Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/08/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 18th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

archivo dañado POLVORA C (talk) 00:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a photograph of a likely copyrighted screen, station identification seems to be in the corner. Ytoyoda (talk) 02:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is a photo of the monitor screen, however this photo was taken from the monitor within the TV set of the very same show; therefore it is a « technical screen » not a « user TV scree » if this is a problem why not crop the TV logo at the top right corner User:Goldive (talk) 02:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Unless you are the copyright holder of the television program, you do not have authority to grant license of a screnshot, however taken. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published in Germany. The book cannot be PD in US before 2041 Ankry (talk) 06:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it possible to note somewhere to retake this automatically after 2041? After such long time we may forget about this file and automatic retaking could be helpful. Superjurek (talk) 07:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Can we verify that the author died before 1971? Ankry (talk) 07:54, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
per File:PL Zakopane New Cem Chmielowska Maria.jpg PD in Poland in 2054. Ankry (talk) 19:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Ankry (talk) 19:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porn picture, not really useful. Title "a teen boy erect penis" possibly indicates child pornography? 202.131.73.204 08:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Caption claims over 18, but "teen boy" is indeed unfortunately suggestive if not actually indicative. Human anatomy and sexuality is within project scope, but Commons has no need for random penis selfies. Only contribution by uploader. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, previously published on a 2013 Pakistani postage stamp,[1] and on a 2018 audiobook cover.[2] Verbcatcher (talk) 08:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, CV, fraudulent claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, looks like a web or TV capture, small image without camera metadata, uploader has uploaded other questionable images Verbcatcher (talk) 08:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of Google Maps. Obviously not in CC license. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · 12:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tundow1090 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE fantasy flags and symbols; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". No obvious purpose, let alone educational. The user's only contributions.

GPinkerton (talk) 12:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom; private fantasy illustrations, OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Re-uploaded after being deleted should have been deleted along with similar file @ Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of a fiction nazi country.png. GPinkerton (talk) 13:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source + no information on who Charalampos of Thessaloniki is, so not educational. Veverve (talk) 10:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Educational, Charalampos of Thessaloniki is a published author. Source: Source: Amazon.com
While worthy to mention, user requested file deletion it's been blocked by Wikimedia Commons on the grounds of : creating bad deletion requests after warnings. See here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Veverve
This user is currently blocked. The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
13:01, 16 August 2021 Taivo talk contribs blocked Veverve talk contribs with an expiration time of 1 week (account creation blocked) (creating bad deletion requests after warnings)--Charalampe (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Charalampe: I have been unblocked.
Could you explain what your source for this image is? Is it the Amazon page?
I found this image uploaded in 2019 on the alleged Facebook page of the person. In the image description on Facebook, there is no mention of it being an official symbol. It is must also be assumed the image is copyrighted, so you cannot reproduce it and upload it on WCommons.
Also, Charalampos of Thessaloniki is self-published, not published. Anyone can self-publish themselves, so it is not a criteria of notability. However, notability is not important on WCommons; I did not say the person was no notable enough.
In a nutshell: a) if it is the person's official symbol, it cannot be on WCommons, as it is copyrighted; b) if it is not this person's official symbol, then it cannot be on WCommons, as it would be an original creation which serves no purpose.
As a sidenote, it seems this logo is a derivative of File:Greek Orthodox Churches' flag modified to resemble the emblem of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.svg and File:Palaiologos-Dynasty-Eagle.svg. Veverve (talk) 10:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
After you and other trolls did a personal attack on wikipedia, you only getting bad reputation for the Russan Church which could cause damage just because you made personal attacks out of your radical actions, and you been paid to do so. Have fun. All i did was to lure you (plural) out. So i recommend "speedy delete". And there is registered copyright of this image, prior to any derived work you suggested. --Charalampe (talk) 12:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Charalampe: Just so we are clear: do you claim your upload I DRed is a copyright violation? Veverve (talk) 12:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am the owner of this image file and i do want to delete it. Charalampe (talk) 13:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, No indication of legitimate in scope usefulness, uploader concurs with deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Julius C (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flag "proposals"; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". There are nice ideas, but they are beyond the project's scope

GPinkerton (talk) 13:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted, per nom, with exceptions of two which have found use outside of user space, File:Flag of Peace (Proposal).PNG and File:Flag of the Aral Sea (Proposal).png. (While I have closed those two as kept, this is not to prejudge more narrow future requests for deletion - a quick look at usage of the 2nd image suggests the use may be questionable.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be unpublished. — Racconish💬 13:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • I do. She's my relative. She got killed in action in the Warsaw Uprising of 1944. Apart from my home archive the photo of her has been on her tomb at Powązki Cemetery in Warsaw, Poland since 1955. A cemetery is public domain, isn't it. https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katarzyna_Borowi%C5%84ska Taurus234

