Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/12/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 3rd, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by improved, SVG version: Preocupante (talk) 11:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Ezarateesteban 13:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of non-notable individual; note that the cross-wiki uploader has subsequently overwritten it with junk Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Gower (talk) 03:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Haroon Rashid Wani (talk) 13:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim55 (talk) 15:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Derivative work, a photoshopped version of a https://www.themayor.eu/en/a/view/the-world-s-longest-viking-bridge-reopens-in-denmark-3537. MKFI (talk) 08:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:35, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file does not meet public standards. The file has been identified as empty and it is not clear why this file exists. Simsunman (talk) 13:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:22, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

もう使わないから 山田好海 (talk) 06:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error LG UltraLink (talk) 21:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see nothing at https://www.facebook.com/160374357397412/posts/4005393312895478 that indicates this is Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported. That a football club posts an image at their FB does not mean they "give it away." Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Herbythyme at 13:33, 9 December 2021 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 20:33, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United Kingdom, where the TOO is very low. Fma12 (talk) 00:13, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo serving no educational purpose. Out of project scope. BRP ever 00:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, blurry and low-quality image. JPxG (talk) 01:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (personal photo of non-contributor), not quite sure if it meets COM:F10 (as it is a relatively good quality photo). JPxG (talk) 01:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image with non-notable random person, no clear purpose, nor educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   02:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random photo of nondescript vegetation, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   03:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content. User obtained the photo from Instagram. 1233 (talk) 03:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be a simple logo: the logo is complicated enough to warrant its designer copyrights. Needs COM:VRTS correspondence of commercial license permission from the designer of this logo, as I doubt this was created by the uploader himself. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:10, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Gidahatti-logo.jpg. mattbr 06:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of software stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Animated logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Portrait photo seemingly of the uploader stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Not used anywhere. No educational value. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 06:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 07:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Not used anywhere. No educational value. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 07:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image by non-contributor. Not used anywhere. No educational value. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image by non-contributor. Not used anywhere. No educational value. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 07:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low resolution. Unused personal image by non-contributor. Not used anywhere. No educational value. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 07:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image by non-contributor. Not used anywhere. No educational value. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 07:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image by non-contributor. Not used anywhere. No educational value. Out of commons scope. Yahya (talk) 07:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, private shot, discriminating caption Xgeorg (talk) 07:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader claims to be the author and copyright holder of these drawings, which have been previously published at http://www.thomas-scharnowski.de/wappen/WappenFellbach.htm. There is no evidence to support the authorship and copyright claims and no sign of any free licensing at the source site. The uploader blanked out the {{no permission since}} problem tags.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @LX: In that case, just restore the template tags (or use the Lrw instead) and if vandalism continues, write a note to the admins. THanks. Ruthven (msg) 07:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded as "simplelogos", these logos clearly are complex enough to be above ToO.

Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Various authors mentioned, so obviously not own works. The source doesn't clearly mention a free license. The copyright status should be clarified, either with a Creative Commons license at the source, or by email via COM:VRT.

Yann (talk) 21:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On the website it says, "Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) license. No attribution is required for heraldic or artistic use by members of the SCA." RootOfAllLight (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RootOfAllLight: Where is that mention? I didn't see it. Did I miss something? Yann (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@RootOfAllLight - Can you please provide that website link? It is not listed here. Also, please provide a source link on *every* one of the files you upload - if you can please do that I would appreciate it. If the sourcing can't be provided, I will have to delete. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It's here. http://heraldicart.org/viking-answer-lady-svg-images-for-heralds/ At the top of the page. RootOfAllLight (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The source book as a whole is clearly NC, as can be seen on the copyrights page. The CC-BY-SA license cited at the bottom applies only to one creator of many. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing, account has 1 upload - this photo Gbawden (talk) 10:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found here before upload https://fullgaz.co.il/%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%A1%D7%98%D7%9C%D7%92%D7%99%D7%94-%D7%A1%D7%95%D7%96%D7%95%D7%A7%D7%99-rgv500-1993-%D7%90%D7%95%D7%A4%D7%A0%D7%95%D7%A2-%D7%A9%D7%9C-%D7%90%D7%9C%D7%95%D7%A3-%D7%94%D7%A2%D7%95%D7%9C/ - unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 10:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photos and the name of the photographer is watermarked onto each. Not own work as claimed

Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akhojasteh2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claims to be an iraninan rapper so may be in scope but none of these have exif and they are all good quality. Unlikely to be own work as the uploader claims to be in them. PCP

Gbawden (talk) 11:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work but a crop of something - look at the black border top left Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

村上真紀本人からの強い希望で、削除願いたい Mumugf12 (talk) 11:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This is our only available image of her, and it is of high enough quality to be usable in multiple Wikipedias. If she wants to provide a more flattering picture of herself, she can contact COM:VRT. This image appears to have been taken in France, where consent is not required for "public figures performing their public functions or activities". -- King of ♥ 17:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

肖像権の侵害(撮影禁止ゾーンでの盗撮による画像)村上真紀本人からの強い要望 Mumugf12 (talk) 03:20, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Mumugf12 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: 肖像権の侵害(撮影禁止ゾーンでの盗撮による画像)村上真紀本人からの強い要望 Verbcatcher (talk) 04:40, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, based on Google Translate, the request is based on the subject not liking the image and on the photo being taken at an event where photography was not permitted. These are not valid reasons for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 04:47, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per above. Brianjd (talk) 05:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shooting was prohibited at the venue at that time, this was a voyeur. ・ The editor in charge of the person who was present at that time is a witness. Until now, she had not been informed that the photos were posted without permission. Please delete immediately Mumugf12 (talk) 17:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy keep, renominated on the day after a keep decision. If you think a mistake was made then please contact the administrator who made the decision, see Commons:Deletion policy. Still no valid reason for deletion. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:14, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As a result of Murakami himself confirming with the people concerned, this is a photograph taken by voyeur. It is an illegal act to disclose it to an unspecified number of people for a long time without permission. Please delete immediately Mumugf12 (talk) 13:46, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shooting was prohibited at the venue at that time, this was a voyeur. ・ The editor in charge of the person who was present at that time is a witness. Until now, she had not been informed that the photos were posted without permission. Please delete immediately Mumugf12 (talk) 13:28, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As a result of Murakami himself confirming with the people concerned, this is a photograph taken by voyeur. It is an illegal act to disclose it to an unspecified number of people for a long time without permission. Please delete immediately

