Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/04/19
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
_cyclam_perchlorate_Structure.jpg){kind=link}
![39 File:Крейсер "Москва" тоне.jpg + File:FQlEjIoXwAYLYpS.jpg](#File:Крейсер_"Москва"_тоне.jpg_+_File:FQlEjIoXwAYLYpS.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Copyrighted poster 219.78.190.55 02:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, clear COM:DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Загружено по ошибке Arman Militosyan (talk) 06:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader request, false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
out of scope: fictional map of Bulgaria; used only in an unused template; only context is more fictional stuff Enyavar (talk) 08:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Scene from the 1997 American film Titanic 79.145.148.64 16:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyright violation. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jennifernee1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A model (or fan of that model) uploading scans of print adverts that she has appeared in. The copyright would belong to the advertiser rather than the subject.
Lord Belbury (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
Tagged as possible copyright violation 2040901nidhichinnamanthur (talk) 11:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Your talk page is not a copyright violation. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Possible violation of copyright 2040901nidhichinnamanthur (talk) 11:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Your talk page is not a copyright violation. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Possible violation of copyright 2040901nidhichinnamanthur (talk) 11:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Your talk page is not a copyright violation. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Possible violation of copyright 2040901nidhichinnamanthur (talk) 11:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Your talk page is not a copyright violation. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and charts. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Microarray.data.png
- File:Rate of divergence C22orf15 (Molecular Clock).png
- File:Phylogenetic analysis.png
- File:C22orf15 chromosome neighbors.png
- File:Gene.neighbors.png
- File:Chromosome22.gene.map.png
- File:Possible Post Translational Modifications for C22orf15.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elhackerson (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams and chart. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rachna Aneja Giri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Chrysalis High, Marq.jpg
- File:Chrysalis High, Horamavu.jpg
- File:Chrysalis High, Bannerghatta Road.jpg
- File:Chrysalis High, Kadugodi.jpg
- File:Chrysalis High, Yelahanka New Town.jpg
- File:Chrysalis High, Varthur.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Chronic Illness and Disability.png
- File:Chronic Illness Cycle.jpg
- File:Chronic Illness picture.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MuzeumArchidiecezjalne (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, out of scope.
- File:A2jjjjh.jpg
- File:A1iiuhg.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 22.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 55.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 77.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 7.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 9.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 5.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 4.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 2.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH1.jpg
- File:ABDULLAH 3.jpg
- File:عبدالله التزكي.jpg
- File:عبدالله ابراهيم التركي.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:46, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
_cyclam_perchlorate_Structure.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_cyclam_perchlorate_Structure.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality due to incorrect file format, replaced by File:Nickel cyclam perchlorate.png. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 00:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
_cyclam_perchlorate_Structure.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:33, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
_cyclam_perchlorate_Structure.jpg){kind=link}
Low quality due to incorrect file format, replaced by File:Nickel cyclam perchlorate.png. Nucleus hydro elemon (talk) 00:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Starmetier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 00:49, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
correction of typo, left unuseful redirect Peli (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination, user request within own userspace. -- CptViraj (talk) 04:46, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Участник, загрузивший изображение, не является автором фото - оно взято с телеграм-канала
The user who uploaded the image is not the author of the photo, he took it from a Telegram channel. Vodolaz (talk) 07:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Участник, загрузивший изображение, не является автором фото - оно взято с телеграм-канала
The user who uploaded the image is not the author of the photo, he took it from a Telegram channel. Vodolaz (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:29, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Участник, загрузивший изображение, не является правообладателем фильма "17 мгновений весны", из которого взяты кадры
The user who uploaded the image does not have copyrights on the movie "17 Moments of Spring" from which the frames are taken. Vodolaz (talk) 07:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal image with no educational value; decoration elements potentially non-free. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 23:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Alaa :)..! 09:47, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Assorted low-quality COM:PORN/COM:NUDITY images
- File:+ Photographic time documentation for sexual education – Ejaculation of an impotent transgender – after 2 hours of taking Tadalafil and sexual stimulation by the photographer's wife Meike Image 003.jpg
- File:+ Wedding ring and its secret - Photographic time documentation of a photographer – Transgender in a pleated skirt on the way to the CSD 2021 in Berlin - Image 1.jpg
- File:+ Wedding ring and its secret - Photographic time documentation of a photographer – Transgender in a pleated skirt on the way to the CSD 2021 in Berlin - Image 2.jpg
- File:+ Wedding ring and its secret - Photographic time documentation of a photographer – Transgender in a pleated skirt on the way to the CSD 2021 in Berlin - Image 3.jpg
- File:+ Wedding ring and its secret - Photographic time documentation of a photographer – Transgender in a pleated skirt on the way to the CSD 2021 in Berlin - Image 5.jpg
- File:+Enlightening image documentation by a photographer– Transgender on the way to women - Hormone treatment with cream for breast growth (Estriol) - Sex Hormone - Breast in pregnancy bra – Image 6.jpg
_-_Sex_Hormone_-_Breast_in_pregnancy_bra_%E2%80%93_Image_6.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 07:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
{{copyvio|1=Copyvio from webpage https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg}} Steph55337 (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the file mentioned is not a Wikimedia Commons file. --Rosenzweig τ 13:37, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg Steph55337 (talk) 09:32, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Fichier:Logo_Open_Moselle.svg Steph55337 (talk) 09:35, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: as before. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Sehr unscharf, versehentlich hochgeladen ClausNe (talk) 17:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 13:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Herzi Pinki as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: identical with [1] on https://www.sulzenauhuette.at (and logo cropped away).User insists on images being just similar, not identical: File talk:KreuzMairspitz.jpg Friedo (talk) 12:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Ich habe bei der Sulzenauhütte nachträglich um Zustimmung gebeten und bitte daher, die Datei nicht zu löschen. --Friedo (talk) 12:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. @Friedo: For a permission follow COM:VRTS. --Wdwd (talk) 13:42, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: As stated here by the uploader, he did not take the picture: https://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Diskussion:Mairspitze&diff=229870249&oldid=229870045 --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 13:49, 15 January 2023 (UTC) Friedo (talk) 14:07, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild trägt zwar denselben Namen wie die ursprünglich gelöschte Datei, doch handelt es sich um ein ganz anderes Bild. Das Bild ist von mir. Es hat meine Frau aufgenommen und die gezeigte Person bin ich selbst. Zudem ist eingetragen, dass die abgebildete Person mit der Veröffentlichung einverstanden ist. Daher ist mir unverständlich, wie es zu dem Löschantrag kommt. Ich bitte darum, ihn unverzüglich wieder zu entfernen. --Friedo (talk) 14:14, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Source and author are wrong, therefore the license is invalid. --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Unsinn; das Bild ist von mir und hat mit dem ursprünglichen unter demselben Namen nichts zu tun. Friedo (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The picture was not taken by User:FkMohr, you wrote that yourself (see link above). Please familiarize with licensing and copyright! --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist mit meiner Kamera in meinem Auftrag von meiner Frau aufgenommen worden; die Bildrechte habe ich selbst und es wurde von mir hochgeladen. Ich bitte, den Löschantrag zurückzunehmen. Friedo (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Die Urheberrechte hast du nicht sondern deine Frau. --Ralf Roletschek 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Habe in die Lizenz nun den Namen meiner Frau eingetragen. Ein nachvollziehbarer Löschgrund ist nicht vorhanden. --Friedo (talk) 11:37, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Die Urheberrechte hast du nicht sondern deine Frau. --Ralf Roletschek 20:04, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Das Bild ist mit meiner Kamera in meinem Auftrag von meiner Frau aufgenommen worden; die Bildrechte habe ich selbst und es wurde von mir hochgeladen. Ich bitte, den Löschantrag zurückzunehmen. Friedo (talk) 14:39, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- The picture was not taken by User:FkMohr, you wrote that yourself (see link above). Please familiarize with licensing and copyright! --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:30, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Unsinn; das Bild ist von mir und hat mit dem ursprünglichen unter demselben Namen nichts zu tun. Friedo (talk) 14:23, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
- Source and author are wrong, therefore the license is invalid. --2001:4652:FBAF:0:D07A:8924:8E0:C033 14:18, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
Keep I have no doubt that Mrs. Mohr irrevocably grants worldwide distribution/exploitation rights etc. to her husband Mr. Mohr. As a non-profit encyclopedia-like platform we are exempt from § 74 Ⅶ → § 18c 2 UrhG (mandatory obligation to obtain permission from the author, i. e. Mrs. Mohr), cf. final sentence of 18c UrhG. The use of {{Own}} is indeed inappropriate though. ‑‑ Kays (T | C) 02:03, 16 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak keep As an admin, I can confirm that the image that was originally discussed and deleted in May is completely different, so the previous deletion discussion can be disregarded for this case. However, the approach is at least unusual. Per User:FkMohr/Tui, he's uploading images taken by his wife Supakon Mohr, with her permission, and there is a whole category for these images: Category:Files by User:FkMohr/Supakon. In this regard, this image apparently isn't different from the others in the category. I would agre with Kays that there is probably "no doubt that Mrs. Mohr irrevocably grants worldwide distribution/exploitation rights etc. to her husband Mr. Mohr", but maybe a permission sent to VRT (Commons:Support-Team), covering all uploaded works by Mrs. Mohr, would be a good idea to settle the matter once and for all? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - While it is likely that the wife has, indeed, granted the permission orally, marriages do break up and we must be sure of her permission. A VRT message from her confirming her permission for his uploads is required. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:23, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
File:+Legs of a transgender – with bodice – from the photographic props fundus of my wife Meike – Picture 002.jpg
[edit]
Unclear what this is supposed to illustrate Dronebogus (talk) 07:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete Not educational Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 20:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 16:56, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Two book covers of the same author; but claimed as "own work" so likely copyright violation unless uploader proves they are "Tanja Mencin"; plus an apparently unrelated fantasy map with no further context, which means out of scope. All files unused.
