Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
-1,3-propanediol.png){kind=link}
_Luca_Trascinelli.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._A._Lateral,_B._Dorsal_view_of_head,_C._Ventral_view_of_head,_D._Lateral_view_of_head,_E._Dorsal_view_of_body_terminus,_F._Ventral_view_of_body_terminus,_G._Lateral_vi.png){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
I don't own the Shahadah in the flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 00:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
I don't own the Shahadah in the flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 00:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Bastiangordo (talk) 02:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#G7. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Поскольку Размыто Kurator 23 (talk) 12:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 12:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Поскольку Бессмыслица Kurator 23 (talk) 12:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 12:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Поскольку Бессмыслица Kurator 23 (talk) 12:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 12:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Поскольку Бессмыслица Kurator 23 (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 12:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Поскольку Бессмыслица Kurator 23 (talk) 12:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --A.Savin 12:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Copy vio. Not user's own work. Speedy request reverted by uploader. GhostOfDanGurney (talk) 16:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Per description, not the uploader's own work and clear copyvio of https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nhswPXi4fU which isn't freely licensed. -M.nelson (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Violation — Preceding unsigned comment added by Squishy5761 (talk • contribs) 20:22, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom and COM:CSD#G7. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, false license, fails TOO:Mexico. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Seengogo2 (talk) 04:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake Farhansnigdho (talk) 07:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request; OOS. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
STUPID NON COMMERCIAL LICENCE 😡 Tewdar (talk) 17:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
STUPID NON COMMERCIAL LICENCE 😡 Tewdar (talk) 17:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
copyvio https://twitter.com/medea_medea26/status/1310535339107381249 NorthAfricanArmsDealer (talk) 19:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
copyvio http://lacuisinelouisa.over-blog.com/2020/04/kesra-rakhssis.html NorthAfricanArmsDealer (talk) 19:01, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.pinterest.com/pin/312437292896861047/ from 2018 NorthAfricanArmsDealer (talk) 19:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This file originates from http://spinops.blogspot.com/2012/06/zygorhiza-kochii.html which currently states that it is released under CC BY-NC-ND 3.0. As such, it would not qualify for Commons. However, it is possible that the author used a different licence originally. There are a lot of images from Nobu Tamura on Commons, mostly uploaded by User:ArthurWeasley~commonswiki back in 2012, which have a different copyright notice indicating CC-BY-SA. One random example: File:Diplovertebron BW.jpg. I wasn't able to confirm whether this particular image was or was not also released like that originally. (It is likely that there are more such images by Nobu Tamura on Commons, both in User:Zerohead127's uploads and elsewhere.) JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 18:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
STUPID NON COMMERCIAL LICENCE 😡 Tewdar (talk) 17:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; incompatable license on Brit Museum website. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Alexanderps as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/documentation/card_bio_typed/card_bio_ele.htm Alex Pereiradisc 19:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 20:57, 27 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: https://press.vatican.va/content/salastampa/it/documentation/cardinali_biografie/cardinali_bio_steiner_l.html --Krdbot 01:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as no permission (No permission since) Probably old enough, but source and license need to be fixed. Yann (talk) 21:32, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete, two websites identify this image as "Colour printed (chromolithograph) illustration by F. John from Tiere der Urwelt Animals of the Prehistoric World, 1910, Hamburg",[1][2] so this is a German work but is not anonymous, and the 'life + 70 years' rule applies, see COM:GERMANY. I have found two auction listings of paintings that may be by this artist, but neither indicates his dates.[3][4] The 1910 date is not old enough to assume public domain, so add 50 years to the 'life + 70 years', and undelete in 2031. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
This my friend’s ( User:Eagle Site ) work. He said me to upload in his account. But I uploaded to my account Kunjiramayanam (talk) 10:42, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. Tagged DW no source. --Achim55 (talk) 17:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, no encyclopedic use. Taichi (talk) 00:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Innerbelt Bridge
[edit]Unused personal photos. Delete as out of scope.
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29730288743).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29730304383).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29730305333).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29731553464).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29731554414).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29731555384).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29731557074).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29731559054).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29731560994).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (29731563224).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (30275760551).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (30275761071).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (30275762201).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (30275763101).jpg
- File:Senior Photos - Carley (30362094045).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Eureka Lott 02:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: no realistic educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 03:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; personal pic/joke -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project Zafer (talk) 08:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 12:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Private image, out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
private image, out of scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:56, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Low quality chemical diagram, not used, replaced by File:Ammonium bromide.svg. Wostr (talk) 17:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
OOS promotional Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
{{BadJPG}}, replaced by File:NH2COONH4.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 11:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Uneven bond-lengths in addition to the inferior file-type. Noting also typo in nom'ed filename (it's ammonium carbamate). DMacks (talk) 05:38, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 23:39, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:DEU Rust Banner.svg. Original uploader request. Flagvisioner (talk) 05:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 17:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect structure, see Category:Nitroguanidine. Leyo 11:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The chemical structure is indeed incorrect and there are high quality correct versions that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 13:08, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality, better alternatives in Category:Pentaerythritol tetranitrate. Leyo 11:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
poor quality, probabvly copyrighted Ske (talk) 14:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages: no additional value compared to Category:Methadone. Leyo 10:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per consensus and outcome at Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages. Marbletan (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There's no need to keep outdated gallery pages. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:09, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages: no additional value compared to Category:Mescaline. Leyo 10:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per consensus and outcome at Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages. Marbletan (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There is no need to keep abandoned gallery pages of chemistry-related articles when there are category pages. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}, replaced by File:CL-20.svg. Leyo 10:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:45, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
{{BadGIF}}, better alternatives in Category:Diazodinitrophenol. Leyo 11:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
-1,3-propanediol.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-1,3-propanediol.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Trimethylolmethane-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
-1,3-propanediol.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:46, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
-1,3-propanediol.png){kind=link}
Files uploaded by IamNasirZaman (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-quality images lacking credible exif-data. Unlikely that uploader is original creator and copyright holder.
Njd-de (talk) 20:56, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:13, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MbMehr banoo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low-quality images lacking exif data. Uploader cannot be trusted as they have uploaded other copyvios.
Njd-de (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:12, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work claim. No EXIF, small resolution, blurry, and a derivative of an original work without a source. ✗plicit 01:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. Potential copyvio. SCP-2000 04:22, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
The ticket in ticket:2015112410025764 does not provide a valid license from the copyright holder. Instead, it merely contains an assertion that the artist, w:George Fisher (cartoonist) (d. 2003), is dead and the work is not protected by copyright. There may be a date next to the signature, but I can't read it, and I could not find if/when/how the painting was first published. We will need more information and a more accurate license to keep the file. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anup Rajbansi (talk · contribs)
[edit]All files look like photographs of images of screens, unlikely the uploader's own work.
