Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/02/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
delete just DreaMelodic (talk) 08:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, G7-speedied. --Túrelio (talk) 17:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violations, source doesn't indicate it's licensed under CC Paper9oll (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violations, source doesn't indicate it's licensed under CC Paper9oll (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violations, Pinterest images are normally not licensed for reshare unless the author gave permissions. However, there isn't any license indicated for this image Paper9oll (talk) 14:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyiov. --Túrelio (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violations, source doesn't indicate it's licensed under CC Paper9oll (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- But what is the source? --Túrelio (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: Sorry about that, user didn't provide source. However, reverse image search on Google returns similar images [1]. Given that it's unlikely the photo is screenshot from YouTube as the 2 YouTube links is not licensed under CC 3.0. Hence it's likely, user obtained it from [2] which is the 3rd link in the reverse image search result which also doesn't indicate it's licensed under CC or any. Paper9oll (talk) 15:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speeied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Please delete this picture. The upload was a mistake. I am a new user and wanted to test the upload function for an article - not for the Wikipedia Commomns. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Scitophil (talk • contribs) 22:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 22:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
لأنها كلام فارغ Aelrhman2007 (talk) 18:14, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept (non-sysop closed): No valid reason for deletion. --(｀・ω・´) (talk) 01:07, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyrighted newspaper, probably. Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:08, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
لأنها ضبابية Aelrhman2007 (talk) 18:16, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedied as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 15:22, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Potential copyvio. Seem took screenshot from Google map. SCP-2000 15:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 15:01, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Movie poster. E4024 (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:53, 14 Februar 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: movie poster --Krdbot 22:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Movie poster. E4024 (talk) 18:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 15:53, 14 Februar 2021 UTC: Commons:Licensing: movie poster --Krdbot 22:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 16:21, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted by Dyolf77 at 16:44, 20 Januar 2021 UTC: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vinod young.jpg: As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion --Krdbot 21:38, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
File information is insufficient. And it is clear that this photo isn't taken by this person. For these reasons, I think the copyright status is unclear and this file should be deleted. Uncitoyen (talk) 11:54, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- I think it would be easier to block Vinod young from adding OoS pictures here, instead of opening redundant DRs. --E4024 (talk) 13:02, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
- @E4024: I created a candidate for deletion automatically. It seems that this file with this same name to have been deleted multiple times. I think the deletion requests within the same file are automatically opened again on this page. Please correct me if this situation is wrong. Uncitoyen (talk) 19:40, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:48, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
As per COM:ADVERT , self promotion Ts12rAc (talk) 07:35, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Until the self-promo account is barred, we will have to use our energy with these... E4024 (talk) 12:51, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 19:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AJ MENTALIST (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seem out of scope. Only usage was of one file in a speedy-deletion (since deleted 00:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)) tagged user page on enwiki, which they are banned from for promo.
Perryprog (talk) 00:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AJ MENTALIST (talk · contribs)
[edit]These would appear to be personal and unused images that are outside the scope of this project
- File:AJ PROFESSOR -Hypnotist.jpg
- File:AJ PROFESSOR BLUE.jpg
- File:AJ PROFESSOR -MENTALIST.jpg
- File:AJ PROFESSOR.jpg
Herby talk thyme 07:24, 30 September 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
Unused SVG of a logo, seems out of scope and could be a copyright violation. Perryprog (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Instituto Belforth. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, seem out of scope. I can't find a live version of the site it likely belongs to (Internet Archive didn't grab the photos it seems).
- File:Corp. Instituto Belforth IB.png
- File:Corporación Instituto Belforth.png
- File:Corporación Instituto Belforth IB.png
Perryprog (talk) 00:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:47, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused low resolution logos. Probably don't meet TOO, but they do seem to be from this Facebook page.
Perryprog (talk) 00:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Satyakotagiri (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mostly out of scope. Some without permission.
- File:EC (2).jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 71.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 70.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 69.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 68.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 67.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 66.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 65.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 63.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 64.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 62.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 61.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 60.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 55.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 59.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 58.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 57.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 56.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 54.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 51.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 52.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 53.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 50.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 49.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 48.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 47.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 46.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 45.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 44.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 43.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 42.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 41.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 40.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 39.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 38.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 37.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 36.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 35.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 34.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 33.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 32.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 31.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 29.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 30.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 28.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 27.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 26.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 25.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 24.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 23.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 22.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 21.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 20.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 19.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 17.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 18.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 16.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 15.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 14.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 13.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 12.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 11.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 4.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 10.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 9.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 8.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 7.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 5.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 6.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 3.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 2.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY 1.jpg
- File:WORLD PROSTHODONTIST DAY.jpg
Minoraxtalk 03:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:39, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sourlyrics2020 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not your personal free web host.
- File:Move in silence.jpg
- File:So Low Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:GOLDDIGGER Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:FindA Way Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:Dont Like Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:Shine Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:No pressure Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:Me dont play Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:Watch Me Sour Lyrics.jpg
- File:Graceof destruction.jpg
- File:SourLryrics10.jpg
- File:SourLryrics9.jpg
- File:SourLryrics7.jpg
- File:SourLryrics8.jpg
- File:SourLryrics6.jpg
- File:SourLryrics5.jpg
- File:SourLryrics4.jpg
- File:SourLryrics2.jpg
- File:SourLryrics1.jpg
- File:SourLryrics3.jpg
- File:Sour Lyrics 2.jpg
Achim (talk) 19:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
نمیدانستم که آن را در ملا عام آشکار خواهند کرد. Mohammadr501 (talk) 17:53, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not used (and possibly out of COM:SCOPE) + uploader's request over privacy concerns. --Ahmadtalk 17:11, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
فهمیدم که این برای حریم خصوصی من بد است. Mohammadr501 (talk) 21:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not used (and possibly out of COM:SCOPE) + uploader's request over privacy concerns. --Ahmadtalk 17:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
band photo without educational use, possible copyvio Drakosh (talk) 05:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 21:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
promo on wikidata Minoraxtalk 09:34, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 21:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope and likely copyvio as the uploader is in the photo
Gbawden (talk) 09:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 21:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. The deletion request should be followed Commons:Deletion_requests/Listing_a_request_manually and nominated in a subpage of Deletion request, not in the file talkpage. -SCP-2000 16:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 02:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused private artwork, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 19:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete --Achim (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot. Out of projrct scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 02:44, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Banglapress13 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own works: transmission code in EXIF data. Unreliable uploader, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Dipak Barua.jpg.