Enyavar (talk) 13:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Edmccool306 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images of imaginary flags. Out of COM:SCOPE for hosting on Commons.
- File:The Femboy State of New Tokyo.png
- File:Imperium Artharium 4.png
- File:Ordenstaat Artharien 1.png
- File:Artharian National Reclaimation Government 2.png
- File:Imperium Artharium 1.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 14:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:03, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:06, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 17:05, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour, cette photo représente bien Christine Chevalier et Jean-Claude Junin, fondateur de GrasseMat'Info, en février 2019. Photo de Claire Camarasa. 109.18.209.54 16:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Neither these people nor GrasseMat' are notable enough for this image to be educationally usable. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:02, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GodblessValdonia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Scope: Maps of a fictional place in the arctic sea; no further context given.
Enyavar (talk) 12:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Draceane as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: from TW John Konrad V Robert.Allen (talk) 20:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
![20:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/19#c-Robert.Allen-2022-04-19T20:30:00.000Z-File:Крейсер_"Москва"_тоне.jpg_+_File:FQlEjIoXwAYLYpS.jpg){kind=link}
- I think this needs some discussion. What is the evidence this picture was taken by Konrad V and not the uploader? It seems to be all over the internet at this point. Konrad V does not indicate where he got it. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- The Guardian says the source is unknown [2]. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete No evidence it's been released under a free license. Uploader previously uploaded incorrectly licensed content. Ovinus (talk) 21:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Does the template "Non-free historic image" used in Will Smith slapping incident licensing apply to here? Viewsridge (talk) 22:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- It may well qualify. The English Wikipedia article Sinking of the Moskva which links this image includes critical commentary concerning the image itself with two citations, it is certainly historic, and we don't have any free alternatives. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Roth, Andrew (18 April 2022). Film and photos appear to show Russian cruiser Moskva shortly before she sank. The Guardian. Retrieved on 18 April 2022.
- Sutton, H. I. (18 April 2022). Moskva Sinking: Images Reveal Once Powerful Russian Navy Ship On Fire. Covert Shores.
- It may well qualify. The English Wikipedia article Sinking of the Moskva which links this image includes critical commentary concerning the image itself with two citations, it is certainly historic, and we don't have any free alternatives. --Robert.Allen (talk) 23:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete both - Likely copyright violation and non-free content. @Robert.Allen and Viewsridge: This is not English Wikipedia. In Commons non-free policy is stricter. Centaur271188 (talk) 00:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- DeleteCopyright violation Victorgrigas (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep The guardian did not take the image, worker on a coastguard tug did. Russian military imagery is either top secret or creative commons. User:Nickel_nitride regularly publishes Russian military photos Geek surine (talk) 15:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete
Keep per User:Geek surine.The Times published the photo today, crediting "RUSSIAN DEFENSE MINISTRY PRESS SERVICE VIA AP". --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC) Revised my vote based on comment by User:Centaur271188 and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia, which probably applies in international waters, since the photo was likely taken from a Russian ship. --Robert.Allen (talk) 19:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC) - Added duplicate File:FQlEjIoXwAYLYpS.jpg to nomination. --Rave (talk) 06:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment - @Robert.Allen: Most other news sites still say 'unknown source', 'social media' or some Twitter accounts (ua_industrial, OSINTtechnical etc.) so I find The Times' claim not very credible. 'We retrieved it from AP, who retrieved it from 'Russian Defense Ministry press service' ' - er... what? If 'Russian Defense blah blah blah' means eng.mil.ru (All content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 - bottom of their page), then it would be an easy Keep, although we should take the photo from them directly, rather than The Times. But I have not found it at eng.mil.ru, and we may never do. Centaur271188 (talk) 06:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - without a source to verify a claimed license is worth nothing. --Denniss (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Downright copyvio. Fair use only. Lesless (talk) 05:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete delete both, no evidence given that these two images have been published under free licenses. --Mosbatho (talk) 22:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete. Copyright status unknown. HeminKurdistan (talk) 21:01, 23 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Commons does not need files with unknown copyright status. --Huusmik (Talk • Edits) 12:54, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
- Move to en.Wikipedia with a fair use justification. This is an important image with no free alternative.--agr (talk) 11:58, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete This file has been on the Moskva page, but it used to actually be under Fair Use. It has now been uploaded under commons under a fake license. This is a clear copyvio. Why wasn't this deleted 21 days ago? Lallint⟫⟫⟫Talk 20:57, 9 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination and discussion. According the source mentioned by User:Robert.Allen, the file is copyrighted “RUSSIAN DEFENSE MINISTRY PRESS SERVICE VIA AP”. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia, photos by the Russian government are not in PD or otherwise free to use. Therefore this image must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
![08:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2022/04/19#c-Ellywa-2022-05-12T08:39:00.000Z-File:Крейсер_"Москва"_тоне.jpg_+_File:FQlEjIoXwAYLYpS.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Stragglewise (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional photos of personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope, and images inside the frames are DW, missing essential info and permission.
- File:Driftwood Frame 8x12 custom made frames-Craig's Unique Frames.jpg
- File:Unusual size picture frames 8x8 live edge frame Driftwood.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal essay, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope, and DW of front page image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
No indication of early enough PUBLICATION to be public domain under PD-Ukraine. PlanespotterA320 (talk) 02:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep 1922 publication confirmed [3] (p. 21). (Info added to photo page.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per above. I don't think there is copyrights concern. --185.34.183.5 09:22, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep No doubt as to the fact that the photograph was published in 1922 given the new source. Mhawk10 (talk) 15:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Problems resolved with additional information. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:51, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Unclear resolution 2600:100C:A213:9783:D83E:7B2A:2875:774A 04:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Unclear resolution 2600:100C:A213:9783:D83E:7B2A:2875:774A 04:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: In use. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:52, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Low quality file, superseded by File:DotLK domain logo.png Yeeno (talk) 04:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
source said All Rights Reserved. Ghrenghren (talk) 06:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pil56 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: logo not free e not CC BY SA
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion about whether this logo is above Commons:Threshold of originality#Italy. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- sorry for the bad english: on the official website it is marked "Copyright © 2022 - All rights reserved", not CC-BY-SA. In any case, the license is wrong. Pil56 (talk) 07:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. However, if something is not copyrightable at all (which still needs to be shown), there is no protection. --Túrelio (talk) 08:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:21, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
file broken Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no viewable image. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:22, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope Dronebogus (talk) 09:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:23, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Flickrwashing, flickr account only has this image Gbawden (talk) 09:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
taken from another website https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivUSKbCpo4O-lfY71II9zQQ5xz2mjVC7upV4wdiUPs3qVWGI1njXngcSCIUQKG29EFwNAQdFnhvFM7eiQeoWcEzVQHlpm_1D-ZeEdOEQLC9ciPeXhczr0BPfhE18I20hZp98nN7vtbnbEe6P1Wqpz_1mTWTmj_1g no proof of permission Putitonamap98 (talk) 09:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:24, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Focus to much on the advertisement, not de minimis 218.250.56.177 09:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; DW. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Non--free book cover GeorgHH • talk 10:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; false license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
This seems to be from a brochure to do with the event and not a creation of the uploader as purported. As it is from 1984 it is not likely to be free of copyright. Readro (talk) 10:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, not taken in 2022, subject died in 1979. Possibly public domain, but there is not enough information to know. MKFI (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; actual source information lacking. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Also
A superb piece of aviation archaeology (France, ca. 1938). Unfortunately, is it certainly not "own work" and there is no provenance on author and/or real copyright holder and the first publication. Retired electrician (talk) 11:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure EU countries award 70 years of protection for anonymous works. "Own work" refers to the derivative copy made when you scan an original work. --RAN (talk) 12:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Using the picture search engine "TinEye" [4] over 53.4 billion images were searched in its database without finding a match, so the picture is obscure and not an obvious copyright violation. Firewall (talk) 19:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per discussion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peterpan6419 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from toys and commercial packaging.
