Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/09/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 1st, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake Amodeep (talk) 11:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Closed. You obviously nominated something wrong (a help page) for deletion. --Martin H. (talk) 12:13, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

emilio,meneses costa Kamilacanosa (talk) 01:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy closed. Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 02:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The is but schoool chill 41.115.72.135 10:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jean-Fred (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is spam. 2003:DA:1707:C8AB:5CC9:CDCD:F337:DCD7 12:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 12:19, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio / not own work : http://boats.wimbi.com.au/company/ Supertoff (talk) 05:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 07:20, 1 September 2021 UTC: Copyvio / not own work : http://boats.wimbi.com.au/company/ --Krdbot 14:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arthur Carvalho Braga (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User has uploaded multiple photographs by different photographers and claimed ownership. Unlikely that they own these images either,

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web (e.g., here) and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Эlcobbola talk 16:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this picture by mistake Tsufull (talk) 15:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

schlechte Wiedergabe - Urheberrechtsverletzun Nina Eger (talk) 17:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 17:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found on the following website ([1]) so quite obviously not own work Iggy the Swan (talk) 09:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 20:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo comes from (gettyimages.com which people have to pay to remove the watermarking off the photo. I think the uploader has paid for it that way in order to use the photo on the relevant article. Iggy the Swan (talk) 09:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The Getty copy is visibly watermarked, this isn't, and Getty have a long record of claiming their own rights over things which aren't theirs and are freely licensed. This might (or might not) be the uploader's own work and so might require deletion. But "Getty offers a derivative of this, when this is clearly not a derivative of Getty's" is no sort of basis for DR nomination. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Strong  Delete. Sorry, Andy. But in this case all the clues scream Copyvio. Getty offers it since March 2018 and names the photographer (Sean Mathis). Our uploader dates it on August 2021, has no metadata and has more uploads deleted as copyvio-suspect. Problem with Getty images is not so much for WMF and Wikipedia, but external re-users who trust our claimed free license and end up getting a legal bill of $ 1000 per re-use from Getty's lawyers. --Túrelio (talk) 21:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy with deleting it, because Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mark Mckenna.jpg is a stronger hint that it's not the claimed own work. But this is still nothing to do with Getty claiming it as theirs. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 01:47, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File appears to exist to bully someone. Mbrickn (talk) 04:14, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:05, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

作者称此图片为自己的作品,而此图片实为 Apple 中国官方提供予媒体的 Apple 长沙宣传照片(见使用例 https://weibo.com/1906286443/Kv5IPxf3Ahttps://weibo.com/1642720480/Kv5RRtAkd ),可能使用错误的版权标记。

Uploader claimed the file was self-work while it is the press image provided for media purpose by Apple China. (Example as two URLs above), potentially using incorrect copyright license. Marvin Lou (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

系本人上传过程中出现的错误,错误上传为Apple 中国官方给予信任媒体的Apple 长沙 围挡宣传照片。

This is an error in my uploading process. It is an Apple Changsha fence publicity photo given by Apple China's official trusted media.Ruyadeyy44 (talk) 12:12, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:25, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:23, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SNRTZ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PACKAGING and the logos on their own need permission as they are complex logos

Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Sziasztok! Az összes képet én magam készítettem a saját fényképező készülékemmel. Nem másoltam ki semmilyen weboldalról. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SNRTZ (talk • contribs) 11:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 08:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screencap from FoxNews video (near bottom of page https://www.businessinsider.com/franklin-graham-donald-trump-pope-crhistian-2016-2) GreenC (talk) 20:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 21:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are no pages that use this file. FifaWorldClub. (talk) 22:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of Scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Precautionary principle: user's other uploads are blatant copyright violations of the same person. Perryprog (talk) 23:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashing. 0 followers etc and files all uploaded in Aug 2021

Gbawden (talk) 12:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 13:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the final product, there is a missing "OH" group and two missing methyl groups. The file has been corrected by the same uploader, but given a different file name (File:Thc synthesis new2.svg), so this file is no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 13:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shumokuzame33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags ("for my fictional country"); violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".

