Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/03/06
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Because I orignaly wanted it to be on a Wikipedia page, but I don't want to face the consquences of uploading a google maps image that dosen't belong to me B0ii AAA (talk) 01:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Speedydelete |7= Author requests deletion of file}} HamRadioOperator73 (talk) 02:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, oos. --Túrelio (talk) 09:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
wrong format Helmut Schindlwick (talk) 03:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request, missing permission. --Achim (talk) 10:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hanay as no permission (No permission since) rubin16 (talk) 05:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- File:מזבח יהושע בהר עיבל.jpg - seems to be from the same set and has OTRS permission. @Geagea is this covered, too? rubin16 (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:מזבח יהושע מבט עילי.jpg” under ticket:2021022210009791. -- Geagea (talk) 12:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: rubin16, You are correct. The permission is for two photographs.Thanks. -- Geagea (talk) 12:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo without educational use Kotivalo (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Low quality personal photo without educational use Kotivalo (talk) 12:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Possible copyvio: screenshot of a website with no Creative Commons mention CoffeeEngineer (talk) 14:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 15:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
duplicate Dionysio.Calucci (talk) 18:14, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: but redirected the other. --JuTa 11:37, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
it's a duplicate and the original has been uploaded. Dionysio.Calucci (talk) 09:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: in case thats relay important, I swapped the 2 files now. --JuTa 15:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Used in [Warszawa w pigułce https://warszawawpigulce.pl/tak-wyglada-zabytkowa-sala-do-sekcji-zwlok-szpitala-praskiego/#gallery-2] (2017) Matlin (talk) 09:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:14, 6 März 2021 UTC: Copyright violation: Used in [Warszawa w pigułce https://warszawawpigulce.pl/tak-wyglada-zabytkowa-sala-do-sekcji-zwlok-szpitala-praskiego/#gallery-2] (2017) https://warszawawpigulce.pl/tak-wyglada-zabytkowa-sala-do-sekcji-zwlok-szpitala-praskiego/#gallery-2 --Krdbot 15:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
{{Duplicate|File:Purple - Squared - Archive (Deus WikiProjects).svg}} Bruce The Deus (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
I realized it is bad for my privacy Captian Ackerman (talk) 18:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request & likely copyvio. --Achim (talk) 18:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it by mistake Captian Ackerman (talk) 18:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
to mój wizerunek, wgrałem niechcący. Proszę o usunięcie. Robert Koprowski (talk) 23:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 10:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
This file is a work by the Labour Party (Partij van de Arbeid) as the source indicates. However, the party website does not indicate that its pictures fall under the cc-by-sa-4.0 license. It would only have the right license if it were uploaded on the party's Flickr page, which it was not. Supercarwaartalk 22:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- They published the list of portraits on Flickr. This one is in a better resolution here --Vera (talk) 13:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: published under free license elsewhere. Vera (talk) 13:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo at 10:44, 11 März 2021 UTC: author's request on creation week --Krdbot 15:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Minoraxtalk 00:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
small, low res, no metadata. Unlikely to be own work Minoraxtalk 00:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:51, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Azeempashaeditor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 00:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 00:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dibosh Chakma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inonsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Myanmar navy submarine.jpg
- File:Hisar-O Air defense system Bangladesh army.jpg
- File:T300 Kasirga of Bangladesh army.jpg
- File:Type 87 mortar of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:Automatic grenade launcher of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:Sniper rifle of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:Kriss vector submachine gun of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:Bangladesh Army heckler and Koch MP5.jpg
- File:Type 56 assault rifle of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:AK 47 of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:BD 08 MK2 of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:Recoilless rifle of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:T55 Tank of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:VT 5 Light Tank of Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:Land Rover Defender of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Nissan Patrol of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:BGB Shah Jalal of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Toyota land cruiser of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Floating border out post of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:ATV of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Helicopter of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:APC of border guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:RPG of Border guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Tata 1413 of Border guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Motorcycle used by Border guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Type 96 Artillery gun Bangladesh Army.jpg
- File:MFG33XLC high speed patrol boat of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Toyota Hilux truck of BGB.jpg
- File:Border guard Bangladesh ford ranger pickup truck.jpg
- File:Isuzu pickup truck Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh petrol boat.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh RPD machine gun.jpg
- File:Mitsubishi L200 Border guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Isuzu FSS Border guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:BGB Recoilless Rifle M20.jpg
- File:Border guard Bangladesh 81 mm mortar.jpg
- File:Kamaz Truck Border guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Polaris ATV BGB.jpg
- File:BGB Otokar Akrep APC.jpg
- File:Border guard Bangladesh exercise.jpg
- File:BD 08 LMG.jpg
- File:STK-40 Automatic grenade launcher of Bangladesh Army (cropped).jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dibosh Chakma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/incosnsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh Type 56 carbine.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh parade.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh BD-15 LMG.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh motorcycle.jpg
- File:Haval H2 used by Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh truck.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh truck Kamaz-43501.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh truck ISUZU FSS.jpg
- File:BD-15 LMG of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Type 56 carbine of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Mi-171E Helicopter of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Border guard Bangladesh Toyota land cruiser.jpg
- File:Border Guard Bangladesh patrol boat.jpg
- File:MFG33XLC High speed boat of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Type 80 machine gun of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Polaris ATV of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Type 87 Mortar of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:M 20 Recoilless rifle of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Otokar Akrep APC of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:M 29 A1 mortar of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Type 63-1 mortar of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Type 67 Machine gun of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
- File:KaRZ Spartan APC of Border Guard Bangladesh.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:06, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dibosh Chakma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unreliable uploader, all their uploads so far have been copyvios. No reason to think that these are not.
- File:Bangladesh Army para commando training.jpg
- File:বিজিবি মহাপরিচালকের শীতকালীন প্রশিক্ষণ পরিদর্শন.jpg
- File:শীতকালীন প্রশিক্ষণে বিজিবি সদস্যবৃন্দ.jpg
- File:বর্ডার গার্ড বাংলাদেশ শীতকালীন মহড়া.jpg
- File:TR-300 Kasırga Kılavuzlu.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 06:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 01:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tafadzwa Blessed (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:ALONGSIDE BROTHER PANASHE.jpg
- File:IN GOD I RELY.jpg
- File:BORN TO EXPLORE.jpg
- File:GREAT IS GOD'S LOVE.jpg
- File:Man of the match.jpg
- File:ALONGSIDE RUTENDO.jpg
- File:Evangelist.jpg
- File:Advocate Blessed.jpg
- File:Born Great.jpg
Minoraxtalk 01:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
- File:Yaj network ran.jpg
- File:Vciyaj .. Gk.jpg
- File:Vciyaj gk.jpg
- File:Vciyaj enersto.jpg
- File:Vciyaj wise boy.jpg
- File:Durmi.jpg
- File:Vciyaj.jpg
Minoraxtalk 01:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 01:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by IMacintoshPlus (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused fantasy flags, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Quebec .svg
- File:British Piano League.svg
- File:Great Britain .svg
- File:New Zealand .svg
- File:Canada .svg
- File:Australia .svg
- File:America .svg
- File:Jack of the United States - Union Jack Blue Color.svg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused images for fantasy land, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope.
- File:Lcnnsflag.png
- File:Coat of arms of Quebecshire.png
- File:Quebecshire Flag.png
- File:Quebecshire expedition map.png
- File:Quebecshire cantons map.png
- File:Quebecshire Parliament 2019.svg
- File:Final Gif.gif
- File:Constitution of Quebecshire.png
- File:Quebecshire travel advisory 2.0.png
- File:Quebecshire travel advisory.png
- File:Air quebecshire logo.png
- File:Monarchist Coalition for the Reunification of Quebecshire.png
- File:Quebecshire Republican Assembly.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out-of-scope unused personal photo AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 02:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 02:12, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 07:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manalrayan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/video hosting. Not used.
