Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/08/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![43 File:"IMG 20180530 104811272.png".jpg](#File:"IMG_20180530_104811272.png".jpg){kind=link}
_ואתר_הבנייה_(מאחורה).png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
No such license is indicated on the web site indicated as source https://www.cineaparte.com/n/4566/karime-scander Ovruni (talk) 07:17, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535 at 07:40, 20 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: No such license is indicated on the web site indicated as source https://www.cineaparte.com/n/4566/karime-scander https://www.cineaparte.com/n/4566/karime-scander --Krdbot 13:35, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Bastianjoto (talk) 19:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, uploader blocked. --Achim55 (talk) 20:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
There is no educational purpose for this image, so it is out-of-COM:SCOPE. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:05, 20 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Book cover --Krdbot 20:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Moved to it.wiki under Exemption Doctrine Policy (https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:File_non_liberi), currently adopted for party and coalition logos. See https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Italia_Viva_logo_elettorale.svg as an example. MatMasIt (talk) 10:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 17:38, 20 August 2022 UTC: author's request on creation week --Krdbot 20:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yasu at 15:25, 20 August 2022 UTC: No license since 2022-07-30. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 20:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted by Yasu at 15:24, 20 August 2022 UTC: No license since 2022-07-18. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 20:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yasu at 15:24, 20 August 2022 UTC: No license since 2022-07-13. For more information read the introduction of COM:L, about essential information and about Internet images. --Krdbot 20:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VeryPizza09 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The Sims 4, and its marketing materials for its expansion packs, are copyrighted and not available under a free license.
- File:High School Years box art.webp
- File:1023459 LB 231x326 en WW ^ 2019-06-19-13-51-31 d9f97106e74fd82aedaf3e6f34172b3f63aa0e5e.jpg
- File:1023456 LB 231x326 en WW ^ 2019-06-26-12-12-22 579c00a10c849d4440d1a85f6db4b3e11556a3d5.jpg
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete All Per nom. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 05:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted screenshot of box art for The Sims 4, which is unavailable under a free license. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 02:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:35, 21 August 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: game artwork --Krdbot 07:35, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyvio, CC claim very doubtful given the user's other submissions JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 21:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 21:58, 20 August 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: promo/press photo --Krdbot 07:36, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
L'ho caricata per errore John Adolf Smith 00 (talk) 21:28, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 12:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyright violation but not confirm Abeeralish (talk) 14:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: https://economics.stanford.edu/people/mark-duggan. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:02, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- also file:Simbolo Elettorale Più Europa 2018.jpg
I did not find license from source site. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Delete per nom. Uploaded by a copyvio-only account. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 13:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:55, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This building is too hard to apply {{PD-structure|PHL}}. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep all. The first two files show DiviMart Pulilan, which is a minimalist-type building that applies the usual box/warehouse-type design that is too ordinary to be considered as an architecture. See my withdrawal remark at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Divimart Pulilan.
- I misunderstood. So
I withdraw my nomination. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:40, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- I misunderstood. So
Unused file uploaded by user with only one edit; probably a photo of the user himself. COM:NOTHOST. —howcheng {chat} 00:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
and:
- File:Alicia, Cadillac Mountain Trail, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, Maine (68549375).jpg
- File:Alicia, Cadillac Mountain Trail, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, Maine (67003552).jpg
- File:Alicia, Cadillac Mountain Trail, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, Maine - 67003552.jpg
- File:Alicia, Cadillac Mountain Trail, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, Maine (67003550).jpg
- File:Alicia, Cadillac Mountain Trail, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, Maine - 67003550.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:21, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused image of logo of questionable notablity. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Clearly appear to be out-of-scope. There is no educational purpose to them. Additionally, I see no evidence that the uploaded is the copyright holder on the original photographs.
— Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:46, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:23, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jasper0333 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE fictional future election maps invented by the uploader (A 2024 election map I made so I can use it in an alternate future wikibox I'm making for fun).
Lord Belbury (talk) 08:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope; just a black rectangle, described as "Here you can see it". Seems to be a hoax or test upload at best. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Same problem with: File:Gjcdrkfww.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarkMohammadShoriful (talk · contribs)
[edit]Vanity/self-promotion. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contributions to wm projects.
- File:Shoriful.jpg
- File:Shoriful Islam,.jpg
- File:Mark Mohammad Shoriful, Shoriful Islam.jpg
- File:Mark Mohammad Shoriful,.jpg
- File:Mark Mohammad Shoriful,,.jpg
- File:Shoriful Islam.jpg
- File:Marl Mohammad Shoriful.jpg
- File:Mark Mohammad Shoriful.jpg
Achim55 (talk) 17:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nominator. Non-encyclopedic and not used on any wiki project. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
out of scope, experiments, no usage Gampe (talk) 19:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Used as vandalism. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:32, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Possibly, not an auto-portrait, thus a personal photo of a non-contributor. Ignatus (talk) 17:43, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 16:57, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Protolanguage1 (talk) 18:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC) Uploaded for a school project - it includes artwork postcards covered by artistic copyright.
