Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/02/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Quick Kept, no reason for deletion offered, no evident problem, in-scope image in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use in multiple projects, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kskhh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: As an original uploader of this file, I want this file to be deleted. I have uploaded a better version here: file:Gilgit Baltistan Traditional Hat.jpg. Kskhh (talk) 08:29, 15 March 2022 (UTC). The file is not used anymore and replacement file is uploaded. But in my opinion the nominated file is better than proposed replacement, so discussion is allowed. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Keep No evident reason for deletion; nothing wrong with having more than one image of a type of traditional cultural dress. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
Delete, As the original uploader of the file, I request it to be deleted. I have some personal reasons regarding it. I would be very thankful. --Kskhh (talk) 18:22, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![112 File:Inva Mula und die Jury-Kommission des albanischen Klasskwettbewerbs "Virtuozet" für junge Talente 2018.jpg](#File:Inva_Mula_und_die_Jury-Kommission_des_albanischen_Klasskwettbewerbs_"Virtuozet"_für_junge_Talente_2018.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_flag.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
As the original author of this file I want this image to be deleted. As I requested this file to be deleted a month ago and but it was kept. Kindly delete the file as I have some personal reasons regarding it and I don't want any more discussion portal. I would be obliged. As a replacement I have uploaded a clear and better image File:Gilgit Baltistan Traditional Hat.jpg. Kskhh (talk) 20:43, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- Could you please explain what has changed since the previous deletion listing was closed a few days ago, or if you have additional reasons for deletion? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:40, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
- The man in the picture is my friend. He asked me to remove the previous picture and upload a new one. I uploaded a better version. That is the reason I wanted the old picture to be removed citing I had personal reasons but no one understood. Again as the original uploader of the file I want the image to be deleted. Please give attention to my request. Thank You Kskhh (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
Kept. No new arguments, nothing wrong with current file. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Its been more than 2 months since I started the deletion request for this file which I created. Why the file is not being deleted? I'm the original uploader of the file. Do I not have rights of the file? I already posted the reason of deletion and still the file is there. I request again that the file be deleted. --Kskhh (talk) 14:34, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Comment According to the irrevocable CC-by-sa-4.0 license which you authorized for your photo, you have rights to attribution. Others may copy and reuse, as long as they comply with attribution to you in accordance with the license. Listing it repeatedly, until 2 days ago without giving explanation, might have been considered more an annoyance to others in Commons than a reason for deletion. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, user talk page, no reason for deletion offered, part of series of apparent prank/troll requests -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, no reason for deletion offered (one of apparent series of prank/troll requests?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use in multiple projects, no reason for deletion offered, one of apparent series of prank/troll requests -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image - in use, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope, in use, no reason for deletion, one of apparent series of bad faith troll/prank deletion requests. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use in multiple projects, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:54, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:26, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use, no reason for deletion offered, malformed listing (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Kept, in scope image, in use in multiple projects, no reason for deletion offered (apparent prank/troll request?) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{db-author}} Ncy90a (talk) 08:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 08:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation 83.200.98.27 01:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- {{speedy| Error }} — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 83.200.98.27 (talk) 09:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 09:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{db-author}} Ncy90a (talk) 09:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 09:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
low resolution photos of professional shots that are grabbed from Facebook pages without permission
- File:Maysweet.jpg
- File:EstherDCS1.jpg
- File:Phway2.jpg
- File:Phway1.jpg
- File:Wutthmone1.jpg
- File:Thetmonmyint2.jpg
- File:Thetmonmyint1.jpg
- File:NNKZ2.jpg
- File:NNKZ1.jpg
- File:Misandi.jpg
- File:Thuzarwintlwin05.jpg
- File:Nwedarli01.jpg
- File:Thuzarwintlwin04.jpg
- File:Thuzarwintlwin03.jpg
- File:Thuzarwintlwin02.jpg
- File:Thuzarwintlwin01.jpg
- File:Maymyatnoe567.jpg
- File:Maymyatnoe123.jpg
Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 07:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 17:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleting. Archivo robado de Facebook 191.126.159.40 19:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Info: Image search: Google negative, Tineye negative, Yandex negative, Bing negative, Sogou negative, Alamy negative, Getty negative. --Achim55 (talk) 19:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Invalid nomination. (non-admin closure)--Kadı (talk) 21:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Facebook metadata means file has been uploaded to the net before coming here. Thus "facebook file" is a valid basis for a deletion request. Noobs should avoid closing discussions or face being sanctioned for it. Frog informs (talk) 13:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Trolling, Vandalism. (non - admin closure) --Kadı (talk) 18:54, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, part of series of disruptive nominations by since indef blocked troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, part of series of disruptive nominations by since indef blocked troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, part of series of disruptive nominations by since indef blocked troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, in scope, in use, no reason for deletion, apparent disruptive troll nomination -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, in scope, in use in multiple projects; part of series of disruptive nominations by since indef blocked troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, part of series of disruptive nominations by since indef blocked troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, part of series of disruptive nominations by since indef blocked troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
tagged for speedy deletion as out-of-scope by @Kadı: ; changing to deletion request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:10, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: A quick web search for the name "Colette Choisez" resulted in "about 251,000 results", suggesting she is a porn actress of some note. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, @Infrogmation. She is not notable. Kadı Message 20:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
- How so? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:18, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, @Infrogmation. She is not notable. Kadı Message 20:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 13:07, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Photoshopped collage, no evident in-scope usefulness, uploader mostly making dubious possibly prank/troll deletion request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Speedy Deleted, uploader has since been indef blocked as multi-account abusing troll. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted again after re-upload. --Achim55 (talk) 22:04, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted again after re-upload. --Achim55 (talk) 09:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Zenodo source says "License Not Specified", not CC-Attribution. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:31, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no indication of a free license. --Achim55 (talk) 20:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope, this image seems to be of self-promotion purpose. Stang★ 15:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no free license. --Yann (talk) 19:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by بو غريب الفايدى (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope, Commons is not a place for self image hosting.