- File:Renu Dahal5.jpg
- File:Shilpa Nirala Karki.jpg
- File:Nagesh Koirala3.jpg
- File:Chiri Babu Maharjan 3.jpg
- File:Rajesh Man Singh.jpg
- File:Dhanraj Acharya 1.jpg
Yeeno (talk) 07:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. See COM:DW. — Tulsi 24x7 02:51, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
photo of a poster, no proof of CC Culex (talk) 12:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:13, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
See File talk:Doug Mastriano.jpg. VRT permission never came through. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:18, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:39, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Traced copyvios by A. C. Tatarinov
[edit](Original image links are on deletion template in each pages)
- File:Prototaria primigena.jpg
- File:Syncerus acoelotus.jpg
- File:Libysiren sickenbergi.jpg
- File:Ashokia antiqua.jpg
- File:Haplolambda quinni.jpg
- File:Alcidedorbignya inopinata.jpg
- File:Pelochelys bibroni.png
- File:Dvinia prima.jpg
- File:Africanacetus gracilis.jpg
- File:Borealestes serendipitous.jpg
- File:Xianshou songae.jpg
- File:Parahygrobia_natans.jpg
- File:Melogale everetti.png
- File:Hydrolagus alphus.png
- File:Skull of Paracrocidura maxima, male.jpg
- File:Jachaleria candelariensis.png
- File:Chelonoidis alburyorum-Skull.jpg
- File:Macrogenis_crassigenis.png
- File:Stethantyx_covida.jpg
- File:Strashila daohugouensis.png
- File:Griphopithecus sp.png
- File:Anoiapithecus brevirostris.png
- File:Desmodus draculae.png
- File:Osodobenus eodon.jpg
- File:Neotherium mirum skull.jpg
- File:Megapropodiphora arnoldi.jpg
- File:Paralouatta varonai skull.jpg
- File:Scull of Lopholatilus ereborensis.png
- File:Danuvius guggenmosi.jpg
- File:Neogale africana.png
- File:Valenictus chulavistensis 2.png
- File:Cyonasua_sp.png
- File:Bharatoliaphilus punjabensis.jpg
- File:Xenothrix_mcgregori.jpg
- File:Tapirus lundeliusi.png
- File:Mayulestes_ferox.png
- File:Miomaci pannonicum.jpg
- File:Pseudoliparis amblystomopsis.jpg
- File:Molossops_neglectus.jpg
- File:Lekaneleo roskellyae.jpg
- File:Leninia stellans skull.jpg
- File:Skull of the Phoberomys pattersoni.jpg
- File:Cosmophorus_regius.jpg
- File:Chrysocetus.jpg
- File:Tremarctos_floridanus.jpg
- File:Capnodis jacobsoni.jpg
- File:Megistotherium.png
- File:Pyrrhula crassa.jpg
- File:Ursinoscorpaenopsis kitai.jpg
- File:Halicephalobus_mephisto_head.jpg
- File:Skull of the Progiraffa.jpg
- File:Perunium ursogulo.png
- File:Ursavus_tedfordi,_skull.png
- File:Adalatherium hui.jpg
- File:Tapirus_johnsoni.jpg
- File:Osbornodon iamonensis.jpg
- File:Dinailurictis bonali.jpg
- File:Centrochelys_atlantica.png
- File:Skull of the Piauhytherium capivarae.jpg
- File:Taratretis derwentensis.jpg
- File:Bolbochasmops bucculentus.jpg
- File:Solitudo robusta.jpg
- File:Maxilla of Puma pumoides.png
- File:The holotype specimen of Pelagiarctos thomasi (LACM 121501) in dorsal aspect.png
- File:Arctodus_pristinus.png
- File:Atlantochelys mortoni 2012.jpg
- File:Brachiopsilus dianthus.png
- File:Dorikranites bogdoanus.jpg
- File:Acanthopsylla rothschildi.png
- File:Hulitherium tomasetti.png
- File:Halobates ruffoi.png
- File:Paracamelus alexejevi.jpg
- File:Australopithecus bahreghazali holotype mandible.jpg
- File:Borophagus_secundus.jpg
- File:Choristopsyche tenuinervis.png
- File:Lioscorpius_longiceps.jpg
- File:Skull_of_the_Acropithecus_rigidus.jpg
- File:Xenobrachyops_allos.jpg
- File:Indohya_damocles.png
_in_dorsal_aspect.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These images were all uploaded by User:A. C. Tatarinov. I believe they should be deleted because they are all tracings, or rather just Photoshop filtered versions of copyrighted images that can be found in non-free journals and Twitter posts, without mentioning the sources or original authors. More evidence and examples to come. Note the user has not responded to previous queries[5] about this issue. FunkMonk (talk) 00:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Added images for nomination. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 01:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Added images again, I will try again for one or two times. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 10:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- I think these are all images that are probably copyvio. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 13:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Added images again, I will try again for one or two times. Ta-tea-two-te-to (talk) 10:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- The problem has never been that the images are traced. It is fine to create a drawing of a fossil based on a copyrighted image. The probem is the fact that Tartarinov doesn't do that, he just photoshops images until they look like a lithograph/drawing, which is not the same. The fact that he also doesn't credit where the image is also a major concern. Hemiauchenia (talk) 13:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- So basically, that would make it copyvio. Magnatyrannus (talk) 16:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, technically these are actually just modified photos, which makes it worse. FunkMonk (talk) 00:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- The reason why he doesn't respond to previous queries is maybe because he prefers not to talk, just like maybe Lapitavenator. Magnatyrannus (talk) 16:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:39, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
No reliable source info for this image has been provided. The link is dead and the original uploader claimed that the picture was "Drew by someone in the past in China", which is not helpful. No information about the source or date of publication has been provided. Until publishing and/or copyright info can be provided, this image should be deleted. Retinalsummer (talk) 05:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, lacking information needed to determine copyright status. (Too bad, was in use in multiple projects). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
non free picture see metadata "copyright marcel@marcellennartz.net" Hoyanova (talk) 05:47, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:44, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
_Luca_Trascinelli.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Luca_Trascinelli.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no permission from the organisation Brussels Philharmonic nor from the given photographer (c) Luca Trascinelli. Hoyanova (talk) 05:49, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
_Luca_Trascinelli.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of free license from copyright holder. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
_Luca_Trascinelli.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no permission from the organisation Brussels Philharmonic given Hoyanova (talk) 05:52, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:45, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
COM:PACKAGING DanielPenfield (talk) 08:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Screenshot of ad, not uploader's to license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Own work? No metadata, many hits on Google. on this page is mentioned at the bottom "Copyright. All rights reserved. ". Wouter (talk) 08:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:47, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
pd-textlogo does not apply, no permisison Krd 09:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages: no additional value compared to Category:1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane. Leyo 10:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per consensus and outcome at Commons:Deletion requests/Chemistry-related gallery pages. Marbletan (talk) 17:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. But Category:Tetrafluoroethanes is the actual main cat according to the non-specific name of the nominated gallery. DMacks (talk) 00:27, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per reasons stated above. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 11:19, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:49, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Image copied from :en, where it is under fair-use exception, which is not valid on Commons. It might be discussed whether the flag reaches COM:TOO or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, false license claims. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Book cover CoffeeEngineer (talk) 10:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uncat, unused, uploaded by passing user in 2016 without other contributions. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIO, bookcover not older than 70 years 82.135.80.136 10:57, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see EXIF Geralt Riv (*talk) 11:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.12.148 12:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