This image contains copyrighted artwork of other artists on the postcards. 86.156.166.195 15:35, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
This image contains copyrighted artwork of other artists on the postcards. Protolanguage1 (talk) 15:36, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:34, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
The OH group in the carboxylic acid is attached incorrectly. The sugar is missing essential stereochemistry. I have created File:Luteolin-7-O-glucuronide.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 12:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Duplication of Rochester, August 2022 01.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: apparently the same photograph. --Strakhov (talk) 16:36, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely own original work by uploader; likely screenshot/capture from movie. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work, last upload remaining from the uploader. --Strakhov (talk) 16:38, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
The file is not my original work for clear transparency and was taken directly from Sadiq Daniel's twitter page. It should have been cited as well Baselinekickzz (talk) 11:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Meets COM:GCSD#G7. (Original uploader requests deletion of recently created content.) Guliolopez (talk) 12:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader was User:Irishanna4921, not User:Baselinekickzz. Anyway, unlikely to be own work, apparently taken from Twitter. --Strakhov (talk) 16:40, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 13:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: low quality selfie pic used in an userpage in ar.wiki of an account with 2 editions in ar.wiki (both in the userpage) and 1 in Commons (the upload). Not useful. --Strakhov (talk) 16:43, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Because it is Nonsense Sami.gh (talk) 16:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 16:44, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
google is not a valid source *angys* (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of a free license at source ("google"). --Strakhov (talk) 16:45, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:But-2-yn-1-ol-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 22:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 22:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
I think this is out-of-scope? I have no idea what this is supposed to be, but it doesn't look educational. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 06:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused, low quality. Better files at c:Category:Minar-e-Pakistan. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope also watermarked. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Attempt to make out of COM:SCOPE article-style content, fails to credit use of File:ISKCON temple, Delhi at Janamashtami.jpg under CC licence. Lord Belbury (talk) 12:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
COM:PENIS Dronebogus (talk) 13:55, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
OOS garbage Dronebogus (talk) 14:01, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Unremarkable personal doodle, OOS Dronebogus (talk) 14:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
![14:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/08/20#c-Dronebogus-20220820140700-File:"IMG_20180530_104811272.png".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
![19:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/08/20#c-George_Chernilevsky-20220828194200-File:"IMG_20180530_104811272.png".jpg){kind=link}
Logo of a minor book publisher, fawiki page deleted, out of scope. CC license doubtful given user's other submissions. JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 21:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Logo of a minor book publisher, fawiki page deleted, out of scope. CC license doubtful given user's other submissions. JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 21:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
not notable, search engine https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=%22Simon+Gill+Youngest+Humanitarian+In+Pakistan%22 gives only this img as a result. Ordinary person. Mateus2019 (talk) 08:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:51, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Proszę o usunięcie mojego pliku Lotokot. (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:52, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]I could certainly be wrong here, but it seems to me that any photos or artwork of Lego minifigures are derivative works of copyrighted toys. Unless there is any reason to believe these toys are in the public domain? See COM:TOYS.
- File:Andeiviet Groot.jpg
- File:Batman (3100958105).jpg
- File:Brickfilm - Laufanimation.gif
- File:Carnival in Limassol 2014 (12888279615).jpg
- File:Dekonstrukcja (3697448759).jpg
- File:DSCN7472 (5191825192).jpg
- File:DSCN8736 2 (5260340491).jpg
- File:DSCN8738 2 (5260339059).jpg
- File:DSCN8742 2 (5260948612).jpg
- File:DSCN8748 2 (5260949974).jpg
- File:DSCN8752 2 (5260951228).jpg
- File:DSCN8758 2 (5260952716).jpg
- File:Ego Leonard in Brighton 2008.jpg
- File:Figurine géante Skateur Minifigures - Série 1 - 2 - 20150324 17h21 (10024).jpg
- File:Flickr - lejoe - Lego Man.jpg
- File:Foto composición.JPG
- File:It was an ugly night (3497587443).jpg
- File:Jamming Troopers on TT-303 Bass Bot.jpg
- Keep because critical regions have been already blurred, and kept on previous deletion request. For details, see previous discussion. --Clusternote (talk) 22:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Absolutely, keep. Sorry - I did try to look through these as I compiled the bulk delete, but obviously not carefully enough. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Juno lego.jpg
- Keep All NASA supplied images are in the public domain, regardless of the subject matter. -- 14.2.107.109 09:57, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Why would NASA not be subject to regular copyright laws? I realize that photos produced by the US government are copyright free, but I don't see why the content wouldn't still be copyrighted if it doesn't belong to them. - Themightyquill (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Because the content does belong to them. It's ornamentation on a space probe. -- 14.2.3.245 15:07, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Okay, thanks for your reply. If I understand correctly, you're saying that NASA created these figures and that they aren't technically derivative of Lego toys, even though they look like lego toys and are labelled as such. I'm neither familiar enough with the back catalogue of LEGO toys nor knowledgeable enough about copyright law to argue one way or another in this particular case. - Themightyquill (talk) 15:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
- Why would NASA not be subject to regular copyright laws? I realize that photos produced by the US government are copyright free, but I don't see why the content wouldn't still be copyrighted if it doesn't belong to them. - Themightyquill (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Knowledge sharing (6003136440).jpg
- File:Korg monotron DUO with LEGO people.jpg
- Keep because critical regions have been blurred. --Clusternote (talk) 23:24, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Absolutely, keep. Sorry - I did try to look through these as I compiled the bulk delete, but obviously not carefully enough. - Themightyquill (talk) 09:31, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:Lego - ljudje.JPG
- File:Lego Ambulance Team.JPG
- File:LEGO Assault Van.jpg
- File:Lego Brickfilm - Laufanimation.gif
- File:Lego builder with hammer drill.JPG
- File:Lego Chef.JPG
- File:LEGO Clown Advert 2.jpg
- File:LEGO Clown Advert.jpg
- File:Lego Diver minifigure from the Aqua Raiders series.jpg
- File:Lego Easter Bunny drowning in eggs.jpg
- File:Lego Fabuland.JPG
- File:Lego Fire Fighter.JPG
- File:Lego Head Led.jpg
- File:LEGO Indiana Jones in Grass (2809158854).jpg
- File:LEGO Indiana Jones in Jungle (2808302019).jpg
- File:LEGO Indiana Jones in the Desert (2810749797).jpg
- File:Lego Knight.JPG
- File:Lego Minifigure hats and hair.jpg
- File:Lego Minifigure heads, torsos, hips and legs.jpg
- File:Lego Minifigure Monument.jpg
