Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
There is another file that requires same name. Haideronwiki (talk) 03:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
The logo has been changed David.manoukian (talk) 07:28, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
The logo of this organization has been changed and the new logo is uploaded to Wikimedia commons. David.h.manoukian (talk) 10:12, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Sorry, Commons is seriously understaffed. I'll delete the logo as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Duplicate|File:Google Fonts logo.svg}} Haideronwiki (talk) 11:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Created by mistake — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eleazar~enwiki (talk • contribs) 09:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Speedy delete per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Oils_lamps_in_Palestine&diff=540807463&oldid=540806743 and COM:CSD#G7. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
kl,k ôji 212.234.77.58 09:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense. --Achim (talk) 17:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eda Naz Duru (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparent copyvios - low res, no EXIF, visual characteristics suggest screen captures from some video source (e.g., File:Başak Sengül.jpg is clearly from this @ ca. 0:36). Duck/COM:PRP issue.
- File:Zeynep Tuğçe Bayat.jpg
- File:Başak Sengül.jpg
- File:İlayda Akdoğan.jpg
- File:Emine Ün.jpg
- File:Ecem Baltacı8.jpg
- File:Ecem Baltacı.jpg
- File:Elif Doğan.jpg
- File:Cüneyt Mete.jpg
- File:Seda Güven.jpg
- File:Zeynep Günay Tan8.jpg
- File:Gözde Kaya8.jpg
- File:Gözde Kaya.jpg
- File:Fulya Öztürk.jpg
- File:Gizem Karaca.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 18:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Nevermind. Found to be sock of Selen Yağmur. Unambiguous copyvios (F1/F3). --Эlcobbola talk 18:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Movie poster with no indication it is available under the license stipulated nor any indication the work is provably of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Movie poster with no indication it is available under the license stipulated nor any indication the work is provably of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 16:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded the original photo containing EXIF data. I'll change a picture later. 蝠翔似黑潮 (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:18, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE - this appears to be tantamount to a wiki-style article rendered as a pdf. Inappropriate as both an article (see also COM:NOT) and fails scope as not being a media file (a defined term that precludes "Files which are representative merely of raw text") Эlcobbola talk 18:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status.
- The identified author of the photo is Dave Guttridge, a professional photographer trading as The Photo Unit, whose clients include Imperial College (where the subject of the photo works), and whose website states his photographs are copyright him.
- The stated source of the photograph however, is from the Wikimedia blog, where it was included in a blog post, credited as "Photo via (subject), CC BY-SA 4.0."
- The person who uploaded it here, is neither the subject, the photographer, an Imperial employee, or the Wikimedia blog author.
It has to be assumed therefore, without a clear statement to the contrary, that somebody somewhere in this complex chain of custody, has not obtained a proper release from the author and/or Imperial and/or subject (or properly recorded said release to denote who owns what and how it came to be here). Markus Warner (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I suppose we can argue about whether the copyright status is unclear, but I trust the Wikipedia blog author verified the copyright status of the photo before publishing it as "Photo via Jess Wade, CC BY-SA 4.0" // sikander { talk } 🦖 00:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- The claimed copyright status here is clear (author, source, license and subject all documented), but it doesn't actually match the status implied by that credit line. I cannot trust the judgement of a blog author who apparently didn't realise it's a requirement of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license to include attribution to the picture creator, David Guttridge, and possibly also Imperial, if they also hold an interest. Commercial photographers don't take what looks like a commercial (and quite specific) use photograph, and then sign away all commercial interests in it, including transferring/voiding their basic attribution right, just so it can be put on a blog. It clearly isn't a selfie, it was possibly a favour/gift, but the sort of confusion that could give rise to that credit line on the blog, is common. Markus Warner (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Info The filer of this request is a globally locked harassing LTA. Blablubbs (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- The claimed copyright status here is clear (author, source, license and subject all documented), but it doesn't actually match the status implied by that credit line. I cannot trust the judgement of a blog author who apparently didn't realise it's a requirement of the CC BY-SA 4.0 license to include attribution to the picture creator, David Guttridge, and possibly also Imperial, if they also hold an interest. Commercial photographers don't take what looks like a commercial (and quite specific) use photograph, and then sign away all commercial interests in it, including transferring/voiding their basic attribution right, just so it can be put on a blog. It clearly isn't a selfie, it was possibly a favour/gift, but the sort of confusion that could give rise to that credit line on the blog, is common. Markus Warner (talk) 22:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: closing this deletion discussion as Keep for the time being, as it's a LTA who is harassing Jess. --Nick (talk) 09:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Click To Go as no permission (No permission since)
Previously survived DR, ineligible for speedy. Converting to DR for further discussion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:38, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete per the precautionary principle. Absent any clarifications from the parties directly involved, that one credit line ("via Jess Wade") is frankly doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Satisfying existing and future re-users that this is a legally released image currently seems to rely on little more than guesswork regarding the precise circumstances and contractual arrangements that led to this image being created, and what communications took place between Wade and the blog author to satisfy themselves they were aware of the full implications of that credit line. Simply trusting the parties involved surely has no basis in policy, precisely because the circumstances are so unclear. Click To Go (talk) 22:13, 7 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete for pretty much the same reasons I pointed here. ─ The Aafī (talk) 04:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This should presumably also cover File:June-8 Jess Wafe BEM.jpg and File:WikiHerStory - Jess Wade.png, so @AJohnson (WMF), Victuallers, and Jesswade88: . Maybe someone knows how to add those derivative images to this deletion request?
Keep As the King of Hearts wrote earlier, when a large organization says an image is released under an acceptable license we generally believe them. The fact that large organization is Wikimedia itself, all the more so. After all, if we can't believe Wikimedia, how can we believe OTRS/VRT? After all, they're just permissions-commons@wikimedia.org...--GRuban (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- @GRuban I must ask again, where did Wikimedia Foundation claim that the image is freely-licensed? I also pointed in my reply that I linked above about certain problems wrt permissions on the Diff blog in very recent blogs. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Let's wait for the subject and/or the Wikimedia Foundation folks to respond to the pings. I could make a convincing argument that would go nowhere if one of them shows up and says "whoops!", or, vice versa, they could show up and say, "yes, we're sure because of X". --GRuban (talk) 17:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- @GRuban I must ask again, where did Wikimedia Foundation claim that the image is freely-licensed? I also pointed in my reply that I linked above about certain problems wrt permissions on the Diff blog in very recent blogs. ─ The Aafī (talk) 14:04, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Embaressing If this project doesnt believe itself then whats the point in offering a view? Is there nothing that we are mot willing to throw on to this bonfire for common sense Victuallers (talk) 07:05, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete unless permission is provided through OTRS/VRT; based on the image extracted from the blog.wikimedia.org post [1], the metadata indicates the image creator is a professional photographer who generally retains copyright for their images (according to their website), but is not credited in the blog.wikimedia.org attribution. If the image creator has provided permission, then this can be made available, i.e. through OTRS/VRT, which appears to be standard practice, e.g. FAQ: I am not the author, but I have permission. Beccaynr (talk) 13:41, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- OTRS/VRT is the exception and by no means the rule. Over 99% of Commons files are here because they are either PD due to age, or marked with a free license on the site where they were published; fewer than 1% have OTRS/VRT permission. Not to say that requiring such permission isn't necessary at times, but it's certainly not the standard. --GRuban (talk) 18:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- To clarify my comment, when I wrote "standard practice, e.g." followed by a link to a Commons FAQ section, this was intended to indicate an apparent standard practice when someone is not the author of an image, but has permission. Beccaynr (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- OTRS/VRT is the exception and by no means the rule. Over 99% of Commons files are here because they are either PD due to age, or marked with a free license on the site where they were published; fewer than 1% have OTRS/VRT permission. Not to say that requiring such permission isn't necessary at times, but it's certainly not the standard. --GRuban (talk) 18:38, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
- Delete with prejudice Jess Wade was directly asked to comment here on 20th Ocotber. She has completely ignored it. This shows a flagrant disregard of the issues raised, namely what, if anything, did she do to reassure the blog author she was legally entitled to release that image on a free license. The blog author no longer works for the Foundation, and the absence of any proof she filed paperwork with the Foundation to demonstrate she had satisfied herself Wade was legally entitled to release it, combined with Wade's silence, leads to only one logical conclusion. This image represents both a legal risk and a reputations risk to Commons, precisely because it involves a corporation and an editor who absolutely should know better. And to state the obvious, no, trusting large organizations to just know what they are doing when it comes to licensing, is not Commons policy. You don't even need to see proof that even the Foundation doesn't necessarily know what it's obligations are to know that, but thankfully someone has provided it. Jekarran (talk) 19:03, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
Kept. I reviewed the license. Wikimedia movement is generally very competent in copyright matters and I see no reason to doubt in license. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
unused; selfpromo Jan Myšák (talk) 08:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- no its not for SELF PROMO. — Preceding unsigned comment added by FeedeL (talk • contribs) 08:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Certainly looks like it to me, considering all your xwiki contributions are to this one company, which you are quite clearly connected to… --Jan Myšák (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Herbythyme (talk • contribs • blocks • protections • deletions • moves • rights • rights changes) (non-admin closure). Ixfd64 (talk) 17:52, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
may be COM:ADVERT Netora (talk) 01:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
COM:ADVERT Netora (talk) 13:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 11:49, 17 März 2021 UTC: Failed license review; non-free license (F4) --Krdbot 15:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ali ahmed andalousi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works, but likely taken from internet: inconsistent sizes and format, low-res, missing EXIF data. Many found online, missing original source and permission. Unreliable uploader.