 Keep (adjusting my opinion), this requires further discussion. It appears that this was taken in France, at w:fr:Japan Expo. Commons:Country specific consent requirements#France says Taking a picture of a person in a public space: Requires consent, with exceptions. The exceptions include photos [that] contribute to the public's exchange of ideas, opinions, or if they are part of the artistic freedom. The use of this photograph in Wikipedia articles about the person shown clearly contributes to the public's exchange of ideas. We should tag the file with {{Personality rights}} to indicate that other users of the file should respect the consent requirements. In my view the license is valid and the file can be kept. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:20, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There are two reasons why this photo should be removed. First, by uploading this photo, Murakami's personal rights have been greatly violated. The second reason is that the photo was taken without permission in an area where photography is prohibited.

I asked Maki Murakami how she felt about this photo being uploaded. Here is what she had to say. 「私は描いたものだけが全ての勝負の世界で生きていました。描いたものさえ合格ならば、学歴も年齢も殺人鬼でもぶさいくハゲでも、全く関係ないです。そのための膨大なリスクも払ってまいりました。それが何故描いたもの以外まで晒されているのか、死ぬほどつらいです。お願いだから放っておいて欲しかったです。独身の若い女が無許可で世界に長年晒され続けた事が、日本という国においてどれほどの人生の十字架になるのかを伝えて欲しい。これは、違法ダウンロードよりも何倍も罪深い事なのです。アップロードした人に、私の人生を返して欲しいです。」 English translation [I lived in a world where all that mattered was what I drew. It doesn't matter if you are an educated person, an old person, a homicidal maniac or a ugly bald man, as long as what you draw is acceptable. I have taken enormous risks to achieve this. I'm dying to know why I'm being exposed to things other than what I've drawn. I wish they would have left me alone. Please tell them how much of a life cross it is in the country of Japan that a single young woman has been exposed to the world for years without permission. This is many times more sinful than illegal downloading. I want the person who uploaded it to give me my life back.] She has been very deeply hurt by the uploading of this photo. She will never be able to heal from this trauma. Please protect her personal rights. Please protect her personal rights and delete this photo immediately. The uploading of this photo is an unquestionable violation of her personal rights.

I asked her how this photo was taken. She had no idea that the photo had been taken. The photo was taken at the event venue in France. No one was allowed to take pictures inside the venue. Only a limited number of people were allowed to take pictures. It was strictly forbidden for anyone else to take pictures without permission. The word "No Photo" was written in large letters where everyone could see it, so everyone must have known that it was a place where photography was prohibited. The situation in the photo suggests that he was in the process of signing autographs for visiting fans. If the photo was taken by a few people who were allowed to take pictures, she would have known. However, she was completely unaware that she was being photographed. The situation in which this photo was taken is that of unauthorized voyeurism. It is obvious that the photo was taken without her permission in a place where photography is forbidden. Uploading a photo taken without her permission in a place where photography is prohibited is a violation of the Commons guidelines.

In France, taking a picture of a person in a public space requires consent, with exceptions. The exceptions include photos that contribute to the public exchange of ideas, opinions, or if they are part of the artistic freedom. Using this photo in an article about a person on Wikipedia does not contribute to the public exchange of ideas. She is an artist. The exchange of ideas about her as an artist should only take place about the works she has created. Exposing the figure of an artist will never help the public exchange of ideas. Also, the artist's appearance is not part of the art. Illegally taken photographs are also not part of the art. The only thing that is art is the work she has created. For these reasons, taking her picture without her permission does not fall under any of the exceptions set forth in the Commons:Country specific consent requirements in France. As it does not fall under any exceptions, the photos taken without her consent should be deleted immediately.

Here is what she had to say. 「当時の関係者と本人が確認しました。この写真は、「撮影禁止」の会場内でのサイン会で、ファンにより盗撮されたものであり、さらにそれを本人に無許可で長期に渡って違法に公開されているものに間違いありません。今まで知らずに本人の受けてきた精神的苦痛は、はかり知れません。貴方達のした事は、一人の女性の人生と人権を踏みにじってきた、違法アップロードにも劣る最低の行為です…。」 English translation [Murakami and a person involved at the time confirmed this. This photo was taken by a fan at an autograph session in a venue where photography was prohibited, and it has been illegally published for a long time without permission. The mental anguish he has suffered without knowing it is immeasurable. What you have done is the worst act of trampling on a woman's life and human rights, and is no better than illegal uploading....] Please delete this photo immediately.


