Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
when imposter sus Whenimpostercool (talk) 01:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
1234567890 Whenimpostercool (talk) 01:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
File:Jodie Comer arrives for the Royal Television Society (RTS) Programme Awards at the Grosvenor House Hotel, Park Lane.jpg
[edit]Unlicensed celebrity image; uploaded without non-free use rationale. RCraig09 (talk) 05:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
File uploaded per error, when testing Wiki Loves Monuments Italy app. These are duplicates or photos not intended for upload on Commons, but on the app test wiki.
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 33.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 32.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 31.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 30.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 29.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 28.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 27.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 26.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 25.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 24.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 23.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 22.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 21.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 20.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 19.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 18.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 17.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 16.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 15.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 14.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 13.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 12.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 11.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 10.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 9.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 8.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 7.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 6.png
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 5.jpeg
- File:Bari - fontana di piazza Garibaldi - 202109150001 4.png
Ferdi2005[Mail] 08:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy: per nomination + user's request. Ruthven (msg) 09:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
probable copyright violation - this image has been around the web for 2-3 years. Its origin is not clear as several sites seems to claim copyright - need clear permission Headlock0225 (talk) 09:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 14:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Porque lo he subido por equivocación y la fotografía es mía. HortensiaLaencina (talk) 19:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 20:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
unnecessary Dondogdulam (talk) 23:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:35, 18 September 2021 UTC: unnecessary and no evidence of permission --Krdbot 14:04, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Cannot be own work and simultanously have been taken in the British Indian period Shyamal L. (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Likely 1945 but not high enough quality to be useful, especially given vague and inconsistent source. --99of9 (talk) 08:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment What-if it is an IR or smth camera? A09090091 (talk) 16:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete : I found this image in colour at https://panindiatours.com/packages/periyar-national-park + https://villageresortfrombangalore.wordpress.com/2018/09/26/best-wildlife-ecotourism-holidays-in-india/ + https://beta.cent.co/bitman007/+ln4boj + https://www.southexplore.in/2012/11/periyar-wildlife-sanctuary-idukki-kerala.html + https://www.tourmyindia.com/wildlife_sancturies/periyar-national-park.html – BhagyaMani (talk) 09:53, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Yann (talk) 08:32, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo - The grpahic element in the centre of the shield is sufficently ceative to not be below TOO. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 08:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep This appears to have been released by the off-wiki author. So TOO is irrelevant. Andy Dingley (talk) 09:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Uncategorized File, and There is no Freedom of Panorama in Italy. WikiLoverFan1007 (talk) 13:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason given for deletion Andy Dingley (talk) 09:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 11:02, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
This chemical structure is incorrect. Denatonium has ethyl groups, not methyl groups, on the quaternary ammonium group. Marbletan (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 19:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
The chemical structure is incorrect. There should be + charge on the nitrogen atom or outside the brackets, but not both. We have File:Dithianitronium.svg that can be used instead. Marbletan (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Marbletan, this file was uploaded at a later date. I corrected it and you could leave it for the shape of the file name in line with the other two 3Ds:
- Dithianitronium-2D-dimensions.png
- Dithianitronium-3D-balls.png
- Dithianitronium-3D-vdW.png
- and also because it highlights the electron pairs present in the ion.--Grasso Luigi (talk) 16:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the quick fix to the image! Marbletan (talk) 18:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Marbletan (talk) 18:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Low quality Estopedist1 (talk) 15:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 15:28, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 15:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 15:27, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Hendrith Smith and Wife Natalie Smith.jpg
- File:Hendrith Smith, Wife Natalie Smith & Daughters.jpg
- File:Hendrith Smith, Wife Natalie Smith & Daughter.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 15:26, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
personal photo of a non-notable person. Hanooz 19:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 15:22, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo for non-Wikipedian. Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 20:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 15:21, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 114.17.112.238 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This file not CC. No Tineye/Google reverse image results, but low-res without EXIF. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be free. --Yann (talk) 20:43, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Instagram watermark. Cjp24 (talk) 07:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of project's scope, other wiki's logo that is not used in the project 203.137.182.151 03:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Should be vectorized, if useful. A09090091 (talk) 16:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:51, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ytoyoda as no permission (No permission since). Needs to be dated and checked against COM:MOROCCO. Subject lived from 1909 to 1961; date is claimed to be 1920 but no evidence is supplied. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krd at 08:24, 25 September 2021 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Hamoodscorwe --Krdbot 14:15, 25 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]- File:Eglise Saint Joseph Au Havre (180699421).jpeg
- File:Eglise Saint Joseph Le Havre (180698277).jpeg
- File:Le Havre Accumulation Of Power Chiharu Shiota (213966737).jpeg
- File:Le Havre, the City Rebuilt by Auguste Perret-113535.jpg
- File:Plage du Havre.jpg
- File:St. Josef, Le Havre.jpg
- File:Église Saint-Joseph du Havre - intérieur.jpg
VIGNERON (talk) 07:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 13:55, 9 October 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]- File:A. Perret by Anhelina Livia Starkova.jpg
- File:Eglise Saint Joseph.jpg
- File:Eglise Saint-Joseph (Le Havre).jpg
- File:Eglise St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 28261987289.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 28281704439.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 39330572074.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 39330572904.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph - 39330573474.jpg
- File:Le Havre - Église Saint-Joseph.jpg
- File:Le Havre Boulevard François 1er 1.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 10.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 11.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 12.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 13.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 14.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 15.jpg
- File:Le Havre Eglise St-Joseph 16.jpg
- File:Le Havre, façade maritime entre St Joseph et le sémaphore.jpg
- File:Le Havre, France (39834773333).jpg
- File:Le Havre- Saint Joseph church tower.jpg
- File:Orgel St. Josef, Le Havre.jpg
- File:St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg
- File:St. Joseph Church Tower (Focus) in Le Havre 4.jpg
- File:St. Joseph's church, Le Havre.jpg
VIGNERON (talk) 12:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Delete most except File:Eglise Saint Joseph.jpg, File:Le Havre, façade maritime entre St Joseph et le sémaphore.jpg & File:St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg which can be considered as de minimis. --Minoraxtalk 11:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 19:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]This building has been designed by Auguste Perret (1874-1954), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Auguste Perret-LE HAVRE-Eglise saint Joseph-1957.jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0054 (49001385107).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0055 (49001181666).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0056 (49000627478).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0060 (49001384847).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0061 (49001181396).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0062 (49001384772).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0064 (49001181301).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0065 (49001384682).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0066 (49001384632).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0067 (49001181211).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0069 (49001384517).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0070 (49001181086).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0071 (49001181031).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0072 (49001180981).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0073 (49001374957).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0074 (49001384307).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0075 (49001384257).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0076 (49000636548).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0077 (49001180821).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0078 (49001384112).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0079 (49001180741).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0080 (49001180701).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0082 (49001383992).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0085 (49001383827).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0086 (49000636108).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0090 (49000635908).jpg
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0094 (49000635703).jpg
- File:LeHAVRE StJoseph.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 18:41, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Joseph (Le Havre)
[edit]No FoP in France. Architect Auguste Perret died in 1954
- File:Le Havre 041DSC 0059 (49000637208).jpg
- File:Le Havre 08.jpg
- File:Le Havre, France (27401583797).jpg
- File:Photo-2016-08-01-16-20-46 St josef le havre.jpg
- File:St Joseph - Le Havre.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 03:23, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
COM:PENIS - out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted poorly photographed penis selfies -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:03, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. The given source is a newspaper and no evidence of permission is provided. EnPassant (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused fantasy flag, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:07, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
Not Own Work. Image taken from internet 190.160.194.81 21:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- This photo was created by editing an older photo of Chairman Gonzalo. Like the previous work, the nominator is requested to show proof of the existence of this specific photo before the publishing date. Red1922 (talk) 10:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image is an edit of a non-free image, this is the original image [1] Librero2109 (talk) 13:49, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above; false claims, false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Diannaa as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Image is under copyright in country of origin (Vatican City) and I should not have uploaded it to the Commons. If it's actually from 200 AD, then I see no reason why it would be copyrighted. The reproduction falls under COM:PD-Art, and the red underline is ineligible for copyright protection. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:52, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep (Copied from w:WP:AN) To assert copyright, one has to create something. Vatican has not created Papyrus 75, and creating a replica (scan) of a public domain work (at the time of the scanning) does not drive out of the public domain, at least per COM:PD-Art; and, of course, you can always make a red line in Paint, which also does not drive the work out of public domain, as it does not really constitute [EDIT: original] analysis. I agree with User:Veverve that it is typical w:copyfraud, and that Vatican's assertion, FWIW, should be ignored as ridiculous. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 12:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Unsure See here for an informative video on the Hanna Papyrus specifically. The bits that are relevant for PD-Scan are around the 20 minute mark where they talk about the methods and techniques used to make the writing legible (on parts of the text). Some of the scans at the original source *may* pass the threshold for having significant personal input and so constitute a new creative work. I cannot comment if this particular scan is one of them. If you watch the vid from around the 10 min mark, there is some footage of the papyrus in general which indicates its very similar to the scans (and so probably has not had a lot of image processing done). I personally would say 'this scanned image probably doesnt pass any creative threshold', but the key word there is probably. Only in death (talk) 13:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep.
