Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/06/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 12th, 2021
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Dup|GitHub OctoTales - Epic Games.webm}} NairobiPapel (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@NairobiPapel: What? (`・ω・´) (talk) 00:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination as duplicate.  — billinghurst sDrewth 08:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata cites Patrick Semansky of the Associated Press RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 01:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need to use RgguAndrei (talk) 01:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G7. --Túrelio (talk) 08:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of non-contributor, was only used to vandalize the English Wikipedia. Ixfd64 (talk) 02:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is not by the State Department. RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 07:31, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 08:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The cameraman, S. Sheinin died in 1994, and all other principal crewmembers died less than 70 years ago, so the image is copyrighted. Materialscientist (talk) 10:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • "5.

Произведение представляет собой нелюбительский кино- или телефильм (или кадр, или видеофрагмент из него), впервые показанный в период с 1 января 1929 года[2] до 1 января 1946 года." in the template is valid point. Lesless (talk) 10:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per comment. --Materialscientist (talk) 10:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image non libre de droit copie depuis https://www.dourfestival.eu/fr/artist/detail/Freeze-corleone/ Lefringant (talk) 12:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 12:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jessluu0403 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

License laundering.

Minoraxtalk 15:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: License laundering (F6). --Эlcobbola talk 15:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad furqon Akbar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images. Commons is not a web host. Thanks

Herby talk thyme 11:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 19:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is not accepted by Commons, it is CC BY-ND 3.0 Hyju (talk) 19:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete per nom. Source https://www.deviantart.com/gryvry/art/Battle-Angel-Alita-655192056 says "Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 License" just above "COMMENTS".   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 19:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 19:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free license Hyju (talk) 19:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 19:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo is from the Associated Press. http://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/G7-Biden/0366bf2d89544a6e8851f256e9887dd2/56/0 RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 01:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a cropped photo from the Associated Press. http://www.apimages.com/metadata/Index/G7-Biden/3df0130b9cc046fd87f7fd75bdaede3b/48/0 RandomUserGuy1738 (talk) 01:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 07:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by S.Jasmine jeno (talk • contribs) 06:31, 12 June 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 07:43, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Because it is a screenshot of the JoJo's Bizarre Adventure Anime. Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 07:41, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of a free license. Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 07:40, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation of TF2 Game. Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 07:35, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free. Check the Bottom right of the image. Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 07:36, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of a non contributor. Has no use. out of project scope. আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 23:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 07:34, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aghil.eng (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian- Our of Scope

--Alaa :)..! 11:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:27, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Rana alabri

[edit]

possible copyvio, sources in parentheses

- Nutshinou Talk! 11:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (except 2 last). — Racconish💬 09:26, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Shreeparmishu

[edit]

advertisement for a non-notable person, Dr Pratayksha

- Nutshinou Talk! 13:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Pratayksha

[edit]

self-advertisement for non-notable person, Dr Pratayksha

- Nutshinou Talk! 13:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:24, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shavarsh Vardanyan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:22, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 09:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, there are enough pictures and this is only placed for a form of Exhibitionism.. Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, per G7 (by uploader). --Túrelio (talk) 12:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by INaturalistReviewBot as no permission (No permission since). At source page: CC BY-NC Kenraiz (talk) 08:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Eligible for speedy deletion since we do not accept non-commercial (nc) licenses. --De728631 (talk) 17:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A bunch of tourist photos from the Castello di Amorosa. We have many photos in the category that can represent the Castello without us violating Commons policy of being a web host for tourism photos. And no, the woman in some of these photos is not famous in Indian television - not notable enough, at this point. I wasn't able to find anything that shows she passes GNG.

Missvain (talk) 04:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

About File:NorCal2018 Castello di Amorosa Wine Tasting Napa Valley S0151015.jpg - I am the author. Thanks for the notification. This picture was uploaded so that it could be used in Wikipedia:en:wine tasting. Feel free to replace the image at Wikipedia:en:wine tasting with a better picture before actual deletion of this picture. Thanks! Fred Hsu (talk) 05:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Fred Hsu - I can totally live with that (I live in wine country here in the US and appreciate that you're showing "the experience" and I'll have to work on getting a few more of my own, too!). I'll remove it from the nomination! Thanks for chiming in. Missvain (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Missvain - hey, no issues. Thanks for cleaning Wiki projects. It's because of folks like you that Wikis don't become a garbage dump. I do agree that tourist selfies not useful as illustrations for articles should be removed. Most media you nominated should be purged. I know it may sound ironic, since I do want at least a useful wine tasting picture, whether it's mine or someone else's. I don't normally upload pictures with recognizable faces. Usually I do that only when I feel an article needs it. Over time, people find better illustrations for articles, and some of these are eventually retired, and I am happy about such evolution. Your work is much appreicaited. Thanks! Fred Hsu (talk) 16:39, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete holiday snaps — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:29, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: all but one per discussion. — Racconish💬 17:55, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lisette2221 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted images taken from the Internet and uploaded here as own work. Would it be possible to ask for a block for this user? Repeated warnings have been placed in his/her talk page yet he/she still keeps on uploading copyright violations.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and blocked. — Racconish💬 17:57, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor-quality hand-drawn chemcial structure. Have File:2-Iodobutanoic-acid-2D-structure.svg as high-quality alternative. — Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif info, seems not uploder's own work. (`・ω・´) (talk) 00:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promotion / out of scope. OTRS needed if the file is to stay (see the discussion page). --Podzemnik (talk) 03:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Works attributed to Nora Blanka Vlášková

[edit]

For each, User:MarVolf claims that:

  1. it's their "own work";
  2. it's User:J.S. (Jaroslav Šolc)'s "own work";
  3. (via the description) it's Nora Blanka Vlášková's work.

Well, which? The draft en:Draft:Nora Blanka Vlaskova and the article cs:Nora Blanka Vlášková do say that it's the work of Nora Blanka Vlášková, who, we are told, died back in the last century and therefore long before the Creative Commons license attached to the file was invented. -- Hoary (talk) 00:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination. OTRS permission needed for the artwork. --Podzemnik (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Khmergfn15 (talk) 00:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, already exists as File:Skype logo (2019–present).svg. TherasTaneel (talk) 01:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar Non-free and deleted before. TherasTaneel (talk) 01:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar Non-free and deleted before. TherasTaneel (talk) 01:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:07, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need to use RgguAndrei (talk) 01:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete lousy image — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:17, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need to use RgguAndrei (talk) 01:32, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete lousy image — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need to use RgguAndrei (talk) 01:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete lousy image — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need to use RgguAndrei (talk) 01:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete lousy image — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:19, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I could not find indication in source that it is licensed under the terms of the tag placed Link20XX (talk) 03:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:08, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative work: subject is a packaging with copyrighted designs or illustrations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:09, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian- Out of Scope --Alaa :)..! 11:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:52, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo for non-Wikipedian- Our of Scope