- File:Al-bargel heathy unit in Giza,Egypt.webm
- File:Al bargel healthy family unit,Giza,Egypt.webm
- File:Ornamental fish in the Aquarium of the Aquarium Grotto Garden.jpg
- File:The pond of the Aquarium Grotto Garden.jpg
- File:The mountainous area at the Aquarium Grotto Garden.jpg
- File:The the Aquariums of colourful fish like Goldfish.jpg
- File:The enternce of the Aquarium Grotto Garden.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Unicornioydragon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Manuel Carballal con Uri Geller..jpg
- File:Manuel Carballal (centro) con dos chamanes toltecas en México.jpg
- File:Javier Sierra, Premio Planeta 2017 y autor del prólogo.jpg
- File:Andy Puharich (Izda) con su padre..jpg
- File:Ulrich Thal, hermano de Florinda Donner.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Frutera PR (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. Also no evidence of permission(s).
- File:La Frutera Puerto Rico.jpg
- File:Frappé de frutas naturales.jpg
- File:Logo de La Frutera.jpg
- File:Frutera.jpg
- File:La Frutera.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Not used.
- File:Kumar Aatram is certificate and social media.jpg
- File:Kimś kunar khim khima.jpg
- File:Kumar Aatram .Horror Story step.jpg
- File:Kumar Aatram shopping with my love story short.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:24, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:The story books library.jpg
- File:The photo editions-- you happy.jpg
- File:The photo action.jpg
- File:Photoshop the --styles wrtting.jpg
- File:Bike ride with me.jpg
- File:Actor-hero-dancer moment.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:49, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Länsbiblioteket i Västerbotten (talk · contribs)
[edit]com:out of scope. some random swedish texts and shapes.
- File:MIK webb yttrandefrihets- & informationsfrihetskunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb TV-kunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb spelkunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb reklamkunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb nyhetskunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb mediekunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb internetkunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb informationskunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb filmkunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb digitalkunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb datorkunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb bibliotekskunnighet.png
- File:MIK webb hela 2.png
- File:MIK webb hela.png
- File:MIK webb med text.png
- File:MIK webb stor.png
RZuo (talk) 19:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope - small unused images of stones. Quality is terrible. Spam/copyvios maybe
- File:Stone & marble 22.png
- File:Stone&marble 1.png
- File:Stone & marble 2.png
- File:Stone 25.png
- File:Stone 24.png
- File:Stone 23.png
- File:Stone 21.png
- File:Stone 20.png
- File:Stone 17.png
- File:Stone 18.png
- File:Stone 16.png
- File:Stone 15.png
- File:Stone 14.png
- File:Stone 13.png
- File:Stone 12.png
- File:Stone 11.png
- File:Stone 9.png
- File:Stone 8.png
- File:Stone 7.png
- File:Stone 6.png
- File:Stone 5.png
- File:Stone 4.png
- File:Stone 3.png
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 21:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:26, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused random photo without context or description, no educational use, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Redundant to File:Google "G" Logo.svg and File:Google-favicon-2015.png. Larryasou (talk) 02:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Muhammad Imtiaz joyia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-presentation, out of project scope. Commons is not your personal free web host. No contribs to any wm project.
- File:Happy Happy JOYIA 04.jpg
- File:Happy Happy JOYIA 01.jpg
- File:Happy Happy JOYIA 03.jpg
- File:Happy Happy JOYIA 02.jpg
- User:Muhammad Imtiaz joyia
Achim (talk) 12:28, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Kotivalo (talk) 12:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Television screenshot uploaded as "own work". Thuresson (talk) 13:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:36, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EJ Bishop3 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Files not legitimately in use; File not realistically useful for an educational purpose
Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 16:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Delete Got to agree with Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨--Headlock0225 (talk) 21:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:37, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Personal photos/cross-wiki promotion; out of COM:SCOPE.
𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:32, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Vanity spamming at worst but clearly out of scope. G10 / F10. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 13:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 11:38, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Very low quality, no location information MPF (talk) 00:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marlin2014 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional photos of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:20, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Hasley as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F10. Out of scope, but doesn't quite meet F10. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Comment. Cross-wiki spam. Previous uploads were deleted. See JahidulislamRatul, Jahidulislamratull and Jahidulislamratulwiki. —Hasley 11:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:18, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Looks to be a school report card uploaded at illegibly small resolution. Uploaded in 2016; only upload by user. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 02:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unnotable person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 02:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. E4024 (talk) 16:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
promo on wikidata. Minoraxtalk 03:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mostafa Walid10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploads from three different sites claimed as licensed, but for which no evidence of a license is provided. I don't see anything on the source website.
B (talk) 03:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Scan from a book published in 1989 -- no indication book or image is under a free license Renata3 (talk) 04:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:16, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Retirovshik (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photo(s), out of scope.
Minoraxtalk 04:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Black image with two names in white. Not used, no value for Commons. Mippzon (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:52, 11 July 2015 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo(s), out of scope. Minoraxtalk 04:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Perroj kristina (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these documents seem to be out of scope.
- File:FENERET BRENDA PLANIT TE PERHAPJESTE PRONAVE TE SHERBIMIT(1929).pdf
- File:Kodi detar 19.pdf
- File:List of lighthouses in Albania.pdf
- File:Albanian Hydrographic Service.pdf
- File:Headlights inside and outside the property placement and expansion plan. -.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Obviously a photo of a photographic print on the wall, unlikely to be own work Kotivalo (talk) 07:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:15, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Advertising, likely with copyrighted elements Kotivalo (talk) 07:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Dubious "own work" source. Original source of the logo is not specified, and it's impossible that the user might create the logo by himself (in .jpg format, not .png or .svg format? Likely grabbed somewhere). Also, this logo might exceed COM:Threshold of originality. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:14, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MultiJames95 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Given the uploader's questionable uploads, I doubt these are his self-photographed images too. Some appear to be historical images (dating from 2000s, 90s, 80s, or 70s), but these cannot be verified if these are really his images or just grabbed from the Internet or social media / scanned from old photos/post cards/etc. still in copyright. If these are indeed his, it cannot be certain if these are purely his images or were published elsewhere before uploading these here. Inconsistent resolutions too, Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies for the following images.
- File:B-1836 of China Airlines .jpg
- File:Second terminal.jpg
- File:B-1836, the Ninoy death plane.jpg
- File:Ninoy Gate.jpg
- File:Ninoy death plane.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Pictures without camera details tend to be suspect. We require a very much better declaration of source and/or permissions. See COM:OTRS. Potential copyright violation, the more so since it is a tiny picture of low resolution, likely to have been culled from elsewhere Timtrent (talk) 07:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence this is freely licensed. TJMSmith (talk) 08:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Holiday snap? Person pictured of no relevance. 62.216.207.203 10:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (in different versions, e.g. [1][2]), no evidence that uploader is the photographer as claimed.. HaeB (talk) 10:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Clearly taken from: Briener, Peter; Slovak Philharmonic(2013), The Complete National Anthems of the World (2013 Edition). Naxos. or; Briener, Peter; Slovak Philharmonic(2019), The Complete National Anthems of the World (2019 Edition) Kirkworld (talk) 10:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (see e.g. the version here), no evidence that the uploader is the photographer as claimed. HaeB (talk) 10:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted Logo of an organisation. Suggest to delete. Ranjithsiji (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Vanity picture of inactive user https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:MIRZAYUSUF55 Fayenatic london (talk) 10:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Cute cow picture, out of scope this is not Instagram. 62.216.207.203 11:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Keep: Nonsense request. --Achim (talk) 12:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
unsure that the uploader took the image, or indeed that it is the subject that is claimed Lugnuts (talk) 11:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused, undescribed incident or person. No edu or exemplar value. Richard Avery (talk) 11:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
This file is cropped image of a probably non-free source wrongly claimed as own work. Parnaval (talk) 12:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - For future reference Parnaval if you're 110% certain it's a copyvio then tag it with {{copyvio|your reason here}} - It saves admins having to close this and saves the file being here for 7 odd days. Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 00:14, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Staalhermo (talk · contribs)
[edit]User has uploaded a lot of images with obviously incorrect licenses. Some are tagged CC BY-NC-ND at the source, some have no license specified. Some are tagged CC-BY-SA and Own work where that is unlikely to be true. Some of these are possibly some version of PD-OLD, but I wasn't able to verify the date of death of those that had a photographer specified.