- File:كتاب بو غريب 2.pdf
- File:شجرة عائلة بو غريب.jpg
- File:كتاب بو غريب (2).pdf
- File:مشجرة ( عيت غريب).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Stang★ 15:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Speedy Kept, no reason offered for deletion, no evident problem, dubious nomination -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 09:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 09:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:27, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 10:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 10:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Mako001 (talk) 10:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 21:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Username13z (talk) 23:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, vandalism-only account. --Rosenzweig τ 00:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, vandalism-only account. --Rosenzweig τ 00:32, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, vandalism-only account. --Rosenzweig τ 00:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, vandalism-only account. --Rosenzweig τ 00:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, vandalism-only account. --Rosenzweig τ 00:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, vandalism-only account. --Rosenzweig τ 00:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Inappropriate Idro10 (talk) 18:04, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep. Commons is not censored (COM:CENSOR) and hosts a wide variety of sexually explicit images. The image is high quality and COM:OTRS has confirmed that there is no issue with permissions. The image depicts something that isn't well-represented on Commons (sexual intercourse between a trans man and cis man), and per COM:NUDITY a file that is sufficiently different from existing files should generally be kept. WanderingWanda (talk) 00:09, 6 January 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Wikipedia is not censored. Satyricon2 (talk) 12:04, 16 January 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Delete}} Pagegez (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Block}} Rosenzweign (talk) 04:33, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. ...Uh, not really sure what's going on here, but I stand by what I wrote above. WanderingWanda (talk) 04:40, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Reason given is nonsense. Tabercil (talk) 06:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Vandalism. --Achim55 (talk) 08:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
copyright image - ELLE Korea - no Common license on video Evaders99 (talk) 22:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 20:38, 27 February 2022 UTC: per COM:NETCOPYVIO. --Krdbot 02:48, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
I am reasonably confident that this work by Jean-Michel Basquiat passes the threshold of originality and thus is subject to copyright, but it's worth getting a second opinion. DS (talk) 19:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- @DragonflySixtyseven: Agreed. May even be eligible for speedy deletion. QuickQuokka [talk] 14:10, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 17:04, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Opel Movano C
[edit]Both images are the same and the vans have been photoshopped into the background - presumably the uploader doesn't hold the copyright for the background nor the van images, These also look like company promotional images aswell, Thanks,
–Davey2010Talk 16:49, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:29, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Exhibitionism, COM:PENIS, unremarkable or poor quality
- File:Cut penis.jpg
- File:Recently circumcised.jpg
- File:Cockandballs 04.jpg
- File:Cockandballs 02.jpg
- File:Cockandballs 01.jpg
- File:Cockandballs 03.jpg
- File:(m=e-yaaGqaa)(mh=e-4IjWwCNTnMVWym)original 208789801 03.jpg
(mh%3De-4IjWwCNTnMVWym)original_208789801_03.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Dronebogus (talk) 01:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Essentially all PENIS SELFIES. Quality wise they're all great however the uploader has only used this repository to upload 'dick pics' before buggering off. We're not a porn site. –Davey2010Talk 17:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Images by umnak
[edit]Per COM:PARTYPICS: Out of scope personal snapshots of non-notable, identifiable living individuals, including children, mass uploaded from Flickr with little consideration of educational use.
- File:30th Reunion. (7569089518).jpg
- File:60th Birthday (9049855779).jpg
- File:60th Birthday (9049857015).jpg
- File:60th Birthday (9049862751).jpg
- File:60th Birthday (9052089882).jpg
- File:Aanas (8452731043).jpg
- File:Aanas (8453822430).jpg
- File:Amy (7034088449).jpg
- File:Amy (9928414455).jpg
- File:Amy at Cowee Creek (6216495844).jpg
- File:Amy at Dan Moller Cabin (5523595333).jpg
- File:Angus, Steve and Julie (5898983577).jpg
- File:Ayesha Birthday Bash (7563176396).jpg
- File:Ayesha Birthday Bash (7563177910).jpg
- File:Ayesha Birthday Bash (7563179610).jpg
- File:Ayesha Birthday Bash (7563181754).jpg
- File:Ayesha Birthday Bash (7563183762).jpg
- File:Beach Hike (15128532540).jpg
- File:Beach Hike (15128705817).jpg
- File:Beach Hike (15314899712).jpg
- File:Beach Party (5774860776).jpg
- File:Beach Party (5774862770).jpg
- File:Birthday Cake (4532732863).jpg
- File:Birthday Dinner (5215876535).jpg
- File:Birthday Party (4283315379).jpg
- File:Boy Scout Beach Overnight (4357638912).jpg
- File:Bubble Gum (7885661204).jpg
- File:Bubbles on the mountain (6054771354).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Animalparty (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 13:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/albert fono
[edit]Copyright rests with Albert Fono and his family until 70 years after the death of the author. COM:CRT/Hungary#Durations
- File:Albert Fono's ramjet-cannonball in 1915.png
- File:Albert Fono's ramjet-cannonball in 1915.jpg
- File:Albert Fono's Patents for jet engines 1928.jpg
- File:Albert Fono's ramjet-cannonball in 1915-hu.svg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 14:56, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
See COM:FOP US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:57, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
See COM:FOP Azerbaijan. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 14:59, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
US patents are copyrighted. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --✗plicit 14:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure; opaque (white) background & colored atom labels. We have File:Dihydro-3(2H)-furanone-2D-skeletal.svg as high-quality replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
-furanone-2D-skeletal.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:52, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
as per Category:Unreviewed files from Bollywood Hungama only photos of event and parties are allowed and this is not from parties and event. A36 (talk) 16:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete The image is from a photoshoot by VenuRasuri. No evidence of being owned or copyright by Bollywood Hungama. -- Ab207 (talk) 20:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- CptViraj (talk) 03:38, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
No metadata, seems like a screenshot. Not the user's own work. Kadı (talk) 21:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found at https://www.radkomm.de/mobilitaet-ist-ein-genderthema/. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adam Chacko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claims of own works on these images associated with India's Film Industry.
- File:Mhara Peehar Sasra.jpg
- File:जय करौली माँ.jpg
- File:चिंतामणि सूरदास.jpg
- File:Harishchandra Shaibya 1984.jpg
- File:Ravindra Jain Usha Khanna Ravi.jpg
- File:अलका नूपुर.jpg
- File:Chandrani Mukherjee.jpg
- File:Natharam Sharma Gour.jpg
- File:Raj Kamal, Mohammad Rafi and Asad Bhopali.jpg
- File:Amrit Pal.jpg
- File:Rahi Masoom Reza.jpg
- File:Recording of Is Nadi Ko Mera song from Chashme Baddoor (1981).jpg
- File:Raj Kamal.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
@Ellin Beltz: Necessary changes have being made to avoid deletion. All the images aren't claimed Own. Kindly look first and then nominate for deletion. Subhash Chanda Bose (talk) 02:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Closing administrator please review above commenter's talk page prior to making final decision. The above commenter apparently removed Deletion Nomination tags as their changes. The links provided for the movie posters are clearly labeled (C) at the bottoms of the page/s. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:42, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:00, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
File:GogoOriginal.png es suficiente. Borrar esta imagen por favor 191.126.159.40 20:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by Fitindia at 05:06, 8 March 2022 UTC: No permission since 28 February 2022 --Krdbot 08:34, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
Does not have an acceptable license MB (talk) 18:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted by King of Hearts at 05:40, 12 March 2022 UTC: Unfree Flickr license: https://flickr.com/photos/90595777@N06/8242983998 is licensed under cc-by-nc-2.0 --Krdbot 08:25, 12 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational use, out of scope. And likely not own work: subject same as uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal drawing, out of scope. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS, toys are copyrightable and therefore photos of them aren't able to be freely licensed. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Even if toys weren't copyrighted, there are advertisements on the side of the truck that certainly could meet it. Sennecaster (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
It is a duplicate of File:1996 Summer Olympic medals, Atlanta History Center.jpg JJonahJackalope (talk) 04:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