- The law of the Vatican states it has "Exclusive right on 'purely documentary' reproductions of cultural heritage for 70 years from the fixation".
- As I wrote: From what I read here: "A work is considered fixed when it is stored on some medium in which it can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated. For example, a song can be fixed by writing it down on a piece of paper. The paper is the medium on which the song can be perceived, reproduced and communicated. It is not necessary that the medium be such that a human can perceive the work, as long as the work can be perceived by a machine." So, I think the fixation of this manuscript was in the Antiquity once the scribe wrote it.
- Also, it is not a reproduction, it is a mere scan. Veverve (talk) 13:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: by the way, the red line was drawn by a user on WP in order to show the word w:Epiousion; the line is not in the original scan. Veverve (talk) 13:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- That is not what they mean when the Vatican talks about fixation. They mean they have an exclusive right on documentary reproductions from the fixation of the reproduction, not the original base material (because that would be utterly pointless, as it will have expired in 99.9% of all cases). They dont for purely mechanical copies like un/minimal edited scans obviously, but you are misinterpreting that particular claim incorrectly. The context here is that a lot of their reproductions are a mixture of combinations of scan, hand copies and restorations, some of which contain significant amounts of work (probably not in this case). Only in death (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- As the Wikipedia entry to the Berne Convention, to which the Holy See is signatory, says, "As soon as a work is "fixed", that is, written or recorded on some physical medium, its author is automatically entitled to all copyrights in the work and to any derivative works, unless and until the author explicitly disclaims them or until the copyright expires." The author is not the Holy See, it's presumably some guy in 2nd/3rd century. Now add 70 years to that (we don't know the author), and there's no way we end up in 2021. I believe the case is solved based on that. Just because you restore elements of some work doesn't mean that the authorship suddenly becomes yours. Szmenderowiecki (talk) 15:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Only in death: I did not find the definition of "fixation" on the Vatican copyright law. Therefore, I believe this law uses the term in its common meaning. Veverve (talk) 15:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- That is not what they mean when the Vatican talks about fixation. They mean they have an exclusive right on documentary reproductions from the fixation of the reproduction, not the original base material (because that would be utterly pointless, as it will have expired in 99.9% of all cases). They dont for purely mechanical copies like un/minimal edited scans obviously, but you are misinterpreting that particular claim incorrectly. The context here is that a lot of their reproductions are a mixture of combinations of scan, hand copies and restorations, some of which contain significant amounts of work (probably not in this case). Only in death (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I think this is likely to be copyrighted in Vatican City, which is presumably the country of origin. From the Google translation of [2] (linked above): The norms mentioned in Art. 1 apply to reproductions, even purely documentary, cultural heritage described in art. 1 of the law of 25 July 2001, N. CCCLV, obtained with the medium of photography or with similar procedures, on any medium and in whatever way they were obtained... Any fixation in a different format constitutes a new publication of the work and all legal effects. That suggests that if you scan a work (a photographic reproduction) that scan constitutes a new work which you can claim copyright on, even if the original is PD. COM:ART doesn't apply because the subject isn't a work of art and it doesn't look like the picture was taken from a distance. If it was scanned then {{PD-scan}} says it needs to be in the public domain in the country of origin. Hut 8.5 18:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- There is nothing about COM:ART that requires the subject to be a work of art; it merely needs to be a more or less two-dimensional surface. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- COM:ART says several times that it only applies to artworks and pictures taken from a distance. This picture is better considered as a scan rather than a picture of an artwork. Hut 8.5 07:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- In any case, it's a 2D representation of the original. It doesn't matter whether PD-Art or PD-Scan applies, neither process is sufficiently creative to attract copyright protection. Local law doesn't matter, what matters is the WMF's official opinion which applies globally. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:38, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- COM:ART says several times that it only applies to artworks and pictures taken from a distance. This picture is better considered as a scan rather than a picture of an artwork. Hut 8.5 07:43, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- There is nothing about COM:ART that requires the subject to be a work of art; it merely needs to be a more or less two-dimensional surface. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The original work is from the Roman era and is clearly PD worldwide. COM:ART/COM:SCAN says that we get to ignore the country-specific copyright laws surrounding reproductions of PD works (regardless of whether the reproduction is a scan or a photograph) and treat them as PD worldwide. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per King of Hearts. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:21, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --clpo13(talk) 18:13, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Ce fichier correspond à l'ancienne version du logo MooM qui est désormais obsolète. Benjamin19982302 (talk) 08:11, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Aucune raison valable de suppression. N'hésitez pas à télécharger une version récente (en utilisant un nom de fichier différent). --Achim (talk) 08:27, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
Ancienne version du logo Benjamin19982302 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --clpo13(talk) 18:14, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
I am the representative on of the owner of Illuste manor and this picture does not describe the manor and we would like it to be taken down. MihkelTanila (talk) 09:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: "I don't like it" is no valid reason for deletion. Use File:Illuste mõis (5).jpg instead. --Achim (talk) 11:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, also COM:INUSE. --clpo13(talk) 18:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Photo of a computer screen. See COM:DW. Stefan2 (talk) 10:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 18:22, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Not Own Work. Image taken from internet Librero2109 (talk) 21:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete: https://www.deviantart.com/davidlazarartist/art/Yohinata-890826198 no permission. — BriefEdits (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 06:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. The given source is a newspaper and no evidence of permission is provided. EnPassant (talk) 17:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Rubin16 at 09:35, 3 October 2021 UTC: Bot: Redirect to a deleted or non-existent page --Krdbot 13:48, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful license, w:File:FreeStateProjectLogo.png attributes the website, which has no indication the logo is under the license shown. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Krinkle at 00:32, 4 October 2021 UTC: Fair use material is not permitted on Wikimedia Commons (F2): See w:File:FreeStateProjectLogo.png --Krdbot 07:42, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Afghan National Army Maj. Wali Jan, center, the commander of the 4th Tolai, 1st Kandak, 1st Brigade, 203rd Corps, leads fellow soldiers out of Combat Outpost Baraki Barak for a presence patrol and resupply 130522-Z-QE403-011.jpg
[edit]This image contains identifiable Afghans that may be threatened by the Taliban Mclovinplasse (talk) 15:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- That is not really a reason for deletion. Commons is not censored. The question is whether the image is suitable for Wikimedia Commons. Of course, if WMF office deems that this image is a threat to people around, they may immediately delete as an office action.