- File:Ratan Talukder with his students at Friends Club Karate academy Chittagong.jpg
- File:Ratan Talukder with Katsutoshi Shiina.jpg
- File:নিশিতা বড়ুয়া.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 06:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:33, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The background may be non-free. Larryasou (talk) 06:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
HTC Sense UI may be non-free. Larryasou (talk) 06:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
The background may be non-free. Larryasou (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 08:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:35, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Found here in 2016 https://www.businessinsider.com/unilever-digital-advertising-budget-up-to-24-2016-1?IR=T - no EXIF, needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Probably taken from here http://kennethtobin.com/ and the web. Needs OTRS Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Came via Facebook per FBMD metadata; their Terms of Use are incompatible with publishing here. Permission from original uploader should be given via OTRS for confirmation. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 10:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
sheer advertising with phone numbers and all Kotivalo (talk) 14:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
sheer advertising with phone numbers and all Kotivalo (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
sheer advertising with phone numbers and all Kotivalo (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
sheer advertising with phone numbers and all Kotivalo (talk) 14:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:36, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a non-notable promotional item on Wikidata which has since been deleted. Does this company logo (for a company that may not even exist) benefit the project? Quakewoody (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded as part of a non-notable promotional item on Wikidata which has since been deleted. Does this company logo (for a company that may not even exist) benefit the project? Quakewoody (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:37, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation — Mr White 15:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no evidence of free license. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violation — Mr White 15:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:SCREENSHOT Чорний Кіт (talk) 16:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:38, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram with meaningless names.
- File:Asdasdasdasdasdsad234235.png
- File:Svgfiles 2020-05-27-22-31-04-396527-11651704350475558046.svg
- File:Svgfiles 2019-11-30-02-53-23-263233-17824788002227747690.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
A screenshot from a movie, copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:39, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album/files storage. Used in vanity Wikidata item.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as w:en:Help:Table to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, likely out of scope Perryprog (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of this site; likely out of scope. Perryprog (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:40, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
no educational use, along with the second upload File:Mahai.png. Pibwl (talk) 17:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
unused, out of scope. Pibwl (talk) 17:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, seems out of scope Perryprog (talk) 17:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, seems out of scope Perryprog (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: advertising, promotional 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of project scope: advertising, promotional 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Markus.akerlund (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image gallery. All unused. Out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 22:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Non-notable organisation. IWI (talk) 23:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:41, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- User:Jianhui67 what happened here? I need this file for Croatian Wikipedia article where it is notable. Please un-delete and check use before deleting in the future. Zblace (talk) 18:13, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
Image is taken from the Singer offical website as mentioned in description by the uploader, their is no indication of a free license on the source site (F1) C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Nick (talk) 17:19, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Replace with SVG Version File:Flag of Bophuthatswana Army.svg, Also correct the description. (see https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/za-bw.html for source info) BoonDock (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:41, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Larryasou as no permission (No permission since) OTRS pending. Larryasou (talk) 06:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello Larryasou, I sent the OTRS Form to Wikimedia Support today. Everything schould be fine now. Regards --87.128.65.21 15:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Ticket:2021020510003819 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 17:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination: OTRS Ticket reviewed.--Larryasou (talk) 03:23, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:42, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
permission احمد سامي (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
permission احمد سامي (talk) 08:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:53, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
permission احمد سامي (talk) 08:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ru:Сатпаевит and uk:Сатпаєвіт with TeX equivalent:
Now unused image that should not be an image WIKImaniac 18:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Unused image that should not be an image.
Could be replaced with TeX equivalent:
![{\displaystyle {\begin{matrix}{}\\{\ce {{\mathsf {Ar-I}}->[{\begin{matrix}{\ce {\mathsf {iPrMgCl}}}\\{\mathsf {\text{THF}}}\end{matrix}}][{\ce {\mathsf {ZnBr2}}}]{\mathsf {Ar-ZnBr}}}}\end{matrix}}}](https://wikimedia.org/api/rest_v1/media/math/render/svg/26ade9e2bf4026c6122e67149f554a85571e6f57)
--WIKImaniac 18:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Replaced in ast:Historia de la química, es:Historia de la química, it:Cronologia della chimica and it:Utente:Jacopo Werther/Babel with TeX equivalent:
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Виктория_Ауреловна,_Суд_Да_Правда_.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
_21.jpg){kind=link}
_23.jpg){kind=link}
_5.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Now unused image that should not be an image, linked on user pages only WIKImaniac 19:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:56, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A picture of a modern building in Ukraine.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:59, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
The architect of the building died in 1988. So the copyright did not expire yet.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:10, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:00, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
This is an old building. Its Wikipedia article notes two architects, but when did they die?-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:13, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 13:19, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A picture of a modern building in Ukraine.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:36, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 14:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A picture of a modern building in Ukraine.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:28, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A picture of a modern building in Ukraine.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:28, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:29, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
A picture of a modern building in Ukraine.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:31, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The architect of that building died in 1990. So the copyright have not expired yet.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:34, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 01:31, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:NOTUSED. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW of the copyrighted work. SCP-2000 15:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:DW. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:NOTUSED. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW of the copyrighted work. SCP-2000 15:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:40, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:NOTUSED. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:DW of the copyrighted work. SCP-2000 15:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:DW. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 13:41, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright violations - This photo was taken after WW2. This not own work! Bajetyom (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- The same problem is with another foto uploaded by Dawid2001: file:EU41 1.jpg. Malarz pl (talk) 10:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- This photo is from book ‘Wąbrzeska Kolejka Powiatowa’ by Robert Prusakowski. --Bajetyom (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, by Achim55. --Túrelio (talk) 17:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Author request - image upload cut off part of the structure. CraigOfWaffles (talk) 16:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- You can replace it by clicking on "Upload a new version of this file". --Achim (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (better alternatives in Category:Santalol anyway. --Leyo 20:28, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
