Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2022/01/23

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 23rd, 2022
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from Joey Foo needed --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E4f9hG9068g Otávio Astor Vaz Costa (talk) 00:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mhhossein at 04:02, 23 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: Tirado do Youtube --Krdbot 08:16, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional purpose image, out of project scope. Stang 11:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Advertising so speedy - thanks. --Herby talk thyme 12:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Menocl (talk) 17:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 17:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

War ein versehen beim ausprobieren St.Roybar (talk) 17:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 18:17, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of some sort. Lymantria (talk) 11:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 20:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of some sort Lymantria (talk) 11:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 20:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Remontees as Copyvio (Copyvio) Remontees (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 16:07, 23 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation: Screenshot from Google Maps --Krdbot 20:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free television program poster -- DaxServer (talk) 20:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (speedied). --DMacks (talk) 23:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paola Vega Castillo-3.png

[edit]

There is a false claim that this image was made using unfree software. It was made using BigBlueButton, which is open source. No elements of the software are visible. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bquast (talk • contribs) 15:05, 23 January 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]


(non-admin closure) Deleted: Done by Túrelio (per {{Screenshot}}), thanks!   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 20:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

should be protected by copyright! Geoprofi Lars (talk) 20:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym at 21:47, 23 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 02:17, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

should be protected by copyright! Geoprofi Lars (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Didym at 21:47, 23 January 2022 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing (F1) --Krdbot 02:17, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Discostu (talk) 13:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam only account. --Achim55 (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Discostu (talk) 13:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, spam only account. --Achim55 (talk) 10:52, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:05, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:10, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:08, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot. Ruthven (msg) 12:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DOXING of Steven Reichenberg SissyStephanie (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 16:43, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kes47 as Copyvio (copyvio)  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Original source: A Honduran media outlet -Kes47 [REPORT AN ERROR] 04:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:44, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zezzoo24 2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:34, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ric energy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 04:35, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:55, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Milupinbu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope.

--Minorax«¦talk¦» 08:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 22:28, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr Gato Perez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal "artwork", OOS, lack of COM:EDUSE.

Achim55 (talk) 11:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 22:29, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XXXTL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, commons is not personal photo hosting place.

Stang 12:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 22:30, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giuseppe Lellis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 22:31, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no valid reason for deletion, see [1] for the date of its completion (during the Spanish colonial era). {{PD-Philippines-FoP work}} tag applies. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Sorry. I confused it.  I withdraw my nomination. Ox1997cow (talk) 12:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Tomer T (talk) 06:51, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. This building is copyrighted. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 06:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jethop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 11:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 06:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for an Australian sports team missing VRT permission. The threshold of originality is very low for Australian works, see COM:TOO Australia. The logo includes modified and embellished text, and graphic elements. Sufficient effort (from an Australian perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin. For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 12:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. --Tomer T (talk) 06:58, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, no educative value  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 06:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Tomer T (talk) 07:01, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Satirdan kahraman (talk) 12:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Tomer T (talk) 07:02, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. --Tomer T (talk) 07:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:SebastianG7Peru

[edit]

All files come from copyrighted sources as can be seen in the watermarks of some pictures. Although the uploader claims own work, most of them can be found at: www.facebook.com/MetroNewsLMC. --Aucahuasi (talk) 14:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 14:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album, Unusual personal photos —MdsShakil (talk) 03:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:46, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:47, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 03:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:48, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 04:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 19:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 08:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:09, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely a copyvio since no META data with this photo. Pierre cb (talk) 14:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:15, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joehandpromotions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 14:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:17, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DrQuantum001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo and cover image of a journal claimed as 'own work'. Website of the journal has an 'all rights reserved' notice and the articles are released on a non-commercial basis. Unlikely to be the work of the uploader and missing VRT permission. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 14:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is my personal profile picture, I would like to protect my privacy from here on out 1947 miles driven (talk) 20:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:29, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Trade (talk) 20:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:28, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

tiny picture, hardly usable. And docking shouldn't be promoted anymore. probably copyright violation. Xocolatl (talk) 21:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:24, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Beruang Perkasa

[edit]

Out of project scope. Unlikely own work by the likes of them (low size, quality/resolution). User blocked on id.wikipedia for advertising using them.

MarcoAurelio 22:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 20:26, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hatedrix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Found elsewhere online which attributes the upload date to earlier than our dates (https://mirincondelabahia.wordpress.com/2011/11/15/exploraciones-otonales-del-norte-de-burgos-a-la-costa-de-santona/ and https://www.verpueblos.com/castilla+y+leon/burgos/brizuela/foto/1298947/). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:51, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what the difference is between Commons and Wikapedia.org. I use Wikipedia constantly. I thought commons was a version of Wikipedia for the general public.

There is a lot of information on this site with several mediums so please be patient with me. I believe the Commons File:0 66z9NyQFCBMTr9dG.jpg was robo flagged. Yeah, that was a big mess and can be deleted.

I would like to have some clarity on the difference. My interests in Wikipedia is not personal alone, but community-based :-) Although my expertise is in the realm of Communications thinking & networking - with a non-biased facts-based approach. Knowledgable.

