Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/06/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 18th, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Denise Hat Photo 181.203.4.97 14:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim55 (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A copyright of a Saudi photographic work or work of applied art is expired if it is published prior to 1986. This image is taken on 2007, which means it is still copyrighted and not in public domain. 94.205.43.189 10:13, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo at 11:32, 18 June 2022 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) --Krdbot 19:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Denn es ist Molgreen (talk) 19:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate? -- Syrio posso aiutare? 20:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Syrio, last night I called "Review" in the Commons:Mobile app. By chance your picture was called up. The picture is an interior shot. Interior shots are prohibited in my country (Germany) without the consent of the owner. Therefore, I have decided to propose the deletion. If that is not a problem in this case, the deletion request will certainly be withdrawn. Many greetings and thank you for posting images on Commons. --Molgreen (talk) 04:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Molgreen: but this is a picture from Italy... :| interiors are not prohibited here (at least for public spaces such as churches like this one, someone's living room may reasonably be different). -- Syrio posso aiutare? 06:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Syrio: I am sorry for that and I would like to apologize to you. Next time I will choose "Skip" in case of doubt. Since I am not an admin, I do not want to try to withdraw the deletion request. I hope you can understand that. Many greetings from Germany to Italy. And until sometime again --Molgreen (talk) 07:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jaqen (talk) 08:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of CCTV ("中国中央电视台(CCTV)发布的视频报道截图"), not {{PD-US-Gov}}. Mys_721tx (talk) 00:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It's extracted from an article of VOA, which belongs to the US government({{PD-US-Gov}}). So keep. Hank2530 (talk) 00:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
According to VOA Copyright Statement
"All text, audio and video material produced exclusively by the Voice of America is in the public domain. Credit for any use of VOA material should be given to voanews.com, Voice of America, or VOA. However, voanews.com content may also contain text, video, audio, images, graphics, and other copyrighted material that is licensed for use in VOA programming only. This material is not in the public domain and may not be copied, redistributed, sold, or published without the express permission of the copyright owner."
This picture is not work of VOA. It's just licensed for use in VOA by third party (AFP). Kethyga (talk) 01:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Agree Got it, delete this pic then. Hank2530 (talk) 02:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. -- 04:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, The instructions above have been explained clearly. --Cwek (talk) 08:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:44, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From http://vincentwardfilms.com/project/films/what-dreams-may-come/gallery/gallery-2/ Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:12, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unwanted category — Preceding unsigned comment added by TimSC (talk • contribs) 09:03, 18 June 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope

— Racconish💬 09:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Too reckless nominations.
A few tourist, which don't dominate the composition of the photograph cannot be always a reason to delete file. Also social events and pictures of daily life in public places may have educational value through it's historical values.
I list files, that I vote for to keep. ( Keep, i dont have time to describe all reasons to keep):
(social activism and public events in London, there are a few files not listed here, because there are portraits and doesn't have any value [no transparents, signs etc.])
  • File:-BigIf (8998046283).jpg
  • File:-BigIf (8998067635).jpg
  • File:-BigIf (8998061927).jpg
  • File:-BigIf (8998078639).jpg
  • File:-BigIf (8999239762).jpg
  • File:-BigIf (8999245060).jpg
  • File:-BigIf (8999259740).jpg (landscape)
  • File:-BigIf (8999267042).jpg (landscape)
  • File:-BigIf (8999269168).jpg (landscape)
  • File:202008- Porini Mara Trip-51 (50231877153).jpg
  • File:-fire place (4280700587).jpg (plain fireplace)
  • File:202011- thanksgiving 2020-65 (50664652503).jpg (as above)
  • File:-i---i- (9226740233).jpg (landscape)
  • File:-i---i- (9484962402).jpg (landscape)
  • File:18A 0614 (8460456985).jpg (landscape)
  • File:19A 0441 (8460320735).jpg (landscape)
  • File:19A 0615 (8461556862).jpg (landscape)
  • File:202102 - Lake Alice Mt Kenya-2 (50999122306).jpg
  • File:202102 - Lake Alice Mt Kenya-4 (50998421253).jpg
  • File:202102 - Lake Alice Mt Kenya-6 (50999240612).jpg
  • File:202011- thanksgiving 2020-7 (50665531927).jpg
  • File:202011- thanksgiving 2020-67 (50665396861).jpg
  • File:202008- Porini Mara Trip-65 (50232727217).jpg
  • File:202011- thanksgiving 2020-69 (50665472327).jpg (useful items)
  • File:202102 - Lake Alice Mt Kenya-2 (50999122306).jpg (landscape)
  • File:090226-skiing in fog (3326092317).jpg (landscape)
  • File:22A 0444 (8461419790).jpg
  • File:Afternoon in the park (3248389887).jpg
  • File:9A 0605 (8461558076).jpg
  • File:Acres of intersection (4976579225).jpg (WTF)
  • File:202102 - Lake Alice Mt Kenya-2 (50999122306).jpg
  • File:20100824-moscow fashion (4975897913).jpg (dialy life in Moscow)
  • File:-i---i- (9229382198).jpg (dialy life in New Mexico)
  • File:-i---i- (9229496680).jpg and File:-i---i- (9226681187).jpg (she is propably a public official, interesting)
Over and out. Matlin (talk) 10:57, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn 9. @Matlin: it is a pleasure to see you accepting to communicate at last. — Racconish💬 12:24, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any reason to not delete these photos? You submit it a few months ago, so this can be closed. Matlin (talk) 15:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Procedural close. Nomination too broad to be handled by current admin work force. Please nominate individual images to be considered out of scope, or in smaller batches. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 03:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non notable people, out of scope and not in use

