Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/20
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
I uploaded it by mistake HKMAHATO2 (talk) 03:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
No file exists by the name. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope and no educational purposes. used for vandalism. WhitePhosphorus (talk) 08:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
i want it deleted Zande William (talk) 11:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity page masquerading as file. No file exists here. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 11:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
it's inappropriate Rajdeep Mote (talk) 10:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. Inappropriate for what, and in what way? —VeryRarelyStable (talk) 11:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion I can't even imagine what would constitute a genuine rationale for deletion. Inappropriate as an image? Too modern to be relevant as a portrayal of an ancient goddess? What? Haploidavey (talk) 11:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Strong Oppose to deletion of this important image. It's a featured picture, used on dozens of pages. The nominator's only edits have been doing this nom. Johnbod (talk) 12:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 13:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
i want it deleted Zande William (talk) 11:27, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity page, out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio 19 October. --Achim (talk) 14:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 15:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation and incorrect license. This image has appeared on a hollywoodreporter.com article (https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie-news/natalie-portman-shopping-raunchy-comedy-44793) and the images copyright is "Matt Carr/Getty Images" vistadan 10:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
foto eliminata Rosariop327 (talk) 10:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep as the rationale is incomplete/incorrect. Please elaborate or otherwise speedy keep. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 16:07, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: small, no EXIF, watermarked. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
foto eliminata Rosariop327 (talk) 10:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: small, no EXIF, watermarked. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 16:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Photo is by Alberto E. Rodriguez / Getty Images (https://www.businessinsider.in/entertainment/news/pete-davidson-says-working-with-his-grandfather-on-the-king-of-staten-island-felt-like-his-life-came-full-circle/articleshow/79782592.cms) Abu-Dun (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Obvious copyvio. Please also fix this file's usage on en.wp. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --clpo13(talk) 18:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une photo de moi dont je ne souhaite pas la diffusion. 89.3.1.164 18:07, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Je ne souhaite pas la diffusion de cette image qui me représente. Laclédusonge (talk) 18:19, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{delete}}
Laclédusonge (talk) 18:50, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{Speedydelete droit à l'image}}
Laclédusonge (talk) 18:53, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
{{Speedydelete / violation du droit à l'image}}
Laclédusonge (talk) 18:55, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Keep The subject is notable, the image is properly licensed, the image does not seem to be made in private context; I see no valid reason for deletion. Ankry (talk) 19:41, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
Kept, per Ankry. Taivo (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
I am Laura Alcoba and I oppose the publication of this image. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 13:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Je suis Laura Alcoba et je m'OPPOSE à la publication de cette image qui est une atteinte à ma personne. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:E9DD:6C1D:6996:47EA 14:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Photo diffusée sans accord de Laura Alcoba 80.13.50.138 14:44, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- "I don't like it" has never been a valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 15:19, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Cette image a été prise à mon insu. Je m'oppose à sa diffusion. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:56E:7844:E040:565A 20:11, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Je m'oppose à la publication de cette photo qui me représente. Je l'ai déjà fait savoir au photographe qui ignore mes demandes. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:6119:C0CA:70B5:F8FD 17:17, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021101410006838 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ticket:2021101410006838. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 10:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Je demande la suppression de cette photo qui a été prise à mon insu. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:8525:F767:211B:5B94 17:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Per Ticket:2021101410006838. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Publication faite en total désaccord avec la personne représentée. 2A01:CB08:281:9D00:D567:7D17:F309:D64 14:16, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep No new reason given for deletion, vexatious reopening of multiple previously resolved DRs. 69.174.144.79 00:18, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:07, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution PNG, appears to be a screenshot than an original photo Ytoyoda (talk) 19:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Claims To Be Own Work NairobiPapel (talk) 19:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of better version. — Racconish 💬 07:07, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Remove authorization to be on Wikimedia Commons Escapement (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: A CC license cannot be revoked. --Jcb (talk) 00:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded from a private collection without permission from copyright holder. Tincash (talk) 04:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Could you clarify that statement, please? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
- Yes I was wrong and confused at the time, there was/is no public domain for it, sorry. Not my own work, delete.Escapement (talk) 19:10, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Copyright infringement, please delete this. Tincash (talk) 19:15, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|Copyright violation}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tincash (talk • contribs) 19:50, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Will you please delete this, it is not public domain and is not my own work. Escapement (talk) 19:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Given the 2017 request, I see no reason to believe the new statement here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Please delete, this is not my own work and is not public domain. the photo source is from my aunties camera, not mine. Escapement (talk) 04:19, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Licences are not revokable. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Not my own work, image is copyright of private property, I made a mistake, I am sorry, it is not my own work, are you going to punish those in the photo who have not given any permission because of me. It is private property and not public domain. This not my own work. please delete. Escapement (talk) 21:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept. Repetitive deletion requests by the same user. --BrightRaven (talk) 07:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
empty file page after renaming, very strange. Elly (talk) 22:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ellywa: I made a redirect, somehow a redirect was not made.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 09:57, 21 October 2021 (UTC) PS you can close this if you want, or if you want me to do it, please say so and ping back. Thnx.
Kept: solved. --Elly (talk) 11:06, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
please remove this image, I do not want it under this category,,, PLEASE remove! Pure male feet (talk) 00:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
please remove this image,,, ! I do not want it under this category,,, PLEASE remove! Pure male feet (talk) 00:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader request within 7 days; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 15:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
SpaceX only PD till about 2018. This media is invalid for the pledge. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 02:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, please see the metadata at bottom of the page, where SpaceX has specifically released this under the CC-Zero license, CactiStaccingCrane, as indicated in the permission field. — Huntster (t @ c) 03:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought that it is a "2018 public domain in Flickr" thing. My mistakes. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- CactiStaccingCrane, yeah, this one is an oddball amongst the rest of their Flickr files. — Huntster (t @ c) 04:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought that it is a "2018 public domain in Flickr" thing. My mistakes. CactiStaccingCrane (talk) 03:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
LTA self promotional spam, non notable Trade (talk) 08:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
The file uploaded was wrong by mistake Tinkvu (talk) 12:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader request within 7 days; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 15:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't show location David mystery books research 🕵️♂️ (talk) 23:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Uploader request within 7 days; not in use. Brianjd (talk) 12:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why? It's not your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 16:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} Joe83023dwq (talk) 12:30, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:52, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why? It's not your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} Joe83023dwq (talk) 12:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Prompt request by uploader (in addition to request by another account) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:55, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why? It's not your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 16:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} Joe83023dwq (talk) 12:31, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request (what is the relationship between those two accounts requesting deletion?)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:54, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why? It's not your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} Joe83023dwq (talk) 12:32, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt request by uploader (in addition to unexplained request by another account) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate image submitted in error. Chris debian (talk) 13:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 08:19, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Own work, recently uploaded and not used on wikis. Does not work properly as an automated location map. GrandEscogriffe (talk) 21:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have requested a speedy deletion. Please close this request if the speedy deletion is accepted. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 12:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 13:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Own work, recently uploaded and not used on wikis. Does not work properly as an automated location map. Also jpg: I realized later that there is already a svg doing a similar job. GrandEscogriffe (talk) 21:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- I have requested a speedy deletion. Please close this request if the speedy deletion is accepted. --GrandEscogriffe (talk) 12:58, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 13:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Vandalism. COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Mitte27 (talk) 21:19, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:55, 25 October 2021 UTC: CSD G3 (content intended as vandalism, threat, or attack) --Krdbot 13:55, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Sorry this picture is not interesting for an encyclopedia VishwakEIMP (talk) 15:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Weak delete The nomination rationale is not valid: This is not an encyclopedia, and the file is in use. But the licence notice seems questionable. Brianjd (talk) 16:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio [1]. --Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
it has alot of errors Zande William (talk) 11:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
i want it deleted Zande William (talk) 11:26, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Likely also a copyvio, as (C) Tom Sharman, per metadata. --Túrelio (talk) 12:25, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
i dont want this online William Zey (talk) 13:51, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- What do you, user:William Zey, have to do with this image? It was uploaded by User:Zande William. --Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
this page has alot of unresolved errors William Zey (talk) 04:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly not own work from EXIF data. Copyright holder is listed as "TomSharmanFilms". IronGargoyle (talk) 06:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
i want it deleted Zande William (talk) 11:28, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason. You uploaded it >2 months ago under a free license. So, why? --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Subject is not the photographer, so unlikely to be own work. Likely outside of project scope too, non-notable individual and only used on vanity page. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
i want it deleted Zande William (talk) 11:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Not a valid reason. You uploaded it >2 months ago under a free license. So, why? --Túrelio (talk) 12:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Subject is not the photographer, so unlikely to be own work. Likely outside of project scope too, non-notable individual and only used on vanity page. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
i want it deleted Zande William (talk) 12:55, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. User talk pages are kept to preserve a record of the communication that occurred there. They are not deleted except in extraordinary circumstances. The talk page can be blanked if desired. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 13:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused file, redundant to File:Flag of Lesotho.svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 03:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, plus super low resolution and a replica.
- Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not an appropriate representation of the 3D geometry of formic acid. The C-O-H angle in the carboxylic acid is depicted as 90° when it should be 120°. Marbletan (talk) 12:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:Formic-acid-3D-balls-A.png among several others in Category:Formic acid. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:15, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 11:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:40, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by مصعب الخطيب (مطرب اردني) (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 15:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:42, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experimets, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:53, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:54, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:55, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in article illustrated with other photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:59, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Bipul Sheikh's photo in 2021.jpg
- File:Photo-1d06c8af-9deb-4114-b40f-8d38e4af6888.jpg
- File:Azadmia.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:00, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:32, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Dies ist nicht mein eigenes Werk, ich habe es aus dem Internet kopiert. BJay0507 (talk) 20:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:36, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Dies ist nicht mein eigenes Werk, ich habe es aus dem Internet kopiert. BJay0507 (talk) 20:36, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Dies ist nicht mein eigenes Werk, ich habe es aus dem Internet kopiert. BJay0507 (talk) 20:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Dies ist nicht mein eigenes Werk, ich habe es aus dem Internet kopiert. BJay0507 (talk) 20:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Dies ist nicht mein eigenes Werk, ich habe es aus dem Internet kopiert. BJay0507 (talk) 20:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Dies ist nicht mein eigenes Werk, ich habe es aus dem Internet kopiert. BJay0507 (talk) 20:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
See COM:DW. Stefan2 (talk) 20:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:35, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Source is a YouTube video which is not tagged with a CC license Alduin2000 (talk) 21:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Support - I second this nomination, this photo is from a nonfree copyrighted YouTube web series. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RogueShanghai (talk • contribs) 02:43, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Picture with website, no permission. Cjp24 (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Scritto per errore e non idoneo !! Appare sulla ricerca di Google Strong.AL& (talk) 23:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Esce sulla ricerca di Google !! Creato per errore Strong.AL& (talk) 00:14, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Nominator (who is also uploader) overwrote it with an all-black image, and overwrote the description, which was quite inappropriate. And I don't for a moment believe that this image, which previously had a quite extensive description, was upploaded per errore. That said, it is probably an out-of-scope image of a not particularly notable person, and I'd have no problem with it being deleted on that basis. - Jmabel ! talk 04:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Agreed. It's either an unused personal image or something that would have required OTRS permission (or both). Let's not keep junk we don't want just because the uploader/subject wants it gone as well ;-) Delete. --El Grafo (talk) 07:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per El Grafo. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Owner requested for deletion Designeriel (talk) 11:03, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Owner requested for deletion 84.228.239.110 08:07, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:33, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in irrelevant context. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:37, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 16:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. We have File:Hex-1-ene 200.svg as appropriate replacement. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:21, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
experiments, no usage, out of scope Gampe (talk) 16:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:44, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elhossany shabaan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
--Alaa :)..! 16:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo of non-notable company. Article on English Wikipedia was deleted. Ixfd64 (talk) 20:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عمر يحيي٣٤٥ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope
- File:Hussein Star Hashem.jpg
- File:الروائي محمد حسام.jpg
- File:الملحن محدي سليم.jpg
- File:Omar yahya .jpg
--Alaa :)..! 21:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
re-uploaded. See same request. @Yann: . Микола Василечко (talk) 17:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
And also one more re-uploaded File:Центр надання соціальних послуг.jpg --Микола Василечко (talk) 09:18, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
Автором цього твору є Колектив Центру надання соціальних послуг, а я являюсь співавтором, який має повні права на публікацію такого логотипу — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kobzarandrij26 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Надайте підтвердження на права і публікацію через агентів VRT. --Микола Василечко (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely crop of a web photo, not original work: https://www.vavel.com/es/futbol-internacional/2020/09/26/1039035-paco-montesinos-nuevo-entrenador-del-ce-carroi.html Ytoyoda (talk) 19:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Poor quality, orphaned. Leyo 16:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:35, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
exact duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gamabomb3.jpg FMSky (talk) 10:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, cross-wiki spam Bodhisattwa (talk) 11:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:18, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Boulette897 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are all violating living architects' copyrights, as the buildings are from UAE, which has no freedom of panorama except free uses of recent public artworks and architecture on broadcasting programmes (but nothing about photos or commercial online media). These are not de minimis also; Burj Al Arab and another modern buildimg are intentional, and not cityscape or skyline images.
- File:Beit al Bahar - Dubai (9269273267).jpg
- File:Beit al Bahar - Dubai (9269268767).jpg
- File:Beit al Bahar - Dubai (9272046386).jpg
- File:Beit al Bahar - Dubai (9269256041).jpg
- File:Beit al Bahar - Dubai (9271999262).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach Hotel (9276051712).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach Hotel (9273263439).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach Hotel (9273253981).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach Hotel (9276035536).jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab (9273237939).jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab (9276020834).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach (7576445402).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach (7576426256).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach (7576415268).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach (7576396422).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach (7576392326).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach (7576388206).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach (7576383162).jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab (7576373414).jpg
- File:Jumeirah Beach Hotel (7576265946).jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab (9273223087).jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab (9273221127).jpg
- File:Burj Al Arab (9276007422).jpg
- File:Wild Wadi Water Park Dubai (41596630225).jpg
- File:Wild Wadi Water Park Dubai (41777210644).jpg
- File:Wild Wadi Water Park Dubai (42499902281).jpg
- File:Wild Wadi Water Park Dubai (27628877447).jpg
- File:Wild Wadi Water Park Dubai (41777325594).jpg
- File:Wild Wadi Water Park Dubai (40691934440).jpg
- File:Wild Wadi Water Park Dubai (27628897157).jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Not taken on 19th October, published before: https://www.newsbugz.com/abhishek-raja/ MKFI (talk) 12:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, over COM:ToO. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:19, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tarunjtejpal22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality, low res (1080 px max), no metadata,
- File:Tarun J Tejpal - Death of a salesman and other elite ironies.png
- File:“A whole generation of writers learned how to write from V S Naipaul,” says Tarun J Tejpal.png
- File:Tarun Tejpal - No Mimic Man, this the incredible life of VS Naipaul.png
- File:Tarun Tejpal - 20 Years Of Operation West End – Has Anything Changed.png
- File:Tarun Tejpal - Most Heart-breaking Power Couple Divorces and split-ups.png
- File:TARUN TEJPAL - Mrs Gandhi And Her Extra God.png
- File:TARUN TEJPAL - Look Back In Anger.png
- File:Tarun J Tejpal - The Missionary Position.png
- File:Tarun Tejpal - Season-2! Most Awaited Sequels of Hit Web Series.png
- File:Tarun J Tejpal - 20 Years of Lagaan A Film Worth Remembering.png
- File:TARUN TEJPAL’S POLITICAL PERSECUTION THAT HAS BEEN A FINANCIAL NIGHTMARE FOR GOA’S TAXPAYERS.png
- File:Tarun J Tejpal - WHEN THE BJP DID NOT HAVE ITS WAY IN THE TARUN TEJPAL CASE (1).png
Cjp24 (talk) 06:46, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tarunjtejpal22 (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]More derivative works by this user. Unusable images with huge watermarks.