GPinkerton (talk) 00:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have the photocopy rights. 191.126.63.225 00:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Screenshot from the movie. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 01:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 01:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Nomination is the usual nonsense, but we already have a white dragon SVG flag and this is the wrong dragon. This dragon was created in Wales, in the 1950s, and is recognisably specific to the Welsh flag.
If anyone wants to argue that the English dragon (and the historical use of it as a white dragon badge) would necessarily use an identical dragon to the Welsh one (even if it didn't exist like this before the 1950s), then I'm happy to keep it. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
NB that the msileading claim that this is the "wrong dragon" implies that there is somehow a "right dragon", a conjecture for which no evidence or explanation has been furnished. GPinkerton (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fjb call (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Bodhisattwa (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:20, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashok vidh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope

Bodhisattwa (talk) 02:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep (all) - out of scope of the "Monuments competition" but still documenting various aspects of life in India in the late 2010-ties --Oo91 (talk) 20:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, they are in scope of Wikimedia Commons. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:22, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richardt1956 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader has a history of copyvios. I do not trust that any of these are their own works. In fact, I suggest speedy deletion of all files listed in this DR. If there was a mistake, we can always undelete them.

pandakekok9 05:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Richardt1956 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted characters.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   23:22, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:PACKAGING, complex packaging needs OTRS-permission from producing company. In my opinion this is not a simple design. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation and incorrect license. This image has appeared in Variety Magazine, and a Variety.com article (https://variety.com/2021/film/news/sacha-baron-cohen-borat-subsequent-moviefilm-trump-coronavirus-1234878420), with the image copyright "Steven Chee for Variety" Vistadan 11:07, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halitkya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 22:03, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halitkya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Since these aren't free works and are copyrighted works, I suggest they will be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 11:26, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halitkya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User blocked for copyvios, unlikely to be under a free license.

Yann (talk) 19:25, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted photograph by Robin Utrecht (Hollandse Hoogte), see https://www.welingelichtekringen.nl/beroemd-2/2801107/ing-willem-engel-gebruikte-50-000-euro-aan-viruswaarheid-donaties-voor-stuk-grond-in-spanje.html Vysotsky (talk) 11:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; I don't see how this is in scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The low quality and size makes this image uninterpretable. The same uploader has replaced it with a higher resolution version, File:Metildigoxin 500 .png, so this file is no longer needed. Marbletan (talk) 14:51, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lo subí por error Culos de pozz (talk) 14:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WikiTrajanus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aramatereo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictitious symbols of questionable notability

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a typo on the diagram that I would like to correct. I need to delete this image so I can upload the correct diagram 128.62.53.225 14:59, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Upload a fixed version. --Gbawden (talk) 07:57, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eizkz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:00, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The user has uploaded numerous files (already deleted) falsely stating "own work". No reason to assume this one is different, and the missing meta data supports this conclusion Prokurator11 (talk) 15:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. The user has uploaded numerous files (already deleted) falsely stating "own work". No reason to assume this one is different, and the missing meta data supports this conclusion Prokurator11 (talk) 15:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weil ich unten aus Versehen Metadaten der Kamera drauf habe Nina Eger (talk) 15:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Unten Metadaten der KamerA Nina Eger (talk) 17:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

wegen Metadaten der Kamera bitte löschen, außerdem gestutzte Flügel Nina Eger (talk) 10:22, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 08:02, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The portaitee doesn't like the photo. Hladnikm (talk) 18:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. INUSE and license is irrevocable. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandal's post. Not in use. Bilderling (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alhaikitivo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE - unused image of non-notable person (intended article, w:Draft:Sabri alhaiki صبري الحيقي/w:Draft:Sabri al-Haiki, for example, was deleted)