- File:Mahjoubi Aherdane.png
- File:Cherif Kheddam.png
- File:Mouha Oulhoussein Achiban.png
- File:Harazem.png
- File:Hyperion.webp
- File:Moroccan Moukhala type TAOUZILT.png
- File:Moroccan Moukhala type Tetuán and Rif.png
- File:Moroccan Moukhala type ALTIT.jpg
- File:Moroccan Moukhala type AFEDALI.jpg
- File:Memouna cannon 2.jpg
- File:Bocchus-ii-a-77000344-jpg.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:17, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal images, out of scope. Self promo on wikidata.
- File:B'Atista.jpg
- File:Rosto Divino B'Atista.jpg
- File:Perfil B'Atista, Divino.jpg
- File:Divino B'Atista 2.jpg
- File:Divino B'Atista3.jpg
Minoraxtalk 09:17, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
- Delete File:B'Atista.jpg is even a fresh reupload of a previously deleted picure File:Divino B'Atista.jpg.--QTHCCAN (talk) 20:24, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 03:08, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and previous section. I have warned the uploader. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:21, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:18, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohdshmshad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Scope personal photos and some unnecessary pics of other types.
- File:MOHD SHMSHAD - Copy.jpg
- File:NEERAJ WITH ME.jpg
- File:NEERAJ.jpg
- File:NEERAJ WITH ME5 - Copy.jpg
- File:ME 6 - Copy.jpg
- File:Monal gajjar.jpg
- File:SHKTIYAN3.png
- File:Tfd sahabaganj.jpg
- File:Tfd taj.png
- File:NEERAJ WITH ME 0 - Copy.jpg
- File:MOHD SHMSHAD 4 - Copy.jpg
- File:MOHD SHMSHAD TFD.jpg
- File:TAJ FLOWER DECORATION.jpg
- File:NAUSHAD.JPG.jpg
- File:NAUSHAD.jpg
- File:MOHD NAUDHAD.jpg
- File:MOHD SHMSHAD SAHABAGANJ SULTANPUR.jpg
- File:MOHD SHMSHAD.jpg
Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 05:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:21, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohdshmshad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 09:08, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohdshmshad (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE.
- File:मोहम्मद शमशाद Sultanpur 2.jpg
- File:मोहम्मद शमशाद Sultanpur.jpg
- File:MOHD SHMSHAD SULTANPUR.jpg
- File:MOHD SHMSHAD 2.jpg
- File:ताज फ्लॉवर डेकोरेशन.png
CptViraj (talk) 16:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:19, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BIT Meerut (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos by non-contributor, promotional edits, promotional username
- File:Jeewna.jpg
- File:Sita Sharan Logo2.jpg
- File:Sita Sharan Principal.jpg
- File:Sita Sharan Logo.jpg
- File:Nikesh Jeewna2.jpg
- File:Ashish Vishwakarma BIT.jpg
- File:Punit Goyal BIT.jpg
- File:Vikhyat Tyagi BIT.jpg
- File:Mayur Kant Tyagi BIT.jpg
- File:BIT College Meerut Sky.jpg
- File:Nikesh Jeewna.jpg
- File:बीआईटी मेरठ खेल.jpg
- File:BIT Meerut Sports Team.jpg
QueerEcofeminist[they/them/their] 18:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Happy faet (talk · contribs)
[edit]File sizes like Facebook, no metadata, claimed as own work but appear to be professional.
- File:Flu-1679104 960 720.webp
- File:Coronavirus-4947755 340.webp
- File:Epidemic-4952933 340.jpg
- File:Estornudo.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 02:20, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of a non-notable Twitter user. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 03:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:26, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of unknown person. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 07:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of project scope. Nanahuatl (talk) 07:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused file. Does it have educational value? Taivo (talk) 10:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:28, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused, unexplained image, looks like personal artwork, no information available about "group". Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:29, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope, like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cofounder.png. Wikisaurus (talk) 13:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope, like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cofounder.png. Wikisaurus (talk) 13:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope, like Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cofounder.png. Wikisaurus (talk) 13:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Genealogical relationship between Timur and Qubilai With His ancestor Tumbinai & Temüjin.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:33, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:34, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:36, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
No location, no intuitive content, no educational or exemplar value. Richard Avery (talk) 17:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Sorry, in my opinion this upload missed our project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:37, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AQUA PROTECH (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:ADVERT --Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 18:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
out of scope - COM:SELFIE Nintendofan885T&Cs apply 19:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vicky at 1st CENTRAL (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional images, article was deleted on the English Wikipedia.
Ixfd64 (talk) 19:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
File:Friedrich A. Dirkmann Governments- Industrial- Economic- Independently honorarium- Pro-Bono- and Prive consulter and Investor Special extraordinary extreme worldwide Ambassador for special extraordinary extreme worldwide af0.jpg
[edit]Self-promotion, cf. de:Spezial:PermaLink/209668313 and de:Special:DeletedContributions/Friedrich A. Dirkmann. Schniggendiller (talk) 22:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:40, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused presentation slide. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 23:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Image with Copyright © 2020 Primicias24.com Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 17:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 14:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 09:05, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 09:06, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 16:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
Credit line in metadata says "© European Union 2019 - Source : EP" Ytoyoda (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 10:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Philippines. According to en:SM Megamall, the building appears to be from 1991.Stefan4 (talk) 12:33, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:TOO. I can hardly see what is copyrightable about this building. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- All of those examples are from France and are based on guessing what the words "without a particular or original character" in COM:FOP#France mean. The formulation is very vague, so it is entirely possible that some or all of those DRs got a wrong closure. Also, the threshold of originality in the Philippines may differ from that in France. Do you have any examples from the Philippines? --Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
- As Philippine copyright law is based on US law, I would imagine threshold of originality would be defined similarly (the US has a pretty high bar). The Philippines just doesn't have enough case law to decide it one way or another. On Commons, if we are not sure about something because of insufficient research on our part, we play it safe and delete, but if we're not sure about something because it actually is pending case law, we keep. Take, for example, the URAA pictures that were provisionally accepted before the court ruling came out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 09:45, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- I just found the following in Sec. 186: "Copyright in a work of architecture shall include the right to control the erection of any building which reproduces the whole or a substantial part of the work either in its original form or in any form recognizably derived from the original: Provided, That the copyright in any such work shall not include the right to control the reconstruction or rehabilitation in the same style as the original of a building to which that copyright relates." While not directly related, I think this implies some sort of threshold. Think about it: Suppose someone built a building shaped like a grey cube, with no features, nothing at all. If someone else came along and built a grey cube-shaped featureless building (which is almost identical to the first by necessity of the description), is that a copyright violation? You could say, well, it's almost identical, and hence "recognizably derived from the original." But an idea that can be expressed in a short phrase like "grey cube-shaped featureless building" is merely a style, and so we have a contradiction. So we conclude that there ought to be some threshold of originality, only above which is an idea separable from its expression. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 10:26, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that quote looks interesting. There is also another thing: COM:CRT#The Philippines tells that artistic works are copyrighted for life+50 years whereas applied art only is copyrighted for creation+25 years. Would a building count as an artistic work or as applied art? It doesn't affect anything here, but it is certainly relevant for other buildings. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have always been using creation+25, as you can see the parameters I have been putting in w:Template:FoP-USonly on my transfers of Philippine building photos from here to enwiki. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:41, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, that quote looks interesting. There is also another thing: COM:CRT#The Philippines tells that artistic works are copyrighted for life+50 years whereas applied art only is copyrighted for creation+25 years. Would a building count as an artistic work or as applied art? It doesn't affect anything here, but it is certainly relevant for other buildings. --Stefan4 (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
- All of those examples are from France and are based on guessing what the words "without a particular or original character" in COM:FOP#France mean. The formulation is very vague, so it is entirely possible that some or all of those DRs got a wrong closure. Also, the threshold of originality in the Philippines may differ from that in France. Do you have any examples from the Philippines? --Stefan4 (talk) 18:50, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Kept: as per KoH. Yann (talk) 16:40, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
SM malls are considered as distinct architectural works in the Philippines (and architecture is treated as a form of fine arts here rather than applied art as in the West). This particular section of SM Megamall is the original Buildings A and B, which were designed by Architect Antonio Sindiong who died in 1996. There's no freedom of panorama yet in the Philippines, and COM:OTRS permission from Sindiong's heirs is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:15, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
One file showing Malacañan Palace has been deleted due to no freedom of panorama in the Philippines (Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Malacañang Palace). Unless replaced, the entire montage is collaterally compromised. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:11, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal National Shrine and Parish (Sucat, Muntinlupa City)
[edit]No COM:FOP Philippines as of now. The building, finished and consecrated in 1980, was designed by architect Jose Ma. Zaragosa[2] who died in 1994 (according to the enwiki article on the architect). Permission from Zaragosa's heirs is required for retention of these freely-licensed images of his work, or restore only if FOP is officially introduced here.
