Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/28
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
This must be a joke. One of the people's heads substituted by a cat picture, 3/4 of the picture amateurishly blurred, the result being a horrible quality image. Worst of all: If people or objects are not o.k. with being published here, then don't do so in the first place. --217.239.11.59 11:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete It doesn't really matter if they people in the photograph are OK with it being published here. That said, the image serves zero educational purpose and Commons isn't a personal file host. So the image should be deleted on those grounds alone if nothing else. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. We agree on the goal. However, I also think that personality rights do matter a lot. Commons has the responsibility to protect people's rights, and even more so for people who are currently in a war situation. --217.239.11.59 12:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: from https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=399421948896001&set=pcb.399422952229234. --Achim55 (talk) 14:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
AABVSKS SSNSL S 181.64.93.22 18:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 19:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Clear Flickr washing. This image was made by the fashion company Chaumet and Chaumet clearly states that its photographs are protected under copyright source
(https://twitter.com/yifeinews/status/1343767316266250241) 27.57.10.49 03:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 09:13, 28 July 2022 UTC: Clear Flickr washing. This image was made by the fashion company Chaumet and Chaumet clearly states that its photographs are protected under copyright source (https://twitter.com/yifeinews/status/1343767316266250241) --Krdbot 01:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb size photo with no META, most likely from website. Pierre cb (talk) 23:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Very low quality dupe of File:2207 GLH asciopolis-01view-03 copy.jpg slightly cropped. --Achim55 (talk) 11:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb photo with no META likely from a website, not the uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 23:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Very low quality dupe of File:Cyril Ramaphosa e Michel Temer 2 (cropped).jpg slightly cropped. --Achim55 (talk) 11:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb size photo without META, unlikely uploader owned. Pierre cb (talk) 23:14, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Very low quality dupe of File:Ford GT Mustang P5201092.jpg slightly cropped. --Achim55 (talk) 11:42, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb size photos without META, unlikely uploader owned. Pierre cb (talk) 23:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Very low quality dupe of File:2011 Ford Ranger XLT -- NHTSA.jpg slightly cropped. --Achim55 (talk) 11:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb size image without META, unlikely uploader owned. Pierre cb (talk) 23:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=3475481332491899&set=ecnf.100054673950219. --Achim55 (talk) 13:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb size photo likely from website. Pierre cb (talk) 23:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & spam. --Achim55 (talk) 13:31, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb size photo likely from website. Pierre cb (talk) 23:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & spam. --Achim55 (talk) 13:32, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Thumb size photo without META, likely from website. Pierre cb (talk) 23:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Low quality dupe of File:2207 GLH asciopolis-03view-02 copy.jpg slightly cropped. --Achim55 (talk) 13:20, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Clearly a thumb size photo extracted from website. Pierre cb (talk) 23:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, from https://www.facebook.com/Assupol-102004318288808/. --Achim55 (talk) 13:17, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Image widely used online but no indication that it is licenced under cc-by-sa-4.0 as claimed by uploader. Nthep (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Elcobbola at 16:31, 29 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) --Krdbot 19:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
No valid license Shinohara Chihiro (talk) 22:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 13:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
PORQUE ME EQUIVOQUÉ CON LA LICENCIA QUE ME PERMITIÓ EL AUTOR Y QUIERO SUBIRLO NUEVAMENTE CON LA LICENCIA CORRECTA Normaminn (talk) 21:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Appears to be ineligible for Commons. Per discussion on Help desk the pertinent license does not allow commercial use or derivatives. - Jmabel ! talk 18:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, as explained above.
Personal junk Dronebogus (talk) 01:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shobhitsrivastavaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images that are outside the scope of this project. Commons is not a web hosting platform
- File:SHOBHITSRII.jpg
- File:SHOBHITT.jpg
- File:SHOBHIT.jpg
- File:Shobhitsrivasrte.jpg
- File:Shobhitsriavstava9959535.jpg
- File:Shobhitsriavstavaaaa.jpg
- File:Shobhitsriavstavaaaaa.jpg
- File:Shobhitsriavstavaaaaaa.jpg
- File:Shobhitsriavstavaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg
- File:Shobhit sriavstavaa.jpg
- File:Shobhit srivatsva.jpg
- File:Shobhitsriavstava12.jpg
- File:Shobhitsriavstava3454.jpg
- File:Shobhitsrivastava43.jpg
- File:Shobhit221.jpg
Herby talk thyme 07:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per NOTHOST or whatever it is. Plus the images are probably OOS since they have zero educational value. --Adamant1 (talk) 10:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Personal artwork? not used, not in scope, small size, the only upload of user Avron (talk) 07:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:56, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional intent. Several variations have been uploaded in the last week by two users with no other unrelated edits to this app. MexTDT (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional intent. Several variations have been uploaded in the last week by two users with no other unrelated edits to this app. MexTDT (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional intent. Several variations have been uploaded in the last week by two users with no other unrelated edits to this app. MexTDT (talk) 07:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Promotional intent. Several variations have been uploaded in the last week by two users with no other unrelated edits to this app. MexTDT (talk) 07:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:57, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope PDF spam for some "investment" company. Rosenzweig τ 08:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Fake logo, non-existent video game. StomboyCarGeek (talk) 09:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:58, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DatamanUSA Colorado (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be be part of advertisment. Due to the small size of the image not usable
- File:Cococo.jpg
- File:Datamanusa123.jpg
- File:CommercialColor.png
- File:StateAndLocalColor.png
- File:FederalColor.png
- File:Staffing services.jpg
Avron (talk) 10:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:01, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:05, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused random company logo, out of COM:SCOPE. (Doubtful own work but possibly below COM:TOO.) -M.nelson (talk) 23:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable company; out of COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 23:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused photo of a non-notable individual; out of COM:SCOPE. Also, questionable own work claim. -M.nelson (talk) 23:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused images/logos of a non-notable software company; out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:LogoVertical.svg
- File:Group 26.svg
- File:InsightCat1.png
- File:InsightCat.png
- File:InsightCat full-stack monitoring solution.png
-M.nelson (talk) 23:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:03, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914)
[edit]Principal author is - :- Carruthers, Douglas, 1882-1962, and the scanned edition was published in London.
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592117149).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592157960).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592161080).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592197830).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592228079).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592272648).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592302880).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592341018).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592385338).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592397910).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592464239).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592471478).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592490647).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592492727).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592499577).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14592521627).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14755889526).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14756017586).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14756026536).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14756029456).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14756093736).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14775951621).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14775986081).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14776654204).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14776655034).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14776706844).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14776749414).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14776763324).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14776781384).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14778466912).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14778555212).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14778735132).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14778853055).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14778940505).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14779103555).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (1914) (14779117195).jpg
- File:Unknown Mongolia - a record of travel and exploration in north-west Mongolia and Dzungaria (IA unknownmongoliar01carr).pdf
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment, 1962 + 70 + 1 = 2033, so Undelete then. Note that laws can change and if in the future the UK updates is laws to extend the copyright (which is very likely) then please update the category below. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:01, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:02, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Spellpheniox2 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Doubtful own work - 3 of them have very small filesize and no exif, another is a professional portrait. These were used in a declined draft en:Draft:Samrat_Pharmachem_Limited_(1) so are likely out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:SPL-FH 2021.png
- File:SPL - Iodine.jpg
- File:SPL-Directors.jpg
- File:SPL-Office.jpg
- File:SPL-Factory.jpg
-M.nelson (talk) 23:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:32, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Smaller photos with no metadata from a proven copyright violator and fraudster.
