Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/07/15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 15th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redirect to deleted or non-existent page Мельников Мадина (talk) 09:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, broken redirect. --Achim55 (talk) 09:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Ruslan Fink (talk) 12:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, courtesy deletion as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 12:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dupplikat von File:Steiermark Wappen.svg. Einbindungen sollen umgeschrieben werden. Maxwxyz (talk) 14:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It was only a duplicate because you overwrote it with another version. I've reset the file to the first version. --Rosenzweig τ 17:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Bastianxito (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused photo of a penis, we have better pics available. Tabercil (talk) 05:15, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. very low quality, useless --:bdk: 05:24, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it’s my file, my picture, and i want it deleted immediately Flameon393 (talk) 22:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. Why did you load it up?. --Achim55 (talk) 22:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/72/Male_Penis.jpg Yiwopa6021 (talk) 22:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PENIS. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:18, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]


 Delete and lock title Dronebogus (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation Nolan MacLellan (talk) 20:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it’s my file, my picture, and i want it deleted immediately. i know i’m the one who uploaded it, but i changed my mind, and i don’t want it on here anymore. Flameon393 (talk) 22:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry, Nonsense Avocadoy72 (talk) 00:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user :(. --Achim55 (talk) 07:44, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense, Blurry Avocadoy72 (talk) 00:49, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense request by another Android app user :(. --Achim55 (talk) 07:46, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Uploader is blocked for the same. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:01, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. & COM:CSD#F10Pius (talk) 10:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this music album cover is copyrighted EROY (talk) 17:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this music album cover is copyrighted EROY (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this music album cover is copyrighted EROY (talk) 17:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:30, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:(2-Methoxyethoxy)acetic-acid-2D-structure.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 10:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:32, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 11:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work, created when at a time when I didn't understand user pages on Wikipedia. Please delete this for my privacy. Lord Urjit (talk) 20:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:58, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Protected book Cover issued after 2000 in lebanon Michel Bakni (talk) 22:54, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Kareem4kareem (talk) 23:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 12:59, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no permission no author Hoyanova (talk) 14:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 18:50, 26 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 01:19, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is in scope? 186.173.207.199 01:55, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is in scope? 186.173.207.199 01:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:01, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-advertisement; no educational value Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT BoH (talk) 13:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:02, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT BoH (talk) 13:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT BoH (talk) 13:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This MS Paint drawing is out of scope. I'm not a sock and I have never been blocked. Heraldrist (talk) 13:28, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:03, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nkokkinakis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr.Alaa.Daher (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:05, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aneesh motive pix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in sandbox.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random guy FMSky (talk) 19:34, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:07, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. (Presumably only uploaded in an attempt to drive traffic to the link in the description.) Marbletan (talk) 19:57, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Maria.Manteeva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused and uncategorized diagrams created with some mind mapping website. Out of project scope.

Rosenzweig τ 21:58, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:08, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal usage. Gust Justice (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal usage. Gust Justice (talk) 23:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:09, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thompson4422 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Families' personal photos related to various murder and missing person cases from the 1980s, collected from around the internet. No evidence images have been CC licenced (to "unknown"?) as claimed, and no reason to expect them to be in the public domain.

Lord Belbury (talk) 22:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bitte löschen auf Wunsch einer der abgebildeten Personenen und des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC14:23, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ra'ike T C 10:48, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auf Wunsch der abgebildeten Person und des Hochladers Pimpinellus((D)) • WikiMUC14:24, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ra'ike T C 10:49, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hary1mo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Questionable claims of own work by a blocked sock; the sources of neither image suggest that they are free. I've flagged several other uploads by this user as copyvios.

Hog Farm (talk) 17:41, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hary1mo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of 3D models subject to copyright; underlying work is not free. Nomination is part of an enwiki copyright cleanup related to the contributions of the uploader and their socks.

Hog Farm (talk) 02:25, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:17, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hary1mo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

3D and what looks to be virtually created models are subject to copyright. Uploaded by socker with enwikipedia CCI.