- File:3D embossing.jpg
- File:Christmas tin box.jpg
- File:Easter tin egg.jpg
- File:Candle tin box.jpg
- File:Piggy bank money box.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Please do not delete. There is no indication of a copywrite. These files are valuable to communicate examples of decoraative materials. Pkgx (talk) 18:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Pkgx: : Modern works can be under copyright without a notice on them. See Commons:Derivative works. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:44, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
This photo is from Radio France according to the text and from a photograph called Christphe Abramovitz (http://www.auctionartparis.com/ventes-aux-encheres-513/2020-12-09-vente-aux-encheres-caritative-fondation-architectes-de-lurgence/113718-abramovitz-christophe-photographe). This seems to me a potential copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 17:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of claimed free license seen. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE — Baidax 💬 17:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; personal photo by non-contributor, no in scope usefulness evident. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright logo, previously deleted. Vangchuk (talk) 18:13, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:41, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Not the right licence. Also no own work Rots61 (talk) 19:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
image was uploaded to illustrate an article which never got past the "COI userbox" stage (seriously, there's not even a draft). As such, I feel that the image is not within scope. I'm also not thrilled about the fact that they're in front of a mural - the category tags indicate that they're a US band, and there's no Freedom of Panorama in the US. DS (talk) 19:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete based on the FOP issue. But plenty of bands that don't merit a Wikipedia article are still worth a photo on Commons, if correctly licensed. - Jmabel ! talk 23:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
A screenshot of The Backrooms Game. No indication that the game is freely licensed. Multichill (talk) 19:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom (as well). Chlod (say hi!) 09:49, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope: Map+Flag series of a fictional nation or a fictional war. Apparently unused and no further context.
- File:Výškové pásma Karpatánia.jpg
- File:Karpatánia.jpg
- File:Vlajka K..png
- File:Biomy Kapatánia.jpg
- File:Karpatánia (vojenská mapa).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Enyavar (talk) 20:47, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:38, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
I can find no reference to the copyright status of this image on the website. FunkMonk (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no evidence of free license. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:37, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation. See https://playingcarddecks.com/products/royal-vortex-gold-foil-playing-cards-gemaco?variant=12292797333582 oknazevad (talk) 21:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Lifted from here, copyrighted and not "own work" IJReid (talk) 22:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:36, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Shutterstock image per here, not "own work" IJReid (talk) 22:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcialopezlunaa (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed as own work but the majority are professional photos with no exif. One is found here https://www.eldiario.net/portal/2021/06/30/marcia-lopez/ - PCP, these are unlikely to be own work
- File:MARCIA LOPEZ.jpg
- File:PROGRAMA DE TELEVISION AXESSO.jpg
- File:Gonzalo Rodriguez y Marcia Lopez locutores.jpg
- File:LOCUCIÓN RADIO EXITO.jpg
- File:MARCIA LOPEZ LUNA.jpg
- File:Marcia audifonos Sennheiser.jpg
- File:Marcia lopez es una locutora boliviana ha realizado trabajos como voz comercial ,voz institucional, y narraciones para niños.jpg
- File:Marcia audifonos y jean chauqeta.jpg
- File:Marcia López.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:57, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jingming N (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seeing the upload history, unlikely to be own works or under a free license. Also advertising.
- File:XAG APC1 AutoPilot Console on A Tractor.jpg
- File:XAG R150 2022 with HydraulicSpray System.jpg
- File:XAG R150 Spray in Woore Fruit Farm.jpg
- File:XAG Fixed-wing EVTOL Remote Sensing Drone.jpg
- File:XAG XMission Remote Sensing Drone.jpg
- File:XAG P100 Agricultural Drone.jpg
- File:XAG V50 Agricultural Drone.jpg
- File:XAG P40 Agricultural Drone Spreading Fertilizers To Rice Field in Vietnam.jpg
- File:XAG Agricultural Drone P30.jpg
- File:Agricultural drone spraying rice crops.jpg
- File:XAG SuperX Cotton Farm.jpg
- File:XAG drone in disinfection.jpg
- File:XAG IoT Moniotr Tree Growth.jpg
- File:180730-LR---Parmjit-Chima-Justin-Gong-Dr-David-Llewell952465.jpg
- File:XAG Company Building.jpg
Yann (talk) 14:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all. I nominated many of this user's files for speedy deletion, where the files were easy to find by web search. I have no doubt that all of these remaining files are also copyvios (some falsely claimed as own work and some from the manufacturer's website which is marked "© 2005-2022 XAG Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved"). In addition, behavior here and at c:en:XAG (company) make it clear that the sole purpose of these files is for advertising. Marbletan (talk) 14:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Historical photos and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Blue pere ajuwa.jpg
- File:Pere and Helen.png
- File:ChristopherPereAjuwa.png
- File:Pere-and-buhari.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 12:00, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nacktschnecke96 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Mostly small files, no metadata. Some files mention Vichyat Var as author, one file Markus Mainka.
- File:Lemberg vom Neckartal bei Rottweil aus gesehen.jpg
- File:Silberdistel am Lochenstein.jpg
- File:Schafberg mit Wacholderheide und Schafen.jpg
- File:Wachholderheide auf dem Kehlen.jpg
- File:Wanderpfad auf dem Oberhohenberg.jpg
- File:Schutthalde am Hochberg-Steilhang.jpg
- File:Blick vom Hochberg zum Lemberg.jpg
- File:Lemberg vom Neckartal.png
- File:Bolberghütte Winter.jpg
- File:Schwäbische Alb - Schema mit Landschaftsteilen und Klima.png
- File:Plettenberg-Gipfel.jpg
- File:Landschaft bei Gosheim mit Lemberg und Hochberg, Aussicht vom Klippeneck..jpg
- File:Großer Heuberg im Winter 2021 in der Nähe von Bubsheim.jpg
- File:Lochenstein im Spätwinter.jpg
- File:Nadelwälder am Nordhang des Hochbergs.jpg
- File:Lochenpass im Winter.jpg
- File:Gosheim vom Lemberg im Winter gesehen.jpg
- File:Großer Heuberg.jpg
- File:Langlauf auf dem Heuberg.jpg
- File:Hohe Schwabenalb von Rottweil gesehen.png
Didym (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 11:58, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Bad photo, no educational use Dronebogus (talk) 07:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 12:02, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
This photo is from Radio France according to the text in File:StephaneJobert.jpg and from a photograph called Christphe Abramovitz (http://www.auctionartparis.com/ventes-aux-encheres-513/2020-12-09-vente-aux-encheres-caritative-fondation-architectes-de-lurgence/113718-abramovitz-christophe-photographe). This seems to me a potential copyvio. Pierre cb (talk) 18:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 12:03, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Azmi 16:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
This is specifically a copyrighted artwork (1) from Oriolo's Felix the Cat Productions Inc. ("Trademark and © Felix the Cat Producions"). Only Pat Sullivan's Version (designed by Otto Messemer, Raoul Barre, or Bill Nolan) from the 1920s to the 1930s is public domain, not Oriolo's version. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bacromisee (talk • contribs) 22:51, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
- Can you show us them side by side so we can make a determination. We host a dozen images and they all look the same to me. --RAN (talk) 01:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Starting with the Pat Sullivan Felix, it is a LOT different than the modern one. It has a square body, square head, and square tail, and teeth. It resembles more of a actual cat rather than an anthropomorphic one.
