Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/10/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Files uploaded by Anhlinhceo47 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unnamed UserName me 10:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Already deleted by someone. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
I don't need it anymore. Markoss512 (talk) 19:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: User's request. --Yann (talk) 19:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
because is lol 50.248.210.153 23:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC) <bɾ> ̆keep ̴̴̴ ̴̴̃
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --clpo13(talk) 00:59, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect file name Michieliosios (talk) 09:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Michieliosios: Files can be moved via {{Move}} A09090091 (talk) 15:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Not yet used, and license problem. Sorry. Antoine Beretto (talk) 16:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2021/mar/19/drowned-land-hunger-stalks-south-sudans-flooded-villages SashiRolls (talk) 01:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 15:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright? https://www.pinterest.com/pin/426012445980062977/ SashiRolls (talk) 02:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 15:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 22:03, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong file location uploaded LegendaryLim (talk) 09:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @LegendaryLim: Files can be moved via {{Move}} A09090091 (talk) 15:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Advertising material: Spam.
I personally don't think it is a spam. rubin16 (talk) 14:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @rubin16: Sorry about that. I did some batch task and was too lazy to rewrite the rationale. However, considering that the file name means "Full house moving service" and that it is out of scope, it should be deleted, either speedily or not. Unnamed UserName me 15:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality; subject almost invisible MPF (talk) 10:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
very low quality, subject minuscule in photo MPF (talk) 10:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:13, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
its my photo and i want to delete it Shafieinet (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: F10 --Achim (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
this is my photo and i want delete it , thanks Shafieinet (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Don't know why it hasn't been deleted per closed DR. --Achim (talk) 16:38, 29 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Racinggold (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional/advertising and personal images, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:RBR Lamp Spread Final CMYK.jpg
- File:Vase 3 V2 Final CMYK.jpg
- File:TBRIZ-RBPRODUCT-257v2 Final CMYK.jpg
- File:Lamp 2 Spread Final CMYK.jpg
- File:Jake Humphrey Monaco.jpg
- File:POTT 4.jpg
- File:POTT 3.jpg
- File:Kai Ebel Monza.jpg
- File:POTT 2.jpg
- File:POTT 1.jpg
- File:ArtofRacing 1.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Puripuneet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal documents and image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:REWARD POINT CERTIFICATE.jpg
- File:INDIAN OIL CERTIFICATE.jpg
- File:MBA Degree Certificate.jpg
- File:BBA Degree Certificate.jpg
- File:Puneet Puri.jpg
- File:Atom -electron nature.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. And above COM:TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
A mix of images taken from FB, a screenshot or 2. PCP
- File:พระสิทธิการโกศล (เมธ ปญฺญาวโร)2564.jpg
- File:พระชะรินทร์.jpg
- File:พระมหาสถิต.jpg
- File:พระสาสนโสภณ (โกศล สิรินฺธโร)2564.jpg
- File:พระราชวิมลโมลี (มานพ)2564.jpg
- File:สมเด็จพระพุฒาจารย์ (สนิท ชวนปญฺโญ)2564.jpg
- File:พระวิสุทธาธิบดี (เชิด จิตฺตคุตฺโต).jpg
- File:พระพรหมบัณฑิต (ประยูร ธมฺมจิตฺโต)8.jpg
- File:พระราชภาวนาพิธาน (ศิริวัฒน์ สิริวฑฺฒโน)8.jpg
- File:พระพรหมวชิรโมลี (ทองอยู่ ญาณวิสุทโธ)904.jpg
- File:พระครูพัฒนสารคุณ (สอ)01.jpg
- File:พระครูสุภัทรโพธิคุณ (เผือก)01.jpg
- File:พระพุทธสุรินทรพร.jpg
- File:พระธาตุเจดีย์วัดกลางสุรินทร์.jpg
- File:พระครูปริยัติกิจธำรง พระครูสัญญาบัตรรองเจ้าอาวาสวัดราษฎร์.jpg
- File:พระครูปริยัติกิจธำรง รับพระบัญชา.jpg
- File:พระครูปริยัติกิจธำรง เจ้าคณะอำเภอเมืองสุรินทร์.jpg
- File:เหรียญที่ระลึกพระราชพิศาลสุธี(อาจ) วัดทุ่งโพธิ์.jpg
- File:รูปที่ระลึกพระราชพิศาลสุธี(อาจ).jpg
- File:ี่เหรียญที่ระลึกพระสังวรวิสุทธิคุณ.jpg
- File:ที่ระลึกพระครูพิพิธวรการ (หลวงปู่อึก).jpg
- File:เหรียญที่ระลึกพระครูพิพิธวรการ.jpg
- File:พระสังวรวิสุทธิคุณ (แผ่นทอง จาครโต).jpg
- File:เจ้าคุณแผ่นทององค์สรวง.jpg
- File:พระครูประภัศร์อาภาธร.jpg
- File:พระครูพิพิธวรการ.jpg
- File:พระราชวิมลโมลี (มานพ ปิยสีโล).jpg
- File:พระมหาชาญณรงค์ จิรเมธี.jpg
- File:พระพรหมวชิรโมลี (ทองอยู่ ญาณวิสุทฺโธ).jpg
- File:พระครูปริยัติกิจธำรง (สมหวัง อคฺคเสโน) รองเจ้าคณะจังหวัดสุรินทร์.jpg
- File:พระเทพวชิรญาณโสภณ วิ. (เยื้อน ขนฺติพโล).jpg
- File:พระราชพิศาลสุธี (อาจ อาวุธปญฺโญ).jpg
- File:พระครูประภัศร์อาภาธร (ออก อาภาธโร) วัดสนสัทธาราม.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:02, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
All taken from FB - all need OTRS
- File:QCU San Francisco Campus Façade.jpg
- File:QCU San Bartolome Campus Façade.jpg
- File:QCU Batasan Hills Campus Building.jpg
- File:QCU San Bartolome Campus Main Entrance.jpg
- File:Laboratory Building and Auditorium at QCU San Bartolome Campus.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by T.hrytsenko (talk · contribs)
[edit]All taken from FB, all need OTRS
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Військовий капелан.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Заступник керівника Департаменту військового капеланства.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Капелан на передовій.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Лекція "Релігія та наука".jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Священник УГКЦ.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Морська піхота України.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. УАЛ.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. УКУ Етика-Політика-Економіка.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Виступ на конференції для молоді.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Виступ на конференції.jpg
- File:Андрій Зелінський. Авдіївська промзона.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prashanthdalawaiwiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]All from the internet or FB - needs OTRS or proof of PD
- File:J S Rao Emeritus Chairman in 2006.png
- File:J S Rao Fundamental Contributions in 2004.png
- File:J S Rao signature.png
- File:J S Rao Family in 1970.png
- File:JS Rao Distinguished Alumnus Award in 2011.jpg
- File:J S Rao Talk on 29 Februrary 2020.png
- File:J S Rao Books 1983-2000.png
- File:J S Rao Books 2000-2017.png
- File:J S Rao as founding father in 1969.jpg
- File:J S Rao in 1983.png
- File:J S Rao in 2020.jpg
- File:Graphic-2-iftomm-50th-anniversary.jpg
- File:J S Rao in 2014.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:06, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by A&D Talent Agency (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unlikely to be own work. Screenshots without original sources.
- File:Screenshot 20210914-111527 Facebook.jpg
- File:Ali king reper.webp
- File:Ali king rap star.webp
- File:Ali King most recognized Slavic rap star.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 07:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamersonscher1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work, 2 are from FB per MD. PCP
- File:Jamerson scher 3.jpg
- File:Jamerson scher 4.jpg
- File:Jamerson scher 0.jpg
- File:Jamerson scher 1.jpg
- File:Jamerson scher 2.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Variants of a copyrighted logo, not own work.
- File:Post-1061121-0-79171500-1611817441 thumb.png
- File:Prima-TV-va-avea-un-nou-logo.jpg
- File:Alternative PrimaTV 2020 SVG.png
Gikü (talk) 09:54, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is really borderline case, but I decide, that this is complex logo. Taivo (talk) 22:07, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logos uploaded deceptively as Creative Commons.