j'aime pas du tout ma photo!!!!! 2A01:E0A:414:DF00:514E:1D8B:EBF8:25C9 17:23, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- c'est quelqu'un autre a mis ma photo, je n'étais pas au courant et je ne suis pas d'accord!!! 2A01:E0A:414:DF00:65A7:BE04:F177:FD21 14:57, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Person pictured does not wish for this photo to remain on Commons RSVartanian (talk) 14:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep, the subject not liking the photo is not a valid reason for deletion. This does not depict her in a demeaning or a compromising way and it appears to have been taken at an event where she would not have a reasonable expectation of privacy, see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people. File:Anahid Sarkissian (cropped).jpg is a possible alternative, although her face is dark and there is a possible copyright issue with the sculpted figure. This file is not in use in any Wikimedia projects but it is in use in a Bibliothèque nationale de France website, with a link the image on Commons.[6] Because of this a courtesy deletion is not appropriate. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Please....I want this photo to be deleted...I'm Anahid Sarkissian, and I don't want this photo on social media!!! 2A01:E0A:414:DF00:C463:D844:9702:3091 20:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
please delete this photo....I'm the person in this photo, and don't wish it exists on social media!!! 2A01:E0A:414:DF00:C463:D844:9702:3091 20:28, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I'm sympathetic, but could you upload a better photo under a suitable Creative Commons license? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:29, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- I agree, uploading a better photo would not guarantee the deletion of this photo, but the availability of a better photo would make this photo less likely to be used. Ideally the photo should be uploaded by the photographer, to clearly establish the necessary permission. And please be patient, deletion requests sometimes take several months to be closed by our busy administrators. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:48, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Photo of notable author, one of only 2 we have, both of which are unfortunately mediocre. (Note: Wikimedia much prefers good quality photos, when such are available under a free license. The subject of the photo is encouraged to share good quality photo(s) they like under free license.). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is fan art of Rinu, but it is not educationally useful and may be copyright infringing. Mugenpman (talk) 14:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
I'm not finding anywhere on the website where this file was taken that it was released under the license claimed. The same image was deleted twice. I think it may be a copyvio. Netherzone (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
A very low version of this file, described as Daoud Pasha, Wali of Baghdad, when he is clearly not باسم (talk) 15:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Private image, out of Scope Cholo Aleman (talk) 15:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (Rather nice photo, but with no info on location, who the person is, nor context, not useful for Commons). --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:14, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. There are plenty of genuine images availalbe on WP Smerus (talk) 16:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. There is/are genuine image(s) available on WP Smerus (talk) 16:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in multiple Wikipedia articles. And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:38, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. doesn't link to any English WP article Smerus (talk) 16:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely the uploader's own work. Geralt Riv (*talk) 17:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, unsourced, uncat. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
This is a likely copyright violation. It seems that this image first appeared in a Tumblr post from Jack Stauber [7], so the copyright holder is certainly Stauber himself. It doesn't appear that he released the image under a Creative Commons license. VigilantCosmicPenguin (talk) 18:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- As the original uploader of this image, after some consideration I agree with you. However if this image is going to be removed, another non-copyrighted image of Jack Stauber should be uploaded in its place, as this image serves as the main image on Jack Stauber's Wikipedia article. Royz-vi Tsibele (talk) 21:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Could convert it so its compliant with fair use policy, since there are no images of him in the CC-BY-SA license. Koltinn (talk) 11:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
copyvio https://www.facebook.com/ines.sortie/photos/pcb.1087769595351703/1087768985351764/ from february NorthAfricanArmsDealer (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:58, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
The other three files uploaded by this user were all copyvios, so there's a high probability that this one is a copyvio as well, and I think it should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 20:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused, uncat, DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright would likely be retained by the Times-Picayune; no evidence of permission to free license. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no reason given to think that either photographer or publication has released this under free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. There is/are genuine image(s) available on WP. Not used in any WP article Smerus (talk) 16:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:41, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. Smerus (talk) 16:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. Subject (Stepan Botchitz) not mentioned in any WP articles (English or Russian) Smerus (talk) 16:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. Doesn't appear on any EN or RU WP article. Smerus (talk) 16:14, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. There is/are genuine image(s) available on WP. Not used in Arbat article (for which there are amny other images available) Smerus (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. There is/are plenty of image(s) of Venice available on WP Smerus (talk) 16:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Non-notable atwork uploaded by editor/creator. Only purpose can be self-publicity. Subject doesn't appear in WP. Smerus (talk) 16:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, in use in w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна and w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova). And please use Commons:Deletion requests/Mass deletion request when nominating multiple related files for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 02:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- User:Verbcatcher is incorrect. w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova) has been deleted.As one contributor to the discussion wrote "It was created as a promotional article by a blocked COI/UPE editor, and contains unverifiable and/or dubious claims. "--Smerus (talk) 07:54, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
- I was not incorrect when I wrote it, w:en:Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova) was deleted on 18 September 2022. However, this file is still in use in the Russian Wikipedia article w:ru:Ханемайер, Аида Евгеньевна, so it should be kept. The consensus of the discussion in w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aida Hanemayer (Lisenkova) (2nd nomination) was that the article was irreparable (see w:WP:TNT), not that the artist was clearly non-notable. The citations in the article included an exhibition review in Kultura, a notable newspaper covering Russian art. While this was insufficient to establish notability for an article in English Wikipedia, the rules on Commons are different and this is sufficient to establish an educational purpose for these files. Also, this file is a portrait of the cosmonaut Svetlana Savitskaya. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:15, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
Foto ohne Freigabe Jbergner (talk) 22:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, non-free album cover.[8] Verbcatcher (talk) 23:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
It is a close shot, high resolution picture of Julia Olayanju 191.126.167.155 01:14, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Question What's the deletion rationale? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Scope — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.167.155 (talk) 01:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
- Obvious
Keep. Why would you nominate a headshot for deletion without doing a web search? See w:Julia B. Olayanju. Time to withdraw the nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:37, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:02, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
8 kb Flickr file uploaded same day to both platforms? Don't make me laugh please... 186.172.225.129 02:59, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep So it was kept the day before yesterday and you're nominating it for deletion as of yesterday? And when it's kept tomorrow, you'll request deletion again the next day? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Dubious license claim; this is her Linkedin headshot. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:39, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
The concern with the images in this category is that they show the exterior or design elements of a prominent French architectural work completed in the late 1970's. France does not have Freedom of Panorama.