--Alaa :)..! 11:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:53, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:10, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from https://twitter.com/KhuthadzoJr/status/979052975149764610 - Nutshinou Talk! 09:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work; from http://en.gravatar.com/veganlotfi - Nutshinou Talk! 09:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 10:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work; from https://www.thetutuguru.com.au/shop/dodonaea-green-hop-bush/ - Nutshinou Talk! 10:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 10:45, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. - Nutshinou Talk! 11:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:51, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, image is from https://twitter.com/OmanObserver/status/992692281093296128/photo/4 - Nutshinou Talk! 11:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, image is from https://twitter.com/OmanObserver/status/992692281093296128/photo/3 - Nutshinou Talk! 11:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE. (description says yo which is "me" in spanish) - Nutshinou Talk! 11:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 14:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sardar Ahsan Ismail (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 21:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 10:23, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Allegedly an Iranian musician, cannot find any proof of his notability. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 00:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, bad quality, duplicity to File:Map of USA OK.svg, the title is suggesting that it's a test file Podzemnik (talk) 01:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photoshopped picture for a trash draft article on en wikipedia (en:Draft:Pardeep "Big Dick" Dhillon) - Nutshinou Talk! 11:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nonsense files, non-existing person The Banner (talk) 11:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, Minecraft skin with the uploader's name at the bottom - Nutshinou Talk! 12:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, no educational value shown - Nutshinou Talk! 12:45, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promo on enwp Minoraxtalk 15:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope (probably copyright violation as well as the subject has not made the photo) Elly (talk) 21:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope (probably copyright violation as well as the subject has not made the photo) Elly (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope, user did not contribute to articles see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bianca_Gabriele (probably copyright violation as well as the subject has not made the photo) Elly (talk) 21:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope, user did not contribute to articles see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bianca_Gabriele (probably copyright violation as well as the subject has not made the photo) Elly (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, out of scope, user did not contribute to articles see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bianca_Gabriele (probably copyright violation as well as the subject has not made the photo) Elly (talk) 21:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and doge image non-free Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, unused Ciaurlec (talk) 23:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. This building was completed in 1997 and its three architects 윤승중, 변용, and 김석주 are still alive. plicit 01:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete per COM:PRP. All other uploads from this user were copyvios Podzemnik (talk) 02:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a screenshot of this video: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hvjOKEwqi0M Ytoyoda (talk) 04:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The rim/case of this piano is decorated with some sort of 2D artwork. Is the artwork ancient or just a modern application of an ancient-style artwork? If the latter is true, then this image violates no commercial freedom of panorama in SoKor. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a two-dimensional artwork on this NHK train. Certainly not old enough to be in public domain (the artists has not been dead for more than 70 years). There is no commercial FOP for any works like this in Japan. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elías (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images that appear to be screenshots, not original photographs. See also File:Momo2015.jpg

Ytoyoda (talk) 05:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:05, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Ukraine A1Cafel (talk) 07:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 20:06, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ozcentr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violation and license laundering.

Serhio Magpie (talk) 21:44, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ozcentr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

user has uploaded a painting and a portrait of its author. The painting should be credited to the painter and have the license verified via COM:OTRS. I also doubt that he is the author of the photo.

Vera (talk) 16:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:25, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One of the file in the montage was deleted A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (related are two files: File:Parroquia Maria Auxiliadora.jpg and File:Banderas PA.jpg ). --Wdwd (talk) 16:23, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

staged portrait without EXIF, limited resolution. Only upload from account, likely not own work Vera (talk) 16:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 16:20, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader's user name indicates he is the subject of the photo. Copyright normally spittle be held by the photographer. COM:OTRS verification would be needed. Whpq (talk) 18:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:03, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in Venezuela applies only for permanently installed objects. This poster is not permanent. Taivo (talk) 18:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is apparently the subject of the images. Photographer is unknown.

MKFI (talk) 19:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect File:Jazz performance.jpg is a video screencap (1080x700px), washed-out colours. File:Raunak Raut Choreographer.jpg seems heavily processed, with almost drawing-like lines. MKFI (talk) 16:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 16:00, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright Apple Wouter (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a screencap from a since-deleted video, File:Michael Twitty- "Southern Discomfort — Confronting Culinary Injustice".webm. I can’t see what happened to the video but I am guessing the permissions were judged insufficient in which case the derivative image would be too. If an admin could double-checked with the deleted .webm file, I would appreciate it. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I don’t know what broke the link on this screencap’s page but the underlying file is still active and passed review. Innisfree987 (talk) 20:41, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: DR revoked. --Wdwd (talk) 15:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be correctly described; small resolution; iffy uploader.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 21:57, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused and out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

