Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/08/26
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
The description says this is a temporary exhibition, so com:FOP doesn't apply Vera (talk) 18:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Bigger DR needed. Vera (talk) 18:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
blatant copyvio https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/yassine-bounou-of-sevilla-celebrates-with-the-uefa-europa-news-photo/1267580442?adppopup=true 2A00:23C5:E187:5F00:E95D:4C5D:F7E3:55C5 18:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 19:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
{{Copyvio}} Hsarrazin (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 1958 + 70 + 1 = 2029. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
This photo is not my own work. Kidgeorge (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected to File:1971 Salem, Illinois derailment aerial.jpeg. --Achim (talk) 19:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 21:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, badly drawn vanity/personal fantasy/prank image, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation: copyright data in the metadata contradicts information given when the file was uploaded NapoliRoma (talk) 21:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom, no evidence of claimed license at source page. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
A pointless image, apparently uploaded as amusement for the uploader GPinkerton (talk) 21:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy ("proposed") flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 21:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted OOS per nom; on Commons since 2009, not even used in user space. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
This image can violate copyrights. Here is a news with other author and source stated Voltmetro 20:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted CV (found multiple places online predating Wikimedia upload & claimed date; Getty Images - a shame that such a blatant copyright violation by new uploader can so quickly be put in so many articles.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Collage of unsourced photos -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- All photos were taken from Wikimedia Commons. You can credit all of them without any problem. 😊 --Gabomiranda (talk) 22:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- If any of them were under an attribution license, you need to credit the authors or it is copyright violation. If it is no problem to credit, do so. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept, images are now properly attributed, thank you. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
false authorship and license claims. Image might well be {{PD-Mexico}} if it had true source information, but it does not. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed up. Whenever I upload a photograph of the INAH I credit it but this time it passed me.--Gabomiranda (talk) 23:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept, issues fixed, thanks for your prompt attention. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Collage of unsourced photos -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed up --Gabomiranda (talk) 13:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Close as Kept, fixed (thanks for your prompt attention) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 13:31, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
File without apparent valid permission. --Kasper2006 (talk) 06:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per https://www.swim4lifemagazine.it/2018/06/30/nuoto-carlotta-gilli-bissa-con-il-record-del-mondo-nei-100-stile-s13/ — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:04, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --DaB. (talk) 16:08, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Bears striking resemblance to this album cover. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 19:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Promo photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:58, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
empty category SimplyFreddie (talk) 21:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
The image is too pixelated to be useful. Might even be a television screenshot, which would make this a copyvio. pandakekok9 05:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 14:00, 29 August 2021 UTC: Commons:Screenshot: TV --Krdbot 20:10, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:ADVERT GreaterPonce665 (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:ADVERT GreaterPonce665 (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:ADVERT GreaterPonce665 (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:ADVERT GreaterPonce665 (talk) 01:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:ADVERT GreaterPonce665 (talk) 01:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope per COM:ADVERT GreaterPonce665 (talk) 01:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 01:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DSAnufrieva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Two logos of a non-notable school, along with group photos of students and classwork assignments. Delete unless shown to be in COM:SCOPE.
- File:Leaf Bioschool Piligrim logo RGB.jpg
- File:Bioschool Piligrim logo RGB.jpg
- File:MmVgjTQqp3Q.jpg
- File:Bnj FmFYBj4.jpg
- File:Nij5bPwLIao.jpg
- File:N8YqM48cMQ.jpg
- File:Q-y1LgNgb1M.jpg
- File:Printcip.jpg
- File:E6VelOrqems.jpg
- File:SHdMLL5wYQg.jpg
- File:W-0bW2z4F7E.jpg
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:57, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GeorgiosKorkis (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope.
- File:Jpg NAMES KOS 2020.jpg
- File:Jpg 31-01-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 29-01-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 26-03-2020 KOS Just.jpg
- File:Jpg 26-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 25-02-2020 KOS Octo2.jpg
- File:Kos 2020.jpg
- File:Jpg 23-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 21-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 19-02-2020 KOS2.jpg
- File:Jpg 16-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 15-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 15-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 14-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 12-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 10-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 10-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 08-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 09-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 08-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 07-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 07-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 06-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 03-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 02-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 02-02-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 01-03-2020 KOS.jpg
- File:The flying Lithuanian.jpg
- File:Jpg NAMES KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 09092019 KOS.jpg
- File:Jpg 02092019 KOS.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 01:58, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Duplicate uploaded in error. Mliu92 (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: ND REDIRECTED. --JuTa 07:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
GPinkerton (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mateoamero (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags, maps, etc.; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:Drummlandia Regions 2020.png
- File:Le Bandiera de Drummlandia.png
- File:Un Mappa de Drummlandia.png
- File:Un mappa del Drummlandia.png
- File:Amiral Amero.png
- File:Drummlandiaflag.png
- File:DrummlandiaLFN.png
GPinkerton (talk) 21:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE low-quality fantasy flag-map; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 21:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 22:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Cela ne correspond pas du tout à une photo d'une école d'Esternay mais plutôt à une école de CRAMANT! 2A01:CB0C:9E9:A300:436:BEDF:F554:E09A 22:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Keep. Reason given is rationale to rename the image, not to delete it. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:34, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 22:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Collage of unsourced photos -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
no educational value, low quality Icodense 22:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Esta imagen se subió sin permiso del señor Ricardo Sheffield Padilla. Soy parte de su equipo y el pide personalmente que se elimine. Bart0101 (talk) 22:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]The uploader claims to be the author and copyright holder of these drawings, which have been previously published at http://www.thomas-scharnowski.de/wappen/WappenFellbach.htm. There is no evidence to support the authorship and copyright claims and no sign of any free licensing at the source site. The uploader blanked out the {{no permission since}} problem tags.
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @LX: In that case, just restore the template tags (or use the Lrw instead) and if vandalism continues, write a note to the admins. THanks. Ruthven (msg) 07:27, 1 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:New flag of the Soviet Union.svg
- File:Flag of the USSR (Alternate).svg
- File:Flag of the Chinese Communist Party (Alternate).svg
- File:Flag of the Soviet Union (Alternate).svg
- File:African Soviet Flag.svg
- File:Hammer and Keyboard.svg
- File:Keyboard and Mouse.svg
- File:War Ensign of Germany (Eisernes Kreuz ).svg
- File:Red Gold Dragon China Flag.png
- File:War Ensign of Germany (1938-1945) Alternative.svg
- File:War Ensign of Germany (1935–1938) Alternative.svg
- File:Reichskriegsflagge Alternative.svg
GPinkerton (talk) 23:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploaded as "simplelogos", these logos clearly are complex enough to be above ToO.
Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:13, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RootOfAllLight (talk · contribs)
[edit]Various authors mentioned, so obviously not own works. The source doesn't clearly mention a free license. The copyright status should be clarified, either with a Creative Commons license at the source, or by email via COM:VRT.