Jonathan J Tibbs Jonathan J Tibbs (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No license. Uploader must provide license or work will be removed as Copyright violation. Please write me on my talk page for help with Commons if you need it!. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fantasy diagram, out of project scope Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:48, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF date, unlikely original authorship NoonIcarus (talk) 16:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 01:19, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author, license not listed on the source page. Ostrzyciel (talk) 10:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:13, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://stavropolye.tv/news/142262 Mitte27 (talk) 14:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Josve05a at 00:37, 3 February 2022 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Beluga96 --Krdbot 08:03, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny. Not useful. Xocolatl (talk) 15:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per JWilz12345. Ruthven (msg) 09:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per JWilz12345. Ruthven (msg) 09:20, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, very low resolution (106 × 212 pixels, file size: 28 KB). Poor color. It looks gray compared to the other images and there is no gray version of the controller -- only black, white, red purple and woodgrain, making this look like a poorly colored white image. There is a high resolution console image with controllers showing in the same Intellivision Amico section and its article already and a detailed description in the text. Daltonsatom (talk) 07:20, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Commons: This user has spilled over from English Wiki, where they are upset that the Gif image they inserted into the article has been removed by multiple editors (4 and counting) as overtly promotional. The image nominated is an extraction from the same gif, hence it's resolution. As the original GIF has permissions, the extraction itself is fine and is being used explicitly to illustrate the controller outside of the promotional content of the gif. All complaints about the image's quality, resolution or color stem from the fact that that is the way the GIF shows the controller. Frankly this should be speedy closed if Commons has such a criteria. There is no valid rational for deletion given, and this is spill over of a English Wiki content dispute. See w:en:Talk:Intellivision_Amico#Inclusion_of_File:Intellivision_Amico_Controller.gif -- ferret (talk) 15:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Useful image, currently used in article. This is the only still image of a front-facing Intellivision Amico controller, so COM:Redundant does not apply. – Pbrks (t • c) 16:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regarding The Ferret's comment: He should listen to WP:AGF, rather than make comments like "If your negativity doesn't improve, I will improve it for you." The gif he speaks of was about first time vistors removing a gif without discussion. The gif had been approved by admin several months ago with no challenges until a bunch of guys just showed up together, one with no viewable edit history. I said I wanted the admin present to decide if it should stay or be removed. I did not complain about the admin decision to remove it. This issue, however, is about a decision by others to use a poor quality static image that is unnecessary and its discussion should be considered as WP:AGF. To tie the two together is to assume bad faith. If they really want such an image of the controller, I don't see why they can't obtain a high resolution one in the same way the console image and animated gif were obtained. WP:FILESIZE "images should be uploaded at high resolution whether or not this seems "necessary" for the use immediately contemplated‍" Daltonsatom (talk) 20:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment: Is the "approval" you're referring to on the gif a VRT ticket? That just means Commons won't delete it for not having a verifiable license because you directly verified the license with a volunteer who may or may not have had the adminstrator user group on their account. Admins on English Wikipedia (who may not be the same users as Commmons admins) don't generally make "approvals" on article content, that's usually handled by editors coming to consensus via either edits or (often) discussion, and in this case I think it's clear that the consensus is not to use the gif and that the derivative png is an adequate replacement. (I, for instance, removed the gif because it read as clearly promotional to me and did not realize I was going to get pulled into a contentious discussion. When I got pinged for that discussion I civilly shared my thoughts, which is how Wikipedia is supposed to work.) You can't just strongarm your way into your preferred outcome by misapplying policies and processes like these. Further, referencing assuming good faith here falls apart a bit when that comment was made after a long spate of uncivil behavior (both generally and directly aimed at users who disagreed with you, which you continued after that point anyway). (ferret's remark might have been a bit WP:BITE-y but it wasn't a remark made in a vacuum.) Anyhow, to get back on the topic of the deletion nomination and not the cross-wiki content dispute, I mostly wanted to make this comment purely to notify others who may be party to this discussion that "admin approval" the nominator is referring to for the gif this image is a derivative of is probably referring to having the license verified via a VRT ticket. - Purplewowies (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Purplewowies does not understand. I worked with admins in the help section to get that image and gif approved and they discussed the value for acceptability with me. This is just a distraction by them so why do they continue to discuss it? The Ferret's reaction and Sergecross73's reaction ("There's zero rationale or support for just removing everything entirely. Please stop. Your comments are increasingly unconstructive, and more about being mad about not doing things strictly your way") seem pretty extreme to me for a disagreement about a single low res, poorly colored image and is it a coincidence they all show up at the same time and that they gang up on me? Sergecross73's and The Ferret's comments were in succession. Seems like a bit of a gangup, don't they? Again [[wikipedia:WP:AGF|assuming good faith] is reasonable and they seem to all over-react to being disagreed with after showing up as a gang out of nowhere or from the complaints of similarly pop-in editors repeatedly showing up who are affiliated with a bizarre reddit group who has been trolling the article and trying to use their reddit group posts as citations. Also, besides WP:AGF, remember: WP:FILESIZE "images should be uploaded at high resolution whether or not this seems "necessary" for the use immediately contemplated‍". I would ask why they hold so strongly to this poorly done image, if not for the reasons they're falsely accusing me of?Daltonsatom (talk) 00:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per the reasoning brought forth by Pbrks (and that to some extent this is a "revenge nomination" for lack of a better turn of phrase). (Struck out comment that came across more charged than I mean it, see below. 00:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)) - Purplewowies (talk) 22:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Revenge? Revenge for what? Putting up a low quality off color image? If anything, it seems the other way around.Daltonsatom (talk) 00:43, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment: "Revenge" might have been a charged term even though I tried to disclaim that I was using it to explain that I couldn't figure out a better concise way to phrase what I meant. I'll strike it from my !vote to make clear I wasn't going for charged and elaborate here on what I meant. Your opinion appears to have been clearly for most of the dispute that the gif should be used, whereas the alternative prior to this creation would have been no image at all. This image was in some ways a sort of compromise between the two; it's completely sufficient for its use and a higher quality image does not presently exist. In the context of this deletion discussion (which is what this page should be primarily about, not the content dispute): I don't think your nomination holds up against scrutiny of the policies you're trying to cite for its removal, and so I think your reasoning reads as if you're looking for any way you can to remove it because the discussion didn't come to the outcome you wanted. - Purplewowies (talk) 00:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        I'm sorry, but that is in no way true. I said I was willing to let admin decide if the gif could stay or not. Of course, I've explained that before, but you don't really care, right? So, saying that most of my dispute was that the gif should be used and now I'm "looking for any way you can to remove it because the discussion didn't come to the outcome you wanted" is pure vitriol. You are way off base and both of your statements show exaggeration to smear my character. Daltonsatom (talk) 01:28, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
          • Comment: I was just redacting a comment and explaining my concern, but at this point I think I'll refrain from any further response other than clarifying I meant no vitriol and just let the rest of this discussion play out without my further being party to it. A bit of a WP:JUSTDROPIT directed toward myself, in a way. I hope you find what you're looking for, I guess. - Purplewowies (talk) 02:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
            What I'm looking for? Well, if this group takeover of the article is quality driven as I am supposed to believe, then you would think one of these guys would go get a high quality image directly from Intellivision, which is how the others were obtained. Oh, and smearing my character and claiming you're not, you're either too lazy to check that you were wrong, given what I said in my previous post or you are talking vitriol. Can't just wish it away. Daltonsatom (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I should add that The Ferret and Sergecross73 had both agreed no image for the controller was needed until Pbrks put it up and I didn't want it there. Then they decided to start attacking me for *agreeing* with their opinion!Daltonsatom (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • (a) No, that is not what happened. (b) What does that have to do with this deletion request? – Pbrks (t • c) 00:40, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      (a)looks like it to meDaltonsatom (talk) 02:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      (b) the gang here wants to accuse me of some kind of revenge based subterfuge, so I'm saying I could just as easily say that you act like a group of thugs who like to show up and shoot first with accusations and criticism and tolerate no questioning or dissent. You guys really need to work on your people skills if you plan to continue staging hostile takeovers of Wikipedia articles. Maybe you're even sympathizers with that reddit troll group, given what you've been up to. That would all be speculation based on your group's behavior, of course. Could be Sergecross73 just thinks the worst of people and treat them as such and the others just enjoy the ride.Daltonsatom (talk) 02:49, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      • At no point have I been hostile toward you. I removed with the gif in the article, and began a conversation once you reverted it, as is standard. I created a still upon the request of another editor (which is why you are mistaken on the above point (a)). I lightened said image after you pointed out it was darker than it should be. I disagreed with this deletion request and gave a clear reasoning. Lastly, I pointed out that you were mistaken in regards to Wikipedia and Commons policies. Never once have I done any of this with any aggression. The same cannot be said about your responses. I will follow suit with Purplewowies, bow out here, and let the deletion request run its course. – Pbrks (t • c) 03:09, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
        How about claiming I had a COI from the beginning without even talking to me or checking to see that I have explained I don't have one in the past? That does make you look a little suspicious of being aligned with the reddit group as they like to try to get me out of the way using that, just like you guys. In fact, the Reddit group trolls are the only ones who have ever started that claim in the past year, making you look especially suspicious in joining that group. Maybe you're complicit or maybe just an unwitting patsy. Like Sergecross73 basically saying that not letting the reddit group post poor citations makes me look like a COI. If you look at talk policies, it says the same policies apply there as in the article, regardless of whether most people read it or not. The Ferret seemed quick to try to reverse removal of a poorly cited Reddit group troll rant. It also seemed like Sergecross73 assumed I was responsible for the page and thought I was telling him I was not a COI in order to stop him from changing the page which would both be untrue.Daltonsatom (talk) 03:39, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      To clarify, since I've seen Daltonsatom misquote me repeatedly on this. I agree with removal of the Gif. The still image is fine. -- ferret (talk) 13:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
      I have never misquoted The Ferret. I only quoted him once in my initial reply to him and it was verbatim. He may mean I misunderstood his phrase "The still image we have would seem to be sufficient." as I assumed he meant the console image since "the still image" is singular.Daltonsatom (talk) 22:14, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Nothing wrong with the image. It's licensed appropriately, and quite useful. No better alternative for a front-facing image of the controller exists. TarkusAB (talk) 10:47, 7 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - image source licensing is VRT verified, and the image itself is useful for illustrating the controller. Although a higher resolution image would be nice, the resolution is sufficient. -Whpq (talk) 03:43, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion and withdrawal of the nomination by the OP. --De728631 (talk) 15:34, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work copyright violation: images show a banner tarpaulin with underlying portraits of persons. The portraits are certainly recent; needs COM:VRTS correspondence/s of commercial license permission/s from the photographer/s of the underlying portraits. These images won't benefit from future Philippine freedom of panorama, as the banner is not "otherwise than temporarily situated" (banners here in the Philippines are temporal in nature).