Kept: Per User:Verbcatcher - Disagree with this closure? If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. This is my final decision, so please do not take it to my talk page or ping me unless it’s technical issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy new year!. --Missvain (talk) 16:38, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image displayed as a portrait of Maki Murakami in WIKIMEDIA COMMONS above appears to have been taken at Chibi JAPAN EXPO held in Paris, France, in October 2010. At the event, the prohibition of photography and audio recording was announced in advance, but the image was taken (stolen) without permission, and it was uploaded and released on the Internet without the consent of Maki Murakami and the event organizer. In other words, This is an image that violates the rights of portrait and privacy that was captured and published without the consent of Maki Murakami herself. Maki Murakami is currently working on lawsuits against illegal websites (pirated websites) that infringe on her own copyrights. In connection with this, several illegal websites have been closed, and there are moves in SNS and other organizations to identify and defame or harm the identity of the illegal website operators and users who have brought complaints against Maki Murakami. In light of the above circumstances, if Maki Murakami's portrait photos (portrait photos not approved by the person) are displayed and spread on WIKIMEDIA COMMONS, etc., it may lead to crimes and serious human rights violations. Therefore, please take measures to prevent Maki Murakami from displaying the portrait photos as soon as possible. For reference: Maki Murakami's article about litigation activities https://torrentfreak.com/manga-artist-maki-murakami-targets-large-pirate-site-nyahentai-com-220115/ If no response is received within two weeks, the next step will be taken. (Take legal action) 80.11.37.141 08:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. The image is in the public domain, which is what matters. The subject may make claims relating to personality rights, but no such concept exists in the United States, so it is not relevant to any deletion discussion. There is no place in the Copyright Act where “rights of portrait and privacy” are mentioned and, as copyright is a creature of statute, those rights therefore do not exist. The legal documents referenced in the article you provided relate to actual copyright infringement: she claims that some Web-site illegally host (or hosted) copies of her works. No so-called “serious human rights violations” were mentioned. Also, are you acting on behalf of the subject? I ask because of your claim of legal action. If that is the case, you may be banned: see the policy on legal threats. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 04:26, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept per discussion. Commons does not tolerate legal threats. While some places prohibit photography, Commons does not obey so-called house rules, see wikiversity:Museum photography. Actually the photo is not in public domain, because it is published under CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as CC0 but this is flickrwashing. Flickr account has 0 followers and 0 following. This flickr account cannot be trusted

Gbawden (talk) 11:38, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 06:54, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As in the previous nomination this is a case of flickrwashing. They have 3 followers now and randomly follow 140 accounts. The flickr account can still not be trusted, and previously deleted images were denied undeletion.

Njd-de (talk) 11:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:15, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright infringement -- www.lugansk.ua (c) Sergey Prohorov 89.179.104.231 12:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private snapshot; completly out of project scope. 84.140.174.209 12:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio; please reproduce map using OSM if it is needed Enyavar (talk) 13:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 02:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed. 20Panorama15 (talk) 13:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 13:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior version replaced by SVG version. 20Panorama15 (talk) 20:14, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@20Panorama15 What's the SVG version's name? —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 01:50, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Aena Madrid logo.svg 20Panorama15 (talk) 11:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; use File:Aena Madrid logo.svg instead. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:18, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not needed anymore, as there is now a vectorised version of this logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:33, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 13:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. Replace file with the vector file & nominate again, showing both file names. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:41, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed. 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:40, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:17, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed. 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed. 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:16, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed. 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:15, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Airport now longer owned and operated by Aena, thus logo no longer needed. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 11:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads. As of Jan 2019, this airport is now closed, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:45, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:46, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:18, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:47, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:52, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --ƏXPLICIT 02:20, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer needed as there is now a vectorised version of this same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:54, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 11:45, 1 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and there is now a .SVG version of this logo, so it is not needed 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unnecessary low quality crop with no perceivable educational value that the original would not better convey. Anarchyte (talkwork) 14:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD |1=F10 JopkeB (talk) 14:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. And insufficient permission, needs COM:VRT. P 1 9 9   14:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD |1=F10 JopkeB (talk) 14:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File not transparent. 2A02:C7F:C65:D100:10A7:4B51:6F28:E8F1 17:09, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept by Jameslwoodward acording to file history. I also decide that this should be kept, since a badly formatted SVG is not a reason to delete a file (simply fix it). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:42, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and not needed. 20Panorama15 (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --ƏXPLICIT 06:34, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I originally uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as I am having a clear out of old uploads and the name of this airport has now been changed. Thanks 20Panorama15 (talk) 14:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. we do not delete pngs when it is superseded by svgs. It is done on a case-by-case basis and usually only when the png is of really poor quality. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhijitgade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

SD |1=F10

JopkeB (talk) 14:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD |1=F10 JopkeB (talk) 14:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD |1=F10 JopkeB (talk) 14:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD |1=F10 JopkeB (talk) 15:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is Nonsense ZisisGR (talk) 15:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaharovdn-3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo/drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD |1=F10 JopkeB (talk) 15:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SD |1=F10 JopkeB (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Fitindia. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Drkarnuladil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 17:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:27, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moramachandran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inocnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. After creation of the request Moramachandran uploaded another photo. I'll nominate it for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 14:26, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moramachandran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 21:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sh Shaharyar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 17:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album —MdsShakil (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 17:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:25, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 18:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See copyright notice Microsoft Corp. in lower left corner. Enyavar (talk) 19:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as importer. JackPotte (talk) 19:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:21, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chris Redfield 10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some sort of information for religious proselytizing. Unlikely to be own work, out of Commons project scope.

IronGargoyle (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HOLA! POR QUÉ ME ELIMINÁS LAS IMÁGENES?? POR FAVOR NO HAGAS ESO... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris Redfield 10 (talk • contribs)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Googlemaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 22:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Googlemaps Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 22:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:22, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blank file Jelican9 (talk) 23:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:24, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, sole upload. Pibwl (talk) 23:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

some youtuber's autopromo(?) drawing, unused, no ency value, as well as the other one File:Greeting Video.png. Pibwl (talk) 23:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Han hecho dos! hamed moradian en Wikidata. Pueden borrar una por favor... 191.116.224.51 01:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Self promo on wikidata. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:38, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:50, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hay dos de esta foto. Se necesitan ambas? 191.116.224.51 01:44, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:CSD#F10. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hay dos de esta foto. Se necesitan ambas? 191.116.224.51 01:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:CSD#F10. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 03:54, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as there are too many versions on Wikipedia of the same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 13:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File:Aena Madrid logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:35, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as it is not needed and there is now a more superior quality version of this logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. File:Aena Madrid logo.svg. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:34, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chris Hollo / Hollo Photographics Inc. is author, not the uploader. Have proper rights transfer been arranged? Artaxerxes (talk) 13:56, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erika Goldring took the picture, not the uploader. Has proper rights transfer been arranged? Artaxerxes (talk) 13:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

exif data credits picture to Mischa Scherrer. The filter and squareness of the picture is also suggestive of a pic published on Instagram Vera (talk) 14:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:33, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BlackMambaWestPapua45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. No permission. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:32, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BlackMambaWestPapua45 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