- File:Logo playhouse disney.png
- File:Jetix logo tv jetix.jpg
- File:Download logo.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2020.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2018.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2014.jpg
- File:% 3Ftirile Prima TV 2014.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2008.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2007.png
- File:Focus Prima TV 2004.png
- File:Focus Prima TV % 282003-2004% 29.png
- File:Focus% 2B Prima TV % 282001-2002% 29.png
- File:Focus Prima TV % 281999-2001% 29.png
- File:Disney Channel Russia logo.png
- File:Logo ch big new.png
- File:Disney Channel RS 2011.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002 logo.png
- File:Disney Channel logo 2011.png
- File:Tv paprika 2021 wide.png
- File:TV K Lumea.png
- File:Atomic TV.png
- File:LogoAtomicTv.png
- File:Digi 24.png
- File:Analog TV Timi% 3Foara.png
- File:OTV % 282009% 29.png
- File:OTV % 282006% 29.png
- File:OTV % 282001% 29.png
- File:De-ziua-noastra-am-pus-la-cale-un-show-cum-numai-o-data-la-17-ani-vezi-1-decembrie-se-traieste-la-protv size20.jpg
- File:Stirile protv.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV osb 2008.png
- File:Logo 2010 protv.png
- File:Logo 2014 new.png
- File:Index 8.png
- File:Canal 38 Amerom Bucure% 3Fti.png
- File:Prima 2004.png
- File:Cartoon Network logo 2010.png
- File:Disney Channel - logo (2019).png
- File:Logo 2011 disney junior.png
- File:Disney Junior logo 2011.png
- File:Logo summer disney channel.jpg
- File:Discovery Channel 2019.png
- File:Discovery Channel logo 2014.png
- File:Discovery Channel 2009 logo.png
- File:Discovery Channel 2000.png
- File:Discovery Channel 1995.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002 alt.png
- File:Happy Channel % 282020-present% 29.png
- File:Happy Channel % 282016-2020% 29.png
- File:Happy Channel % 282014-2016% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:ZU TV % 282014-present% 29.png
- File:Zu channel logo 2013.png
- File:PRO Cinema % 282003-2004% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:Acas% 3F % 281994-1998% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:Acas% 3F Clasic.png
- File:Canal 31 % 28Romania% 29.png
- File:Playhouse Disney 2000.png
- File:Playhouse Disney Romania logo 2009.png
- File:Maxresdefault logo.jpg
- File:Prima TV % 282002% 29.png
- File:Prima 1999.png
- File:Prima 1997.png
- File:Post-1061121-0-16125700-1609149672 thumb.png
- File:PRO TV % 281994-1995% 2C prelaunch% 29.png
- File:Fox Kids Play logo 2003.png
- File:Jetix Play 2007.png
- File:Jetix Play 2004 V2.png
- File:Kanal D alt.png
- File:JimJam 2018.png
- File:JimJam (1).png
- File:JimJam logo.png
- File:PRO Gold % 282017% 29.png
- File:Acasa gold logo 2015.png
- File:Acasa Gold % 282012-2015% 29.png
- File:Kiss TV.png
- File:Kiss TV % 282008% 29.png
- File:Kiss TV Romania.png
- File:Cartoon Network Alternative logo.png
- File:Animal Planet 2018.png
- File:Animal Planet logos.png
- File:Animal Planet 2006 logo.png
- File:Animal Planet 1996.png
- File:TVR1 2019.png
- File:TVR 1 % 282010% 29.png
- File:TVR 1 % 282004% 29.png
- File:Romania1 2001.png
- File:Romania 1 99.png
- File:Tvr198.png
- File:TVR1 1996.png
- File:TVR 1 % 281994% 29.png
- File:TVR 1 % 281991% 29.png
- File:Tvr1 1990.png
- File:TVRL.png
- File:Televiziunea Rom% 3Fn% 3F % 281985% 29.png
- File:Programul 1 1980.png
- File:TVR 1 1973.png
- File:TVR oldest.png
- File:Antena 3 % 282016-present% 29.png
- File:Antena 3 A3.png
- File:Antena 3 % 282005-2009% 29.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2020 logo.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV logo 2017.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV logo 2016.png
- File:Stirile Pro TV logo 2015.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2013 LOGO.jpg
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2013.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 2003.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 1999.png
- File:% 3Ftirile Pro TV 1995.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282017% 29.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282008% 29.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282003% 29.png
- File:PRO TV Interna% 3Fional % 282000% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282017% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282016% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282015% 29.png
- File:Pro-tv-prezinta-reteta-pentru-o-toamna-de-succes.png
- File:PRO TV % 282008-2013% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 282003-2008% 29.png
- File:PRO TV % 281995% 29.png
- File:Antena 2 logo 2006.png
- File:Antena 2 % 282007-2011% 29.png
- File:Acasa % 281998-2003% 2C s teni% 29.png
- File:Acasa % 282003-2012% 29.png
- File:Observator 2020.png
- File:Observator 2016.png
- File:Observator Logo 2007.png
- File:Boomerang 2015.png
- File:Boomerang TM Logo 2012.png
- File:Boomerang Europe.png
- File:Playhouse-disney logo.png
- File:National 24 Plus new.png
- File:N24Plus new.png
- File:N24 Plus 2009.png
- File:N24 2004.png
- File:National TV.png
- File:Na% 3Fional TV 2003.png
- File:Minimax 2021 (1).png
- File:Minimax3d logo.jpg
- File:Minimax logo (1).png
- File:Logo of minimax 1999 2004 recreation by andrewdaniel2k6 ddvh94p-fullview.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282007-2015% 29.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282006-2007% 29.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282005-2006% 29.png
- File:Realitatea TV % 282004-2005% 29.png
- File:Realitatea tv 2001.png
- File:PRO Cinema % 282017% 2C with purple background% 29.png
- File:Pro-cinema-va-difuza-cea-de-a-13-a-editie-a-festivalului-de-film-studentesc-bdquo-geo-saizescu-rdquo size20.png
- File:PRO Cinema % 282009-2014% 29.png
- File:Daca-e-luni-la-pro-cinema-e-thriller size11.jpg
- File:PRO Cinema % 282004-2006% 29.png
- File:PRO X % 282017% 29.png
- File:Sport.ro % 282009-2017% 29.png
- File:Sport.ro % 282007-2009% 29.png
- File:TV Sport.png
- File:Antena 1 social media.png
- File:Antena 1 graphics 2006.png
- File:Antena 1 Mereu Aproape.png
- File:Antena 1 % 281993-1998% 2C on-screen bug% 29.png
- File:B1 logo 2021 2.png
- File:Png-transparent-logo-fox-kids-fox-broadcasting-company-television-show-high-school-dxd-logo-television-text-logo.png
- File:Jetix-Logo.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282020-present% 29.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282019-2020% 29.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282019% 29.png
- File:Realitatea Plus % 282015% 29.png
- File:Cartoon Network % 2B1 Alternative.png
- File:Cartoon Network 2004 Red2.png
- File:Cartoon Network % 282004% 29 % 28Gray% 29 % 28Alt% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 282010% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 282006% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 281998% 29.png
- File:Antena 1 % 281993% 29.png
- File:Cartoon Network 2004 Red.png
- File:Cartoon Network Alternative.png
- File:Disney Channel % 282010% 29.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002.png
Gikü (talk) 19:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:11, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Account has endless previous uploads deleted for the same reason. Some logos in this list could stay because they don't exceed COM:TOO, but I'd still suggest deleting them because they lack sourcing and can thus be fake.
- File:Prima TV Logo 2022.webp
- File:A1 HD logo 2022.svg
- File:Antena 1 logo 2010.svg
- File:Antena 1 logo 2007.webp
- File:Antena 1 logo 1998.png
- File:Antena 1 logo 1993.png
- File:Noul logo Antena International.webp
- File:Antena International Logo 2022.webp
- File:Disney-Channel-Logo 2022-Prezent.png
- File:Logo 2017-2022.png
- File:Logo 2014-2017.png
- File:Logo 2011-2014.png
- File:Disney Channel 2002 alt.webp
- File:Disney-junior-disney-junior-logo-2019-text-alphabet-number-symbol-transparent-png-2827146.png
- File:Logo-Disney-Junior.png
- File:Playhouse Disney Logo.webp
- File:Logo Disney Junior 2019.png
- File:Disney Junior Logo Romania.webp
- File:Playhouse-disney romania logo 2009-2011.png
- File:Noul logo Prima TV din 2022.png
- File:Noul logo PRIMA TV din 2022.webp
- File:PRO TV Logo 2017-Prezent.png
- File:PRO TV Logo 2016-2017.png
- File:PRO TV Logo 2015-2016.png
- File:Playhouse-disney.png
- File:Disney Channel Logo 2022-Tentative.webp
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2017-Prezent.webp
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2010-2017.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2009-2010.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2008-2009.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 2006-2008.png
- File:Cartoon Network Logo 1998-2006.png
- File:B1 TV Logo 2021-Prezent.png
- File:B1 TV Logo 7 Mai 2021-Prezent.webp
- File:PRO ARENA Logo 2022-Prezent.jpg
- File:PRO X Logo 2017-2022.png
- File:TV Sport Logo 2003-2007.gif
- File:Disney Channel Logo 2022- Tentative.png
- File:Prima TV 29.png
Gikü (talk) 11:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:03, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
Taken from FB, needs OTRS from original photographer
- File:Йован Стояновски.jpg
- File:Българска книжарница, Скопие.jpg
- File:Скопски надпис.jpg
- File:От ляво на дясно....Йове Стояновски, Георги Боев, Н.В. Цар Симеон, Любчо Коцарев, Саво Коцарев.jpg
- File:Между първите панихиди на Тодор Александров.jpg
- File:Йован Стояновски, Любен Топчев и Панде Ефтимов.jpg
- File:Илия Тромпев.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abubakar Ibrahim Mohamed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Old images, no source, obviously not own work, wrong license.
- File:Nurieni sabir.png
- File:Asharaf man in baraawe.png
- File:Tunni man.png
- File:'Adayga.png
- File:The old Mihraab.png
Yann (talk) 12:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:34, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Exxelia Groupe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional material. Some of these images may be useful, but permission from a legal representative is needed. See COM:VRT.