- File:LEGO Minifigure skating through town.jpg
- File:Lego Modular - Set 10211 Grand Emporium (7115021203).jpg
- File:Lego Neo Classic Spacemen.jpg
- File:Lego play.jpg
- File:Lego Police Officer.JPG
- File:Lego Rob (2934479060).jpg
- File:Lego robber.JPG
- File:Lego Space Classic minifigures.jpg
- File:Lego Space minifigures.jpg
- File:LEGO Star Wars Episode I - A New Hope (2808329673).jpg
- File:Lego Store, Rockefeller Center (7175078374).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men (2933524113).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men - Magneto (2933535649).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men - Professor X (2934388380).jpg
- File:Lego X-Men - Wolverine (2934384750).jpg
- File:Lego-Ausstellung (10562633424).jpg
- File:LEGO-Ferrari 7 - Big Legomen.JPG
- File:LEGO-Ferrari 7.jpg
- File:Lego-Nice.jpg
- File:LegoFigurine.JPG
- File:Legoland Windsor - Indiana Jones (2835946022).jpg
- Keep because is protected by FOP in UK. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto2.JPG
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto3.JPG
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto4.JPG
- File:LegolandXmasTree.JPG
- File:LegolandXmasTree2.JPG
- File:Macro photo of a Lego Minifigure taking a macro photo of a flower.jpg
- File:Montreal Zombie Walk 2015 (22031202624).jpg
- File:Montreal Zombie Walk 2015 - Zombie minifig (22033015473).jpg
- File:Mr212nd LOGO.png
- File:Occupy Lego Land OWS 2011 Shankbone.JPG
- File:Pompier en légo - 6.jpg
- File:Ready For Battle (2911580961).jpg
- File:Resistance was futile....jpg
- File:San Diego Comic-Con 2011 - Lego Ninja (5985864566).jpg
- File:Sandwichposition1.jpg
- File:Storm trooper (9159886753).jpg
- File:Sylvia-earle-and-lego.jpg
- File:Tom the Cafe Owner (2809145552).jpg
- File:U nákladového nádraží 10, označení LEGO.jpg
- File:Unemployment was high in lego land.jpg
- File:USD253711-Toy figure 01.jpg
- File:USD253711-Toy figure 02.jpg
- File:Wall of LEGO minifigures.jpg
- File:Zabawa klockami LEGO 05.JPG
- File:Zabawa klockami LEGO 08.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 01.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 02.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 03.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 05.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 06.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 08.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 09.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 10.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 11.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 12.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 13.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 14.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 22.JPG
- File:Zabawa Lego 31.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 12:18, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Comment File:U nákladového nádraží 10, označení LEGO.jpg is protected by FOP, anyway. --Mormegil (talk) 13:24, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I think you're right. It looks like Lego advertising, so they would have the rights to create the sculpture and since they put it in public in the Czech Republic, FOP should apply. - Themightyquill (talk) 13:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- (It’s a sculpture & logo above an entrance to the office building of the LEGO Trading company. --Mormegil (talk) 12:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC))
- Yes, I think you're right. It looks like Lego advertising, so they would have the rights to create the sculpture and since they put it in public in the Czech Republic, FOP should apply. - Themightyquill (talk) 13:36, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
- You are probably right, I do not know the rules here. I will have no objections to a deletion of my pictures here if the Wiki community finds it to be the right thing to do! Ida Tolgensbakk (talk) 08:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- We need more experienced people to comment here. I don't think Lego minifigures count as art, either on a practical level or a legal one. ɱ (talk) 20:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think, the real breadth of application of copyright is uneven and illogical, as it results from real tolerance or legal pressure in various domains. Eg. films or photos are often considered as protected even when they are absolutely not "creative", but simply a work of craftsmanship or even automatic. Unfortunately, LEGO characters (I'm not sure about simple construction parts) have a certain extent of artistic originality, and LEGO company is very active and aggressive in their defence. In the Czech Republic, the Pirate Party used characters freely inspired by the LEGO figures in their election shot, and was condemned to a penalty.[1] However, there is some space to seek and defend limits of application of copyright to be not quite absurd. --ŠJů (talk) 21:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Nordic copyright law is less illogical in that aspect: most photos are considered to be below the threshold of originality. Since it is useful to provide copyright protection for photographs, Nordic countries therefore protect photographs through a related right, which is not based on originality.
- Lego bricks are made by a Danish company, so Denmark is probably the source country for many of the figurines. Per COM:L, we therefore need to consider at least the laws of Denmark and the United States.
- In the United States, there is a rule that utilitarian objects are ineligible for copyright, but toys are considered to be non-utilitarian. The only toy example we have is File:Koosh Ball Wall.jpg which is too simple to be copyrighted, but that toy is obviously a lot less simple than these figurines.
- In Denmark, utilitarian objects are eligible for copyright, so there are more examples to look at. This knife and this chair are copyrighted in Denmark. Originality in the Nordic countries is largely about the risk for dual creation, so one would have to consider how likely it is that someone else accidentally might create identical toys. I'm guessing that the risk of dual creation is low for most, possibly all, of the figurines, but it is hard to tell. For example, the hand design is a bit unique. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:09, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I think, the real breadth of application of copyright is uneven and illogical, as it results from real tolerance or legal pressure in various domains. Eg. films or photos are often considered as protected even when they are absolutely not "creative", but simply a work of craftsmanship or even automatic. Unfortunately, LEGO characters (I'm not sure about simple construction parts) have a certain extent of artistic originality, and LEGO company is very active and aggressive in their defence. In the Czech Republic, the Pirate Party used characters freely inspired by the LEGO figures in their election shot, and was condemned to a penalty.[1] However, there is some space to seek and defend limits of application of copyright to be not quite absurd. --ŠJů (talk) 21:51, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: While a single Lego brick may not have a copyright, the more complex parts clearly do and any assembly of bricks or other parts also does. I have kept several that are covered by FOP, but deleted those where there was only an outline as I think even the outline is above the ToO. The NASA figures clearly infringe on the Lego copyright and while Lego may tolerate or even encourage NASA doing that on a space probe, that does not put the result into the PD. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]Per COM:TOYS
- File:14027233 1086928444718824 432919324 n(1).jpg
- File:2001 Stormtroopers.jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (005).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (041).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (042).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (043).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (044).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (059).jpg
- File:2017-07-04 Legoland Deutschland Günzburg (075).jpg