- File:Phallus.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Arms Spear.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Bee.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Bodypart Hand of Benediction.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Bodypart Hand with Middle Finger Extended.svg
- File:Hotei icon.svg
- File:Purple Hotei Icon.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Owl.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Moor's Head.svg
- File:Baltic Flower Snowflake.svg
- File:Gelfling Clans.png
- File:Ancient Greek Swastika Shield.png
- File:Firefighter St. Florian Cross.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Double-Headed Eagle.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Unicorn Passant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Hydra Passant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Horse Passant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Cock.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Hen.svg
- File:Death's head.svg
- File:Alabama-Coushatta Symbol.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Elephant with Tower.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Elephant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Polypus.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Calamarie.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Griffin.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Ouroboros.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Ark of the Covenant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Dragonfly.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Snail.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Crab.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Scorpion.svg
- File:Chucky Voodoo Knife Symbols.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animals East Asian Dragon.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Crossbones.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Whale.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Spider.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Insect Butterfly.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Cross Gringoly.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Human Skull.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Death's Head.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Apple Slipped and Leaved.svg
- File:Fleur-de-lis Seashell.png
- File:Fleur de lis seashell.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Caduceus.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Rod of Asclepius.svg
- File:Ciel Phantomhive Brand.svg
- File:Los Illuminados logo.png
- File:Kipling Elephant Swastika.png
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Two Serpents Entwined.svg
- File:Chinese Longevity and Prosperity Symbols.svg
- File:Join, or Die (Massachusetts Spy).svg
- File:Proud Boys Rooster Logo.svg
- File:Neo-Nazi Black Sun Flag.png
- File:Frog Foot.svg
- File:Rosa Camuna Swastika 3.svg
- File:Rosa Camuna Swastika 2.svg
- File:Vanguard America Logo.svg
- File:Vanguard America.jpg
- File:Patriot Front Flag.png
- File:Kipling Elephant Swastika 2.svg
- File:Kipling Elephant Swastika.svg
- File:Wufu (Five Blessings).svg
- File:SS-Ehrenring und Heilszeichen.svg
- File:Viking Wolf Cross.svg
- File:Scythian Horse Head Swastika.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Bat.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Plant Lily 1.svg
- File:Ancient Greek Triskelion.svg
- File:New Order Knights of the Ku Klux Klan Flag.png
- File:QAnon Gadsden Flag.jpg
- File:Brotherhood of Steel.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Sea Wolf.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Sea Lion.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Planet Sun v2.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Salamander Couchant Regardant.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Salamander.svg
- File:Illuminati Eye.svg
- File:Neo-Nazi Mjölnir Flag.svg
- File:Green Chinese Dragon.svg
- File:Red Chinese Dragon.svg
- File:Mjöllnir Necklace.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Serpent Entwined About A Pillar.svg
- File:Coa Illustration Elements Animal Sea Horse.svg
Yann (talk) 21:59, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
- On the website it says, "Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) license. No attribution is required for heraldic or artistic use by members of the SCA." RootOfAllLight (talk) 18:59, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- @RootOfAllLight: Where is that mention? I didn't see it. Did I miss something? Yann (talk) 19:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- @RootOfAllLight - Can you please provide that website link? It is not listed here. Also, please provide a source link on *every* one of the files you upload - if you can please do that I would appreciate it. If the sourcing can't be provided, I will have to delete. Thank you. Missvain (talk) 20:33, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
- It's here. http://heraldicart.org/viking-answer-lady-svg-images-for-heralds/ At the top of the page. RootOfAllLight (talk) 20:47, 29 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The source book as a whole is clearly NC, as can be seen on the copyrights page. The CC-BY-SA license cited at the bottom applies only to one creator of many. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:18, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Purportedly a 'photograph of a photograph' embedded in a monument at the w:Yasukuni Shrine in Japan. Derivative work unlikely to meet De Minimis or Freedom of Panorama requirements under U.S. or Japanese law. Muzilon (talk) 05:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- There are more photographs of the same public stone monument here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Radha_Binod_Pal_Yasukuni_112135010_24372cdf47_o.jpg and here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yasukuni_Radha_Binod_Pal_Commending_Stele.jpg . The source is also provided: the photo was taken by Lubinlunib at Yasukuni Shrine in Tokyo. So it should be allowed. -Artanisen (talk) 06:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: the image was originally uploaded by Lubinlunib as "Own Work" with no source or location information. The annotation specifying that the photo was actually taken by Lubinlunib at the Yasukuni Shrine was very recently added by you – where did you obtain that information? There is a similar monument at the w:Kyoto Ryozen Gokoku Shrine in Kyoto, and the photo could have been taken there, for all we know. In any case, it would seem that the image of Pal has been cropped/extracted specifically to illustrate Pal's biography, which makes it a Derivative Work. As the photograph of Pal is a posed studio photograph that has been embedded within these monuments, it is possible the original photo may still be under copyright, which raises issues of COM:FOP and COM:DM. Cf. the successful copyright claim by the creator of the w:Korean War Veterans Memorial, which has resulted in Commons having to delete or censor photos of that memorial – e.g. File:Korean War Veterans Memorial Without Soldiers.jpg. Muzilon (talk) 08:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- It was originally uploaded by lubinlunib as "own work". So it's not 100% certain, but very likely taken at the shrine. The photo is not under copyright otherwise all other photos of Radhabinod Pal would need to be removed. There's no copyright claim by the creator. -Artanisen (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- I note that Lubinlunib's two other "own work" uploads have also been nominated for deletion. That aside, who was the original photographer who took the studio photo of Judge Pal, and when? Is it non-copyrighted under U.S. and Japanese law, as required by Commons:Licensing? It may be that although a photo of the entire monument is ok on Commons under Freedom of panorama, cropping the photo for the sole purpose of illustrating Pal's Wikipedia biography fails the De minimis test. Muzilon (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Muzilon and Artanisen: This file is deleted by JuTa, still need discussions or not? Also how about two extra files that used this file as a part of them File:Indian People - Mosaic.jpg and File:Notable indians.jpg? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:42, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- I note that Lubinlunib's two other "own work" uploads have also been nominated for deletion. That aside, who was the original photographer who took the studio photo of Judge Pal, and when? Is it non-copyrighted under U.S. and Japanese law, as required by Commons:Licensing? It may be that although a photo of the entire monument is ok on Commons under Freedom of panorama, cropping the photo for the sole purpose of illustrating Pal's Wikipedia biography fails the De minimis test. Muzilon (talk) 08:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- It was originally uploaded by lubinlunib as "own work". So it's not 100% certain, but very likely taken at the shrine. The photo is not under copyright otherwise all other photos of Radhabinod Pal would need to be removed. There's no copyright claim by the creator. -Artanisen (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- @Artanisen: the image was originally uploaded by Lubinlunib as "Own Work" with no source or location information. The annotation specifying that the photo was actually taken by Lubinlunib at the Yasukuni Shrine was very recently added by you – where did you obtain that information? There is a similar monument at the w:Kyoto Ryozen Gokoku Shrine in Kyoto, and the photo could have been taken there, for all we know. In any case, it would seem that the image of Pal has been cropped/extracted specifically to illustrate Pal's biography, which makes it a Derivative Work. As the photograph of Pal is a posed studio photograph that has been embedded within these monuments, it is possible the original photo may still be under copyright, which raises issues of COM:FOP and COM:DM. Cf. the successful copyright claim by the creator of the w:Korean War Veterans Memorial, which has resulted in Commons having to delete or censor photos of that memorial – e.g. File:Korean War Veterans Memorial Without Soldiers.jpg. Muzilon (talk) 08:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- A lot of pages used that image so it would need to be replaced. Discussion can be closed. -Artanisen (talk) 22:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, two files mentioned above used this, User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2015 June 10 15:00 can be simply ignored as it's a less-traffic page, not sure why Category:Radhabinod Pal "used this", probably from Wikidata (so I've added another file)? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- As this image was being used to illustrate w:Radhabinod Pal, I've replaced it with another Commons image whose CC status is not in doubt. Muzilon (talk) 22:56, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, two files mentioned above used this, User:OgreBot/Uploads by new users/2015 June 10 15:00 can be simply ignored as it's a less-traffic page, not sure why Category:Radhabinod Pal "used this", probably from Wikidata (so I've added another file)? Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:50, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
- A lot of pages used that image so it would need to be replaced. Discussion can be closed. -Artanisen (talk) 22:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
(non-admin closure) Deleted by JuTa, images that include this file as a part of them should consider modifying. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:53, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
This is pretty clearly a photograph of a TV screen. This is this user's only contribution. Denniscabrams (talk) 02:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP, unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 08:08, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 02:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:09, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
-0.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alternative.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Alternative.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
File:Flag of Chinese Nagasaki.svg Vexillology Hub (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Flag of Chinese Nagasaki.svg Vexillology Hub (talk) 06:14, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
