Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/03/02

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 2nd, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work that includes a non-trivial logo. Salavat (talk) 01:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 08:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy Kept, part of series of disruptive nominations by since indef blocked troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tagged for speedy deletion as out-of-scope by @Kadı: ; changing to deletion request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate file already uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. The original file is File:HM333XO - Self Portrait by HM333XO.jpg. Alexandrarosalinda (talk) 04:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 07:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is a mistake Uscbino (talk) 13:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

it's amistake Uscbino (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

badly done GeminiWriter88 (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo. Uploaded as own work, but it isn't, as the copyright belongs to the FIA, and logo has too much detail to be pd-logo Joseph2302 (talk) 12:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 23:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Professor Guru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader says these images were made by "creating the photos from my own design" and that they are "digital paintings", but hasn't clarified what that means. They've uploaded other edited, copyrighted photos of Formula 1 races since, and it seems likely that these (plus Commons:Deletion requests/File:F1 Abu Dhabi lap 57.jpg) are similarly based on copyrighted original images. The combination of high-quality photo/renders of cars surrounded by grey rectangles where the uploader didn't even attempt to remove or recolour the backgrounds suggests that the uploader did not in fact create the original car artwork, and has taken it from somewhere else.

Lord Belbury (talk) 11:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 10:00, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 10:32, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From www.ruben-associes.com : © 2019 – RUBEN & ASSOCIÉS – Tous droits réservés. Hyméros-(talk) 13:15, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recreation - Still copyrighted... Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 16:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wutsje 11:22, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

3th time... and still copyrighted (https://www.ruben-associes.com/photos-presse/) Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 17:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by Fitindia. --Rosenzweig τ 14:09, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

again... from https://www.ruben-associes.com/photos-presse/ (under copyright) Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 22:45, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This photo belongs to Jessica MARC and she gives permission to publish it on Wikipedia. 2A01:CB00:78F:E300:697F:F70:70C7:749A 23:31, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an incorrect chemical structure. The positions in which the adenine and the phosphate side chain are attached to the sugar are reversed. There are existing correct alternatives in Category:Coenzyme A that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 14:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 08:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Daveklibanoff (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works: subject is same as uploader.

P 1 9 9   15:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:05, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an incorrect chemical structure. Oxygen atoms are missing negative charges. Marbletan (talk) 14:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 08:38, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains a logo; no source on the underlying map. Appears to be created by the company itself. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted indoor stained glass. See COM:FOP China. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted stained-glass art. See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced. Implausible PD-self claim on a long-deceased subject. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsourced. Impossible PD-self claim on a 115 year old picture. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak delete, there is no indication that the picture is 115 years old, simply that the building shown in 115 years old. This issue is whether the uploader is the original photographer. The compression artefacts in the image suggest that is has been cropped from a small detail in a digitally-compressed picture, leading to the suspicion that this may have been copied from an unidentified webpage. This casts doubt on the license. Verbcatcher (talk) 07:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-CSPAN. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:20, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --plicit 12:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not a screenshot of IOS 15 KevinNov3 (talk) 03:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And NOT “OWN WORK”!! Copyright owner is Apple Inc. please to delete this file thanks! Usernogood (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by AntiCompositeNumber. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:01, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ebadi.Mehdi.afg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal pictures.

Lymantria (talk) 07:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:09, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal material, out of scope Hugo.arg (talk) 08:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willshambles (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely taken from here - https://www.french-waterways.com/boats/luciole/ - think we need OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 10:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:13, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio see metadata which read "Author Ro Reyes Copyright holder RO REYES MEDIA" Hoyanova (talk) 10:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given no permission Hoyanova (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:16, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope used for cross wiki person promo Hoyanova (talk) 10:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from https://www.lelittoral.be/fr/a-faire/circuit-uitkerkse-polder Culex (talk) 11:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:34, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from https://www.lelittoral.be/fr/a-faire/circuit-uitkerkse-polder Culex (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:35, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has been overwritten to delete sensitive information contained in the EXIF data. Please remove the old file variant. Vepelza26 (talk) 14:03, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already done. --King of ♥ 06:50, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the author of this file wish the deletion of it from Commons. ThePinkFireman (talk) 18:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE, past the one-week grace period permitted by COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 19:24, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I, the author of this file wish the deletion of it from Commons. ThePinkFireman (talk) 18:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE, past the one-week grace period permitted by COM:CSD#G7. --King of ♥ 19:25, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from https://www.lelittoral.be/fr/a-faire/circuit-uitkerkse-polder Culex (talk) 11:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.natuurpunt.be/afdelingen/bezoekerscentrum-uitkerkse-polder Culex (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from https://www.natuurpunt.be/afdelingen/bezoekerscentrum-uitkerkse-polder Culex (talk) 11:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rokibulislamroton (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal promotional images that are outside the scope of any projects including this one.