PDFs and screenshots of Wikipedia pages; not useful for an educational purpose on Wikimedia Commons

Yeeno (talk) 00:21, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 22:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Max.sessions (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanjusmohs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE. Unused company logo of questionable notability.

Netora (talk) 16:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alienfahad (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 16:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sher Khan Sameer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 17:00, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:21, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fictional map for the future. Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains multiple unsourced illustrations; COM:DW -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imaginary states map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imaginary states map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. Unused private artwork, no educational value . This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:34, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. Unused private artwork, no educational value . This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. Unused private artwork, no educational value . This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:31, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover, unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:54, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:30, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image - unlikely to be own work, promotional image largely available on kpop press sites Evaders99 (talk) 00:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:12, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ixocactus as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Improbable own work by good-faith student. Converting to DR, COM:CSD#F1 requires actual evidence. King of ♥ 08:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio from this https://br.pinterest.com/pin/421438477625544920/. Cheers! --Ixocactus (talk) 14:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. COPYVIO: File is from Instagram. — Tulsi Bhagat contribs | talk ] 04:09, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derechos de autor 191.116.224.51 01:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ezarateesteban 21:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality photo and probably violating Polish freedom of panorama as it was a temporary instalation according to description. ~Cybularny Speak? 02:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not in use, no educational purpose. --Ezarateesteban 21:06, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of an art installation from MassMOCA. There is no freedom of panorama for art in the USA. Whpq (talk) 03:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 21:07, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mearkit (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Previously tagged as copyvio by DragonflySixtyseven. The user claims to be related to Allan Erwö, so I am converting this from a speedy to a regular deletion request. Mearkit Please provide evidence of your affiliation with the artist according to the instructions at COM:VRT.

King of ♥ 07:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Global contribs show Mearkit last edited in April 2021. However, they've got their email active and can, if you want, be contacted. DS (talk) 15:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 21:28, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical maps User:Marcello Di Maio

[edit]

Fictional election result maps for 2024 and 2022. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. --Jahobr (talk) 20:42, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 22:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably taken from this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4rxjSFtBuw but no license Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif and same as twitter profile pic https://mobile.twitter.com/KGardapkhadze/status/1380900260755685378/photo/1 - think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:31, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ 17:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:TOO Indonesia. low TOO. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:49, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:50, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Self Journeys (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of non-notable musician. Out of Commons project scope.

IronGargoyle (talk) 20:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:11, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 20:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:51, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 06:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:18, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by U3188019 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ラキたま (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Clearly not own work, however some may be underneath the threshold of originality for Japan, but I am not familiar with the threshold in that jurisdiction.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Draculavonbambula (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyrighted comics. Unlikely to be own work and certainly out of project scope.

IronGargoyle (talk) 20:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:14, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is clearly not the copyright holder of the work as it has been online as early as 2010. https://sophiandy.blogspot.com/2010/12/hikmah-di-sebalik-penyejagatan.html Subject died in 1970 and all photos taken before 1987 are copyrighted for 70 years from the date it's taken. This file seems to depict him around the 60s when he was president, so the file should only expire in 2040 at the latest. Seloloving (talk) 06:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 00:02, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Alvarez9191 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: image from brand marketing campaign|source= Tagged for speedy deletion by the uploader a year after upload, please discuss. King of ♥ 08:03, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Photo was part of a brand marketing campaign in early 2020, not my own property Alvarez9191 (talk) 08:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image - unlikely to be own work, widely shared on social media Evaders99 (talk) 08:45, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:44, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from FB per MD, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No OTRS. --Herby talk thyme 11:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:49, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hypothetical map not based on professional election poll. This is unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 17:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:50, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of non-notable actor used only on vanity Wikidata page. Out of Commons project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 20:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doubtful own work by anonymous uploader Pibwl (talk) 23:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ticketed. --Herby talk thyme 11:52, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, no cat, unknown notability. Other uploads by anonymous user raise autorship doubts. Pibwl (talk) 23:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was uploaded for the purpose of promoting hate speech. Susmuffin (talk) 00:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete as redundant to File:Anti Gay and Lesbian movements sign.gif. I don’t think anti-LGBT+ logos are inherently bad however as they can represent bigotry against LGBT+ people. If they are exclusively used for hate speech then please do nominate them for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 18:16, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby talk thyme 11:53, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Besides the file not being a geometric shape the source of the file has no license information. Perfektsionist (talk) 00:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Fails COM:TOO and possible Copy Vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