Sennecaster (talk) 00:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - almost certain copyright violations, like most things from this uploader. Hog Farm (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:29, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have no idea where this map is from, but for sure it's not an own work. It comes from some kind of a map portal I'm not aware of. Aʀvєδuι + 07:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Narcitrinh.official (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly professional photos - one with no exif the other with photographers info in exif. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 07:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly invalid license and source information. Might be PD, but that needs to be credibly asserted. Fl.schmitt (talk) 07:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata that clearly state "Author Nathalie A.Jansen Copyright holder toetjansen@hotmail.com" Hoyanova (talk) 07:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source and no permission Hoyanova (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - not free in USA per URAA. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a painting by Ridley Borchgrevink, a Norwegian artist who died in 1981. His work of art cannot be uploaded until 2052. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Public_domain#Copyright_terms_by_country Norway life + 70 Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 08:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:33, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a painting by Jens Ferdinand Willumsen, (https://www.nasjonalmuseet.no/en/collection/object/NG.M.01008) a Danish artist who died in 1958. His work of art cannot be uploaded until 2029. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Public_domain#Copyright_terms_by_country Denmark Literary and artistic works: life + 70 Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 08:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not PD - renewed copyright - https://exhibits.stanford.edu/copyrightrenewals/catalog/RE345550 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:35, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS

— Racconish 06:46, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. Why do you want all videos which I upload ??? Some stop-motion videos were on WikiCommons before I upload it. You have the right not to like these videos. But that's not a reason to ask for their removal. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And why do you don't want to delete this file : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Stop-motion_lego.gif ??? Because its not mine ??? --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:22, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Et dans ce cas supprimer toutes les images/vidéos ou l'on voit des Lego non? Tyseria (d)(Sorry for my english !) 16:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tyseria: see COM:DM. — Racconish 17:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Racconish: je ne vois pas ce que ça change Tyseria (d)(Sorry for my english !) 20:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sujet principal ou non. — Racconish 22:27, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Le sujet principal : l'histoire racontée par ces personnage, non les personnages eux-mêmes. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It is absolutely shocking that someone that has been here for 9 years does not understand derivative works. Please, please, read COM:DW ComputerHotline. If multiple people are telling you that this is not ok then you should take that under advisement. --Majora (talk) 20:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept the ones where there weren't a single frame focused on a copyrighted item (which could be extracted and be a copyvio). Ruthven (msg) 19:27, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Lego minifigures, any content featuring Lego minifigures is a derivative work of a copyrighted toy. (The two Belfort videos here are protest clips with a short opening credits sequence made using Lego minifigures.)

Lord Belbury (talk) 09:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dates in files suggest these are post 1964 works which are still in copyright. IA metadata date is the start of the series, not the actual date of publication sometimes...

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Firdaushaque (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These all appear to be hotel media photos (and one map) which are likely not the uploader's own work. The are missing EXIF and have a lot of hits on Tineye, including some before being uploaded here (e.g. File:Petit St Vincent Dining.jpg, File:Petit St Vincent Island View.jpg.

