Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2021/01/15
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
دکتر_ابولحسن_سدیدی.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_avec_cadre.jpg){kind=link}
1930s photograph by a photographer who died in 1978. Public Domain Mark at source, might be artistic enough to not be able to keep. Abzeronow (talk) 01:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 07:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Not allowed on Wikimedia Commons license SkateboardingWiki (talk) 09:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Per French jurisprudence such work is not collective [1] and the photographer can be identified by the entity managing the rights. — Racconish 💬 12:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please elaborate - the copyright holder is Keystone, a respectable organization; yet they do not provide the author. How can the author be found for this 1945 photograph? Materialscientist (talk) 15:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination on second thought.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — Racconish 💬 15:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a duplicate of File:Leonard Fournette (50832399803).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Duplicate processed. --Regasterios (talk) 19:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
{{speedydelete|author/uploader request}} Ceratarges (talk) 18:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a duplicate of Buccaneers offensive line (50832403298).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 03:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:43, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a duplicate of File:Buccaneers @ Redskins (50833151341).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 15:37, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 09:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
FIles uploaded by User:Brian Aria
[edit]- File:Uw2003lg.jpg
- File:File:Zagreb1999.jpg
- File:Annecy-2013.png
- File:P5mhdn5rhZN1Pccc4tu-o.png
- File:Poland1993.jpg
- File:Sapporo1991.png
- File:Sofia89.png
- File:13ThWinterUniversiade.jpg
- FIle:Belluno1985.jpg
- File:Espana1981.jpg
- File:CSSR78.jpg
- File:Villars1962.png
- File:Chamonix1960.jpg
- File:Dreami.jpg
- File:64-76e5f3d88bc876cd4.jpg
- File:Uw1995lg.gif
- File:Uw2001l2.gif
- File:Uw1997lg.gif
- File:Aimag 2021 Mascot.png
- File:Tokyo2009-Logo.png
- File:2003WorldMilitaryGames.png
- File:Dubai2017AsianYouthParaGames.png
- File:AostaValley2010 .png
- File:Mudori.gif
Reasons for deletion request --Brian Aria (talk) 18:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC) Copyright Violation
Deleted: Speedy deleted as Copyvios. Ruthven (msg) 09:44, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is a duplicate of Taylor Heinicke (50832406158).jpg Denniscabrams (talk) 03:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 10:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
delete photo 2001:8004:1500:8FA:94E:AFF3:D5B0:F443 03:21, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- No reason given. If you are User:Vu-0001 log in please. --Achim (talk) 09:29, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
2-3-2K.jpg Vu-0001 (talk) 01:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- And the "reason" for your deletion request? --E4024 (talk) 01:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete - (Other than uploader request within period) certainly it is not an own work as was declared. --E4024 (talk) 01:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
2-3-2K.jpg Vu-0001 (talk) 07:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Please do not open repetitive deletion requests. E4024 (talk) 11:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: obviously not own work. --rubin16 (talk) 20:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work as declared. E4024 (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per CSD G4. --ƏXPLICIT 03:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Should be made a WP article if the person is considered notable. E4024 (talk) 15:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright WikiMan3090tix (talk) 12:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 19:49, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Copyright WikiMan3090tix (talk) 20:59, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. --Achim (talk) 21:18, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
Questionable own-work; seen in this YouTube video (not marked CC-BY, no clear indication of their source) Vahurzpu (talk) 02:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is not own-work. It was taken from the depicted person's Instagram post presumably without permission, and should be deleted ASAP. 7rst1 (talk) 22:23, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 09:11, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Work by a Spanish painter who died in 1952. Can be restored on October 13, 2032 and/or put into the Undelete in 2033 category. Abzeronow (talk) 03:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --rubin16 (talk) 08:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kartadharta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private photo book. All unused, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 11:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:36, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
istiyorum 46.1.67.194 10:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept Not a meaningful request (gibberish) Non-admin closure. --E4024 (talk) 14:38, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bineshgardi (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of a free license.
- File:Phoebe-Apperson-Hearst.jpg
- File:رابرت ترنر - یکی از حواریون عبدالبهاء.jpg
- File:آقا بزرگ خراسانی ملقب به بدیع.jpg
- File:نبیل زرندی.jpg
- File:Hermann Grossmann (1899-1968).webp
- File:William Sutherland Maxwell (1874-1952).webp
- File:William Sears (1911-1992).webp
- File:Valíyu’lláh Varqá (1884-1955).webp
- File:Ugo Giachery (1896-1989).webp
- File:Taráz’u’lláh Samandarí (1874-1968).webp
- File:Siyyid Mustafá Rúmí (d. 1942).webp
- File:Siegfried Schopflocher (1877-1953).webp
- File:Shu’á’u’lláh `Alá’í (1889-1984).webp
- File:Roy C. Wilhelm (1875-1951).webp
- File:Rahmatu’lláh Muhájir (1923-1979).webp
- File:Paul Edmond Haney (1909-1982).webp
- File:Músá Banání (1886-1971).webp
- File:Mullá Muḥammad-Riḍáy-i-Muḥammad Ábádí, known as Jináb-i-Shaykh Muḥammad-Riḍáy-i-Yazdí.webp
- File:Mulla Muhammad-i-Qa’ini, known as Nabíl-i-Akbar (1829-1892).webp
- File:Muhammed Taqiy-i-Isfahani (d. 1946).webp
- File:Mirza ‘Alí-Muhammad Varqá, the father of Rúhu’lláh (d. 1896).webp
- File:Mírzá `Ali-Muhammad, known as Ibn-i-Asdaq, (d. 1928).webp
- File:Martha Root (1872-1939).webp
- File:Louis George Gregory (1874-1951).webp
- File:Leroy C. Ioas (1896-1965).webp
- File:Keith Ransom-Kehler (1876-1933).webp
- File:John Henry Hyde-Dunn (1855-1941).webp
- File:John Graham Ferraby (1914-1973).webp
- File:John Ebenezer Esslemont (1874-1925).webp
- File:John Aldham Robarts (1901-1991).webp
- File:Jalál Kházeh, also transliterated as Jalál Kháḍih (1897-1990).webp
- File:Horace Hotchkiss Holley (1887-1960).webp
- File:Hasan Muvaqqar Balyúzí (1908-1980).webp
- File:Harold Collis Featherstone (1913-1990).webp
- File:Hají Mullá `Alí-Akbar, known as Hají Ákhúnd,(1842-1910).webp
- File:Hájí Mírzá Muhammad-Taqí, known as Ibn-i-Abhar (d. 1917).webp
- File:Hají Mírzá Hasan-i-Adíb (1848-1919).webp
- File:Hájí Abu’l-Hasan-i-Ardikání, known as Hájí Amín (1831-1928).webp
- File:George Townshend (1876-1957).webp
- File:Enoch Olinga (1926-1979).webp
- File:Dorothy Beecher Baker (1898-1954).webp
- File:Dhikru’lláh Khádim (1904-1986).webp
- File:Corinne Knight True (1861-1961).webp
- File:Clara Dunn (1869-1960).webp
- File:Amelia Engelder Collins (1873-1962).webp
- File:Amatu’l-Bahá Rúhíyyih Khánum (1910-2000).webp
- File:Agnes Baldwin Alexander (1875-1971).webp
- File:Adelbert Mühlschlegel (1897-1980).webp
- File:‘Abdu’l-Jalíl Bey Sa‘ad (d. 1942).webp
- File:Abu’l-Qásim Faizi (1906-1980).webp
- File:`Alí-Muhammad Varqá (1911-2007).webp
- File:`Alí-Akbar Furútan (1905-2003).webp
- File:Hands and First House 1963.jpg
- File:ایادیان امرالله و اولین هیئت انتخابی بیت العدل اعظم در نزدیکی مرقد بهاءالله.jpg
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
4nn1l2 (talk) 02:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:38, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable person, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:04, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sismodesign (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
- File:Photo expo.jpg
- File:GreenageBibliotheque.jpg
- File:Mug sismo.jpg
- File:Portraitsismo.jpg
- File:Sismo design.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:42, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Modern art and promo photos. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0051.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0050.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0049.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0046.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0045.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0044.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0043.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0042 (1).jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0041.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0040.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0038.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0037.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0035.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0033.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0030.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0031.jpg
- File:IMG-20210114-WA0032 (1).jpg
- File:Time fami.jpg
- File:Azadd.jpg
- File:زياد الرومي 3.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان21 1.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 284.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 86.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 744.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 845.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 5233.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 463.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 856.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 2754.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 26غ5.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 265.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 453.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 43.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 45.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 33.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 56.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 67.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 9.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 7.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 77.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 4.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 3.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 2.jpg
- File:لوحة للفنان 1.jpg
- File:زياد الرومي 2.jpg
- File:الحاج ابراهيم الذهبي.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Votevotevote2012 (talk · contribs)
[edit]3D object; photograph is copyrightable. See COM:ART#Photograph of an old coin found on the Internet.