De donde bajaron esta foto? 191.116.224.51 01:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:08, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of Hamed Moghaddam in the studio. 191.116.224.51 01:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yo creo que este usuario ha subido fotos que no son suyas. 191.116.224.51 01:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a fictional flag, and out of scope. JPxG (talk) 02:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a flag, but a (yes fictional) orbital shot but from a somewhat relevant work of fiction. There is a whole category of these files, there is potential use, and unless you can prove a copyright violation, I vote  Keep. --Enyavar (talk) 07:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I agree with User:IronGargoyle. Can't really figure out how this unused, personal Star Wars fan art can contribute to our projects. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:09, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist is Ji Qingyuan (纪清远, born 1954), PD-OLD does not apply Yinweiaiqing (talk) 04:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist is Ji Qingyuan (纪清远, born 1954), PD-OLD does not apply Yinweiaiqing (talk) 04:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://institutes.lnu.edu.ua/archeology/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/11/visnyk_11-2016.pdf. Converting to DR due to age and lack of an exact date on the claimed source. AntiCompositeNumber talk 04:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:10, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No license provided for home country Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per User:IronGargoyle - If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original document of 1945 GBTU KA cannot be your own work. You took this file from warspot.ru: https://warspot.ru/7036-metamorfozy-amfibii-razvedchika You has violated user agreement of warspot.ru: see paragraph 5.1 - it is not allow a free use. Kursant504 (talk) 05:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original WW2 foto cannot be your own work. Kursant504 (talk) 05:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original WW2 foto cannot be your own work. Kursant504 (talk) 05:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original WW2 foto cannot be your own work. Kursant504 (talk) 05:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong license. The original WW2 german book cannot be your own work. Kursant504 (talk) 05:18, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed verification; the reason "ineligible for copyright" doesn't make sense Benevolen (talk) 05:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted image - no evidence of freely available license, shared on social media Evaders99 (talk) 05:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. None of the reasons for PD-Iraq applies. Jcb (talk) 12:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Iraq: It is a photographic or cinematic work that is not compositive (artistic in nature) first published before 1 January 1999. Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence given that the source is "Iran Press Service" (which goes to a deadlink). It also says the author is "شهاب میرزایی (BBC)" (Shahab Mirzaei from BBC Persian), which does not make any sense because according to Mirzaei's BBC profile page, Mirzaei started his "press career in a women's newspaper in 1998". That picture was taken in 1986 in Iraq, in Saddam Hussein's private quarters, so the chances that a (then) teenage Iranian who hadn't started their journalistic career would have access to Saddam Hussein in the middle of the Iran-Iraq war are more than unlikely. Ypatch (talk) 06:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence was given that shows the image was published before 1999 or that the author gave permission to use it. Ypatch (talk) 05:04, 7 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely copyright violation - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Temporary exhibition per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:CowParade in Warsaw. ~Cybularny Speak? 06:10, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is a logotype designed by a contemporary artist (died 2012) and I do believe that U. Tel Aviv didn't release as a free; even if, I highly doubt that the uploader is a copyright holder. On He-wiki it is tagged: [1] Masur (talk) 06:38, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicts one of David LaChapelle's works "Deluge" (2006) at an exhibit. De minimis doesn't apply: the artist is an American, and this copyrighted American work doesn't belong in Commons. George Ho (talk) 06:49, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thank You, copyrighted content removed. --Svajcr (talk) 12:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This has deliberately changed the photo content. With the painting blackened out, the photo should be either renamed or deleted. Also, the info should be changed as well. --George Ho (talk) 17:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my work Nafiur14 (talk) 06:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:12, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The type of source is incorrect. This image is not old. Masoud bukani (talk) 07:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The type of source is incorrect. This image is not old. Masoud bukani (talk) 07:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The type of source is incorrect. Masoud bukani (talk) 07:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover. MKFI (talk) 08:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work, taken from social media with backairen tag - https://twitter.com/always_lsg/status/1450736598505574400 Evaders99 (talk) 08:40, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad snapshot showing parts of a red bus. Relevance not given. Julius Senegal (talk) 08:50, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your reason for deletion = ???? !! = Your argument "relevance not given" is, in my view, a "death bombing". Almost every image would have to be deleted in this way.
" The picture is crooked" –

Interesting aspect that you add to Wikimedia as an image deletion reason. You are a "grand master of photography" and understand your craft. It is always a pleasure for me to talk to people, from whom I can learn something artistically. I had interesting conversations with Avedon, Lagerfeld, Blum which enriched me. My teacher was a famous advertising and sports photographer. Who did you learn your trade with? Help me to become better in my craft; show some of your pictures with a link here.

A request to you: - Please do not delete all pictures of (Streeet)- photographers on Wikimedia that use the "image misalignment" as an "artistic element".

Man Ray 1934

The Wikimedia world will thank you! I'm looking forward to your artworks, which have certainly enriched Wikimedia many times. Connected greetings that come from the heart .... The --Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 09:51, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COM:NOT #1.3.
This is not art, but just a bad picture among other bad pictures.
Gladly, your attempts to spam this into articles failed.
And please, don't use silly straw mans or c%p of this elaborate (klick). --Julius Senegal (talk) 19:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's one way you can look at this world. But only from one side. That's your view of the world. That's a good thing ...Freedom of opinion. But please remain more polite in your actions and your choice of words! Keep your opinion! It makes little sense to talk about good or bad here any longer. Let the administrator decide, and the world has peace! Connected greetings that come from the heart ....--Lupus in Saxonia (talk) 08:47, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Despite how folks feel about it, this personal photo is in use on an active userpage. If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not free image that was taken from book. Kursant504 (talk) 09:09, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Russian archives (as usual) don't allow a free commercial using of it's fotos. It is not free image even if author is unknown. Kursant504 (talk) 09:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

according to the uploader discussion, it's not her own work w:ca:Usuari Discussió:Marta Sistach Docosong (talk) 09:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

according to the uploader discussion, it's not her own work w:ca:Usuari Discussió:Marta Sistach Docosong (talk) 09:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