Эlcobbola talk 19:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably no own work, but a cropped version of one of these pictures. Encycloon (talk) 20:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably no own work, see also other files of the same uploader. Encycloon (talk) 20:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rmpwork (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Duck copyvios, clearly professionally staged and shot, lower res, no EXIF, File:Shyraa during Miss Pakistan Beauty Pageant.jpg is here; File:Chaudhary from her recent photoshoot.jpg has studio watermark in upper left, File:Arman Ali Pasha during a Photoshoot.jpg appears from this set; etc. Quack/COM:PRP

Эlcobbola talk 20:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cyprien.mly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

images not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Habertix (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:12, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission. --Regasterios (talk) 13:33, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously manipulated (photoshopped) image, which is totally unencyclopedic and might also violate copyright and personality rights. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with other image of same uploader:


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:28, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:34, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 09:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works of a Santa Claus statue, which is a sculptural work. There is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. Also, these may not be eligible for future Philippine FOP (modelled on the Australian FOP), as these types of works are not meant to be permanent (all year round). See also: COM:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Santa Claus in Germany.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:19, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of tarpaulin with background illustration. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also this file

_ JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:35, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to File:09874jfBarangay Guadalupe Viejo Bridges Roads Makati City Landmarksfvf 12.jpg. Same scene, just a few steps apart. COM:WEBHOST. Another contribution by blocked Judgefloro (talk · contribs). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:34, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:NOTUSED and redundant to all others at Category:Pasig River (Makati-Mandaluyong City section). Quality was also reduced by the glare of the sun. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also another near-identical file

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:20, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. You can consult COM:TOO Spain. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is found on the web (source: [15] so it's unlikely this is the user's own work. Iggy the Swan (talk) 09:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Looks like an uploader who can't be trusted. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:27, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Lotje (talk) 10:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   10:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 16:10, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by JuTa at 21:48, 12 September 2021 UTC: No license since 1 September 2021 --Krdbot 02:00, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gchead (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Text documents. Based on the text, they are unlikely to be own work of the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 00:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete except for File:Princess Diana Letter to John Head.jpg which includes signature from Princess Diana. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why would something written by Princess Diana be freely licensed or in the public domain? I think it would either be a British government work (copyrighted for 50 years from first publication) or a personal work by Princess Diana, copyrighted until 70 years after her death. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:06, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, two first files are derivative works of photos with unknown copyright status. In my opinion letter by princess Diana is work of British government and copyrighted 50 years from creation. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FTCjuan08 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Lower quality, off-colour, and oddly-shaped and -sized .png duplicates of the normal .svg equivalents (File:Flag of Wales.svg, File:Flag of Scotland.svg, etc.); needless forking.