- File:Hermos barn.jpg
- File:Marygift.jpg
- File:Detsistebildet.jpg
- File:FBib.03010-044.jpg
- File:Grand Hotel Jansen.png
- File:Anton Marentius Hermo på trapp.jpg
- File:GrandHotelHammerfest.jpg
- File:FBib.03010-850.jpg
- File:FBib.03010-849.jpg
- File:TRH11019100220001 SORO.jpg
- File:AntonMarentiusHermoFamilie brullup.jpg
- File:AntonHermoKirkegaarden1939.jpg
- File:AntonMarentiusHermo06.jpg
- File:Antonhermo1.jpg
TommyG (talk) 12:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:06, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
screenshot copyrighted Caulfield (talk) 14:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:04, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS must be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:03, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
- File:Application of Mentoring Skills in Educational Practice (1).pdf
- File:Application of Leadership Stance in Teaching Practice.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
As per the file description this is obviously a screenshot from a live stream. Fails COM:DW. De728631 (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Also nominated: File:Jodoumerg.png as a TV screenshot. De728631 (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Found the same image on infobae. Despite a poorer resolution, the photo was published a month earlier on the website, and also the original file size is larger (1920x1920) A1Cafel (talk) 15:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work A1Cafel (talk) 15:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from toys. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:01, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:00, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Schiesari, Elisa, Qui e Ora, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
- File:Bettella, Rosa, La lettrice, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:59, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused copy of File:CC-BY icon.svg Askeuhd (talk) 16:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
duplicate with File:FranantaTarigan.jpg — Tjmoel 
bicara 19:37, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Deleted: Please use {{duplicate|otherfile.jpg}} Martin H. (talk) 20:17, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Facebook image per Metadata, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 17:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Transmission code appears to be a Facebook image, permission is required A1Cafel (talk) 17:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:52, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 17:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
There is only a release by the scanner, the release of the photographer is missing. Tohma (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:51, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
A non notable person, a personal image with no edu value Richard Avery (talk) 17:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
A screenshot with a simple description but no perceived educational value. Out of scope Richard Avery (talk) 17:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdul Rehman wattoo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Multiple reasons: file from Facebook, unfree logos and file with low quality and dubious notability
- File:Mian Abdul Rehman wattoo.jpg
- File:Tehreek anti corruption Pakistan.jpg
- File:Tehreek anti corruption logo.png
- File:Adorable plant.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 18:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:22, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bhjakhar22 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality, no educational purpose
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 18:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:50, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Meheryar Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad quality and likely copyright issues (some images from Facebook)
- File:ATD Sunset.jpg
- File:Another Shot.png
- File:Charsadda.jpg
- File:Hazara M2.png
- File:Hazara Motorway.jpg
- File:The Whole.jpg
- File:Park in Abbottabad.jpg
- File:Abbottabad Hills.jpg
- File:Evenings.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 18:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:49, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; contemporary artwork; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 18:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Low quality image of sunset (unused) + personal (?) family tree
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 18:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:46, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Bad quality and copyright issue (watermark)
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 18:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Is this something in scope? If so, is "own work" OK? E4024 (talk) 19:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:MathiasDlb/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité D with table equivalent:
Degré Nombre de nœuds Louise 3 2 Daphné 3 3 Mathias 4 3 Elsa 5 4 Auriane 5 4
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:MathiasDlb/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité D with table equivalent:
Degré Degré voisins Louise 3 5 Daphné 3 4,66 Mathias 4 4,33 Elsa 5 5 Auriane 5 5
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:MathiasDlb/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité D with table equivalent:
Nœud Coefficient de clustering Louise Daphné Mathias Elsa Auriane
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:41, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:MathiasDlb/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité D with table equivalent:
Degré Corrélation combinée (degré, coefficient de clustering) 3 4 5
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:MathiasDlb/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité D with table equivalent:
Nœud Proximité Louise Daphné Mathias Elsa Auriane
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:44, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:MathiasDlb/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité D with TeX equivalent:
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![205 File:Full view of "Angels Unawares" sculpture.jpg](#File:Full_view_of_"Angels_Unawares"_sculpture.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
![231 File:"Angels Unawares" sculpture.jpg](#File:"Angels_Unawares"_sculpture.jpg){kind=link}
![232 File:"Angels Unawares".jpg](#File:"Angels_Unawares".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_con_dos_chamanes_toltecas_en_M%C3%A9xico.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_con_su_padre..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in fr:wikt:Utilisateur:MathiasDlb/Modélisation des Réseaux (M1 SIREN, 2020)/Activité D with table equivalent:
Nœud Intermediarité Louise 0 Daphné 0 Mathias 0 Elsa 1 Auriane 1
Now unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image. WIKImaniac 19:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:43, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Spam, out of project scope. Ubcule (talk) 20:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:42, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Presumed selfie of uploader or other person with no indication of notability. Ubcule (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Apparent spam. Ubcule (talk) 20:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:40, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Er staat duidelijk 'copyright' op de afbeelding. / There is clearly a 'copyright' on the image. Erik Wannee (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saba.seher (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (low quality). Also copyright issues
- File:Town's Mosque.jpg
- File:Town's Twilight.jpg
- File:Beach wave.jpg
- File:Beach's Sunset.jpg
- File:Seasand.jpg
- File:Spring's evening.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 21:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:35, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Omar chrayah (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope (low quality and unused diagrams with dubious notability)
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:34, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Zeerakmehdi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope due to poor quality and/or likely copyright issue
- File:Ghakuch Valley.jpg
- File:Gahkuch River.jpg
- File:Attabad Lake 10.jpg
- File:Gahkuch River 1.jpg
- File:Creek Vistas.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:33, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope due to bad quality
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 22:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamza78fazil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope due to bad quality. We have many quality images of these themes
- File:Moon’s light touching the surface of sea.jpg
- File:Hyderabad Mirpurkhas road.jpg
- File:Lost Boat.jpg
- File:Bonding of trees.jpg
- File:Sun is mixed with the clouds.jpg
- File:Glowing light of sun going down.jpg
- File:Glowing light of rising sun.jpg
- File:Do darya DHA Karachi.jpg
Юрий Д.К. (talk) 22:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:32, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
The given source does not mention the supposed cc-by-sa-4.0 license. Supercarwaartalk 22:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:30, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
User uploaded this as "own work", but also states "© Pieter Clicteur". Seems like a copyright violation. Encycloon (talk) 22:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 20:29, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
In my opinion the file is out of project scope. Should be .svg, if really useful. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:58, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Personal, vanity photo. Out of scope for Wikipedia/Commons. Oaktree b (talk) 23:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Self-nominating a Flickr-sourced file that I uploaded here via Flickr2Commons. There is no freedom of panorama yet here, and until the amendment to copyright law becomes law, regular rules apply. I didn't have permission from the heirs of architect Arguelles (d. 2008) in doing the Flickr2Commons transfer. Undelete when FOP becomes existing here. Related DR opened by a different user is at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:ABS-CBN Broadcasting Center. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:29, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:48, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:APEC Sculpture Garden
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the phils. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/APEC_Sculpture_Garden says these are put in 1996 and created by artists from the 20 APEC countries
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - AUS.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Brunei.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Canada.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Chile.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Chinese Taipei.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Hong Kong.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Indonesia.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Japan.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Malaysia.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Mexico.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - NZ.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - PH.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - PNG.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - PRC.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Republic of Korea.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Russia.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - SG.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Thailand.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - US.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden - Vietnam.jpg
- File:APEC Sculpture Garden Sign.jpg
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 02:27, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 02:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Deletion requests/uploaded by User:Klstkomutyann (User talk:Klstkomutyann · Special:Contributions/Klstkomutyann)
[edit]
COM:NOTUSED these media's descriptions are empty of meaning and low-quality. see also --Netora (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:50, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright). Timtrent (talk) 07:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the image is under an acceptable free licence. Ownership or possession of a photo, proprietorship of the equipment used to take the photo, or being the subject of the photo does not equate holding the copyright. The copyright holder is the photographer (i.e. the person who took the photo), rather that the subject (the person who appears in the photo) or the person possessing the photo, unless transferred by operation of law (e.g. inheritance, etc.) or by contract (written and signed by the copyright holder, and explicitly transfers the copyright).