- File:Tarun Tejpal - Indians on the Booker List Sunjeev Sahota may have missed by a whisker, but these five winners didn’t.png
- File:Tarun Tejpal - Remembering the Original Chocolate Boy Of Bollywood in His Birthday Month – Rishi Kapoor.png
- File:Tarun Tejpal - Rejection. Reinvention. Resilience. Amitabh Bachchan’s storied life has it all.png
- File:Why conviction of Tarun Tejpal would have been a travesty of justice for him and not justice to the “prosecutrix”.png
- File:Tarun Tejpal - Public Interest Journalism Another Side of Media.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sohan wankhade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Scope, personal photo
- File:Sohans wife.jpg
- File:Wedding of my bro.jpg
- File:Gpk Akash Sontakke.jpg
- File:Puja wankhade.jpg
- File:Charudada.jpg
- File:Ceremony la sadi Bhet.jpg
- File:Engagement Sohala.png
- File:Halad mazi.jpg
- File:Sasurvadi.jpg
- File:Wedding fb.jpg
- File:My wife AS.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 20:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sohan wankhade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Scope, personal photo
Afifa Afrin (talk) 20:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:20, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
"FBMD" in the metadata indicates a Facebook/Instagram download. If this is your own work, I suggest uploading the original, not a download. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Tiny image that is out of COM:SCOPE. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted unused personal vanity photo by uploader with no other contributions; OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:09, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Source is a YouTube video which is not tagged with a CC license Alduin2000 (talk) 21:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unsupported license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
The uploader is likely not the author of the file as claimed. The date is the date uploaded to Commons and is not when the file was taken since she has been dead for four years. The edit summary was "Cross-wiki upload from en.wikipedia.org" which is incorrect because the file was not uploaded to en.wikipedia.org. Aspects (talk) 22:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment the "from en.wikipedia" is just indication that the upload was initiated there rather than directly at Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted dubious sourcing/ claims -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Likely out of scope as a fictional flag of a political party (I could not find any use anywhere else on the web). Also a bad file format for flags (non-photographic JPEG). Eyesnore (talk) 02:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. en.wikipedia. --Amada44 talk to me 19:03, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely out of scope as a fictitious flag of a political party. There is no evidence that this flag is used at all when the party existed, not even on the web. It is also a bad file format for flags (non-photographic JPEG). I removed the flag from enwiki so that it may be deleted. Eyesnore (talk) 22:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; also either the description or the license must be false. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
LosMadriles nominated this file for deletion under rationale The file is of low quality and does not contribute anything that is not already provided by the other images available on the subject. / El archivo es de baja calidad y no aporta nada que no esté ya proporcionado por las otras imágenes disponibles sobre el tema.
LosMadriles beforhand didn't make the deletion request right so I am doing it. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 02:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as it is a enough-quality image for Commons and is completely in COM:PS, also mentioned on my talk page. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 05:54, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I have no idea what the nominator is talking about; I cannot find a single other image of this subject on Commons. Brianjd (talk) 12:33, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Good quality and uploader\photographer and dr requester tried to delete valid categories. Tm (talk) 12:14, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per comments. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:01, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M.Amin.A.2002 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:نخل نوقاب-2.jpg
- File:نخل نوقاب.jpg
- File:مدنی بجستانی.jpg
- File:ملازاده.jpg
- File:Azadi Azadmanesh2.jpg
- File:Azadi Azadmanesh.jpg
- File:مهدی مهدی زاده.jpg
- File:Mohammad Safaee.jpg
- File:Photo-gonabad-noghab-masjed-abdollah.jpg
- File:دکتر محمد ذبیحی.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --4nn1l2 (talk) 17:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Not own work, easily found on Google: https://www.google.com/search?tbs=simg:CAQShAIJWg99GVH85HEa-AELELCMpwgaOgo4CAQSFIwqwBTwIvQmyyORHe874DmMGu85GhpxVWPKgRpkMwj3WGA9KPioWjvfi8T2ikIQgyAFMAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgS89-kGDAsQne3BCRqYAQobCghsYW5ndWFnZdqliPYDCwoJL2ovMnNoX3k0ChsKCHZlcnRpY2Fs2qWI9gMLCgkvYS80aGgzcDAKJgoSbmF2aWdhdGlvbiBjaGFubmVs2qWI9gMMCgovbS8wY245cDAyChUKA21hcNqliPYDCgoIL20vMDRfdGIKHQoKc2NyZWVuc2hvdNqliPYDCwoJL20vMDF6Ym53DA&q=origin+of+australian+aboriginal&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiasIHBgdrzAhVz_7sIHTEmC2UQ2A4oAXoECAEQMw&biw=1920&bih=937&dpr=1#imgrc=N8YGamYkaMc-TM Glennznl (talk) 22:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, it is based on the reference which was given, which is published under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. So any remix and share is correct while citing the original authors, which I have done correctly. There is no reason to delete the file. Thank you.Baikal13 (talk) 16:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Source is https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5689 , NC-ND. --Yann (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why? It's not your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 16:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021102110009992 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already published at http://www.movietrainer.com/personaggi/santo-pennestr (gallery) + no permission. Ruthven (msg) 21:33, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 15:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and probably Out of Scope. --Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020.07.27 Advanced Nursing Process graph E.pdf. Ixfd64 (talk) 18:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcornelius at 14:23, 18 November 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Advanced Nursing Process graph".pdf: Out of scope, see also Commons:Deletion requests/File:2020.07.27 Advanced Nursing Process graph E.pdf. --Krdbot 20:23, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
Printed manual, surely not for free use. GeorgHH • talk 12:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- You are right, although it is only 1 page. I would be pleased, if you could give me a hint, how to demonstrate the thorough instruction manual for this toy.--Scoid (talk) 12:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Advertising.
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 13 Perfect Locks.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 12 Hair Planet.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 11 SGI Hair.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 10 JC Hair.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 9 Apohair.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 8 Perfect Locks.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 7 Salon Labs.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 5 Foxy Hair.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 4 Hair Development.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 3 Hair Planet.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 2.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 1.png
- File:Hair Extensions Supplier 6.png
Achim (talk) 13:08, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close, files already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Very bad quality, we have way better photos in Category:Flaccid human penis. XenonX3 (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Image clairement non libre de droit. La source renvoie à un article de journal en ligne où la photo est créditée AFP Aréat (talk) 16:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted. Source show it's an AFP picture. Aréat (talk) 00:09, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:PRP This is the last remaining upload from series of faces of public figures. This one has meta data suggesting it has been nearly doubled in size from original. There is some odd Artefact to it, and I really question the own work here, as the quality is so low, yet the file size is double what it says it should be in metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ram Dhaneesh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos far above COM:TOO.