درخواست حذف این اثرشخصی را دارم. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmirWikiFa (talk • contribs) 22:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but you have uploaded this image under a free license 1 year ago. --Túrelio (talk) 07:30, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion and not a recent upload. Please see Commons:License revocation. --Wdwd (talk) 15:52, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong use of personal image in a home area AmirWikiFa (talk) 11:55, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep COM:INUSE. Iwaqarhashmi (talk) 14:21, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I, as the creator of this work, since the city of Darab in Fars province of Iran is a small town, the location from which the photo was taken has been clearly identified and is in public view, and according to the request of the owner of the houses in the picture and to For security reasons, I have decided to remove this image from all Wikimedia sub-sets. AmirWikiFa (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete As the creator of this work, I have requested its removal for some reasons and I do not want this work to be used in Wikipedia. AmirWikiFa (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Apparently, the neighbors whose houses are visible in the picture have realized that I am the creator of this picture and have come to me to remove it, and because they are not interested in the picture of their houses being on the Internet, I have decided to delete it. Please cooperate with me to remove it, I will replace it with better pictures of this city. AmirWikiFa (talk) 15:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is a big panorama. Your neighbors don't have the right to veto panoramic shots of their city just because someone can see their buildings if they focus narrowly on them. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
True, but I will replace it with much better pictures that represent the view of this city. Please help me remove this work. As the uploader of this image, I am not interested in it remaining on Wikipedia. AmirWikiFa (talk) 07:23, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not interested in being involved in decisions about which thumbnails are used in a Wikipedia article about this city. Debate about that on the Wikipedia article's talk page. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • As the photographer and uploader of this image, don't I have the right to take the copyright of this image from Wikipedia and remove it? As the photographer of this work, from this date I cancel the right to use this image in all articles related to Wikimedia, and Wikipedia does not have the right to use it on any public or personal page even if this image is not deleted. AmirWikiFa (talk) 07:34, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Wikipedias, like all other wikis, work by consensus. Sure, you and any other user have the power (not right, really) to remove any thumbnail from any article, but it might be re-added by another user. But what we don't have the right to do on Commons is delete a photo that's COM:INUSE. Read that link, please. All that said, of course it's a great idea for you to upload a superior photo and substitute that as a thumbnail on Wikipedia articles. That doesn't require deleting anything here on Commons. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:44, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I, as the creator of this image, just want to delete it, I don't think it will be a problem, and I just ask for your help as an administrator and someone who has access to do this, to delete it, and I don't want this file on the Internet (by Wikipedia) Be available! AmirWikiFa (talk) 11:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm sorry, but according to the request of the uploader of an image, you are obliged to remove that image from the Commons wiki. I have the right to decide whether an image I mistakenly uploaded to Commons should remain here or not. AmirWikiFa (talk) 11:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yes, you are sorry, but you're also wrong. If you still haven't read COM:INUSE or Commons:Courtesy deletions, it's no-one else's problem. "A free license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and irrevocable (you can't take it back)." I don't know why do you think I'm an administrator of Commons, but if I were, I wouldn't have the authority to violate Commons policy by deleting the photo you irrevocably licensed 4 years ago. And acting like others have to do so is only likely to make things worse for you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:26, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • This has gone on quite long enough.  Speedy keep per the previous deletion request and COM:INUSE. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per Ikan. I might have been moved to !vote delete if the photo depicted only their house, but that isn't the case here and the file is used. Ratekreel (talk) 19:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Why are you submitting a deletion request but then also want the image renamed? Which I renamed because I overlooked the deletion request. As mentioned, from someone who doesn't exactly come from Darab, they can't identify the houses. איז「Ysa」For love letters and other notes 09:11, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Addition: I would also like to mention that there aren't many pictures of Darab, so that would be a loss. But thank you for your offer to add more pictures about the city, these are certainly welcome. איז「Ysa」For love letters and other notes 09:27, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion; no valid reason for deletion; general panorama of place not a violation of anything personal. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:55, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is cropped from a photo of Guru as a noticeably sickly man with an individual who is allegedly responsible for Guru's passing. I humbly request that you delete this image and replace it with media from before 2005, where he appeared in good health. Aaalqasabi (talk) 22:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Innocent girl.jpg 191.116.130.113 22:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation that likely comes from the website Tenor. Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:44, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:48, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not seem to fit in within the project scope and also potentially a copyvio (see watermark) Nutshinou Talk! 13:41, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted per nom -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 00:55, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Actual author is nintendo. Copyright violation as it comes from a Super Mario Game. Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Source is https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/big-floppa Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:46, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image used only in spam page deleted off enwiki DS (talk) 15:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies to File:Hungry for a Snack .jpg and File:Snacktime Book.jpg. DS (talk) 15:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (also presumed-nonfree book-cover). --DMacks (talk) 18:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist is not dead 70 years ago. (S)He died in 1974. And this is not French, but Vietnamese work. In addition, USA demands 95 years from publication. The painting can be restored in 2064 (95+1 years from publication). Taivo (talk) 12:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not own work (filename) and previously posted here https://facebook.com/chataly.SMYziMardan/photos/a.835328103232884/1448802228552132 - Nutshinou Talk! 13:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is porn Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Speedy  Keep IDONTLIKEIT is not a reason to delete and Commons is not censored. Now, it seems, is more convinient to nominate an image to deletion instead of doing a proper research. If the nominator had did this this wouldnt repeat again. How many times is it needed to repeat the same conclusions. These file is clearly educational and not being of your liking is not a reason to delete. Its parent category. Category:Project "Geekography" by Exey Panteleev (nude portrayals of computer technology) clearly states its scope and educational use:
Project by Exey Panteleev, as an artistic project that connects technology and nude photography. This project has been a Winner of The Best of Russia 2011 (and selected as one of the 55 best between 309 winners), an photographic award organized by the Moscow Contemporary Art Center Winzavod with the support of the Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation, and has been nominated in 2011, 2012 and 2013 in the american International Colour Awards.
This project that have been covered by several newspapers, magazines and technolgy websites, like the The Next Web , GQ Italy and the french newspaper Libération, that have made articles about this project, besides being interviewed to an interview to the tech page of Mail.Ru where he talks about his project. Besides these newspapers and tech sites, other covered this same project, like being news in Reflex, was the cover of the Russian "Hacker Magazine" of January 2012 was by him" or of the ukrainian "SHO Art Magazine" of July\August 2012.
Because of the subjects of this projects, Violet Blue, "an American journalist, author, editor, advisor, and educator" covered this same project and had photos published in "nude art photography" book."
This educational purpose has clearly been established since November of 2019, when there was an covert attempt to sequester the Wikiconference 2019 and an concerted attempt to delete this images, with allegations of mysogeny, uneducational subjects, situation that was reject by vast majority in Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2019/11#Category:Nude_portrayals_of_computer_technology.
Also there were several deletion requests, with the same arguments, closed as kept and invalid reasoning to opening those deletion requests, like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fake News (48708611322).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - z-index.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Binary prefixes (41983361972).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - before.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:HTML output - Exey Panteleev.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erlang (9690003046).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - display.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Full Stack (Exey Panteleev).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:RSS feed icons painted on a naked woman (by Exey Panteleev).jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - QR code.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - Proxy.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - MongoDB's "WHERE".jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Radio button and female nude.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Body painting - float left right.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:SQL - DROP TABLE.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bling-bling - iframe.jpg, Commons:Deletion requests/File:TypeScript bodypaint (15003177534).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology. Clearly a invalid prudish and not valid reason to delete. 23:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Kept: per discussion. plicit 12:11, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative work: packaging and artworks. See the nomination page proper for more details.

Packaging with copyrighted designs or illustrations
Three-dimensional works. Possibly violations of no commercial freedom of panorama in SoKor for some images and COM:TOYS for others. Missing COM:OTRS authorizations from artworks' creators.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. plicit 11:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pranay Dongre 27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 04:53, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvios. --Wdwd (talk) 14:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pranay Dongre 27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both files are sourced to a COM:FLICKRWASH account. The same account was used as the source for File:Mc Ren performing in 2016 Coachella.jpg and File:Mc Ren in 2015 Straight Outta Compton Premiere.jpg, both previously published copyvio images. No evidence that the Flickr owner owns these images, but if they do, they can follow the steps described at COM:OTRS.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:03, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Com:Derivative work: subject is a packaging with copyrighted designs or illustrations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. logo was printed on the upside-right product. Semi-Brace (talk) 00:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from https://schallertech.com/portfolio-items/auditorio-cuc/ Ytoyoda (talk) 05:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative work: subject is a packaging with copyrighted designs or illustrations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Semi-Brace (talk) 00:05, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:50, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Com:Derivative works problems. See the nomination page proper for added details.