File:Flag of Chinese Nagasaki.svg Vexillology Hub (talk) 06:15, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Speedy keep this deletion request has been started by an LTA (Jurisdrew). Pinging @1234qwer1234qwer4: SHB2000 (talk) 11:49, 29 July 2021 (UTC)- Speedy keep no valid reason for deletion and LTA. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 15:58, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 09:39, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Needless to say, Nagasaki has never been Chinese. GPinkerton (talk) 03:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- The file is currently in use here and on jawiki. pandakekok9 03:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- It's in use once on the uploader's own page and nowhere else, as far as I can see. GPinkerton (talk) 07:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by P199. --Strakhov (talk) 08:10, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
(1) it's not "Own work", per its metadata it is encoded by "Instagram" (2) all of its categories are wrong which makes doubt about its uploader FMM-1992 (talk) 05:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio https://www.instagram.com/p/CFM0c5xgvWS/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link. --Strakhov (talk) 08:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blueraspberrycoolattaanon (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of Out of scope photos and possible copyvios only used in their sandbox
- File:Have You Seen This Man?.jpg
- File:Fiveman manga.jpg
- File:Jebediahchase.jpg
- File:Kky9cw8pvth71-1.jpg.webp
- File:Fiveman.jpg.webp
- File:3 TheOrigin.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:18, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Foto don't used anywhere. Wiki is not a hosting. Изображение нигде не используется. Kursant504 (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Photo is, in fact, in use here https://tt.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%98%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B5_%D0%A7%D3%99%D1%87%D0%BA%D0%B0%D0%B1&oldid=3159208. --Strakhov (talk) 08:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Foto don't used anywhere. Wiki is not a hosting. Изображение нигде не используется. Kursant504 (talk) 09:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 08:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Foto don't used anywhere. Wiki is not a hosting. Изображение нигде не используется. Kursant504 (talk) 09:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 08:21, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Foto don't used anywhere. Wiki is not a hosting. Изображение нигде не используется. Kursant504 (talk) 09:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Foto don't used anywhere. Wiki is not a hosting. Изображение нигде не используется. Kursant504 (talk) 09:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Strakhov (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: File description states: "Photo is from IMDB because I couldn't find a better one". --Strakhov (talk) 08:25, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
from www.researchgate.net . No permission. Only (remaining) uploading by this user. Estopedist1 (talk) 14:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. --Strakhov (talk) 08:26, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Not own work. Author is alive, so cant be PD. Каракорум (talk) 15:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely own work. Copyright owner should send permission to COM:VRT. --Strakhov (talk) 08:30, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: stock image https://www.redbubble.com/fr/people/photosmontajes/works/27774609-truth?PartnerCategory=&PartnerID=77643&PartnerType=pt.aff&Region=&irclickid=2qZ00hSZFxyLToh2vQx9iVURUkBWaHwX5RZ8Qs0&irgwc=1&utm_group=RBC&utm_medium=brand_awareness&utm_source=Impact CoffeeEngineer (talk) 17:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:33, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Not Public Domain, unless the uploader is w:fr:Inès Longevial - Hsarrazin (talk) 17:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: the copyright owner (the painter) should send permission to COM:VRT. --Strakhov (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
how can this painting be PD, the painter is alive... Is the uploader the painter ? Hsarrazin (talk) 18:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: the copyright owner (the painter) should send permission to COM:VRT. --Strakhov (talk) 08:35, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE user-generated ("user-made") fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 18:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:36, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Unused low quality image of nondescript item, little educational use, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:37, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
No evidence found on source website to prove that this image has a CC-BY-SA licence claimed by the uploader. Therefore, this image may be a possible copyright violation. GeoWriter (talk) 19:29, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
bad quality, photo is useless for wiki Bestalex (talk) 19:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: bad quality and blurred depiction of a person in a chair, out of scope. --Strakhov (talk) 08:41, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Pierre Commarmond died in 1983. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:AD93:FD41:1F8A:AA1E 20:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright owner should send permission to COM:VRT. --Strakhov (talk) 08:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated ("user-made") fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Very low quality. GPinkerton (talk) 21:22, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated ("user-made") fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 21:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality out of COM:SCOPE flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 21:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:43, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/nueva bandera de Bolivia
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated "new" flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
- File:Nueva bandera de Bolivia.svg
- File:Nueva Bandera de Bolivia.png
- File:Nueva bandera de Bolivia versión 2.svg
GPinkerton (talk) 21:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Comment As the creator of the SVGs, I have no objection to their deletion; I made them as editing practice because the PNG was in Category:Images that should use vector graphics. —CalendulaAsteraceae (talk | contribs) 02:41, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 08:44, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Maket: is protect file 181.203.118.124 00:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; Out of scope as well. --Gbawden (talk) 09:16, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Foto da rimuove JessicasacconeK (talk) 13:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- @JessicasacconeK: Can you please elaborate on why this image needs to be deleted? pandakekok9 13:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; photo published by the Italian Senate. Ruthven (msg) 11:57, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Motion blurred photograph taken more likely by accident and uploaded by PanoramioBot without attribution. No any educational value. Красный wanna talk? 14:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:08, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Quezon City Hall 1
[edit]https://lakansining.wordpress.com/2020/06/02/quezon-city-hall-the-erehwon-murals-on-philippine-history/ - 2014 public artworks by private artists from EREHWON ART COLLECTIVE. 9 out of 10 artists alive. No freedom of panorama in the philippines. No commercial license from struggling artists!
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 37.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 43.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 04.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 05.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 06.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 08.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 09.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 10.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 14.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 15.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 16.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 21.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 23.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 25.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:20, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete in accordance with COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle, the uploader must provide evidence that the artists indeed waived their economic rights over the artworks they created that would make them {{PD-PhilippinesGov}}. Uploader (or the Quezon City Government) must send copies of genuine documents of copyright transfer via COM:VRT correspondence. But until then, it is reasonable to assume that Quezon City Government has no rights over these artworks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Quezon City Hall 2
[edit]Government posters showing creations by artists. The likes of Napoleon Abueva, Eduardo Castrillo, Federico Ilustre and many many many more artists
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 01.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 13.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 14.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 17.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 18.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 22.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 24.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 26.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 27.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 29.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 31.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 41.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 17:24, 25 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete two important things here. For one, while the posters are indeed published by the government, Section 176.3 of the copyright law states: "Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions, the Government is not precluded from receiving and holding copyrights transferred to it by assignment, bequest or otherwise; nor shall publication or republication by the government in a public document of any work in which copyright is subsisting be taken to cause any abridgment or annulment of the copyright or to authorize any use or appropriation of such work without the consent of the copyright owner. This means, the underlying works' copyrights are still in effect and that publication of images of the underlying works by the government does not negate the subsisting sculptors' copyrights over their public art. Note that it is nearly similar (but not exact) to the U.S. FOP case of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Koreabattery.JPG. Another thing: by looking at some of the other related images in the category, it seems these posters are just temporary installations, as there was an event being conducted there. So FOP, even if passed here, does not apply. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 00:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Additionally, a third thing, the photos on the posters themselves. Per COM:PRP, we should err on the side of caution which means we cannot automatically assume that the photos of QC landmarks themselves are taken by Quezon City Hall employees or not (perhaps the employees just took stock images of QC landmarks or other people just submitted them, for purposes of printing them on these one-time use posters). Even if that was the case, they should have took pictures during their employment hours, not outside office hours (the photos may have to go if the latter is true). The copyright status of photos used in the posters is thus questionable. Uploader Judgefloro (talk · contribs) should be the one to provide all informations as per COM:EVIDENCE, not admins or longtime users. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 06:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Quezon City Hall 3
[edit]Similar to my concerns at #Files in Category:Quezon City Hall 2, regarding photos contained in the posters that these images depict. We should err on the side of caution which means we cannot automatically assume that the photos themselves are taken by Quezon City Hall employees or not (perhaps the employees just took stock images or other people just submitted them, for purposes of printing them on these one-time use posters). Even if that was the case, they took should have pictures during their employment hours, not outside office hours. The photos may have to go if the latter is truem The copyright status of photos used in the posters is thus questionable.