I hate to be that guy but we don't have sufficient proof this was released under a free license by the copyright owner. We don't know who the photographer is, when it was taken, who even owns the copyright. Burden of proof is with the uploader. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 05:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation, requires permission from the heirs of the artist Marc Cavell, who died in 1989 Verbcatcher (talk) 06:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
coypright violation Reality006 (talk) 11:44, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
Deleted. A.Savin 22:08, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Obviously a screenshot Wutsje 08:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manishjain03 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:Logo-400-200.png
- File:Konstant Infosolutions Logo.jpg
- File:Konstant Infosolutions logo.png
- File:Konstant Infosolutions Logo.png
mattbr 20:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete all of them. Out of project scope. Kadı (talk) 21:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, out of project scope. Kadı (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kadı (talk) 21:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Kadı (talk) 21:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope. Kadı (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:31, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KoppermannWiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:36, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Michael Valeras (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 21:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:54, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 21:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Permotionem (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 22:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
copyright image - ELLE Korea - no evidence of freely available license Evaders99 (talk) 22:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I realized it is bad for my privacy Realmartcraft (talk) 22:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion and commons licenses are irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
grabbed from the web http://www.gazetadita.al/ekskluzive-ja-cili-eshte-ish-kryeministri-i-proceduar-me-pare-per-korrupsion-i-skandalit-cez-dia/ Albinfo (talk) 23:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Inva Mula und die Jury-Kommission des albanischen Klasskwettbewerbs "Virtuozet" für junge Talente 2018.jpg
[edit]
most probably not own work: black and white, small dimensions, no meta information > looks like it's grabbed form the web Albinfo (talk) 23:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Only promotion crosswiki Emolga826 (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Does not appear to be own work, comic book page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality drawing, particularly in the surrounding torso Dronebogus (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Commons no es un deposito de "obras" de arte amateur. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.125.45.108 (talk) 01:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete - Is this really going to have any educational use ?, Personally I doubt it. –Davey2010Talk 17:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Photo of a painting with zero information as to its author, year of creation, or copyright status. Burden is on the uploader to indicate that the work is out of copyright or otherwise freely licensed. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; No FOP in the US for art. --Gbawden (talk) 11:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
E. L. Short lived from 1925-2015; photo clearly taken while in middle age, so can't be PD-old. Unable to tell from photo whether any copyright notice exists on it or was renewed. Burden is on the uploader to provide evidence that an upload is out of copyright or freely-licensed. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 01:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res web-sized screengrabs with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. The watermarks in some of them make it obvious that these are screenshots (see e.g. File:Kadiri-Railway-Station.jpg).
- File:Kadiri-on-board-mumbai-express.jpg
- File:Kadiri-railway-station-out.jpg
- File:Thimmamma Marrimanu.jpg
- File:Batre palli waterfalls.jpg
- File:Kadiri-Railway-Station-Board.jpg
- File:Kadiri-Railway-Station.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pavlovskiy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic with two different author claims. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexandrem1999 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Redundant to File:Logo Bomolet.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects.
mattbr 09:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:08, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:37, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Fichier non utilisé Yipikaye35 (talk) 09:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- You obviously have no appreciation for art 2603:9001:106:89C6:5C71:8E0E:CBFE:9CFE 18:48, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; g7. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map. The filename speaks for itself. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic and promotional product images claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 09:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:39, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map. GB is Eastern Europe but Poland is not?. The filename speaks for itself. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map. GB is Eastern Europe but Poland is not?. The filename speaks for itself. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map. Germany is Eastern Europe but Poland is not?. The filename speaks for itself. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation 83.200.98.27 09:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; found online before upload, needs OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ibrahimkhalil2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 10:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic / QR code claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
- File:QR-Code-www.kolizeras.jpg
- File:Kolizeras accommodative facilities.jpg
- File:Kolizeras Restaurant.jpg
mattbr 10:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Also used on https://l1.nl/l1-gaat-documentaire-maken-over-kerkraadse-zanger-nico-ploum-147651/, which was published in 2019. Doubt if uploader owns the copyright to this picture. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 10:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 10:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Mexico_City_Metro_2D_pictograms and Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_88#Mexico_City_Metro_pictograms_(again), particularly the line "Iconography and typography are registered through Mexican Institute of Industrial Property. Its use, reproduction, modification, and commercialization are forbidden without written permission."
- File:Mexico City Metro Line B scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line A scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 12 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 9 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 8 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 7 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 6 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 5 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 4 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 3 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 1 scheme 2022.png
- File:Mexico City Metro Line 2 scheme 2022.png
Lord Belbury (talk) 11:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sylvia1000 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logo / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.
mattbr 11:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 11:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the photo violates sculptor's copyright. Sculptor Arnaldo Pomodoro is still living. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Sono spiacente, ma secondo me quando un'opera viene donata ad una città e messa in mostra per impreziosire una sua parte e far conoscere la bellezza dell'arte a tutti, questa diventa patrimonio della comunità e, a meno che non venga sfruttata per motivi economici che non é questo il caso, la divulgazione dell'immagine é da paragonare a quelle inserite in un libro di scuola. La conoscenza é libertà.
- Giò Sciarrone 2.34.48.149 09:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
- Commons photos must be usable for every purpose, including commercial. Taivo (talk) 18:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GoldenHayato as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1|This file is the logo of Mankind Pharma, if this file is copyrighted, its copyright may belong to Mankind Pharma. But the uploader has uploaded the file under his Own Work licence. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyrighted logo, Above TOO IMO. --Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Too blurry. 禁樹なずな (talk) 13:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
その根拠 自撮り, いたずら バレロン (talk) 13:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; COM:PENIS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: Mismatch between the metadata and the date of the picture. The mobile phone used hs been released in 2017 https://www.plusmobile.fr/fiches-techniques/lg/phoenix-3/m150/. Also, the picture looks like it has been taken from a video, and Steve Williams has the gear he used to wear in the All Japan Pro Wrestling. CoffeeEngineer (talk) 13:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. PCP. Unlikely to be own work of a new user whose sole upload this was. --Gbawden (talk) 10:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused personal drawing of unidentified subject, out of COM:SCOPE. Lord Belbury (talk) 16:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Per nom. I believe the rest of the files uploaded by this user were nominated here. Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 19:00, 11 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.