GPinkerton (talk) 00:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio - Appears in https://www.gamesradar.com/razer-phone-2-review/ from 2018 https://web.archive.org/web/20181206003630/https://www.gamesradar.com/razer-phone-2-review/ Mbrickn (talk) 01:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Abominable quality out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flag; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 01:43, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, really bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:20, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because I am gypsy 78.98.253.96 14:54, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should request deletion of ENwiki file, not this! Hosmich (talk) 15:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Didym (talk) 00:18, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 01:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"user-generated fantasy flag" Except that it isn't. A white dragon flag on a red ground does have some history in English / Welsh relations. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:49, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Prove it. GPinkerton (talk) 15:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted. No evidence of notability, unused. Taivo (talk) 10:23, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE GPinkerton (talk) 01:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In what possible way is this a selfie? Or do you mean (as you usually past) that it's a "fantasy flag which does not exist". Except that it's a photo of an actual flag – just sat there, existing away. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. There are plenty of other projects on the Internet you can use for such a purpose, such as Flickr. Such private image collections do not become educational even if displayed as a gallery on a user page on Commons or elsewhere." Or do you mean (as you usually past) that Commons is properly treated as just such a personal web host? GPinkerton (talk) 15:53, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, of course this is not a selfie. I really do not believe, that uploader is a white dragon! Deleted due to missing educational value. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work and therefore no permission. The uploader himself is in the picture. The picture is on the band's Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/SpaceTherapyMusic/), but the photographer/copyright holder is unknown. ErikvanB (talk) 02:08, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused 8-year-old file. Multiple duplicate versions available. CzarJobKhaya (talk) 02:23, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete most uploads of Redoaaa as .jpg duplicates of .svg files. Taivo (talk) 10:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Later upload and lower quality of File:Sam Shepard Stealth.jpg -- please check their history and files, this file is the first file of the target page. FMM-1992 (talk) 03:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I replaced all occurrences. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:54, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:Kaleswaram Temple.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because the logo is cut in weird way and there are no options to resize it properly Martinnilssonsweden (talk) 05:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See watermark at the top of the photo. Due to the history of copyvios of the uploader, I doubt this one is own work. pandakekok9 05:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author of both drawing and photograph, no metadata. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:03, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader vandalized Commons and is now globally locked. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unattributed author from 1975, please undelete in 2045. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, work of anonymous artist will be restored in 2071 (per URAA 95 years from publication). Taivo (talk) 11:22, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source to prove the license. Via DR as an old file rubin16 (talk) 06:06, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IDK why you haven't simply googled it — it took me 5 minutes to find original scan of postcard printed before 1917 (according to style and grammatics). Anyway, this file can be deleted, later I'll upload an original scan in much better quality. Красный wanna talk? 06:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Uploaded full image: Череповец, Ягорбский мост (открытка).jpg. Красный wanna talk? 07:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, thank you, Red! I thought, what to do with the nominated file, because new version has different colors, and decided, that at moment we can keep both. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Facebook-code in metadata unlikely own work by uploader. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all uploaded photos of Worldeq as copyvios from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same as File:Traditional Dance from Ponorogo.jpg. It was uploaded on 17 March 2020 by the same user. Labdajiwa (talk) 07:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete both as copyright violations. Photographer is Sugeng-Eagle Eyes-Santoso. No evidence, that uploader Myeyes.picture is the same person. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously recent sculpture, thereby still in copyright. Sculptor even not mentioned in description of image. Regrettably, there is no freedom-of-panorama exception in the US for such works. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I'm just leaving a quick comment since it is 4AM and I was notified about this just before I was about to go to sleep. I'm not sure if this is really considered a "sculpture" rather than just one of the many unnamed structures within Centennial Hills Park that were constructed. There might be info on who manufactured it somewhere on the internet but I don't have the time to look for it at the moment. I'm not 100% familiar with copyright laws and I just uploaded this from Ken Lund's page on Flickr to add as a photo to the Centennial Hills Park article I wrote on Wikipedia. WaddlesJP13 (talk) 08:09, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, let me ask a question: is it architecture or sculpture? This cannot be architecture, no way, so this must be sculpture. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lizenzierung des Fotographen Romina Amato fehlt Alpöhi (talk) 08:11, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete most uploads of Vhsluzern as copyright violations. The uploader claims to be Romina Amato, Jan Maat, Damian Amstutz and Roger Hofstetter. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 08:18, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source – Facebook. this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan I just uploaded has missing pages and there is an alternative at File:Transactions and proceedings of the New Zealand Institute (IA transactionsproc61873newz).pdf Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:25, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:13, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a pdf version of the file I just nominated and, of course, has the same missing pages. So there is no point keeping this one either. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 08:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:15, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, we have OTRS-permission, but en:Nate Paul was thrice deleted, seems like he is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

user photo out of the scope — Draceane talkcontrib. 08:44, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete file:J Nayek.jpg due to same reason. These are the uploader's only contributions. I nominated the talkpage in en.wiki for speedy deletion as spam. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