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 10.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 11.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 15.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 16.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 17.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 18.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 19.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 20.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 26.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 27.JPG
- File:FvfMetroManila6304 32.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 09.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 12.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 13.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 17.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 18.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 21.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 22.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 23.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 27.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 28.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 29.JPG
- File:FvfSucatShrinedjf6339 30.JPG
- File:SucatChurchjf6371 01.JPG
- File:SucatChurchjf6371 02.JPG
- File:SucatChurchjf6371 03.JPG
- File:SucatChurchjf6371 23.JPG
- File:SucatChurchjf6371 24.JPG
- File:SucatChurchjf6371 26.JPG
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 19:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in the phils and no permission from the heirs of creator ANASTACIO CAEDO - 1990 died - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anastacio_Caedo the article includes "The Death March Memorial, Capas, Tarlac"
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 02.JPG
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 10.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 05.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 06.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 07.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 08.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 11.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 17.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 19.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 20.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 21.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 23.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 24.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 29.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 30.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 31.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 32.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 33.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 01.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 02.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 07.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 10.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 02.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 03.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 04.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 05.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 10.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 12.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 13.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 15.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 18.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 22.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 24.JPG
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 09:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Keep Because the Tourism Office of Capas Tarlac when I visited Judge Alipio C. Yumul of the Capas Regional Trial Court at the Capas Town Hall - expressly gave me permission to take photos of their monuments and memorials, like this and Rizal monuments; this is a National and Capas Treasure, Government Property; only the heirs of the sculptor may question any FOP infringement in the Special Courts, as strictly provided by the 2019 New S.C. Circular, implementing the Copyright and Intellectual Property laws in the Civil Code; with more reason, any editor here has no Legal rights whatsoever to question any Uploading; besides, the Aguinaldo Monument like Rizal Monuments in the Philippines and Cavite are owned by the National or here the Local Government Code; hence, under this Special Law, the Artists alleged creators have no Copyright rights since they were paid by the Municipal Goverment; in addition the façade or exterior is unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of National or Local Government which granted me express permission to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantage in the future elections, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; In support of my stance, opposition to the delition and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons administrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 10:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Kept: Nominator was blocked temporarily due to mass nomination of images from PH. Someone else can review and nominate if they see fit. Thanks. --Missvain (talk) 22:11, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Reviewing this object again. According to [3], this was commissioned by then-President Corazón Aquino on December 7, 1991. The sculptor is unknown, and without tangible evidence of a written stipulation of copyright transfer, copyright still remains with the sculptors who designed the shrine.
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 01.JPG
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 02.JPG
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 03.JPG
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 05.JPG
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 06.JPG
- File:006jfSanto Domingo March Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 10.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 01.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 05.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 06.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 07.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 08.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 11.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 17.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 19.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 20.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 21.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 23.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 24.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 25.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 26.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 29.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 30.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 31.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 32.JPG
- File:09929jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 33.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 01.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 02.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 03.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 04.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 07.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 08.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 09.JPG
- File:09969jfSanto March Marker Capas Park Children Tarlacfvf 10.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 02.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 03.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 04.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 05.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 07.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 10.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 12.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 13.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 15.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 18.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 19.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 22.JPG
- File:09979jfSanto Domingo March Marker Capas Park Road Tarlacfvf 24.JPG
- File:9899jfSanto Domingo Park March Marker Capas Tarlacfvf 07.JPG
- File:9899jfSanto Domingo Park March Marker Capas Tarlacfvf 10.JPG
- File:9899jfSanto Domingo Park March Marker Capas Tarlacfvf 16.JPG
- File:9899jfSanto Domingo Park March Marker Capas Tarlacfvf 21.JPG
- File:9899jfSanto Domingo Park March Marker Capas Tarlacfvf 23.JPG
- File:Death march memorial - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:40, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Structure is incorrect Vortioxetine (talk) 00:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. It is incorrect and has already been replaced by File:ACT-335827.svg. Marbletan (talk) 19:47, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete perhaps even per speedy deletion as the file was nominated for deletion by the original author. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 21:53, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Request by original uploader. --Leyo 14:26, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Dublette von File:Sansui AU-D11 Integrated Audio Amplifier 1980-retusched.jpg nach Derivative Work Pittigrilli (talk) 18:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- This deletion request was a mistake. I have removed the tag from the file already, please delete this page as well as other traces. Sorry, Pittigrilli (talk) 18:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: DR withdrawn. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
We have a larger and better quality version of this at File:Saltillo1846.jpg which was here 9 years before the nominated file was uploaded. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment Redirect small version to larger. (I have added the better categorization information to the larger version with additional improvements.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: and kept a redirect. --Achim (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Typo in Lemma--Ramsch (talk) 10:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of non-free game. Also seems to have a watermark Bultro (talk) 21:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:29, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Views of "Tours de la Défense" (recent buildings). There is no freedom of panorama in France, permission from the architecs is required for publication of this photo. Poudou99 (talk) 13:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 13:30, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation [4], [5], permission missing (and won't be provided...) Jcornelius (talk) 13:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fa:بهینهسازی خطی عدد صحیح with TeX equivalent:
Persian numbers were replaced by Arabic numbers, as it was done in the rest of the formulas in the article. Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 16:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 13:53, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fa:بهینهسازی خطی عدد صحیح with TeX equivalent:
Persian numbers were replaced by Arabic numbers, as it was done in the rest of the formulas in the article. Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 16:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 00:10, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fa:بهینهسازی خطی عدد صحیح with TeX equivalent:
Persian numbers were replaced by Arabic numbers, as it was done in the rest of the formulas in the article. Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 16:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hanooz 00:09, 9 April 2021 (UTC)
No actual content KandidKansan (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This media doesn't make sense. --Netora (talk) 10:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Yasu (talk) 15:28, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SleepyKiings Blogs (talk · contribs)
[edit]Logos of a non-notable YouTuber, appears to be self-promotional. Out of project scope.
ƏXPLICIT 03:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - Per nom. Pbrks (talk) 17:47, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 18:56, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
Право на неприкосновенность частной жизни, личную и семейную тайну, защиту своей чести и доброго имени Exemnia (talk) 11:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, you have uploaded this image nearly 2 years ago by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:05, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Право на неприкосновенность частной жизни, личную и семейную тайну, защиту своей чести и доброго имени Exemnia (talk) 11:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Право на неприкосновенность частной жизни, личную и семейную тайну, защиту своей чести и доброго имени Exemnia (talk) 11:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, you have uploaded this image nearly 2 years ago by yourself. --Túrelio (talk) 10:19, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal photo, courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 12:41, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Wikiedro as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: G7. Author or uploader request deletion (username before rename, previous global count and global rename); G1. Test page: failed test image.