Kept: I withdraw my nomination. — Racconish💬 14:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has an incorret name. The lowercase “o” shouldn’t be there Vittoriochichia (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: In the future, you can just add {{Rename}} rather than uploading a duplicate file. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

due to being blocked for editing SidraRanaAdv (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deleted per COM:CSD#U1. -- CptViraj (talk) 10:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 10:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 10:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 10:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 10:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 10:08, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 07:11, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused random and repetitive photos of w:North Luzon Expressway that are more personal snapshots-like nature. They cannot be normally used in all Wikimedia pages, articles, and sites, and I doubt these are usable outside Wikimedia too. They also focus on random spots of a short part of the road and not the whole views like File:9711North Luzon Expressway Guiguinto section 26.jpg and File:JfBulacan9897ChapelMarilaoLiasfvf 29.JPG (of which their categories have abundance of wide views of the expressway itself, whether from the overpasses or from front or back of the vehicles). A few useful ones have been moved to more decent categories: Category:Bocaue diamond interchange (Fortunato Halili Avenue – Bocaue and Santa Maria), Category:North Luzon Expressway (Guiguinto segment), and Category:Santa Rita, Guiguinto, Bulacan Exit - Kilometer No. 38 (Partial cloverleaf interchange, North Luzon Expressway). The rest: COM:SPAM-like photos that are best confined at Facebook.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:56, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image of table depicting chemical & physical properties of methyl acetate. I have replaced it with wiki-table on Disolventes en la Industria Química/Ésteres as its only use case. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:16, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant to both File:0880jfBocaue Exit Toll Plaza M. Villarica Road Marilao San Jose Del Monte Road Loma de Gatofvf 03.jpg (which better shows the tollgate structure) and File:0880jfBocaue Exit Toll Plaza M. Villarica Road Marilao San Jose Del Monte Road Loma de Gatofvf 05.jpg (which better shows the list of toll fees, albeit relatively outdated now). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:12, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smleimbach (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejandro2018PDP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:47, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alejandro2018PDP (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo/flag. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 16:48, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AJMAL K VARODE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of the project scope file

MdsShakil (talk) 16:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 19:58, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PR Issue. This image is uproaded to promote unnotable virtual money brand Reiro (talk) 08:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by JuTa. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader works for an advertising company and is writing on commission an article on the pictured person. The photograph has an uncertain provenience because it's claimed as "archive photograph (where?) and the claimed author is...the pictured person himself. More than enough for assuming that , at least, this photo lacks of information about its copyright status Blackcat 10:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:53, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TokiyoBR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khaliljaan99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope (COM:SELFIE)

MdsShakil (talk) 14:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:54, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original page was deleted. So I nominated my own cropped version Gag0409 (talk) 14:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope file —MdsShakil (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reliable source supporting the accuracy of the photograph. The only source I can find is this tweet, which does not explain how are where the photo comes from. 2405:201:4013:80F1:F8B8:786:FEF7:CD1C 15:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 15:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 16:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:55, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 16:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Sahaib3005 (talk) 16:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. Unusual personal photos —MdsShakil (talk) 16:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://king-gear.com/articles/1174 and credited to Yoshimoto Holdings Group, albeit at a lower resolution. If you are the owner of the image, please provide a copyright statement via COM:OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope. (COM:SELFIE) —MdsShakil (talk) 16:28, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project scope file —MdsShakil (talk) 16:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos —MdsShakil (talk) 16:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 16:25, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and unused. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Uploaded for self promotion in wikidata. Yahya (talk) 19:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality - no realistic use, so out of Commons scope MPF (talk) 22:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete too poor quality to have any use. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file, out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   22:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 22:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This svg map is already made TylerKutschbach (talk) 00:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This svg map was already made. TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 10:58, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Another duplicate of the Postmann Michael map, which is highly inaccurate, showing purported enclaves of sizable German minorities in places where they simply do not exist (this can be verified by checking census data from countries such as Poland, Czech Rep, and Slovakia). As such, there are no reliable sources cited to back up any of the claims this map makes. Finally, the editor responsible for the original version of this map Postmann Michael, had several of his maps already deleted, and was banned from the German Wikipedia on 25 May 2006 for "POV from doubtful sources and trivializing National Socialism. (link) E-960 (talk) 07:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, in this case, it should also be deleted. - --GizzyCatBella (talk) 23:28, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
A problematic map, we need to cleanup so many similar ORish ones... --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 04:58, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 16:50, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please remove the image. AliBag (talk) 20:04, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image of questionable scope and permission, requested by uploader. --King of ♥ 05:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:21, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:07, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:36, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:20, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:34, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:21, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:31, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:32, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 06:13, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:30, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 10:40, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, replaced. --P 1 9 9   15:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не является собственной работой. Рисунок - производное от чужого изображения. Not your own job. Drawing - a derivative of another's image. Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Enzyme_structure.svg Kursant504 (talk) 04:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is A selfie Comtesse d'Autodidactica (talk) 05:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; Out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as own work. Doubt this is the author’s own work. It’s a selfie, a clear copyvio Xclusivzik (talk) 21:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; no exif. PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 10:47, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не является собственной работой. Рисунок - производное от чужого изображения. Not your own job. Drawing - a derivative of another's image. Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lock_and_key.png Kursant504 (talk) 04:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не является собственной работой. Рисунок - производное от чужого изображения. Not your own job. Drawing - a derivative of another's image. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Inducedfit080.png Kursant504 (talk) 04:39, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не является собственной работой. Рисунок - производное от чужого изображения. Not your own job. Drawing - a derivative of another's image. Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cartoon_of_protein_hydrophobic_interaction.jpg Kursant504 (talk) 04:42, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 02:34, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Either out of COM:SCOPE (as an unremarkable supermarket mall building) or a violation of architect's copyright as there is no FOP in the Philippines. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 15:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Race Car 40 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans of old photos and 2 from FB - needs OTRS

Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From TP:
The scans of the photos suggested for deletion were commissioned by Jim Derhaag when he owned Derhaag Motorsports as part of its PR campaign. As such, they are his property and used in this Wikipedia page at his request.

The two photos attributed to Richard Martin are his and used here, specifically on the Jim Derhaag Wikipedia page, with his permission

@Race Car 40: In future please comment here Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:40, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faiyan Fahim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope

MdsShakil (talk) 10:43, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:38, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work given watermark, widely available on social media Evaders99 (talk) 21:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been created for the purpose of vandalism/attack. Larry Hockett (talk) 22:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 02:37, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo stated as own work. No usage on Wikimedia projects. No obvious educational use therefore out of Commons:Project scope. mattbr 04:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- 20:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Не является собственной работой. Рисунок - производное от чужого изображения. Not your own job. Drawing - a derivative of another's image. Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Enzyme_Model.svg Kursant504 (talk) 04:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per DMacks-- 20:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo concept, no encyclopedic value. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- 20:41, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pie chart with no evidence of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:59, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Can you delete my file Aaron106 (talk) 03:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The original uplaode has known to upload images with improper source and there's obvious watermark. I tracked the original and found the real author. See also the relatively same case: File:Area Benteng Portugis Jepara.JPG. AnsyahF (talk) 04:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:46, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files formerly using Attribution-TRGov-Military-Navy

[edit]

At Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Attribution-TRGov-Military-Navy the template {{Attribution-TRGov-Military-Navy}} was deleted as the VRT ticket this template relied upon was invalid and could not be corrected in the nine months the DR was open. Absent a VRT ticket, by default media from TR navy sites do not meet COM:L, as, for example Türkiye Deniz Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı says "© 2021 Deniz Kuvvetleri Komutanlığı". The following files relied exclusively on {{Attribution-TRGov-Military-Navy}} for their license, and now after the template deletion they lack a license.

RP88 (talk) 05:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete File:Sadik altincan.jpg: In this photo, the person is the Naval Forces Commander (and Oramiral rank, please see look at the rank on his arm.) of Republic of Turkey. (He works as Naval Forces Commander in 1950-1957, as oramiral in 1955-1957). So this photo appears that it has been taken between 1955 and 1957. This person is the 2nd Commander of the Turkish Navy.
    File:ZekiOzak.jpg This person is the 4th Commander of the Turkish Navy. In this photo, he is the Koramiral (he works in this role in 1955-1961) and probably is the Naval Forces Commander. (he works in this role in 1960-1961). So this photo appears that it has been taken between 1955 and 1961. The other commanders are Oramiral and Naval Forces Commander after 1960, so detailed comments aren't need for them. Operation and naval exercise images are copyrighted. Now, I suggest deleting because OTRS permission is also not valid. Uncitoyen (talk) 21:44, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:53, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 09:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Personal photo. Out of COM:SCOPE. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 18:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, seems to be purely OR (a screenshot from a text document). Images are likely not made by the uploader, potential copyright violation. Only here to displays the uploader's personnal ideas COM:NOTHOST. Veverve (talk) 09:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:56, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusual personal photos. Out of the project scope (COM:SELFIE) —MdsShakil (talk) 10:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:57, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused pie chart with no evidence of importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 11:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:58, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE low-resolution fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 12:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:59, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il contient le nom d'un site internet et le nom de la personne. L'Élan Wallon (talk) 15:22, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Writing the name of your website across a 110 year old postcard image doesn't generate a new copyright. This is still PD through age. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See also: File:Chateau de farciennes carte postale.jpg We can keep either both of these, or neither. Their copyright status is the same.
Also this image is an upload by the nominator here, and is apparently the same source image, with a crop to remove the watermark. If that's what you want to do, then fine, but just leave it as a new upload under the same title as before. We do not need a second upload of the same image, especially not followed by a deletion request (which has little point other than to irritate the original uploader). Andy Dingley (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Version with added watermark frame Deleted as redundant and false attribution; other version kept as in-scope free licensed. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:05, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused fictitious flag. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:24, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. I was the uploader. Back when I uploaded this, I was relatively new to Commons and was mostly just happy to find an image that met copyright requirements. While fictional flags are not inherently banned from Commons, this one does not have any special notability or significance. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)  17:17, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per above-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No puse los derechos a quien le pertenece LDAM19 (talk) 19:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE user-generated "concept" flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:28, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:27, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag ("of an imaginary time when the United States is taken over by the Islamic Republic"); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:30, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No la subi correctamente LDAM19 (talk) 19:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:31, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vandalism, probably not own work [3] Boylarva99 (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:33, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag ("bandera ficticia"); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:42, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:34, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". Not a serious flag proposal, just of one of thousands pulled from Reddit. GPinkerton (talk) 19:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated flag ("flag suggestion"); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:35, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE poor quality low resolution fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 19:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 20:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the recent article I uploaded 2 pictures, but since I am new to the site, made a few mistakes as to copyright. I have permission from the author to use them, but mistakenly chose wrong licence and thus it says those are my photos, which are not. Could you help me delete them? So I can reupload properly. Sorry for the mess RinaRi102 (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the recent article I uploaded 2 pictures, but since I am new to the site, made a few mistakes as to copyright. I have permission from the author to use them, but mistakenly chose wrong licence and thus it says those are my photos, which are not. Could you help me delete them? So I can reupload properly. Sorry for the mess RinaRi102 (talk) 21:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per prompt uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