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 02.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 03.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 04.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 05.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 06.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 07.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 08.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 09.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 10.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 12.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 16.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 19.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 20.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 21.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 23.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 25.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 26.JPG
- File:7619Quezon City Hallfvf 30.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 18.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 34.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 38.JPG
- File:7795jfQuezon City Hall Metro Manilafvf 42.JPG
- File:7840jfQuezon City Hall Manilafvf 03.JPG
- File:7840jfQuezon City Hall Manilafvf 04.JPG
- File:7840jfQuezon City Hall Manilafvf 05.JPG
- File:7840jfQuezon City Hall Manilafvf 06.JPG
- File:7840jfQuezon City Hall Manilafvf 08.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:39, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, not used anywhere. Out of scope. Yahya (talk) 11:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
change Balakashyap (talk) 17:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 03:57, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:44, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 19:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed to publish by the railway company, only for personal use. Chewy.commuter (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 23:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
No confirmation of claimed free license at source link, which has an all rights reserved notice. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
It seems some online service produces such fake book covers: see https://www.amazon.com/Decapoda-Siboga-Expedition-L-Holthuis/dp/1175823724, https://www.amazon.com/Werdegang-Menschheit-Entstehung-Kultur-German/dp/1246448203 and https://www.amazon.com/Report-Commercial-Statistics-Syria-Bowring/dp/1173683712 for instance. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, DW and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Clipped from some book. Copyrighted? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Assume copyrighted unless proven otherwise. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Clipped from some book. Copyrighted? Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Assume copyrighted unless proven otherwise. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
The information provided by the uploader claims that this was taken in April 2021, but http://www.outburstamericas.org/es/loren-ipsum-loren-ipsum/ shows an earlier date (15 January 2021). I doubt this is the own work of the uploader. pandakekok9 02:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Some IP (probably the uploader) changed the date to 7 July 2019 from 2 April 2021. Still doesn't convince me to not delete this photo though. @LA Contracultural: If you want to keep this photo, upload the original photo in its original resolutions, and don't exclude the EXIF data from the camera. Use it in a Wikimedia wiki as well. pandakekok9 02:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:14, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 02:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
By the Law of State Symbols of Montenegro , NO CHANGES should be made to the official standard flag, even in those "fun purposes" . As a matter this flag makes no sense, please delete. 37.122.185.10 20:36, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 02:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no longer in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Also low quality, no probability of use. GPinkerton (talk) 02:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:47, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Please delete my own uploaded images File:Blue-tailed Skink 0006.jpg and File:Blue-tailed Skink 0007.jpg, I intend to re-upload them after removing author and date EXIF data. Alterntively, if you can directly remove the author and date fields from the two images without leaving them veiwable in the file history, that would be fine too. Thanks, ChromeGames923 (talk) 03:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 03:44, 12 September 2021, by Billinghurst. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:48, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement, no source is mentioned DZwarrior1 (talk) 04:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:49, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This is above the threshold of originality in the United States, and probably Indonesia too if it has it. There is no evidence of permission from the copyright holder either. pandakekok9 05:32, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
-0.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-0.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Pure text. Out of project scope. pandakekok9 05:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
-0.png){kind=link}
Including File:Wikipedia Entry of Lords University, Rajasthan (1)-1.png as well. pandakekok9 05:34, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
-1.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-0.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:50, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
-0.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploaded mistakenly FrozenAvatar (talk) 05:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This either a personal photo uploaded by a contributor with no constructive edits, or it was taken by a photographer that doesn't have the same name as the stated subject and it is therefore questionable whether the uploader/subject are the copyright holder. Additionally, no usage on Wikimedia projects and no apparent educational value, therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 05:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:51, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Personal tourist snapshoot, not usable for Wikipedia Berthold Werner (talk) 06:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep As uploader. This is not an "Personal tourist snapshoot", but a image taken of the "Arco Triunfal da Rua Augusta" and "Praça do Comércio" in Lisboa, Portugal. No reason provided why this is "not usable for Wikipedia".
This is as much as an "Personal tourist snapshoot" as the images taken by Berthold Werner of people on the street in File:Lisbon BW 2018-10-03 13-48-44.jpg, tourists wondering randomly in File:Batalha BW 2018-10-05 17-27-44.jpg, File:Óbidos BW 2018-10-05 10-27-43.jpg, File:Batalha BW 2018-10-05 16-22-38.jpg, File:Alcobaça BW 2018-10-05 12-58-25.jpg, File:Alcobaça BW 2018-10-05 12-35-12.jpg, File:Alcobaça BW 2018-10-05 12-36-28.jpg or taking pictures in File:Batalha BW 2018-10-05 16-25-45.jpg and File:Batalha BW 2018-10-05 16-19-27.jpg.
Refer to the similar situation to Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2021/05#When_is_a_photo_out_of_scope_because_of_being_a_"holiday_snap"?, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (11) (30324098098).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (18) (42383500400).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (20) (42383499620).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (22) (42383498750).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (26) (42383497440).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (27) (43285361165).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (41) (44143064732).jpg,Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (42) (44143064092).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kasteel Hoensbroek (45) (42383492990).jpg. Tm (talk) 06:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
_(30324098098).jpg){kind=link}
_(42383500400).jpg){kind=link}
_(42383499620).jpg){kind=link}
_(42383498750).jpg){kind=link}
_(42383497440).jpg){kind=link}
_(43285361165).jpg){kind=link}
_(44143064732).jpg){kind=link}
_(44143064092).jpg){kind=link}
_(42383492990).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. The woman is the focus as much is the arch. Therefore this image doesn't compare to the examples given above of "other tourist snapshots" where people are incidental. Moreover, this one serves no purpose/is redundant to the 100s of images we already have of this arch. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 00:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
very bad quality Indianspy007 (talk) 06:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
No proof this was originally made by the uploader. This same image can be found from multiple different websites with a reverse search:https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivdXNjslTY489RGPmFnkSAfSNx_1F2I-9r7FdjBQjra18rdcVWTc_1kgeuViOATP0-rs2MUHYpO21vn2lUzValNC1AGllSqQpgh--Yl_1_1k9_1zE5EqoKrNlbJVPqtuBssn_1bqS-wkpEvUzzLy12SO5ZtsfsJHCx4hGzLcTMtR0EuN39ajbtVBhfOoIXhND5K65iUpZUnkECDvYKo6X9U_1lskENpnzwUVBsgQFYoPNHsRCnOHhNh6i4o86MFmjw80NCuKIq6U8ee9aQEXG_1D_1xbTH8i-kQOm18aCAvZX22l7tOX7AVeIibnOm6p5JIpvb_1bOU8SZvaIs0MX93Fk7_1lQZzGzn7cqkkn3-KL5b_1QG_1sL2PUR4nhHItOlRf3M9cO5kGiogQ4SaQWnQa296jjHPFWOUzY_1_1_1w Putitonamap98 (talk) 06:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- There are also matches in TinEye as well. One match even dates way back from 2009. pandakekok9 06:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Dubious own work claim, I doubt many people own a satellite. Source most likely is rolling/requires archiving. Sennecaster (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:00, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be this user's own image. Appears in a number of places on the Internet if you do an image search, e.g. here - https://twitter.com/ErzincanSpor24/status/1415566377725857795?s=20 AAhelifan (talk) 08:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:01, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
File:Engaging business Twitter presence matters @seeminglee + @bonobosninjas + @bonobos 2012-11-25 SML Screenshots (8215058871).png
[edit].png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Flickr user reposting their own Twitter feed featuring an advertisement; the advertisement is probably protected by copyright and some random person's Twitter feed is out of project scope in the first place. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:15, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, I believe above COM:ToO. MKFI (talk) 11:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