- File:PolishAmericans for Dole.jpg
- File:PolishAmericans for BushCheney.jpg
- File:Polish-Americans for Obama.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:28, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal sketches, COM:WEBHOST, little possible use, out of scope.
- File:Sección galerías y respiraderos..jpg
- File:Planta de el Capricho.jpg
- File:Sección tratamiento arboleo.jpg
- File:Nuevo doc 6 2.jpg
- File:Nuevo doc 6 3.jpg
- File:Nuevo doc 6 1.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DonauDanube (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:52, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
DW work, missing original author, source, date, and permission. Without that, no way of knowing if the license is correct. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos and screenshot, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logos, no educational value, out of scope. And above TOO.
- File:The Swan School Black Logo.tiff
- File:The Swan School.png
- File:TheSwanSchoolLogo.png
- File:TheSwanSchool.png
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Personal logo/image, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:54, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text diagram, should be in wiki-markup if needed, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:55, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused text doc, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:56, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused tiny diagram, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused screenshots, no educational value, out of scope and DW.
- File:WkndHappps.PNG
- File:WkndHappps2.PNG
- File:Happpsweekend.png
- File:Happpstemplate1.PNG
- File:Template4.PNG
- File:Template2.PNG
- File:Template3.PNG
P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Likely not own work: credit in EXIF data not matching the uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal lego project, COM:WEBHOST, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:45, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Canyonista (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvios, not own works: inconsistent sizes, quality, and styles, missing EXIF data or credit to someone else (and File:Ryad Kerbouz at Ronnie Scott's, London, 2000.tif appears to be a scan).
- File:Ryad Kerbouz.jpg
- File:Ryad Kerbouz Wkpdia 201902.jpg
- File:Ryad Kerbouz 2019.jpg
- File:Ryad Kerbouz Profile 01.jpg
- File:Ryad Kerbouz Legends Of LC Vid 1.jpg
- File:Ryad Kerbouz at Ronnie Scott's, London, 2000.tif
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:46, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of non-notable event, no context/location, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo of non-notable performer, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jw bridges (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, no educational value, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Logos with bogus self/CC claims. Discussion needed about TOO in origin country(ies), especially File:League of Legends European Championship logo.svg
Эlcobbola talk 15:41, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. Only used on userpage of user without meaningful edits. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Legacy Musik Inc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused promotional images, COM:WEBHOST, out of scope.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:47, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: one is a historical photo/scan without original author/date/source/permission, and one looks like low-res screengrab.
P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: what new could be added to existing collection of explicit materials?
- File:8 inch dick.png
- File:Cock leaking precum.ogv
- File:19 year old male masturbating and ejaculating.ogv
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram. Duplicate. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:48, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jugrajsingh77 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons stated, better yet tag all three with {{subst:npd}}. Who knows, maybe the uploader DOES own the rights. Not likely, but I trust the Commons:OTRS process. Davidwr (talk) 18:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rananaeem110 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Naeemfashion model.jpg
- File:Muhammad Naeem .jpg
- File:Muhammad Naeem in Event.jpg
- File:Rananaeem110.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Rana Naeem is beautifull Personality he born in sahiwal pakistan now he is living in UAE — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 217.165.183.246 (talk) 05:28, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Adding latest uploads:
Delete all: Blatant self-promotion by a vanity SPA. --Achim (talk) 10:45, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:49, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in vanity Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sillerkiil (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from book covers and souvenirs.
- File:Moskva olümpiamängudeks loodud mänguasjad Miša (vasemal) ja Vigri (paremal)..jpg
- File:Pipi, esikaas.jpg
- File:"Seitse venda" kaanepilt 1966. aastal ilmunud tõlkel. Kujundanud Erkki Tanttu..jpg
- File:Hulkur Rasmuse raamatukaas.jpg
_ja_Vigri_(paremal)..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:50, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in vanity article.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete Minerva97 (talk) 23:49, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 04:51, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Logo above COM:TOO P 1 9 9 ✉ 04:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peachyeung316 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Sweetheart bunny in studio.jpg
- File:Ghost in summer.jpg
- File:Four group doll in the wedding hall.jpg
- File:The fourth toy group in studio.jpg
- File:Four buddy in sitting in graden.jpg
- File:Four buddy in Summer hoilday.jpg
- File:Four little actor in show.jpg
- File:Moo and Ghost.jpg
- File:The four toy in summer.jpg
- File:The little tutor in my home.jpg
- File:Bud in close up.jpg
- File:Bud in doll.jpg
- File:Bud doll 20191.jpg
- File:White rabbit in home.jpg
- File:Honey bee at home.jpg
- File:The evil bear.jpg
- File:Honey bee and little bunny.jpg
- File:Three rabbit in flower fair.jpg
- File:Honey bee in table.jpg
- File:The brownies bunny.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 16:32, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peachyeung316 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Bunny couple wedding crystal ball.jpg
- File:Love bunny couples crystal ball in Hong Kong.jpg
- File:Bunny couples wedding crystal ball.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
No evidence of the claimed free license; even at the time of upload[2]. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:34, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fabriciotsukamoto10 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private photo album. All unused, out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 10:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
es:Tito Valdez was deleted due to non-notability. The photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 07:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Jenő Haranghy
[edit]Jenő Haranghy died in 1951. These works are copyrighted. PD in 2022.