COM:PACKAGING - copyrighted packaging designs and illustrations
COM:Derivative works - posters and illustrated food menus

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Derivative work: subject is a packaging with copyrighted designs or illustrations.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:48, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Taqrisdarimi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self promo on enwp

Minoraxtalk 06:11, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. unused personla photos/image, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FB Exif, OTRS validation needed. — Racconish💬 06:39, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:30, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have added a wrong image by mistake P.Jothi Lakshmi0496 (talk) 06:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content. --Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Royal flags of Thailand

[edit]

Definitely not CC licensed, and probably copyrighted. The copyright in Thailand lasts for 50 years, so any flags adopted after 1971 should be deleted. No clear evidence about the monograms/flags being freely licensed, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Flag of HM Queen Suthida.svg. --BustersRed8 (talk) 04:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: category not empty. Nominate the files for deletion not the cat pls. --JuTa 20:10, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Msg51671 (talk) 12:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyrighted poster. --Hanooz 04:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map data is incorrect and the uploader does not respond to the discussion about reliable sources Wil13 (talk) 15:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the borders in the desert and the warring tribes were frequently changing (borders of Saudi not fully setteld till 1980s) “map data is incorrect” seems to be no valid argument.  Keep (with caveat) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 22:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 00:22, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is incorrect and the uploader was alerted, but he did not respond. I submitted a request to delete and the uploader "DavidFirst1" canceled it, violating Wikimedia Commons policies! Wil13 (talk) 05:36, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 00:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality, many inaccuracies, especially on the world map. Hellbat31 (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the map itself is relevant... Have the sources to correct the flaws. Is anyone can do this, contact me.--Antemister (talk) 20:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:10, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The minimap in the bottom left hand corner is wildly incorrect. The continents are distorted and the coastlines are incorrect. 51.7.171.169 17:56, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-sysop closed): Still no valid reason for deletion. However, file has been modified to address the concern. Instead of additional DRs, if issues remain, discuss the inaccuracies on the file's talk page. —Tcr25 (talk) 16:11, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map data is incorrect and the uploader does not respond to the discussion about reliable sources Wil13 (talk) 15:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the borders in the desert and the warring tribes were frequently changing (borders of Saudi not fully setteld till 1980s) “map data is incorrect” seems to be no valid argument.  Keep (with caveat) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 22:00, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 00:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is incorrect and the uploader was alerted, but he did not respond. I submitted a request to delete and the uploader "DavidFirst1" canceled it, violating Wikimedia Commons policies! Wil13 (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(`・ω・´) (talk) 00:23, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP Israel: The sign is not situated permanently in a public place in Israel. Dgw (talk) 20:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The sign is the Likud party's election propaganda for the Arab sector. He illustrates the Likud's rapprochement with the Arab sector in this election campaign - and is very relevant for some artcels. I personally took the picture in an Arab village in Israel. Therefore, the image is free to use. Bar (talk to me) 19:14, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PS: "Wikimedia Commons is a media file repository making available public domain and freely-licensed". Files with fair use rational are not allowed in Commons. The sign is not situated permanently in a public place in Israel.

עברית: על פי סעיף 23 לחוק זכויות היוצרים בישראל: שידור או העתקה של יצירה הממוקמת במקום ציבורי: שידור, או העתקה בדרך של צילום, ציור, שרטוט או תיאור חזותי דומה, של יצירה אדריכלית, יצירת פיסול או יצירת אמנות שימושית, מותרים אם היצירה ממוקמת בקביעות במקום ציבורי.
. -- Geagea (talk) 20:21, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Publish on Royal Family's Twitter first, thus not US Government works A1Cafel (talk) 02:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP Denmark, there is not freedom of panorama in Denmark for works of art, like murals. TherasTaneel (talk) 02:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

From the linked site:

Under the Consolidated Act No. 1144 of 23 October 2014,

  • Buildings may be freely reproduced in pictorial form and then made available to the public."[1144/2014 Art.24(3)]
  • Works of art may be reproduced in pictorial form and then made available to the public if they are permanently situated in a public place or road. The provision of the first sentence shall not apply if the work of art is the chief motif and its reproduction is used for commercial purposes."[1144/2014 Art.24(2)]

Therefore, the request for deletion is without merrit. -- Liberaler Humanist (talk) 02:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any difference from this, these and several other in Category:Danish FOP cases. If "work of art is the chief motif" then "The provision of the first sentence shall not apply". TherasTaneel (talk) 02:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. Image lacks authorization for use of commercial licensing from the creator/maker of this doll. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work: food menus and illustrations. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. Semi-Brace (talk) 00:06, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Uploaded without permission from photographer 188.95.55.54 09:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any evidence for that? --Túrelio (talk) 15:43, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have permission from the author, photographer? - You don’t have. Uploaded by subject of photo, for self-promotion. Uploader is not copyright holder 194.150.167.80 16:36, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Still not the evidence I asked for. If User:Miljcom is not the photographer, as you claim, then who is the photographer? If he/she doesn't want to identify in the public, then he/she should contact permissions-commons@wikimedia.org (OTRS) and confirm his/her authorship. --Túrelio (talk) 18:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You need to have evidence that you have right to post photo! If photographer not send you permission personally by email with his id to prove that he is the author - you don’t have permission to keep his photo here. Photo without permission must be deleted, otherwise there is a competent court 194.150.167.84 00:51, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:42, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted 2022-01-18 by Missvain per Copyright violation. Uploaded without permission from photographer. --Achim55 (talk) 08:13, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures replaced by SVG files RyanCray (talk) 10:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted by O. Pescott (can't seem to directly link to the image with the copyright info so click the left arrow once) - Nutshinou Talk! 10:40, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no event or product named "Outfit7 One" as per the internet. This logo is pure fiction with no educational purpose. 45.251.33.60 11:00, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photographer, Rita Martin who died in 1958, still under copyright in the UK, while this image created in 1907, which is only public domain in the US. Frontman830 (talk) 11:06, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Autonomous agent 5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Incorrect licensing or self-made licenses.