- File:ARCHITECTURE2(1).jpg
- File:ARCHITECTURE2.jpg
- File:A person who works Motobike Taxi.jpg
- File:ARCHITECTURE1.jpg
- File:RIVER.jpg
- File:MIRROR "A".jpg
- File:A HOUSE NEAR THE RIVER.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Honestly it's hard to say if they are copyvio or not, but it's probably better to air on the safe side and delete the images anyway given the users history. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:20, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Margins are too large to be useful. These files have already been properly cropped and re-uploaded as File:6-Methyl-2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde Structual Formula V2.svg and File:4-Pyridinecarboxaldehyde Structual Formula V2.svg. The unused inferior versions are therefore no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 13:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both files per nom since there are corrected replacements available. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: both per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Irrelevant & unused, same image already exists @ Google Play Store badge EN.svg Tytygh55 (talk) 00:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Wdwd (talk) 10:21, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Per request off wiki. The uploader uploaded another version (WikiCon Brasil 2022 Painel de Educação Fernanda Zucki.pdf), without some images they didn't want to include. EPorto (WMB) (talk) 01:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Question What's the difference between the two files? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: This one has personal photos on the third page. EPorto (WMB) (talk) 23:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Thanks, yes, I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:24, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Cropped from a bigger photo - see https://www.full-stop.net/2018/03/28/interviews/john-farley/noah-cicero/ - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 07:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
File:Master Vergil-an anthology of poems in English on Vergil and Vergilian themes, (IA mastervergilanan00nitc).pdf
[edit]Contains work by - McCormick, Virginia T. (1873-1957) and Deutsch, Babette (1895-1982), which may be subject to seperate copyright from compiled work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission(s). --Wdwd (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 09:34, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nobin Sadik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from FB per MD, needs OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Found online in 2020 - https://english.sakshi.com/news/entertainment/rumoured-bigg-boss-4-contestant-takes-divorce-123563 - needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-82646-0001, Friedensfahrt, Mannschaft aus Bulgarien (Ненчо Христов).jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
spam and promotion. Also questionable license. Gymnicus (talk) 10:10, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mike Peel (talk) 22:20, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Keep This file was initially tagged by Taichi as no source (No source since) Wilfredor. It was a handmade painting made from all the photos that are on this page with a personal interpretation of the face of Carmen Clemente Travieso. As it is an interpretation and not a copy of any of her images, it should not be considered a copyright violation. I did this because I was part of a painting Wikiproject among several other users to be able to cover articles with my own paintings (talk) 13:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Own work, no source needed - no valid reason for deletion. -- Darwin Ahoy! 15:34, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
High likelihood of Copyright infringement: Despite claims that the image is from the 1800s and therefore in the public domain, image has clear digital artifacts, actual source (linked as Immediate source) is a Facebook post and stated source is a living person who I cannot find in the linked original source. EmeraldRange (talk) 01:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
On the face of it, this seems like a case forI don't think you can copyright a scan. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC) Keeping.- Well I guess my question is if facebook post images are copyrighted as the source is purportedly a Facebook post photo and not necessarily a scan. Again, there's no verifiability on the actual source of the image. EmeraldRange (talk) 17:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- True. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also corrupted file. --Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Willian Prieto Nunes Leite (talk · contribs)
[edit]One of the things that Wikimedia Commons is not, it's not a personal photo album. Here we have six personal photos, odd sizes, no real reason to keep all of them. Strange distortions too as if they were resized without thinking.
- File:WILLIAN PRIETO NUNES LEITE.png
- File:Willian Prieto.png
- File:WILLIAN PRIETO NUNES.jpg
- File:Willian Prieto Nunes Leitee.png
- File:Willian Prieto.jpg
- File:Willian Prieto Nunes Leite.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
Chemistry-related gallery pages
[edit]Over a month ago I asked about this issue on WikiProject Chemistry talk page with only one answer (Leyo). I can only repeat my motivation here and request the deletion of 39 galleries about chemical substances. All that I stumbled upon curating WD data.
- Meta-Xylene
- Ortho-Xylene
- Para-Xylene
- Potassium ferricyanide
- Toluene
- Dinitrogen tetroxide
- Pentane
- Paracetamol
- Octane
- Morphine
- Methane
- Menthol
- Luminol
- Malonic acid
- Acetic acid
- Pyruvic acid
- Tartaric acid
- Abscisic acid
- Xylitol
- Cocaine
- Ibogaine
- Imidazole
- Heroin
- Heptane
- Gefitinib
- Galactose
- LSD
- Carbon dioxide
- NaCl
- Butane
- Acetic anhydride
- Berberine
- Epinephrine
- Amphetamine
- Anthracene
- Aspartame
- Acetone
- Ethyne
- Citric acid
Such galleries are a relic of the past. Only a few of them had any meaningful edit in the last 10 years, many were not edited (except bots and technical edits) after creation in the late 2000s. Also, only a few have any meaningful arrangement of content, most have 1–5 random (from present point of view) files. These galleries are unmaintained, have no use and no educational purpose. Moreover, the sections that exists in some galleries seems to be much better reflected in subcategories – like Category:Chemical structure diagrams of acetic acid, Category:Chemical structure of methane. In other words, with the resources we have, it is much more constructive to maintain categories, with limiting the number of files by removing redundant duplicates (what we do anyway on a regular basis) or creating additional subcategories. Maintaining galleries in the same time – that introduce no additional advantages – is just counterproductive. The existence of galleries was not a big problem in the past (these pages just hung in categories and were not visited) and wouldn't be right now, however, here comes Wikidata. In WD items the main sitelink to Commons will always be a page, not a category. In many situations it may be correct, but in this case – it is not. Sitelinks from Wikidata are exported to other Wikimedia projects and outside Wikimedia. And what the readers get from it? A link to a crappy page that was not edited for about 10 years and have a bunch of random files. They may not know that there are also galleries, that there are more files about this topic. Even if they know, these pages are the worst showpiece of this project. Wostr (talk) 17:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- If your concern is how WikiData displays it, the logical fix might not be to delete what you don't want displayed, but to advocate there to change what is prioritised when displaying commons information... Effeietsanders (talk) 17:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- If the problem was only WD then I would try to find a solution there and i wouldn't bother here (despite the fact that changes in WD in this regard are, in my opinion, not possible, as I tried once to change it). In fact, what shows up in WD is just a Commons problem. Wostr (talk) 09:38, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Deleted all the galleries. An example of the non-maintenance is Carbon dioxide, where the gallery is titled “Photos”. However, only 1 out of 15 images is actually a photograph. --Leyo 21:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Delete all, we have categories of these chemicals which are used nowadays. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:32, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all. Categories display what we have automatically. Galleries must be manually currated, but there's no clear basis for that task (some have many equivalent rather than a variety "best of" each style or type of detail) and nobody seems to care enough to do it. Nor are they updated when new or better images become available. They therefore they continue to decay. DMacks (talk) 03:35, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. As other commenters have noted, these pages no longer serve any need and because of their lack of maintenance may actually present more harm than good. Marbletan (talk) 20:01, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:45, 26 August 2022 (UTC)
It's not a copyvio so regular deletion policy should be applied ZYXTL (talk) 11:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Published previously @ https://www.facebook.com/MahboobAlamMLA/photos/a.709536325731912/3743180395700808/?type=3, so Delete unless COM:VRT procedure is done. --Achim55 (talk) 17:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 10:33, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for modern sculpture. Xunks (talk) 18:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 05:56, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded a new one Fidelreyiz (talk) 09:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Fidelreyiz, please link the new one so we can judge whether it's better to our ears. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:41, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The "new one" is File:People's Republic of the Congo - Les Trois Glorieuses.ogg. Since the deletion of this file was requested by the uploader shortly after upload and it is most likely a copyvio as well, I have deleted it. --Rosenzweig τ 22:01, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Elaimon (talk) 22:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:04, 3 September 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial logo --Krdbot 19:05, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
This is an old logo of a privately owned and operated football club. As such it violates copyright laws in the country it originated from. Kj1595 (talk) 01:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per the licensing section of the file. See, also, Commons:Threshold of originality for more.--Εὐθυμένης (talk) 08:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
This is an old logo of a privately owned and operated football club. As such it violates copyright laws in the country it originated from. Kj1595 (talk) 01:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per the licensing section of the file. See, also, Commons:Threshold of originality for more.--Εὐθυμένης (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
This is an old logo of a privately owned and operated football club. As such it violates copyright laws in the country it originated from. Kj1595 (talk) 01:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per the licensing section of the file. See, also, Commons:Threshold of originality for more.--Εὐθυμένης (talk) 08:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:09, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
I am the copyright holder and did not upload this to Wikimedia Commons. In the Extended Details in the metadata, it is clearly stated All Rights Reserved. I am Steve Markos, and this came from my website npplan.com. 24.158.254.160 17:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
I am the copyright holder and did not upload this to Wikimedia Commons. In the Extended Details in the metadata, it is clearly stated All Rights Reserved. I am Steve Markos, and this came from my website npplan.com. 24.158.254.160 17:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC) 24.158.254.160 17:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Yes it does. I'm sorry that happened. Delete. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:06, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake XonamvongchukRjr (talk) 18:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:05, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Die Grafik habe ich selbst gezeichnet. Sie ist auch als Schemazeichnung zu unrealistisch in den Maßen. Ich habe eine neue gemacht: File:Sehwinkel 4.png. Die alte ist redundant, wird auch nirgends mehr verwendet. Sciencia58 (talk) 21:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
The graphic is my own work. It is to unrealistic in dimensions even as a schematic drawing. I made a new one: File:Sehwinkel 4.png. The old one is redundant, not used anywhere anymore. Sciencia58 (talk) 21:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:04, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
from google maps or so, but not own work as stated Avron (talk) 10:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- You can actually see a rather poor attempt to get rid of the word Google when you zoom in on the image. Delete. everyone's favorite Blua lago
(let's have a chat y'all) 22:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