- I support deletion, but because the image is not being used actively on any Wikimedia projects, which is an indication this image does not seem to be educationally useful. Aasim 22:09, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This photo has been published widely and is still available at a site of the US army. Please note that COM:SCOPE does not cover just those media which are actually used in one of our projects. This is an historical relevant photo from the time an Afghan army existed. --AFBorchert (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Considering the evolving situation in Afghanistan, and the increased persecution of Afghans involved with the US and its allies through online digital footprints as has been reported in Al Jazeera, Wired, Reuters this (and the many other images like it on Commons) are a major security threat for Afghans in them. I am sure the Foundation deems this image a threat too but firstly doesn't have the right to just delete it on a whim and secondly does not have the resources to go through all the Wikimedia projects to decide what may or may not be a threat. Understanding the gravity of the situation in Afghanistan I think it is our duty to do what ever we can to protect Afghan who may be threatened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovinplasse (talk • contribs) 09:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per AFBorchert. Deleting this image from Commons is pointless at the moment if it can be easily accessed via US government websites. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I disagree, this is absolutely not pointless because it reduces the scope of access to this image significantly. Secondly, while the image is on this US website or on Flickr or anywhere else we can’t do anything about it, but on Wikipedia we have the agency to change things and we should. While the Taliban is only in the early stages of consolidating their power, no-one can tell how repressive they might still become and what technologies that might have to exert control. As such, this image presents a great security risk for the people within it. Furthermore, the persons quite likely are unaware of its existence and public accessibility making it all the more dangerous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovinplasse (talk • contribs) 08:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, per AFBorchert. Can we also note this image is from 2013; if the Taliban wanted to look for these people from freely viewable US Gov pictures (which they probably have the capacity to do), they would've done so by now. — Berrely • T∕C 17:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- My poll and input (with some emphases): unless there is an official action by the Wikimedia Foundation itself or its legal team, I will lean towards Keep. Note that Commons does not delete images just because of security or even private owner's property reasons, as these are COM:Non-copyright restrictions. See COM:NOTCENSORED. Prior cases have been discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rue Vivienne, 47.jpg from France (kept, despite the claim of the nominator that it poses terrorist risk) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Ringhals nuclear power plant (kept despite the plant being a highly-sensitive location in Sweden). Commons only deletes images that violate architects', sculptors', and muralists' copyrights if they show recent architecture and public works (like the common "mantra" in many nominations: "no commercial FOP in France", "no FOP in Afghanistan", etc..). But as there are no copyright and scope issues here, this should be kept (again , except of course, if WMF finally intervenes for deletion). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete I understand, but I respectfully disagree.COM:Non-copyright restrictions has some exceptions pertaining to photographs of identifiable people. While a person's photo taken in public is not subject to their consent to be "published" on Commons, this is arguably an outdated policy. Especially considering the the chilling sophistication and activities of companies such as Clearview AI who prey on exactly this loophole. Now in the context of Afghanistan, who is to say the Taliban will not use such technologies to exert control? Are we willing to take that risk? As for the Foundation, this is an extraordinary situation and considering the limited resources they have, it is up to the community to help, support and protect other communities. There is simply to much content for the Foundation to take note of everything to decide what is appropriate or not, and regardless, this is a community driven platform so it should also be up to us. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mclovinplasse (talk • contribs) 10:04, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Mclovinplasse: if you wish you may want to contact Wikimedia Foundation regarding the matter. This page of theirs lists possible avenues for concerns, from information queries and copyvio removals (DMCA) to others, with their relevant email addresses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:36, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Note: this comment was added by the nominator, who has already added a bolded vote above. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 16:45, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: based on the discussion above, the consensus is against deletion of this image, on the basis that none of our extant policies support deleting it. Matters of security and privacy are best discussed at other venues, such as the Village Pump. --clpo13(talk) 18:20, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
This image contains identifiable Afghans that may be threatened by the Taliban}} Mclovinplasse (talk) 10:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Commons cares only about copyright. This is non-copyright problem and Commnns does not care about it. Taliban knows anyway, that she is a female general and how does she look like. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unlike Commons:Deletion requests/File:Afghan National Army Maj. Wali Jan, center, the commander of the 4th Tolai, 1st Kandak, 1st Brigade, 203rd Corps, leads fellow soldiers out of Combat Outpost Baraki Barak for a presence patrol and resupply 130522-Z-QE403-011.jpg, I'm going to vote "delete" for this particular image. My rationale is that this image is no longer accessible via US government websites (no idea about Flickr or other services). The image has not be circulated widely on the web except for the notorious Alamy. The name of the woman can be read on her shirt as well as the image description. Google search returns few results about this individual (which I purposefully won't provide links to them), so I say she has succeeded in keeping a rather low profile. I'm also more sympathetic for females regarding Taliban threats. They will be the worst affected victims. 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This photo shows a female general of the former Afghan National Army, serving as director of nursing for the Afghan Office of the Surgeon General at the time of the photograph. She was (and possibly still is) serving for more than 40 years as military doctor at the Daoud Khan Military Hospital, apparently the best medical facility in Afghanistan (see Afghanistan Times, 1 December 2015, p. 3). This image is available elsewhere (at Alamy) and more photos of her can be easily found. She can be surely seen as a role model for women in Afghanistan. We should not help in erasing such documents. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:25, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Useful photo, no copyright issue. Identification issue is a red herring: The subject was a general in the army and would be identifiable from army records (not that that's a Commons issue in any case). TheOverflow (talk) 08:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep invalid reason for deletion. It has been a longstanding policy here not to delete images that some claim as terrorism risk. Strongest prior rationale is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rue Vivienne, 47.jpg, in which users defended the image against deletion proposal just because it posed security risk. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Afghan National Army Maj. Wali Jan, center, the commander of the 4th Tolai, 1st Kandak, 1st Brigade, 203rd Corps, leads fellow soldiers out of Combat Outpost Baraki Barak for a presence patrol and resupply 130522-Z-QE403-011.jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:32, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --clpo13(talk) 22:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of a photograph posted on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/613066338810353/photos/pb.100044432676392.-2207520000../3475460935904198/?type=3. Previously published photographs require COM:VRT/CONSENT. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:14, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Querying the licensing, The author is unknown, An image published in 1930's France might not be out of copyright unless the photogrpaher died before 1950 URAA would then apply a 95 year term in the US. (So this could still be in copyright till 2025 at the earliest.). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Unknown author. Not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. --BrightRaven (talk) 09:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubioud own work claim for book cover art- w:File:The Man Who Wouldn't Stand Up (book).jpg attributes "Jacob M. Appel. " but the cover art is probbaly copyright of the publishers. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:50, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
I feel, that the photo has no educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --clpo13(talk) 16:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Photograph is probably younger than 50 years, so PD-Thailand does not apply. Bujo (talk) 13:58, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:47, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
- No se ha cerrado desde 2021? 181.43.1.187 15:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Unlikely that User:Mixvasuvadh is indeed the author of the photo, it was previously published elsewhere. The PD tag was not even added by Mixvasuvadh, but by User:223.24.185.129. Thus, the authenticity of the licence is highly dubious. Bujo (talk) 23:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- The uploader User:Annop Nakabut states that the image was taken from this website where it was uploaded by a user named น้ำเกลือยอดเยี่ยม ("excellent salt water") in February 2006 without any copyright notice. After my first deletion request, User:223.24.185.129 added a PD tag, claiming that Thai Wikipedia user User:Mixvasuvadh had released the image into public domain. It is however highly unlikely that this user was indeed the author of the photograph (unfortunately Thai Wikipedia is quite lax on image rights). Indeed, the image seems to be an official photograph from the time General Suchinda was commander-in-chief of the Royal Thai Army from 1990 to 1992. --Bujo (talk) 14:34, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above, also machine translation of source page shows no evidence of free license nor of blogger claiming authorship of image. (too bad, was in fairly wide use; finding genuinely free licensed good photo of Suchinda Kraprayoon would be useful for Wikimedia.)-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
While the source video itself is CC-By licensed, it is composed of still images from other sources. The screen capture would thus be a derivative of the presumably copyrighted photo. Rameshe999 (talk) 13:49, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- Este archivo no había sido borrado? 181.43.1.187 15:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
- * Comment - different image from 2 images of same name previously deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:27, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:26, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot; need to know where it comes from. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Has a Noncommercial CC license watermarked on it and it is not clear it is own work? If so that mark will need to be cropped out or replaced with the correct license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello I am the owner of the rights of the file (I created it). Lacogency is me and the CC by 4.0 is the level of rights that I have declared for this illustration. Do you want me to put my signature somewhere else and the CC stays in the same place?--Vero Marino (talk) 04:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yes sorry, files with a noncommercial CC license can't be kept here (the list of acceptable CC licenses is at Commons:Licensing), but you could remove the watermark or change it to CC BY-SA 4.0 which is the license you assigned it at upload, then it would be no problem. Thanks for your help. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:53, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hello I am the owner of the rights of the file (I created it). Lacogency is me and the CC by 4.0 is the level of rights that I have declared for this illustration. Do you want me to put my signature somewhere else and the CC stays in the same place?--Vero Marino (talk) 04:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:29, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