De foto van Alex van Warmerdam die men mij had gestuurd blijkt niet rechtenvrij te zijn – de producent heeft dat me laten weten. Ik upload een nieuwe foto die wel rechtenvrij is. De huidige svp verwijderen. Kapp (talk) 08:47, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request. Also this can easily be copyright violation (not own work and I do not see evidence of permission). Taivo (talk) 15:51, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source doesn't correspond the licence. Published in 1996, no mention of any authorization from the authors. Zunkir (talk) 09:13, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio by silence about nameof photograph Mario De Biasi // - without photographer permission https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/vava-brodsky-sitting-next-to-her-husband-russian-born-news-photo/158748795 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 10:45, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, 1967 Italian photos are free from copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:57, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

بی‌کیفیت بودن و وجود جایگزین

POS78 (talk) 11:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --King of ♥ 00:39, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded this file after its author gave me permission to do so but it has his watermark on it and i think it's better to remove it from wiki commons. The-s-destination (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No explicit free license from the author. --King of ♥ 00:45, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ 00:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

portrait used only in self-promotional CV article which should better be moved to facebook Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:24, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 00:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yuki9717 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Japan.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Some of these may fall under COM:DM, but there is significant doubt over whether the uploader is the photographer of these images given the inconsistent and small sizes and lack of metadata. --King of ♥ 01:02, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE: "Anexos" appear to be mainspace-adjacent. --King of ♥ 00:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gollik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 00:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Zppix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Still under copyright by Columbia Pictures Industries (U.S. Copyright office record number: PA0001925457) DMacks (talk) 03:07, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion.  JGHowes  talk 22:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:INUSE. --King of ♥ 00:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

edit verbessert Nina Eger (talk) 17:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean "doctored photo"? If so why delete? Keep for now. Zezen (talk) 20:32, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Although the reason is unclear, the uploader is not required to supply a valid reason for courtesy deletion within one week. --King of ♥ 00:47, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 1990s. No Permission from the architect Анатолій Водоп'ян. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 00:59, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio: no indication of creative commons in the source CoffeeEngineer (talk) 12:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot for advertising only Osama Eid (talk) 12:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its a greater coucal Afsarnayakkan (talk) 14:01, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; you are free to rename it. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:29, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused selfie Jochen Burghardt (talk) 14:30, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof of permission of the copyright holder or the portrayed person to publicly transmit or display the photographs included in the image. Image previously published in other media with no indication of license that allow use by third parties. Examples of previous publication: 1 2 3 Awikimate (talk) 19:55, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; I cant find evidence of free license. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama for 2d works in Ireland (COM:FOP Ireland). The photo of the man is presumably copyrighted and not freely licensed. -M.nelson (talk) 21:48, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