- File:THIS IS MY JELLY FISH U LOSERS.png
- File:I MADE THIS, THIS IS MY DUCK U LOSERS.png
- File:DADFSD wWEFCSQW.jpg
- File:20220225 3 33d HU.jpg
- File:Image 2022-02-25 222132-removebg-preview.png
- File:Wertrtfqwer.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- +1 Delete! --Veliensis (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete useless files Prahlad (talk to me / what I've done) 22:10, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Author ro:Zina Blănuță died in 1998. No proof of permission. Undelete in 2069. Gikü (talk) 17:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
no educational use possible due to non-informative description and file name Jochen Burghardt (talk) 17:14, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, Out of project scope. Kadı (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
I wrote the wrong species in the title and would like to redo it Rallekralle11 (talk) 17:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; can be renamed. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
This is a picture of myself, I uploaded it back when I was young and stupid. I didn't understand the Internet completely back then. But now, I want this to not show in the internet search results for my name and the only way to make it happen is by getting this image deleted. Please help me, this image won't be helpful to anyone and it embarrasses me. Jigyasu Baranwal (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete – non-encyclopedic content. --Furfur ⁂ Diskussion 08:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
no quality Xocolatl (talk) 17:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Unused file and out of scope. Delete. Kadı (talk) 21:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Car il n'est pas utilisé et la personne ne souhaite plus être sur WikiMedia Canicule10 (talk) 17:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Commons is not Instagram so delete! Kadı (talk) 21:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused File C.urrutia (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, out of project scope. Kadı (talk) 21:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused File C.urrutia (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused File C.urrutia (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, out of project scope. Kadı (talk) 21:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused File C.urrutia (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused File C.urrutia (talk) 18:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused File C.urrutia (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Unused File C.urrutia (talk) 18:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, not own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Violation, all images of Thornewood Castle, a private home are the property of Thornewood Castle LLC 75.146.52.142 18:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Keeping. Deje de hablar burradas por favor. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.159.40 (talk) 19:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep, there is not a problem with the file.--Kadı (talk) 21:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- As photographer:
keep, the ownership of the property in no way gives anyone a copyright on my photographs of it. - Jmabel ! talk 04:56, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Objection withdrawn, consider me (as photographer) to have no objection to the deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 19:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Violation 75.146.52.142 18:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Keeping. Deje de hacer vandalismo por favor. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.159.40 (talk) 19:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Dear anonymous could you inform us why it is violating copyrights? Kadı (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- As photographer:
keep, the ownership of the property in no way gives anyone a copyright on my photographs of it. - Jmabel ! talk 04:57, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Objection withdrawn, consider me (as photographer) to have no objection to the deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 19:11, 6 March 2022 (UTC)- No answer, so keep. Kadı (talk) 17:17, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Could not find the original file, but this event happened in July 2021 ([1], [[2]), so the date is not correct. This + the low resolution + this copyvio of the same singer by the uploader = unlikely ownership claim. Gyrostat (talk) 18:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Copyright Violation 75.146.52.142 18:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keeping. Deje de hacer vandalismo por favor. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 191.126.159.40 (talk) 19:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- As photographer:
keep, the ownership of the property in no way gives anyone a copyright on my photographs of it. - Jmabel ! talk 04:58, 27 February 2022 (UTC)Objection withdrawn, consider me (as photographer) to have no objection to the deletion. - Jmabel ! talk 19:10, 6 March 2022 (UTC) - Keep, not at all a copyright violation. ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 03:29, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Album cover (see Amazon music). Permission via VRT required. GeorgHH • talk 19:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete, copyvio. Can be uploaded with fair use. Kadı (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
© GOVERN ILLES BALEARS 191.126.159.40 19:51, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The GOVERN ILLES BALEARS allows the free use of its images under "a license called Creative Commons" you can check yourself: https://www.caib.es/govern/external/informacio.do?path=/webcaib/govern_illes/avis_legal/legalgovern&lang=ca&fitxa=3437402 Glaçat (talk) 20:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: There is a valid cc statement given. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image of James Burton from his site with permission. Donde esta el permiso? 191.126.159.40 20:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
English: A photo of Edward at the Royal Military College of Canada 191.126.159.40 20:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work, OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
English: Justin Goulet at the Royal Military College 191.126.159.40 20:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:50, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Wikiproject banner which appears to not render correctly. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 21:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- One of the works that I've created long ago while experimenting with different graphic designs for my city's WikiProject on pl-wiki. It's not being used and It won't be used anymore, it doesn't have any documentary value, so it can be deleted. Olos88 (talk) 12:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete — Johannes Kalliauer - Talk | Contributions 16:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Santino Facal (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on college logos, photos of professors, group shot of golfers, etc. Seems to be a promotional gallery for the school.
- File:Ucema logo apaisado.png
- File:Ucema apaisado office.jpg
- File:Jose Luis Espert.jpg
- File:Roque Fernandez.png
- File:Juan Carlos de Pablo.png
- File:Escudo UCEMA.png
- File:Golf UCEMA.jpg
- File:Biblioteca Adrián Guissarri.png
- File:UdeSA.png
- File:Escudo UdeSA.png
- File:Logo UCEMA 2021.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for sculptures/paintings/artworks in the US. Visitor centre at Lubbock Lake was built in the 1980s, so this cannot be out of copyright. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:34, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for sculptures/paintings/artworks in the US. Visitor centre at Lubbock Lake was built in the 1980s, so this cannot be out of copyright. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for sculptures/paintings/artworks in the US. Visitor centre at Lubbock Lake was built in the 1980s, so this cannot be out of copyright. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:43, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:14, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Copyright violation Supermæn (talk) 08:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/no evidence of permission. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Appears to be title artwork from a 2007 television series (https://elcinema.com/work/1896715/). Lord Belbury (talk) 15:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Bad quality SVG file: it is just a PNG file inside SVG container, could be replaced by its PNG version. Stang★ 23:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:36, 22 April 2022 (UTC)
Same angle and a split-second difference in pose from his official Facebook photo at https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=290192299143972&set=pb.100044596112174.-2207520000..&type=3 Lord Belbury (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Under what guideline does that make it worthy of deletion though? Sultan.abdullah.hindi (talk) 13:47, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
- That it's likely to be a publicity photo used without permission, rather than the own work of the uploader. --Lord Belbury (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2022 (UTC)
@Lord Belbury: Hi, there is a difference. look at his mouth. Regards Karim185.3 (talk) 11:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- @Karim185.3: Yes, that's the "split-second difference in pose" I'm referring to. The angle is identical. If one photo is an official publicity shot then the other one must be also. --Lord Belbury (talk) 11:39, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
@Lord Belbury: this Profile image since 2021, and seems the same file. Do you agree? Karim185.3 (talk) 12:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- Sure. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:07, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom. Karim185.3 (talk) 12:11, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:43, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
another file was updated 87a849b (talk) 03:41, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 10:48, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
Fictional map. The filename speaks for itself. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 10:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:21, 20 July 2022 (UTC)
The stated CC license is clearly not correct. However, some of these may be PD, but we will need to determine the country of publication.