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:57, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:44, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:45, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:46, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhericopantaleon120521 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely not own works: official and promo photos, low-res web sized images without or inconsistent EXIF data. All of the same person, Not likely that uploader was present at these divers times and places.

P 1 9 9   04:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 17:51, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted album cover. Ostrzyciel (talk) 10:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:00, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a non-free website. Ostrzyciel (talk) 10:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:01, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Remontees as Copyvio (Copyvio) Remontees (talk) 14:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No evidence of permission. --King of ♥ 08:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent poster, no permission. Yann (talk) 15:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:04, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Wikipedia screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:05, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has been over-processed. I have taken several others similar to this. I do not think it has anything to offer to anyone. This is my humble opinion, though. The final decision is always yours. My apologies for the inconvenience. George E. Koronaios (talk) 15:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: High-quality image, no reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 08:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucas de Freitas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics for singers claimed as 'own work'. Seemingly self-made by the uploader rather than being official and officially-sourced logos. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 17:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thosch71 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos and graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 17:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:07, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a very new building, the design is copyrighted. It has to be deleted imho because there is no Freedom of Panorama in South Korea, per COM:FOP South Korea Ellywa (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK Sam-son (talk) 20:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Transferred to w:File:Seoul City Hall.jpg. --King of ♥ 08:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama in SoKor. The author of this recent building as per enwiki is Yoo Kerl of the Korea-based w:en:iArc Architects. The building is too prominent to be dismissed as de minimis. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:05, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a very new building, the design is copyrighted. It has to be deleted imho because there is no Freedom of Panorama in South Korea, per COM:FOP South Korea Ellywa (talk) 17:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a photo; COM:DW? ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 08:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --King of ♥ 08:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alternate History file from User:LittleMissDexterous

[edit]

Fake Election results:

Private Photos:

Fictional "alternate History" Files by User:LittleMissDexterous. This is unused private artwork, no educational value. + Unused private photos of non notable person. → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 09:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:39, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1999 photo by Phil Cole is Getty Images ID#1206793 and was uploaded to Commons using the {{PD-Italy}} licensing tag. While it may be public domain in Italy, Commons policy requires that works be either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work. Unfortunately, as a work published in 1999, the U.S. copyright to this work expires 70 years after the death of the author which will be no sooner than 2093 for a still living author. —RP88 (talk) 00:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspect to cpoyright violation: https://www.bbc.com/persian/iran-59928377 - uploader claims that it is his own work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspect to cpoyright violation: https://namnak.com/%D8%B3%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%A7%D9%84-%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C-%D8%AD%D9%85%DB%8C%D8%AF-%D9%84%D8%A8%D8%AE%D9%86%D8%AF%D9%87.p6047 - uploader claims that it is his own work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspect to cpoyright violation: screenshot with no source - uploader claims that it is his own work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:25, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspect to cpoyright violation: screenshot with no source - uploader claims that it is his own work Shkuru Afshar (talk) 01:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:26, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer : Antoine Guilbert Se requiere permiso del autor 191.125.12.229 01:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

También: File:Taïg Khris à Rennes cropped.jpg


Kept: it seems more than reasonable to assume that User:Antoine Gui = Antoine Guilbert. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.125.12.229 01:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: screenshot, DW. --P 1 9 9   14:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recuerdo de vacaciones de un boludo 191.125.12.229 01:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Google translate says "Holiday memory of a jerk". I don't know anything about Chris Hunkeler's character. I don't know if he has any real fame, or if he is a nobody. I assert that his character or notability is irrelevant - if he took a picture of an iconic location, a location clearly in scope.
  • Some contributors argue that pictures of locations visited by tourists should not be included, when they contain tourists. I completely disagree. Ideally, we would have images of those venues that both include and disclude tourists. Geo Swan (talk) 20:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. And not own work as per description ("author unknown"). --P 1 9 9   14:34, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quién es? 191.125.12.229 01:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:47, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Basura F10 191.125.12.229 01:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and not own work. --P 1 9 9   14:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Nick Moyes as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Licenced only as CC BY-NC-ND 3.0, thus not acceptable. See open access source document at https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266395536_Identification_and_nomenclature_of_the_genus_Penicillium  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Confirmed as "This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license". --P 1 9 9   17:41, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, personal image, no usage Gampe (talk) 01:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

