Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/05
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
{{speedydelete|I uploaded it by mistake for practising in sandbox, the photo is private property}} DillonPalm (talk) 01:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 04:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
River otter portrait Richardt1956 (talk) 04:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant copyvio from Getty[1]. --Túrelio (talk) 07:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake SONIANKIT135 (talk) 07:39, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 07:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Random photo from internet Aayush Preet 369 (talk) 01:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep File uploaded by long-term trusted contributor. No evidence of copyright problems. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user who couldn't resist. --Achim (talk) 12:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Logo Aayush Preet 369 (talk) 01:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. The Kellereischloss was built in the 1700s. This sculptural work/coat of arms (I guess you could call it a logo) is clearly in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an Android app user who couldn't resist. --Achim (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
perchè ne ho postato uno con risoluzione più alta Graziano Cannoletta (talk) 05:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader's request, replaced by File:Airone bianco alle cesine.jpg. --Achim (talk) 15:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Museu Carmen Thyssen Andorra
[edit]Following this message, it seems that these images are not in the public domain. Painters not mentioned. Regards,
- File:Ros y guell antoni paisatge el ter.jpg Antoni Ros Y Guell (1873 - 1954)
- File:Terruella matilla joaquim marina l'estartit.jpg Joaquín TERRUELLA MATILLA (1891-1957)
- File:Terruella matilla joaquim platja de port de llança.jpg Joaquín TERRUELLA MATILLA (1891-1957)
Yann (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 15:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE Nutshinou Talk! 14:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE Nutshinou Talk! 14:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 20:38, 5 September 2021 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3) --Krdbot 02:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE Nutshinou Talk! 14:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 20:38, 5 September 2021 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3) --Krdbot 02:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE Nutshinou Talk! 14:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 20:38, 5 September 2021 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3) --Krdbot 02:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
out of COM:SCOPE Nutshinou Talk! 14:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 20:38, 5 September 2021 UTC: Derivative work of non-free content (F3) --Krdbot 02:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
This is a copyrighted file. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 20:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 02:44, 6 September 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: movie poster --Krdbot 08:31, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 16:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Speedy as F10. --Gbawden (talk) 10:49, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
,_Bhalobasa_Jindabad_(2013l,_Ontor_Jala_(2015),_Keno_Ami_Oporadhi_(2018),_Bisso_Batpar_(2010)._His_Fathe.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Not sure what this is. It shows up in Google Images reverse image searches, so I'm pretty sure this is not own work. Also looks to be outside project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Delete Cropped so the logos from Arabic media are not seen. Such thing does not create new copyright. A09090091 (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio, lots of web hits. Uploader blocked indef. --Achim (talk) 13:34, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
{{Delete |reason=G2 |subpage=Category:Sidor Kapelle, Sevelen |day=5 |month=September |year=2021 }} — Preceding unsigned comment added by HenkvD (talk • contribs) 17:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @HenkvD: G2 does not apply, did you perhaps mean G7 or C2? Please see COM:CSD. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: . Sorry, I meant: G7. Author or uploader request deletion. There was a typo in the name. The proper category is Category:Isidor Kapelle, Sevelen, which I created later instead. HenkvD (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @HenkvD: So tagged. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: . Sorry, I meant: G7. Author or uploader request deletion. There was a typo in the name. The proper category is Category:Isidor Kapelle, Sevelen, which I created later instead. HenkvD (talk) 12:45, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#G7 as above. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:50, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:16, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
Pictures uploaded from jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy's account (stolen pictures)
[edit]- File:S Bellefield Avenue From Cathy.jpg
- File:Forbes and Fifth from Cathy.jpg
- File:Cathedral of Learning at sunset.jpg
- File:Cathedral of Learning and Heinz Memorial Chapel Winter 2019.jpg
- File:Vinkeveense Plassen at dusk, 2019.jpg
- File:Lucky Lake Hostel.jpg
- File:Pitt's Lower Campus From Upper Campus.jpg
- File:Cathedral of Learning from Upper Campus.jpg
- File:Ventral view of juveile leucauge venusta.jpg
I (the photo owner) did not actually upload these photos; my roommate stole them from my computer and uploaded them on my account out of which I forgot to log on our shared computer. I really do not want these pictures uploaded as they are my private property and I do not agree to the common use agreement. I do feel as keeping these images up is a violation of my privacy, so please have them removed.
The photo of the lake and the hostel were uploaded to the Dutch (Nederlands) language page as well, so please take note of that.
Thank you in advanced --Jizzygizzyfoshizzyyy (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The files at the Dutch Wikipedia were uploaded only here but were linked through to Wikipedia. So they are also gone over there. --De728631 (talk) 21:07, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality chemical structure with colored atoms and opaque background. The geometry is depicted unfavorable as well. Replaced by File:Natta projection of difluoroiodomethane.svg. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 20:15, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
self promotion — Preceding unsigned comment added by King Molala (talk • contribs) 2021-09-02T06:09:01 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:07, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 06:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete All the logos may be the problem too. A09090091 (talk) 12:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Mys 721tx. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:04, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrew Makumbi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images that are not relevant to this project. Commons is not a web hosting service
- File:DSC 0027 copy.jpg12.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 10.jpg
- File:DSC 0027 copy.jpg
- File:DSC 0025 copy.jpg
- File:DSC 0024 copy.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 12.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 11.jpg
- File:DSC 0005 copy.jpg
- File:DSC 0006 copy.jpg
- File:DSC 0005 copy 2.jpg
- File:DSC 0001 copy.jpg
- File:DSC 0001 copy 2.jpg
- File:Andezx1.jpg
- File:Ande1.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 9.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 8.jpg
- File:Adta22222.jpg
- File:Adr21.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 7.jpg
- File:Adr2aa.jpg
- File:Aderu copy.jpg
- File:Aderu copy 2.jpg
- File:Ad malt2.jpg
- File:20210430183132 IMG 6873.jpg
- File:Ad malt.jpg
- File:20210430182845 IMG 6871.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 6.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 5.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 4.jpg
- File:Andrew Makumbi 2.jpg
Herby talk thyme 10:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Delete all, per nom. A09090091 (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:05, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, COM:SPAM files by now-blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). These images do not even show the monument itself. A few useful ones have been moved to Category:Alabang-Zapote Road and Category:Buildings in Las Piñas.