- File:First felix.gif — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bacromisee (talk • contribs) 02:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Felix Cat-Haha (transp sharp).png
- Then, the Otto Messmer/Bill Nolan/whatever has whiskers, stubby legs, body and feet, wide eyes and body, but tiny pupils
- File:Felix VF-31 logo.svg
- File:Felix the Cat, by Raoul Barré.gif
- The modern copyrighted version has longer legs, no whiskers, a pear shape body, larger pupils, and a stubby tail.
- Now do you see the difference? Bacromisee (talk) 02:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nomintation. Yes, this is clearly the late 1950s/early 1960s redesigned Felix, not the original 1910s/1920s design. Felix the Cat History. Statement of it being PD assumes it is an earlier design, which it is clearly not. Should be assumed to still be under copyright unless evidence can be shown that *this* particular version of Felix (c. 1960 Joe Oriolo design for Trans Lux) has fallen into public domain for some reason. (Image in currently in use in multiple projects; I suggest before deletion one of images of earlier Felix design be substituted, perhaps File:Felix_Laff_clean.svg or a couple other possibilities in the category.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:49, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- There having been no counter-arguments, I have filed for usage of this image to be bot replaced with the mentioned PD alternative. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:03, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete per discussion after it is no longer in use. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:20, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per above. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:15, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Unused low quality image of text Yeeno (talk) 04:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:16, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not educationally useful or even a good illustration of topic. Dronebogus (talk) 07:42, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Collage of unsourced elements, likely DW problem -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:17, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Bad Quality image. The picture was taken as a screenshot from a video, it has a bad resolution and makes the depicted person look a little ghoulish. This picture is currently used by no wiki. A better image is in the database, File:Ciani-Sophia_Hoeder_2020.jpg Please erase this one. Grizma (talk) 08:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- I would like to support this statement: this screenshot is not an option, especially since a better quality image exists in commons.--18quirl08 (talk) 16:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:20, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE as "Files that contain nothing educational other than raw text" Lord Belbury (talk) 08:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
no permission Hoyanova (talk) 09:15, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW, questionable license claim. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:22, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
COM:PS unclear, new user, no EXIF data. Leyo 09:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, apparent unused personal photo by user with no other contributions. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:23, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
This seems to be from a brochure to do with the event and not a creation of the uploader as purported. As it is from 1984 it is not likely to be free of copyright. Readro (talk) 10:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Com:Packaging SD hehua (talk) 11:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:25, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
Old image, not own work
Estopedist1 (talk) 14:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no factual source, old but lacking info that it is old enough to certainly be PD. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:27, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too blurry to be any use; also very common photo topic, but lacking location data to help with identification MPF (talk) 20:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:39, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:28, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Uploader is apparently the subject; photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 10:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
"Foto by lena maria loose": VRT permission from Lena Maria Loose needed. MKFI (talk) 10:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:09, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Не имеет ценности для Википедии и было загружено для практики в редактировании страниц 212.45.18.226 12:07, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cristiano-ronaldo-frontal.jpg Museo de Cera de Madrid (talk) 12:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion, G7. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Slightly lower-resolution copy of File:Mapa Político Valdesia.jpg, unused Enyavar (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
UI arrow on the top right on the picture. Most likely a screenshot Nicolas22g (talk) 18:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
outside the project's scope (not an actual soccer team) Rojelio (talk) 18:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and lions logo is (c). --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
OTRS needed / OTRS sera necessaire Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, unused image, many alternatives in the category 219.78.190.55 09:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 23:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of scope (selfie). Only used on wikidata where I have requested the deletion of the item too. Hulged (talk) 09:43, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
Inappropriate use of userpage Dronebogus (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: I don't see anything that would classify as Inappropriate use of userpage so there for I am bold and closing.
Suspected copyright violation, watermarked image. Found without watermark in https://www.yugoday.in/post/binsar-mahadev. MKFI (talk) 11:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F1 -- DaxServer (talk) 18:35, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Adding on that, the original image from Flickr is also copyrighted and thus also fails -- DaxServer (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as a watermark protected and thus likely copyright image (0.95 probability) 🇺🇦 Timtrent 🇺🇦 talk to me 🇺🇦 20:26, 30 June 2022 (UTC)
- Adding on that, the original image from Flickr is also copyrighted and thus also fails -- DaxServer (talk) 18:37, 16 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:54, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
Low quality, unused image, many alternatives in the category 219.78.190.55 09:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi .. what is the problem?
- This is my own work.
- [1]https://www.arttrustonline.com/portfolio/200038
- Also there https://www.flickr.com/photos/veronicaindream/
- Please let me know what is the problem..
- ps: have uploaded the instagram copy because the original is very tiny but i have the original footage ! VeronicaInDream (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- ps: (its not a low quality) It's the quality i wanted.. it's from a research from 2018 , it's in progress : it's a snapshot.. so à VHS snippet VeronicaInDream (talk) 22:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- So please is it possible to erase the tag until / the deletion nomination can be closed? Many thanks VeronicaInDream (talk) 18:46, 14 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close. --Gbawden (talk) 13:00, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
low quality ... useless photo... cluttering the search function and blocking good images 2003:F2:6746:A800:85B1:FEA9:9AF3:3DD6 12:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Small and unused image, can be replaced by many alternative in the category A1Cafel (talk) 17:10, 30 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete Agreed. Also, the description belongs in an article, not here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
Delete Agree with the other two. --Rosenzweig τ 00:56, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:40, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Scan einer Postkarte, kein Fotograf beim Upload angegeben, Foto zeigt Kunstwerk eines Künstlers, der erst 1974 verstorben ist; Werk daher urheberrechtlich geschützt, Bild daher zu löschen. Paulae (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Fehler von mir, bitte Löschen. Danke--Man sollte aber die wichtige Bedeutung dieses auf einer im Album eingeklebten Ansichtskarte hervor heben. Eine Kontaktaufnahme mit den Hinterbliebenen ist in Arbeit! (talk) 19:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)--Bybbisch94 (talk) 16:50, 27 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. The file can be restored in 2055 with {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 13:00, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'un ancien logo de l'entreprise Groupe Mutuel qui en plus, de n'être plus d'actualité, n'est pas libre de droits. CommunityGM (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Former logos are not deleted, but kept for historical reasons. --Leyo 23:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Leyo. --Rosenzweig τ 12:58, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
no pd-textlogo Krd 14:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Below COM:TOO --Leyo 23:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: below German TOO. --Rosenzweig τ 12:57, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
No FOP in Iran Rohalamin (talk) 05:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Why it is still not deleted even after 4 months of first nomination ... are wikimedia admin sitting on thier ass????? lazy idiots 2003:F2:6746:A800:85B1:FEA9:9AF3:3DD6 12:19, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- To the IP user: be patient. There is a backlog of deletion requests. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:23, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:54, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
taken from another website: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitsqLyR01Ed-xPmeNkTFFiTHNp2IhJh_11-7-dtkRQakQ1HfMMgo2KFnOqFGxzBNjN5t73L9UhMljzI3JUCbObRwHE63I1WnvZbKMJ20bXm2O0L4vAIQ0zmhxU7ya_1j3ExuPfCrm6AFysd0F99KgcmEG84pz1A No proof of permission Putitonamap98 (talk) 09:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
