt einfach in einer - verdächigten Annahme - ohne Rückfrage, einen Löschungsantrag gestellt und somit eine Konzequenz folgen lassen. Der Löschungsantrag wurde gestellt, auf Grund eines anonymen Hinweies. Klingt nicht wirklich Vertrauenswürig? Im übrigen, betrifft eine solche Urheberrechtsverletung die Verletzung des Urheberpersönlichkeitsrechts und des Verwertungsrechts des Urhebers die Rechte sind bei mir. Also hätte ich nur selbst reagieren können. Wer bitte war den der "Anonyme-Melder" und warum anonym, wer versteckt sich den da und warum? Übrigens eine falsche Verdächtigung stellt auch einen Tatbestand des deutschen Strafrechts dar. Gruß Jens Erdmann Jens Erdmann (talk) 12:53, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weil das der absolute Standardfall in solchen Diskussionen ist, die es hier ständig und immer wieder gibt. Daher auch der Löschantrag (bzw. der ursprüngliche Genehmigungs-Baustein), man kennt diese Fälle hier schon. Du bist tatsächlich der erste, von dem ich lese, dass er das Foto auf dem Datenträger/Umschlag/Medium etc. auch selbst gemacht hat, nicht nur das Foto, das dieses zeigt. Gruß --Rosenzweig τ 09:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Weil ich schon vermutete, dass es da Verständnisprobleme geben könnte, habe ich ihn auf seiner User-Disk. angesprochen, weil ich es hier kürzer halten wollte. Die Antwort hier oben ist nur eine von Achim übertragene Kopie. Laut seiner Aussage hat er auch dieses Bild gemacht (Ja, es hat ein unangemeldeter Benutzer geantwortet). — Speravir – 17:12, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Du hast das Foto von der CD gemacht, aber nicht das Foto auf der CD, das das Schloss zeigt. Dieses Foto ist urheberrechtlich geschützt und deswegen hier nicht ok. --Rosenzweig τ 13:08, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:08, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
- File:N1 Armenian churches in Istanbul (N1 Armenian churches in Istanbul ).jpg ← https://noev-kovcheg.ru/pic_img/2011-02/51.jpg
- File:N2 Armenian churches in Istanbul.jpg ← File:Surb Mariam Astvatsatsin armenian apostolic church in Istambul.jpg
- File:N3 Armenian churches in Istanbul.jpg ← panoramio: https://web.archive.org/web/20161027115610if_/http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/86612090.jpg
- File:N4 Armenian churches in Istanbul.jpg
- File:N5 armenian churches in Istanbul.jpg
- File:N6 Armenian church in Istanbul.jpg
- File:N7 armenian church in Istanbul.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Low resolution with no EXIF data. Possible copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:59, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete – Agree with nominator. These images do not improve the project, and have useless filenames. Eric talk 12:15, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Adding 3 possible sources. --Achim55 (talk) 19:19, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Remark: User:Leon petrosyan is a generally good contributor, and I very much hope to see his explanation of what was going on here. - Jmabel ! talk 19:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- His talkpage doesn't make that obvious. Also, note that an IP editor (Leon himself?) made a comment on his talkpage under the notification for this nomination. Eric talk 02:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Remark: User:Leon petrosyan is a generally good contributor, and I very much hope to see his explanation of what was going on here. - Jmabel ! talk 19:27, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:21, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JustAnotherArchivist as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3. Brave is FOSS, is this covered by the license? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- The file was previously deleted for F3 and then immediately reuploaded, so that's why I nominated it as F3 again. While the Brave browser is open-source, Brave Search is not. –JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 19:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JustAnotherArchivist, I'd argue that this website is below the threshold of originality --Matr1x-101Pinging me doesn't hurt! {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:21, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep. That the code is not open source does not make this image copyrighted. The amount shown is similar to that of the browser (see this image). TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 03:33, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Website is above TOO imo. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:13, 8 January 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The Brave logo is MPL2 licensed (see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by コヨミヤ), and the rest is either de minimis or below TOO in my opinion. --Rosenzweig τ 14:47, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 06:23, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted artwork. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:03, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- There are four more versions of this, all uploaded by the same user, and all five are in Category:The Byzantine eagle. Coat of arms of the Palaiologos Dynasty:
- File:The Byzantine eagle. Coat of arms of the Palaiologos Dynasty(GR).png
- File:The Byzantine eagle. Coat of arms of the Palaiologos Dynasty(PT).png
- File:The Byzantine eagle. Coat of arms of the Palaiologos dynasty(RU).png
- File:The Byzantine eagle. Coat of arms of the Palaiologos Dynasty(TR).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- All show the same double-headed eagle image on different background. I'm not sure where the eagle image is from originally and if it's the uploader's own work or taken from somewhere. So far I have not found it on the web except at Commons/Wikipedia and other websites which took it from there. --Rosenzweig τ 16:10, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. The 3D photo used of the eagle might be an own work, but it is not known whether that is the case. The background might be own creations. But based on this, the images should be deleted. Deleted the category as well, as it is empty and unlikely to be created with the same name. --Ellywa (talk) 09:22, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
False Information, Against Photographic Evidence. NSR97 (talk) 12:12, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep, that is not a pretext for deletion per Commons:Deletion_policy. Even so, do you have any hardline source and evidence that will back up the requested deletion? PyroFloe (talk) 04:36, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 09:25, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Merge/Redirect to File:Flag of Syria.svg. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 16:42, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- The flags of the former United Arab Republic and current Syrian Arab Republic are both identical, there's no need to have two separate files of the same flag. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 16:52, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It is fine to have these both names of a flag, if somebody searches for one or the other. --Ellywa (talk) 09:25, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
fail WP:GNG Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandro Salsano closed as delete Contribuine34 (talk) 18:35, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. This is not a valid reason for deleting a file on Commons. Materialscientist (talk) 23:34, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- out of scope, duplicate selfprmo, same photos with same jacket
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_president_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Salsano_Group_chairman_Sandro_Salsano.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_2.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_25.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_3.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_28.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_20.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_Forbes_2018.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_1.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_26.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_5.jpg
- https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sandro_Salsano_6.jpg Contribuine34 (talk) 12:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep doesn't seem to be completely unnotable, if so for English Wikipedia. Enhancing999 (talk) 19:14, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not used on the projects since september 2022. The other images in the category Category:Sandro Salsano are not in use either. Therefore deleted because this image is out of COM:SCOPE. Duplicates have been deleted already. --Ellywa (talk) 09:33, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