- File:Salem Spartans.jpg
- File:TNPL logo.jpg
- File:Salem Corporation logo.jpg
- File:Salem Spartans theme logo.png
- File:Chepauk Super Gillies logo.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ram Dhaneesh (talk · contribs) 2
[edit]Likely not own works: disparate sizes and quality/styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else. Unreliable uploader with other works claimed as own.
- File:J. Jayalalithaa double decker flyover.jpg
- File:Salem Anna Park.jpg
- File:Salem Metropolitan Area.jpg
- File:Umashankar Sushil.jpg
- File:Man of the Match Vijay Shankar.jpg
- File:Celebration of Salem Spartans team mates.jpg
- File:Salem Town Railway Station.jpg
- File:Mettur dam night view.jpg
- File:SCF Stadium.jpg
- File:Salem Spartans Bus.jpg
- File:SCMC Headquarters.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ram Dhaneesh (talk · contribs)
[edit]One of these images has FBMD in metadata showing it came from Facebook. The others are all Facebook sized and quality, but lack any metadata at all. Suggest none are own work.
- File:Salem Corporation Map 2022.jpg
- File:SCMC office.jpg
- File:Salem Corporation Building.jpg
- File:ISKCON Salem.jpg
- File:Salem SEZ front view.jpg
- File:Salem TIDEL Park.jpg
- File:Salem Anna Park 3.jpg
- File:Anna Park 2.jpg
- File:Anna Park 1.jpg
- File:View of Anna Park.jpg
- File:SCF Stadium.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:48, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- Greetings Ellin Beltz !
- Thanks for letting me know about deletion nomination.
- Let me clarify the rights for those files.
- 1. File:Salem Corporation Map 2022.jpg is purely my own work, I uploaded the same in my Facebook, Insta, Twitter page namely The Salem New, I mentioned my personal user ID in the social media pages of The Salem New as admin. So, now you can get clarity, that it's purely my own work.
- 2. # File:SCMC office.jpg
- You mentioned the same reason for all these images, and some of the images are publicly available in government public domain, it can usable as public domain. but, I don't what is the tag must use for public domain.
- Let me mention the files available in public domain, File:Salem TIDEL Park.jpg this file is publicly available in ELCOT official website & File:SCF Stadium.jpg this file is taken by my me for my YouTube channel. So these two files and File:Salem Corporation Map 2022.jpg is doesn't goes against any Wikimedia guidelines.
- Other files are taken from online, I don't know what is the rights to use those files in Wikimedia. So its on your decision.
- And one more kind request, File:Salem Corporation Head Office.jpg & File:Salem Corporation Emblem.png is available in public domain. It's already deleted, But I I don't know how to tag as I said earlier. Kindly restore it too.
- Kindly make those above mentioned 3 files alive in Wikimedia. Thanks in advance ! Dhaneesh Ram Commons (talk) 14:40, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
- @Dhaneesh Ram Commons: It is not enough to say "these are _____ license." You need to provide a source for the images which are not yours which shows there is an open license. Neither of the files you wish restored has that. If anything is "publicly available in government public domain" you need to provide the link to that source page, not say "own work." Because even if it's public, does not make it your "own work." Please see COM:L for licensing information and tags you can use - as long as you provide a source which matches it. I will not be restoring any of those files. We wait for a closing administrator. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- I just rechecked the "sources" for both of those images, and neither has licensing information. However, that does not mean they are free and you can claim them as your own work. You also seem to have a second account ("Dhaneesh Ram M V") uploading images of same subject, with same issues. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)
- Ok sir, I will try to provide the source and change the licence, but how can I prove that File:Salem Corporation Map 2022.jpg as my own work. I uploaded the same in all social media pages as already mentioned. Dhaneesh Ram Commons (talk) 08:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)
- @Dhaneesh Ram Commons: Merely edit the template to show the source of the basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except one that is explicitly declared as own work. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:02, 26 June 2023 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:24, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not own work but scan of hardcopy map (paper folds can be seen in full view). P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:25, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|delete foto}} SantoPennestri3 (talk) 12:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Why? It's not your upload. --Túrelio (talk) 16:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|vorrei eliminare la foto che ho caricato con il mio vecchio account}} Santopennestri4 (talk) 07:55, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ticket:2021102110009992 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 12:00, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused personal photo. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 26 November 2021 (UTC)
Brxdxe
[edit]- File:Himalayan mountains view NLS.jpg
- File:Cartoon map of world war 1.jpg
- File:Stevenson Lighthouse image.jpg
- File:Bartholomew Collection map J. G.jpg
- File:Title page of Shakespeare's the Taming of the Shrew.jpg
- File:Men treading ganja in Ahmednagar, 1893.jpg
- File:A hemp drug shop in Kandesh, 1894, displaying bhang, ganja and majum.jpg
- File:Indian elephants.jpg
- File:Elephant Diagram in Burmese.jpg
- File:Photo of bhang drinkers, from the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission report, 1893.jpg
- File:Scientific memoirs of the medical officers of the army of India.jpg
- File:Isabella Lucy Bird's Yangtze Valley and Beyond (1899).jpg
- File:Don Juan Manuscript Extract, Lord Byron.jpg
- File:Katharine Cooper Cater Hall.jpg
Reasons for deletion request -- The user copied all these from the National Library of Scotland. The website does not state that there under a free license and says at the bottom "© 2021 National Library of Scotland". I have already nominated File:John Byrne's Set of the Cheviot, the Stag, and the Black Black Oil.jpg (which came from here) and File:Title page for William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Nights Dream.jpg (which came from here) for deletion Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:06, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The website may be "© 2021 National Library of Scotland" but these images in my opinion would be PD-1996 in the USA. Most website software stamps each page with a boilerplate copyright statement. See all of Category:Copyfraud. --RAN (talk) 03:46, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept. As RAN notes, the copyright notice is for the website, not the individual images, which the National Library shares under attribution free license. Most if not all of the original images here included have clearly been long in the public domain. Includes eg, publication and death of author more than 100 years ago, page of a book printed in 1631 (!) etc. (I have not researched all the images here included and therefore do not prejudge renomination of individual file if assumption of public domain was wrong for that image; closed as reason for group deletion is not supported.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
The Bob Carpenter Center and Delaware Field House are two separate buildings at the University of Delaware GoingBatty (talk) 03:05, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Redirect deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
This file is out of fashion and contains invalid licenses. Currently, there is nothing this file symbolizes and there is no reason for it to exist. Request deletion. Gameposo (talk) 12:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep (but fix licence notice) This is a nonsensical request. DuckStation appears to be a mature, active project; its logo should be just as much in scope as any other logo. The only issue is licensing. The main "duck" logo, at least, is included in a screenshot, and the entire repository is under GPL v3. Brianjd (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept per Brianjd. Out-of-date material is in project scope as historical record as much as current versions are. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:33, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
This file is out of fashion and contains invalid licenses. Currently, there is nothing this file symbolizes and there is no reason for it to exist. Request deletion. Gameposo (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep(but fix licence notice) This is a nonsensical request. DuckStation appears to be a mature, active project; its logo should be just as much in scope as any other logo. The only issue is licensing. The main "duck" logo, at least, is included in a screenshot, and the entire repository is under GPL v3. Brianjd (talk) 15:29, 20 October 2021 (UTC)- In scope per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Duckstation-logo and wordmark (Vertical).svg, but note copyright issues in Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Duckstation. Brianjd (talk) 04:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per my comments above. (non-admin closure) Brianjd (talk) 04:35, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 21:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
exact duplicate exists, File:Kit body Pereira1951h.png Elly (talk) 22:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)
실수로 업로드했습니다 Dand music (talk) 02:04, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:48, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
File:Honraria dada pela Câmara dos Deputados (DF) por serviços humanitários, combate à desigualdade social e à fome.jpg
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. O revolucionário aliado (talk) 04:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:47, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
PR Issue. It is created only for PR Reiro (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use, logo likely below TOO. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
PR Issue. This is created only for PR of unnotable media Reiro (talk) 05:20, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use, simple text. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