...y no es trabajo propio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 191.126.132.136 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 29 January 2022‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:42, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 02:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and copyvio. --P 1 9 9   17:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image hoax. Note that ABS-CBN Regional ceased its operations last August 28, 2020. This kind of TV Patrol Regional 2022 logos are just edited because they already ended last August 28, 2020. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:03, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Also, hoax or not, this bears extreme resemblance of the actual w:en:TV Patrol logo, a COM:SCREENSHOT copyright violation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:31, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: Same reason as File:TV_Patrol_Northern_Mindanao_(Cagayan_de_Oro,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Central_Mindanao_(Cotabato,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Western_Mindanao_(Zamboanga,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Socsksargen_(General_Santos,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Regional_2022.png, File:TV_Patrol_Central_Mindanao_(Cotabato,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Caraga_(Butuan,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Southern_Mindanao_(Davao,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Northwestern_Mindanao_(Pagadian,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_(Bacolod,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Negros_(Bacolod,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Eastern_Visayas_(Tacloban,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Central_Visayas_(Cebu,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Panay_(Iloilo,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Palawan_(2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Cagayan_Valley_(Isabela,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Southern_Luzon_(Batangas,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_South_Central_Luzon_(Pampanga,_2022).png, File:TV_Patrol_Northern_Luzon_(Baguio,_2022).png and File:TV_Patrol_North_Central_Luzon_(Dagupan,_2022).png. Probably the uploader copied the logo and edit it by adding the defunct TV Patrol Regional names. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 05:39, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@SeanJ 2007: the uploader's act of editing does not diminish the underlying ABS-CBN News' copyright of the real TV Patrol title card. They can be speedily deleted as copyvios, whether such programs exist or not. Fair use content is perpetually not allowed here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:42, 30 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@JWilz12345: They cannot be speedy deleted for now because I nominate them for deletion and I waited for responses from you and other users. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 03:54, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, and copyvio. --P 1 9 9   17:45, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary duplicate of File:Flag of Norway.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:46, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

redundant to File:Flag of Vietnam.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:48, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Commons isn't a testing ground for various images. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I once used it as a background on a wiki, but I don't use it now. Yeah, it can be deleted. User:Anpang01 01:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:49, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a Google Maps image. It does not tell if its used with the author's permission SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 05:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   17:49, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: falsely claimed as own work, small cropped version of File:Airport-LPA.jpg,. --P 1 9 9   17:52, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 07:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better version: File:李國鼎故居3105.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 07:23, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The better version: File:李國鼎故居3108.jpg Solomon203 (talk) 07:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recently uploaded jpg that is redundant to File:718smiley.svg --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:02, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published work: https://onwardstate.com/2012/11/01/winter-jam-brings-christian-rock-to-penn-state/ From the file name here, it appears to be from the band directly. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:03, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CyberMasha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 08:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 08:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work' by two different uploaders. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 08:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Blurry Harsh Anand Sah (talk) 08:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:04, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JetMultimedia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 09:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Company seems to be part of Neuf Cegetel (Q504288) so, it is not unheard of if a Wikidata item can be created to show their relation and thereby a logo of that company would be in scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Potentially, the question is how likely is it. Such an entry doesn't appear to fulfil a structural need on Wikidata, and would it be sufficiently notable "in the sense that it can be described using serious and publicly available references"? I think it is unlikely. If it is decided to keep because of this, there is insufficient permission for the licence claimed given it is a logo, a COM:TOO assessment is needed considering the country of origin and five versions of the logo are not required. mattbr 08:50, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. User:JetMultimedia only uploading JetMultimedia logos - that can only be advertising. --P 1 9 9   18:08, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional "alternate History" map. This is private artwork, only used in fantasy sandbox, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is fantasy only, but I don't know where else to make it. It can be deleted, ive already gotten my use out of it. I just don't know where else to make it. Judobigdog (talk) 18:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Commons is not your free COM:WEBHOST. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal Image, without scope of wiki education - IndrajitDas 09:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:09, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:MarkKirkStan

[edit]

Files by User:MarkKirkStan. Fictional "alternate History" maps an private photos. Most descriptions are just "eeee". This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. In my opinion fake election maps are just inviting embarrassing mistakes by unsuspecting users. --Jahobr (talk) 09:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:11, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional "alternate History" map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 09:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 10:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete no likely educational value. Llwyld (talk) 03:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:12, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Val626 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 11:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivonovic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. Image watermarked with said logo and other text which is unlikely to be uploaders own work as claimed. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 12:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 12:28, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:39, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abrownjf93 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. Image seemingly of the uploader who has no substantive contributions. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 13:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 13:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:13, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for a British company missing VRT permission. The threshold of originality is very low for British works, see COM:TOO UK. The logo includes wavy graphic elements and a colour gradient. Sufficient effort (from a UK perspective) is likely to have been expended and the logo is potentially sufficiently original to qualify for copyright protection in its country of origin. For public domain works Wikimedia Commons only accepts media that are in the public domain in at least the United States and in the source country of the work. mattbr 13:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used on any Wikipedia page anymore. Map created by myself using Datawrapper in November 2020, and has not been used ever since. Edl-irishboy (talk) 14:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:14, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it does not mark the arabian peninsula, but rather it marks the political contemporary boundaries of GCC countries and Yemen, without any reliable citation this map is very misleading for very important matter Abu aamir (talk) 08:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9   14:44, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it does not mark the arabian peninsula, but rather it marks the political contemporary boundaries of GCC countries and Yemen, without any reliable citation this map is very misleading for very important matter Abu aamir (talk) 13:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep Identical to previous deletion request, which was closed as "no valid reason for deletion". Widely used on other projects. Brianjd (talk) 14:46, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Physically looking the image is itself correct. You cannot count any Middle East country more, because it doesn't have water on both sides or is on a peninsula. A09090091 (talk) 15:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, this map is not, is not for Arabian peninsula, it is for the contemporary GCC countries plus Yemen, it is not for Arabian peninsul Abu aamir (talk) 14:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
please I would like to talk with someone who knows about this topic, but those who do not know, please do not engage in it, leave alone asking for keeping this wrong and misinforming map, the least to do with this map is to move the name into "Map of GCC countries plus Yemen" that exactly fit the map content. Abu aamir (talk) 14:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. if you don't like the description, fix it or use {{Fact disputed}} instead. STOP nominating the file!. --P 1 9 9   18:16, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mery Coloane? 191.125.12.229 14:09, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Adrian Castro 191.125.12.229 14:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhankaarlpu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 14:11, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:18, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:44, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you saying that it is of "Unused software" because I did not use the Windows Snipping tool that showed the URL, and that it is a snip of my MediaWiki instance? Also, I'm not sure what you mean by "questionable notability". I created that image from my MediaWiki instance. I only uploaded it to illustrate the problem I was having. 209.23.179.98 13:17, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   18:20, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:19, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