— Racconish💬 16:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:53, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal charts, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. See description: "Has bank accounts abroad, which were not declared in the 3 of 3" Feyth (talk) 00:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-free material -- Asclepias (talk) 00:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of non-free photo. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quién es? 181.203.4.97 01:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quiénes son? 181.203.4.97 01:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:20, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English: 1223342 181.203.4.97 01:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es trabajo del usuario 181.203.4.97 01:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es trabajo del usuario 181.203.4.97 01:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:18, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unspecified candy. (= Result of my attempt to categorize this photo.) Feyth (talk) 02:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was shared by mistake Aditya Vikram Singh Gaharwar (talk) 02:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kannansivaram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and stamps. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:51, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kannansivaram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Duplicates. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

just random crap --FMSky (talk) 07:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible ad, no encyclopedic value CoffeeEngineer (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cooper Robertson.jpg ImChessFan21 (talk) 08:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

? Kadı Message 08:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:08, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-wikipedian: Out of. No notability, unknown --Karim talk to me :)..! 08:41, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alternate history maps by User:Kostas2005

[edit]

Files by User:Kostas2005. Fictional "alternate History" maps. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 11:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused signature of uploader. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Educational value is not shown. Taivo (talk) 11:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 11:30, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with this deletion request. CameronFromCA (talk) 22:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"alternate History" fictional map. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 12:03, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:09, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete it, too low quality Tom5551 (talk) 16:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite a policy that shows this image is too low quality. The object is still recognizable, and do we have another picture with that particular advertising? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary. Throwaway865432 (talk) 17:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only file. GeorgHHtalk   18:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The starting material should be ethyl cyanohydrin, not propyl cycanohydrin. I have created File:Acrylonitrile synthesis from ethyl cyanohydrin.svg as a replacement. Innerstream (talk) 20:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asf Dine Ysf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. -- see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by AsfDine2018

Habertix (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no quality Xocolatl (talk) 20:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bahaa Noseir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose with file names that do not make sense to me. It is possible that the photos of the ocean have a use, but without a description, I am at a loss

Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hi there guerillero , try to tell me in a simple way what you want from me please Bahaa Noseir (talk) 22:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of non-contributor used in an draft autobiography Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 22:55, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[COM:SELFIE|Selfie of non-contributor]] Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

[COM:SELFIE|Selfie of non-contributor]] Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of non-contributor Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plain wiki text GeorgHHtalk   23:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:04, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

still we write a biography of Chamazi music record label so still this photo log of company is important please don't delete Datty Tz (talk) 17:02, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:07, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon-mauvais format Tyo310 (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon-mauvais format Tyo310 (talk) 23:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon-mauvais format Tyo310 (talk) 23:22, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon-mauvais format Tyo310 (talk) 23:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doublon-mauvais format Tyo310 (talk) 23:24, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by User:Jrosales080878

[edit]