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 20.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 22.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 23.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 24.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 25.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 26.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 28.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 29.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 30.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 31.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 32.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 33.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 34.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 35.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 36.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 37.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 38.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 40.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 41.jpg
- File:296Las Piñas City Landmarks 44.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:08, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic image, for promotion only Osama Eid (talk) 22:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by علاء. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Non-encyclopedic image, for promotion only Osama Eid (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by علاء. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:09, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
I want to keep the photo as a personal archive Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 01:13, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not a recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 13:36, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The administrator requested to remove the photo from publication for copyright reasons Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:07, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Question Which administrator? Which copyright problems? Taivo (talk) 10:00, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept. No reason for deletion is shown. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
users who want it, because of religious issues Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. No valid reason given for deletion. IronGargoyle (talk) 06:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
From Facebook according to the metadata, need permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 01:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sobhanjahanpanah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: promotional
4nn1l2 (talk) 02:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sobhanjahanpanah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own-work claim: small size, missing EXIF, user upload history
4nn1l2 (talk) 10:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 11:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcelo1988 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Cartoons associated with a non-notable Twitch streamer (currently tagged for speedy deletion). Unclear if own work, out of project scope.
IronGargoyle (talk) 03:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WhatsUpCanarias (talk · contribs)
[edit]Selfies of non-notable YouTuber using user page for promotional purposes and out of project scope. No constructive contributions. Commons is not a free webhost.
IronGargoyle (talk) 03:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 03:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 03:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of child's drawing. Out of project scope. IronGargoyle (talk) 04:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 12:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:14, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Self Promotion — Preceding unsigned comment added by King Molala (talk • contribs) 2021-09-02T06:05:25 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
This is from the subject's Facebook page, unlikely to be licensed under CC-BY-SA Twotwofourtysix (talk) 05:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- If this is deleted, please delete File:Dr. Kevin Baumlin Headshot (cropped).jpg, the cropped image too. Twotwofourtysix (talk) 05:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:16, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
dublicate https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Araldiz_Manno_259.svg Zaripov999 (talk) 05:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep We don’t consider raster & vector versions of the same image to be duplicates, even if the latter renders identically to the former on MediaWiki sites. I‘ve linked the SVG to this file with the usual template.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Biogreen Science (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, unused logos. No indication of COM:EDUSE.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 07:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A09090091 (talk) 12:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 16:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE/out of the project scope Nutshinou Talk! 16:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 16:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 16:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:05, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Self promotional content - IndrajitDas 19:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photograph, out of scope - IndrajitDas 19:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photograph, out of scope - IndrajitDas 19:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photograph, out of scope - IndrajitDas 19:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photograph, out of scope - IndrajitDas 19:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blijbijmij1212 (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal image
TFerenczy (talk) 20:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:06, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
out of scope advertising Nutshinou Talk! 22:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:11, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:10, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Incorrect arrow, replaced by File:Structural formulas of s-cis- and s-trans-butadiene.svg (by the same uploader). Leyo 20:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete The file can get deleted! — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 20:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
No FOP in US for 3d works (COM:FOP US). Is the statue in the public domain? -M.nelson (talk) 23:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: If it's not public domain, then probably all of Category:Nuclear Energy - Henry Moore (LH 526, University of Chicago) should be deleted. However, (judging by File:Chicago Pile 1 Monument.JPG) the plaque with the statue has no mention of copyright, and the work was installed before 1978, so Template:PD-US-No notice may apply? Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 15:40, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
(non-admin closure)Already Deleted by Fitindia, if you don't agree with deletion, feel free to request an undeletion. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:18, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dungnguyen1979 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality and repetitive COM:PENIS images. No educational use. Out of project scope.
- File:8082516D-1C22-4AAA-A32B-BC4E0D83B3F.jpg
- File:9F5ABB8D-6715-4AD0-BBBA-78CDAFB4AC.png
- File:7C16D434-EEDC-4BC2-B06C-F9D7E194A0E.png
- File:D7A009D1-55BD-490A-8299-85D6FF3EF95.png
- File:28DC346C-4FE2-485A-B073-15A6C688628.jpg
- File:F04F75EC-9452-4212-93F9-2917F54426A.jpg
- File:A4E0860A-35AE-4C43-9DA5-6C15788586A.png
- File:08DBB14A-DA17-4956-9A41-DC08D8E1D80.jpg
- File:5C2E9729-5A9A-49F2-A3B6-D7E03D1D6D9.jpg
- File:8659B103-3DD5-419D-8708-8876EEF994B.jpg
IronGargoyle (talk) 04:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:22, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, used for self-promotion at wikidata.org Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mandy Corrente Vzla (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, professional photos. No original author or permission.
- File:Mandy Cotton.jpg
- File:Mandy Love.jpg
- File:Mandy.jpg
- File:Mandy Corrente.jpg
- File:Mandy corrente.jpg
Smooth O (talk) 12:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshots of questionable notability
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:24, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Claimed as own work but no meaningful exif. one photo is from FB per MD, the other from Insta, needs OTRS IMO
Gbawden (talk) 15:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:24, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
Not necessarily a simple logo due to stylized gradients... (w:File:DotASIA logo 2013.png is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment - I'm assuming the {{PD-AustrianGov}} is not valid as the .asia domain has nothing to do with the Austrian government. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:24, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore NitinMane7035 (talk) 21:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request for unused image of non-notable people. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:45, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
As noted in the commentary on Flickr, the object itself is in the public domain due to its age, but the photograph is presumed to be copyrighted. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Flickr says All rights reserved. A09090091 (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, too bad, and my bad (as uploader). Argument is correct. DELETE. --Pete Tillman (talk) 23:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete — Per Nikkimaria — Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 17:23, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:46, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VictoriaPKreindler (talk · contribs)
[edit]Files uploaded by User:VictoriaPKreindler and claimed as "own work" but EXIF data shows copyright holder is "JUSTIN CLYNES".