Author request - image upload cut off part of the structure. CraigOfWaffles (talk) 16:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- You can replace it by clicking on "Upload a new version of this file". --Achim (talk) 17:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (better alternatives in Category:Santalol anyway. --Leyo 20:29, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author request Nick Boppel (talk) 18:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:45, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Finnusertop as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: KCNA phtos are not PD, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kim Jong Un Makes Statement (2017).jpg and others Jianhui67 T★C 09:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete KCNA photos are not PD and have been invariably deleted from Commons. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 07:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Doesn't meet the criteria of PD North Korea A1Cafel (talk) 08:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:13, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Doctor Architect (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
The architect of that building died in 1975. So the copyright should not have expired yet.-Роман Рябенко (talk) 00:05, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Could an OTRS administrator check whether {{Borys Zhezherin}} applies here? Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Presidential Administration of Ukraine it does — NickK (talk) 11:20, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Of course not. It was architected by https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4149326. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- d:Q4149326 and d:Q4178629 were co-authors. Per Ukrainian copyright law, unless agreed otherwise in the agreement between co-authors, permission from one co-author is sufficient. Do you have an evidence that Hryhoriev and Zhezherin agreed that specifically Zhezherin cannot give any permission? — NickK (talk) 15:36, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
- Of course not. It was architected by https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q4149326. Doctor Architect (talk) 16:32, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: there is permission form Borys Zhezherin. --Anatoliy (talk) 12:12, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Someone else made a svg file of this same map. TylerKutschbach (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC):
- So what? There are different versions of many maps and images. If you really have nothing better to do (like create something instead of destroy what others make) but must be a pain trying to delete map images made in 2013 (like one of the hundreds of maps in this same consistent format I made going back to 2012 for all different states/elections before anyone else started doing this), tell "someone else" to delete their copy of something that was already made 7 years ago, which is actually correctly shaped, given historical geographic changes to counties, as that other SVG map created in 2020 that was being used by the Wikipedia article on this election shows inaccurate post-1989 county map borders which don't reflect what the county map really looked like in 1984 (before Denver expanded and annexed parts of Adams County for the new airport). The SVG map I created in 2013 was already here first for 7 years before "someone else" made another such map; the only apparent difference being that mine has correct accurately shaped counties based on the state's geographic history. There's absolutely no reason this should be deleted. Inqvisitor (talk) 07:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no good reason to delete. Elli (talk) 12:50, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Double file Jelican9 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Duplicate}} template next time. --Sreejith K (talk) 23:56, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Cardiff Kook
[edit]No FoP in US for 3D artworks. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cardiff Kook - FInd a Cure.jpg.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 17:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. These images under commercial licensing violate the sculptor's copyright. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:59, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 09:55, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Japan for 3D works. Yuraily Lic (talk) 03:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:31, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for 2D works in Japan A1Cafel (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:38, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
No evidence this is licensed correctly - All rights reserved ⓒ awesome.ent Evaders99 (talk) 07:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyvio. It contains more than basic geometric shapes and text. Nanahuatl (talk) 16:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
copyright violation Kotivalo (talk) 04:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 11:00, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jony Cooper (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos of photo.
- File:Liparis punctulatus.jpg
- File:Thalamita macropus.jpg
- File:Melanotaenia splendida inornata.jpg
- File:イエローベリーロックコッド.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 00:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. DW, missing original author, source, date, and permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo of 2 photos. Unclear who the authors are and whether the photos are free of use. Badzil (talk) 01:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of a copyrighted banner A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Instead of deletion, would not be better to just blur the face? But as a protest banner, there is no fair use on it? Paladinum2 (talk) 13:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, the face can be blurred and then the file may be kept; IMHO. Fair use on Commons? No. --E4024 (talk) 01:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel, Paladinum2, and E4024: Disagree of any deletion. The photo on the poster is also on Commons. Derivative work does not aply here. Chronus (talk) 00:13, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- This is a very important information, thanks, @Chronus: ! So I think there is no reason for deletion. Paladinum2 (talk) 17:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
- @A1Cafel, Paladinum2, and E4024:
- Yes, the face can be blurred and then the file may be kept; IMHO. Fair use on Commons? No. --E4024 (talk) 01:41, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:03, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment The photo is a scaled-down version of another photo on Commons, File:Britney Spears, Roundhouse, London (Apple Music Festival 2016) (30072938871).jpg, which was reviewed by Flickrreviewr before it was deleted from Flickr. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:26, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
_(30072938871).jpg){kind=link}
Kept: already redirected. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Image is rather obviously copyrighted by the SHARC company which makes Piranha products. Image also seems to serve to other purpose than to advertise the product. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:06, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:03, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:13, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Standard license from YouTube A1Cafel (talk) 04:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Acoustics Design.png
[edit]
Differing copyright info
Unable to find source
- File:Diffused Lighting.png
- File:Space & Proximity.png
- File:Raised Platforms.png
- File:Deaf Door Knocker.png
Last year a student uploaded images and mismarked them as their own work. Some of them I was able to mark as speedy, but the above images were problematic because I either wasn't able to find the source or I wasn't able to pinpoint what the copyright status was of the images. For the top three, I was able to find this source from 2016 that marks them as CC-BY. No acknowledgement was given on the images that I could find, so I assumed that it was the author's own work. However this page has them copyrighted to Dangermond Keane Architecture, so there's a question as to which page is the right one. Wayback has the page history going back to 2017, but it's entirely possible that the CC-BY paper used the images improperly. Since it's unclear, I think that it would be best to just delete them. --ReaderofthePack (talk) 04:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- This was my class back in May 2020 and I'm normally better about checking for copyvio images, but this ended about the time that my class load was winding down, so stuff slipped through the cracks. Then COVID-19 had a big impact on Wiki Ed and they had to let half of their staff go, so then it REALLY slipped through the cracks. Sorry about that. ReaderofthePack (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:16, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Someone already made a svg file map like this TylerKutschbach (talk) 05:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
{{speedydelete|1=This svg map was already been made.}}
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Mississippi Presidential Election Results 2016.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:18, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
A map for this election already exists which is an SVG. Let's try not to upload .png or .jpeg images of elections like this. Mr.Election (talk) 00:58, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 03:28, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
A svg file of this map was made TylerKutschbach (talk) 06:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Kentucky Presidential Election Results 2012.svg. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope / No useful content A09090091 (talk) 08:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep I don't see how a photo of a motorway could be out of scape. --Sporti (talk) 08:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Sporti: If we keep it, it needs to be in another category than Slovenia. It may be taken in Slovenia, but at the same time, it could be taken at any other country. I see a lot all pictures of @antonio marano a bit pointless, from mass of his pictures are just a few of them, which are good or useful. Many of them could be taken to pages or portals, for example Slovenian hribi.net, which is used for navigation in hills with pics of parking lots and paths (no promotion). There are mostly snapshots of highway exits and lots of parking places.