Very likely not uploader's own work. The first image's exif data has "Johnny Stevens" as the author. Meanwhile, the second image's exif data has "Gonzalo E. Pozo" as the author. While the other two do not have authors in their exif data, I significantly doubt they are the uploader's work. This image uploaded by them has "Maj. Christopher Vasquez" as the author (uploader originally uploaded it under CC, claiming to be the author). Uploader has a history of uploading copyvios on Commons and Wikipedia. Requesting deletion per COM:PCP. --– Pbrks (t • c) 02:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nomination. The claim of own work is not credible given the mish mash of EXIF data with different authors. -- Whpq (talk) 11:15, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 18:34, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown house in an unknown location. (= Result of my attempt to categorize this photo.) Feyth (talk) 01:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:00, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quién es andrian_z? 181.203.4.97 01:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader removed the deletion template, but I do not see any evidence that the uploader is the photographer, which means the file must be deleted. Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name. Ten-nen 07:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)


Kept: In use. Try {{Rename}} instead. ファイル名の間違いだけであれば {{Rename}} をお試しください. --Yasu (talk) 15:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore AkaneM (talk) 13:32, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: CC licenses are non revocable; courtesy deletion is not applicable either. --Yasu (talk) 15:12, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear license of image/no clear permission from Facebook image uploader Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Érico at 15:08, 27 July 2022 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 18:59, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS IS MY WORK I DONT WANT IT TO BE ON WIKIMEDIA ANYMORE Anhelina Starkova (talk) 12:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

this is my photo I want it to be deleted Anhelina Starkova (talk) 21:26, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IT IS MY IMAGE 84.117.86.166 11:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IT IS NOT FOR PUBLIC Anhelina Starkova (talk) 11:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded 15 months ago licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. You cannot revoke this given license. Why do you want it to be deleted? --Achim55 (talk) 15:37, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Nice photo, too. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:33, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is my image Copyright 84.117.86.166 11:46, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I want it to be deleted It it my file Anhelina Starkova (talk) 11:47, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:52, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is my photo. please delete it 185.38.216.48 11:47, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete First proposed for deletion by original uploader 1 year after original upload. Yes, we've proved the point, too late for automatic courtesy deletion, and free licenses are not revocable. However image is unused, and categorized only as "Building interiors in unidentified countries". I see no particular in scope usefulness. -- 17:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)
  •  Keep We can't allow someone to grind us down by repeatedly requesting deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:01, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:38, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SuperGion915 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Evidence for a free license should be sent to COM:VRT.

Yann (talk) 21:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: both already deleted by Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 11:45, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:50, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too similar to the background of [2] (in this article). Perhaps the uploader got this image from the author privately, or it is actually uploader's own work? An email with copy of a written permission to VRT is needed. 12:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

我,本文件的上传者,是该图片著作权人“福州格致中学学生会技术部”的代表,我校技术部是学校微信公众号图片的主要来源之一,您所指出的文章图片即系我部提供,我认为这可以被允许一稿多投 TakeuchiYui (talk) 14:01, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@TakeuchiYui:请按Commons:电子邮件模板的要求发送授权信。 14:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
已通过Outlook邮箱发送 TakeuchiYui (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Added File:Fuzhou Gezhi High School Gate.png, uploaded by the same user. Per ticket 2022061810004811, please delete these two files. Stang 23:27, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete both of the two.--TakeuchiYui (talk) 05:23, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:43, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete, typo, correct Category:Stolpersteine at Zolastraße (Berlin-Mitte) BerlinMitteFoto (talk) 21:32, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep and redirect per COM:CATRED.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:47, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: this is a simple typo, not a common one, and no one is going to ever search for the category under this name by accident. AxelBoldt (talk) 16:02, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:16, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownwork Sahaib (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownwork Sahaib (talk) 09:27, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cihuaweb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are on flickr but with a license that is not compatible with Commons. Please review.

On this flickr page are found the files uploaded to Commons: https://www.flickr.com/photos/gwendalcentrifugue/8241501526/in/photostream/

  • File:Huehuecoyotl.svg
  • File:Ometecuhtli-Omecihuatl.svg
  • File:Tezcatlipoca B.svg
  • File:Tonatiuh.svg
  • File:Xipetotec.svg
  • File:Xiuhtecuhtli.svg
  • File:Xochiquetzal.svg
  • File:Xolotl.svg

File:Mictecacihuatl.svg was the only one I couldn't find. But most probably by same artist.