PD-RU-exempt covers government decrees, official documents, etc., not works created by the government, government workers or government companies (compared to the US, for example).

rubin16 (talk) 12:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:TsarBomba wolk1.jpg i.e. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:TsarBomba_wolk1.jpg is currently in use @ wikipedia russia, downloaded 2006, so I see no reason to delete the file here, unless the contesting editor would like to go challenge the same file there. Autonomous agent 5 (talk) 13:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Hi. That is different, in ru.wiki it is stored as fair use, not a free file (like needed here on Commons) rubin16 (talk) 14:38, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I added a speedy deletion template to File:Tsarbomba.jpg, having neglected to do so at an earlier time, when another user prior to yourself suggested a 7 day interim before deletion, I had already decided at that time the file should be deleted, but forgot to add the speedy delete template... - c.f. the reasons given @ that file, thanks Autonomous agent 5 (talk) 13:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I changed c.f. > q.v. @ https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bomba%3DeM.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=568699967 etc consequent to your request, to show that the Public domain#governmental works indication is a relevant referent not a proof, regards 14:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Autonomous agent 5 (talk • contribs) 14:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:43, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Autonomous agent 5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious application of {{PD-ineligible}} and {{Cc-zero}}. No evidence of a free license.

plicit 10:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Succinct reply: Copyright law doesn't apply because the crafts shown are of extra-terrestrial origin, so it is not in the interests of any member of the species (that is humans) to protect (by copyright law) a possible risk, or stop the possible advancement of technology possessed by the human species. Copyright law exists to protect individuals rights, being a protection of one individual, this same protection protects all members of humanity, by recognising there is a law for one, so there is a law for all. There is no indication of the works being secret military technologies or hoaxes at the source (the former being a necessitated request for use to a secret military technology organisation, the latter being a recognition of an artistic work, i.e. by CGI), unless either of these aspects are known (if the actual owners would "own-up" to being the owners), wikimedia has the automatic right to any use, so therefore all humans have this right.

Longer thought reply: Looking at fairuse.stanford.edu...basic-copyright-principles, considering the problem isn't solved by establishing suitability for the fair use criteria, I found the images should be considered at least possible as exempt from restriction (with regards to the fair use as a guide) because: " Educational, nonprofit ", "Using only a small portion of a copyrighted material".

With regards to the actual cc-zero, ineligible aspects, my thoughts were that, the technology seemed non earth based, therefore the works aren't owned by the video producers. Since the subjects of the images are then of extra-terrestrial origin - although the video takers are personally associated with the work (i.e. those individuals are the uniquely positioned viewers of such aspects of reality, which indicates a kind of special right those two have, by the fact of they being witness to the reality of the events), wikimedia is authorised to use the images because the takers were only that, i.e. they aren't authors on a subject, as professors or artists for example are thought of, in relation to their own work (literally it is their work, their own work, so they own that work, and trying to re-associate with their work, interferes with the good and constructive progress of thinkers, that is professors and artists, for example, by creating a confusion in reality as to author, and possibly dis-credits the authors, i.e. jeopardizes their place is society for obtaining financial reward for their work, which they need to further their own and societies progress and good. Re-considering the images, the crafts are of extra-terrestrial origin, therefore it is of benefit to the species to obtain the right to use the video stills,especially for commercial use (i.e. arms trade, secret technological project works (Boeing Phantom Works, DARPA, Skunk works) in order that thought and progress could be made to improve the species survivability against threats of an extra-terrestrial origin, in addition to spurring technological advancement generally whether or not to this previous (contra-extra-terrestrial agencies defence) end. Agent: autonomous type (5) (version: prototype) (talk) 19:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC) spelling correction after signature 19:47, 21 October 2021 (UTC) minor correction 19:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC) minor correction 19:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC) typo correction 19:51, 21 October 2021 (UTC) minor correction 20:48, 21 October 2021 (UTC) minor correction 20:50, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

afterthought: asserting the right of an alien species over humanity is tantamount to securing the possibility of the obliteration of the human species by alien hostility. My thoughts on this, is that, this would not be a good thing. If the alien species would in the future assert this right, it is for that species to do so, not wikimedia. Agent: autonomous type (5) (version: prototype) (talk) 20:01, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this is ridiculously wrong. plicit 12:58, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you could clarify, how wrong? In support of deletion or against deletion? I'm presuming the former not the latter, so; you think the video stills depict some other reality than I showed in my response, and therefore the argument is ... what? Please state the argument of how I'm wrong, and/ a policy page where I could see how I have made an error; so that I could concur or provide an argument against. Regards Agent: autonomous type (5) (version: prototype) (talk) 16:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Copyright has nothing to do with the design of the UFO's but it protects the video/photo itself. --P 1 9 9   14:50, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not used anymore 2A02:A458:73F7:1:2D97:E2B2:FC53:4ED2 12:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The file "Regency Belu and its districts (West Timor).png" has been replaced by the file "Regency Belu and its districts (West Timor) v2.png" in which the names of the districts Lamaknen and Lamaknen Selatan have been taken up well. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tajala (talk • contribs) 17:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license. Unlikely to be uploader's own work as the subject of the photograph died in 1953. RJFF (talk) 14:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible license laundering, flickr account only has 1 uplaod Minoraxtalk 14:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 18:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded it by mistake Sowmiyasowmiya (talk) 16:34, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture has been floating on the Internet without attribution before it was uploaded here (example from 2015 and as early as 2013 (archive)). Likely a modern painting. Another uploader's picture of Anne Bonny was deleted as copyvio. TFerenczy (talk) 16:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution portrait uploaded by an SPA, no EXIF, very likely not own work Vera (talk) 16:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:29, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, upload from a sock FleurDeOdile (talk) 18:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:M7m1d

[edit]

three pictures showing how to create an account, been unused since september 2012, don't see the point of these considering commons already has a bunch of these, of much better quality

- Nutshinou Talk! 19:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:30, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cheems and doge memes are non-free. Eaaaaugh (talk) 22:51, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