- File:Photo October 29 2020.jpg
- File:Photo shoot Oct 30 2020.jpg
- File:Photo shoot July 23 2020.jpg
- File:Photo shoot Oct 15 2020.jpg
- File:R O S E S.jpg
Timtrent (talk) 07:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:49, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Because it is A selfie Movses (talk) 20:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 12:47, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Luca M as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: original as roma "lupetto" logo https://www.asroma.com/en/news/2016/7/gallery-seven-famous-roma-kits-with-the-lupetto-badge
Converted to regular DR to allow for discussion, as external hit is from 2016, whereas our upload from 2009. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- The Lupetto is an AS Roma official logo since 1978 (not 2016), it is a registred trade mark since 1998 and it is owned by ASR Media and Sponsorship S.p.A.. Because of this, it is not own by Francesco interman~commonswiki.--Luca•M 20:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Similar to 600px_-_LupaRoma_flag.png in Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_W_Ferruz. Ruthven (msg) 21:10, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials? And what good does it do to the society? — Preceding unsigned comment added by ZzMysyeryxX (talk • contribs) 13:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, seems to have encyclopedic relevance if we do not already have media of the specific act. -- The Anome (talk) 12:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no valid reason provided for deletion; video is unique in its subject matter and of reasonably high quality. Dronebogus (talk) 17:29, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. ƏXPLICIT 13:31, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Pornographic content without educative purpose 80.146.8.244 10:30, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy keep Not a valid reason. Definitely educational (and we don't have many of these). Previously kept allready. --PaterMcFly (talk) 13:13, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
Speedy Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Dronebogus (talk) 19:33, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
Nieodpowiedni 31.61.229.221 12:02, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Imagem de sem autorização de uso Lokal333 (talk) 00:23, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Uso sem autorização Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:34, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
uso sem autorização Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
uso sem autorização Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:45, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
Uso indevido da imagem Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:47, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
- Who uploaded it? --E4024 (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
preciso que elimine este ficheiro Caroline ilhabela (talk) 00:42, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- We also have File:Miniatura de Maria Perpétua Calafate de Souza.jpg, but this one looks better. E4024 (talk) 00:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, still no acceptable source and no author. Taivo (talk) 07:12, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
Because it is Press photo, Random photo from internet NomadEXT (talk) 22:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Speedy keep – another meritless deletion request by NomadEXT.--TFerenczy (talk) 12:05, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
_-_2020-10-21_-_3.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: looks like a perfectly valid upload, neither "press photo" nor "random photo from the internet" seem applicable. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:39, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
it's a duplicate and the original has been uploaded. Dionysio.Calucci (talk) 09:38, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:12, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Discord (software)
[edit]Copyright violation. The Discord logo is not freely licensed (the icon is included in a free icon pack, Font Awesome 5, but the creators of that icon pack do not own the rights to the logo) and surpasses the threshold of originality.
- File:Discord-512.webp
- File:Discord.png
- File:Font Awesome 5 brands discord color.svg
- File:Font Awesome 5 brands discord white.svg
- File:Font Awesome 5 brands discord.svg
- File:Hero.png
IagoQnsi (talk) 22:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - As the uploader of the Font Awesome files, I was skeptical that it was actually CC-BY licensed. But seeing that File:Font Awesome 5 brands github.svg had existed with no problem, I assumed it was ok and proceeded with the upload. Saucy (talk) 22:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Saucy: The GitHub logo is an unusual case because GitHub themselves have released the mark under a free license as part of their Octicons icon set: File:Octicons-mark-github.svg. --IagoQnsi (talk) 18:09, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, falls under COM:TOO. A two coloured gaming headset and speech bubble definitely falls under TOO. This logo is much simpler than a lot of the examples at COM:TOO United States, such as File:Nikken logo and wordmark.svg. — Berrely • T∕C 13:52, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, If that Nikken logo is allowed on Commons, then why not the Discord logo? MarioSuperstar77 (talk) 19:34, 14 May 2021 (UTC)
- The Nikken logo was denied copyright by the US Copyright Office because it used the public domain "universal symbol for man" and did not alter it substantially enough. Whether the same logic can be applied to a video game controller I'm not sure. Saucy (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment - Added File:Discord-Logo+Wordmark-Color.svg.--Vulphere 08:39, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Beat me to it Saucy (talk) 08:52, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Well past threshold of originality in the US - no way can be called a simple collection of geometric shapes --Masem (talk) 12:26, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, this is complex logo. It does not consist of simple geometrical shapes. user:Taivo (user talk:Taivo) 09:54, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Discord (software)
[edit]Per the DR above.
- File:Discord default profile picture green.png
- File:Discord default profile picture grey.png
- File:Discord default profile picture orange.png
- File:Discord default profile picture red.png
- File:Discord logo (2021).svg
- File:Discord Old Logo.svg
- File:Discord-Logo-Color.svg
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Jonteemil (talk) 19:15, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: File:Discord logo (2021).svg is a different logo, that has been massively oversimplified.