The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 13:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 15:47, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Versehentlich als PNG hochgeladen. Danach habe ich es als JPG hochgeladen. PNG unscharf und redundant. Sciencia58 (talk) 08:06, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant to File:Vulva - CUMD 2.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 02:25, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein eigenes Werk, keine Rechte Nils Freiheit (talk) 14:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 02:14, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein eigenes Werk, aus Traueranzeige entnommen, Einwilligung der Angehörigen liegt nicht vor, ist aber rechtlich vorgeschrieben (§ 22 Kunsturhebergesetz) Nils Freiheit (talk) 14:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC) PS: Das ist nicht Irmgard Möller aus der RAF, sondern eine völlig unbeteiligte. Die ehemalige Terroristin Irmgard Möller ist nicht gestorben. --Nils Freiheit (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 02:13, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

versehentlich hochgeladen LoKiLeCh (talk) 18:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 02:12, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image of a non-contributer, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 12:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:33, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Raw text bio, out of scope. Achim55 (talk) 09:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:46, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hochlader offensichtlich nicht mit Urheber/ Rechteinhaber identisch, kein Hinweis, dass Hochlader berechtigt ist, das Foto unter eine CC-Lizenz zu stellen Lutheraner (talk) 18:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:43, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark from Chinese site Gaoloumi can be seen in bottom right corner —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 03:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 18:05, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of Painting by Paul R. Gregory (who is still alive). 213.54.110.71 06:34, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. That's en:Paul R. Gregory btw, not de:Paul R. Gregory. --Rosenzweig τ 18:16, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio. Google shows this image on several websites; unlikely to be “own work” just created. Larry Hockett (talk) 06:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 16:58, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Bild zeigt Mia Pittroff und nicht Liza Kos, deshalb bitte löschen - danke Schnöpf (talk) 10:19, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; I will rename the file instead. --Rosenzweig τ 16:53, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acapote311 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, not taken in 2000s, the subject died in 1984. These might be in public domain, but there is not enough information to know.

MKFI (talk) 07:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: File:JLV 15.jpg, added, File:MSW.2.jpg removed (different subject). MKFI (talk) 07:25, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The date originally uploaded was the date the photos were scanned. I have uploaded the accurate dates for the photos and sourced where I found them (Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach). Please let me know if anything else needs to be updated/changed — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acapote311 (talk • contribs) 13:35, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Acapote311: thank you for dates and sources. US copyright rules are rather complicated, these are likely public domain as {{PD-US-no-notice}} or {{PD-US-not-renewed}}. MKFI (talk) 14:12, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: NO evidence of first publication or publication without notice. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:35, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Acapote311 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader claims that these are their own work. I find this hard to believe: they're decades old.

Hoary (talk) 12:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The date originally uploaded was the date the photos were scanned. I have uploaded the accurate dates for the photos and sourced where I found them (Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach). Please let me know if anything else needs to be updated/changed Acapote311 (talk) 16:00, 20 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Acapote311, each of the three is described as your own work. Are you the photographer? If you are not, then any assertion that they're your own work is false. Who took the photographs? Who are the copyright holders? How can we be sure that the photographs are now in the public domain, that the (previous) copyright holders have explicitly waived all rights to them, or that the copyright holders have copylefted them? -- Hoary (talk) 06:35, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: unclear copyright status per discussion, uploader did not answer questions regarding this for several months. --Rosenzweig τ 16:49, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Eric Gerets 1995 Lierse SK Panini.jpg