smaller and more recent duplicate of file:Christopher Paolini, Eragon 1 (cropped).jpg Arlo James Barnes 15:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:53, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   18:21, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.125.12.229 01:14, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Found uncropped version published online back in March 2020, needs COM:VRT at minimum. --P 1 9 9   14:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Trabajo propio? 191.125.12.229 01:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not found online but this user has previously uploaded an image of this person on en.wp that was also deleted for licensing reasons. If really own work, it'll need COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9   14:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear face potrait, not useful in educational purposes Encik Tekateki (talk) 04:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible COM:ADVERTisement + missing permission information Nutshinou Talk! 09:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work: FB code in metadata. --P 1 9 9   14:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible COM:ADVERTisement + missing permission information Nutshinou Talk! 09:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work: transmission code in metadata. --P 1 9 9   14:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible COM:ADVERTisement + missing permission information Nutshinou Talk! 09:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9   14:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible COM:ADVERTisement + missing permission information Nutshinou Talk! 09:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work: transmission code in metadata. --P 1 9 9   14:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The icons in the image cannot be used for commercial purposes: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/graphic.shtml This violates Wikimedia Commons and should be deleted. Nutshinou Talk! 09:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:52, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Interface element of a non-free website (SoundCloud). Ostrzyciel (talk) 10:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:King of Hearts. --P 1 9 9   14:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The licence only allows the personal and non-commercial use. You are not allowed to modify the image --D-Kuru (talk) 11:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC) Permission text from the image: "Yes, Samsung offers its photos in low and high res resolution on this special website to be used for informational and non-commercial purposes. See terms of use => https://www.samsungmobilepress.com/footer/termsOfUse"[reply]
Permission text from Samsung's page: "General Use and Restrictions: All content provided on the Website (including, but not limited to, data, information, documents, texts, design, trademarks, logos, graphics, images, icons, sound, video, code and software: the "Materials") is the exclusive property of Samsung, its licensors or its content providers, and is protected by copyright, trademark and other applicable laws. You may access, copy, download and print the Materials contained on the Website solely for your personal, informational and non-commercial use, provided that you do not modify or delete any copyright, trademark or other proprietary notice appearing on the Materials you access, copy, download or print." (The original Samsung page got deleted, but here is a link to the internet archive.
This deletion request also applies to all other uploads by the same user since they all have the same problem GvanGiessen (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log --D-Kuru (talk) 11:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Is it also possible to report users? It is not true at all what D-Kuru claims and his false claims are very annoying. No photo I've posted has been edited contrary to what D-Kuru claims: "This deletion request also applies to all other uploads by the same user since they all have the same problem". For example, look at this image https://www.samsungmobilepress.com/fs/?keyword=Galaxy+S21+FE+5G and this one I uploaded, https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samsung_Galaxy_S21#/media/Bestand:Samsung_Galaxy_S21_FE_5G_(Olive).jpeg. Exactly the same, so that I would have edited these images is nonsense. All I did with Samsung Galaxy S21 5G Series.png was put the original images side by side so they could be placed as one image. This is not an edit of the original photos and can therefore remain. Again I would like to ask the question whether it is also possible to report a user for unnecessary reports and false claims. GvanGiessen (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


https://www.samsungmobilepress.com/terms-of-use/GvanGiessen (talk) 08:01, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, this still is not applicable to the license of Wikimedia Commons. --Encycloon (talk) 10:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete This is non-commercial use file. --Hajoon0102 💬 13:55, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:55, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

a draft of the TimedText namespace page, not a content itself Pacha Tchernof (talk) 14:22, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   14:56, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a picture, but a painting. No FoP in India, therefore date of creation and author needed. Yann (talk) 15:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Author unknown, image uploaded and placed in the Banaras Hindu University - a central government (India) funded university. Requesting exemption under PD-India and GODL-India. Date of creation most likely ~100 years old. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 18:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, that's not so old. Certainly painted after Gandhi's death in 1948. And the copyright is also certainly owned by the artist, not by the government. Regards, Yann (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Any indications on being painted after Gandhi's death? File:Mahatma Gandhi with Madan Mohan Malaviya.jpeg is also a painting of the same two men, but exempted under PD-India. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 19:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This is more likely a (heavily retouched) photograph. So no copyright here. We need to know when File:Mahamana Madan Mohan Malviya and Gandhi.jpg was painted, and if the artist is known. If it was painted in 1961 or before, and if the artist is not known, then it is in the public domain in India. Yann (talk) 19:24, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is no information available on the image, however, there is a sign in the bottom left corner with "S.K." something. Let me know if you can find something about the author's age/death, etc. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 20:11, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: I have updated source and license, you may want to see.Thanks, User4edits (talk) 17:11, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Still nothing known of original author, date, source, and permission. It might be based on an old photo, but we also need to know all the essential info of the original work. --P 1 9 9   15:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 15:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: FB code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9   15:04, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 나영욱 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Certificates claimed as own work but unlikely to be so and missing VRT permission. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 16:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 나영욱 (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

More unused promotional certificates, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   15:12, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:28, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 나영욱 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: printouts of enwiki articles with incomprehensible descriptions; additional certificates similar to ones previously deleted.

Omphalographer (talk) 18:50, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 10:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kananelo Joel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images claimed as 'own work' but include those that appear to be promotional / publicity images with inconsistent metadata. Other uploads have been deleted as copyright violations. Unlikely to all be own work as claimed. Includes personal images. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 16:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:Jirnexu Logotype.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects. mattbr 16:37, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:18, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright vio Joschi71 (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, screengrab. --P 1 9 9   15:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:19, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since) w:Henri Breuil died in 1961, not public domain in the EU and I see no basis for a CC license. 1931 drawing. Undelete in 2032 Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:06, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:08, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uega Oluap (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics for a singer claimed as 'own work'. Seemingly self-made by the uploader rather than being official and officially-sourced logos. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 17:27, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 17:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mario  ? 191.125.12.229 17:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mario  ? 191.125.12.229 17:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mario  ? 191.125.12.229 17:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deutsch: Entrepreneur, Trainer & Coach, Top-10 Network Marketing Pro 191.125.12.229 17:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Español: Mario Di Constanzo dizque trabajando. 191.125.12.229 17:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, and tiny thumbnail screengrab. --P 1 9 9   15:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work 191.125.12.229 17:51, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, and tiny thumbnail screengrab. --P 1 9 9   15:25, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 21:01, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:51, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taivoed. 191.125.12.229 17:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: reupload of previously deleted image. --P 1 9 9   15:26, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Татарча/tatarça: Marianas Danielle 191.125.12.229 17:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

F1 F1 F1 191.125.12.229 17:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, failed COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   15:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Estupidez 191.125.12.229 18:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too blurry. Commons has better file:2008-06-03 (Toledo, Spain) - 050 (2561965588).jpg about the same. Taivo (talk) 18:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal art, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 18:25, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:29, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTHOST. The photo of an unknown men cannot be used for educational purposes. GAndy (talk) 19:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image by non-contributor. Not used anywhere. Yahya (talk) 19:19, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:38, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:43, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Yahya (talk) 19:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:47, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:50, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jkrsocial (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Redundant to File:Jkr logo white on black.png. No usage on Wikimedia projects.

mattbr 19:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Claudia Bertijn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logo / graphic claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 19:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RCQ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos / graphics claimed as 'own work'. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope.