- File:7190 Billund, Denmark - panoramio (7).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28143802063).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28143819683).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28143826813).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28654065852).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28654068182).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28681870811).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28727546446).jpg
- File:76067 Tanker Truck Takedown (28758981745).jpg
- File:Bench Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:CfA Lesson.jpg
- File:Crazy Scientist - flicker 33469154156 05b34d4fa2 o.jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends I (5180008204).jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends II (5179407607).jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends III (5179408285).jpg
- File:Darth Vader on a Bike and friends IV (5179409029).jpg
- File:Dr Julius Hibbert Lego.jpg
- File:Imperial Judge.jpg
- File:Imperial Plans Stolen.jpg
- File:Imperial Plans Withheld.jpg
- File:Imperial Plans.jpg
- File:Jumping Red Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Jumping Stormtrooper 01.jpg
- File:LEGO - Winter Village.jpg
- File:Lego Builder.jpg
- File:Lego Deemsters.jpg
- File:Lego Figure Near Big Ben Elizabeth Tower Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:Lego Officer Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:Lego People.jpg
- File:Lego Store Leicester Square London Lester 2.jpg
- File:Lego Store Leicester Square London Lester 3.jpg
- File:Lego Store Leicester Square London Lester.jpg
- File:Legoland Japan Splash Battle - flickr 32708180834 0084afbe23 o.jpg
- File:Legoland Windsor - Indiana Jones (2835946022).jpg: Keep because is protected by FOP in UK --ŠJů (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:LegolandDiscoveryCentreToronto4.JPG: please check why the file was kept in the previous DR. --ŠJů (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Legos- Wonder Woman with Chewbacca.jpg
- File:London Underground Lego Figure Leicester Square London 2.jpg
- File:London Underground Lego Figure Leicester Square London.jpg
- File:Many Imperial Plans.jpg
- File:Nature Stormtroopers.jpg
- File:Original Spaceman Legos.jpg
- File:Pirate - flickr 33551604765 8d868aa333 o.jpg
- File:Pirate - flickr 33551619605 304dfac960 o.jpg
- File:Queen Lego Store Leicester Square London United Kingdom.jpg
- File:Red Stormtrooper Plans Withheld.jpg
- File:Royal Guard Lego Store Leicester Square London.jpg
- File:Sad Stormtrooper Builder.jpg
- File:Sad Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Scraping Lesson.jpg
- File:Scraping Presentation.jpg
- File:Selma Bouviert Lego.jpg
- File:Spider Stormtrooper Shovel.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Batman Builder.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 1.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 2.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 3.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 4.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 5.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Build 6.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Builder.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Configuration 01.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Configuration Docs.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Configuration Fall.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Future.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Gems.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Hourglass.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Lonely.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Meeting.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Money.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Robot.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Scroll.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Scrolls.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Spiderman Links.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Spiderman Meeting.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Spiderman.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Tinfoil Hat.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper walking on sand (Unsplash).jpg
- File:Stormtroopers Book.jpg
- File:Stormtroopers Keyboard.jpg
- File:Stormtroopers Scrolls.jpg
- File:Temple - panoramio (1).jpg
File:U nákladového nádraží 10, označení LEGO.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep, clearly {{FoP-Czechia}}. --ŠJů (talk) 19:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Waving Lego.jpg
- File:Waving Red Stormtrooper and Friends.jpg
- File:Waving Red Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Waving Stormtrooper.jpg
- File:Waving Stormtroopers.jpg
- File:Weighed down... (7357478252).jpg
- File:書籍出版2 2.JPG
- File:書籍出版3 1.jpg
- File:書籍出版3 2.JPG
- File:書籍出版4 1.jpg
- File:書籍出版4 2.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
— Racconish ☎ 03:48, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except some which are likely covered by various FOP laws. --Storkk (talk) 09:44, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]- File:American figure boi.jpg
- File:Carpenters with furniture assembly instructions.jpg
- File:CS3 7397 (14128675012).jpg
- File:I Hate My Job.jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (29018826388).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42843072692).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42843074262).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891187291).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891188111).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891189011).jpg
- File:LEGO Build a Mini Minifigures (42891190151).jpg
- File:Lego minifigures of The Honor Guard of ROC at Flotilla 131 booth 20190324a.jpg
- File:LEGO minifigures.jpg
- File:LyftLegoPanoply.jpg
- File:Stormtrooper Control.jpg
- File:To work by bike.jpg
- File:Weird people waiting in a queue.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 11:11, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Fitindia (talk) 06:44, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]
Yuraily Lic (talk) 14:39, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:03, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]- File:LEGO City 10159 LEGO City Airport (42842780332).jpg
- File:Lego Ghostbusters (2914485906).jpg
- File:Lego one of the Cool Creations.jpg
- File:樂高動畫.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:29, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]Photos of minifigures COM:TOYS: "When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country."
- File:Chained to the desk at work.jpg
- File:Classic Space Renntransporter.jpg
- File:Golf ball and toy.jpg
- File:Lego Neo Classic Space Exploration Rover.jpg
- File:Lego People - Flickr - Joe Shlabotnik.jpg
- File:Lego Space - Set 6822 Space Digger (1981).jpg
- File:Lego Space - Set 6870 Space Probe Launcher (7465209646).jpg
- File:Legolandflag.jpg
- File:Loui Sparks.png
- File:R WP 20160713 18 57 33 Pro (28329251215).jpg
- File:R WP 20160713 18 58 19 Pro (28329252295).jpg
- File:Return to normality - 134- it begins.jpg
- File:This is a submission from Twitter user @ChelseyBallarte (24589110078).jpg
- File:레고 피규어.jpg
- File:Employee chained to his desk.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 11:41, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 18:06, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Lego minifigures
[edit]Per past discussions of this category, photos of regular minifigures fall under COM:TOYS.
- File:BrickCon 2021 Unlimited Master Build (51548642246).jpg
- File:Day 143 Cy365 Make Believe (71559571).jpeg
- File:Day 167 Cy365 Motorhome (74216989).jpeg
- File:Day 45 Cy365 Amore (61040950).jpeg
- File:DnD in a Nutshell.jpg
- File:Figura de lego de Bart Simpson, Diecast Convention, Mexico 2017.jpg
- File:Forestiers (lego).jpg
- File:LEGO Collectible Minifigures Series 4 Crazy Scientist vs. Studios (5535301750).jpg
- File:Lego Figuren.jpg
- File:LEGO minifigure C-3PO.jpg
- File:Lego minifigure parts.jpg
- File:Raspberries - Flickr - places lost.jpg
- File:Robert i Józek.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Lord Belbury (talk) 21:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 03:53, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statue of Charles Atangana
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Cameroon, unless we can prove that the sculptor has been dead for at least 50 years we can't host these on Commons.