- — Berrely • T∕C 18:28, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination. user:Materialscientist (user talk:Materialscientist) 14:44, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Discord (software)
[edit]
Per prior DRs, above, it was decided that the Discord logo is not freely licensed, plus I am pretty certain the Slack v. Discord file is out of the project scope. Nutshinou Talk! 07:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
- Added file:Discord Logo.png and file:Discordphish.png. Arlo James Barnes 23:45, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 02:58, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rachelilli26 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Blandini Giampietro, Retro Pedrocchi, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
- File:Blandini Giampietro, Retro Pedrocchi, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Morgannina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:COLUSSI Sly Diego - You can fly.jpg
- File:Minto Maria Grazia, Il balzo della vita...verso il futuro. Padova Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:56, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Thommyavve (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:ZERO MENTALE - Portale sinaptico.jpg
- File:Al Khalil Ibrahim, Senza titolo - Un titolo non basta, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:59, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:08, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Roxlazar18 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Failla Paola, La solitudine fa i suoi esercizi, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
- File:Prosciutti Marilena, Sesamo, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
cambio nome a causa errore — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zio27 (talk • contribs) 18:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Zio27: In realtà da questa fonte la località è citata come it:Ca' Sabbioni, che leggo essere una località della it:Municipalità di Marghera. Nessun problema a rinominare la categoria per una denominazione più corretta, il mio errore di attribuirla al territorio di Chirignago è evidente (...e non ho idea di quella scelta, devo averlo trovato da qualche parte o aver confuso l'attribuzione di un oratorio con un altro...) ma dato che la località dovrebbe IMO comprendere anche Category:Villa Bottenigo direi, che per coerenza e maggiore dettaglio per chi volesse/dovesse trovare i soggetti fotografati, che l'oratorio sia sia spostato a Category:Madonna del Rosario (Ca' Sabbioni, Venice) e la Villa a Category:Villa Bottenigo (Ca' Sabbioni, Venice). Attendo commenti, grazie :-) --Threecharlie (talk) 07:00, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Threecharlie: L'ho attribuita a Malcontenta perché prima della creazione della municipalità, Ca' Sabbioni veniva attribuita a Malcontenta. Ho fatto così perché mi pareva sbagliato segnare Marghera. --Zio27 10:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: misnamed cat rredirect. --JuTa 20:02, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
The sculpture was completed in 2019 by Timothy Schmalz (1969–). There is no freedom of panorama in Vatican, permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
![16:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/06#c-A1Cafel-2021-03-06T16:15:00.000Z-File:Full_view_of_"Angels_Unawares"_sculpture.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
![08:06, 13 July 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/06#c-Gbawden-2021-07-13T08:06:00.000Z-File:Full_view_of_"Angels_Unawares"_sculpture.jpg){kind=link}
Implausible redirect Nehme1499 (talk) 19:36, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
wrong name Maira zia (talk) 20:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
wrong name Maira zia (talk) 20:39, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Maira zia, you can request a renaming of the file. Go to File:Afsana.jpg and try Shift-Alt-m on your keyboard or click on top on More → Move. --Achim (talk) 20:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unlikely to be own work --Didym (talk) 20:41, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unlikely to be own work / see size and name (Ana) at MD. --E4024 (talk) 21:27, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:07, 13 July 2021 (UTC)
COM:NOTUSED uploader didn't write sufficient description. may be vandalism for "saitom" (see: delete record by this uploader) Netora (talk) 00:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Ruthven at 11:27, 15 July 2021 UTC: No permissions after one week --Krdbot 19:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Has a (c) copyright in image OlEnglish (talk) 14:30, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. Note: Its the mark from Flickr User and photographer Michael Martin. GeorgHH • talk 14:34, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Ok, perhaps I misunderstood a policy somewhere, I was under the impression any image that is marked in any way as being copyrighted is not allowable? Don't (c) watermarks and the like that are within the image contradict the CC license? Sorry, still learning, thanks. -- OlEnglish (talk) 06:38, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: It might be confusing, but the CC licenses are actually all based on existing copyright. Such as in this example - it is copyrighted, but can be used according to the CC-BY-SA 2.0 license granted by the author and owner of the copyright. This is different from public domain where no copyright exists and there are no license terms to follow. Therefore, the copyright watermark technically isn't wrong, though we don't like such watermarks on Commons (as they can be misleading) and it's usually seen as allowed to remove them. The image as such, in this case, still appears to be validly licensed under CC-BY-SA as the flickr user who uploaded it seems to be the photographer, Michael Martin, as GeorgHH says. --Gestumblindi (talk) 20:54, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
Dopplung / double upload Ss279 (talk) 19:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate-processed. --Túrelio (talk) 11:28, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Deepfake suspicion: The woman on this erotic picture on the right looks like the well-known comedian Doon Mackichan from British TV. See: Google image search. I'm not a lawyer but this image may need to be removed from Commons. Kafka-kun (talk) 02:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Why would a nudie / porn photographer from Florida produce "deepfakes" of a British comedian? In 2012?. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
Another image with deepfake suspicion: The woman on this erotic picture on the right looks like the well-known comedian Doon Mackichan from British TV. See: Google image search. I'm not a lawyer but this image may need to be removed from Commons. Kafka-kun (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Why would a nudie / porn photographer from Florida produce "deepfakes" of a British comedian? In 2012?. --Rosenzweig τ 17:20, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
UNKNOWN SOURCES Spsubash5452 (talk) 17:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: nothing to delete or keep here. --Rosenzweig τ 22:52, 30 October 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by AntiCompositeBot as no license (User:AntiCompositeBot/NoLicense/tag). Previously tagged with {{PD-Coa-Germany}}, but that was removed by Hinnerk11 saying that it's not an official coat of arms. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 01:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
It is assumed to be or at the very least have been official, until this issue is closed however I tagged the item with the PD-self license — Preceding unsigned comment added by JonahF (talk • contribs) 21:57, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
- You assume that. We've had this discussion on german Wikipedia last April and you were not able to produce a source for this assumption. That's the first time this was deleted. Now declaring this as an own work, seems a little bit odd.--Hinnerk11 (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted Dubious, OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Published earlier in Twitter [4] I think this needs permission, theres is no proof that the uploader is author. Htm (talk) 02:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:09, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Published earlier in [5] and in Twitter [6]. There is no proof that the uploader is author, I think this needs permission. Htm (talk) 02:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:12, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
The design of this disc seems sufficiently creative as to warrant copyright protection B (talk) 03:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Seems below COM:TOO#United States for me, just rectangles and text. --Thibaut (talk) 12:34, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- A few rectangles and text is ineligible for copyright. A lot of rectangles and text put together becomes eligible. I'd consider the Car Credit City logo case as a good example. Any of the constituent elements by themselves are uncreative, but you put them together and you have something creative. --B (talk) 02:11, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- @B: Will {{MS-PL}} or {{MS-RL}} work? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:01, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: No. If Microsoft is releasing something under one of those licenses, it's probably a coding sample. (And there are plenty of third parties that use one of those licenses, of course.) They are not going to be applicable to anything Microsoft is selling. --B (talk) 14:11, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted DW, Complex design, no indication uploader has rights to license. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:16, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
No skull material are known from Alectrosaurus. I regret making this illustration, as it can mislead the public on what we actually know about the genus Conty (talk) 05:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request, unused, apparently OOS. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Low quality Conty (talk) 06:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use, in scope. (Some seem to prefer "low quality" illustrations of some sexual topics to minimize prurient context while still adequately conveying the meaning.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:22, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Low quality Conty (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept in scope, in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Low quality + not based on a particular genus Conty (talk) 06:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per uploader request; unused and apparently OOS -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:24, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