-M.nelson (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. An inspirational quote with zero educational value, awful graphics, poor translation and spelling errors, and with a large promotional watermark. Not realistically usable. — kashmīrī 09:33, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently this a screenshot from an episode of the fr:Tracks (émission de télévision) TV program. Needs COM:VRT permission from the rightsholders/producers of that program. Rosenzweig τ 09:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of PD-USAF, no source, date, original author. Drakosh (talk) 10:19, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:40, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like derivative work (scan) from somewhere. Certainly not "own work" from 2022: The subject died in 1978. Uploader has been addressed on his German WP user talk page but has not been active for several months, so I don't expect a reply. 217.239.10.65 10:25, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep He looks about age 50 so "PD-EU-no author disclosure" would apply. He was born in 1895 so would be age 50 in 1945. "PD-EU-no author disclosure" would apply up to 1952, so even if +/- 10 years would still be applicable. --RAN (talk) 14:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am personally totally uninvolved and don't care if this picture is kept or deleted, but I don't quite get this reasoning.
This is about a German publisher, so we can safely assume the picture was taken in Germany, and German Urheberrecht applies. By that law, the photographer - who, if this is a scan from a book or a newspaper, is not "undisclosed" but simply not credited - must have been dead for 70 years for the work to be in public domain.
Which in turn does not mean the picture must have been taken before 1952 but the photographer must have died before 1952. I don't see how we can assume that with sufficient certainty. --217.239.3.204 07:27, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The EU license "PD-EU-no author disclosure" has a carve out for Germany that allows a clawback from the public domain if the creator of the image becomes known in the future, that is the Urheberrecht you are referring to. --RAN (talk) 01:28, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, I still don't get what you are saying. I know what Urheberrecht means. Could you please provide a link to that license you are talking about?
You seem to be assuming that the creator of the image is unknown. I don't believe that he or she is. I believe that the uploader simply didn't tell us. Or else, that would be the easiest way to sneak out of Urheberrecht, wouldn't it? I could just upload any copyvio or derivate work. As long as I don't tell you who the creator is, the photographer would then be considered to be "unknown" -- ?
Another thing to consider: With derivative work, there are usually other rights involved. Like a publisher's rights, if the image is taken from a book. Again, simply not telling us where they got the image from can't possibly override all the rights involved. --217.239.8.185 21:53, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - discussion is moot because URAA applies. This will be PD around 2050. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very incomplete map, compare File:Guwahati Map.png Enyavar (talk) 10:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist for this is apparently de:Andreas Eikenroth, born in 1966 and still alive it seems. I don't think the uploader is identical with this person. So this would only be ok for Commons with a COM:VRT permission. Rosenzweig τ 13:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Seite aus Woyzeck.jpg for another file by this artist. --Rosenzweig τ 13:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no Wikipedia pages that use this file. Edl-irishboy (talk) 13:09, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative photo of a non-free original painting. We cannot keep it without permission from the original artist. Furthermore, it appears that the photo was taken at an outside location in India, but there is no freedom of panorama for paintings in India. De728631 (talk) 13:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Hi. I take note of the arguments and now understand why it should be deleted. I therefore have nothing to object. Thank you. Jatin071178 (talk) 14:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:43, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata that clearly stat Copyright holder Full Copyright Pictures by Gaab 2015 Hoyanova (talk) 14:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata - "Author Pictures by Gaab Copyright holder Full Copyright Pictures by Gaab 2015 Copyright status Copyrighted Online copyright statement www.picturesbygaab.com Hoyanova (talk) 14:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata - "Author Pictures by Gaab Copyright holder Full Copyright Pictures by Gaab 2015 Copyright status Copyrighted Online copyright statement www.picturesbygaab.com Hoyanova (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata - "Author Pictures by Gaab Copyright holder Full Copyright Pictures by Gaab 2015 Copyright status Copyrighted Online copyright statement www.picturesbygaab.com Hoyanova (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Rubin16/review5, Commons:Deletion requests/Files on User:Rubin16/review4 and others: I have manually reviewed uploads of one user and marked those that couldn't be considered trivial enough and couldn't be kept due to lack of FoP for statues in Russia

rubin16 (talk) 14:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:44, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:45, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Channel 3 (Thailand) drama synopsis videos

[edit]

These files are screen captures from promotional videos uploaded by Thai Channel 3's 3Plus YouTube channel under the CC By licence. However, these videos only visually consist of a slideshow of previously released promotional still photographs, and it should be presumed that the CC licence does not extend to them as they are previously published copyrighted work.

Paul_012 (talk) 15:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment - added four uploaded after DR started. Эlcobbola talk 14:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:47, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear text that ends with "here a link" but provides no link. Possibly taken from another website. Certainly out of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artworks locates in Switzerland. (See camera location info.) Switzerland has no FoP for indoor works. (see COM:FOP Switzerland.) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:05, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This artworks locates in Switzerland. (See camera location info.) Switzerland has no FoP for indoor works. (see COM:FOP Switzerland.) Ox1997cow (talk) 16:06, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myrrine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ap 2 hoghiz 04.jpg. Sources are licensed with 'Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License' at source; NC is not compatible with Commons.

Gikü (talk) 17:10, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tell me what to do to make them right! Myrrine (talk) 15:05, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Contacting the original authors to request a license change would be an option, but I don't think they'd agree. Sometimes there's just not much one can do. Gikü (talk) 15:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article as PDF, out of project scope. Achim55 (talk) 17:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:51, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these files are certainly not the uploader's "own work" from 2022 as claimed. They need proper sources, authors, dates and rationales why they are either in the public domain or under a free license. If these things are not provided or not satisfactory, the files should all be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 18:53, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That is not true. Images that have "1946" or "1985" in the file name are almost certainly not prior to 1942. The images with "Alfonso López Echandía" in the file name show a man who was born in 1932 and is certainly older than nine years in the images. Also, even if you don't write it, you treat them all as if they were anonymous. Without any sources, original publication etc. we cannot at all tell if that is actually the case. --Rosenzweig τ 11:51, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry if my words are ambiguous. I am trying to say "Keep all images [that are] prior to 1942 as PD-Colombia" not "Keep all. All images are prior to 1942 as per PD-Colombia". Several have the names of the author on the image, but they are pseudonyms. If they can be traced to a person, we can find a death date. Wiki Commons rules allow us to scan images, if they were pulled from the Internet they should be able to be found using the standard reverse image search and standard image search by name. The are several billion images online to match to. --RAN (talk) 01:54, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see. So you just volunteered to do these searches and find authors and death dates? --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I already have performed the search and have not been able to match the pseudonym to a known photographer, I even posted at a Facebook group that specializes on photographers. --RAN (talk) 17:05, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete It's hard to tell for all the files, but most of them are certainly from after 1942. So they should all be deleted as copyvio per the precautionary principle. --Adamant1 (talk) 20:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Columbia is 80 years pma, so in order to beat the URAA, images must be prior to 1927. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