See COM:ART#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, just to clarify: it's not a sculpture. It's a crop from w:Nativity (Christus), a 15th century painting. The archway is painted in a technique called grisaille, which emulates sculpture. So this is not a 3D piece of art. Victoriaearle (talk) 13:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Obviously is 2D work, it is also PD. No valid reason to delete. A09090091 (talk) 16:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Just to clarify since there seems to be some confusion, it's a crop from File:Petrus Christus Nativité Haute résolution.jpg. Victoriaearle (talk) 20:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Info see w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 September 15#File:Petrus Christus Nativity (Cain and Abel).jpg, this is a crop from a scan of a 15th century painting which is not eligible for copyright. -FASTILY 23:33, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- I cropped the image from a file that's a featured image, it's from a 15th century painting, and I cannot understand how this is not free. I object to the deletion and would have liked to have received communication on en.wiki in turns of what needs to be done to keep the file. Thanks. Victoriaearle (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
- There's nothing to worry about, the nominator is simply mistaken. Please remember to assume good faith, we're all human, errors happen :) -FASTILY 00:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I have been assuming good faith because I understand that the way arch is rendered makes it look like actual sculpture, but this sentence seems to indicate it's not free, "this is a crop from a scan of a 15th century painting which not eligible or copyright", which isn't the case. That's what I was reacting to. Victoriaearle (talk) 00:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Oh, those are typos, fixed now. -FASTILY 00:27, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, I have been assuming good faith because I understand that the way arch is rendered makes it look like actual sculpture, but this sentence seems to indicate it's not free, "this is a crop from a scan of a 15th century painting which not eligible or copyright", which isn't the case. That's what I was reacting to. Victoriaearle (talk) 00:16, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- There's nothing to worry about, the nominator is simply mistaken. Please remember to assume good faith, we're all human, errors happen :) -FASTILY 00:00, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
- I cropped the image from a file that's a featured image, it's from a 15th century painting, and I cannot understand how this is not free. I object to the deletion and would have liked to have received communication on en.wiki in turns of what needs to be done to keep the file. Thanks. Victoriaearle (talk) 23:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:30, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 04:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If kept, personal info should be censored. A09090091 (talk) 16:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Naronnas as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: non-trivial logo, "own work" suspect
COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- I must confess I am no expert about Threshold of originality, but I think the big letter "H" has some non-trivial writing style. But I could be wrong about this, so feel free to keep this file if there are any doubts about this explaination.--Naronnas (talk) 19:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely not uploader's self-photographed image. A very thin white line can be noticed on the left margin, suggesting this is a scanned photo of a photo. Whether it is a book or a postcard or what, this makes "own work" status questionable. In addition to that, low resolution and missing metadata. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete probably crop from https://www.facebook.com/groups/1546232475649702/ A09090091 (talk) 16:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, album cover art w:File:Cronian-Terra.jpg is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:33, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
w:File:RTL 8 logo 2017.png was non-free, The elements of concern would be the gradient droplet shape, and the use of an overlapped instead of printed 8. However it's not clear if this is creative enough to exceed TOO. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:34, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work , W:File:Cobbtheatres.gif attributes "Cobb Theatres". However this logo appears to be below TOO for the logo of a US based company. If kept, suggest reimport of metadata from English Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:14, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: May be PD-textlogo, but not used, should be SVG if useful. --Yann (talk) 21:35, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 08:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, w:File:Nagarjun (1911-1998).jpg attributes http://www.hindiguru.org/writer_poet.htm but it's marked as a dead link. There is no indication of when the photo is taken. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 08:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:37, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 09:41, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:59, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
Artwork by a living artist. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 08:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Studio photograph, most likely not own work. MKFI (talk) 08:50, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:38, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio, may be above TOO in country of origin (Germany). Simple text logos generally fall below German TOO, but stylized elements (such as the letters in the middle of the logo), may be complex enough to be copyrighted FASTILY 09:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
possible copyright violation, unclear if this is below TOO in country of origin (Belarus) FASTILY 09:07, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:44, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Smaller resolution version published in https://basharashop.com/. OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 09:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PlumberWiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Company marketing material. File:Abhishek Poddar and Saurabh Arora.jpg photographer unknown.
- File:Real Time Quotation from Plum.jpg
- File:Plum's Desktop Dashboard.png
- File:Plum's Dashboard.png
- File:Abhishek Poddar and Saurabh Arora.jpg
- File:Official Logo of Plum Insurance.jpg
- File:Plum Small Logo.jpg
- File:Plum Insurance Logo.jpg
MKFI (talk) 09:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:48, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Small resolution, seems blurry and pixellated. Suspected COM:SCREENSHOT. Only contribution by Quowarranto97 (talk · contribs), who hasn't contributed other photos. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Hardly own work by uploader, as depicted person died in 1966. Image in color found here. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:54, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:46, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Cover of a (official?) report? Copyright status uncertain. Uploader is apparently the person depicted in the cover. Photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 10:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Blatant self-promotion (out of project scope) and a likely copyvio. De728631 (talk) 19:58, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Same as his twitter pic - https://twitter.com/hugotravers?lang=en - no meaningful exif, only upload of this new user. Unlikely to be own work. PCP Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- I used twitter to advise this twitter user of this discussion. Geo Swan (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Per metadata likely copied from Facebook or Instagram. Also found here. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:47, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Modern art work - we need permission from the artist
- File:David Breuer-Weil - The Coviad - Ten Plagues.jpg
- File:David Breuer-Weil - Ten Plagues - 2021 - 4 x 59.4 x 84.1cm HR.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Huma Anwar
[edit]I am unable to verify the claimed CC license
Gbawden (talk) 12:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:49, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"193019042@N07"
[edit]Flickrwashing, "image search" in title suggest these are not original works, and several photos have watermarkings.
- File:Image search 1621248000172 (51185494189).jpg
- File:Image search 1621246443975 (51184002167).jpg
- File:Image search 1621246462630 (51183991727).jpg
- File:Image search 1621246450588 (51184897953).jpg
- File:Image search 1621246362556 (51184899243).jpg
- File:Image search 1621246343372 (51184906768).jpg
- File:Image search 1621246407037 (51184898488).jpg
- File:Image search 1621246488228 (51185750900).jpg
- File:Image search 1621247806950 (51185792515).jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 12:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
rendering shared by Dapper Companies - needs OTRS from them Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
better version has been uploaded as a separate file Armin Reindl (talk) 13:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
better version has been uploaded as a separate file Armin Reindl (talk) 13:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
better version has been uploaded as a separate file Armin Reindl (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
better version has been uploaded as a separate file Armin Reindl (talk) 13:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:52, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
better version has been uploaded as a separate file Armin Reindl (talk) 13:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
better version has been uploaded as a separate file Armin Reindl (talk) 13:35, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
better version has been uploaded as a separate file Armin Reindl (talk) 13:36, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, film poster art w:File:Tick Tick Boom Movie poster.jpg non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
TOO concern , Graphic element (left). ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:53, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtbful own work, w:File:Clubland tv.png attributes Clubland TV , However this is a stylized font used for an otherwise purely text logo. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
You can delete this file and link the graphics from the English version of the site to the Polish version. 00:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adm02 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 21:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work, fil poster art, Non-free per w:File:Zone four one four.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:54, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Owner has withdrawn permission to use it Yarchie (talk) 14:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used, very poor quality. Courtesy deletion. --Yann (talk) 21:57, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Owner has withdrawn permission Yarchie (talk) 14:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Non notable people, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 21:58, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Owner has withdrawn permission Yarchie (talk) 14:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Non notable people, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Owner has withdrawn permission Yarchie (talk) 14:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Non notable people, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Owner has withdrawn permission Yarchie (talk) 14:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Non notable people, not used, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 21:59, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Low quality and can't even see the subject Naioli (talk) 14:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Previously published at https://strawbaekhyun.tumblr.com/post/641621881208832000, unlikely to be own work Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:00, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:LaVentanaEns.jpg