- File:Christmas Truce 4.jpg
- File:Christmas Truce 3.jpg
- File:Christmas Truce 1.jpg
- File:Christmas Truce 2.jpg
- File:Christmas Truce Postcard.3.jpg
- File:Christmas Truce Postcard.2.jpg
- File:Christmas Truce Postcard.1.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep and fix licenses as "PD-EU-no author disclosure" or "PD-UK-unknown" both are 70 years after made public. --RAN (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination except File:Christmas Truce 2.jpg which appears to be PD per italian photographs. --Geni (talk) 02:47, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
No COM:FOP for art in the US. Visitor centre at Lubbock Lake was built in the 1980s, so this cannot be out of copyright. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:42, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 03:12, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Berthe (talk) 07:44, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Oppose:This photo was taken by me。Berthe (talk) 07:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
{{Vd}}. For each movie poster, please have the poster designer, the main producer, or the distributor post permission on their website or social media or send it via VRT with a carbon copy to you because we don't allow Fair Use here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Comment: I cropped out some areas to further emphasize/enforce the de minimis argument (or whatever), which is what King of Hearts argued in COM:VPCOPY. Honestly, it's hard to tell whether the poster is focal point of the image when individuals are blocking the view of the poster. --George Ho (talk) 21:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Weak keep per George, and hide the first file revision. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:22, 28 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Geni (talk) 03:13, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
It is copyrighted for another 4 years according to {{PD-Bolivia}}, undelete in 2026. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:53, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete That seems like a correct reading of the licence tag. Ww2censor (talk) 11:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Bolivia#Stamps. --Geni (talk) 03:58, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Historical photos/paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:6shhfxhkxaxy-navukhodonosor.webp
- File:J.-K. Van Damm uşaqlıqda.jpg
- File:Camerieri segreti di cappa e spada partecipanti.jpg
- File:Papa IX Piusun zadəgan qvardiyası müşaiyətində dəfn mərasimi.jpg
- File:Papa IX Piusun dəfn mərasimi.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 03:25, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
- File:عمادأحمدأدم 24.jpg
- File:Emad24.jpg
- File:عمادأحمدأدم.jpg
- File:عماداحمدادم.ping.jpg
- File:EmadAhmedAdam.ping.jpg
--Alaa :)..! 16:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 03:56, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alfred Manessier
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 1993; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Alfred Manessier.Moutier.1.jpg
- File:Bremen 2019 - Chorfenster Liebfrauenkirche.jpg
- File:Bremen Liebfrauenkirche, Nordschiff, 2010-(01).jpg
- File:Bremen Unser Lieben Frauen Kirche Altarfenster (retuschiert).jpg
- File:Bremen Unser Lieben Frauen Kirche Altarfenster retuschiert.jpg
- File:Bremen Unser Lieben Frauen Kirche Altarfenster-2.jpg
- File:Bremen Unser Lieben Frauen Kirche Altarfenster.jpg
- File:Bremen, Unser Lieben Frauen, Pfingstfenster (2011)-01.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Martin Sg. (talk) 13:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
{{Commen]] At least for this one COM:De Minimis should apply. --Mosbatho (talk) 17:37, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
According to the Austrian copyright law, which is very similar to the German one: "Stained glass windows are visible from the inside as well as from the outside; they are therefore part of the interior as well as part of the exterior view. Their isolated reproduction is also permitted by photographs taken from inside, simply because they are part of the building." See OGH judgement dated 12.07.1994
- Obviously requests by a MoM (man on a mission)! See here.
- Also according to the Swiss copyright law (in which the term panoramic freedom explicitly does not exist), investigations by the user DidiWeidmann show that interior photographs of churches (including windows) are permitted.
- "man on a mission" etc are irrelevant. This is about copyrights and FoP. Stick to that please, and do not forget to sign although you signed out. --E4024 (talk) 14:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- Since there is obviously no consistent interpretation of the copyright laws in question, it certainly matters what drives the requester to act this way. If he is on a mission, he will not be convinced by dissenting opinions. These dubious requests for deletion will be repeated and cause further trouble and annoyance. This should not be in our interest.
- p.s. I didn't forget to sign, I just didn't do it. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 5.146.193.219 (talk) 14:59, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
- "man on a mission" etc are irrelevant. This is about copyrights and FoP. Stick to that please, and do not forget to sign although you signed out. --E4024 (talk) 14:17, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted according to de:Panoramafreiheit#Schweiz. --rubin16 (talk) 15:25, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Alfred Manessier
[edit]These are works (glass windows in churches) by Alfred Manessier, who died in 1993. They are located in churches in France and Switzerland. Accd. to COM:FOP, there is no freedom of panorama in France (at least none that is free enough for Commons) and none inside churches in Switzerland.
- File:Cathedrale vitraux manessier sepulcre.jpg
- File:Les Bréseux-vitrail Nord chœur.jpg
- File:Manessier.jpg
Rosenzweig τ 17:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stained glass windows of église Saint-Bénigne (Pontarlier) for more of the same.
Deleted: deleted french. Swiss stuff has no FOP inside churches but does for anything visible from a public place. Window can be seen from outside. --Geni (talk) 03:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC) Swiss window also deleted after village pump concluded that stained glass windows counted as interiors.Geni (talk) 01:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
These are works (glass windows in churches) by Alfred Manessier, who died in 1993. They are located in a church in France. Accd. to COM:FOP, there is no freedom of panorama in France (at least none that is free enough for Commons). The files can be restored in 2064.
- File:Pontarlier - Église Saint-Bénigne 13.jpg
- File:Eglise SaintBenigne Pontarlier 14.jpg
- File:Eglise SaintBenigne Pontarlier 15.jpg
- File:Eglise SaintBenigne Pontarlier 17.jpg
- File:Eglise SaintBenigne Pontarlier 29.jpg
- File:Eglise SaintBenigne Pontarlier 31.jpg
- File:Eglise SaintBenigne Pontarlier 34.jpg
- File:Pontarlier - Église Saint-Bénigne - font baptismal.jpg
- File:Pontarlier Sainte Bénigne vitrail d'Alfred Manessier.jpg
- File:Pontarlier Sainte Bénigne vitrail de Manessier 2.jpg
- File:Vitrail de Manessier, dans la chapelle N.D des Ermites.jpg
- File:Église Saint-Bénigne Pontarlier 2.JPG
Rosenzweig τ 17:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alfred Manessier for more of the same.