![64 File:Artwork for single release "See The Sun" by Isaiah Brown.jpg](#File:Artwork_for_single_release_"See_The_Sun"_by_Isaiah_Brown.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14592117149).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592157960).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592161080).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592197830).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592228079).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592272648).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592302880).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592341018).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592385338).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592397910).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592464239).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592471478).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592490647).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592492727).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592499577).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14592521627).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14755889526).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14756017586).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14756026536).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14756029456).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14756093736).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14775951621).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14775986081).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14776654204).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14776655034).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14776706844).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14776749414).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14776763324).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14776781384).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14778466912).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14778555212).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14778735132).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14778853055).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14778940505).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14779103555).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14779117195).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:30, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
There is a newer version of this slide. Robert Neustadter (talk) 15:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 22:29, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation, see metadata Xocolatl (talk) 16:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:25, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
clearly a copyviol: photo by Mark Sutton / Motorsport Images, no indication about a free release — danyele 16:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:23, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters (1919)
[edit]One of the Principal authors is :- Stern, Ernest Julian, 1876-1954 and this was published within the EU (Germany). Not necessarily out of copyright
- File:Alexander Moissi in 'Jedermann'.jpg
- File:Auguste Pünkösdy und Hermann Thimig im 'Doppelselbstmord'.png
- File:Auguste Pünkösdy.png
- File:Camilla Eibenschütz in 'Turandot'.jpg
- File:Dantons Tod - Vor dem Revolutionstribunal.jpg
- File:Der blaue Vogel - Das Brot.jpg
- File:Der blaue Vogel - Fette Freude.jpg
- File:Eduard von Winterstein in 'Jedermann'.jpg
- File:Else Eckersberg (1919).jpg
- File:Else Eckersberg und Johannes Riemann in 'Fasching'.jpg
- File:Else Heims als 'Minna von Barnhelm'.jpg
- File:Emil Jannings in 'Weh dem, der lügt!'.jpg
- File:Ernst Deutsch in Reinhard Sorges 'Der Bettler', 1917.png
- File:Ernst Stern - Die Erscheinung Ariels (aus Der Sturm).jpg
- File:Ernst Stern - König Ödipus.jpg
- File:Ernst Stern - Moritatensänger aus 'Das Jahrmarktsfest zu Plundersweilern'.jpg
- File:Ernst Stern - Wallensteins Lager.jpg
- File:Gertrud Eysoldt als Katze im 'Blauen Vogel'.jpg
- File:Hans Pagay als Klosterbruder in Lessings 'Nathan der Weise'.png
- File:Hans Wassmann in 'Viel Lärm um nichts'.jpg
- File:Helene Thimig in Reinhard Sorges 'Der Bettler', 1917.png
- File:Hermine Körner in 'Maria Stuart'.jpg
- File:Johanna Terwin in 'Was ihr wollt'.jpg
- File:Leopoldine Konstantin als Tänzerin in 'Sumurun'.jpg
- File:Lillebil Christensen im Ballet 'Die Schäferinnen'.png
- File:Lucie Höflich im 'Weibsteufel'.jpg
- File:Max Pallenberg und Else Lehmann im 'Biberpelz'.jpg
- File:Orestie - Vor dem Palast.jpg
- File:Paul Hartmann in 'Volk in Not'.jpg
- File:Paul Wegener in 'Vertauschte Seelen'.jpg
- File:Penthesilea (Kleist) - Amazone.jpg
- File:Penthesilea (Kleist) - Der Zorn des Achilles, Schiffsbild.jpg
- File:Rappelkopf (Max Pallenberg).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (1919) (14586713220).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (1919) (14586775479).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (1919) (14750530356).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (1919) (14771083314).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (1919) (14771170734).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (1919) (14793297933).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (1919) (14793338243).jpg
- File:Reinhardt und seine Bühne, Bilder von der Arbeit des Deutschen Theaters; (IA reinhardtundsein00steruoft).pdf
- File:Rosa Bertens als Mutter im 'Scheiterhaufen'.png
- File:Victor Arnold als 'George Dandin'.jpg
- File:Werner Krauß als St. Just in 'Dantons Tod'.jpg
- File:Wilhelm Diegelmann im 'Lebenden Leichnam'.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Amazone.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Der_Zorn_des_Achilles,_Schiffsbild.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586713220).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14586775479).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14750530356).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14771083314).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14771170734).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14793297933).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14793338243).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Isn't the author the person who writes the text? An anonymous photographer took the images unless credited. There is also a mix of drawings in different styles and photos. Wouldn't they be "PD-EU-no author disclosure"> --RAN (talk) 04:13, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: all the drawings, per nomination, as works of Stern; also deleted the book PDF file. Kept several photographs which I could positively identify as the work of photographers who died over 70 years ago, deleted the others. The photographers were not "anonymous", they were actually summarily credited at the end of the book text, unfortunately without telling us who did which photographs. Many of these photographs were also produced as collectible cards however, with credits, so I could identify them. There are more cards out there which I could not find or that are not on the internet, so the probability that the photographers are credited on such a card is high. And that is all that is needed for the works not to be anonymous accd. to the German law valid for all works before July 1995. The Stern drawings can be restored in 2025, the photographs and the book PDF in 2039 with {{PD-old-assumed}} (the book was first published in 1918, this is a later 1919 edition). --Rosenzweig τ 09:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Modern album poster. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide us with COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 09:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:42, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright holder is indicated in bottom right of image. Danbloch (talk) 02:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is an official chart made by the british think tank Resolution Foundation, dated October 2021, and includes all generations, even Generation Alpha, this is a more recent chart than Pew's, which it is why i think you should not delete it. Historiador1993 (talk) 02:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- The issue here is that Resolution Foundation holds the copyright on this image so Wikipedia can't use it. Danbloch (talk) 02:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- This looks quite simple to me. Yann (talk) 19:31, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Delete per Danbloch, Yann. - Jmabel ! talk 15:03, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
Modern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide us with COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 09:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
![09:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/28#c-Adamant1-20220728092400-File:Artwork_for_single_release_"See_The_Sun"_by_Isaiah_Brown.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
![20:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/07/28#c-Андрей_Романенко-20220912200100-File:Artwork_for_single_release_"See_The_Sun"_by_Isaiah_Brown.jpg){kind=link}
Modern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide us with COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 09:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 20:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Modern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide us with COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: G10. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:19, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Filmwise condensation of steam on low integral-finned tubes. (IA filmwisecondensa00geor).pdf
[edit]Author is - Ioannis V. Georgiadis, who is not a Federal Employee or serving US military personnel. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- ShakespeareFan00: This item got deleted as part of a separate request. Could you please put in an undeletion request for this item? It was published in 1984 without a license and without subsequent notice; thus, it is
PD-US-1978-89. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:04, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-US-1978-89}}. See also [2]. --Yann (talk) 18:13, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
I was unable to verify license given at source of IMDB... I think perhaps this is a copyright violation as it was taken by Mindy Tucker from whom no OTRS is recorded. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
Modern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 09:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by OptimusPrimeBot as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Hooge_Crater_Cemetery_Flanders_-_Further_Unknowns_-_Redvers.jpg — billinghurst sDrewth 11:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @Billinghurst: Any reason for this nomination? —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: treated as duplicate. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The claimed PD license requires publication (not merely being taken) between 1927 and 1963. No evidence is given of publication during that period. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Map seems to have copyright, not created by uploader/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No indication of CC license information at source given. Unlikely free image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused doodle sketch. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused poor photo of nondescript water, no context, nothing meaningful to see, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The logo is from Facebook and probably above COM:TOO. So the image should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless the uploader can provide evidence that it's released under a free license. Adamant1 (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:07, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
No indication of CC4.0 license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
No indication of CC license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Source is a newspaper "El Mercurio" Unlikely free image more likely copyright the original author. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Small size, low quality, no metadata, unlikely own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
This was first published in 1933, so {{PD-old-100}} is not valid. It is unclear if any other free license applies. ✗plicit 00:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I added the correct license PD-Finland. --RAN (talk) 04:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)--RAN (talk) 04:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): {{PD-Finland}} may be a proper country-of-origin copyright tag, but a U.S. copyright tag would also be needed. Toohool (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be subject to URAA restoration, as a foreign work that was still under copyright in its country of origin in 1996. It would therefore be under copyright in the U.S. for 95 years from publication, and would enter the PD in 2029. Toohool (talk) 15:59, 10 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
because im not admin Hovigkoyounian (talk) 19:12, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question OK, so? What's your deletion reason? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:26, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 20:49, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
i cant delete because not admin 213.175.160.45 23:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Am I right in presuming that you're the same user as User:Hovigkoyounian, who uploaded the same file and then got a courtesy deletion yesterday, and that by uploading the same file again and again nominating it for deletion, you're playing games and wasting our time? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bookscatsmusickiwis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies.