PR Issue. This is created only for PR of unnotable media Reiro (talk) 05:21, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:DW. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:49, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Author is unknown. — Redboston 06:31, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:50, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
нет разрешения автора Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 10:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
нет разрешения автора Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 10:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
нет разрешения автора Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 10:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
нет разрешения автора Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 10:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
нет разрешения автора Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 10:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:51, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate Chaturaji (talk) 11:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
duplicate Chaturaji (talk) 02:00, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate of File:Chaturanga Chess Set.jpg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:53, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Scan of book. — Redboston 11:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Please, close this nomination. See and discussion here: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Liilia Moroz.— Redboston 12:38, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
out of scope, family photograph, request from uploader Bodhisattwa (talk) 11:52, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:54, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pusheen
[edit]Appear to be copyrighted per COM:TOYS
Ytoyoda (talk) 12:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:55, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
I find it very hard to believe that Tbci has made all these photos and pieces of art works him/herself, as he/she claims in these files. They are of Ten Berge's Confectie Industrie which was liquidated ± 1965 and some pieces are much older. See Ten Berge's Confectie Industrie for more information. I tried to contact Tbci, see File talk:Administratie haarlem.jpg, but I did not get any answer. JopkeB
- File:Trap, overloop.jpg
- File:Trap met overloop.jpg
- File:Perserij haarlem.jpg
- File:Administratie haarlem.jpg
- File:Fabriek haarlem-.jpg
- File:Magazijn haarlem.jpg
- File:Werkvloer haarlem.jpg
- File:Gevelsteen Haarlem.jpg
- File:Folder 25j 1960.jpg
- File:Scuptuur Rädecker in Huissen 1949-1950.jpg
- File:"Karimata", 1950.jpg
- File:Fabriek haarlem.jpg
- File:LOGO TEN BERGE.jpg
- File:1958 Paletot.jpg
- File:1948 jubileum.jpg
- File:Gevelsteen Wellekom Vrede.jpg
- File:1949-Huissen.jpg
- File:Showroom H60.jpg
- File:Kleine Houtweg.jpg
JopkeB (talk) 12:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
This file is out of fashion and contains invalid licenses. Currently, there is nothing this file symbolizes and there is no reason for it to exist. Request deletion. Gameposo (talk) 12:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: we keep historic logos of notable companies. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Liilia Moroz
[edit]- File:Vabaduse puiestee - бульвар Вабадузе.jpg
- File:Estonia puiestee - бульвар Эстония.jpg
- File:Paldiski maantee - Палдиское шоссе.jpg
- File:Sõpruse puiestee - бульвар Сыпрузе.jpg
- File:Võidu väljak - площадь Выйду.jpg
- File:Raekoja plats - площадь Раэкоя.jpg
- File:Viru väljak - площадь Виру.jpg
These are photographs of pages from the book. The uploader havent provided evidence that he is the copyright holder of the book. — Redboston 12:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Not encyclopedically useful because of blurriness. A09090091 (talk) 12:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: definitely too blurry, but in use. Nominate again if a better alternative has been uploaded. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:58, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Too small to be useful Ytoyoda (talk) 13:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Low quality photo, description suggests uploader is not the photographer/copyright owner Ytoyoda (talk) 13:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
"FBMD" in metadata suggests this is not the uploader's own work Ytoyoda (talk) 13:17, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:59, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Uploader's own request. File is a copy of File:Iranian Azerbaijan (including Zanjan province).png CuriousGolden (talk) 13:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality, unlikely to be own work Gbawden (talk) 14:22, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:00, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart/diagram. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
- File:Az elemi folyamatokban az intenzitas kulonbseg nem okoz folyamat hibat.jpg
- File:Az elemi folyamat működési vázlata.png
- File:Az elemi folyamatok intenzitása.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:01, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author Michael Priest". OTRS permission from Michael Priest needed. MKFI (talk) 12:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
This is my file and it should not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 213.8.121.237 (talk) 13:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @213.8.121.237: I presume you are @Report57: and also Michael Priest? MKFI (talk) 13:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 10:06, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Blatant misuse of {{FoP-Japan}}: this is a 2D graphic work (a no-smoking notice), not a building.(!) There is no commercial FOP for any public non-architecture works still under sculptors', muralists', or other artists' copyrights. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:22, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Il s'agit d'une erreur lors de l'upload Partupp (talk) 14:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
I found it here https://www.nls.uk/collections/theatre/ Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: from 1600, PD. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Seems this might be an image from a video or video chat, see https://www.elmogaz.com/425134 which seems to be same place, same day, same scarf, etc. but clearly copyright and from 2018 at that souce. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Seems to be a logo, not really own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Source appears to be copyrighted, I as unable to verify license Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Seems to be from shutterstock https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/book-logo-store-library-read-club-318527081?irclickid=2d-TN0VPyxyLR01yqjz0xyv-UkBSBJxhT34XVU0&irgwc=1&utm_medium=Affiliate&utm_campaign=TinEye&utm_source=77643&utm_term=&c3ch=Affiliate&c3nid=IR-77643 Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Each picture in a collage needs to be identified for source, author & permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Author Deon Swiggs is not same as uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- I happen to know both Luke and Deon, and I do know that they know each other well. Shall I ask them, or one of them, why there's a mis-match? This could be as simple as changing the uploader info. Schwede66 02:28, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep I've checked in with Deon and it was indeed Luke who took the photo. I've adjusted the upload details accordingly. Is that ok? Does that resolve things? I'll be catching up with Deon in person next week and I shall endeavour to get a contemporary photo of him. Schwede66 06:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Schwede66, AGF. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Item not found at source, unable to verify license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Parece ser una captura de uno de sus videos, no un trabajo propio de un wikimedista. Sebaspikyaq (talk) 18:26, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and not notable. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted screenshot Sahaib3005 (talk) 18:47, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This tiny logo does not appear to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Băng Tỏa as no source (No source since). Badly sourced, yeah, but this file is from the 1890's and looks like a postcard (so likely published around that time and certainly before 1940) meaning that it is unlikely to be copyrighted. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- It needs a source to verify that it's legitimately from the 1890s and not from a modern staging/production/movie. — Băng Tỏa 11:42, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Băng Tỏa, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:50, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Băng Tỏa as no source (No source since). It could use a better source, but it is based on works depicting the Thai Nguyen uprising, information on the artists is needed but I think that a deletion request is better to get "more eyes" on it. In case this file is based on existing public domain works. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Băng Tỏa as no source (No source since). Photograph published during the 1900's in the form of a postcard, I don't think that it's copyrighted at all. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- See Category:Postcards published by Pierre Dieulefils and Category:Pierre Dieulefils. -- sk (talk) 15:53, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: appears to be out of copyright. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Băng Tỏa as no source (No source since). Photograph published during the 1900's in the form of a postcard, I don't think that it's copyrighted at all. These are the Governor-Generals of French Cochinchina. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:46, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- See Category:Postcards published by Pierre Dieulefils and Category:Pierre Dieulefils. --sk (talk) 15:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: appears to be out of copyright. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammad Murtaza Zaidi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Frames of the video https://br.pinterest.com/pin/794040978043037871/. It´s possible even to see the captions between transitions in some images. All images uploaded by the user have the same metadata structure. Another example here and here 2 frames of the same video, that i was not able to find, but sugests the same method. In advance i sugest block and delete all the uploads of the user.