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 03:42, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
For this photo, the Smithsonian restricts its re-use in line with its terms of use. Those terms of use of the Smithsonian museum do not specify a CC-BY-SA compatible license, rather, they specify restrictions on commercial use (the license specifies that [y]ou may not use any Content with usage conditions for commercial purposes, unless you have first obtained permission from the Smithsonian museum or program responsible for the Content and any others rightsholder. This means that, absent express permission, you may not sell Content with usage conditions or sell materials, products, or services that use and incorporate such Content. You may not use Content with usage conditions to promote or advertise products or services). Mhawk10 (talk) 18:00, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- This has been open for four months. I still believe that this photograph should be deleted from the Commons. Mhawk10 (talk) 15:28, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 03:54, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jelican9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This logo is not one's own work. Jelican9 (talk) 13:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 17:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
Book cover, possibly using clip art (similar art appears at https://www.spreadshirt.ie/shop/design/i+wish+my+tears+could+save+this+planet+posters-D5ff8880743413226cdb6f10d, https://www.wattpad.com/story/129558437-emp%C3%ADreo-%C2%A9-1-0-%E2%9C%94). Lord Belbury (talk) 14:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:21, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
It is the wish of Andreas Därmann's wife Katrin Heidemanns and family in her email of February 26, 2022, 15.42 CET to me, to have this file deleted for personal reasons. Since I am the uploader and currently want to respect this wish I hereby ask to delete the file. Thank you. Marbot (talk) 08:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, somewhat belated courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:11, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It is the wish of Andreas Därmann's wife Katrin Heidemanns and family in her email of February 26, 2022, 15.42 CET to me, to have this file deleted for personal reasons. Since I am the uploader and currently want to respect this wish I hereby ask to delete the file. Thank you. Marbot (talk) 08:24, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, somewhat belated courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
It is the wish of Andreas Därmann's wife Katrin Heidemanns and family in her email of February 26, 2022, 15.42 CET to me, to have this file deleted for personal reasons. Since I am the uploader and currently want to respect this wish I hereby ask to delete the file. Thank you. Marbot (talk) 08:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, somewhat belated courtesy deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:10, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
useless, just a formula, should be done with <math>, etc F (talk) 10:31, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:13, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
very low resolution 15k, we have many better files, for example File:DSC 0686 (49258206917).jpg, File:DSC 0772 (49257971536).jpg, File:Punta della Dogana (Venezia).jpg, File:Campanile View IMG 4217.JPG, File:DSC 0776 (49258164537).jpg, File:Venezia Blick vom Campanile der Basilica di San Marco auf die Punta Dogana 4.jpg, File:Santa Maria della Salute from the Campanile, Venice c. 1984 - panoramio.jpg File:Basilica della Salutte dal cielo.JPG, File:Blick vom Campanile auf Punta Dogana und Santa Maria della Salute - panoramio.jpg Oursana (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: duplicate of File:Venezia-punta della dogana.jpg with severely reduced file dimensions. --Rosenzweig τ 13:38, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Photograph-of-photograph, a COM:Derivative work. Original author unknown. Meaningless description. MKFI (talk) 14:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 13:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RebeccaRwanda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Nyungwe Tea plantation.jpg
- File:Dr Daniel Ufitikirezi.jpg
- File:Kate Bashabe.jpg
- File:Nyungwe Bird.jpg
- File:Nyungwe Tea.jpg
- File:Nyungwe national park.jpg
- File:Nyungwe population.jpg
- File:Nyungwe mokeys.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:51, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:37, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RebeccaRwanda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely not own works: low-res web-sized screengrabs and DW with disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data.
- File:Dr Jean Paul in interview with China Meteorological Agency journalist (6th August 2018).jpg
- File:DR Jean Paul NGARUKIYIMANA.jpg
- File:Pst Muteteri Eugenie.jpg
- File:Apostle Dr Mignone Kabera.jpg
- File:Julienne Kabanda Pastor.jpg
- File:Elia photographer.jpg
- File:Straight Line.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- I don't consider File:DR Jean Paul NGARUKIYIMANA.jpg (1.530 × 1.530) and File:Dr Jean Paul in interview with China Meteorological Agency journalist (6th August 2018).jpg (2.048 × 1.536) as low-res web-sized screengrabs. Wouter (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
- 670 KB and 440 KB respectively, they are certainly not high-res either in this day and age. Regardless, this and previous DR shows that the uploader is unreliable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 16:07, 4 August 2022 (UTC)
Uncredited 2021 fork of User:NormanEinstein's much more widely used File:Aegean Sea map.png original from 2006, but with Serbia divided without comment into Kosovo and Serbia (which is being reverted back and forth a little). Lord Belbury (talk) 14:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: file is in use. I've mentioned the source in the file description. --Rosenzweig τ 07:55, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
From the second-hand source cited, it's unclear whether this is a modern drawing ("realized by a jewish artist") which could still be under copyright. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:29, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. It looks old, but without a proper source I can't really establish the copyright status of this image. Internet searches show that it is widely used, also for other persons like El Cid, but didn't turn up a useful source either. --Rosenzweig τ 08:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Incorrect license. Uploader is not copyright holder of flag of capital of state. Correct license is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Obviously this file was my own work, representing a public domain image. From a copyright perspective, I still own a work which is derivative and transformative (in this case, the work was drawn in vector format for the first time)
- I had every right to release this work into the public domain, and I used the license tag which was most appropriate for the situation 15 years ago. Aliasd (talk) 21:53, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: with {{PD-Papua New Guinea}}. Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Papua New Guinea, works of applied art are protected for a period of 25 years from the making of the work. The en:National Capital District (Papua New Guinea) was established in 1975, and there were reforms in 1995. It's therefore IMO likely that this flag is older than 25 years. If you have evidence that it is not, please nominate the file again. --Rosenzweig τ 09:25, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep: Appears to be the logo of it:Tonica (programma televisivo); pretty surely below COM:TOO Italy. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:34, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion, also categorized. --Rosenzweig τ 10:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Probably a copyvio Dronebogus (talk) 05:37, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP; also unused and probably out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 11:18, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Jelican9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyright Jelican9 (talk) 13:17, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP; also unused and probably out of scope. --Rosenzweig τ 11:43, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Fictional flag of Bulgaria being portrayed as the actual national flag. Not supported by https://www.parliament.bg/en/21 — Huntster (t @ c) 14:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 11:42, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
No COM:FOP for sculptures in the US. Unable to determine creation date but at least some portions look modern. Burden of proof that the sculpture is out of copyright is on the uploader. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 04:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Are lists of names on cement squares eligible for copyright? --RAN (talk) 05:48, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- I'd be happy to be wrong, but I believe the arrangement/placement of the stones would be enough to pass COM:TOO as a piece of art. Premeditated Chaos (talk) 18:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP; probably recent and copyrighted. --Rosenzweig τ 12:29, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:57, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:12, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
_flag.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_flag.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per COM:EDUSE and COM:WEBHOST: self-made flag and used to vandalize different Wikipediaes --Zsohl(Talk) 12:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
_flag.png){kind=link}
- Delete and facepalm: the flag comes from the Alternate History forum (!!!). @Fardsk: if you can't tell that it's a fictional flag from a website that has the title 'Alternate History' in its title, then please, for the sake of everyone, stop getting involved in any subject. Constantine ✍ 18:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PCP. --Rosenzweig τ 12:09, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
_flag.png){kind=link}
Credited to Kislov in Газета «Марийская Правда» от 3 января 1941 года PlanespotterA320 (talk) 16:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: If this photo is credited to an author and we don't know when that author died, it is not clear if {{PD-Russia-1996}} applies. The author apparently died no later than 1985; the file can then be restored in 2060 (taking into account possible wartime extensions). --Rosenzweig τ 11:47, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
自撮り バレロン (talk) 13:32, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Do not delete. This is my own photoCh Maheswara Raju (talk) 13:38, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal image, uploader concurs with deletion (see talk page of DR, moved there from file talk page). --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
A commercial COM:TOY which also seems to be COM:FANART. Lord Belbury (talk) 15:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete It looks like a copy of the anime/manga artwork (although it may be a slightly edited/cleaned-up one). [3] Even if it was a fan art inspired (but not copied) from the original artwork, that would at least require permission by the manufacturer of the product indicated as the source in the Commons file page, which we don't seem to have. whym (talk) 13:37, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion; also photo taken from Amazon and edited. --Rosenzweig τ 12:53, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, copyright infringement, third-party logo Bankster (talk) 23:45, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Seems quite simple, though I'm not familiar with COM:TOO Ecuador. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 02:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)
Kept: likely below COM:TOO Andean Community. --Rosenzweig τ 12:30, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Drakosh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyrighted logo non trivial. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:35, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Apparently it is the logo of the South Ural Institute of Biophysics. Might be above TOO, probably also out of scope, so deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 14:04, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion_requests/Mexico_City_Metro_2D_pictograms and Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Archive_88#Mexico_City_Metro_pictograms_(again), particularly the line "Iconography and typography are registered through Mexican Institute of Industrial Property. Its use, reproduction, modification, and commercialization are forbidden without written permission."