- Sorry for being annoying. Have a nice day and stay safe, --A09090091 (talk) 08:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't think any of this is a good reason to delete this photo or others, see Commons:Project_scope#Examples. Also unidentified locations categories exist for a reason. --Sporti (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- It literally tells you in the first sentence of your link. If I cite him: Private image collections, e.g. private party photos, photos of yourself and your friends, your collection of holiday snaps and so on. These are snaps from his trip to Laško and apart of few useful ones are just... BTW I am not requesting deletion JUST because of unidentified location.--A09090091 (talk) 20:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete As far as I know Slovenia doesn't have a commercial-allowed FOP, and as all things are just your topic, the COM:DM does even not apply, and you didn't mention that why you think they are public domain. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 12:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep IMHO there's nothing copyrightable in the image, so FOP isn't an issue. But it's a very generic part of a motorway without any identification apart from it being, supposedly, taken in Slovenia, apparently somewhere on the way to Laško (description "IN VIAGGIO PER LASKO"). So the potential use seems very limited. Gestumblindi (talk) 15:59, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Gestumblindi: The cars are fairly and exclusively designed, beyond TOO, so these are copyrightable. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:35, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- You can hardly make out the makes of these cars, not an issue IMHO. Gestumblindi (talk) 00:43, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
- Weak keep The FOP is not an issue. However, there is limited usability. The location could be determined with effort, given the hill in the background. This claim of no useful content is a slippery slope. If nothing else, the view of this section of the highway and the hill from this location may be of interest here. --TadejM (t/p) 09:09, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
Kept: not a good pic indeed but consensus is leaning towards "in scope". --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Photo of a photo A1Cafel (talk) 08:14, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:23, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of company with questionable notability, probably out of scope Jianhui67 T★C 08:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope material. Glorious 93 (talk) 08:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:25, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No useful content (out of scope) and BTW the picture could be taken in Austria, Italy, Germany, anywhere. A09090091 (talk) 08:41, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: in scope (good image of an Audi). Focus is on car, so location is irrelevant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:26, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Mr White as duplicate (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F8 |2=File:Rodrigo Coelho 2019.jpg
Converted to regular DR per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (PNG -> JPEG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
This file is a duplicate of File:Rodrigo Coelho 2019.jpg. — Mr White 14:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sure. But our policy does consider the PNG and JPEG format too different; so it requires a discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 14:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Please check the files. The PNG one was probably a print screen of the photo itself. I uploaded the original file in the JPG format from the orignal source, with the correct license and author information. — Mr White 15:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Grand physique Tbausier (talk) 09:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Absoluteleslie (talk · contribs)
[edit]Part of an ad campaign - needs OTRS
Gbawden (talk) 09:38, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:29, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
I don't have the rights (author died 55 years ago) Halfirien (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:07, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
(nomination by uploader): The screenshot was needed temporarily for a discussion at Commons talk:Abuse filter which now has been settled and archived. Therefore the image is no longer needed. It did never have educational value (except possibly for wikimedia filter developpers). Jochen Burghardt (talk) 11:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
_%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%90%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0,_%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B4_%D0%94%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B4%D0%B0_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%92%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%8F_%D0%90%D1%83%D1%80%D0%B5%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BD%D0%B0,_%D0%A1%D1%83%D0%B4_%D0%94%D0%B0_%D0%9F%D1%80%D0%B0%D0%B2%D0%B4%D0%B0_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader is not the author, the person depicted could not be the author Lesless (talk) 11:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
dubious "personal work" El Funcionario (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the owner of the image- copyright will be owned by the producers of Dragon Ball Z. Joseph2302 (talk) 13:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo, See decision of File:Toggolino logo.png DH93 (talk) 13:55, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:02, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Image metadata shows that the photographer claims copyright of the image. The uploader has requested deletion at the enwiki help desk: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&diff=1006167567&oldid=1006166260 John of Reading (talk) 14:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete it then, what are we waiting for? --E4024 (talk) 21:36, 8 May 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:03, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Obviously out of scope. Nothing educational at all. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Out of scope. SCP-2000 04:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Obviously out of scope. Nothing educational at all. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Out of scope. SCP-2000 04:35, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope. Artwork without obvious educational use. SCP-2000 14:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Neutral,Weak keep,Keep (as it is just so meta, see updates): while of course it seems and is used as an attack piece, it is also a perfect illustration for the ironic The Truth essay about POV "truth warriors". I have used it for now to illustrate its Polish translation, {but do not mind if it gets deleted}. Zezen (talk) 09:37, 15 February 2021 (UTC) Update after some days: it looks and feels so snug in that essay, so meta (as one may click through), so changing here to a Weak keep from Neutral. Zezen (talk) 05:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Oh, but then by now the uploader (or admins?) deleted it from both his Talks, and my TRUTH essay is the only Wiki corner where it is used, hm. Do what you feel right. Your Meta and Commonly perplexed :) Zezen (talk) 05:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC) Updating to keep after over a month: so meta useful. Zezen (talk) 04:40, 14 March 2021 (UTC)- I withdraw my nomination Per COM:INUSE. SCP-2000 05:13, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:31, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:NOTUSED. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 15:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Low image resolution and lack of educational use. SCP-2000 15:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope, per COM:NOTUSED. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 15:08, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. Lack of educational use. SCP-2000 13:12, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Mediocre quality unused files which is out of scope. It does not serve any educational purpose. AndyAndyAndyAlbert (talk) 15:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Per above. SCP-2000 13:09, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Low-quality photo of a TV show, likely a copyright violation and likely out of scope. Perryprog (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:32, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Even the website of the Turkish parliament uses the same image, copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 16:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not a simple text, it is written in a non-standard, artistic font. PuchaczTrado (talk) 16:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- In this case the only graphic object we can treat as a copyrighted work is the one-day slogan "Protest mediów" which means "protest of the media" (against government’s plans). That's just as simple – one day phrase (10th Feb. 2021), one of hundreds (or thousands) free "eroded" typefaces – e.g. fontriver.com and short universal two-word phrase. I really don't think that editors and publisher of the largest Polish socio-political weekly would have any reasonable objections with putting here (Wikimedia Commons and other Projects) this IMHO simple shape graphic nad text. --Pit rock (talk) 13:02, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Info Please note that Poland has a very low threshold of originality. Thank you. --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 22:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, but per Art. 4 of Polish copyright law simple text messages like this are ineligible for copyright. So Keep: I see no copyrightable graphic here. Ankry (talk) 18:25, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes, but per Art. 4 of Polish copyright law simple text messages like this are ineligible for copyright. So
- OK, thank you for these tips. On Friday (12.02) I wrote to the "Polityka" weekly editorial staff, if I may use their work. We'll see if they'll agree to sent a permission by OTRS to use the graphics. --Pit rock (talk) 20:53, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
- Until now I still haven't got a response mail from "Polityka" editors (despite 2 emails sent within a few days). --Pit rock (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Per Ankry, all texts are simple. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Ankry. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:33, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Copyvio. It contains more than simple geometric shapes and text. Nanahuatl (talk) 16:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the professional photographer has released this commercial image under a free licence William Avery (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:00, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
ComputerHotline (talk · contribs) nominated the file twice for speedy deletion, because it is derivative work of Sonic the Hedgehog. I declined it twice. After carefully examining the image I found Sonic and allow regular deletion request. Maybe Sonic is de minimis? Taivo (talk) 16:45, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Oppose De minimis --ComputerHotline (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)- Oppose, too. De minimis. Maybe File:2021-01-24 16-54-53 masques-cropped.jpg could be deleted instead for focusing on the Sonic image. PrincessPandaWiki (talk) 15:28, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep De minimis applies here. Have nominated the cropped version for deletion. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:39, 2 May 2021 (UTC)
Kept: indeed DM. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of this site; likely doesn't meet TOO but it seems out of scope. Perryprog (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Probably, copyrighted newspaper. Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Uploaded as own work. It looks like an old photo and uploader only have one upload. (Uploader are you the photographer or did you scan it from a book. If its a scan please specify the book etc.). MGA73 (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Photo of text. Google Translate doesn't give me a good enough idea of what it's supposed to mean, but likely out of scope. Description makes me think it was uploaded with questionable intent. Perryprog (talk) 17:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:34, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Wrong file name Karatebudokan (talk) 17:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just use {{Rename}}. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:36, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Probably taken from https://coachhays.com/2019/08/25/all-the-answers/van_barzolha6-1/ and if it is from 1934 (guess based on similar photos) then it is not likely that uploader is the photographer. MGA73 (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:37, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Porque sí Borrosa O5-13CP (talk) 18:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: In use. --Achim (talk) 19:10, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyvio, credit in EXIF data doesn't match uploader. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:10, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Карта не соответствует действительности. Например, есть такие ошибки. В Дербентском районе 90% указан азербайджанский язык, хотя азербайджанцев в районе не более 60% или Хачмазский, Огузский, Кабалинский, Закатальский, Кахский, Кубинский, Исмаиллинский, Ленкоранский и даже территории подконтрольные российскими миротворцами указана на 100% азербайджанский язык, однако это ложь. По этой причине карту нужно удалить. Это карта фальсифицирует реальную этно-языковую картину Закавказья. 2A00:1370:811D:D1FD:6C03:1A41:F51:E0AD 18:18, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Just upload your "true version". Your protest is not the reason for deleting the file, since it doesn't violate the copyright rules. --Devlet Geray (talk) 14:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Areas marked in dark blue do not mean that they are 100% Azerbaijani! This means that Azerbaijani is the language of the majority in those areas. Also, if you have credible sources for your claim, you can modify the map according to your credible sources!--Mr,p balçi (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:38, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
File:Schematic illustration of the evolution of the interaction surface in the deep collapse range.jpg
[edit]
Unused image that should not be an image.
Delete redirect File:Fig5.jpg as well, please. WIKImaniac 18:42, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:39, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
As the photographer Bob Landry died in 1960, this isn't PD for another 9+ years. FDW777 (talk) 19:20, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. A "PD because author died 70+ years ago" rationale cannot apply. Because that isn't the case (1960 + 70 > 2021). Don't see any other rationale that may apply. Otherwise the source/publisher (Getty Images stock photography website) clearly considers this to be a non-free rights-managed commercial image. Don't see any reason to suspect that this/their claim is incorrect. Certainly our counter-claim seems to be invalid/mistaken. Guliolopez (talk) 21:21, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work of text written in 1992. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, believed copyvio. Symphonium264 (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:15, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arie m den toom (talk · contribs)
[edit]copyrighted paintings by محمد تجویدی.
- File:Hafez orakelkaartje 05.jpg
- File:Hafez orakelkaartje 04.jpg
- File:Hafez orakelkaartje 01.jpg
- File:Hafez orakelkaartje 02.jpg
- File:Hafez orakelkaartje 03.jpg
Hanooz 23:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Waarde
Ik heb op de kaartjes geen copyright kunnen ontdekken. De kaartjes komen uit een stadje in de buurt van Shiraz. Ik heb ze gekregen van een vriend die ze in 1978 meegenomen heeft uit Iran. Zijn vader had van 1900 - 1930 een kapperszaak waar de kaartjes toen lagen. Er zijn onnoemelijk veel soortgelijke afbeeldingen omdat veel kunstenaars (Mahmoud Farshchian) zich lieten inspireren door miniaturen uit de 16e eeuw. Ik zelf heb een aantal picturale tapijten met dezelfde voorstellingen, de bron ligt dan ook zeker in een ver verleden.
Ik verwijs u ook naar: http://www.hafizonlove.com/divan
Ik heb oveleg gehad met de heer Shariar zie: Dear Aryaen
The images that you see are contemporary – mostly drawn during the last century or so. In these were images, generally the artist would be inspired by a ghazal or a combination of ghazals, and sometimes as stand-alone images. The publisher of the book would then compile them to add imagery and artistic beauty to the book as a whole.
The images have no direct connection to Hafez or any specific ghazal, that comes from his time.
Generally your guess is as good as mine.