Herby talk thyme 11:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:39, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio and reupload of promo file see metadata "Author Ro Reyes Copyright holder RO REYES MEDIA" Hoyanova (talk) 11:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:42, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adnan Kasim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 07:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text image with DW background, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Obloj1004 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chibby Obi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Used in vanity Wikidata items.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:09, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Im ali rezaei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images that are outside the scope of this project. Commons is not a social media site

Herby talk thyme 16:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riazul Haque Ashiq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works: YT screenshot and FB code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   16:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's some sort of spam Tagishsimon (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam for some concern run by the uploader. Tagishsimon (talk) 16:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:10, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps CopyVio Enyavar (talk) 19:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not likely to be used in article, not used on User pages either. Liz (talk) 19:28, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused text doc, out of scope. Also added:

P 1 9 9   19:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WRaziel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused low quality photos of non-notable person and random graffiti, no educational use, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused screenshots/screengrabs, copyvio and out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo of nondescript place, no location/context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused doodle, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:08, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for harassment on English Wikipedia. Personal photo, unlikely to be used in articles. Liz (talk) 20:14, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mitchellfranklin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused screenshot and logo, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malfdjpm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused logo and product images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rajaji2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 21:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:27, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:35, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 11:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work and copyright owner, Apple Inc. Usernogood (talk) 22:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And showing person’s face in wallpaper!! This file may be deleted. Usernogood (talk) 22:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This file was problem and may be deleted because NOT OWN WORK!!! Copyright owner is Apple Inc. who developed the iPad and operating system iPadOS. Thanks! Usernogood (talk) 00:28, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: done by AntiCompositeNumber. --Jianhui67 TC 11:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 98roger98 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files by User:98roger98. Fictional "alternate History" maps. Bad names, no descriptions. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 13:31, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I additionally nominate theese recent uploads:--Jahobr (talk) 18:08, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 00:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source "Página web" means "web page" ---> copyvio Mateus2019 (talk) 18:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. −ebrahimtalk 23:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given Hoyanova (talk) 10:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 17:42, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

reupload of previously deleted promo file Hoyanova (talk) 11:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 17:43, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source no permission Hoyanova (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio, https://bajeskwartier.com/nl/bajeskwartier/het-plan/. --Lymantria (talk) 20:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 20:34, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that Open Parliament License can be applied to Twitter account of "Your UK Parliament" 219.78.156.57 04:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:17, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free license Wiki Farazi (talk) 10:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:18, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ordovid99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works: File:Musical artist Lexy Panterra.jpg is credited to Copyright holder Monsee G Wood, and File:David Amortegui Ice Hockey.png is a screenshot.

P 1 9 9   16:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Obvious PD-Benin, please make some effort to check on the copyright law in the country of origin, it is faster than nominating for deletion. --RAN (talk) 22:23, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-Benin}}. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:31, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:32, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted asset, most likely without permission of the copyright holder. TrueAuraCoral (talk) 06:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This file is just an unsophisitcated wordwark which clearly falls into the PD-Texlogo license. VileGecko (talk) 07:33, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-textlogo}}. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:51, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-encyclopedic, not in use, bad quality Hugo.arg (talk) 08:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:48, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality, including ugly mix of different styles; better alternatives in Category:Sodium silicates. Leyo 13:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:46, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable event/people, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:33, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beatrix Montakan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: Google Translate of description: "Photo by Kao Klai Party".

P 1 9 9   16:23, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:44, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9   20:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with VRT-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:16, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, logo of an Egyptian business.[1] Too complex to be public domain, so requires evidence of permission from the copyright holder. Verbcatcher (talk) 08:51, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dumb test edits I made. The image came from a YouTube video that is copyrighted. Sparkl (talk) 21:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:37, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carl Otto Czeschka died 1960 Goesseln (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Undelete in 2031. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:00, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/Vespasian_Lungu%2C_autoportret.jpg?20220218201814 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:47, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/2e/Toader_Vicol.jpg?20220214080003 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/Olimpia_%C8%99i_Toader.jpg?20220214075754 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/Vespasian_%C3%AEmbr%C4%83cat_cu_suman.jpg/599px-Vespasian_%C3%AEmbr%C4%83cat_cu_suman.jpg?20220213130209 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/64/Vespasian_Lungu%2C_la_14_ani%2C_%C3%AEmbr%C4%83cat_cu_suman.jpg?20220213125219 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3e/Vespasian_la_14_ani.jpg?20220213124402 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ef/Olimpia_1.jpg?20220213083319 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f2/Bunica_12.jpg/284px-Bunica_12.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/88/Pictorul_Vespasian_Lungu.jpg/314px-Pictorul_Vespasian_Lungu.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Zamfira_Procopciuc%2C_%28Lungu%29_..jpg/599px-Zamfira_Procopciuc%2C_%28Lungu%29_..jpg?20220211222033 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f6/1b._Lungu_Elena%2C_noiembrie_1949.jpg/343px-1b._Lungu_Elena%2C_noiembrie_1949.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/38/Aurel%2C_fratele_pictorului.jpg/319px-Aurel%2C_fratele_pictorului.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/97/Nicu%C8%9B%C4%83%2C_fratele_pictorului.jpg/320px-Nicu%C8%9B%C4%83%2C_fratele_pictorului.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/33/16._Bunicul_Lungu_Eutimie%2C_17.09.1879-1943.jpg/319px-16._Bunicul_Lungu_Eutimie%2C_17.09.1879-1943.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Fitindia at 05:48, 28 March 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ionesi Vespazian --Krdbot 13:12, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information that proves to have copyright on the image. Maikê (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot from copyrighted source Syced (talk) 10:46, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Unchiul_meu.jpg?20220214074201 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unchiul meu.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 05:30, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/ec/Unchiul_meu.jpg?20220214074201 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 05:37, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 20:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by KMFNevesinje (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work. Some images are re-uploaded which are previously deleted as copyvios. Some have watermarks and most of them are available on-line on various websites.