- File:Sauzal.jpg
- File:BanderaMonumentalEnsenada.jpg
- File:Mural de Alfredo Ramos Martínez.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Possibly manipulated content. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 15:19, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:02, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Andrej Danković (talk) 15:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
no encyclopedic value, out of scope, no category since 2015, useless, unused, etc F (talk) 15:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol (a trademark, not a free or under CC licence logo) — danyele 16:46, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. The given source is a newspaper and no evidence of permission is provided. EnPassant (talk) 17:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Given the existence of Category:Los Angeles Examiner Collection, 1920-1961, maybe there is a case for {{PD-US-not renewed}}? Have any Los Angeles Examiner newspapers from that period been renewed? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:23, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:05, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Picture is not needed anymore and has no further use in Wikipedia. Michael F. Schönitzer 18:12, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Not used, very poor quality. --Yann (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Outdated and not used Michael F. Schönitzer 18:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Appears to be a corporate profile photo, stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 19:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:06, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful CC licence, w:File:In Moonlight song by Elgar cover 1902.jpg is under non-free terms. The graphic elements here would be a TOO concern. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- This is either copyright Elgar or Novello, and in either case, 70 years have passed (from Novello’s publication, 1902, and Elgar’s death, 1934). This is
PD-US-expiredin the U.S. TE(æ)A,ea. (talk) 12:29, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:07, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
2D art is not covered by freedom of panorama in India. Lymantria (talk) 20:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
This appears to be an upscaled PNG version of File:Heartland of America Park, Omaha, Nebraska.jpg which makes it undesirable. Anyway, it is not the uploader's own original work as previously claimed. De728631 (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Curtis Williams Jr. and note also FBMD in metadata. Unlikely to be own work. Copyvio? Correct permission is required See COM:OTRS Timtrent (talk) 20:58, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Curtis William (talk · contribs)
[edit]These two pictures are highly unlikely to have been photographed by the uploader. If so this can be verified by use of COM:OTRS. If the uploader is the subject of the picture (note the name similarity) No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
Timtrent (talk) 21:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-030-0780-30, Krakau, Razzia von deutscher Ordnungspolizei-impfpass, bitte.jpg
[edit]Völlig Unangemessen und geschmacklose Bearbeitung eines historischen Dokumentes 2A02:8108:9FC0:1F80:13:C321:1F75:D083 21:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Achim (talk) 07:06, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep- There are certain things called freedom of speech, freedom of expression etc. way beyond the feelings of "woke" Germans.--Quahadi Añtó 15:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
This [3], on the other hand is completely disgusting and innapropriate. Quahadi Añtó 21:47, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Marx-Engels-Lenin-Stalin-Mao-Gonzalo Marxism-Leninism-Maoism, Principally Maoism Flag.png
[edit]Not Own Work. Image taken from internet 190.160.194.81 21:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- I am not sure what proof you want me to give for this because this image never even existed on the internet before the Publishing date which you can just check by reverse searching it anywhere. (In fact, this specific wikimedia page is the only result you get when you reverse search it.) I would request the nominator to show proof that this specific image was available before the date of publishing to prove that it has been taken from the internet. A small observation I made in the nominator's profile is that the Nominator's(IP address) entire history is just nominating one or more of my works for deletion. Red1922 (talk) 10:05, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image is an edit of a non-free image, this is the original image [4] Librero2109 (talk) 13:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- Fair enough. Although I am not sure about the proper licensing of the original image, will it be possible that I change the license of this image in question to prevent deletion? If so, please tell. The same for the other two images[5][6]. Red1922 (talk) 17:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
- The image is an edit of a non-free image, this is the original image [4] Librero2109 (talk) 13:54, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:12, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Not what it seems to be. PD-ANON in 2028. Only possible justification for PD, would be, that the author wanted to make it look like PD. But is this sufficient? Habitator terrae 🌍 21:34, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Amusing ain't it! So long as the Vinland Map was possibly medieval, it was Public Domain. Now that it's known to be a fake, most likely made around 1956, it's technically in copyright. Will the actual copyright owner come forward? David Trochos (talk) 20:47, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Place of origin unclear; if US would be {{PD-US no notice}}. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:19, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep PD-old or {{PD-US no notice}} your choice. --RAN (talk) 15:09, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
- Interesting, but wasn't it first published in the sense of PD-US-no notice in a presumably copyright noticed books 1965? Was the presentation to the public first and sufficiently public? Or does the copyright notice doesn't include the map? Habitator terrae 🌍 14:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
- Since the map was assumed to be PD at that time, the 1965 copyright notice should not include it, should it? --Cosmophilus (talk) 06:13, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
- Interesting, but wasn't it first published in the sense of PD-US-no notice in a presumably copyright noticed books 1965? Was the presentation to the public first and sufficiently public? Or does the copyright notice doesn't include the map? Habitator terrae 🌍 14:01, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 22:13, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
pas de référence à la source primaire Jpak (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Jpak Source: {{Own}} -akko (talk) 12:56, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: attribution was wrong indeed. I corrected it. This is a work by famous French painter Ingres and in PD. Image could be kept. --Elly (talk) 21:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
In a previous DR, I kept this image, because it is an old painting of Ingres and in PD. However, I found out that this is the same painting as File:Bernier-Ingres-1800.jpg, The current painting is wrongly documented. There is a person Francois Bernier. This painting concerns fr:Pierre-François Bernier and not fr:François Bernier (philosophe). It appears best to delete this image, because it is Redundant, and not used correctly on the projects. Elly (talk) 22:42, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Picture with VPR logo, low res, no permission, no metadata.
- File:VPR BMW M4 White.jpg
- File:VPR Ford Focus RS.jpg
- File:VPR M4 burnout.jpg
- File:VPR APR VW Golf 7R.jpg
- File:VPR VW Polo GTi 6r.jpg
- File:VPR Golf Mk1.jpg
Cjp24 (talk) 22:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:15, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Missing evidence of source's terms of use supporting licence declaration. RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk) 23:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Missing evidence of source's terms of use supporting licence declaration (Commons:Essential information). RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk) 23:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Works by the PRC's military are not in the public domain. There's also a footer on the source website stating Copyright © Ministry of National Defense of the People's Republic of China. All Rights Reserved. Evidence of permission is indeed needed. pandakekok9 06:14, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:16, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible COM:TOYS. These were intended for a temporary exhibition in France during 2013–2014. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 01:33, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no license. --✗plicit 01:23, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This building has been designed by Henri Vidal (1895-1955), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Carte postale - La Garenne-Colombes - La Chapelle, rue Pasteur - 9FI-GAC 63.jpg
- File:La Garenne-Colombes.Eglise Saint-André Sainte-Hélène.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Dear Pymouss The reason you give makes sense, but is there a way in Commons, to "hide" or put this file "on hold" for four years ? This would avoid a lot of work in the future. I am sure this is a very usual situation. Thanks. Rc1959 (talk) 13:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Rc1959: yes, there is a way : you delete and undeleted later ; this is exactly why we put the Undelete in 2036 category. Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Pierre de Firminy
[edit]This architectural work was designed by Le Corbusier (1887-1965) as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be considered as a free work of art at least 70 years after the architect's death.
- File:Eglise Le Corbusier Firminy Vert entrée.jpg
- File:Eglise Le Corbusier Firminy Vert.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-01.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-02.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-03.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-04.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-05.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-06.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-07.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-08.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-09.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-10.jpg
- File:EgliseSaintPierreFirminyVert-11.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 19:59, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:13, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Pierre de Firminy
[edit]Le Corbusier, the architect, died in 1965. No FOP in France. The files may be moved to the French Wikipedia under the following condition : « L'importation sur la Wikipédia francophone de photographies libres de bâtiments récents est tolérée. Cependant, l'importation est interdite dans les cas où les ayants droit ont explicitement exprimé leur opposition. »
- File:Church at Firminy.jpg
- File:Drôle d'église… (3863674434).jpg
- File:Eglise Saint-Pierre le Corbusier.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 21:11, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 17:48, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Église Saint-Pierre de Firminy
[edit]This building has been designed by Le Corbusier (1887-1965), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Church @ Firminy, France.jpg
- File:Kirche St Pierre in Firminy.jpg
- File:Le Corbusier+José Oubrerie - FIRMINY - Eglise Saint-Pierre - 1972-2006.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:36, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This architectural work was designed by Le Corbusier (1887-1965) as there is no Freedom of panorama in France, it won't be considered as a free work of art at least 70 years after the architect's death.