- File:Tlhuichapan.svg
- File:Tlgoitia.svg
- File:Tlxochimilco.svg
- File:Tllanoria.svg
- File:Tltepepan.svg
- File:Tlperiferico.svg
- File:Tlhuipulco.svg
- File:Tlxomali.svg
- File:Tleazteca.svg
- File:Tlelvergel.svg
- File:Tltextitlan.svg
- File:Tlregfed.svg
- File:Tlnezahualpilli.svg
- File:Tlxotepingo.svg
- File:Tllavirgen.svg
- File:Tllastorres.svg
- File:Tltasqueña.svg
- File:Tlcdjardin.svg
- File:Centralmetro.svg
- File:Zaragoza.svg
- File:Fugomez.svg
- File:Cuauhtemoc.svg
- File:Zaragoza 3.svg
- File:Stalucia.svg
- File:MetroColObrera.svg
- File:MetroModerna.svg
- File:Metalurgicos.svg
- File:Hmetrop.svg
- File:Fug 3.svg
- File:Ruizcortines.svg
- File:MetroAngeles.svg
- File:Sendero.svg
- File:MetrorreyUniversidad.svg
- File:Zaragoza 2.svg
- File:MetroTapia.svg
- File:Sannico.svg
- File:Regina.svg
- File:Padremier.svg
- File:Fundadores.svg
- File:Niñosh.svg
- File:Cuauhtemoc 2.svg
- File:Anahuac.svg
- File:GralAnaya.svg
- File:MetroAlameda.svg
- File:Ygriega.svg
- File:Unidadmodelo.svg
- File:Talleres.svg
- File:Sanberna.svg
- File:Penitenciaria.svg
- File:Reyes.svg
- File:Mitras.svg
- File:Lerdo.svg
- File:Hospital metrorrey.svg
- File:Golfo.svg
- File:Fundi.svg
- File:Fug 1.svg
- File:EloyCavazosI.svg
- File:Exposicion.svg
- File:Edison.svg
- File:Bolivar.svg
- File:Aztlan.svg
- File:Cuauhtemoc 1.svg
Lord Belbury (talk) 11:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- For all the Metrorrey logos (i.e. the logos that start at File:Centralmetro.svg), Metrorrey is a system owned by the government of Nuevo León and that government has an "All rights reserved" policy. The light train, on the opposite, is owned by the government of Mexico City. Unlike the Mexico City Metro websites,[4] I can't find the "Iconography and typography are registered through Mexican Institute of Industrial Property. Its use, reproduction, modification, and commercialization are forbidden without written permission" restriction[5] that affects the {{LGACDMX}} and the Mexico City Metro pictograms (not even in the oldest available version[6]). These logos were renovated by Lance Wymann (its original author) the last year as part of the light train renovations (compare File:Tlregfed.svg with File:Reg._Federal.JPG). Because of this, I can conclude that all the Metrorrey station logos should be deleted while the MC light train logos should be tagged with {{LGACDMX}}. Tbhotch™ 01:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- Comment. Just to clarify for this and future cases, the full warning reads as follows: "Iconography and typography are registered through the Mexican Institute of Industrial Property. Its use, reproduction, modification, and commercialization are forbidden without written permission by the STC." The STC (Sistema de Transporte Colectivo) is a public decentralized organization that (only) operates the Mexico City Metro. The light train is operated by the Servicio de Transportes Eléctricos (STE), another public decentralized organization that works independently from the STC. The STE also operates the Category:Cablebús and the Category:Trolleybuses in Mexico City systems. The Metrobús is not operated by a specific agency,[7] but they are subjected to the LGACDMX as well. I clarify this in case someone in the future starts to upload their pictograms as well. The only "problematic" pictograms are those of the Mexico City Metro (and their derivative versions) due to the STC's website warning. In the strict sense, all of these pictograms are "public" because they belong to public systems operated with public taxes; as the logos are paid for with public money, they are "public" logos (similar to why {{PD-Coa-Mexico}} exists). Unfortunately, the STC's website is not regularly updated beyond cosmetic changes. I can contact the STC and ask them about this, but this might take several months and there is no guarantee that they will remove the warns. Tbhotch™ 21:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: most, per nomination, kept some per Tbhotch. --Rosenzweig τ 18:14, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Not own work, copyright infringement, third-party logo Bankster (talk) 23:46, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: most likely below COM:TOO Andean Community. --Rosenzweig τ 22:36, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
This logo is not one's own work. Jelican9 (talk) 13:16, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Probably original enough per COM:TOO Turkey. Basically you can only determine what is written there if you know the creative process behind a work, so deleted per the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 23:31, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
Seems like this may be a modern cathedral. See COM:FOP Lebanon. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 14:30, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yes, this is a new church. Construction must have started ca. 2001/2002 and was finished in 2017. I did not find out who the architect is or who designed the building, so the best I can do is to put the file up for restoration with {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2107 (100 years after this 2006 photo was made, term adjusted to 100 years instead of the usual 120 to reflect Lebanon's 50 years pma term). --Rosenzweig τ 12:34, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
その根拠 自撮り, いたずら バレロン (talk) 13:28, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per COM:PENIS; we already have many better images. --Rosenzweig τ 15:59, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Copyright infringement The cover disc ציון הלוי (talk) 07:40, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. JuTa 22:47, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
I would be happy if you remove the picture, as it is an unflattering picture. 46.121.151.3 08:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 19:11, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
Unused PNG format files, can be replaced by SVG format files 182.239.117.162 11:56, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Invalid nomination. We don't do this for "superseded" files, we certainly don't do it because a file might be duplicated in the future. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:20, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete further updates should be made on the SVG files, sorry for any inconvenience (uploaded via fileimporter). --A1Cafel (talk) 10:06, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Normally I would keep such a file, but in this case I don't see much sense in it since it is just a generic map with countries shown in different colors and File:International reactions to the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine.svg has been clearly updated, while this hasn't been updated at all. --Rosenzweig τ 19:15, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-68.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Looking at [8] (p. 167), neither of these two is really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kharkivian as no permission (No permission since). It is stated that this is own work. Why do you need a permition? Venzz (talk) 15:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- I need permition because User:CesarNS1980 and Oleg Goltvyansky is the same person: User:CesarNS1980 is Oleg Goltvyansky. So this photo is not selfie and we need permition for the author of this photo. --Kharkivian (talk) 12:07, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
- А я сомневаюсь, что User:CesarNS1980 and Oleg Goltvyansky это один и тот же человек. Нигде и никогда в Википедии это не подтверждалось. Какие Ваши доказательства? С уважением -- CesarNS1980 (talk) 06:42, 12 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: The claim that the uploader is identical with the person shown is unproven and was disputed. --Rosenzweig τ 12:52, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-45.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are significant differences in design. Which is correct? Fry1989 eh? 14:06, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Looking at [9] (p. 165), this one is obviously incorrect, so I deleted it and then created a redirect to the other file. --Rosenzweig τ 13:09, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - P-29.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Files should probably be merged instead. Fry1989 eh? 14:05, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: looking at [10] (p. 164), none of the two are really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 13:24, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-38.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:09, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Files should be merged instead. Fry1989 eh? 14:02, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: looking at [11] (p. 165), none of the two are really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 13:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-67.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:13, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Looking at [12] (p. 167), neither of these two is really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 13:01, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-60.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: looking at [13] (p. 167), none of the two are really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-61.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:23, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: looking at [14] (p. 167), none of the two are really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 13:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-34.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 11:21, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep - and delete the other file File:Traffic_Sign_GR_-_KOK_2009_-_R-34.svg , which has a less permissive license and a less than perfect filename. SV1XV (talk) 12:15, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete neither and merge instead. This file is the older version having been uploaded first, but was originally uploaded with the wrong typeface. The other file was uploaded in the correct Transport typeface but should have simply been uploaded over this file instead of as a completely new image. Fry1989 eh? 13:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Looking at [15] (p. 164), none of the two a re really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 13:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
