Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/22
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Not in scope: flag and coat of arms of a fictional country.
Tol (talk | contribs) @ 02:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The deletion is not nessasary the pictures were made for a page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowie81 (talk • contribs) 02:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
+ 1, same reason. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 02:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly OOS. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 02:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Personal image by non contributor. Yann (talk) 09:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of user page: spam/advertising. Speedy deletion template removed by the user, and I'd prefer not to edit war over it, so I'm sending it here. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 04:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Taken directly from Instagram account. The source does not mention a license. TOW talk 06:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
この画像の作者は使用を許可していません。 消しゴムみかん (talk) 08:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:12, 22 April 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: この画像に描かれているScratchCatなどは、Scratch利用規約5.4により、特定のライセンスプログラムまたは契約に基づいてScratchからライセンスを取得していない限り使用できないため。The Scratch Cat etc. depicted in this image cannot be used unless licensed from Scratch under a specific license program or contract according to Scratch Terms of Use 5.4 --Krdbot 19:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Wouldn't this be out of scope? file has no use anywhere or anything on commons to relate to it, not sure who would want to use an anime clip on here, if so then close the request. BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Note that I just uploaded it and haven't been able to add anything yet. However, articles like w:Hentai (anime/eroge section) and w:Eroge articles were ones where I was planning to use it. One use case is to remove some user:Midnight68 images that there are currently. -- Zache (talk) 18:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- There is also article about the game in two ja.wikipedia and zh.wikipedia about the game. @BlinxTheKitty: Was this explanation about the rationale enough or do we need to continue the deletion request? --Zache (talk) 18:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- If so, then feel free to have the request closed. BlinxTheKitty (talk) 23:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: not out of scope --Zache (talk) 06:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate, duplicate version File:Tomb of Manuel Teixeira Gomes.png Ser.Silv. (talk) 23:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dupe-processed to File:Túmulo de Manuel Teixeira Gomes.png. --Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
yanlış foto eklendi. Webmasterjob (talk) 08:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Das historische Foto zeigt Wasungen 1991, dies entspricht nicht mehr dem heutigen Zustand. Es wird aber auch bei der Googlesuche immer als erstes angezeigt, was zur Verwirrung von Nutzern führen kann. Daher bitten wir Löschung. Tourist-Information Wasungen (talk) 09:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Es ist ein historisches Foto und auch als solches gekennzeichnet. Gerade deshalb ist dieses Foto doch aber auch lexikalisch bedeutsam. Commons sammelt eben gerade auch historische Fotos. Ein Löschgrund ist nicht ersichtlich, die Löschbegründung hanebüchen. --Dk0704 (talk) 11:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In addition, we are not responsible for Google's search results. --Achim55 (talk) 08:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
looks not like "own work" - cf. metadata and low quality. Xocolatl (talk) 22:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, https://www.mkmusic.com.br/cast/anderson-freire/. --Túrelio (talk) 09:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 07:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
out of scope. Xocolatl (talk) 22:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- hello Xolcatl I believe that this is totally within scope as Mr. LindenBaltt is a Sao Tome native. I'm sorry if there was confusion :). Mrschmidtfan101 (talk) 17:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Content intended as vandalism (G3). --Эlcobbola talk 17:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Looks like a youtube thumbnail from here: https://ar.pinterest.com/pin/122512052349540112/ Putitonamap98 (talk) 05:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:56, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality because of incorrect file format, replaced by File:5-Methyl-7-methoxyisoflavone.svg. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 06:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:49, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution images without EXIF data. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Mollymcgrathvt.jpg
- File:Danielle Trotta bun.jpg
- File:Kaitlyn Vincie 21.jpg
- File:Kaitlyn Vincie headshot.png
IronGargoyle (talk) 05:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:48, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Claimed as own work but as you can see they are screenshots from tv shows, no exif, PCP
- File:Kaitlyn Vincie Racehub 2020.jpg
- File:Lauren Shehadi.png
- File:Danielle Trotta BST2.jpg
- File:Danielle Trotta BST.jpg
- File:Danielle Trotta RH.jpg
- File:Danielle Trotta LM.jpg
- File:Kaitlyn Vincie NASCAR Raceday 2019.jpg
- File:Kaitlyn Vincie William Byron 2018.jpg
- File:Kaitlyn Vincie NASCAR Raceday.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, previous section. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:32, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gallambria (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused CoA and "army unit colour patches" by fictional nation; either no educational value or easier replaced (where needed) by existing files already sorted in shape categories.
- File:New Gallambrian CoA.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0041.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0042.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0040.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0030.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0029.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0028.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0027.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0026.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0025.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0009.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0008.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0007.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0011.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0012.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0010.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0006.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0001.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0005.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0004.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0003.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - MED0002.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0015.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0014.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0013.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0012.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0011.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0009.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0010.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0008.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0007.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0006.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0005.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0004.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0003.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0002.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ARM0001.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0022.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0023.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0021.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0020.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0019.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0018.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0017.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0016.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0015.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0014.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0013.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0012.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0011.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0010.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0008.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0007.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0009.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0005.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0006.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0004.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0003.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0002.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - INF0001.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0010.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0009.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0007.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0008.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0006.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0005.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0004.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0001.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0003.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - ATY0002.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0033.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0034.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0035.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0036.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0037.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0038.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0039.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0002.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0001.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0003.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0004.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0005.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0006.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0008.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0007.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0009.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0010.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0011.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0012.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0013.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0014.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0015.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0016.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0017.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0018.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0019.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0020.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0021.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0022.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0023.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0024.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0025.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0026.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0027.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0028.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0029.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0031.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0030.svg
- File:Gallambrian Army - Unit Colour Patch - HQS0032.svg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:36, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jhonazofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional images of a non-notable YouTuber. Out of project scope. No evidence of permission from photographer(s).