Smooth O (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo for the school has been changed 185.65.25.106 10:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not own work, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I got it wrong. There are 2 people called "Robertson" on this image, and I now cropped the other one (here) as the likeness is better. It is as yet unknown who this lady is. Please delete, I'll recrop if I find out who this is. -- Deadstar (msg) 10:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE, keep for now. --Gbawden (talk) 13:59, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kadı as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Inappropriate personal information  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:01, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's hard to make a concern over privacy for a licence plate that's a legal requirement to display. It's not even as if it's connected to the driver's identity. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Andy Dingley, Do you know the Turkish laws? Please look at here. This file contains inappropriate personal information so needs to be deleted. Kadı (talk) 14:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Adrianwo, Could you please also look at this file? Kadı (talk) 15:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
CC: @Túrelio Kadı (talk) 19:49, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion; weak keep, some elements may be useful. --Gbawden (talk) 14:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is the subject depicted in this photo, requires COM:VRT permission. plicit 12:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination amd scope. --Gbawden (talk) 13:56, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Blurred subject and low quality. SCP-2000 13:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, sorry. This image is really having a lot of problems. If it is not used in any other articles, you can speedily delete it by "uploader's request". Emojiwiki (talk) 14:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Image shows a police van drving fast on road at night how to motion blur in the shot, and we can add it to Category:Automobiles with motion blur. If no better reason could be given, we should not conclude immediately that motion blurred image is out of scope.--Kai3952 (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

COM:SCOPE Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. This picture is not just blurred and also poor composition. SCP-2000 04:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The resolution of the photo itself is good, why do you say it is poor or mediocre quality?--Kai3952 (talk) 07:15, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SCP-2000: Could it be you're misunderstanding the meaning of the "scope" policy?--Kai3952 (talk) 07:23, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is the problem of composition and focus instead of resolution. SCP-2000 07:29, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Problem? Unless this photo are taken by yourself, you do not get to make your own rules however you want to.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:41, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. SCP is applying commons rules, if there is no EDUSE for it, its out of scope. The composition is off - I don't see the value in this motion blur out of focus shot. --Gbawden (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Casa Zamfirei văzută de pe Dealul Crucii” acuarelă de Vespasian Lungu, colecția familiei Grams.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:12, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/be/%E2%80%9ECasa_Zamfirei_v%C4%83zut%C4%83_de_pe_Dealul_Crucii%E2%80%9D_acuarel%C4%83_de_Vespasian_Lungu%2C_colec%C8%9Bia_familiei_Grams.jpg/1200px-%E2%80%9ECasa_Zamfirei_v%C4%83zut%C4%83_de_pe_Dealul_Crucii%E2%80%9D_acuarel%C4%83_de_Vespasian_Lungu%2C_colec%C8%9Bia_familiei_Grams.jpg?20220227105614 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

„Casa Zamfirei văzută de pe Dealul Crucii” acuarelă de Vespasian Lungu, colecția familiei Grams.jpg Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 04:59, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|nu este necesară}} Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 05:02, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:53, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Locotenent_Vespasian_Lungu,_1949,_Br%C4%83ila.jpg#:~:text=File%3ALocotenent%20Vespasian%20Lungu%2C%201949%2C%20Br%C4%83ila.jpg,-From%20Wikimedia%20Commons Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/de/Locotenent_Vespasian_Lungu%2C_1949%2C_Br%C4%83ila.jpg?20220213130642 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WulfKoepke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Urheberrechtsverletzung, Künstler verstarb 2009 (Werk gemeinfrei 2079), keine Panoramafreiheit / copyvio, artist +2009, no fop

