Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/14
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
_3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Nominating for deletion because this seems to be a copyright violation. This image is a screenshot from a recent episode of the tv show SNL. Mason 39 (talk) 09:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wie gerade mitgeteilt wurde, wurden die Bilder angeblich "ohne Erlaubnis der Kirchengemeinde" erstellt und dort auch schon entfernt, daher würde ich auch hier eine Löschung vorschlagen, um Probleme zu vermeiden. Subbass1 (talk) 10:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, also as it's a derivative. --Túrelio (talk) 20:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Borrar de nuevo por favor. 181.203.71.207 23:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: apparently has a VRT permission now. --Rosenzweig τ 20:16, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
Selfie by non contributor, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Boylarva99 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/78065747 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Note that observation license (which is free) != image license (which is non-free). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Boylarva99 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/46476558 King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Note that observation license (which is free) != image license (which is non-free). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:42, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Boylarva99 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CC BY-NC King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Note that observation license (which is free) != image license (which is non-free). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Boylarva99 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CC BY-NC King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Note that observation license (which is free) != image license (which is non-free). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Boylarva99 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: CC BY-NC King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Note that observation license (which is free) != image license (which is non-free). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
not my work. i misunderstood the purpose of this site. Crasher925 (talk) 23:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 13:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Facebook 191.119.204.92 01:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- No... It is just a picture I have taken last June in Annecy. I have ask a vrt for that. - Boungawa (talk) 07:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Has VRT. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:52, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of nondescript computer monitors, no context or purpose, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- User:-revi/Tistory in use. — regards, Revi 02:28, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- @-revi: Please add a meaningful description and relevant category. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. But you can avoid such DR's by giving it a meaningful description and categories. That way this image can be found and used by others. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KingShibbari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private files with no educational use. Out of project scope and used for self-promotion.
- File:JamiulSoikatphoto.jpg
- File:JamiulSoikatPic.jpg
- File:Jamiul-Photo.jpg
- File:Soikat-Photo.jpg
- File:JamiulSoikat.jpg
- File:PXL 20210803 171235647.NIGHT.jpg
- File:Soikat.jpg
- File:Jamiul Soikat Pic.jpg
- File:Jamiul Soikat.jpg
BRP ever 00:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. F10. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:40, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Photographie de la couverture de l'ouvrage (droits d'auteur ?) ~ Antoniex (discuter) 17:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 19:27, 18 December 2021 UTC: Media missing permission as of 14 December 2021 --Krdbot 02:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without education use. No copyright permission in source. Drakosh (talk) 17:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Yann at 19:24, 18 December 2021 UTC: Media missing permission as of 14 December 2021 --Krdbot 02:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Captivlymedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: promotional, advertisement
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - Winery.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - backyard.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio Twilight Photo.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio Dining Room 1.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - Living Room 2.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - fireplace.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - bedroom 1.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - drone photography.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - Dining Room.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio - Bathroom.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Mentor Ohio.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Medina Ohio.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio Bedroom.jpg
- File:Real Estate Photography - Captivly - Akron Ohio.jpg
- File:Captivly real estate photography twilight shot.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 18:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. G10. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:42, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res/web-size screengrabs. And non-notable persons, out of scope.
- File:Taikicdefensa.png
- File:Entrenamientos TAIKIC.png
- File:Daniel Lopez.png
- File:Susana Cordeiro.png
- File:Yee Seil.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: self-promotion.
- File:استارتاپهای علی بصورت پیاپی برندهی جشنواره وب و موبایل ایران بودهاند..jpg
- File:تقدیر جهاد دانشگاهی تهران واحد اصفهان به عنوان ایجاد کسب و کارهای بی خطر و ایجاد بستری نو برای کارآفرینی.jpg
- File:تقدیر از وی به عنوان حضور در جشنواره چالش های استارت آپ ها در دانشگاه صنعتی خواجه نصیر الدین طوسی.jpg
- File:عضو شورای داوری دهمین دوره جشنواره وب و موبایل ایران.jpg
- File:تقدیر از سایت همیار وردپرس در نهمین جشنواره رسانه های دیجیتال به عنوان آموزش هوشمند در بخش پایگاه های اینترنتی.jpg
- File:تقدیر کنسرسیوم کسب و کار اینترنتی ایران از علی حاجی محمدی به عنوان بنیان گذار همیار وردپرس.jpg
- File:داور نخستین رویداد استارت آپ ویکند محیط زیست و مدیریت شهری هوشمند.jpg
- File:علی حاجی محمدی عضو شورای داوری دهمین دوره جشنواره وب و موبایل ایران.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 16:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:57, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lokeshwaran Vela Rajan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike.jpg
- File:Nagpur Municipal Corporation.jpg
- File:Jaipur Municipal Corporation.jpg
- File:Surat Municipal Corporation.jpg
- File:Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation.jpg
- File:Pune Municipal Corporation.jpg
- File:Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation.jpg
- File:Ram Muthuram Cinemas, Tirunelveli.jpg
- File:Uvari beach, Tirunelveli.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:58, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional/advertising images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:Familia Edwards.jpg
- File:Linea Prestige Luis Felipe Edwards.png
- File:Vinos Luis Felipe Edwards.png
- File:Viña Luis Felipe Edwards.jpg
- File:LFE horizontal.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:59, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Google Street View image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:20, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Game screenshot of a blocked user on en.wiki. Leomk0403 (talk) 03:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 16:22, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope Jasrkhalil (talk) 05:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete I'm not sure what is going on here. Jasrkhalil, who posted the DR above, is the uploader. They have also posted an UnDR for the image -- the UnDR has been closed because the image has not been deleted. Aside from the fact that this is the only contribution by this user and therefore is out of scope, it also does not look like a selfie, so the claim that it is the own work of the subject is probably incorrect. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & Jim. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:21, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- File:Poorly drawn noodles.png
- File:Poorly drawn robot.png
- File:Poorly drawn modern art piece.png
- File:Poorly drawn modern art.png
- File:Poorly drawn bubbles.png
- File:Poorly drawn burger.png
- File:Rainbow Spray Paint Can.png
- File:Magenta and turquoise seashell.png
Self-described poorly drawn images, likely just jokes and/or vandalism. No conceivable educational use (COM:EDUSE). Marbletan (talk) 14:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, poor quality, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:The Symphony Towers - Tower One
[edit]https://kmcmaggroup.com/building/The-Symphony-Towers - 2016 architect work. No freedom of panorama, no creative commons permits from architects
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:03368jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 04.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 11.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 12.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 13.jpg
- File:03382jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 15.jpg
- File:03398jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03398jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 08.jpg
- File:03398jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 09.jpg
- File:03398jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Quezon Cityfvf 10.jpg
- File:03409jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Sergeant Esguerra Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:03409jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Sergeant Esguerra Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:03409jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Sergeant Esguerra Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:03409jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Sergeant Esguerra Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 05.jpg
- File:03409jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Sergeant Esguerra Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 06.jpg
- File:03409jfThe Symphony Towers Tower One Sergeant Esguerra Avenue Quezon Cityfvf 07.jpg
- File:03441jfSergeant Esguerra Timog Avenue Scout Ybardolaza Quezon Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:03441jfSergeant Esguerra Timog Avenue Scout Ybardolaza Quezon Cityfvf 03.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 02.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 03.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 04.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 05.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 06.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 07.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 08.jpg
- File:9022Scout Ybardolaza Judge Jimenez, Streets Quezon City 09.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Phenyl rings seem blurry, Na and B are weird color-overlaps. Have File:NaBPh4.png DMacks (talk) 15:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The quality/style of this image falls short of minimum expectations for Wikipedia articles. The alternative image noted by DMacks should be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 22:08, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Livetracktech (talk · contribs)
[edit]Screenshots, missing original source, author, and permission. Adverting, out of scope. Only used on userpage of spam account without meaningful edits.