- File:Charles atangana1v.JPG
- File:Place Charles Atangana, Yaoundé.jpg
- File:Statue de Charles Atangana 01.JPG
- File:Statue de Charles Atangana 02.JPG
- File:Statue de Charles Atangana 2.JPG
- File:Statue de Charles Atangana 3.JPG
- File:Statue de Charles Atangana.jpg
- File:Statue de Sa Majesté Charles Atangana.JPG
Hog Farm (talk) 22:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 03:56, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
No evidence in the Twitter feed (https://mobile.twitter.com/siima/status/1162915911436832768) that SIIMA has released the images under a CC license C.Fred (talk) 11:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 17:55, 29 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 01:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
No verification of CC license at https://movie.webindia123.com/film/artist/2346/sameer-thahir/#/movie/Star/Cinematographer/Regional/Sameer-Thahir/Sameer-Thahir2 C.Fred (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 17:55, 29 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 01:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of CC license at https://www.newsbugz.com/shaan-rahman-wiki-biography-age-songs-family-images/ C.Fred (talk) 11:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 17:55, 29 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 01:24, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of 34 St Margaret's Street, Rochester, August 2022.jpg No Swan So Fine (talk) 08:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
It's a manuscript of a text by an author from 4th-5th century Satdeep Gill (talk) 20:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: --Satdeep Gill (talk) 05:52, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
The stated license is incorrect, and I don't think the logo is simple enough to be hosted under PD-textlogo. Auguel (talk) 22:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 05:26, 4 September 2022 (UTC)
google map Copyright violation *angys* (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:50, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Di (they-them) as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This video uses copyrighted footage (such as from Kong Skull Island) and copyrighted photos of fossils King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- I do agree. My mistake uploading this video. Should be deleted. Sturm (talk) 02:13, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:45, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:PD structure (Philippines)
[edit]These images are too hard to appl {{PD-structure|PHL}}. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines.
- File:Pulilan Bulacan Province 01.jpg
- File:Pulilan Bulacan Province 02.jpg
- File:Toys R Us Philippines.jpg
Ox1997cow (talk) 18:41, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep all. The first two files show DiviMart Pulilan, which is a minimalist-type building that applies the usual box/warehouse-type design that is too ordinary to be considered as an architecture. See my withdrawal remark at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Divimart Pulilan. For the Toys R Us store, the potentially-copyrightable elements here are de minimis: the printed barbie and cartoon designs. The logo does not meet the U.S. threshold of originality (refer to w:en:Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 6#File:Toys R Us Philippines.jpg). The store itself has nothing copyrightable: no specially-designed walls, columns, or ceilings. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I misunderstood. So I withdraw my nomination. Ox1997cow (talk) 03:39, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I misunderstood. So
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
Downscaled conversion from SVG to PNG. Claims to be translated but is not. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work: small size and user history Rohalamin (talk) 05:44, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- سلام این تصویر توسط شخص خودم گرفته شده است. برای حذف نشدنش باید چکار کنم؟؟ Katusha90 (talk) 07:23, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work: small size and user history Rohalamin (talk) 05:49, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- سلام این تصویر توسط شخص خودم گرفته شده است. برای حذف نشدنش باید چکار کنم؟؟ Katusha90 (talk) 07:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own-work: small size and user history Rohalamin (talk) 05:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- سلام این تصویر توسط شخص خودم گرفته شده است. برای حذف نشدنش باید چکار کنم؟؟ Katusha90 (talk) 07:22, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
The image is a needless photoshop of the Star Wars Jedi Fallen order Logo. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 05:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
The image is a needless photoshop of the Star Wars Jedi Fallen order Logo. Yoshiman6464 (talk) 05:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Unofficial media, purporting to be the Thor: Ragnarok logo Yoshiman6464 (talk) 05:54, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from https://www.birraperoni.it/. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 16:07, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from https://www.birraperoni.it/. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:06, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 16:08, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
_%D7%95%D7%90%D7%AA%D7%A8_%D7%94%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%99%D7%94_(%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%97%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D7%95%D7%90%D7%AA%D7%A8_%D7%94%D7%91%D7%A0%D7%99%D7%99%D7%94_(%D7%9E%D7%90%D7%97%D7%95%D7%A8%D7%94).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio from https://techcrunch.com/2022/06/20/max-q-space-xed/ CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:09, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://techcrunch.com/2022/06/20/max-q-space-xed/ CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 06:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:10, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shev123 as no permission (No permission since). Subject lived 1886-1954, possible PD? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- This file isn't "own work" and it is impossible to know if it's DP or not. --Shev123 (talk) 07:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure". When you scan an object, that derivative image you create is your own work, even though it doesn't transfer the original copyright to you. --RAN (talk) 16:40, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Even if we assumed your position, you still need to comply with the copyright of the original photo for using the derivative, RAN. Platonides (talk) 23:33, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. From the bottom of the book cover visible on the photo, the photo shows Honoré Brunel at a book signing event for his 1930 book Sous le chant des sirènes. From the conjuction of other information provided by the uploader on other pages (1, 2, 3), it can be concluded that the uploader claims to be the grandchild (either granddaughter or grandson, as the uploader refers to themself in the feminine form in one place and in the masculine form in another place) of the person pictured on the photo. Given that the uploader's mother (Lise Brunel, the daughter of the pictured person) was born in 1922, it is not possible that the uploader took this photo. Even considering the uploader's claim of being the heir of Lise Brunel, it is not plausible that then 8-year-old Lise Brunel took this photo. The origin and actual authorship are not provided. Therefore, the claim of copyright by the uploader appears insufficiently explained by a rationale. Another user recently removed the uploader's CC license and replaced it with a claim of public domain anonymous without providing evidence of such publication to support it. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:21, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- Once again: When you scan an object, that derivative image you create is your own work, even though it doesn't transfer the original copyright to you. --RAN (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
- Publication, for copyright purposes, is when the image leaves the custody of the photographer and is seen by the public. I could see an argument that this image remained with the photographer if it appeared in an archive donated by the photographer and was scanned from an original negative. For instance the Library of Congress in the USA has several collections donated by the photographer of their negatives and proof copies, and they are considered unpublished until proved published, because we know they remained with the photographer. I have performed due diligence looking to see if this image was ever listed as remaining unseen by the public in an archive, but have found no trace. --RAN (talk) 04:03, 23 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-France + PD-1996. --Yann (talk) 16:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
False license, not own work, screenshot from copyrighted source - game Warcraft 3 TFT Kamolan (talk) 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
False license, not own work, screenshot from copyrighted source - game Warcraft 3 TFT Kamolan (talk) 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
False license, not own work, screenshot from copyrighted source - game Warcraft 3 TFT Kamolan (talk) 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
False license, not own work, screenshot from copyrighted source - game Warcraft 3 TFT Kamolan (talk) 07:20, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:55, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as no permission (No permission since). 1931 image, should be discussed for PD. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We house over 200 photos from the studio. --RAN (talk) 04:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: PD-UK-unknown. --Yann (talk) 17:53, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Dubious license, low resolution, no metadata, image can be found in other sources Kamolan (talk) 07:25, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Author of deleted en:Cosmic secrets A journey with mystic Tirumular, so he can be out of project scope as well. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal logo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
File:Visit to a shore monument of the Admiral Perry in Chichijima Island,Ogasawara,Tokyo,Japan.jpg
[edit]
1996 relief (as shown in the picture). Not in PD, and COM:FOP Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:39, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Uploader is the subject depicted in this image. Requires COM:VRT permission from the original photographer. ✗plicit 11:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:37, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lynne Peters (talk · contribs)
[edit]@Lynne Peters: To prevent impersonation and violation of your copyrights, we require professional photographers to verify their identity; photos from an unverified account claiming to be a professional photographer will be deleted. Please visit COM:VRT for details on how to complete this process. Feel free to reply below with any questions.