- File:014 Pompidou Centre (48826556313).jpg
- File:015 Pompidou Centre (48827087837).jpg
- File:2009-06-02 Pompidou center, Paris.jpg
- File:Apud la Centro Georges-Pompidou 3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep - image très partielle et le centre Beaubourg n'est pas le sujet de la photo.--Mbzt (talk) 14:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - I agree with @Mbzt, a very small part of the building is show. Miniwark (talk)
- Keep - Idem supra. --Mbzt (talk) 14:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - I agree with @Mbzt, a very small part of the building is show. Miniwark (talk)
- Keep - Idem supra. --Mbzt (talk) 14:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - I agree with @Mbzt, a very small part of the building is show. Miniwark (talk)
- Keep de minimis --PierreSelim (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou (165458375).jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou 1997.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou 2.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou 3.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou 34.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou 40.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou 5.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou de Nuit 01.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou de Nuit 02.jpg
- File:Centre Georges-Pompidou.jpg
- File:Centre Pompidou - panoramio (10).jpg
- File:Centre Pompidou, Paris 01.jpg
- File:Centre Pompidou, Paris 02.jpg
- File:Centro Georges-Pompidou 35.jpg
- File:E' meglio viverla (8455850898).jpg
- File:Exterior of the Centre Georges-Pompidou 20171223-2.jpg
- File:P1000954 Paris IV Rue Beaubourg reductwk.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep - Le sujet n'est pas le centre Pompidou mais la rue du Renard et la rue Beaubourg. D'ailleurs les structures du centre Beaubourg sont difficilement visibles. --Mbzt (talk) 10:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Suppression déjà demandée le 29 février 2016 et en juillet 2016 et fichier conservé le 23 mars 2016 là et en juillet 2016 ici----Mbzt (talk) 20:22, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete i think than this this still show a bit to much, the photograph would need to be taken a bit more form afar to be de minimis Miniwark (talk) 10:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete not de minimis for me. Clearly a case where both could be argued without a clear cut, but it seems to me the subject is the copyrighted building. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Paris (33962488891).jpg
- File:Paris (49475148591).jpg
- File:Paris (49475151446).jpg
- File:Paris (49475153451).jpg
- File:Paris (49475371267).jpg
- File:Paris (49475374132).jpg
- File:Paris IV-Rue Simon-le-Franc.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep--Paris 16 (talk) 09:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - Demande un peu étonnante dans la mesure où le centre Beaubourg, en arrière plan, est pratiquement non visible. --Mbzt (talk) 14:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- This image could be recrop or partially blurred because the subject seems to only be the small space-invader street art. Miniwark (talk) 10:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep obvious de minimis --PierreSelim (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- File:Paris-Centre Pompidou-118-2017-gje.jpg
- File:Paris-Centre Pompidou-120-2017-gje.jpg
- File:Pompidou Center - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Pompidou Centre (5684082567).jpg
- File:Rue Saint-Merri, Paris June 2014.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep--Paris 16 (talk) 09:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep de minimis Miniwark (talk) 10:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep de minimis --PierreSelim (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - Demande un peu étonnante dans la mesure où le centre Beaubourg, en arrière plan, est vu de manière très partielle. --Mbzt (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- This image could be recrop or partially blurred because the subject seems to only be the small space-invader street art. Miniwark (talk) 10:33, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep de minimis --PierreSelim (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Comment All of the files with "keep" votes are arguably de minimis, some of them IMO definitely so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Agree with @Ikan Kekek: --PierreSelim (talk) 20:10, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Closed, Kept files with "Keep" votes; Deleted all others. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
taken from official source wion, no evidence of permission. 100cellsman 11:31, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.12.148 12:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Of what? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No indication of what anon alleges the violation is; no other versions found in reverse image search. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:47, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.12.148 12:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Reverse image search shows copyvio of [9]. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.12.148 12:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sahandmehrabi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Speedy delete. Self-promo, not notable. Items in Wikidata are deleted
Estopedist1 (talk) 18:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
These files have been taken from vk.com, according to titles. Out of scope also.
- File:Q0NortiJnuA.jpg
- File:LcWxYqfeKgc.jpg
- File:LnYpgtmMv6s.jpg
- File:JvoF3wi00Ak.jpg
- File:L2uV1Lm0WUI.jpg
- File:DJ0c0UgXF50.jpg
- File:D8nj9Tfmez4.jpg
- File:AZmdKdeO8G8.jpg
- File:Чувства09.jpg
- File:CMaiSU2e-R4.jpg
- File:4TMl9yJYcVY.jpg
- File:7ZMIFwC vjA.jpg
- File:0177TCw 3EA.jpg
- File:Hands in front of LGBT pride flag.jpg
- File:A kiss from Russia 2019.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 19:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Claimed free license not seen at source webpage, which has clear notice "© 2022 · Turf History Times " Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Still lacking permission. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Foto mit Copyrightvermerk Jbergner (talk) 22:23, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, the declared author does not match the copyright holder declared in the image metadata. Looks like a publicity photo for the musician w:de:Sycess (Rapper). Verbcatcher (talk) 23:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:36, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Image of a motorbike in an undescribed landscape of Morocco. The photo is so blurred that not even the brand of the motorcycle can be clearly identified; no educational value, unusable, out of scope. Feyth (talk) 00:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Claimed free license not seen at source website Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marks77steve (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: low-resolution commercial images in different styles. Likely uploaded for advertising purposes (descriptions contain spam links).
Spicy (talk) 01:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
no permission from the organisation Vlaams Radiokoor Hoyanova (talk) 05:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: needs a license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
no permission from the organisation Vlaams Radiokoor Hoyanova (talk) 05:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: needs a license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:31, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
no permission from the organisation Brussels Philharmonic given Hoyanova (talk) 05:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: needs a license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
no permission from the organisation Vlaams Radiokoor given Hoyanova (talk) 05:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: needs a license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
no permission from the organisation Vlaams Radiokoor given Hoyanova (talk) 05:54, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: needs a license from the actual photographer. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:32, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a 3D work of artistic construction ( architectrual model), of French Origin. The building it depicts was designed/constructed in the late 1970's and thus I find it unlikely that any copyrights (or design rights) the architects had would have expired. France doesn't currently have Freedom of Panorama. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:19, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
ScriptRunner is copyrighted commercial software. So I doubt images of it's interface can be hosted on Commons unless the developers provide COM:VRT permission for them to. Same goes for File:ScriptRunner-Admin-App.png. Adamant1 (talk) 09:57, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Although even if we can obtain it this person doesn't appear to be notable and Commons isn't a personal file host. So the image is OOS PROMO SPAM anyway. Same goes for the following files:
- File:Alan shawn's performing on live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's performing on his live concert.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's performing live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's performing.jpg
- File:Alan shawn's first concert.jpg
- File:ALAN SHAWN.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn's voice.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn's performing images.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn performs with his guitar . he is incredible.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn performs with his guitar.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn's performing with guitar.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn performs with his guitar on live.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn live.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn live with mic.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter green back.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter street view.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter cover.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter- street.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter cover sea.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter - live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter live 2.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter street 2.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter street.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter live.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter interview.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer-songwriter.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer cover.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer sea 2.jpg
- File:Alan shawn singer sea 1.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn - wiki pic.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn cover.jpg
- File:Alan Shawn singer.jpg
- File:Alan shawn.png
- File:Alan Shawn - help me feel again cover.jpg
- File:Alan shawn energy.pdf
- File:Alan shawn.pdf
- File:Alan Shawn.jpg
Adamant1 (talk) 14:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - deleted by Fitindia, closed by. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Bonjour, quelle était la raison de la suppression de ces images ?