- File:Sesion de Fotos Jhonaz 2021.jpg
- File:Jhonaz Perfil.jpg
- File:Cover de Jhonaz Confusión.jpg
- File:Jhonaz Cantante.jpg
- File:Jhonaz con Guitarra.jpg
- File:Jhonaz street.jpg
- File:Jhonaz promocionales tv.jpg
- File:Jhonaz Youtuber.jpg
- File:Jhonaz para Youtube.jpg
- File:Jhonaz 2022.jpg
- File:Jhonaz vestido de gala.jpg
- File:Jhonaz en Love Yourself.jpg
- File:Jhonaz en el show de la explosion cretiva 2019.jpg
- File:Jhonaz alfombra roja de explosión Creativa.jpg
- File:Jhonaz en canal i.jpg
- File:Jhonaz en Mujeres en todo.jpg
- File:Jhonaz junto a Dereck Blanco en Globovisión.jpg
- File:Jhonaz interpretando Colors en la ciudad de Caracas.jpg
- File:JHONAZ TOCANDO GUITARRA.jpg
- File:Firma Jhonaz.png
- File:JHONAZ pORTADAS (2).jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 17:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AndrewJacksonn123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fictional maps about an election that hasn't yet occurred. No educational value. User has a history of similar uploads, which were deleted previously.
- File:2024 VT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 UT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 TN Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 SC Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 OR Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 OK Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 ND Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NY Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NM Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NJ Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NE Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MS Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MD Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 ME Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 LA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 IN Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 ID Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 IL Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 CT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 CO Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 CA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 AR Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 AL Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 AZ Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 FL Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 GA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NV Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NC Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NH 2024 Pres.png
- File:2024 MN 2024 Pres.png
- File:2024 MN 2024 Pres.png
- File:2024 PA 2024 Pres.png
- File:2024 Iowa Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 Ohio Pres 2024.png
- File:Wisconsin 2024.png
Eureka Lott 23:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete will become misleading after the 2024 US presidential election. Verbcatcher (talk) 03:23, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Mr. C.C.Hey yo!I didn't do it! 03:24, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AndrewJacksonn123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fantasy maps for an election that hasn't happened yet, Out of Scope
- File:2024 AK Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 WY Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 WV Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 WA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 VA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 VT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 UT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 TN Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 SC Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 OR Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 OK Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 ND Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NY Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NM Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NJ Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NE Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MS Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 MD Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 ME Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 LA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 IN Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 ID Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 IL Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 CT Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 CO Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 CA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 AR Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 AL Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 AZ Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 FL Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 GA Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NV Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NC Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 NH 2024 Pres.png
- File:2024 MN 2024 Pres.png
- File:2024 MI Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 PA 2024 Pres.png
- File:2024 Iowa Pres 2024.png
- File:2024 Ohio Pres 2024.png
- File:Wisconsin 2024.png
Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AndrewJacksonn123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]More misleading maps of an election that hasn't yet happened. Delete all as out of scope.
- File:2024 California.png
- File:2024 Arizona.png
- File:2024 Nevada.png
- File:2024 New Hampshire.png
- File:2024 Minnesota.png
- File:2024 MI Prez.png
- File:2024 PA Prez.png
- File:2024 Ohio Prez.png
- File:2024 FL Prez.png
- File:2024 WI Map.png
Eureka Lott 18:22, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:07, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Fantasy maps by AndrewJacksonn123. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 13:50, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
Poor quality because of incorrect file format, replaced by File:10-Deoxymethynolide.png. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 11:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 05:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Файл больше никогда не будет использоваться. Origami2021 (talk) 07:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 15:39, 30 April 2022 UTC: No permission since 22 April 2022 --Krdbot 20:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Файл не использовался больше года и не будет использоваться в дальнейшем. Origami2021 (talk) 07:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 15:39, 30 April 2022 UTC: No permission since 22 April 2022 --Krdbot 20:01, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be pulled off a formatted website, and quality of the image is very, very low. Sadads (talk) 20:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- According to TinyEye, the image comes from https://wacapol.com/es/inicio/.
- Also that user uploaded Black images. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Beauty_of_darkness.jpg
- Also add Quality Image categories to her uploaded pictures.
- ----> all contributions of that user should be double checked.
- Anthere (talk) 22:54, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- Found it on Wayback machine. https://web.archive.org/web/20190317121928/http://www.wacapol.com/en/ -- notafish }<';> 08:10, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- notafish }<';> 08:21, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Personal artwork created with Paint with no educational value; out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 09:28, 2 May 2022 UTC: Personal photo by non-contributors (F10) --Krdbot 13:44, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
According to its website, the tourist destination was opened in 2009, and built in 2008. Thus the sculptors of the 3D works inside the park are likely still alive or not yet dead for more than 50 years (but, COM:URAA and also COM:CHARACTER for sculptures of Kung Fu Panda and Madagascar characters[!!!]). There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines for commercial exploitations of public art here without artists' licensing permissions.
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 01.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 02.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 03.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 04.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 05.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 06.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 07.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 08.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 09.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 10.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 11.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 12.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 29.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 30.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 37.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 38.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 39.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 40.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 41.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 42.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 43.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 44.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 45.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 46.jpg
- File:02813jfAmana Waterpark Pandi, Bulacanfvf 48.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 02.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 03.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 04.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 06.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 09.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 11.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 34.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 35.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 36.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 37.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 38.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 39.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 40.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 41.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 42.jpg
- File:02863jfSanta Ana Pampanga Landmarks Roadsfvf 43.jpg
- File:Aamanajf.JPG
- File:Cmadagascarjf.JPG
- File:J9824PandiBulacanfvf 03.JPG
- File:J9824PandiBulacanfvf 04.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
No evidence is provided that this image is available under a suitable license and appears to just be taken from a website Simeon (talk) 10:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Picture found from facebook group : https://ibb.co/q1jTMzp Navigator84 (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Picture found from facebook group : https://ibb.co/q1jTMzp Navigator84 (talk) 13:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Picture found from facebook group : https://ibb.co/Nx6p893 Navigator84 (talk) 13:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Picture found from facebook group : https://ibb.co/Nx6p893 Navigator84 (talk) 13:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:36, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
{{copyvio}} Mentioned source site states ©2022 62.216.210.8 19:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:37, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Gmyers92102 (talk) 05:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:07, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
PR Issue. It is just created for promotion Reiro (talk) 04:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Taken from another website https://vcresearch.berkeley.edu/news/signatures_garcia_bedolla_lisa Putitonamap98 (talk) 05:39, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Google Android (talk · contribs)
[edit]it's not clear where these files were taken from and if they were indeed copyright free.
- File:Android operating system.gif
- File:Android operating system.png
- File:Android operating system.webm
- File:Android operating system.webp
- File:Android OS.gif
- File:Android OS.png
- File:Android OS.webm
- File:Android OS.webp
RZuo (talk) 06:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Khulsum dh (talk · contribs)
[edit]random drawings = com:out of scope.