news site copy https://www.google.com/search?q=Belterra&rlz=1C1GCEA_enBR853BR853&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi8xJezyrvyAhUPFrkGHXTbCrUQ_AUoAnoECAEQBA&biw=1360&bih=625#imgrc=cuP1o54hMOcohM&imgdii=AUl-zN5thBQk_M Samuel Quinto (talk) 22:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:42, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

news site copy http://noticiasdesantarem.blogspot.com/2011/07/festa-em-mojui.html Samuel Quinto (talk) 22:16, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 19:44, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 08:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of COM:SCOPE. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 18:26, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Bestand is niet gemaakt door de uploader maar "van het internet geplukt" Saschaporsche (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that an earlier nomination (for copyvio) was removed by the uploader here. I have a WP:PAID-concern. The Banner (talk) 09:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. If ever VRT ticket has been received, then undelete it. --P 1 9 9   02:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I highly doubt if this picture is truly made by the uploader. Seems like work of a paid editor, desperately protecting his work/job. With the uploader removing the nomination of another picture, I have to distrust this one too. Note: uploader is also removing AfD-templates on the Dutch Wikipedia The Banner (talk) 09:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:16, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article signed by Philip Graves who died in 1953, not PD before 2024. — Racconish💬 10:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the deletion as the initial uploader rubin16 (talk) 11:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:17, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and badly pixelated. Not used in any project because there is a SVG version. Andrei (talk) 11:48, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and badly pixelated. Not used in any project because there is a SVG version. Andrei (talk) 11:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of an old pamphlet/print. TrangaBellam (talk) 11:52, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:18, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Euripides ψ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE "fictional" flags; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".

GPinkerton (talk) 12:55, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:19, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jmjriz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE symbols and imagery; violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. No evidence of permission for photographs which are unlikely to be user's own work (and are not explicitly so described). No obvious educational purpose.

GPinkerton (talk) 13:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and User:Tuvalkin. --P 1 9 9   02:20, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion Lotje (talk) 13:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --P 1 9 9   02:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 13:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:32, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 14:34, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:22, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dontsweatite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, no educational purpose, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 15:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Also needs permission from Frank Trampe (the copyright holder per metadata) via COM:VRT. howdy.carabao (talk) 19:29, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:23, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused unencyclopedic personal image, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 15:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:24, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; Not educationally useful Itsfullofstars (talk) 18:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope; Not educationally useful Itsfullofstars (talk) 18:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rmccormcack123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag and map; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".

GPinkerton (talk) 18:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:25, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DavidKelemen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Avowedly out of COM:SCOPE fictional flags ("This is a flag that i made for my fictional world"); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".

GPinkerton (talk) 18:59, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not used meaningfully. --P 1 9 9   02:26, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UtDicitur (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags ("proposals"); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".

GPinkerton (talk) 19:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:27, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flag (for the uploader's very own micronation, apparently); violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 20:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not used meaningfully. --P 1 9 9   02:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low-quality duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:EvaHerman01_web.jpg FMSky (talk) 23:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: Out of COM:SCOPE. --ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 23:17, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Quark.  Delete: Per nom., very poor quality. --Achim (talk) 10:33, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@ the IP: did you click the wrong picture, i'm talking about this one: File:EvaHerman01 web cropped.jpg ----FMSky (talk) 12:01, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   02:29, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy form usmagazineMdsShakil (talk) 14:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete Stock image by Rob Latour/Shutterstock. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 18:54, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 16:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A larger resolution version found here - https://mcsc.it-security-munich.net/ - we need OTRS Gbawden (talk) 12:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: needs OTRS permission. --Materialscientist (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Das Foto ist veraltet Corinna-oldenburg (talk) 07:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Kein Löschgrund. --Achim (talk) 08:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Close as Kept. "Outdated" is not a reason for deletion. Commons documents past times and places as well as current appearance. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:25, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploader's request/ as per: WP:BLPPRIVACY Gpkp (talk) 12:03, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:29, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE fictional flag; violation of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host". GPinkerton (talk) 13:50, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:30, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