- File:Micropen - Exxelia.png
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Rochester-USA.jpg
- File:JM Exxelia Chanteloup 072021.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Chanteloup.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Honeoye-USA 2021.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Marmoutier-2021.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine Longwood USA.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine - Maroc2.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine - Vietnam.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine - Maroc (Projet 3D 2022).jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine - Maroc.png
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Maroc.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Vietnam.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Honeoye-USA.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Longwood-USA.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Saint-Nazaire.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Pessac.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Marmoutier.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Illange.jpg
- File:Exxelia-Usine-Antigny.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine - Dearborn USA.png
- File:Exxelia Usine - Chanteloup-en-Brie.png
- File:Exxelia Site Dearborn.png
- File:Completed balloon exxelia micropen.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine Vietnam.png
- File:Exxelia Usine RAF Rochester.png
- File:Exxelia Usine Micropen Honeoye.png
- File:Exxelia Usine Dearborn.png
- File:Exxelia Usine St Nazaire.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine Pessac.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine Marmoutier.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine Illange.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine Chanteloup.jpg
- File:Exxelia Usine Antigny.jpg
- File:Space Electro Mecanical GBU.jpg
- File:Paul-maisonnier.jpg
- File:History exxelia en.png
- File:GBU Magnetiques en.png
- File:GBU Electromagnetiques en.png
- File:GBU Condensateurs en.png
- File:Exxelia-salle-blanche.jpg
- File:Electronicafair.jpg
- File:Exxelia-salon-electronica.jpg
- File:Exxelia-slip-ring.jpg
- File:Maps exxelia.png
- File:Exxelia-gifas.png
- File:Exxelia.png
- File:Cubisic SLP.jpg
- File:Electronicafair.png
- File:Exxelia-mars.png
- File:SIC SAFCO.jpg
- File:French-fab-exxelia.png
Yann (talk) 12:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann. Some of them are also combinations of logos from the enterprise itself with logos from other entities (File:French-fab-exxelia.png, File:Exxelia-gifas.png...) : I thinkit would require permission for both entities.
- And other images have been uploaded since, like File:GBU.png (other one has been speedy deleted), despite previously warning the user on frWP that it wasn't allowed. --NicoV (talk) 15:24, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 09:35, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by མཁན་ཨོ་རྒྱན་རིག་འཛིན། (talk · contribs)
[edit]These old photos are not own work
- File:Kathok Chokyi Gyatso.jpg
- File:Srimath Anagarika Dharmapala.png
- File:འཕྲིན་ཡིག.png
- File:དགེ་བསྙེན་དྷརྨ་པཱ་ལ། Dharmapala.jpg
- File:ཨ་ནག་ག་རི་ཀ.png
Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:29, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, windows made in 1963; no fop.
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 001.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 002.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 003.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 004.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 005.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 006.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 007.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 008.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 009.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 018.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; church built in 1952; artworks not in pd / no fop.
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 011.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 013.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 015.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 016.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
copyvio; church built in 1952; artworks not in pd / no fop.
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 017.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 018.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 019.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 020.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 021.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 022.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 023.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 024.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 025.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 028.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 029.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Konrad 030.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 17:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Google maps screenshot = copyvio Enyavar (talk) 00:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Berlinschneid (talk) 04:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement, no educational value. Velma (talk) 04:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, COM:POSTER. A09090091 (talk) 15:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with wrong atom charges & incorrect bond angles. Replaced by File:Sodium nonahydridorhenate-2D.png by the same uploader. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 04:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Putting the negative charges on the hydrogen atoms isn't the right way to depict this chemical compound. File:Sodium nonahydridorhenate-2D.png is better. Marbletan (talk) 12:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope personal logo Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama for artworks in Norway TommyG (talk) 07:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Artwork created in 1986 by artist who died in 1994. Still covered by copyright. TommyG (talk) 08:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
No commercial FOP in France Caehlla2357 (talk) 08:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Caehlla2357 (talk • contribs) 08:08, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:45, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Joshifresco
[edit]- File:Surendra Pal Joshi in 2017.jpg
- File:Surendra Pal Joshi in 2017.jpg
- File:IMG-20180626-WA0000.jpg
- File:FINAL 04.jpg
- File:17With mf husain.jpg
- File:Rashtrapati Bhawan new.jpg
- File:01 Blue.jpg
These images were all uploaded by User:Joshifresco. I believe they should be deleted because [not required and copyrighted]. Joshifresco (talk) 10:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Errors found 72.50.3.94 12:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: OOS and DW. --Achim (talk) 12:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 12:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
copyrighted picture Hoyanova (talk) 12:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 13:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
poor quality, no description Joschi71 (talk) 13:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Delete In absence of context or description, no meaningful educational value. Llwyld (talk) 03:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:46, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:PENIS nothing novel here. DMacks (talk) 14:06, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
This file is an image released by ELLE on March 29, 2021. It can be presumed that it is not the uploader's own work. (https://www.elle.co.kr/article/54041) Tychou12 (talk) 14:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Upload them locally, if useful. A09090091 (talk) 15:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete: Per nom. — BriefEdits (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Ich habe es aus Versehen hochgeladen. Mozamaniac (talk) 15:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:47, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KaunainAjaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KaunainAjaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Last remaining images, small images without metadata probably copied from social media, or out of scope personal images.
- File:نظرا مسجد.jpg
- File:Nazra Mosque.jpg
File:Aaqib Anjum Aafi.jpg- File:Kaunain Ajaz.jpg
- File:Aslam Chowk Madhubani Protest 1.jpg
Yann (talk) 18:15, 11 June 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Yann I'm contesting the deletion of the image of mine from these because it was clicked by KaunainAjaz. It hasn't been copied from social media. I'm not sure about other images. Regards, ─ The Aafī (talk) 13:28, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- @TheAafi: You should upload over this one the original image with full EXIF data. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
- Yann, Your suggestion is nice but I do not have access to the image with complete EXIF details. I just remember us all being in the Old library of Jamia, when Kaunain captured this image. So this is definitely not an image that he has copied from social media, and it is not either out of scope. I personally use it at several places. In case, I happen to meet him, I'm definitely going to tell him to upload images with full EXIF details only. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Minorax, could you please close this old discussion? ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- If you can't provide the original images with EXIF, then send a permission via COM:VRT. Yann (talk) 19:14, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- @Minorax, could you please close this old discussion? ─ The Aafī (talk) 18:31, 31 October 2022 (UTC)
- Yann, Your suggestion is nice but I do not have access to the image with complete EXIF details. I just remember us all being in the Old library of Jamia, when Kaunain captured this image. So this is definitely not an image that he has copied from social media, and it is not either out of scope. I personally use it at several places. In case, I happen to meet him, I'm definitely going to tell him to upload images with full EXIF details only. Thanks. ─ The Aafī (talk) 19:37, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
- @TheAafi: You should upload over this one the original image with full EXIF data. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Varying sizes and quality, images of the mosque is clearly a screenshot. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
The poster is likely to be a copyright infringement; it was manipulated. --Fiona (talk) 16:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:48, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation : http://www.mathieubitton.fr/awards/ Lagribouille (talk) 17:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Nutshinou Talk! 12:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Aus persönlichen Gründen möchte ich diese Datei nun doch nicht in meinem Konto hosten und bitte (ausnahmsweise!) um Löschung. --Subbass1 (talk) 09:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:42, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lịch Gỗ Treo Tường (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:LỐC LỊCH GỖ ĐẸP NĂM 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH BLOC TẾT BẰNG GỖ BÁC HỒ 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH BLOC ĐẸP NĂM 2019.jpg
- File:BLOC LỊCH GỖ ĐẸP NĂM 2019.jpg
- File:BLOC LỊCH GỖ GIÁ RẺ NĂM 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT CÔNG GIÁO GIÁ RẺ.jpg
- File:QUÀ TẶNG NHÀ CHỒNG TẾT.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT THEO TÔN GIÁO.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT 2019 TẶNG ÔNG BÀ.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT ĐẸP GIÁ RẺ NĂM 2019.jpg
- File:IN LỊCH TẾT THEO YÊU CẦU.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT KÈM BLOC.jpg
- File:LỊCH BLOC TẾT GỖ.jpg
- File:BLOC LỊCH PHONG THỦY ĐẸP.jpg
- File:LỐC LỊCH PHONG THỦY ĐẸP.jpg
- File:BLOC LỊCH TẾT GIÁ RẺ.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT PHONG THỦY Ý NGHĨA.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT ĐẸP Ý NGHĨA.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT GIÁ RẺ 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT GIÁ RẺ.jpg
- File:IN LỊCH TẾT 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT BẰNG GỖ 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT GỖ THUYỀN VÀNG.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT THEO PHONG THỦY.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT GỖ 2019.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT GỖ CÁ CHÉP.jpg
- File:LỊCH TẾT BẰNG GỖ.jpg
⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 15:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry. I misclicked when tagging {{Db-spam}} to the author's images. I forgot to choose "prepend any text" in VFC, but they are now deleted. ⁂๖ۣۜJon ♥ ๖ۣۜDaenerys໖ 15:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused text image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anikit chaudhary (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works but screengrabs, found online.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:41, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Metadata says it's a screenshot. Furthermore there is a similar picture found here: https://mn2s.com/booking-agency/talent-roster/maria-angelico/ discospinster (talk) 22:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
screenshot from MS Power BI. Might by copyvio, but also out of scope Enyavar (talk) 22:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
screenshot from MS Power BI. Might by copyvio, but also out of scope Enyavar (talk) 22:32, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
screenshot with random business management data, out of scope Enyavar (talk) 22:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Instagram files aren't ordinarily licensed under Creative Commons. And, it's not clear that such a license was given by the author; the current link to the source page is a deadlink. Mikehawk10 (talk) 22:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:39, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
This image is of the copyrighted software Google Maps and has no fair use rationale. Megamanfan3 (talk) 01:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:55, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Foto by Roberto Stuckert Filho from the Dilma Rousseff Flickr stream
[edit]- File:Natal - RN (4857754506).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857753740).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857751892).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857751252).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857741906).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857743536).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857744316).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857745418).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857748842).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857749642).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857725596).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857730824).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857735822).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857736960).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857737962).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857741186).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857711374).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857714300).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857717720).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857720478).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857723628).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857724458).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857692636).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857698882).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857701260).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857702584).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857703744).jpg
- File:Natal - RN (4857709196).jpg
Photos uploaded to Dilma Rousseff's Flickr stream, need permission from the photographer credited or some evidence that the uploader is that person. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
No nooed anymore Yaseen Djor (talk) 08:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This article no need anymore Yaseen Djor (talk) 08:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. --Achim (talk) 08:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy delete Promo. A09090091 (talk) 15:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:OOS A09090091 (talk) 14:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
per COM:OOS A09090091 (talk) 14:36, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Palestine.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of Palestine.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:46, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused low-res diagram without context/description, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Microbolometer.svg, unused. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo of non-notable band, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:47, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:19, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork. The user has uploaded only copyrighted photos. Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:21, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious ownwork Sahaib3005 (talk) 21:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:48, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality; hundreds of far better photos of frigatebirds already on Commons MPF (talk) 09:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 15:16, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Peintre mort en 1985. Newnewlaw (talk) 15:55, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file is an image released by MCND official on January 13, 2021. It can be presumed that it is not the uploader's own work. (Twitter @McndOfficial_ Post) Tychou12 (talk) 01:27, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:29, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
There are two versions of this painting on Commons, File:Emmanuel Benner - Prehistoric Man Hunting Bears.jpg attributed to Emmanuel Benner and File:Leon-Maxime Faivre - Prehistoric Hunt.jpg attributed to Leon-Maxime Faivre. Multiple web sites show that the artist is Emmanuel Benner. Source link on File:Leon-Maxime Faivre - Prehistoric Hunt.jpg is a broken link. The only version of the source provided in the Leon-Maxime Faivre version on www.archive.org is a broken link. Discussed in village pump here with only two comments. Captain-tucker (talk) 01:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate of File:Emmanuel Benner, 1892 - Prehistoric hunt.jpg. --Yann (talk) 20:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Clear copyvio, not own work, screenshot of bing images Leijurv (talk) 02:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This is the uploader's first and only contribution to Commons. No indication of ownership, no EXIF data to prove originality. – Rhain ☔ 03:01, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work; clearly a copy of a modern book cover. Prosfilaes (talk) 03:28, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Images whose copyright was restored in the U.S. by the URAA are no longer accepted at Wikimedia Commons Pppery (talk) 03:43, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. Angelgreat (talk) 00:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- According to what Commons rule? Commons:URAA-restored copyrights appears to disagree, saying that files like this one should be evaluated carefully. That careful evaluation will be done by whichever admin closes this DR, when the time for that comes? Pppery (talk) 15:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Comment The source at the file page leads back to “Old Ocean Liners” on Facebook. Maybe someone with an account there could message them to see if they can provide more info about the provenance. About the only thing I can think of that could make it keepable (aside from a free licence from someone authorized) would be evidence of publication in the US without the formalities.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 03:47, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: URAA can't be the sole reason for deletion. Could have been published in USA at the time. --Yann (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
No longer at the source website, but the website has copyright information. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader suggests they are the person in the photo, need permission from the person who took the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
No longer at the website linked, but is still copyrighted material from the website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope anyway. --Yann (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
No source to prove CC license, https://www.comunisti-italiani.it show copyright © icon WindEwriX (talk) 06:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 20:39, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as no permission (No permission since) Ketil3 (talk) 06:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Keep This image is 29 years old and PD-Italy says 20 years or older is PD.Ketil3 (talk) 06:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)- Keep Sorry, somehow missed the date on the photo/license. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:40, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
File:(MM. Blanchet et Gilbert de Voisins dans le ballon Archimède, concours de distance en ballon de l'Aéro-club de France, départ à St Cloud, le 16 mai 1908) - (photographie de presse) - (Agence Rol).png
[edit]Low resolution .png version of File:(MM. Blanchet et Gilbert de Voisins dans le ballon Archimède, concours de distance en ballon de l'Aéro-club de France, départ à St Cloud, le 16 mai 1908) - (photographie de presse) - (Agence Rol).jpg. The original file was .jpg, there is no reason to keep a duplicate. Le Petit Chat (talk) 07:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:41, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Estuardo Salazar Rosales (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most taken from FB with others from the internet. 1 with no exif, unlikely to be own work. All need OTRS unless they can demonstrate PD
- File:Guillermo Flores Avendaño.jpg
- File:Luis Arturo González López.jpg
- File:Elfego Hernán Monzón Aguirre.jpg
- File:José Bernardo Escobar.png
- File:Pedro José Valenzuela.jpg
- File:Gregorio Márquez.jpg
- File:Mario Zenteno.jpg
- File:Violeta Reyes Pérez de García.jpg
- File:Enrique Maximiliano Castro Rodríguez.jpg
- File:Ricardo del Valle Barrera.jpg
- File:Alfonso Arroyave Mendez.jpg
- File:Prof. Alberto Orantes Lucas, uno de lo fundadores de la Casa de la Cultura.jpg
- File:CortesíaJuan José Muñoz Sequen.jpg
- File:Ladrillera de El Tejar 1940.jpg
- File:Felipe Muñoz Fernández.jpg
- File:Jaime Cordova Palacios.jpg
- File:Rafael Alvares Ovalle.jpg
- File:Andrés Curruchiche.jpg
- File:Parque Central de Chimaltenango. 1943.jpg
- File:Municipalidad de Chimaltenango.jpg
- File:Axel Figueroa Muñoz.jpg
- File:Balbino Garcia Zamora.jpg
- File:Don José Luis Morales Pérez.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Hmm... some of the portraits look pretty old and might be acceptable under {{PD-scan}}. Remember that we can reasonably assume that a photograph of a person could not have been taken after their death. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 22:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
- @ShyAlpaca482: agreed that some might be PD but thats the responsibility of the uploader. They are claiming this as own work Gbawden (talk) 08:21, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No answer. --Yann (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
licence is noncommercial Epipelagic (talk) 08:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and G7, see https://images.ala.org.au/image/1f50819a-2e70-498c-83a2-118d9cbcb87b / https://www.inaturalist.org/photos/79444580 for non-commercial license. Dylsss (talk) 00:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of book cover with unknown copyright status. In addition, the book and its author themselves are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
derivative work of book covers with unknown copyright status. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work as the uploader claims to be in the photo. Same as his twitter photo - https://twitter.com/authordibya?lang=en - the exif has also been edited. Think we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope anyway. --Yann (talk) 20:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Copyright holder Tilki Yapim". OTRS permission from Tilki Yapim needed. MKFI (talk) 10:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
"Source LME Lotti Management Team Author RCV Media", photographer unknown. Image has been published previously: [1]. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 10:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Signature under UK copyright, see COM:SIG UK 49.150.100.127 10:48, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per license tag, copyright expired in 2006. A09090091 (talk) 15:12, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:57, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Don't seem to be own work.