Happy 2021. Shahriar
m.h.g Arie M. den Toom (talk) 13:39, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious copyright status as per comments above. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:14, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Original Flickr user (whose name is identical to the Commons editor) has uploaded a lot of random pornographic photos from various sources, some with identifiable watermarks or by different people. Therefore, I doubt that this is original work. Per COM:LL. BriefEdits (talk) 23:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Obvious Flickrwashing. The Flickr account should be blacklisted, both of the uploads of Bobbynelson88 need to be deleted, the File:Buttplug - 50968093693.jpg upload from Wikieditused917 needs to be deleted, and both users indef blocked for obvious and deliberate copyright violations. Just my opinion, of course. Mo Billings (talk) 23:18, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:29, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ✗plicit 06:12, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: "You need to be signed in to see this". Someone with a Flickr account should check this. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:08, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:02, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: "You need to be signed in to see this". Someone with a Flickr account should check this. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:09, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:04, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: "You need to be signed in to see this". Someone with a Flickr account should check this. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:11, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:57, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
File was removed from Flickr, unknown copyright status A1Cafel (talk) 04:06, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment: "You need to be signed in to see this". Someone with a Flickr account should check this. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Kept: verified through archive.org. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 18:59, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Pallav.journo
[edit]- File:Gargoti Museum Delhi Dinosaur Egg.jpg
- File:Gargoti Museum Delhi Dinosaur Fossil.jpg
- File:Gargoti Museum Delhi Amethyst.jpg
- File:Gargoti Museum Delhi Jute Handicraft.jpg
- File:Gargoti Museum Delhi Vishnu Lakshmi ji.jpg
- File:Gargoti Museum Delhi Wooden Fish Handicraft.jpg
- File:Gargoti Museum Delhi Wooden Handicraft.jpg
These images were all uploaded by myselfUser:Pallav.journo. I believe they should be deleted because [Gargoti Museum of Delhi holds Copyright of these images. Although I clicked them but without their written permission I can not publish them anywhere. Please delete them as soon as possible.]. Pallav.journo (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Peter Stohrer
[edit]copyright violation; artist died in 2017; no freedom of panorama.
- File:Peter Stohrer BBK Köln.jpg
- File:Peter Stohrer Installation Kunstverein Unna.tif
- File:Peter Stohrer Kunstmuseum Ahlen 2017.jpg
- File:Peter Stohrer Landesmuseum Bonn Enterventionale.JPG
Martin Sg. (talk) 17:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Peter_Stohrer_BBK_Köln.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Peter_Stohrer_Installation_Kunstverein_Unna.tif” but not processed yet, ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Peter_Stohrer_Kunstmuseum_Ahlen_2017.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS email received for “File:Peter_Stohrer_Landesmuseum_Bonn_Enterventionale.JPG” but not processed yet, ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 14:50, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Peter Stohrer BBK Köln.jpg” under ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- * After a closer look on “File:Peter Stohrer BBK Köln.jpg”, i withdrew the permission notice under ticket:2021021610005494, since a second artist. Astrid Bartels, is involved. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- *
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Peter Stohrer Installation Kunstverein Unna.tif” under ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Peter Stohrer Kunstmuseum Ahlen 2017.jpg” under ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- I have just accepted permission for “File:Peter Stohrer Landesmuseum Bonn Enterventionale.JPG” under ticket:2021021610005494. --Mussklprozz (talk) 09:16, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per permission (BBK Koln already deleted). —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Unused file Jelican9 (talk) 18:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - Not a valid reason for deletion. Is the file {{Out of scope}}? --Sreejith K (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Insufficient reasoning. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:03, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sakhalinio, is this a joke? Am I reading something wrongly or you want to delete the logo (below ToO) of a major Turkish TV Channel? Admin, what do you think about the link I gave in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mehmet Fırat (Çokreşizade).jpg? Is that in scope for TR:WP? --E4024 (talk) 18:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- @E4024: , As you know turkish and there are writing to "Temsili". If channel is release we can upload. I didn't see any official news from TRT. Regards, Sakhalinio (talk) 18:47, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Link from 2017 (Last edit 5 days before the upload of this image in Commons) --E4024 (talk) 19:15, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- @E4024: , where is the official information. After 4 days channel will be online but no official news from TRT! Sakhalinio (talk) 04:09, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sakhalinio explained me more on my TP. I understand the news (that TRT2 is coming back) has not been officially confirmed yet by the Turkish Radio and Television Corp. (TRT); therefore no official logo yet. I am sure as soon as the channel opens again (it was closed since several years) they will disclose the logo. TRT generally uses simple (text) logos. The one here is made as a similar to TRT1, but of course, I understand, it is the choice of the people at the only link I could find (above). In short, this logo can be deleted, no big deal, when we have it officially Sakhalinio would certainly upload it. Thanks for your care to visit me. --E4024 (talk) 01:02, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - TRT has disclosed the new TRT2 logo and the file has been upgraded. It comprises only of letters and a number, therefore is PD. Thanks for the discussion. --E4024 (talk) 14:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
- Note: I did not mean to vote twice, just a discussion process. Keep, umh maybe, no no keep. --E4024 (talk) 02:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
unused file Jelican9 (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Not a deletion rationale. We keep files so that people may use them. If we delete them without a justification, when people need to use them they will not be able to find them. Please do not propose files for deletion only because they are not being used. The practice is more like, "hey, this file must be deleted for x reason, and don't worry, it is not used, either". IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Insufficient reasoning. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:04, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unused file Jelican9 (talk) 18:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep We don't delete files in Wikimedia Commons just because they are not used :)--Nanahuatl (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep per my views at Commons:Deletion requests/File:TRT2TemsiliLogo.png. --E4024 (talk) 18:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Moved from File:Logo of TRT.png to File:Logo of TRT (2012-2018).png in March 2021. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused file Jelican9 (talk) 18:24, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Keep Insufficient reasoning. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
unused file Jelican9 (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep - unless the file is {{Out of scope}} --Sreejith K (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
- Keep Insufficient reasoning. Fry1989 eh? 19:14, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Copyright licence violation RiazACU (talk) 19:39, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment It can be seen, that the person who uploaded that was the supposed official company of BIGO live. So they would have to put it under a "free" license.