загружено новое изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 14:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

загружено новое изображение Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Uploader request -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:33, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As described by the uploader this file is a WWII movie scene/poster and clearly not "Own Work" and they are clearly not the copyright holder as claimed 2405:201:4013:80F1:F8B8:786:FEF7:CD1C 14:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted false license -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:34, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As described by the uploader this file is a WWII movie scene/poster and clearly not "Own Work" and they are clearly not the copyright holder as claimed 2405:201:4013:80F1:F8B8:786:FEF7:CD1C 14:51, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scene from this movie: en:Tomka and His Friends --Albinfo (talk) 11:32, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted false license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uneducational screenshot, out of scope ManniLo (talk) 15:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain which part of the acknowledged scope explanation is missed? It's an historical screenshot and belongs to an article about this website. At the moment it's removed from the article, but maybe it will enrich the article one day. --StefanMachwirth (talk) 17:53, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted License claim not supported by source site. (Was not in use.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:51, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Boa tarde! Esse arquivo foi incluido por engano por mim. Peço a gentileza de exclusão! 189.10.163.10 18:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept. Anon request, not by uploader account; photo has been on Commons for a decade; no evident problem with in-scope photo; in use in multiple projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:59, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foi incluída por engano por mim mesmo! 189.10.163.10 19:03, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In use, uploaded 10 years ago. If you are uploader User:Romeu wartchow junior log in please. --Achim55 (talk) 19:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:43, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

THIS PHOTO WAS INSERTED BY MISTAKE BY MYSELF. I ASK FOR THE KINDNESS TO DELETE! 189.10.163.10 17:43, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Boa tarde! Esta foto é pessoal e foi inserida por engano! Necessito que seja excluída! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wartchow (talk • contribs) 17:59, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Boa tarde! Esse arquivo foi incluido por engano por mim. Peço a gentileza de exclusão! 189.10.163.10 18:07, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as kept. Anon request, not by uploader account; photo has been on Commons for a decade; no evident problem with in-scope photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foi incluída por engano por mim mesmo! 189.10.163.10 19:02, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you are uploader User:Romeu wartchow junior log in please. --Achim55 (talk) 19:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:44, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

THIS PHOTO WAS INSERTED BY MISTAKE BY MYSELF. I ASK FOR THE KINDNESS TO DELETE! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 189.10.163.10 (talk) 17:42, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VictorHVM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE user-generated fantasy flags ("proposed" and "not official"); violations of COM:NOTHOST, COM:SELFIE, COM:EV. A realistic educational purpose is a policy requirement for all Commons files. All files with no such purpose must be deleted: "Wikimedia Commons is not your personal free web host".

GPinkerton (talk) 20:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom. Some were in use in multiple projects, but a bit of research showed they were not actual flags of those governments, some of which use quite different flags and symbols. Personal fiction, OOS; use in article space was misleading if not outright fraudulent. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of me, I dont want it online, and searchable on google, please take down from your website. 184.144.159.84 21:02, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted personal photo uploaded 6 years ago by user with no more resent contributions; unused and no evident in-scope usefulness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:12, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am a creator of this page and I don't wanna see this photo on this page. I didn't give any permission to anybody to post this photo. Please delete it. Thank you. 83.220.239.209 22:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept, screenshot of free-licensed video showing in-scope person. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:46, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

incorrect copyright JohnS133444 (talk) 22:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Close as Kept; nomination removed by nominator from image page, apparent withdrawl of nomination -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:48, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 13:26, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation COM:FOP Russia. Maxinvestigator (talk) 05:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:20, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains my picture and name without my consent 199.71.239.39 17:57, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Event where you smiled for the camera. No reason to delete. --Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' copyright. Created after 2010. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение этой картины Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 06:31, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

есть лучшее изображение этой картины Kosov vladimir 09071967 (talk) 12:14, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request, image is not in use. per COM:COURTESY. --Ellywa (talk) 17:11, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ToprakM as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Very likely not own work. King of ♥ 03:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1990s photo from 2007 magazine, unsupported cc-by-4.0 license claim, apparent DW CV. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1975 photo from 2001 book, "unknown author". Unsupported cc-by-4.0 license claim. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 05:12, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. 60 videos from a non-notable Japanese roleplaying channel with less than 5000 subscribers. Maybe if the videos contained photos of notable people it could be useful, but even then they could just be grabbed from YouTube, no need to download every video. Not only these but there is a lot of copyrighted content, such as the watermarks, etc, where there is no indication of the license these are released under. If these files are deleted the relevant category, Category:Videos by numan.tokyo, should also be.