RZuo (talk) 06:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Nothing we don’t already have Dronebogus (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Nothing we don’t already have Dronebogus (talk) 10:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
I cannot verify this license claim as the video has been deleted. Based on users upload history the license claim is likely fake. Gbawden (talk) 12:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:04, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Looks to be a selfie, with a higher res uncropped version existing at https://columbusunderground.com/columbus-makes-art-presents-stephanie-rond-and-columbus-open-studio-stage/ credited to Columbus Open Studio & Stage. No clear claim being made that Rond uploaded this herself under a pseudonym, and that if she did she'd rather it was credited to "Noliver99" than her own name. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Apparently CoA of a non-notable micronation; unused and seemingly nothing related online. No educational value and likely based on https://www.123freevectors.com/simple-eagle-drawing-free-vector/, which might not be below TOO/freely licensed. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
CoA of non-notable micronation, uploaded by related individual for promotion. No educational value, out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Flag of non-notable micronation, uploaded by related individual for promotion. No educational value, out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Monkyy1829 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Media all related to non-notable micronation (https://micronations.wiki/wiki/Republic_of_The_Sohnland); unused and no educational value.
- File:TextVoiceTSL EN.ogg
- File:The Sohnland Map.png
- File:Sohnlandic Currency.jpg
- File:The Sohnland Passports and Currency.png
- File:Coat of Arms of The Sohnland.png
- File:Flag of The Sohnland.png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Hoax or joke, there is no Republic of Sovyanka, see en:User:Giyzlelog/sandbox.
Achim55 (talk) 08:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also tagged the draft for deletion. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Media related to a non-notable micronation (pretty much all I could find online is https://www.nationstates.net/nation=prekrasna_gorod); no educational value.
- File:COA Prekrasna Gorod.png
- File:Prek.Gor. Map.png
- File:Prekrasna Gorod Flag.png
- File:Coat of arms Prek.Gor..png
- File:Presidential St. Prek. Gor..png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
CoA of non-notable micronation (all I could find online is https://micronations.wiki/wiki/Kingdom_of_Dominel and https://austenasiantimes.wordpress.com/2020/11/19/dominel-granted-protected-state-status/). No educational value; out of COM:SCOPE. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused flag and CoA of non-notable micronation (all I could find online is this Facebook profile); no educational value.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bhabani sanker behera (talk · contribs)
[edit]Either SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) or probably copyright violation of logos (not of photos)
- File:Chill with friends.jpg
- File:Sahil ray family.jpg
- File:Sahil ray have near all type of graphic card.jpg
- File:Sahil ray the gamer with his parents.jpg
- File:Sahil ray and misty ray.jpg
- File:SAHIL RAY FATHER NIHAR RANJAN RAY.jpg
- File:LIRIL RAY WITH MISTY RAY.jpg
- File:SAHIL RAY THE GAMER LOGO.jpg
- File:Sahil ray the gamer with his sister misty ray.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 14:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DeLavoipiere (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flag and coats of arms of non-notable micronation (no results online for "Chrynisia" and only a 404 site for "Chrynisie" apart from Commons itself); currently only used in personal sandbox (fr:Utilisateur:Damastrage/Brouillon). No educational value.
- File:CoatOfArmsOfChrynisia.png
- File:Sketch-1626338558573.png
- File:Drapeau-Royaume-Chrynisie.jpg
- File:Grandes-Armoiries-Royaume-Chrynisie.png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by João Manoel Sousa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Media related to non-notable micronation (only self-published search results online); unused except for flag, which is used only in a personal sandbox that appears to be a hoax. No educational value.
- File:Cédula de 100 Manolis de Minilândia.png
- File:Antigo Brasão de Minilândia.png
- File:Brasão de Minilândia.png
- File:Bandeira de Minilândia.png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Coastiestevie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Media related to non-notable micronation; unused except for CoA, which seems to appear unintentionally at tr:Şablon:Yerleşim bilgi kutusu/test.
- File:Commonweath of dracul navy ensign.png
- File:Coat of arms.png
- File:Commonweath of dracul.png
- File:Dracul Seal.png
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reynahicckens12 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flag and CoA of non-notable micronation (https://micronations.wiki/wiki/They_Kingdom_of_Glasgowel, also what is this page); no educational value.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
CoA of non-notable micronation; see also fr:Spécial:Journal/Kevin8745. No educational value. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:07, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S5you Stanley w (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo: unclear what this is about, probably the logo of the uploader. The other photo is SD|F10 (personal photos by non-contributors).
- File:London city of New York city Hall is IMG 20220120 130122 475.jpg
- File:Londen city of London skyline from London city IMG 20210328 214239 127.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 15:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Acceso abierto 2020 lmichan (1).jpg
- File:La taxonomía en México siglo XX.png
- File:Usar información digital.jpg
- File:Cómo usar colecciones bibliograficas.jpg
- File:Evaluar un sitio web .jpg
- File:Etiqueta en la clase virtual.jpg
- File:Ciencia en tres idiomas.jpg
- File:Infografía metadatos.jpg
- File:Investigación digital.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: One fantasy map, seven fantasy flags/sigils, two more photographs with doubtful educational value. At least map and photographs were possibly lifted from this fanwiki, copyright violation is possible (compare also different image sources) and "own work" is unlikely at least for some pictures.
- File:Ulfheimr territory map.png (map)
- File:Taela.png (flags/coas/sigils)
- File:Heimdallr.png
- File:Dauderman.png
- File:Sigrkyn.png
- File:GRATABLOD.png
- File:Dagrtribe (1).png
- File:Bjartloss.png
- File:Ecstacy.png (b/w photo)
- File:Viking with Magnum Dong.jpg (color photo)
Enyavar (talk) 15:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Titimagnino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Flag and CoA of non-notable micronation or fictional country; no educational value.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:08, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Supermind (talk · contribs)
[edit]Video screenshots, please provide source info.
- File:Selam Tesfaye in September 2018.jpg
- File:Zeritu Kebede at Negat Concert in 2020.jph.jpg
- File:Elias Melka (Ethiopian composer).jpg
- File:Elias Melka.jpg
- File:Eyob Mekonnen.png
- File:Adanech Abebe.png
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by The Supermind (talk · contribs)
[edit]Blatant screenshots stolen from non-free YouTube videos (e.g., File:Caleb Maekins - Work as Worship.jpg is here; File:Ali Birra in 2017.jpg and File:Ali Birra in 2017 (cropped).jpg are [1]; etc.)--see also File:Menelik Wossenachew.jpg from here. Note also low res, no EXIF, and uploader has significant copyvio history (including lying about authorship).