We have a photo of an ankylosaur skull, and can delete this Conty (talk) 05:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
'Kept. In scope; User appears to want to purge all his drawings from commons DieBuche (talk) 18:20, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use and per previous keep ruling. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:26, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
This is an illustration: we have photos of skulls. Conty (talk) 18:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. Unsourced mass request for deletion by uploader (?). DieBuche (talk) 21:17, 22 August 2010 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use and per previous "Keep" ruling. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
A more accurate version of this image exist on Wikimedia. Conty (talk) 06:25, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept in use in 5 projects. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of ownership or permission to release under a free license. CentreLeftRight ✉ 07:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:32, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A wrong file was uploaded. 66.222.133.51 08:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
A wrong file was uploaded. Anhydride2020 (talk) 08:08, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted prompt uploader request. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:31, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio, speedy deleted twice. — Racconish 💬 09:56, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:06, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
The sculpture was completed in 2019 by Timothy Schmalz (1969–). There is no freedom of panorama in Vatican, permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
![16:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/06#c-A1Cafel-2021-03-06T16:14:00.000Z-File:"Angels_Unawares"_sculpture.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. Vatican follows Italian copyright laws, but there is no FOP in Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:22, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
![21:33, 12 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/06#c-Infrogmation-2021-11-12T21:33:00.000Z-File:"Angels_Unawares"_sculpture.jpg){kind=link}
The sculpture was completed in 2019 by Timothy Schmalz (1969–). There is no freedom of panorama in Vatican, permission from him is required A1Cafel (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
![16:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/06#c-A1Cafel-2021-03-06T16:14:00.000Z-File:"Angels_Unawares".jpg){kind=link}
- Comment @A1Cafel: you can contact the author here. Do you volunteer to ask him? Veverve (talk) 00:27, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel: I have asked the author by e-mail, and his Sec-Treasurer Tony Frey said the statue is copyrighted; he did not say anything else. Therefore, I believe that all images of this statue in the Vatican should be removed from WCommons. Veverve (talk) 18:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Vatican follows Italian copyright laws, but there is no FOP in Italy. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 15:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted per above. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
![21:35, 12 November 2021 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2021/03/06#c-Infrogmation-2021-11-12T21:35:00.000Z-File:"Angels_Unawares".jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Donald Trung (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused software screenshots of questionable notability
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 07.png
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 08.png
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 04.png
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 05.png
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 06.png
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 03.png
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 02.png
- File:Information about the Aangifte 2020 application (2021) 01.png
- File:Drukte bij de Belastingdienst (March 2021) 04.png
- File:Drukte bij de Belastingdienst (March 2021) 02.png
- File:Drukte bij de Belastingdienst (March 2021) 01.png
- File:Drukte bij de Belastingdienst (March 2021) 03.png
_07.png){kind=link}
_08.png){kind=link}
_04.png){kind=link}
_05.png){kind=link}
_06.png){kind=link}
_03.png){kind=link}
_02.png){kind=link}
_01.png){kind=link}
_04.png){kind=link}
_02.png){kind=link}
_01.png){kind=link}
_03.png){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, it is an example of the Dutch national taxation service not being able to process tax filings due to their servers not being able to handle the amount of people. "questionable notability" this affects literally tens of millions of people and is (as far as I am aware) the first time this happened (likely due to the ongoing pandemic), it has been covered by national news outlets like RTL Nieuws. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
News coverage :
- https://m.limburger.nl/cnt/dmf20200301_00149808 (from 2020, so this isn't the first time, but it is a repeating bug in a Dutch national service).
- https://www.telegraaf.nl/nieuws/163421548/grote-drukte-op-site-belastingdienst-veel-storingsklachten
- https://www.nd.nl/nieuws/varia/957119/grote-drukte-op-site-belastingdienst-veel-storingsklachten (this list goes on and on).
These images could literally be used in any of the above news articles. At this point I wonder if the nominator even researched the event before claiming it was of "Questionable notability". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Closed as Kept per above. Good argument by active user for in-scope usefulness; nothing requiring deletion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
North Vietnamese and Việt Cộng propaganda cards
[edit]Copyrighted for now, undelete in the future.
- File:Hey American! Join the winning side and be paid! You don't have to fight! This Girl & $10,000 Cash - North Vietnam 01.jpg
- File:Hey Soldier! Join the winning side and be paid! You don't have to fight! This Girl & $10,000 Cash - Việt Cộng 01.jpg
Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
Tried to create a sub-page for future undeletion, manually nominating them separately. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:39, 21 March 2023 (UTC)
A 1981 bldg by architect Leandro V. Locsin - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninoy_Aquino_International_Airport_Terminal_1 no freedom of pano in the phils.
- File:Manila NinoyAquino InternationalAirport Check-in.jpg
- File:NAIA Terminal 1 Jan 2018.jpg
- File:NAIA TERMINAL ONE CHECK-IN HALL.jpg
- File:NAIA-Termina-1.jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International.jpg
- File:Santo Nino, Parañaque, 1704 Metro Manila, Philippines - panoramio (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 02:40, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: please review the rest of the images. - 124.106.141.178 14:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @124.106.141.178: two problematic ones are now at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pasay, 1300 Metro Manila, Philippines - panoramio (19).jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport 1.jpg. The rest of the images not nominated are fine for me. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:21, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Patrickroque01: NAIA is a gateway to the Philippines, and it's also the first and last place to be visited in the country as you arrive or leave Philippines. This airport is owned and managed by the government of the Republic of the Philippines through Manila International Airport Authority. First of all, I'm interested to know if this deletion request was acknowledged by MIAA and the company behind the design of the airport, L.V. Locsin Partners. Most importantly, I remind the operator of Mcrl Lxmna account to please stop from sending any more petitions to remove and censor what he/she call "unauthorized photos of copyrighted buildings in the Philippines" because this may pose legal threat and chilling effect to many content creators, photographers, tourists, vloggers, students and other people. Patrickroque01 (talk) 16:39, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:34, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Design was made by ADP Aeroport de paris and a 1999 bldg. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninoy_Aquino_International_Airport_Terminal_2 no freedom of pano in the phils.
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 02:44, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: please review the rest of the images. - 124.106.141.178 14:53, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all three nominated here as no FOP still exists. Restore only once it is introduced here officially. The last two images that are not nominated are fine for me: File:NAIA Complex - Terminal 2 (Pasay)(2018-04-02).JPG is a de minimis for me as other generic houses or buildings have blended with it. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
(2018-04-02).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
A recent 2007 building by DP Architects Pte. Ltd. - https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninoy_Aquino_International_Airport_Terminal_3 no freedom of panorama in the phils and no archi firm permission
- File:ManilaTerminal3.jpg
- File:NAIA 3 check-in counters.jpeg
- File:Naia T3 exterior.jpg
- File:NAIA T3 Interior Baggage Carousel - Sep 2018.jpg
- File:NAIA T3 Interior Departure Area - Sep 2018.jpg
- File:NAIA Terminal 3 (2).jpg
- File:NAIA Terminal 3 2009 MC.jpg
- File:NAIA Terminal 3 checkin.jpg
- File:NAIA Terminal 3 Departure 2009 MC.jpg
- File:NAIA Terminal 3 in Pasay.JPG
- File:NAIA Terminal 3.jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) Terminal 3 - arrivals entrance (Pasay; 2014-12-16).jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) Terminal 3 - front (Pasay; 2017-01-01).jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) Terminal 3 - Ticketing Hall (Pasay; 2014-12-16) 06.jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) Terminal 3 - ticketing hall (Pasay; 2017-01-01) 2.jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport (NAIA) Terminal 3 - ticketing hall (Pasay; 2017-01-01) 4.jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal 3 Panorama.jpg
- File:Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal III.jpg
- File:Pasay, 1300 Metro Manila, Philippines - panoramio (30).jpg
- File:Pasay, 1300 Metro Manila, Philippines - panoramio (31).jpg
- File:Pasay, 1300 Metro Manila, Philippines - panoramio (33).jpg