- File:Lulusar Lake, Kaghan Valley, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan1.jpg
- File:Chillas Valley, Indus River, Pakistan1.jpg
- File:Chillas Valley, Indus River, Pakistan.jpg
- File:Babusar Pass, Chilas District, Gilgit Baltistan.jpg
- File:Lulusar Lake, Kaghan Valley, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.jpg
- File:Lulusar-Dudipatsar National Park, Kaghan Valley, Mansehra District, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 20:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Foto descarga desde ecured, sin ningún tipo de licencia https://www.ecured.cu/Archivo:Jorge_Olaya.jpg Ontzak (Bilbo ta Bizkai guztia) 20:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Images uploaded under fake license after removing watermark
[edit]- File:UniCOLT 4x4 military logistical truck family.jpg
- File:Centre for Research and Development manufactured MRLS.jpg
- File:SLNS Gajabahu (P626).jpg
The user has uploaded the images by lying about the license and editing out the watermark. The sources does not show any evidence of the claimed license. Other uploads by the user are also suspicious. --112.134.198.8 20:25, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @112.134.198.8: You are a good liar man!! You can clearly see those images are edited or not from the provided links. Author and the source of the image provided correctly. You are not a registered user. Those deletion requests were your first edit. (see [contributions for 112.134.198.8]) So don't try to vandalize. Thank you . 49lk (talk) 06:36, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I can see no supporting evidence for the licensing claims on any of these images.
- Note that there are also more images affected (check their upload list), not just the ones listed here. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:22, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, fails COM:LR. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Rick Ross
[edit]- File:Rick Ross The Mastermind Tour June 15, 2014 Toronto (14590434716).jpg
- File:Rick Ross The Mastermind Tour June 15, 2014 Toronto (14590434716) (cropped).jpg
I'm unsure what happened here. The first file was uploaded in 2017 and passed automatic bot review. In 2021, Ytoyoda (talk · contribs) removed the Flickr review and requested a new review. The bot now reported that the review had failed (cc-by-nd). I'm unsure what's going on here. Did Ytoyoda for some reason question the original cc-by review? To me it looks like a normal {{Flickr-change-of-license}}. I'm listing the file here to enable discussion about the file. The second file is a crop and obviously has the same copyright status as the original file. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:34, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: Sorry, I made a mistake after I saw that the Flickr account thecomeupshow was listed at COM:QFI. I thought if I ran Flickrreview again, it would place images in Category:Flickr images from bad authors. I only later realized that only files credited to Anton Mak are considered suspect. So I apologize for being hasty and somewhat lazy about this. I think someone with Flickrreview rights could reverse it? Ytoyoda (talk) 20:49, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: obvious mistaken change, which will be reverted. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by HombreDHojalata as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://ocioengalicia.com/pontevedra/concierto-del-coro-vox-stellae-en-pontevedra/ Achim (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Uploaded is a hi res image, ocioengalicia.com shows a low res image. --Achim (talk) 21:35, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
copied from uploader's tp:
Non existe violación de copyright. A autora da fotografía cedeuna para uso de voxstellae e pódese considerar libre totalmente.
A publicacióm "ocioengalicia" non é propietaria da imaxe. Voxstellae (talk) 20:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Vexo que o procedemento de validación da imaxe é complexo. Non hai problema en que a borren. Voxstellae (talk) 21:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: not own work per comments above, needs COM:VRT. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
Potentially subject to abuse. Bobby367 (talk) 20:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:12, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Poor image quality. Bobby367 (talk) 20:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Not a real signature. Bobby367 (talk) 14:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Speedy keep What part of COM:INUSE do you not understand? Don't request deletion again next year. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:55, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 21:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thy Pyrometer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two of these were sent for no license, but uploader states Internet Archive says they're in the public domain. Nominating for deletion for help with which exact license should be applied to late 1930s German Publications, else information to assist uploader.
- File:Soldaten-Liederbuch Volume 1.pdf
- File:Soldaten-Liederbuch Volume 3.pdf
- File:Soldaten-Liederbuch Volume 2.pdf
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: contains e.g. music and text by https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franz_Josef_Breuer († 1996) and many other artists (like them or not), certainly not PD. --Polarlys (talk) 14:36, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
Logo ist veraltet und wird seit 2015 von der Firma nicht mehr verwendet. Aktuelle Logo-Datei liegt unter File:Solarwatt 202x logo.svg 2003:D8:1F1F:100:2D99:D575:4DD3:873A 13:41, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Kein Löschgrund. No valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 14:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, per Achim55. --Rosenzweig τ 19:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license (No license since), which is utterly correct. My wonder is if the image is old enough to be retained as it is in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Proper public domain tag(s) must be used for historical works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per the precautionary principle. Clearly not "own work" as claimed, no rationale why it could be in the PD or under a free license for other reasons. --Rosenzweig τ 19:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland. Artist died in 2020. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:07, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artist Ossi Somma died in 2020. The file can be restored in 2091. --Rosenzweig τ 23:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
No indication of a free license on Rise Up website. MKFI (talk) 13:02, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --GPSLeo (talk) 16:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of Panorama for sculptures in Finland. Artist died in 2005. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The artist is apparently fi:Kauko Räike. The file can be restored in 2076. --Rosenzweig τ 07:58, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for sculptures in Finland. Artist is still alive. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:10, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The artist is fi:Villu Jaanisoo. The file can be restored 70 years after the artist's death. --Rosenzweig τ 08:14, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for statues in Finland. Artwork was created in 1976, so this cannot be 70 years PMA. IronGargoyle (talk) 05:14, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The artist here seems to be Lauri Räike, the son of Kauko Räike, and Lauri seems to be still alive. The file can be restored 70 years after the artist's death. --Rosenzweig τ 08:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
Licenced as a work of Chilean government which is definitely not true: at the source website http://www.memoriachilena.gob.cl/602/w3-article-72568.html they say that this work is copyrighted (Obra protegida). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 17:00, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per the above link, it says the photo comes from a 1979 newspaper article. If we persume this was published by an anoynomous author, it'd be 70 years of copyright per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Chile. Therefore, this is in copyright in the source country until 2050. This doesn't take into account URAA for USA copyright. In any case, there's no Creative Commons license either in the oldest archive of this file in 2019. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 19:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 13:57, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamievontersch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Works from the 1930s with unknown authorship - the stated license of {{PD-old-70-expired}} is not valid, and I cannot find proof they the images are actually PD by any means.