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Protolanguage1 (talk) 13:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC) Image uploaded for Wikimedia Commons University Project on Wikimedia Digital Capabilities, learning to upload, edit and delete - to be deleted.
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation? see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 13:58, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation? see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 14:00, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Uploaded to Flickr by a blacklisted user. Based on the description, it's likely they're all photographs of another photographer's work. Sorry, got confused, I'll remove the deletion templates - though the Flickr user is still on the blacklist, which will prevent the Flickrreview bot from reviewing the license.
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 51.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 50.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 49.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 48.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 47.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 46.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 45.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 44.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 43.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 42.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 41.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 40.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 39.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 20.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 38.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 37.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 36.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 35.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 34.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 33.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 31.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 32.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 30.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 29.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 27.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 28.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 26.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 25.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 24.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 23.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 22.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 21.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 19.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 18.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 17.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 15.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 16.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 14.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 13.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 12.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 11.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 10.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 09.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 08.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 07.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 06.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 04.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 05.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 03.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 02.jpg
- File:COVID-19 National Mall Memorial - Ron Cogwell 01.jpg
Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:30, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- I was aware that it was a blacklisted user, but i saw the following message on the description of the blacklist "Many recent uploads are screenshots from non-free sources with doubtful CC-BY licenses. Some older images are likely legitimate though; careful evaluation required". So instead of uploading through flickr2commons, i uploaded manually all the photos that were seemingly legitimate - if I made any mistake in the process or some of these files are actually not from the user, of course i'm pro-deletion. Parzeus (talk) 20:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for responding here. I ended up tagging images from the batch that were obvious copyvios (one sourced to the AP, two of the artist), but the other ones seem legit. Sorry for kinda making a mess here. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 00:03, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the ones that weren't deleted already. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
The stated license is incorrect, and I don't think the logo is simple enough to be hosted under PD-textlogo. Auguel (talk) 22:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Also this duplicate File:IRF old logo.png. Auguel (talk) 13:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:51, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Per past deletions at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego minifigures, Lego figures fall under COM:TOYS. Lord Belbury (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 24 November 2022 (UTC)
Photo of non-free mural painting. Asclepias (talk) 18:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:57, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio Dronebogus (talk) 14:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Artist died 2018, work is still protected by copyright laws, undelete in due time (+70 years) Peli (talk) 14:53, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:36, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Facebook Copyright violation *angys* (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation from website per source。 *angys* (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://www.taufulou.com/marimbar-the-rooftop-bar-pinnacle-pj/ *angys* (talk) 17:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:37, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Title image of hardly notable vk.com community, even if the uploader is the author, it's derivative from some non-free sources Ignatus (talk) 17:36, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 19:10, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 08:38, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). Low-res without EXIF, but user has no other uploads or deleted uploads, and no reverse search results for this image. Should be discussed whether COM:AGF or COM:PRP applies. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
copyvio, very likely not "own work" as claimed. At en:special:diff/1105441075 uploader says picture is free from royalties, but royalty free does not make it suitable for commons. File has been uploaded before at a lower resolution, see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:EHartog.jpg. Wimmel (talk) 09:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- What can be done to prove it is my "own work", then? Belgord (talk) 08:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
- @Belgord: See COM:VRT for further instructions. --Wimmel (talk) 09:41, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
It's obvious that this is not "own work" from 2021, but I doubt that this is "own work" at all, not even from 1997. Looks much more like derivative work from somewhere to me. 217.239.3.129 13:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Caption says photo is by professional photographer Marc Sabat (Kuopio, Finland), license claims it is own work by uploader Reijo Taipale. 91.157.113.35 13:50, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation https://selangorkini.my/zh-hans/2021/04/%E8%94%A1%E4%BC%9F%E6%9D%B0%EF%BC%9A%E4%B8%87%E6%8C%A0%E8%80%81%E5%9F%8E%E9%95%87%E6%96%B0%E7%94%9F%E5%91%BD/ *angys* (talk) 17:05, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Independent official Diplomat Amy Neagoe (talk · contribs)
[edit]"Official Curriculum Vitae Amy Neagoe", out of Commons' project scope.
Achim55 (talk) 17:59, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
There is no proof of consent of the person pictured. Therefore likely a EU law personal rights violation. 2001:A61:3ADD:8F01:DDDF:D60C:3DA1:60E6 16:24, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no reason. --Krd 14:50, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nedeljko Žugić (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope per Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful, picture of book isn't for Wikimedia Commons per policy Commons:Deletion_policy#Non-free_licenses_and_fair_use.