People may wish to consider I created a derived version of this image which does not have the copyright issue but may still be F3 per a previous decision; or it may become an optional replacement for where this is used. There's also I believe a possibility of a non copvio crop(s) here which could be an alternative image, albeit not as good as the original, or there may be other replacement options. I'm cool with any decisions on the images taken here; but really wish to step back and let others deal. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 23:15, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Although I said I'd step back from this I had a glance around for suitable non-controversial images to replace the article used on the English Wikipedia. In the end I've selected one on Flickr, transferring it to commons, and several others from the same photographer at nearby points in his photostream. I used that image to clear what would be a likely copyvio at English Wiki. asap. and am not expecting any controversy with the replacement, it does include a copy of small photos and larger ones whose size on the image is really tiny making all De Minimis. Djm-leighpark (talk) 15:24, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, here is the link to that derived version File:Spencer_Dock_Luas_stop_Free_Luas.jpg. I think the modified image is acceptable though the poster of grass might also be considered copyrighted; I'm curious to hear the thoughts of other users. -M.nelson (talk) 07:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Grass is grass. Laurel Lodged (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To to to add a little clarity to the implication of the precedent F3 decision at File:Luaswelcome20042021.jpg given that File:Spencer Dock Luas stop.jpg is now likely to fall. If File:Spencer Dock Luas stop Free Luas.jpg is tested fails on copyrighted grass that gives no information as to the validity of the Luaswelcome20042021.jpg/F3; if Spencer Dock Luas stop Free Luas.jpg is F3'd that confirms the Luaswelcome20042021.jpg/F3 decision; and if F3 is determined inappropriate for Spencer Dock Luas stop Free Luas.jpg then it is likely the Luaswelcome20042021.jpg/F3 was invalid. While it is relatively easy to produce a version of File:Luaswelcome20042021.jpg containing no elements of the derived file that is not the case, at least so easily, for Spencer Dock Luas stop Free Luas.jpg. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 00:13, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I've asked the closer which is first step in the process. I shall await response. Thankyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 16:20, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Djm-leighpark: I can't see File:Luaswelcome20042021.jpg as it's deleted, but for a file to be considered a derivative work and deleted as F3, I assume it still had copyrighted elements of the original copyrighted work. If the copyrighted elements are removed (e.g. File:Louvre_pyramid_-_blackout.jpg) then the only copyrightable element is the photo itself which the photographer can license. You can request a review of that deletion at Commons:Deletion requests#Appealing decisions. -M.nelson (talk) 09:51, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
On the basis of that decision I've asked the relevant closer to review and reconfirm their decision and reasoning. Next move, if any, depends on that response. Even if F3 fails there may be a valid alternative deletion reason. Djm-leighpark (talk) 18:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:LL El vídeo subido a Youtube son imágenes de c. 1995, mientras que lamula.pe se fundó en 2009; las imágenes no pertenecen a lamula.pe. MiguelAlanCS (talk) 06:52, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

King of ♥ 00:38, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:28, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission for this file, nor indication that BMK files are published under free licenses. Jean-Fred (talk) 09:58, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the username, User:Perwein, matches the EXIF name of Cajetan Perwein, who is indeed working as “Digitale Kommunikation der Bundesministerin bei Bundesministerium für Klimaschutz, Umwelt, Energie, Mobilität, Innovation und Technologie”.
@Perwein: Welcome to the Wikimedia projects, and thanks for contributing! Can you confirm whether you are indeed Cajetan Perwein? We are used to have enthusiastic users uploading official portraits without the necessary permissions so we must be careful :)
We can figure out together what steps we should take to ensure this file can stay on Wikimedia Commons :)
Thanks, Jean-Fred (talk) 10:04, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I reached out to the folks from Wikimedia Österreich who got into contact with the BMK office - all seems to be in order, and will be clarified through VRTS. Jean-Fred (talk) 07:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not seeing a mention of CC at source. Site is copyright Gbawden (talk) 11:11, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:29, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif, tineye finds this as far back as 2015 although not as large. Same as https://www.henrikkleven.com/bio.html - likely a professional photo, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:31, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Higaword (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Old photos, claimed as own work. Probably scans of old photos

Gbawden (talk) 11:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:30, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's quite too complex not to meet the threshold of originality ValeJappo (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghareshiran (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OOS, unused per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ghareshiran.jpg. Most filenames have nothing to do with the subject matter, and are instead variations on the uploader's username. Some came via Facebook.

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 11:10, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd be happy to keep some of these (the better ones) just as "landscapes of Iran", if we're confident that this is correct enough. Renames to Ghareshiran_01 etc. would be better too. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:40, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No meaningful file name or description and no categories. These are absolutely useless -- the only word in the description translates as "Farsi" so they are probably from Iran, but we don;t even know that. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:49, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is considered Non-free on English Wikipedia (w:File:Kurt Lischka.jpg) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:16, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The photo was taken by a German. Maybe Czechs have something to say about ownership rights, not USans. Zezen (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This image is from the 1940s. Even if it was published then it would not have been PD on the URAA date. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:54, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]