- File:Maison de la culture .jpg
- File:Maison de la culture1.jpg
- File:MaisonDeLaCultureDeFirminyVert-1.jpg
- File:MaisonDeLaCultureDeFirminyVert-2.jpg
- File:MaisonDeLaCultureDeFirminyVert-3.jpg
- File:MaisonDeLaCultureDeFirminyVert-4.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:21, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 18:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
This building has been designed by Le Corbusier (1887-1965), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Foyer bar - Maison de la Culture - P1080021.jpg
- File:Foyer bar - Maison de la Culture - P1080026.jpg
- File:Foyer bar - Maison de la Culture -P1080025.jpg
- File:Intérieur - Maison de la Culture - IMG 6653.jpg
- File:Le Corbusier - FIRMINY - Maison de la culture - 1965.jpg
- File:Maison de la Culture (Charly Jurine) 3770(R).jpg
- File:Maison de la Culture (Charly Jurine)-2064-R.jpg
- File:Maison de la Culture (Charly Jurine)-3156-R.jpg
- File:Maison de la Culture - IMG 6760(R).jpg
- File:Maison de la culture à Firminy-Vert.jpg
- File:Salle de spectacle - Maison de la Culture - P1080020.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:34, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fondation suisse
[edit]Le Corbusier, the architect, died in 1965. No FOP in France. The files may be moved to the French Wikipedia under the following condition : « L'importation sur la Wikipédia francophone de photographies libres de bâtiments récents est tolérée. Cependant, l'importation est interdite dans les cas où les ayants droit ont explicitement exprimé leur opposition. »
- File:Fondation Suisse - Cité Universitaire - Paris 2014.jpg
- File:Maison de Suisse 1, May 29, 2013.jpg
- File:Maison de Suisse 2, May 29, 2013.jpg
- File:Pavillonsuisse.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 21:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fondation suisse
[edit]This building has been designed by Le Corbusier (1887-1965), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Cité internationale universitaire @ Paris (32313286222).jpg
- File:ETH-BIB-Paris, Cité Universitaire, Schweizerhaus, von Osten-Dia 247-07291.tif
- File:ETH-BIB-Paris, Cité Universitaire, Schweizerhaus, von Süden-Dia 247-07290.tif
- File:ETH-BIB-Paris, Cité Universitaire, Schweizerhaus, von Süden-Dia 247-07290.tif cropped.jpg
- File:La fondation suisse (Cité internationale universitaire de Paris) n2.jpg
- File:La fondation suisse (Cité internationale universitaire de Paris) n3.jpg
- File:La fondation suisse (Cité internationale universitaire de Paris).jpg
- File:Le Corbusier-Pierre Jeanneret-PARIS-Cité universitaire- Fondation suisse-1933.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:41, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pyb (talk) 12:53, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fondation suisse
[edit]The building was inaugurated in 1933 by Le Corbusier (1887–1965). There is no freedom of panorama in France. The copyright term of the country is 70 years, and the image can be undeleted in 2036.
- File:Fondation Suisse Pavillon Le Corbusier (50560188293).jpg
- File:Fondation Suisse Pavillon Le Corbusier (50561065502).jpg
- File:Fondation Suisse Pavillon Le Corbusier + Pierre Andre Jeanneret (50560926516).jpg
- File:Fondation Suisse Pavillon Le Corbusier + Pierre Andre Jeanneret (50561057102).jpg
- File:Fondation Suisse Pavillon Le Corbusier + Pierre Andre Jeanneret (50562120448).jpg
- File:Swiss house CIUP picture September 2, 2019.jpg
A1Cafel (talk) 05:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 04:28, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maison du Brésil
[edit]Le Corbusier, the architect, died in 1965. No FOP in France. The files may be moved to the French Wikipedia under the following condition : « L'importation sur la Wikipédia francophone de photographies libres de bâtiments récents est tolérée. Cependant, l'importation est interdite dans les cas où les ayants droit ont explicitement exprimé leur opposition. »
- File:Maison du Brésil 2, May 29, 2013.jpg
- File:Maison du Brésil 3, May 29, 2013.jpg
- File:Maison du Brésil 4, May 29, 2013.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 21:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File:Maison du Brésil 2, May 29, 2013.jpg because this is only a part of the building, and the architecture of this part is not original. --Tangopaso (talk) 19:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- I beg to disagree : I find the Mondrian like design of the facade quite original. — Racconish ☎ 19:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 17:37, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Maison du Brésil
[edit]This building has been designed by Le Corbusier (1887-1965) and Lúcio Costa (1902-1998), two architects who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, these pictures must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Brazil Student Hostel.jpg
- File:La maison du Brésil (Cité internationale universitaire de Paris) n2.jpg
- File:La maison du Brésil (Cité internationale universitaire de Paris).jpg
- File:Le Corbusier-Lucio Costa-PARIS-Cité universitaire- Maison du Brésil-1959.jpg
- File:Maison du Brésil 1, May 29, 2013.jpg
- File:Maison du Brésil @ Cité internationale universitaire @ Paris (31621352604).jpg
- File:Maison du Brésil @ Cité internationale universitaire @ Paris (32343291331).jpg
- File:Maison du Brésil @ Cité internationale universitaire @ Paris (32424657766).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (17461880373).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (17461991613).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (17896006179).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (18079007822).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (18079065742).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (18082325805).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (18083218411).jpg
- File:Paris - Maison du Brésil (18083287021).jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:33, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fondation Avicenne
[edit]This building has been designed by Heydar Ghiai (1922-1985), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Claude Parent-PARIS-Cité universitaire-Maison de l'Iran-1969.jpg
- File:L-OBLIQUE, le nouvel espace d'interprétation de la CIUP (8939716589).jpg
- File:La passerelle reliant les deux Maisons des Arts et Métiers de la Cité Universitaire de Paris.jpg
- File:Paris - Fondation Avicenne (17467177953).jpg
- File:Table tactile sur l'histoire et les maisons de la Cité Internationale Universitaire de Paris (8980927175).jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This building has been designed by Claude Parent (1923-2016) and Paul Virilio (1932-2018), two architects who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Claude Parent+Paul Virilio - NEVERS - Eglise Sainte Bernadette du Banlay - 1966.jpg
- File:Cloche de l'église Sainte-Bernadette du Banlay.jpg
- File:Nevers banlay sainte bernadette.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hôpital Joseph-Imbert
[edit]This building has been designed by Paul Nelson (1895-1979), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Hôpital de Saint-Lô
[edit]This building has been designed by Paul Nelson (1895-1979), an architect who died less than 70 years ago. This work of art is copyrighted and there is no Freedom of panorama in France. For this reason, this picture must be removed from Wikimedia Commons.
- File:Hopital memorial.jpg
- File:Hôpital Mémorial France États Unis.jpg
- File:Saint-Lô - Hôpital Mémorial.jpg
Pymouss Let’s talk - 12:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --VIGNERON (talk) 12:27, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This appears o be a school class picture, annotated withe e subject in a circle. However, the date of 1952 suggests that it is withen copyright. The uploader is highly unlikely to be the copyright owner. Timtrent (talk) 20:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 27 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused fictional flag HapHaxion (talk / contribs) 15:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 05:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:23, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Bank of Georgia headquarters
[edit]No COM:FOP Georgia.
- File:28533 l.png
- File:BankOfGeorgiaHeadquarters.jpg
- File:Lego building - Flickr - bonstormer.jpg
- File:Shekvetili Park Bank building Gruzia 2019 1.jpg
- File:Министерство автодорог ГССР (1).jpg
- File:Министерство автодорог ГССР (2).jpg
- File:საქართველოს ბანკის სათაო ოფისი.jpg
- File:格鲁吉亚银行总部1.jpg
- File:格鲁吉亚银行总部2.jpg
- File:格鲁吉亚银行总部3.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. No evidence that these files are the uploader's own work or that they're freely licensed. // sikander { talk } 🦖 15:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richardt1956 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader has a history of copyvios. I do not trust that any of these are their own works. In fact, I suggest speedy deletion of all files listed in this DR. If there was a mistake, we can always undelete them.