Converted to regular DR, as file does not qualify for speedy. -- Túrelio (talk) 19:11, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment They did so in Special:Diff/428496750, which was marked as minor but also removed Category:Controlled-access highways. We should consider restoring that category (I am not familiar enough with the subject to take that responsibility myself). Brianjd (talk) 13:26, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- [Remove] I am the author this file, and I want to remove the Wikimedia Commons (G1: failed test image). In the Wikipedia in spanish Emperierisse redirect to Wikiedro (see). The photography has not current use (has never been used). Wikiedro 14:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Wikiedro: When you say “commons”, do you mean Wikimedia Commons (in which case the community may grant your request, although I oppose it) or Creative Commons? When you uploaded the file, you applied a range of licences (mostly Creative Commons); all of these licences are irrevocable. Brianjd (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I mean Wikimedia Commons. I love creative commons licenses, but in this case a failed test should not be public. Wikiedro 14:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Wikiedro: You made it public yourself, a full nine years ago. Nine years! Also, please read Commons:Signatures and add the required link. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- I didn't have the same engagement on Wikimedia as today. As well, and due to the redirect, I forgot User:Emperierisse count in Wikimedia Commons (the change was made before the existence of Global renamers, and before my global account), so I forgot the existence of this image, until now. Sorry for delay. I did a rapid check on the internet, and it seems that the file has not been used outside of Wikimedia Commons. Obviously not 100% secure, but it doesn't seem to have been used (see). Wikiedro (talk) 15:50, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Wikiedro: You made it public yourself, a full nine years ago. Nine years! Also, please read Commons:Signatures and add the required link. Brianjd (talk) 15:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Yes, I mean Wikimedia Commons. I love creative commons licenses, but in this case a failed test should not be public. Wikiedro 14:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- Did you redirect the file talk page to your user talk page on eswiki? That seems like a bad idea, although I cannot speak for the eswiki community. Brianjd (talk) 14:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- @Wikiedro: When you say “commons”, do you mean Wikimedia Commons (in which case the community may grant your request, although I oppose it) or Creative Commons? When you uploaded the file, you applied a range of licences (mostly Creative Commons); all of these licences are irrevocable. Brianjd (talk) 14:34, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
- [Remove] I am the author this file, and I want to remove the Wikimedia Commons (G1: failed test image). In the Wikipedia in spanish Emperierisse redirect to Wikiedro (see). The photography has not current use (has never been used). Wikiedro 14:15, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
Túrelio, a question: When is there a resolution? Wikiedro (talk) 01:59, 26 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Wikiedro: When an administrator gets around to closing this request. Administrators are volunteers and there is no set timeframe. Túrelio is an administrator, but they are also the nominator, so they cannot close this request. Brianjd (talk) 14:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
- Another reason (and most important): This image infringe our privacy (I will not go into details). Wikiedro (talk) 17:02, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
- Wow, we will imagine that this pic was taken from your balcony, but regrettably we do not know which city it is. Oooh, Wikiedro is also not just one person but a group of friends; when we find out which city this pic was taken then we will have to guess which one of the people to whom the balcony belongs... Of course as soon as we find out what part of the unknown city the building is situated. Ehem. --E4024 (talk) 17:22, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
When is there a resolution? Wikiedro (talk) 12:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of unused image, little use anyway without location. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:01, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Not used 216.98.11.85 19:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- If you are User:Emile1988 login please and confirm this DR. --Achim (talk) 19:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: procedural close: was already speedily deleted by Túrelio. --Gestumblindi (talk) 12:32, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
User page image of a non-contributing user. E4024 (talk) 12:41, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Not an "own work". E4024 (talk) 19:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, no real information about source, publication history et cetera. Thuresson (talk) 21:18, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
How is this public domain? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:54, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- I see no support for claimed license at source webpage. Unless license can be verified, Delete -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 22:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
5KB by a newcomer. WhatsApp? From the net? E4024 (talk) 01:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, an article about the subject was speedy deleted at English Wikipedia, see en:User talk:Wikipediamagic.123. Thuresson (talk) 17:47, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
8KB "own work" by a newcomer... E4024 (talk) 01:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete It seems to be the same (scaled down) image on the official site of the football team he plays for: https://www.redbullbragantino.com.br/elenco/cleiton. If so, it should be a copyviol. --146.241.214.48 16:33, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 17:53, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
15KB dubious own work by a newcomer. E4024 (talk) 01:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Image size 195 × 260 px. Thuresson (talk) 18:11, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
115KB dubious own work by a newcomer. E4024 (talk) 01:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kudai Talca.jpg who concerned a photo uploaded by same contributor. Thuresson (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
70KB dubious "own work", w/o camera EXIF but with a tr code, by a newcomer. Typical social media image. E4024 (talk) 01:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. The subject is fashion designer et:Gerli A. Chantelle. Uploaded on March 10, 2021 with the claim that this photo is from March 4, 2021. This photo was actually uploaded on subject's Facebook page on November 3, 2020. The visible JPEG artifacts makes it probable that the photo is much older and from another source altogether. Thuresson (talk) 18:46, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 08:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
While this is not my own work, and my filing it as such was a mistake, this work does belong to the Brissenden Family, who have given me permission to upload it, so that I can use it for an English Wikipedia page which I am writing about William Brissenden. I am not sure how I can prove this. If you have any suggestions, please tell me. Thank you! DrOwl19 (talk) 16:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @DrOwl19: You can submit the permission to OTRS--A1Cafel (talk) 07:02, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, I will do so. DrOwl19 (talk) 14:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. May be undeleted if and when successfully processed by a hardworking OTRS volunteer. Thuresson (talk) 18:49, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
The painter died in 1982, there is no indication that the uploader has the permission the publish the artwork under a free license. XenonX3 (talk) 10:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Painting by es:Joaquín Valverde Lasarte. Thuresson (talk) 18:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Unclear context, commercial, out of scope. Jcornelius (talk) 22:12, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded by vandal from wikidata; person on photo is definetely not Amparo Grisales WindEwriX (talk) 12:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 18:54, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
The image has been uploaded without permission by the copyright holder (me). Tombjo (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: The uploader himself added the author's name "Tom Björklund". --Achim (talk) 19:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 19:19, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
corporate stock image ViperSnake151 (talk) 06:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, "source: Amc Theaters". Thuresson (talk) 20:21, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - nonsense screenshot of Commons main page with no educational utility, and especially with user links in upper right. (User may also be NOTHERE.) Also technically a copyvio as a COM:DW of File:Kifli made with spelt flour (Serbian cuisine).jpg that fails to attribute the author and thus breaches the attribution requirement of that image's cc-by-sa license. Эlcobbola talk 14:58, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 20:24, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Not in scope nor an "own work" as claimed. E4024 (talk) 17:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, not in use today. It is possible it was used for a deleted draft, see en:User talk:Sssidshubham. Thuresson (talk) 20:28, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Great name but I doubt scope, never heard of it. E4024 (talk) 17:17, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, not in use today. It is possible it was used for a deleted draft, see en:User talk:Sssidshubham. Thuresson (talk) 20:26, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
living artist Frypie (talk) 17:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Nomination by uploader. Thuresson (talk) 20:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
living artist Frypie (talk) 17:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, nomination by uploader. Thuresson (talk) 20:34, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a cropped version of the image available at http://climatehawksvote.com/candidate/jana-lynne-sanchez/ The most likely copyright holder is Jana Lynne Sanchez or Climate Hawks Vote Political Action. It is dubious that the uploader is the copyright holder. MarioGom (talk) 17:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jana Lynne Sanchez.jpg MarioGom (talk) 08:50, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete On the grounds of copyvio.
Acagastya (talk) 12:16, 6 April 2021 (UTC) - Keep see w:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brandon Lapin/Archive - this is likely paid editing by the Sanchez campaign - and therefore appropriately licensed (though it got them blocked on enwiki). Elli (talk) 02:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
- As discussed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jana Lynne Sanchez.jpg, it may be a member of the campaign, it could be a contractor, or not. None of that guarantees there's permission from the copyright holder. An OTRS ticket is required. MarioGom (talk) 12:32, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per MarioGom. Thuresson (talk) 20:35, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
No copyright information is included, so this is likely to be a Boeing copyrighted image BilCat (talk) 23:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, "source: ABC News". Thuresson (talk) 20:44, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 19:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. This German Democratic Republic photo is obviously not from 2019. Thuresson (talk) 22:22, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Nanahuatl (talk) 19:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:25, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Glorious 93 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong license and logo still under copyrights. 1989 (talk) 20:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, cropped version of fair use image en:File:L.D.U. Cuenca.png. Thuresson (talk) 22:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Source does not contain licensing information, impossible to verify license. Source name implies work of Florida government, not US government. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, Florida House of Representatives is not a federal entity. Thuresson (talk) 22:15, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
LOL, Swiped from Wiki Commons File:Il segno per "segnare" in Lingua dei Segni Italiana.jpg older & larger, so this one is for sure, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, copyright violation. Thuresson (talk) 22:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Not a work of US Gov. 1976 University publication ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, coypright claim on page 12. Thuresson (talk) 22:09, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
File:The chemistry and mode of action of plant growth substances; proceedings of a symposium held at Wye College, University of London, July 1955 (IA chemistrymodeofa00wyec).pdf
[edit]Not a work of US Gov, 1956 British publication ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:07, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