--Axel55 (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
2001 bust (cf. ja:ウォルター・ウェストン#ウェストンのレリーフ). Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files under Category:Sculptures in Asahikawa
[edit]- File:Zahyou.JPG - work by Minami Tada († 2014)
- File:開放Ⅵ（北海道療育園彫刻の森）.jpg - by Takeshi Tsuchitani (ja:土谷武, † 2004)
- File:橇の記.jpg - by living sculptor Tadayuki Fujii (cf. ja:旭川の野外彫刻)
artworks that are not covered by COM:FOP Japan Yasu (talk) 15:05, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Julia Roessing as Fair use (Non-free) and the most recent rationale was: promotional |1= |image_has_rationale= |image_is_of_living_person= . 1931 German work, PD? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:48, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Thank you for the question, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠. Your Majesty rightfully points out that "image_is_of_living_person" is obviously not the correct category because the actress died in 1959. I photographed the cover of this 1931 German magazine (which lasted until 1944). The Melzer photo used by the magazine was most likely promotional, as it was normal for a budding actress to pose at a well-known studio and have the atelier photos distributed to build her career. Melzer only began her theater career in 1928/29, so she was young to the scene and rose to prominence only in 1931, which explains the cover story. Julia Roessing (talk) 04:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - 1931 German image. PD in Germany in 2001, after the URAA date. PD in USA 1/1/2027. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not traced online, but sole remaining contribution by an uploader whose 4 other uploads were all traced copyvios; very unlikely to be own work. Also tiny photo of topic with numerous far better photos. MPF (talk) 16:24, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Most probably a screenshot taken from some (YouTube) video. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 16:34, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
File:Preserved holotype of Chikila darlong sp. nov. (ZSI A11546). A. Lateral, B. Dorsal view of head, C. Ventral view of head, D. Lateral view of head, E. Dorsal view of body terminus, F. Ventral view of body terminus, G. Lateral vi.png
[edit]._A._Lateral,_B._Dorsal_view_of_head,_C._Ventral_view_of_head,_D._Lateral_view_of_head,_E._Dorsal_view_of_body_terminus,_F._Ventral_view_of_body_terminus,_G._Lateral_vi.png){kind=link}
._A._Lateral,_B._Dorsal_view_of_head,_C._Ventral_view_of_head,_D._Lateral_view_of_head,_E._Dorsal_view_of_body_terminus,_F._Ventral_view_of_body_terminus,_G._Lateral_vi.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No indication that this file is under a useable license Magnatyrannus (talk) 17:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Terms of use includes "Unless specified otherwise, Zenodo metadata may be freely reused under the CC0 waiver.". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:47, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Can you delete old version please. Thanks in advance Paulux88 (talk) 17:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Question You're asking for the older version of this image that's in the history to be revdeled (revision deleted)? If so, why? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello, i am new on wiki so I didn't know how to delete the old version. I just want to delete it because it's no longer useful now. Paulux88 (talk) 18:08, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- What old version? The older version of this file, or another file you haven't given us a link to? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- This file : "03:00, 22 August 2022 - 1,603 × 2,412 (711 KB)"
- https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/6/6e/20220827015728%21Charles_Buloz.jpg Paulux88 (talk) 01:05, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- The earlier version of this file. Why do you want to delete it? It's simply part of the history of the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- Because I prefer people download the new version, indeed they can still find earlier version by google image
- (the pictures are from me) Paulux88 (talk) 02:57, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
- The fact that you prefer for people to download the current version is very clearly indicated by its status as the current version. I doubt anyone will do a courtesy revision deletion of the original version, but we'll leave this up to an administrator. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:26, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
- The earlier version of this file. Why do you want to delete it? It's simply part of the history of the file. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:22, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- What old version? The older version of this file, or another file you haven't given us a link to? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
According to PD-RU-exempt and prior consensus (including here) otherwise PD images on post of Russia are copyrighted if they are cropped from the original work. So this image is copyrighted since it's cropped from a stamp. Same goes for the following images:
- File:1975 CPA 4445 Crop Rukavishnikov.jpg
- File:1991 CPA 6322 crop.jpg
- File:Anatoly Filipchenko 1969 stamp (cropped).png
- File:Anatoly Filipchenko 1969 stamp.png
- File:AnatolyAleksandrovichSobchak.png
- File:Boris Borisovich Yegorov2.jpg
- File:Gennadi Sarafanov.png
- File:Kovalyonok.jpg
- File:Krenkel stamp SSSR cropped.jpg
- File:Luna Spacecraft Sample Collection.png
- File:Melbourne 1956 XVI (frag).jpg
- File:Nosov cropped from Dunno and his friends Postal card Russia 2008.jpg
- File:Popovich-Soyuz-14 1974.jpg
- File:RUSMARKA-1827 Cropped.jpg
- File:Russia stamp L.Utyosov 1999 2r cropped.jpg
- File:Soviet Union-1963-Stamp-0.10. Valentina Tereshkova-2.jpg
- File:Stamp Salvador Allende-2010-11-09.jpg
- File:Stamp-Konstantin Feoktistov cropped.jpg
- File:The Soviet Union 1964 CPA 3002 stamp (World War II Hero Starshina 1st Class Nikolai Vilkov and Battle) cropped and retouch.jpg
- File:The Soviet Union 1969 CPA 3810 stamp (Anatoly Filipchenko, Vladislav Volkov and Viktor Gorbatko (Soyuz 7)) cropped Filipchenko Volkov Gorbatko.jpg
- File:The Soviet Union 1969 CPA 3810 stamp (Anatoly Filipchenko, Vladislav Volkov and Viktor Gorbatko (Soyuz 7)) cropped Filipchenko Volkov Gorbatko.png
- File:USSR Stamp 1978 Salyut6 Cosmonauts-2 cropped.jpg
- File:USSR stamp Atkov cropped.jpg
- File:USSR stamp Georgi Dobrovolski cropped.jpg
- File:USSR stamp Georgi Dobrovolski11.jpg
- File:USSR stamp Oleg.jpg
- File:USSR stamp Salvador Allende 1973 6k cropped.JPG
- File:USSR stamp Viktor Patsayev cropped.jpg
- File:USSR-dobrolyubov-1936.jpg
- File:Viktor Petrovich Savinykh .jpg
- File:Voskhod-2 Pavel.jpg
- File:Yury Artyukhin.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cropped_and_retouch.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)_cropped_Filipchenko_Volkov_Gorbatko.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
)_cropped_Filipchenko_Volkov_Gorbatko.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Adamant1 (talk) 17:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely the uploader's own work. Geralt Riv (*talk) 17:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely the uploader's own work. Geralt Riv (*talk) 17:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely the uploader's own work. Geralt Riv (*talk) 17:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
This is a contemporary sculputre temporarily on exhibit. COM:FOP therefore doesn't apply Vera (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- COM:FOP does not apply, but I am the copyright holder of both the sculpture and the photo of it (both my own work). 24.132.175.132 19:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Gartibal: please confirm the license by email to the Commons:Volunteer Response Team. If possible, please confirm the licences for all the photographs that you have uploaded for your artworks. Thank you, Verbcatcher (talk) 00:53, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
https://www.britishmuseum.org/collection/image/327062001 For non-commercial use according to the website of the British Museum, from where the picture as been copied. Zunkir (talk) 18:02, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
probably copyrighted by Discord (official asset used in the application) Nutshinou Talk! 18:26, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:51, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mametz Wood Memorial
[edit]- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 1.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 13.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 2.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 3.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 4.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 5.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 6.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 7.jpg
- File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 8.jpg
- File:Mémorial à la 38e division galloise de Mametz.jpg
- File:Mémorial à la 39e division galloise et bois de Mametz.jpg
Copyright violation of the sculpture. The sculptor David Petersen is alive and his permission is required. The memorial is located in France where there is no freedom of panorama for sculptures, see COM:FOP France.