- File:SwimBoy.png
- File:Composants du SWIMBOT.jpg
- File:Nicolas Granger.jpg
- File:^286ACDDDAC2FD31DEAA0A1516B4701231B2D4FEB7BD882CB24^pimgpsh fullsize distr.png
- File:LOGO-SWIMBOT-Version-FINAL.png
- File:David Jamet.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Joschi71 (talk) 13:45, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:17, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yadyperez20 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional and personal images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. And many are not own works but screenshots and photos of existing photos.
- File:Logo negro alberto lajo.jpg
- File:El arte de la cirugia plastica alberto lajo libro.jpg
- File:Logo alberto lajo.png
- File:CONGRESO MEDICAL CARTAGENA 0016 17XXCXX.jpg
- File:Chiquitos A L.png
- File:Premio excelencia profesional de salud.png
- File:Niños alberto lajo.jpg
- File:Fondation ALcosmetics.jpg
- File:Captura de pantalla 2016-11-23 a las 13.32.31.png
- File:Docto alberto lajo.jpg
- File:Dr. Alberto Lajo en actividad de voluntariado en las misiones de ayuda en Arequipa (Perú).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIOs - low res, no EXIF, uploader serial copyright violator, elsewhere before upload (e.g., File:Laksa Kuala Perlis.jpg is from here; File:Laksa johor.jpg is from here; etc.) - Duck/PRP
- File:Laksa Kuala Perlis.jpg
- File:Laksa johor.jpg
- File:Laksa kuah merah Terengganu.jpg
- File:Laksa kelate.jpg
- File:Laksa ipoh.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 19:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal file collection, all unused, out of project scope.
- File:Uchechukwu Emmanuel 1.jpg
- File:Uchechukwu Emmanuel - 49978692852.jpg
- File:Uchechukwu Emmanuel - 49978446006.jpg
- File:Uchechukwu Emmanuel siting.jpg
- File:Uchechukwu at TEDx YABA.jpg
- File:Uchechukwu Emmanuel.jpg
- File:Uchechukwu at Semicolon.jpg
- File:Daleentontech.jpg
- File:Uchechukwu Portrait.jpg
GeorgHH • talk 19:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Graf zu Pappenheim (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no source for the background map. Maybe its from Google maps?
- File:3.PzDiv - Gefechtsabschnitt.pdf
- File:PzGrenBrig 16 Karte.pdf
- File:PzKp Vtg.pdf
- File:Fulda Gap BAI.pdf
- File:VzöGef schematisch.pdf
- File:Feuerplan PzLehrBrig 9.pdf
- File:Kampf um Gewässer - Phase VI.pdf
- File:Kampf um Gewässer - Phase V.pdf
- File:Kampf um Gewässer - Phase IV.pdf
- File:Kampf um Gewässer - Phase III.pdf
- File:Kampf um Gewässer - Phase II.pdf
- File:Kampf um Gewässer - Phase I.pdf
- File:Sperrplan Pioniere.pdf
- File:Straffe Zügel 75.pdf
- File:GROSSE ROCHADE 75.pdf
- File:Operationsplan - Muster.pdf
- File:Saxon Drive 78.pdf
- File:CONSTANT ENFORCER 79.pdf
- File:SCHARFE KLINGE 81.pdf
- File:Harte Faust.pdf
- File:Bellende Meute 83 Gegenangriff ROT.pdf
- File:Bellende Meute 83 Phasen 2-4.pdf
- File:Bellende Meute 83 Angriff über die Weser.pdf
Ruthven (msg) 20:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:19, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshots, missing original author, source, and permission.
- File:Diszkrét jószág.jpg
- File:Semleges jószág.jpg
- File:Káros jószágok.jpg
- File:Tökéletes kiegészítők.jpg
- File:Tökéletes helyettesítők.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:00, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Website copyright Rameshe999 (talk) 12:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vivement Lundi ! (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from movie posters. Should be blanked/cropped to keep.
- File:Bruno Collet lors de l'Animated shorts screening showcase en février 2020.png
- File:Bruno Collet à la cérémonie des Oscars 2020.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:31, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:DERIV, photo of a videogame with the game screen itself as the focus of the image. Lord Belbury (talk) 13:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:39, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christian Sanroma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Conventional multi-stage flash system.png
- File:Brine Mixing Multi stage system.png
- File:Once-through multi stage system.png
- File:Single-Stage Flashing Unit scheme..png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lillian Rínkū (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Lac du Revest.jpg
- File:Brissa Gonzáles Gerés Disparu.jpg
- File:Bateau de TLV TVM.jpg
- File:Politesse.jpg
- File:Mercedes PNG80151.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused and uncategorized logo. Out of scope. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Text formula, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. Also added:
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Apparent COM:NETCOPYVIO: low res, no EXIF, uploaded in batch of blatant copyvios of same subject matter stolen from social media (see deleted contribs), appears to be from this set, etc. Duck/COM:PRP. Эlcobbola talk 16:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshot and logo, no educational value, out of scope.
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UnnaoRabbit (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused trick (photoshopped?) image of nondescript object, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete --Joschi71 (talk) 13:44, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:38, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res image of quotation marks, unusable and superseded by many others in Category:Quotation marks. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:37, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused text table, should be in wiki-table format if needed, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fiona Walker England (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional product images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree with the nomination, it does appear to be product promotion. Marbletan (talk) 14:15, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:36, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamtherealking (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded for self-promotion without educational use. Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:Intro to Lots of Love.png
- File:Perry's Fashion.jpg
- File:King Tri-Zi Signature 20210807 213433.jpg
- File:King's Records.jpg
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohdfarhi50 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos of not apparently notable organisations; out of COM:SCOPE.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 22:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:46, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 22:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - File:ShqiponjaDoko.jpg is here, for example. --Эlcobbola talk 23:12, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Does not appear to fit within the project scope: Personal photo. Nutshinou Talk! 09:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Buildings in the Philippines
[edit]There's no freedom of panorama in the Philippines, and these are not applicable for de minimis. A free license from the architect is needed.
- File:ADDU Community Center.jpg
- File:Agaton Orosa House1.JPG
- File:Camiling,Tarlacjf2252 03.JPG
- File:Camiling,Tarlacjf8322 05.JPG
- File:College of Medicine, Bicol University.jpg
- File:College of Nursing.jpg
- File:Ferrymar Building.jpg
- File:LHS-Main Building.jpg
- File:Multipurpose Building, Bicol University.jpg
- File:The Student Services Center.jpg
★ Poké95 03:25, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:52, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Buildings in the Philippines
[edit]https://www.emporis.com/buildings/100903/union-bank-plaza-pasig-philippines - 2004 work created by D. Del Rosario Architects AND RTKL Associates Inc.. NO freedom of panorama in the philippines. No creative commons permit from architects
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused bookcover, no educational value, out of scope. And unknown copyright status. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused low-res diagram without context, little educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Unused text formula, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Low-res diagram without context or clear purpose, little educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without any edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:51, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Image here May 2012, well before August 2012 Commons upload. Also low res, no EXIF, etc. COM:VRT required per previous publication. Эlcobbola talk 16:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's Jenny Bae in the photo. Apm44 (talk) 09:42, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional image, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alfonsodf1981 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. And not own works but DW and photos of existing photos.