- File:The Fabulous Thunderbirds filming a video at Liberace's house in Las Vegas, 1987.jpg
- File:Fran Christina behind the kit he custom-built at Antone's in Austin.jpg
🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 21:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by User:Krd. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:03, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Dubious own work claims - two of these seem to be screenshots from the movie en:Star Wars (film)
-M.nelson (talk) 22:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING - the packaging design is presumably copyrighted. A similar image is hosted at https://www.freewater.io/media/media-assets/ labeled © 2022 Copyright FreeWater All Rights Reserved. -M.nelson (talk) 22:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Because I noticed that there's a white line on the flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 23:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Fix the file and upload the corrected version on the same page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:49, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:01, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by MelbourneStar as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3 – Hoax: this is not a real flag. In my opinion the flag is a hoax, but as it was kept after regular DR, I allow discussion. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 23 March 2023 (UTC)
Because it's a copy of a flag. ThePartOfLife123 (talk) 23:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Question I'm sorry, what's your basis for deletion? Please be clearer. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:46, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment No, I get it: It's because of the white line at the bottom of the flag. Why don't you just fix the image and upload an edited version? There's no need to nominate an image for deletion when you can edit it suitably. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:48, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:02, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Personal avatar with no use value Thyj (talk) 11:26, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:15, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Advertising/self-promotional Senator2029 16:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination, plus COM:NETCOPYVIO seems to apply because the image is easily found on multiple websites and is probably falsely claimed as own work. Marbletan (talk) 15:09, 30 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:08, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Headlock0225 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: See Com:Toys King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
Advertising/self-promotional. Not used on any WMF project. Senator2029 19:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:06, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused low quality photo of nondescript dog, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. Superseded by numerous better alternatives already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, clearly out of scope. everyone's favorite Blua lago(let's have a chat y'all) 22:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Dogs are not out of scope, it's just that the photo sucks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- We know that. Obviously, when we say "out of scope" it refers to the quality of the photo, not the topic. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:14, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- That's not obvious at all. There are lots of requests to delete perfectly good photos because someone lacks the imagination to understand how broad the scope of human knowledge covered by Wikimedia is. It's clearest to use plain language. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:22, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, OOS. Low res, out of focus, unclear subject. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, as dog pictures of better quality are abundant on Commons. --Webfil (talk) 13:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:04, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is an old logo of a privately owned and operated football club. As such it violates copyright laws in the country it originated from. Kj1595 (talk) 01:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per the licensing section of the file. See, also, Commons:Threshold of originality for more.--Εὐθυμένης (talk) 13:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
This is a logo of a privately operated sports association. As such it violates copyright laws in the country it originated from. Kj1595 (talk) 02:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:20, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
It's extremely doubtful this logo is below the threshold of originality or that it's the uploaders own work since it comes from Facebook. So it should be deleted as copyvio unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Adamant1 (talk) 09:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
This image is from Facebook and there's zero evidence that it was released under a free license. So it should be deleted as copyvio unless someone can provide evidence to the contrary. Same goes for File:Alba Reche en Les Arts 2022.jpg.
Adamant1 (talk) 09:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Image of a modern album cover that comes from Facebook. So likely copyvio unless the uploader can provide COM:VRT permission to use it. Same goes for the following files.
Adamant1 (talk) 09:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:22, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The image comes from Instagram and there's zero evidence that it was released under a free license or otherwise hostable on Commons. Adamant1 (talk) 10:31, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:23, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Likeky license laundering.
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879683904).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879688764).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879745644).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879812164).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19880760304).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19880763654).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19881482743).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19881566603).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19881585233).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20314311510).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20314345670).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20314420470).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315352670).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315372930).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315693829).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315754089).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315804199).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315835889).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315864559).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20476135646).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20477207086).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20477218196).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20493569322).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20493580872).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20493602482).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20502502485).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20502566885).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20503458305).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20503466485).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509768381).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509779841).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509786481).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509789121).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509794101).jpg
_(19879683904).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19879688764).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19879745644).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19879812164).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19880760304).jpg){kind=link}
_(19880763654).jpg){kind=link}
_(19881482743).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19881566603).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19881585233).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20314311510).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20314345670).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20314420470).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20315352670).jpg){kind=link}
_(20315372930).jpg){kind=link}
_(20315693829).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20315754089).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20315804199).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20315835889).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20315864559).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20476135646).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20477207086).jpg){kind=link}
_(20477218196).jpg){kind=link}
_(20493569322).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20493580872).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20493602482).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20502502485).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20502566885).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20503458305).jpg){kind=link}
_(20503466485).jpg){kind=link}
_(20509768381).jpg){kind=link}
_(20509779841).jpg){kind=link}
_(20509786481).jpg){kind=link}
_(20509789121).jpg){kind=link}
_(20509794101).jpg){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 17:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- License laundering? I can't find a copyright notice so {{PD-US-1978-89}} seems to apply. --Fæ (talk) 17:18, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment @Fæ: naturally, I did not imply it was your laundering
. — Racconish 💬 17:33, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn per Fæ. — Racconish 💬 17:38, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
These originate in a 1979 US publication, Post 1978 works did not need a notice, and thus I fail to see why these would be public domain.