mattbr 20:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:21, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Historical photo, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9   15:34, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:R0187942.jpg Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 20:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and redirected per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:35, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no metadata. A narrow blue stripe can also be seen on the left edge of the image. Looks more like a screenshot to me. Geoprofi Lars (talk) 20:54, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The word Schermafbeelding is Dutch for Print Screen. This image is thus most likely a still from a video. Dqfn13 (talk) 21:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Iris Kaczmarczyk, no permission Polarlys (talk) 21:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Iris Kaczmarczyk, no permission Polarlys (talk) 21:56, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:36, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blank space Gower (talk) 22:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unnecessary collage factor Dronebogus (talk) 22:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May be a cursed lost episode but Viacom or whoever still owns the copyright Dronebogus (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:37, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judging by the file data, the person who uploaded the photo took it from a third-party site GAndy (talk) 22:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:38, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been uploaded without the consent of the original creator, the person depicted does not wish to be represented in a public sense. 2A02:908:175D:A1C0:3465:D90D:C00A:B45B 22:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is a photo of me, I have not agreed that my photo is used here. 2A02:908:175D:A1C0:3465:D90D:C00A:B45B 14:19, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 12:22, 24 January 2022, by Túrelio (CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)). --P 1 9 9   15:39, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Promotional not used in any article Userantonella (talk) 22:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Promotional not used in any article Userantonella (talk) 22:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Promotional - self Userantonella (talk) 22:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:43, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All images are COM:REDUNDANT (and COM:NOTUSED) to those found at Category:Paddy fields in San Miguel, Bulacan. Other images that were previously here have been moved by me to Category:San Miguel Welcome Arch in Bulacan (from San Ildefonso, Bulacan), which is more useful.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:05, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep complety different motives to Category:Paddy fields in San Miguel, Bulacan Quote: "Redundant or low-quality files only get deleted on a case-by-case. You can't claim redundancy for a whole category.--Jahobr (talk) 09:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jahobr: note that the uploader (Judgefloro (talk · contribs)) has been blocked since last year, and also his sock JFVelasquez Floro (talk · contribs). Why completely different motives when they both show the same fields of the same town? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:58, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Plus the highly unreasonable long category name suggests the intention of uploading is COM:WEBHOSTing. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:00, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
See also: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 93#JFVelasquez Floro. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment
this is to be deleted. Do we have an alternative(better qulity image) of this landmak? If yes please provide proof on a case by case basis.Jahobr (talk) 10:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Pleas give a propper reason for deletion. Redundancy has to be established on a case-by-case basis. The images show not just fields but different landmarks. Long/False category names are no reason for deletion of images; nether is the block of the user later on. --Jahobr (talk) 10:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jahobr: now removed the 4 files showing the marker, plus 2 files showing kilometer stone markers. However, the rest, I see no purpose but COM:WEBHOSTing. The highway is essentially the same as Category:Maharlika Highway (Cagayan Valley Road, San Miguel, Bulacan section). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:15, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@JWilz12345: Thanks for taking the time and effort to clean up Commons, but I agree that this DR is a bit too much. There seem to be several images of general landscapes and road scenes that are in scope. I know that this uploader uploads an excessive amount of redundant images but in this case, are some or most of these general landscape images also available in other categories? If not, several should be kept. Please review this DR and strike out any unique landscape image. Thanks. --P 1 9 9   16:09, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: the landscape is near-identical to ones found at Category:Paddy fields in San Miguel, Bulacan, since the nominated images show the rice fields of the same town. Also, Category:Paddy fields of San Ildefonso, Bulacan and its three subcategories. There are way too many (zillions?) images of Bulacan now (yet very scant amount of/few images from several towns of far-flung areas like Apayao, Eastern Samar, Basilan, and Davao de Oro), and as such the nominated images can freely go. Besides all are not in use today. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Indeed redundant to hundreds of similar, near-duplicate images in other categories as stated above. --P 1 9 9   16:44, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is just a screenshot of this article. If it is to be used on wikis, then the original wikitext should be used instead. Twotwofourtysix (talk) 06:34, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: totally agree with DR but it is in use. --P 1 9 9   16:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Greece that would be mean that photographs of infoboards can be uploaded in commons. C messier (talk) 15:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   16:45, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COMMONS:Screenshots Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have struck my previous rationale per my rationale here. Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:13, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9   16:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COMMONS:Screenshots Sahaib3005 (talk) 19:04, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have now discovered that apparently the website is not copyrighted per File:FlightPath default banner logo.png, I struck my previous rationale though I think that the image's file page should have made it clear if the website was copyrighted because it seemed like an obvious copyvio. Sahaib3005 (talk)