- File:Danh gia thi truong bat dong san da nang tiep tuc tang manh 2016.jpg
- File:Bat dong san da nang tiep tuc tang manh 2016.jpg
Unnamed UserName me 10:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The 2nd is a spam. --Yann (talk) 20:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Photo of photos. Who is photographer of depicted photos, when (s)he died and when the photos were published? Taivo (talk) 10:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused art of unknown artist, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:58, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ahunt as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not the uploader's own work as claimed, but a photograph of a copyright publication authored by TWA and as such cannot be released under a free licence Yann (talk) 12:52, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- The cover is probably {{PD-ineligible}}. Yann (talk) 12:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- It would not be covered by {{PD-ineligible}} because it does not "consist only of information that is itself in the public domain" or "lack evidence of original authorship/ creative input of any kind." The wording is unique and obviously copyright. It could be uploaded to en.wikipedia as "fair use" to illustrate a specific article, but not on Commons which does not accept "fair use" rationales.- Ahunt (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- The wording is only the title of the book, the date, and the edition number. That's not sufficient to create a copyright. The logo is probably de minimis. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- I uploaded this because I thought the artwork was de minimis and the rest was standard obvious text for a pamphlet that wouldn't rise to the level of copyright. Jonathan Schilling (talk) 22:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Then why did you upload it declared as your "own work" when it clearly is not? Obviously it is TWA's work. - Ahunt (talk) 01:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- There are to different things here which may or may not have a copyright: the picture and the book cover. I added a tag for the book cover. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is kind of degenerating - now the file has two different incongruent licences. Clearly the book cover is the subject of the photograph, it is not de minimus.- Ahunt (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- The book cover is not de minimis, but the licenses are OK. The book cover is of simple design, so there is no copyright. The picture has a copyright by the photographer. Yann (talk) 12:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- This is kind of degenerating - now the file has two different incongruent licences. Clearly the book cover is the subject of the photograph, it is not de minimus.- Ahunt (talk) 11:41, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- There are to different things here which may or may not have a copyright: the picture and the book cover. I added a tag for the book cover. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:39, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Then why did you upload it declared as your "own work" when it clearly is not? Obviously it is TWA's work. - Ahunt (talk) 01:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- I uploaded this because I thought the artwork was de minimis and the rest was standard obvious text for a pamphlet that wouldn't rise to the level of copyright. Jonathan Schilling (talk) 22:24, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- The wording is only the title of the book, the date, and the edition number. That's not sufficient to create a copyright. The logo is probably de minimis. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- It would not be covered by {{PD-ineligible}} because it does not "consist only of information that is itself in the public domain" or "lack evidence of original authorship/ creative input of any kind." The wording is unique and obviously copyright. It could be uploaded to en.wikipedia as "fair use" to illustrate a specific article, but not on Commons which does not accept "fair use" rationales.- Ahunt (talk) 13:03, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Unnecessary crop of File:Sketch map of North Mesopotamia to illustrate the paper by Mark Sykes, the central portions compiled by the author – The Geographical Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3, September 1907, pp. 237-254.png, misleadingly named, no possibility of educational use. GPinkerton (talk) 13:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- The user making this nomination is permanently blocked on En WP, and is hounding me on several WP projects and should be blocked here too. What's wrong with a file zooming in to show location of Kurdish tribes instead of a giant map of Western Asia? Thanks, Amr ibnu Kulthoum عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 14:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- The user (banned on English Wikipedia for long-term racist abuse of exactly this kind) is making these spurious uploads to push their unique POV about the purity of the Arab race. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds_and_Kurdistan#عمرو_بن_كلثوم which states, by unanimous decision of the Arbitration Committee " عمرو بن كلثوم has edited tendentiously in the Kurds and Kurdistan topic area, by seeking to erase Kurdish names and mentions of Kurdistan, and by pushing anti-Kurd POV. On three occasions, twice in 2015 and once in 2020, عمرو بن كلثوم has been blocked for conduct in the topic area, which included edit-warring. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Western Kurdistan by Mark Sykes.jpg where an identical POV crop of the same map was uploaded by this user, again with the intention of claiming that there are no Kurds in Syria (by cropping them out) and claiming Kurdistan is (contra to all reliable sources) not in Syria and claiming "Western Kurdistan" (i.e. Syrian Kurdistan) is in Turkey and not (as all reputable authorities state) in Syria. To do this, the user uploads cropped parts of antique maps and mislabels them, as here, and in the previous crop rightly deledt by P199. In that instance, as here, عمرو بن كلثوم excuse for uploading such useless images is to blame accuse others. GPinkerton (talk) 15:41, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- The user is even spamming the upload into random language Wikipedias, such as Bulgarian Wikipedia: [2] together with a wholly misleading caption. (Equal to the nonsensical file description, but machine-translated into an approximation of Bulgarian!) GPinkerton (talk) 15:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- GPInkerton, YOU ARE indefinitely blocked on En WP, I am not. You were blocked for this exact battleground behavior, incivility and personal attacks you are showing here, time and again. Amr ibnu Kulthoum عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- You are indefinitely banned for precisely this abusive and racist denialism, an fact unanimously recognized by the Arbitration Committee. There is no need for you to deny this, no-one is likely to trust to anyway. GPinkerton (talk) 11:25, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- GPInkerton, YOU ARE indefinitely blocked on En WP, I am not. You were blocked for this exact battleground behavior, incivility and personal attacks you are showing here, time and again. Amr ibnu Kulthoum عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin: Please note that user GPinkerton is indeffed/blocked in 3 other projects. Thanks, Amr ibnu Kulthoum عمرو بن كلثوم (talk) 21:53, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Further note to closing admin: the original uploader does not have policy-based objections to deletion. GPinkerton (talk) 22:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- As usual the nominator does not consider "COM:INUSE" to be an official policy, and whether or not a user is blocked has no bearing on the quality of an upload. Just because because user "عمرو بن كلثوم" is blocked somewhere doesn't mean that they can't be a valuable contributor somewhere else, this "blockphobia" paranoia should not be seen as an extra reason to remove content here, we have templates for bad maps and people at other projects can remove them then, the Wikimedia Commons should not be "the content police" for other Wikimedia websites and this hatred against users who are blocked on other websites by the nominator should be indicative of their combative attitude. This is not a comment on this educational value of the map, simply that we shouldn't be deleting files in use on other Wikimedia websites if there are no copyright © issues. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:59, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as no permission (No permission since) Ketil3 (talk) 14:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)̽
- Keep This image is 29 years old and PD-Italy says 20 years or older is PD. Ketil3 (talk) 14:11, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, that's my mistake. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:14, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:08, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Italy photo taken in 1997, how can it be copyright-free in 1996? Fails PD-1996 license A1Cafel (talk) 04:20, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 14:30, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
per COM:OOS, enwiki ask for RfD of his userpage as spam A09090091 (talk) 14:30, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Out of scope & advertising. I disagree on both counts. A photo of a business is not necessarily an advertisement, and this view seems illustrative of the local area. clpo13(talk) 15:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: It seems that I somehow misclicked. Keep. Unnamed UserName me 15:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by عمرو بن كلثوم (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bungled attempted duplicates of File:Sketch map of North Mesopotamia to illustrate the paper by Mark Sykes, the central portions compiled by the author – The Geographical Journal, Vol. 30, No. 3, September 1907, pp. 237-254.png, unnecessary, unsed.
- File:Sykes map of middle section of Syria-Turkey border (cropped).jpg
- File:Sykes Ras el Ain to Nissibine map Page 21.jpg
The files are also mis-described as "demographic" maps, another nonsense not justified by the map's contents. GPinkerton (talk) 15:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. One is used. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:11, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Unclear if the uploader is the copyright holder indicated. File would also be more useful if the person were identified. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: No permission from photographer anyway. --Yann (talk) 21:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This map is filled with numerous inaccuracies, and is being used by certain users to benefit their POV. Firstly, the map bases the borders of the Sultanate on British-era boundaries of Bengal Province despite the Wikipedia article stating that the Sultanate ruled over other areas too. Secondly, the naming of these mint towns are completely made-up. One example is Sylhet in the northeast being referred to as Jalalabad. 20th-century historian Ahmad Hasan Dani has written greatly on Bengal Sultanate inscriptions and mentions Sylhet being referred to as Srihat - not Jalalabad. There are many many more inaccuracies, but I hope the above reasons are enough for this image to be deleted off Wikimedia. SalamAlayka (talk) 17:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Used on 4 wikipedias. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
The uploader does not appear to be the copyright holder noted in the metadata, need permission to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:00, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Scan of a newspaper front page from 1991. Source page at https://archive.org/details/McGillLibrary-mcgill-daily-v81-n038-november-11-1991-13734 does not state it to be CC licenced, as is claimed on the file page. Lord Belbury (talk) 17:07, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:13, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Low quality picture. Out of COM:SCOPE is it can't be used to due to the weird facial expression of the subject. Myloufa (talk) 17:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Currently, the grace period and existence of this logo have disappeared. It is identified as a file that does not contribute to or benefit from preservation and is not used. It is confirmed that it is not a copyright, but the trend that this logo symbolizes is now gone. I insist on deleting it. Gameposo (talk) 17:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unused JPEG logo, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 21:14, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file should be deleted because this map showns false boundaries, namely, the border of the Teutonic Order is shown in this map as pretty much identical to the East Prussian region (which it wasn't) and also forgets the Livonian Order. Finally, the map has a historically inaccurate label, namely "Russo-Lithuanian State". No serious scholars refer to the Lithuanian state in such a manner. Cukrakalnis (talk) 20:02, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep It is not the task of the project to reflect "only correct documents". --Лобачев Владимир (talk) 21:15, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
This obviously is a copyrighted work without valid free license. Serge Obolensky was born in 1890 and died in 1978. While Pierre Bregy was born in 1898 (source of his birth year), so he is even younger. It is not supported by any source that 70 years had already passed since Pierre Bregy's death. Uploader of this file clearly picked a random license template without providing any evidence that it is valid for this file. Anyway, I think it is safe to assume that both Serge Obolensky and Pierre Bregy have equal copyrights to this file/book. Since one of the authors (Serge Obolensky) of this file/book died only 43 years ago, the {{PD-old}} license tag will be valid for this file only after 27 years (so in 2048). -- Pofka (talk) 18:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:19, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
If the author is known, we need to know when he died. Yann (talk) 18:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann Considering the co-author who was born eight years before Pierre Brégy still lived to 1978, it is safe to assume that he lived to a similar time. I have found a person named Pierre, who was born in Brégy exactly in 1898 and who died in 1979, and considering that his birth place was just below 600 people, it is a pretty certain guess, that this is indeed the person concerned. So, 70 years have definitely NOT passed since the death date of whichever author.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:12, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's a different person. Brégy here is the name of a town, not a family name. BTW where did you find the authors' birthdate? Yann (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann I found the birthdate of Pierre Brégy here and Serge Obolensky here. The problem with Pierre Brégy is that him being an obscure author means that not a lot is known about him. My rationale for picking this as a possible person, is because there is a possibility that Pierre Brégy was an alias (1st name and birthdate is the same, but the 2nd name he changed into his birthplace village). Unfortunately, this is speculation, but it is the best available suggestion there is on the material available online.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's useful. There is another Serge Obolensky with different dates, but in all cases, these make this file under a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your time and patience, Best --Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Here is a database of all people who died in France after 1970, based on birth and death municipality records. There is no match for Serge Obolensky born in 1890 or 1901, and for Pierre Brégy born in 1898. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Serge Obolensky born in 1890 in Russia and died in USA in 1978, so him not being registered in France makes sense.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also, Pierre Brégy, who would have been born in 1898, doesn't even appear. Him not being in official records, but having written a book raises some questions.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is probably a confusion between 2 people called Serge Obolensky: LoC and VIAF give the dates 1901-1992 for the author of language courses. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is such a possibility, but regardless, whichever death date is the correct one for the co-author of this book, this file is in copyrighted 'territory'.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cukrakalnis: Pierre Brégy is the pseudonym of Kyriak Stameroff, who died on February 18th, 1944, according to this newspaper. Yann (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what a find! I have no clue how you even came about that. My speculation is definitely brushed aside considering the findings you presented, although I was right about this being an alias. It definitely mentions all of the books that are ascribed to this person, so it is without a doubt him. But even then, considering there were two authors of the book, and one of them died in the late 1970s or 1990s, doesn't this still raise issues?--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- In a book about history, you cannot assume that the author of the book is the author of the maps ; even less that the authors of the books are both the authors of the maps...