So it would be "better" to contact them to see if it was appropriate or not. Alejitao123 (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete we cannot assume that the user name genuinely reflects the ownership of the copyright. Permission is required through COM:OTRS Timtrent (talk) 08:45, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
no metadata ? Copyright violation ? Supporterhéninois (talk) 21:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- There is no metadata because it is a screencap of a video. When you create a screencap using VLC as I did, it doesn't contain any metadata or EXIF. Anyway, you can see in the source that the uploader released this video under Creative Commons Attribution. — Dudek1337 (talk) 21:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Dudek1337 Can you see the CC-BY grant? I can't. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- Delete OK, looks like they changed the license and the source is not available on Web Archive. I uploaded another file depicting this person, that is CC-BY on YT: File:Teji Savanier 2021.jpg. So this one can be deleted — Dudek1337 (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Dudek1337 Can you see the CC-BY grant? I can't. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 17:41, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
1982 pic. Tasnim News Agency was founded much later. Does it have any rights on this image? E4024 (talk) 02:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: Uploader's arguments are at the talk page of this DR. --E4024 (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, qualifies for {{PD-Iran}} on the basis that this appears to be a press photograph and it is reasonable to assume that it was published shortly after it was taken in 1982. COM:IRAN indicates a copyright expiry date for photographs of 30 years. It is unclear whether {{Tasnim}} applies as this news agency may have acquired the copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:40, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete {{PD-Iran}} requires evidence for publication. The image maybe in the PD, but we can't just assume. Delete per COM:PRP. Tasnim has nothing to do with these old images, but it shamelessly continues to write its name under them! 4nn1l2 (talk) 06:55, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment of 4nn1I2. Per nomination. No proof of publication date. Can be undeleted 30 years from publication date on Commons, e.g. 2051. . Unless somebody can calculate the publication date in CE from 1395 as shown on the source website https://www.tasnimnews.com/fa/news/1395/10/20/1292295/%D8%A2%DB%8C%D8%AA-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%84%D9%87-%D9%87%D8%A7%D8%B4%D9%85%DB%8C-%D8%B1%D9%81%D8%B3%D9%86%D8%AC%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C-%D8%AF%D8%B1-%D8%A2%D8%A6%DB%8C%D9%86%D9%87-%D8%AA%D8%B5%D8%A7%D9%88%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D8%A7%D8%B1%DB%8C%D8%AE%DB%8C. --Ellywa (talk) 19:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
COM:tOY. -- IN (talk) 03:15, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep, De minimis. --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:38, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per remark. Added template De minimis. --Ellywa (talk) 19:35, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France A1Cafel (talk) 03:28, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- I don't see the problem. Keep Datsofelija (talk) 18:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader. Taken from flicker, where it was published by the painter with free licence, https://www.flickr.com/photos/home_of_chaos/25243498749/. It has been reviewed properly. --Ellywa (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
May exceed threshold of originality in Poland A1Cafel (talk) 04:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Another version of this logo – File talk:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg, has been kept, per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Cyberpunk 2077 logo.svg. So please reopen that DR and include this logo as well if you consider the reason for keeping should be reconsidered. --Ellywa (talk) 19:46, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if it is PD in US A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of author, date, country so no way to determine if it's PD. The source is a web forum. -M.nelson (talk) 21:39, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Not sure if it is PD in US A1Cafel (talk) 04:33, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete No indication of author, date, country so no way to determine if it's PD. The source is a web forum. -M.nelson (talk) 21:40, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:35, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 05:59, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - no COM:FOP HK. The underlying photos and possibly graphic design are likely copyrighted. -M.nelson (talk) 21:38, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_21.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_21.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Can these be {{Non-free graffiti}} since they violate HK National Security Law? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:41, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Delete all appear to be copyrighted. Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:13, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
_23.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_23.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP for "graphic works" in Hong Kong A1Cafel (talk) 06:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep: the advertising is damaged and not clear to see, it can keep it.--Wpcpey (talk) 08:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Wpcpey: damaged ≠ public domain, unless the owner of "I am essential" said not copyrighted. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:10, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't matter if the advertisement is damaged or not, it is clearly copyrighted still, Wpecey's reason is just sad. Eti15TrSf (talk) 03:11, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 15:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
Shows copyrighted programming, which is a COM:DW. However the programming part could be censored. Eti15TrSf (talk) 05:05, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. nobody took the effort to blur the screen. --Ellywa (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Shows copyrighted programming, which is a COM:DW. However the programming part could be censored. Eti15TrSf (talk) 05:07, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. nobody took the effort to blur the screen. --Ellywa (talk) 12:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
_5.png){kind=link}
_5.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by A1Cafel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SS Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:23, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
_5.png){kind=link}
- Comment I'm not the author of the screenshot nor have I originally uploaded it but I've cut it to get rid of the Zoom's copyrighted interface. The speedy drletion only referred to COM:SS with no further elaboration which elements are copyrighted. Considering that the screenshot consists of small inages, it'd be no problem to clone out the copyrighted material.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 08:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Kept: kept the cropped version, deleted the original version, thanks. --Ellywa (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
_5.png){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by GiaoThongVN as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Emblem of Backan Province.png
Converted to regular DR per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:46, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: looks like an errorenous upload: the same uploader, the file has .png.jpg extension. --rubin16 (talk) 14:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GiaoThongVN as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Emblem of Soctrang Province.png
Converted to regular DR, per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:35, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GiaoThongVN as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Emblem of Tayninh Province.png
Converted to regular DR, per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:38, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GiaoThongVN as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Emblem of Binhthuan Province.png
Converted to regular DR, per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (JPEG -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:49, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:42, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by GiaoThongVN as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Emblem of Binhthuan Province.png
Converted to regular DR, per Commons:Deletion_policy#Duplicates (GIF -> PNG). -- Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:44, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
No EXIF data, low resolution, no permission, possible copyvio Jianhui67 T★C 08:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:40, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
It does not look like the 19th century to me. Probably something more recent. Ghirlandajo (talk) 09:32, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: the source in the description isn't available. I tried searching for another one but haven't found a proof for the icon be old enough. --rubin16 (talk) 14:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
stolen image without permission to use, remove immediately 半島困難 (talk) 10:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Comment Wasa Kawasaker, where is it stolen from? SHB2000 (talk) 04:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- Very likely gelio.livejournal.com. I don't see any indication of a license whatsoever, but it would be good to have a Russian speaker double check. Also, tineye found the top-left image in another website, as far back as 2016.Strainu (talk) 12:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- I don't know, but the name of the author does not match the name of the uploader. And the page of the uploader does not say that they are the same person. --Wasa Kawasaker (talk) 12:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: other uploads of the user refer to Ilya Shevchenko with the link to the userpage, so, the author of the nominated file isn't the uploader himself. --rubin16 (talk) 14:52, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
The uploader might posess the copy, but not the copyright, so no pd-self. 92.213.14.91 11:43, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Keep This magazine was published in 1959 and the copyright has never been renewed. A PD-US-no-renewal template is clearly indicated in the permissions section and the file is currently in main space use on at least ten different projects. Nevadawest (talk) 06:26, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
Kept: kept at no renewal. --rubin16 (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/"nyc dance project"
[edit]These three photos bear the label of the NYC Dance Project, and come from the Flickr account https://www.flickr.com/people/botalex/ bearing the name Alexey Yakovlev. Our User:Alexey Yakovlev who has uploaded most of the images of that Flickr user (they show up here as Flickr user yakovlev.alexey - I'm guessing the Flickr username changed? It is almost certainly the same Flickr account, though) has had two of his ballet images deleted as copyright violations before (see user talk page). However, just to be sure, I emailed the NYC Dance Project to confirm that they allowed him to release these three specific images, and they wrote back quite quickly that they would be asking Alexey to remove the images.