The image may be from a file, but it has to have some kind of a source of where it came from after that. There is no indication of date, author or source. It is not possible to verify the license given without the missing information. Its not in use. If retained, it needs a category. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry for uploading.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 02:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:02, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
No indication that this is a "non-US work" or that it comes from Pakistan. It is stated to be scanned from a book but with unknown author. Google says the book was published in SouthAfrica, not Pakistan and who knows if the author had copyright to all the images? Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, first published in Cape Town by the South african publisher Howard B Timmins in 1953. "This is the inside story of the legendary drawn Springbok cricket tour of Australia in 1952-53.". This photo was published under fair use at Engligh Wikipedia and then transferred here with a made up license. Thuresson (talk) 21:59, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized since 2011, probably not in COM:SCOPE plus no real source of the data, it's just a bunch of lines and numbers. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, has probably never been used. Uploader may have been interested in en:Discrete frequency domain. The same image in PNG is available at en:File:Discrete cosine wave BTW 261.png (also unused). Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 21:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, size 145x145 pixels. Thuresson (talk) 21:39, 20 May 2021 (UTC)
I want to reupload Kosmoso (talk) 03:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, no reason to delete. Thuresson (talk) 19:57, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I want reupload Kosmoso (talk) 04:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, no reason to delete. Thuresson (talk) 19:58, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I want to reupload Kosmoso (talk) 03:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, no reason to delete. Thuresson (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
I want to treupload Kosmoso (talk) 03:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, no reason to delete. Thuresson (talk) 20:00, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work of the uploader. Looks like a scan from unknown publication. jdx Re: 07:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, looks like a scan from a book. Thuresson (talk) 20:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Promotional photo of a band. Unlikely to be own work. Enjoyer of World (talk) 08:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - Did you notice that it was loaded by the band's lead singer? Robman94 (talk) 13:29, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Well, no, apart from their username, the identity of the uploader is not verified. But well, fine, I withdraw this deletion request. Enjoyer of World (talk) 03:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- If this nomination is withdrawn, are you going to remove the nomination template from the file itself and close this nomination? Robman94 (talk) 13:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Robman94: you're free to remove the template. This should be closed by an uninvolved editor though. Enjoyer of World (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- I think that's really for you to do, or an admin. Robman94 (talk) 22:40, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Robman94: you're free to remove the template. This should be closed by an uninvolved editor though. Enjoyer of World (talk) 04:43, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- If this nomination is withdrawn, are you going to remove the nomination template from the file itself and close this nomination? Robman94 (talk) 13:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Well, no, apart from their username, the identity of the uploader is not verified. But well, fine, I withdraw this deletion request. Enjoyer of World (talk) 03:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, nomination withdrawn. Thuresson (talk) 20:04, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
This is a clear case of copyvio as the newspaper that has published the news has not released any content, especially this one, under a Commons-compatible license. Psubhashish (talk) 08:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 20:05, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Lack of any verifiable source (EXIF) by author whether the author is an organization or individual or how they have copyright over the image. Psubhashish (talk) 08:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 20:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of en:Garmin BaseCamp. Usually I would tag it as {{Fair use}} but curious what in this image should be CC-BY-SA-4.0. The WP says that it's a proprietary software and I can't imagine that the map is free since it's also made by Garmin. The best thing I can think of is that the interface and the map is {{PD-ineligible}}. Even it might work for the interface, I don't think that the same can apply to the map. Further it is claimed that Ali00ABC is the author. Considering the software and map publisher I highly doubt that. If the file gets deleted it may should be transfered to en.wikipedia since over there it can be used under fair use
@Ali00ABC: Can you give us more information here? D-Kuru (talk) 09:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Seems like this user has some more screenshots of unfree programs. So the closing admin might should take a look at them as well. --D-Kuru (talk) 09:37, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, uploader has chosen not to reply. Thuresson (talk) 20:08, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Seems like some sort of homework devoid of context. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, mathematics should be transcribed in Wikimedia projects with the Math extension. Thuresson (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Holiday snap? Everyday situation. Possibly violating personality rights as obviously shot from a distance with subjects unaware. 62.216.207.74 20:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep ist nicht aus der Ferne aufgenommen sondern mit Normalbrennweite. Kein Löschgrund ersichtlich. --Ralf Roletschek 19:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, per Ralf Roletschek, apparently taken at a public place. Thuresson (talk) 20:14, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
There is a better version and this map has many errors. No reason to use a map with so many errors. Nanahuatl (talk) 23:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- "Turkey and China are among the leaders if not the leaders in Censorship of Wikipedia." I love these objective contributions to WPs and Commons. Delete. --E4024 (talk) 18:53, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Not in use today. Thuresson (talk) 20:15, 21 May 2021 (UTC)
Nominated by original author for undisclosed/personal/other reasons Psubhashish (talk) 10:37, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Hmm, for an image uploaded >2 years ago and re-used externally, you should provide a sound deletion-rationale. --Túrelio (talk) 20:26, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, no rationale why the photo should be deleted. Thuresson (talk) 22:14, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Nominated by original author for undisclosed/personal/other reasons Psubhashish (talk) 17:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is for @Thuresson: and @Túrelio: : per request by the person appearing in the picture. The picture is no longer used in any external site. --Psubhashish (talk) 17:33, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 02:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FactCheckDC (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photo by George Rizer for the Boston Globe, needs OTRS. CC license appears to be bogus
Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:18, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
useless test file Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 13:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:21, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jaisonabraham2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not social media. Out o sfcope vanity pictures
Timtrent (talk) 13:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. These photos may of unnamed individuals may have something to do with uploader's failed article drafts, see en:User talk:Jaisonabraham2020. Thuresson (talk) 22:25, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Photo is sourced to IBL Indonesia: https://www.instagram.com/p/CMOt1xcHnPl/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:29, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ja:積分回路 with TeX equivalent:
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![108 File:El signo para "segnar" en Lengua de los Signos Italianos.jpg](#File:El_signo_para_"segnar"_en_Lengua_de_los_Signos_Italianos.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Foto-_Harry_Soremski.jpg){kind=link}
,_2008,_Umschlagtitel.jpg){kind=link}
_(16584234029).jpg){kind=link}
_(16770431365).jpg){kind=link}
_(16769284721).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![21:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/11#c-Ellin_Beltz-2021-03-11T21:12:00.000Z-File:El_signo_para_"segnar"_en_Lengua_de_los_Signos_Italianos.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, not in use. Thuresson (talk) 22:33, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Nothing in the source says this file is not under copyright and uploader does not seem to be the photographer. 2A01:CB1D:8B7A:5400:88BE:92D2:70F6:8C02 19:19, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 22:35, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Authored by the Order of Malta, source lists no author, improper liscencing CzarJobKhaya (talk) 23:04, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, "Author: not known" according to uploader. Thuresson (talk) 22:39, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bingar1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Norwegian stamps enter the public domain after the author has been dead for 70 years: Commons:Stamps/Public domain.
- File:Posten13L1863.jpg
- File:Posten13TN1862.jpg
- File:Posten13DDB1861.jpg
- File:Posten13P1860.jpg
- File:Posten10AR1757.jpg
- File:Posten10SG1756.jpg
- File:Posten10Bob1755.jpg
- File:Posten11SK1797.jpg
- File:Posten11MB1796.jpg
- File:Posten11ILR1795.jpg
- File:Posten11WM1794.jpg
- File:Posten12SL1824.jpg
- File:Posten12OP1825.jpg
- File:Posten12ÅA1826.jpg
- File:Posten12MA1827.jpg
- File:Rockheim-2020-sivertsen.jpg
- File:Rockheim-2020-toneff.jpg
4ing (talk) 21:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Pictures of stamps from Norway Post's press pages can be used in Wikipedia. The content can be downloaded, used and shared in various media by, for example, journalists, bloggers, columnists, comment fields, etc., with the intention of communicating, telling and commenting on your press releases, notices or information, provided that the content is unchanged and used in its whole. The author must be named to the extent and in the manner good practice dictates (this means, for example, that photographers must almost always be named). This has been confirmed by Pressesjef Posten Norge Kenneth Tjønndal Pettersen. Bingar1234 (talk) 17:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. You claimed to be the author, did not credit Norges Post, did not name the real author and included a phony Creative Commons license where you demanded to be credited. Thuresson (talk) 07:10, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bingar1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright of British stamps expires 50 years after publication: Commons:Stamps/Public_domain.
- File:GD14603628@David-Bowie-LOW--6076.jpg
- File:GD14603627@Led-Zeppelin-LOW-5556.jpg
- File:GD14603621@The-Clash-LOW-RE-5059.jpg
- File:GD14603623@Rolling-Stones-L-3820.jpg
4ing (talk) 21:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 07:13, 24 May 2021 (UTC)
It looks like this was scanned from a newspaper or a magazine. XenonX3 (talk) 09:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: The moiré pattern indicates clearly enough that this is a scan from a printed halftone image. "Own work" would at least need a plausible statement by the uploader why they scanned their own (very professional looking) image from a printed source (such things happen; sometimes photographers don't have their own originals anymore, but we can't simply assume that, there's enough doubt here per COM:PCP). --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
It looks like this was scanned from a newspaper or a magazine. XenonX3 (talk) 10:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: It looks clearly enough like a scan from a printed image. "Own work" would at least need a plausible statement by the uploader why they scanned their own image from a printed source (such things happen; sometimes photographers don't have their own originals anymore, but we can't simply assume that, there's enough doubt here per COM:PCP). --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:34, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Flags and coat of arms uploaded by User:DownTownRich
[edit]Flags and coat of arms uploaded by User:DownTownRich
- File:Royal Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Africa.svg
- File:Flag of Kingdom of Africa.svg
- File:Kingdom of Africa flag.png (see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingdom of Africa flag.png)
No realistic educational purpose, see COM:SCOPE.These appear to have no established usage and may be recent inventions. They may relate to the medieval Kingdom of Africa or to Bir Tawil, an unclaimed area between Egypt and Sudan. --Verbcatcher (talk) 06:23, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Made up, hoax, mischievousness. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:44, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete, serve no useful purpose.