- File:Caleb Maekins - Work as Worship.jpg
- File:Ali Birra in 2017 (cropped).jpg
- File:Ali Birra in 2017.jpg
- File:Elias Melka.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 17:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Tagged by @Afeef: as lacking permission; unclear what permission is lacking; I suspect tagging is prudery related. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN. Nothing we don't have. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
No EXIF data other than a reference to Instagram, looks suspiciously like a team photo. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Bit of promotional, resume-style text. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:09, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Illegible, unused screenshot with no educational value; out of COM:SCOPE 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 18:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
low quality, no proper description or category Xocolatl (talk) 20:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
One of a series of images including nudity or sexuality tagged by User:Afeef as supposedly missing permission. Converting to deletion request. Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete COM:PORN. Nothing we don't have. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 21:18, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:10, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herzi Pinki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: see https://www.wandersite.ch/Europaweg_wegweiser.jpgreference to {{Panoramafreiheit Friedo (talk) 17:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Das ist ein öffentliches Wegzeichen; daher bitte nicht löschen. Friedo (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Für Bilder von öffentlichen Wegzeichen, die nicht von dir stammen, brauchst du eine Freigabe unter einer freien Lizenz vom ursprünglichen Fotografen. Panoramafreiheit gilt nur für deine eigenen Bilder. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:41, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyvio: Copyright holder Johanna Passon 217.239.1.41 14:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Link doesn't seem to show the copyright mark; here's another try (click on the image in the gallery, and the name of the copyright holder will appear below the full size image). --217.239.1.41 14:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. Hulged (talk) 00:46, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:09, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 13:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:53, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:PACKAGING. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:55, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope, from Minecraft. BlinxTheKitty (talk) 17:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Also copyright issues. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:56, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
copyright violation Xocolatl (talk) 22:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clearly copyvio[2]. --Túrelio (talk) 08:35, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Concorde2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Ci roma.jpg
- File:Trajan's Market, Rome, .jpg
- File:Colonne Trajane.jpg
- File:La naissance d'Hélène de l'œuf..jpg
- File:Préhistoire de la pierre taillée.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 16:31, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herbythyme as no source (No source since). But Commons doesn't need a source/reference for the text (assuming it is indeed own work). On the other hand, it is plain text, hence out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Raw text personal essay, thus out of scope. --Achim55 (talk) 18:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)
Editorial use only. Probably a non-free media file. Velocitas (talk) 18:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Velocitas, as I understand the image is cleared by the Dutch Press Agency ANP. Rednasberg (talk) 19:59, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete In the United Press International (UPI) website under the description of this photo it says "License Photo" (i.e. to use it, one must pay) and at the bottom says "Copyright © 2022 United Press International, Inc. All Rights Reserved". On the Dutch Press Agency ANP, it says "Mandatory Credit: Photo by Vladyslav Musienko/UPI/Shutterstock (12882905a)" and it is the same situation to license the photo (i.e. to use it, one must pay). No proof of free license. Tm (talk) 16:41, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: unfree file. --Wutsje 13:03, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
no proper description or category. not useful. Xocolatl (talk) 20:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own work: low-res web-sized image with FB code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia AlexMahlon (talk) 02:33, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; not sure about own work claim. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lord Belbury as Dw no source since (dw no source since) JopkeB (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is a cropped version of a painting (1871) by Henrik Olrik (1830–1890) (see for instance File:Christian IX af Henrik Olrik.jpg Note: this is not the photo were this file was cropped from). So the painting is in the public domain and therefor the photo also because this is a two-dimensional work of art, then the photo also is in PD, no matter who took it or when it was taken. I changed some data in the file (licence, source, description and author) to better values and now I think this file may stay. --JopkeB (talk) 14:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
This file has been kept: no copyright violation because the painting is in the public domain (the painter died in 1890, so well over 70 years ago) and so is the photo. --JopkeB (talk) 05:31, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
mistake Mar (talk) 17:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Creator's request, bad name. --Achim55 (talk) 14:57, 9 July 2022 (UTC)
Загружено по ошибке Arman Militosyan (talk) 09:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Rubin16 at 07:07, 8 August 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; can usually be uploaded to your local Wikipedia as fair use if an article exists (F1) --Krdbot 12:46, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:38, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
copie de https://parissecret.com/octobre-rose-2019-dido-et-catherine-ringer-en-concert-gratuit-et-tour-eiffel-paree-de-rose-a-paris/ et de https://www.francedimanche.fr/actualites/paul-amar-j-ai-echappe-de-peu-a-la-mort
Habertix (talk) 21:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio by an user who have a bad history. Miniwark (talk) 17:41, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as this is confirmed copyvio. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:49, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 10:52, 18 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KEMET2040 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CC-BY-SA 4.0 requires that a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable be provided, but there is no hyperlink to the photo provided anywhere on this page even though it would be practical to do. This does not appear to be an upload of one's own work, so this is a copyright violation under the terms of CC-BY-SA 4.0. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.133.57.178 (talk) 00:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete.--Faisal talk 06:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KEMET2040 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CC-BY-SA 4.0 requires that a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable be provided, but there is no hyperlink to the photo provided anywhere on this page even though it would be practical to do. This does not appear to be an upload of one's own work, so this is a copyright violation under the terms of CC-BY-SA 4.0. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.133.57.178 (talk) 02:06, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete.--Faisal talk 06:03, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Túrelio. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by KEMET2040 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CC-BY-SA 4.0 requires that a URI or hyperlink to the Licensed Material to the extent reasonably practicable be provided, but there is no hyperlink to the photo provided anywhere on this page even though it would be practical to do. This does not appear to be an upload of one's own work, so this is a copyright violation under the terms of CC-BY-SA 4.0. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 197.133.57.178 (talk) 02:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete.--Faisal talk 06:02, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Taivo. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheWalkingLag55 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: low quality photographs of a screen; displaying game maps and game characters of a video game. Game itself might even be relevant (offshoot of en:Slender: The Eight Pages?), but only image usage is in a user page since five years abandoned. Possible copyVio as well.