[edit]
  • Speedy delete. Copyvios. Works published after February 1989. Not free in the United States. (The uploader mistakenly used the URAA tag, which does not apply to material directly copyrighted in the U.S., such as publications after February 1989). -- Asclepias (talk) 16:37, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Can you please explain why these would not be ok on Commons ? I am from Belgium and not completely acute on US laws. I was specifically told to include model "PD-1996" for stickers edited prior to 1977 and model "Not-PD-US-URAA" for those as of 1977... but these are all free of rights in Italy, country of origin ! All Panini stickers older than 20 years are ok... Is there any other license model to be used ? Thanks ! Garulfo71 (talk) 18:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Garulfo71, Oui, pour des images qui sont admissibles à PD-Italy, le modèle PD-1996 peut convenir aux images qui ont été publiées jusqu'au 31 décembre 1975 inclusivement, et le modèle URAA peut convenir aux images publiées ensuite mais seulement à celles publiées avant le 1er mars 1989. Cela parce que les droits d'auteur aux États-Unis sur ces œuvres publiées de 1976 à 1989 leur ont été attribués rétroactivement par l'URAA. Par contre, toutes les œuvres publiées à partir du 1er mars 1989 ont acquis directement des droits d'auteur aux États-Unis (sans rapport avec l'URAA). Ainsi, elles ne peuvent pas être versées sur Wikimedia. La page Commons:Hirtle chart peut servir de guide pour évaluer le statut de droit d'auteur d'une œuvre aux États-Unis en fonction de sa date de publication et des formalités applicables. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bjr Asclepias, je n'arrive pas à saisir comment une image libre de droits dans son pays d'origine peut ne pas être libre aux US et du coup ne pas être versée sur Wikimedia ! Cela va tout de même totalement à l'encontre du droit international ! Garulfo71 (talk) 14:24, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Les lois de différents pays sont différentes. Wikimedia, dont les serveurs principaux sont aux États-Unis, doit suivre la loi des États-Unis. Par ailleurs, par une politique volontaire de régie interne, Commons choisit de suivre en plus la loi du pays d'origine. Cette politique essentiellement interne de Commons peut parfois donner aux utilisateurs de Commons une fausse impression que la loi du pays d'origine aurait quelque chose de spécial, mais en fait il n'en est rien. La loi du pays d'origine a juridiction sur l'usage qui est fait à l'intérieur de ce pays. Quelqu'un qui utilise l'œuvre dans un autre pays doit suivre la loi du pays dans lequel il utilise l'œuvre. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:08, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Garulfo71: Certains pays, dont les États-Unis, n'utilisent pas la Règle du terme le plus court, ce qui fait les droits sont protégés sur une durée plus longue que dans le pays d'origine. Voir COM:URAA pour la (très longue) discussion sur cette question. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 14:06, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination, discussion. We're not even sure for many or all of these that they are "Italian" photos (as in: they were first published there), nor do I think that they are "simple" photos of the kind for which {{PD-Italy}} is meant. The URAA aspect is a secondary consideration. --Rosenzweig τ 16:40, 29 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and:

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a newspaper article of January 2021. Copyright owner is Nuri Fatolahzadeh, a Journalist, not the uploader. Moliva (talk) 12:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:40, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS IS MY WORK I DONT WANT IT TO BE ON WIKIMEDIA ANYMORE Anhelina Starkova (talk) 12:28, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licencing information here is clearly bogus - this is not an "own work" image, it's a low quality, metadata free screenshot of a professionally made map. The bottom of the image even has what appears to be the remains of some kind of credit or copyright statement on it, but this has been uploaded at such a low resolution I can't read it. Unless the source can be identified and it can be verified to be under a compatible licence it should be deleted. 192.76.8.88 12:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an "own work" image, it's a low quality, metadata free screenshot of a professionally made map. There appears to be some kind of disclaimer or copyright information at the bottom of the image, but this is so low quality it is unreadable. Unless the source can be identified and it can be verified to be under a compatible licence it should be deleted. 192.76.8.88 12:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The certificate is protected with copyright and the uploader is NOT a copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 13:15, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:41, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es usuaria o Wikipedista 181.203.4.97 14:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is scope? 181.203.4.97 14:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is scope? 181.203.4.97 14:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is duplicate Tom5551 (talk) 16:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of what? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no answer. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is duplicate Tom5551 (talk) 16:17, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Of what? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no answer. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:43, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete it, duplicate Tom5551 (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate of what? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:05, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete it, its copy Tom5551 (talk) 16:25, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Don't be lazy, link to the copy. Sigh. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