why is this still not deleted .... i am seeing the admins are getting lazy and lazy each day 2003:F2:6746:A800:85B1:FEA9:9AF3:3DD6 12:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:55, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: unused file, rather photographical artwork without obvious educational use Estopedist1 (talk) 15:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
- Maybe the plant, the colors? Darwin Ahoy! 17:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Its a decent colourful photo. --Gbawden (talk) 11:27, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Academy-aureus-argent (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all:
- File:Ann Prentice .png – description includes "Nutrition Society award page 2020", and this picture is on a webpage of the society that is dated before the upload to Commons.[5]
- File:MRC Keneba.jpg – in a webpage that is dated before the upload to Commons.[6]
- File:Christopher Cannon .jpg – description is "Prof Christopher Cannon at JHU", and this is Cannon's profile image on the Johns Hopkins University website.[7]. It is also in an archived copy of the webpage made before the upload to Commons.[8]
- Verbcatcher (talk) 22:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 22:55, 3 September 2022 (UTC)
Already published at https://www.behance.net/veroll Bahnmoeller (talk) 09:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, presumably copyvio. --Rosenzweig τ 13:52, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
This is a user-generated imaginary flag which never was used officialy, thus it has absolutely no historical value. Consequently, this file violates the COM:NOTHOST rule. -- Pofka (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep We are not a government project. Therefore, it does not matter to us whether it is an official flag or an unofficial one. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 11:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep COM:NOTHOST provides a clear explanation of what is this rule about Wikimedia Commons is not a place to store your vacation photo collection. And historical national flag of Belarusians (be-tarask:Бел-чырвона-белы сьцяг) combined with the one of historical Belarusian emblems (be-tarask:Калюмны) is not the case, since it is realistic and educationally useful. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 14:03, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a place to upload user-generated fake flags without any historical significance and usage. It is as important as it would be with Teletubbies instead of the Columns of Gediminas. This flag is completely imaginary, so it clearly violates "all media must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" (COM:NOTHOST). -- Pofka (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- There are many fictional flags on Wikimedia Commons. For example, Lithuanian Battle of Grunwald flag 1410, where the geometry is taken from Teutonic Order unit banners, the Pahonia rider is taken from jagiello's tombstone of 1435, and the colors of the rider are taken from coat of arms of the modern Republic of Lithuania 1991. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 10:09, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
- This is not a place to upload user-generated fake flags without any historical significance and usage. It is as important as it would be with Teletubbies instead of the Columns of Gediminas. This flag is completely imaginary, so it clearly violates "all media must be realistically useful for an educational purpose" (COM:NOTHOST). -- Pofka (talk) 17:23, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fake image ... not a place for personal photo... false propognda ... spreads misinformation ... SPEEY DELETION 2003:F2:6746:A800:85B1:FEA9:9AF3:3DD6 12:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Comment I don't understand how a fake national flag could be useful. Could someone please explain? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:28, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- There is no any "fake" in this flag, because it combines historical national flag of Belarusians (be-tarask:Бел-чырвона-белы сьцяг) with the one of historical Belarusian emblems (be-tarask:Калюмны). For now this image is used by two articles in the Ukrainian Wikipedia, which in my opinion is quite enough to close this request. In any case there are many images uploaded in the Wikimedia Commons for design purposes only, which are not used anywhere and are waiting to be applied. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:39, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- The Russian Wikipedia also uses this image.--Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- If those wikis are using it with accurate descriptions, then yes, we have to respect them and need to keep this image. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:43, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Made a version in .svg format: File:Belarusian flag with Columns of Gediminas.svg. --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 13:40, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep There's zero consensus that "fake" flags shouldn't be hosted on Commons. If the nominator really wants them deleted they should do an RfC about it. Although I doubt it would pass, but whatever. Ignoring the wider consensus by repeatedly nominating flags for deletion is just beating a dead horse at this point though. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Kept: fake flags are not automatically deleted but often they have no educational value like other hoax images. Then they could be deleted as out of scope. But in this case, it is in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:57, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
fichier doublon Mkgwb (talk) 08:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Voici le fichier d'origine qui a été mis à jour en conformité avec les fonctionnalités de wikimedia : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Woodbrass.png Mkgwb (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use and apparently not actually a duplicate. --Rosenzweig τ 13:34, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Low resolution, the only left upload of a user, whose entire contributions were clear copyvios. Xunks (talk) 05:32, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
Low res, no metadata, seems to be cropped from videos.
NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 11:29, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvios. --Rosenzweig τ 07:36, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
There's a possible issue with the SVG Ugochimobi (talk) 15:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- The issue was that the SVG contains nothing but an embedded PNG image and the image data was in an "href" attribute, but the SVG renderer requires it to be in an "xlink:href" attribute instead. It's an extremely common problem here in the Wikimedia Commons. TilmannR (talk) 17:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The "issue" was apparently fixed, but the file was still a fake SVG containing only a raster image, with an ambiguous description (what is it really?), uncategorized, not used in WMF projects. Therefore deleted as out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 10:02, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Historical photos, drawings, paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Àurea de Sarrà.jpg - photo by ca:Gabriel Casas i Galobardes (died 1973), can be restored in 2054
- File:Lion's Law.jpg - kept: apparently own photo
- File:Llorenç Torres.jpg - Casas
- File:Carles Soldevila.jpg - Casas
- File:Joan Alavedra.jpg - Casas
- File:Màrius Gifreda.jpg - Casas
- File:Josep Maria Planes.jpg - Casas
- File:Andreu-Avel·lí Artís.jpg - Casas
- File:Exvots.jpg - kept: apparently own photo
- File:Francesc Rufes.jpg - apparently photo of someone else's photo and therefore probably a copyvio, no proper date, likely recent (person shown is alive)
- File:Concepció Gonzàlez.jpg - drawing by Ermengol (alive), can be restored at an unknown date
- File:Maria Rúbies.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Aurèlia Pijoan.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Dolors Piera.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Zoe Rosinach.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Aurembiaix d'Urgell.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Rosa Viñals.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Margarida Rugall.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Aenaː.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Mataelefantes.jpg - artwork by ca:Joan Fontcuberta i Villà (alive), can be restored at an unknown date
- File:Cristòfol.jpg - photo showing sculptor ca:Leandre Cristòfol i Peralba (died 1998) with one of his works of art, no proper date, apparently photo of someone else's photo (and therefore a copyvio) (can be restored in 2069 at the earliest, more like 2119 to be on the safe side unless a concrete year is provided)
- File:Guillem Viladot.jpg - photo showing ca:Guillem Viladot i Puig (died 1999), no proper date, apparently photo of someone else's photo (and therefore a copyvio)
- File:Critòfol i Viladot.jpg - compare [9], photographer Josep Porta (?), 1965, can be restored in 2086 with PD-old-assumed (unless someone can provide the year the photographer died)
- File:Col·lectiu d'Obrers en Lluita.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Fora Nuclears.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Bloc Català de Treballadors.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:PSAN-provisonal.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Antifeixisme.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Confederació Sindical de Treballadors de Catalunya.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Cas Torà.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Operació Garzón.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Antimilitarisme.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Socors Català.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Joventuts Revolucionàries Catalanes.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Capella Gitana.jpg - work of ca:Helios Gómez (died 1956), can be restored in 2037
- File:Camp de concentració de Bram.jpg - Gómez
- File:Death of Mayakovsky.jpg - photo of someone else's photo (newsprint), 1930 funeral in Moscow, can be restored in 2051 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Servidumbre.jpg - Gómez
- File:Helios Gómez 2.jpg - Gómez
- File:Nu i mussol.jpg - Gómez
- File:Història de la Inquisición.jpg - Gómez
- File:L'Opinió.jpg - Gómez
- File:L'Hora.jpg - Gómez
- File:Helios Gómez.jpg - photo showing Helios Gómez, no later than 1956, rather unclear when this was taken, by whom and where (could be Spain, France, Belgium, Netherlands, Germany, USSR), in any case not old enough for PD-old-assumed yet; can be restored in 2077 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Retrat de Ramón Acín.jpg - Gómez
- File:Max Deauville.jpg - Gómez