This is a low-resolution PNG version of a picture that I've now uploaded as a higher-resolution JPEG at File:B&M Express, 21 Market Street, Bridgend (geograph 6682978).jpg. It's thus redundant, but I don't think I can use {{Duplicate}} because it's a different format. bjh21 (talk) 11:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:17, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ArianeMoffo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Really looks like copyright violations
- File:CUDcheguewabo2.jpg
- File:CUDcheguewabo.jpg
- File:Guerrière2covidparTexturesbySally.jpg
- File:Arbre sur la tête par TexturesbySally.jpg
- File:GuerrièrecovidparTexturesbySally.jpg
- File:Danielle robe.jpg
- File:Danielle MISS.jpg : copy of new facebook profile
- File:Danielle Miss Cameroun France.jpg
- File:Cameroon1.png
- File:Daniellecheguewabo.jpg
Shev123 (talk) 11:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- No, we are copyright for theses pictures. ArianeMoffo
- Only pictures with CC-BY-SA license (or compatible license) are allowed on Commons. Habertix (talk) 20:07, 27 August 2021 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. Not own works: FB and transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:02, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Purely fictional flag, no mention of any historical source used so it cannot be assumed it is a historical recreation as claimed, COM:NOTHOST and COM:SCOPE. Veverve (talk) 11:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Fictional. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:18, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:03, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader does not appear to be the author and copyright holder listed in the metadata. Need permission from the copyright holder to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 13:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:19, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
What does a dentist create? Creator template abused for promotional purposes. Achim (talk) 14:01, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Also:
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Render of proposed monument at the place of Lenin statue, uploader to Panoramio most likely not an author of monument or render. Красный wanna talk? 14:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality render of proposed monument in Cherepovets, no any educational value and probably a copyright violation. Красный wanna talk? 14:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:06, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Low resolution crop, unused duplicate CzarJobKhaya (talk) 14:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictional logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
A screen capture of a copyrighted piece with a copyrighted logo. Not eligible for hosting on Commons. 104.205.129.214 15:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Not a Wikipedia, just trying to promote himself Osama Eid (talk) 16:47, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:08, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Thibaut (talk) 17:18, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Out of com:PS. Hanooz 17:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Raghsekhodkar (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of com:PS
Hanooz 17:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE user-generated ("user-made") fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 18:38, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
related DR: commons:deletion requests/File:Goa.jpg Arlo James Barnes 23:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data (although mentioned 'according to...') to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 19:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE user-generated ("user-made") fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 18:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
related DR: commons:deletion requests/File:Fictional Goa flag.svg Arlo James Barnes 23:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:10, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Basscabass (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".
GPinkerton (talk) 21:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploads by User:Capisred
[edit]- File:Sam Gallucci.jpg
- File:Sam Gallucci (cropped).jpg
- File:AnthonyTrimino.jpg
- File:AnthonyTrimino (cropped).jpg
File:Jenny-Rae-GOV 106-scaled.jpgFile:Jenny-Rae-GOV 106-scaled (cropped).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
We have no evidence that the campaigns gave uploader (User:Capisred) permission. --SecretName101 (talk) 00:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi, SecretName101. Jenny Rae's campaign uploaded her photo themselves, so that does not concern me. If you want evidence for the other two, where could I upload the email giving me permission? Capisred (talk) 12:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC) The emails sent contained the following message in response at the end "This message contains privileged and confidential information. If it was sent to you by mistake, do not read it. Instead, please notify the sender by reply e-mail, and delete this e-mail. Unauthorized dissemination, forwarding or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited". You can email info@anthonytrimino.com & gallucciforgovernor@gmail.com to confirm. The language used by Trimino was "You may use the image attached for a page like this. Thank you!" and Gallucci said "Hi Ken, Here is a photo of Sam Gallucci. Can you upload it to Wikipedia? Thank you!". Again, if you would like to confirm, feel free to do so. I did ask them in my initial email to upload it themselves, but not everybody knows how to work Wikipedia well. If you need evidence, there is nobody better to confirm with than their very active campaigns! Capisred (talk) 13:00, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
@Capisred: We need proof that they have released the images for use under an appropriate public domain/ creative commons license. SecretName101 (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Almost all of the time, organizations such as this campaign have the right to use images for the purposes of the campaign, but they do not have the right to freely license the images to others -- that right is held by the photographer. Note also that "upload it to Wikipedia" is insufficient -- the image must be freely licensed by its creator for any use anywhere by anybody. Finally, there is nowhere that the uploader can send a permission. That permission must come directly from the copyright holder to VRT. We require this because, unfortunately, there are too many uploaders who are perfectly willing to forge a permission. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:33, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
In the summary it is stated that the author is ArtBridges Greece. In the Meta Data it is stated that the author is Ignatis Tsiknis and that Tlačová agentúra SR is the Copyright holder. As source for the picture a news website is mentioned. It is not allowed to download a picture from a website and upload it in wikimedia commons. It must always be clear who the author is and that the author gave permission to upload the picture in wikimedia commons. Faktengebunden (talk) 01:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Russia. Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
According to this article, this building was established in 2017. And since there is no freedom of panorama for buildings in the Philippines, this building is non-free, unfortunately. pandakekok9 04:33, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Official photos, not own work as claimed
_Hasan_Londang,_M.S.S.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. ✗plicit 09:37, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete some of the dolls may be old enough to be out of copyright, but several look too modern. The doll in the middle with a Ty label (possibly a cheerleader) was manufactured by the Ty corporation which was founded in the USA 1986, see w:en:Ty. Verbcatcher (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Rebuttal comment from User:Black Doll Enthusiast regarding deletion of File:Black dolls. jpg: I am the owner of the dolls and the photographer; therefore, I own the copyright of this photograph. I included it with the Wikipedia entry, "Black doll," that I created in approximately 2008. I chose a group of antique-to-modern Black dolls from my private collection to photograph as an illustration of the progression of black dolls throughout the years. The dolls are from the early 1900s through the date the photograph was taken. The issue of "the dolls being too modern" to be included with this entry is invalid because I own the dolls. Once a doll or object is part of someone's personal collection, they can photograph it and share the photograph as they please. Again, the dolls in the File:Black dolls.jpg are part of my private collection and I took the picture. There is no valid reason, therefore, for the image to be deleted. 11:33 26 August 2021(UTC)
- @Black Doll Enthusiast: please see Commons:Derivative works. A photograph of a object is a 'derivative work' of that object. With a few well-defined exceptions, for a photograph to be published or uploaded to Commons, permission is needed from the photographer and from the owners of the copyrights of all the objects depicted. Owning an object does not mean that you own the copyright of that object. Sufficiently old objects are public domain, but the rules for 'sufficiently old' are complex. The rules for things first published in the USA are defined in Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States and are summarised in Commons:Hirtle chart. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - I always wonder whan I see arguments like the one above. Surely we all understand that we can make and sell copies of books that we own unless they are old enough to be out of copyright. Why then do some of us think that we can make photographs of copyrighted dolls and sell them?. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Jacques Nam died in 1974. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:956B:79ED:DB33:C119 09:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Jacques Nam died in 1974. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:956B:79ED:DB33:C119 09:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Jacques Nam died in 1974. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:956B:79ED:DB33:C119 09:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:38, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Constant Le Breton died in 1985. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:956B:79ED:DB33:C119 09:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Constant Le Breton died in 1985. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:956B:79ED:DB33:C119 09:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:41, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Suspected copyright violations: claimed own work, but File:The Wooden Floor's Annual Concert.jpg EXIF shows "Author STR, Kevin P. Casey" while File:John Heginbotham in residency for The Wooden Floor's Annual Concert.jpg EXIF shows "Author Christine Cotter".