New uploads with the same problems. As before: The files need proper sources, authors, dates and rationales why they are either in the public domain or under a free license. If these things are not provided or not satisfactory, the files should all be deleted per the precautionary principle.

Rosenzweig τ 23:26, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

These images are PD-Colombia as prior to 1942 and should not be deleted

[edit]
These are the ones nominated for deletion that are PD-Colombia because they were created prior to 1942. They should not be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:15, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I see. I think the usual procedure is to put a strikethrough through whichever images in a group should not be deleted. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Only anonymous images published before 1942 are in the PD in Colombia. Not just any image created before 1942 as implied above. So we still need sources and first publication to be able to (perhaps) determine that they are anonymous. OR they can be kept with {{PD-old-assumed}} if they are at least 130 years old (template adjusted with the duration=80 parameter to accomodate Colombia's 80 years pma term). --Rosenzweig τ 11:08, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment For anybody deciding this, please also note that some file descriptions were changed by User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ), claiming that the author is anonymous and changing years without giving any evidence. So please check what was changed before deciding anything. --Rosenzweig τ 13:20, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Our rules allow you to scan an original image, it doesn't have to be downloaded from the internet. There are 750 billion images are on the internet, if you can't match one of these images with a reverse image search, or a simple name search, to the name of a photographer, you have performed all of the due diligence that can possibly be accomplished. --RAN (talk) 17:03, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:54, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

And another one. I will warn the uploader one last time; the next time it's a block.

Rosenzweig τ 15:32, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:55, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ernesto Rosales 1103 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Another batch of files related to politics of Venezuela, taken from various web sites, uploaded with CC licenses. File:Laidy Gómez.png is taken from a site called Poderopedia, which claims to be under a CC 3.0 license [1], but a reverse image search with TinEye and Google Images shows that this image was used on Twitter and various web sites since at least 2019, also in larger versions, so I highly doubt it originated from that Poderopedia site. I also can't find CC licenses for the others, and File:Freddy Bernal Gobernador.jpg I can't find at all at the source page that is named. So all those files should be deleted per the precautionary principle unless convincingly shown to be either under a free license or in the public domain.

Rosenzweig τ 17:25, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   01:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
English: PD-old-60 can't apply to a French photographer. since the author died in 1958, I believe this photo will be in public domain in its country of origine only in 2029.
VIGNERON (talk) 19:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, the rights of a French photographer apply until 70 years after his death. PD-old-60 does not apply (Google translate). --H2O(talk) 12:30, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment that photograph might be available under licence ouverte, as most of the online collections of :fr:La Contemporaine. -- Le Petit Chat (talk) 21:25, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:57, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation, unlikely to be uploader's own work Film Enthusiast (talk) 19:22, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is my own work; I am a photographer who often works on Broadway red carpets (see many of my other photos). PhilipRomanoPhoto (talk) 22:23, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:58, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a post-1927 photograph of a three-dimensional work of art. Sinopecynic (talk) 23:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

However, there does not appear to be a copyright indication on the Christie's page, whence the image was sourced. Sinopecynic (talk) 13:47, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Contrary to the comment above, there is an explicit copyright notice at the very bottom of the source page, but, in any even, a 2022 UK publication doesn;t need notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by QTHCCAN as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: There is a parallel deletion request on Commons:Deletion requests/File:جوجل بلاي ألعاب.png. Larryasou (talk) 03:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Keeping to process as a duplicate. --Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found in internet, probably not own work 2.132.233.2 16:59, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:13, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/ OPL does not cover live and archive video or audio broadcasts