- File:Juez Fernando Silva.PNG
- File:Juez Fernando Silva entrevista.jpg
- File:Juez-Fernando-Silva-img.jpg
- File:Juez Fernando Silva.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused flag, logo, and wordmark of a university, not own works, missing permission.
- File:Bandera de la Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores.jpg
- File:Tipografía de la Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores.jpg
- File:Efigies de la Fundación Universitaria Los Libertadores.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram with little context, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused legislature diagram without context, no educational value, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event/persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: low-res sizes, disparate quality and styles, missing EXIF data. Includes photos of photos. All photos of same person, unlikely that uploader was present at all these diverse places and times.
- File:Phil on a School Beach Trip.jpg
- File:Philip Chandler Gale.jpg
- File:Phil jamming2.jpg
- File:Phil jamming.jpg
- File:Phil keyboard.jpg
- File:Phiip gale and sister 1991.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pipi-langstrum (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused text formulas, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope.
- File:Slide1כגדכגדק.png
- File:Equhghghdg gfttwbry gf.png
- File:Point prevalence.jpg
- File:חישוב.jpg
- File:Prevalence123.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 17:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete This file is derived from File:Ismaeel Buba Ahmed.jpg which has a studio watermark asserting copyright Timtrent (talk) 17:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:52, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused random photo without clear purpose, no context, no educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo and screenshot, no educational value, out of scope and missing permission.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused diagram of unidentified election, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res photo of non-notable persons, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chang Sony (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos/sign, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Ezarateesteban 17:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own works as stated, missing permission.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GabrielTheWriter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional content, unused, out of scope.
- File:Pierre Subeh Profile Picture.png
- File:Pierre Subeh is an author, business expert, and award-winning executive producer. He is mostly known for advocating Middle-Eastern representation and pushing the U.S. Department of State & The White House.png
- File:Pierre Subeh is an author, business expert, and award-winning executive producer.png
- File:Pierre Subeh as Speaker at the 2020 CES Powered by Forbes.jpg
- File:Pierre Subeh Headshot.jpg
- File:The National Arab American Heritage Month Logo.png
GeorgHH • talk 19:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Professional copyrighted photo, see metadata. No indication that uploader is identical with photographer. 91.34.37.71 11:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- We might consider speeding this up. The uploader has declared that they are not identical with the photographer. The image has been uploaded under the common misconception that whoever owns the picture has the rights to the picture. --2003:C0:8F03:D300:A4E1:4D7D:B660:ADFE 18:57, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio so speedy. --Herby talk thyme 17:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Reasons for deletion request -Labrang (talk) 21:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC) This map is in violation of Georgian Criminal Code Article 343'1. It portrays Georgia without occupied territories, placing them outside of Georgia by design, thus violating Georgia's territorial integrity and illegal to distribute in Georgia. See Warning for additional source.
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Invalid licensing information. The photo is of German origin, so "This work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 70 years or fewer." does not apply. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep PD-EU-no author disclosure --RAN (talk) 04:07, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per RAN - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
we uploaded a similar file with a watermark from the archive that is giving permission for the photo to be released PMCH2 (talk) 01:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep unwatermarked is preferred. --RAN (talk) 14:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: We want unwatermarked images. Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dos diferentes imagenes? 191.119.204.92 01:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Google Street View image. Not obvious why that is the case, send to DR like a normal low-res image without EXIF. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:48, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:49, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stolen archive image. No evidence presented, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Refreshing88 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Google Street View image. No obvious signs of Street View, converting to DR. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:50, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:11, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Incorrect licensing (nowhere on anything from the company, does it clearly state their logo is released under CC0) and possible copyright violation, as it may be above the threshold of originality for copyright, in the source jurisdiction (the UK/Guernsey). Likely to qualify as public domain, on English-language Wikipedia, et al. Bacon Noodles (talk) 03:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- The logo is given as part of their resources package given to journalists and the media, hence it is public domain. BI's previous logo is available on the Commons under the same release method with no issues. DC-9-30 (talk) 23:18, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't see any proof that this is CC0 - just because it's in a press kit (I am a journalist, myself) doesn't mean it's public domain and the graphic is a little too creative for my tastes re: COM:TOO - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year! --Missvain (talk) 19:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
PR Issue. This is uproaded for promote unnotable music group Reiro (talk) 05:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: File is in use, but we dont' have persmissions - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
unused template Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
unknown person, questionable own work claim Denniss (talk) 06:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:53, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This is not the correct photo 100.1.7.66 06:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- This is Swamy sandeepanandagiri. what is the problem? why you suggest to delete?--Fotokannan (talk) 07:09, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Not a valid rationale. --Sreejith K (talk) 07:26, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
no scientific significance 95.31.191.213 07:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Raster version of File:Flybe Logo.svg. We don't normally create raster versions of SVG logos if they are not superior to the original. — kashmīrī 07:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
no word or human sound recorded, this should present French word pronounced, looks like software error during recording Derbeth talk 08:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of project scope
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as image might well be in scope, IMO. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The file was uploaded solely for advertising purposes. Uploader knows nothing about Commons for sure, considering that they added "Copyright by LuongVanBao2702" as caption, and even described it using a single bad word. With diacritics, the file name can be readed as "Xăm hình nghệ thuật Bảo Trọc", which is promotional, at least for vi-speaking people. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 08:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user history Rohalamin (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Urheberrechtlich geschütztes Foto ohne Freigabe Jbergner (talk) 08:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:55, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user history Rohalamin (talk) 08:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user history Rohalamin (talk) 08:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user history Rohalamin (talk) 08:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user history Rohalamin (talk) 08:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user history Rohalamin (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work: small size, user history Rohalamin (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
WTF?! Why this photo is using a PD tag??? 119.237.239.151 09:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I'm so sorry if I did a mistake here, it really is my first time uploading things on Wikimedia Commons outside of the Philippines. The correct person may delete it if this is really violating copyright. Cyclonicationly (talk) 06:36, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I note that this was checked by A and a I once is stated to have been found. I have asked them to check again because I can find no licence at https://ohmysh-ing.tistory.com/149 which is the stated source. I am pinging them here so that they may contribute easily to this discussion.