- File:Victoria kreindler 290 2.jpg
- File:Victoria kreindler 478 21626184867947(1).jpg
- File:Victoria kreindler 916 2.jpg
- File:VictoriaKreindler323-2.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
IronGargoyle (talk) 03:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Uploader has history of copyright violations. IronGargoyle (talk) 03:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:47, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Not taken by me — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikisempra (talk • contribs) 2021-08-30T14:03:08 (UTC)
- Comment Image is Commons:INUSE. --A09090091 (talk) 12:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Without obvious evidence that the uploader is the photographer, or any indication that they are abusing DR in this way, I think we should take their word for it. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:48, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
don't know if the institution that digitalized it has copyrighted the content — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luanfbbsdf (talk • contribs) 2021-09-05T02:09:11 (UTC)
- Keep Video is PD. Template says it all. --A09090091 (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Digitalization is slavish copying which is ineligible for copyright. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Seemingly a publicity image for a musician (see Google images). Unlikely to be own work as claimed. mattbr 07:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Probably taken from https://writewyattuk.com/2017/05/19/delivering-the-late-bloomers-last-rider-the-ron-sexsmith-interview/ or https://www.v2benelux.com/news-represented-labels/new-album-ron-sexsmith-in-april-listen-to-the-first-single-evergreen-14941 A09090091 (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
the professor and the owner would like to delete this picture, and there is another on: File:Yona-Chen-2.jpg. please respect their request. Ace-af (talk) 08:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Ace-af, we have proper permission from the photographer and the license is irrecoverable. once the photo released to public domain, it is in public domain. Personally I have no problem that the file be deleted as COM:OOS. We do have replaceable portrait file. -- Geagea (talk) 08:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Licenses are irrevocable. We only have two images of the subject, which is below the level where we might start culling less desirable images in the lot. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING, the main subject in this photo is the packaging, which is too complex to fall below the threshold of originality. The details are neither minimal nor incidental, and is therefore an unacceptable derivative work. ✗plicit 08:28, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was uploaded by a sockpuppet of a globally locked user. SHB2000 (talk) 08:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Promo photo. A09090091 (talk) 12:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:55, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Appears to be a previously published file, see Google Lens result. Adeletron 3030 (talk) 20:39, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; image online for 3 years before uploader's claimed creation date. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:21, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
I changed my mind, I don't want it to be publicly visible anymore — Preceding unsigned comment added by NitinMane7035 (talk • contribs) 2021-09-04T21:31:30 (UTC)
Kept: The CC license is irrevocable. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
I think this template is unnecessary. Ox1997cow (talk) 07:26, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep I think it could be useful, but the standard delete nom. has taken over. A09090091 (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- So
I withdraw my nomination.Ox1997cow (talk) 17:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
- So
Withdrawn by the nominator himself (non-admin closure)Ox1997cow (talk) 17:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
If a logo is believed to be above TOO in its source country, then it should be nominated for deletion. This nonstandard problem tag serves no purpose at all. pandakekok9 14:00, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As a guide, I started looking at the other TOO templates. From {{TOO-Malaysia}}:
- The implications of these situations on Commons' ability to continue to distribute this and other depictions like it are currently under analysis.
- Really? What analysis? Where? COM:CRT/Malaysia#Threshold of originality is of little help. And as the nominator suggested, why not just nominate these files for deletion?
- Then there is this gem from {{Not-free-US-TOO}}:
- This policy may change in the future, depending on the outcome of community discussions and new case law.
- Note the broken link.
- Maybe not just this template, but that entire category needs to go. Brianjd (talk) 14:47, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Pandakekok9 and Brianjd: Comment TOO templates and NoTOO templates were made by me and Chubit. So I ping @Chubit: . Ox1997cow (talk) 14:56, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Pandakekok9 and Brianjd:
- Delete all - agree with the nominator that if a file is believed to be copyrighted, it should be nominated for deletion. I can't think of a valid reason to tag (potentially) copyrighted works without nominating them for deletion. -M.nelson (talk) 13:19, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- if a file is believed to be copyrighted AND it is not available under free license then it should be nominated for deletion. If it is available under free license then stamping this template does not help. In which case it would be useful? Though template for works on edge of TOO, warning that court decision may be different from analysis of Wikimedia Commons users may be useful. But "The work in this image is believed to be copyrighted" is a different case. Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:49, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: "If a logo is believed to be above TOO in its source country, then it should be nominated for deletion" is not true. Image may be also freely licensed by author or as a matter of law and in such cases should not be nominated for deletion Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 19:50, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, but then why would it need this template? Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- I am supporting deletion of this template, this comment was directed to people/person that created it. Maybe they intended something like this? Mateusz Konieczny (talk) 13:00, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sure, but then why would it need this template? Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This template does seem rather odd, much too large, and overly alarming text. If something is over the threshold, like most works, it needs to be licensed or deleted. I don't see the need for this template on any work. If something is below the threshold, the corresponding license tag should probably explain the situation and uncertainty across countries. But you wouldn't put a statement "we believe this is protected by copyright" on an "ineligible for copyright" license image. So not sure what this template is used for. It looks like it was supposed to be a parallel to (and mostly a copy of) {{FoP}}, but it's not really a valid parallel, FoP is for a situation where there is a copyrighted subject, but a licensed photo and where the usage of that copyrighted work is allowed. But for threshold, that is a delete-or-not question -- and if licensed, it's presumably above the threshold (or at least we don't care). Carl Lindberg (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Not-free-US-TOO. Brianjd (talk) 12:24, 29 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Template:TOO and Template:Not-free-US-TOO and Keep other TOO templates and NoTOO templates. These templates are useful for showing the status of threshold of originality in countries. Ox1997cow (talk) 11:41, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
- And I ping @Chubit: . Ox1997cow (talk) 15:26, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Going with the deletes here. Thanks everyone for participating and if you disagree with this decision please take it to Commons:Undeletion requests - unless there is a tech issue. Thanks for assuming good faith and happy holidays!. --Missvain (talk) 17:08, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE/promo image used in a sandbox page left untouched for more than two years Nutshinou Talk! 16:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 12:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blackmuffy (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused basic geometric shapes, not sure what was the point of uplading but hardly educational as it stands