5225C (talk) 11:29, 20 April 2021 (UTC) - Delete, as a hoax. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 23:43, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment should there be two, simultaneous, deletion discussions (Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kingdom of Africa flag.png)?. Liz (talk) 02:55, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - part of an elaborate but not very competent hoax. --Orange Mike | Talk 01:17, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted as fantasy flags. Thuresson (talk) 19:36, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mithila Madawa Gunathilake (talk · contribs)
[edit]Tagged as {{PD-textlogo}}, but it cannot possibly be applied to these complex graphics, maps, portraits, etc.
- File:Sri Lanka Rain Forest Map.png
- File:Dehiwala-Mount Lavinia Municipal Council Seal.jpg
- File:Dimuth Karunaratne.jpg
- File:EAP Films Logo.png
- File:2019–21 ICC World Test Championship Logo.jpg
- File:Colombo Municipal Council 150th Anniversary.jpg
- File:Supreme Court Complex Fire.jpg
- File:Melstacorp Logo.png
- File:Lion Brewery (Sri Lanka) logo.png
- File:Peoples Bank Logo (Sri Lanka).jpg
- File:Dhammika Perera.jpg
- File:Distilleries Sri Lanka.png
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
ƏXPLICIT 07:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Explicit: Keep the first one and the 11th one, the uploader changed them to {{PD-self}}. Delete rest. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 05:54, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- The first image credits the Forest Department on the image and the Department of Wildlife Conservation in the description, and the second links to a page where the image was published over a year prior to the Commons upload. Both require evidence of permission. ✗plicit 12:15, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all Bottom 10 are clearly copyvios, and the top one looks to be too per the comment above. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted every single image. Thuresson (talk) 19:42, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Suspected flickr washing - Author Ron Sachs Copyright holder 2018 Ron Sachs CNP All Rights Reserved per exif. needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 11:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
I agree that the exif data does indicate a copyright. JournalismResearch (talk) 18:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 19:52, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Lutheraner as no permission (No permission since) Indeedous (talk) 12:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep obviously taken by family member, why do you assume he has not the right to publish it? --Indeedous (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:Andreas Begert.jpg” under ticket:2021032410005021. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:16, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, now has OTRS permission. Thuresson (talk) 19:56, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Photographs uploaded by User:DownTownRich
[edit]- File:Slumber Tsogwane Portrait.jpg
- File:Mokgweetsi Masisi Portrait.jpg - on Botswana Parliament website[6] and news website [7]
- File:Thapelo Matsheka Portrait.jpg - on Botswana Parliament website[8]
- File:Dumelang Saleshando Portrait.jpg - on Botswana Parliament website[9]
- File:Tumiso Rakgare Portrait.jpg - metadata indicates Facebook source, used in a Facebook image [10]
- File:Unity Dow Portrait.jpg - on Botswana Parliament website[11]
- File:Peggy Serame Portrait.jpg - on Botswana Parliament website[12]
- File:Mpho Balopi Portrait.jpg - on Botswana Parliament website[13]
- File:Annah Mokgethi Portrait.jpg - on Botswana Parliament website[14]
These appear to be official portraits of Botswana politicians. Most were available on an archive of a Parliament of Botswana webpage made dating from the uploads here.[15]
- File:2021 Xumabee Crash 2.jpg
- File:2021 Xumabee Crash 4.jpg
- File:2021 Xumabee Crash 3.jpg
- File:2021 Xumabee Crash 1.jpg
Risk of copyright violation, all are included in video that was uploaded to YouTube before these images were uploaded to Commons.[16] One is on a newspaper website dated before the upload.[17] No metadata, dimensions suggest an Internet source. --Verbcatcher (talk) 06:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Uploader has chosen not to respond. Thuresson (talk) 18:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
,_Foto-_Harry_Soremski.jpg){kind=link}
,_Foto-_Harry_Soremski.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by LexICon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photographer & copyright holder = Harry Soremski; so for clearly not an: "own work of Solva24". Karsten11 (talk) 11:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
,_Foto-_Harry_Soremski.jpg){kind=link}
- Uploader has contacted me and will initiate an OTRS notice from Harry Soremski.--Karsten11 (talk) 11:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Dr. Arnd Klein-Zirbes (2021), Foto- Harry Soremski.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021031210006588. --Mussklprozz (talk) 20:54, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Dr. Arnd Klein-Zirbes (2021), Foto- Harry Soremski.jpg” under ticket:2021031210006588. --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:47, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, permission received through OTRS. Thuresson (talk) 21:55, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Galerie Anne-Sarah Bénichou (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images sous copyright, autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr
- File:MS2018005 Sanstitre4 (SérieAltérables).jpg
- File:A-ton besoin des ombres pour se souvenir - Venise 2015.jpg
- File:Portrait Massinissa Selmani.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shev123 (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted per nomination. The artist is Massinissa Selmani. Thuresson (talk) 21:58, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Although plagiarized from another school's emblem, this may have a copyright. E4024 (talk) 14:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, published here on July 20, 2020 before upload. Thuresson (talk) 22:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pallez-Beauchamp Faustine (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images sous copyright, autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr
- File:Massinissa Selmani "Intervalle" (2018), graphite et mine couleur sur papier, 50 x 65 cm © Galerie Anne-Sarah Bénichou.jpg
- File:Vue de l'exposition "Les choses que vous faites m'entourent" (2017) Galerie Anne-Sarah Bénichou, Paris © Galerie Anne-Sarah Bénichou .jpg
- File:Vue de l'exposition "Habiter la terre", Biennale international de l'art contemporain, Melle, France, commissariat d'exposition Dominique Truco (2011) © Galerie Anne-Sarah Bénichou.jpg
- File:T'en fais pas. Et moi je plante les clous, 2015 Graphite sur papier 3 dessins 80 x 120 cm- 2 dessins 120 x 80 cm Biennale de Lyon 2015 © Blaise Adilon.jpg
- File:Vue de l'exposition "All the world’s futures" 56ème Biennale de Venise Biennale, Arsenal, commissaire d'exposition Okwui Onwezor, Italie (2015) © Galerie Anne-Sarah Bénichou.jpg
- File:Vue de l'exposition "La Vie moderne" 13ème Biennale de Lyon, commissaire d'exposition Ralph Rugoff (2015).jpg
- File:Massinissa selmani galerie anne sarah benichou 792.jpg
- File:Ce qui coule n’a pas de fin. SAM Art Projects Prize, Palais de Tokyo, Paris. Curated by Yoann Gourmel..jpg
- File:Massinissa selmani galerie anne sarah benichou 968.jpg
- File:01R.jpg
- File:Unspecified3.jpg
- File:Massinissa Selmani - CCCOD - Philippe Gaujard.jpg
- File:Portrait-Massinissa-Selmani.jpg
,_graphite_et_mine_couleur_sur_papier,_50_x_65_cm_%C2%A9_Galerie_Anne-Sarah_B%C3%A9nichou.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Galerie_Anne-Sarah_B%C3%A9nichou,_Paris_%C2%A9_Galerie_Anne-Sarah_B%C3%A9nichou_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%C2%A9_Galerie_Anne-Sarah_B%C3%A9nichou.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%C2%A9_Galerie_Anne-Sarah_B%C3%A9nichou.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shev123 (talk) 12:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 20:08, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
It is a FAKE SVG and the identical PNG exists now: 202008 Desert locust gregarious phase adult.png.
Like many other FAKE SVGs this file must be replaced by the originating .png version.
All SVG files bear the link to the png version; after their upload the fakes should be deleted.