Kept: witdrawn, in use. --P 1 9 9   16:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. To me, this looks like a distinct artwork that does not qualify as "simple geometry ineligible for copyright" Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9   16:47, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} removed by DMacks (talk · contribs) with comment Source does not make this release, uploader does not claim to own license either. It's either PD or non-free. The AP is still commercially licensing this file [2]. I thought the R25773 listed on that site might be a renewal number, but it belongs to a work of music first registered in 1920 (renewed 1947). I can't find enough information (title, author, date of publication) to do a proper renewal source, and there's definitely not enough to say PD-US-no-notice. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:35, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Assuming that was taken in 1932 (see discussion) and published then as an AP photo as well, the file can be restored in 2028 with {{PD-old-expired}}. --Rosenzweig τ 18:20, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A photo taken in 1907 is highly unlikely to actually be the uploader's own work, as is claimed. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PD-UK-Unknown says "This tag can be used only when the author cannot be ascertained by reasonable enquiry. If you wish to rely on it, please specify in the image description the research you have carried out to find who the author was." I don't see that any of that was done here. --Rosenzweig τ 20:43, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own image, see watermark on spacebar. P 1 9 9   04:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 20:46, 22 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not PD-RU-exempt. PD only for whole postcard. — Redboston 04:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 00:52, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the depicted artwork on this tabernacle is likely still in copyright, it needs to be evaluated whether the image is covered wrt to location by The Netherland's freedom-of-panorama exception or not. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:45, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I (the uploader) have frankly never heard of that rule applying in the Netherlands. If it's any help, it's a tabernacle in a chapel that is public accessible and that everyone can just freely walk into during all office hours.
I have unfortunately no idea what the age of this object is, if that would be any help? It looks pretty new, but the chapel is pretty old so that could be deceptive.
Just for my information, what kind of copyright law would that be? Are we sure this law exists in the Netherlands? And wouldn't that then apply to ALL artwork that you in churches and chapels?
I'm really curious what prompted anyone to flag this particular image/object. Greetings, RagingR2 (talk) 23:18, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay addition; I just read the article/section that you linked to. It says that artworks (I'm summarizing) are okay if you photograph them "as they appear" in the public place that they are located in. I guess the tabarnacle could fall under sculpture/engraving. As I said; it's located in a chapel that is publically accessible, and I just photographed it as it's standing there in it's natural surroundings. The chapel does not charge any fee, there isn't even a guard; the door is always open and most times you are in there alone. I guess theoretically they could "deny access based on private law" even though no such rules exist right now that I'm aware of; but technically I guess you are on private property (the chapel is probably property of a parish or decanate or something like that). That's all I can think of right now in terms of information that could help here.
By the way, the linked article doesn't mention it (or I haven't found it yet); but surely there is some kind of statute of limitations on this in regards to the age of artworks even if this exception does somehow NOT apply? I mean if you photograph a 200 year old painting or stained-glass window in a church in such a way that you crop everything else out of the frame (so not so much "as it appears in the location" anymore) surely this would be totally okay? I can't imagine there is not an age limit somewhere, but I can't find it yet.
Greetings, and I hope we can solve this either way, because if anything I am really curious right now what comes out of this!
RagingR2 (talk) 00:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
When opening this DR, I assumed that the sculpture/engraving is copyrighted. Until there is evidence to the contrary (sculptor dead since >70 years), we should assume that, i.e. that copyright by the artist is still in place. Therefore it would be important to know the name of the artist, which I consider also a moral duty, as the image depicts his artist and he/she has the right to be mentioned.
Freedom-of-panorama is a copyright-exception, which restricts the exertion of an still existing copyright for works in the public, bound to certain terms, which vary from country to country, and is very important (often used) for uploads on Commons. However, often the copyright-laws are not very specific when defining their own terms, especially what is included in "public space" and what not. So, we need either case-law or the expertise of knowledgable users from the country of interest, here from the Netherlands. --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. Per COM:FOP Netherlands, Dutch freedom of panorama applies to exteriors and some public interiors like railway stations, airports, underpasses, (covered) parking lots, shopping malls. Most likely not churches since schools, operas, entrance halls of businesses, and museums are also excluded. --Rosenzweig τ 02:44, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Interier photo. No freedom of interiors in the Czech Republic. Juandev (talk) 13:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This was shot in a hospital hallway. In my view, this is a public space. The description of Freedom of panorama in CZ here does not say anything about interiors being generally forbidden. JiriMatejicek (talk) 17:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There has been a lot of professional and amateur discussion what is "prostranství" space. The law itslef mentiones some "spaces" and one of the general characteristics of them is, that they doesnt have a roof. Thats also mentioned in this article, which points to legal disputes, which ended aginst interiors. Moreover on other Wikimedia Freedom of Panorama page, Czech Republic doesnt have Freedom of Interiors, like e.g. UK have. So I would also love to have freedom of Interiors, but untill its not legal, we should not break local laws. Juandev (talk) 20:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that this is not a clear case. Different people can have different opinions about what is 'public space'. The bottom line is that its definition in the Czech law is not exhaustive, therefore, these are just opinions. Since I believe the photo is a useful contribution to Wikimedia Commons, I suggest this (in line with the general In dubio pro reo principle): unless it is clearly declared illegal, consider it legal and leave it alone.
P.S. Referring to 'other Wikimedia page' without specific link is not really helpful. JiriMatejicek (talk) 08:53, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. This is not a criminal trial, and the principle to apply is not "in dubio pro reo", but the precautionary principle. --Rosenzweig τ 14:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isolation Von Dna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 09:40, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redraw a coat of arm is not eligible to CC license. Just like i redraw a spiderman, does not means Marvel losing the copyright claim. There is no other evidence that the gov of the city has no copyright claim on the coat of arms such as the right expired etc. Then the copyright tag should be public domain and the uploader only able to claim CC license for derived work portion. Matthew hk (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Copyright of coat of arms of Italian municipalities was already discussed many times in the past. The design officially used by the municipality may be copyrigthed, but any other design which is based on the blazon – that is free of copyright – belongs to the designer. I did design this CoA by myself (partly taking some elements from other Commons files under public domain) and I published it here as CC0, so I there is no copyright infringement. --Neq00 (talk) 17:05, 24 January 2022 (UTC) P.S. I highly doubt that spiderman can be considered as a coat of arms. ;)[reply]
  •  Keep I don't know if my comment is still valuable, but it's a CoA based on a blazon (as said, it's copyright free): furthermore, if we eliminate it, we should eliminate all the CoA on Commons, according to the reason of elimination.--Gb89.2 (talk) 07:34, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Then I still don't agree on replacing the official logo/cost of arms design with wiki user created content (e.g. in en-wiki articles). It just like replacing Inter Milan logo with fans one. Matthew hk (talk) 04:14, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for the late answer: I missed your comment. The current coat of arms on en.wiki is a small, low-quality raster, while this one is a vectorial graphics that can be displayed at any size without losing quality. I think all wikis will benefit from this better image. --Neq00 (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: if this is own work by the uploader as assured in the discussion, there is no valid reason for deletion. If en.wp rather wants to use the small fair use png, they can. --Rosenzweig τ 11:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work 191.125.12.229 17:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 11:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No es own work. 181.203.101.233 23:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And why do you think that? Just claiming it is not enough, I just closed this deletion request from January because there was just this claim and I couldn't find anything. I will close it again if no evidence is provided to back up this claim. --Rosenzweig τ 00:10, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per User:Rosenzweig, insufficient reason for deletion. Maybe out of scope?. --P 1 9 9   19:48, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JJMC89 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: source is © 2022 Azərbaycan Respublikası Əqli Mülkiyyət Agentliyi; note the comemtnary in the file history; putting before the ecommunity  — billinghurst sDrewth 01:29, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

please look license AzeWEB (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
at this picture free license. State symbols and emblems are considered world heritage. AzeWEB (talk) 20:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This is the logo of a government agency, so I'd say {{PD-AZ-exempt}} applies. --Rosenzweig τ 15:02, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Silly Symphony title cards with musical notes in background

[edit]