- File:Emléklap Horthy Miklós fővezér.jpg
- File:Hungary, Budapest Fortepan 71794.jpg
- File:Hungary, Budapest Fortepan 73231.jpg
- File:Painting. Radisson Blu Béke Hotel restaurant. - Budapest.JPG
Regasterios (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- also file:Mydrawing.png
Unused personal drawings, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user graphics, uploader has no other live global contributions. Out of project scope.
ƏXPLICIT 12:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:30, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused user logo, uploader has no other live global contributions other than the creation of her userpage. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DHeeraj jalal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images that appear to be outside the scope of the project. Commons is not a web host
Herby talk thyme 08:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:31, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Exif info show that this image origin souce is Facebook, seems not own work. (｀・ω・´) (talk) 13:57, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 19:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:45, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:46, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:32, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jojofribaki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:00, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Montevinci (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Saint Florentin de Bonnet.jpg
- File:"Bonnet, mon village." Lorraine France (Emanuel Vanden Berghe - acrylique sur toile, 100x150cm).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:06, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Seyran1987 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Viktoria Skliarova.jpg
- File:Evgenii Ganin.jpg
- File:Edil Kozhamberdiyev.jpg
- File:Akhmed Musaev.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 17:08, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 06:33, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Very unlikely to be own work. No EXIF, no metadata Ganímedes (talk) 20:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:06, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by আদনান পাশা আইয়ান (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope & uploaded by a sockpuppet.
আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 02:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lakshaypaliwal99 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image gallery, all unused. Out of scope.
GeorgHH • talk 09:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Painter es:Antonio Brunt Rodríguez died in 1974. The paintings can be restored in 2055 (80+1 years from death). Taivo (talk) 12:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk ✉ 15:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Obviously is a copy of Pikachu (Pokémon Company). Gusama Romero (talk) 09:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 17:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Unused user graphic, uploader has no other live contributions other than an edit filter report. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:58, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Screenshot of an obviously copyrighted cartoon uploaded by an LTA. Techyan（Talk） 12:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (a screenshot of Boonie Bears). --Ahmadtalk 22:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable YouTuber. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 12:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 22:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Probably not too simple for copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- i exported it because it looks simple Baratiiman (talk) 07:12, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete Too complex to be PD-textlogo IMHO. --Ganímedes (talk) 13:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO US. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:24, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Probably not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO Australia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Derivative work. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ƏXPLICIT 00:13, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:DW of copyrighted book covers. https://www.amazon.com/dp/4088807235 Yuraily Lic (talk) 05:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused logo of non-notable company. Out of project scope. ƏXPLICIT 06:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:17, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, as I can't see an EDUSE for the backs of 2 unknown people. And potential copyvio as the photo wasn't taken by the flickr user Gbawden (talk) 09:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Murals aren't covered by the partial American FOP, which is limited to buildings only. Cannot be COM:DM as the mural is the principal motif of the image. An COM:OTRS permission from the artist is required. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:48, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 04:42, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Useless image, otherwise uploaded to troll users in Hungarian Wikipedia village pump pages, see link Teemeah (talk) 13:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
What is the problem? Not a troll. --Pinguin69 (talk) 07:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: by Túrelio. --Minoraxtalk 04:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
personal use and useless for wikipeida Hoseina051311 (talk) 14:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - not useful. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 02:18, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
personal use and useless for wikipeida Hoseina051311 (talk) 14:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of unexplained certificate. Description no help. No educational value. Malcolma (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 04:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Greece. Subject is a 1997 sculpture by Sophia Vari who is still alive. Howhontanozaz (talk) 07:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
I uploaded it, now no need it anymore. Please delete it. Azerbaijan1991 (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination out of scope. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
No COM:FOP in Greece. Subject is a 2001 sculpture by Sophia Vari who is still alive. Howhontanozaz (talk) 08:02, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Used to propogate false network on en.wiki; copyvio of trademarked logo Nate • (chatter) 09:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:05, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo without educational use Drakosh (talk) 10:33, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Personal photo bad quality without educational use Drakosh (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
this is my profile VIT ROSHI (talk) 10:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
I DO NOT WANT THIS PHOTO Roshith SREELAYAM (talk) 14:46, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete by courtesy. --Achim (talk) 16:11, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
it is not aa good photo Praksh rauter (talk) 07:31, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
please remove it Roshith SREELAYAM (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:04, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Not "own work", unclear where user got it. Destroyeraa (talk) 16:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Files of User:Contemporaryartlover1
[edit],_Alexander_Augustus.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Photographs of artworks by a living artist. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:03, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
From this website, which has copyright information located here, no indication of the Creative Commons license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
COM:Redundant. Poor quality image taken through car window obscured by raindrops. There are plenty of other, better-quality images available at Category:One M & T Plaza. File is not in use anywhere except a gallery at w:One M&T Plaza, again accompanied by several higher-quality images. Andre Carrotflower (talk) 16:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
From the artist's website credited to "Tom Grill" Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Photograph of artwork by a living artist. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:03, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo of unidentified objects. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Flickr-washing; the person in the photo posted it to Flickr with a usable license, but the metadata indicates it is a copyrighted photo so we would need permission from the actual photographer/copyright holder. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:14, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:02, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Unused photo. Strange image of person with no idication of her importance. Out of scope. Malcolma (talk) 17:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete unused photo for the last 5 yrs, fuzzy and non-notable person depicted. Oaktree b (talk) 20:43, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
The metadata credits this to a professional photography company, need some indication the uploader has permission to assign it a Creative Commons license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
cswiki vandalism Jan Myšák (talk) 17:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete Unused insufficiently described private portrait photo with an offensive file name, out of scope. --ŠJů (talk) 04:27, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
out of scope Rodrigolopes (talk) 19:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Not CC Licensed on Vimeo. Eatcha (talk) 20:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have just change it to Creative Common License on Vimeo. I think issue should be resolved by now. Zawthet (talk) 10:25, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination -- Eatcha (talk) 14:14, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Uploader and subject contacted OTRS and requested deletion. The image is not obviously educational and is not used anywhere. Ijon (talk) 20:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Cena Documentário U.R.L 2050 por Tcheller Durrep.jpg