Berrely • TC 15:36, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

, and Commons does not have the "notability" requirement of source-channel imposed by many of the Wikipedia sites (see the differences between Wikipedia policies and Commons' ones ), so not out of scope (the videos have categories of the voice actors). also,CC license is irrevocable, and the videos have archived license information. (see "source" section of the videos) Puramyun31 (talk) 15:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

    • p.s. some of the videos has successfully been reviewed already, this is an example.(reviewed by Shizhao, AntiCompositeNumber) Puramyun31 (talk) 16:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      COM:SCOPE says that files must be "realistically useful for an educational purpose" and that they require "realistic utility, either for one of the Wikimedia projects or for some other educational use". Mass-downloading YouTube videos (as you have done hundreds of times) before, from YouTube channels that will likely never be used on any Wikimedia project (I very much there is a need for a Wikipedia article to have a gallery of 60 videos). Just because something "contains information of a part of Japanese pop culture" is incredibly vague and doesn't mean it falls under Commons scope. I could say a drawing I made of a politician doing some stupid thing "contains information as part of political culture", but I am very sure that would not provide use to Commons. Mass uploading videos from a YouTube channel just because Wikimedia projects have articles, etc. on them doesn't mean it offers educational value. Say PewDiePie made all of his content CC-BY; I very much doubt uploading every one of his videos would offer educational value or would legitimately be in use.
      Sure, if an article on the subject of the video exists, it might be sutiable to upload that video, but no article uses any of these, and even then, a few videos would be enough, not 60 of them. — Berrely • TC 17:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is no restriction ("If an article on the subject of the video exists, ...") like "one-article minimum" for free media files because files on Commons can also be used outside of Wikimedia projects for talking about Japanese anime/manga culture (that's why files on Commons are freely licensed). and there are no duplicates on the uploads, so keep all. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How is the English Wikipedia's non-free content guideline in any way related to this...? — Berrely • TC 17:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't intend to make a suggestion such as "adopt fair use" but I tell the use of files on Commons on other Wikimedia projects such as Wikipedia articles ("If an article on the subject of the video exists, ...") is not necessarily demanded to offer educational value because files on Commons can also be used outside of Wikimedia projects (for providing information of Japanese anime/manga culture and talking about the matter in this case. the videos not simply depict private life of the subjects, and there are no duplicates on the uploads) Puramyun31 (talk) 18:35, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

people depicted in these videos appear to be notable -- that's enough educational value.
however, some videos like File:高橋健介さん撮り下ろしコメント動画【numan】沼落ち5秒前!-俳優編第23回-.webm should have been uploaded with audio, otherwise usage of these muted videos is severely restricted. RZuo (talk) 21:18, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RZuo: If muted videos have no subtitle like the example you said, I will re-upload ASAP. however, per this discussion ("... However, the inclusion of subtitles means that the educational use of the video, ... is sufficient for keeping on Commons."), there is no Commons policy that demands videos on the site should contain sounds such as music and voices (even some of Youtube videos do not have sounds, in this case, due to copyright-related reasons of the background music.) Puramyun31 (talk) 21:45, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RZuo: The re-upload of muted videos have no subtitle and merely showing a people has been done. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And again, the Japanese actors/voice actors' depicted in these videos are doing their normal business such as en:variety show in the videos, not doing a "stupid" thing ("a drawing I made of a politician doing some stupid thing...") as Berrely said. the DR is apparently based on a misunderstanding of the nature of these videos. Puramyun31 (talk) 17:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
yes, these videos are good documentation of the depicted people's performance, personalities and charisma. they are undoubtedly in scope. RZuo (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: There is consensus to keep the files. --De728631 (talk) 07:33, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by זור987 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: This file has been uploaded to Wikicommons from the Internet
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as per uploader's statement on talkpage. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:11, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

את התמונה הזאת קיבלתי מארגון מתנת חיים בשביל להכניס אותו לוויקפדיה, ונתנה אותו אשתו של הרב הבר - רחל הבר, אפשר לקבל אישור גם בכתב בברכה יונה אריה (talk) 10:31, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This file was created by User:מרים הנחמדה, which has been blocked in the Hebrew Wikipedia, because it has been detected as a sockpupet of a blocked user. זור987 (talk) 11:27, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

גם המשתמש החסום בוויקפדיה 'אריה יונה' העלה הרבה תמונות ולא היתה בהם שום בעיה, כל החסימה היא בגלל שלדעת העורכים הכתיבה לא מספיק אנציקלופדית, אבל אין שום בעיה עם העורך, ולכן גם אין שום בעיה להשתמש בתמונה שהעלתה על ידו או על ידי 'מרים הנחמה' שהיא בשמו החדש יונה אריה (talk) 01:20, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