26 kb, no metadata. probably not "own work". what is this? Xocolatl (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:57, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wikipedia admin ETIENNE has rejected this content since it's not relevant from his perspective. Thus, I believe this content can be erase from Commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 11:59, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the uploader of this picture. I added this picture in a wikipedia page related to a small town in Italy. Nonetheless, wikipedia admin ETIENNE deleted my content since it was not relevant according to wikipedia guidelines (this picture represent a local football team which is not relevant according to wikipedia rules). Thus, since this picture cannot be included in any kind of wikipedia page, I believe it should be cancelled from commons' servers. Wikiar001 (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:37, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation? wrong date... Xocolatl (talk) 19:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

photo does not have any copyright restraints. R6830 (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright Violation: Blurred image and there is no source. 84.239.49.176 19:43, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Romania. Per description, the ceiling was painted in 1988–1989 by Daniel Neamu. The photo is protected with his copyright until 70 years from his death. Taivo (talk) 21:31, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:35, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGINGGranger (talk  · contribs) 21:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "unknown german painter" owns the copyright of the underlying work Guerillero Parlez Moi 23:02, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This painting was gifted to my grandparents in Greece during the Nazi occupation around 1941-1945. My Greek grandparents provided vegetables to the neighborhood via a street cart and a starving German soldier asked for some food even though he had no money. They gave him food and in return he gifted them this painting which hung in my grandparents house from that point until 1970 when my father immigrated to the US with his belongings. There is no specific knowledge of the painter or soldier and no further information is known. It is assumed it's a German painter, however no real information of its origin is documented. 73.17.55.202 23:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:38, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is taken from the company's website without any permission. A possible copyright violation. 84.239.49.146 19:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from https://www.sunstar.com.ph/article/162545/Business/Colorful-people-of-the-flood-plains Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:38, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation from https://www.mymindanao.com/2018/01/inaul-festival-2018-schedule-of-events.html Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:39, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educational/OOS. Primarily uploaded for spamming.

NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 16:58, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Spam. Uploaded by global locked account. The Wikidata item should be also deleted. --SCP-2000 06:49, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:01, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not properly licensed, taken from website of subject MB (talk) 22:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date, no metadata. copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 11:33, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:21, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Copyrighted elements used. Jahobr (talk) 12:11, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per nom. SCP-2000 14:52, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very bad quality. Does not represent the object adequately. Already many pictures with a similar motif, but much better quality. Geoprofi Lars (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Surely not "very bad". The subject is distinct and identifiable in the image. This image is not significantly worse than many other images in the category. The number of better images on a topic is generally not a reason to delete an image. --ŠJů (talk) 00:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
As you can read in Commons:D: Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. --Lukas Beck (talk) 04:25, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Per above. Out of scope. Low quality photo. --SCP-2000 06:44, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Krd 08:22, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Features political promotion by Azerbaijan - the white writing on the ground says "Qarabag Azerbaycandir" ("Karabakh is Azerbaijan"). Other photos posted by this user related to Azerbaijani president website should be scrutinised for propaganda Armatura (talk) 17:38, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this is my opinion as the nominator. Armatura (talk) 22:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: not a good reason for deletion. Uploaded images may contain text that advocates an idea. Solavirum (talk) 15:26, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NB: This user is indefinitely banned on English Wikipedia for multiple violations, mostly in Armenia-Azerbaijan topic. Armatura (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nom. Archives908 (talk) 15:31, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Archives908, I should point out that this is not a voting and I'm failing to see any guidelines being cited in favor of the file's deletion. Armatura, COM:NPOV cleary states that "files uploaded here do not necessarily need to comply with the Neutral point of view ... requirements imposed by many of the Wikipedia sites". Furthermore, Armatura, calling a photograph "propaganda" is one of "examples of subject matter disputes that are not appropriate here", per the guideline I've cited in this paragraph. Please, in the future, take a notice to that. Solavirum (talk) 15:40, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: No any valiable reason for deletion is provided. White writing "Qarabag Azerbaycandir" ("Karabakh is Azerbaijan") on the ground is not a reason. By the way Karabakh region is internationally recognized part of Azerbaijan. So there is no any problem with that writing. The nomination is typical example of WP:IDONTLIKEIT. --Interfase (talk) 20:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
NB: This user is the uploader of the photo nominated for deletion. Armatura (talk) 22:43, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And? Does it mean that my arguments must be ignored? Is there any rule about it? --Interfase (talk) 06:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The licensing is in tact and the claim is irrelevant for me Toghrul R (talk) 06:57, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is no freedom of panorama in Azerbijan - does the structure to the left of the writing on the ground count as architecture or art? If so, it is protected. (The message itself isn't a problem - while it may be propaganda, Commons allows far more controversial signs to be shown.Nigel Ish (talk)
It's two stones painted in white. I doubt it can be considered as architecture or art. — Golden call me maybe? 11:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per COM:INUSE and COM:NPOV. Even the structure to the left of the writing on the ground is copyrighted, it is a small part of photo, so this photo could satisfy COM:DM requirements. --SCP-2000 09:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably in public domain, but low quality, wrong date, wrong author and so on. Xocolatl (talk) 20:12, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