- File:This Way to Jollibee.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Terminal_3_-_arrivals_entrance_(Pasay;_2014-12-16).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Terminal_3_-_front_(Pasay;_2017-01-01).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Terminal_3_-_Ticketing_Hall_(Pasay;_2014-12-16)_06.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Terminal_3_-_ticketing_hall_(Pasay;_2017-01-01)_2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Terminal_3_-_ticketing_hall_(Pasay;_2017-01-01)_4.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 02:48, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- @JWilz12345: please review the rest of the images. - 124.106.141.178 14:54, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete almost all except File:NAIA T3 Interior Baggage Carousel - Sep 2018.jpg ( Keep of this one as the main focus is the baggage area). For the rest, unfortunately restore only when FOP is officially and formally introduced here. For the concern of 124.106.141.178, browsing through the untagged images via VisualFileChange I see no problem (some show only the airplanes, others probably COM:DM). However, the last few images in the category show former Pres. Arroyo unveiling a bust of the slain Ninoy Aquino (which is unambiguously recent), and I'm not sure if these can pass incidental inclusion or de minimis. Perhaps a third-party Wikimedian editor may nominate the problematic ones individually. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Patrickroque01: NAIA is a gateway to the Philippines, and it's also the first and last place to be visited in the country as you arrive or leave Philippines. This airport is owned and managed by the government of the Republic of the Philippines through Manila International Airport Authority. First of all, I'm interested to know if this deletion request was acknowledged by MIAA and the group behind the design of the airport. Most importantly, I remind the operator of Mcrl Lxmna account to please stop from sending any more petitions to remove what she call unauthorized photos of copyrighted buildings in the Philippines because this may pose legal threat and chilling effect to many content creators, photographers, tourists, vloggers, students and other people. Patrickroque01 (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - images all infringe on the architect's copyright. Most of what User:Patrickroque01 says above is either irrelevant or wrong. If the user continues to threaten other users he or she will be banned from editing here. When "many content creators, photographers, tourists, vloggers, students and other people" infringe on copyrights, a "chilling effect" is entirely appropriate. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:37, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No skull material are known from Alectrosaurus. I regret making this illustration, as it can mislead the public on what we actually know about the genus Conty (talk) 06:00, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment image is in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:18, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No skull material are known from Gondwanatitan. I regret making this illustration, as it can mislead the public on what we actually know about the genus Conty (talk) 06:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment image is in use. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:19, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
I think I made this too simple. Conty (talk) 15:13, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Kept. true, but it is in use. Amada44 talk to me 20:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:04, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Not based on a particular taxon, low quality Conty (talk) 06:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Can't be used for something good Conty (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Kept. In scope DieBuche (talk) 18:18, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:16, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:45, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
No reference to a particular fossil specimen it could be based upon + low quality Conty (talk) 06:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:46, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Clearly not uploaders own work as claimed - needs an actual source for the drawing and when and where it was first published and by who. Nigel Ish (talk) 09:59, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- it is my own work. I made a photo yesterday. Decided to change the license type to the Public domain. Igors Cernovs (talk) 11:07, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- The photo that you made is a derivative work of a drawing with its own copyright - so it cannot be released into the public domain - if the original drawing was by Kārlis Irbītis who died in 1997 then Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Latvia applies - so the drawing is in copyright until 2067. If it's not by Irbītis but by an unknown author then copyright lasts until 70 years after first made available to the public - if as you claim here that this is the first time the drawing has been published then copyright remains in place until 70 years from now - i.e. 2091!Nigel Ish (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Real date of the drawing is 1939. I saw some copies from the archive and made a photo yesterday. That’s why I claimed it as my own work. Be advised that I made photo from the copy. I don’t know where is an original and who is an author of the copy. For information, Irbitis many years ago left Latvia and was living in Canada. Where he died 23 years ago, as stated in Wikipedia. I don’t think why you use copyright rules by territory/Latvia and where do you see on the picture that it is copyrighted? Original drawing disappeared and most probably destroyed during second world war. So, we are speaking about the owner of the copy. Which is unknown. Why I can’t release the image into the public domain in that case? Igors Cernovs (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- The copy in the archive will be a derivative work of the original drawing (which is dated 1939 - i.e. when Irbītis was still working for VEF in Latvia) and thus be subject to the same copyright as the drawing - as will the photo you took of the copy in the archive.Nigel Ish (talk) 10:16, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Real date of the drawing is 1939. I saw some copies from the archive and made a photo yesterday. That’s why I claimed it as my own work. Be advised that I made photo from the copy. I don’t know where is an original and who is an author of the copy. For information, Irbitis many years ago left Latvia and was living in Canada. Where he died 23 years ago, as stated in Wikipedia. I don’t think why you use copyright rules by territory/Latvia and where do you see on the picture that it is copyrighted? Original drawing disappeared and most probably destroyed during second world war. So, we are speaking about the owner of the copy. Which is unknown. Why I can’t release the image into the public domain in that case? Igors Cernovs (talk) 18:17, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- The photo that you made is a derivative work of a drawing with its own copyright - so it cannot be released into the public domain - if the original drawing was by Kārlis Irbītis who died in 1997 then Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Latvia applies - so the drawing is in copyright until 2067. If it's not by Irbītis but by an unknown author then copyright lasts until 70 years after first made available to the public - if as you claim here that this is the first time the drawing has been published then copyright remains in place until 70 years from now - i.e. 2091!Nigel Ish (talk) 13:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:49, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
The original 1939 airplane blueprint cannot be your own work. Kursant504 (talk) 05:53, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
- Is there a reason why there are two deletion requests for the same file?Nigel Ish (talk) 09:38, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
- And two files with the same file name?Nigel Ish (talk) 09:42, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:50, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Soviet Militsiya rank insignia (1939-1943)
[edit]- File:RKM-01.gif
- File:RKM-02.gif
- File:RKM-03.gif
- File:RKM-04.gif
- File:RKM-05.gif
- File:RKM-06.gif
- File:RKM-07.gif
- File:RKM-08.gif
- File:RKM-09.gif
- File:RKM-10.gif
- File:RKM-11.gif
- File:RKM-12.gif
- File:RKM-13.gif
- File:RKM-14.gif
- File:Главный директор РКМ ш.png
- File:Главный директор РКМ.png
- File:директор ркм 2 ранга ш.png
- File:директор ркм 2 ранга.png
- File:инспектор ркм ш.png
- File:инспектор ркм.png
- File:капитан ркм гаи ш.png
- File:капитан ркм ш.png
- File:капитан ркм.png
- File:лейтенант ркм гаи ш.png
- File:лейтенант ркм ш.png
- File:лейтенант ркм.png
- File:майор ркм гаи ш.png
- File:майор ркм ш.png
- File:майор ркм.png
- File:Мвд1939вс1.png
- File:Мвд1939вс2.png
- File:Мвд1939вс3.png
- File:Мвд1939вс4.png
- File:Мвд1939вс5.png
- File:Мвд1939мил.png
- File:Мвд1939мс2.png → Fake,
Speedy delete - File:Мвд1939мс3.png
- File:Мвд1939мс4.png
- File:Мвд1939сс2.png
- File:Мвд1939сс3.png
- File:Мвд1939ст1.png
- File:Мвд1939ст2.png
- File:Мвд1939ст3.png
- File:Мил1939швс1.png
- File:Мил1939швс2.png
- File:Мил1939швс3.png
- File:Мил1939швс4.png
- File:Мил1939швс5.png
- File:Мил1939шмил.png
- File:Мил1939шмс2.png → Fake, Speedy delete
- File:Мил1939шмс3.png
- File:Мил1939шмс4.png
- File:Мил1939шсс2.png
- File:Мил1939шсс3.png
- File:Мил1939шст1.png
- File:Мил1939шст2.png
- File:Мил1939шст3.png
- File:милиционер ркм ш.png
- File:милиционер ркм.png
- File:младший лейтенант ркм гаи ш.png
- File:младший лейтенант ркм ш.png
- File:младший лейтенант ркм.png
- File:отделенный командир ркм ш.png
- File:отделенный командир ркм.png
- File:сержант ркм гаи ш.png
- File:сержант ркм ш.png
- File:сержант ркм.png
- File:старший лейтенант ркм гаи ш.png
- File:старший лейтенант ркм ш.png
- File:старший лейтенант ркм.png
- File:старший майор ркм ш.png
- File:старший майор ркм.png
- File:старший милиционер ркм ш.png
- File:старший милиционер ркм.png
- File:старшина ркм ш.png
- File:старшина ркм.png
Dear Túrelio, hello! Please deletion erroneous files und replacement by these files requested by Polygon v. (This is the correct field color, right proportions. The important thing is that the buttonholes were worn at an angle, not horizontally or vertically.) Quote user Túrelio: I had rejected his previous duplicate-speedy for formal reason, as images aren't 100% duplicates. — Niklitov (talk) 12:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Attn: mistake license {{PD-old}} for first 14 files from http://opoccuu.com/rkm.htm and http://www.vedomstva-uniforma.ru (someone else's work of authorship without permission)! COM:L, COM:FU, COM:Dupe, COM:Redundant. — Niklitov (talk) 13:50, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Misleadingly labeled image: this is not en:Gympie Pyramid at all, it seems to be en:Walshs Pyramid, an entirely different thing, and if tha'ts the case, labelling it as Gympie Pyramid is actively misleading. The low resolution makes me wonder if was actually shot by the submitter, but if it is indeed of Walshs Pyramid, surely they would know they were over 1000km from the named location?