- File:The Wooden Floor's Annual Concert.jpg
- File:John Heginbotham in residency for The Wooden Floor's Annual Concert.jpg
- File:David Dorfman in rehearsal with The Wooden Floor's students.jpg
- File:The Wooden Floor's Main Street Location in Santa Ana.jpg
- File:Opening Ceremony of Depot at Santiago.jpg
MKFI (talk) 11:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
©2006–2021 FAT TAIL INVESTMENT RESEARCH
- File:Ftir-banner-light.jpg
- File:FTIR editor callum-newman.jpg
- File:FTIR editor Greg Canavan.jpg
- File:Ryan Dinse.jpg
--Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Georges Pacouil died in 1997. Copyright violation. 2A01:CB00:A05:D100:78A4:9B84:94A5:6540 11:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Files from meeting Putin with Merkel (Kremlin.ru)
[edit]RIA Novosti is the copyright holder of these photos. This is clearly indicated in the links on the news pages (1, 2). The page about the use of site materials (1) says the following: All content on this site is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International. The present rules for using materials from this website do not apply to RIA Novosti photographs that MIA Russia Today is the copyright holder of, or to photographs the TASS News Agency is the copyright holder of, when such photographs are posted on the www.kremlin.ru website with an indication of the agency and author.
- File:Меркель-Путин 20.08.21 1.jpg
- File:Меркель-Путин 20.08.21 2.jpg
- File:Меркель-Путин 20.08.21 3.jpg
- File:Меркель-Путин 20.08.21 4.jpg
- File:Меркель-Путин 20.08.21 5.jpg
- File:Путин 20.08.21.jpg
Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 11:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not an MoD image: copyrighted to Camera Press in the metadata. OGL doesn't apply to third-party rights. DrKay (talk) 12:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment This means that other files located in the Category:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom in 2021 should also be nominated for deletion. Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 14:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- I've added one other copyrighted to Camera Press in the metadata. The others are either White House pictures or tagged in the metadata as Crown copyright. DrKay (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- This is a rather strange thing, since the notice published on their website says that the copyright belongs to the Ministry of Defense. Maybe we should save a smaller version of the photo? Roman Kubanskiy (talk) 08:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- I've added one other copyrighted to Camera Press in the metadata. The others are either White House pictures or tagged in the metadata as Crown copyright. DrKay (talk) 19:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Crown Copyright by itself not acceptable on Commons, see COM:CROWN. The other Royal Navy pictures in the category are acceptable because the 'Terms and conditions' link at the bottom of the source page links to a page with the statement www.royalnavy.mod.uk is published under the Open Government Licence, and you can reproduce information from the site as long as you obey the terms of that licence.[1] Verbcatcher (talk) 19:39, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW. The artist is probably this guy, not the photographer. BrightRaven (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. And no COM:FOP in Cambodia for any works created by living people. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW. The artist is probably this guy, not the photographer. BrightRaven (talk) 13:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. See also my input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bayon 0679 (27773820390).jpg. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Angkor Wat
[edit]Derivative works of artworks for sale at Angkor, Cambodia. The author of these artworks is not the photographer.
- File:Angkor Wat 0800 (28020153466).jpg
- File:Angkor Wat 0801 (27773804470).jpg
- File:Angkor Wat 0802 (28020153056).jpg
- File:Angkor Wat 0803 (27773803960).jpg
- File:Angkor Wat 0804 (27773782370).jpg
- File:Angkor Wat 0805 (27773803830).jpg
- File:Angkor Wat 0806 (27773803610).jpg
- File:Angkor Wat 0807 (28020152666).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
BrightRaven (talk) 13:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. See also my input at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bayon 0679 (27773820390).jpg, which also applies to these images. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:01, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Edu! as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Probable copyright infringement: Image has been visibly edited, has low resolution, and has no metadata. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work but copyvio: published on FB back in 2018, credited to "Jacas Photography + Spectrum Ph", see [2]. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Work is created by AP, so the work is no PD because was published outside of Peru DSan (talk) 15:40, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – the subject of the photo is actually misidentified; a reverse image search and the photo's metadata confirm the woman in the picture is Leona Gage, not Gladys Zender. Thus Peruvian copyright law is not applicable in this case. I was going to request a rename, but decided to inquire in the copyright help desk first (no answer yet). FlyingAce (talk) 16:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal and low-res vacation photo, focus on person, out of scope. Plenty of alternatives already on Commons. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Dries (Opdorp)
[edit]This village has a biannual statue exhibition. A temporary exhibition isn't excepted under com:FOP
- File:Kerkvlieger - panoramio.jpg
- File:Lente 2012 op den Dries - panoramio.jpg (can be cropped)
- File:Lente 2017 in Opdorp - 07 (33480946692).jpg
- File:Lente 2017 in Opdorp - 66 (33596771776).jpg
- File:Lente 2017 in Opdorp - 67 (33596768816).jpg
- File:Lente 2017 in Opdorp - 70 (33481036062).jpg
- File:Lente 2017 in Opdorp - 84 (32823656643).jpg
- File:Luc De Man (Opdorp 2017) (cropped).jpg
- File:Luc De Man (Opdorp 2017).jpg
- File:Opdorp, Lente 2015 (16390918724).jpg
- File:Werk van W. Jacobs voor de kerk van Opdorp - panoramio.jpg
- File:Lente 2017 in Opdorp - 79 (33637288365).jpg
- File:ZonneschilderOpdorp2.jpeg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Vera (talk) 18:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:51, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Not own works: historical images missing essential info: original author, source, date, and permission.
- File:Muzaffer Ozak Jerrahi Postnişîni.jpg
- File:Muzaffer Ozak sahaf.jpg
- File:Muzaffer Ozak Dergah.jpg
- File:Sahaflar Şeyhi Muzaffer Ozak.jpg
- File:Muzaffer Ozak.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Image is credited to the Max-Planck-Institut für extraterrestrische Physik (MPE). Their copyright policy states images can only be used for non-commercial purposes. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:52, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Collage of unsourced photos -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
It is listed by the uploader as his own work, but this is highly doubtful. Viloris (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artist died in 1961, still under copyright. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
It is listed by the uploader as his own work, but this is highly doubtful. Viloris (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artist died in 1961, still under copyright. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
It is listed by the uploader as his own work, but this is highly doubtful. Viloris (talk) 10:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artist died in 1961, still under copyright. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
screenshot of non-free software Ankry (talk) 11:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author ELXAN QENIYEV". OTRS permission needed. MKFI (talk) 11:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
I have uploaded the photo and it has typos. I will upload another one to replace it. Abd Alsattar Ardati (talk) 11:42, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I may have had to upload a new version of the photo instead of requesting a deletion. Abd Alsattar Ardati (talk) 11:48, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: yes, just re-upload/overwrite existing one. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:22, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
THese files all have EXIF "Author = hamanaka", which is not the name of the uploader. In order to keep them on Commons, hamanaka must provide confirmation that they are their uploads using VRT.
- File:Skar-Myren in May 2019 1.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in May 2019 2.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in May 2019 3.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in May 2019 4.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in May 2019 5.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
These are all small and have limited or no EXIF. Since they are all recent, if they were actually created by the uploaded, they would be larger and would have full EXIF.