If the licence is available and present, and I have simply missed it then this discussion is able to be closed at once
Otherwise COM:PCP applies and the file may only be kept if COM:OTRS has been used to lodge correct permissions. I do see EXIF camera data, but that is not uncommon in pictures taken from other sites Timtrent (talk) 09:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
source inconnue --Benjaaam37 (talk) 09:50, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Replaced by File:Schopenhauer - Le Fondement de la morale, traduction Burdeau, 1879.djvu - same book, same source - no missing page for transcription on wikisource Hsarrazin (talk) 09:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope drawing Yeeno (talk) 09:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OOS - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Complex logo design. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:DERIV, photo of videogame box art. Lord Belbury (talk) 09:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I have pixelated the copyrighted images. If necessary, I can completely hide the images. Let me know if I need to change the photo again.--Arosio Stefano (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
I don't know if this is copyright infringement. Yyfroy (talk) 10:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
EXIF states "Doug Adams 2011 All Rights Reserved", which is not the Flickr uploader. Potential copyvio. Yeeno (talk) 10:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 19:59, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Susmuffin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The source image is obviously copyrighted. The attached diatribe is not convincing. https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1898608-soy-boy-face-soyjak
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, about whether this line-drawing is still a derivative of the mentioned meme-image. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The two pages using this file - one has uploaded only two images and hasn't contributed anything outside of these types of images. THe other is a blocked IP. I think we can survive without this derived work on the project. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Old archive photo, source unspecified, author unspecified. Definetly not own work of 2019. Drakosh (talk) 10:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Photo from 1965, author unknown, source unknown. Not own work. Drakosh (talk) 10:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:15, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Old archive photo, source unspecified, author unspecified. Definetly not own work of 2019. Drakosh (talk) 10:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Old archive photo, source unspecified, author unspecified. Definetly not own work of 2014. Drakosh (talk) 10:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright by Rai Cinema Caulfield (talk) 10:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:16, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright infringement 95.31.191.213 10:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published https://гильдия-петрушечников.рф/papermachos Yellow Horror (talk) 10:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published https://гильдия-петрушечников.рф/balagan Yellow Horror (talk) 10:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published https://гильдия-петрушечников.рф/kykartel Yellow Horror (talk) 10:43, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published https://гильдия-петрушечников.рф/russianbalaganpetrushka Yellow Horror (talk) 10:44, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published https://гильдия-петрушечников.рф/koza-dereza-teatr Yellow Horror (talk) 10:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published https://гильдия-петрушечников.рф/petrushka_vyatskiy Yellow Horror (talk) 10:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:17, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Karel Philips Spierincks - The drunken Silenus tied up in his sleep by the nymph Aegle and putti.tiff
[edit]this is a very poor quality pic and there are two pics that are much better already on commons Froutrouprou (talk) 10:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Previously published https://www.facebook.com/%D0%90%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BC%D0%B8%D1%8F-%D0%9F%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%80%D1%83%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B8-465923767243322/photos/465925433909822 Yellow Horror (talk) 10:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Structural formula with unusual angles; replaced by File:Trioxygen difluoride structural formula V.1.svg. Leyo 11:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete as a proper & correct replacement is available. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 09:38, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Contested speedy (licensing). Andy Dingley (talk) 11:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- This has twice been tagged for speedy deletion [1] [2]. There was no basis for the first claim of "Missing permission", it was an uncontroversial own work from some years ago. Fortunately the uploader is still active.
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chinook_salmon_found_by_Roger_Castillo_on_San_Tomas_Aquino_Creek_mid-Oct._1996.jpg&diff=613563873&oldid=553756004){kind=link}
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Chinook_salmon_found_by_Roger_Castillo_on_San_Tomas_Aquino_Creek_mid-Oct._1996.jpg&diff=613580118&oldid=613579646){kind=link}
- The second tagging should not have been done. If it's contested, it should go to a DR, that's how we work. Accordingly, I've opened this.
- I see no reason to support either of these deletions, and OTRS / VRT is not required. No reason has been given to support any of this.
- Keep as above. (And if anyone uninvolved wants to close this, please do) Andy Dingley (talk) 11:58, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I marked it as a no permission @Andy Dingley. He didn't understand what is no permission and so I explained him and undo his action. Why the hell did you just convert a no permission into DR? 1 time doing undo should not be a problem, especially when user is okay with it and didn't do any action further. Don't vent your anger of my opinion on COM:ANU here. Contributers2020Talk to me here 11:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- And I didn't add the no permission for the second time @Andy Dingley. It should be very bluntly called vandalism on the file, as removing the template without knowing what does it do, Contributers2020Talk to me here 12:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- You tagged a non-problematic file as "no permission". Why? You gave no reason.
- You instructed the uploader (you didn't explain) that they needed to use VRT. You gave no reason. There is no reason. They don't need to do that.
- You re-added a speedy deletion tag against a contested speedy deletion. You should not have done this, if it was challenged you should have raised a DR instead (hence this one).
- "I didn't add the no permission for the second time", yes, you added a {{No permission since}} (and also changed the uploader's licence) here [3]
- "It should be very bluntly called vandalism", no, it should not. Please don't accuse GF uploaders of files of "vandalism" (or of lacking permissions) without giving evidence to support that.
- I have no idea why you're at ANU again, but I don't see why that's my problem. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley let me clear myself- 1) I didn't change the licence! I simply clicked undo. Maybe the uploader when removing the No permission since did that. Please check that
- 2) The reason is this as this user has previously uploaded no permission files (see uploader's talk page)+ A fishman just wouldn't waste his time by someone else taking his picture with the fish. Of course he would take some money. Given his experience, I wouldn't expect him to spend.
- Of course, these are just my theories, but if he has taken the image, then he should just simply take the VRT permission just for us to be sure.
- 3) This file was not yet speedy- as per F5 of COM:CSD after 7 days this would qualify for a speedy. Contributers2020Talk to me here 13:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- "I didn't change the licence!" Yes, you did. Please check that
- " The reason is this as this user has previously uploaded no permission files " Ten years ago, they uploaded a file and didn't know they needed to add a licence tag and it was summarily deleted as a result. Not implying that it was any form of copyvio, just that they hadn't done the paperwork on it. To make it clear to you: that is not any policy-based reason for you to come back a decade later and start picking off their random uploads for no reason.
- " A fishman just wouldn't waste his time by someone else taking his picture with the fish. Of course he would take some money. Given his experience, I wouldn't expect him to spend." I have no idea what any of that means. But it's nothing resembling a deletion reason.
- "This file was not yet speedy" I'm using the term in a rather lax manner. My point is that it's a form of summary deletion without a DR, without a mechanism for discussion or refutation of your deletion rationale (A rationale that was anyway so obviously false, that I could perhaps even have simply reverted it and not bothered with this pointless DR). We do use such summary deletions as a time-saving measure, if the deletion rationale is so self-evident that there is no likely challenge to the deletion. But if there is, we return to our standard process, of deletion by discussion and consensus (i.e. a DR). No-one gets to stick repeated summary, non-discussion deletions onto content over and over (unless there's a pretty exceptional reason).
- Are you still advocating this deletion as valid? Or can we close this. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- And I didn't add the no permission for the second time @Andy Dingley. It should be very bluntly called vandalism on the file, as removing the template without knowing what does it do, Contributers2020Talk to me here 12:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I marked it as a no permission @Andy Dingley. He didn't understand what is no permission and so I explained him and undo his action. Why the hell did you just convert a no permission into DR? 1 time doing undo should not be a problem, especially when user is okay with it and didn't do any action further. Don't vent your anger of my opinion on COM:ANU here. Contributers2020Talk to me here 11:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I never said this file should be deleted or kept. I am just wanting that the uploader submit permission and its done. It would take less than 10 minutes for the uploader. And please stop nitpicking. The time we are wasting here just arguing @User:Andy Dingley, I request to uploader to submit the permission of you are sure you are the sole copyright owner.