- File:JPEG Image (561324).jpg
- File:LJUDI GOVORE, PRVA INTERNЕT TV U BIH.jpg
- File:MAJKA, NEZASITA LJUBAV PREMA COVJEKU.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Zoranzoki21 (talk) 11:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 18 April 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nedeljko Žugić (talk · contribs)
[edit]Kolica...jpg is a low-resolution image, I personally don't think that the uploader is the copyright holder.
The other two images are personal images, also low-resolution + unused, I read in some deletion requests that in this case NOTHOST applies, as images don't have any educational purpose.
Thank you for your understanding!
Kizule (talk) 11:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Feyth as no permission (No permission since) Didym (talk) 13:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep, as it is the own work of the uploader (according to him, that is.̴̴Jeff5102 (talk) 15:09, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. No reason to think this is not own work,regarding also the EXIF data. --Ellywa (talk) 00:07, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wheelix-de as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: superseded by file:1912-Mst.png. As the coats of arms are somehow different, I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 17:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not because it is "superseded" (these are two different drawings), but because its copyright status is unclear; author Otto Miltsch (who might also be the artist of this 1911 coa) might have lived beyond 1953. The file can be restored in 2032 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 22:42, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
The modern building of the center is the intended subject of these nominated photos. Unfortunately, France disallows commercial uses of their works in public, so these commercially-licensed images are copyright violations, with no permissions from the still-alive architect, w:en:Renzo Piano.
As New Caledonia follows French laws, it follows restrictive non-commercial FOP too.
- File:Jean marie tjibaou 04.jpg
- File:Tjibaou Cultural Center 2 (44129882580).jpg
- File:Tjibaou cultural center 2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:00, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I guess, the crest presented here may not related to any Polish historical sources confirming it's shape, therefore it should be deleted. Genatsvale (talk) 00:56, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Does not have educational use, not used on the projects and therefore out of COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 19:46, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be PD-self as claimed. Above COM:TOO US, no evidence the design is PD for any other reason. Second and third versions are substantially similar to the first version. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 03:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I'm not sure what the PD laws for tribal lands are, but I assume they would be similar to the general PD laws in the United States. If that's the case, then as far as I know official flags of states, counties, and other administrative boundaries are public domain. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:23, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. An original version of the seal is to be found here: https://www.texasbeyondhistory.net/nasoni/images/caddologo.html . It bears a copyright 1997 sign. So this is a copyrighted material and has to be deleted from commons imho. --Ellywa (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Likely to be a derivative work. Mike Rohsopht (talk) 06:26, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source youtube film consists of photos of posters etc. So not an original photo of the subject. --Ellywa (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Previously tagged by Shizhao as "no permission". Given the large number of similar photos, I think it is reasonable to conclude that these are indeed self-photographed. So the question is whether these can be accepted under COM:FOP China (or alternatively, if any are below COM:TOO China).
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 19.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 18.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 17.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 16.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 15.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 14.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 13.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 12.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 11.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 10.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 09.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 08.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 07.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 06.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 05.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 04.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 02.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 01.jpg
- File:沈丘县第二高级中学荣誉 03.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:31, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is unknown whether these photos were taken inside or outside. All images are used on a draft article, https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:%E6%B2%88%E4%B8%98%E5%8E%BF%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E9%AB%98%E7%BA%A7%E4%B8%AD%E5%AD%A6 about a school. Uploader did not comment or explain the copyright situation. Therefore deleted all per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
No Creative Commons statement in this source https://tokohbatak.wordpress.com/2015/04/22/kamaruddin-simanjuntak-sh/ Urang Kamang (talk) 09:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, possibly copyrighted. Deleted per COM:PRP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Proszę o usunięcie mojego pliku. Lotokot. (talk) 10:14, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, to long ago for a COM:COURTESY deletion. @Lotokot.: as the uploader, please explain why you want this photo to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Not Creative Commons statement https://joglosemarnews.com/images/2022/07/1657735530161.jpg Urang Kamang (talk) 10:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep the photo while probably not copyright free it is useful for identification of the victim, like in the Shooting of Michael Brown, Killing of Breonna Taylor and the Disappearance of Natalee Holloway, it is only used once and is sufficiently used by media outlets to identify the victim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Technetium 99m (talk • contribs) 07:56, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
- All of them are fair-use photos, which does not conform with Wikimedia Commons policy. AnsyahF (talk) 02:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence the photo is freely licensed at the source. A photo can be useful, but that is not a criterium for Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 21:03, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Unused lower quality duplicate of File:Gulf of Venice, Delta of Po river - ISS006-E-30956.JPG — Ltrlg (talk), 10:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:REDUNDANT. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:04, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
(Image uploaded for Wikimedia Commons University Project on Wikimedia Digital Capabilities, learning to upload, edit and delete.) Protolanguage1 (talk) 12:29, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- A better way to do this, if you are the uploader, is to add {{SD|G7}} to the file page, and the file will be deleted fairly speedily. A regular deletion procedure can take weeks or months. TommyG (talk) 12:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:COURTESY, albeit a bit late. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:05, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 13:27, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Je suis Frederic Gastineau (fredgagas) et je me suis proposé de faire une page Wikipedia sur les activités professionnelles de mon frére Jacques Gastineau.
- Nous avons travaillé , entre autres, dans le domaine des effets speciaux pour le cinema et la publicité.
- les 4 photos que je compte utilisé pour cette page Wilpedia , font partis de notre fond personnel et elles sont libres de droits.