- File:Mark Slender.jpg
- File:Ubicaciones De los respectivos Lugares.jpg
- File:Mapa original De Haunted Memories.jpg
Enyavar (talk) 10:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
old photo, not own work Estopedist1 (talk) 10:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN. --Gbawden (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
low quality, no description, no category, no use. Xocolatl (talk) 22:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
copyright image - no freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 22:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Image is licensed under the Creative Commons 3.0 license, still taken from this video uploaded by the cinematographer - [3] Breaktheicees (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Has cc license at source. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
One of a series of images including nudity tagged by User:Afeef as supposedly missing permission. Converting to deletion request. - Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: PCP, no meaningful exif, unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
COM:PORN 2A02:8108:50BF:C694:49A5:ABEE:9C02:3D51 09:36, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Definitely no porn. --Achim (talk) 11:25, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
Tagged by @Afeef: as "no permission". Unclear whose permission is needed; uploader appears to be photographer, and subject seen from back is not identifiable. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Unless Afeef explains the "permission" problem. Seems a decent image illustrating beach nudity. Afeef seems to be tagging images by uploader that contain nudity, but not the other images by the same photographer that do not. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per Infrogmation. --Rosenzweig τ 14:17, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
I want to delete it because I made a mistake in the file name 織原美津夫 (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete but as copyvio, not courtesy deletion: work by the illustrator Seiroku Otsuka († 1974). Not in PD. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
My Choice Muinudin (talk) 10:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
copy vio Wiki Farazi (talk) 12:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The image in question is a camera screenshot of a copyrighted still from the Netflix series, Rabbids Invasion. The image is owned by Ubisoft Motion Pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Yoshiman6464 (talk • contribs) 05:45, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Subject of the images is Marco Peresani, but the source and author is also given as Marco Peresani. Actual photographer(s) unknown.
MKFI (talk) 07:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Moved response to below nomination.
There is no real reason listed for deleting this content. I can assure that images posted have been obtained with the explicit permission of Marco Peresani, they are coming from his personal archive (i.e. not published elsewhere) and were taken privately. So they do not infringe any copyright issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chert11 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Chert11: it is best that you ask Marco Peresani to send the explicit permission to VRT (Commons:Wikimedia VRT release generator is probably easiest). Even still the images show Marco Peresani, but he is clearly not photographer - someone else took the photographs, and is thus the author. And author is the copyright owner. File:Peresani Rugby.jpg is even watermarked. Marco Peresani might own the physical photographs, but he might not actually own copyrights. MKFI (talk) 12:00, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022060710009426 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 14:00, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
- Ticket:2022060710009471 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 17:00, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:45, 11 September 2022 (UTC)
Logo obsolète, le nouveau logo est "IRUP la grande école de l'alternance" cf : www.irup.com Anthéa DI MURRO (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: we don't delete historic logos just because they're historic. --Rosenzweig τ 13:46, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo by Dutch press agency ANP. Velocitas (talk) 18:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete On the Dutch Press Agency ANP, it says that the photo was taken by RONALDO SCHEMIDT / AFP (AFP is Agence France-Presse), on every of the three versions. In every situation is the same situation the photo must be licensed the photo (i.e. to use it, one must pay). No proof of free license. Tm (talk) 16:56, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:30, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
This file is not free. Vladimir Solovjev (talk) 14:15, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Well-Informed Optimist at 18:57, 13 September 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ktitor portrait of Euphrosyne of Polotsk.png --Krdbot 00:17, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
no FOP in the United States for 3D works of art; was dedicated in 2003 per the sculptor's website and is copyrighted for 70 years PMA. Sennecaster (talk) 18:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored 70 years after sculptor Mike Escovel's death. --Rosenzweig τ 06:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Imagem fornecido por David S. Bustamante Soccrates Images Getty Images Sport pela Getty Images.jpg
[edit]copyright violation? Xocolatl (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obvious copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 06:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
No parece own work. 191.125.23.27 01:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found online and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Lower res image taken from another website https://ballotpedia.org/Erik_Simonsen Putitonamap98 (talk) 05:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:30, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
taken from another website and cropped https://hantmanlaw.com/author/atgfx/page/5/ Putitonamap98 (talk) 05:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Publicité manifeste. Je vais me pencher sur les contributions de cet utilisateur mais à première vue il n'intervient sur WP que pour sa pub. Bertrand Labévue (talk) 07:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Advertising, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
It is a picture taken from the facebook page of the municipality of charbila Daliabteklo (talk) 08:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not found online but unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:37, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
Likely copyright problem: uploaded as 'own work', but image appears on other sites eg. Facebook and IMDb. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
I don't see evidence that this is licensed under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license or that the uploader can make it available under that license Simeon (talk) 10:08, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 218.250.79.15 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F3|Copyrighted banner
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether the depicted drawings are above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, yes, above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
The image is copyrighted by the norwegian photo agency NTB. Here, the image is used, credited to Terje Pedersen/NTB scanpix: https://www.dagsavisen.no/nyheter/navn-i-nyhetene/2018/09/19/totalt-uforberedt/ Tarjeimo (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Similar looking photo in the 2018 Dagsavise article predates the 2019 Commons upload, which suggests this is not by the uploader. Dagsavise also doesnt have a CC license either. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 02:01, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:29, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
EXIF credits the image directly to John Hamon, it appears per https://twitter.com/johnhamon_ to be a self-portrait that he uses in his work. Would need evidence that he's released it under a CC-Attribution licence. Lord Belbury (talk) 11:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work from the copyrighted egg! We need the permission from Theo Fabergé's heirs.
Ras67 (talk) 11:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
one pixel difference to the original File:SNORMAN.JPG Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:41, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Support. The original had a border around it, as in a thumbnail image, so I created this cropped one. The original has since been replaced without the border. WylieCoyote (talk) 10:36, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
photograph of a copyrighted archive photo Mindmatrix 12:24, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Professional photo without exif, PCP. Uploader has a history of copyvios Gbawden (talk) 12:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
I want to delete it because I made a mistake in the file name 織原美津夫 (talk) 13:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete but as copyvio, not courtesy deletion: work by the illustrator Seiroku Otsuka († 1974). Not in PD. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Yasu. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
I want to delete it because I made a mistake in the file name 織原美津夫 (talk) 13:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete but as copyvio, not courtesy deletion: work by the illustrator Seiroku Otsuka († 1974). Not in PD. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Yasu. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE nonsense image. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 13:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Photo found on a facebook group : https://ibb.co/6ZXQx26 Navigator84 (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Photo found on a facebook group : https://ibb.co/6ZXQx26 Navigator84 (talk) 13:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Small, limited EXIF, which names the subject as copyright holder. Appears in several places on the Web with explicit copyright notices. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Maps taken from kavval.com, the terms and conditions of which autotranslate to The content and data of the Kavval Site (including, but not limited to, messages, data, information, text, music, sound, photos, graphics, videos, maps, icons, software, codes or any other element), as well as the infrastructure used to provide such content and information belong to Kavval; User agrees not to modify, copy, distribute, transmit, display, make available, reproduce, publish, license, create derivative works from, transfer, or sell or resell any information, software, products or services obtained from or through the Kavval Site.