Same situation (png exists, fake svg - should be deleted as well):
- File:202103 Human male.svg
- File:202103 Pig.svg
- File:202004 leaf drop inoculation.svg
- File:202101 Protein tertiary structure.svg
- File:202103 Rice.svg
Sarang (talk) 12:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 20:18, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by University College of Aviation Malaysia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation
- File:Flight Simulator UniCAM.jpg
- File:University College of Aviation Malaysia Gate.jpg
- File:University College of Aviation Malaysia (UniCAM) Campus.png
_Campus.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Timtrent (talk) 13:03, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Apparently uploaded for en:Draft:University College of Aviation Malaysia which has been rejected. Thuresson (talk) 20:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Does not look like own work of 2021 year. Wikisaurus (talk) 13:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Real date (2004-07-01) corrected by the author --Perohanych (talk) 19:52, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, image description updated. Thuresson (talk) 20:23, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Collage has eight images, seven are sourced from Commons. One appears to have been deleted. Need source & license for all collage images. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:26, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep All the sourced file has been given in the parameter other version. Only one file if them is deleted. You can delete it from the collage also.--Junior Jumper (formerly Tæ) 02:57, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- 1/7th copyvio is still a copyright violation. :) Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, one file already deleted; three of the remaining files are used in breach of the Creative Commons license. Thuresson (talk) 16:32, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
,_2008,_Umschlagtitel.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_2008,_Umschlagtitel.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
,_2008,_Umschlagtitel.jpg){kind=link}
- Deleted, per nomination. No response from uploader. Thuresson (talk) 22:19, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 19:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. No response from uploader. Thuresson (talk) 22:18, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:35, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Size 292 × 172 px. Thuresson (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Unintentional Flickrwashing - the photograph is credited to Reagan Lunn / Duke Athletics, not the work of Tigernet.com. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted. From the Flickr account of Clemson, not Duke Athletics. Thuresson (talk) 20:41, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: inexperienced user, no EXIF data, low resolution = likely not own work Regasterios (talk) 16:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
It's not a CSD case. --Regasterios (talk) 16:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not done, uploader seem to be identical with User:StudioKleurrijk who has uploaded several photos of this subject. There needs to be something other than "likely not own work". Thuresson (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, from gettyimages.com: "LONDON, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 11: Rishabh Pant of India celebrates his century during day five of the Specsavers 5th Test match between England and India at The Kia Oval on September 11, 2018 in London, England. (Photo by Jordan Mansfield/Getty Images)" Thuresson (talk) 19:19, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Not done, no hits on TinEye or Google Images. Thuresson (talk) 19:39, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
fr:Joachim Turin was twice deleted, probably he is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 19:08, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:13, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Photo from facebook. --Kharkivian (talk) 19:49, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per Kharkivian. Thuresson (talk) 19:43, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Apparent copyvio - low res; no EXIF; appears to be a scan of a framed photo (see leather frame around image) and, even if the framed photo is the uploader's, it is derivative of the statue; and uploader is a serial copyvio uploader. Duck/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 16:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, appears to be a photo of a work of art which may be copyrighted. Thuresson (talk) 19:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Image uploaded under improper copyright. It's claimed as CC/own work, but it's the official cover art to one of their singles — which means it has preexisting copyrights on it, and there's no way to verify whether the uploader was the rightful holder of those copyrights in order to waive them. It's also not necessary for visual identification of the band, as they already have another more properly licensed image in their infobox, or of the single, which doesn't have a Wikipedia article at all. Bearcat (talk) 19:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Uploaded by single-purpose account. Thuresson (talk) 19:51, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
DW of the statue of the Little Mermaid in Copenhagen. The original work is in the public domain in 2030. We've to check if this "Chinese copy" made for Expo 2010 in Shanghai can be used here. Ruthven (msg) 09:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- This is exactly the original statue of the Little Mermaid which was moved to Shanghai for exhibition during Expo 2010, see [18]. --Baycrest (Talk) 15:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete This isn't matter, it's of course fall under Category:Undelete in 2030. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:38, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Info There seems to have been new development regarding FOP for indoor works in China. Ping @Liuxinyu970226: if you would like to give some information about this. Thuresson (talk) 19:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Indeed, the Mainland China's FOP rules are changed this month. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
- Kept, per COM:FOP China. Thuresson (talk) 21:03, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_(16584234029).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16584234029).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Partial image, no information content. P. Hughes (talk) 15:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, Internet Archive garbage. Thuresson (talk) 21:23, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_(16770431365).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16770431365).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Partial image, no information content. P. Hughes (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, Internet Archive garbage. Thuresson (talk) 21:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
_(16769284721).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16769284721).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Partial image, no information content. P. Hughes (talk) 15:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, Internet Archive garbage. Thuresson (talk) 21:25, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
there is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 17:12, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
This is the cover of a music album and it is protected by copyright. There is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 17:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, by nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
This is the cover of a music album and it is protected by copyright. There is no information that this image is distributed under a free license EROY (talk) 17:15, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. Thuresson (talk) 21:29, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
copyright violence - no release by Zograf recognizable Wickipädiater (talk) 18:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, uploader is not the artist, see [19]. Thuresson (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of claimed license seen at source site. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. From [20]. Thuresson (talk) 21:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Per the notice on https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Coins_of_Singapore, engraving of coins are copyrighted by the Government of Singapore. This design is part of the second series and minted in 1987. It shall not expire until 2058. Seloloving (talk) 19:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, per nomination. See also Category:Coins of Singapore. Thuresson (talk) 21:58, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. capture from TV program Gahukuro (talk) 02:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, image size 740x555, eg. 4:3, standard TV screen ratio. Thuresson (talk) 20:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Pas de nom attribué Jean-Claude MELLIN (talk) 13:51, 3 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Existe en double sous le nom de "Château de la Malartrie à la Roche-Gageac. D'autre part titre non adéquat 2A01:E0A:423:4660:C167:37CF:E9B3:FF2D 16:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, duplicate of File:Château de la Malartrie à la Roque-Gageac.jpg. Thuresson (talk) 21:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Joe Biden at Age 10.jpg: Credited to Biden family. No immediate Biden family member was a federal employee in 1953. Credible evidence of initial publication is lacking. --Animalparty (talk) 01:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Question - Isn't it PD due to age? According to Wikipedia:Copyright law of the United States#Works created before 1978, "For works that received their copyright before 1978, a renewal had to be filed in the work's 28th year with the Copyright Office for its term of protection to be extended. The need for renewal was eliminated by the Copyright Renewal Act of 1992, but works that had already entered the public domain by non-renewal did not regain copyright protection. Therefore, works published before 1964 that were not renewed are in the public domain." nagualdesign 03:48, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- We need evidence of when and where it was first published (or received copyright registration). Creation of an image does not equal publication. It could have been published decades ago, or it could have been kept in a desk drawer for half a century. If it was published in a yearbook that lacked copyright or whose copyright was not renewed, then a plausible claim to PD could be made (see Commons:Hirtle chart). The 'keeps' in the previous discussion relied almost entirely on presumptions with no positive evidence, which is why the image was deleted. --Animalparty (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Even if it's not, would the retouching of it be enough to count as a "meaningful contribution/change"? Thanoscar21talkcontributions 16:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Animalparty: If it gets deleted, will it be permissible to upload it to Wikipedia under Fair Use? nagualdesign 17:49, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Thanoscar21: retouching or modifying a copyrighted image does not change the underlying copyright, just as speeding up or remixing a copy of Star Wars doesn't permit me to sell, relicense, or profit from it without permission of Lucasfilm. See Commons:Derivative works. @Nagualdesign: Possibly, assuming the en:Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria is satisfied. --Animalparty (talk) 21:13, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
- We need evidence of when and where it was first published (or received copyright registration). Creation of an image does not equal publication. It could have been published decades ago, or it could have been kept in a desk drawer for half a century. If it was published in a yearbook that lacked copyright or whose copyright was not renewed, then a plausible claim to PD could be made (see Commons:Hirtle chart). The 'keeps' in the previous discussion relied almost entirely on presumptions with no positive evidence, which is why the image was deleted. --Animalparty (talk) 05:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted No evidence that an employee of the federal congress is the photographer. Uploader claims date of publication is 2021 in New York Times so copyrighted until 2074 (Commons:Hirtle chart). Thuresson (talk) 22:48, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Dw no source since (dw no source since) Pugilist (talk) 21:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is a photo taken by me of a newspaper. The paper as such is not copyrighted. The different elements of the content of the newspaper are either not readable (e.g. copyrighted text) or just minor elements of a larger whole (e.g. photographs). None of these visible minor elements stands out. --Pugilist (talk) 21:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Deleted, includes three photographs and two illustrations. The two photographs of people are clearly identifiable, eg. w:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and w:Lawrence Ferlinghetti. The latter photo are published by Getty Images at gettyimages.com. The illustrator is Liv Asje. Thuresson (talk) 22:56, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This photo has been deleted from the original source citated in this article. This photo is of me and I demand i be deleted without hesitation as well as the extracted image. Best regards, Kristín A. Árnadóttir, ambassador 89.160.239.220 00:32, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Oppose en:Kristín A. Árnadóttir as well as en:Inese Lībiņa-Egnere are public figures and the photo is obviously taken at some kind of public event. Thuresson (talk) 17:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; per Thuresson. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Is this below ToO? (Not used BTW.) E4024 (talk) 00:57, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:53, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
Rank insignia of Fire and Rescue NSW files