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Ich, Wulf Köpke, bin der Sohn des Künstlers EO Köpke und habe die Aufnahmen seiner Arbeiten erstellt und hier eingestellt.
Da ich der Erbe bin verfüge ich über die Rechte an den Werken meines Vaters.
Bitte nehmen Sie die Löschankündigung zurück.
WulfKoepke (talk) 13:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Das Vorgehen, Wulf Köpke, muss – im Interesse der Urheber von Kunstwerken ebenso wie des Projektes hier – ein anderes sein. Unter Commons:Support-Team ist beschrieben, wie gültige Freigaben zu erlangen sind. Martin Sg. (talk) 23:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Danke! Ich werde die Mail für die o.g. Bilder heute noch absenden.
Die Datei "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EOKoepke_Altarwand_der_Apostelkirche_Düsseldorf.jpg" habe ich irrtümlich mit hochgeladen, da muss ich die Rechte noch klären.
Bitte diese erst einmal löschen.
Danke, bis später
Wulf Köpke WulfKoepke (talk) 10:36, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 12 kept that have OTRS, one deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/ce/Vasile_Ionesi%2C_cumnatul_pictorului.jpg?20220218055600 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a fost încărcat din greșeală. Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:10, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate. Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:12, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 13:46, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist impression without proper source or permission Hoyanova (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source given Hoyanova (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the work of the Flickr user, a press photo by Daimler with restrictions on use. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the people depicted asked to have the name removed. Replacing the picture with a different version with the name overwritten would not be sufficient in my view. Manfred Werner (WMAT) (talk) 13:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used to illustrate a named character at an anime article on the Arabic Wikipedia, so is either copyrighted or COM:FANART. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi

this is Dominik, brand ambassador at Truphone.

This is our old logo and we'd like to request the deletion of this file.

The new Truphone logo has already been uploaded to Wikipedia Commons and can be found here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Truphone_logo_primary.svg

Thanks in advance Dominik — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 31.121.30.114 (talk) 13:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The logo is outdated and shouldn't be used anymore Dominik.birkel (talk) 15:24, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Logo of a UK company, very likely above the very low COM:TOO UK. --Rosenzweig τ 20:44, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Omar Revillat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: subject is same as uploader. And COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:45, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ovcak123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.

P 1 9 9   15:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata credits Dilman Dila, possibly not the uploader. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 15:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dilman Dila, the photographer, granted me the copyright over the image. 83.137.6.172 18:33, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; needs OTRS to keep. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OlivierAlp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:VRT. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 17:34, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I note this is stated to come from https://skwasimakram.com/image-licence/ whcih it does. Licencing is vague at best: "This image free to use for good purpose. Copyrights Free Image."
My opinion is that this is likely to be licence washing. Timtrent (talk) 17:37, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Licence washing is even more likely when we note that w:en:Draft:Mukul Gain is edited by w:en:User:Sk Wasim Akram 13 and the web site with the alleged onward licence is likely to be owned by that person (0.9 probability). Timtrent (talk) 17:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt a file named "Screenshot YouTube" and cited "ArsTechnica" would be licensed under appropriate cc license C933103 (talk) 17:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence washed via https://skwasimakram.com/image-licence/ (0.9 probability). This site is owned by w:en:User:Sk Wasim Akram 13 again (0.95 probability). See w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sk Wasim Akram 13. At the very least formal permission is required via COM:VRT. Also COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 17:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of Timtrent (talk) 17:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"joke map" - we have better maps of Europe though Enyavar (talk) 18:11, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly either a film screenshot or someone else's photo, not "own work" as claimed. George Ho (talk) 18:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fantasy map of a fictional island in the North Atlantic ocean Enyavar (talk) 18:48, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Fantasy flag of a fictional island nation in the North Atlantic ocean Enyavar (talk) 18:49, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has requested deletion on the talk page. I believe that this stamp is PD in the United States, because it is indistinguishable from File:Faroe stamp 280 olavur halgi (st olav).jpg and that one is PD. We need to discuss this. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 19:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Stamps of finland, of whihc Aland is part, are (c) if published after 1990. You maybe able to crop the PD stamp to use some elements but this stamp is (c) based on my reading of COM:FOP Finland. --Gbawden (talk) 13:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Nd12052010 has problems with copyright (look his/her talkpage). This is small photo, very different from his/her other remaining uploads. I suspect again copyright violation. Subject is barely notable (article about him was deleted, article about his band was kept). Taivo (talk) 19:13, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Flag of a fantasy nation Enyavar (talk) 19:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Flag of a fantasy nation Enyavar (talk) 19:29, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Map of a fantasy nation Enyavar (talk) 19:30, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:13, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... in beginning of special instructions field of metadata, the photo is previously published in Facebook. All previously published files must have evidence of free license, for example VRT-permission. In addition, this is uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 19:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation, no evidence of being uploader's own work Film Enthusiast (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zebellahdriver (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrab images with transmission code in EXIF data.