התמונה נמצאת גם באתר מכלול https://www.hamichlol.org.il/%D7%90%D7%91%D7%A8%D7%94%D7%9D_%D7%99%D7%A9%D7%A2%D7%99%D7%94%D7%95_%D7%94%D7%91%D7%A8 על ידי אותו עורך יונה אריה (talk) 01:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: now with a VRT permission. --Rosenzweig τ 02:25, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redirection page to be deleted, in order to rename File:1 Revue d'Histoire de Lyon - 1905 - tome 4.pdf to File:Revue d'Histoire de Lyon - 1905 - tome 4.pdf. Etienne M (talk) 12:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted and moved as requested by someone else. --Rosenzweig τ 02:52, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Italy. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:20, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the person depicted cannot be the author Lesless (talk) 14:56, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:21, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

And also

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in 1990s-2020s. No Permission from the sculptor an architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:38, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 14:23, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. Created 2004. Derivatives of work. No Permission from the sculptor Олександр Маляр. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 1957s. No Permission from the architects І. Михайленко, В. Новиков, Д. Чорновол. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was reconstructed in the 2010s. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 18:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 2000s. No Permission from the architect Олег Головчак. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:53, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 2010s. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:54, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Ukraine and the photos violate sculptors' and architects' copyright. The building was built in the 2010s. No Permission from the sculptor / architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 20:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1968 photo; "author unknown", dubious claimed CC by 4.0, no indication it is free licenced for any other reason Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:21, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 09:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1998 photo from publication; "author unknown", dubious claimed CC by 4.0, no indication it is free licenced for any other reason -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 19:58, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZhangiWIKI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of these are fairly high-resolution (so no clear evidence of previous publication at the same or higher resolution), but there are lots of different cameras in the EXIF so "own work" is suspect.

King of ♥ 03:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and discussion. Uploader did not comment to explain copyright situation or authorship. --Ellywa (talk) 20:00, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Jmbashor

[edit]

Copyrighted files from the Berkeley Lab Photo Archive which has the glaring and extensive notice reading "You agree that the image selected by you may be used for noncommercial, educational purposes only; no derivative works are allowed, photos of individuals may only be used for identifying the individual and/or their research, and attribution and copyright notice is required. Please credit the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and provide the following copyright notice: "© The Regents of the University of California, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory." If you do not agree to these terms and conditions, do not download, display or use the image." These are one of those exceptions noted in the DOE public domain tag on the files. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 03:33, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:02, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Semeai (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Doubtful license. Mugshots from the archival work do not apply to official documents of a legislative or judicial character.

Maxinvestigator (talk) 06:10, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Maxinvestigator. Firstly, I suppose that this work is not an object of copyright, because it is a part of an investigation file, which can not be protected by the copyright as a material of judicial character according to the Russian Civil Code (article 1259). Secondly, even if it is an object of copyright, there is an argument presented by User:Ctac which proofs that this photo is in the public domain. In the opinion of Ctac, in the Soviet Union police photographs were an intellectual property of the juridical person which made it (in this case, NKVD). In modern Russia the intellectual property of soviet juridical persons was regulated by the Law 231-FL of December 18, 2006 (implementation act for part IV of the Civil Code). According to article 6 of this document "copyright of juridical persons that arose before August 3, 1993 ... expires after seventy years from the date of the lawful publication of the work or from the date of the creation of the work, if it has not been published". Since this photograph was created in 1944 and was not published by 1993, copyright on it expired in 2014. --Semeai (talk) 08:47, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
See discussion. Maxinvestigator (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notable that a number of soviet prison photographs had already been an object of a deletion debate in 2020. Back then they were nominated for deletion by the same reason as now ("Mug shots do not qualify for PD-RU-exempt"), but eventually were kept by sysop @Julo. Semeai (talk) 18:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
More information. Maxinvestigator (talk) 15:46, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per previous DR, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:PD-RU-exempt (mug shots). --Ellywa (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per [9], the building is modern and built during the new era (likely post 90s). Unfortunately, the copyright law of Afghanistan does not provide freedom of panorama for free uses of images of copyrighted public space works like buildings. COM:VRT permission from the architect is still required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:24, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination and per COM:FOP Afghanistan. --Ellywa (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Light_of_the_Harem.jpg, with wrong title, periodically uploaded as a picture of Mahidevran because some people need to invent pictures when none is available (same problem with other Ottoman women who gained notability in recent years following the success of Turkish TV shows) Phso2 (talk) 12:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per COM:DUPE, exact copy and not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:11, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Duplicate |file=600px chequered Black HEX-0000FF.svg|reason=Exists already on Wikimedia Commons with the same format.|user=DZwarrior1}} DZwarrior1 (talk) 12:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comments. images are different. --Elly (talk) 12:12, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader suggests he is the person in the photo. Was going to request he get permission from the photographer to license the photo so it can be used on the person's Wikipedia page, but unfortunately he appears to be deceased. This needs to be deleted. Maybe someone can find a usable photo for the guy's page. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 12:49, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, sadly. --Ellywa (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