- File:Gómez i Weber.jpg - 1932/33 Moscow photo, unknown photographer, can be restored in 2054 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Franco a Lleida.jpg - kept: photo of someone else's photo from 1955, Franco on a visit, {{PD-Spain-photo}} on the assumption that it was also published no later than 28 February 1989 without a copyright notice and {{PD-1996}} applies
- File:Blocs Ramiro Ledesma.jpg - kept: photo of someone else's photo from 1956, {{PD-Spain-photo}} on the assumption that it was also published no later than 28 February 1989 without a copyright notice and {{PD-1996}} applies
- File:La fiel infantería.jpg - photo of someone else's photo from 1959, looks rather staged, so probably not a simple Spanish photo, can be restored in 2080 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Elefant Paeria.jpg - photo of someone else's photo from ?, without a year I can't determine if PD-Spain-photo actually applies
- File:Josep Gómez.jpg - photo of someone else's photo from ?, person shown lived 1921–2005, without a year I can't determine if PD-Spain-photo actually applies
- File:Pedro Álvarez.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP, no PD-shape
- File:Marins de Cronstadt.jpg - photo of a film poster in museum or similar, no FoP, no PD-shape, signed 1936 but signature not legible, artist unknown, can be restored in 2057 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Zirianin.jpg - kept: photo of 1936 magazine page or similar, {{PD-Spain-photo}} on the assumption that it was published without a copyright notice and {{PD-1996}} applies
- File:Contra els gasos.jpg - photo of some public health announcement poster (with drawings) in a museum or similar, no FoP, no proper date but not later than 1939, can be restored in 2060 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Visions de guerra i de rereguarda.jpg - photo of pages (drawing + photos) from 1937 book in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2058 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Nova Ibèria.jpg - work of ca:Antoni Clavé i Sanmartí (died 2005), can be restored in 2076
- File:Fractures de guerra.jpg - photograph of pages of apparently a medical text book, showing photos of war wounds, text by ca:Josep Trueta i Raspall (died 1977), no proper date but not later than 1939, can be restored in 2060 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Catarsi Magazín.jpg - magazine cover from 2019
- File:Chaise de salon d'art.jpg - photo of a work of ca:Jaume Xifra (died 2014) in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2085
- File:Font de la vida.jpg - photo of a work of ca:Aurèlia Muñoz Ventura (died 2011) in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2082
- File:Retrat de Ramon Rogent.jpg - photo of a 1943 painting by ca:José Vilató Ruiz (died 1969) in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2050
- File:La carn fa carn.jpg - kept: work of ca:Francesc Xavier Nogués i Casas (died 1941), PD since 2022
- File:La presó (Joan Ponç).jpg - photo of a 1950 painting by ca:Joan Ponç i Bonet (died 1984) in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2065
- File:La dona impúdica.jpg - photo of a 1950 painting by ca:Àngel Planells i Cruañas (died 1989) in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2060
- File:Retrat de Joan Ponç.jpg - photo of a 1947 painting by ca:Joan-Josep Tharrats i Vidal (died 2001) in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2072
- File:Tres ulls.jpg - photo of a 1947 painting by ca:Joan Ponç i Bonet (died 1984) in a museum or similar, no FoP, can be restored in 2065
- File:Salomé agenollada.jpg - photo of a photograph by photographer ca:Josep Masana i Fargas (died 1979) in a museum or similar, no FoP; can be restored in 2060
- File:Constel·lació.jpg - photo of a 1933 painting by ca:Artur Carbonell i Carbonell (died 1973) in a museum or similar, no FoP; can be restored in 2054
- File:En quin lloc del cel et trobaré?.jpg - photo of a photograph by photographer ca:Joan Vilatobà i Fígols (died 1954) in a museum or similar, no FoP; can be restored in 2035
- File:Directa.jpg - 2021 magazine cover
- File:Llibertat Pablo Hasél.jpg - not a mural, but on some kind of plastic plate, unclear if this is outside and permanent (only then Spanish FoP applies)
- File:Quim Sànchez.jpg - presumably Spanish photo taken from 1963 to 1985 (year of birth and death of the person shown), presumably not before 1971 so URAA applies
- File:Seu Vella blava.jpg - unclear if this is outside (only then Spanish FoP applies)
- File:Homenatge a Durruti.jpg - photo of a 1938 art exhibition poster in museum or similar, no FoP, no PD-shape, artist unknown, can be restored in 2059 with PD-old-assumed
- File:Cursa Ciclista.jpg - photo of a 1937 cycling event poster in museum or similar, no FoP in Spain, no PD-shape, signed but not legible, artist unknown, can be restored in 2058 with PD-old-assumed
- File:El més petit de tots.jpg - poster using a photograph showing a 1937 sculpture by ca:Miquel Paredes i Fonollà (died 1980), so we have copyrights of the artist, the photographer and possibly a graphic designer; deleted, can be restored in 2061 at the earliest
- File:Piedpremu fasismon!.jpg - 1936 poster by ca:Pere Català i Pic (died 1971), can be restored in 2052
- File:Enganxines.jpg - outside, but apparently non permanent, so no FoP in Spain
- File:Pablo Hasél.jpg - non-permanent poster, no FoP in Spain, no PD-shape
- File:Cazares.jpg - work of ca:Josep Maria Cazares (alive), can be restored at an unknown date
- File:Àngel Jové.jpg - work of ca:Àngel Jové i Jové (alive), can be restored at an unknown date
- File:Josep Maria Cazares.jpg - Cazares
- File:Montserrat Vidal-Barraquer.jpg - 1961 photo showing ca:Montserrat Vidal-Barraquer i Flaquer (died 1992) who might also be the photographer (with a self-timer or similar), obviously not a simple Spanish photo (because of some creative work with mirrors or similar), can be restored in 2063
- File:Soldat del Poble.jpg - kept: ca. 1937 Spanish photo, photographer unknown, statue ok per FoP, {{PD-Spain-photo}} on the assumption that it was also published no later than 28 February 1989 without a copyright notice and {{PD-1996}} applies
- File:Carme Garcia Padrosa.jpg - 1959 self-portrait of ca:Carme Garcia Padrosa (died 2015), can be restored in 2086
- File:Rosa Szücs de Truñó.jpg - ca. 1960 photo showing ca:Rosa Szücs de Truñó (died 1984), probably a self-portrait, can be restored in 2065
- File:Anna Maria Martínez Sagi.jpg - kept: 1936 Spanish photo, photographer unknown, {{PD-Spain-photo}} on the assumption that it was also published no later than 28 February 1989 without a copyright notice and {{PD-1996}} applies
- File:Scala Barcelona.jpg - 1978 Spanish photo, photographer is apparently Guillermina Puig (alive?) - not sure if this is a simple photo, deleted per COM:PCP
- File:Lotta Continua.jpg - kept: cover of Italian magazine featuring a 1945 photo of Mussolini hanging upside down from that gas station, {{PD-Italy}} on the assumption that it was also published without a copyright notice and {{PD-1996}} applies
- File:Gustau Muñoz.jpg - photo of a woman wearing a shirt with a photo printed on it (logo of a 2021 documentary film, the man shown died in 1978 (?)
- File:Ton Sirera.jpg - photo of a 1959 work (photo?) by ca:Ton Sirera (died 1975), can be restored in 2056
- File:Antoni Garcia Lamolla.jpg - photo of a 1935 painting by ca:Antoni Garcia i Lamolla (died 1981), can be restored in 2062
- File:Alenesar Vlod d'Evru (2008).jpg - photo of 2008 artwork by ca:Evru (alive), can be restored at an unknown date
- File:Sant Anastasi.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Ermengol.jpg - Ermengol
- File:Montagut (Alcarràs).jpg - Ermengol
- File:Isabel Cinc Hores.jpg - photo of a 2021 poster
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Spain, Spain only awards 25 years of protection. All the portraits should be kept. This is way too many to evaluate all at once. --RAN (talk) 12:38, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete pictures fall into few categories: A) some appear to be street photos from the 1920s-1940s; B) some appear to be portrait photos from the 1920s-1940s; C) some appear to be works of art displayed either in public or in a museum or in a book, photographred recently; D) some appear to be street photos taken recently. I believe only D can be reasonably licensed as "own work", andt I can hardly see how A, B and C could be tagged this way. The uploader undermined his/her credibility by providing false "own work" tag for A, B and C, which casts doubt also as to the D category. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hh1718 (talk • contribs) 16:24, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep These files are the result of my own work. These are photographs taken on the street in accordance with the freedom of panorama. AlbertRA (talk) 15:22, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- File:Lion's Law.jpg
- File:Aenaː.jpg
- File:Pedro Álvarez.jpg
- File:Llibertat Pablo Hasél.jpg
- File:Seu Vella blava.jpg
- File:Enganxines.jpg
- File:Pablo Hasél.jpg
- File:Gustau Muñoz.jpg
- Keep Checking out these files you'll find this is a wide selection (too much to be judged all at once). Furthermore, there are a bunch of street art pictures, and outside views aren't violating any copyright law. The same happens with pictures of gigs, street events, so no reason to be banned. Last, as Ran said here before, portraits should be kept. --Kowalskyn (talk) 00:28, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep In addition, this license may be applied to these other files:--AlbertRA (talk) 22:35, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
{{PD-textlogo}} {{PD-shape}} {{Trademarked}}
- File:Col·lectiu d'Obrers en Lluita.jpg
- File:Fora Nuclears.jpg
- File:Bloc Català de Treballadors.jpg
- File:PSAN-provisonal.jpg
- File:Antifeixisme.jpg
- File:Confederació Sindical de Treballadors de Catalunya.jpg
- File:Cas Torà.jpg
- File:Operació Garzón.jpg
- File:Antimilitarisme.jpg
- File:Socors Català.jpg
- File:Joventuts Revolucionàries Catalanes.jpg
Deleted: almost all of them, kept only a few. Many of these files show artworks by named artists, and most of them died less than 70 or 80 years ago (these are Spanish works, and Spain has 80 years pma for artists who died before 7 December 1987) or are alive. These files can be restored 70/80 years after the death of the respective author or 120 years after creation with {{PD-old-assumed}} if we have a clear date. Of the photos, many are portraits by named and notable photographers. These are protected for 70/80 years pma because {{PD-Spain-photo}} with a 25 years term of protection only applies to simple photographs, which these are not. (And no, I don't subscribe to the theory that basically every photo is simple with the sole exception of highly artistic ones.) I kept a few pre-1971 photos with {{PD-Spain-photo}} (and assumed {{PD-1996}}). Freedom of panorama didn't really help with all the posters and "street" artwork because either they were clearly not permanently in a public place or it was unclear if they were actually outside. Both are necessary for Spanish FOP to apply.