This would seem to rule out a user taking a Kavval map and making it available on Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Marathon Geneve Carte Marathon pccqrm.jpg
- File:Marathon Geneve Carte Generale r6imr2.jpg
- File:Marathon Geneve Carte Marathon Relais q3zkar.jpg
- File:20km Paris Carte.jpg
- File:UTMB Carte Generale ci3nhj.jpg
- File:Parcours du Marathon de New-York.jpg
- File:Semi Marathon BB Carte.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:52, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused very low-res duplicate of File:Wirtland Coat of Arms.png. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 14:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. This photo is also on (among many others) https://www.businessinsider.com/hollande-is-giving-up-2014-11?international=true&r=US&IR=T. The photo is made by REUTERS/Sergei Karpukhin and I cannot imagine that this photo was licenced with CC BY-SA 4.0 AND I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 14:59, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Photo would need permission from Reuters if it is indeed under a CC license. In any case, the smaller version of the photo in the 2014 Business Insider article predates the 2022 Commons upload. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 01:59, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Unused (photograph of) logo of non-notable company; out of project scope. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:53, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Someone who is not a Wikipedian Osama Eid (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
(تعليل طلب الحذف) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hosny77 (talk • contribs) 18:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photos are a collage from photos on https://danielfooddiary.com/2019/08/09/sgfood/. This exact photo is also on https://www.jf21mall.cf/ProductDetail.aspx?iid=140479797&pr=59.88. So who made the photos and who made the collage? I do not see a VRT ticket. JopkeB (talk) 15:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:54, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work from the copyrighted egg! We need the permission from Theo Fabergé's heirs.
Ras67 (talk) 15:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
No indication (as far as I can tell) that the image was released under a free license; see source: https://m.weibo.cn/status/4760646355520422? Guettarda (talk) 16:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
No indication (as far as I can tell) that the image was released under a free license; see source https://weibo.com/u/6353282636 Guettarda (talk) 16:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. It is a logo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Twitter screenshot HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:55, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Album cover protected by copyright HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Poster protected by copyright HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Film poster protected by copyright HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PRP, and unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Book cover protected by copyright HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 00:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Book protected by copyright HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:59, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. By defapress.ir HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Watermark mashreghnews.ir HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, please delete the image. I uploaded this image incorrectly and its permissions are incorrect and the image is generally corrupted. I request to remove it. I will upload the image with the correct permission and from another source. Thanks. Ozeyr (talk) 15:13, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by De728631 at 15:35, 16 February 2022 UTC: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mohammad Amin Mirmoradzehi.jpg: Hello, please delete the image. I uploaded this image incorrectly and its permissions are incorrect and the image is generally corrupted. I request to remove it. I will upload the image with the correct permission and from another source. Thanks. --Krdbot 20:39, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Not a Tasnim work HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Why do you think it is not a Tasnim work? I don't read Farsi, but the Google translation of the credit line starts with "Tasnim News Agency:". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:54, 1 July 2022 (UTC)
- Person in this picture was killed in 1982 (about 30 years before Tasnim existed) and the content is obtained from http://sb.basij.ir/ ("به نقل از پایگاه اطلاع رسانی سپاه سلمان سیستان و بلوچستان"). HeminKurdistan (talk) 13:57, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Not published under CC HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:02, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and COM:PRP. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Scan of document by Bank Melli Iran. Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:33, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Persoanl document. Privacy violation. Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:04, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Historical photo. Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
{{Db-g7}} Miggawka (talk) 18:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- File does not qualify for G7-speedy. Uploaded in February and currently in use. --Túrelio (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: historical image missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:05, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lulucmy as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: G7
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as file does not qualify for G7-speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi,
- I would like to delete this file for privacy reasons. Lulucmy (talk) 11:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hmm, there are no people visible in this image (at least I didn't see any). --Túrelio (talk) 11:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: doesn't qualify for courtesy deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:06, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
No author mentioned, the source mentioned doesnt have any author or licensing information.But the uploader has used PD-old-100 as the reason for public license, which doesnt make sense when the author is unknown.Raised the issue for discussion on talk page, but no response received. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment – The highest resolution/quality version of the painting that I could locate on the net is at Getty Images: [4]. It was uploaded by the Universal Images Group and mentions the date of creation as 02 January, 1763, i.e. nearly one year prior to the subject's death on 25 December 1763.[1] So the painting is 250-plus years old and is obviously in the public domain. - NitinMlk (talk) 23:07, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, Thanks for clarifying, could you upload the higher resolution version with correct source to avoid similar doubts again, since this picture is being used in multiple places and depicts a prominent person. Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 06:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
- I have added the date of creation to the file. But the higher resolution version of Getty images has a watermark on it. And such watermarked images are deprecated, as they give unnecessary publicity to the private companies. So it should not be uploaded without removing the watermark. BTW. the current watermark-free version seems good enough. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
References
- ↑ Pandey, Uma Shanker (2020) European Adventurers in North India: 1750–1803 (1st ed.), Routledge, p. 31 DOI: 10.4324/9780429317668. ISBN: 978-0-429-31766-8. "The death of Suraj Mal in a battle with Najib-ud-Daula on 25 December 1763 created a succession crisis in the Jat state."
Kept: appears resolved. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
1975 or 2022? Really own work? Xocolatl (talk) 19:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- eigene Arbeit Schibelbein (talk) 22:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical image missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
wrong date - really own work? Xocolatl (talk) 19:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical image missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
1980 or 2008? really own work? Xocolatl (talk) 19:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historical image missing all essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:18, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
This is most definitely not a photo of Russian thistle, Salsola tragus/Salsola iberica Sennen, which at maturity is a large ball of painfully spiney stems forming a tumbleweed. 2600:100E:B028:240E:4CCF:9305:5893:74A6 19:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Any idea what it might be? Chris Light (talk) 02:25, 23 April 2022 (UTC) Deletions because of a miss named image file is not an appropriate approach. I always appreciate assistance in identification of botanical images. Please note that a category of 'Argemone' and not 'Kali tragus' is used, thus it only appears in a search by file name as Russian Thistle, not a reason to delete as there a numerous file names that are garbage, in spite of an attempt by commons when loading to avoid camera names, it still leaves lots of problems.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Fact disputed}} instead. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:19, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
High quality photograph but in low resolution with no exif. The uploader hasn't uploaded any other own work photographs, all their other uploads are photo montages (sometimes incorrectly labeled as own work) or copyvios labeled own work. -M.nelson (talk) 21:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of something that looks like an old painting and project drawing of Lakhta-center skyscraper that was cancelled later. Source of second image is not specified (same as source of painting), very likely usage of it here is a copyright violation. Also image seems to have no any educational value. Красный wanna talk? 21:54, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
French painter Roger Dubut died in 1960, will be in PD on 1/1/2031. Culex (talk) 15:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- On ne connait pas d'héritier à Roger Dubut, dès lors à qui demander l'autorisation ?