- File:Chris Evans Home, Jack Frost.jpg
- File:Chris Evans(outlaw) Redwood Ranch. Eva Evans sitting on steps.jpg
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:51, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- I apologize, I'm not sure how to message you. I have found those pictures in several places (books and websites) and I can prove more than once that they are PD. If I can change edit source to something more appropriate I can do that. The original author is unknown and the photo is more than 70 years old and was published more than 70 years ago. Please do not block me from uploading. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamievontersch (talk • contribs) 02:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- The 70-year period is after the date of the creator's death, not the date of publication, and can only be used whether the author's identity and death date are known. Works with anonymous authorship, like these, require information about the first publication to demonstrate either lack of copyright notice in that publication or lack of copyright renewal. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 22:09, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
I checked the link and it says it can’t be found. It should be deleted as dubious ownwork. Sahaib3005 (talk) 17:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - ok they changed the link, as museums do. See the movie instead, or this. Silly nom. Just because, after what must have been a very brief search, you can't find the image elsewhere doesn't mean it's "dubious ownwork"! Johnbod (talk) 20:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
@Johnbod: , I found it here https://www.nls.uk/collections/theatre/john-byrne/ Sahaib3005 (talk) 20:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Where does it say that this image is {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} (the license tag that is used)? --Rosenzweig τ 09:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of the CC license the file is claimed to be under. --Rosenzweig τ 22:07, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
Metadata credits photographer Andy Crook, no evidence of permission Ytoyoda (talk) 13:09, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The EXIF says all. While the username suggests a connection to the interviewer Harry Flower, Andy Crook is credited with taking the photo. It also clearly states this photograph is copyrighted, which makes the CC license incorrect. OTRS permission from Andy Crook would be needed. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 04:23, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, COM:PRP. --Rosenzweig τ 00:38, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli executive and politician. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 07:55, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. I couldn't actually find this image on the web outside Wikimedia contexts / clones. --Rosenzweig τ 07:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
Unserer Bürgervorsteherin Sabine Detert ist im Juli 2021 verstorben. Ein Foto ihres Nachfolgers habe ich bereits hochgeladen und möchte dieses deswegen löschen. Danke! Gemeindemarketing (talk) 09:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rosenzweig τ 09:26, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:FoP-Japan
[edit]Misuse of {{FoP-Japan}}: these are not architecture.(!) Japanese FOP is noncommercial only for non-architecture works (sculptures, murals, etc.), still under sculptors', muralists', or other artists' copyrights. But Commons forbids noncommercial licensing.
- File:Onji-jinja Shinryu.jpg – might be in public domain, but who was its sculptor and when was it installed?
- File:Speybank by Luc Deleu.jpg – the artist w:Luc Deleu is still living
- File:Takebe Taisha daitoro.jpg – might be in public domain, but who was the street lamp's designer and when was it installed?
- File:The Statue of Liberty in Momoisi-Oirase Aomori Japan.jpg – see w:Replicas of the Statue of Liberty#Japan. Japanese replicas were installed after 1999. Replicas deserve their own copyrights (refer to Davidson v. United States over U.S. Post Office's use of the Las Vegas replica in their stamps without license from the replica sculptor Robert Davidson).
- File:US Navy 060208-N-1194D-003 Musician 2nd Class A.C. Smith, left, Musician 2nd Class Tommy Horner, center, and the rest of the 7th Fleet Band's big band Far East Edition perform for hundreds of spectators on a stage made entirely.jpg – ice sculptures
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Here are my thoughts:
- Delete File:Speybank by Luc Deleu.jpg, File:The Statue of Liberty in Momoisi-Oirase Aomori Japan.jpg - Clearly copyrighted artistic works.
- Unsure File:Onji-jinja Shinryu.jpg, File:Takebe Taisha daitoro.jpg - Copyright owners are unknown, and when they were installed are unknown.
- Keep File:US Navy 060208-N-1194D-003 Musician 2nd Class A.C. Smith, left, Musician 2nd Class Tommy Horner, center, and the rest of the 7th Fleet Band's big band Far East Edition perform for hundreds of spectators on a stage made entirely.jpg - The main object is the performers, the ice sculptures are incidentally included.
- Ox1997cow (talk) 07:48, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: However, since File:US Navy 060208-N-1194D-003 Musician 2nd Class A.C. Smith, left, Musician 2nd Class Tommy Horner, center, and the rest of the 7th Fleet Band's big band Far East Edition perform for hundreds of spectators on a stage made entirely.jpg was taken by US Navy in Japan, I am not sure whether to apply Japanese de minimis clause or US de minimis clause. --Ox1997cow (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ox1997cow: it can be cropped, but must be made as a new file instead of overwriting it, as such act may not conform to COM:OVERWRITE. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:27, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also, regarding File:Takebe Taisha daitoro.jpg, here is the whole discussion from File talk:Takebe Taisha daitoro.jpg:
- @JWilz12345: However, since File:US Navy 060208-N-1194D-003 Musician 2nd Class A.C. Smith, left, Musician 2nd Class Tommy Horner, center, and the rest of the 7th Fleet Band's big band Far East Edition perform for hundreds of spectators on a stage made entirely.jpg was taken by US Navy in Japan, I am not sure whether to apply Japanese de minimis clause or US de minimis clause. --Ox1997cow (talk) 07:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
From "File talk:Takebe Taisha daitoro.jpg
|
---|
Indeed this is an artistic work. Definitely this is not a building. Laitr Keiows (talk) 15:16, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
|
_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:30, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: Anyway, in case File:US Navy 060208-N-1194D-003 Musician 2nd Class A.C. Smith, left, Musician 2nd Class Tommy Horner, center, and the rest of the 7th Fleet Band's big band Far East Edition perform for hundreds of spectators on a stage made entirely.jpg, which country's law applies, Japan or the United States? How would you compare Japanese de minimis clause with South Korean de minimis clause and US de minimis clause? South Korean de minimis clause uses incidental concept, and US de minimis clause uses trivial concept. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted first 4. Kept File:US Navy 060208-N-1194D-003 Musician 2nd Class A.C. Smith, left, Musician 2nd Class Tommy Horner, center, and the rest of the 7th Fleet Band's big band Far East Edition perform for hundreds of spectators on a stage made entirely.jpg after cropping and deleting copyrighted section. --Ellywa (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
"simple logo"? How about the reflecting thing on the logo itself? DerpGunKV2 (talk) 11:58, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not a simple text logo. --Ellywa (talk) 20:26, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Oscitare as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: violates COM:FOP Cambodia Stefan2 (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Who made this building? When was it built? --Stefan2 (talk) 12:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- I'd love to ping Khmer Wikipedia administrators @Albeiror24, Trezoo, គីមស៊្រុន, and វ័ណថារិទ្ធ: , as the details of author(s) of this work may be highly recored in Khmer. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 15:48, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- I do not know about who took this photograph. Also, this building is part of the Cambodian Royal Palace and was built in 1913-14 (according to the Wikipedia article about Cambodian Royal Palace).--Trezoo (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Trezoo: not the name or the person who took the photo (the uploader) that was being asked, but who was the author of the architectural work; that is, the architect, and is he/she dead for more than 50 years (which would make the building compliant with {{PD-Cambodia}})? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)
- I do not know about who took this photograph. Also, this building is part of the Cambodian Royal Palace and was built in 1913-14 (according to the Wikipedia article about Cambodian Royal Palace).--Trezoo (talk) 22:07, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. this photo can be undeleted 121 years after 1914 so in 2035 .. --Ellywa (talk) 20:29, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Calligraphy is subject to copyright protection per COM:TOO Taiwan. Wcam (talk) 12:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:30, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DerpGunKV2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a copyrighted news program. The file is PD-textlogo. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not a simple text logo. --Ellywa (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DerpGunKV2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logo of a copyrighted news program The file is PD-textlogo, text covers over 80% of the logo. ~Cybularny Speak? 13:13, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not a simple text logo. --Ellywa (talk) 20:31, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Nur ein Teil des Logos ist sichtbar. Unterhalb des orangenen Balkens steht bei der WWK stets der Zusatz "Eine starke Gemeisnchaft" oder "Versicherungen". Eine Version ohne Unterzeile existiert nicht. Die richtige Version existiert bereits auf Wikimedia (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WWK_Unternehmenslogo.svg). 185.156.125.1 14:43, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. The file is currently in use on the projects, so it has to be maintained. --Ellywa (talk) 20:33, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP France, derivative work that focuses on a copyrighted element. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Between the PSG crest and the poster below, the focus of the image is on copyrighted elements and there is no freedom of panorama in France. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:56, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:34, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Este símbolo ya no es el actual, ahora mismo se utiliza la nueva versión ya subida a la web. Se debe borrar, ya que no es legal y da lugar a confusión. Caet.oficial (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Innecesario eliminarlo; no porque sea el actual se debe retirar ¿acaso retiramos los escudos de otras épocas?. El nuevo archivo subido es exactamente igual pero no es vectorial, así que carece de preferencia; además el diseño es el mismo. No se elimina . --HansenBCN (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion per remark of HansenBCN. --Ellywa (talk) 20:35, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dennis william nyback (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Dennis and Jack Pike St. Cinema Seattle 1993.jpg
- File:Pike St. Cinema Dennis and Jack 1108 Pike St Seattle Wa.jpg
- File:NybackJohnHolteband.jpg
- File:Jack Stevenson Author Film Showman (1).jpg
- File:Son-house-with-bob-west-1968-2.jpg
- File:John Holte with 3 musicians in his big band The Radio Rhythm Orchestra Seattle.jpg
- File:Lew Cook c1920.jpg
- File:Bill Plympton and Matt Groening.jpg
- File:1950 1061725711670 9535 n.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
[[Category:ALL OF THESE PHTOS EXCEPT FOR LEW COOK WERE TAKEN BY ME WITH MY CAMERA. IF YOU VISIT I CAN SHOW YOU THE ORIGINALS. I USED A 35MM PENTAX K 1000 THAT STILL USE FOR PHOTOS AND SLIDES, SEVERAL OF THE PHOTOS ARE OF ME. Dennis william nyback (talk) 16:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)]]
Ticket:2019010210005212 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 23:00, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. Dennis william nyback (talk) 18:26, 18 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dennis william nyback (talk · contribs)
[edit]Scanned images do not appear to be own work.