- Keep - Andrew yet again sticking his nose in where it's not wanted thinking he knows best when he clearly doesn't. C2020 acted accordingly by no-permissioning this so why the holy hell are we here ?. –Davey2010Talk 19:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021121710001002 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: COM:VRT has been received. The ball is in their court now. --Missvain (talk) 20:19, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Petra Taieb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation; works by living artist; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Carl vetter ausstellung.jpg
- File:Carl vetter klangaktion 2020.jpg
- File:Carl vetter - winter - kunsthaus salzwedel.jpg
- File:Carl vetter - Nah & Fern, Magdeburg.png
- File:Carl vetter - schloss kannawurf.png
- File:Carl vetter - winter.png
Martin Sg. (talk) 11:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:41, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Petra Taieb (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright violation; works by living artist; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Carl vetter 5.jpg
- File:Carl vetter 4.jpg
- File:Carl vetter 3.jpg
- File:Carl vetter 2.jpg
- File:Carl vetter 1.jpg
- File:"Winter" - 2018 - 116x79cm - verschiedene Folien, Abtönfarben.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021121810003008 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 05:00, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:VRT DID NOT accept the submitted permissions. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that this is actually "own work" by uploader. Copyright more likely to be owned by the company. David Biddulph (talk) 11:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
IamIconoclast uploaded a lot of copyright violations and this is his/her last remaining contribution. Small photo without metadata, in my opinion copyvio as well. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Why do you think it's a copyvio? "Small file without EXIF" carries zero weight as a deletion reason. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:59, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- https://www.dnaindia.com/jaipur/report-the-jaipur-dialogues-what-comes-first-nation-or-nationalism-2561010 --Isderion (talk) 22:10, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete OK then, now we have a source, so copyvio. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:51, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
own work claim but photographer Imke Koldijk is named as author https://elsvanswol.nl/tag/jacqueline-voorheen-frederique/ https://stichtingpianoconcerten.nl/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/ImkeKoldijk-persfoto-dec2020-kopie-scaled.jpg Agora (talk) 12:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:20, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
According the the source, this representation of the arms was created about 1950. As a United Kingdom work which is not subject to crown copyright, it is most likely still copyrighted. "It is understood that the item was recovered from the offices of Mott, Hay and Anderson at 14 Melville Street, Edinburgh upon its closure (c1968)." So this particular image was not published more than 70 years ago and {{PD-UK-unknown}} cannot be applied either. De728631 (talk) 12:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:21, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
duplicate of File:BMU Logo.svg with misleading filename Nw520 (talk) 12:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Because it is not my property and i am unsure on the copyright and licensing for this image. Please may you delete this. Hickseeey (talk) 12:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Speedy, as both user request and also a likely rights problem. Thanks for the upload, but we do need to be careful with these things. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:22, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Upload by a now-blocked puppet with no usage or even suggestion of bearing any importance. Aʀvєδuι + 12:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 12:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused upload by the now-blocked puppet. Clearly a remake of File:Flag of the Soviet Union (1923, unofficial).svg, what is not stated anywhere. Unclear why this one should be considered as "official" rather that the "unofficial" original. Aʀvєδuι + 12:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Personal/Private photo. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 12:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Architect Giulio Gio died in 1958. Copyright in the architecture will not expire until 1958+70+1=2029. See COM:FOP Italy. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused upload by a now-blocked puppet depicting a flag from a mobile game. Aʀvєδuι + 12:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Architect Giulio Gio died in 1958. Copyright in the architecture will not expire until 1958+70+1=2029. See COM:FOP Italy. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not even sure, what's that. Some strange merger of flags of Latvia and Germany with Austria in file's name. It has not been used since it's upload in September. Aʀvєδuι + 12:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: COM:OOS - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:23, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
If the text is useful, then it should be written directly into articles. In Commons it is out of project scope. In addition, we have no correct source. It is not own work, it is work of Debora Kayembe. Taivo (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:SCOPE- Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused spin-off of File:RTP logo.svg uploaded by a now-blocked puppet. No proper licencing, no perspectives of being used. Aʀvєδuι + 12:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Upload by a now-blocked puppet. Clearly it's not an own work, as it comes directly from here. At en.wiki there is a file called en:File:ETGE_Emblem.png depicting the same thing. It is marked as copyrighted. Aʀvєδuι + 13:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused fake-SVG fake-flag of a French town uploaded two months ago by a now-blocked puppet. Aʀvєδuι + 13:11, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Helper412358 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional-quality photos either credited to a website but with no evidence of permission for free use, or uploaded as "own work" while being a copyright violation (File:Kovaketass.jpg is https://www.alamy.com/hard-disk-drive-hdd-isolated-on-white-background-with-soft-shadow-image349508486.html).
- File:Kovaketass.jpg
- File:Serverarvuti.jpg
- File:60klaviatuur.jpg
- File:Klaviatuur.jpg
- File:Arvuti kuvar.jpg
- File:Toiteplokk.jpg
- File:Lahtine psu.jpg
- File:Aknaga-korpus.jpg
- File:Korpuse õhuringlus.png
- File:Tühi ATX-korpus.jpg
Lord Belbury (talk) 13:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:24, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:FANART, fan drawing of a particular cartoon bee character, in the same style as the original. Lord Belbury (talk) 14:02, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury: The image was simply uploaded on an independent user thread in encouragement to one user's return or recovery of mental illness. I do not really have any protestations on if the image was delete, for the purpose I suppose- was served. I do have an idea on the reason this deletion request was held, but before any action is made, I do hope you will give me a brief explanation if you may. I suppose it touches the copyright issue. TheeChEese (talk) 01:27, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- The only reason I flagged it for discussion was COM:FANART, as stated, specifically Commons:Fan_art#Re-drawing_does_not_avoid_copyright_infringement, it being a redrawing of a bee from the Adventure Time cartoon. I found the image by chance when searching commons for digital art, the copyright issue is the only issue I have with it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Lord Belbury Then, savvy, well, go ahead. No opinions or counter argument. TheeChEese (talk) 01:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
- The only reason I flagged it for discussion was COM:FANART, as stated, specifically Commons:Fan_art#Re-drawing_does_not_avoid_copyright_infringement, it being a redrawing of a bee from the Adventure Time cartoon. I found the image by chance when searching commons for digital art, the copyright issue is the only issue I have with it. --Lord Belbury (talk) 12:40, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Regretful but policy-based deletion! Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
원본 영상(2021-10-01)에서 가져온 영상클립(2021-10-02). 46분 11초부터 확인. (clip from origin video. check it, 46m 11s~) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVx3HwmqBDA -- 메이 (토론) 14:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
en:Syed Ali Asgar Razvi is deleted due to non-notability. His photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:25, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raghuljothiram (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos and material of a small company. VRT permission needed. The two pictures look like they are based on stock photos and may be COM:Derivative works.
- File:Rj multimedia.png
- File:ஓடு நீ இமயத்தை தொடும் வரை ஓடு ஓடு உன் ரத்தம் இருக்கும் வரை ஓடு ஓடு நீ உன் வழியிலே வரும் தட.jpg
- File:ஒரு நாள் நிச்சயம் வருவேன் ஆனால் என்னை உலகமே திரும்பி பார்க்கும் அது வரை நான் உழைப்பேன்.jpg
- File:Imageonline-co-transparentimage (1) (1).png
_(1).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MKFI (talk) 14:13, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
A cropped version of this image was published in 2016, before this was uploaded in 2017: https://www.hawaiibusiness.com/hawaii-business-environmental-report-fuel-leaks/. Authorship is unclear and it's a low-res TIFF for some reason. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:20, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 14:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
The law does not apply to most Commons images. The template quotes as follows:
- "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for:
- (a) Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature;
- (b) Any Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction executed by or on behalf of the government, unless stated to be protected by laws and regulations, a statement to such Works, or when Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction to such Works are made;
- ...
- (e) Reproduction, Publication, and/or Distribution of Portraits of the President, Vice President, former Presidents, former Vice Presidents, National Heroes, heads of State institutions, heads of ministries/nonministerial government agencies, and/or the heads of regions by taking into account the dignity and appropriateness in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations."
- "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for:
- (a) This clause could be used in a much more limited template.