I've noted those I've kept in the list with kept:, the rest was deleted for the various reasons listed. --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC). --Rosenzweig τ 18:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
- Restored: 2 files as per [10]. Yann (talk) 19:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
![[10]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=689957222#File:Enganxines.jpg){kind=link}
Modern building in South Korea, no FOP exemption 219.78.190.55 07:20, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:17, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
No proof has been provided that this coat of arms image is free. The license template {{PD-Coa-Germany}} does not apply in this case, as this is a private coat of arms, not a public one. AFBorchert (talk) 09:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:18, 19 September 2022 (UTC)
The original author is me, please delete it. Thank you. Thyj (talk) 06:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Derivative of deleted, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Avalokitesvara 32 avatars. Note: Currently in use, suggested substitutes? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- There is no substitute for it for the time being. Because the painting style is too poor, I asked to delete it. Thyj (talk) 02:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment I made the vectorization as part of the ilustration workshop i dont mind if it is deleted or not.-sorry wrong signature lol.. -LadyofHats (talk) 15:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, no meaningful uses (and user on whose page the image was used doesn't object deletion). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
l'auteure ne veut pas de cette photo qui est assez dure. 92.173.123.153 09:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
- Il n'est pas possible de supprimer une photo pour cette raison. Maintenant, vous pouvez téléverser une photo qui vous convient. Cette photo doit être libre de droit. Elle doit être versée par la personne qui prend la photographie. Bien cordialement. DeuxPlusQuatre (talk) 06:03, 24 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
I doubt if this very small resolution thumbnail is really own work as claimed. MKFI (talk) 10:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emily.Wight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Claimed own work but file EXIF shows "Author Paul Joseph Copyright holder Paul Joseph". VRT permission from Paul Joseph needed.
MKFI (talk) 10:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:28, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
very low quality image; there are better photos of the same organ in the category Syrio posso aiutare? 11:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
artist Hyperreal (Jacques Bodin) uploaded two of his paintings. One painting, I was able to find on his website. This one which has since been deleted. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jacques_Bodin,_Arbre_II,oil_on_canvas.jpg This painting,
I have not been able to find it on his website however, the description states "English: Painting by Jacques Bodin, De dos XXXXV, oil on canvas" and...
Artist is still living. His website is here: https://www.jacquesbodin.com/paintings-jacques-bodin The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect Name, Description. Apollobyte (talk) 12:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- uploader request. Unused thumbnail. Estopedist1 (talk) 18:35, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
Я осознал, что это разглашает мою приватность NaumovichLeonard (talk) 12:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
J’ai téléversé ce fichier par erreur Empereur de Phéggarixia (talk) 13:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
File:HK 佐敦道 Jordan Road 彌敦道 Nathan Road 裕華國貨 Yue Hwa Chinese Products Emporium goods 連花清瘟膠囊 Lianhua Qingwen April 2022 Px3 01.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by SD hehua as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Com:Packaging Yann (talk) 14:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per Com:Packaging. SCP-2000 13:52, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
erneut fragliche Lizenz (Fotograf ist nicht der Urheber; Selfie?? Dirk Lenke (talk) 15:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep @Dirk Lenke in general, we don't delete files where uploader name refers directly to the subject. It is very likely that the uploader is the copyright owner (selfie, acquired rights from the photographer). If the photographer will appear and appeal, we will act accordingly Estopedist1 (talk) 05:59, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you. Dirk Lenke (talk) 08:06, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —howcheng {chat} 18:10, 21 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused very poor quality image of Persian Gulf, nothing discernible, unusable. Innumerable better alternatives in Category:Persian Gulf. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 16:57, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file is a scan of a Botswanan newspaper published on 1980-07-14. Per COM:Botswana, collective works last for 50 years after publication, which means that the newspaper itself won't enter local public domain after 2030. The period also certainly exceeds the URAA restoration date of 1996-01-01, which means the file is neither within Botswanan and American public domain. The file is therefore copyrighted, and may be unfree unless permission is given. 廣九直通車 (talk) 07:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Also listing the cropped image of File:1980, Founding President of Botswana() (cropped).jpg at here.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- Keep PD-Botswana is PD after 25 years, while the entire newspaper issue is a collective work, this is one page of one article by one person, and the image is the work of a single person. Text: There is no evidence that more than one person wrote the paragraph of text. Image: I have never seen two people with their finger on a camera shutter at the same time. --RAN (talk) 12:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): But as the author and photographer (if not taken from stock photography companies) are affiliated with the newspaper press, it is quite likely that the newspaper press ultimately holds the copyright of the newspaper as published. Therefore the standard for collective copyright (50 years from publication) should be adopted. Moreover, even if the file entered public domain after 25 years (i.e. 1980+25=2005), it still passes the URAA date of 1996-01-01. As a file uploaded in 2017, this violates COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law (as per what noted on Template:Not-PD-US-URAA), regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Except Botswana was not a signatory to the URAA agreement, all signatories had boilerplate text added to their templates years ago explaining the rule. The Commons:precautionary principle explicitly states not to use speculation like "it is quite likely" as a reason for deletion, you must present "significant doubt", you can speculate about any image stored at Commons that several people could have had their finger on the shutter simultaneously, and it represents a collective work, and both people need to release the image under a creative commons license. As to the text, once again, the entire issue is a collective work, not a single paragraph of anonymous text. You can speculate for every book, that the listed author was not the real author, and a ghost-writer was used. We house over 100,000 anonymous text based news articles in which we assume there is one author. --RAN (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your helpful explanation, and I think I misunderstood the meaning of "collective work". Nevertheless I think you erred in the period of copyright protection. Neither the newspaper article nor the image is a work of applied art (defined as "an artistic creation with utilitarian functions or incorporated in a useful article [...]")—see {{PD-Botswana}} and section 2 of the Botswanan Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, 2000. For ordinary works, they enter the local public domain after 50 pma. So the article will not enter Botswanan public domain before 2030 (1980+50=2030). The same is for the image, unless there is evidence that it is taken before 1980.
This point is irrelevant to URAA and relates solely to local copyright law, so this should be quite a solid reason for doubting the file's public domain status, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 06:07, 21 April 2022 (UTC) - Just a sidenote, Botswana is a member of the WTO, so it must have ratified the Marrakesh Agreement (which establishes the WTO and in which relates to the American URAA).廣九直通車 (talk) 06:09, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for your helpful explanation, and I think I misunderstood the meaning of "collective work". Nevertheless I think you erred in the period of copyright protection. Neither the newspaper article nor the image is a work of applied art (defined as "an artistic creation with utilitarian functions or incorporated in a useful article [...]")—see {{PD-Botswana}} and section 2 of the Botswanan Copyright and Neighbouring Rights Act, 2000. For ordinary works, they enter the local public domain after 50 pma. So the article will not enter Botswanan public domain before 2030 (1980+50=2030). The same is for the image, unless there is evidence that it is taken before 1980.