P 1 9 9   20:06, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:08, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low quality photo of nondescript sign, no context/location, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9   20:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
This is a scanned copy of the log entry made on March 3rd, 1909 in the college log book.
Please find the official alumnai post on this as well.
https://sumangalaoba.com/happy-founders-day-and-113th-anniversary-to-sri-sumangala-college-and-to-all-sumangalians/ Peiris (talk) 02:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Scope?. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helmut Hayd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused text tables, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   20:17, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tirado da internet com provável copyright Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 21:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and scope. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source provided does not corroborate that this has been released as CC-BY-SA, and the author listed here appears to be the *uploader*, not necessarily the author. Original source might be [2], as this image appears to be a crop of the subject at the Mobkitchen studio. MIDI (talk) 21:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I contacted the website on February 26th about licensing the image and have not received a response. Either they don't intend to release the image or their inbox is very full. Richienb (talk) 06:09, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:06, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:24, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspect to copyright violation. Because of Getty Images label on this link https://www.bbc.com/persian/iran-56348616.Shkuru Afshar (talk) 12:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated this image for deletion because of Getty Images label on the link. File:AS17-140-21496.jpg has NASA source and should be copyright free. But on this link https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/60677041 Getty Images label in on the picture. It is confusing that a Getty Images picture is copyright free. So, I am not sure if File:Reza Shah portrait.jpg is copyright free or not.Shkuru Afshar (talk) 23:38, 14 March 2022 (UTC)f[reply]

  • Keep. This 1920s photograph has been published thousands of times in Iran and there is no reason to think that it is protected by copyright. And Getty Images does not claim copyright, it is just selling a high quality version of the picture. I added a book printed in 1942 to prove public domain, though I don't think it was necessary for a vote to keep it. HeminKurdistan (talk) 14:17, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Getty have been known to claim PD photos as their work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for an Australian school claimed as 'own work' but missing VRT permission. The threshold of originality is very low for Australian works, see COM:TOO Australia. Sufficient effort (from an Australian perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin. For public domain / copyright ineligible works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 07:40, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Random person using Commons as repository for photos - article deleted in fr.wp Hyméros-(talk) 10:54, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Notability of the pictured person is highly dubious; besides, the uploader had claimed that the picture is taken from Instagram so that its copyright status is also problematic. --Andrei Romanenko (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recreation (multi-deleted) Hyméros --}-≽ Yes ? 16:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-professional map of a location somewhere in the world. Or even fictional. No description or label. Enyavar (talk) 18:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We already have satellite mosaicked maps that are not obscured by labels. (Which are placed without context here). Enyavar (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7e/Spre_Drahanovice.jpg?20220213125906 Ionesi Vespazian (talk) 13:41, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Gikü, and in addition to the copyright concerns, very poor quality. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Copyright? Maybe SVG will Useful KMBDENNISTRIDENT (talk) 00:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File was previously deleted, above the COM:TOO. This SVG-text version seems to be an alternative. Fuger 01:30, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 14:04, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works by G. Chini (1873-1956): they are still under copyright in Italy and in the US (where there is no FoP for artworks).

Ruthven (msg) 11:42, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as still being copyrighted in Italy. I'm not so sure about them being protected in the US though. Per Commons:Public art and copyrights in the US, if they were, since 1922/1923, in a hotel where people could "make copies" (like: photograph them), they probably count as "published", and published works from before 1927 (as of 2022) are in the public domain in the US, regardless if they're from the US or not. --Rosenzweig τ 20:40, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eddcuevas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low res photos with minimal source information, some with visible watermark/agency credit. Unlikely to be own work.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:50, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing or inconsistent EXIF data or credit to someone else. Unreliable uploader. --P 1 9 9   16:50, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eddcuevas (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

More images that are likely not own works: low-res web-sized images with disparate quality and styles, missing or transmission code in EXIF data. Unreliable uploader.

P 1 9 9   16:52, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The File:Kyiv music fest.png should be kept as an instance of text logo (I've edited the license already). VileGecko (talk) 07:39, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Struck one per User:VileGecko. --P 1 9 9   15:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:11, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture shows our private house, having it published online violates our need for privacy. Foto was taken from our backyard. 145.224.73.45 16:04, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bild wurde von dem Forstweg, der da vorbeiführt, aus aufgenommen. Eine Kennzeichnung als Privatbesitz gab es damals nicht. Das Gelände (ehem. Ferienlager) war verlassen und zugänglich. Lutzto (talk) 09:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Bild wurde von dem Forstweg, der da vorbeiführt, aus aufgenommen. Eine Kennzeichnung als Privatbesitz gab es damals nicht. Das Gelände (ehem. Ferienlager) war verlassen und zugänglich.Lutzto 20:46, 02 März 2022(UTC)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 09:52, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

当社の商標を無断で流布している。 210.249.30.138 00:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