fixed license and description/date —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:05, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Krd 08:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not "own work". looks like a bad scan... Xocolatl (talk) 21:00, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Xocolatl: Hello sir. I'm new to Commons so I'm not familiar with some of the rules. Please forgive me if I made some mistake in the process of uploading the picture. Thank you.--रोहितबातचीत 06:53, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:24, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear license of image/no clear permission from Twitter image uploader Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:42, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Kadı Message 10:00, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instagram 181.203.4.97 14:40, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: copyvio, [3]. --Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a scan from a book - apparently , published in 1943, and therefore not the uploader's own work as claimed by the licence. Nigel Ish (talk) 16:51, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; not enough information to determine copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 10:49, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of photo from book, apparently en:Bombers Fly East, published in 1943 and therefore not the uploader's own work as claimed by the licence. Nigel Ish (talk) 16:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; not enough information to determine copyright status. --Rosenzweig τ 10:51, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no obvious use, uploaded by an LTA, out of COM:SCOPE. I can't think of anywhere we would want to use a professionally made error icon that's been "liquified". This is not going to be of any use in project content and it isn't going to be of use in system messages. In the process of being "liquified" some horrible looking artefacting has been created in the shadow effect. 192.76.8.88 12:48, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusable as contains serious errors in Sanskrit text — kashmīrī 16:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Krd 10:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong information Spanishknight09 (talk) 16:52, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:55, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

That image is scam image with unfit title. Upper part of his body or head should be viewable at File:Wentworth_Miller.jpg and of character only some of w:en:Prison Break scenes what is actually (latter advice) breaking Commons current policy that content must be freely licensed which FOX's obviously is not. --5.43.78.53 12:53, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW of non-free object 137.189.240.18 06:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is indeed a derived work of graphics by the European Audience Film Reward. However, this photo has been released under a free license by the European Union which, through the European Parliament, is also awarding the European Audience Film Reward in association with the European Film Academy. Hence, the license appears to cover both, the photo and the original work as depicted. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:05, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Indeed, the image has been released on Flickr with a free licence, but the details on the image appear to be taken from the film FLEE itself, and it is not shown the owner of that copyright has given permission. Therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 15:47, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map is not readable and contains incomplete information Saad Ali Khan Pakistan (talk) 10:45, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. In addition, the data are visible on the large version. @Saad Ali Khan Pakistan: , you could consider to add {{Fact disputed}} to the file page, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. --Ellywa (talk) 15:50, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong date (he died in 2011). where is the photo from? Xocolatl (talk) 11:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. In this case it is not shown when the image has been published for the first time. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 09:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undeleted by Yann after the UDR discussion most likely due to misunderstanding: there is no evidence in the discussion (nor in the undeletion rationale) that the image should be considered a collective work. Copyright term for other photos is independent on creation date. Ankry (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep OK. So we need to assume it was published at the time. Commons:Licensing#Old orphan works should cover this. Yann (talk) 17:00, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Weak delete We need to know when this was published as we don't have evidence this was a collective work. Abzeronow (talk) 17:09, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep the license reads: "collective audiovisual or photographic work", I think people are reading it as: "collective audiovisual or collective photographic work". I have never heard of a "collective photographic work", one person chooses when to press the shutter button, and that person is the creator. I have never seen a copyright jurisdiction declare a single photographic image as a collective work. But I have seen "collective audiovisual" works, where a photomontage has a dozen images, each from a different photographer. We use photomontages here in the WikiUniverse, and we require that each creator be acknowledged. See:Category:Montages --RAN (talk) 19:17, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • COM: Bolivia says "Economic rights in collective audiovisual and photographic works, phonograms, broadcasting programs and computer or computing programs, shall last 50 years starting from their publication (emphasis mine), exhibition, fixation, transmission and utilization, as appropriate, or, if they have not been published, since their creation" Abzeronow (talk) 19:21, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • RAN has a very good point. There is no such thing as "collective photography". So this should be read as photographic work or collective audiovisual. Yann (talk) 07:20, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please present evidence that this was created before 1946 and unpublished past 1995 or that this was published before 1946, because we also need evidence this is public domain in the US, which the UDR did not resolve. Abzeronow (talk) 21:12, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • We don't need a proof of publication. As mentioned before, photographic works get into public domain 50 years after publication or creation, whatever date is the latest. Guillermo Kenning Voss is not more than 30 here, so this is from 1947 or before. Yann (talk) 18:01, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Every image prior to an exif date and gps stamp has information estimated from clues in the images, we have half a dozen images of him at various dates including his wedding. In the image he appears about age 30. I am not seeing any significant evidence presented that the age estimate is wrong. Perhaps if you presented a reliable source dating the image differently, it could supersede our own estimate. For instance if the image came from his passport, we would have an exact date. --RAN (talk) 01:17, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  This is really complicated. First, the date. The image is dated to the end of the 1930s on several web sites, for example "Kenning a fines de los años treinta" here, so 1939 would be the year to base any calculations on.