File:Mametz, monument à la 38e division galloise 13.jpg is a copyright violation of the design of the plaque.
I have not nominated some of the files in the category because I assume that the design of the plinth is sufficiently simple to be under the threshold of originality, and that the military insignia carved on the plinth are sufficiently old to be public domain. --Verbcatcher (talk) 20:09, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 11:00, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Mametz Wood Memorial
[edit]- File:Carnoy-Mametz Mémorial gallois 12.jpg
- File:Carnoy-Mametz Mémorial gallois 13.jpg
- File:Carnoy-Mametz Mémorial gallois 14.jpg
- File:Carnoy-Mametz Mémorial gallois 15.jpg
Copyright violations of the sculpture, no indication of permission from the sculptor David Petersen. No applicable freedom of panorama in France, see COM:FOP France.
Copyright violations of the notice and the plaque that are depicted. No applicable freedom of panorama in France, see COM:FOP France.
See the earlier deletion request under this name and also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Welsh Dragon Memorial Mametz Wood.jpg, which resulted in the deletion of other photographs of this sculpture. Verbcatcher (talk) 21:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:04, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Uploader ≠ copyright holder; certainly not "own work" unless she was a five-year-old child prodigy. 91.34.35.24 22:12, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Only part of a map; would probably not be created like this. User's other uploads were claimed to be own work but were other people's and already published online. Peter James (talk) 22:29, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:20, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Lower-res duplicate of File:1901 maps of The Dardanelles and the Troad and The Bosphorus and Constantinople.jpg Enyavar (talk) 21:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: worth keeping the not cropped version. --GPSLeo (talk) 17:27, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted software Champion (Talk) 12:27, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Yes, this is non-free software screenshot. —Hajoon0102 💬 06:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:18, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Redundant with File:Missouri Presidential Election Results 2020.svg TylerKutschbach (talk) 01:08, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Question Not the same. Which file is more accurate? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: The svg file is more accurate. TylerKutschbach
- OK. Please state which file is more accurate every time there's a discrepancy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Redundant with File:Montana Presidential Election Results 2020.svg TylerKutschbach (talk) 03:11, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment These files actually are the same. SVG is favored over PNG, right? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
@Ikan Kekek: Yes svg is favored over PNG TylerKutschbach
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:45, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.12.148 12:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 18:17, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
Although the uploader added to this picture his own copyright as a watermark, it cannot be his own work as far as the photograph is at least 80 years old: the portrayed person was born in 1896. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, the description indicates that this was taken in 1940, when the subject would have been about 44, which is consistent with his appearance. This has the appearance of a studio photograph and the subject Guido Spagnoli was a prominent musician. A professional photographer in portrait studio would probably have been at least 25 years old, so if this was taken in 1940 they would be about 105 when this was uploaded, and unlikely to be uploading photographs to Commons. COM:ITALY indicates that this is unlikely to be public domain. This is the uploader's only upload. Delete, because the authorship claim is unreliable. Verbcatcher (talk) 23:00, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" is the applicable license. A due diligence search has not found this image attributed to a photographer like 95% of the images from this era. While every photograph has a photographer, most images do not have the name of the photographer written on the image, and that name is lost to history, and the image is anonymous. --RAN (talk) 23:54, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
- It does not work this way. According to Italian copyright law, anonymous works are copyrighted during 70 years since the first publication. As far as the uploader did not provide the source of this image, we have no date to count these 70 years from. By the way, you cannot even prove that the portrayed person is indeed the composer Spagnoli. I have not deleted this picture as a speedy deletion only to give the uploader the chance to clarify situation. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 11:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- According to the Berne and URRA agreement, publication is when an image is made available to the public, not just appearing in a magazine or newspapers. That is how paintings, for instance, have the copyright clock started. In countries that rely on publication, the painting is exhibited, and seen by the public. So, when a photograph leaves the custody of the photographer, it becomes available to the public. We have several large collections of images, that never left the custody of the photographer and remained as negatives, never seen by the public, and donated to an archive, like the Library of Congress. See for example Category:George Grantham Bain Collection. Those images are assumed to be unpublished until proved published. If you can cite some Italian case law that contradicts Berne and URRA agreements, that would be helpful for your argument. In the USA we have lots of court rulings on the details of copyright for text and image at Authors Guild v. Google. --RAN (talk) 22:39, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- This arguing makes absolutely no sense. There is no law (or Commons rule) to assume a picture unpublished or published: no source = no picture at Commons. I had hoped the uploader might appear and clarify the case. As far as it does not happen, I delete the picture in question. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
_21.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_21.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Iran v Lebanon, 29 March 2022 (Moj) 02.jpg. Nehme1499 (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
_02.jpg){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:47, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
_21.jpg){kind=link}
copyrighted map material, no permission Krd 06:07, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hallo Krd,
- das Messtischblatt ist von 1930, es ist jetzt 92 Jahre alt. Die Karte ist ein Ort in dem heutigen Polen, im ehemaligen deutschen Niederschlesien. Also heute kein deutsches Territorium. Es ist ein Ausschnitt mit den für die Stadt bedeutenden Fischzuchtteichen. Heute 2022 sind die Teiche zum Teil verlandet und nicht mehr bewirtschaftet.