[edit]- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Assistant Commissioner.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Chief Superintendent.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Commissioner.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Deputy Commissioner.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Leading Firefighter.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Qualified Firefighter.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Retained Captain.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Retained Deputy Captain.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Retained Firefighter 10.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Retained Firefighter 15.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Retained Firefighter 5.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Senior Firefighter 15.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Senior Firefighter.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Station Officer.svg
- File:Fire and Rescue NSW Superintendent.svg
Elements in the rank insignia are still copyrighted, per Government-produced works these are still copyrighted since the main elements of the logo was created in 1977 but officially adopted in 1978. Also threshold of originality is very low in Australia, these rank insignia are quite modern and not older than 50 years. The uploader also claims own work, even though these are derivative works of copyrighted material. Bidgee (talk) 06:46, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Images were listed under own work due to them being created by myself, or edited from CC existing images (the crown). The published images by F&R NSW are located here, and can be seen to be different images, with differences in design of the different elements of the ranks to those published by F&R NSW -- Cdjp1 (talk) 08:22, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- You cannot claim them as your own, you can say you created them based off “the source” (see COM:DW. But regardless, they cannot be uploaded here, per https://www.fire.nsw.gov.au/page.php?id=467 “If you wish to reproduce, alter, store or transmit the material which appears on the Fire and Rescue NSW website for a purpose other than personal, in-house or non-commercial use” Bidgee (talk) 08:27, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Does wikipedia not count as a "non-commercial use" under the Australian legislation? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 08:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- COM:LICENSING “Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use justifications: see Commons:Fair use. Media licensed under non-commercial only licenses are not accepted either.” Bidgee (talk) 09:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- An email has been sent to F&R NSW enquiring about whether the images created can be allowed for use on Wikipedia. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 08:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
- I hope you informed them that they would be hosted on Commons and used for commercial use, rather than misleading them to think it is being hosted on Wikipedia and used for non-commercial. Bidgee (talk) 01:10, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- The email sent stated where they would be uploaded and where/how they would be used. -- Cdjp1 (talk) 17:15, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2028. —RP88 (talk) 16:03, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
This photo has been deleted from the original source citated in this article. This photo is of me and I demand i be deleted without hesitation as well as the extracted image. Best regards, Kristín A. Árnadóttir, ambassador 89.160.239.220 00:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Oppose en:Kristín A. Árnadóttir is a public figure and the photo is obviously taken at some kind of public event. Thuresson (talk) 17:41, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
Closed as kept, no support for deletion, anon request with unclear reason. (If there is some more specific problem that a government official has with the photo, they could send details by contacting Commons:Volunteer_Response_Team.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Doubtfully PD-textlogo. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:55, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep By no reason it does not meet the COM:TOO. Rodney Araujo (talk) 22:07, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Likely fails TOO in South Korea: "it has own characteristics as a product of mental efforts, and can be distinguished from existing ones". Anarchyte (work | talk) 08:55, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom and Anarchyte. TOO in So Korea seems low. Assume copyright applies per precautionary principle. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Advertisement from a 1931 newspaper; no own work. Velocitas (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Change to {{PD-text}}. Thuresson (talk) 19:44, 29 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted was still on Commons under false license and false claims. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:26, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
- also file:Sports Club kids.jpg
OTRS-permission from author Gevorg Gasparyan / copyright holder Luman Cinematography is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:28, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP SK, there is no freedom of panorama in South Korea. This sign contains copyrighted text.
ƏXPLICIT 11:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep I think it's below TOO and DM. Most of texts are below TOO, and this image can be used even if copyrighted text is blacked out. Copyrighted text is Roh Moo-Hyun president's signature. See also COM:TOO South Korea and COM:DM South Korea. Ox1997cow (talk) 10:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- Except the text is a biography, which is copyrighted. You can't argue that it's de minimis when the main focus of the image is the text. Blacking it out would make this file useless. ƏXPLICIT 00:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Explicit: As I believe that those calligraphic Korean texts are not one of its important parts, we may consider to cut out the right-bottom 1/4, so that the rest image can obey our TOO rules? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 09:22, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Except the text is a biography, which is copyrighted. You can't argue that it's de minimis when the main focus of the image is the text. Blacking it out would make this file useless. ƏXPLICIT 00:07, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Clearly the extensive text is the subject of the photo; the text has not been shown to be PD therefore the photo is DW. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:30, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Other versions of this file can be found elsewhere (for example here); if the copyright holder, I’m not sure why they wouldn’t upload the full image. This version appears here. Innisfree987 (talk) 13:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:13, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Commercial. E4024 (talk) 14:38, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Reverse image search finds several instances of this file. This article contains this image and is dated October 2016, which predates the upload date of this file on Commons. Pbrks (talk) 14:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, probably official photo, other version from the same shot exists eg. here. Permission needed. ~Cybularny Speak? 16:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:12, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, questionable license; in any case unused and uncategorized since October 2018. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:10, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 19:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per nom; deliberate garbage name and "description"-- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:33, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 19:30, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, more garbage false descriptions and false licenses from User:MbIam9416 -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:54, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 19:33, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, more garbage false descriptions and false licenses from User:MbIam9416 -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:55, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 19:36, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, more garbage false descriptions and false licenses from User:MbIam9416 -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 20:34, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Support Blurry photo of a flying bird. Not in use today. Thuresson (talk) 20:42, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, bad quality image without compensating importance/uniqueness. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:08, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I think there should be more information about this image which is licensed self, yet appears to have been from a newspaper. The source does not contain the date given here as "1924" or any other information about the image which appears to be cut from a newspaper. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept after some web search, seems to have been published in Mexico in 1915; I have changed the license to {{PD-Mexico}} -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't see a source which means the license is incorrect. Description calls it a YouTube advertisement Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, Derivative of children's video game character, smaller than Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:42, 21 August 2021 (UTC)
Nomination by uploader: a better-quality version of same illustration already exists at File:The Mah'mil. (1836) - TIMEA.jpg MartinPoulter (talk) 13:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
_-_TIMEA.jpg){kind=link}
- Oppose File:Modern Egyptians The Mahmal.png is the better version and is public domain. Thuresson (talk) 22:03, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:38, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
MGausmann made a better version under Kreisteilungskoerper5zerlegung.png which is now used in the notes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bocardodarapti (talk • contribs) 12:20, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Also, the behavior over (29) in my hand drawn version is wrong.Bocardodarapti (talk) 15:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
Works by Alexander Grigoriev
[edit]- File:A.V. Grigoriev - Portrait of A.L. Chizhevsky.png
- File:A.V. Grigoriev - The Father (Portrait Drawing).jpg
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Etude. The village (20th).png
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Female Portrait (20th).png
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Oka at Tarusa.jpg
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Pereslavl Zalessky (20th).png
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Scenery (1927).png
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Scenery (20th).png
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Still life. Tarusa (1934).jpg
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Still Life.jpg
- File:Alexander V. Grigoriev - Tarusa (20th).png
- File:Alexander Vladimirovich Grigoriev - 1920s.jpg
- File:Artist Alexander Vladimirovich Grigoriev - 1920s.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
These works are tagged as being by Russian artist en:Alexander Grigoriev (artist), who died in 1961. They as therefore not in the public domain in Russia and the artist died after 1947 (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Russia). mattbr 20:41, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:39, 2 November 2021 (UTC)
The files are still images from the Stand News' Facebook pages, but are not from the news agency's Facebook live stream. As Template:The Stand News explicitly stated that only their Facebook live streams are free for use ([E]veryone and every organisation can use the live streams of the Stand News' Facebook Page freely), Template:The Stand News is therefore not applicable, and they're most likely all rights reserved as other contents posted by the Stand News.
- File:Hong Kong protest against proposed national security law on 24 May 2020.jpg
- File:Joint meeting held by 17 Hong Kong District Councils, 6 June 2020 (cropped).png
- File:Joint meeting held by 17 Hong Kong District Councils, 6 June 2020.png
- File:Protest against national anthem bill and proposed national security law in Hong Kong, 27 May 2020.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
廣九直通車 (talk) 08:44, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Keep. It is arguable that this is a translation or miscommunication, and the Stand News' refers to their facebook feed as a "live stream". --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 15:48, 22 June 2021 (UTC)
- @Piotrus: Thanks for your comment, but I don't think so. The original Chinese sentence is 各機構及個人，可隨便使用《立場新聞》Facebook 專頁的直播片段. I don't think there are much disambiguation when using the term "直播", as its common meaning is "live stream". Moreover, later they stated 《立場新聞》資源和設備有限，在人數眾多的遊行和集會中網絡訊號不穩，可能難以做到合理質素的 Facebook 直播...... (The Stand News has limited resources and equipment. Internet signal may be unstable during demonstrations and protests, and may not produce Facebook livestream with proper quality...). It seems that till the end, they intended "livestream" to be the streamed videos, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:18, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and discussion. --Ellywa (talk) 17:08, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 13:25, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete None of this user's uploads are their own work. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sanwar nath. -M.nelson (talk) 21:17, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 17:09, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation Timtrent (talk) 13:28, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete None of this user's uploads are their own work. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sanwar nath. -M.nelson (talk) 21:17, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Uploader did not comment or explain authorship and copyright. --Ellywa (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
The source 404s, it doesn't look like own work. File is small and of low quality and contains illustrative material. If uploader can find a source with proper licensing, I would withdraw the nomination, but as it is, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:52, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Should be PD per {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. The file is low quality but is in use. -M.nelson (talk) 21:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark of M.nelson. --Ellywa (talk) 17:11, 7 December 2021 (UTC)