- Frederic. Fredgagas (talk) 18:51, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @Fredgagas: , please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. We would also need permission to publish the figure in front, from its designer. If the permission is received of both copyright holders, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:11, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- also file:Bouquet portada life.jpg
VRT-permission from author and copyright holder Daniel Alujas is needed. No evidence, that uploader Lisandraprmo is the same person. Taivo (talk) 14:16, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
No free use license at source (anymore) https://am.adlibhosting.com/amonline/advanced/Details/collect/99340 Artist died 2018, work is still protected by copyright laws, undelete in due time (+70 years) Peli (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. The PD-100 tag is obviously false. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.255.65.197 (talk) 22:29, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:13, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation of the photograph included in the poster, unlikely that the YouTube Flickr uploader owns the copyright of this. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:08, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Also delete the derived file File:Dr Alavaro de Loyola Furtado.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:09, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sebastiao Mazarelo.jpg, for a similar photo from the same Flickr account. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Work displayed in public interest by the local government. Shows no copyright on the poster. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejoy2003 (talk • contribs) 12:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- We need positive evidence that the poster has a free license, including the photograph and the text in the poster. See COM:POSTER. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:52, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- See [2] There appears to be no claim of copyright whatsoever. The Goa state government has built this sort of "memorial place" in public interest. I suggest we keep it or maybe relicense Rejoy2003 06:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- @Rejoy2003: "No claim of copyright" is insufficient. Please read Commons:Licensing before you upload any more files. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep these posters come under the {FoP-India} tag. Relicensing is the only way. No need of deletion when these posters like I've said above are for "public display" by the state government. Rejoy2003 05:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Rejoy2003: freedom of panorama in India does not apply to 2-D items, please read COM:FOP India. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- FOP India is modelled on FOP UK which states that 2D work by craftsmans are allowed. The fact that FOP India clearly says that works that are "copyrighted" are not allowed. These works are for public display by the state government Rejoy2003 18:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Rejoy2003: Under UK law a photograph would be classified as a '2D graphic work', for which UK freedom of panorama does not apply. Under most jurisdictions a work is not required to display a copyright claim for it to be subject to copyright, and I can see nothing in COM:INDIA that contradicts this. A state government displaying a photograph to the public does release the photo from copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 22:28, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- FOP India is modelled on FOP UK which states that 2D work by craftsmans are allowed. The fact that FOP India clearly says that works that are "copyrighted" are not allowed. These works are for public display by the state government Rejoy2003 18:17, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Rejoy2003: freedom of panorama in India does not apply to 2-D items, please read COM:FOP India. Verbcatcher (talk) 16:21, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Rejoy2003: "No claim of copyright" is insufficient. Please read Commons:Licensing before you upload any more files. Verbcatcher (talk) 09:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
- See [2] There appears to be no claim of copyright whatsoever. The Goa state government has built this sort of "memorial place" in public interest. I suggest we keep it or maybe relicense Rejoy2003 06:49, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per COM:FOP India: Not OK. For copyrighted 2D (paintings, drawings, maps, pictures, engravings, etc.). --Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Invalid copyright declaration, the description includes "Released under the Creative Commons 3.0 attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license." Non-commercial license are not acceptable on commons, see COM:L. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:19, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Moreover, the authorship is unreliable, the declared author Frederick Noronha appears to conflict with the description "From the archives of Luis Assis Correia", but Correia is not the photographer because he is one of the people shown in the photo. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:21, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Also delete the cropped version File:Reita Faria in Africa (cropped).jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep File is released under multiple licenses. Also the author is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rejoy2003 (talk • contribs) 12:31, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete "Released under the Creative Commons 3.0 attribution, non-commercial, share-alike license. Some rights reserved. Conditions for non-commercial reuse: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/" which is in the description on Flickr is clear that the intended license is CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0 which is not compatible with Commons. Ravensfire (talk) 15:14, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep like I said above there's "multiple licensing" it doesnt only come under CC-NC-SA 3.0. If that was the case why would the flickr uploader upload it under CC-SA-2.0? Lol. The above comment of Ravensfire stands baseless. Rejoy2003 05:44, 11 October 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Rejoy2003 uploads from Frederick Norohnha which covered images from this Flickr account and was closed as delete. Ravensfire (talk) 17:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Confusing licensing, but CC-NC-SA is clealy intended imho. In addition I wonder whether this is an own photo. Probably dates from 1966, not 2011. --Ellywa (talk) 21:20, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
- Restored: for the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/Rejoy2003 uploads from Frederick Norohnha. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
There are discrepancies due to the shape of the figure linked to the O, since it does not appear to be a simple text and could have reached the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
There are discrepancies due to the shape of the figure linked to the O, since it does not appear to be a simple text and could have reached the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 23:12, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
There are discrepancies due to the shape of the figure linked to the O, since it does not appear to be a simple text and could have reached the threshold of originality. Taichi (talk) 23:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
This image is copied from a 2017 webpage of the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation [3] ([4]). The uploader to Commons in February 2022 claimed to be a relative of the subject and that he took the photo used by the CBC. It was explained to him that evidence was required and how it can be provided. See User talk:Rjcream#File:Elliemoonimage.jpg. It is now six months later and evidence is not provided. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
![[4]](https://i.cbc.ca/1.4382331.1509559756!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_1180/sex-truth-audio-tape-ellie-moon.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: no evidence of permission. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:10, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyvio, CC licensing claim highly doubtful. The logo is used throughout the publisher's website http://ketabekoolehposhti.com/ and social media https://www.instagram.com/ketabekoolehposhti/ . User has uploaded at least one obvious copyvio before as 'own work' (File:ریچل بریتن در جزیره آروبا.jpg). JustAnotherArchivist (talk) 21:03, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
This map is irrelevant. constituency boundries are not visible and map is very rough Saad Ali Khan Pakistan (talk) 21:13, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Error in the first identification of the name of the sanctuary Pompilos (talk) 21:18, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Too poor quality comparing to other pictures of this person (see Category:Anna Malihon). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 21:39, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:49, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Can this building and this statue be applied {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}}? Otherwise, this image should be deleted because there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Ox1997cow (talk) 18:29, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:07, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Author request; Likely Copyright Violation WeaponizingArchitecture (talk) 04:33, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Flags of official administrative boundaries in the United States are usually (or always) PD. --Adamant1 (talk) 22:25, 29 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep based on what Adamant1 says. It does indeed seem to be true. Flagvisioner (talk) 01:00, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note Appears on the official website of Macomb County. Ellywa (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence for PD given. --Krd 13:27, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
No Tasnim logo can be seen in the image. More probably this image doesn't belong to TasnimNews agency. Rohalamin (talk) 05:42, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:24, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