- Cordialement Charles Flourez (talk) 17:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The file can be restored in 2031. --Rosenzweig τ 19:37, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Not own work. Interview by BBC HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep This is only a sample of Yarshater's voice taken from the interview. Based on the WP:SAMPLE The sample was used only to add to the wikifa article linked in the usage section. It is only one general sentence. Gharouni (talk) 01:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- I couldn't find anything on WP:SAMPLE. You tagged the file as your own work with cc-by-sa-4.0 tag while the copyright holder is BBC. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- @HeminKurdistan Good day, I unfortunately was in a hurry and made a mistake then taged the sample as my own work, of course the interview is BBC's and I only took a very short sample based on WP:Sample. However, I have changed the source now. It covers the WP:saple criteria. Thanks. Gharouni (talk) 03:20, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- I couldn't find anything on WP:SAMPLE. You tagged the file as your own work with cc-by-sa-4.0 tag while the copyright holder is BBC. HeminKurdistan (talk) 07:57, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. en:WP:SAMPLE is an en.wp guideline about fair use audio samples. Wikimedia Commons however does not accept fair use content. --Rosenzweig τ 19:42, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Converting another unexplained "no permission" tag by @Afeef: into a deletion discussion listing. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:43, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
pt: Não há qualquer indicação no site de origem da imagem sobre ela estar licenciada sob CC0, domínio público ou qualquer licença livre. en: There is not any indication in the image's source about it being under CC0, public domain or any free license. Solon 26.125 23:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
pt: Atualização - Érico fez um levantamento do status de direitos autorais de imagens publicadas por governos e assembleias legislativas estaduais do Brasil, e imagens publicadas pela ALERJ (assembleia legislativa do Rio de Janeiro), como esta, não podem ser incluídas no Commons porque não são disponibilizadas sob uma licença livre. // en: Update - Érico made a survey on the copyright status of images published by state governments and legislative assemblies of Brazil, and images published by ALERJ (Rio de Janeiro legislative assembly), like this one, cannot be included in Commons due to not being disponibilized under a free license. Solon 26.125 12:08, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 09:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
This picture may have been a copyright made picture since it is similar to other pictures of this. Also can see a poor graphic of this picture and it is a stolen picture unless the picture is in clear graphic. Copied from YT which in my opinion not guaranteed to be uploaded to commons at all unless the graphics are good and the picture isn't screenshot from Youtube. See the link below which is copyright of the YT owner copyright and it was created by Funweek.it, not the creator of this picture. MrKDunleavy (talk) 09:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- @MrKDunleavy: Which other pictures? It's taken from a YouTube video from Funweek.it which they've published as CC-Attribution and credited to "TikTok Italia". Is it a copy of interview footage from somewhere else? --Lord Belbury (talk) 10:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- I just look at similar picture to this which is deleted for similar reasons in the past. There is a picture like this which is deleted too. But sadly, only administrators here will decide the fate of this picture. MrKDunleavy (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- You raised https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Khaby_lame.png last month, is that the one you mean? The deletion request here is factually incorrect when it says that the image "was created by Funweek.it, not the creator of this picture" - the source and author has always been given as funweek.it on this file. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- I just look at similar picture to this which is deleted for similar reasons in the past. There is a picture like this which is deleted too. But sadly, only administrators here will decide the fate of this picture. MrKDunleavy (talk) 14:58, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In my humble opinion it is an inconsistent deletion request. As said Lord Belbury the file has a regular CC license. --Kasper2006 (talk) 09:37, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, no explanation given of why Funweek.it might not own the copyright. Funweek.it are clearly being credited as the source of the image. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:05, 30 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment The nominator removed the deletion template on June 13 saying Deletion no longer worth it for this. --Lord Belbury (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 21:18, 28 September 2022 (UTC)
Лжефлаг, без источников. Налевайкин (talk) 13:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- It is original research -- Nikolay Omonov (talk) 13:43, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Though I really doubt that a flag that could be described as "red triangle on a transparent background" can be correct. --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
File:The Soviet Union 1980 Illustrated stamped envelope Lapkin 80-275(14289)back(The common pheasant).png
[edit]This file is the same as The Soviet Union 1980 Illustrated stamped envelope Lapkin 80-275(14289)back(The common pheasant).jpg, except this one is slightly fuzzier. Although the resolution on this file is better then the other file. There's zero point in having multiple files of the same image though. So I think this one should be deleted and the non-fuzzy one kept per the guideline that Redundant or low-quality files can be deleted on a case-by-case basis. Adamant1 (talk) 00:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Both JPEG and PNG formats can be loaded together.