- File:Concentriccircles1.svg
- File:Swirl1234.svg
- File:Artboard.svg
- File:Line123.svg
- File:Line234234.svg
TFerenczy (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
This corporate does not longer exist Rdgc4142 (talk) 20:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:SCOPE Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
certainly not own work Polarlys (talk) 21:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Seems unlikely to be own work, especially considering the other works that the user has labeled as their own. This photograph was previously published in a lower resolution on this website, but I suspect that it may have been published elsewhere even earlier. Mysterymanblue 21:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
The claim of authorship is obviously bogus as one can also tell from this user's other uploads (all of which I'm nominating for deletion). Pichpich (talk) 21:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
The claim of authorship is obviously bogus as one can also tell from this user's other uploads (all of which I'm nominating for deletion). Pichpich (talk) 21:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Book cover , Doubtful own work. (see w:File:Cover of The Peter Principle by Pan Books.jpeg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Non-free logo w:File:Crowdin Company Logo.png , Graphic element left, tips this over threshold of originality ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Non-free logo w:File:Cython-logo.svg (needs more information to support own work claim.) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Non-free logo w:File:Darwen FC crest.png over threshold of originality. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE Nutshinou Talk! 22:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Picture is used in one user page at en-wiki. User page images have been allowed here without educational value, so I'm not sure if this one can be deleted. --Velma (talk) 06:25, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- it surely can, see COM:INUSE then the user's global contributions; 5 edits in 10 years. --Nutshinou Talk! 21:28, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Non-free w:File:Dave Apollon with mandolin.jpg Publication date given as 2010 ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
was already present on the web before being uploaded on commons (https://tineye.com/search/0642fdf0811a40eab6a9cd2b98fbf5ff0b0ca299?sort=size&order=desc&page=1), not own work - Nutshinou Talk! 22:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Non-free logo w:File:Dei Mundus Deo.jpg. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo w:File:Delhaize Group logo.svg , Lion element in centre tips this over threshold of originality ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of the project scope? - Nutshinou Talk! 22:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
out of the project scope? - Nutshinou Talk! 22:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:08, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Doubtful own work , w:File:Dry January logo.png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:20, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:26, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
advertisment Nutshinou Talk! 22:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Lo subí por error Angela-blanco-feet (talk) 23:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:28, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Catherine L Richmond Spiritual Medium (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photographs of paintings with unclear sources. No indication that the painter(s) died more than 70 years ago.
- File:Cora L Richmond ( Cora L Scott) Medium Born 1840 Died 1923.jpg
- File:Gordon Higginson Medium inspiring Catherine L Richmond Medium.jpg
- File:Helen Hughes medium.jpg
- File:Etta Wriedt evidential medium born 1859- died 1942).jpg
- File:Gordon Higginson Medium Born 17 November 1918, United Kingdom died 1993.jpg
- File:Alec Harris Alexander Frederick Harris ( 1897-1974) welsh Medium.jpg
_Medium_Born_1840_Died_1923.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_welsh_Medium.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
IronGargoyle (talk) 03:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:31, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Wisma Nugra Santana
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia for free culture uses of images of architecture without architects' licensing permissions. This building was completed in 1990.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation of official website of Opel — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.179.147.34 (talk • contribs) 2021-09-02T00:12:11 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
According to the occupant's official website, their firm was established in 1987. Emporis does not provide the date of completion of the building, but it is most likely recent and the architect is still living. Note that freedom of panorama for commercial uses is not recognized in Indonesia. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license. Yann (talk) 11:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all rights reserved at source. clpo13(talk) 20:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license. Yann (talk) 11:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete non-free license. clpo13(talk) 20:04, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
A person of no notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete A09090091 (talk) 12:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
The quality of picture is too low. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete A09090091 (talk) 12:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Own poem of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete A09090091 (talk) 12:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Own poem of the uploader, out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete A09090091 (talk) 12:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Wilson E. Roca
[edit]Book covers, copyright is doubtful. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- File:Escondites y Apariencias.jpg
- File:Los Reinos Escondidos.jpg
- File:La Magia de Poseer un Corazón.jpg
- Delete Copyright is still holdable.--A09090091 (talk) 13:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a simple logo. See also Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Case_Olaf_Kosinsky. Yann (talk) 12:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete One could argue that the deer and the paddles are de-minimis, but the recent legal practice in Germany has become rather restrictive when it comes to logos. De728631 (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:11, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license. Yann (talk) 11:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The image is PD in Egypt, but copyrighted in the US becasue of URAA. --Sanandros (talk) 20:33, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Out of COM:SCOPE unless the uploader can justify its educational use. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 02:12, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 16:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
All the words are nonsense and are not affiliated to the picture at all NearEMPTiness (talk) 16:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; dup of File:Martin Luther, 1529.jpg. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
no source given Hoyanova (talk) 17:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: OoS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:17, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
possibly non free photo, uploaded by mistake Zache (talk) 17:27, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
logo uploaded by user of the same name, promo image, not used anywhere - Nutshinou Talk! 17:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
logo uploaded by user of the same name, promo image, not used anywhere - Nutshinou Talk! 17:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Annie Kibod Abando- Iglesias (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope files. COM:WEBHOST — personal photos with no educational / encyclopedic value.