- File:Four Emperor penguins walking on the beach, Antarctica.jpg
- File:Chickens in the chicken coop.jpg
- File:Harp seal pup sleeping.webp
- File:White-tailed deer in the meadow.jpg
- File:Mud Crab on Beach, Western Australia.jpg
- File:Marilyn Monroe (Some Like It Hot).jpg
- File:Thomas O'Malley voice.jpg
- File:Marie (The Aristocats).jpg
- File:Hyenas (The Lion King).jpg
- File:Rafiki (The Lion King) Disney character.jpg
- File:Grizzly Bear.png
- File:Squirrel on tree limb eating nut.png
- File:Red fox.png
- File:Portrait of a Kalahari lion.png
- File:African giraffe.png
- File:African Elephant.png
- File:Clown Fish.png
- File:Bottlenose Dolphins.png
- File:Green Sea Turtle.png
- File:Patas monkeys.png
- File:Raibow lorikeets in Australia.png
- File:Bengal tiger resting closeup.png
- File:Mallards in new york.png
- File:Domestic pig.png
- File:Black stallion running in meadow.png
- File:Holstein Cow.png
- File:Costa Rican Butterfly.png
- File:Red dragonfly.png
- File:Caterpillar on a grass.png
- File:Honey bees on flowers.png
- File:Spider spinning web.png
- File:Ladybug on a blade of grass.png
- File:Rabbit on grass.png
- File:Male Cardinal bird.png
- File:Yellow-necked mouse.png
- File:Tabby cat.png
- File:Golden Retriever head.png
pandakekok9 05:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Richardt1956 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in tabular data, MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:21, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Although the YouTube video is marked CC, it’s re-using footage from a third party, so the license does not apply here. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:48, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: Change the screenshot from the same youtube video. If the new file is subject to cc regulations, please withdraw the deletion application. Tychou12 (talk) 05:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Tychou12: Thank you, it looks like the new image is fine. I recommend keeping the new image, deleting the old one. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:10, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: Thanks for your guidance. Because I just became a member of Wikipedia and I can’t find a way to delete the old image. What should I do next? Tychou12 (talk) 14:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Tychou12: You don't have to do anything now. Someone will delete the old one and close out this deletion request. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:45, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: Thanks for your guidance. Because I just became a member of Wikipedia and I can’t find a way to delete the old image. What should I do next? Tychou12 (talk) 14:40, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Tychou12: Thank you, it looks like the new image is fine. I recommend keeping the new image, deleting the old one. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:10, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: original version per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
It is not clear that the uploader is the author and copyright holder noted in the metadata, need their permission to license the file. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:02, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since). Should be dated and checked for {{PD-Italy}}. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since). Should be dated and checked for {{PD-Italy}}. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ZioNicco as no permission (No permission since). Should be dated and checked for {{PD-Italy}}. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:08, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:16, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo - The graphic element in the centre of the shield is sufficently ceative to not be below TOO. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- So, why didn't you fix it? ;) , It's not neccesary, I apologize as I did not qualify correctly with the proper template.
Cr.conts (talk) 19:26, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Cr.conts: what evidence is there that this is public domain in Chile? That information should be added to the information page as well. clpo13(talk) 18:16, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Doutbful own work claim, Erich Moritz von Hornbostel died in 1935 and so any image would have to be taken prior to that. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). I have not been able to find this photo online. I found https://www.tpsss.edu.hk/tc/webpage.php?cid=245&fid=25 which appears to be taken a few minutes apart (note the difference in clouds at the top corner of the building). King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Adding File:曾璧山（崇蘭）中學 外觀.jpg, which I could not find at all, even similar images. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: it appears from the user name that they are associated with the school, hence it is not surprising to find a similar image on the school's official website. The images may have been taken as this person's duties for the school. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shaan Vinoth (talk · contribs)
[edit]This user has uploaded a ton of copyvios, so the rest of their images should be deleted per COM:PRP.
- File:Peackock mudumalai 2.jpg
- File:Great hornbill mudumalai.jpg
- File:Crested serpent eagle mudumalai.jpg
- File:Cobra in mudumalai.jpg
- File:Leopard in mudumalai.jpg
- File:Mudumalai national park bengal tiger.jpg
- File:Mudumalai jungle biome 2.jpg
- File:Mudumalai jungle biome 3.jpg
- File:Mudumalai jungle biome 1.jpg
- File:Mugger crocodile in mudumalai.jpg
- File:Wild boar mudumalai.jpg
- File:Western ghats jungles.jpg
- File:Western ghats rainforest, nilgiris.jpg
- File:Majestic Tiger in mudumalai protected area.jpg
- File:BengalTiger in Mudumalai National Park.jpg
- File:Moist forest in Mudumalai.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- The authorship claims and metadata are brazenly incorrect in many cases as well. - File:Western ghats rainforest, nilgiris.jpg - has lat-longs in the Amazon. Shyamal L. (talk) 08:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sourcherry123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]photo by Shaira Luna - and found here before upload - https://www.nme.com/en_asia/features/music-interviews/zild-benitez-album-huminga-2021-2913768 - think we need OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 12:15, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if it's the right license Atippa1 (talk) 12:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of free license at source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if it's the right license Atippa1 (talk) 12:32, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: license matches the one at source. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:27, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if the file has the right license Atippa1 (talk) 12:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: wrong license (not art). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:28, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Lyle Stuart the subject of this photo was born in 1922, and this photo seems to have been taken later in his life, most likely at some point in the 1960-1990's, I therefore think that the PD license shown here is unlikely. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim, for an image most likely taken no later than 1985 or so.. seew:File:Azilda Lapierre Marchand.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- File:Cegerxwîn (cropped).jpg
- File:Xalid Cemîl Mihemed (cropped).jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Balyozxane (talk • contribs) 17:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a poor judgement on my part. Image is clearly marked as VOA on the provided source but there is no way neither of the images could have been taken by VOA. Balyozxane (talk) 17:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Redundant with File:Start of Ivythorn Hill footpath - geograph.org.uk - 1448515.jpg. Not a duplicate because that version has been rotated to the correct orientation, but there's not much use for a sideways version. bjh21 (talk) 23:10, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:29, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D art. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:07, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Error en el nombre de archivo Bmxdrp (talk) 01:22, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep but
Rename A09090091 (talk) 16:16, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
_Programme_Awards_at_the_Grosvenor_House_Hotel,_Park_Lane.jpg){kind=link}
![31 File:Chairman Abimael Guzman "Gonzalo".png](#File:Chairman_Abimael_Guzman_"Gonzalo".png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![45 File:Kodi Najm "This is New York" party roxy hotel NYC.jpg](#File:Kodi_Najm_"This_is_New_York"_party_roxy_hotel_NYC.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![98 File:Raketni sistem M-94 "Plamen".jpg](#File:Raketni_sistem_M-94_"Plamen".jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![176 File:Medal TPPR "Za Braterską Pomoc" złoty awers i rewers.jpg](#File:Medal_TPPR_"Za_Braterską_Pomoc"_złoty_awers_i_rewers.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Programme_Awards_at_the_Grosvenor_House_Hotel,_Park_Lane.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Programme_Awards_at_the_Grosvenor_House_Hotel,_Park_Lane.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_in_Le_Havre_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![21:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-190.160.194.81-2021-09-15T21:26:00.000Z-File:Chairman_Abimael_Guzman_"Gonzalo".png){kind=link}
![22:09, 27 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-Infrogmation-2021-09-27T22:09:00.000Z-File:Chairman_Abimael_Guzman_"Gonzalo".png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![10:55, 15 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-Taivo-2021-09-15T10:55:00.000Z-File:Kodi_Najm_"This_is_New_York"_party_roxy_hotel_NYC.jpg){kind=link}
![16:37, 7 October 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-Clpo13-2021-10-07T16:37:00.000Z-File:Kodi_Najm_"This_is_New_York"_party_roxy_hotel_NYC.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![15:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-Andrej_Danković-2021-09-15T15:29:00.000Z-File:Raketni_sistem_M-94_"Plamen".jpg){kind=link}
![22:03, 9 October 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-Yann-2021-10-09T22:03:00.000Z-File:Raketni_sistem_M-94_"Plamen".jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[5]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Chairman_Abimael_Guzman_%22Gonzalo%22.png){kind=link}
![[6]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Chairman_Abimael_Guzman_%22Gonzalo%22_of_the_Communist_Party_of_Peru_(PCP).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_3770(R).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-2064-R.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-3156-R.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_n2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_n3.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_n2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Disney_character.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination/uploader request. In addition I suspect copyright violation, no source is given and it looks like a logo and publications of an organization. --Ellywa (talk) 11:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Built after 2000. No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 14:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: My bad, sorry. Is CC-BY-2.0 --Turbojet (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
In my opinion the CC license was only applied by the Flickr photographer for the photo itself, not the architecture on this photo. There is no commercial FOP in Romania, however, and COM:VRT permission from the architect is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:09, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:FOP Romania. --Ellywa (talk) 11:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
The file is not the uploader's own work as claimed. It was taken by the General Presidency for the Affairs of the Saudi Grand Mosque and the Prophet's Mosque, a Saudi government agency managing the two holy mosques (https://www.timesofisrael.com/saudi-arabia-releases-first-ever-photos-of-holy-kaaba-stone/). LéKashmiriSocialiste (talk) 04:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete if falls under {{PD-Saudi Arabia}}, then should be kept. A09090091 (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. It does not fall under a PD licence, because the object including the frame is in 3D. --Ellywa (talk) 11:26, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Túrelio as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: own work? https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivVQZ1HvGyZHrZc7R4zaxBou-Uay-TkclTIorcoOHp7hzQD3QDsE_15tap7zVBrXeW8iOYR0OhggUAETQfVOpIsv224kNWRLuGVRdytU3T-d9hMmUr4w-7OaRN77FYMOIarOFLlPRQiXKQDbw0Ma7s7ixW9VCTCjY6q_1hW_1JwjYRSFeIDnVmV2oqOnyhNV-YscLViFH3oYBr712Mdp2Dqxc8OYMEYEIJeuyYRbwzZ4yUqhGa5f0Ah8QjvX9Me_1bvJFJD1At2e26kpuka-rkxSGQkos6N7DOfgl46BOctSn3TctuIsl7Du01qeR93bvSSm4JQ2t98-9QdpCwsP_1VbAPgIYTmqlw. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: imho this is below COM:TOO. --Ellywa (talk) 11:27, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stwalkerster as Logo. COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per TS. --Brateevsky {talk} 07:56, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Brateevsky: What does TS stand for? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:02, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: On the guidelines of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Azerbaijan it is not described whether this country has copyright laws that define a threshold of originality too show which images are not copyrighted. Therefore it must be assumed this logo is copyrighted. Consequently, it must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:31, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
We must have proof that these files have been licensed under the CC-BY-SA by the copyright holder. @Felix220: Please have the game developers contact COM:VRT. Also note that three of these are logos which may fall under COM:TOO irrespective of any permission release, but that should be discussed.