- the author of the map could be (and probably is) a third person, about whom we have no information at all, except, perhaps, the cyrillic initials that can be read in the bottom right "ΔΛ" (DL)... 4 of the 5 maps in this book have this same signature...
- however, I agree that it cannot reasoneably be assumed that a page of a book published in 1939 is in the Public Domain according to the 70 years post death rule, unless it is provable that the author died during war, or shortly after... --Hsarrazin (talk) 07:07, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The initials can also be read as cyrillic "АЛ" (AL), but they do not fit the two known authors of the book anyway. Consequently, the maps signed with these initials can be considered as works of an unknown author, passed into the public domain 70 years after publication.--Yellow Horror (talk) 08:36, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Wow, what a find! I have no clue how you even came about that. My speculation is definitely brushed aside considering the findings you presented, although I was right about this being an alias. It definitely mentions all of the books that are ascribed to this person, so it is without a doubt him. But even then, considering there were two authors of the book, and one of them died in the late 1970s or 1990s, doesn't this still raise issues?--Cukrakalnis (talk) 22:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Cukrakalnis: Pierre Brégy is the pseudonym of Kyriak Stameroff, who died on February 18th, 1944, according to this newspaper. Yann (talk) 22:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is such a possibility, but regardless, whichever death date is the correct one for the co-author of this book, this file is in copyrighted 'territory'.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:56, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is probably a confusion between 2 people called Serge Obolensky: LoC and VIAF give the dates 1901-1992 for the author of language courses. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also, Pierre Brégy, who would have been born in 1898, doesn't even appear. Him not being in official records, but having written a book raises some questions.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:47, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The Serge Obolensky born in 1890 in Russia and died in USA in 1978, so him not being registered in France makes sense.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:44, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Here is a database of all people who died in France after 1970, based on birth and death municipality records. There is no match for Serge Obolensky born in 1890 or 1901, and for Pierre Brégy born in 1898. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:41, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for your time and patience, Best --Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:32, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks, that's useful. There is another Serge Obolensky with different dates, but in all cases, these make this file under a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:31, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Yann I found the birthdate of Pierre Brégy here and Serge Obolensky here. The problem with Pierre Brégy is that him being an obscure author means that not a lot is known about him. My rationale for picking this as a possible person, is because there is a possibility that Pierre Brégy was an alias (1st name and birthdate is the same, but the 2nd name he changed into his birthplace village). Unfortunately, this is speculation, but it is the best available suggestion there is on the material available online.--Cukrakalnis (talk) 19:26, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's a different person. Brégy here is the name of a town, not a family name. BTW where did you find the authors' birthdate? Yann (talk) 19:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion above and linked discussion on Wiksource. --Ellywa (talk) 21:16, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
The reactions shown in this image don't make any sense. Presumably it's trying to show a conjugate addition reaction (something like the bottom reaction in File:Gilman vs Grignard.jpg), but if so the starting material shouldn't have the R group and the two products shouldn't have the carbon-carbon double bonds. Stereobonds at non-stereocenters are wrong too. Marbletan (talk) 20:42, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom; orphaned. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 04:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 15:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag ("proposal"); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC) Original PNG version was deleted as a result of Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Julius C; SVG version is similarly without merit. GPinkerton (talk) 20:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Your generic boilerplate cut-and-paste doesn't address the specifics of this particular image, which represents ideas that people have been kicking around for decades. Such ideas haven't affected the overall UK flag yet, but see the local flags below. I don't see what's really gained by purging an example of a somewhat influential trend because it's not an official national flag... AnonMoos (talk) 16:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
-
Flag of Shetland (2005) -
Flag of Orkney (2007) -
Flag of Caithness (2016) -
Flag of Yorkshire West Riding (2013) -
![Flag of the island of South Uist (recognised 2017)[1]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/89/Flag_of_South_Uist.svg/120px-Flag_of_South_Uist.svg.png)
Flag of the island of South Uist (recognised 2017)[1] -
![Isle of Barra (recognised 2017)[2] File:Flag of Sutherland 2018.svg](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cf/Isle_of_Barra_flag.svg/120px-Isle_of_Barra_flag.svg.png)
Isle of Barra (recognised 2017)[2]File:Flag of Sutherland 2018.svg
![Flag of the island of South Uist (recognised 2017)[1]](/wiki/File:Flag_of_South_Uist.svg)
![Isle of Barra (recognised 2017)[2] File:Flag of Sutherland 2018.svg](/wiki/File:Isle_of_Barra_flag.svg)
- Classic special pleading. See COM:NOTUSED, where the following appears Not all images for example are realistically useful for an educational purpose. An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X, merely because X happens to be the subject of the photograph. For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs. The fact that an unused snapshot of your friend could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Photographic portraiture" does not mean that we should keep all photographs of unknown people. The fact that an unused pornographic image could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on pornography does not mean that we should keep low quality pornographic images. Now, if we adapt this wording to the present instance, we will see how spurious this special pleading is. Not all images for example are realistically useful for an educational purpose. An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on
Xflags, merely becauseXflags happensto be the subject of thephotographSVG. For example, the fact that anunused blurred photographunused user-generated fantasy flag could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on"Common mistakes in photography"user-generated fantasy Nordic cross flags does not mean that we should keep allblurred photographsunused user-generated fantasy flags. The fact that an unusedsnapshot of your friendfantasy Nordic cross flag could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on"Photographic portraiture"Nordic cross flags does not mean that we should keep allphotographs ofuser-generated fantasy Nordic cross flags made by unknown people. The fact that an unusedpornographicuser-generated fantasy flag image could theoretically be used to illustrate an article onpornographyfantasy flags does not mean that we should keeplow quality pornographicuser-generated fantasy flag images. See also COM:SPAM, where these words appear There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Quite part from all of that, the idea that all fantasy flags uploaded to Commons should be kept simply because the whole genre of fantasy flags exists is quite absurd, as is the suggestion that such doodles might "affect the overall UK flag", thereby somehow becoming educational because ... they've been seen in someone's crystal ball (cf. "yet", "a somewhat influential trend"). The claim that this policy-mandated deletion is "purging ... because it's not an official national flag" is quite backwards; there is no need for flags to be "official", there is a need for images on Commons to have a purpose. Lastly, claims that this specific image "represents ideas that people have been kicking around for decades" should be equipped with evidence, or without such evidence, should be withdrawn, or better yet not made at all. GPinkerton (talk) 18:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- Classic special pleading. See COM:NOTUSED, where the following appears Not all images for example are realistically useful for an educational purpose. An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X, merely because X happens to be the subject of the photograph. For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs. The fact that an unused snapshot of your friend could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Photographic portraiture" does not mean that we should keep all photographs of unknown people. The fact that an unused pornographic image could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on pornography does not mean that we should keep low quality pornographic images. Now, if we adapt this wording to the present instance, we will see how spurious this special pleading is. Not all images for example are realistically useful for an educational purpose. An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on
- You certainly vented forth a vehement virulent vicious tirade. I hope your blood pressure is lower and you're feeling better now, but most of it has little to do with whether this specific image should be deleted.
- First, the claim that an image should be deleted if it won't be used in a Wikipedia article is false. Commons has hundreds of thousands of images which will never be used in any language-specific wikiproject. Second the policies on Wikimedia Commons are a little different from Wikipedia policies. To start with, wikipedia simply doesn't have any "no original research" policy. Also, while Commons is somewhat strict about photographer or image-author sources, most images on Commons do not require Wikipedia-style citations to justify their existence. If I upload to Commons a photo I've taken, and title it "Foal outside Nashville 2019.jpg" then there's no citation needed or available to prove that this is actually a 2019 photo of a foal outside Nashville. I may be a trustworthy or untrustworthy image uploader, but "citations" are pretty much irrelevant.