- File:O Verdadeiro Inimigo por Tcheller Durrep.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: publicity of non notable person. Stego (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
This picture must be restored, you can not judge that it’s violating anything since you cannot prove that I am not authorised to use it, in what base can you affirm that? Why are you deleting? You don’t t have any proof, Who is claiming it’s rights??? I am the owner of this picture, it belongs to me, I have all rights concerning it. I produced it and I have full rights to use it anywhere. it should not be deleted! what kind of criteria is this? Please restore it, This is not a fair decision! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcheller (talk • contribs) 05:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Cena Documentário U.R.L 2050 por Tcheller Durrep.jpg
- File:O Verdadeiro Inimigo por Tcheller Durrep.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: publicity of non notable person. Stego (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
This picture must be restored, you can not judge that it’s violating anything since you cannot prove that I am not authorised to use it, in what base can you affirm that? Why are you deleting? You don’t t have any proof, Who is claiming it’s rights??? I am the owner of this picture, it belongs to me, I have all rights concerning it. I produced it and I have full rights to use it anywhere. it should not be deleted! what kind of criteria is this? Please restore it, This is not a fair decision! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcheller (talk • contribs) 05:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
And also:
- File:Cena Documentário U.R.L 2050 por Tcheller Durrep.jpg
- File:O Verdadeiro Inimigo por Tcheller Durrep.jpg
Out of Commons:Project scope: publicity of non notable person. Stego (talk) 20:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
This picture must be restored, you can not judge that it’s violating anything since you cannot prove that I am not authorised to use it, in what base can you affirm that? Why are you deleting? You don’t t have any proof, Who is claiming it’s rights??? I am the owner of this picture, it belongs to me, I have all rights concerning it. I produced it and I have full rights to use it anywhere. it should not be deleted! what kind of criteria is this? Please restore it, This is not a fair decision! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tcheller (talk • contribs) 05:34, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:00, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
And also:
Out of Commons:Project scope: publicity of non notable person. Stego (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete - This should be speed deleted. The metadata clearly indicates: "Copyright 2019. All rights reserved". Meaning copyvio. --SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 23:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
And also:
Out of Commons:Project scope: publicity of non notable person. Stego (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete - This should be speed deleted. The metadata clearly indicates: "Copyright 2019. All rights reserved". Meaning copyvio. --SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 23:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
And also:
Out of Commons:Project scope: publicity of non notable person. Stego (talk) 20:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete - This should be speed deleted. The metadata clearly indicates: "Copyright 2019. All rights reserved". Meaning copyvio. --SirEdimon Dimmi!!! 23:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: publicity of non notable band. Stego (talk) 20:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
This is a photo of a PC screen. I'm not sure the uploader owns the copyright of the actual portrait. The girl is also an unknown minor named Emilia Verdoliva. All the more reason to assume cyberbullying. The article that used this image was also deleted as cyberbullying. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emilia_(voornaam) Mikalagrand (talk) 21:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Previously published at https://letterblack.com/ as https://imagery.zoogletools.com/u/465434/ee94b05019726ce92000868a6808b7bb442e8360/original/band-photo.jpg/!!/b%3AW1sicmVzaXplIiwyMDAwXSxbIm1heCJdLFsid2UiXV0%3D.jpg Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Image in copyright http://webgrec.ub.edu/webpages/personal/ang/004348_jordigarcia.ub.edu.html Docosong (talk) 21:54, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete Image of no encyclopedic value; so brurred that almost nothing can be seen. Furthermore, the description is a made-up trollish story, and so the image itself. This user is indef. blocked at en/WP as sockpuppet (see this, and recently two other socks of the same sockmaster active in el/WP (see the CU) were found to create hoax articles using similar photos and writing stories from their own mind much like the aforementioned descriprion (see the case I filed at the el/WP admin. noticeboard). ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 22:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Delete Image of no encyclopedic value; so brurred that almost nothing can be seen. Furthermore, the description is a made-up trollish story, and so the image itself. This user is indef. blocked at en/WP as sockpuppet (see this, and recently two other socks of the same sockmaster active in el/WP (see the CU) were found to create hoax articles using similar photos and writing stories from their own mind much like the aforementioned descriprion (see the case I filed at the el/WP admin. noticeboard). ǁ ǁǁǁ Chalk19 (talk) 22:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No educational value / Selfie / Party pic. Jeffrey Beall (talk) 22:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No permission for underlying work. COM:DERIV --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 22:44, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete COM:FOP Australia excludes "graphic works" like posters or murals. --A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:58, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Low res, no EXIF, uploaded with description (see original log) of "Photo was taken by actress Isla Fisher on the pedestrian's digital camera." Accordingly, author (copyright holder) is Isla Fisher and COM:OTRS evidence of her permission is required. Duck copyvio/COM:PRP issue. Эlcobbola talk 18:52, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Recently-uploaded lower-resolution image equivalent to File:Manganese-heptoxide-3D-vdW.png, and also has less plausible relative atomic radii. DMacks (talk) 18:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Low-quality chemical model which was superseded by a better version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 17:31, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; shows work by living artist; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:10, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; shows work by living artist; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:16, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 15:53, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nizamiye Mosque
[edit]The mosque was completed in 2012. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in South Africa, thus permission from the architect is needed.
- File:Ceiling - Nizamiye Mosque (48446150702).jpg
- File:Ceiling - Nizamiye Mosque (48446152087).jpg
- File:Detail - Mehrab (48446001246).jpg
- File:Dome Interior - Nizamiye Mosque (48446146792).jpg
- File:Entrance - Nizamiye Mosque (48445987751).jpg
- File:Entrance II - Nizamiye Mosque (48445986526).jpg
- File:Entrance III - Nizamiye Mosque (48445983666).jpg
- File:Entrance IV - Nizamiye Mosque (48445977366).jpg
- File:Nizamiye Mosque (48446005976).jpg
- File:Nizamiye Mosque (48446006791).jpg
- File:Nizamiye Mosque - Interior (48446145207).jpg
- File:Nizamiye Mosque .jpg
- File:Thumb DJI 0024 1024.jpg
- File:Thumb DJI 0027 1024.jpg
- File:Thumb DJI 0031 1024.jpg
- File:Welcome - Nizamiye Mosque (48446127267).jpg
- File:Welcome II - Nizamiye Mosque (48445973326).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
A1Cafel (talk) 02:50, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 03:54, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. Proffesional photo available on-line. Single upload, not used anywhere. Smooth O (talk) 11:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 00:56, 27 January 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2015. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 02:55, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2015. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:38, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2015. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in United Arab Emirates, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 02:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 06:40, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
The owner wants to retire the image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aastral (talk • contribs) 09:59, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
- File is in use and Aastral is not the owner of it. If you want it to be deleted you can claim (or better prove) that it was on the net before upload here. (Something that seems probable to me.) --E4024 (talk) 01:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- I have found the image hosted on the other path and I think is duplicated and it could be deleted - https://recursos.march.es/web/img-web/javier-goma.jpg --Aastral (talk) 14:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC) {{Aastral (talk) 09:27, 19 January 2021 (UTC)|13:22, 18 January 2021|193.146.251.70}}
Deleted: copyvio. --Amada44 talk to me 21:40, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
Various empty categories for a fictional entity
[edit]Various empty categories for a fictional entity, created mostly by IPs and single-purpose accounts.