its an copyright 2A02:CE0:2801:465F:B1DA:2161:AB91:B83 23:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a family photo. It is not copyrighted. Evan-Amos (talk) 06:04, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence that this is copyright violation. Did you find it anywhere on the internet with prior date of publication? --Albert Horáček (talk) 19:10, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Missvain (talk) 20:32, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has been drastically photoshopped and looks nothing like her; you can do a Google image search to see what she actually looks like. While editing Wikipedia, it is important that the images used represent the subject adequately and does not mislead readers. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Photoshopped_images Ekmz (talk) 01:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep First things, first. Welcome, new user, to Wikimedia Commons a sister project of English Wikipedia, but a different project none the less. Second different projects have different policies and guidelines, so the english wikipedia "Photoshopped_images does not apply here (and it is not a policy or guideline but, per top of page it is an "idea is in the brainstorming stage", that was last edited w years ago by a random IP and by an user almost 4 years ago, so this is an idea in comatose stage.
Also this file is in use in af.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, ar.wikipedia.org جانيس ديكينسون, arz.wikipedia.org جانيس ديكينسون, azb.wikipedia.org جنیک دیکینسن, be.wikipedia.org Джэніс Дзікінсан, da.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, de.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, en.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson List of I'm a Celebrity...Get Me Out of Here! (British TV series) contestants No Lifeguard on Duty, es.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, eu.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, fa.wikipedia.org جنیس دیکینسن, fr.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson Celebrity Big Brother (Royaume-Uni), gl.wikipedia.org, Wikipedia:Wikiproxecto mulleres/Lista de fotógrafas Janice Dickinson, he.wikipedia.org ג'ניס דיקנסון, hu.wikipedia.org Modell (foglalkozás), it.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, ka.wikipedia.org ჯენის დიკინსონი, ko.wikipedia.org 재니스 디킨슨, nl.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, pl.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, pt.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, ro.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, ru.wikipedia.org Дикинсон, Дженис, simple.wikipedia.org Janice Dickinson, www.wikidata.org Q230911 and zh.wikipedia.org 珍妮絲·狄金森. So also in scope. And the photo is not manipulated. Tm (talk) 13:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Most of those use this image as indirect via Wikidata. There was no need to mention all of those WPs names, next time just link to the #globalusage section, for example File:Janice_Dickinson_2014.jpg#globalusage -- FMM-1992 (talk) 07:46, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Project_scope#File_in_use_in_another_Wikimedia_project is pretty clear that "media file that is in use on one of the other projects of the Wikimedia Foundation is considered automatically to be useful for an educational purpose, as is a file in use for some operational reason such as within a template or the like. Such a file is not liable to deletion simply because it may be of poor quality: if it is in use, that is enough", so the fact that it links from Wikidata is irrelevant. In use, in scope, so invalid deletion request. And it wouldn't be the first time that someone tried to pull a sneaky one and silently delete an image from the articles were it is in use.Tm (talk) 13:15, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please do not add posterior comments like "you can do a Google image search to see what she actually looks like" to the original phrase. And i still say, as i did a google images before your posterior eddictions and i still say that the photo is not manipulated. Given that it was you that open this deletion requests, please provide proofs of Commons policy about Photoshoped images. Tm (talk) 19:17, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete This image is so clearly doctored it's not even funny. Tm I honestly have no idea how you can claim it's not modified. Just because it is on many other pages in other languages only means that whoever modified the image put it there. It is simply not an honest representation of how she looks. There is no skin texture whatsoever and it does not look like any other press photos from 2014, or any other year for that matter. I encourage you to look at a Getty Images search for her name. There are lightly modified images in that search as well, but none of them are as bad and obvious as this image. OtherworldlyBroadcast (talk) 20:41, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep We have templates to make clear when images have been modified. That alone is not reason for deletion. It's in use on many projects, so clearly many people think it's our best picture of the subject. Thus it shouldn't be deleted. Just doing a quick search for the same person smiling (I didn't know who this was), I see [1] [2] [3], none of which are wildly different from this one. If you don't think it should be used on wikipedia, make an argument on that talk page, but I fail to see any reason for deletion. — Rhododendrites talk21:55, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I am honestly stunned. The images you shared are COMPLETELY different. OtherworldlyBroadcast (talk) 07:42, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete with a longer note:
I have came here from ptwiki, where I discovered another doctored (and challenged) image, with even more background POV. First I was about to vote for "keep", as people do use make-up, put on masks, etc. I am also "naive" that is I have never seen her or have heard of her. But then I performed the recommended "a google images before [...] posterior eddictions" (see above for this quote) operation and I advise you to do the same: click me. Here is thus my "posterior comment":
I am equally stunned and I agree with @OtherworldlyBroadcast: "The images you shared are COMPLETELY different". Otherworldly so.
@Rhododendrites: since you much more experienced than us and are also "contracting with the Wikimedia Foundation", do teach us what you meant here by "none of which [reffed photos] are wildly different from this one" and how can this photo be not heavily retouched if taken in 2014.
I will alert my home wiki in the meantime. Bows to all,
Zezen (talk) 15:10, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The point is it doesn't matter if it's heavily retouched. If you don't want it used in a Wikipedia article, that's handled at the Wikipedia article. As long as at least one Wikimedia project is using the image, it's considered "in scope" on Commons and thus can't be deleted on those grounds. We have retouched, low resolution, blurry... all sorts of low quality images. And we can label them accordingly so people know. But it's not a reason to delete unless it's very low quality and not in use. — Rhododendrites talk15:23, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the reply @Rhododendrites. OK, but then let us tag it as an icon, poster, (AI) mod, whatever. Its metadata (description) are deceptive: "Janice Dickinson attending Luisa Diaz's Havana White Party at Berri's Café ..." only.
It does matter a lot. A random example: Obama's "hope" pic more recognisable as this one in fact (see the comments hereinabove), has this Commons meta: "Barack Obama "Hope" poster, originally by Shepard Fairey...
Zezen (talk) 20:31, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
http://fotoforensics.com/analysis.php?id=b5af89d3cc0a29bff59ff184fd927e19f99bf953.4023864
Eyes, lips, ring. Multiple resave. Theory and a sample: http://fotoforensics.com/tutorial.php?tt=ela.
Zezen (talk) 12:51, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment About possible doctored actions and manipulations, how about a little analysis to some of the users that are present in this deletion. Clearly Ekmz (the deletion request opener) is almost likely an SPA as he has only five edits in 12 and 13 of June. Also suspiscious is OtherworldlyBroadcast with only has 4 edits between June 30 and July 1. So if "if it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck.". Tm (talk) 16:15, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per COM:NPOV, this is not the place to adjudicate content disputes. As long as the image is used, it is in COM:SCOPE. --King of ♥ 04:03, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map data is incorrect and the uploader does not respond to the discussion about reliable sources Wil13 (talk) 15:10, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the borders in the desert and the warring tribes were frequently changing (borders of Saudi not fully setteld till 1980s) “map data is incorrect” seems to be no valid argument.  Keep (with caveat) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 22:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

if “the tribes were frequently changing“ Why did you draw the map like this?! Wil13 (talk) 03:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion here is not about the borders of Saudi Arabia. An article on Wikipedia is enough to get a good education and solve this point. The problem we are talking about here is the internal borders of the third Saudi state. The map is incorrect and the stages of tribes joining the state are also inaccurate, so drawing the map in this way and these interim colors are not correct.Wil13 (talk) 04:03, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The map is incorrect and the uploader was alerted, but he did not respond. I submitted a request to delete and the uploader "DavidFirst1" canceled it, violating Wikimedia Commons policies! Wil13 (talk) 03:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on Arabic Wikipedia, hence in COM:SCOPE. See COM:NPOV. --King of ♥ 04:06, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality, many inaccuracies, especially on the world map. Hellbat31 (talk) 11:15, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But the map itself is relevant... Have the sources to correct the flaws. Is anyone can do this, contact me.--Antemister (talk) 20:37, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE. --IronGargoyle (talk) 13:08, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of mural painting. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

>>> I looked through Commons and there are many mural paintings. I do not see why this mural would not be admissible. Is there a rule page I failed to read? --BiblioQC (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