- File:Lea Mathilde Skar-Myren in June 2014.jpg
- File:Leamyren.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in December 2020 2.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in December 2020 3.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in December 2020 4.jpg
- File:Skar-Myren in December 2020 7.jpg
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/josh mandel
[edit]Unintended and good-faith COM:FLICKRWASH. It seems implausible that the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers owns the rights to Josh Mandel's headshot. Please identify the actual source and license of this photo.
- File:OH- Sherrod Brown v. Josh Mandel on retirement security (cropped).jpg
- File:OH- Sherrod Brown v. Josh Mandel on retirement security.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Apparent copyright infringment - uploaded stating that the work is created by a person who is not an uploader Prokurator11 (talk) 14:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Apparent copyright infringment - uploaded stating that the work is created by a person who is not an uploader Prokurator11 (talk) 14:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Lower resolution duplicate of P 054--RSoF--Order Cross of Trinidad.jpg CzarJobKhaya (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
The uploader lists "supremecourt.gov" though no actual URL as source, but this appears to be a video screenshot and the SCOTUS website does not host video as far as I'm aware. More likely that the video is this one published by Reuters, which is not in the public domain. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:05, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:08, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Uploader cites whitehouse.gov as source but provides no URL to verify it. Plus, it was likely taken during the Trump administration so we won't find the image there anyway. Appears to be the photo the subject uses for his Twitter profile: https://twitter.com/AndrewHGiuliani/photo, but the uploader has not provided any evidence that it's the work of the White House. Ytoyoda (talk) 15:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:10, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:11, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:12, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
file in copyviol, not a free-use logo — danyele 15:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
In the describtion is stated "foto met goedkeuring van Pixturedk" (Photo with approval of Pixturedk), suggesting that it is not an own photo. To my opinion the photo has an incorrect or even false license The Banner (talk) 15:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
no source given Hoyanova (talk) 15:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Publié par erreur, inutilisé dans le futur Wikiliz972 (talk) 16:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion, G7. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted content, Not enough data attached - IndrajitDas 16:25, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Il existe un équivalent de qualité supérieure 
Wikiliz972 (talk) 16:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
copyvio, no right on text and images. Martin Sg. (talk) 19:06, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
There is an VRTS email received for “File:Cherry Foundation Bericht.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021082910002381. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:11, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
Kept: VRT ticket received. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Jenny-Rae-GOV 106-scaled.jpg
[edit]
No proof that uploader (User:Namaanster) owns copyright to campaign image. --SecretName101 (talk) 20:24, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Namaan works for the campaign, hence they uploaded the photo with the campaign tag on it. If you are going to continue to nominate all these photos for deletion, what is your solution? How is a campaign volunteer able to upload a photo to this website without it being nominated for deletion by you? What proof must they provide? I believe people should be able to see the faces of the candidates they vote for. Capisred (talk) 21:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: 19:49, 5 September 2021, by JuTa (No permission since 25 August 2021). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
old press photo Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, historic photo without essential info. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Duplicado da foto Edifício América 22.jpg DiogoBaptista (talk) 23:49, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:42, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GiangLy
[edit]- File:Logoyhbd.png
- Translation: Logo of VIMI (Vietnam Indigenous Medical Institute)
- Delete Logo of a non-notable institution. Article on Vietnamese Wikipedia was deleted. — Băng Tỏa (talk) 20:30, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Translation: Logo of VIMI (Vietnam Indigenous Medical Institute)
- File:Hành trình mùa xuân.jpg
- Translation: Spring voyage
- File:Bác Vũ Mão (nguyên Chủ nhiệm văn phòng Chính phủ) và Bác Hoàng Sầm (Chủ tịch Viện Y học bản địa Việt Nam).jpg
- Translation: Mr. Vũ Mão (former Chairman of Government Office) and Mr. Hoàng Sầm (Chairman of Vietnam Indigenous Medical Institute)
- File:Bà con dân tộc Dao chụp ảnh cùng đoàn khảo sát.jpg
- Translation: Dao ethnic minority people with the examiner (?)
- File:Du khách thắp nhang miếu Thủ Tài Mỉu.jpg
- Translation: Tourists praying at Thủ Tài Mỉu miếu
- File:Đường đi từ Hà Nội lên Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- Translation: From Hanoi to Tả Phìn Hồ
- File:Trang phục của người người H'mông và người Dao đỏ.jpg
- Translation: H'mong and Dao ethnic minority people's costume
- File:Nhà thơ Vũ Mao và bác sĩ Hoàng Sầm.jpg
- Translation: Poet Vũ Mao and Doctor Hoàng Sầm
- File:Du khách nước ngoài.jpg
- Translation: Foreigner tourists
- File:Đoàn du khách.jpg
- Translation: The tourists
- File:Đến Tả Phìn Hồ đi Chợ Thông Nguyên.png
- Translation: Thông Nguyên market at Tả Phìn Hồ
- File:Resort bên suối Phìn Hò Xoang.jpg
- File:Trang phục thiếu nữ H'Mông Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- Translation: Tả Phìn Hồ H'mong teen girl's costume
- File:Cầu sang resort.jpg
- Translation: Cầu sang resort
- File:Không khí se lạnh quanh năm tại Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- Translation: Common cold weather at Tả Phìn Hồ
- File:Trèo bè trên suối Phìn Hò Xoang.jpg
- Translation: Raft-rowing on Phìn Hò Xoang brook
- File:Cảnh đẹp Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- Translation: Tả Phìn Hồ beautiful scene
- File:Locot trên đỉnh Bèng Bọ.jpg
- Translation: The tent on mount Bèng Bọ
- File:Check in bên suối Phìn Hò Xoang.jpg
- Translation: (Take a) "check-in" image next to Phìn Hò Xoang brook
_v%C3%A0_B%C3%A1c_Ho%C3%A0ng_S%E1%BA%A7m_(Ch%E1%BB%A7_t%E1%BB%8Bch_Vi%E1%BB%87n_Y_h%E1%BB%8Dc_b%E1%BA%A3n_%C4%91%E1%BB%8Ba_Vi%E1%BB%87t_Nam).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Most of these file does not have any metadata, and the uploader seems to have conflict of interest (promoting for Tả Phìn Hồ (a travel destination) and Vietnam Indigenous Medical Institute (an organization which invest in the place)). The rest of theirs hardly have any evidence of copyright status. Unnamed UserName me 14:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not own works; includes Google Maps screenshots and images with transmission code in EXIF data. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own works: disparate sizes, quality, and styles, missing or inconsistent EXIF data and many with transmission code. Even includes Google Map screenshot as own work. Unreliable uploader. (I excluded the few high-res images with full EXIF data.)