- Category:SVG flags of South Azerbaijan
- Category:SVG flags of Azerbaijani organizations in Iran
- Category:SVG historical flags of South Azerbaijan
- Category:Historical flags of South Azerbaijan
- Category:Historical flags of Azerbaijani organizations in Iran
- Category:Flags of South Azerbaijan
- Category:People of South Azerbaijan
- Category:South Azerbaijan
--Orijentolog (talk) 00:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:37, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Other maps of this election exist, should be removed for redundancy MisterElection2001 (talk) 03:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo taken from Discogs with no clear license statement. Hiro (talk) 03:47, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Seems to be an old photo. The photographer and exact date should be specified. Also, if the building is fairly recent (like less than 50 years old), we also need evidence of permission from the architect, because there is no freedom of panorama in the Philippines. pandakekok9 07:56, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:39, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
%E2%81%A8%D8%AF%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%86_%D8%B3%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%DB%8C%E2%81%A9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
%E2%81%A8%D8%AF%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%86_%D8%B3%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%DB%8C%E2%81%A9.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Historical pic. Needs a better license than "own work". E4024 (talk) 21:01, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
دکتر_ابولحسن_سدیدی.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. It's obviously a photo of a photo, and while it can be an "own work", the original photo isn't likely to be one. --Ahmadtalk 16:37, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
دکتر_ابولحسن_سدیدی.jpg){kind=link}
%E2%81%A8%D8%AF%DA%A9%D8%AA%D8%B1_%D8%A7%D8%A8%D9%88%D9%84%D8%AD%D8%B3%D9%86_%D8%B3%D8%AF%DB%8C%D8%AF%DB%8C%E2%81%A9.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Re-upload? E4024 (talk) 10:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not delete
Hello, this photo is an integral part of the article on Professor Mahmoud Shahabi << https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/ محمود_شهابی_خراسانی >> and should not be deleted please, this photo belongs to my private collection.--Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 07:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Bonjour, cette photo va faire partie intégrante de l'article sur professeur Mahmoud Shahabi << https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/محمود_شهابی_خراسانی >> et il ne faut pas la supprimer s'il vous plait. --Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 10:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
درود بر شما من خیلی خوب نفهمیده ام که چرا شما درخواست حذف این عکسها را داده اید قابل ذکر است که این عکسها از البوم شخسی بنده است و از آنها در مقاله زندگی نامه مرحوم استاد محمود شهابی در ویکی پدیای فارسی استفاده میشود لذا تقاضا دارم اگر زحمتی نیست از حذف این عکسها خودداری فرمایید و بر چسب های مربوطه را پاک کنید ، با تشکر و عرض احترام--Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly DW, missing original author, date, permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Not an own work. E4024 (talk) 10:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Please do not delete
Hello, this photo is an integral part of the article on Professor Mahmoud Shahabi << https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/ محمود_شهابی_خراسانی >> and should not be deleted please, this photo belongs to my private collection.--Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 07:21, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Bonjour, cette photo va faire partie intégrante de l'article sur professeur Mahmoud Shahabi << https://fa.wikipedia.org/wiki/محمود_شهابی_خراسانی >> et il ne faut pas la supprimer s'il vous plait. --Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 10:40, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
درود بر شما من خیلی خوب نفهمیده ام که چرا شما درخواست حذف این عکسها را داده اید قابل ذکر است که این عکسها از البوم شخسی بنده است و از آنها در مقاله زندگی نامه مرحوم استاد محمود شهابی در ویکی پدیای فارسی استفاده میشود لذا تقاضا دارم اگر زحمتی نیست از حذف این عکسها خودداری فرمایید و بر چسب های مربوطه را پاک کنید ، با تشکر و عرض احترام--Docteur Mansour Chehabi (talk) 11:04, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly not own work, missing original author, date, permission. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mutter Erde as duplicate (Dupe) and the most recent rationale was: File:Thea Frenssen.jpg; pdf isn't jpg. so needs approval of community — billinghurst sDrewth 11:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, redundant. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:43, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Image without utilisation on the Wikimedia Projects Nonovian [Communications] 12:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep, insufficient rationale. Note, this DR page has been deleted before as vandalism. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Jeff G., i'm not used to the wikimedia deletion policy but I think that if this photography represent a people who uploaded that 5 years ago, when he was underage, the deletion can be considered. Especially when the selfie reprensent no interest for the community. Beyond that, I don't think that give my opinion deserve a global lock, mostly when you have no proof except a past vandalism whose I have absolutely no knowledge. Cordialement, ---Nonovian [Communications] 09:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- @Nonovian: Was the photographer a minor at the time of upload? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Jeff G., i'm not used to the wikimedia deletion policy but I think that if this photography represent a people who uploaded that 5 years ago, when he was underage, the deletion can be considered. Especially when the selfie reprensent no interest for the community. Beyond that, I don't think that give my opinion deserve a global lock, mostly when you have no proof except a past vandalism whose I have absolutely no knowledge. Cordialement, ---Nonovian [Communications] 09:00, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:44, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moatlhodi Nkwadzile (Jutas) as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: the picture does not clearly show the vehicle please be on a proper position before capturing a picture,I requested this for speedy deletion because you can't clearly see what the user wants you to see. This is not a reason for speedy deletion. I allow one week for discussion about educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not a great pic, but in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
J'ai mis une nouvelle version modifiée de la présentation avec un titre différent. Je n'avais pas vu qu'il y avait une option "ajouter une nouvelle version". Gilliane (talk) 12:57, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Logo of uncertain licensing and of no use for Wikipedia: The article on the German WP it had been used for has been speedy deleted as totally irrelevant. 91.34.42.34 18:34, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
unused selfie along with File:POTAP13.jpg. Pibwl (talk) 18:36, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
kimzo and eross 94.200.184.18 20:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 01:51, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Delete All of this user's uploads appear to be copyvios. That's a reason to delete this one.
- But we have to get away from nominations like this. "small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images." none of these are valid reasons for deletion. You can't claim that something could be found with Google Image Search unless you're prepared to do the legwork and show that it is found that way, citing the other source for it. Vague handwaves are not enough. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:00, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Copyright moved, https://twitter.com/dldlofusu/status/1350033949460889603 , https://twitter.com/GawaSumida/status/1350034063256522755 . The original copyright holder gave me the copyright. In Japan, any license agreement before copyright move become invalid after move. 111.108.210.112 11:27, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The user who uploaded the image pasted it on the Japanese Wikipedia entry himself two minutes later. (https://ja.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%E5%B1%B1%E5%96%84&diff=81334813&oldid=81104834) The image was licensed under GFDL/CC4.0 at the time of upload, and the subsequent statement of rights transfer made on Twitter is meaningless.--KAMUI (talk) 09:28, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep The twitter link can't be taken into account as a proof that the copyright has been really transferred. Thanks --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 17:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- Keep no reason. CC-BY-SA v4 is irrevocable license (2a). --eien20 (talk) 17:35, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- @ネイ: Hi! There is also a discussion on ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/ファイル:Yamaze fan.jpg about the same file. I tried to translate it with Google Translate but I do not understand it. Perhaps you can leave a comment here in English? The question is who is the photographer and is that the same as the user that uploaded it to Japanese Wikipedia? If photographer is not the same as the uploader then we need to know if photographer agreed to a license. --MGA73 (talk) 17:35, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- I can provide two facts:
- The tweets linked from jawiki's discussion state that the file's copyright was transferred from Twitter user @GawaSumida to @dldlofusu.
- @GawaSumida is the same person as the uploader, per w:ja:利用者:Sumidagawaja. --ネイ (talk) 17:43, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
- I can provide two facts:
- @ネイ: Thank you! Based on google translate I thought the situation was reversed that @dldlofusu was photographer and transferred copyright to @GawaSumida.