For a short and direct description, please see the section COM:CB#Murals (in English) ou la section Peintures murales (en français). For a general and lengthy description of the relation between a work (e.g. a painting) and its reproduction and its use in another work (e.g. a photograph), please see the page COM:DW (in English) ou la page Œuvre dérivée (en français). -- Asclepias (talk) 23:40, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --King of ♥ 04:07, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by BubbaJoe123456 and the most recent rationale is: Very hard to argue that this falls under the "just geometric shapes or text" public domain exception. Rodney Araujo (talk) 16:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this. ItsJustdancefan (talk) 01:01, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know. I think some version of the Disney Junior logo is said to be registered by the US Copyright Office on COM:TOO US, but the registration listing for VA0001927957 lists "DISNEY JUNIOR - RETAIL AND MARKETING BRANDING GUIDE SS14 UPDATE" as the application title, though it is listed as 2D artwork based on and incorporating pre-existing Disney character designs. I need to look to see if this has ever been noticed... -BRAINULATOR9 (TALK) 16:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per several past deletion discussions on other Walt Disney Company logos establishing that the "Walt Disney" logo itself constitutes text, such as this one and this one. The remainder of the logo obviously constitutes "simple geometric shapes or text." Throast (talk) 23:13, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom. At best borderline, and with a famously litigious corporation I think we should side with caution. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 20:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, as not a mere text-logo. --Túrelio (talk) 07:58, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no commercial freedom of panorama for works like this in Japan. No evidence of COM:OTRS permission from the artist who created this 2D artwork.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:59, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

“The Copyright Act (Act No. 48 of May 6, 1970, as amended up to Act No. 35 of May 14, 2014), allows the reproduction of artistic works located permanently in open places accessible to the public ...” which can be said for trams (otherwise all images of Japanese trains would have to be deleted),  Keep — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:37, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@62.216.207.31: but for noncommercial purposes. It is not suitable for Commons. And note that this is not a building, a type of work that enjoys full freedom of panorama in Japan even for commercial uses. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom. Semi-Brace (talk) 00:02, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Utilitarian? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:13, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orizan (talk · contribs) 1

[edit]

Three image files show the copyrighted Las Vegas replica of the Statue of Liberty. There is no freedom of panorama in the United States for copyrighted non-architectural works. Cannot pass American de minimis standard because the statue's presence is not trivial in the three images.

See also the following pages that prove the statue's copyrightability.

  1. My inputs at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Statues of Liberty at New York-New York Hotel and Casino
  2. The article The United States v Davidson—Copyright infringement of a Replica Statue of Liberty. Copyright for creative copycats? by the Infusion Lawyers.
List of files

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • To other users and admins, please also throughly check for the user's other Flickr-sourced uploads that might contain no FOP violations too (images of works from countries with no commercial or insufficient freedom of panorama). The user also has uploaded other DW-problematic images from Flickr, like packaging. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 05:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 07:14, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Orizan (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, private images

BrightRaven (talk) 15:32, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 11:13, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the public domain in 2023, I uploaded it to be undeleted then. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 06:16, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 07:14, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: VRT permission needed. Ruthven (msg) 11:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not included in GWOIA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Decasurger (talk • contribs) 12:30, 12 June 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: According to Taiwan's National Development Council's (the government agency responsible for {{GWOIA}}) explanation, organizational logos are out of the scope of {{GWOIA}}. See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Logos of universities and colleges in Taiwan. --Wcam (talk) 17:29, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Wcam.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 00:21, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 11:30, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Merge to File:Flag of Belarus.svg ColorfulSmoke (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. per COM:REDUNDANT the image is used on Wikipedia. --Ellywa (talk) 11:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in Exif data: the picture was previously published on Facebook and there is no OTRS ticket. - Nutshinou Talk! 12:15, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his/her uploads as copyvios. Taivo (talk) 15:24, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation. COM:PCP applies. Timtrent (talk) 09:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 05:01, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this photo was uploaded from an earlier website which no longer exists, while the other copy is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:19, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per above discussion with nominator -M.nelson (talk) 16:22, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

zweimal drin Artisatama (talk) 07:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

in there twice
translator: Google Translate -M.nelson (talk) 13:48, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as requested by uploader shortly after upload. --Rosenzweig τ 18:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not self made Fristajl (talk) 15:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 12:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 07:09, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Фотографировал я, но файла с EXIF у меня не осталось. --Mitte27 (talk) 07:18, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep lack of EXIF no reason for deletion. Used in article. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:43, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per remark of uploader. Software like Paintbrush removes exif data, certainly the older versions. --Ellywa (talk) 22:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate of another identical photo. However, this one was uploaded from a site which no longer exists, while the other more recent photo is of higher resolution. Gary Lee Todd (talk) 09:05, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello
I don't find the other photo in higher resolution. what's the name of that file?
Squallgofsc (talk) 07:26, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I'm not able to find the other photo either, so this one should be kept. If the other file is found, please nominate for deletion again and include a link to that file. -M.nelson (talk) 13:45, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and com:DUPE, made a redirect to the larger version, File:Western Han Iron Halberd & Dagger (9930184036).jpg. --Ellywa (talk) 23:03, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in Ukraine, unfortunately rubin16 (talk) 12:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The church looks old. And an old cemetery is around this (it is visible on the picture). --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 17:19, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no proof this is an old church, I did not find a reference in various articles about this church in Polyana on en, uk, etc. --Ellywa (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no information about the publication date that would let us keep the image rubin16 (talk) 12:26, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rubin16: As for me, this is wrong. The man died before 1941. The authorship cannot be established. It doesn't matter where the scan was taken.--Arxivist (talk) 15:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
If you read the license plate, it says “ it was published before January 1, 1951”. Published doesn’t mean created, that’s why man’s death is also not an indicator here rubin16 (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Copyright in Ukraine 70 years after the death of the author or the "creation" of an anonymous author. The man is from Yevpatoria, so it is obvious that it falls under Ukrainian law Art 28.--Arxivist (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It is directly in your link that is written - article 28 point 3: “ Для творів, оприлюднених анонімно або під псевдонімом, строк дії авторського права закінчується через 70 років після того, як твір було оприлюднено.” Оприлюднено = published, not created. That is the same concept in most (maybe all) exUSSR countries, it cares about publication, not creation rubin16 (talk) 21:47, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Are you seriously? And if this photo has already been taken, then it is a priori published. She is not a manuscript of a book. Conventionally, I have a photograph of 1940 (physically) is it published or not? Is the publication for you a scanned copy only?--Arxivist (talk) 07:46, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
There is a separate definition of publication, creation of something isn't equal to it. If you have a physical copy of an old photo and it is not published, you can't upload it here (that is specific for exUSSR, some other countries count from creation, not publication). It is sad, but serious. Just, as FYI and sharing, as you know Russian language - ru:ВП:СЕМАРХИВ gives some information about old but unpublished photos. As I said, it is the same for Russia, Ukraine and other exUSSR countries. rubin16 (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think the dates and licenses are fine as they are. Mahnka (talk) 07:24, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Uploader should give COM:EVID that the image is published more then 70 years ago. The image can be undeleted safely 120 years after 1941, so 2061. [[Category:Undelete in 2061]]. --Ellywa (talk) 13:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not used anymore 2A02:A458:73F7:1:2D97:E2B2:FC53:4ED2 12:48, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The name of two districts in the north-east of the regency have been corrected in the new file, named: File:Regency South Central Timor and its districts (West Timor) v2.png; the correct name is Amanatun Utara respectively Amanatun Selatan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tajala (talk • contribs) 17:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File is used on many pages on ban.wikipedia.org. --Ellywa (talk) 13:55, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Wikipedia:Tablón de anuncios de los bibliotecarios/Portal/Archivo/Miscelánea/Actual#Caso Sonaes, the uploader is the person photographed and it isn't a selfie, who's the photographer? Ezarateesteban 16:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I do not see evidence that the subject claims he made this photo. The link provided does not work. So no reason for deletion imho. --Ellywa (talk) 13:58, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i renamed this file File:கம்பன் கலை நிலை உரைநடை தொகுதி-1.pdf as File:புலவர் உலகம், கம்பன் கலை நிலை 1.pdf. so, this rename / redirect name is not required.-Info-farmer (talk) 13:31, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion, especially after five years.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 13:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i renamed this file File:கம்பன் கலை நிலை உரைநடை தொகுதி-2.pdf as File:புலவர் உலகம், கம்பன் கலை நிலை 2.pdf. so, this rename / redirect name is not required.--Info-farmer (talk) 13:37, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, no valid reason for deletion, especially after five years.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 17:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
sorry for the misconception. we, ta.wikisource, do not need this file's redirection name only (File:கம்பன் கலை நிலை 2.pdf)not the file. It's original name is File:கம்பன் கலை நிலை உரைநடை தொகுதி-2.pdf. By mistake, first i redirected the original name into File:கம்பன் கலை நிலை 2.pdf Then, i understand the mistake and again i redirect the name as File:புலவர் உலகம், கம்பன் கலை நிலை 2.pdf which available as index in ta.wikisource. so, if possible keep the second rediect name(File:புலவர் உலகம், கம்பன் கலை நிலை 2.pdf) and delete the original name(File:கம்பன் கலை நிலை உரைநடை தொகுதி-2.pdf) and first redirect(File:கம்பன் கலை நிலை 2.pdf) names not the file.--Info-farmer (talk) 04:04, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellywa (talk) 14:00, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