「日本の著作権法第2条では、思想又は感情を創作的に表現したものであって、文芸、学術、美術又は音楽の範囲に属するものが著作物であると規定されています。日本の裁判所は、テキストロゴが著作権を有するためには、観賞価値ある外観を有している必要があると判断しています。幾何学的な図形と文字だけで構成されたロゴも、一般的には著作権の対象にはなりません。詳しくはCOM:TOO Japanをご覧ください。」 C933103 (talk) 17:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This image below Japanese threshold of originality, so this is public domain. Trademark rights and copyright are separate concepts.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. howcheng {chat} 21:23, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 03:32, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Chào Wikipedia,
Hiện tại mình muốn xoá File có hình của triệu tiểu đường được không ạ? Uyen Le2 (talk) 06:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Info The user above is not the original uploader. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 10:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 21:36, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The color scheme is undefined, Mobil branching off of Total seems incorrect, some company names and relationships have changed, and the employee count and economic data is 17 years out of date. 73.244.173.204 04:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: according to the SVG replacement, the data was accurate as of 2005, so I added that to the description; as for the color scheme, the solution would be to fix it rather than to delete the image completely. howcheng {chat} 21:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, found here https://www.2dgalleries.com/artist/luc-cromheecke-2355 and google finds the original here in colour - https://www.hbvl.be/cnt/dmf20201201_98402226 (requires subscription to read) Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 21:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violation privacy DirkVE (talk) 07:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not sure how this is a privacy violation, but the file is unused anywhere, so I'm deleting as out of scope. howcheng {chat} 21:41, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Hugo.arg (talk) 08:36, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keeping. Como que fotocopia? Dos banderas y unas letras. Nada de derechos de autor. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.119.229.11 (talk) 00:42, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: {{PD-ineligible}}. howcheng {chat} 21:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the filename, one of many screenshots of the "Hunter X Hunter" anime uploaded by this user. Reverse image shows no copies, so may have been taken directly from a video still. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. howcheng {chat} 21:48, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works by G. Chini, who died in 1956. Still under copyright in Italy (where there is no FoP for artworks).

Ruthven (msg) 11:19, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'd only keep File:Galileo chini, san giovanni battista, 04 firma.jpg as it falls under Commons:Signatures, and File:Melograna marchio Arte della Ceramica.jpg as it is an old trademark --Sailko (talk) 11:31, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Sailko: On Commons we do not host fair use files, thus a trademark is still a copyrighted logo. Ruthven (msg) 11:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Il_vasto_piazzale_della_Reggia,_bozzetto_di_Galileo_Chini_per_Turandot_(1924)_-_Archivio_Storico_Ricordi_ICON000206.jpg. As far as I know, Galileo Chini sold this set design to Ricordi (it was the company practice at the time), so it is now the Archivio Ricordi who owns the right to share it. --LutiV (talk) 17:53, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@LutiV Fine. How can we know that for sure? Ricordi should send us a proof via COM:VRT + their permission; which is the standard procedure. In fact, in their Legal Notices they state: "All the contents featured on this website are protected by copyright laws and by the other national and international provision regarding the protection of intellectual and industrial property" (and later on they forbid commercial use).Ruthven (msg) 08:30, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: if you see here, they are releasing this and other images under CC-by-SA 4.0 LutiV (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@LutiV I see that they are releasing some material, but the page with the permission is too heavy and with too much files to be checked (a bad web master I presume). Moreover, the source is too generic for Il_vasto_piazzale_della_Reggia,_bozzetto_di_Galileo_Chini_per_Turandot_(1924)_-_Archivio_Storico_Ricordi_ICON000206.jpg: you should link the exact page on Ricordi's website (the one relative to id. ICON000206), where it is to be expected that the free license is specified. It is up to the uploader to provide the precise links and information about the copyright status of a work. Ruthven (msg) 14:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven Yes sure, that's why I linked both the website, the one with the license specification and the one with the ID. Anyway, I can assure that the image ICON000206 is in the page with the license specification because I uploaded it myself. I'm aware it is not easy to find it, that was the only solution we found to make the license statement on the group of images the Archivio selected to be shared on Wikicommons. It wasn't possibile to specify the license on the page with the ID.
The Archivio Storico Ricordi is part of a GLAM project and is sharing a lot of its documents, collaborating to many Wiki projects, that's the reason why this page was created. LutiV (talk) 10:36, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@LutiV thanks for your answer. Well, the GLAM has no license verification capacities on Commons whatsoever: they can give you advice on how to proceed, and clearly in this case it wasn't so good. This is not the place to discuss this matter, but the best way to proceed would have been to contact COM:VRT or to ask advice in the Village Pump. A list with the uploaded file names sent to VRT could have solved the matter, rather than a very heavy and unorganized web page. Ruthven (msg) 10:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven Thank you for your advise, I just sent the email. LutiV (talk) 15:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it's worth going through the trouble of deleting these, the copyright will expire soon, but if you do, please do it in such a way that they'll be undeleted when the copyright expires. It's only a couple more years. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 12:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]