- Keep If @GawaSumida = w:ja:利用者:Sumidagawaja = uploader then I think we can keep it. We can however also delete as a favor (we sometimes do that if uploader regret shortly after upload and the photo is easy to replace). --MGA73 (talk) 10:37, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
- The original uploader (Sumidagawaja) has not expressed any regrets; the user (C1K98V) who moved the file to Commons has expressed a keep opinion. If we delete as a favor, it is currently a favor to 111.108.210.112, a complete stranger. ネイ (talk) 10:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus for deletion, CC licenses are irrevocable. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:49, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
COM:L and COM:EVID require evidence sufficient for others to verify the claimed license. "US Court House in Syracuse, US Court House in Albany" is not adequate, and is a mere unverifiable assertion. No evidence of federal authorship and indeed other sources suggest otherwise. Эlcobbola talk 17:20, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- While it might be difficult to verify that this portrait is hanging in the hallways of the Courthouses in Syracuse and Albany, NY, particularly during the pandemic, that is possible to do and is not an unverifiable assertion. avvo.com is a lawyer directory. While Judge Bianchini has uploaded a copy of this portrait to his web page at that site, Avvo does not hold any copyright over the image. While that copy of the portrait contains a watermark from the photographer, that watermark does not include a copyright notice. As is typical when a photographer is being paid to take a photo, this was a work for hire, so the photographer does not hold any copyright over the image. It was paid for by the US Federal Government.
- This is only the 2nd image I have uploaded to Wikipedia, I would definitely welcome any advice or recommendations as to how I could provide more conveniently verifiable evidence that this is an official federal courthouses portrait. Judge Bianchini does have another physical copy of this portrait in his possession, would a photo of him holding the portrait with a sign stating that it is his official federal courthouse portrait be suitable? Glenn Anderson (talk) 22:29, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
- WP:SOURCEACCESS also says not to reject reliable sources just because they are difficult to access. Glenn Anderson (talk) 19:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
- This is the Commons, not en.wiki--WP:SOURCEACCESS has no relevance here. Here you must follow COM:L and COM:EVID. From what source did you learn the photographer was a federal employee? What is the photographer's name? Эlcobbola talk 21:39, 18 January 2021 (UTC)
OK, I see now the problem with this image is that the contact between the federal government and the photographer would need to be provided as evidence. I don't have that necessary evidence, so I agree this image should be deleted. Glenn Anderson (talk) 23:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:40, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Failed COM:LR, I didn't see a free license at source. Moreover, it is unlikely that the claimed author is the photographer since he himself is in the original (uncropped) photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 03:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep ...even during a private SW-travel of this friend with her wife ? (Skblzz1 (talk) 19:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC))
- This doesn't address any of the copyright issues. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- To dogmatic. Poor wikipedia (Skblzz1 (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC))
- Skblzz1 Te souviens-tu de qui a pris la photo ? Tu peux toujours demander à cette personne de faire une autorisation en bonne et due forme à l'OTRS, pour sauver la photo de la suppression. - Groupir ! (talk) 18:47, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
- To dogmatic. Poor wikipedia (Skblzz1 (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2021 (UTC))
- This doesn't address any of the copyright issues. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:19, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 1
[edit]Various Milau Viaduct photos where the viaduct is clearly the subject and focus of the image, thus failing COM:DM.
- File:2005 MillauViaduc0409.JPG
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct, A75, Aveyron, France, 2008 - Flickr - PhillipC.jpg
- File:Millau (10).JPG
- File:Millau (19).JPG
- File:Millau bridge struts (3843357484).jpg
- File:Millau Bridges.jpg
- File:Millau Bridges2.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct 1 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct overall view.jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau - depuis le point de vue au sud de Millau.png
- File:Viaduc Millau 01.jpg
- File:Zicht op het Viaduc de Millau.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-mattbuck (Talk) 21:10, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
Hi @Mattbuck: , Have you seen [ https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama&oldid=256272743 my edit on this very subject]? I have been trying to understand why the English have so much difficulty with a simple French law? Probably because the French do too- and it is not that simple. The law seems to be moving, based on developments of case law. WP is erring on the side of caution when it makes a bland statement stating there is no FOP- and we need to use the American concept of DM in whether to allow or not allow an image.
- Firstly an error of translation- this viaduc is a civil engineering work Ouvrage d'Art not a Work of Art.
- The draughtsman or his employer holds copyright on the 2D drawings, and the concept if it is original and has never been used before. He does not hold copyright on any concept that is a concept because it is a good technical solution (or a design inspired as the only technical solution to a project, his copyright is on the ćreative decisions he has taken within group of technical possibilities. The onus of proof lies on the designer to convince a court that he holds a copyright that has been breached.
- If it accepted that the draughtsman has designed something truly original then photographs are not permitted of that work in its entirity or photographs of the entirity of the actual section of the work that was deemed to be creative. Photographs of parts of the work that have been used before on other structures can be used.
- Au Millau, all of it has been done before- conceivably the only artistic decision that can be copyrighted is the relative heights and number of the pylons and their shape above the bridge deck. Below the deck, the deck, each individual pylon the play of light caused by a parabolic curve are all common engineering solutions so cannot be copyrighted. If copyright was ever claimed the architect, would still have to prove that there were other viable engineering solutions and his solution was more than a consequence of engineering necessity.
- To prevent publication, there is another test that must be fulfilled and it is not DM- more the question could the desired photograph have been taken without including the civil engineering structure. This gives us virtually the same freedom as FOP.
I apologise for not giving you references for all the case law/ It is essential to read the judgements in French- as American synopses miss all the nuances. So lets look at all the beautiful photographs and make some comments:
- File:2005 MillauViaduc0409.JPG- mine- borderline-I claim the view could not have been taken without including the bridge
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct, A75, Aveyron, France, 2008 - Flickr - PhillipC.jpg-same as above
- File:Millau (10).JPG-engineering detail
- File:Millau (19).JPG-photo of bridge not exhibiting creative element
- File:Millau bridge struts (3843357484).jpg engineering detail
- File:Millau Bridges.jpg the view could not have been taken without including the bridge- then not sufficient is included
- File:Millau Bridges2.jpg the view could not have been taken without including the bridge- then not sufficient is included
- File:Millau Viaduct 1 - panoramio.jpg-hard to defend
- File:Millau Viaduct overall view.jpg-hard to defend
- File:Viaduc de Millau - depuis le point de vue au sud de Millau.png-hard to defend
- File:Viaduc Millau 01.jpg-hard to defend
- File:Zicht op het Viaduc de Millau.jpg- no opinion
The Case law is growing, and I think we should reflect it in our decisions- ann then revisit other deletions File:Millau7641.JPG and File:2005 MillauPéage0416.JPG which quotes the Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Gare Lorraine TGV deletions and reversions. --ClemRutter (talk) 00:14, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
- @ClemRutter: Actually I would like to read the judgements (or at least an article about them in the French press) to make my mind on these ones. If you say that Commons guidelines are not enough, you must provide an alternative. I can read French, so there are no problems I presume. --Ruthven (msg) 22:29, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: While bridges are not copyrighted in the USA, they are in France. The fact that cable stayed bridges have been built before does not mean that cable stayed bridges cannot have a copyright. Glass fronted skyscrapers all have copyrights, although they all are similar to prior works. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:07, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 2
[edit]No acceptable FOP in France. None of the images nominated here pass French de minimis; the viaduct forms an important element to each of these images. See also the prior nomination above and also Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Viaduc de Millau.