I'd also point out that we are not short of photos of Walshs Pyramid: see Category:Walshs Pyramid, so there's no need to keep this image around for that purpose. -- The Anome (talk) 12:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Cleary not the location claimed: see here. As this seems to be an impossible mistake considering they claim to be the source, this feels more like a copied photo being used fraudulently. I can see the uploader has a global office block on them as well, which does not help cedibility. Kuru (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Also its too likely its a copy vio. Nickm57 (talk) 23:14, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:53, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chiaravendra03 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Alessio B, Dream, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
- File:Trapanotto Sergio, Eterocromia, Padova, Liceo Duca d'Aosta.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:04, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Cederom as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: owner harassment. The photo has some educational value, so I do not agree to delete it speedily. No evidence for harassment was given. If the harassment happened outside Commons, then Commons is not a proper place to search solution. Taivo (talk) 13:08, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I agree, but the photo was used in anti-hunting-harassment campaign and the owner asked to remove it. Cederom (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
- Commons photos can be used in any campaign, both pro-hunting and anti-hunting, that's what Commons is for. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Daphne Lantier 22:55, 18 April 2017 (UTC)
pokazuje okrucieństwo wobec zwierząt Klarqa (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Image is signed by "M. Ribas" and it dates back to 1933. Its title is "Poblet in 1830". According to this authority record, Marià Ribas i Bertran (1902-1996) signed an engraving with the title "Auca de Poblet" as "M. Ribas", and he collaborated with his drawings in "El Monasterio de Poblet, en 1830. Representación de los monumentos del Histórico Monasterio destruido el s. XIX (1995)". Since works by Marià Ribas won't enter the public domain in Spain until 2066/2067, a COM:OTRS permission is needed from copyright owner to host this file in Wikimedia Commons. Strakhov (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
¿Category:Undelete in 2067? Strakhov (talk) 17:37, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
File:160 Monestir de Poblet, dibuix al museu.jpg This one is by the same author.
Delete Both files. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 17:54, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:05, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Because of the camera lens or the angle of the photographer, this person's head looks misshapen. It's not that it's unflattering, it's that it looks distorted. Liz (talk) 20:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This is an image from Category:Files from Canadian Film Centre Flickr stream. Over the last dozen years or more the Canadian Film Centre has held close to one hundred events, and have uploaded to flickr thousands of photos of figures from the Canadian film industry under a free cc license. Category:Files from Canadian Film Centre Flickr stream contains about 5000 images.
- Category:Headshots of individuals cropped from the Canadian Film Centre's photos currently contains 904 images. Over the last seven years or so I am responsible for most, but not all of those 904 crops.
- I am not going to weigh in with a keep or a delete today. I will list note that a few other images, from the headshots category, show some slight distortion, or were taken under less than ideal lighting conditions, or were snapped when one figure in the group shot was holding their head at an odd angle. If we did not already have a headshot of the individual, I uploaded less than ideal images thinking they were better than nothing. Geo Swan (talk) 22:13, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Liz, I thought I left a substantive, meaningful reply to the concern you voiced. I am pinging you to draw it now to draw it to your attention. I will add that dozens, maybe more than 100, of the approximately 1000 crops of the images of individuals from the Canadian film industry made their way into the infobox of BLPs on those individuals, articles that had previously been unillustrated.
Up until you raised your concern I would not have hesitated to add this image into the infobox of an article on Mr Boxen. Clearly common courtesy would cause us to use the most flattering image we have. And if the only image we have has a very slight distortion, like this one, then we should use that one.
If you are arguing that this image is just too unflattering for us to use could you explain your reasoning more fully? Geo Swan (talk) 15:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
- Liz, I thought I left a substantive, meaningful reply to the concern you voiced. I am pinging you to draw it now to draw it to your attention. I will add that dozens, maybe more than 100, of the approximately 1000 crops of the images of individuals from the Canadian film industry made their way into the infobox of BLPs on those individuals, articles that had previously been unillustrated.
- Keep, I didn't explicitly say keep, before. I think the image is clearly in scope, as Boxen is a significant figure in the film industry, that is, someone who may be covered in a Wikipedia.
Because I don't think nominator Liz actually challenged whether the image was in scope, I call for closure. Geo Swan (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
- I repeat my call for closure. Geo Swan (talk) 23:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:06, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted page of The Economist newspaper. Wodgester (talk) 22:45, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.
The restoration are inaccurate, and must be deleted. 81.231.20.225 18:28, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Assuming IP-adress belongs to uploader Conty Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Kept. In use so it's within our project scope. Rocket000 (talk) 18:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Innacurate, low quality Conty (talk) 06:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Unused png version that is uploaded years after File:Bandera de Tielmes.svg. Minoraxtalk 00:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Unused png version and uploaded years after File:Coa Illustration Cruz Tau Franciscana.svg Minoraxtalk 00:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:23, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
low quality, superseded by File:Messenger Lite.webp Larryasou (talk) 01:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:24, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
プライバシーによる 久次米一弥 (talk) 12:20, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work: the uploader and subject are the same. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
プライバシーの画像 久次米一弥 (talk) 12:21, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work: the uploader and subject are the same. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
プライバシー画像 久次米一弥 (talk) 12:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: likely not own work: the uploader and subject are the same. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
プライバシー画像 久次米一弥 (talk) 12:23, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work: the uploader and subject are the same. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
プライバシー画像 久次米一弥 (talk) 12:24, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely not own work: the uploader and subject are the same. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete this file. It is a duplicate of File:Texas Blue-Bonnet -- Lupinus.jpg . I am the author Jim Evans (talk) 13:05, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Delete this file. It is a duplicate of File:1937 Delahaye 135MS Roadster; Criterion 1) . I am the author Jim Evans (talk) 13:10, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:28, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Video originally posted by Vogue US magazine under a non-Creative Commons license.[7] Video reposted by Vogue Taiwan with a different license. Minerva97 (talk) 21:31, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Same ownership, different account, that Vouge Taiwan Youtube account is verified, so, it belongs to the same author RevengerTime (talk) 21:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:RevengerTime. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:30, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:TOYS P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:14, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Geni (talk) 05:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Clearly Davide La Greca is using Commons to promote himself. "Decadence" printed at top right of file matches his employment on linkedin seen here - https://www.linkedin.com/in/maestrobd The Eloquent Peasant (talk) 15:15, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ciell (talk) 15:34, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