- Es wird keinen Einspruch gegen diesen Kartenausschnitt geben. Zur besseren Erkennbarkeit sind die Teiche von 16Exul82 mit der geodätischen Farbe blau gekennzeichnet worden. Außerdem sind Messtischblätter von 1930 Eigentum des Deutschen Reiches, das es seit 1945 nicht mehr gibt. Lasst den Kartenausschnitt bitte bestehen. NICHT LÖSCHEN. 16Exul82 (talk) 11:33, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @16Exul82: Alte Messtischblätter können in Deutschland gemeinfrei sein (i. d. R. mit Lizenzvorlage {{PD-Germany-§134}}), aber dazu müsste man erst einmal feststellen können, ob die Bedingungen dafür zutreffen ("Dieses Werk ist vor dem Inkrafttreten des Urheberrechtsgesetzes am 1. Januar 1966 von einer juristischen Person des öffentlichen Rechts veröffentlicht worden, ohne dass der Verfasser auf dem Titelblatt, in der Widmung, in dem Vorwort oder am Ende genannt wurde"). Da du nur einen Ausschnitt zeigst und nicht das ganze Blatt, ja nicht einmal angibst, welches Blatt das eigentlich ist, kann ich das nicht feststellen und habe die Datei daher mangels ausreichender Angaben gemäß dem Vorbeugenden Prinzip gelöscht. Da steht dann auch drin, warum eine Einlassung wie "Es wird keinen Einspruch gegen diesen Kartenausschnitt geben" hier kein Argument ist. Ein deutsches Werk von 1930 (wie von dir genannt) ist zudem wahrscheinlich auch noch in den USA urheberrechtlich geschützt, und eine der Grundregeln von Wikimedia Commons ist, dass alle Inhalte sowohl in ihren Ursprungsländern (hier Deutschland) als auch in den USA urheberrechtlich frei sein bzw. unter einer freien Lizenz stehen müssen. Übrigens: Ein Messtischblatt, das mindestens 120 Jahre alt ist, würde mit der Lizenzvorlage {{PD-old-assumed}} i. d. R. akzeptiert, sofern nicht etwas dafür spricht, dass es doch noch geschützt ist - bspw. ein bekannter Urheber, der vor weniger als 70 Jahren gestorben ist. --Rosenzweig τ 14:27, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Hallo Rosenzweig, danke für den Tipp. Nun werde ich Karten/ Meßtischblätter benutzen die mindestens 120 Jahre alt sind. Die Teiche gab es schon vor 1930, ich stelle die Zeichnung nur etwas älter wieder ein. Danke für deine ausführliche Erklärung.16Exul82 (talk) 21:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
While the sheet music is out of copyright, there is still a recording and performance copyright for the interpretation by the band. See the non-free source. De728631 (talk) 16:51, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, the recording is credited to 'Banda dei carabinieri; dir. Luigi Cirenei'. Spotify confirms this attribution.[10] Luigi Cirenei died in 1947,[11] and the low technical quality is consistent with a recording made before 1947. Banda dei carabinieri indicates a police band, so {{PD-ItalyGov}} is probably valid. The principal author died over 70 years ago, so the recording is public domain under the 'Life + 70 years' rule. {{PD-Italy-audio}} also appears to be applicable. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- Those are some good points and barring any other compelling copyright concerns, I am now inclined to recommend a keep to the closing admin. De728631 (talk) 07:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- My main concern is that since it was re-released in 2011, this may have received audio restoration. While in the US such restoration may be still in the public domain, I'm not sure if it's the case in Italy. As I commented earlier,
- I also believed that since it was recorded before relatively noise-free recording mediums were invented that they took significant effort to clean-up this audio material. Should this be removed from Commons due to this?
- I would incline not to keep this unless that it is proven that this is a straight digitalization or if these kinds of restoration is not protected under Italian law. - 2001:4453:53E:500:3028:13FD:75D5:B44C 11:59, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
- There was a major improvement in the quality of sound recording when electrical recording was introduced in 1925, see w:en:History of sound recording. Recordings made in the 1930s and 1940s had sound quality that was broadly similar to the movies of that era. This recording probably had no restoration beyond a high-cut filter to reduce the prominence of noise, broadly similar to adjusting the treble control on a hifi amplifier. This would not introduce a new copyright. Also, it is unclear that restoration work that is intended to restore a work to its original state would create a new copyright. This could apply to many of the files in Category:Restored paintings. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:47, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete unless the year of publication can be shown to be earlier than 1923. Per the Hirtle chart, any recordings published in 1923 or later are still under copyright in the U.S. Toohool (talk) 05:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- I assume you mean 1927 – the "before 1923 or 95 years ago" has changed from meaning the former to mean the latter. It seems that he became director of the band in 1925. {{PD-Italy-audio}} gives 50 years, so for the URAA date it would need to have published before 1946 (?). For {{PD-ItalyGov}} before 1976 suffices, and it is unlikely that such a recording would not have been published soon after it was made. I don't think the recording was copyrighted in the USA. –LPfi (talk) 09:22, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- No, it's 1923. The 95-year term never applied to sound recordings. Sound recordings before 1946 get a 100-year term, per the CLASSICS Act. This is shown on the Hirtle chart under the "Sound recordings" section. Toohool (talk) 17:28, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. As this work was published outside of the United States without following the formalities of U.S. copyright law, it never had any copyright in the United States prior to the passage of the URAA. In relation to foreign works, the Hatch–Goodlatte Act can only apply to those whose copyrights were restored under section 104A, which Toohool has misread. That section clearly recognizes (subsection (h)(6)(C)(ii)) that it applies to pre-1972 sound recordings. It also clearly requires that the work in question be copyrighted in the country of origin. As the work was in the public domain when the URAA came into effect, the work is in the public domain in the United States, as well, despite the incorrect statement on the Commons copy of the Hirtle chart. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 03:20, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: Are you saying that the CLASSICS Act has some exception for foreign works, or somehow only applies to works that were subject to URAA restoration? Where are you getting that from? I'm not seeing anything like that in 17 USC § 1401. Toohool (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Toohool: “somehow only applies to works that were subject to URAA restoration”—yes. That act could only apply to works which are copyrightable. This work is not, because its copyright was not restored by the URAA. The URAA clearly applies to pre-1972 sound recordings, so for a foreign work (such as this) to be subject to title II of the Hatch–Goodlatte Act, in must have had its copyright restored under the URAA. And for a work to be a “restored work” under the URAA, it must be copyrighted in the country of origin, which this recording is not. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: "That act could only apply to works which are copyrightable." Where exactly are you getting that from? I don't see any such requirement in in section 1401. Toohool (talk) 23:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- Toohool: That’s not specific to any act, that’s just a basic premise of copyright law. The entirety of the Copyright Act (title 17, U.S.C.) is predicated on a work being copyrighted—for any provision of the Copyright Act to apply, a work must have some copyright. There are two types of copyrights: “native” copyrights (under § 102) and “restored” copyrights (under § 104A). The Hatch–Goodlatte Act does not create a new type of copyright; it merely modifies the length of copyright terms for a class of works (namely, pre-1972 sound recordings). The modified terms set out in title II thus can only apply to one of the two types of works I mentioned above. This work is undisputedly a foreign work, and has no “native” copyright. Thus, for this work to be copyrighted in the United States, it must have had its copyright restored under the URAA. This work was in the public domain in Italy on the applicable URAA date; thus, its copyright was not restored by the URAA, and the modified terms set forth in title II of the Hatch–Goodlatte Act cannot apply to it. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:08, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: Sorry but that's not right. The plain text of section 1401 is clear that it applies to all pre-1972 recordings. The mere fact that it is located in Title 17 does not limit its applicability. The titles of the U.S. Code are just buckets to keep the law somewhat organized, they have no legal effect.
- Your interpretation would completely defeat the purpose of the law, which was to bring the normalcy of federal copyright protection to old recordings that were not under federal copyright at the time. These recordings were previously covered by the patchwork system of state copyright laws, which caused lots of problems.