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879683904).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879688764).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879745644).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19879812164).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19880760304).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19880763654).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19881482743).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19881566603).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (19881585233).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20314311510).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20314345670).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20314420470).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315352670).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315372930).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315693829).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315754089).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315804199).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315835889).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20315864559).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20476135646).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20477207086).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20477218196).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20493569322).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20493580872).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20493602482).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20502502485).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20502566885).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20503458305).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20503466485).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509768381).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509779841).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509786481).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509789121).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1979) (20509794101).jpg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:59, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Are you claiming that they were in fact registered with the Copyright Office? If not, the lack of a notice does make these public domain during that publication year. Dominic (talk) 17:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Post 1978 works didn't need a notice or registration as I understand it. If you can show otherwise please update the relevant license tags. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @ShakespeareFan00: Please see COM:HIRTLE and Template:PD-US-1978-89. Dominic (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- These issues and the 1980 issues are being renominated for deletion after having been closed as kept on 21 May 2021, so it's only appropriate to ping the closers and participants in those discussions. Any comments, User:Racconish and User:Fae? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- @ShakespeareFan00: Please see COM:HIRTLE and Template:PD-US-1978-89. Dominic (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Post 1978 works didn't need a notice or registration as I understand it. If you can show otherwise please update the relevant license tags. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:36, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:16, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
The Exif information says the images author is Atelier Lumière and there's zero evidence that they are the uploader or released it under a free license. Adamant1 (talk) 10:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
he uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
he uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
odern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 10:30, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:32, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 10:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:08, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:46, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:48, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong license (is owned by organization, not CC) A8B (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- false report, please remove deletion request. A8B (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
1996 Work of US publication, This cannot be public domain given the stated date, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Another botched attribution by the Internet Archive. De728631 (talk) 15:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
With Twitter as a source, it's unlikely the license is correct. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
Fake image taken from untrustworthy russian site liveinternet.ru. This is black-and-white version of Giuseppe Sarti's portrait by Salvatore Tonci: File:Giuseppe Sarti (1729-1802).jpg Hoa binh (talk) 06:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep There's zero evidence that the image is a fake whatever that means. There's a chance it's just another version of the portrait. That is something that happens, people make other versions of portraits. It's not really a reason to delete something. Especially not just because it's hosted on a Russian website. Really, save the anti-Russian nonsense for another platform. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and rename. The attribution is incorrect, good detective work. I went ahead and renamed it, the old name should be deleted to prevent confusion, after the thread is closed. --RAN (talk) 04:58, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I know you deleted your comment about it so feel free to not answer this if you don't want to, but where do think the line is between a derivative work and a straight up "fake"? --Adamant1 (talk) 18:44, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- It looks like it is a misattribution by the Russian website. The website I now link to has the following information: "Portrait painted in 1873 by Cesare Mussini, after the original painting by Salvatore Tonci (Modern Gallery of the Pitti Palace) DR." It recognizes that it is a copy of the first painting, and you cleverly recognized the error. Some errors sit for years in Commons, thank you for fixing it. -RAN (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
I doubt the uploader is Jamie McCaffrey, on flickr it is CC BY-NC 2.0 [3] Avron (talk) 06:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:22, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo. Nanahuatl (talk) 06:58, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Modern art, would need OTRS from artist and scope? Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete, uploaded from a Flickr account that specialises in photographs of abandoned buildings, with few other photographs of similar artwork.[4] I suspect that this is a photograph of an painting found by the photographer in an abandoned building, possibly in the UK as the Flickr account holder is based in London. No evidence of permission from the artist, and COM:FOP UK would not apply. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:13, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:21, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Vivian's Lesson (1907)
[edit]Artwork by Hilda Gertrude Cowham (1873–1964) who was British. These are not out of copyright in the UK.
- File:Vivian's lesson (1907) (14566114459).jpg
- File:Vivian's lesson (1907) (14729766126).jpg
- File:Vivian's lesson (1907) (14749603321).jpg
- File:Vivian's lesson (1907) (14752450982).jpg
- File:Vivian's lesson (1907) (14752757995).jpg
_(14566114459).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14729766126).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14749603321).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14752450982).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14752757995).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The work from which these images originate was published in the U.S. in 1907, making the work (and these images)
PD-US-expired. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:55, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Images must be PD in both the US and country of origin, here the UK. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:27, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Russian portraits (1921)
[edit]All originate from a work whose principal author is Sheridan, Clare, 1885-1970 , published in the UK, These are not necessarily out of copyright in the UK.
- File:Bust of Trotsky. Image from page 201 of "Russian portraits" (1921) - 14761208484.jpg
- File:Bust of Zinoviev (profile). Image from page 123 of "Russian portraits" (1921) - 14783414513.jpg
- File:Clare Sheridan. Bust of Dsirjnsky (front view). Image from page 128 of "Russian portraits" (1921) - 14577090407.jpg
- File:Clare Sheridan. Bust of Dsirjnsky. Image from page 128 of "Russian portraits" (1921).jpg
- File:Clare Sheridan. Bust of Krassin. Image from page 31 of "Russian portraits" (1921).jpg
- File:Clare Sheridan. Bust of Lenin. Image from page 168 of "Russian portraits" (1921) - 14761201024.jpg
- File:Clare Sheridan. Bust of Lenin. Image from page 168 of "Russian portraits" (1921).jpg
- File:Clare Sheridan. Bust of Trotzky. Image from page 201 of "Russian portraits" (1921).jpg
- File:Clare Sheridan. Bust of Zinoviev. Image from page 123 of "Russian portraits" (1921).jpg
- File:Russian portraits (1921) (14576903069).jpg
- File:Russian portraits (1921) (14576913828).jpg
- File:Russian portraits (1921) (14576914608) (Sedov crop).jpg
- File:Russian portraits (1921) (14576914608).jpg
- File:Russian portraits (1921) (14783401153).jpg
- File:Russian portraits (1921) (14783416173).jpg
_-_14761208484.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Image_from_page_123_of_%22Russian_portraits%22_(1921)_-_14783414513.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
._Image_from_page_128_of_%22Russian_portraits%22_(1921)_-_14577090407.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_14761201024.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14576903069).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14576913828).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14576914608)_(Sedov_crop).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14576914608).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14783401153).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14783416173).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
These originate from a book by "Giulio Caprin (1880 – 1958), first published outside the United States. They are not necessarily out of copyright in Italy.
_(14595155210).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14781870115).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:47, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:33, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
These originate in a Norwegian published work by "Ørjan Mikael Olsen" (1885 - 1972), and are thus not necessarily out of copyright.
- File:Image from page 85 of "Til Jeneseis kilder; den Norske Sibirieskspeditions reise, 1914" (1915) (14784979645).jpg
- File:Til Jeneseis kilder; den Norske Sibirieskspeditions reise, 1914 (1915) (14598402058).jpg
_(14784979645).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14598402058).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:50, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- First published not later than 1915, no matter later publishings. Keep --Figure19 (talk) 11:07, 28 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Norwegian images must be PD in the US and Norway. Here, that means life+70. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
iNaturalist doesn't have Commons compatible licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:24, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Support, it would be better to say that the licence on iNaturalist has “All rights reserved” as the licence as some images do have compatible licences. Quetzal1964 (talk) 21:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- iNaturalist doesn't have Commons compatible licenses. on this particular image. The exceptions to the iNaturalist rules are so rare, I skipped being specific enough. Sorry! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:57, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:35, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Fl.schmitt as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No own work, previously published: https://www.enaex.com/era/en/davey-bickford-enaex-history/ - no attribution, no permission.
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external hit is younger and has lower resolution[5]. In addition, company-website suggests image to be from early 1900, whereby it might be in the public domain. -- Túrelio (talk) 18:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
![[5]](https://www.enaex.com/era/content/uploads/sites/12/2021/05/1908-Hery-texte-image-ordi-copie.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 02:24, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:39, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Failed blurry image, unused and unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Keep The image is categorized and on scope - and, BTW, I don't see any other images of that coastline. Being "unusable" just because it's somewhat blurry is just personal opinion. Not being used is not a valid reason for deletion as well. Therefore, keep.-- Darwin Ahoy! 20:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, regardless of anything else, images with watermarks are per se inadmissible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:20, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- No they're not? Watermarks can be removed if the image is properly licensed otherwise. DS (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Darwin and DS. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:38, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
This is a logo of a privately owned and operated football club. As such it violates copyright laws in the country it originated from. Kj1595 (talk) 02:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Obviously, not own work (the user uploaded a photo of himself, but it hadn't been taken by him) Vodolaz (talk) 06:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:29, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Seems to be beyond the threshold of originality (and therefore copyrighted?) VateGV ◦ taper la discut’ ◦ 07:33, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
This image was originally posted to Instagram in 2019, which is a few years before it was uploaded, and there's zero evidence that it was posted under a free license. Adamant1 (talk) 09:34, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
This image comes from a television interview. So it likely isn't the uploaders own work and is copyrighted. Same goes for the following images.