- (b) Use on Commons or elsewhere is not "executed by or on behalf of the government". This clause applies only to the Indonesian government's use of images and not ours or anyone using an image from Commons. Also, since many images to which the template has been applied have explicit copyright notices, they cannot be used.
- (e) This prohibits use in criticism and satire, which restricts the free use required on Commons.
Therefore, except for images to which (a) is applicable, the template cannot be applied to images on Commons. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Probably WMID members should be announced by this DR? I left a message on their talk page: m:Talk:Wikimedia_Indonesia#c:Commons:Deletion requests/Template:PD-IDGov. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Nothing new. See Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2015/01#All_Indonesian_government_pictures_are_copyvio and Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/07#A_possible_issue_with_Indonesian_copyright_exemptions. dwadieff ✉ 17:53, 20 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep for now as per DWF, running of clauses are still confused for any DRs on the related topics, better to continue discussing modifications and endorsements of those rules, via COM:VPC or WMID's mailing lists (if any). --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Transfer discussion to a COM:RFC-like forum, similar to Commons:Requests for comment/Non-US Freedom of Panorama under US copyright law, or to COM:VP/C. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:10, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- I seconded dwf and JWilz12345's recommendations. This may be discussed in a larger forum and receive feedback and explanations from communities. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 09:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
- More discussion will be needed because this template deletion would affect thousand of files, so I support transferring this discussion to a proper venue.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 10:41, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Please take this heavily used template proposal to the appropriate forum (see this discussion for recommendations). Thank you. --Missvain (talk) 20:27, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabjan Badio (talk · contribs)
[edit]The template does not apply
- File:Pelantikan Hasbi Hasan sebagai Hakim Tinggi PTA Palu.jpg
- File:Pelantikan Hasbi Hasan.jpg
- File:Hasbi Hasan.jpg
The source site has "Hak Cipta Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia © 2021".
The cited law does not apply:
- "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for:
- (a) Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction of State emblems and national anthem in accordance with their original nature;
- (b) Any Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction executed by or on behalf of the government, unless stated to be protected by laws and regulations, a statement to such Works, or when Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction to such Works are made;
- ...
- (e) Reproduction, Publication, and/or Distribution of Portraits of the President, Vice President, former Presidents, former Vice Presidents, National Heroes, heads of State institutions, heads of ministries/nonministerial government agencies, and/or the heads of regions by taking into account the dignity and appropriateness in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations."
- "There shall be no infringement of Copyright for:
- (a) The image is not one of the items listed.
- (b) Use on Commons or elsewhere is not "executed by or on behalf of the government" and since there is an explicit copyright notice, the exception applies.
- (e) This prohibits use in criticism and satire, which restricts the free use required on Commons.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Batalbatal1975 (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader claims these are own work, but they are all small and have no or inconsistent EXIF. Also the uploader has uploaded a number of other images without any evidence of permission, see below.
- File:Zade Dirani at The Hope Concert for The King Hussein Cancer Foundation - February 2019.jpg
- File:Zade Dirani One Night in Jordan, June 2008 .jpg
- File:Zade Dirani One Night in Jordan June 2008 .jpg
- File:Zade Dirani at Jounieh Summer Festival 2017 .jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Batalbatal1975 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all listed as Author= Zade Dirani, who is the subject. Since they don't appear to be selfies, that is almost certainly incorrect. Moreover, even if Dirani were the author, there is no evidence that he has given permission for their upload here.
- File:Zade Dirani and Richard Clayderman filming "Princess of the Night" in Xabia, Spain.jpg
- File:Zade Dirani and Pitingo, filming Pulseras Del Verano in Jerez de la Frontera, Spain.jpg
- File:Zade Dirani with Queen Elizabeth, London 2001.jpg
- File:Zade Dirani with Muhammad Ali, Louisv,ille KY 2007.jpg
- File:Zade Dirani with Romero Britto, Miami 2006.jpg
- File:Richard Clayderman and Zade Dirani.jpg
- File:Zade Dirani.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:24, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Skyscrapers in the Philippines
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the philippines. No creative commons permits from architects
- File:Anchor Skysuites.jpg
- File:DMCI Zinnia Towers North Tower rooftop seen from the rooftop of the South Tower.jpg
- File:DMCI Zinnia Towers.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 15:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Info per en:Anchor Skysuites, the skyscraper (#1 on the list) got topped out in 2013 (and opened in 2014), with Albert Yu of Asya Design Partner as its artist/author. The Zinnia Towers, on the other hand, were completed in December 2017 as per the website of its builder, DMCI. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:54, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Image is from a screenshot from a video, possible copyright violation Lady Lotus (talk) 15:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Accidentally shows personal information in exif data, which I forgot to remove. Washing Machine of Lies (talk) 15:57, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- The easiest way to resolve this would be to upload a new version without the exif data you have a problem with and then delete the old version --Isderion (talk) 22:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Also personal artwork is COM:OOS - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
BadPNG converted to File:Lake Phewa 2020.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:00, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
BadPNG converted to File:Fewa Lake, bird eye view.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 16:04, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused photoshopped version of File:Colleen Prietz on the Catwalk.jpg, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- The above file was uploaded to commons because of its file designation by the uploader and apparent photographer. Its educational use regards a model using a catwalk to display clothing, one of three here on commons. As such it has educational value but it's up to commoners to decide scope. --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- The original File:Colleen Prietz on the Catwalk.jpg is better quality! --Marshallsumter (talk) 02:43, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a Wikipedia page, only used to show a (now fixed) layout issue on a talk page. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Well, I think this should be kept for future references on the talk page. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:18, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per User:Minorax - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Susmuffin as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wojak is copyrighted. Should be discussed: 1) whether it uses enough copyrighted portions of Wojak to be considered a COM:DW legally; 2) if this is in COM:SCOPE. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I already deleted this one. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
2010 Korean Grand Prix flyer
[edit]- File:F1 Grand Prix in Korea (ENG) (5910822853).jpg
- File:F1 Grand Prix in Korea (CHNS) (5910820745).jpg
- File:F1 Grand Prix in Korea (CHNS) (5910820017).jpg
- File:F1 Grand Prix in Korea (JPNS) (5910821829).jpg
_(5910822853).jpg){kind=link}
_(5910820745).jpg){kind=link}
_(5910820017).jpg){kind=link}
_(5910821829).jpg){kind=link}
Official flyer of the race. Likely not released under cc-by-sa-2.0. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I just noticed that there is an OTRS ticket for this content. I'm still doubtful that it would apply to an official Korean Grand Prix document, but don't have OTRS permission to check. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 16:37, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Putting my trust in COM:VRT - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:33, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from modern art. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. And who are they? Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo with no information - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:34, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
First published here https://volumezeroltd.com/story/ website says "© Volumezero Limited", This might be COM:flickrwash, we need real permission. Interesting thing is it was upload today on flicker & also imported today on commons. All of User:Wikikmhk's upload has same pattern. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:09, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
_3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am the uploader. Unuseful redirect (wrong name) Tangopaso (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
_3.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
_3.jpg){kind=link}
First published here https://volumezeroltd.com/story/ website says "© Volumezero Limited", This might be COM:flickrwash, we need real permission. Interesting thing is it was upload 11 August on flicker & also imported same day on commons. All of User:Wikikmhk's upload has same pattern. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:16, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Avec un copyright dans le nom du fichier le fait que cette image soit libre me parait extrèmement douteux. Bertrand Labévue (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- L'auteur de la photo en question, Duc Truong, m'a envoyée la photo pour qu'elle soit ajoutée en creative commons sur Wikimedia.