As for Bolivia's copyright law, I looked at the original text in Spanish, and it appears that the English translation is somewhat confusing or even misleading, at least it is missing a comma. Per article 19 of the law, the 50 year term from publication/creation is valid for "las obras colectivas, audiovisuales y fotográficas, los fonogramas, los programas de radiodifusión y los programas de ordenador o computación" (collective works, audiovisual works, photographic works, phonograms, broadcasting programs and computer or computing programs). So there is this 50 year term for any photographic works, regardless of author. How that plays out in this case depends on the date of first publication. If in1939 (or not before 1990), the photo would be in the PD in Bolivia, and the URAA would not have restored its US copyright. If first published at a later date (before 1990), URAA restoration might have taken place, or it might even still be protected in Bolivia. We don't know the photograph's publication history, and we also don't really know what is considered "publication" in Bolivia besides the obvious ways of printed books / newspapers etc.

To make matters even more confusing, Bolivia is a member of the Andean Community, which has a common copyright jurisdiction. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Andean Community#Threshold of originality, the Andean Court ruled that "A simple photograph that does not meet the requirement of originality cannot be considered a photographic work and is consequently not protected by copyright." The case was about Peru I think, but it should be applicable to Bolivia as well. So simple photographs (as opposed to photographic works) are not protected by copyright. COM:TOO Andean Community notes that "An example of simple photographs is a simple portrait or taken in automatic booths." Is this a simple portrait as interpreted by courts in the Andean Community? I cannot really tell, I'd need examples to compare this with.

Since there are clearly (too) many unknowns here, we should probably go with {{PD-old-assumed}} and wait until 2060 unless we can find out more facts that enable us to come to another decision. --Rosenzweig τ 07:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Rosenzweig. holly {chat} 18:07, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear license of image/no clear permission from Facebook image uploader Sanglahi86 (talk) 13:41, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 16:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook 181.203.4.97 14:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP. Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to insufficient of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:17, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please delete this file, low quality and private person face Tom5551 (talk) 16:20, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The face is not an issue, but as the creator I concur this is mostly redundant. The quality (resolution) is not a problem, however, and it could be cropped, etc. Week keep, no valid reasons to delete. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:03, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image is in use on the projects today. --Ellywa (talk) 16:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purported to be the logo for WJZY, but the station's actual logo is slightly different (and already uploaded to English Wikipedia). (The license is also incorrect — it is unlikely a television station group would release its logos under a Creative Commons license even if this were the legit logo, though this is likely below TOO anyway.) WCQuidditch 18:35, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, below TOO. Please feel free to replace by the correct version. --Ellywa (talk) 16:20, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture was taken during Yom Kippur War on Egyptian front, has nothing to do with aerial Iraqi raid on Israel in 67's war, thus has nothing to do with Iraqi copyrights. Amr F.Nagy (talk) 21:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The same image with less cropping can be found on https://www.almasryalyoum.com/news/details/1201466 , an Egyptian website. Probably copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 16:26, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]