- File:Alba 2022.png
- File:Alba Reche 2022.png
- File:FRIv 77WYAEE7SF.jpg Adamant1 (talk) 09:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:37, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide us with COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 09:53, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
The uploader is the subject depicted in the image. So we need COM:VRT permission from the original photographer to host the file. Adamant1 (talk) 10:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Modern album cover. So likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide COM:VRT permission to use the image. Adamant1 (talk) 10:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
The image looks to be from a professional shot and comes from Facebook. So it's likely copyrighted unless the uploader can provide COM:VRT permission to host it. Adamant1 (talk) 10:15, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Pizza hut world map .png Heraldrist (talk) 12:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: other one was deleted and redirected. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:14, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
wrong date, probably copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 16:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:35, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Author is not found in a Google search. Uploader is very unlikely to have their own private satellite, therefore the source of satellite image is unknown and therefore it is not possible to decide if the satellite imagery licence is compatible with the licensing requirements of Wikimedia Commons. This image should be assumed to be not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. GeoWriter (talk) 22:17, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a professional promo photo, unlikely to be the uploader's own work. If the uploader is the photographer or copyright holder, they should provide permission to COM:VRT. -M.nelson (talk) 23:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable company; out of COM:SCOPE. -M.nelson (talk) 23:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mario20212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obvious scans or photos of printed materials.
- File:LAURA LAVRIC.jpg
- File:Justina Baluteanu.jpg
- File:Stefania Rares.jpg
- File:Maria-Pietraru.jpg
- File:Florea Țupa.jpg
- File:Marin Ghiocel.jpg
- File:Polina Manoila.jpg
- File:Maria Ciobanu 1964.jpg
- File:Maria Lătărețu.jpg
- File:Constantin badea.jpg
- File:Mariana Anghel.jpg
- File:Mariabutaciu1978discelectrecord999.jpg
- File:Rodica.bujor-1940.jpg
Gikü (talk) 19:08, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Since the DR started the user has uploaded 5 more problematic files: File:Maria Cornescu.jpg, File:Maria Cornescu si Nelu Balasoiu.jpg, File:Rodica-Dima.jpg, File:Polina-Manoila.jpg, File:Laura-lavric.jpg. Gikü (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: per COM:CV. --Sîmbotin (talk) 15:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:24, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mario20212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work on these two tiny image, one is an album cover the other is a photo of a performer.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: per COM:CV. --Sîmbotin (talk) 10:00, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete without any doubt and the uploader should be banned for recidivism. Gikü (talk) 20:40, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-RO-photo. Romania doesn't award copyright to portrait photographs and if it is "art" it gets 5 years protection. This was taken in 1967.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk • contribs) 23:30, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete File:Veta biris.jpg The image is clearly not from 1990 as she appears to be far too old for a 41 year old. A similar image (possibly from the same photo session) was posted online in 2019,[6] suggesting this one is from when she was in her 60s. For this file the 1990 date added by RAN and the corresponding PD tag are invalid. An alternative case for retention must be made. From Hill To Shore (talk) 03:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The first one is an album cover, not just a photograph, so it is subject to the regular law, which is pma 70. The second is a portrait and may or may not be PD. The copyright period is five years from "issuance" -- publication -- and we have no evidence of when it was first published. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per Jim. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mario20212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Older drawings of chickens, obviously not own work. There are reproduction artefacts and similar images were found on internet website http://www.leghorn.nl/index.php/leghorns-132/exchequer
- File:Portelan Italiana.jpg
- File:Herminat Deschis Italian.jpg
- File:Galbena Italiana.jpg
- File:Bief Italiana.jpg
- File:Albă cu șa roșie.jpg
- File:Barat italiana.jpg
- File:Albastra.jpg
- File:Neagra.jpg
- File:Italiana Alba.jpg
- File:Potârnichie.jpg
- File:Italiana Argintie.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete and block user for persistent violations of COM:L. Gikü (talk) 08:12, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mario20212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Obviously not own works, no evidence of a free license, or public domain. User blocked for copyvios.
- File:Polina Manoila 1975.jpg
- File:Gheorghe Turda.jpg
- File:Petrică Moise.jpg
- File:Felician Fărcășiu.jpg
- File:Maria Cornescu Discogs.jpg
- File:Maria Peter.jpg
- File:Ion Cristoreanu.jpg
- File:Aurelia Fătu Răduțu 1968.jpg
- File:Ana Pacatiuș.jpg
- File:Brahma 2022.jpg
- File:Blacksexlink..jpg
Yann (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the appear to meet "PD-RO-photo". Romania does not copyright ordinary portraiture and "art photos" were only given 5 years protection.
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Could you please update the license, and mention it here? Thanks, Yann (talk) 11:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Will do! --RAN (talk) 19:19, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Many of these images are cropped from music record covers available at www.discogs.com. As noted by Jameslwoodward in a previous discussion above, record covers are protected with 70 pma. I am not familiar enough with Romanian law to confirm that statement, so I am posting this as a comment rather than a vote. I have included some more detailed findings for each image below this comment. From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
- File:Polina Manoila in 1973.jpg - looks like the art from a record cover (but is not certain) and is available from Discogs (click "more images") https://www.discogs.com/artist/3267857-Polina-Manoil%C4%83
- File:Gheorghe Turda.jpg - a black and white version of an image used for a record cover available at Discogs. It is unclear if this is a separate version of the photograph or the record cover version has been manipulated. https://www.discogs.com/release/6989191-Gheorghe-Turda-Hai-M%C3%AEndr%C4%83-S%C4%83-Trecem-Dealul
- File:Petrică Moise.jpg - record cover from Discogs https://www.discogs.com/release/4193615-Petric%C4%83-Moise-C%C3%AEte-n-Lume-Vin-%C8%98i-Trec
- File:Felician Fărcășiu.jpg - no matches on TinEye
- File:Maria Cornescu Discogs.jpg - available at Discogs but there is no indication of the original source.
- File:Maria Peter.jpg - no matches on TinEye
- File:Ion Cristoreanu.jpg - record cover from Discogs https://www.discogs.com/release/5266834-Ion-Cristoreanu-Ne-Vorbe%C8%99te-o-Lume-Intreag%C4%83-Nu-%C8%98tiu-La-Al%C8%9Bii-Cum-Li-i-Fric%C4%83-Mi-i-C%C4%83-Mor-Ca-M%C3%AE
- File:Aurelia Fătu Răduțu 1968.jpg - no matches on TinEye
- File:Ana Pacatiuș.jpg - no matches on TinEye. Note the random date inserted by RAN for this image is rather implausible as she looks far older than 41.
- File:Brahma 2022.jpg - no matches on TinEye
- File:Blacksexlink..jpg - claimed as own work in 2022 but shows up on a TinEye search as being online in 2018 (only a thumb image remains at TinEye as the source website now returns an error). As the majority of uploads by this user have been proven to be false claims of own work, I think this file is a clear cut case for Delete. From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:44, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - No evidence of publication dates,. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Three copies same logo, seems to be over COM:TOO and claimed as own work.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on this portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:56, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
No real source. Hurfer (talk) 11:49, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clear copyvio of http://www.clublanus.com/ and above the TOO. Fma12 (talk) 00:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:22, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Death Ship.png; it's from a 1980 film and cannot be PD. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:38, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Screenshot per visual characteristics and description (1971 Eurovision Song Contest) Эlcobbola talk 14:45, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:20, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Primary author is Anna Maria Elizabeth Cust (1870-1959) and this is a London published edition. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- See also category: Category:The ivory workers of the middle ages (1906) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Noting the advertisement afore the frontispiece, it is clear that the books published in the series of which this book is a part were published in New York, which makes this a U.S. work (even though this copy is a London publication). It is
PD-US-expired. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:59, 18 September 2022 (UTC) - Keep. Per page 6 ([7]), looks like this was published simultaneously in both London and New York. We seem to follow the Berne Convention's definition of "country of origin" for COM:L's "country of origin" requirement, which "in the case of works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection", is "the country whose legislation grants the shortest term of protection". Because the work is public domain in the US (PD-US-expired), which is the country of origin of the work, it meets COM:L's requirements and should be kept. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Mdaniels5757. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:19, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Principal author is - Findlay, Alexander, (1874-1966) and this is a London published edition. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This work was published in the U.S. in 1911, where it is
PD-US-expired. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 01:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC) - Keep. Per page 6 ([8]), looks like this was published simultaneously in both London and New York. We seem to follow the Berne Convention's definition of "country of origin" for COM:L's "country of origin" requirement, which "in the case of works published simultaneously in several countries of the Union which grant different terms of protection", is "the country whose legislation grants the shortest term of protection". Because the work is public domain in the US (PD-US-expired), which is the country of origin of the work, it meets COM:L's requirements and should be kept. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:55, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Mdaniels5757. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Shows a person rather than a business center. Out of scope. Glrx (talk) 15:44, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 18:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Licence is public domain, but it is presumably a registered trademark of a company: Acciona Energia Does this image meet the commons:Threshold of originality? If so, Commons does not host Commons:Fair use images and it should be deleted as such. Adakiko (talk) 20:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I don't know Spanish copyright law, but gut level, it certainly looks above Com:Too to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:18, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:34, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Likely license laundering
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (19880854214).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (19882578433).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (19882589313).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315345868).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315375218).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315406968).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315415900).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20316840529).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20477198826).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20477281956).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494598692).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494687902).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494698662).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494711382).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20503529835).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20509846661).jpg
_(19880854214).jpg){kind=link}
_(19882578433).jpg){kind=link}
_(19882589313).jpg){kind=link}
_(20315345868).jpg){kind=link}
_(20315375218).jpg){kind=link}
_(20315406968).jpg){kind=link}
_(20315415900).jpg){kind=link}
_(20316840529).jpg){kind=link}
_(20477198826).jpg){kind=link}
_(20477281956).jpg){kind=link}
_(20494598692).jpg){kind=link}
_(20494687902).jpg){kind=link}
_(20494698662).jpg){kind=link}
_(20494711382).jpg){kind=link}
_(20503529835).jpg){kind=link}
_(20509846661).jpg){kind=link}
— Racconish 💬 17:13, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
- PD-US-1978-89. --Fæ (talk) 19:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion (see https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/39837). — Racconish 💬 19:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
These originate in a 1980 US publication, They cannot be considered Public domain.