I don't think the YouTube channel is the same user as the Chinese content creator as their more recent content do not overlap. Thus the YouTube channel does not have the rights to release this as CC-BY. Voidvector (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:36, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - P-28.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are significant differences in the design of the arrow. Which is correct? Fry1989 eh? 14:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: looking at [16] (p. 164), none of the two is really correct, but the other one is much closer. So I'll delete this one and then create a redirect to the other one. --Rosenzweig τ 14:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - P-27.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:04, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- There are significant differences in the style of arrow. Which is correct? Fry1989 eh? 14:03, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: looking at [17] (p. 164), none of the two is really correct, but the other one is much closer. So I'll delete this one and then create a redirect to the other one. --Rosenzweig τ 14:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - Κ-1δ.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: looking at [18] (p. 158), none of the two are really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 14:21, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - Κ-1α.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:22, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: looking at [19] (p. 158), none of the two are really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 14:22, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - K-30.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: looking at [20] (p. 161), none of the two are really correct. --Rosenzweig τ 14:18, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-1.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 09:58, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- The two files should probably be merged instead. Fry1989 eh? 14:07, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:REDUNDANT. This version is not used on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 19:13, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Traffic Sign GR - KOK 2009 - R-52.svg, they have the same meaning Llama jim. Clapped (talk) 10:10, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Files should be merged instead. Fry1989 eh? 14:01, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:REDUNDANT. --Ellywa (talk) 19:15, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Tarataraq
[edit]
COM:EDUSE and COM:WEBHOST: self-made flag and used to vandalize different Wikipediaes. Not a Rashidun Flag --Zsohl(Talk) 12:19, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
- Keep These are the real flags of the Rashidi Caliphate and are never fictional. moreover, these flags are accepted on the wiki. So your claims are completely false. You cannot delete files according to your personal wishes. Raddadid (talk) 07:22, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete Raddadid is a Sockpuppet, account used to vandalize and block indefinite on en wiki. No fact of above comment. Zsohl(Talk) 10:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Delete There were no national flags back then, only dynastic colors, and the Rashidun were not a dynasty. This is a typical case of projecting modern concepts and symbols into the past. Constantine ✍ 11:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- KeepAt that time, states had flags. These are the green flags used by the Rashidi Caliphate. there are no wrong elements in these files.
The green standard has already been used since the time of Muhammad.
Tarataraq (talk) 14:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy KeepPer use. The green flag was used by the Rashidun Caliphate and contunues to be used as the islamic flag today.
Kept: One kept, two deleted. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral image is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The svg version is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. @Zsohl: , you could consider to add Template:Fact disputed to the file page, or one of the other more applicable warning templates listed on the template description. The other two versions were deleted per COM:REDUNDANT. --Ellywa (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Some people in the image may recognize themselves and sue me. I did not have their permission to take this image because I did not know I needed it. I was not aware of the legal issues one day I may deal with. My brother is a lawyer and told me this is not permitted unless I have the consent of the people photographed. I did not have it. George E. Koronaios (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: No reason to delete the file, but I wanted to help the uploader with their concern. I cropped the image to delete two persons which might be recognized and deleted that version, to keep the cropped version. It is too late to delete this file per COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 07:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Some people in the image may recognize themselves and sue me. I did not have their permission to take this image because I did not know I needed it. I was not aware of the legal issues one day I may deal with. My brother is a lawyer and told me this is not permitted unless I have the consent of the people photographed. I did not have it. George E. Koronaios (talk) 19:39, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements, there are consent requirements for Greece. The text is complicated and there might be exemptions for crowds outside, as this photo is displaying. In addition. I think there are solutions to maintain this image. As an example I cropped the image of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syriza party rally at Syntagma Square on May 24, 2019.jpg to remove the recognisable persons in front and deleted the original version. @George E. Koronaios: , can you please take the effort to crop this image as well, or to blur the faces of recognisable people. After that, please ask me on my talk page to delete the original versions, with a reference to this DR. Thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 07:51, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Some people in the image may recognize themselves and sue me. I did not have their permission to take this image because I did not know I needed it. I was not aware of the legal issues one day I may deal with. My brother is a lawyer and told me this is not permitted unless I have the consent of the people photographed. I did not have it. George E. Koronaios (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements, there are consent requirements for Greece. The text is complicated and there might be exemptions for crowds outside, as this photo is displaying. In addition. I think there are solutions to maintain this image. As an example I cropped the image of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syriza party rally at Syntagma Square on May 24, 2019.jpg to remove the recognisable persons in front and deleted the original version. @George E. Koronaios: , can you please take the effort to crop this image as well, or to blur the faces of recognisable people. After that, please ask me on my talk page to delete the original versions, with a reference to this DR. Thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 07:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Some people in the image may recognize themselves and sue me. I did not have their permission to take this image because I did not know I needed it. I was not aware of the legal issues one day I may deal with. My brother is a lawyer and told me this is not permitted unless I have the consent of the people photographed. I did not have it. George E. Koronaios (talk) 19:40, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
Kept: Per Commons:Country_specific_consent_requirements, there are consent requirements for Greece. The text is complicated and there might be exemptions for crowds outside, as this photo is displaying. In addition. I think there are solutions to maintain this image. As an example I cropped the image of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Syriza party rally at Syntagma Square on May 24, 2019.jpg to remove the recognisable persons in front and deleted the original version. @George E. Koronaios: , can you please take the effort to crop this image as well, or to blur the faces of recognisable people. After that, please ask me on my talk page to delete the original versions, with a reference to this DR. Thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 07:52, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