- C'est la première fois que j'upload une photo sur wikimedia, dites-moi s'il faut modifier qqch et comment Brolestan (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
copyright violation; stained glass windows by Wilhelm Buschulte who died in 2013; no freedom of panorama.
- File:2019-08-30 09-21 Dreifaltigkeitskirche.jpg
- File:Stained glass window - Dreifaltigkeitskirche - Worms - Germany 2017.jpg
- File:View towards the altar - Dreifaltigkeitskirche - Worms - Germany 2017.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
.
- File:Soest - St-Patrokli-Dom 11 ies.jpg
- File:Soest - St-Patrokli-Dom 12 ies.jpg
- File:Soest St Patrokli curch crypt 02.jpg
- File:Soest St Patrokli curch window 01.jpg
- File:Soest St Patrokli curch window 02.jpg
- File:Soest St Patrokli curch window 03.jpg
- File:Soest St Patrokli curch window 04.jpg
- File:Soest St Patrokli curch window 05.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 18:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- To understand wheather or not this is contempory artwork, we need to know who the artist is. So please tell us the name of the artist! -- Ies (talk) 11:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arash.ghasemenezhad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: self-promotion
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4nn1l2 (talk) 18:54, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Recent artwork, no evidence of a free license. Yann (talk) 18:55, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks (see [4]; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Paderborn Dom 527.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 528.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 529.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 530.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 531.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 532.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 535.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 536.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 537.JPG
- File:Paderborn Dom 888.jpg
- File:Paderborn Dom 889.jpg
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:06, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:36, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; public domain in 2036.
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- die Werke die auf den Bildern zu sehen sind, sind von Frau Ahnert geschaffen worden und befinden sich in unserem Besitz. Artwork-m (talk) 12:51, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- Besitz hat nichts mit Urheberrecht zu tun. --Achim55 (talk) 14:26, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Possible Copyright violation no metadata and oddly uploaded as a PNG file - FOX 52 (talk) 19:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Umm the photo on that page https://www.aerotime.aero/28548-air-india-one-stuck-on-the-runway-HAL says "Image : Ketan Lanke / Wikimedia Commons", so I think they took it from us, not the other way around. - Ahunt (talk) 13:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
- Ah - Good catch Ahunt will reduce to lacking metadata - FOX 52 (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:37, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Esquire the magazine does not usually release material under Creative Common license. Benevolen (talk) 19:48, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation of Bob Dowling / Hipgnosis' cover art for Pink Floyd's Meddle LP, issued in 1971 and copyright EMI Records. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: I love that album. - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No tiene sentido tener en Commons una copia PNG de un archivo SVG que además viola los derechos de autor y ni se usa ni se va a usar. Macucal (talk) 20:05, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Stock photo, missing essential source info Ytoyoda (talk) 20:17, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for a business Tiinz (talk) 20:23, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OUTOFSCOPE - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for a business Tiinz (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OUTOFSCOPE - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for a business Tiinz (talk) 20:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OUTOFSCOPE - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for a business Tiinz (talk) 20:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OUTOFSCOPE - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for a business Tiinz (talk) 20:25, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OUTOFSCOPE - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This is an advertisement for a business Tiinz (talk) 20:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:OUTOFSCOPE - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:39, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Denniss as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: no metada, low res, looking like pro/publicity image King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:32, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Low quality unused portrait Lymantria (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope - per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files by Raulcortesc118
[edit]- File:Minardi M198 1998 F1.jpg: No EXIF
- File:Minardi M197 1997 F1.jpg: No EXIF
- File:Minardi M195b 1996 F1.jpg: copyright holder: Motorsport Images
- File:Minardi M192 1992 F1.jpg: No EXIF
- File:Minardi M190 1990 F1.jpg: Copyright holder: goldkindstein.de
- File:Minardi M189 1989 F1.jpg: No EXIF
- File:Minardi M188 1988 F1.jpg: Copyright holder: Anchoa Foto (from watermark)
- File:Minardi M187 1987 F1.jpg: Copyright holder: Anchoa Foto (from watermark)
- File:Minardi M185 1985 F1.jpg: No EXIF
- File:Alpha Tauri F1.svg: Formula 1 team logo
- File:Red Bull Racing F1.png: Formula 1 team logo
- File:Minardi M186 F1 1986.jpg: Copyright holder: goldkindstein.de
- File:Haas VF21 2021.jpg: No EXIF
All images without EXIF, or with different copyright. Obviously copy/pasted from around the internet. According to the talk page of the user, they already have had a few images deleted. --Cryptic-waveform (talk) 21:36, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Фото взяты с сайта киевского "Динамо". Лицензия предполагает брать лишь фото собственных журналистов football.ua (например - https://football.ua/gallery/2475.html).
- File:Mircea Lucescu and Emil Caras.jpg
- File:Diego Longo cropped.png
- File:Training Dynamo Kyiv 2020-2021.jpg
- File:Lucescu, Karavayev and Syrota training cropped.jpg
- File:Olabiran Muyiwa Benito.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 22:22, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Comment To put it in context: {{Football.ua}} gives blanket permission for images from http://football.ua/galleries/ which were created by football.ua. The nominator is claiming that these images were not in fact created by football.ua. I take no position on whether the nominator's claim is true. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:26, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Note that it does not give a blanket permission, it clearly mentions that This permission applies only to images from photogalleries except images gathered from news agencies or image services like Getty Images. For licensing purposes FC Dynamo Kyiv is kind of a news agency. In other words, they can give permission to reuse images produced by their staff, but they cannot provide permission for images by FC Dynamo Kyiv staff or Getty Images staff, as they do not own copyright on them — NickK (talk) 00:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's why I qualified it with "which were created by football.ua". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- I would say it's pretty obvious the claim is true. FC Dynamo Kyiv is clearly not a part of football.ua, nor has any affiliation with it — NickK (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2021 (UTC)
- That's why I qualified it with "which were created by football.ua". -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:01, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Note that it does not give a blanket permission, it clearly mentions that This permission applies only to images from photogalleries except images gathered from news agencies or image services like Getty Images. For licensing purposes FC Dynamo Kyiv is kind of a news agency. In other words, they can give permission to reuse images produced by their staff, but they cannot provide permission for images by FC Dynamo Kyiv staff or Getty Images staff, as they do not own copyright on them — NickK (talk) 00:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#c-Jeff_G.-20241214142100-Mitte27-20241214070300 [Permalink: [5]] and above.