King of ♥ 19:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Thanks for this information. Strange thing indeed. I can't remember anything mentioned about restrictions for videos in the e-mail I received from parliamentlive.tv when they sent me the link to the video file (28 Jan.). I also can't find these restrictions mentioned here. I will send parliamentlive.tv an e-mail with a request about copyright re this file. Vysotsky (talk) 21:20, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Vysotsky: Clicking the copyright link at the bottom of the page took me straight to the link Mike provided Gbawden (talk) 08:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:14, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/ OPL does not cover live and archive video or audio broadcasts King of ♥ 19:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/ OPL does not cover live and archive video or audio broadcasts King of ♥ 19:03, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not licensed under OGL King of ♥ 19:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: not licensed under OGL King of ♥ 19:04, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright-parliament/ OPL does not cover parliamentary photographic images King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.nhslanarkshire.scot.nhs.uk/copyright/ not licenced under OGL King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: ttps://www.judiciary.scot/crown-copyright photographs are © CROWN COPYRIGHT not OGL King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.judiciary.scot/crown-copyright photographs are © CROWN COPYRIGHT not OGL King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no OGL stated in the source King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no OGL stated in the source King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.judiciary.scot/crown-copyright photographs are © CROWN COPYRIGHT not OGL King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.judiciary.scot/crown-copyright photographs are © CROWN COPYRIGHT not OGL King of ♥ 19:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mike Rohsopht as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.judiciary.scot/crown-copyright © CROWN COPYRIGHT King of ♥ 19:08, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is above COM:TOO UK, since it contains the Conservative Party logo (see en:File:Conservatives logo.svg, which is non-free in the UK). Yeeno (talk) 19:14, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Monkey1987king (talk · contribs)

[edit]

They are not licensed under the Open Government Licence.

See terms of use of The University of Glasgow [2]

It is © Moira Leggat

Photographs form judiciary.scot are excluded from OGL [3].

The source is licensed under CC-BY-ND 2.0 [4]

Mike Rohsopht (talk) 19:29, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wik!geek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This set of pictures patently cannot be "Own Work" and are likely the copyright of another. No date information is present to allow us to judge whether the copyright has lapsed. No camera details exist. COM:VRT is required to regularise the permissions, ownership and licencing. COM:PCP applies

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:35, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wik!geek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This picture patently cannot be "Own Work" and is likely the copyright of another. No date information is present to allow us to judge whether the copyright has lapsed. No camera details exist. COM:VRT is required to regularise the permissions, ownership and licencing. COM:PCP applies

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:38, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wik!geek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This set of pictures patently cannot be "Own Work" and are likely the copyright of another. No date information is present to allow us to judge whether the copyright has lapsed. No camera details exist. COM:VRT is required to regularise the permissions, ownership and licencing. COM:PCP applies

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:20, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep File:ACL-ARCH 00269 Indian Princes And The Crown 0033.jpg is a public domain book published in British India in 1912 with no author listed, because it is a photo book. --RAN (talk) 03:46, 3 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1; deleted 2. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wik!geek (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unless verified via COM:VRT it seems unlikely that this picture can be the "own work" of the uploader. COM:PCP applies

🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 22:24, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

how do i verify this picture Wik!geek (talk) 06:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wik!geek Please visit COM:VRT as you have been told oft times previously. Follow the process there. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader has now changed the source to be https://www.instagram.com/houseofpaigah/ where I have been unable to find any form of licencing, nor have I found the picture. I am, however, not an Instagram account holder, and the this may be hidden from me. 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 06:51, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
the user of that instagram page in the owner of the picture Wik!geek (talk) 07:31, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
the user of that page is the owner of the picture Wik!geek (talk) 09:48, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Wik!geek How many times do I need to say this??? Use COM:VRT 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 13:18, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
sorry i did not notice that, not really internet Person i have just sent an email for the permission and licensing of these picture which belong to my dear friend, thank you for the help. Wik!geek (talk) 05:45, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 03:05, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't find any evidence that this is licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0. Weeklyd3 (talk) 21:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, user's four other uploads seemed to be taken from various golf/area websites, some at lower resolutions. Lord Belbury (talk) 21:13, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with deletion nomination , will obtain the common area licensing paperwork before resubmitting. Have permission for all the uploads but will clarify the paperwork. Sbariz (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self portrait, promotional. MexTDT (talk) 21:40, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP, no exif, unlikely to be own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work, no EXIF data Rodm23 (talk) 21:44, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have received courtesy deletion request in ticket:2022070810007675; the image is unused Ankry (talk) 12:00, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:18, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission no source, copyvio from https://vng.nl/personalia/mark-slinkman-herbenoemd-in-berg-en-dal Hoyanova (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:28, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this is stated as "Uploaded a work by Plus TV Africa from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W6BjYIl2MyA&ab_channel=PlusTVAfrica with UploadWizard" and while there is correct licencing present, this is a badly focussed screenshot, and surely not the quality required here? 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 14:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep — not sure how this is done on Commons though but I think it is only wise IF you could upload a newer version of it, if you're worried about the quality/focus of the file. Best, Reading Beans (talk) 04:36, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INUSE, if we get a better quality image of the person we could consider deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:17, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The page on Wikipedia has been deleted. Thank you Apoulet (talk) 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation: https://www.plazarzeszow.pl/o-centrum Panek (talk) 17:18, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:15, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1926 works, (which need to be checked for renewals) , and post 1964 works which are likely still in copyright. (see also :- User_talk:ShakespeareFan00#Request_for_mass_deletion_requests