- Here is a guide from the Library of Congress that gives an in-depth look at the motivation for the law and its effects. Note in particular the discussion on pp. 45–47 that points out that allowing the MMA to apply at all to URAA-restored works was not well thought out, as it created ambiguities by giving these works two forms of protection with different terms. Toohool (talk) 16:10, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- Toohool: My interpretation of copyright law is not dependent on the fact that the law is codified under one title. However, in that sense you are also incorrect; the titles of the U.S. Code are more than mere regulatory “buckets.” In addition, title 17 has been enacted as positive law, further defeating your position. That the Hatch–Goodlatte Act was intended to bring together under the regime of federal law, copyrights in pre-1972 sound recordings previously protected my various state laws, I do not deny; but this further agrees with my interpretation, that title II of the Act does not apply to foreign works absent restoration under the URAA, as the URAA is the source of copyright for those works. As to the “plain text,” you misinterpret it. The section’s reference to pre-1972 sound recordings can, of necessity, only refer to those which are copyrightable. Certain recordings, such as the Edison Records, are not copyrightable (in that case owing to section 105). Similarly, foreign works which were not granted a restored copyright by the URAA can have no term of protection in the United States; thus, the statement in section 1401 cannot apply to them. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 18:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: Citation needed. This whole convoluted chain of reasoning is all in your head. Toohool (talk) 06:40, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: "That act could only apply to works which are copyrightable." Where exactly are you getting that from? I don't see any such requirement in in section 1401. Toohool (talk) 23:07, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
- @TE(æ)A,ea.: Are you saying that the CLASSICS Act has some exception for foreign works, or somehow only applies to works that were subject to URAA restoration? Where are you getting that from? I'm not seeing anything like that in 17 USC § 1401. Toohool (talk) 19:23, 24 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle.
For the Italian side: The Carabinieri band should be a state institution, so its works should be covered by {{PD-ItalyGov}}. The protection term is 20 years from first publication. We're not given the year of this performance, but we know the following: The recording cannot have been made later than 1947 because of Luigi Cirenei's death in that year, and it probably was not made before 1925 when Cirenei became head of the band. The recording apparently comes from the archive of public broadcaster RAI (per the CD sleeve seen at the Youtube source), so this performance was probably recorded by them and might have been broadcast as well. I'm not exactly sure how publication is defined by Italian law. The US does not consider a radio or TV broadcast to be publication, but other countries do. If we assume that either a public performance or a broadcast of the recording happened at some point in the 1925 to 1947 period and it was considered publication, the Italian term of protection would have run to not later than the end of 1967, and the recording would have been out of copyright in Italy on the URAA date of January 1, 1996. This is probably the most likely scenario, but because I'm lacking the pertinent information I cannot rule out first publication at a later date, perhaps even in 2011 when the CD this was taken from apparently came out. In that case, the recording would be still protected by copyright even in Italy.
For US copyright: If the Italian term of protection had already expired on the URAA date, its US copyright was not restored. That seems likely, but given the lack of knowledge of first publication, we don't really know if that is the case. So the recording's US copyright might or might not have been restored. If restored, we don't know when the 95 year term starts because we don't know the year of first publication. If first published 1978 through 28 February 1989 while NOT being in the PD in its source country on the URAA date (which would be the case here) or if first published on 1 March 1989 or later, the term would be 120 years from creation (because even for a 1947 creation, that term would be shorter than a 95 year term from first publication).
For US protection by the MMA/CLASSICS/CPAA act: From what I gathered, 17 U.S. Code Chapter 14 is not copyright, even if it works the same way. So any US copyright for a foreign sound recording that was restored by the URAA would exist in parallel to the protection of the sound recording by the MMA. Because the MMA protection is not copyright, but a separate kind of protection, I don't think the claim that the MMA "modifies the length of copyright terms for a class of works" is true. Which means the MMA does apply to foreign sound recordings, whether they are copyrighted in the US or not. The term of the MMA protection (per COM:HIRTLE) would depend on the date of first publication (which we don't know): 100 years if published 1923 to 1946, 110 years if published 1947 to 1956, until 14 February 2067 if published 1957 to 14 February 1972.
If first published 15 February 1972 through 28 February 1989 while also being in the PD in its source country on the URAA date, the recording would be subject to US state common law protection and enter the public domain on 15 February 2067.
Summary: Because we don't know the actual date of first publication, it seems likely that this is in the PD in Italy, but it is not certain. The recording might or might not have a US copyright, either restored by the URAA or directly if published at some later date, all depending on the date of first publication. The recording is almost certainly protected by the MMA (or US state common law protection) in the US (unless it was first published on 1 March 1989 or later, but then it would have a US copyright for 120 years from creation). So per the precautionary principle, I've deleted the file.
As for restoration: If first published in Italy 1925 through 1975, the Italian copyright would have expired, and the US copyright would not have been restored. So we'd have to consider the MMA protection: either 100 or 110 years after publication, or 15 February 2067. If first published in 1976 or later, there would be the Italian term of 20 years from first publication (since we know of a 2011 publication, that would expire no later than the end of 2031) plus a US copyright term of 120 years from creation (which in this case is shorter than a 95 years term from first publication) to a date between the end of 2045 (if created in 1925) to the end of 2067 (if created in 1947). So the earliest year a restoration seems possible is 2026 (if the first publication was in 1925), the latest is 2068 (if the first publication was after 1975 and the year of creation was 1947). --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
All the kits and logos present here are still under copyrights. Εὐθυμένης (talk) 16:35, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (although some may be public domain in the US). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:35, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Election apportionment diagrams of Angola
[edit]- File:Angolan National Assembly 2008.svg: It is redundant to File:Angola National Assembly 2008.svg, is newer, has less-than-ideal color scheme, and has svg errors.
- File:Angola National Assembly Seats (1992-2008).svg: It is redundant to File:Angola National Assembly 1992.svg and is newer.
- File:Angola National Assembly Seats (2008-2012).svg: It is redundant to File:Angola National Assembly 2008.svg and is newer.
- File:Angolan National Assembly 2012.svg: It is redundant to File:Angola National Assembly Seats (2012-2017).svg, is newer, and has svg errors.
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
The request is to redirect these images to the oldest image to which these are redundant. —CX Zoom (A/अ/অ) (let's talk|contribs) 16:03, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected per nomination (one file not redirected because it was not used). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
While the video is under the CC BY 3.0 on youtube and the uploader is an account that can be trusted, the gameplay footage has the FoxSports bug on it and is probably copyrighted by them. I doubt that FoxSports released their copyright to the Wanderers to place under the CC BY 3.0. I am pretty sure this is Flickrwashing. Guerillero Parlez Moi 13:53, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- I say that, but here, FoxSports uploaded NCAA footage under the CC BY 3.0 -- Guerillero Parlez Moi 14:15, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep because releasing under CC-BY seems to be consistent with Fox Sports' past practice; perhaps they don't care about this type of footage much. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:33, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 05:33, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