IP, just read the categories name. Ruthven (msg) 09:29, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: almost all, per nomination, except one that has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 17:37, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Restored a cropped version of File:Galileo chini, san giovanni battista, 04 firma.jpg (to minimize the amount of painting shown around the signature), per request. --Rosenzweig τ 15:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Restored File:Bruna Rossi, Palazzo Comunale Montecatini Terme, La bellezza è di casa, 7.jpg per UDR as PD-ItalyGov and PD-1996. Abzeronow (talk) 16:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ContributePhoto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical newspapers and photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: most, per nomination, kept the death notice. I didn't see any evidence that the one supposedly from 1971 was published without a notice. --Rosenzweig τ 17:54, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M uo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted files - some of the files uploaded by M uo that I have not nominated may be passable as being from the 1900s-10s, they would have been published long ago enough (so I have not nominated those specific files) but may need to be checked per French copyright. Many of the nominated photographs would have been taken by either Jean (1910-1979) or Albert Seeberger (1914-1999) - so it is going to be a long wait before their photographs become public domain and I am assuming that the Seeberger copyrights are still firmly extant. In addition, some of the earlier photographs may have been taken by Henri Seeberger, who died in 1956, not quite long ago enough for his work to enter public domain yet. Given that the Seeberger Freres are very well known in their field, it seems highly improbable that their work is not copyright protected (especially as the last Seeberger died only 23 years ago). At any rate, these are NOT the uploader's "own work" as claimed.

Mabalu (talk) 14:43, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have corrected the copyright details on the anonymous portrait of the 3 brothers taken around 1900 and on the Water Carriers by the oldest of the brothers as they are out of copyright in France. The other images uploaded by M uo are too recent. Jamesmcardle (talk) 23:07, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The files can be restored in 2070 if they are the work of one of the Seebergers (I'm not so sure about the photos which show them). The two mentioned by Jamesmcardle were not nominated in this DR. --Rosenzweig τ 11:23, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by コヨミヤ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Japan for 2D works.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment The creator of this file.I have confirmed Commons: Freedom of panorama.Please delete all.(このファイルの作成者です。Commons:Freedom of panoramaを確認しました。全て削除でお願いします。)--コヨミヤ (talk) 21:23, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 16:34, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by コヨミヤ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

i dont think these are simple logos.

RZuo (talk) 14:22, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Brave lion.png is the logo for Brave and may possibly be OK under COM:TOO US, but per COM:TOO Hong Kong, File:Tuen Mun logo.png is almost certainly not allowed. howcheng {chat} 22:24, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the Brave Logo, deleted the other file. The Brave logo is actually part of the browser (compare [3]), and that is licensed with {{MPL2}}, see [4]. The HK logo is probably above the low TOO there, so deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 18:40, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Corbis claims a copyright for this image from 1922. However, they add that boilerplate copyright notice to every image, even ones that have been released into the public domain by the Library of Congress. Commons:Publication says publication is when the image is made available to people other than the photographer and his immediate family, so even if this was never published in a newspaper, I would say that being seen by other police officers, makes it public. --RAN (talk) 18:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If I had any evidence that this photograph was not only taken, but also published in 1922, we could keep it with PD-US-expired. But I don't. I've searched quite a bit, using web searches and the newspaper sites of newspapers.com and ProQuest, NYT, Washington Post, various others, and could not find it. Various articles about this 1922 Brooklyn murder, yes, also about this re-enactment of the murder by this gang a few days later, but not this photo. And no, Commons:Publication does NOT say „publication is when the image is made available to people other than the photographer and his immediate family“; it's quite a bit more complicated for pre-1978 publication, see Carl Lindberg's comment in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Minerva Kohlhepp Teichert 1908.jpg. None of the cases mentioned there (like the sale of prints by a professional photographer) seems to apply here, or at least we don't have any evidence beyond pure speculation. We can only assume that the photo was made by some kind of police body, probably state or municipal, so any federal PD-US-tags also would not apply. Since the photo came from the Corbis/Bettmann pool, it could easily have been unpublished prior to January 1, 2003 and so would be in the realm of {{PD-US-unpublished}}. But since we don't have a named photographer with death date, we can only fall back on the other case: an anonymous work, a pseudonymous work, or a work made for hire created over 120 years ago. Which it is not yet, as it was created 100 years ago. So the file can be restored in 2043 with {{PD-US-unpublished}} and / or {{PD-old-assumed}}. --Rosenzweig τ 18:33, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused lang template (page replaced by translate extension) Stang 15:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Patrick Leigh Fermor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, drawings, symbols. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep the following:
  • File:1Arma del Colonnello Felice Lombardo , IV Barone di San Chirico,( 1774+1828) con i quarti Belvedere, Pagano, de Gennaro e Pinto di Barri.jpg PD-COA --RAN (talk) 20:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • File:Stampa della città di Troia.jpg "PD-EU-no author disclosure", appears to be a map from the 1800s
  • File:Stampa della città di Lucera.jpg "PD-EU-no author disclosure", appears to be a map from the 1800s
  • Ritratto di D. Felice Lombardo (1829+1913) V barone di San Chirico.jpg "PD-EU-no author disclosure" circa 1900 anonymous painting
  • File:Carlo Lombardo ( 1869+1959) VIII barone di San Chirico, Compositore ed editore musicale.jpg "PD-EU-no author disclosure"