- File:Beautiful Millau Viaduct (190899149).jpeg
- File:Crossing Millau Viaduct (2724957846).jpg
- File:Le viaduc de Millau - Millau viaduct - Flickr - OliBac.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (2724140287).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (2724142781).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct (2724938054).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct (2724940182).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (2724960820).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct 2 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct tourist view.jpg
- File:The Viaduct Of Millau (31594173).jpeg
- File:Viaduc - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau (10458569676).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau (10458688003).jpg
- File:Viaduc Millau P1010248mod.jpg
- File:Viaduc-de-Millau.jpg
- File:Viaduct in Millau (2724111935).jpg
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- It appears that the implementor of Architect Lord Norman Foster's copyright holder-ship (the management) has placed some authentic restrictions over any forms of reuses of images of this bridge: [3] Perhaps night scenes of the bridge (which I haven't yet nominated) might need to be deleted too. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 3
[edit]Per the CEVM's house rules on usages of any visual representations, even drawings are not allowed if they will be reused commercially (without permission from CEVM who acts as the "guardian" of architect Norman Foster's copyright). This means graphical renderings of this bridge are not OK per their rules in relation to French copyright law. Furthermore, no freedom of panorama in France.
- File:Heights of Millau Viaduct.PNG
- File:Viaduc-Millau Pile-P2 Eiffel.svg
- File:Viaduc-Millau Pile-P2.svg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 10:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 4
[edit]5 images of the viaduct at night, and 4 images of the viaduct at the "borderline of foreground and background". No FOP in France, the bridge's management is aggressive in protecting Architect Norman Foster's copyright over the bridge, and see the above nominations. While the 4 images are borderline between foreground and background, the main intent of those images are the viaduct itself (as evidenced by their file titles). COM:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies for this case.
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct 20140102 123012.jpg
- File:Approaching the Millau Viaduct 20140102 123019.jpg
- File:Millau viaduct (2724126321).jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct at night (2724120179).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct at night (2724124919).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct at night (2724945334).jpg
- File:Millau viaduct at night with car (2724947154).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau. (6744815357).jpg
- File:Viaducte de Millau. France - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:59, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 13:20, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 5
[edit]No FOP in France. Designed by Michel Virlogeux and Norman Foster, both are still living. The Compagnie Eiffage du Viaduc de Millau is clear that only non-commercial images are permitted without royalty payments. See: https://www.leviaducdemillau.com/en/rules-use-images-viaduct.
- File:00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg
- File:Aire de Montjaux 03-edit.jpg
- File:Aire de Montjaux 03.JPG
- File:Detailshot of the 11 years old Millau viaduct with the Causses Noir (black chalk higlands) in the background - panoramio.jpg
- File:Driving on the Viaduc de Millau.jpg
- File:Millau-PM 37773.jpg
- File:Millau-PM 37785.jpg
- File:PM 037774 F Millau.jpg
- File:PM 037785 F Millau.jpg
- File:PM 037802 F Millau.jpg
- File:PM 037809 F Millau.jpg
File:Tarn Comprégnac Peyre amont.jpg- File:The Elegant Millau Viaduct.jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau (10458519044).jpg
- File:Viaduc de Millau C.JPG
- File:Viaduc de Millau Peyre.JPG
- File:Viaduc de Millau.JPG
- File:Viaducto de Millau, Francia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Vista aerea-Viaducto de Millau.JPG
- File:Vue du viaduc depuis le village de Peyre.JPG
- File:Vue sur le viaduc de Millau depuis le village de Peyre.JPG
_in_the_background_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Labattblueboy (talk) 06:16, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment My very limited understanding was that photos which don't have the copyrighted structure as their primary focus, but merely in the background as some of these do, are legal. But I couldn't name or quote the relevant law. Anyone else with more expertise?--ThunderingTyphoons! (talk) 10:18, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- See ClemRutter's comment above. We'd however need some more clarification on the law and jurisprudence. –LPfi (talk) 12:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Das Foto File:00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg zeigt die Stadt Millau vom Standort östlich der Stadt an der „Route du Causse Noir“. Aus dieser Blickrichtung auf die Stadt kommt in einem Bildfeld zur Aufnahme des gesamten Stadtareals zwangsläufig der „Viaduc de Millau“ in die Aufnahme. Beabsichtigt war nicht eine Aufnahme des Viadukts, sondern das Stadtbild. Ob in diesem Falle eine Verletzung des Urheberrechts vorliegt, zweifle ich an. Mit freundlichen Grüßen W. Bulach
- The photo file: 00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg shows the city of Millau from the location east of the city on the "Route du Causse Noir". From this direction of view of the city, the “Viaduc de Millau” inevitably appears in an image field to capture the entire city area. The intention was not to record the viaduct, but the cityscape. I doubt whether there is a violation of copyright in this case. Sincerely, W. Bulach W. Bulach (talk) 13:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- Taking a precautionary approach, I do question whether in image File:00 0238 Millau - Viaduc de Millau.jpg the bridge is unintentional and simply background. Compositionally the bridge's location in the image follows the rule of thirds and contains the entire bridge length. The image could also be cropped (at the bridge deck) without deleting the image of the city. As noted in the nomination a cautionary stance is necessary as the copyright holder has expressly stated that royalties are required for commerical images.--Labattblueboy (talk) 05:35, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- Bonjour. Et désolé, je ne suis pas doué en anglais. Ma photo File:Tarn Comprégnac Peyre amont.jpg est l'une des 51 photos que j'ai prise ce jour-là à Peyre (Aveyron) et déposées sur commons. Lorsque je visite un lieu, je prends un maximum de photos, notamment des cours d'eau, vers l'amont comme vers l'aval. J'ai donc pris le Tarn (sujet principal) vers l'amont et vers l'aval. Il se trouve que vers l'amont, au fond, il y a un petit morceau du viaduc de Millau qui apparait, représentant environ 5 % de la photo. Donc, pour moi, vouloir la supprimer pour ce motif est clairement un abus. Pour précision, j'étais en vacances à Millau pour une semaine et des photos beaucoup plus précises du viaduc, j'en en fait quelques dizaines, mais je n'en ai déversé aucune sur commons. Père Igor (talk) 14:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- I've retracted the nomination for File:Tarn Comprégnac Peyre amont.jpg. I agree that the bridge composes a minor attribute of the background.-Labattblueboy (talk) 05:14, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
- See ClemRutter's comment above. We'd however need some more clarification on the law and jurisprudence. –LPfi (talk) 12:36, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Sorry, just now - maybe too late - I realized that I should give my statement about deletion request of my file. "Driving on the Viaduc de Millau.jpg" at this place. Actually I put it at my Discussion side as follows:
Hello user Labattblueboy, thank you for the check on my file "Driving ...". Yet I oppose the result in form of the deletion request. As you can see in in the version history of the file, there was a deletion request in February 2021 that finally got cancelled by User:Racconish with his remarkː "On second thought, I think my deletion was excessive. Just leave the file as it is and good luck for the challenge". I had argumented that the topic of the picture was not the construction of the bridge itself but the impression of driving on a bridge towards the dark clouds of a thunderstorm contrasted by the cables high lighted by the sun. The name of the bridge is just mentioned to tell the location where the picture was taken. Best regards Foeniz (Diskussion) 14:56, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
I do hope this stil may have any influence on the decision process. Best regardsFoeniz (talk) 20:57, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
If it would help, I would not mind to change the file name to "Driving on a cable-stayed bridge".Foeniz (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- File:Driving on the Viaduc de Millau.jpg is a lovely photo. That said, the bridge is not a de minimis feature in the photo. I understand the intent but there is no indication that bridge's copyright holders would consider this image being in the public domain.--Labattblueboy (talk) 23:07, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Labattblueboy: one of the files has an active DR started by me on July 2021: Commons:Deletion requests/File:PM 037802 F Millau.jpg. Please be mindful of initiating mass DRs next time; you can see a file with an active DR having a "d" with rectangular orange background designation. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:47, 29 January 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, discussion, previous discussions on this DR page. --Rosenzweig τ 14:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
I am sorry about this decision. Especially as it contradicts the earlier decision by User:Racconish that made me hope for some time. Besides this personal event: I do appreciate your engagement in Commons. Best regardsFoeniz (talk) 09:14, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Viaduc de Millau 6
[edit]The bridge is the main subject here, and it is most probably covered by copyright.