See: Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in Russian. Discussion about JPEG and PNG format files in English.. Как было продемонстрировано в этих обсуждениях, файлы PNG и должны быть немного размытыми. Именно поэтому эти файлы переформатируют в JPG, которые дают четкий рисунок. Разумеется, архивные файлы PNG следует оставлять. И как сказано в Commons:Deletion policy, "it is common and useful to have both a PNG and JPEG of the same image, since (due to a long-standing issue with the thumbnailer), JPEGs thumbnail is better." Правило, что оба формата JPG и PNG одной картинки (JPG получен из PNG) следует всегда оставлять, следует также из того, что наш "Redundant" связан в основном с форматом SVG и к данному обсуждению отношения не имеет, см. Commons talk:Superseded images policy. Все дело в неправильном понимании "Redundant". Кстати, упомянутые два файла имеют картинки совершенно одинакового разрешения и почти одинакового качества. --Matsievsky (talk) 01:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Seriously dude, what part of the guidelines saying that Redundant or low-quality files can be deleted on a case-by-case basis don't you understand? It's not that complicated. You repeatedly posting the same message that miss-represents those discussions and the guidelines over and over in every deletion discussion having to do with Russian stamps is just disruptive. I'm really sick of dealing with it and your battleground behavior in every discussion. --Adamant1 (talk) 03:11, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 07:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The source website states "Copyright by ESA.". I do not see evidence this particular image can be used with one of the licences permitted on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 07:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The source website states "Copyright by ESA.". I do not see evidence this particular image can be used with one of the licences permitted on Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 07:27, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Bastille Day event coronal mass ejection and particle storm from SOHO's LASCO C2 coronagraph.gif
[edit]Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, https://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2000_07_14/, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
File:Bastille Day event coronal mass ejection and particle storm from SOHO's LASCO C3 coronagraph.gif
[edit]Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: er nomination. No sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, https://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2000_07_14/, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: er nomination. No sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, https://soho.nascom.nasa.gov/hotshots/2000_07_14/, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:31, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:32, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:33, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Warnings: Images from SOHO required permission for commercial use 218.250.79.15 10:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- The actual license information reads: "The use of SOHO images or data for public education efforts and non-commercial purposes is strongly encouraged and requires no expressed authorization." I don't see strongly encouraged as a legally binding demand of non-commercial use, merely a suggestion. --RAN (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: o sign of a PD licence or any other licencing on the source website, so therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 07:34, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright situation; the uploader only provided the data of the photo of the photo in 2015. Encycloon (talk) 11:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think i completed all copyright information; Can deletion request be removed? Ouwejokke (talk) 19:07, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Ouwejokke: IDK if that was you, but DR notices are not removed till DR is closed. If IP was not yours, I beg your pardon. A09090091 (talk) 19:40, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Krd 11:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright situation; the uploader only provided the data of the photo/scan of the photo in 2015. Encycloon (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think i completed all copyright information; Can deletion request be removed? Ouwejokke (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Krd 11:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Não é criação do próprio, sim da 777 Partners Kongs (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:52, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Not a Tasnim work HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 11:56, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Should be deleted as per Template:GODL-India discussions done for similar items here [5] Lord 0f Avernus (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This is content from the Lok Sabha, one of the two chambers of India's parliament. As far as I could find out, {{GODL-India}} does not apply to the Lok Sabha. Compare [6]. --Rosenzweig τ 14:16, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:CSM, educational noticeboards/signs aren't allowed due to potential copyvio Tcr25 (talk) 21:38, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP, COM:FOP US, not enough information about the author(s) and the year this was installed. --Rosenzweig τ 17:58, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. IRNA photo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:51, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Please note that File:Iranian Karrar Tank.jpg and File:Iranian third generation tank-Karrar.jpg are versions of the above photo. Streamline8988 (talk) 00:48, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deleted all three. --Rosenzweig τ 23:47, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
Tagged by @Afeef: as "missing permission"; I suspect the tagging is prudery related, as Afeef seems to be tagging all images by the uploader containing nudity but not all the other images by the same uploader. I offer no opinion as to if this particular image is in project scope, but suggest it be kept or deleted on that basis unless Afeef explains the permission issue they tagged. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 23:54, 2 October 2022 (UTC)
It was published without my permission by an ex-girlfriend. TheRollo76 (talk) 05:11, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Comment You're probably not recognizable to anyone who hasn't seen you naked in person, but I don't think the photo is so important that it shouldn't get a courtesy deletion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:23, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete, but with "out of scope reason" Matlin (talk) 13:34, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per Matlin, does not actually depict nude swimming, and we have no shortage of more potentially illustrative photos of men's genitalia. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --IronGargoyle (talk) 03:50, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Uncertain copyright situation; the uploader only provided the data of the photo/scan of the photo in 2022. Encycloon (talk) 11:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- I think i completed all copyright information; Can deletion request be removed? Ouwejokke (talk) 19:08, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Anonymous publication of more then 70 years ago, is in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 21:48, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
The children shown in this picture have not given their consent to upload it on commons.wikimedia.org. In addition, the children who are photographed in this picture were 7 to 14 years old when the picture was taken. I am one of them. And I see myself violated in my right to privacy and data protection. 2A02:8388:6001:1380:A41F:C1AB:DD3C:3194 12:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements#Austria, taking a picture of people and publishing it is permitted in Austria, especially if ‘’their appearance is merely accidental and not incriminating,’’ as is the case imho on this image. The image can therefore be maintained on Commons. However, not all publications might be permissible. A Personality rights warning template was already included on the file page of the image, {{Personality rights}}. --Ellywa (talk) 21:56, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
I believe this is a misinterpretation of File:Royal Niger Company flag.svg. The Royal Navy granting a warrant for a defaced white ensign with the cross of St George is most unlikely. I don't have access to the source, but believe this should be opened to discussion. Fry1989 eh? 13:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- An Admiralty warrant for this sort of ensign is indeed very unusual, but David Prothero, working off Foreign Office records, at FOTW specifically says that they did approve this for inland use but that the Company itself used the version you linked. So yes, they're different interpretations of the same warrant, but this was the approved version. The name should be changed to reflect that - I'm not sure "naval ensign" is the best way to describe it in any case. JPD (talk) 04:49, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 22:02, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
No watermark. Possibly not a work by Mehr News HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:40, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The Exif data of the photo on the source website and on the file page state "www.mehrnews.com" as copyright holder. No reason to doubt this claim imho. --Ellywa (talk) 22:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Not a Mehr News photo HeminKurdistan (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: The Exif data of the photo on the source website and on the file page state "www.mehrnews.com" as copyright holder. No reason to doubt this claim imho. --Ellywa (talk) 22:07, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Personal documents issued by Government of Iran. Privacy violated. Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Are dead people entitled to privacy? --RAN (talk) 06:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Some jurisdictions indeed honor some post-mortal personality rights, though I don't know if thats true for Iran. --Túrelio (talk) 20:39, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and per COM:PRP. The age of these documents/photo is not known, so it cannot be determined whether these are in PD. per COM:Iran it is not clear whether government documents and photos are in PD. --Ellywa (talk) 22:13, 3 October 2022 (UTC)
Privacy violation. Not own work HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:37, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Are dead people entitled to privacy? --RAN (talk) 06:23, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader – who was notified about this request – did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. Therefore – due to lack of information like source, author, publication status and creation date – this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:14, 3 October 2022 (UTC)