esiste già una foto come questa GabScat (talk) 17:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please provide the link to the duplicate file so it can be evaluated again. --Ellywa (talk) 14:01, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version and original have same content Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:01, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and com:REDUNDANT. Not in use, File:Martha's Vineyard Railroad at Katawa Lodge (John H White Jr collection No 523).jpg is much sharper verion. Will delete redirect as well. --Ellywa (talk) 14:04, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required — Preceding unsigned comment added by A1Cafel (talk • contribs) 16:21, 9 June 2021‎ (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: What is your basis for that conclusion about the transmission code?   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 18:37, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: should be deleted because of the copyright of the painted faces. --Ellywa (talk) 14:07, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Descripción del Archivo equivocada JoaquínMJF (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, @JoaquínMJF: you can rename the image if this is not correct. --Ellywa (talk) 14:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The map is a tracing of the map produced by Sebők László, consequently is a derivative work. The IP is owned by the Teleki László Institute and László Sebõk and László Sáry according to http://www.geog.port.ac.uk/hist-bound/project_rep/proj_eurograph.htm.

Though the map appears to be released for non-profit use, this does not comply with COM:L nor is it equivalent to the GNU and CC-BY-SA licenses currently displayed. (talk) 09:20, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: why do we assume that map was received by tracing of the non-free map? I zoomed in and checked borders line - they are not equal in terms of how lines were put there. I suppose the non-free map was used as a source of data, not just a basis of something redrawn. --rubin16 (talk) 17:14, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by as no source (No source since) rubin16 (talk) 21:49, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some sort of incorrect appeal by placing speedy template while it should be done in a different way. Converted to appealed DR myself rubin16 (talk) 21:50, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The correct process was followed for obviously derived works with no source.
The above DR that you closed has failed to supply any evidence for where the underpinning map has come from. There never was any claim that the map was own work, it just never has had a source.
Deletion is required per COM:PRP, COM:L and COM:DW. From a technical point of view, it was never clear why this is a PNG file, a format that throws doubt on how it was sourced, and unfortunately, the original metadata shows nothing helpful. -- (talk) 22:08, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep What nonsense. There can be no copyrights to the reproduction of state and other political borders, as well as the location of places on maps. These inevitably always look the same, because they are historical and political in origin and thus cannot represent an artistic work with any copyrights. The same applies to the graphic reproduction of collected data such as, in this case, census data. This data is also not a work of an author worthy of copyright, but the mere reproduction of the result of a census. Thus, no author has any personal influence on the reproduction of these facts as a marked area on a map. These will have to look inevitably always the same. Same numbers, same areas. The only design possibility is the choice of colors. But this is like a children's coloring book and has no creative power. Thus, any question in connection with a source is also superfluous.--Ciao • Bestoernesto 16:05, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 14:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nyarlathotep1001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Potential copyvio. Missing valid exifdata. Some of images contain watermark (e.g. 3). Most of images are low resolution (e.g. 1 2 ) and can be found in the Internet by Google search (e.g. 4 can be found in [4], 5 can be found in [5] )

SCP-2000 09:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SCP-2000: A few of the photos are suspect (mainly the ones containing a watermark), but most of them are original and cannot be found on the Internet by Google Search. The Google Search examples that were linked by the nominator above lead only to pages that either direct back to Wikipedia pages where these images I uploaded were used or to pages that are directly copying those Wikipedia articles (meaning to say that, the Google Searches are actually linking back to these very images that I uploaded here). Nyarlathotep1001 (talk) 11:33, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As the uploader has uploaded much of images that missing exifdata and some of images can be found in internet, I recommend that should be mass deleted. Here is some example that taken from othere website and not own work:
SCP-2000 11:54, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Recommend deleting some but not all the images. Most of the images are own works and are cannot be found on other sites (barring those sites that are basically copies of Wikipedia pages and using these very images that are uploaded on this site), such as:

Nyarlathotep1001 (talk) 17:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FoP China: “Indoor works: OK since June 2021 with the 2020 amendment of the copyright law.” Thus indoor files not obviously copyvio should be kept — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.216.207.31 (talk) 21:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
FOP is unrelated to this case. SCP-2000 10:50, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per nomination, deleted files on the list kindly provided by User:Nyarlathotep1001, so around 60 images could be kept. --Ellywa (talk) 20:59, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]