Also, these are most likely previously published on Facebook before uploading here: FBMD code seen at the metadata. Proof of identity verification of the true copyright holder (the photographer) via email correspondence is required for works previously published on social media so to confirm if the uploader is indeed the photographer (the copyright holder) of this image and that the photographer (the copyright owner) has applied the license as indicated, as there have been numerous cases on Wiki before (and up to now) that the uploaders just grabbed images from Facebook or other social media sites. For email template, see COM:VRT#Email message template for release of rights to a file.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
اريد حذف الصورة سعد احمد محمد (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Support out of scope, not used in any project. Dr-Taher (talk) 09:42, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 18:15, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:15, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Samee as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 Not a recent upload. Yann (talk) 18:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No indication why this should be deleted. GeorgHH • talk 21:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete low quality image, of no encyclopaedic value. samee .com 18:53, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Image with watermark / overlaid text. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 18:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. The image appears to be an official promotional headshot for the subject, who died in 1994. Potentially not the uploader's own work as claimed. mattbr 18:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unlikely to be own work. can be undeleted with OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:18, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
TV Tropes content is licensed under CC BY-Non commercial-Share alike, which is not compatible with Wikipedia license. discospinster (talk) 23:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- That, and I'm not sure whether it's their work in the first place. Delete. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 10:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:11, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
The image is from 1965 and on the top right corner, it says the source. The Panaramio uploader isn't the original creator of the file. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own work: previusly published here, see this file Bradipo Lento (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:33, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too many variants Dalibor1975 (talk) 08:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep No exact image found. A09090091 (talk) 12:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Author Marko Horvat Copyright holder NEXUS produkcija - unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
As uploader, uploaded wrong file in error Epipelagic (talk) 09:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; next time tag as SD G7. --Gbawden (talk) 13:24, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No proper licence by the photographer Malte Schürmann Bahnmoeller (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:23, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Wrong license. Yann (talk) 11:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Wrong license. Yann (talk) 11:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Ceremonia de Toma del Mando Supremo del Presidente de la República Pedro Castillo Terrones. 20210728 0047 (Recortado).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Wrong license. Yann (talk) 11:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep even if wrong license, still used and in public domain — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mausebru (talk • contribs) 16:53, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:SPAM and redundant to File:0122jfR-30 Bridge I Estero de Vitas Marcos Road Balut Tondo Manilafvf.jpg. Another addition by the blocked uploader Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:31, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Amdadul Hoque Is A Bangladeshi Film Actor, Director and Writer. He Is Known For His Movie Bap Boro Na Shosur Boro (2010), Bhalobasa Jindabad (2013l, Ontor Jala (2015), Keno Ami Oporadhi (2018), Bisso Batpar (2010). His Fathe.jpg
[edit],_Bhalobasa_Jindabad_(2013l,_Ontor_Jala_(2015),_Keno_Ami_Oporadhi_(2018),_Bisso_Batpar_(2010)._His_Fathe.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Bhalobasa_Jindabad_(2013l,_Ontor_Jala_(2015),_Keno_Ami_Oporadhi_(2018),_Bisso_Batpar_(2010)._His_Fathe.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope —MdsShakil (talk) 12:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If image is kept, it should be renamed. A09090091 (talk) 13:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- This file has no educational value. Spamming/self-promotion is carried out on various Wikipedias using these files —MdsShakil (talk) 04:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:29, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
According to the linked correspondence, the permission only applies to the user who uploaded the file to English Wikipedia. It is also unclear in which situations the uploader may use the file. Stefan2 (talk) 00:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarieMarcouxRoberts (talk · contribs)
[edit]The files are various images uploaded by MarieMarcouxRoberts, in which 3 different author information is found in the EXIF documentation of 3 of the user's upload: "Jaime O." for File:2017-02-02 Sault Ste Marie-3.jpg, "WTB PHOTOGRAPHY" for File:Royal York.jpg, and "Bobb Barratt" for File:PFC trek.jpg.
Given by the disparity in EXIF documentation and camera model (taken by 3 models), it is doubted that the uploads are not the uploader's self work, and likely to be made and copyrighted by others.
- File:Joe presenting to BC Health Leaders.jpg
- File:JR Interview.jpg
- File:Joe walking Day 442.jpg
- File:2017-02-02 Sault Ste Marie-3.jpg
- File:Royal York.jpg
- File:Homeless Joe.png
- File:PFC trek.jpg
廣九直通車 (talk) 08:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Derivative, no permission 188.123.231.13 08:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Maps are mostly ineligible to copyright, this one is PD per Commons:MAPS. A09090091 (talk) 12:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- ‘Maps are mostly ineligible to copyright’ - where did you find this nonsense? --188.123.231.13 21:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Это произведение не охраняется авторским правом согласно статье 1259 части четвёртой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации № 230-ФЗ от 18 декабря 2006 года. 188.123.231.13 не занимайтесь вандализмом.--Mixabest (talk) 11:48, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:55, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:40, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
{{Cc-zero}} is certainly the wrong license for this image. The description links to "http://www.theotown.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=4144 for copyright". That forum thread by the game's developer contains a statement "All non IAP ( In app purchases ) graphics are ok to use freely. But, it's compulsory to add credits to the developers Lobby & Theotheoderich". If applicable to this specific image, that would mean an {{Attribution only license}}, not CC-zero. But as I'm not familiar with the game, I have no idea if this is an image eligible for this attribution-only license or maybe it's one of the "in app purchases" graphics? At the least, if the file is kept, the license needs correction. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: I played the game some time ago. This is add-on to game, because the object is composed from city park and some redesigned small school or smth. like this. A09090091 (talk) 12:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- @A09090091: Thanks for the fast reply! So it is an in-app purchase building, yes? Then the license from that forum thread is not applicable and we have to delete it, I think. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- IDK how you define in-app purchase as the add-on/DLC is free. I think Delete per Commons:PRP. A09090091 (talk) 13:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- IDK how you define in-app purchase as the add-on/DLC is free. I think
- @A09090091: Thanks for the fast reply! So it is an in-app purchase building, yes? Then the license from that forum thread is not applicable and we have to delete it, I think. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
The license is false, this is a picture of youngf wife of the poet dead in 1942 so it was created in 1930-ies. According to Hungarian law it might be in PD if first published earlier than 70 years ago which is quite possible but not even claimed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If the image was published in 1942, her copyright would extent in 2012. Agree on the license change. A09090091 (talk) 12:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Maybe PD in source country, but the URAA applies. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
The license is false, this is a picture of old parents of the poet dead in 1942 so it was created in 1920-30-ies. According to Hungarian law it might be in PD if first published earlier than 70 years ago which is quite possible but not even claimed. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Maybe PD in source country, but the URAA applies. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
CVs and resumes are clearly out of Commons educational scope. File also contains likely copyrighted elements not owned by the uploader. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