- This image (File:Nordic flag of the United Kingdom (Proposal).svg) is an example of a significant UK flag design trend of the 21st century, which obviously hasn't affected the official national flag, but has most definitely affected a number of local flags. In that respect, it's not a "fantasy" image -- it's a simple extrapolation to show how a real (non-"fantasy") trend affecting various local flags could be carried over to the national flag. I don't really see what the purpose of zealously trying to delete this image is -- and I also don't see how cutting and pasting a lot of generic boilerplate stuff not so directly relevant to this particular image helps very much. AnonMoos (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is no need to do anything more than quote the policy that makes this fantasy image useless. There is nothing special about this flag as against the thousands of others that have been deleted, or the hundreds more that will be deleted. Nothing distinguishes this image from them. If an image cannot be used on any WMF and has no other reason for being hosted here, then it should be deleted. What you call a "vehement virulent vicious tirade" is nothing more than quoting policy. I understand that you would prefer your upload not to be deleted, but that is your preference, not our policy. You've used the "animal outside city" metaphor before, and, as before, it is inapposite. No-one is alluding to Wikipedia policies beside yourself. I have quoted Commons (NB, for the umpteenth time, not Wikipedia) policy which proves such useless images are to be deleted as they are outside COM:SCOPE (which I encourage you to actually read). Why you imagine that "Commons has hundreds of thousands of images which will never be used in any language-specific wikiproject" is relevant is quite beyond me. These will be images that have possible uses or reflect an external reality in some way. Beside a purported "trend" unnoticed by any except yourself, this image has no attachment to anything in this universe. GPinkerton (talk) 01:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Whatever, dude -- the trend is noted on the English Wikipedia "Nordic cross flag" article (from which I excerpted the above gallery), and with a little Google keyword tinkering it's not hard to find links like: Scots communities go Nordic in rising demands for their own flags | HeraldScotland.
- Wikimedia Commons policies are certainly relevant, but most of the time they should be applied with a little bit of common sense, and keeping in mind the context of the particular image under consideration -- and not with rigid narrow intolerant fanatical literalistic textualism. However, I apologize for calling your previous comment "vicious". "Vitriolic" was the word I wanted, but I couldn't quite bring it to mind in time...
- P.S. This design is not really a personal creation by me. I slightly improved a previously-existing PNG using the SVG format, and the general idea has been kicking around for a while (before I was involved in any way). AnonMoos (talk) 05:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Just because "the general idea has been kicking around for a while" on Commons does not mean it deserves to stay forever on Commons. There still isn't the least indication such an image has an independent or pre-existing existence, and again, claiming something should be kept because there are lots of examples of one or another kind of thing with similarities to the thing in question is not "a bit of common sense", rather, it is highly illogical. What you have described as "rigid narrow intolerant fanatical literalistic textualism" would surely not have led to hundreds of fantasy files of exactly the same "worth" as this image being deleted with exactly the same rationale. It is permissible to observe and record a purported "trend" happening outside Commons, it is not within COM:SCOPE to anticipate or exaggerate one by generating all kinds of new examples of it. When dinosaurs are new discovered, we may illustrate them, until such time as they are discovered, we may not attempt to illustrate speculatively on their potential appearance. GPinkerton (talk) 06:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- It's rather unfortunate for you that you have such a rigid narrow intolerant fanatical deletionist mindset, that you're almost incapable of discussing in a reasonable manner a particular case where there are things going on a little bit beyond your usual mechanical generic boilerplate cutting-and-pasting routines. Your previous vehement vitriolic insistence that there was no recent trend toward Nordic cross designs in UK local flags has been revealed to be complete and total nonsense, so why should anyone bother with your latest nonsense? The flag below came close to becoming the official flag of West Germany in the late 1940s, and there have been various discussions and experimentations over the years among people who actually know something about flags... AnonMoos (talk) 08:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
2564.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2564.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2564.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2564.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
8.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
904.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%B8%E0%B9%88%E0%B8%87%E0%B9%82%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%98%E0%B8%B4%E0%B9%8C.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%87%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%88%E0%B9%89%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%84%E0%B8%93%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%88%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%AB%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B8%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%A3%E0%B9%8C.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%94%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%AA%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%97%E0%B8%98%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%A1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_-_(photographie_de_presse)_-_(Agence_Rol).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
- I am sorry, I obviously wasn't clear before: pulling up all sorts of other Nordic crosses to prove Nordic cross flags exist does not make every and all possible combination of colours in a Nordic cross flag within scope. Your claims to the contrary are just special pleading. The image proposed for deletion came nowhere close to being any kind of anything, and the fact that you can't demonstrate anything to the contrary proves only that ad hominem is all you've got left to say in this discussion. The flag is a user-generated fantasy flag with no real-world applications and has no more place on Commmons than anyone's other doodles. GPinkerton (talk) 16:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's nice -- I already conclusively demonstrated that you have no real inhibitions about spouting forth factually false statements about things that you have no knowledge of. Trying to reshape an area of Commons (flags) which you seem to be ignorant about many aspects of, by means of generic boilerplate cut-and-pasting, and vehement vitriolic denunciations when someone dares to stand up to your cutting-and-pasting activities, is not something that I can respect. I'm already kind of regretting the few minutes of Googling that it took to refute your last round of bad-faith nonsense, and really can't be bothered to dig up "citations" to refute your current round of nonsense (such Wikipedia-style "citations" have a very limited role on Commons anyway, as I explained before). Suffice it to say that people interested in flags have been discussing and experimenting with Nordic-style flags off and on for years (at least since the 1940s), rising to prominence in the UK recently with the trend toward Nordic-style 21st-century local flags in Scotland (and to a lesser degree in Northern England). You can throw around all the epithets you want, but it won't change these facts (which you were ignorant of, and which don't seem to want to learn about if this would disturb in any way your grim humorless fanatical deletionism). AnonMoos (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Your opinions on the niceness or humorousness of images are irrelevant. This image is out of scope, and arguing that other wholly different images are not out of scope does not change the status of this image. You haven't been able to provide evidence that the image exists beyond Commons; the image is, as noted at the beginning of the discussion, out of scope. The length diversionist rhetoric above has demonstrated as much. You may feel that nominating rule-breaking files for deletion is bad faith, but then you clearly enjoy having such images on Commons. GPinkerton (talk) 17:10, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Also, above you claimed you had "refuted". "Refute" however, means "to prove wrong" not "deny without evidence". Best to be unambiguous. GPinkerton (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- That's nice -- I already conclusively demonstrated that you have no real inhibitions about spouting forth factually false statements about things that you have no knowledge of. Trying to reshape an area of Commons (flags) which you seem to be ignorant about many aspects of, by means of generic boilerplate cut-and-pasting, and vehement vitriolic denunciations when someone dares to stand up to your cutting-and-pasting activities, is not something that I can respect. I'm already kind of regretting the few minutes of Googling that it took to refute your last round of bad-faith nonsense, and really can't be bothered to dig up "citations" to refute your current round of nonsense (such Wikipedia-style "citations" have a very limited role on Commons anyway, as I explained before). Suffice it to say that people interested in flags have been discussing and experimenting with Nordic-style flags off and on for years (at least since the 1940s), rising to prominence in the UK recently with the trend toward Nordic-style 21st-century local flags in Scotland (and to a lesser degree in Northern England). You can throw around all the epithets you want, but it won't change these facts (which you were ignorant of, and which don't seem to want to learn about if this would disturb in any way your grim humorless fanatical deletionism). AnonMoos (talk) 14:26, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Whatever my opinions, they're based on factual knowledge, while your opinions are based on ignorance combined with a grim humorless fanatical deletionism that tries to impose an inappropriate uniformity which refuses to recognize possible special cases ("humorlessness" has nothing to do with images in this case, but refers to some martinet-type personality traits which you appear to have chosen to cultivate, as far as I can judge from the on-line conversations which you've participated in). Nominating this image for deletion is not inherently a bad-faith move, but some of your rhetoric above most definitely displays "reckless indifference to truth or falsehood" (as the lawyers say). I refuted your bad-faith nonsensical ignorant claim that there was no recent trend towards Nordic Cross designs in recently-adopted UK local flags by linking Scots communities go Nordic in rising demands for their own flags | HeraldScotland, thereby revealing that you have little concern for truth or falsehood. (As I said above, I'm kind of regretting the few minutes of Googling that it took to turn up that link, since it was more effort than your arguments deserved, viewed strictly on their own merits.) It would be nice if you could actually evaluate the substance of the arguments I've made for keeping this image, instead of just spouting some of your favorite epithets regardless of their appropriateness ("fantasy" etc etc) triggered by a knee-jerk reflex reaction to the fact that this is not an official national flag design... AnonMoos (talk) 15:18, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 15:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
It's absurd. The original version of this flag was deleted but the copy is kept. --Roxanna (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
The file description claims free license, but it is from a site ([3]) marked " © 2021 by Adoptee Rights Coalition. All Rights Reserved", and on which the Terms of Use document states "All code, text, software, scripts, graphics, files, photos, images, logos, and materials contained on this Website, or within the Services, are the sole property of Adoptee Rights Coalition and our web host, Wix.com." There is no indication of the free license release for this image that the description claims. Seraphimblade (talk) 02:25, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Free license claim not supported at source. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Soyuz MS-19
[edit]While these are screenshots from a NASA TV broadcast, this is merely a rebroadcast of the Roscosmos video feed of the MS-19 welcoming ceremony which occurred in the Zvezda station module using Roscosmos equipment. It is not U.S. Government public domain and remains copyrighted to Roscosmos.