according to the uploader discussion, it's not her own work w:ca:Usuari Discussió:Marta Sistach Docosong (talk) 09:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am nominating for deletion in connection with the letter to Evgeniya888 with a request to delete this file. The file is not used. Ailbeve (talk) 10:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine. Even if original image is general view of place, this cropped image is a substantial reproduction. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:14, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source and no permission Hoyanova (talk) 10:29, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source and no permission Hoyanova (talk) 10:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph has been published under a CC-BY-NC-ND license, not a CC-BY-SA license as claimed by the uploader. The license is unfortunately incompatible with COM:L. AFBorchert (talk) 10:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok, sorry about that, will i delete? 80.233.41.68 10:41, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
You are Killim? Please login. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): How do you come to the conclusion that this photo has been published in 1950 and that the photographer is unknown? --AFBorchert (talk) 19:30, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The information comes from Europeana, if they knew the author, they would have entered the information, some images have a person's name in the field "Creator", sometimes it is the name of the collection within the archive that housed the image. The images is dated 1940s. For copyright purposes publication is distribution of a discernable copy, if the person who operated the shutter created the negative then distributed a print to the subject, it starts the copyright clock. If there was an indication that the image stayed as a negative, like most of the Bain Collection at the Library of Congress, they would remain unpublished. As always with historic images we have to use our best judgement. It looks like the archive that hosted the image stamped all their images with CC-BY-NC-ND no matter what the actual status was. For instance, the New York Times stamps each historic article with a boilerplate copyright notice despite the articles being published prior to 1926. Also all images from Swedish archives at Europeana are also stamped CC-BY-NC-ND even though Sweden did not recognize non-art portrait and landscape photography, created prior to 1971, as copyrightable. --RAN (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Where do you see any record information from Europeana where a publication in 1950 is documented? Speculations do not help here. We need not “best judgement” or best guesses but proofs. A photographer who took a photograph in 1940 is very likely not yet dead since 70 years, hence we have to assume that this photo is still copyrighted. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:12, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • You can't prove a negative, epistemology does not allow that. I can't prove that God doesn't exist, but if you show up with God for lunch with me, you have proved he/she exists. We can only look at the evidence presented to us by Europeana, and if they fill in a person's name as creator, then the creator's name is known. That is the way we use creator=anonymous in every instance in over 100,000 images. If you are able to discern from the available information who the creator is, I will do the research to find a death date. "Publication" for copyright purposes is distributing a discernable copy, not appearing in a newspaper or magazine. If Europeana says they scanned the original camera negative, then I would agree that it was unpublished. You can read about the Bain Collection where the LOC scanned original glass camera negatives that came to the archive from the creator. We can only give our opinions, if copyright was easy, a bot would be handling them. Let us hear what other people think. --RAN (talk) 22:56, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): Your approach is not supported by COM:PRP. The first requirement for {{PD-anon-70-EU}} would be a proof of publication more than 70 years ago. No speculation but a bibliographic reference. You weren't able to provide this. If we got this, we can check whether a photographer was named or any other information that would help in identifying the photographer. Sometimes this is possible even if the photographer wasn't named in the original publication. (I was actively searching Irish newspaper archives with photos of Evie Hone. I've found multiple photos of her which were likewise taken in her cottage at Rathfarnham, i.e. in the Irish Times of 15 November 1952, p. 5, and in the Irish Independent of 29 July 1958, p. 6. But these photos are not from this series of the Fáilte Ireland collection.) --AFBorchert (talk) 23:38, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • That policy says we use the "best of our knowledge" and we must have "significant doubt" to delete, the exact arguments I have been using to keep the image. --RAN (talk) 07:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Good argument presented by RAN. If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:15, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file uses {{PD-EU-no author disclosure}} as license tag without providing proof that this photo has been published more than 70 years ago. AFBorchert (talk) 11:58, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source and no permission Hoyanova (talk) 10:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BlissfulBlueLotus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files appear to be a photographs or other representation of a copyright item

Timtrent (talk) 10:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:30, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BlissfulBlueLotus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low resolution image with no camera details suggests that these images have been acquired in breach of copyright. COM:OTRS must be used to regularise the permission to use them here. COM:PCP applies. We need very much better declaration of sourcing, permissions, etc for them to remain here

Timtrent (talk) 10:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ... I intended to continue our discussion adressing the copyright issues regarding my "Alesh Jermar" Wikipedia article. I had problems with my WIFI and could not get online for a few days. By the time the WIFI issue was resolved, four images were deleted. I would like to continue this discussion and ask for these to be undeleted. Bellow, please, find the list of these files and my statement regarding their copyright.


• File:Crossway of Dreams.jpg

• File:AleshJermarSingle.jpg

• File:AleshJermarVELA.jpg

• File:AleshJermarKarikatura.jpg


I hereby affirm that I represent Etnah Jermar, Alesh Jermar’s widow, who, having inherited his estate, has the sole ownership of the above listed images. There is no copyright on any of these, and, if there ever was any, it has expired by now. Moreover, if anyone ever had the copyright to these, they are deceased by now.

Mrs. Jermar is in agreement with releasing these files to the Wikimedia Commons and has given me full authority in my capacity as a curator of Alesh Jermar's collected music and creator of this Wikipedia article to do so.

I and Mrs. Jermar agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the following free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International.

Marie H Kurfirtova Appointed Representative

P.S. Regarding the little ID card, File:AleshJermarVELA.jpg ... I would like to explain that it is not owned by the Czech government but it was issued by the VELA, the Belgian resistance group fighting Nazi occupation in Czechoslovakia during the WWII. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlissfulBlueLotus (talk • contribs) 18:45, 15 December 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

@BlissfulBlueLotus The information needs to be sent to COM:OTRS using the instructions you will find at that page. Leaving it here is not sufficient, and will have no effect. No-one can do this for you. Timtrent (talk) 19:13, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Once you have sent this information to COM:OTRS and once it has been accepted you will be able to request undeletion Timtrent (talk) 19:15, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, will do. BlissfulBlueLotus (talk) 15:33, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:16, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found elsewhere https://c8.alamy.com/compfr/rfjd65/autoportrait-de-gaelle-ghesquiere-rfjd65.jpg Jmax (talk) 10:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC) User: Zaidou Je ne connais pas et n'ai jamais déposé cette image chez Alamy.(A ce propos j'ai contacté le site qui m'a expliqué qu'un tiers a vendu cette photo libre de droits, j'ai demandé le retrait que vous pourrez contrôler par vous-même: Sans admettre aucune responsabilité, nous avons retiré l’image en question, et celle-ci sera supprimée du site Web d’Alamy après notre prochaine mise à jour du moteur de recherche. Cordialement[reply]

) Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de l'œuvre présente. Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence  CC-BY-SA

Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but noncommercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que * d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia. Merci de me demander si vous voulez des précisions.