Deleted: COM:Botswana is pma + 50 (create + 25 is solely for applied art, which this absolutely is not). Even if the photographer died immediately upon taking the picture, this would not be PD in Botswana until 01.01.2031 (1980+50+1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:48, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This is a "cropped" foto of a computer screen that has already been published online, at least on March 5. [11]. Here is full foto: [12]. Moreover, the source indicated under this "photo" on Commons says that it was published on March 25. At a minimum, it is required а permission from VRT. Now it is look like foto was just taken from web and cut. It seem to be a type of license laundering Commons:License_laundering. Kursant504 (talk) 08:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
![[12]](https://news.pn/photo/24235d81137c47532c28281c477562cc.i999x999x670.jpeg){kind=link}
- Your source says that the photo comes from Telegram post of the Governor of Sumy Oblast, and it is obviously a frame from a video surveillance camera. Videos of automatic cameras are not copyrightable. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 22:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)
- So it is mean that it is not free and was published earlier. Even automatic camera has owner and for me is obviously that it's owner has all copyrights to it's videos. If sityation is another - "armyinform" may apply with a letter to VRT and get a special permission from it for this frame. Kursant504 (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- What is "obviously", does not matter here, automatic camera images are regarded as copyright free. Your constant attempts to delete war-related images which don't come from Russian Ministry of Defence with no valid reasons deserve administrators' attention. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- Even if you will read it:Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Surveillance_camera_footage, you will see that commons does not have an exact position about automatic camera, because judicial precedents are different and have a different outcome. And there are no examples from Ukraine. So I think that this is a copyright infringement. Not to the topic: I will be very happy if it is decided that such videos are not protected by copyright in Ukraine, because then it will be possible to use a huge number of beautiful videos from automatic cameras that record strikes on the territory of Ukraine. But now I didn't think that it is possible. Kursant504 (talk) 10:03, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
- What is "obviously", does not matter here, automatic camera images are regarded as copyright free. Your constant attempts to delete war-related images which don't come from Russian Ministry of Defence with no valid reasons deserve administrators' attention. Sneeuwschaap (talk) 22:13, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
- So it is mean that it is not free and was published earlier. Even automatic camera has owner and for me is obviously that it's owner has all copyrights to it's videos. If sityation is another - "armyinform" may apply with a letter to VRT and get a special permission from it for this frame. Kursant504 (talk) 01:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In Russia, photos from automatic cameras are not protected per COM:TOO Russia. In Ukraine this is not the case per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Ukraine. Therefore this image should be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 10:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Original research without references or source which this map is based on. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Comment Currently in use. Map shows nations in various colors with no explanation of what the colors are supposed to indicate. -- 18:16, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 10:21, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Riga-to-Rangoon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos and drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Pietroasa hoard drawing of man wearing brooch.jpg
- File:M.V.A. Bent 1847-1929.jpg
- File:Edward G Brisch photographed in the 1940s (studio unknown).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep "PD-UK-unknown" the UK awards 70 years of protection for anonymous works. --RAN (talk) 04:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Pietroasa_hoard_drawing_of_man_wearing_brooch.jpg can be deleted. --RAN (talk) 04:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: The Pietroasa image has to be deleted, as the possible author, Elizabeth Colwell, died in 1961, so the drawing is still copyrighted. The other two images are correctly licenced per RAN and can be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 10:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since)
The question is "Are Neapalese official documents usable under a free license?". If not CC-BY-SA it could by some sort of PD. Ruthven (msg) 15:23, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. According to the emblem on the passport has been introduced in 2022, a previous version in 2008. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Nepal, this is file is not in PD, works of government are not listed as not protected, so it has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 10:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
Не свободный файл. Скопирован с сайта. Не понятно какой танк и причина разрушения. Anahoret (talk) 20:08, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
Delete As I can see the original source is facebook-account: [13]. Most of soursces that I found are refer to it: [14], [15], [16]. But this original source has no indication that all of its materials are free [17] - so, it means that they are not free. And using them by "armyinform" with free-license is just seem to be a some type of license laundering Commons:License_laundering.--Kursant504 (talk) 02:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
{{Armyinform.com.ua}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by PBKIHX (talk • contribs) 04:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Original source is not "armyinform.com.ua" - and they can't use this foto for free. They just took it from facebook. It is illegal. And it is not a first time when Ukraine sources do that. Kursant504 (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
- Its all Ministry of Defense of Ukraine PBKIHX (talk) 03:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- It is mean nothing. If you want to say that since the photo was taken by a serviceman, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine has the right to dispose of these materials, then you are wrong. That's not how it works. Kursant504 (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Ministry of Defense of Ukraine own copyrights PBKIHX (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- It is mean nothing. If you want to say that since the photo was taken by a serviceman, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine has the right to dispose of these materials, then you are wrong. That's not how it works. Kursant504 (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Its all Ministry of Defense of Ukraine PBKIHX (talk) 03:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Destruction of Russian tanks by Ukrainian troops in Mariupol (1).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Destruction of Russian tanks by Ukrainian troops in Mariupol (2).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Destruction of Russian tanks by Ukrainian troops in Mariupol (4).jpg, the "reasons" provided by Anahoret are irrelevant and invalid.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
As said previously, what tank is, be it a T-80 or other soviet era, it is irrelevant, but as you asked it is not an T-64, T-72 or T-90, but an T-80, per wheels configuration, as can be seen in other image of the same original link. The cause of destruction is stated to be made by an en:NLAW. Well, what caused, for certain, was a penetration made by an anti-tank weapon as this image clearly shows some of the pretty well documented fatal flaws of the soviet\russian tanks, like the inexistance of blast doors and blow-out panels between the tank ammo and the crew compartments, the problems with the autoloaders and ammo carousels that, when a tank is penetrated, makes the ammo to cook of, the turret to fly far from the chassis and the tank armour bursting like a ballon (as this image show the tank ripped apart and the armour twisted from the inside out).
Also, again we have Kursant504, uploader of putinist propagand imagery from the russian MOD all about this putinist war of agressions, as can be seen by his uploads and frequent deletion requester of images of putinist crimes like the Massacre of Bucha and others under clearly wrong and untrue reasons, tries again to delete images taken and uploaded by the ukranian state organizations, under the cover of "concerns" with unexisting copyright violations, with the same modus operandi.
He nows argues that an image being taken by an ukrainian servicemen during his official dutties (an soldier in active war zone and under martial law is always discharging his official duties) and them this images being published by the official pages of the Armed Forces of Ukraine "It is mean nothing. If you want to say that since the photo was taken by a serviceman, the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine has the right to dispose of these materials, then you are wrong. That's not how it works. ". Really? In what you base your assumptions? In what ukrainian law, regulation or statute you base your bold claims???
Them why the contradiction with your vivid assertions to the contrary, about image uploaded by you, where is the case of an image taken by a soviet military photograph during WW2 and the same image being published by the Russia Ministry of Defense website, you said that "The photographer was a war correspondent of the "Krasnaya Zvezda" newspaper and serves in the Soviet army. Taking these photos was his job, his duties in military service. And the results of his work belong to the Soviet army (as a newspaper owner) and now to its legal successor - the Ministry of Defense of Russia (as the current owner of the newspaper). 1) Why Mil.ru can't use them as they want?". So when is the Russian MOD it can dispose of the copyright of soviet military photos, but the Ukrainian Armed Forces cannot dispose of the photos taken by the servicemen of Ukrainian Armed Forces during their active duty? What a flagrant contradiction you have here.
The Facebook link you mention if from the Facebook "Official page of the 93rd separate mechanized brigade "Cold Yar" of the Operational Command "East" of the Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine", fact that you conveniently "forgot" to mention that it is a official page of an active unit of the Armed Forces of Ukraine. You also forgot, in the links that you provided, to mention that the same images where published by the Facebook official page of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine·
You also, conviniently, forgot to mention that the image clearly was sourced from the official website of the Inform agency of the Ministry of Defence of Ukraine ArmyInform, where it is clearly stated that "© 2022, Інформаційне агентство АрміяInform Матеріали на сайті розміщені на умовах ліцензії Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, якщо не вказано іншого." or "© 2022, ArmyInform News Agency The materials on the site are posted under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license, unless otherwise stated."
So you have that clearly say that this image was taken\released by the Ukranian Armed Forces, so there is clear provenance and authorship. Any similar arguments and zero solid proofs, as in other deletion requests, by the deletion requester are merely attempts to hide images of the putinist Z agression and how the dream of a quick, unopposed and triumphant victory were defeated. Tm (talk) 02:22, 27 April 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, the press service of the 93rd brigade of Ukrainian Armed Forces works for Ministry of Defense of Ukraine. That means this image was taken as part of that person's official duties. --VoidWanderer (talk) 20:00, 8 July 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion and the source, https://armyinform.com.ua/2022/03/25/holodnoyarivska-pihota-znyshhyla-rosijskyj-tank-t-80/. --Ellywa (talk) 10:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)