Deleted: most, kept the two that were shown to be from a 1703 book. Some of the others looked like they could be old enough for a PD-old tag, but there was not enough information / evidence to determine if they really are. And the flag (low size and quality webp file) was redundant to the other files in Category:Flags of the Kingdom of Italy (1861-1946). --Rosenzweig τ 17:37, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a biased map with no sources Randoperson1 (talk) 01:26, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Biased how? It states the fact that the uncolored countries do have a rothschild bank and the colored ones don't. Are you a rothschild or something? 139.47.42.177 23:39, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Persons like the complainer who want it deleted are new world order followers who want to censor opposing positions. Leave the post alone. 96.43.248.17 20:35, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Prove those countries do have centralized reserve banks and show how they are backed. 155.190.21.4 13:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
How can one NWO follower get this page removed? Why dont you prove that this is false as as there are only six Counties it show be easy for you to prove, or are you saying that there are more Countries without Rothchild controlled banks, if so you should prove this and get the Author to add to his map 92.207.87.171 09:08, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is all in the family's archives: https://www.rothschildarchive.org/business/rothschild_worldwide/ https://www.rothschildandco.com/en/about-us/ Based on the info provided, this account presented on the map would currently be false (which doesn't necessarily mean that they don't conduct business there). — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 198.41.74.13 (talk) 20:26, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Tagged with {{References missing}}. howcheng {chat} 21:34, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 21:06, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChandlerMinh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Publications, symbol, official document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination deleted the first file (copyrighted logo), kept file 2 and 3 (old text in PD) and kept file 4 in PD per Template:GODL-India. --Ellywa (talk) 21:12, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shayan khalesi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and movie posters. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-Iran, Iran only awards 30 years of protection, so all prior to 1992 would be PD. The images are are film posters from Iranian films from the 1950s according to articles the images are used in. Two images are of men from circa 1950 and are also PD-Iran. The dates are in the articles and some in the image titles using the Iranian calendar, and need to be converted. --RAN (talk) 21:00, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Iran, material is copyrighted 30 years from publication date. As publication dates are not mentioned on the file pages, it is not shown per COM:EVID that these images are in PD. They have to be deleted therefore. If you do not agree with my decision to delete the file, please ask for undeletion on COM:UNDELETE. If you do so, formulate your motivation why this image can be maintained very clearly and base your motivation on the Commons policies. After that, another administrator will take a decision.. --Ellywa (talk) 21:15, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SardarUmerKhitab (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-Pakistan all are more than 50 years old based on the presidency of the person pictured. Delete the file File:Sardar Haji Gul Khitab Khan (MNA).jpg was taken at the United Nations as an official image, UN Images are under copyright. --RAN (talk) 00:34, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Pakistan and remark of RAN. Deleted the UN image. --Ellywa (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from https://aliifayyad.wordpress.com/2021/01/17/pena-madridista-de-beirut/ Adeletron 3030 (talk) 21:38, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello dear, This photo has been taken by myself and i have the right to publish content Shishkode (talk) 07:20, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Shishkode Since it was previously published and available on the web, please follow the directions at COM:VRT to verify that you are the owner and consent to releasing the image under a free license. Thank you. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 13:54, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no final permission on the image today. --Ellywa (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ww2censor (talk) 21:55, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MaryannaNesina: Samoa stamps are not specifically mentioned in their copyright laws, so we must rely on the normal copyright term for the country. Stamps, in general in many countries are not known to be in the public domain, except as you see from that map, which is not accurate at all nor complete, that the eastern block (Eurasia, inc. Russia, etc.,) stamps are in the public domain. Images of money are a different matter altogether which I know very little about but seems equally as complex as stamps copyright. Ww2censor (talk) 16:25, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Most of the stamps in the category are from the 1800s or early 1900s, well before the 75 year copyright term. The nominator should nominate specific stamps that are after it instead of bundling a bunch of files together that are clearly in the public domain. From what I can tell only 2 stamps out of the whole category/sub categories are copyrighted. Unless they are only nominating the two files that have been listed and not the whole category. Then obviously they should be deleted. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Adamant1 You are not reading the nomination correctly. That is the way VFC, Perform Batch Task titles the nomination. It is not the whole category that is nominated but two specific files within the category. What do you think the specific noted stamps are listed for but because they are still in copyright? The other older stamps are obviously fine. Ww2censor (talk) 12:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't necessarily say that. Which is why there is the part at the end where I said to delete the ones that are listed in this deletion request and clearly copyrighted. That said, I changed my vote to delete so it's clearer. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:05, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 18:14, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MaryannaNesina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Ww2censor (talk) 22:03, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My response is the same as the one I gave you at: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps of Samoa. Ww2censor (talk) 16:33, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Vanuatu. --Ellywa (talk) 18:15, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]