- File:The Mel Blanc Project Program created by Oregon Cartoon Institute Portland 2011.jpg
- File:The Mel Blanc Project Lectures created by Oregon Cartoon Institute 2011 Portland.pdf
- File:Flyer for showing of A Boy and His Car A film made by Anne Richardson.jpg
- File:Anne Richardson.jpg
- File:Spade & Archer.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Ellen, I took the photos of Anne Richardson and of Spade & Archer. The other three items are ephemera from projects Anne I did. There is no copyright on any of this stuff. the Mel Blanc project items were promotional materials distributed far and wide. Same with the post card for A Boy and His Car. I must have a thousand of them. Thanks, Dennis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennis william nyback (talk • contribs) 20:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted three, scans of copyrighted work. Kept the two photos per remark of uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 20:38, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Desde DIVOPE han marcado el símbolo como ilegal. La base no tiene bandera propia. Caet.oficial (talk) 18:59, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: No reason for deletion of this file. According to the Deletion policy a supposedly incorrect, original researched or not-neutral file is not a reason for deletion. This aspect should be addressed on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:39, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Băng Tỏa as no source (No source since). The photograph's date is listed as 7 January 1936, while it isn't clear that this date indicates the creation date or publication date, I prefer that it's nominated for deletion so it can be viewed by people with more access to its source. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Donald Trung: According to this article, the photo was taken in April 1936: "Đền Bạch Mã ở Hà Nội, tháng 4/1936. Đền thờ thần Bạch Mã (Ngựa trắng) và thờ thần Long Đỗ. Ngôi đền này cũng là nơi thường diễn ra các nghi lễ uống máu ăn thề. Trong ảnh, người chủ nợ đang ngồi đợi trong vòng vôi."--Ltn12345 (talk) 15:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Ltn12345: Please feel free to add the source to the file description. — Băng Tỏa 22:04, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is not clear if/when this photo was published. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Vietnam a photo is in PD 75 years after publication. --Ellywa (talk) 20:43, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Băng Tỏa as no source (No source since). Published before 1948, unlikely to be copyrighted under Vietnamese law. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:44, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- It needs a source to verify that it's legitimately published in the 40s and not from a modern staging/production/movie. — Băng Tỏa 11:46, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Curious, but why do you think that it could be from a film set? Is it the sharpness of the photograph compared to the somewhat "blurrier lines" of actual 1940's photographs or a modern person you recognise? I prefer to follow the precautionary principle that there should be significant doubt for an image to be deleted and I am sure that you tagged it in good faith, but having seen plenty of files from the 1940's I don't think this file seems out of place. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Băng Tỏa and Donald Trung: According to a article from Zing News, this photo was taken in April 1939. I don't know whether or not there is consensus on the reliability of Zing News, but I think it is generally reliable. Ltn12345 (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ltn12345: Zing News is an acceptable source since it's an online newspaper with editorial oversight. Please feel free to insert the source into the description box of the pic. — Băng Tỏa 16:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Băng Tỏa and Donald Trung: According to a article from Zing News, this photo was taken in April 1939. I don't know whether or not there is consensus on the reliability of Zing News, but I think it is generally reliable. Ltn12345 (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Curious, but why do you think that it could be from a film set? Is it the sharpness of the photograph compared to the somewhat "blurrier lines" of actual 1940's photographs or a modern person you recognise? I prefer to follow the precautionary principle that there should be significant doubt for an image to be deleted and I am sure that you tagged it in good faith, but having seen plenty of files from the 1940's I don't think this file seems out of place. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 12:57, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- United States public domain
In order for this pic (published between 1926 and 1977) to be kept on Commons, it must also meet the following criteria to be in the United States public domain.
- It was first published outside the States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days) and I think that it's okay to assume that this pic belongs to French School of the Far East. The organization was founded in 1900 in Hanoi. → So I assume the pic was first published in Vietnam.
- It was in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996) According to Vietnamese copyright law, it was in PD in Vietnam in 2014 (which is 1939 plus 75 years).
— Băng Tỏa 17:27, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Băng Tỏa: I don't know much about copyright law, but according to this page, the 2005 law "was not retroactive, so works that had gone into the public domain remained in the public domain even if they now qualified for copyright protection", and "We may assume the 50-year term applied on the URAA date, so works published before 23 December 1948 where the author remains unknown, and works by authors who died before 23 December 1948, are in the public domain in the United States." Ltn12345 (talk) 00:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Ltn12345: You are right. I just recently knew that the URAA date for Vietnam is December 23rd 1998 (not January 1st 1996) and the term is 50 years. Publication date + 50 years = 1939 + 50 years = 1989. So this pic is in the public domain in Vietnam in 1989, which qualifies it to be in the U.S PD before 1998. I guess the case can be closed now. — Băng Tỏa 18:17, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Keep It looks old. This photo is probably took in the early 1900's, (hope it's before 1927), or anytime older. Leomk0403 (talk) 03:49, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It is not clear if/when this photo was published. Per Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Vietnam a photo is in PD 75 years after publication. --Ellywa (talk) 20:44, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
Small images without metadata, unlikely to be own works, no evidence of a free license.
Yann (talk) 20:45, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- author: SuchaKlub
- licence: ccbysa4.0
- size: < 1000px
Why the photos from Zaolzie were submitted for deletion?--Rosewood (talk) 22:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
- Because of SuchaKlub upload record, which is mostly copyright violations, and because these files are small and have no metadata, which is usually a sign that they are copied from the Internet. If they are SuchaKlub's own works, why not uploading the original files? Yann (talk) 18:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
- Has anyone contacted SuchaKlub?--Qasinka (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, this is photo taken by the student during the educational wiki-project with Wikimedia Polska ̴̴̴ Klara Sielicka-Baryłka (WMPL) (talk) 12:08, 25 November 2021 (UTC)
- Has anyone contacted SuchaKlub?--Qasinka (talk) 09:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: On [[2]] uploader states it are their own images and they do not have the original versions any more. So decided to assume good faith and keep these images. --Ellywa (talk) 20:46, 4 May 2022 (UTC)