- File:Motorways Logo-1920x1080.png
- File:Motorways Logo Banner-1846x300.png
- File:Motorways Announcement-1024x572.jpg
- File:Motorways AppIcon-2048x2048.png
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 07.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 08.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 09.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 05.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 06.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 04.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 02.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 01.jpg
- File:Mini-Motorways-image 03.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:30, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
@King of Hearts: Hi! I upload this pictures because:
- On Commons there are already screenshots and logos from Mini Metro (behavior game) and on websites are same instruction, so I thought I can upload them.
- On official site of creators there are "Press Kit" which has in it "MONETIZATION PERMISSION" and there are some instructions (link: https://dinopoloclub.com/press/mini-motorways/).
If I broke any rules, I apologize. Felix220 (talk) 13:13, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Thibaut120094: As the reviewer of File:Mini Metro screenshot 0.png, would you happen to remember where you found the CC license? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- See this archive, at the bottom of the page. --Thibaut (talk) 16:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Hi! I want to ask, if are there some changes about pictures. Thanks --Felix220 (talk) 19:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Hello! Is there some changes about pictures? If there's nothing wrong, can you please close this discusion? Thanks --Felix220 (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination deleted most, kept the Logo Banner, because that appears below TOO. The archived website shows a CC-BY-SA4.0 licence. However, the current website is showing a copyright sign and the text "all rights reserved". So these images cannot be maintained. Press kits can be used for limited purposes only. --Ellywa (talk) 11:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
No Commons:FoP in Ukraine. The church opened in 1999 (as said in Ukrainian Wikipedia) Brateevsky {talk} 07:49, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:38, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Shizhao as no permission (No permission since). Should be discussed whether the PD license tags are valid. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:11, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. RZuo (talk) 15:10, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
Kept: according to https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E5%9C%8B%E7%AB%8B%E4%B8%AD%E5%B1%B1%E5%A4%A7%E5%AD%B8, this calligraphy is attributed to Sun Yat Sen, who died in 1925. So the image is no in PD in China (50 years afther the death of the author). --Ellywa (talk) 11:43, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Not necssarily simple - Stylised flower and leaves emblems (left). Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Moldova has no infromation concerning TOO. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- It is pixel art of traditional pattern so might also be categorised as "folklore expressions" --95.160.159.147 22:33, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: On the guidelines of Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Moldova it is not described whether this country has copyright laws that define a threshold of originality too show which images are not copyrighted. Therefore it must be assumed this logo is copyrighted. Consequently, it must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Licensing conflict, this isn't own work w:File:Air Tahiti Nui logo.svg is attributed to the airlines web site, The Airline is based in French Polynesia, and Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/France does not have a specfic section on TOO. The TOO concern would be the stylised flower/palm(?) graphic top. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per COM:TOO France, the level of originality required for copyright protection is low in this country. To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creative effort of the designer. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 11:46, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Derivative work of a banner of former CJ w:Renato Corona. Corona's image does not look like a government or Supreme Court-sourced photo, but a photo from non-government entity. The banner also has some designs. Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Plus this seems to be a temporal graphic artwork. Hence COM:VRT correspondences of authorization from both the photographer of the photo of Corona and the graphic artist of the banner is a must. Cannot be COM:De minimis as removing the banner by blurring renders the whole image useless. The image is also used at the article "w:Impeachment of Renato Corona" in a décorative manner (at the gallery section). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:59, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:47, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
- also file:Zamenhof Minekov.jpg
OTRS-permission is needed from Ivan Minekov, who is both photographer and sculptor. There is no freedom of panorama in Bulgaria. No evidence, that uploader Liefje is the same person. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivan_Minekov the subject was born in 1947 and is still alive. The sculptures (of unknown author to me) will be copyrighted for a long time. --Ellywa (talk) 11:49, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Soubor neuvádí správné autorství fotografie, autorem je Khalil Baalbaki viz https://temata.rozhlas.cz/josef-nerusil-8326896 Mám pochybnosti o tom, že je na wikipedii fotografie nahrána se svolením autora a s vědomím uvolnění autorských práv, Frydolin (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Reakce: Odkazovaná fotografie je jiná. Zveřejnil jsme svou fotografii. Josef Nerušil — Preceding unsigned comment added by Josef Nerušil (talk • contribs) 21:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Looks like a part of photo set made by Khalil Baalbaki, pro photographer of the Czech Radio. See the very similar photo. --Bazi (talk) 08:48, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Josef Nerušil: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Taken somewhere from internet, probably also fake Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know whether the file is sourced from the internet or own work of the uploader, but the flag itself is real 1 2 3 (albeit with slightly different color variations). Jauhsekali (talk) 02:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
Medal chroniony prawem autorskim, ustanowiony w 1986 r., a więc zapewne i koło tego roku zaprojektowany. Bez wątpienia nie upłynął jeszcze okres 70 lat, jak by go nie liczyć. Nie zachodzą żadne przesłanki wyłączeni tego utworu spod ochrony prawnoautorskiej. W szczególności nie zachodzą przesłanki z art. 4 pkt. 2 prawa autorskiego, albowiem TPPR nie było urzędem. Z tego względu proponuję usunięcie. Teukros (talk) 19:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
![19:01, 15 September 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-Teukros-2021-09-15T19:01:00.000Z-File:Medal_TPPR_"Za_Braterską_Pomoc"_złoty_awers_i_rewers.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
![11:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/09/15#c-Ellywa-2022-03-29T11:53:00.000Z-File:Medal_TPPR_"Za_Braterską_Pomoc"_złoty_awers_i_rewers.jpg){kind=link}
This may be in public domain in the Philippines, but likely copyrighted in the United States as it was under copyright on January 1, 1996, the date when COM:URAA restoration of U.S. copyright to all eligible international works took effect for all Philippine works. As per COM:Licensing, files need to be free both in the source country (Philippines for this case) and the United States. Claimed date was late 1950s, so might have been in copyright in 1996. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 11:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
+ derived image File:SeaFrance Molière light cropped.jpg
This is the sole upload by what might be a corporate account SeaFrance (talk · contribs). I doubt this account was the photographer or had the authority to grant this image a free license. -M.nelson (talk) 21:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. @SeaFrance: please closely follow the procedure on VRT to show you have permission from the copyright holder/photographer to publish the image(s) on Commons with a free license. If successful, the image(s) can be undeleted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:57, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
No evidence of free license at source, uploader claims all rights reserved. Source states that it's from 1930, depicted person appears to be from Brazil. Can't quite tell if this is a photograph, so I don't think that {{PD-Brazil-media}} applies. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:05, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
- Primeiramente, eu acredito que não tenha problemas com direitos autorais pelo fato de eu ter ido no site oficial de onde eu achei a foto, ter pego os direitos autorais e ter colocado, a foto em questão foi pega de uma revista de 2020 em formato PDF na qual não há limitações por ter sido usada publicamente, além do fato de qualquer imagem pública ou privada com mais de 40 anos pode ser usada na internet! Então eu acho que a imagem não quebra nenhuma regra aqui da Wikipedia e deve permanecer na página! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luis1250Xx (talk • contribs) 05:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 11:59, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