- File:Chòi nghỉ chân Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Thịt treo Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Rắn lục hoa Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Rắn xanh Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Bọ cánh cam Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Bướm lạ Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Cây Ngọc Am Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Dây bầu rừng Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Liếm lưỡi cày nung đỏ.jpg
- File:Phụ nữ người Dao Làn Tiẻn.jpg
- File:Trang phục thiếu nữ người Dao trong ngày cưới.jpg
- File:Sâm Vũ Diệp Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Ruộng bậc thang Bản Phùng.jpg
- File:Toàn cảnh resort Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Lan Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Biển mây Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Sớm mai trên bản Phùng.jpg
- File:Trang phục người Mông Tả Phìn Hồ.png
- File:Trang phục người Dao đỏ.png
- File:Nướng gà bên Thác Năng Lượng.jpg
- File:Ẩm thực Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Khe nước trong rừng.jpg
- File:Cảnh đẹp thác năng lượng.jpg
- File:Cảnh Thác Năng Lượng.jpg
- File:Phiên chợ xã Nậm Ty.jpg
- File:Cây Ngải Tiên.jpg
- File:Matcha từ chè Shan tuyết Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Thảo Quả.jpg
- File:Phiên chợ tại Nậm Ty.jpg
- File:Trang phục người H'mông.jpg
- File:Thác Năng Lượng Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Săn mây Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Bầu trời Tả Phìn Hồ chiều đông.jpg
- File:Nhảy lửa cúng hồn.jpg
- File:Phiên chợ Nậm Ty.jpg
- File:Trang phục người H'mông trên Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Dong riềng đỏ.jpg
- File:Thác Năng Lượng.jpg
- File:Núi trời Tả Phìn Hồ.png
- File:Chiều tà Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Người dân thu hái chè Shan tuyết.jpg
- File:Lan Kim Tuyến Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Rừng nguyên sinh Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Chè Shan tuyết Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Đường đi Tả Phìn Hồ.png
- File:Vườn ươm Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Đón ánh nắng tại Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Buổi sáng mùa đông Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Resort bên suối.jpg
- File:Nhảy lửa.jpg
- File:Mùa lúa trên đường lên Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Địu con xem hội thảo.jpg
- File:Tả Phìn Hồ về đêm.jpg
- File:Hoa chè.jpg
- File:Cảnh hoàng hôn Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Cảnh mây núi Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Chòi nghỉ Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Dọc đường lên Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Suối cá Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Trẻ em người H'mông.jpg
- File:Cảnh suối Tả Phìn Hồ.jpg
- File:Đỉnh Bành Bọ.jpg
- File:Miếu Cụ Nùng Thị Mao.png
- File:Đám cưới của người Dao.jpg
- File:Miếu Thủ Tài Mỉu.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Unnamed UserName me 08:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:20, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo
Needs discussion to decide its COM:TOO status. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, false licenses, questionable TOO -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo. COM:TOO? Note: Logo of Santos Laguna. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:45, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted false license, questionable TOO. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
The file is obvious nonsense. Speedy deletion was rejected. -120.150.121.92 04:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Blatant false description as troll/prank/personal joke. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO Australia --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:28, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; also false license claim -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:16, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Violação dos Direiros de autor Ribeiro2002Rafael (talk) 13:15, 26 August 2021 (UTC) en:Violation of copyright Ribeiro2002Rafael (talk) 18:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo. To discuss: COM:TOO? King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:51, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Apparent false license, questionable TOO. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
no evidence that uploader holds copyright to this image SecretName101 (talk) 20:19, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work (F1). --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:53, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate (only B&W) copy of File:Гайдамак (акварель Н.С. Самокиша).jpg Very trivial (talk) 00:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Want to add that the filename incorrectly names "UkraInian" as well. --Very trivial (talk) 21:45, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - COM:REDUNDANT: unused and lower quality. If BW is needed, a better version could probably be made from the other file. -M.nelson (talk) 10:41, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. Image is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Duplicate of pre-existing SVG version of file CzarJobKhaya (talk) 02:26, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, redundant with File:Coat of arms of the Principality of Trinidad.svg -M.nelson (talk) 10:42, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and remark. Image is not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 22:26, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Logo. Claimed to be PD-textlogo by uploader, so needs a discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:46, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Delete If Commons has details of TOO in Algeria, I have not been able to find it. Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Algeria. Looks like a good bit of original input rather than simple geometry. Unless we have info that this is allowed by Algeria copyright law, precautionary delete. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:04, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Algeria does not have a section about TOO, so it is possibly above threshold and copyrighted. So it is has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 22:28, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Foto don't used anywhere. Wiki is not a hosting. Изображение нигде не используется. Kursant504 (talk) 09:56, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Информация может пригодиться... Но сейчас согласен с предложением об удалении. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ser-mil (talk • contribs) 10:34, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per uploader comment above -M.nelson (talk) 10:54, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was previously nominated for Copyvio by Buidhe and the most recent rationale was License review NOT passed: Both video and archived video are unavailable so it is impossible to confirm the source of the image. Contributers2020Talk to me here 16:07, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- What I think is, not passing License Review and the sources unavailable doesn't mean its a Copyvio. Copyvio has a meaning, which is- Copyvio is an often-used speedy deletion tag used for files that are obvious and blatant copyright violations. This is not a blatant copyright violation. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 16:14, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- We can delete this. I think I screenshotted a frame from this video, which was made by VOA, so I assumed that it was public domain. However, back then, I didn't realize that not all footage in VOA videos are necessarily created by VOA. They might use footage from other sources.--FutureTrillionaire (talk) 08:49, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ManFromNord as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://visualrian.ru/media/76567.html. I am unable to read Russian so I have no idea whether Commons:RIA Novosti applies here. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:41, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, not every photo published by RIA Novosti is free, but only those in Commons:RIA Novosti and its subpages. As this is not the case, the photo must be deleted. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ligue Nationale Basket (talk · contribs)
[edit]These two images were tagged for speedy deletion by Glorious 93. I noticed on French Wikipedia that there is a ticket Ticket:2021041410008731 verifying their identity, but I am unable to read it. @Mattho69: Could you please check the ticket and confirm if any actions (edits/uploads) taken by this account are considered to be duly licensed by the LNB under the Wikimedia clickwrap?
King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:52, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Hi. I checked the OTRS ticket. Error by the uploader. These files should be stored on :fr only. I uploaded them on :fr; they must now be deleted here on Commons. Zetud (talk) 22:26, 25 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Zetud: Could you please move it to permissions-fr so I can see it? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- @King of Hearts: Done. See item 4. On :fr; on the page to import a file, there is a special process for logos, but new contributors are not aware as they don't read the page up to the end. Zetud (talk) 10:45, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- @Zetud: Could you please move it to permissions-fr so I can see it? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:20, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:25, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pandakekok9 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Multiple matching images on Google Images and TinEye. Very unlikely to be the own work of the uploader. Not sure if this is copyrightable. This looks a lot like an auto-generated chord diagram from visualization software, based on uncopyrightable data. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:36, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, copyrightable. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Licensing issues. Richard C. Duncan (originator of the Olduvai Theory) is listed as the author, but there is no evidence that he has licensed this image for use on Wikimedia Commons. The image appears to originate from the karlnorth.com blog in the filename, specifically http://karlnorth.com/?p=978, but if Karl North is the author there's no evidence that he has licensed the image for use on Wikimedia Commons either. The image does not appear in the pdf given by the tinyurl.com link within the image. The most likely explanation is that this image was grabbed from the linked blog post, and is a copyvio. Apocheir (talk) 21:09, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Other uploads by the same user are suspect as well:
- File:Http mikebert.neocities.org Amer-sec-cycles.gif was probably stolen from the URL in the filename.
- File:Robber-barons2.png is clearly not the user's "own work", unless this user is very old. It's a dupe of File:The Bosses of the Senate by Joseph Keppler.jpg.
- -Apocheir (talk) 21:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:20, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
Vermutlich nicht "eigenes Werk" - passende Lizenz für so ein Logo verfügbar? Xocolatl (talk) 09:20, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
- Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren,
beigefügt finden Sie die Urkunde für das Logo-Bild. Wir hoffen, dass das für die Erstellung des Artikels ausreicht.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
O. Bilokonenko im Nahmen von MILRAM-Team — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lenahh21 (talk • contribs) 14:03, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
Question for admins - is File:MILRAM Urkunde Logo.pdf sufficient proof that the above user has permission to re-license this logo? Or do they need to contact COM:VRT? -M.nelson (talk) 10:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The document uploaded seems to relate to the trademark registration. This is a totally different trajectory then the publishing the logo with a free licence. @Lenahh21: please follow the procedure outlined on VRT to show you are the owner of the copyright of the logo. If succesfull, the image can be undeleted. I will nominate the document for deletion, because it also contains an image of the copyrighted logo. --Ellywa (talk) 18:46, 10 March 2022 (UTC)