کاربرد خاصی ندارد. SsMmNn (talk) 13:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, translated: "It has no special application". Agree, this cropped version has no educational use, is not used on the project and therefore out of scope per COM:SCOPE. --Ellywa (talk) 20:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work by Flickr photographer. Point of photo is illustration of cartoon seasonal artwork. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 14:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Starbucks' rockin' war on Christmas 2005.jpg. howdy.carabao 🌱🐃🌱 (talk) 18:38, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete, derivative work of non-free content. --Webfil (talk) 13:35, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate |file=Flag-map of the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR).svg|reason=Exists already on Wikimedia Commons with the same format.|user=DZwarrior1 DZwarrior1 (talk) 14:44, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per COM:REDUNDANT, because it is not exactly the same image, but slightly different color blue, not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:50, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TheMaintainer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination and per COM:PRP . Uploader did not comment to explain the authorship and copyright situation of this image. --Ellywa (talk) 20:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe in Russia, but there is no evidence or cases where CCTV footage is released into the public domain in other countries. For videos where they were uploaded by a news outlet who released it under CC-BY, There is no indication that they are the copyright holders of the video.

Berrely • TC 15:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the second DR nomination for Gone Postal, and the name of this page (I haven't done a batch nom before). This is not a DR for all files on the above mentioned page, but CCTV and bodycam files (which are the only video files there). — Berrely • TC 15:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Maybe in Russia, but there is no evidence or cases where CCTV footage is released into the public domain in other countries. For videos where they were uploaded by a news outlet who released it under CC-BY, There is no indication that they are the copyright holders of the video.

Berrely • TC 15:20, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the second DR nomination for Gone Postal, and the name of this page (I haven't done a batch nom before). This is not a DR for all files on the above mentioned page, but CCTV and bodycam files (which are the only video files there). — Berrely • TC 15:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 20:52, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

niepoprawny format pliku Rafal Gnasiuk 15:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by RafalZero7 (talk • contribs) 15:40, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per COM:COURTESY, request of uploader. Not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file contains my name and picture without my consent 199.71.239.39 17:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Image is still available at the source, https://www.flickr.com/photos/asuenglish/34721032941/. Please remove from the source and write to VRT and identify yourself and give arguments why the image should be deleted from Wikimedia Commons. --Ellywa (talk) 20:57, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: historical photo without original author/date/source/permission LMLM (talk) 19:58, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Hijo mío parece que tienes obsesión conmigo, 3 de las fotos que llevan mas de 5 años colgadas te acabas de dar cuenta de que tienen derecho de autor justo cuando las pongo yo en la página del Girona. Date una vuelta por las paginas de los equipos de primera como siempre te digo, porque parece que te cuesta entender las cosas, borras todas las ponen que que son trabajos propios y son fotos de los años 30-40-50 y nadie es capaz de tocar a la pagina del barça o mardrid, otra vez más tu comentarios son arbitrario. --Jmsolerb (talk) 20:30, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The uploader did not give sufficient evidence that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence, per COM:EVID. Therefore the file has to be deleted. --Ellywa (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zamanında görseli açacağım Vikipedi sayfasında kullanacaktım fakat söz konusu oluşum kayda değerlik göstermediği için kaldırılmasını istiyorum. AliBag (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (of uploader). Appears of no educational use, not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zamanında görseli açacağım Vikipedi sayfasında kullanacaktım fakat söz konusu oluşum kayda değerlik göstermediği için kaldırılmasını istiyorum. AliBag (talk) 20:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (of uploader). Appears of no educational use, not in use on the projects. --Ellywa (talk) 21:08, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zamanında görseli açacağım Vikipedi sayfasında kullanacaktım fakat söz konusu oluşum kayda değerlik göstermediği için kaldırılmasını istiyorum. AliBag (talk) 20:01, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, but mainly because possibly derivative work of copyrighted photo. --Ellywa (talk) 21:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this file may be under a free license, there is no Freedom of Panorama for "public interiors" in Germany. This image was taken in a museum, and COM:CRT/Germany states "Buildings such as museums, public collections, churches, or administrative buildings are not "public" within the meaning of the statute, and thus photographs of works exhibited in their interior do not qualify for § 59(1)." The statue could not have been constructed prior to 1981 as that is when Cats (musical) premiered. As such, this image is copyright infringement in its home country, Germany, until at least 1 January 2052 (assuming the author died the earliest possible year the wax sculpture could have been created, 1981+70+1) and should therefore be deleted. ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 23:06, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@2A01:598:B1AB:ED84:74DB:58A9:5554:C5DA: In that case, VRT permission would be needed to keep this image here. Please refer to the following quote (emphasis added by me) from the page COM:VRT: "If any of the following statements is one you could make, then you must send an email to the VRTS system: I have received permission from the original author (not me) to upload the file to Commons."
Please note that I am using an automatic translator tool. I apologize for any communication misunderstandings. / Bitte beachten Sie, dass ich ein automatisches Übersetzungsprogramm verwende. Ich entschuldige mich für eventuelle Missverständnisse in der Kommunikation.--ShyAlpaca482 (talk) 10:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. apperantly no VRT permission has been received since august 2021. --Ellywa (talk) 21:09, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]