  •  Keep as the file on alamy.com was listed ~(in the file name itself) as a self-portrait too, so there is no reason to doubt that the subject is also the copyright owner and thus can choose to republish it under a CC license. Nonetheless, said licence has to be more precise... Alchemica (talk) 09:10, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User: Zaidou Je ne connais pas et n'ai jamais déposé cette image chez Alamy. Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de l'œuvre présente. Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence CC-BY-SA Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but noncommercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que * d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia. Merci de me demander si vous voulez des précisions.


Deleted: I think it's better to be safe than sorry. Anyone can upload anything and if it indeed the subject who did it, they can provide permissions. Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Je ne connais pas et n'ai jamais déposé cette image chez Alamy.(A ce propos j'ai contacté le site qui m'a expliqué qu'un tiers a vendu cette photo libre de droits, j'ai demandé le retrait que vous pourrez contrôler par vous-même: réponse du site: Sans admettre aucune responsabilité, nous avons retiré l’image en question, et celle-ci sera supprimée du site Web d’Alamy après notre prochaine mise à jour du moteur de recherche.

Cordialement

) Je confirme par la présente être l'auteur et le titulaire unique et exclusif de l'œuvre présente. Je donne mon autorisation pour publier cette œuvre sous la licence  CC-BY-SA

Je comprends qu'en faisant cela je permets à quiconque d'utiliser mon œuvre dans un but noncommercial, et de la modifier dans la mesure des exigences imposées par la licence. Je suis conscient de toujours jouir des droits extra-patrimoniaux sur mon œuvre, et garder le droit d'être cité pour celle-ci selon les termes de la licence retenue. Les modifications que * d'autres pourront faire ne me seront pas attribuées. Je suis conscient qu'une licence libre concerne seulement les droits patrimoniaux de l'auteur, et je garde la capacité d'agir envers quiconque n'emploierait pas ce travail d'une manière autorisée, ou dans la violation des droits de la personne, des restrictions de marque déposée, etc. Je comprends que je ne peux pas retirer cette licence, et que l'image est susceptible d'être conservée de manière permanente par n'importe quel projet de la fondation Wikimedia. Merci de me demander si vous voulez des précisions.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong format; superseded; wrong orientation Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:17, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vujcic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos of a photos. No original authors and permission.

Files affected:

Smooth O (talk) 12:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I'm not allowed to take photos of photos? Since when? I'm not allowed to take a photo of an old newspaper clipping or a framed photo in a Tim Horton's? Vujcic (talk) 12:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Vujcic Your photos are derivative works of the original photos, so we need to make sure the original photos are public domain or freely licenced. And 2004 is nowhere near old enough to be public domain is most jurisdictions. Brianjd (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A similar photo was uploaded 筒井石 (talk) 13:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as it is not really needed and there is a Spanish/Catalan version of the same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 13:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a file that I uploaded but I would now like it to be deleted, as it is not really needed and there is a Spanish/Catalan version of the same logo. 20Panorama15 (talk) 13:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader not the author. Have proper rights transfer been arranged? Artaxerxes (talk) 13:55, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:18, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is also confirmed to be the same file as the vert file. vert file, this file is unspecified and we are concerned about deletion claims. Simsunman (talk) 14:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused logo file - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Includes copyrighted content not de minimis. Anarchyte (talkwork) 14:39, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich möchte nicht mehr, dass meine politische Ausrichtung hier zu sehen ist YodaMaster445 (talk) 14:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded .svg version Bruce The Deus (talk) 15:15, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:19, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Se Plakho (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Я завантажив усі ці фото в межах конкурсу Вікі любить пам'ятки. Хочете видалити, видаляйте. Хрін я братиму надалі участь у Вікі любить пам'ятки і запрошуватиму інших. Se Plakho (talk) 09:51, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Извиняюсь, но украинский не знаю настолько, чтобы на нём писать. К огромному сожалению, организаторы этого конкурса (далеко не только на Украине) уже который год забывают объяснить участникам особенности местного законодательства. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been uploaded by the subject. No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 15:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from author Hoyanova (talk) 15:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation? No FOP in USA. No VRT permission. JopkeB (talk) 16:07, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal artwork, COM:WEBHOST, little educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:52, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nominator - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly not own work. Very low resolution file —MdsShakil (talk) 17:02, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:20, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photograph riped from Sotheby's website (see Terms & Conditions of Use )... 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:682C:B444:FF2F:A587 17:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Erroneously licensed {{PD-Art}}. --Achim55 (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ies as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of copyrighted material. Copyrighted photograph on a temporary banner. No FoP-Germany. Converting to DR per COM:CSD#F3. King of ♥ 17:27, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist died in 1995 (public domain in 2065) Martin Sg. (talk) 17:31, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luisa1951 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violation; artist died in 1965 (public domain in 2035)