A formal PR picture of an Israeli politician and the photographer is mentioned in the file's EXIF. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 21:42, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Hi, the politician gave me the rights for using this photo, can you explain me what exactly the problem and what is needed to be done to approve it correctly? Omerlubi (talk) 09:30, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- Omer, In Wikimedia projects we take copyright issues very seriously. Hence, in order to save an image in Wikimedia so that it can be used on Wikipedia, we need an official statement from the copyright holder stating that the image can be published and reused for any use, including commercial. What you are now asked to do is to obtain the release note for it. You can find a relevant statement for that in the Hebrew.Wikipedia page titled "OTRS:ויקיפדיה". Without this formal permission to use this picture for any use, it has no legal basis to remain in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 21:26, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of France.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:40, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Flag of the United Kingdom.svg. Fry1989 eh? 14:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:51, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Samee as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G7 Not a recent upload. Yann (talk) 18:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No indication why this should be deleted. GeorgHH • talk 21:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete File not in use and not of much encyclopaedic value. samee .com 09:49, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: perfectly acceptable picture of a clearly defined place. There are not too many pictures in Category:Jalalpur Jattan. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:38, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
This is an official portrait of Mia McLeod that predates upload here (Source). Uploader's claim that this is an own work is dubious. The portrait must be assumed to be non-free unless a valid rationale can be given. Mysterymanblue 21:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:40, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
users who want it, because of religious issues Balkis Anton Nurohman (talk) 00:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment What is shown on picture, that could be religious-sided or disputed? A09090091 (talk) 12:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unused personal photo. Out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I don't understand what the "religious issues" may be either, but per Minorax. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 14:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
This is packaging artwork, and the artwork is above threshold of originiality ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 06:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:22, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Not ineligble , Grpahic element center is not simple (Non-free on EnglishWikipedia - w:File:CERH European League.png) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Taken in 1976? No arguments why this is free. MGA73 (talk) 09:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Non-free Flickr license
This was previously deleted as non-free (w:File:Christina Stead.jpg is considered non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:08, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:23, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:24, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
This file is redundant. It's a reduced version of File:Suninnbentworth22.JPG with a thin white strip along the bottom. Were it not for the thin white strip, I would just tag it as {{Duplicate}}. I don't think the white strip is useful (or even intentional), though, so any use of this file should use the original instead. bjh21 (talk) 13:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Please can the uploader provide further details to confirm this file is their own work. Appears to be a screenshot or picture of a screen? Dubious own work claim. Additionally, no usage on Wikimedia projects and on obvious educational use. mattbr 14:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:26, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:25, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Another upload from this user (File:Yazuri.jpg) is a copyright violation so further evidence should be provided by the uploader to confirm this is their own work (Commons:VRT). Additionally, no usage on Wikimedia projects and no obvious educational use, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 09:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Martin Urbanec (talk) 12:21, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Logo from a personal copyrighted Website about meteorology (https://www.eltiempoconjr.es/), likely to promote its use by the uploader. Pierre cb (talk) 13:43, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:50, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Logo / graphic stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 14:36, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
For more than six years this hoax of a two-tailed fish has been online. I replaced it by the original version from the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, where today only a lo-res version is shown. The original is archived. Even though a governmental institution, EXIF reads "2012 All rights reserved". Achim (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: original version per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Author and uploader are different. DR as it is an old file rubin16 (talk) 18:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Complex logo, not used on any articles. No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
Complex logo, not used on any articles. No evidence uploader is copyright holder. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Derivative, no permission 188.123.231.13 08:10, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Это произведение не охраняется авторским правом согласно статье 1259 части четвёртой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации № 230-ФЗ от 18 декабря 2006 года. 188.123.231.13 не занимайтесь вандализмом.--Mixabest (talk) 11:57, 18 September 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:01, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
The image appears on spotify with the text "Photo by Jordan Drysdal". It seems to be uploaded at full resolution, perhaps by the artist, but there is no evidence of permission to use Muhandes (talk) 14:35, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magiciandude as no permission (No permission since) Uploaded more than 5 years ago, many uses, let's have a proper DR. Yann (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Tineye were able to find this image on www.fastcompany.com way back on Jun 5, 2014. That's earlier than our copy; would require evidence of permission be sent to COM:VRT per COM:EVID. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:29, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Dharmala Sakti
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia for free culture uses of images of public works in the country still copyrighted. This building in particular was completed in 1988 and designed by Paul Rudolph (who died in 1997). COM:VRT correspondence from his heirs is required. Note that it is listed on the website of what I assume are his heirs — The Estate of Paul Rudolph and The Paul Rudolph Heritage Foundation.
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:06, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia for free culture uses of images of protected public works. According to enwiki article, the entire complex is recent. WTC 1, 5, and 6 buildings were completed in 1985, WTC 2 was completed in 2002, while the tallest, WTC 3, was completed in 2017. COM:VRT correspondence of licensing permission from the architects is required as there is no FOP in that country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:17, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:04, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Damaged≠not copyrighted, per JWilz. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:02, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete It is a real shame that we cannot use this great photo on Wikimedia project but we have to respect the architect's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:23, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/World Trade Centre Jakarta panoramio
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia for free culture uses of images of protected public works. According to enwiki article, the entire complex is recent. WTC 1, 5, and 6 buildings were completed in 1985, WTC 2 was completed in 2002, while the tallest, WTC 3, was completed in 2017. COM:VRT correspondence of licensing permission from the architects is required as there is no FOP in that country.
- File:World Trade Centre Jakarta - panoramio.jpg
- File:World Trade Centre Jakarta pra-2013 - panoramio.jpg
- File:World Trade Centre Mangga Dua - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/WTC Jakarta panoramio
[edit]There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia for free culture uses of images of protected public works. According to enwiki article, the entire complex is recent. WTC 1, 5, and 6 buildings were completed in 1985, WTC 2 was completed in 2002, while the tallest, WTC 3, was completed in 2017. COM:VRT correspondence of licensing permission from the architects is required as there is no FOP in that country.