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (19880854214).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (19882578433).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (19882589313).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315345868).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315375218).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315406968).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20315415900).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20316840529).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20477198826).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20477281956).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494598692).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494687902).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494698662).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20494711382).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20503529835).jpg
- File:Bulletins of American paleontology (1980) (20509846661).jpg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:57, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep {{PD-US-1978-89}} applies. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:31, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per PD-US-1978-89. --IronGargoyle (talk) 21:24, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
painter died in 1954, so PD in source country in 2025, undelete then Hekerui (talk) 10:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- I believe that in France, photography inside churches is permitted unless there is a specific instruction posted telling you photography is not allowed. In this case, there was no such notice. Mccapra (talk) 12:23, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; also deleted other version File:Honfleur F PM 030464.jpg. The files can be restored in 2025. --Rosenzweig τ 15:22, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Digixonic
[edit]Unused logo of a non-notable company; out of COM:SCOPE. Might also exceed COM:TOO.
-M.nelson (talk) 23:13, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 16:45, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Not cc-4.0, not own work, missing transparency and useles because exist this better file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Grand_Theft_Auto_(1997)_logo.png StomboyCarGeek (talk) 09:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Inferior duplicate. IceWelder [✉] 11:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:52, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
The image was uploaded by the "Panoramio upload bot". Neither the description nor the image gives to understand what is shown here. Not useful for educational purposes. Out of scope. Nemracc (talk) 17:04, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. I am not sure if this helps, but there was a boat show going on at the convention center where and when the photograph was taken. Does this look like a noteworthy boat component? IronGargoyle (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: it's a side view of the anchor contraption seen in File:São Paulo Boat Show Internacional 2011 - panoramio.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 22:27, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Compiled work, Eash drama will have it's own copyright. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Absent individual notices, the general notice following the title page controls the whole work. The work was not renewed, and it thus in the public domain. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:13, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Keep I've looked for each drama and found no evidence that any of them were renewed.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:47, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 23:02, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, it is highly unlikely that the uploader is the author. E.g. here it is uploaded as a fair-use file. Wostr (talk) 18:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:35, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Logos from copyirighted sites, two of them with false authorship claim. Consider if they may pass PD-logo threshold.
- File:Livesport Prague Open logo 2022.png
- File:Livesport Prague Open 2022 logo.png
- File:Logo kandidatury Prahy na pořádání LOH.png
Gumruch (talk) 18:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --IronGargoyle (talk) 23:33, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
The image contains a signature of Bart Verhaeghe's wife, while this was uploaded by a communication employee who claims it to be her work. Given that another image of his is also a copyright infringement, I suspect this one to be as well. Dajasj (talk) 07:35, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:30, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
No permission from given author Ann De Kelver - stated is in Duch that this imag has been given to the uploader only Hoyanova (talk) 19:52, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Hoyanova. I was contacted by the photogapher herself to add this recent photo to the page of Bart Verhaeghe. I have a 100% authorization to publish this picture. DeVosJan (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- @DeVosJan, could you follow the steps of nl:Wikipedia:Contactpunt/Toestemming voor gebruik afbeelding vragen to verify this? Important to note that you not only posted it on the page of Bart Verhaeghe, but also provided a license which means it can also be used outside Wikipedia. Dajasj (talk) 09:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
- @DeVosJan: The request for Com:VRTS is not noted on the file. We need that approval to host the file, otherwise we will be required to delete the image. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:27, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Dajasj raises a good point. If Ann De Kelver only gave DeVosJan permission to use this image in that one article, it cannot be hosted on Commons. DeVosJan would have to upload the image to Dutch Wiki directly. Tvx1 (talk) 21:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- @DeVosJan, could you follow the steps of nl:Wikipedia:Contactpunt/Toestemming voor gebruik afbeelding vragen to verify this? Important to note that you not only posted it on the page of Bart Verhaeghe, but also provided a license which means it can also be used outside Wikipedia. Dajasj (talk) 09:50, 8 July 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: needs VRT. --Abzeronow (talk) 18:01, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Not available at the source indicated, and not in any archive links either. Failed license review but I'm not sure what to do with this one. That's why I'm bringing it here to seek opinions from other community members. I tried to connect with the uploader but no help! ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:12, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: For some reason, an author changed the visibility of it to private after someone uploaded it several months ago.
- The Harvett Vault (user; talk) 11:39, 30 July 2022 (UTC); edited: 11:57, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
Segundo o autor, foi retirada de um livro Ininteligível (talk) 12:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
On [9], the uploader stated that the picture came from a book and it was not his own work. Ininteligível (talk) 12:11, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Foi retirada com a autorização do seu autor, como me parece evidente. O livro irá sair brevemente, em setembro, com a fotografia, escrito por Rita Delgado, que detém os direitos de autor da fotografia e a quem a pedi para este efeito. Apaguei-a da página porque erradamente a assumir sem querer como minha. PPM65 (talk) 02:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Missing permission, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
no indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain. 1988 Heroes of the Soviet Union encyclopedia is not early enough! PlanespotterA320 (talk) 13:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
These images do not seem to be own work. Each is smaller than Facebook, blurry or poor quality and a map with no source data.
- File:Igrejinha de Ibiraçu.png
- File:Igrejinha.Ibiraçu.png
- File:CapelaLocaliz.png
- File:Capela-IbiraçuGeral.png
- File:Capela-Ibiraçu1.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to beg you to do not eliminate images I have done by myself.
- File:Igrejinha de Ibiraçu.png
- File:CapelaLocaliz.png
- File:Capela-Ibiraçu.png
- Hugs
- Carrion18 (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to beg you to do not eliminate images I have done by myself.