After @Magog the Ogre: wrote here that File:Title card of Hell's Bells.png is not simple enough for stay in Commons, the other five files might not be too. --Andr€a (talk) 08:59, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, see also previous DR Commons:Deletion requests/File:Title card of Hell's Bells.png. The files can be restored 95 (+ 1) years after the respective year of publication, so in 2027 or 2028. --Rosenzweig τ 15:14, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unreasonably described as public domain. Yellow Horror (talk) 15:57, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The photo unreasonably described as public domain. The author is not listed in the referenced source. A. N. Severtsov (1966—1936) is present in the photo, there is no reason to consider him the author. It is not possible to consider it in the public domain as an anonymous work also, because there is no evidence of a sufficiently old publication.--Yellow Horror (talk) 16:02, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 14:01, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. To me, this looks like a distinct artwork that does not qualify as "simple geometry ineligible for copyright" Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Scientific drawing, there is no artistic creation here but it has simply been drawn from a picture or using a camera lucida. The leg has been created by nature which has no creator :) Totodu74 (talk) 22:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Totodu74: Of course there is artistic creation here (there are millions of ways to depict a 3D object such as a foot). A simple photograph of the foot would have less artistic creation but is definitely under copyright. I would love to learn that your assessment is correct, as it would mean that we could upload thousands of similar images from papers to illustrate our articles. But I fear that this is not the reality. --Jens Lallensack (talk) 10:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Jens Lallensack: you used the word "artwork": could you please give a precise and legitimate definition of this word, and indicate how the current scientific illustration falls under this definition? To me the use of this word is inappropriate, as there is no aesthetic value in such a scientific illustration. The same was said when I seeked for a "media copyright advice" in December 2013. Back then, a qualified user explained that "the drawing of the beaks is sufficiently simple and schematic that one can reasonably exclude an artistic side ("which reflects the personality of its author", which is the touchstone). In the case of the beaks, legs and feathers, a specialist in naturalistic drawing would have to be consulted as to whether he or she considers these to be "simple technical executions" or whether there are small fancies in the execution that may reflect the personality of the author. This being the case, just as in scientific descriptions, it is relatively easy to free oneself from a possible copyright ("literary and artistic") by paraphrasing what is in front of one's eyes to reproduce what makes up the actual information (scientific, and therefore free of copyright) while discarding the contingent details (potentially carrying copyright). For example, for the beaks, one can reconstruct (by hand or with ad hoc software) a vector reproduction of one or the other, and then make eleven modifications to this vector drawing so that it decals the eleven graphic versions presented: with this paraphrasing/rewriting filter, one can be reasonably assured that the contingent details are not transferred into the vector variations, and therefore that the result is only the scientific information that is free of copyright." I did not import the drawings from the publication (a low quality raster file) but created my own vectorial image. Best regards, Totodu74 (talk) 11:43, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Totodu74: – if you drew that image free-hand by yourself (no precise tracing), using the original image as basis for information, then yes, this is acceptable from my understanding. But you didn't indicate that you did any changes to the original in the file description. I think that, in this case, you would in fact be the author of the image, and you should state something like "re-drawn (free-hand) after [original source]". --Jens Lallensack (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for your answer. Would this be appropriate? Totodu74 (talk) 18:08, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. I also compared this drawing with the original drawing, it is not an exact copy. --Rosenzweig τ 14:25, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam/Promotional not used in any article Userantonella (talk) 22:49, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. It is actually used at pt.wp, but the uploader requested deletion of all her/his files as "spam" and all the others were deleted as well. --Rosenzweig τ 02:33, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9   04:30, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:29, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid source (not own work) and author. Copyrighted logo. Ostrzyciel (talk) 10:40, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. This is a Danish company. COM:TOO Denmark doesn't really offer a lot to compare, so I'll delete this per the precautionary principle because it might be above Danish TOO. --Rosenzweig τ 13:36, 18 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
@Enpatrais: I asked him to upload the full size photo. That must be enough to prove ownership. --C messier (talk) 12:49, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I agree.--Enpatrais (talk) 12:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This looks like a screenshot from an HD video. --Rosenzweig τ 11:12, 15 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: keeping this for now because even if it looks like a screenshot it's not necessarily a copyvio. I'd need some evidence for that and could not find any. --Rosenzweig τ 07:35, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raysh2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A quantity of personal images that seem to have no obvious use within the scope of this project.

Herby talk thyme 12:41, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

به درخواست شخص برای زندگی نامه و بیوگرافی و در رویت قرار گرفتن دوستان و شاگردان خود ارسال گردیده است . با تشکر Raysh2 (talk) 13:12, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 19:44, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DragonflySixtyseven as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: With no further information about the artist's identity than the name "A. Silva", we cannot assess whether the image's copyright has in fact expired. Precautionary principle says take it down. Putting before community. Should not delete based on precautionary principle for 19th century artist when no clear issues with copyright  — billinghurst sDrewth 06:55, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete If one assumed that this painting was done during the subject's lifetime (and not later from a photograph), so no later than 1897, there's a good chance that painter A. Silva died no later than 1951, which would mean the painting is in the PD in Mexico per COM:Mexico. But we're not given a year when the painting was done, just as we don't know anything about the painter except this abbreviated, not exactly rare name. Mexico has a term of protection of 100 years pma since 2003, before that it was 50 years since 1982 and 75 years since 1994. If the painter has died just a little bit later in 1952, the copyright for his (or her?) works would have been until the end of 2002 since 1982, until the end of 2027 since 1994, and until the end of 2052 since 2003. 1897 would also not be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}} with a Mexican work, because PD-old-assumed is 120 years for countries with the standard 70 years pma term, but 150 years with the duration=100 parameter that is needed for Mexico. --Rosenzweig τ 14:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
PS: The source page has a CC license, but it is CC BY-NC-ND 4.0, so not acceptable for Wikimedia Commons. --Rosenzweig τ 15:27, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and remarks. --Ellywa (talk) 22:27, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ahmad252 as no license (No license since). 1939 drawing, likely published in 1939 and still in copyright. Undelete in 2035. Abzeronow (talk) 16:52, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm inclined towards keep now. Abzeronow (talk) 01:25, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment We don't know if this drawing was actually published and, if it was, if there was a notice or not. [3] says this image is "undated". en:Walsh Gymnasium says that construction of the gymnasium began in 1939, but that does not mean the drawing is from 1939, it could be earlier. So any search in the copyright database should be for several years. --Rosenzweig τ 23:49, 17 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The New York Times had an article about the new gymnasium on June 27, 1939 (the day of the groundbreaking ceremony), featuring a drawing of the building, but not this one. They wrote that en:Anthony J. DePace is the architect. So this could be a drawing by DePace ([4] calls it an "Architectural Conception"), but we're not sure. But there is another (much better) version at [5] (just missing the bottom "South Orange N. J." line), called "Architect's conception print for Walsh Auditorium for Seton Hall College" and dated "1939 October", which would indicate this is indeed the work of DePace.
Unless publication is proven, we should assume that the drawing was unpublished before 2003 (added to the university's eRepository website in 10/2016). Which means: If the author is known, copyrighted for 70 years pma. If the author is unknown or corporate authorship, the earlier of 95 years after first publication or 120 years after creation. The file could be restored in 2060 then with {{PD-US-unpublished}}, or in 2048 if DePace's authorship of the drawing is established. --Rosenzweig τ 19:04, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Abzeronow did not give arguments why they changed their minds. --Ellywa (talk) 22:29, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. The photo is taken from the publication "Harcerski Słownik Biograficzny" vol. 4. However, the publisher declares as follows "Zamieszczone w publikacji fotografie pochodzą ze zbiorów Muzeum Harcerstwa w Warszawie, Archiwum Komisji Historycznej Chorągwi Krakowskiej ZHP, zbiorów prywatnych autorów i archiwów rodzinnych" (The photographs included in the publication come from the collections of the Museum of Scouting in Warsaw, the Archive of the Historical Commission of the Krakow Region of Polish Scouting and Guiding Association, the private collections of the authors, and family archives.) Therefore, it is not possible to clearly identify the author of the photo, and the appropiate licence. WTM (talk) 17:48, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep PD-Poland and "PD-EU-no author disclosure" would both apply. It would be nice if had a Wikidata entry on the person. --RAN (talk) 22:24, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Taken from a book that was published in 2016 (pl:Harcerski słownik biograficzny, vol. 4). {{PD-Poland}} applies to photographs that were published before May 23, 1994, so that publication does not qualify the photograph for that tag. The photo might have been published before, but we would need more details about that. Since we don't know if and, if yes, when and where this was published before 2016, we also don't know if that publication (or indeed the 2016 publication) was actually anonymous, so we cannot apply a license tag for anonymous works. The only possibility I see for a photo like this, not much known about it but said to be from 1946, is {{PD-old-assumed}} in 2067. --Rosenzweig τ 13:50, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Uploader did not give evidence to show the image is in PD, per COM:EVID. --Ellywa (talk) 22:31, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]