- File:AVEYRON.Viaduc de Millau-1-cliche Jean Weber.jpg
- File:Millau Viaduct (42509428741).jpg
- File:Rob Bell by the Milau Viaduct in the South of France.jpg
- File:Tallest Bridge. (6744815357).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 10:15, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep File:Tallest Bridge. (6744815357).jpg - Despite the photographers intentions this image is basically a motorway with a bridge sort of in front of it - I give or take would say the bridge is DEMINIMIS, If kept I'll rename / +cats, The rest are either close ups or imho too close for DEMINIMIS to apply, –Davey2010Talk 13:17, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep Rob Bell picture. As his head takes up 3/5ths of the picture and the bridge just 1/5th the bridge is clearly not the main focus!Davidstewartharvey (talk) 15:44, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Technically speaking there's nothing that confirms the uploader is Robbie Bell, Anyone can grab a picture of the net, call themselves "that person" and upload it here. –Davey2010Talk 16:07, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- You realize, it's COM:INUSE in w:Rob Bell (TV presenter), so do you have any reason to believe it's not Rob Bell? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- I do although I only realised after I made that reply, Still irrespective of INUSE the point still stands there's no evidence to say this is Rob. –Davey2010Talk 15:54, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- You realize, it's COM:INUSE in w:Rob Bell (TV presenter), so do you have any reason to believe it's not Rob Bell? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:49, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Comment Tallest Bridge might be OK. File:AVEYRON.Viaduc de Millau-1-cliche Jean Weber.jpg is definitely not OK; File:Millau Viaduct (42509428741).jpg is a bunch of extraneous people sitting in front of the bridge, also not OK; I think File:Rob Bell by the Milau Viaduct in the South of France.jpg may be OK because he is the subject, but that's open to question. If he were not himself in scope, that photo definitely would not be OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:52, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Keep and nominee by other user, because Yann has a personal prejudices against me. Matlin (talk) 10:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete all photos but Keep one. File:Rob Bell by the Milau Viaduct in the South of France.jpg can simply be censored by cropping the whole bridge away and turning it into a portrait picture. Reference to this discussion is encouraged on the file description page so that no one will wrongfully nominate it (there is a tendency that once cropped, the indications of his selfie action will disappear along with the bridge). For others, I do not see those as passing de minimis. File:Tallest Bridge. (6744815357).jpg may be a close call but I'm uncomfortable at having a 50/50 photo (50% main subject, 50% de minimis) that may lead to Wikimedia being slapped with French lawsuits from CEVM, the management who is Architect Foster's beneficiary of his property rights over the public landmark he designed. Note the descriptions and title suggesting the bridge as the real intent of the photo. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:12, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Info "File:Tallest Bridge..." seems to be a reupload of File:Viaduc de Millau. (6744815357).jpg, deleted through this deletion request page too. See the file title's log. Therefore, it is eligible for speedy deletion as reupload of deleted content deleted through a consensus. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
- Indeed, if this DR isn't happened, the last one may be G4-able. Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 03:01, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
- From all of the above views, Keep the Rob Bell one and Delete the rest 3, this looks like another propaganda of Yann on their selection of {{De minimis}} applications. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 02:59, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Rob Bell image cropped and old version hidden. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:39, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Commons does not accept the CC-BY-NC-ND license as stated in the file URL. Suzy Oh tell me 23:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 10:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Commons does not accept the CC-BY-NC-ND license as stated in the file URL. Suzy Oh tell me 23:58, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 10:43, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2003. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Iraq, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:50, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Correction: This mosque is located in Syria, not Iraq. The category has been updated accordingly. ƏXPLICIT 00:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2003. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Iraq, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
The mosque was completed in 2003. Sadly, there is no freedom of panorama in Iraq, thus permission from the architect is needed A1Cafel (talk) 02:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 00:52, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Por requerimiento del autor Cardinalabgs (talk) 02:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Descatualizado Cardinalabgs (talk) 13:04, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: unused photo of non-notable person, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:08, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Lithuania. The object was built in 2015. Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Violation COM:FOP Lithuania. The object was built in 2015. Maxinvestigator (talk) 04:18, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:12, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Only upload from contributor.. This photo seems not have been made by the uploader. Who is the photographer ? Serious doubts about licence. Havang(nl) (talk) 13:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
-2021-01-15T13:05:00.000Z-File:OscarLA220812.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Erroneous copyrights. A drawing from a 1955 book. Алёна Синичкина (talk) 15:11, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:14, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Photograph of a public figure by this professional photographer whose work is copyrighted; not convinced that the uploader is that person and is releasing her copyrighted work with a Creative Commons license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:49, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- Эту фотографию по моему заказу делал фотограф Светлана Мишина. Я взяла файл, загруженный в фейсбук. Если нужно именно оригинал, то, конечно, загружу оригинал. Простите, немного сложно ориентироваться в устройстве Википедии — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 46.39.56.57 (talk) 09:28, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
- ~~Полина Козловская ~~
- Вам надо попросить Светлану Мишину послать разрешение в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Estonia. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:53, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
- It is still a graffiti from anonymous author. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:54, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
- In this case, {{Non-free graffiti}} should be marked. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 04:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Porque no está autorizado para estar en la web. Alexbcc (talk) 18:43, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: vandalism. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; shows work by living artist; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
copyright violation; shows contemporary artworks; no freedom of panorama. Martin Sg. (talk) 20:24, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Without a source link with evidence of the license, we have no proof this file is actually available under the claimed license. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: FOP-related requests have been split to Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Judgefloro (FOP-related). However, to preserve existing references to these requests, all numeric disambiguations have been preserved. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:13, 26 December 2022 (UTC) edited Brianjd (talk) 15:44, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_avec_cadre.jpg){kind=link}
,_avec_cadre.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
,_avec_cadre.jpg){kind=link}
,_avec_cadre.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