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2016 Publication, Australian origin, Not compatibly licensed (see - User_talk:ShakespeareFan00#Request_for_mass_deletion_requests) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:17, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are Not necessarily old enough to be out of copyright in Australia, or they are not compatibly licensed for Commons. Images derived from these volumes should also be deleted.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Post 1952 publication of British (United Kingdom origin), These cannot be compatibly licensed with Commons.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Channel 3 (Thailand) music videos

[edit]

These are screenshots of videos posted to YouTube by Ch3Thailand Music under the CC By licence. They are mostly music videos to the soundtrack songs for several of Channel 3's television dramas. However, the files nominated here appear to show footage from the respective TV shows, which as far as I know have not been released under a CC licence. As such, it should be presumed that, as previously published copyrighted content, the CC licence does not extend to them.

Paul_012 (talk) 14:43, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • in this case,then this file also have the same issue
File:Sutatta Udomsilp in I Hate You, I Love You (cropped).png
--愛子棋枰 (talk) 00:07, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't included screen captures from trailers in the nom, seeing as the trailers are released before the series themselves, so things are probably less clear there. I assumed that the music videos are generally posted after the series' initial release, but that might not have been correct. If you know this not to be the case, please point out the affected files. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:55, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The page linked on Wikipedia has been deleted. Thank you Apoulet (talk) 14:56, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, personal photos of non contributors. --Kadı Message 11:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the current logo for Roscosmos TV, as seen at https://www.youtube.com/c/tvroscosmos, but uploader states "own work" and has applied a Creative Commons license. Works by Roscosmos are copyrighted and, unless this is somehow deemed ToO, would need to be deleted. Huntster (t @ c) 16:16, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:22, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from here, content of that website protected, no CC licensing. 217.239.10.65 06:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from the Region Aachen website, content of that website protected, no CC licensing. 217.239.10.65 06:41, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:10, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no coat of arms for this page Andreifeldi (talk) 09:15, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:38, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1) Most likely fair use because the game itself was never published under a free licence
2) Let's Plays are probably as out of scope as it can be D-Kuru (talk) 06:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

1)The main content of the video are streamers: Uebermarginal and Egor Prosvirnin, their voice call on Discord, the texts of the donates on the screen.

2)It's not a let's play, they talk about politics and philosophy.

If videogame is fully copyrighted then maybe convert this video file into audio? HareGovorittKrishna ( class="signature-talk">talk) 07:32, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 15:15, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

L'immagine è stata inserita nella pagina sbagliata Nakal04 (talk) 08:39, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as requested by the uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:58, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is what it claims to be, it is almost certainly taken from the research paper which announced the discovery of the fossil. In that case, it is not likely to be the uploader's own work, as claimed. JBW (talk) 16:02, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The image description says "Eternal River Museum" (that's a museum of natural history in Amman, Jordan). That would fit the pattern of this user's uploads, who took a lot of photographs in various museums located in several countries. File:Gigantatypus humerus.jpg and File:Postredectes harranaensis.jpg are said to be taken in the same museum and were apparently taken with the same camera, though the dates vary. Unless some more concrete evidence for copvio turns up, I'll consider this photo to be the uploader's own work. --Rosenzweig τ 13:55, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Есть дубликат - File:Ministry_of_finance_in_Belarus.png MasterRus21thCentury (talk) 12:37, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 20:38, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]