- File:Ferrer y Rebrov - Barcelona vs Dynamo Kyiv 1993.jpg
- Undelete in 2089 - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- File:Team Atletico Madrid 1995-1996.jpg
- Undelete in 2092 - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- File:Camp Nou Barcelona - Atletico 1996.jpg
- Undelete in 2092 - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
— 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 14:38, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
see in the topic above
- File:Dinamo Kiev players in Barcelona 1997.jpg
- Undelete in 2093 - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- File:Andriy Shevchenko vs Barcellona 1997.jpg
- Undelete in 2093 - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- File:Bakero y Laudrup - Barcelona vs Dynamo Kyiv.jpg
- Undelete in 2088 - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- File:Barcelona - Atleti 1995.jpg
- Undelete in 2091 - Jmabel ! talk 17:21, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Mitte27 (talk) 14:42, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — 🇺🇦Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me🇺🇦 18:00, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:49, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as Logo. Claimed to be PD-textlogo by an experienced uploader, I'd like to hear his justification. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:35, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- My rationale for tagging is that this is clearly above COM:TOO in my view, and that the creator even put a (c) next to the hand in the actual image to attribute the icon's artist. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I agree, it's just that the uploader is not known for making errors like this so I want to see if they know something that we're missing. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:31, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fotografía copiada alterada de la original al igual que declaración de derechos Incorrectos — Preceding unsigned comment added by H.Leonard83 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This not-in-use image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted (the part next to the text). As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 23:15, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Chris Wilson Photography watermark ViperSnake151 (talk) 23:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This picture seems to be copied as it appears in this article. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- יש אישור מדו"צ להעלות את התמונה
- הנושא בטיפול מולם לצורך קבלת אישור בכתב Shlomirit (talk) 05:49, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
very blurry 4 better files in Portrait of Ottavio Strada (Jacopo Tintoretto) Oursana (talk) 23:34, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Eimear McGeown with Barry Douglas at Teatro Coliseo Buenos Aires in Argentina October 2015.jpg
[edit]
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: ©2019 by Eimear McGeown. from https://www.eimearmcgeown.com
At User talk:Engineersone88 the uploader has challenged the speedy deletion. I have advised them to use COM:OTRS to verify the statement that have made, and challenged the deletion in their behalf Timtrent (talk) 23:40, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE: Thankyou. I have provided a release email as per wiki guidelines to permissions team COM:OTRS to ensure permission in noted and use is fully approved. Engineersone88
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Timtrent as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From https://www.eimearmcgeown.com ©2019 by Eimear McGeown.
At User talk:Engineersone88 the uploader has challenged the speedy deletion. I have advised them to use COM:OTRS to verify the statement that have made, and challenged the deletion in their behalf Timtrent (talk) 23:41, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
RESPONSE: Thankyou. I have provided a release email as per wiki guidelines to permissions team COM:OTRS to ensure permission in noted and use is fully approved. Engineersone88
Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 20:43, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Miraval Estate cropped.jpg
[edit]
- Delete This is a picture of a picture and it's not the uploader own work (same problem here Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miraval Estate.pdf).--Lefringant (talk) 20:39, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:59, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative work. Where is the evidence of a free license? Yann (talk) 10:29, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Дублирование Bibliograf76 (talk) 09:28, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Bibliograf76 - Of what? Please present what it is the duplicate of. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 19:56, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Dokuchaev 1888.jpg. --Gbawden (talk) 08:55, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Obvious copy and paste of the inner sleeve for the 1971 album "Meddle", copyright held by EMI Records / Hipgnosis and published that October. The assertion that it was first published in Billboard without a copyright notice is factually incorrect. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:20, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Keep, As stated in the Licensing notice: This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published in the United States between 1925 and 1977, inclusive, without a copyright notice. Coldcreation (talk) 10:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
- You are wrong, it was published as copyright EMI records, and this has been cropped out. The easiest way to spot this is to go to discogs.com and search for album artwork. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:59, 15 July 2020 (UTC)`
- Delete It is clear that the source indicated (https://books.google.com.br/books?id=0QgEAAAAMBAJ&lpg=PA1&hl=pt-BR&pg=PA25#v=onepage&q&f=false) is not the source of this image. This image is far higher in resolution and contains an area (the lower portion) that does not exist in the source indicate. Thus, since the source is invalid, any claims to this image being in the public domain by way of {{PD-Pre1978}} are invalid. As an aside, it is quite troubling to me that a deletion request has been allowed to remain open for more than seven months. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:09, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note - I have uploaded the version from the source indicated. This version is indeed PD (somehow). Looking at my copy of Meddle on vinyl and CD, if the former image is a scan, it's been compressed to no tomorrow. However, the white dots on their clothes line up. I suggest someone with image editing skills clean the new upload a bit, and that the potential copyright violations be deleted. - Floydian (talk) 16:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Floydian, deleted the original upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:29, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Still a blatant copyright violation of a record sleeve. The previous deletion request was closed as "keep per Floydian", who didn't offer a view to keep, and ignored the views of myself and Hammersoft who explained why this was a copyright violation. Anyone can assert "This version is indeed PD (somehow)" without evidence; it doesn't mean that it is! We also questioned why blatant copyright violations such as these were allowed to go unchallenged on Commons for some months. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:52, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- I agree! I would like to apologise for the cropped picture of Richard Wright I did, as I assumed (given this picture is still here after a year) that it was okay to use it. Now I agree with your opinion, it is quite questionable how this is still here. --InPursuitOfAMorePerfectUnion (talk) 20:27, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This is a very tricky case, pinging Clindberg as the resident expert on these kinds of things. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:24, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
- So... where is the copyright notice on the original? On photos of the inside sleeve, I do see a pile of credits at the top right, where it credits a photographer Bob Dowling for "outer sleeve photos", and "inside photo by Hipgnosis". Plus engineering and recording credits. Nowhere do I see a copyright notice. Unsure if I'm looking at at U.S. pressing, but... where is the notice exactly? The authors are all British, so I was thinking that the URAA would have restored anything anyways, but... sounds like the album was released on October 30, and in the UK on November 13. So they are simultaneously published per Berne, and there is no URAA for the U.S., but obviously the photos are still under copyright in the UK for a long long time. The U.S. status though (which might technically be the country of origin) would be based on if there was a copyright notice somewhere on the album. It would not take much, so I'm leery of keeping it, but the presence of a copyright notice (either the word copyright or the C-in-a-circle symbol) needs to be there somewhere. I could understand deletion though given its copyrighted status in the EU, given it was a British photographer, and it brings up gray areas in the Berne definition of "simultaneous publication" -- at the time, the U.S. was not part of the Berne Convention, but can that country change when the U.S. joins later, and questions like that. If there is a copyright notice, that question is moot, but on a technical basis, it may be OK if the album was missing one. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:18, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Clindberg: Suppose that the album did in fact bear a copyright notice. Is the fact that the photo appears as part of a cartoon in the ad important, with respect to whether it should be considered a republishing (of a significant number of copies) or a derivative work (similar to COM:CHARACTER), or would the ad always be considered a derivative work rather than a republishing even if it used the photo as-is? (As I understand it, a republishing without notice would cause the original to fall out of copyright, but a derivative would not.) -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:29, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, that might well cause it to lose copyright, though only that version -- if that was a lower resolution photo or crop or something, only the amount of expression in the non-notice work would become PD, so if the original contained any additional expression that copyright may still exist. And yes, if the ad amounted to "relatively few" copies compared to the album, that might not lose copyright, though that might be a stretch -- a case here lists a few decisions, and once you get to 2% of copies distributed, courts tended to say that was more than a "few". That was in the 1980s though, and judges could change the standards today. Correct the copyright of a derivative should not affect that of the original -- just the added expression. Usually a derivative work is by another author though, and tends to recast the original work in a way that's not a straight copy. Something that copies the photo but arranges it into a larger work probably would not be derivative. Carl Lindberg (talk) 05:28, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
- Why was I not pinged as closing admin of the previous DR? Anyway... My "keep" decision in the previous DR was based on the version of March 6 and October 12, 2021, which is NOT taken from the album but from an advert in Billboard (it appears that the other versions were inadvertently restored). The discussion above is not applicable to the Billboard magazine. AFAIK, the permission statements in the Summary box are accurate. Therefore Keep the Billboard version and delete (again) the other versions. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:06, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Per P199 -- it is clear that this came from an ad in Billboard Magazine and that the ad did not have a separate copyright notice as required at the time. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoordward: That is impossible unless Billboard have a time machine or were granted public domain status from EMI records. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:52, 8 February 2022 (UTC)