I don't know whether this means we should also delete the other yakovlev.alexey ballet images (there are others), or even all the yakovlev.alexey images (they're mostly flowers and insects and there are many of them, hundreds, so many that I had a hard time picking out the ballet images, because I did seriously consider nominating all of them as well). Sometimes I'm glad I'm not an admin to make these kind of hard choices. But we should certainly delete these three NYC Dance Project images.
- File:Artem Ovcharenko - Principal, Bolshoi Ballet (26990830835).jpg
- File:Artem Ovcharenko - Principal, Bolshoi Ballet (26990830785).jpg
- File:The Bolshoi Theatre Principal dancers Olga Smirnova and Artem Ovcharenko (36303959455).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
GRuban (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: I have found the same photos on the site of NYC dance project and Ovcharenko websites. Both don't have any mention of a free license, deleted. --rubin16 (talk) 15:05, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
No FoP in Lithuania. Commercial use of reproductions of works of architecture or sculpture in public places is not allowed when the work is the main subject and it is used commercially. Under Law No. VIII-1185 of 1999, as amended up to Law No. XII-1183 of 2014, Article 28 Doctor Architect (talk) 15:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Copyvio. Nanahuatl (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 14:53, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
It needs to be evaluated whether the depicted statue is still in copyright, as there is no freedom-of-panorama exception for such works in the U.S. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:50, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: the subject died in 2003 and we can assume that the statue was installed post-mortem. If so, it is unfree. --rubin16 (talk) 15:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Still in copyright. Frida Kahlo died in 1954. Image is on English Wikipedia thanks to fair use, but can't be on Wikimedia Commons until 2055 or whenever Kahlo's work will fall into the public domain. Spinster (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 15:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
in der Quelle kann ich keine CC-Lizenz finden Ralf Roletschek 20:44, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Todos los videos de esa cuenta son publicados habitualmente con licencia CC - Atribución. Al momento de la subida la misma estaba activada en el video al igual que cientos de videos producidos desde la misma cuenta. --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Vale, probablemente suene así, pero no puedes ver nada en la fuente, ¿o me falta algo? --Ralf Roletschek 21:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- Nada, sólo que es extraña la revocación de la licencia, adelante con el borrado. Saludos, --ProtoplasmaKid (talk) 00:04, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Vale, probablemente suene así, pero no puedes ver nada en la fuente, ¿o me falta algo? --Ralf Roletschek 21:40, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: no free license right now and I failed to find the proving snapshot from web.archive. --rubin16 (talk) 15:11, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Die Lizenz von File:15-07-Mexico-Vorauswahl-RalfR-WMA 0255.jpg ist nicht kompatibel Ralf Roletschek 20:47, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In addition another source image was deleted, File:Hospital de Campo de la Cruz Roja Mexicana en el INER.png. Uploader did not comment and nobody changed the image to comply with the licencing. --Ellywa (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamel saleh (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 21:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- - هذه الصور قمت بتصويرها من خلال تلفوني الخاص. لذا أرجو أن تبقى، أو مساعدتي في كيفية الحفاظ على بقائها منشورة. كل الشكر لتفهمك
- These pictures I took on my own phone. So please stay tuned, or help me on how to keep it posted. All thanks for your understanding
- - --Kamel saleh (talk) 23:01, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
- No, you obviously did not take these pictures on your phone. At least File:كامل فرحان صالح.jpg was not even taken on a phone, as the Exif data indicates. --Didym (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- - صباح الخير،
صورة File:Farhan othman saleh.jpg , وصورة File:خليل أحمد خليل.jpg، التقطتهما من هاتفي الجوال، وأجريت عليهما تحرير من كومبيوتري "Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer". أما صورة File:كامل فرحان صالح.jpg، فقد التقطتها منذ عشر سنوات تقريبا، ولم أعد أذكر تحديدا طريقة التقاط الصورة، لكن أرجح أنني التقطتها من هاتفي الجوال. وقد أجريت عليها تحرير على كومبيوتري أيضا. صديقي، هذه الصور هي لي، وهي تحت المشاع الابداعي المسموح به. لذا أرجو منك مساعدتي وتفهم طلبي بابقاء هذه الصور.
- - good morning,
Image File: Farhan othman saleh.jpg, File image: Khalil Ahmad Khalil. Jpg, I took them from my mobile phone and edited them from my Microsoft Windows Photo Viewer. As for the image File: Kamel Farhan Saleh. Jpg, I took it about ten years ago, and I no longer remember exactly how the image was taken, but it is more likely that I took it from my mobile phone. It has been edited on shareware, too. My friend, these pictures are mine, and they are under Creative Commons Permission. So please help me and understand my request to keep these photos. --Kamel saleh (talk) 08:25, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. uploader is not convincing imho. you could upload the original images. --Ellywa (talk) 19:30, 15 November 2021 (UTC)