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Als Inhaberin des Nachlasses von Amelie Breling darf ich alos kein Foto aus ihrem Nachlass veröffentlichen? Luisa1951 (talk) 18:06, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Background image is too prominent and unsourced, and the icons on the bottom are copyrighted as well. Prosfilaes (talk) 17:36, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Background image is too prominent and unsourced, and the icons on the bottom are copyrighted as well. Prosfilaes (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, artist d. 1995 Martin Sg. (talk) 17:37, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of the original painting and therefore the right to show it to the public. I allow it to be published here. Sunrise1873 (talk) 21:12, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, the fact that you are the owner doesn't include the right to publish it, especially here, in public domain. --Martin Sg. (talk) 12:31, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. Portrait of Agustín de Foxá (1906-1959), probably taken... in the 1940s? Information about original publication needed in order to evaluate copyright status. Strakhov (talk) 17:53, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation; artist * 1936; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Martin. Warum sollte hier eine Copyrightverletzung vorliegen? Beide auf dem Bild gezeigten Personen sind mir persönlich bekannt und würden sich direkt bei mir melden sobald Sie mit einer Veröffentlichung nicht mehr einverstanden wären. ~~ Sven Brinkhoff (talk) 19:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Salut Sven Brinkhoff. Es geht nicht um die abgebildeten Persönlichkeiten, sondern um das gezeigt Kunstwerk, welches dem Urheberrecht unterliegt. --Martin Sg. (talk) 23:46, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:22, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that [2] is freely licenced so far as I can see. In fact, it looks to be licenced to Hootsuite Inc, who are not the uploader here on Commons Joseph2302 (talk) 18:05, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support: Joseph2302 Yep. I uploaded that. If you find that file was uploaded without following Commons guidelines, you should delete it. I agree with your point. I wasn't the original author.

Joseph2302 The discussion was going beyond 7 days. And also, None fact. Hootsuite is not a commercial platform for commons files sort of copyright claimers. It's just integrating tool for social media platforms which have been used by authors/owners (According to our Wiki also). Just an UI., Real owner is Jonathan Northall was used Twitter Integrated by Hootsuite tool, while uploading. and due credit was given here. Kirubar (talk) 16:45, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The duplicate file with but I want to delete it because it's my own work. Mongolia44 18:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 01:26, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:55, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The duplicate file with but I want to delete it because it's my own work. Mongolia44 18:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Picture​ on sign. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 09:56, 26 December 2018 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 17:57, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect.Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! มองโกเลีย๔๔ 15:10, 16 September 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:29, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The duplicate file with but I want to delete it because it's my own work. Mongolia44 18:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The traffic sign will not be repeated with the svg file and the traffic sign is a png. File or a gif file, which is not the clearest image, so I have to delete the traffic sign that is wrong from that country's standard. Please allow everyone with respect. มองโกเลีย๔๔ 17:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The duplicate file with but I want to delete it because it's my own work. Mongolia44 18:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)


Deleted: Courtesy deletion of unused file - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:23, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

implausible own work. Taken from a professional shoot Slywriter (talk) 18:59, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal photo and likely copy vio. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Googlemaps Copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag) Mile (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No need to delete. All is there. --Mile (talk) 19:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

GoogleMaps copyvio Enyavar (talk) 19:25, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:24, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pls, delete picture from 18:54, 3. december 2021 and 19:09, 3. december 2021 Rio Paric (talk) 19:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:25, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ErAxY (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of paintings by a living Russian artist. No evidence of permission.

IronGargoyle (talk) 20:19, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copy vio - We can always undelete if COM:VRT is provided and approved. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

contains a watermark and low image quality ArnabSaha (talk) 20:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The image has been updated with the Cropped version of image without watermark. The image showcase the beautiful landscape of Mukutmanipur and hopefully also meets the quality standard.. Thanks. Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 03:57, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:01, 2 February 2019 (UTC) I have now requested permission of the owner to use image in wiki. (I wasn't sure which option to select.) I will delete this image if the owner does not give permission. SergeevnaA (talk) 00:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC) Permission was been granted.--125.167.99.106 01:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:05, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant file, uploaded originally as test only. Unused. Request by author. SergeevnaA (talk) 20:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant file, uploaded originally as test only. Unused. Request by author. SergeevnaA (talk) 20:58, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:27, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploads by WMF-banned user Meganesia

[edit]

Originally uploaded by a sockpuppet of King kong92 (see enwiki SPI case), who has been WMF-banned alongside other accounts associated with that person, before someone else transferred it to Commons under assumption that the content is free. Also, "own work" is claimed. However, considering that the uploader has also uploaded other possibly unfree files with most likely incomplete information, I wonder about the information provided and where the content is originated from. --George Ho (talk) 22:32, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion flickr washing: The photo was uploaded to flickr from a third party under a free license, without the consent of the author being recognizable. Numerous (c) statements indicate the opposite. Stepro (talk) 23:14, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr says: © vzbv - Holger Groß, where "vzbv" stands for "Verbraucherzentrale Bundesverband". This is the "third party" that uploaded the photos to flickr. Other works of this photographer for Verbraucherzentrale can be found in this album. There it says: "Bitte Quelle nennen: © vzbv - Holger Groß", (translation: "please cite source: © vzbv - Holger Groß") which is a clear indication to me that Holger Groß allows the usage under the condition of attribution. If you doubt that he is okay with that you can ask him via email. Redrobsche (talk) 11:09, 4 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion per User:Redrobsche - If one wishes to renominate this file, they are able to do so. I will defer to other administrators to review it. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 18:28, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adityagaikwad2912006 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Project scope: Commons is not private photo album

MdsShakil (talk) 17:16, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Possible bug found, do not delete. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:29, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax I also notice that, when I started the deletion discussion. Can you post a bug file at Phabricator? —MdsShakil (talk) 03:46, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MdsShakil: phab:T297451 --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@MdsShakil @Minorax - What's the status here? Thanks. Missvain (talk) 18:21, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Missvain: Still no reply from the devs. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:18, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Minorax - Ok..just wondering if I can move ahead with closing this out or not. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 03:50, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Martin Urbanec: Can you take a look at this? --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]