- File:WTC Jakarta dan Menara Bank Permata - panoramio.jpg
- File:WTC Jakarta dan Menara Bank Permata - panoramio (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:24, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:27, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/Media Hotel & Towers jakarta
[edit]The Flickr-sourced information reveals the completion year as 1997, therefore recent building that is still copyrighted. As there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia, permission from the architects is required.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
The building was completed in 2017. Since there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia, architects' permission for Creative Commons licensing is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:50, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:28, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful PD claim ( Non-free on English Wikiedia w:File:CB Prat new version.png ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:47, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Copyright violation; see c:Commons:Licensing (F1): Non-trivial sport club logo) Goldorak (talk) 23:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Querying CC claim - Equivalent at English Wikipedia is non-free (W:File:Canada-Ukraine Parliamentary Program LOGO.jpg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:52, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - no evidence that it's been released under a free license; exceeds COM:TOO Canada. -M.nelson (talk) 20:14, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:40, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
اريد ازالة الصورة Saadahmedmohmed (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; unused and uploader request. --IronGargoyle (talk) 01:47, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Photo d'un prospectus touristique, ne respecte pas les droits d'auteur remplacée par: File:Vía XIX.svg. Xicodaponte (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Most of the maps are PDs, only problem may be logos on the bottom of the image. A09090091 (talk) 12:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep. Photograph of a permanently installed street sign. The photographical reproduction of this work is covered under the article 35.2 of the Royal Legislative Decree 1/1996 of April 12, 1996, and amended by Law 5/1998 of March 6, 1998, which states that: Works permanently located in parks or on streets, squares or other public thoroughfares may be freely reproduced, distributed and communicated by painting, drawing, photography and audiovisual processes. Please see: Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Spain#Freedom_of_panorama. Thank you. Xicodaponte, non é un panfleto, é unha placa. Ben se ven os parafusos nas esquinas. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:48, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- HombreDHojalata A reprodução é permitida em Espanha, mas a licença não é universal, para mim não cumpre as regras de licenciamento da Commons! Xicodaponte (talk) 13:29, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Covered by FOP Spain. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. The issue about how we treat graffiti is secondary to the unknown copyright status of the stencils used to create it. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:43, 7 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:54, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:56, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:14, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:57, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:58, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:12, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:13, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since) Yann (talk) 10:59, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Could it be {{Non-free graffiti}}? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:00, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (original stencil art). — Racconish 💬 09:15, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Graphic element (left) is not below threshold of originality ( Non free on English Wikipedia w:File:Bricostore.png) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:44, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful own wok claim - English Wikipedia w:File:Bronze Wolf Award-knot.png attributes this to World Scout Bureau, http://www.scout.org/wse/conf02docs/bwawards.pdf ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:45, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:04, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Photo is credited to the AP in its collection, thus a potential copyvio. Looking for opinions on whether there were news photographers in Tarwa at the time. Yeeno (talk) 07:49, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per COM:EVID uploader should have shown the image is in PD. They did not comment however. Therefore the photo has te be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:06, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful own work claim, This is an organisational logo and the graphic element center top , tips this over threhsold or originality. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:03, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Per COM:TOO Russia even simple designs can be copyrighted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, but a logo - w:File:Chwarae-teg-logo2.jpg considered non-free, but the onyl possible element above threshold of originality is bottom right. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:09, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. This is a logo of a Welsch firm. According to COM:TOO UK threshold of originality in the UK is low. So therefore this logo must be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:09, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Querying own work, w:File:Coanda_1910-Antoniu_Collection.jpg attributes Henri Coandă and his technical work during 1906-1918, ISBN: 978-973-7729-61-3 as source, but the image is clearly from the 1910's ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Fixed link. --A09090091 (talk) 12:32, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination. As the photographer is unknown it is not clear if the image is in public domain. It is also not known when the image was first published. Therefore the photo must be deleted. Per community decision of Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/03#Cut-off_date_for_the_PD-old_template the photo can be undeleted safely 120 years after the image was made, which will be 1910+121=2031.. --Ellywa (talk) 20:12, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Derivative, no permission 188.123.231.13 08:12, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Too simple to have copyright, it may be even PD. A09090091 (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per comment. --Ellywa (talk) 20:13, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Non-free maps.
Maxinvestigator (talk) 09:46, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment If the cration data is really y. 1942, it may be PD. License below is wrong at the moment. A09090091 (talk) 12:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- 1st file was also uploaded to Ru-Wiki with source David Glantz, Jonathan M. House, To the Gates of Stalingrad: Soviet-German Combat Operations, April-August 1942. - University Press of Kansas, 2009. Alex Spade (talk) 22:47, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the files have to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 20:14, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Some sort of receipts for food, out of project scope.
Quick1984 (talk) 11:13, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Only 5 images in the category. We need images of mundane things. --RAN (talk) 22:02, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: per RAN. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:59, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
- Modification of decision: It's 2x the exact same image of a lunch check, deleted one. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
The source is not an official youtube channel of Mosse Program in History.The official channel does not use free licensing for its videos. Maxinvestigator (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Unclear origin of the video, although the source states CC-BY-SA. --Ellywa (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Per the enwiki article, the mall incepted in 2007, but there is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. Architect's permission via COM:OTRS correspondence is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:17, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Indonesia. The building is obviously recent, per [2] the structure began construction in 2011. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:38, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Please stop the removal of important images from Indonesian Wikipedia articles through wikilawyering. The reasoning that "some pictures might be used for commercial purposes" is pathetic. Enormous damage has already been done to the Indonesia project, and soon people will be deprived of almost all pictures of cities and structures. Davidelit (talk) 05:10, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Davidelit: then why not try to lobby for Indonesian copyright law reform or modernization? There is really going to be damage to idwiki since Indonesian laws does not recognize free and unrestricted uses of recent buildings, public monuments, and murals without the need for architects' or artists' licensing permissions. The Commons' perspective on Indonesian FOP won't change. Even Creative Commons Indonesia's statement regarding the matter disagrees Wikimedia Indonesia's statement. The only solution is a major reform to Indonesian copyright laws. Wikilawyering, nope the principle is COM:CARES. Reworded with respect to FOP principles: Wikimedia Commons respects copyright and licensing restrictions regardless of whether the architects/artists care about enforcing them. Uploading derivative images or videos of unfree public artworks and architectures in good faith with excuses such as "the artist won't find out", "the architect would be glad that we redistributed their work", or similar statements is not how things work on Wikimedia Commons. Take note that Wikimedia Foundation was part of a special mention of former French EU rep. Jean Marie-Cavada way back 2015: The commercial use of reproducing works in the public space leads to abuse of which artists – and sometimes the users – are the victims. Wikimedia would like to exploit these works for commercial use and not just for educational purposes without compensating the authors. Facebook dispenses of the need to compensate the author for each commercial use of photos uploaded to its network by making its users responsible through its terms of service. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:03, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. It is a real shame to delete this great photo but we have to respect the architect's copyright. --A1Cafel (talk) 16:20, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Yes please, start a worldwide lobby for FOP. --Ellywa (talk) 20:18, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by JuTa as Dw no source since (dw no source since)
Ich habe den Löschantrag nicht gestellt; er ist mir völlig unverständlich; denn ich habe das Bild selbst 1967 aufgenommen und es auch selbst mit Lizenzangabe hochgeladen. Das Bild zeigt ein von der Berliner Verwaltung (vermutlich Senator für Verkehr) zur Information der Öffentlichkeit aufgestellten Schaukasten im öffentlichen Raum (hier Hermann-Ehlers-Platz in Berlin-Steglitz).