- File:10 crew members in the ISS.jpg
- File:Klim Shipenko.jpg
- File:Soyuz MS-19 crew.jpg
- File:Yulia Pereslid in Space.jpg
— Huntster (t @ c) 07:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. As the nom points out, this is not a work of the US government, and is not public domain on that basis. Unless there is some other basis for a public domain claim, it should be deleted from Commons.
- It may arguably be a fair use, which would enable it to be hosted on particular Wikipediae, but not on Commons. TJRC (talk) 22:13, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- for informmation; Roscosmos Media Usage Guidelines — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lqp (talk • contribs) 07:58, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wording prohibits commercial reuse among other restrictions; not free for Commons. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Deleted (Too bad; multiple usages). Not NASA as tagged; no indication of free license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:20, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Beware, this is not an "own work" as described. The photographer (Roel Dijkstra) is sending out copyright claims. See https://fotos.roeldijkstra.nl/photos/5eb28284c1e73a1ffc0181c4 67.5.110.82 18:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Who is the photographer and where are the claims? Hohum (talk) 18:05, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader also describes this image, described as taken in 1965, as "own work 2011". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Comment the uploader Olavtenbroek (talk · contribs) also has tons of seemingly-old or historical photos labelled as "own work", including File:Scheveningen, Kurhaus, 1963.jpg, File:Rotterdam harbour 1962.jpg, and File:Rotterdam, Maastunnel noordzijde, 1966.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 23:38, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: I warned them. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:58, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Madonna world tour 1987 ticket.jpg. Looks like it would be best to delete all of their uploads. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:38, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader also describes this image, described as taken in 1965, as "own work 2011". Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:32, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- highly unlikely that this person made this photo themselves. Especially because the first version has false colors. Perhaps he made the photo or scan from a magazine. Elly (talk) 22:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Pigsonthewing, and Elly. We should try to replace the uses before deletion. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:02, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
- User:CommonsDelinker/commands could be used for that, once a suitable replacement is identified, probably one from the same tour or around the same time period. Then again, it might be better to leave it up to individual projects to decide what photo they want instead of making a decision here, since it's used in so many different contexts. clpo13(talk) 20:06, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, seems pretty obvious. Unfortunate that it's been uploaded for 10 years. Looks like they uploaded a bunch of pictures over two days and barely contributed again. Most of their uploads though look to be more of the style of personal photos from the 1960s, which are pretty valuable and seem unlikely to be copied from elsewhere (not really commercial photographer quality), so I'd probably leave those alone (i.e. keep them). The exception would be File:Nike1.jpg and File:Nike2.jpg, which state they come from a Netherlands Air Force calendar, so seems doubtful we can apply the license tags there. There does not seem to be any evidence supplied for that claim, anyways. Carl Lindberg (talk) 20:18, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom & discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:41, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Halftoning on facade and incorrect geotag implies that this is a photograph of a printed picture such as a postcard. OTRS is needed unless uploader can demonstrate ownership. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.64.99.106 (talk) 08:10, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
potential copyright issue - looks similar to https://music.amazon.com/albums/B096LJR222? GoingBatty (talk) 19:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
This looks like a screenshot of Google Maps. Stefan2 (talk) 19:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- There is more information at w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 6#File:WDSW-LP CoverageArea.png. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per info at Stefan2 comment. (Note: closed as kept because reason for nomination seems unsupported; no prejudging of any future nomination for other reasons. Image is not in use; I do not know if it is useful or not.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Historical photo, missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:49, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; lacking source info to establish license (apparently from Mexico 1940s which can still be in copyright) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused miniscule floor plan, unusable, out of scope. Redundant to numerous floor plans already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Unused and unreadable in tiny size (and if it really is uploader's own work, why such a tiny small res image?); OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:33, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable band (no entries in any wp), no educational value, out of scope. And likely not own work: transmission code in EXIF data. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
This picture seems to be cropped from this one, available on the commercial page on Facebook. It cannot stay in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 20:51, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:35, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
Modern sculpture, created in 2015 (see w:Portsmouth African Burying Ground). No FoP in the US for sculpture.
- File:Portsmouth African Burying Ground Memorial Park 04.jpg
- File:Portsmouth African Burying Ground Memorial Park 05.jpg
- File:Portsmouth African Burying Ground Memorial Park 06.jpg
- File:Portsmouth African Burying Ground Memorial Park 07.jpg
- File:Portsmouth African Burying Ground Memorial Park 08.jpg
- File:Portsmouth African Burying Ground Memorial Park 09.jpg
AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 14:38, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploader request/This looks like worse version of File:Qarahunj observatory in late March 14.JPG and is not used anyway. Xelgen (talk) 18:34, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Uploader request: This is underexposed version of File:Qarahunj observatory in late March 01.JPG and is not used Xelgen (talk) 18:35, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:11, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 014.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 015.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 018.JPG
- File:Ingolstadt St. Joseph 019.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: one has transmission code in EXIF data, another is a caricature signed by someone else.
- File:Caricatura Stiven Claros, Soltau.jpg
- File:Stiven Irreverente.jpg
- File:Stiven claros premios india catalina manu.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:47, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
Image blurry and not of good quality; Image out of scope WikiFan (talk) 19:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 12:10, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
A collage of photos (que no es usado y nadie sabe si son libres) 191.126.132.136 00:07, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Agree Speedy delete I agree with the nominator. The file is of low quality and falls outside of the Wikimedia Commons scope since it does not have a realistic educational purpose and does not have much use. I am seeking to have this file removed as a courtesy deletion since there are plenty of more useful and higher quality files on the same subject that Wikimedia Commons holds that can be used instead of this file. I believe this to be a well-reasoned request for a courtesy and/or speedy deletion and am hoping an administrator can help with this request. Thank you. WikiFan (talk) 19:53, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep shows a foreskin retraction in stages, useful illustration, no valid reason to delete. Dronebogus (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- Speedy delete In all honesty, there are many other files on Wikimedia that are much higher quality and more scientifically detailed. If this file were to be removed, little or no information will be lost. I do still maintain that this file falls outside of Commons scope since it is not realistically purposeful. I continue to request that this file be removed as a courtesy deletion. Thanks for any help. WikiFan (talk) 20:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
Why do you keep uploading dick pics only to ask for them to be deleted later? @Ringmaster32571: --Trade (talk) 00:08, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- This file was uploaded some time ago. I only ask that it be deleted as a courtesy for the reasons listed. I most definitely do not want to cause any hardships and am kindly requesting to have it removed by an administrator. WikiFan (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- Could you nominate them all at once and just one at a time? @Ringmaster32571: --Trade (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Trade, yes I would prefer to have them all nominated at once and removed at the same time. However, I am not sure how to do that. I did not initiate many of the current deletion requests myself although I agree with their deletions/removal from Commons. Any suggestions for their speedy removal is most welcomed and appreciated. Thanks. WikiFan (talk) 21:52, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
- Could you nominate them all at once and just one at a time? @Ringmaster32571: --Trade (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, self-requested. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Drochon Christophe (talk · contribs)
[edit]couverture de livre https://www.decitre.fr/livres/selection-drochon-9782355323393.html
Habertix (talk) 01:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello, What is the problem with my picture? I'am the artist, it is my own book. I have all the rights to use my picture. Thank you. ch. drochon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drochon Christophe (talk • contribs) 08:29, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Drochon Christophe: All accounts here are essentially pseudonymous. For any work previously published elsewhere, a formal permission is needed. Please see COM:VRT for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 20:28, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Per Palle Storm
[edit]No freedom of panorama for publicly displayed artworks in Norway. Creator died in 1994 so artworks are still under copyright protection.
- File:Kong Haakon statuen, Kristiansand - no-nb digifoto 20151021 00035 NB MIT FNR 10099.jpg
- File:Per Palle Storm - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Per Palle Storm - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Per Palle Storm - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Per Palle Storm - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:Per Palle Storm - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Per Palle Storm - panoramio.jpg
- File:Sculptures, city hall in Oslo.jpg
- File:Skulptur. Rådhuset - no-nb digifoto 20150225 00100 NB MIT FNR 10859.jpg
- File:Sven Oftedal.JPG
- File:Trondheim (8275001954).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TommyG (talk) 08:22, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Gbawden. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, artist of stained glass window * 1932; no fop. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & permission from Bernd Hiepe needed. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
"Quelle: Internet" reicht m. E. nicht aus. Das ist ziemlich eindeutig ein Scan aus einem Buch oder einer Zeitschrift. Das Bild selbst dürfte wegen seines Alters gemeinfrei sein... Außerdem ist in dem Text deutlich zu lesen, dass es nicht der Zustand um 1910 ist, sondern der um 1890. Ist die Datierung also auch zusammenphantasiert? Xocolatl (talk) 18:40, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
- Keep as {{PD-old-assumed}}. Clearly dated on image as 1890. IronGargoyle (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. The immediate source seems to be [4], but obviously this is a scan from a book, they don't say which one however (not clear on the "sources" page they have as well). --Rosenzweig τ 21:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
- ↑ South Uist flag. Hebrides-news.com. Retrieved on 28 December 2017.
- ↑ Isle of Barra's flag officially recognised. BBC News. Retrieved on 26 May 2018.