- File:Igrejinha de Ibiraçu.png
- File:CapelaLocaliz.png
- File:Capela-Ibiraçu.png
- Hugs
- Carrion18 (talk) 16:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 6 December 2022 (UTC)
The photo was given a CC-BY-NC-ND license to the uploader by NPG, but was tagged a CC-BY-SA license here, which is clearly invalid. While it's possible that this photo is in the UK public domain, there are serious doubts -- this comes from a negative (one of at least three) given to the NPG by Bassano in 1974. It became PD in the UK in 1989 due to their older law, but was definitely restored in 1996 when the UK implemented the EU directive. It was therefore restored by the URAA, if it had been previously published without notice. If the photo was published in 1938, the year it was taken, then it has since gone back into the UK public domain in 2009. However, since this comes from a negative, there is no indication this particular one (if any) was actually published at the time. NPG photos which come from silver gelatin prints are easier to diagnose, since those show publication then. If this was not published then, then likely this was not made available to the public until at least 1974, in which case its UK copyright won't expire until at least 2045, and the NPG copyright claim is quite valid. If it can be shown that this work was never "made available to the public" until 2009, then it became PD then (but would then be under U.S. copyright as an unpublished work, not via URAA, until 2059). The NPG started cataloguing the Bassano works in 2002, but it may have been "made available" to at least some of the public long before then. The only chance for this to be OK for Commons is to show publication in the 1930s or 1940s, and *also* demonstrate simultaneous publication in the United States to avoid the URAA, neither of which is shown. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- As per previous discussion, the current license is invalid, as based on a creative commons license, it would need to be cc-by-nc-nd-3.0 which immediately puts the image into the CSD category. The photo was taken (or published?) in 1938 as per the NPG website but if it was only published much later as noted above, I think the 70 years starts from that point? I can't clearly see evidence of this being PD and we can't fall back on any license issued by the NPG. Bungle (talk • contribs) 15:51, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- The 70 years starts from "making available to the public", which includes publication and broadcast and public display, unless not "made available" within 70 years of creation. Bassano would sell prints of some of their photos, which would have started that clock in 1938, but you'd also assume that some of their negatives were not selected for use, so those may have remained unpublished until the NPG made them available. There is no way to know which situation this one was in, to me. It could be a little hard to define exactly when the NPG made them available to the public as well, but there aren't any good options for us if it was unpublished at least to 1974. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:55, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:45, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
File:Harper's Weekly Senate Sergeant-at-Arms serving the impeachment summons on President Johnson, 1868.jpg
[edit]
colorization probably not original print. may not be pd SecretName101 (talk) 18:42, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. The image is old enough (published in the 1860s) that the likelihood that it was colorized when that colorization would attract still-current copyright is vanishingly small. COM:PCP says we should delete if there is significant doubt. I am not seeing significant doubt here. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:49, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per IronGargoyle. --Gbawden (talk) 08:34, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Sady Pridonia
[edit]Rorty91 (talk · contribs) загрузил три фотографии Андрея Самохина — директора компании «Сады Придонья»:
- File:Andrey Samohin 2016.jpg (original name is File:^D10FA30047C6C6F8E240F131A878E80D68BADE3E843B7D09C7^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg; EXIF author is Rogulin Dmitiy);
- File:Андрей Самохин .jpg (EXIF author is Rogulin Dmitiy);
- File:Самохин, Андрей Павлович.jpg (EXIF author is Sady Pridonia).
Здесь стоит сказать, что фотографии с автором Sady Pridonia уже неоднокретно удалялись с Викисклада: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Наталия Потопаева, Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Namira1. Таким образом, последний файл однозначно подлежит удалению. Первые два, скорее всего, тоже не являются работами загрузившего участника, а предоставлены ему пресс-службой компании для написания статьи в Википедии. И здесь же нужно обратить внимание на загрузки участника Namira1 (talk · contribs), чьи фото уже удалялись:
- File:Sady Pridonia (company) 2009 1.jpg (original name is File:^B75F1DEA16CA3F85679CA384C56EC638360C32C683A7319A5F^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg);
- File:Hydraulic presses in Sady Pridonia company.jpg (original name is File:^199EC5BFA5DAE15A95C4F477871B8B59A1EE146DC4F9504B73^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg);
- File:Sady Pridonia (company) 2012 1.jpg (original name is File:^59E2A4B2086E1568D821B1BE4F72432DEFA7E61F6B68D4A4B7^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg);
- File:Sady Pridonia (company) 2015 1.jpg (original name is File:^C10D096FBD73E424C08B285910AFF5FA2D1FC5646B7BECDC98^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg);
- File:Cherry harvest in Sady Pridonya 2009.jpg (original name is File:D2qgnj85k96vssob 1024x768.jpg);
- File:Сады Придонья .jpg;
- File:Компания Сады Придонья .jpg.
_2009_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2012_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2015_1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Оригинальные названия первых четырёх файлов имеют такую же структуру, как и первый файл первого участника. Очевидно, что участники получили эти файлы из одного источника — от представителей компании «Сады Придонья» для написания статьи в Википедии (см. w:ru:Обсуждение:Сады Придонья (компания)#Проверка статьи — Namira1 и начал писать эту статью). С учётом сказанного, я предполагаю высокую вероятность нарушения авторских прав в указанных фотографиях. — — Redboston 05:55, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploaders – who were notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of these images. Therefore – due to lack of information like source, author, publication status and creation dates – these images must be deleted. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file(s), please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image (or these images) can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 21:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Specifc renewal in respect of translation/N.M - "VERGILIUS MARO, PUBLIUS. The Aeneid. Books 1-6. With introd., notes, vocabulary, and grammatical appendix by Clyde Pharr. (The Heath Latin series) © on pref., introd., notes, appendix & arrangement; 28May30; A24457. Clyde Pharr (A); 26Aug57; R198035." ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:52, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:22, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
Should probably be transferred back to Wikipedia under the fair use criteria - the image is definitely not PD-100 and as it was taken in the 1940s or even 1950s (perhaps late 30s at a stretch) PD-100 does not apply. I added a comment to this effect over on Wikipedia. It is unlikely that this image would raise any copyright issues as the photographer is probably long forgotten and almost unidentifiable (there's nothing in the image to pinpoint any specific school or location), but the mis-dating and wrong licensing do need addressing. Mabalu (talk) 13:54, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- ok Jistrum (talk) 13:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is a very comparable/like for like image already on Commons as well which could be substituted for this, see File:Hyde Grammar School netball 1949 (cropped).jpg - so perhaps it's best to just delete the image outright as its status cannot be verified, under Fair Use rules it can be swapped with the Hyde Grammar image, and there isn't a way to check who took it or whether it is PD or not. Mabalu (talk) 14:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
This photograph is an excerpt or screenshot of the following publication created in 1989., This means it does not satisfy the remit domain in India as tagged. Lil-unique1 (talk) 19:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- But I have question here in this Wikipedia commons file it has been stated by file creator that it is not his own work then why it is tagged for deletion. Srimant ROSHAN (talk) 02:11, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- If someone takes a picture of something then they own the copyright to that picture and can decide if it is made available for use on Wikipedia. The screenshot is from a booklet/file which cannot be determined if the person who uploaded the file owns the copyright to that image. You can't just get a book or publication, take picture or screenshot if it and upload it without permission from the person who authored said publication. Lil-unique1 (talk) 16:10, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. This is ultimately a faithful rendering of an inscription from thousands of years ago. There is nothing copyrightable here. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:31, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. per IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 21:25, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
No sourcing to prove it's copyright free BilCat (talk) 19:37, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Interestingly, this should fall within {{PD-RU-exempt-autocam}}. This particular type of jet is only flown by the Russian military. IronGargoyle (talk) 15:41, 21 November 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. agree with IronGargoyle. --Ellywa (talk) 21:26, 8 December 2022 (UTC)
A renewal was found for a 1949 work with identical title and authors - " R637190 " ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:00, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The renewal was for the first edition. This file is the second and revised edition from 1960 which did not get a copyright renewal. De728631 (talk) 15:25, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Also - File:Andean culture history (1964) (17572775664).jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
_(17572775664).jpg){kind=link}
- Surely the second edition, would contain material from the first (which is copyright)? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:12, 31 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Absent very unusual circumstances, a second edition would be considered a derivative of the first edition, so it still important to look to the copyright of the first edition. The copyright for the first edition was not properly renewed. The listed proprietor is “the American Museum of Natural History,” yet the renewal is given under the name of “Junius B. Bird.” As Mr. Bird did not own the copyright, he had not legal authority to renew the copyright; thus, the renewal is invalid. Neither edition, thus, was (properly) renewed. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 02:02, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The author can renew a work.--Prosfilaes (talk) 01:20, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion and arguments in similar case Commons:Deletion requests/File:George Eliot's Silas Marner,the weaver of Raveloe, (IA georgeeliotssila00elio 1).pdf. The file can be restored in 2045. --Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 10 December 2022 (UTC)