Daher bitte ich um Rücknahme des Löschantrags. Friedo (talk) 11:37, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Keep --Friedo (talk) 17:35, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Da sich der Antragsteller (obwohl extra angepingt) nicht mehr geäußert und auch sonst niemand Stellung bezogen hat, werde ich demnächst den Baustein von der Bildseite entfernen. --Friedo (talk) 12:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Done, zehn Tage ohne Erklärung oder Gegenstimme. --Friedo (talk) 16:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Comment Although the uploader has already removed the DR template from the file description page, this still needs a decision / closure. JuTa was referring to this being a Derivative work ("Dw") of the scale model shown in the picture, assuming that the scale model is copyrighted. The uploader argues, apart from that the photo was taken by themselves in 1967, that the scale model in the picture was on display in public space in Berlin, in a display cabinet. Freedom of panorama in Germany, however, requires the object to be permanently located in a public place: a work is permanently located in a public place if "from the point of view of the general public, [it is] intended to remain in the public place for a long, mostly indefinite, period of time". So the decision here will depend upon the question whether that model was displayed for a long, indefinite period of time, or just temporarily. If it was a temporary exhibition, FoP doesn't apply, and if we also can assume copyright protection, we have to delete, I think. But I'm not sure and for now, I will only reinstate the prematurely removed DR template and leave this for the next admin to decide. Gestumblindi (talk) 14:30, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Das Objekt hat lange Zeit dort gestanden, bis die damals so bezeichnete "Westtangente" gebaut wurde. Ich habe das Bild selbst aufgenommen und selbst eingestellt. Es ist nicht erkennbar, wessen Rechte hier noch betroffen sein sollen. Ich plädiere nochmal für Keep, zumal es ja keine Gegenstimmen gegeben hat. Dann möge ein Admin nach Zeitablauf den Baustein entfernen. --Friedo (talk) 14:43, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Die Diskussion hat keinen Zeitablauf, sie läuft bis zu einer Entscheidung durch einen Admin (jedoch mindestens 7 Tage, die natürlich schon um sind). Wenn das Objekt sehr lange dort gestanden hat, würde ich mich deiner Argumentation anschliessen und dem nächsten Admin empfehlen, in deinem Sinne zu entscheiden und das Foto zu behalten. Ich möchte hier nun allerdings, da ich mich so selber in die Diskussion eingebracht habe, nicht selber abschliessen. (English: Uploader argues that the object was located there for a very long time, so German FoP might be applicable, in that case I would support keeping the image). Gestumblindi (talk) 15:16, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
- Wann wird denn jetzt der Baustein entfernt? Oder wann darf ich ihn selbst entfernen? Der Antragsteller hat sich nicht geäußert und es gab keine einzige Äußerung für löschen. --Friedo (talk) 11:22, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
- @FkMohr: Wir müssen warten, bis ein Admin den Antrag abarbeitet. Aufgrund eines erheblichen Rückstaus bei den Löschanträgen auf Commons kann das durchaus noch dauern - manchmal Monate. Bis zu einer administrativen Entscheidung bleibt der Löschantrag aber halt offen und der Baustein daher auch auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite. Gestumblindi (talk) 23:21, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Supposing this was displayed for a long time in a public place, according to COM:FOP Germany, the image can be maintained. However, this can be contested, please reopen the DR if you think my decision is not the right one. --Ellywa (talk) 20:23, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Own work, I was the photographer of the photo, but since I don't know where it is today, I took it from his Facebook account. But I repeat that it is my own work. Martín Arauz (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of Martin Arauz, no reason to not believe their statement. --Ellywa (talk) 20:27, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Come la precedente, foto che sembra scattata a caso. Tremej (talk) 19:50, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 20:28, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luanfbbsdf
[edit]I believe those files should be deleted because i don't know if the institution that digitalized it has copyrighted the content.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Luanfbbsdf (talk • contribs)
- Keep They are PD per Brazilian law, no legit reason to delete.--A09090091 (talk) 17:25, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
- The OGG file only has a sound recording copyright tag, but you also need a copyright tag for the underlying work. Both files also need copyright tags for the United States. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:37, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: The sound recording is old enough to keep (dates from 1902, 120 years old) the film is too recent, dates from 1937. --Ellywa (talk) 20:32, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Doubtful Own work, w:File:Digital Video Broadcasting Logo.svg is non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - this logo may be below the threshold of originality. Do we know the source country? Ixfd64 (talk) 23:26, 13 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: To determine whether a logo is below TOO is always a bit subjective. Imho this image shows a creative effort of the designer, per COM:TOO Switzerland, where the orginasation seems to originate from. Therefore I decided to delete the file. --Ellywa (talk) 20:35, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Not simple , Graphich right tips this over thershold of originality (w:File:Dotaero.png is non-free) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:18, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
Graphic element right means this is not a simple logo (w:File:Douglas-logo.png is non-free. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:19, 5 September 2021 (UTC)
- Comment As this image was transferred from German Wikipedia, this should be return back to there. --Great Brightstar (talk) 07:32, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2022 (UTC)
